DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessing Racial Differences in Offending Trajectories: a Life-Course View of the Race-Crime Relationship Michael S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessing Racial Differences in Offending Trajectories: a Life-Course View of the Race-Crime Relationship Michael S View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Scholar Commons | University of South Florida Research University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2011 Assessing racial differences in offending trajectories: A life-course view of the race-crime relationship Michael S. Caudy University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Scholar Commons Citation Caudy, Michael S., "Assessing racial differences in offending trajectories: A life-course view of the race-crime relationship" (2011). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/3037 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Assessing racial differences in offending trajectories: A life-course view of the race-crime relationship by Michael S. Caudy A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Criminology College of Behavioral and Community Sciences University of South Florida Co-Major Professor: Michael J. Lynch, Ph.D. Co-Major Professor: Ojmarrh Mitchell, Ph.D. Wesley G. Jennings, Ph. D. Michael J. Leiber, Ph.D. Thomas A. Loughran, Ph.D. Date of Approval: October 20, 2011 Keywords: Race, Ethnicity, Life-course theory, Developmental trajectories, Risk factors Copyright © 2011, Michael S. Caudy i Table of Contents List of Tables............................................. ........................................................................ iv List of Figures............................................... ..................................................................... vi Abstract......................................................... .................................................................... vii Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................1 The Age Crime Relationship and Developmental Life-Course Criminology .......................................................................................................5 Race and DLC ........................................................................................................12 The Current Study ..................................................................................................16 Chapter 2: The Relationship between Race and Crime .....................................................19 Defining Race ........................................................................................................20 Official Crime Statistics .........................................................................................21 Non-Official Data ..................................................................................................24 Differential validity of self-report data ......................................................27 Explanations of Differential Arrest Rates ..............................................................30 Race and Criminological Theory ...........................................................................33 Conclusion.............. ...............................................................................................36 Chapter 3: Theoretical Framework ....................................................................................37 Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime ............................................37 Empirical status ..........................................................................................40 Explaining racial and ethnic differences ....................................................41 Theoretical critiques...................................................................................43 Summary ....................................................................................................44 Sampson and Laub’s Age-Graded Theory of Informal Social Control .................45 Empirical status ..........................................................................................48 Causes of delinquency ...................................................................49 Stability and change in offending ..................................................50 Explaining racial and ethnic differences ....................................................50 Theoretical critiques...................................................................................52 Summary ....................................................................................................55 Moffitt’s Developmental Taxonomy of Antisocial Behavior ................................56 Empirical status ..........................................................................................61 Explaining racial and ethnic differences ....................................................62 Theoretical critiques...................................................................................66 Summary ....................................................................................................68 ii Explaining Offending over the Life-Course across Race and Ethnicity ................68 Chapter 4: Review of Relevant Literature .........................................................................73 Developmental Trajectories of Offending .............................................................72 Distinguishing Offending Trajectories ..................................................................75 Generality of risk factors across subgroups ...............................................79 Racial Differences in Offending Trajectories ........................................................81 Foundations of the Current Study ..........................................................................86 Chapter 5: Methods........ ....................................................................................................89 Hypotheses......... ....................................................................................................89 Data.................... ....................................................................................................92 Measures....................... .........................................................................................96 Dependent variable ....................................................................................96 Independent variables ................................................................................97 Demographics ................................................................................98 Individual factors ...........................................................................98 Family factors ..............................................................................101 Peers .............................................................................................102 Structural factors ..........................................................................103 Analytic Strategy .................................................................................................106 Identification of developmental trajectories ............................................108 The SPGM process ......................................................................109 Relevant SPGM formulas ............................................................111 Estimation of trajectories in the current study .............................113 Chapter 6: Results................ ............................................................................................115 Prevalence of Self-Reported Offending ...............................................................115 Frequency of self-reported offending ......................................................116 Mean Differences in Risk and Protective Factors across Race and Ethnicity............ .............................................................................................118 Trajectory Estimations .........................................................................................120 Model selection ........................................................................................120 Self-Reported Offending Trajectories..................................................................121 Full sample ...............................................................................................121 White sample ...........................................................................................124 Black sample ............................................................................................126 Hispanic sample .......................................................................................129 Frequency of offending across trajectory groups.....................................132 Mean Differences in Risk and Protective Factors across Trajectory Groups ......135 Full sample ...............................................................................................135 White sample ...........................................................................................138 Black sample ............................................................................................139
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Latino Criminology: Unfucking Colonial Frameworks in 'Latinos and Crime' Scholarship
    Please do not remove this page Latino criminology: unfucking colonial frameworks in ‘Latinos and crime’ scholarship León, Kenneth Sebastian https://scholarship.libraries.rutgers.edu/discovery/delivery/01RUT_INST:ResearchRepository/12643390400004646?l#13643501570004646 León, K. S. (2020). Latino criminology: unfucking colonial frameworks in “Latinos and crime” scholarship. In Critical Criminology. Rutgers University. https://doi.org/10.7282/t3-0ztz-t895 This work is protected by copyright. You are free to use this resource, with proper attribution, for research and educational purposes. Other uses, such as reproduction or publication, may require the permission of the copyright holder. Downloaded On 2021/09/25 01:48:11 -0400 LEÓN, LATINO CRIMINOLOGY | AUTHOR ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT LATINO CRIMINOLOGY: UNFUCKING COLONIAL FRAMEWORKS IN ‘LATINOS AND CRIME’ SCHOLARSHIP Kenneth Sebastian León1 ORC-ID 0000-0001-6754-6137 Accepted and Forthcoming in Critical Criminology: An International Journal Special Issue on Centering the Margins: Addressing the Implementation Gap in Critical Criminology Abstract To “unfuck” is to correct a situation, or yourself if necessary, and in a timely manner. There is an enduring need to audit and deconstruct the colonial features of criminological theory and criminal justice practices. To better understand these enduring colonial harms, this article offers a forward- looking prospectus on the merits of a Latino2 Criminology and highlights the shared historical and conceptual overlaps between critical criminology and Latino studies in studying state violence, interpersonal harms, and racialized social control. Compatible with both orthodox and progressive perspectives in criminology and criminal justice scholarship, an emergent and politically reflexive Latino Criminology centers the margins by articulating areas of intervention for scholars to improve criminological inquiry and depart – or unfuck ourselves – from the many settler colonial and white supremacist inheritances of our field.
    [Show full text]
  • Race, Social Disorganization and Delinquency Alina Bazyler East Tennessee State University
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 12-2013 Race, Social Disorganization and Delinquency Alina Bazyler East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Criminology Commons, Race and Ethnicity Commons, and the Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons Recommended Citation Bazyler, Alina, "Race, Social Disorganization and Delinquency" (2013). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2283. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/2283 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Race, Social Disorganization, and Delinquency ___________________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Criminal Justice and Criminology _________________________________ by Alina Bazyler December 2013 _________________________________ Gregory Rocheleau, Chair Michael Braswell Larry Miller Keywords : Race, ethnicity, nonviolent delinquency, violent delinquency, social disorganization, economic disadvantage, collective efficacy ABSTRACT Race, Social Disorganization, and Delinquency by Alina Bazyler The overrepresentation of racial and ethnic minorities in crime has been an issue of debate. Some evidence, however, has shown that racial differences in offending are largely accounted for by economic disadvantage. Using data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (n = 4,290), the relationship between race and delinquency was examined looking at social disorganization factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Race/Ethnicity, Juvenile Court Processing and Case Outcomes: Fluctuation Or Stability?
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Race/Ethnicity, Juvenile Court Processing and Case Outcomes: Fluctuation or Stability? Author(s): Michael J. Leiber, Ph.D., Jennifer H. Peck, Ph.D. Document No.: 246229 Date Received: April 2014 Award Number: 2012-IJ-CX-0051 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant report available electronically. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. RACE/ETHNICITY, JUVENILE COURT PROCESSING AND CASE OUTCOMES: FLUCTUATION OR STABILITY? Final Report Submitted to Data Resources Program for 2012: Funding for Analysis of Existing Data National Institute of Justice Award No.: 2012-IJ-CX-0051 March 14, 2014 Michael J. Leiber, Ph.D. Professor and Chair Department of Criminology College of Behavioral and Community Sciences University of South Florida 4202 East Fowler Ave. SOC 107 Tampa, FL 33620 (813) 974-9704 - Office (813) 974-2803 - Fax [email protected] Jennifer H. Peck, Ph.D. School of Criminology & Criminal Justice Florida Atlantic University 777 Glades Road Boca Raton, FL 33431 [email protected] This project was supported by Award No. 2012-IJ-CX-0051, awarded by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. We like to thank the National Center for Juvenile Justice, especially Melissa Sickmund, for their support and use of the Juvenile Court Data Archive (NJCDA), the states and localities that approved access to the data, as well as the data person for providing more detailed data for the Northeast state.
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining the Gaps in White, Black, and Hispanic Violence Since 1990
    ASRXXX10.1177/0003122416635667American Sociological ReviewLight and Ulmer 6356672016 American Sociological Review 2016, Vol. 81(2) 290 –315 Explaining the Gaps in White, © American Sociological Association 2016 DOI: 10.1177/0003122416635667 Black, and Hispanic Violence http://asr.sagepub.com since 1990: Accounting for Immigration, Incarceration, and Inequality Michael T. Lighta and Jeffery T. Ulmerb Abstract While group differences in violence have long been a key focus of sociological inquiry, we know comparatively little about the trends in criminal violence for whites, blacks, and Hispanics in recent decades. Combining geocoded death records with multiple data sources to capture the socioeconomic, demographic, and legal context of 131 of the largest metropolitan areas in the United States, this article examines the trends in racial/ethnic inequality in homicide rates since 1990. In addition to exploring long-established explanations (e.g., disadvantage), we also investigate how three of the most significant societal changes over the past 20 years, namely, rapid immigration, mass incarceration, and rising wealth inequality affect racial/ ethnic homicide gaps. Across all three comparisons—white-black, white-Hispanic, and black- Hispanic—we find considerable convergence in homicide rates over the past two decades. Consistent with expectations, structural disadvantage is one of the strongest predictors of levels and changes in racial/ethnic violence disparities. In contrast to predictions based on strain theory, racial/ethnic wealth inequality has not increased disparities in homicide. Immigration, on the other hand, appears to be associated with declining white-black homicide differences. Consistent with an incapacitation/deterrence perspective, greater racial/ethnic incarceration disparities are associated with smaller racial/ethnic gaps in homicide.
    [Show full text]
  • CRIME and VIOLENCE in CHICAGO a Geography of Segregation and Structural Disadvantage
    CRIME AND VIOLENCE IN CHICAGO a Geography of Segregation and Structural Disadvantage Tim van den Bergh - Master Thesis Human Geography Radboud University, 2018 i Crime and Violence in Chicago: a Geography of Segregation and Structural Disadvantage Tim van den Bergh Student number: 4554817 Radboud University Nijmegen Master Thesis Human Geography Master Specialization: ‘Conflicts, Territories and Identities’ Supervisor: dr. O.T Kramsch Nijmegen, 2018 ii ABSTRACT Tim van den Bergh: Crime and Violence in Chicago: a Geography of Segregation and Structural Disadvantage Engaged with the socio-historical making of space, this thesis frames the contentious debate on violence in Chicago by illustrating how a set of urban processes have interacted to maintain a geography of racialized structural disadvantage. Within this geography, both favorable and unfavorable social conditions are unequally dispersed throughout the city, thereby impacting neighborhoods and communities differently. The theoretical underpinning of space as a social construct provides agency to particular institutions that are responsible for the ‘making’ of urban space in Chicago. With the use of a qualitative research approach, this thesis emphasizes the voices of people who can speak about the etiology of crime and violence from personal experience. Furthermore, this thesis provides a critique of social disorganization and broken windows theory, proposing that these popular criminologies have advanced a problematic normative production of space and impeded effective crime policy and community-police relations. Key words: space, disadvantage, race, crime & violence, Chicago (Under the direction of dr. Olivier Kramsch) iii Table of Contents Chapter 1 - Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 § 1.1 Studying crime and violence in Chicago .................................................................... 1 § 1.2 Research objective ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Theoretical Perspectives on Race and Crime
    Theoretical CHAPTER 3 Perspectives on Race and Crime A wide variety of sociological, psychological, and biological theories have been proposed to explain the underlying causes of crime and its social, spatial, and temporal distribution. All of these theories are based on the assumptions that crime is accurately measured. But when variation in crime patterns and characteristics is partially attributable to unreliability in the measurement of crime, it is impossible to empirically validate the accuracy of competing criminological theories. —Mosher, Miethe, and Hart (2011, p. 205) onsidering the historical and contemporary crime and victimization data and sta- tistics presented in Chapter 2, the logical next question is, What explains the crime patterns of each race? Based on this question, we have formulated two goals for this C chapter. First, we want to provide readers with a rudimentary overview of theory. Second, we want to provide readers with a summary of the numerous theories that have relevance for explaining race and crime. In addition to this, where available, we also discuss the results of tests of the theories reviewed. Last, we also document some of the shortcom- ings of each theory. Decades ago, criminology textbooks devoted a chapter to race and crime (Gabbidon & Taylor Greene, 2001). Today most texts cover the topic, but only in a cursory way. In general, because of the additional focus on race and crime, scholars have written more specialized books, such as this one, to more comprehensively cover the subject. But even in these cases, many authors devote little time to reviewing specific theories related to race and crime (Walker, Spohn, & DeLone, 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Homicide Stud
    NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Homicide Stud. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 February 8. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptPublished NIH-PA Author Manuscript in final edited NIH-PA Author Manuscript form as: Homicide Stud. 2011 August ; 15(3): 268±290. doi:10.1177/1088767911416917. Race/Ethnic-Specific Homicide Rates in New York City: Evaluating the Impact of Broken Windows Policing and Crack Cocaine Markets Preeti Chauhan1, Magdalena Cerdá2, Steven F. Messner3, Melissa Tracy2, Kenneth Tardiff4, and Sandro Galea2 1John Jay College of Criminal Justice, NY, USA 2Columbia University, New York, NY, USA 3University at Albany, State University of New York, NY, USA 4Weill Cornell Medicine College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA Abstract The current study evaluated a range of social influences including misdemeanor arrests, drug arrests, cocaine consumption, alcohol consumption, firearm availability, and incarceration that may be associated with changes in gun-related homicides by racial/ethnic group in New York City (NYC) from 1990 to 1999. Using police precincts as the unit of analysis, we used cross-sectional, time series data to examine changes in Black, White, and Hispanic homicides, separately. Bayesian hierarchical models with a spatial error term indicated that an increase in cocaine consumption was associated with an increase in Black homicides. An increase in firearm availability was associated with an increase in Hispanic homicides. Last, there were no significant predictors for White homicides. Support was found for the crack cocaine hypotheses but not for the broken windows hypothesis. Examining racially/ethnically disaggregated data can shed light on group-sensitive mechanisms that may explain changes in homicide over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Prison Release, Religious and Civic Contexts, and Recidivism Samuel Carlson Thomas IV University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 12-2018 Prison Release, Religious and Civic Contexts, and Recidivism Samuel Carlson Thomas IV University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons, and the Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons Recommended Citation Thomas, Samuel Carlson IV, "Prison Release, Religious and Civic Contexts, and Recidivism" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 3033. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/3033 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Prison Release, Religious and Civic Contexts, and Recidivism A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Sociology by Samuel Thomas University of Arkansas Bachelor of Arts in Criminal Justice, and Sociology, 2014 December 2018 University of Arkansas This thesis is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. _________________________________ Casey Harris, Ph.D Thesis Director _________________________________ ______________________________ Shaun Thomas , Ph.D Rodney Engen, Ph.D Committee Member Committee Member Abstract Under the veil of mass incarceration many of the prisoners will be released, then later readmitted for another crime or parole/probation violations, which falls under the definition of recidivism. Criminologist have attempted to shed light on indicators that explain why some individual prisoners have higher likelihoods than others. I attempt to understand the specific context (at the county level) in which prisoners are released in one point in time and see if the context in which they are released can help explain their likelihoods of recidivating, specifically in the context of religious and civic organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vita
    Curriculum Vita (February 2020) Michael Rocque 265 Pettengill Hall Bates College Lewiston, Maine 04240 Phone: (207) 786-6196 Email: [email protected] ​ EDUCATION 2013 Northeastern University, Boston, MA ​ PhD in Criminology and Justice Policy Dissertation “Understanding the relationship between maturation and ​ desistance: A life-course developmental perspective” Committee: Ineke H. Marshall (chair); Chester L. Britt; Raymond; Paternoster; Helene R. White 2007 The University of Maryland, College Park, MD ​ Masters of Arts in Criminology and Criminal Justice Thesis “The impact of a therapeutic correctional boot camp on social bonds: A ​ randomized comparison” Committee: Doris L. MacKenzie (chair); Raymond Paternoster; Denise C. Gottfredson 2005 The University of Maine, Orono, ME ​ Bachelor of Arts Degree in Sociology CURRENT ACADEMIC POSITION 2019-present Associate Professor Bates College Department of Sociology Faculty Athletic Representative Bates College Athletics Department PAST ACADEMIC POSITIONS Page | 1 2014-2019 Assistant Professor Bates College Department of Sociology PUBLICATIONS JOURNAL ARTICLES (Peer Reviewed) ​ McCuish, E., Lussier, P., and Rocque, M. (Forthcoming). Maturation beyond age: ​ ​ ​ Interrelationships among psychosocial, adult role, and identity maturation and their implications for desistance from crime. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. ​ Wendel, B., Rocque, M, and Posick, C. (Forthcoming). Rethinking self-control and ​ ​ ​ crime: Are all forms of impulsivity criminogenic? European Journal of Criminology. ​ Duwe, G., and Rocque, M. (Forthcoming). The predictive performance of risk ​ ​ assessment in real life: An external validation of the MnSTARR. Corrections: Policy, ​ Practice, and Research. Forrest, W., Hay, C., Widdowson, A., & Rocque, M. (2019). The development of ​ ​ impulsivity and risk-seeking: Implications for the dimensionality and stability of self-control Criminology. 57(3): 512-543.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reciprocal Relationship Between Crime and Neighborhood Structural Characteristics
    UC Irvine UC Irvine Previously Published Works Title A Dynamic View of Neighborhoods: The Reciprocal Relationship between Crime and Neighborhood Structural Characteristics Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0204z868 Journal Social Problems, 57(2) Author Hipp, John R Publication Date 2013-12-10 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California A Dynamic View of Neighborhoods: The Reciprocal Relationship between Crime and Neighborhood Structural Characteristics John R. Hipp, University of California, Irvine Prior research frequently observes a positive cross-sectional relationship between various neighborhood structural characteristics and crime rates, and attributes the causal explanation entirely to these structural char- acteristics. We question this assumption theoretically, proposing a household-level model showing that neighbor- hood crime might also change these structural characteristics. We test these hypotheses using data on census tracts in 13 cities over a ten-year period, and our cross-lagged models generally find that, if anything, crime is the stronger causal force in these possible relationships. Neighborhoods with more crime tend to experience increas- ing levels of residential instability, more concentrated disadvantage, a diminishing retail environment, and more African Americans ten years later. Although we find that neighborhoods with more concentrated disadvantage experience increases in violent and property crime, there is no evidence that residential instability
    [Show full text]
  • Criminological Theory * Means Steffensmeier Is Senior Author
    Criminological Theory * Means Steffensmeier is senior author 2014. Taking Criminal Opportunity Seriously: An Actor-Centered Approach. Challenging Criminological Theory: The Legacy of Ruth Kornhauser (edited by Francis Cullen, Pamela Wilcox, Robert Sampson, and Brendan Dooley). Transaction Publishers. (with Jeffery Ulmer)* 2013. Gender and Twenty-first-Century Corporate Crime: Female Involvement and the Gender Gap in Enron-Era Corporate Frauds. American Sociological Review 78:448-476. (with Jennifer Schwartz, Michael Roche)* 2013. Racial/Ethnic Composition and Violence: Size-of-Place Variations in Percent Black and Percent Latino Effects on Violence Rates. Sociological Forum 28:811-841. (with Ben Feldmeyer) 2014. The Sociological Explanation: The Age and Crime Relationship: Social Variation, Social Explanation. The Nature versus Biosocial Debate in Criminology (Kevin Beaver, J. C. Barnes, Brian Boutwell, eds.). Sage. (with Jeffery Ulmer) 2010. Scope and Conceptual Issues in Testing the Racial Invariance Hypothesis: White, Black, and Hispanic Comparisons. Criminology 48:1133-1169.(with Jeff Ulmer, Ben Feldmeyer, and Casey Harris)* 2007. The nature of female offending: Patterns and explanation. In Female Offenders: Critical Perspectives and Effective Interventions. Edited by Ruth Zaplin. Boston: Jones & Bartlett. (with Jennifer Schwartz)* 2007. Gender and Serious Violence: Untangling the Role of Friendship Sex Composition and Peer Violence. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice 5:235-253 (with Dana Haynie) 2006. Black and White Control of Numbers Gambling A Cultural Assets and Social Capital View. American Sociological Review 71 (1):123-156. (with and Jeffery Ulmer)* 2006. Is There No Place for Culture in a Sociology of Legal and Illegal Enterprise? American Sociological Review 71(1):162-166. (with Jeffery Ulmer) 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • SECTION III Theoretical Perspectives on Race and Crime READING
    SECTION III Theoretical Perspectives on Race and Crime SECTION HIGHLIGHTS · What Is Theory? · Biological Theories on Race and Crime · Sociological Theories on Race and Crime · Summary · Edited Readings y What Is Theory? According to Bohm (2001), “A theory is an explanation” (p. 1). Some theory can be found in practically everything we do. When it comes to explaining crime, just about everyone has an opinion. All of these insights, however, might not qualify as scientific theory. Curran and Renzetti (2001) stated that a scientific theory is “a set of interconnected state- ments or propositions that explain how two or more events or factors are related to one another” (p. 2). Furthermore, scientific theories are usually logically sound and empiri- cally testable. They also help us “expand our knowledge of the world around us and sug- gest systematic solutions to problems we repeatedly confront” (p. 2). Many of the theories reviewed in this chapter fit some of the criteria posed by Curran and Renzetti, whereas others do not—but in our view, they all provide useful insights into race and crime. This section provides a brief introduction to theories that have been applied to racial/ethnic groups and their involvement in crime. For example, we review biological approaches that look to physical features or genetic inheritance to explain 95 96 RACE AND CRIME: A TEXT/READER crime. We also review sociological theories that have their foundations in the American social structure, social processes, or culture. We begin with a review of biological theories and how they have been applied to explain crime committed by racial/ethnic groups.
    [Show full text]