DOCSLIB.ORG

News and Syria: Creating Key Media Moments in the Conflict Greg Simons1*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
News and Syria: Creating Key Media Moments in the Conflict Greg Simons1* Simons, Cogent Social Sciences (2016), 2: 1170583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2016.1170583 POLITICS & INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS | RESEARCH ARTICLE News and Syria: Creating key media moments in the conflict Greg Simons1* Received: 19 October 2015 Abstract: Mass media play a critical role through the production of news in influenc- Accepted: 29 February 2016 ing how citizens have their perceptions and opinions shaped. This article intends *Corresponding author: Greg Simons, to delve into the role of news production in creating knowledge and shaping public Uppsala Centre for Russian and Eurasian Studies, Uppsala University, Uppsala, perception and opinion within the Syrian case and demonstrates that news is not Sweden an accidental occurrence, neither in terms of subject or timing. Articles on specific E-mail: [email protected] issues, such as the reaction to the chemical weapons attack of August 2013 and the Reviewing editor: Christina Holtz-Bacha, Friedrich- allegations of “industrial killings” by the Syrian government, appearing in the mass Alexander-Universitat Erlangen- media, are subjected to analysis based on the theoretical notions outlined in the pa- Nurnberg, Germany per. These two cases hint that the timing and nature of these specific news events Additional information is available at are not as “random” and coincidental as would seem at first glance. the end of the article Subjects: Communication Studies; Politics & International Relations; Social Sciences Keywords: Arab Spring; Syria; regime change; propaganda; news; industrial killing; chemical weapons 1. Introduction Prior to the approximation of armed conflict, there is often a flurry of informational activity that tries to establish the storyline of the event. A good example of this was the establishment of the Committee of Public Information in the United States prior to entry in the First World War. A domi- nant storyline is established and contrary information is often scarce. There is a need to take a criti- cal stance towards information and “evidence” that creates the emotional context for war. This does not necessarily mean rejecting the information, but rather the need to probe more deeply into pos- sible underlying motives and interests in the nature and timing of the content, therefore correspond- ing to an attempt to minimise the chances of repeating past failures (such as using weapons of mass destruction and links to terrorism as a pretext for war, similarly to what happened in Iraq in 2003). The current Syrian conflict has been referred to as a proxy war, with the United States and its allies ABOUT THE AUTHOR PUBLIC INTEREST STATEMENT Greg Simons, associate professor, is a researcher This paper is intended to explore the different ways at the Uppsala Centre for Russian and Eurasian and means through which mass media coverage, Studies (Uppsala University, Sweden), the via news, can manipulate public perception and, Swedish Defence University, the Department of therefore, opinion of an event. An underlying Communication Sciences at Turiba University reason for this manipulation is to engineer public (Riga, Latvia) and an associated researcher at consent for a certain line of policy that would the Swedish Institute for International Affairs be potentially unpopular and hence encounter in Stockholm. He specialises in researching resistance. In the framework of this paper, two key the relationships that exist between politics, moments in the Syrian conflict are chosen so as to mass media and armed conflict. He teaches an test this concept of engineering consent. undergraduate course at Uppsala University on mass media and contemporary armed conflict. He has published numerous books and journal articles, primarily in English, Russian and Spanish. © 2016 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. Page 1 of 16 Simons, Cogent Social Sciences (2016), 2: 1170583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2016.1170583 seeking to topple the regime of Bashar Assad (Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA), 2012). The politi- cal leadership of the United States and the United Kingdom has been a very vocal proponent of re- gime change in Syria and has engaged in covert military action and support to realise this goal (supplying weapons, intelligence, finance, training and so forth). The pursuit of peace by some countries, within the context of their foreign policy toolkits, has in fact proved to be a thinly disguised effort to promote certain national foreign policy interests (Eriksson & Kostic, 2013; Holland & Aaronson, 2014). The recent case of Libya, where Gaddafi was overthrown under the given pretext of protecting civilians from warring sides, illustrates this ap- proach. An open war between the United States-led allies and the Syrian government of al Assad seemed almost inevitable when the “red line” on the use of chemical weapons in the Syrian war imposed by Obama was conveniently broken. This was used as a cue to put the use of military means on the table again. Naturally, these actions were quickly blamed on Assad as “irrefutable” and “un- deniable” by those same countries that had been consistently advocating a military “solution” to end the conflict. However, a combination of a deep-rooted public aversion to another war and the Russian proposal on securing the chemical weapons and avoiding a military conflict, for now, ulti- mately prevailed. This does not change the ultimate goal of the US-led allies (UK, France, Turkey, Qatar and Saudi Arabia, for example), although it does momentarily close one window on how to achieve regime change (Dreyfuss, 2012). Various media (TV, radio and Internet), either deliberately [as in Rupert Murdoch’s admission that he used his media assets to gain public support for Iraq (Greenslade, 2003)] or inadvertently (through the acceptance without question or double checking of information or statements given by parties with vested interests), have been at the forefront of masking national interests of the US-led coali- tion in regime change from global audiences. The make-up and content of news are crucial for a political elite’s ability to pursue potentially unpopular policy, such as foreign military intervention. There is a lot of literature on the issue of the media being used to manipulate public opinion within the context of armed conflict (Bennett, Lawrence, & Livingston, 2007; Jowett & O’Donnell, 2006; Snow, 2003; Willcox, 2005; Zelizer & Allan, 2002). Many discuss the use of media frames and narra- tives in guiding the nature of the debate (DiMaggio, 2009; Nacos, 2007; Tuman, 2010). A number of academic articles on the Arab Spring, including those that take a less than positive appraisal of the situation, emphasise the negative nature of the outcome or uncover foreign power involvement. These often adopt the point of view of ethics, law or political science (Friedman, 2011; Siebens & Case, 2012; Springborg, 2011). Increasingly more articles are appearing from a communication per- spective on the issue of the Arab Spring, focusing on how information is managed (Campbell & Hawk, 2012; Comunello & Anzera, 2012; Karagiannopoulos, 2012; Khondker, 2011; Simons, 2012, 2013; Downloaded by [Uppsala universitetsbibliotek] at 02:17 12 April 2016 Stepanova, 2011; Wollenberg & Pack, 2013). The present article shall tackle the subject of under- standing what happens when the goal of regime change stays the same, but the means of achieving this change have altered owing to events and public opinion in Syria post-August 2013. Both of the media events covered demonstrate the use of atrocity stories to serve either as a primer for public opinion to support military operations against Syria or as a means of detracting support and per- ceived legitimacy from the Syrian government on the eve of crucial peace talks. The task of this paper is to explore some of the possible means and mechanisms to engineer pub- lic consent for a distinct (and probably unpopular) line of foreign policy via news content in the mass media. An idealised role of news is the first subject to be analysed: news should serve as an objective means of enlightening the public so as to facilitate the making of informed decisions. This is tem- pered by the manipulation of news, such as explained by Bernays and Lippmann, which provides subjective information on the basis of which the public reaches a certain pre-determined conclusion, such as support for military intervention. There is a need to take a look at the role of motivation (priming an audience) and propaganda in the news. In order to explore how these two particular aspects are managed for the originator of the manipulated message to realise specific goals and objectives, this article will focus on two media events, namely the chemical weapons attack, which Page 2 of 16 Simons, Cogent Social Sciences (2016), 2: 1170583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2016.1170583 was coordinated by Turkey and the United States, and the “industrial killing” story that was sup- ported by Qatar. 2. Theoretical role of news News is something that saturates the information environment and can come in many different shapes and forms from many different kinds of media. So what is news exactly? Denis McQuail pro- vides a concise definition: The main form in which current information about public events is carried by media of all kinds. There is a great diversity of types and formats as well as cross-cultural differences, but defining characteristics are generally held to be timeliness, relevance and reliability (truth value) (McQuail, 2010, p. 564). Despite the fact that news can be found in many different shapes and forms, there are a number of common underlying conceptual commonalities. One of the basic underlying assumptions and duties of journalism is to separate “facts” from “val- ues”, a separation that inheres in the objectivity of reporting, for example. Having said this, rather than being found in absolute terms, objectivity and subjectivity should be viewed as essentially rela- tivistic.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy Discussion Paper Series
    Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy Discussion Paper Series #D-64, June 2011 Disengaged: Elite Media in a Vernacular Nation1 By Bob Calo Shorenstein Center Fellow, Spring 2011 Graduate School of Journalism, UC Berkeley © 2011 President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. Journalists, by and large, regard the “crisis” as something that happened to them, and not anything they did. It was the Internet that jumbled the informational sensitivities of their readers, corporate ownership that raised suspicions about our editorial motives, the audience itself that lacked the education or perspective to appreciate the work. Yet, 40 years of polling is clear about one thing: The decline in trust and the uneasiness of the audience with the profession and its product started well before technology began to shred the conventions of the media. In 1976, 72% of Americans expressed confidence in the news. Everyone knows the dreary trend line from that year onward: an inexorable decline over the decades.2 And if we fail to examine our part in the collapse of trust, no amount of digital re-imagining or niche marketing is going to restore our desired place in the public conversation. Ordinary working people no longer see media as a partner in their lives but part of the noise that intrudes on their lives. People will continue to muddle through: voting or not voting, caring or not caring, but many of them are doing it, as they once did, without the companionship of the press. Now elites and partisans don’t have this problem, there are niches aplenty for them.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Good Society by Walter Lippmann
    BOOK REVIEWS The weather report for the new volume: "Clear, with fresh but moderate winds." And from the old prophets, perhaps, "storms of protest." Fnmc E. HoRAcK, JR.* The Good Society. By Walter Lippmann. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1937. Pp. xxx, 390. $3.00. Since its first publication early last fall, Mr. Lippmann's book, The Good Society, has been the subject of a good deal of highly divergent comment. Within my own observation, the highest note of praise has been that struck by Mr. Horace J. Bridges, of the Chicago Ethical Society. "The work," says Mr. Bridges, "has stirred me to great enthusiasm. For twenty years I have been consciously waiting and longing for just such a book as this..... [It is] a work worthy to stand in the line of succession to the First Book of Hooker, to Milton's 'Areopagitia,' to Locke's 'Treatises on Civil Government,' to Burke and Adam Smith, and to John Stuart Mill.", In contrast to the enthusiasm of Mr. Bridges are the opinions of Mr. Lippmann's ex-brother socialists. From them has come a chorus of assertion and innuendo, that Mr. Lipp- mann has simply "sold out"; and even the relatively moderate Max Lerner, though absolving Mr. Lippmann of any conscious dishonesty, observes significantly that "Mr. Lippmann is a rich man; [that] his friends are the possessors of the earth; [and that] he is their prophet." His book is described as "a rationalization of the economic claims and political fears" of his friends, and he is accused of "fleeing to the Nirvana 2' of political inaction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Divide Between Order and Disorder
    Transcript The Divide Between Order and Disorder Thomas Friedman Columnist, The New York Times Chair: Lord Michael Williams of Baglan Distinguished Visiting Fellow, Chatham House 16 September 2014 The views expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the speaker(s) and participants do not necessarily reflect the view of Chatham House, its staff, associates or Council. Chatham House is independent and owes no allegiance to any government or to any political body. It does not take institutional positions on policy issues. This document is issued on the understanding that if any extract is used, the author(s)/ speaker(s) and Chatham House should be credited, preferably with the date of the publication or details of the event. Where this document refers to or reports statements made by speakers at an event every effort has been made to provide a fair representation of their views and opinions. The published text of speeches and presentations may differ from delivery. 10 St James’s Square, London SW1Y 4LE T +44 (0)20 7957 5700 F +44 (0)20 7957 5710 www.chathamhouse.org Patron: Her Majesty The Queen Chairman: Stuart Popham QC Director: Dr Robin Niblett Charity Registration Number: 208223 2 Transcript: The Divide Between Order and Disorder Chair: Lord Michael Williams of Baglan Ladies and Gentlemen, it’s a great pleasure to welcome you to the 2014 John Whitehead Lecture. I’m delighted that our speaker this evening is the distinguished American journalist and columnist Tom Friedman of the New York Times. This lecture honours John Whitehead for the many contributions that he has made over the decades to Anglo-American relations.
    [Show full text]
  • OPC Forges Partnership to Promote Journalists' Safety Club Mixers To
    THE MONTHLY NEWSLETTER OF THE OVERSEAS PRESS CLUB OF AMERICA, NEW YORK, NY • November 2014 OPC Forges Partnership to Promote Journalists’ Safety By Marcus Mabry compact between Your OPC has been busy! Since news organiza- the new officers and board of gov- tions and journal- ernors took office at the end of ists, in particular the summer, we have dedicated freelance, around ourselves to three priorities, all safety and profes- designed to increase the already sionalism. We have impressive contribution that the only just begun, but OPC makes to our members and our partners include our industry. the Committee to We have restructured the board Protect Journalists, to dedicate ourselves to services Reporters Without for members, both existing and po- Borders, the Front- tential, whether those members are line Club, the In- Clockwise from front left: Vaughan Smith, Millicent veteran reporters and editors, free- ternational Press Teasdale, Patricia Kranz, Jika Gonzalez, Michael Luongo, Institute’s Foreign Sawyer Alberi, Judi Alberi, Micah Garen, Marcus Mabry, lancers or students. In addition to Charles Sennott, Emma Daly and Judith Matloff dining services, we have reinvigorated our Editors Circle and after a panel of how to freelance safety. See page 3. social mission, creating a committee the OPC Founda- dedicated to planning regular net- tion. We met in September at The you need and the social events you working opportunities for all mem- New York Times headquarters to want. And, just as important, get bers. So if you are in New York – or try to align efforts that many of our friends and colleagues who are not coming through New York – look us groups had started separately.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting the Origins of Communication Research: Walter Lippmann’S World War II Adventure in Propaganda and Psychological Warfare
    International Journal of Communication 11(2017), 3721–3739 1932–8036/20170005 Revisiting the Origins of Communication Research: Walter Lippmann’s World War II Adventure in Propaganda and Psychological Warfare DOMINIQUE TRUDEL1 Concordia University, Canada Based on a close study of Walter Lippmann’s correspondence and publications, this article aims to critically reconsider his legacy in the field of communication. To this end, I focus on Lippmann’s involvement in propaganda and psychological warfare activities during the Second World War. Following a succinct overview of the history of the psychological warfare and propaganda agencies, I successively explore three different aspects of Lippmann’s involvement. First, this article examines Lippmann’s contribution to the activities of the Committee for National Morale. Second, the article focuses on the relationship between Lippmann and William “Wild Bill” Donovan, the director of the Office of the Coordinator of Information and the Office of Strategic Services. Third, the article turns to the relationship between Lippmann and Assistant Secretary of War John J. McCloy, and explores Lippmann’s role in the War Department’s Psychological Warfare Branch. Keywords: communication research history, propaganda, psychological warfare, Second World War Ex-Soviet agent Alexander Vassiliev, who was temporarily granted access to the KGB archives in the mid-1990s, recently revealed some interesting details about Soviet espionage activities in the United States during the Second World War. According to Vassiliev, Walter Lippmann, the famous columnist and communication research pioneer, was an important target for Soviet spies. They recruited his own secretary, Mary Price, as an agent (Haynes, Klehr, & Vassiliev, 2009). In November 1941, Price reported to her Soviet handlers that Lippmann was cutting short his newspaper articles and giving more of his time to secret meetings with government officials.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Jew As Journalist Especially Pp
    Victor Karady duction of antisemitic legislation by an ~ than earlier) in their fertility as well as ::ases of mixed marriages. For a study of see my articles, "Les Juifs de Hongrie :iologique," in Actes de La recherche en The American Jew as Journalist especially pp. 21-25; and "Vers une ]s: Ie cas de la nuptialite hongroise sous J.47-68. J. -oint Distribution Committee was quite Stephen Whitfield Jrevented by the establishment of soup (BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY) Along with this, the main task of the olished or destroyed Jewish institutions, -elped the non-Jewish poor, too. It is a g the end of the war it distributed at least :sky, "Hungary," p. 407). According to elp of the Joint up to the end of 1948 lillion worth of aid had been distributed The subject of the relationship of Jews to journalism is entangled in paradox. Their I. The scope of this aid was something role in the press has long been an obsession of their enemies, and the vastly lie, about 3,000 people were engaged in disproportionate power that Jews are alleged to wield through the media has long ve Jewish population (E. Duschinsky, been a staple of the antisemitic imagination. The commitment to this version of T, the Hungarian authorities gradually bigotry has dwarfed the interest that scholars have shown in this problem, and such -ompletely liquidated. _magyar zsid6sag 1945 es 1956 kozotti disparity merits the slight correction and compensation that this essay offers. ; Situation of Hungarian Jewry Between This feature of Judeophobia attains prominence for the first time in a significant ·rszagon [Jewry in Hungary After 1945] way in the squalid and murky origins of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the most ubiquitous of antisemitic documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Walter Lippmann's Critique of Censorship and Propaganda
    CHAPTER 16 "THE WORLD'S GREATEST ADVENTURE IN ADVERTISING": WALTER LIPPMANN'S CRITIQUE OF CENSORSHIP AND PROPAGANDA SUE CURRY JANSEN [T]here is no way of evading the fact that liberty is not so much permis­ sion as it is the construction of a system of information increasingly inde­ pendent of opinion. -Walter Lippmann, Liberty and the News' After World War I private industry converted wartime technology to peacetime use. And they also applied wartime propaganda methods to launching peacetime services and products. -Edward Bernays, Biography of an Idea' THE Great War, as the First World War was known to those who experienced it, is regarded as a transformative moment in human history. It marked the end of the Western world's faith in the inevitability of human progress; it was the first industrial war; the first total war in which civilians as well as combatants were deliberately tar­ geted; and it was also the first global information war. Propaganda and even psychological warfare are ancient arts that played important roles in warfare long before there was a critical vocabulary to describe these activi­ ties. During the First World War, however, they were practiced on a scale never before imagined as modern technological and organizational knowledge and resources were 302 SUE CURRY JANSEN effectively mobilized to "fight the Hun:' So, effectively, in fact, that after the war, German generals and some independent analysts claimed the war was not lost in the trenches but in the minds of the German people, who succumbed to British and American propaganda. The generals were determined that this would never happen again.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Nationalism and Democracy's Opinion Leaders
    2 Cultural Nationalism and Democracy’s Opinion Leaders Probably not one man in a thousand is geared with sufficient heart action to run counter to a false public opinion. [. .] There are just two such men in our hundred and odd millions today. Douglas Fairbanks, writing about T. Roosevelt and W. Wilson, 19181 Any description in words, or even any inert picture, requires an effort of memory before a picture exists in the mind. On the screen the whole pro- cess of observing, describing, reporting, and then imagining, has been ac- complished for you. Walter Lippmann, Public Opinion, 19222 NATIONAL DEMOCRACY The war taught many lessons to American politicians and intellectuals. Past pro- gressive understandings of what nationalism entailed gave way to more aggressive ones in the thick of novel practices of public opinion management. When in 1910 Roosevelt unveiled the program that came to be known as the “new nationalism,” his politics of countering the era’s profit-driven individualism and mobilizing a national sentiment for novel forms of welfare amounted to an inspiring platform for constructive, progressive change.3 The program also shared a surprising ideo- logical convergence with The Promise of American Life, a volume that progressive intellectual Herbert Croly had written in 1909, four years before cofounding the New Republic. To today’s readers, the word nationalism conveys ideological fanat- icism and military belligerency. In Croly’s analysis, nationalism was as a powerful unifier for a strongerdemocratic America. “It may discover,” he argued, “that the attempt to unite the Hamiltonian principle of national political responsibility and efficiency with a frank democratic purpose will give [.
    [Show full text]
  • Pulitzer Prize Winners and Finalists
    WINNERS AND FINALISTS 1917 TO PRESENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Excerpts from the Plan of Award ..............................................................2 PULITZER PRIZES IN JOURNALISM Public Service ...........................................................................................6 Reporting ...............................................................................................24 Local Reporting .....................................................................................27 Local Reporting, Edition Time ..............................................................32 Local General or Spot News Reporting ..................................................33 General News Reporting ........................................................................36 Spot News Reporting ............................................................................38 Breaking News Reporting .....................................................................39 Local Reporting, No Edition Time .......................................................45 Local Investigative or Specialized Reporting .........................................47 Investigative Reporting ..........................................................................50 Explanatory Journalism .........................................................................61 Explanatory Reporting ...........................................................................64 Specialized Reporting .............................................................................70
    [Show full text]
  • Articles the Anticanon
    VOLUME 125 DECEMBER 2011 NUMBER 2 © 2011 by The Harvard Law Review Association ARTICLES THE ANTICANON Jamal Greene CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 380 I. DEFINING THE ANTICANON ............................................................................................ 385 II. DEFENDING THE ANTICANON ........................................................................................ 404 A. The Anticanon’s Errors..................................................................................................... 405 1. Dred Scott v. Sandford ............................................................................................... 406 2. Plessy v. Ferguson ...................................................................................................... 412 3. Lochner v. New York ................................................................................................... 417 4. Korematsu v. United States ....................................................................................... 422 B. A Shadow Anticanon ........................................................................................................ 427 III. RECONSTRUCTING THE ANTICANON ............................................................................ 434 A. Historicism ........................................................................................................................ 435 1. Dred Scott ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1960S Futurism and Post-Industrial Theory A
    "More than Planners, Less than Utopians:" 1960s Futurism and Post-Industrial Theory A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Jasper Verschoor August 2017 © 2017 Jasper Verschoor. All Rights Reserved. 2 This dissertation titled "More than Planners, Less than Utopians:" 1960s Futurism and Post-Industrial Theory by JASPER VERSCHOOR has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Kevin Mattson Connor Study Professor of Contemporary History Robert Frank Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT VERSCHOOR, JASPER, Ph.D., August 2017, History "More than Planners, Less than Utopians:" 1960s Futurism and Post-Industrial Theory Director of Dissertation: Kevin Mattson This dissertation studies the ideas of a group of thinkers described by Time Magazine in 1966 as “Futurists.” The American sociologist Daniel Bell, the French political philosopher Bertrand de Jouvenel, and the physicist Herman Kahn argued that the future could not be predicted but that forecasting certain structural changes in society could help avoid social problems and lead to better planning. In order to engage in such forecasting Jouvenel founded Futuribles, an international group that facilitated discussion about the future of advanced industrial societies. Bell chaired a Commission on the year 2000 that aimed to anticipate social problems for policy makers. The dissertation also focuses on work done by Kahn and others at the RAND Corporation and the Hudson Institute. The origin of 1960s futurism is traced to debates held under the auspices of the Congress for Cultural Freedom, especially ideas about the “end of ideology.” The supposed exhaustion of left and right-wing political ideologies produced a desire for new theories of social change.
    [Show full text]
  • Chomsky Noam
    NOAM CHOMSKY NECESSARY ILLUSIONS THOUGHT CONTROL IN DEMOCRATIC SOCIETIES ESSENTIAL CLASSICS IN POLITICS: NOAM CHOMSKY EB 0007 ISBN 0 7453 1345 0 London 1999 The Electric Book Company Ltd Pluto Press Ltd 20 Cambridge Drive 345 Archway Rd London SE12 8AJ, UK London N6 5AA, UK www.elecbook.com www.plutobooks.com © Noam Chomsky 1999 Limited printing and text selection allowed for individual use only. All other reproduction, whether by printing or electronically or by any other means, is expressly forbidden without the prior permission of the publishers. This file may only be used as part of the CD on which it was first issued. Necessary Illusions Thought Control in Democratic Societies Noam Chomsky Pluto Press London 4 First published in the UK 1989 by Pluto Press 345 Archway Road, London N6 5AA 97 98 99 9 8 7 6 5 Copyright Noam Chomsky 1989 British Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 0 7453 0380 3 Digital processing by The Electric Book Company 20 Cambridge Drive, London SE12 8AJ, UK www.elecbook.com Classics in Politics: Necessary Illusions Noam Chomsky 5 Contents Click on number to go to page Preface ....................................................................................... 7 1. Democracy and the Media......................................................... 9 2. Containing the Enemy............................................................. 36 3. The Bounds of the Expressible ................................................. 67 4. Adjuncts of Government.......................................................
    [Show full text]