DOCSLIB.ORG

Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Bath PHD Comparative Cladistics: Fossils, Morphological Data Partitions and Lost Branches in the Fossil Tree of Life Mounce, Ross Award date: 2013 Awarding institution: University of Bath Link to publication Alternative formats If you require this document in an alternative format, please contact: [email protected] General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 03. Oct. 2021 Comparative Cladistics: Fossils, Morphological Data Partitions and Lost Branches in the Fossil Tree of Life Ross Callum Parker Mounce http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3520-2046 A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Bath Department of Biology and Biochemistry October 2013 Copyright: © 2014 Ross Mounce. This is an open-access thesis distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Signature: 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................. 2 Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................. 5 Publications ......................................................................................................................... 6 Media ................................................................................................................................... 76 List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................................. 7 List of Figures ...................................................................................................................... 9 List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... 10 Summary ........................................................................................................................... 11 Chapter 1: Introduction ...................................................................................................... 12 1.1 Overview of Inferring Evolutionary Relationships in Palaeontology ...................... 13 1.2 Why not just use molecular data? ......................................................................... 16 1.3 Is Morphology Actually Useful for Reconstructing Phylogeny? ............................. 16 1.4 Aims of this thesis ................................................................................................. 19 The Congruence of Cranial & Postcranial Characters in Vertebrate Phylogeny ................ 21 2.1 Abstract ................................................................................................................. 21 2.2 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 23 2.2.1 Congruence between Partitions of Morphological Data ..................................... 24 2.2.2 Previous Quantitative Studies ............................................................................ 25 2.2.3 Why Examine the Congruence of Cranial and Postcranial Partitions? .............. 27 2.3 MATERIALS AND METHODS ....................................................................................... 28 2.3.1 Do Cranial and Postcranial Characters Imply Different Levels of Homoplasy? .. 29 2.3.2 Is there More Conflict Between Cranial and Postcranial Characters than we Might Expect? ............................................................................................................. 34 2.4 Results .................................................................................................................. 42 2.4.1 Homoplasy and Resolution in Cranial and Postcranial Data Partitions .............. 43 2.4.2 Congruence between Cranial and Postcranial Signals (ILD tests) ..................... 44 2.5 Discussion ................................................................................................................ 46 2.5.1 A Significant Minority of Cranial and Postcranial Partitions have Incongruent Signals ........................................................................................................................ 48 2.5.2 Cranial and Postcranial Partitions Imply Significantly Different Relationships in a Significant Minority of Cases ...................................................................................... 50 2.5.3 What do these Results Imply for Cladistic Analyses of Morphology? ................. 51 2.6 Conclusions .......................................................................................................... 53 2 Chapter 3: An Updated Examination of the Impact of the Fossil Taxa in Parsimony Analyses of Morphology ..................................................................................................... 55 3.1 Abstract ................................................................................................................. 55 3.2 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 56 3.3 Methods ................................................................................................................ 57 3.3.2 A new taxon-jackknifing analytical pipeline ........................................................ 58 3.4 Results ..................................................................................................................... 62 3.4.1 On average Fossil and Extant Taxa have remarkably similar Topological Impact as judged by single-taxon deletions ............................................................................ 64 3.4.2 Fossil Taxa on average do not increase the number of MPTs any more than Extant Taxa ................................................................................................................. 65 3.4.3 Leaf Stability ...................................................................................................... 67 3.4.4 Extreme Taxa ..................................................................................................... 67 3.5 Discussion ................................................................................................................ 67 3.6 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 68 Chapter 4: A review of the ILD randomisation test: uses and abuses ................................ 69 4.1 Abstract .................................................................................................................... 70 4.2 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 70 4.2.1 Historical Importance and Context ..................................................................... 71 4.2.2 Inappropriate usages of the ILD test .................................................................. 72 4.2.3 Additional developments .................................................................................... 74 4.2.4 Raison d'etre for this review of ILD test usage ................................................... 75 4.3 Methods ................................................................................................................... 76 4.4 Results ..................................................................................................................... 77 4.5 Discussion ................................................................................................................ 78 4.6 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 80 Chapter 5: A modification of Archie's Homoplasy Excess Ratio in the presence of missing data .................................................................................................................................... 82 5.1 Abstract .................................................................................................................... 82 5.2 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 82 5.2.1 The Problem of Permuting Missing / Inapplicable Data in Matrices ................... 84 5.2.2 Time-Efficient Computational Implementation .................................................... 87 5.2.3 How many replications are needed for a robust MEANNS estimate? ................ 87 5.2.4 Is the HER missing data problem significant in real matrices? .......................... 88 5.3 Method ....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BOA2.1 Caecilian Biology and Natural History.Key
    The Biology of Amphibians @ Agnes Scott College Mark Mandica Executive Director The Amphibian Foundation [email protected] 678 379 TOAD (8623) 2.1: Introduction to Caecilians Microcaecilia dermatophaga Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia There are more than 20 synapomorphies (shared characters) uniting the group Lissamphibia Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Integumen is Glandular Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Glandular Skin, with 2 main types of glands. Mucous Glands Aid in cutaneous respiration, reproduction, thermoregulation and defense. Granular Glands Secrete toxic and/or noxious compounds and aid in defense Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Pedicellate Teeth crown (dentine, with enamel covering) gum line suture (fibrous connective tissue, where tooth can break off) basal element (dentine) Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Sacral Vertebrae Sacral Vertebrae Connects pelvic girdle to The spine. Amphibians have no more than one sacral vertebrae (caecilians have none) Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Amphicoelus Vertebrae Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Opercular apparatus Unique to amphibians and Operculum part of the sound conducting mechanism Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Fat Bodies Surrounding Gonads Fat Bodies Insulate gonads Evolution of Amphibians † † † † Actinopterygian Coelacanth, Tetrapodomorpha †Amniota *Gerobatrachus (Ray-fin Fishes) Lungfish (stem-tetrapods) (Reptiles, Mammals)Lepospondyls † (’frogomander’) Eocaecilia GymnophionaKaraurus Caudata Triadobatrachus Anura (including Apoda Urodela Prosalirus †) Salientia Batrachia Lissamphibia
    [Show full text]
  • Examples of Sea Sponges
    Examples Of Sea Sponges Startling Amadeus burlesques her snobbishness so fully that Vaughan structured very cognisably. Freddy is ectypal and stenciling unsocially while epithelial Zippy forces and inflict. Monopolistic Porter sailplanes her honeymooners so incorruptibly that Sutton recirculates very thereon. True only on water leaves, sea of these are animals Yellow like Sponge Oceana. Deeper dives into different aspects of these glassy skeletons are ongoing according to. Sponges theoutershores. Cell types epidermal cells form outer covering amoeboid cells wander around make spicules. Check how These Beautiful Pictures of Different Types of. To be optimal for bathing, increasing with examples of brooding forms tan ct et al ratios derived from other microscopic plants from synthetic sponges belong to the university. What is those natural marine sponge? Different types of sponges come under different price points and loss different uses in. Global Diversity of Sponges Porifera NCBI NIH. Sponges EnchantedLearningcom. They publish the outer shape of rubber sponge 1 Some examples of sponges are Sea SpongeTube SpongeVase Sponge or Sponge Painted. Learn facts about the Porifera or Sea Sponges with our this Easy mountain for Kids. What claim a course Sponge Acme Sponge Company. BG Silicon isotopes of this sea sponges new insights into. Sponges come across an incredible summary of colors and an amazing array of shapes. 5 Fascinating Types of what Sponge Leisure Pro. Sea sponges often a tube-like bodies with his tiny pores. Sponges The World's Simplest Multi-Cellular Creatures. Sponges are food of various nudbranchs sea stars and fish. Examples of sponges Answers Answerscom. Sponges info and games Sheppard Software.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Manual for Coral Reef Assessments
    EPA/600/R-12/029 | April 2012 |www.epa.gov/ged Field Manual for Coral Reef Assessments Office of Research and Development National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory Gulf Ecology Division Field Manual for Coral Reef Assessments Deborah L. Santavy William S. Fisher Jed G. Campbell Robert L. Quarles Gulf Ecology Division National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1 Sabine Island Dr. Gulf Breeze, FL. 32561 Notice and Disclaimer The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through its Office of Research and Development and Office of Water funded and collaborated in the research and development of these field protocols. It has been subjected to the Agency’s peer and administrative review and has been approved for publication as an EPA document. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. This is a contribution to the EPA Office of Research and Development’s Safe and Sustainable Water Resources Program, Coral Reefs Project. The appropriate citation for this report is: Santavy DL, Fisher WS, Campbell JG and Quarles RL. 2012. Field Manual for Coral Reef Assessments. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Gulf Ecology Division, Gulf Breeze, FL. EPA/600/R-12/029. April 2012. This document can be downloaded from EPA’s website at: http://www.epa.gov/ged/publications.html ii Table of Contents Notice and Disclaimer ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download Vol. 11, No. 3
    BULLETIN OF THE FLORIDA STATE MUSEUM BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES Volume 11 Number 3 CATALOGUE OF FOSSIL BIRDS: Part 3 (Ralliformes, Ichthyornithiformes, Charadriiformes) Pierce Brodkorb M,4 * . /853 0 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA Gainesville 1967 Numbers of the BULLETIN OF THE FLORIDA STATE MUSEUM are pub- lished at irregular intervals. Volumes contain about 800 pages and are not nec- essarily completed in any one calendar year. WALTER AuFFENBERC, Managing Editor OLIVER L. AUSTIN, JA, Editor Consultants for this issue. ~ HILDEGARDE HOWARD ALExANDER WErMORE Communications concerning purchase or exchange of the publication and all manuscripts should be addressed to the Managing Editor of the Bulletin, Florida State Museum, Seagle Building, Gainesville, Florida. 82601 Published June 12, 1967 Price for this issue $2.20 CATALOGUE OF FOSSIL BIRDS: Part 3 ( Ralliformes, Ichthyornithiformes, Charadriiformes) PIERCE BRODKORBl SYNOPSIS: The third installment of the Catalogue of Fossil Birds treats 84 families comprising the orders Ralliformes, Ichthyornithiformes, and Charadriiformes. The species included in this section number 866, of which 215 are paleospecies and 151 are neospecies. With the addenda of 14 paleospecies, the three parts now published treat 1,236 spDcies, of which 771 are paleospecies and 465 are living or recently extinct. The nominal order- Diatrymiformes is reduced in rank to a suborder of the Ralliformes, and several generally recognized families are reduced to subfamily status. These include Geranoididae and Eogruidae (to Gruidae); Bfontornithidae
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology, Phylogeny, and Evolution of Diadectidae (Cotylosauria: Diadectomorpha)
    Morphology, Phylogeny, and Evolution of Diadectidae (Cotylosauria: Diadectomorpha) by Richard Kissel A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy Graduate Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto © Copyright by Richard Kissel 2010 Morphology, Phylogeny, and Evolution of Diadectidae (Cotylosauria: Diadectomorpha) Richard Kissel Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto 2010 Abstract Based on dental, cranial, and postcranial anatomy, members of the Permo-Carboniferous clade Diadectidae are generally regarded as the earliest tetrapods capable of processing high-fiber plant material; presented here is a review of diadectid morphology, phylogeny, taxonomy, and paleozoogeography. Phylogenetic analyses support the monophyly of Diadectidae within Diadectomorpha, the sister-group to Amniota, with Limnoscelis as the sister-taxon to Tseajaia + Diadectidae. Analysis of diadectid interrelationships of all known taxa for which adequate specimens and information are known—the first of its kind conducted—positions Ambedus pusillus as the sister-taxon to all other forms, with Diadectes sanmiguelensis, Orobates pabsti, Desmatodon hesperis, Diadectes absitus, and (Diadectes sideropelicus + Diadectes tenuitectes + Diasparactus zenos) representing progressively more derived taxa in a series of nested clades. In light of these results, it is recommended herein that the species Diadectes sanmiguelensis be referred to the new genus
    [Show full text]
  • Winged Sharpshooter
    REPRODUCTIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY OF GONATOCERUS ASHMEADI, AN EGG PARASITOID OF THE GLASSY-WINGED SHARPSHOOTER Project leader: Cooperator: Mark Hoddle Leigh Pilkington Dept. of Entomology Dept. of Entomology University of California University of California Riverside, CA 92521 Riverside, CA 92521 Reporting period: The results reported here are from work conducted from April 2004 to October 2004. ABSTRACT The reproductive and developmental biology of Gonatocerus ashmeadi Girault, a self-introduced parasitoid of the glassy- winged sharpshooter (GWSS) Homalodisca coagulata Say, was determined at five constant temperatures in the laboratory; 15; 20; 25; 30; and 33°C. Wasps at each experimental temperature were given, on average, between 10 and 15 GWSS eggs per day for its natural life for oviposition. At 30°C, immature G. ashmeadi sustained the highest mortality rates as adult emergence was lowest at this temperature. The largest proportion of female offspring was produced at 25°C and lifetime fecundity was greatest at 25°C. The development time was greatest at 15°C and lowest at 30°C. Mean adult longevity was inversely related to temperature with a maximum of approximately 30 days at 15°C to a minimum of approximately two days at 33°C. INTRODUCTION The mymarid wasp species Gonatocerus ashmeadi Girault, G. triguttatus Girault, G. morrilli Howard, and G. fasciatus Girault are the most common natural enemies associated with the insect pest Homalodisca coagulata in it’s home range of southeastern USA and northeastern Mexico (Triapitsyn and Phillips, 2000). The wasp G. ashmeadi is a self-introduced resident of California and most likely came into the state in parasitized Homalodisca coagulata eggs (Vickerman et al., 2004) and has established widely in association with H.
    [Show full text]
  • 71St Annual Meeting Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Paris Las Vegas Las Vegas, Nevada, USA November 2 – 5, 2011 SESSION CONCURRENT SESSION CONCURRENT
    ISSN 1937-2809 online Journal of Supplement to the November 2011 Vertebrate Paleontology Vertebrate Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Society of Vertebrate 71st Annual Meeting Paleontology Society of Vertebrate Las Vegas Paris Nevada, USA Las Vegas, November 2 – 5, 2011 Program and Abstracts Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 71st Annual Meeting Program and Abstracts COMMITTEE MEETING ROOM POSTER SESSION/ CONCURRENT CONCURRENT SESSION EXHIBITS SESSION COMMITTEE MEETING ROOMS AUCTION EVENT REGISTRATION, CONCURRENT MERCHANDISE SESSION LOUNGE, EDUCATION & OUTREACH SPEAKER READY COMMITTEE MEETING POSTER SESSION ROOM ROOM SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS SEVENTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING PARIS LAS VEGAS HOTEL LAS VEGAS, NV, USA NOVEMBER 2–5, 2011 HOST COMMITTEE Stephen Rowland, Co-Chair; Aubrey Bonde, Co-Chair; Joshua Bonde; David Elliott; Lee Hall; Jerry Harris; Andrew Milner; Eric Roberts EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Philip Currie, President; Blaire Van Valkenburgh, Past President; Catherine Forster, Vice President; Christopher Bell, Secretary; Ted Vlamis, Treasurer; Julia Clarke, Member at Large; Kristina Curry Rogers, Member at Large; Lars Werdelin, Member at Large SYMPOSIUM CONVENORS Roger B.J. Benson, Richard J. Butler, Nadia B. Fröbisch, Hans C.E. Larsson, Mark A. Loewen, Philip D. Mannion, Jim I. Mead, Eric M. Roberts, Scott D. Sampson, Eric D. Scott, Kathleen Springer PROGRAM COMMITTEE Jonathan Bloch, Co-Chair; Anjali Goswami, Co-Chair; Jason Anderson; Paul Barrett; Brian Beatty; Kerin Claeson; Kristina Curry Rogers; Ted Daeschler; David Evans; David Fox; Nadia B. Fröbisch; Christian Kammerer; Johannes Müller; Emily Rayfield; William Sanders; Bruce Shockey; Mary Silcox; Michelle Stocker; Rebecca Terry November 2011—PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS 1 Members and Friends of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, The Host Committee cordially welcomes you to the 71st Annual Meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology in Las Vegas.
    [Show full text]
  • Onetouch 4.0 Scanned Documents
    / Chapter 2 THE FOSSIL RECORD OF BIRDS Storrs L. Olson Department of Vertebrate Zoology National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC. I. Introduction 80 II. Archaeopteryx 85 III. Early Cretaceous Birds 87 IV. Hesperornithiformes 89 V. Ichthyornithiformes 91 VI. Other Mesozojc Birds 92 VII. Paleognathous Birds 96 A. The Problem of the Origins of Paleognathous Birds 96 B. The Fossil Record of Paleognathous Birds 104 VIII. The "Basal" Land Bird Assemblage 107 A. Opisthocomidae 109 B. Musophagidae 109 C. Cuculidae HO D. Falconidae HI E. Sagittariidae 112 F. Accipitridae 112 G. Pandionidae 114 H. Galliformes 114 1. Family Incertae Sedis Turnicidae 119 J. Columbiformes 119 K. Psittaciforines 120 L. Family Incertae Sedis Zygodactylidae 121 IX. The "Higher" Land Bird Assemblage 122 A. Coliiformes 124 B. Coraciiformes (Including Trogonidae and Galbulae) 124 C. Strigiformes 129 D. Caprimulgiformes 132 E. Apodiformes 134 F. Family Incertae Sedis Trochilidae 135 G. Order Incertae Sedis Bucerotiformes (Including Upupae) 136 H. Piciformes 138 I. Passeriformes 139 X. The Water Bird Assemblage 141 A. Gruiformes 142 B. Family Incertae Sedis Ardeidae 165 79 Avian Biology, Vol. Vlll ISBN 0-12-249408-3 80 STORES L. OLSON C. Family Incertae Sedis Podicipedidae 168 D. Charadriiformes 169 E. Anseriformes 186 F. Ciconiiformes 188 G. Pelecaniformes 192 H. Procellariiformes 208 I. Gaviiformes 212 J. Sphenisciformes 217 XI. Conclusion 217 References 218 I. Introduction Avian paleontology has long been a poor stepsister to its mammalian counterpart, a fact that may be attributed in some measure to an insufRcien- cy of qualified workers and to the absence in birds of heterodont teeth, on which the greater proportion of the fossil record of mammals is founded.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Tetrapod Relationships Revisited
    Biol. Rev. (2003), 78, pp. 251–345. f Cambridge Philosophical Society 251 DOI: 10.1017/S1464793102006103 Printed in the United Kingdom Early tetrapod relationships revisited MARCELLO RUTA1*, MICHAEL I. COATES1 and DONALD L. J. QUICKE2 1 The Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, The University of Chicago, 1027 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637-1508, USA ([email protected]; [email protected]) 2 Department of Biology, Imperial College at Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire SL57PY, UK and Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW75BD, UK ([email protected]) (Received 29 November 2001; revised 28 August 2002; accepted 2 September 2002) ABSTRACT In an attempt to investigate differences between the most widely discussed hypotheses of early tetrapod relation- ships, we assembled a new data matrix including 90 taxa coded for 319 cranial and postcranial characters. We have incorporated, where possible, original observations of numerous taxa spread throughout the major tetrapod clades. A stem-based (total-group) definition of Tetrapoda is preferred over apomorphy- and node-based (crown-group) definitions. This definition is operational, since it is based on a formal character analysis. A PAUP* search using a recently implemented version of the parsimony ratchet method yields 64 shortest trees. Differ- ences between these trees concern: (1) the internal relationships of aı¨stopods, the three selected species of which form a trichotomy; (2) the internal relationships of embolomeres, with Archeria
    [Show full text]
  • Progeny Quality of Gonatocerus Ashmeadi (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) Reared on Stored Eggs of Homalodisca Coagulata (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae)
    BIOLOGICAL AND MICROBIAL CONTROL Progeny Quality of Gonatocerus ashmeadi (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) Reared on Stored Eggs of Homalodisca coagulata (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) 1 2 WEN-LONG CHEN AND ROGER A. LEOPOLD J. Econ. Entomol. 100(3): 685Ð694 (2007) ABSTRACT This study assessed the effects of refrigerated storage on the suitability of eggs of the glassy-winged sharpshooter, Homalodisca coagulata (Say) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), as hosts for propagation of the parasitoid Gonatocerus ashmeadi Girault (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae). Develop- ment of the host eggs was terminated by chilling at 2ЊC for 5 d before storage was initiated at 10ЊC for up to 70 d. Parasitism, adult emergence rate, developmental time, and sex ratio were used to gauge the suitability of the eggs as hosts after storage. In addition to these measures, demographic growth parameters also were used to assess the quality of the wasp progeny through the F2 generation. Host eggs stored 20 d remained fully acceptable to the wasps for attack. Although the parasitism rate decreased with storage time, Ͼ 80% adult parasitoid emergence was realized from eggs stored 30 d. After 70 d storage, adult emergence rate was decreased by 48%, fecundity decreased by 53%, female production by 19%, developmental time was extended 3 d, and female longevity was shortened 5 d. The emergence pattern of F1 but not F2 adults varied with storage time of the parental and grand- parental hosts, respectively. For the F2 generation, emergence rate, development, and sex ratio did not vary with storage time when the F1 parents parasitized fresh host eggs. Demographic parameters Ͼ for the F1 population showed that net reproductive rate was 20 although it decreased signiÞcantly after their parental host eggs were stored for Ͼ 30 d.
    [Show full text]
  • The Braincase of Eocaecilia Micropodia (Lissamphibia, Gymnophiona) and the Origin of Caecilians
    The Braincase of Eocaecilia micropodia (Lissamphibia, Gymnophiona) and the Origin of Caecilians Hillary C. Maddin1,2*, Farish A. Jenkins, Jr.1, Jason S. Anderson2 1 Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America, 2 Department of Comparative Biology and Experimental Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Abstract The scant fossil record of caecilians has obscured the origin and evolution of this lissamphibian group. Eocaecilia micropodia from the Lower Jurassic of North America remains the only stem-group caecilian with an almost complete skull preserved. However, this taxon has been controversial, engendering re-evaluation of traits considered to be plesiomorphic for extant caecilians. Both the validity of the placement of E. micropodia as a stem caecilian and estimates of the plesiomorphic condition of extant caecilians have been questioned. In order to address these issues, the braincase of E. micropodia was examined via micro-computed tomography. The braincase is considered to be a more reliable phylogenetic indicator than peripheral regions of the skull. These data reveal significant new information, including the possession of an ossified nasal septum, ossified anterior wall of the sphenethmoid, long anterolateral processes on the sphenethmoid, and paired olfactory nerve foramina, which are known only to occur in extant caecilians; the latter are possibly related to the evolution of the tentacle, a caecilian autapomorphy. A phylogenetic analysis that included 64 non-amniote taxa and 308 characters represents the first extensive test of the phylogenetic affinities of E. micropodia. The results place E. micropodia securely on the stem of extant caecilians, representing a clade within Temnospondyli that is the sister taxon to batrachians plus Gerobatrachus.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish, Coral, and Sponge Assemblages Associated with Altiphotic and Mesophotic Reefs Along the Guánica Biosphere Reserve Continental Shelf Edge, Southwest Puerto Rico
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 10 September 2018 doi: 10.3389/fmars.2018.00303 Fish, Coral, and Sponge Assemblages Associated With Altiphotic and Mesophotic Reefs Along the Guánica Biosphere Reserve Continental Shelf Edge, Southwest Puerto Rico Jaaziel E. García-Hernández 1†, Phillip J. Sanchez 1,2†, Nicholas M. Hammerman 1,3† and Nikolaos V. Schizas 1* 1 2 Edited by: Department of Marine Sciences, University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez, Mayagüez, PR, United States, Department of 3 Yehuda Benayahu, Marine Biology, Texas A&M University at Galveston, Galveston, TX, United States, Gehrmann Laboratories, School of Tel Aviv University, Israel Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia Reviewed by: Darren James Coker, The benthic and fish communities of the central portion of the Guánica, Puerto Rico King Abdullah University of Science shelf edge were studied to determine species abundance, distributions and species and Technology, Saudi Arabia Jacob L. Johansen, overlap between two depth stratifications, 20 and 45m, at eight sites. A total of 67 fish New York University Abu Dhabi, species belonging to 21 families were identified. Similar species richness estimates were United Arab Emirates observed between depths, though fish assemblage composition differed significantly, *Correspondence: Nikolaos V. Schizas with observable changes in feeding guild contributions of herbivore and omnivore [email protected] (20 m) to a deeper assemblage composed of piscivores and planktivores (45 m). Coral †These authors have contributed assemblages consisted of 31 species at 20 m and 11 species at 45 m, accounting for equally to this work 17.0% (±1.76 SE) and 2.6% (±0.89 SE) benthic cover for the altiphotic and mesophotic surveys, respectively.
    [Show full text]