DOCSLIB.ORG

The Anthropocene: Comparing Its Meaning in Geology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Anthropocene: Comparing Its Meaning in Geology REVIEW ARTICLE The Anthropocene: Comparing Its Meaning in Geology 10.1029/2020EF001896 (Chronostratigraphy) with Conceptual Approaches Key Points: Arising in Other Disciplines • The Anthropocene concept developed in the Earth System Jan Zalasiewicz1 , Colin N. Waters1 , Erle C. Ellis2 , Martin J. Head3 , Davor Vidas4 , science community is closely Will Steffen5, Julia Adeney Thomas6, Eva Horn7, Colin P. Summerhayes8 , consistent with its proposed 9 10 11 1 chronostratigraphic (geological) Reinhold Leinfelder , J. R. McNeill , Agnieszka Gałuszka , Mark Williams , 12 13 8 14 definition Anthony D. Barnosky , Daniel de B. Richter , Philip L. Gibbard , Jaia Syvitski , • A wide range of other meanings Catherine Jeandel15 , Alejandro Cearreta16 , Andrew B. Cundy17 , Ian J. Fairchild18 , of the Anthropocene subsequently Neil L. Rose19 , Juliana A. Ivar do Sul20 , William Shotyk21, Simon Turner19 , emerged that represent inherently Michael Wagreich22 , and Jens Zinke1 valid, but partly different, concepts • Cross-disciplinary discussion is 1Geography, Geology and the Environment, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK, 2Geography & Environmental encouraged to help resolve issues of 3 meaning and communication in this Systems, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA, Earth Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, 4 5 important area Canada, The Fridtjof Nansen Institute, Lysaker, Norway, Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, 6History, University of Notre Dame, South Bend, IN, USA, 7German Studies, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 8Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, Correspondence to: 9Geological Sciences, Freie Universität, Berlin, Germany, 10Department of History, Georgetown University, Washington, J. Zalasiewicz, 11 12 [email protected] DC, USA, Institute of Chemistry, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland, Jasper Ridge Biological Preserve and Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, 13Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA, 14Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA, Citation: 15LEGOS, Université de Toulouse, CNES, CNRS, IRD, Toulouse, France, 16Geología, Facultad de Ciencia y Tecnología, Zalasiewicz, J., Waters, C. N., Ellis, 17 E. C., Head, M. J., Vidas, D., Steffen, Universidad del País Vasco UPV/EHU, Bilbao, Spain, Ocean and Earth Science, University of Southampton, National 18 W., et al. (2021). The Anthropocene: Oceanography Centre (Southampton), Southampton, UK, School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Comparing its meaning in geology University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK, 19Geography, University College London, London, UK, 20Leibniz Institute (chronostratigraphy) with conceptual for Baltic Sea Research Warnemüende (IOW), Rostock, Germany, 21Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, approaches arising in other disciplines. 22 Edmonton, AB, Canada, Geology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria Earth's Future, 9, e2020EF001896. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001896 The term Anthropocene initially emerged from the Earth System science community in Received 18 NOV 2020 Abstract Accepted 1 FEB 2021 the early 2000s, denoting a concept that the Holocene Epoch has terminated as a consequence of human activities. First associated with the onset of the Industrial Revolution, it was then more closely linked Author Contributions: with the Great Acceleration in industrialization and globalization from the 1950s that fundamentally Conceptualization: Jan Zalasiewicz, modified physical, chemical, and biological signals in geological archives. Since 2009, the Anthropocene Colin N. Waters, Erle C. Ellis, Martin J. has been evaluated by the Anthropocene Working Group, tasked with examining it for potential Head, Davor Vidas, Will Steffen, Julia inclusion in the Geological Time Scale. Such inclusion requires a precisely defined chronostratigraphic Adeney Thomas, Eva Horn, Colin P. Summerhayes, Reinhold Leinfelder, J. and geochronological unit with a globally synchronous base and inception, with the mid-twentieth R. McNeill, Agnieszka Gałuszka, Mark century being geologically optimal. This reflects an Earth System state in which human activities have Williams, Anthony D. Barnosky, Daniel become predominant drivers of modifications to the stratigraphic record, making it clearly distinct de B. Richter, Philip L. Gibbard, Jaia Syvitski, Catherine Jeandel, Alejandro from the Holocene. However, more recently, the term Anthropocene has also become used for different Cearreta, Andrew B. Cundy, Ian J. conceptual interpretations in diverse scholarly fields, including the environmental and social sciences and Fairchild, Neil L. Rose, Juliana A. Ivar humanities. These are often flexibly interpreted, commonly without reference to the geological record, and do Sul, William Shotyk, Simon Turner, Michael Wagreich, Jens Zinke diachronous in time; they often extend much further back in time than the mid-twentieth century. These broader conceptualizations encompass wide ranges and levels of human impacts and interactions with the environment. Here, we clarify what the Anthropocene is in geological terms and compare the proposed geological (chronostratigraphic) definition with some of these broader interpretations and applications of the term “Anthropocene,” showing both their overlaps and differences. The Anthropocene concept, that modern human impacts on © 2021. The Authors. Plain Language Summary This is an open access article under Earth have been sufficient to bring in a new geological epoch, is only two decades old. In that short time, the terms of the Creative Commons its use has grown explosively, not only in the Earth sciences but also far more widely to spread through Attribution License, which permits use, the sciences generally, to spill over into the social sciences, arts, and humanities. This has led to welcome distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is discussions between diverse scholarly communities, though also to some very different interpretations properly cited. of the Anthropocene, when interpreted through different disciplinary lenses. Notably, the geological ZALASIEWICZ ET AL. 1 of 25 Earth’s Future 10.1029/2020EF001896 Writing – original draft: Jan interpretation used as basis for a potential unit of the Geological Time Scale, of a time unit starting Zalasiewicz, Colin N. Waters, Erle C. planet-wide and synchronously in the mid-twentieth century with the massive changes triggered by Ellis, Martin J. Head, Davor Vidas, Will Steffen, Julia Adeney Thomas, Eva industrialization and globalization, jars with interpretations of an Anthropocene that ranges back many Horn, Colin P. Summerhayes, Reinhold millennia to encompass early human environmental impacts. We analyze and compare these diverse Leinfelder, J. R. McNeill, Agnieszka standpoints and their effect upon evolving disciplinary practices, and discuss approaches that could make Gałuszka, Mark Williams, Anthony D. Barnosky, Daniel de B. Richter, Philip communication clearer and enhance cross-disciplinary exchanges. L. Gibbard, Jaia Syvitski, Catherine Jeandel, Alejandro Cearreta, Andrew B. Cundy, Ian J. Fairchild, Neil L. Rose, Juliana A. Ivar do Sul, William Shotyk, 1. Introduction Simon Turner, Michael Wagreich, Jens The term Anthropocene was coined by Paul Crutzen in 2000 (Crutzen, 2002; Crutzen & Stoermer, 2000) Zinke Writing – review & editing: Jan during a review of the first decade of research in the International Geosphere–Biosphere Programme Zalasiewicz, Colin N. Waters, Erle C. (IGBP). The term crystallized the growing realization in the Earth System science (ESS) community that Ellis, Martin J. Head, Davor Vidas, Will human activities were fundamentally changing the Earth System (Steffen et al., 2020). The ESS focus on Steffen, Julia Adeney Thomas, Eva Horn, Colin P. Summerhayes, Reinhold planetary processes, including significant global changes to the atmosphere, biosphere, cryosphere, geo- Leinfelder, J. R. McNeill, Agnieszka sphere, hydrosphere, pedosphere, technosphere, and the climate, demonstrated that conditions typical of Gałuszka, Mark Williams, Anthony D. the Holocene (specifically, the last 11,700 years of Earth history) no longer resembled those of the present Barnosky, Daniel de B. Richter, Philip L. Gibbard, Jaia Syvitski, Catherine day. In proposing this new term, Crutzen and Stoermer (2000, p. 17) indicated the onset of the Anthropo- Jeandel, Alejandro Cearreta, Andrew cene as “the latter part of the 18th century … when data retrieved from glacial ice cores show the beginning B. Cundy, Ian J. Fairchild, Neil L. Rose, of a growth in the atmospheric concentrations of several ‘greenhouse gases’, in particular CO2 and CH4.” Juliana A. Ivar do Sul, William Shotyk, Simon Turner, Michael Wagreich, Jens They, and Crutzen (2002), linked this physical record with the global effects of human activities associated Zinke with the onset of the Industrial Revolution in the UK, catalyzed by the development of a greatly improved steam engine by James Watt. Continued research within the IGBP community led to the recognition that there were sharp upward in- flections of many socioeconomic and resultant Earth System trends of global significance in the mid-twen- tieth century. The term for this, the “Great Acceleration,” was coined in a Dahlem Conference in 2005 that included social scientists and humanities scholars
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Circum-Indian Ocean Hydroclimate at the Mid to Late Holocene Transition: the Double Drought Hypothesis and Consequences for the Harappan” by Nick Scroxton Et Al
    Clim. Past Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2020-138-RC2, 2021 CPD © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Interactive comment Interactive comment on “Circum-Indian ocean hydroclimate at the mid to late Holocene transition: The Double Drought hypothesis and consequences for the Harappan” by Nick Scroxton et al. Harvey Weiss (Referee) [email protected] Received and published: 4 January 2021 Global KM-A Congruence and the Indus Collapse Harvey Weiss Printer-friendly version Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, Environmental Studies Pro- gram, and School of Environment, Yale University Discussion paper The IUGS-recognized global boundary stratotype for the 4.2 - 3.9 ka BP event, marking C1 the middle to late Holocene transition to the Meghalayan stage, is the KM-A speleothem δ18O record from Mawmluh Cave, Meghalaya, NW India, that is an Indian Summer CPD Monsoon (ISM) drought record (Berkelhammer et al 2012; Walker et al 2019). The recent analysis of the Indus delta foraminifera record at core 63KA has identified, as well, the Indian Winter Monsoon drought synchronous with the 4.2 ka BP ISM drought Interactive (Giesche et al 2019). The global boundary sub-stratotype is the Mt. Logan Yukon comment glacial core’s δ18O moisture event (Fisher et al 2008). Scroxton et al present a principal components analysis of seven recent δ18O speleothem records from the Indian Ocean region and the Giesche et al 2019 delta foraminifera analyses (line 110) “to investigate the impacts of the 4.2 kyr event on trop- ical Indian Ocean basin monsoonal rainfall” and the late third millennium BC Indus urban collapses.
    [Show full text]
  • R~;: PHYSIOLOGICAL, MIGRATORIAL
    ....----------- 'r~;: i ! 'r; Pa/eont .. 62(4), 1988, pp. 64~52 Copyright © 1988, The Paleontological Society 0022-3360/88/0062-0640$03.00 PHYSIOLOGICAL, MIGRATORIAL, CLIMATOLOGICAL, GEOPHYSICAL, SURVIVAL, AND EVOLUTIONARY IMPLICATIONS OF CRETACEOUS POLAR DINOSAURS GREGORY S. PAUL 3109 North Calvert Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21218 ABSTRACTT- he presence of Late Cretaceous social dinosaurs in polar regions confronted them with winter conditions of extended dark, coolness, breezes, and precipitation that could best be coped with via an endothermic homeothermic physiology of at least the tenrec level. This is true whether the dinosaurs stayed year round in the polar regime-which in North America extended from Alaska south to Montana-or if they migrated away from polar winters. More reptilian physiologies fail to meet the demands of such winters -in certain key ways, a· point tentatively confirmed by the apparent failure of giant Late Cretaceous phobosuchid crocodilians to dwell north of Montana. Low metabolisms were also insufficient for extended annual migrations away from and towards the poles. It is shown that even high metabolic rate dinosaurs probably remained in their polar habitats year-round. The possibility that dinosaurs had avian-mammalian metabolic systems, and may have borne insulation at least seasonally, severely limits their use as polar paleoclimatic and Earth axial tilt indicators. Polar dinosaurs may have been a center of dinosaur evolution. The possible ability of polar dinosaurs to cope with conditions of cool and dark challenges theories that a gradual temperature decline, or a sudden, meteoritic or volcanic induced collapse in temperature and sunlight, destroyed the dinosaurs. INTRODUCTION America suggests that dinosaurs were regularly crossing, and NCREASINGNUMBERSof remains show that dinosaurs lived living upon, the Bering Land Bridge within a few degrees of the I near the North and South Poles during the Cretaceous.
    [Show full text]
  • A Possible Late Pleistocene Impact Crater in Central North America and Its Relation to the Younger Dryas Stadial
    A POSSIBLE LATE PLEISTOCENE IMPACT CRATER IN CENTRAL NORTH AMERICA AND ITS RELATION TO THE YOUNGER DRYAS STADIAL SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY David Tovar Rodriguez IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE Howard Mooers, Advisor August 2020 2020 David Tovar All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor Dr. Howard Mooers for his permanent support, my family, and my friends. i Abstract The causes that started the Younger Dryas (YD) event remain hotly debated. Studies indicate that the drainage of Lake Agassiz into the North Atlantic Ocean and south through the Mississippi River caused a considerable change in oceanic thermal currents, thus producing a decrease in global temperature. Other studies indicate that perhaps the impact of an extraterrestrial body (asteroid fragment) could have impacted the Earth 12.9 ky BP ago, triggering a series of events that caused global temperature drop. The presence of high concentrations of iridium, charcoal, fullerenes, and molten glass, considered by-products of extraterrestrial impacts, have been reported in sediments of the same age; however, there is no impact structure identified so far. In this work, the Roseau structure's geomorphological features are analyzed in detail to determine if impacted layers with plastic deformation located between hard rocks and a thin layer of water might explain the particular shape of the studied structure. Geophysical data of the study area do not show gravimetric anomalies related to a possible impact structure. One hypothesis developed on this works is related to the structure's shape might be explained by atmospheric explosions dynamics due to the disintegration of material when it comes into contact with the atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Formal Ratification of the Subdivision of the Holocene Series/ Epoch
    Article 1 by Mike Walker1*, Martin J. Head 2, Max Berkelhammer3, Svante Björck4, Hai Cheng5, Les Cwynar6, David Fisher7, Vasilios Gkinis8, Antony Long9, John Lowe10, Rewi Newnham11, Sune Olander Rasmussen8, and Harvey Weiss12 Formal ratification of the subdivision of the Holocene Series/ Epoch (Quaternary System/Period): two new Global Boundary Stratotype Sections and Points (GSSPs) and three new stages/ subseries 1 School of Archaeology, History and Anthropology, Trinity Saint David, University of Wales, Lampeter, Wales SA48 7EJ, UK; Department of Geography and Earth Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, Wales SY23 3DB, UK; *Corresponding author, E-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Earth Sciences, Brock University, 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way, St. Catharines, Ontario LS2 3A1, Canada 3 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois 60607, USA 4 GeoBiosphere Science Centre, Quaternary Sciences, Lund University, Sölveg 12, SE-22362, Lund, Sweden 5 Institute of Global Change, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xian, Shaanxi 710049, China; Department of Earth Sciences, University of Minne- sota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA 6 Department of Biology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5A3, Canada 7 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa K1N 615, Canada 8 Centre for Ice and Climate, The Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Julian Maries Vej 30, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark 9 Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK 10
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Disparity in Summer Monsoon Precipitation in the Indian Subcontinent During Northgrippian to Meghalayan Transition
    REVIEW ARTICLES Regional disparity in summer monsoon precipitation in the Indian subcontinent during Northgrippian to Meghalayan transition Som Dutt1,*, Anil K. Gupta2, Rahul Devrani1, Ram R. Yadav1 and Raj K. Singh3 1Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, 33, General Mahadeo Singh Road, Dehradun 248 001, India 2Department of Geology and Geophysics, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721 302, India 3School of Earth, Ocean and Climate Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar, Argul 752 050, India soon domain1–6,8–15. Detailed reviews on ISM variability The present study reveals distinct spatial variability of 1,2 summer monsoon precipitation in Indian subcontinent during Holocene are available , but regional precipita- during Northgrippian to Meghalayan transition. Pro- tion disparity in Indian subcontinent during the 4.2 ka tracted dry phase lasting ~1000 yrs was observed event is not much discussed. Here, we examined availa- ~4.2 ka BP in southern and northwestern India whereas ble marine and terrestrial proxy records of ISM variabi- 200–300 yrs event occurred in northeastern parts. lity from different regions in Indian subcontinent and Strong El Niño conditions beginning ~4.3 kyr BP were northern Indian Ocean (IO) for better understandings of associated with the millennial long dryness in western precipitation variability during Northgrippian to Megha- parts but its influence was limited in the eastern layan transition. region. Cross-verified, high-resolution records from different geographic regions of India are still required to ascertain if regional differences occurred in span Domain of ISM and magnitude during Northgrippian to Meghalayan transition. ISM precipitation is pivotal for socio-economic wellbeing of 1/3rd of human population living in Indian subconti- Keywords: Indian summer monsoon, Indus civilization, nent.
    [Show full text]
  • Sedimentological-Geochemical Data Based Reconstruction of Climate
    quaternary Article Sedimentological-Geochemical Data Based Reconstruction of Climate Changes and Human Impacts from the Peat Sequence of Round Lake in the Western Foothill Area of the Eastern Carpathians, Romania Réka Orsolya Tapody 1,Pál Sümegi 1,*, Dávid Molnár 1 ,Máté Karlik 2,3, Tünde Tör˝ocsik 1,Péter Cseh 1 and László Makó 1 1 Department of Geology and Palaeontology, University of Szeged, Egyetem Str. 2-6, H-6722 Szeged, Hungary; [email protected] (R.O.T.); [email protected] (D.M.); [email protected] (T.T.); [email protected] (P.C.); [email protected] (L.M.) 2 Isotope Climatology and Environmental Research Centre, Institute for Nuclear Research, Bem Square 18/c, H-4026 Debrecen, Hungary; [email protected] 3 Institute for Geological and Geochemical Research, RCAES, Budaörsi Str. 45, H-1112 Budapest, Hungary * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: This paper presents the results of comparative sedimentological and geochemical analysis of the mire at Sânpaul, Round Lake (Kerek-tó). The palaeoecological site is situated in the western Citation: Tapody, R.O.; Sümegi, P.; foothill area of the Eastern Carpathians in Romania. The primary objective of this study was to Molnár, D.; Karlik, M.; Tör˝ocsik,T.; analyse the accumulation of major and trace elements in a 7500 year-long peat and lake deposition. Cseh, P.; Makó, L. The concentrations of 13 elements were determined by using handheld XRF. This paper presents Sedimentological-Geochemical Data the results of a multidisciplinary study, for which the principal aims were to examine the long- Based Reconstruction of Climate term relationship between land degradation in the Homoród Hills using various palaeoecological Changes and Human Impacts from techniques, primarily comparative geochemical analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • International Chronostratigraphic Chart
    INTERNATIONAL CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHIC CHART www.stratigraphy.org International Commission on Stratigraphy v 2018/08 numerical numerical numerical Eonothem numerical Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age GSSP GSSP GSSP GSSP EonothemErathem / Eon System / Era / Period age (Ma) EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) / Eon Erathem / Era System / Period GSSA age (Ma) present ~ 145.0 358.9 ± 0.4 541.0 ±1.0 U/L Meghalayan 0.0042 Holocene M Northgrippian 0.0082 Tithonian Ediacaran L/E Greenlandian 152.1 ±0.9 ~ 635 Upper 0.0117 Famennian Neo- 0.126 Upper Kimmeridgian Cryogenian Middle 157.3 ±1.0 Upper proterozoic ~ 720 Pleistocene 0.781 372.2 ±1.6 Calabrian Oxfordian Tonian 1.80 163.5 ±1.0 Frasnian Callovian 1000 Quaternary Gelasian 166.1 ±1.2 2.58 Bathonian 382.7 ±1.6 Stenian Middle 168.3 ±1.3 Piacenzian Bajocian 170.3 ±1.4 Givetian 1200 Pliocene 3.600 Middle 387.7 ±0.8 Meso- Zanclean Aalenian proterozoic Ectasian 5.333 174.1 ±1.0 Eifelian 1400 Messinian Jurassic 393.3 ±1.2 7.246 Toarcian Devonian Calymmian Tortonian 182.7 ±0.7 Emsian 1600 11.63 Pliensbachian Statherian Lower 407.6 ±2.6 Serravallian 13.82 190.8 ±1.0 Lower 1800 Miocene Pragian 410.8 ±2.8 Proterozoic Neogene Sinemurian Langhian 15.97 Orosirian 199.3 ±0.3 Lochkovian Paleo- 2050 Burdigalian Hettangian 201.3 ±0.2 419.2 ±3.2 proterozoic 20.44 Mesozoic Rhaetian Pridoli Rhyacian Aquitanian 423.0 ±2.3 23.03 ~ 208.5 Ludfordian 2300 Cenozoic Chattian Ludlow 425.6 ±0.9 Siderian 27.82 Gorstian
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHIC CHART International Commission on Stratigraphy V 2020/03
    INTERNATIONAL CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHIC CHART www.stratigraphy.org International Commission on Stratigraphy v 2020/03 numerical numerical numerical numerical Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age GSSP GSSP GSSP GSSP EonothemErathem / Eon System / Era / Period age (Ma) EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) Eonothem / EonErathem / Era System / Period GSSA age (Ma) present ~ 145.0 358.9 ±0.4 541.0 ±1.0 U/L Meghalayan 0.0042 Holocene M Northgrippian 0.0082 Tithonian Ediacaran L/E Greenlandian 0.0117 152.1 ±0.9 ~ 635 U/L Upper Famennian Neo- 0.129 Upper Kimmeridgian Cryogenian M Chibanian 157.3 ±1.0 Upper proterozoic ~ 720 0.774 372.2 ±1.6 Pleistocene Calabrian Oxfordian Tonian 1.80 163.5 ±1.0 Frasnian 1000 L/E Callovian Quaternary 166.1 ±1.2 Gelasian 2.58 382.7 ±1.6 Stenian Bathonian 168.3 ±1.3 Piacenzian Middle Bajocian Givetian 1200 Pliocene 3.600 170.3 ±1.4 387.7 ±0.8 Meso- Zanclean Aalenian Middle proterozoic Ectasian 5.333 174.1 ±1.0 Eifelian 1400 Messinian Jurassic 393.3 ±1.2 Calymmian 7.246 Toarcian Devonian Tortonian 182.7 ±0.7 Emsian 1600 11.63 Pliensbachian Statherian Lower 407.6 ±2.6 Serravallian 13.82 190.8 ±1.0 Lower 1800 Miocene Pragian 410.8 ±2.8 Proterozoic Neogene Sinemurian Langhian 15.97 Orosirian 199.3 ±0.3 Lochkovian Paleo- Burdigalian Hettangian proterozoic 2050 20.44 201.3 ±0.2 419.2 ±3.2 Rhyacian Aquitanian Rhaetian Pridoli 23.03 ~ 208.5 423.0 ±2.3 2300 Ludfordian 425.6 ±0.9 Siderian Mesozoic Cenozoic Chattian Ludlow
    [Show full text]
  • Circum-Indian Ocean Hydroclimate at the Mid to Late Holocene Transition: the Double Drought Hypothesis and Consequences for the Harappan Nick Scroxton1,2,3, Stephen J
    https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2020-138 Preprint. Discussion started: 4 November 2020 c Author(s) 2020. CC BY 4.0 License. Circum-Indian ocean hydroclimate at the mid to late Holocene transition: The Double Drought hypothesis and consequences for the Harappan Nick Scroxton1,2,3, Stephen J. Burns1, David McGee2, Laurie R. Godfrey4, Lovasoa Ranivoharimanana5, 5 Peterson Faina5 1Department of Geosciences, 611 North Pleasant Street, University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA 01030, USA 2Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 3School of Earth Sciences, University College Dublin, Bellfield, Dublin 4, Ireland 10 4Department of Anthropology, 240 Hicks Way, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA 5Mention Bassins sédimentaires, Evolution, Conservation (BEC) – BP 906 – Faculté des Sciences, Université d’Antananarivo – 101 Antananarivo, Madagascar Correspondence to: Nick Scroxton ([email protected]) Abstract 15 The decline of the Mature Harappan period of the Harappan civilization in and around the Indus Valley between 4.3 and 3.9 kyr BP, its transition to the Late Harappan and subsequent abandonment by 3.0 kyr BP are frequently attributed to a reduction in summer monsoon rainfall associated with the 4.2 kyr event (4.26-3.97 kyr BP). Yet while the 4.2 kyr event is well documented in the Mediterranean and Middle East, its global footprint is undetermined, and its impact on monsoon rainfall largely unexplored. In this study we investigate the spatial and temporal variability of the tropical circum-Indian ocean 20 hydroclimate in the mid to late Holocene. We conducted Monte-Carlo principal component analysis, taking into account full age uncertainty, on ten high-resolution, precisely dated paleohydroclimate records from the circum-Indian Ocean basin, all growing continuously or almost continuously between 5 and 3kyr BP.
    [Show full text]
  • Meghalayan Age
    Meghalayan Age drishtiias.com/printpdf/meghalayan-age Why in news? Geologists have decided to classify the past 4,200 years as the Meghalayan Age. It is the most recent unit of the Geologic Time Scale in the 4.6 billion-year history of the Earth. Following this, the International Chronostratigraphic Chart, which depicts the timeline for Earth's history will be updated. What is Meghalayan Age? The “Meghalayan Age” began 4,200 years ago and experienced an abrupt mega- drought and cooling around the globe. The drought and the cooling lasted two centuries and severely impacted agricultural- based societies that developed in several regions after the end of the last Ice Age. It resulted in the collapse of civilisations in Egypt, Greece, Syria, Palestine, Mesopotamia, the Indus Valley, and the Yangtze River Valley. Evidence of the 4,200-year climatic event has been found on all seven continents. This age is considered unique as this was the only age which began with a global cultural event produced by a global climatic event. Geologists have also introduced two other age classifications: 1. Greenlandian Age (11,700 - 8,326 years ago) - began when the last ice age ended and the world began to warm up. 2. Northgrippian Age (8,326 – 4,200 years ago) – began after an abrupt global cooling started following the Greenlandian Age. Together, these three stages stretch across the Holocene Epoch, which is the current geological time unit - having started 11,700 years ago. The Holocene epoch falls under Cenozoic Era and is the time after Ice Age. Methods of Classification 1/3 Each subdivision of the Holocene Epoch is marked out by sediments accumulated on sea floors, lake bottoms, glacial ice and in stalactites and stalagmites across the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Revista Brasileira de Paleontologia, 23(4):234–250, Outubro/Dezembro 2020 A Journal of the Brazilian Society of Paleontology doi: 10.4072/rbp.2020.4.02 FIREFIRE EVENTS EVENTS AND AND VEGETATION VEGETATION DYNAMICS DYNAMICS DURING DURING THE LATETHE LATE PLEISTOCENE-MEGHALAYAN PLEISTOCENE-MEGHALAYAN INTERVAL INTERVAL IN THE IN THESOUTHERNMOST SOUTHERNMOST BRAZILIAN BRAZILIAN COASTAL COASTAL PLAIN PLAIN VERIDIANA RIBEIRO Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geografia, Centro Polar e Climático, Instituto de Geociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul/UFRGS, Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500, 91501-970, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. [email protected] MARGOT GUERRA-SOMMER Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geociências, Instituto de Geociências, UFRGS, Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500, 91501-970, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. [email protected] RUALDO MENEGAT Departamento de Paleontologia e Estratigrafia, Instituto de Geociências, UFRGS, Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500, 91501-970, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. [email protected] LIDIA AUMOND KUHN Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geociências, Instituto de Geociências, UFRGS, Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500, 91501-970, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. [email protected] JEFFERSON CARDIA SIMÕES Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geografia, Centro Polar e Climático, Instituto de Geociências, UFRGS, Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500, 91501-970, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. [email protected] RICARDO BURGO BRAGA Laboratório de Gerenciamento Costeiro, Centro de Estudos de Geologia Costeira e Oceânica, Instituto de Geociências, UFRGS, Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500, 91501-970, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. [email protected] SORAIA GIRARDI BAUERMANN Laboratório de Palinologia, Universidade Luterana do Brasil, Av. Farroupilha, 8001, 92425-900, Canoas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil.
    [Show full text]
  • Historian Angers Group Who Proposed Labeling Late Holocene As Meghalayan Age 21 September 2018, by Bob Yirka
    Historian angers group who proposed labeling late Holocene as Meghalayan Age 21 September 2018, by Bob Yirka resulted in the collapse of a number of civilizations—in Greece, Mesopotamia, Syria, Egypt, Palestine, the Yangtze River Valley and the Indus Valley. This last one was particularly significant because the new age was named for a state in what is now India—Meghalaya. Middleton claims that there is no real evidence of mass civilizations collapsing. He suggests that at most, there was restructuring of several societies due to the drought. He further suggests that because of this inaccuracy, it is inappropriate to use the date chosen as a meaningful threshold for a new geologic age. He adds that he believes that such errors crop up due to a lack of communication between archaeologists and historians—a problem Credit: CC0 Public Domain that could be solved with more interdisciplinary collaborations. Such statements have angered some of the people Guy Middleton, a historian at the Czech Institute of who proposed the labeling of the new age, Egyptology at Charles University in Prague, has according to Robinson Meyer, in a column for The angered members of the group who successfully Atlantic. He claims a squabble has arisen due to pushed for the creation of a new unit of geological the piece Middleton published. He writes that some time called the Meghalayan Age. In his Perspective of the Meghalayan group have even gone so far as piece published in the journal Science, he claims to question Middleton's credentials, calling him a that evidence of widespread collapse of "failed archeology Ph.D." Others have suggested civilizations following the onset of a mega-drought that the claims by Middleton were poorly in 2200 BCE, is lacking.
    [Show full text]