Cassell's History of the Boer War, 1899-1902

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cassell's History of the Boer War, 1899-1902 507 CHAPTER XXXIX. THE RETREAT. O far, in these pages, no comment has the defence ot the summit had been taken S been made on the wisdom or un­ regularly in hand, entrenchments laid out, wisdom of any of the proceedings which gun emplacements prepared, the dead re­ led to the evacuation of Spion Kop at moved, the wounded collected, and, in fact, Colonel Thorneycroft’s order. the whole place brought under regular There was a great conflict of opinion, military command, and careful arrange­ not only amongst all members of the ments made for the supply of water and public, but amongst the commanders in food to the scattered fighting line, the hills South Africa, as to the wisdom of the step would have been held, I am sure. taken by Colonel Thorneycroft when he “ But no arrangements were made. ordered his men to evacuate Spion Kop General Coke appears to have been or­ on the night of 24th January. The facts dered away just as he would have been seemed to be that there was practically no useful, and no one succeeded him ; those communication between Sir Charles Warren on the top were ignorant of the fact that AngloBoerWar.com at the bottom of the hill and Thorneycroft guns were coming up, and generally there on the summit. Warren was making some was a want of organisation and system sort of preparation to send guns up to the that acted most unfavourably on the top of the hill at night, but of this inten­ defence.” tion he had in no way informed Colonel It is probable that Lord Roberts hit Thorneycroft. He was also making pre­ upon the explanation of the muddle when parations to send up supplies of food and he wrote in his despatch, commenting on water, as well as ammunition, all three or the despatch of Sir Redvers Buller :—u It which were quite as necessary as artillery. is to be regretted that Sir Charles Warren For the men at the summit had been did not himself visit Spion Kop during the fighting for seventeen hours without bite afternoon or evening, knowing as he did or sup ; and although British infantry, so that the state of affairs there was very long as it is actively engaged, can put up critical, and that the loss of the position with an absence of creature comforts quite would involve the failure of the operations.” as well as most people, yet there are limits It was all very well for Sir Charles to human endurance. , Warren to summon General Coke from Sir Red vers Buller made severe com­ the summit to make a report as to the ments in his official despatch upon the state of affairs there ; but the old saw conduct of the divisional commander. which says if you want anything to be well “ There was,” he said, “ a want of organi­ done do it yourself applies as much to sation and system that acted most un­ warfare as to anything else in human life. favourably on the defence. If at sundown One knows how difficult it is for any one HISTORY OF THE BOER WAR.508 person to make it clear to any other what able to concur with Sir Redvers Buller in the exact state of affairs is when that state thinking that Colonel Thorneycroft exer­ of affairs happens to be something which cised a wise discretion in ordering the can be seen. You may do very many things troops to retire. Even admitting that by deputy ; but you must see for yourself. due preparations had not been made for Had Sir Charles Warren thought it his strengthening the position during the duty to proceed to the top of Spion Kop, night, reorganising the defence, and bring­ he would immediately, with his soldier’s ing up artillery—admitting also that the eye, have taken in the whole circum­ senior officers on the summit of the hill stances of the case. He would have seen might have been more promptly informed not only that the state of affairs there was of the measures taken by Sir Charles critical, but he would have recognised how Warren to support and reinforce them, I critical it was. He would have learned am of opinion that Colonel Thorneycroft’s something of the conformation of the assumption of responsibility and authority ground on the plateau. He would have was wholly inexcusable.” seen whether or no it was possible to plant What Colonel Thorneycroft ought to guns in position on the summit, and if so, have done, according to Lord Roberts, would have been able to give directions as was to send a messenger to General Coke, to the best spot for the construction of or Sir Charles Warren, asking for permis­ emplacements. On any question of for­ sion to retire, or for such other orders tification his opinion and advice would the)* might have to give. Because, said have been invaluable ; for he AngloBoerWar.comhimself was Lord Roberts, the fire of the Boers having an Engineer, and a skilful one to boot. now altogether abated, not to be resumed More than this, there can be no doubt until daylight came, Thorneycroft’s men that his presence would have been useful, could not have incurred any loss during as showing the men who were engaged in the couple of hours it would have taken that desperate struggle that some arrange­ for him to communicate by messenger ments would be made to assist and relieve with his superiors. It should be said here them in holding their hardly won position that the commander-in-chief in South against the tremendous odds of artillery Africa expressed no opinion as to the brought to bear against them. feasibility of holding Spion Kop. Of As to the order given by Colonel course, he could not ; because he did not Thorneycroft to abandon the hill, there know the ground. Sir Charles Warren was a considerable difference of opinion and Sir Redvers Buller were equally in­ as to whether he ought to have done it capable of passing any really valuable or not. Sir Redvers Buller officially ex­ opinion on the wisdom of Thorneycroft’s cused his action. “ Preparations for the action, for they were equally ignorant. second day’s defence should have been It may be assumed that if the position organised during the day, and have been captured by the British on the kop was commenced at nightfall. As this was not tenable at all, then Thorneycroft ought done I think Colonel Thorneycroft exer­ not to have evacuated it. Was it tenable, cised a wise discretion.” On the other even with artillery ? Sir Charles Warren hand, Lord Roberts differed entirely from in his report says that he was making General Buller. “ I regret that I am un­ arrangements for sending guns to the top A QUESTION OF ETIQUETTE. 509 during the night, but there was an almost taken into consideration — something unanimous opinion amongst those who which does not appear in the official had actually been in the position that even despatch, unless, perhaps, it is included if guns had been by superhuman exertions in Sir Redvers Buller’s comprehensive dragged up to the summit, they would phrase, w want of organisation and sys­ immediately have been put out of action tem ”—and that is, that it was most by the Boers. This was owing to the con­ difficult for the officers in command on figuration of the ground. It may safely the summit to obtain any orders at all be assumed of a man of the conspicuous that they could follow. A messenger personal courage of Thorneycroft, a man would be sent to headquarters, and there who sought danger rather than avoided it, would probably return two people, or that he would not have abandoned a perhaps more, with answers to the message position deemed by his commanders of —giving directions generally different and strategical importance if he had thought frequently quite contradictory. It was it could be held at all. lamentable, it was more than lamentable, There was a story told of him which that gallant fellows should be sent to storm illustrates the nature of the man. A a steep and high mountain and left to hold certain major in a Line regiment com­ it when the task was almost impossible, plained to him that the men of Thorney- and that their difficulties should have been croft’s Horse did not salute him (the increased tenfold by the incompetence of major) every time they met him. “ Not the persons who ought to have been able salute you, eh ? Why, they don’tAngloBoerWar.com salute to render them every assistance. me. But they’re the devils to fight ! ” said On the morning of the 25th January Thorneycroft. Sir Redvers Buller posted from Spearman’s What ought to have been done, un­ Camp to Trichardt’s Drift. When he doubtedly, was for the troops who had arrived—for the purpose of arranging a clung to their position so tenaciously all day plan of action with Warren—he was met to deliver a bayonet attack in the dark, and by the news, “ Spion Kop was abandoned so make themselves masters of the whole in the night.” Buller could hardly believe top of the mountain. But Thorneycroft his ears. Still more incredulous did he had no real idea of the facts of the case. grow when he was told that Thorneycroft He did not know but that if he secured the had abandoned it without orders. And top he might not find his position as bad then Sir Redvers Buller took over the as ever ; for he would still have been command of Warren’s force.
Recommended publications
  • Ireland and the South African War, 1899-1902 by Luke Diver, M.A
    Ireland and the South African War, 1899-1902 By Luke Diver, M.A. THESIS FOR THE DEGREE OF PH.D. DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND MAYNOOTH Head of Department: Professor Marian Lyons Supervisors of Research: Dr David Murphy Dr Ian Speller 2014 i Table of Contents Page No. Title page i Table of contents ii Acknowledgements iv List of maps and illustrations v List of tables in main text vii Glossary viii Maps ix Personalities of the South African War xx 'A loyal Irish soldier' xxiv Cover page: Ireland and the South African War xxv Introduction 1 Chapter 1: Irish soldiers’ experiences in South Africa (October - December 1899) 19 Chapter 2: Irish soldiers’ experiences in South Africa (January - March 1900) 76 Chapter 3: The ‘Irish’ Imperial Yeomanry and the battle of Lindley 109 Chapter 4: The Home Front 152 Chapter 5: Commemoration 198 Conclusion 227 Appendix 1: List of Irish units 240 Appendix 2: Irish Victoria Cross winners 243 Appendix 3: Men from Irish battalions especially mentioned from General Buller for their conspicuous gallantry in the field throughout the Tugela Operations 247 ii Appendix 4: General White’s commendations of officers and men that were Irish or who were attached to Irish units who served during the period prior and during the siege of Ladysmith 248 Appendix 5: Return of casualties which occurred in Natal, 1899-1902 249 Appendix 6: Return of casualties which occurred in the Cape, Orange River, and Transvaal Colonies, 1899-1902 250 Appendix 7: List of Irish officers and officers who were attached
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette
    ftantt* 27157. 497 The London Gazette. bp & utJjontg. y • 1 ................ # ■ — ■ ■ ■ ■ — — ■1 FRIDAY, JANUARY 26, 1900. War Office, January, 26, 1900. Fusiliers, and Mounted Infantry Company j 6th HE following Despatches, with their en­ Veterinary Field Hospital. closures, have been receiredfrom General, With 1 Company, 1st Battalion King’s Royal Tthe Bight Honourable Sir Redvers Boiler, G.C.B.,Rifle Corps at Eshowe, and a detachment of the South Africa : — Umvoti Mounted Rifles at Helpmakaar. 3. The information available regarding the From the General Gommanding-in-Chief the positions occupied by the armies of the two Dutch Forces in South Africa to the Secretary of Republics showed the great bulk of the forces of State for War, War Office, London, S.W. the Orange Free State were massed near the Cape Town, passes of the Drakensberg mountains, west of Sib , November 9, 1899. Ladysmith. The troops of the South African I HAVE the honour to forward herewith a Republic were concentrated at various points west, report from Lieutenant-General Sir George north, and east of the northern angle of Natal. White, V.C., &c., dated 2nd November, on his On 10th October His Excellency the Governor operations in Natal, which was handed to me informed me that Her Majesty’s Government had yesterday by Lieutenant-General French onAngloBoerWar.com his received an ultimatum from that of the South arrival from Durban, It does not seem to call African Republic, and that the outbreak of for any remarks from me. war on the evening of 11th October might be I have, &c., regarded as certain.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Cavalry on the Western Front, 1914-1918
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 4-9-2013 12:00 AM "Smile and Carry On:" Canadian Cavalry on the Western Front, 1914-1918 Stephanie E. Potter The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Dr. B. Millman The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in History A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy © Stephanie E. Potter 2013 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Potter, Stephanie E., ""Smile and Carry On:" Canadian Cavalry on the Western Front, 1914-1918" (2013). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 1226. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/1226 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “SMILE AND CARRY ON:” CANADIAN CAVALRY ON THE WESTERN FRONT, 1914-1918 by Stephanie Elizabeth Potter Graduate Program in History A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada Stephanie Elizabeth Potter 2013 Abstract Although the First World War has been characterized as a formative event in Canadian History, little attention has been paid to a neglected and often forgotten arm of the Canadian Expeditionary Force, the Cavalry. The vast majority of Great War historians have ignored the presence of mounted troops on the Western Front, or have written off the entire cavalry arm with a single word – ‘obsolete.’ However, the Canadian Cavalry Brigade and the Canadian Light Horse remained on the Western Front throughout the Great War because cavalry still had a role to play in modern warfare.
    [Show full text]
  • The Boer War Memorial – Unveiled in Cannon Hill Park, Birmingham – 23Rd June 1906
    The Victoria Cross Garden The Story of the Anglo/Boer War Memorial erected in the Victoria Cross Garden, Cheswick Green Will you come with me in silent thought to the battlefields of South Africa, to the lonely graves scattered over the veldt, and to the thousands of those who had died of wounds, disease and sickness since that Great Adventure. John W Pettinger January 2019 The Mysterious Stones Those people who have lived in Cheswick Green since the new Village was built in the 1970s have been aware of a tall column standing in the garden of 194 Creynolds Lane, on the corner of Cheswick Way. A fascinating and mysterious feature. Living in this Village, with its many odd features and origins, has stirred in many of its inhabitants a desire to understand more of its history. The author has some understanding of its origins and some of its odd features. Having relatives who were brought up and lived on the old Mount Estate, and who as children were discouraged from playing in the area around the column. It was regarded as a special, almost sacred place and not a place for playing! But what was its significance, and why was it regarded as special? There exists an old pamphlet from the early 1900s, advertising the features and attractions of the Pleasure Grounds that existed in Cheswick at that time. This document contains a reference to a ‘Victoria Cross Garden’. VICTORIA CROSS GARDEN. This is another object of interest commemorating the South African War, and especially the bravery of the Warwickshire men who were engaged.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules of Play
    RULES OF PLAY OVERVIEW Redvers' Reverse is a solitaire boardgame portraying the Battle of Colenso, fought on the 15th of December 1899 during the Second Anglo-Boer War. 16,700 British troops attempted to cross the Tugela River, defended by 4,500 Boers, hidden in emplacements and on high ground, to try and relieve the siege of Ladysmith. The game puts the player in the same position as the British commander Redvers Buller, with the same constraints of time, poor knowledge of Boer deployment, unknown locations of drifts and the added problem of subordinates not acting as instructed. An introductory scenario based on the historical situation is presented. Additional scenarios may be created allowing the player to set unique situations for each game. LEGION WARGAMES, LLC ©2016 SECTION TITLE PAGE SECTION TITLE PAGE 1. PLAYING PIECES .......................................... ..... 2 7. RIFLE FIRE PHASE ................................................ 7 1.1 British Army Counters 7.1 British Rifle Fire Segment 1.2 Boer Army Counters 7.2 British Recovery Segment 2. GAME SET UP ............................................. ..... 3 7.3 Boer Rifle Fire Segment 2.1 Draw Cups 8. STATUS PHASE ................................................... 7 2.2 General Markers 8.1 Boer Shaken Segment 2.3 Drift Markers 8.2 Victory Segment 2.4 Armies 9. BRITISH FIRE PROCEDURE .................................. 8 2.5 Game Start 9.1 British Targeting 3. SCENARIOS .................................................. ..... 4 9.2 British Firing 3.1 Buller Version 9.3 Boer Losses 3.2 Optional Variants 9.4 Boer Morale 4. ORDERS PHASE .......................................... ..... 4 9.5 British Status 4.1 British Event Segment 10. BOER FIRE PROCEDURE....................................... 8 4.2 British Command Points Segment 10.1 Boer Targeting 4.3 British Send Orders Segment 10.2 Boer Firing 4.4 British Receive Orders Segment 10.3 British Losses TABLEOF CONTENTS 10.4 British Leaders 4.5 British Emergency Withdrawal Segment 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Ireland's South African War 1899–1902
    1 IRELAND’S SOUTH AFRICAN WAR 1899–1902 Luke Diver, PhD Candidate History Department, National University of Ireland, Maynooth Abstract It has been estimated that around fifty thousand Irishmen fought during the South African War, many of whom were at the forefront of a number of key engagements, serving in Ireland’s thirteen infantry battalions and three cavalry regiments. Ireland’s Imperial connections were further reinforced by the country’s impressive civilian contribution to the war effort. At least thirty-three militia battalions were mobilised during the course of the war, with seven units being despatched to the front, thirteen companies attested for the Imperial Yeomanry, many civilian Irish nurses and doctors enrolled into the army medical services, and tens of thousands of pounds were raised through various Irish war charities. Notwithstanding the immense Irish military contribution and contemporary civilian interest in the war, very little modern research or public knowledge exists on the subject. The dearth in research is perhaps due to Irish Nationalist historiography and sensitivity during the twentieth century, which has arguably distorted our perspective of Ireland’s shared history with the British Empire. Therefore, it is the purpose of this article to present an alternative Ireland, which has largely been ignored, by discussing Ireland’s military contribution and experience during the course of the war. In addition, the article attempts to recall the Irish public’s active demonstration of Imperial support and highlights the relationship that existed between Ireland and the British Empire during the conflict. Introduction A corporal of the First Australian Horse observed the variations of the English language amongst Her Majesty’s soldiers during the South African War: There were few distinctions in dress as Scientia Militaria, South African the campaign grew older, and most Journal of Military Studies, Vol men looked alike, but one was 42, Nr 1, 2014, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • REDVERS BULLER – the Bayard of South Africa by Brian Best ______
    REDVERS BULLER – The Bayard of South Africa By Brian Best ____________________________________________________________________________________________ When satirists lampoon a typical overfed, red-faced block-headed Victorian general, they probably have in mind a picture of General Sir Redvers Buller. In his sixties, and reluctantly in command of British forces at the outbreak of the Anglo-Boer War, he did, indeed, cut an archaic and risible figure. He was ponderous in both speech and build and his rather piggy eyes were set in a crimson jowly face dominated by a large grey walrus moustache. He had a short fuse and a spectacular temper. He was also stubborn, lacking in energy and unsuccessful, which led to his being replaced by his hated rival, General Frederick Roberts. Sadly this lasting impression of Buller conceals what an exceptional and inspiring leader he had been just twenty years earlier in the Zulu War. Born in 1839, Buller was the second of seven sons and four daughters born to a West Country squire and M.P. The family home of Downes, near Crediton, Devon, was a large well-run estate and the family was a close, self- contained unit, greatly influenced by their warm-hearted mother. His father, in contrast, was an undemonstrative and distant figure. The young Buller grew up as a country-boy who enjoyed mixing with the estate workers and gaining a firm grounding in carpentry, smithy work, animal husbandry and other rural skills that later often surprised his soldiers. After a brief stay at Harrow, he moved to Eton where he was regarded as a clumsy country bumpkin and an undistinguished pupil.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Effectiveness of Boer and British Rifle Fire, 1899–1914
    SHOOTING POWER ‘Shooting Power’: A Study of the Effectiveness of Boer and British Rifle Fire, 1899–1914 SPENCER JONES University of Wolverhampton Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT The effectiveness of Boer rifle fire had a significant legacy on the development of British musketry standards. This would prompt improvements in training which would allow the infantry of the BEF to cause disproportionate casualties to their German adversaries in 1914. This paper charts the success of the Boer methods and explains how the British adapted to the increase in infantry rifle fire. I The growing effectiveness of infantry small arms from the mid-19th century onwards was a recognised influence upon military tactics.1 Although the technical limitations of early generation rifles reduced their overall effect, by the latter part of the century the greatly increased lethality of modern weaponry was becoming apparent.2 In large European armies reliant upon a conscript system that limited the available time for training and largely precluded the creation of marksmen, sheer weight of fire was more important than accuracy. For example, Prussian victory over Austria in 1866 had, in part, been influenced by the tactical advantages conferred by the rapid fire of the Dreyse Needle Gun.3 However, the unique colonial duties of the British Army meant that this emphasis on rapidity was less appropriate. Warfare fought in the proximity of undeveloped imperial frontiers made the movement of supplies a herculean challenge. The army could not afford to be wasteful with its ammunition. In these conditions, rapid 1 For example, see Perry D.
    [Show full text]
  • U Ottawa L.'Univcrsild Cnnnrticnnc Oinodn's University FACULTE DES ETUDES SUPERIEURES «=J FACULTY of GRADUATE and ET POSTOCTORALES U Ottawa POSDOCTORAL STUDIES
    u Ottawa l.'Univcrsild cnnnrticnnc Oinodn's university FACULTE DES ETUDES SUPERIEURES «=J FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND ET POSTOCTORALES U Ottawa POSDOCTORAL STUDIES L'Umversittf canadienne Canada's university Joel Carlson TljfEURDElAWSETWJTHOR^FTHESls" M.A. (History) GRADE/DEGREE Department of History lACToT£c"ai7Dl^ From Spion Kop to the Somme: Experience of Warfare and its Imperial Context TITREDE LA THESE /TITLE OF THESIS Dr. Richard Connors DIRECTEUR (DIRECTRICE) DE LA THESE / THESIS SUPERVISOR EXAMINATEURS (EXAMINATRICES) DE LA THESE / THESIS EXAMINERS Dr. Vasilis Vourkoutiotis Dr. Galen Perras Gary W. Slater Le Doyen de la Faculte des etudes superieures et postdoctorales / Dean of the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies From Spion Kop to the Somme: Experience of Warfare and its Imperial Context By Joel Carlson Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the MA degree in History University of Ottawa © Joel Carlson, Ottawa, Canada, 2008 Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-48436-4 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-48436-4 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Plntemet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats.
    [Show full text]
  • The Project Gutenberg Ebook of South Africa and the Transvaal War Vol. II. by Louis Creswicke
    TRANSCRIBERS' NOTE For speed of loading, many illustrations have been provided as thumbnails, linked to larger versions of the images [Pg i] "ALL THAT WAS LEFT OF THEM." Downloaded from www.gendatabase.com THE BLACK WATCH AFTER THE BATTLE OF MAGERSFONTEIN. From the Drawing by R. Caton Woodville. [Pg iii] SOUTH AFRICA AND THE TRANSVAAL WAR BY LOUIS CRESWICKE AUTHOR OF "ROXANE," ETC. WITH NUMEROUS ILLUSTRATIONS AND MAPS IN SIX VOLUMES VOL. II.—FROM THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE WAR TO THE BATTLE OF COLENSO, 15TH DEC. 1899 EDINBURGH: T. C. & E. C. JACK 1900 [Pg v] CONTENTS—VOL. II. PAGE CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE vii Downloaded from www.gendatabase.com CHAPTER I PAGE THE CRISIS AT HOME 1 IN SOUTH AFRICA 2 THE OCCUPATION OF DUNDEE 7 THE BATTLE OF GLENCOE 14 ELANDSLAAGTE 20 THE RETREAT FROM DUNDEE 32 SIR W. PENN SYMONS—GLENCOE 35 THE BATTLE OF REITFONTEIN 36 LADYSMITH 38 THE BATTLE OF LOMBARD'S KOP 41 THE DISASTER OF NICHOLSON'S NEK 45 THE SIEGE OF LADYSMITH 51 CHAPTER II PAGE THE SIEGE OF MAFEKING 55 KIMBERLEY 64 CHAPTER III PAGE NATAL 70 THE INVASION OF CAPE COLONY 76 THE BATTLE OF BELMONT 86 THE BATTLE OF GRASPAN 92 THE BATTLE OF MODDER RIVER 97 AFTER THE FIGHT 108 CHAPTER IV PAGE THE INVESTMENT OF LADYSMITH 110 ESTCOURT 119 ARMOURED TRAIN DISASTER AT CHIEVELEY 121 ESTCOURT 126 THE FIGHT ON BEACON HILL 132 LADYSMITH 135 ESTCOURT AND FRERE 139 SURPRISES AT LADYSMITH 145 FRERE CAMP 151 CHAPTER V PAGE Downloaded from www.gendatabase.com ACTIVITY AT THE CAPE 154 WITH GENERAL GATACRE 159 THE REVERSE AT STORMBERG 163 AT THE MODDER RIVER 168 THE BATTLE OF MAJESFONTEIN 171 CHAPTER VI PAGE CHIEVELEY CAMP 187 THE BATTLE OF COLENSO 188 FACSIMILE OF MS.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the British Military Strategy During the Anglo-Boer War up to "Black Week", December 1899
    JOERNAAVJOURNAL WESSELS AN ASSESSMENT OF THE BRITISH MILITARY STRATEGY DURING THE ANGLO-BOER WAR UP TO "BLACK WEEK", DECEMBER 1899 Andre Wessels' 1. INTRODUCTION On 9 October 1899 Gen. Sir Redvers Buller was appointed commander-in-chief of the British forces in South Africa. He arrived in Cape Town on 31 October of that year. Initially he planned to concentrate the bulk of his Army Corps south of the Gariep (Orange) River, invade the Orange Free State (OFS), capture Bloemfontein, and then advance to Johannesburg and Pretoria. However, soon after his arrival in South Africa, he decided to deviate from this strategy, and divided his force into four smaller armies, taking the largest portion of his troops with him to Natal. Buller hoped to relieve the siege of Ladysmith before the end of 1899, and to safe­ guard Kimberley so that British forces could then return to the Cape Colony in preparation of a full-scale invasion of the OFS. However, "Black Week" led to his offensive failing on all three the main fronts. On 10 December 1899 Maj.-Gen. WF Gatacre was defeated at Stormberg, the next day Gen. Lord Methuen was repulsed at Magersfontein, and on IS December Buller's army was forced to retreat at Colenso. By the middle of December 1899, a total of 80 000 British soldiers were already participating in the war.2 Total British losses since the outbreak of hostilities on II October 1899, and up to IS December, amounted to about 900 dead, 3 SOO Department of History, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of the Boer War (1899 – 1902) on the Tactical Development of the Regular British Army 1902 – 1914
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Wolverhampton Intellectual Repository and E-theses THE INFLUENCE OF THE BOER WAR (1899 – 1902) ON THE TACTICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE REGULAR BRITISH ARMY 1902 – 1914 SPENCER JONES BA, MPhil. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Wolverhampton for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2009 This work or any part thereof has not previously been presented in any form to the University or to any other body whether for the purposes of assessment, publication or for any other purpose (unless otherwise indicated). Save for any express acknowledgements, references and/or bibliographies cited in the work, I confirm that the intellectual content of the work is the result of my own efforts and of no other person. The right of Spencer Jones to be identified as author of this work is asserted in accordance with ss.77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. At this date copyright is owned by the author. Signature: Date: 1 Abstract This thesis examines the influence of the Boer War 1899 – 1902 upon tactics and training in the regular British Army 1902 – 1914. The work argues that several key lessons drawn from South Africa became the tactical cornerstones for infantry, artillery and cavalry throughout the pre-First World War period and shaped the performance of the B.E.F. during the early battles of 1914. The experience of combat against well armed opposition in the Boer War prompted the British Army to develop improved tactics in each of the three major service arms.
    [Show full text]