In Modern Britain
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Power & Participation &IN MODERN BRITAIN David Beetham, Andrew Blick, Helen Margetts and Stuart Weir A Literature Review by Democratic Audit Power and Participation in Modern Britain An internal Democratic Audit paper, February 2008A Literature Review 1 Power & Participation IN MODERN BRITAIN by Democratic Audit for the Carnegie UK Trust Democracy and Civil Society programme David Beetham, Andrew Blick, &Helen Margetts and Stuart Weir Democratic Audit Literature Review for Carnegie Trust UK Designed by Tony Garrett, Printed by Creative Print Group, Wembley 4 The Democratic Audit Preface his paper was originally are keen to receive feedback on commissioned by the its findings to date, not least any Carnegie UK Trust gaps. Comments can be fed back to inform its new to Democratic Audit or directly Democracy and Civil to Carnegie UK’s Democracy Society Programme. Programme Director, Raji Hunjan TThe programme has been set at [email protected] up to contribute towards the strengthening of civil society Charlie McConnell and people empowerment across Chief Executive, Carnegie UK the UK and Ireland. The Trust has established a Commission of Inquiry into the future of civil society, chaired by Geoff Mulgan, and this has just completed its first phase of investigation. The Trust will be publishing its initial findings later this autumn. For further information on the work of the Carnegie Commission see www.carnegieuktrust.org.uk In addition to the work of the commission, Carnegie has contracted a number of independent think tanks to map and analyse power in the UK and Ireland, of which this paper is one. Our aim is to move beyond the work of the Rowntree Trusts’ Power Inquiry, which largely focused upon the interface between the citizen and the local and national state. Carnegie’s power mapping exercise is intended to examine wider political, economic, cultural, social and media influences in society and ways in which civil society can affect and democratise the distribution of power. This paper does not necessarily represent the views of Carnegie UK. Indeed, we see this very much as work in progress and Power and Participation in Modern Britain 5 6 The Democratic Audit Contents Preface 5 Part 4: Participation in Civil Society 47 Acknowledgements 8 Inequalities in Resources and Power 47 About the Authors 8 Poverty and social exclusion Towards middle class hegemony Introduction 9 Economic, social and cultural inequalities Executive Summary 11 The balance of power Who Participates? 52 Part 1: Variations in political participation Theories Of Political Power 14 Associational life and social capital Introduction 14 Personal and political efficacy The Nature of Political Power 15 Citizen Action 55 Key features of political power Spaces for participation: closed, invited, claimed/created The Ideological Framework 17 Observations 59 Part 2: Power And Participation in Practice 19 Part 5: Conclusions 60 National Government and Globalisation 19 Power at a global level Perspectives on power and influence 60 Britain’s role in the world Comments on local democracy 62 Political and Corporate Power 22 Government at the centre The powers of the executive Corporate influence on government The media – ‘unelected legislators’? Power in the workplace Participation in Local Governance 31 The new localism The Brown effect The local governance framework Part 3: Handles On Power 36 Government Policies on Participation 36 Rights and Citizen Mobilisation 37 Redress Countervailing Influences 40 Civil society Trade unions Political parties? The Power of the Internet 44 Power and Participation in Modern Britain 7 Acknowledgements About the authors e are very pleased to of the Institute for Political and Professor David Beetham be able to publish this Economic Governance, University is a leading British political report on power and of Manchester, for advice on theorist and Associate Director participation in Britain drafted sections; and to Professor of Democratic Audit. He has with a generous grant Marian Barnes, of the School of undertaken many recent interna- from the Lipman- Applied Social Science, University tional consultancies on democracy WMiliband Trust. The research for of Brighton, who shared with for UNESCO, the UN High this literature review was carried us the fruits of her researches Commission on Human Rights, out in the summer of 2007. We had into participation. Thanks too to International IDEA and the Inter- only three months in which to carry Professor Keith Ewing, of King’s Parliamentary Union (IPU). Recent out the research and so there are College, London, for sharing with publications include Democracy gaps in what we have been able to us ideas on workplace rights; to and Human Rights, Democracy, a cover; and the research has been Hilary Wainwright, co-editor of Red Beginner’s Guide and Parliament becoming increasingly out of date. Pepper and research director of the and Democracy in the Twenty- Nevertheless we believe that we New Politics Project of the Tran- first Century: a Guide to Good have identified issues that are of snational Institute, Amsterdam, for Practice, IPU 2006; and (jointly) great importance to the Brown her thoughts on participation; and International IDEA Handbook government’s governance package, to Martin McIvor, of UNISON, for on Democracy Assessment and and especially to its welcome valuable insights into modern trade Democracy under Blair. He emphasis on participation, and so unionism. acted as adviser on the ESRC we decided that we should publish We are also grateful for valuable programme on participation. it, warts and all, if at all possible. contributions to the study from Andrew Blick is currently full-time Our thanks go to the trustees of those who attended a seminar to Research Officer at Democratic the Lipman-Miliband Trust for discuss power and participation at Audit. He has conducted political rescuing the report. 1 Parliament Street, London SW1: research for Lord Radice, Professor We also owe thanks to all Anthony Barnett, openDemocracy; George Jones and BBC Television. those who gave us advice and Tufyal Choudhury, University of He was Secretary to an All-Party information last summer. We owe Durham; Jane Foot; Sofia Hamaz, Group of MPs on the Constitu- particular thanks to Professors Linacre College, University of tion for two years. He is author of Keith Dowding and Patrick Oxford; Peter John; Stephen People who Live in the Dark (on Dunleavy, both of the LSE, Pittam, Joseph Rowntree Charitable political advisers) and How to go and John Gaventa, Fellow at Trust; and Lord Smith of Clifton. to War and has contributed to a the Institute for Development Raji Hunjan, who was in number of Democratic Audit books Studies, University of Sussex, charge of the democracy project at and reports. who gave us early steers on the Carnegie UK Trust, was unfailingly theoretical literature of power; enthusiastic and supportive. Helen Margetts is Professor of to Jane Foot, independent policy We owe thanks too to Charlie Society and the Internet at Oxford consultant and associate, Centre McConnell, director, and Morven University and was formerly for Urban & Community Research, Masterton at Carnegie. Professor in Political Science, Goldsmiths College, University UCL, and Director of the School of of London, for a personal seminar Stuart Weir, Andrew Blick, David Public Policy, UCL. She carries out on local government in Britain; Beetham and Helen Margetts research and writes on electoral to her and Professor Peter John, 5 February 2008 systems and results, popular 8 The Democratic Audit Introduction attitudes to democratic issues, olitical power is important, tion in the UK, and particularly e-government and participation on because it constitutes the to enable people to take full the Internet. She is a consultant very fabric of politics, advantage of the government’s to the National Audit Office and and of society itself, and drive to open up participation at was co-leader of the team that determines how the local level. wrote the influential NAO study, benefits, opportunities and The paper has its origins in Government on the Web. She also Pdisadvantages of life in the United a literature review, undertaken led on the study, The BNP: the Kingdom are shared between its on behalf of the Carnegie UK roots of its appeal, for the Joseph inhabitants and communities. Trust, to inform its longer-term Rowntree Charitable Trust. Yet the study of power in the UK project to map power in the UK. is, as the sociologist Anthony It is necessarily indicative: the Professor Stuart Weir is Director of Giddens wrote 30 years ago, research was carried out within a Democratic Audit, a research body ‘almost uncharted territory’. This very short time-span and there are attached to the Human Rights paper is an initial exploration of inevitably omissions. While the Centre, University of Essex. He is this ‘uncharted territory’. There review broadly covers the United joint author of three democratic is still scarcely any empirical Kingdom as a whole, much of audits of the UK, including research on power in the United the detailed research, especially Democracy under Blair and of Kingdom, the literature on partici- on local governance, centres on other Audit books and reports. pation is sparse, and this paper England and Wales and we barely He was one of the authors of the represents the first attempt we cover the impact of devolution. International IDEA Handbook know of that seeks to consider Further, most of the research was on Democracy Assessment and both power and participation conducted before Gordon Brown has acted as a consultant on together. For Democratic Audit, became Prime Minister and we democracy and human rights a deeper understanding of the have been able only to modify the in India, Macedonia, Malawi, structures of power – institutional study to take account of what are Namibia, Nigeria, Palestine and in society at large – is vital potentially far-reaching changes and Zimbabwe.