DOCSLIB.ORG

A Violent Education RIGHTS Corporal Punishment of Children in US Public Schools WATCH

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Violent Education RIGHTS Corporal Punishment of Children in US Public Schools WATCH United States HUMAN A Violent Education RIGHTS Corporal Punishment of Children in US Public Schools WATCH A Violent Education Corporal Punishment of Children in US Public Schools Copyright © 2008 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-369-2 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org August 2008 1-56432-369-2 A Violent Education Corporal Punishment of Children in US Public Schools I. Summary and Key Recommendations .............................................................................. 1 Corporal Punishment in US Public Schools ..................................................................... 2 A Violent and Degrading School Environment ........................................................... 3 Discrimination in the Classroom................................................................................5 Lack of Recourse .......................................................................................................5 Legality and Reform.................................................................................................. 6 Key Recommendations ................................................................................................... 9 II. Methodology.................................................................................................................11 III. Corporal Punishment in US Public Schools ...................................................................14 The Mechanics of Corporal Punishment.........................................................................14 The Paddles and the Position of the Child................................................................14 Clothing as Protection against Blows...................................................................... 20 Number of Blows .....................................................................................................21 Other Instruments Used.......................................................................................... 22 Other Physical Force Used against Students ........................................................... 23 Persons Administering Corporal Punishment.......................................................... 23 The Atmospherics of Corporal Punishment ....................................................................25 Intimidation and Threats .........................................................................................25 Witnesses to Paddling ............................................................................................ 26 “The Devil’s Bargain”: Choosing to Be Beaten .............................................................. 29 Why Students Opt for Beatings................................................................................31 IV. Offenses Leading to Corporal Punishment ................................................................... 35 Disproportionate Responses to Minor Misbehavior .......................................................35 Vague Offenses and Arbitrary Use of Corporal Punishment ........................................... 38 Corporal Punishment for Serious Offenses, including Violence..................................... 39 V. Prevalence of Corporal Punishment in US Public Schools.............................................. 42 Data on Corporal Punishment....................................................................................... 42 Constant and High Levels of Paddling in Some Schools.................................................47 VI. Impact of Corporal Punishment.................................................................................... 50 Lasting Injuries and Immediate Pain............................................................................. 50 Depression and Anger ...................................................................................................54 Academic Disengagement and Drop Out........................................................................57 Links to Domestic Violence........................................................................................... 58 VII. Best Practices in School Discipline .............................................................................60 Positive Disciplinary Approaches.................................................................................. 60 Educators’ Views on Corporal Punishment.................................................................... 64 VIII. The Use of Corporal Punishment against Specific Groups ..........................................69 Boys Paddled More Than Girls ...................................................................................... 70 Race ..............................................................................................................................71 Discriminatory Learning Environment ......................................................................75 Particular Issues Raised by the Paddling of Girls............................................................77 Case Study: Allison Guthrie .................................................................................... 78 Special Education Students and Students with Disabilities .......................................... 79 IX. Regulating Discipline in Schools .................................................................................84 Regulations and Training on School Discipline ............................................................. 84 Educators Who Disagree are without Recourse ............................................................. 85 Case Study: Ralph McLaney.................................................................................... 87 Parental Choice ............................................................................................................ 88 Methods of Opting Out of Corporal Punishment...................................................... 88 Parental Struggles to Opt Out ................................................................................. 90 Parental Preferences against Corporal Punishment Ignored.....................................91 X. Seeking Redress for Corporal Punishment .................................................................... 94 School District Response to Parental Complaints.......................................................... 94 Immunity for Perpetrators............................................................................................. 96 Lack of Adequate Responses from Police or Courts....................................................... 97 Parents’ Inability to Protect Children............................................................................. 99 XI. Banning Corporal Punishment: International Human Rights Law and US Constitutional Standards ...................................................................................................................... 102 International Human Rights Law ..................................................................................102 Freedom from Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment..................103 The Right to Freedom from Physical Violence.........................................................104 The Inherent Dignity of the Child and the Right to Education..................................105 Non-discrimination and Equality............................................................................107 Parents’ Rights ......................................................................................................108 The United States and International Human Rights Law.........................................109 US Law Permitting Corporal Punishment...................................................................... 113 Cruel and Unusual Punishment ............................................................................. 113 Due Process .......................................................................................................... 115 Trends to Abolish Corporal Punishment....................................................................... 116 XII. Conclusion and Recommendations ............................................................................118 To Legislatures in States with Corporal Punishment..................................................... 119 To Governors and Departments of Education in States with Corporal Punishment........120 To Police, District Attorneys, and State Courts ............................................................. 121 To the President of the United States........................................................................... 121 To the United States Congress....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Corporal Punishment in Tennessee
    Office of Research and Education Accountability JUSTIN P. WILSON, COMPTROLLER Corporal Punishment in Tennessee Lauren Spires Legislative Research Analyst March 2018 Table of Contents Executive summary 2 Box: Definitions for corporal punishment and students with disabilities 2 Key findings 3 Policy considerations 6 Section 1: Tennessee’s corporal punishment policy 7 Box: TCA 49-6-4103 7 Box: TCA 49-6-4104 7 School board policies on corporal punishment 7 Exhibit 1: Where corporal punishment is allowed and not allowed per school 8 board policy, 2017-18 school year Tennessee School Boards Association model policies on corporal 8 punishment Variation in district policies 9 Box: Charter schools and corporal punishment 9 Section 2: Variation between board policy and use 10 Variation between board policies and affirming corporal punishment use 10 Variation between affirming corporal punishment use and reported data 11 Exhibit 2: Corporal punishment in Tennessee schools, 2013-14 school year 11 Exhibit 3: Tennessee school districts | Variance among board policies and 12 corporal punishment use Tennessee compared to other states 12 Exhibit 4: The United States of America | State laws on corporal punishment 13 Exhibit 5: The United States of America | Corporal punishment use by school 14 district, 2013-14 school year Section 3: Beyond local board policy | How decisions are made 14 about corporal punishment Exhibit 6: How decisions regarding the use of corporal punishment are made in 15 Tennessee schools Survey of directors of schools 16 Exhibit 7:
    [Show full text]
  • PROHIBITING CORPORAL PUNISHMENT DOES NOT MEAN CRIMINALISING PARENTS a Fact Sheet to Counter the Claim That Parents Will Be Criminalised
    FACT SHEET 1 FOR PROMOTING POSITIVE DISCIPLINE PROHIBITING CORPORAL PUNISHMENT DOES NOT MEAN CRIMINALISING PARENTS A fact sheet to counter the claim that parents will be criminalised SONKE GENDER JUSTICE Sonke Gender Justice is a non- has established a growing presence on the African continent and plays an active role internationally. Sonke works to create the change necessary for men, women, young people and children to enjoy equitable, healthy and happy relationships that contribute to the development of just and democratic societies. Sonke pursues this goal across Southern Africa by using a THE FACTS human rights framework to build the capacity of government, civil Unfortuantely, children routinely do not report the most egregious harm done to society organisations and citizens 1 them; it is highly unlikely that they will beat a path to the door of the police station to achieve gender equality, prevent because someone smacked them. gender-based violence and reduce the spread of HIV and the impact of In any event, South African law operates on the principle that the law does not AIDS. 2 concern itself with that which is trivial (de minimas curat lex) which applies equally to MENCARE adults and children who have been subject to less serious assaults. MenCare – A Global Fatherhood Imprisonment of their parents is seldom in children’s best interest, and will only Campaign – is coordinated by 3 happen where corporal punishment has been severe enough to cause injury, and in Promundo, Sonke Gender Justice the best interests of the child in question. (Sonke) and the MenEngage THE MYTH Alliance, as an effort to promote The majority of the current international men’s involvement as fathers and 4 as caregivers.
    [Show full text]
  • 98675NCJRS.Pdf
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of JUstice - This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the pe~~on ~r organization originating it. Points of View or opinions stated In IS entocument are those of the authors and do not necessarll Jrepresustlce. the offiCial position or policies of the National Institute OYf Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material has bee granted by n _Bn~_Violence Against the Next ~eration---··· -------------- to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS) Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ Sion of the cOPYright Owner THE INFLUENCE OF SCHOOL THE INFLUENCE CORPORAL PUNISHMENTS OF SCHOOL ON CRIME CORPORAL PUNISHMENTS ON CRIME ) -by- "'ADAH MAURER -by­ and ADAH MAURER . JAMES S. WALLERSTEIN and JAMES S. WALLERSTEIN \ ; < d ) c· - ......,.....----- ,~----'~----- THE INFLUENCE OF SCHOOL Young male drivers who had oppressive school experiences were CORPORAL PUNISHMENTS ON CRIME inclined toward "speeding, recklessness, lawlessness and defiance of A STATISTICAL STUDY authority." (7) Do delinquents grow from "lack of discipline" or from too much by Adah Maurer and James S. Wallerstein discipline? Dr. Alan Button reports, "This, it now appears, is the wrong question. We should be asking about the sequence. Parents of delin­ . There are still some pundits, although a dwindling number, who quents, 100% of them, report physical beatings in the first six to ten years attnbute our "alarming" crime and delinquency to the decline of corporal of a child's life, but rarely thereafter. They 'wash their hands' of the kids, punishment in school and home.
    [Show full text]
  • Status Offences CRIN Is a Global Network Coordinating Information and Promoting Action on Child Rights
    Guide to mechanisms for children’s rights Global Report on Status Offences CRIN is a global network coordinating information and promoting action on child rights. More than 2,000 member organisations and tens of thousands more activists from across the world rely on CRIN for research and information. CRIN presses for rights, not charity, for children and is guided by a passion for putting children’s rights at the top of the global agenda by addressing root causes and promoting systematic change. Its guiding framework is the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). First published 2009 © Child Rights Information Network 2010 The Child Rights Information Network is a charity registered in England and Wales (1125925). Registered Company No. 6653398. CRIN encourages personal and educational use of this publication and grants permission for its reproduction in this capacity where proper credit is given in good faith. For resale or commercial distribution in any other manner, prior permission must be obtained in writing from the publisher. Contents Introduction........................................................................................................................................................1 Curfews..............................................................................................................................................................2 Curfew reform....................................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook for the Protection of Internally Displaced Persons
    Handbook for the Protection of Internally Displaced Persons Action Sheet 8 Liberty and Freedom of Movement Key message The ability to move freely and in safety within one’s country is a basic right as well as a pre-condition for the enjoyment of many other rights. Limitations on freedom of movement can have serious consequences for the lives, health and well-being of individuals and communities. Ensuring freedom of movement thus forms an important part of any protection strategy. 1. What do we mean by the term freedom of movement? Freedom of movement consists of the right and ability to move and choose one’s residence freely and in safety within the territory of the State, regardless of the purpose of the move. It also includes the right to leave any country and to return to one’s own country. It is closely related to the right to liberty and security of person, which guarantees freedom from arbitrary arrest and detention, and the right to seek asylum in another country. Taken together these rights mean that all persons, including the internally displaced, have the right to: l Take flight and seek safety in another part of the country (of choice), or to leave the country in order to seek asylum in another country. l Move freely and in safety within the country, including in and out of camps and settlements, regardless of the purpose of the move. l Voluntarily return to the place of origin or relocate to another part of the country. l Not be arbitrarily displaced or forced to return or relocate to another part of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Facilitating Peaceful Protests
    ACADEMY BRIEFING No. 5 Facilitating Peaceful Protests January 2014 Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Geneva Académie de droit international humanitaire et de droits humains à Genève Academ The Academy, a joint centre of ISBN: 978-2-9700866-3-5 © Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights, January 2014. Acknowledgements This Academy Briefing was written by Milena Costas Trascasas, Research Fellow, and Stuart Casey-Maslen, Head of Research, at the Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights (Geneva Academy). The Academy would like to thank all those who commented on an earlier draft of this briefing, in particular Anja Bienart and Brian Wood of Amnesty International, and Neil Corney of Omega Research Foundation. The Geneva Academy would also like to thank the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (DFAE) for its support to the Academy’s work on facilitating peaceful protests, especially the Human Security Division for its funding of the publication of this Briefing. Editing, design, and layout by Plain Sense, Geneva. Disclaimer This Academy Briefing is the work of the authors. The views expressed in it do not necessarily reflect those of the project’s supporters or of anyone who provided input to, or commented on, a draft of this Briefing. The designation of states or territories does not imply any judgement by the Geneva Academy, the DFAE, or any other body or individual, regarding the legal status of such states or territories, or their authorities and institutions, or the delimitation of their boundaries, or the status of any states or territories that border them.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Corporal Punishment Child Abuse?
    St. Catherine University SOPHIA Master of Social Work Clinical Research Papers School of Social Work 5-2017 Crossing the Line: Is Corporal Punishment Child Abuse? Jade R. Wallat St. Catherine University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://sophia.stkate.edu/msw_papers Part of the Social Work Commons Recommended Citation Wallat, Jade R.. (2017). Crossing the Line: Is Corporal Punishment Child Abuse?. Retrieved from Sophia, the St. Catherine University repository website: https://sophia.stkate.edu/msw_papers/806 This Clinical research paper is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Social Work at SOPHIA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master of Social Work Clinical Research Papers by an authorized administrator of SOPHIA. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CROSSING THE LINE: IS CORPORAL PUNISHMENT CHILD ABUSE? Crossing the Line: Is Corporal Punishment Child Abuse? Submitted by Jade R. Wallat May 2017 MSW Clinical Research Paper School of Social Work St. Catherine University & University of St. Thomas St. Paul, Minnesota Committee Members: Dr. Lance Peterson (Chair) Jaime Robertson MSW, LSW The Clinical Research Project is a graduation requirement for MSW students at St. Catherine University/University of St. Thomas School of Social Work in St. Paul, Minnesota and is conducted within a nine-month time frame to demonstrate facility with basic social research methods. Students must independently conceptualize a research problem, formulate a research design that is approved by a research committee and the university Institutional Review Board, implement the project, and publicly present the findings of the study. This project is neither a Master’s thesis nor a dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Sex Education in Mississippi
    Sex Education in Mississippi: Why ‘Just Wait’ Just Doesn’t Work Sex Education in Mississippi: Why ‘Just Wait’ Just Doesn’t Work INTRODUCUTION……………………………………………………………………………....3 I. Federal Investment in Abstinence-Only-Until-Marriage and Sexuality Education Programs……………………………………………………………………………………..3 II. Adolescent Health in Mississippi……………………………………………………………..6 III. Mississippi Sex Education Law and Policy………………………………………………....…9 IV. Methodology of the Report…………………………………………………………..……...11 V. Figure 1. Map of Mississippi Public Health Districts……………………………..…………13 WHAT YOUNG PEOPLE ARE LEARNING IN MISSISSIPPI…………………..……………14 I. Federally Funded Abstinence-Only-Until-Marriage Programs in Mississippi …………....…..14 II. Abstinence-Only-Until-Marriage and Sex Education Programs in Mississippi Public Schools……………………………………………………………………………………...22 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS………………………………………………..30 APPENDIX 1. LIST OF MISSISSIPPI SCHOOL DISTRICTS THAT RECEIVED AND RESPONDED TO OUR PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST…………………………….....32 REFERENCES …………………………………………………………………....……………..34 2 INTRODUCTION The federal government’s heavy investment in abstinence-only-until-marriage funding over the past few decades has promulgated a myriad of state policies, state agencies, and community-based organizations focused on promoting an abstinence-only-until-marriage ideology. The trickle-down effect of the funding for abstinence-only-until-marriage programs and the industry it created has impacted states throughout the nation, with a disparate impact on Southern states, including
    [Show full text]
  • Protection from Arbitrary Arrest and Detention Under International Law Laurent Marcoux, Jr
    Boston College International and Comparative Law Review Volume 5 | Issue 2 Article 3 8-1-1982 Protection from Arbitrary Arrest and Detention Under International Law Laurent Marcoux, Jr. Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/iclr Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, International Law Commons, and the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Laurent Marcoux, Jr., Protection from Arbitrary Arrest and Detention Under International Law, 5 B.C. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 345 (1982), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/iclr/vol5/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Protection from Arbitrary Arrest and Detention Under International Law by Laurent Marcoux, Jr. * I. INTRODUCTION Since the adoption of the United Nations Charter in 1945, the international community, in recognition of the vital importance of securing respect for human rights and freedom from fear, has developed an impressive body of interna­ tional human rights law. 1 Among the most fundamental of all human rights is the right to personal liberty. One significant dimension of this right is freedom from arbitrary arrest and detention.2 In recognition of the right to this freedom, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Universal Declaration), adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations in 1948, provides in Article 3 that "[e]veryone has the right to life, liberty and security of person," and in Article 9 that "[n]o one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile."3 Simi­ larly, Article 9(1) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Covenant on Civil and Political Rights) states: "Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person.
    [Show full text]
  • Position Statement on Physical/Corporal Punishment [This Position Statement Replaces Apsaa’S 2013 Position Statement on Physical/Corporal Punishment]
    Position Statement on Physical/Corporal Punishment [This position statement replaces APsaA’s 2013 position statement on Physical/Corporal Punishment] The American Psychoanalytic Association (APsaA) condemns the use of physical punishment (corporal punishment) in the discipline of children and recommends alternative methods that enhance children's capacities to develop healthy emotional lives, tolerate frustration, regulate internal tensions, and behave in socially acceptable ways. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, Atlanta, GA) has now formally come out with policy asserting that physical punishment is child abuse (p. 8) and that it should be prohibited (p. 46)(Fortson et al, 2016). This stance is in response to consistent data showing physical punishment to be associated with increased violence and emotional disorders (Durrant and Ensom, 2012; Straus et al, 2013; Gershoff and Grogan-Kaylor, 2016). The USA has no federal law prohibiting physical punishment. There are still 19 states which permit physical punishment in schools. All this is in contrast to the international response to these data on physical punishment—49 countries have banned physical punishment in all settings, and over 100 countries have banned it in schools. APsaA identifies and advocates for three crucial interventions for the prevention of physical punishment of children: 1. Education about the psychological problems caused by physical punishment and about alternative approaches to discipline. Educational efforts should be directed towards parents, caregivers, educators, clergy, legislators and the general public. 2. Legislation to protect all children from physical punishment and to aid parents at risk. 3. Research about alternative methods of disciplining and managing children and about the best ways to communicate these methods to parents, educators and caregivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Declaration of Human Rights
    Universal Declaration of Human Rights Preamble Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world, Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people, Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law, Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations, Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom, Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in cooperation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms, Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge, Now, therefore, The General Assembly, Proclaims this Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • SOS Banner June-2014
    A Special Briefing to the Mississippi Municipal League Strengthen Our Schools A Call to Fully Fund Public Education Mississippi Association of Educators 775 North State Street Jackson, MS 39202 maetoday.org Keeppublicschoolspublic.org Stay Connected to MAE! Mississippi Association of Educators "Great Public Schools for Every Student" 775 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39202 | Phone: 800.530.7998 or 601.354.4463 Websites: MAEToday.org and KeepPublicSchoolsPublic.com Ocean Springs Mayor Connie Moran Moderator Agenda 1. State funds that could be used for public education Rep. Cecil Brown (Jackson) 2. State underfunding to basic public school funding (MAEP) Sen. Derrick Simmons (Greenville) 3. Kindergarten Increases Diplomas (KIDs) Rep. Sonya Williams-Barnes (Gulfport) 4. The Value of Educators to the Community Joyce Helmick, MAE President 5. Shifting the Funding of Public Schools from the State to the Cities: The Unspoken Costs Mayor Jason Shelton (Tupelo) Mayor Chip Johnson (Hernando) Mayor Connie Moran (Ocean Springs) 8. Invest in Our Public Schools to Motivate, Educate, and Graduate Mississippi’s Students Superintendent Ronnie McGehee, Madison County School District Mississippi Association of Educators "Great Public Schools for Every Student" 775 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39202 | Phone: 800.530.7998 or 601.354.4463 Websites: MAEToday.org and KeepPublicSchoolsPublic.com Sources of State Funding That Could Be Used for Public Schools As of April 2014 $481 Million Source: House of Representatives Appropriations Chairman Herb Frierson Investing in classroom priorities builds the foundation for student learning. Mississippi Association of Educators "Great Public Schools for Every Student" 775 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39202 | Phone: 800.530.7998 or 601.354.4463 Websites: MAEToday.org and KeepPublicSchoolsPublic.com From 2009 – 2015, Mississippi’s State Leaders UNDERFUNDED* All School Districts in Mississippi by $1.5 billion! They deprived OUR students of .
    [Show full text]