Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Fisseha Berhane Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:58 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: Kirsten Coombs;Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; SabinaTaj; Mavis Ellis;Chao Wu; Jennifer Mallo; Superintendent Subject: [External] Overlooked geographical information: New island being created

1 CAirpON: ThMem^

Dear Board of Education, I would like to bring an important geographical factor that has been continuously overlooked in the redistricting process thus far. The final plan sends the Pointers Run community polygons (64, 1064, 129, 1129)to Swansfield Elementary School. However, this creates a discontiguous attendance area for Swansfield. The polygons in question may appear close to polygons 135 and 1135 on a map (see below), but in fact the Middle Patuxent Environmental Area separates these neighborhoods with over 1000 acres of wooded, undeveloped land. "^-~:r -a- .. 7T~B'?. ^'"^.. V-^ i.-.w. ~;'-. sy;. . A. ^.^V-^'i^... ;Sy ... L. 'i. .,.. ^^. v^^. -^'^_... l;. -'r'. -.. -L^s';^^'.... %i.. ''. r'JPointere Run area (64, 1064, 129, 1129) El I; jte a discontlguous islandwith respect to f ^'jtheSwansnd^EtementarjfSdiool attendance area^, . * ';A r"^ '"'^ . 1

^"l. ". ~'^"'";, Jl; Middle Pahiunt F^''. :, ^:}s^'^''-il-. " jEnvn>nnl8"t9lAfaa' ^ . r^.,^^;^,,. ;^-^rNoro»ds,no houses; \^ ^:-^'^'., 1^^ Notr&al!lifowrtl9uou8!n ^- '^: :-^^^-*i^ ^. tt&nmsoTtransportatton "'^.<"f-'--, ~'ht':;i. ^-' ---*?->!Ty:?-:-': rv ^-. "'?<;. -KI^'>'^. :'.. ;."'.. '..^. t<"^ '. "':J^' '.; l. ;--'s''tfi*.'2"^'

**'«(' -;

3. CurrenlrssittenceSt in Uns area only ^

-... ^. x"''\ ";-; :2. Only tngress/egress to Easl^ Grace Or & Cedar Lane h^1"-"' -3';..r (leads to CCES attendanoa arfta)! ', ''! . . '.

._.. L^ ^^^__^_. _.

While the colored polygons on the map abut each other, it is not really a contiguous area as far as driving is concerned. The only way in or out of our neighborhood to get to Swansfield is at Grace Dr and Cedar Lane, which actually leads into the Clemens Crossing attendance area. If you were to drive from the center of our polygons to the East, you would see that you quickly leave the developed area and then drive several minutes along Grace Dr to Cedar Lane. At that point, you'd pass through many polygons assigned to Clemens Crossing, through many busy 4- way intersections, before reaching Swansfield. In contrast, leaving the Pointers Run neighborhood to the West would pass through one 4-way intersection and require just 2 turns before arriving at PRES. Along the way, you'd pass our community pool, multiple tot lots, and the route of the community July 4th parade.

This appears to be a clear violation of Policy 6010 Section IV.B. 2. b regarding community stability and contiguous neighborhoods. I sincerely hope you will consider re-examining the decision to move these polygons. The final few work sessions appeared very rushed, and it appears many similar issues have been raised with the final plan. I believe more time is needed to ensure the board members have accurate data and can fully discuss some of the severe ramifications of these decisions. Thank you for the continuing effort. We know this process has been long and difficult, but it's critical to get it right. Thousands of children's lives are being affected.

Sincerely, Polygon: 1064

Fisseha Berhane, PhD Senior Data Scientist Website: httD://datascience-enthusiast. com/ Cell: 571-623-4632 1801 Porter Street, Baltimore, MD

\/whe

ASCEN71A Marilyn Grosskopf

From: sridhar chandupatla Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:57 PM To: BoE Email; Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle

! CAUTION:This email originated from outside of HCPSS.Do not click links or open attachments, unlessyou recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thankful to BOEmembers for unanimously passinga motion to move Polygon 189 backto PRES.

BOE'soriginal decision to move Polygon 189 from PRESand CMSto DOAS and LKSwas due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRESand CMSto DOASand LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to addressthe correction of moving Polygon 189 backfrom Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are less than 20 students proposed to go into Lime Kiln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impacton any ofthe FARMor Capacitynumbers, aswe are lessthan 20 kidsgoing to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary population is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacity.

2. KeepingCommunities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMScommunity and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1.3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereasthe proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6.8 miles awayfrom Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement supporting our request is attachedfor reference and consideration.

5. By keeping Polygon 189 at CMS, there are no impacts to FAMR numbers.

Thank you for your consideration. Marilyn Grosskopf

From: rupalimarathe Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:57 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting; Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs;Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont- Small; Jennifer Malta; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu Subject: [External] Subject: Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle Attachments: FARM Numbers. jpg

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not cUcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Board of Education Members, Wegreatly appreciated all seven BOE members for unanimously passinga motion to move Polygon 189 backto PRES. BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are a micro feed less than 20 students proposed to go Into Lime Klln Middle. Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending forthe school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight. 1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impacton anyof the FARM or Capacitynumbers, aswe are lessthan 20 kidsgoing to Clarksville middjeschool. Our existing elementary ooou/adon /s a/so dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacity

2. By keeping Polvaon 189at CMSnot only help to reduce the cost. time and resources of County'sTransporfatjon Division, but also greatly reducetravel time, reduce traffic blocks and enhancethe safetyof kids. 3. Keeping Communities together- Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

4. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and iead times - Clarksvilie Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

5. Clarksville Middle School PTAposition statementsupDortina our request is attachedfor reference and consideration.

6. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS. there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached).

Thank you for your consideration.

Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device FARM FARM FARM Mlttdte School Capactty Aug 22 Nov 19 Change Bonnle Branch MS 701 27% i^Al'. BurieitfiManor MS 779 u% 0.27 ClarltsvllleMS 643 U9t t. t. *fe3; Dunloggln MS SS5 16% ..:-5' ElkrtdgeLanding MS 779 26% 120: ancottMffltMs 701 im FtrilyQuarter MS 662 <5» Slenwood MS 545 ASS Hammon!l MS »3.79'

Harpers Choice MS 506 31M * '" !.'. ^..' Uke EWthomMS 643 ii. U> UmeKUnMS 721 <5% Mayfleld Woods MS 798 41% ; 2.7;: Mount View MS <5« Murray HIMMS Oakland Milk MS SUB l^. PatapscoMS 643 PiituxentValley MS 760 33% l^..Vi MS 701 3896 ^. Oi WlldelakeMS 721 38% J6.5SS Marilyn Grosskopf

From: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:54 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle

! CAUTION:This emaUoriginated from outside ofHCPSS. Do notcUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thankful to BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES. BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are tess than 20 students proposed to go into Lime Klln Middle. Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight. 1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189at the Clarksville MiddleSchool will have no negative or adverse impacton anyof the FARM or Capacitynumbers, as we are fessthan 20 kkls goingto Clarksville mlddie_schQol. Our existing elementary Dopulation is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacity 2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuityfor Children and avoiding increasedtransportation costs and lead times - Clarksville MiddleSchool is less than 1. 3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarkswlle Middle School PTA oosition statement suooortinaour request

5. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS. there are no impacts to FAMR numbers^aswe can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers /attached). Thank you for your consideration.

Miao liu Dear Board of Education,

I would like to bring an important geographical factor that has been continuously overlooked in the redistricting process thus far. The final plan sends the Pointers Run community polygons (64, 1064, 129, 1129) to Swansfield Elementary School. However, this creates a discontiguous attendance area for Swansfield. The polygons in question may appear close to polygons 135 and 1135 on a map (see below), but in fact the Middle Patuxent Environmental Area separates these neighborhoods with over 1000 acres of wooded, undeveloped land.

Pointers Run area (64, 1064, 129, 1129) is a discontiguous island with respect to the Swansfield Elementary School attendance area.

ci-s

1. Middle Patuxent EnvironmentalArea: No roads, no houses; Not realty contiguous in terms of transportation

4. Only Ingress/egress to West: Summer Sunrise & Great Star (leads to PRES attendance area)

CCES

PRES 3. Current residences in this area only

2. Only ingress/egress to East: Grace Or & Cedar Lane (leads to CCES attendance area)|

While the colored polygons on the map abut each other, it is not really a contiguous area as far as driving is concerned. The only way in or out of our neighborhood to get to Swansfield is at Grace Dr and Cedar Lane, which actually leads into the Clemens Crossing attendance area. If you were to drive from the center of our polygons to the East, you would see that you quickly leave the developed area and then drive several minutes aiong Grace Dr to Cedar Lane. At that point, you'd pass through many polygons assigned to Clemens Crossing, through many busy 4-way intersections, before reaching Swansfield. In contrast, leaving the Pointers Run neighborhood to the West would pass through one 4- way intersection and require just 2 turns before arriving at PRES. Along the way, you'd pass our community pool, multiple tot lots, and the route of the community July 4th parade.

This appears to be a clear violation of Policy 6010 Section IV. B. 2. b regarding community stability and contiguous neighborhoods. I sincerely hope you will consider re-examining the decision to move these polygons. The final few work sessions appeared very rushed, and it appears many similar issues have been raised with the final plan. I believe more time is needed to ensure the board members have accurate data and can fully discuss some of the severe ramifications of these decisions.

Thank you for the continuing effort. We know this process has been long and difficult, but it's critical to get it right. Thousands of children's lives are being affected.

Sincerely, Meerim Kanatbek, Polygon 64. Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Alans Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:57 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu Subject: [External] RE: Ashleigh Knolls Redistricting

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside of HCPSS.Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello,

I am sure you have heard quite often from our neighborhood.You are splitting up a great thingstarting at PRES.The kids nowwill only have a 15%feed from Clarksville to AHS. Halfwaythrough the dayyesterday we were slated to go to RHHS as expected. We are now being pushed back again to AHS. What is going on here?

We have no voice here? The polygon 128 seems to get favoritism for some reason. They were moved into the PRES district years backwhich overcrowded the school. They are nowgetting treated far better than polygons 117/1117. It seems someone is taking care of them here. It was stated that Polygon 128 is a big part of PRES and must be kept with the students basethere. Well Ashleigh Knolls in Clarksville is and hasalways been a large part of PRESand deserves a fair shakewhen it keeps the kidstogether with their peers. Pleaseexplain to me whythis is happening.We need answers or a better resolution.

Alan

Alan Strott Operations Director/ Sales Director Novo Trading LLC. 6822 Oak Hall Lane Suite B Columbia, MD 21045 410. 381. 5500 office 301. 807. 5683 mobile www.novobeads.com

From: Alans novobeads. com> Sent: Friday, November 15, 2019 11:18 AM To: 'redistricting@)hcpss. org' hcoss. org> Cc: mavis_ellis@)hcpss.org' ; 'kirsten coombs@)hcoss.ore' ; [email protected]' hcoss.ore>; 'Christina delmont-small@)hcoss.ore' ;'jennifer_mallo(®hcpss. org' hcoss.orB>; 'sabina_taj@)hcpss.org' : 'chao_wu@)hcpss. org' Subject: RE:Ashleigh Knolls Redistricting

Hello,

Our polygons (117/1117) need your help in keeping with the RHHS redistricting. We cannot be the lone soldiers of the Pointers Run students to be kept at AHS. Our children deserve to join their friends and student base in the move. I find it interestingthat this is all changedat the last minute and favoritism given to larger neighborhoods. Eithersomething shady is going on or someone is helping out friends. We all along were to be moved with the other PRES students and now blindsided at the very last minute.

Alan Strott Operations Director/ Sales Director Novo Trading LLC. 6822 Oak Hall Lane Suite B Columbia, MD 21045 410. 381. 5500 office 301. 807. 5683 mobile www.novobeads.com

From: Alans Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 12:00 PM To: 'redistricting@hcpss. org' Cc: 'mavis_ellis@)hcpss. org' ; 'kirsten coombs@hcoss. org' ; 'vicky_cutroneo@hcpss. org' ; 'Christina delmont-small@hcoss. ore' ; 'Jennifer mallo@)hcoss. org' ; 'sabina_taj@>hcpss. org' ; 'chao wu@hcpss. orB' Subject: Ashleigh Knolls Redistricting

Hello,

It has come to my attention yesterday that the student population ofAshleigh Knolls in Clarksville will be not be moved to River Hill as originally expected. This decision is not good for our children who have been with their classmates now for 6 years, plus 3 more in middle school. Please please take this into consideration. Thank you in advance.

Alan

Alan Strott Operations Director/Sales Director Novo Trading LLC. 6822 Oak Hall Lane Suite B Columbia, MD 21045 410. 381. 5500 office 301. 807. 5683 mobile www. novobeads. com Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Bhagyashree Sane Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:54 PM Subject: [External] 1171 - Westmount - Please do not move our polygon

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe.

Dear Board of Education Members and our elected officials,

OnNovember 18th, the BoE unanimouslypassed a motion to move Polygon 1171 and 171 toFQMS andGHS.

1. Island - PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE ARE NO KIDS IN POLYGON 171 TODAY. This means that the way you are usingpolygon 171 to connect us (polygon 1171) to GHS, FQMS and TRES is WRONG.We'll become island because 171 is going to be fannland in near fatoire. Nearest polygon that goes to GHS is 5 miles away from our community. If you value maintaming sense of community, this plan which makes us isolated on island, is tearingus apart from our neighboringcommunities. In your plan, we will no longer live near our schools which was a minimum expectation we had from this redistricting.

2. We feel heartbroken after seeing sequence of events that happenedduring BOE sessions for our polygon 1171.

On work session V - moved us 1171 to GHS from MRHS On work session VI - moved us 1171 back to MRHS On work session D( - first time motion failed to move 1171 to GHS On work session DC - another motion and this time moved our middle school now On work session DC - yet another motion and this time moved 1171 to GHS and middle school change - at the very end

Polygons are not objects to play with them like this and we have no chance to protest with this very last minute changes.

3. Longer commute - We are very far away from all these 3 schools.

Distance to TRES = 6. 2 miles Distance to FQMS = 6. 5 miles Distance to GHS =8. 1 miles

The decision BOB made in 2017 was wrong. There was no one in 1171 at that time to raise concerns about moving 1171 to TRES. But now you are makingmore wrong decisionsbased on one wrongdecision that was made in 2017. This is not fair at all. Please do not do this to our kids. Our kids will be very much stressed our due to longer commutes. I cannotimagine the sfa'essmy current freshmandaughter will go through once she starts drivingto this far awayhigh school.

4. Tiny feed for HS - If you keep us at MRHS, we are very tiny feed for HS today and we'll be very tiny feed as per BOE projections in 2024-25.

For ES andMS, we agreethat we are not tiny feeds. But there are otherpolygons that you can look at who are

1 closer to these ES, MS and HS who will not be impacted in terms of commute as much as we'll be impacted. Also you can explore the option ofmoving us to the new ES that is comingin near future in TurfValley.

5. Keeping Connnunities together - Since all surrounding communities around Polygon 1171 are involved in MWES,MVMS and MRHS, we would like to join them instead ofjoining communities who are more than 6 miles away from us.

6. On personal note, after giving a lot of thought, our family moved from Centennial school district to MRHS district sinceMRHS is under-utilized school andwe did not wantto contribute the overcrowdingissue at CHS. I am not saying you shouldreward us for our proactive actions, but at least do not penalize our kids by making them travel too far away. From bottom of our heart, we request you to correct prior Board's decision from 2017 and let us stay with our neighboringcommunities.

Thankyou for your cooperation.

Bhagyashree Rajpafhak Westmount - POLYGON 1171 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Mythrai Sangem Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:56 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Please KEEP Polygon 189 at Clarksville Middle School Attachments: CMS PTA Letter.jpg; FARM Numbers.jpg

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Board of Education Members,

We greatly appreciated all seven BOB members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are a micro feed less than 20 students proposed to go into Lime Kiln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019-20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary population is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacity.

2. By keeping Polygon 189 at CMS not only help to reduce the cost, time and resources of County's Transportation Division, but also greatly reduce travel time, reducetraffic blocks and enhancethe safety of kids.

3. Keeping Communities together Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community. 4. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 iniles away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6.8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

5. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement supporting our request is attached for reference and consideration.

6. By keepingPolygon 189at CMS, there areno impacts to FARMnumbers, aswe can seefrom the attached BOB FARM numbers (attached).

Thankyou for your consideration.

KOtmON STATtWWT

ocwtwxx. aott

Clartevftte Wddle Sdwrt Parent Teach jr Assoctatfcm Posttiwi Statwnent «t»nftated Augiat 20.

*<»OT^ to Uw»H3dMd5TA the mteton of our PTSAti to awort »«»*?wk oft faehrtf of dta<»»nfti^w-tdiBol, In the cummunl^, aid tNtare tewfnn»cnt bctfe* andattw wawwatton* urn nato

1. It (t twt dwr. ho»ww. that wMenw supportt mo»int ttudents mit at ttietrcomnNintUataadAtasi yifeauri. Soctoecan

2. AnyrodWrtethi|&ident», whoare abte to waft to OukwlUe <»»dport-ft1enitt, fltbBr(>M»ttt, t»Aen. aiimtd^ )»d admWttrrtwt-tenm them vutoemhte durtnt a alUaAttoetnttefrdwetopmei*. HoimdCcurtyhunoenttylnawNd rttenUwiandntiounatinmentrthmWt. FiBic(nBC«ldn»ito»aowto«

4. 6ene CBffliBentttMtAUieprocMiofni

(nato) , moi'ethouBlttMpF ocuBO«tBCbtan^iaMn|. B be tovolwd to how tmindMiu are nMbwn. We unde tt nsdawfctlng wRlNwm btf thearnmt pmpan ftuai prwhw pnipctewhl* hwe town a mt «>r .nd commw^y toput owr die p^ tm ywn. b. rf mHiUrktKl rtudntti riwuU te ^MR a irtrtnum «rftw

c* FARM FARM FARM Mlitdte School Capacity Aug 22 Nov 19 Change Sonnte Branch MS 7DI 27% 13.41' SurtefghManor MS 779 u» 0.27 ClaiksullleMS 643 12% 11.W; Dunloggln MS 565 16% . S7i Elto-ldgeLanding MS 779 26% It.' EIBcott Mills MS 701 10% Folly Quarter MS G6Z <596 Glenwootf MS 545 0.68 Hammond MS 604 26» (3.79! HarpersChoice MS 506 31% Lake Bfihorn MS 643 U. 15,, Ume Ktln MS 721 <5« Mayfrld Woods MS 798 i2^: Mount View MS 798 <5% Murray Hill MS 662 33K ^3.36; Oal0»nd Mills MS sos 44K . us' Patapsco MS 643 18% |B31; Paluitent Valley MS 760 33% Thomas Vtadud MS 701 >4.0' Wilde take MS 721 38% J6.5A} Marilyn Grosskopf

From: sridhar chandupatla Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:56 PM To: BoE Email; Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Immediate Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thankful to BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

BOE'soriginal decision to move Polygon 189 from PRESand CMSto DOASand LKSwas due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are less than 20 students proposed to go into Lime Kiln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Caparity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary population is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacity.

2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1.3 miles away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles awayfrom Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement supporting our request is attached for reference and consideration.

5. By keeping Polygon 189 at CMS, there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached).

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sent from my iPhone Marilvn Grosskoof

From: Scan Diamond Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:55 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Sabina Taj; Mavis Ellis; Chao Wu; Jennifer Mallo; Superintendent Subject: [External] Overlooked geographical information: New island being created

: CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education,

I wouldlike to bring animportant geographical factorthat has been continuously overlooked inthe redistricting process thus far. The final plan sends the Pointers Run community polygons (64, 1064, 129, 1129)to SwansfieldElementary School. However, this creates a discontiguous attendancearea for Swansfield.The polygons in question may appear close to polygons 135 and 1135 on a map (see below), but in fact the Middle Patuxent Environmental Area separates these neighborhoods with over 1000 acres of wooded, undeveloped land. Pointers Run area (64, 1064, 129, 1129) is a discontiguous island with respect to the Swansfield Elementary School attendance area.

CES

1. Middle Patuxent EnvironmentalArea: No roads, no houses; Not really contiguous in terms of transportation

4. Only ingress/egress to West: Summer Sunrise & Great Star (leads to PRESattendance area)

CCES

PRES 3. Current residences in this area only

2. Only ingress/egress to East: Grace Dr & Cedar Lane (leads to CCESattendance area)

Whilethe colored polygons on the map abut each other, it is not really a contiguous area as tar as driving is concerned. The only way in or out of our neighborhood to get to Swansfield is at Grace Dr and Cedar Lane, whichactually leads into the Clemens Crossing attendancearea. If you were to drive from the center of our polygons to the East, you would see that you quickly leave the developed area and then drive several minutes along Grace Dr to Cedar Lane. At that point, you'd pass through many polygons assigned to Clemens Crossing, through many busy 4-way intersections, before reaching Swansfield. In contrast, leaving the Pointers Run neighborhoodto the Westwould pass through one 4-wayintersection andrequire just 2 turns before arriving at PRES.Along the way, you'd pass our community pool, multiple tot lots, andthe route ofthe community July 4th parade.

This appearsto be a clear violation of Policy 6010 Section IV.B.2.b regarding commumty stability and contiguousneighborhoods. I sincerelyhope you will considerre-examining the decisionto move these polygons. The final few work sessions appeared very mshed, and it appears many similar issues have been raised with the final plan. I believe more time is needed to ensure the board members have accurate data and can fally discuss some of the severe ramificationsof these decisions.

Thankyou for the continuing effort. We knowthis process has been long and difficult, but it's critical to get it right. Thousands of children's lives are being affected. Sincerely,

Sean Diamond Polygon 129 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Alans Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:57 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu Subject: [External] RE:Ashleigh Knolls Redistricting

! CAUTION:This email originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not cUcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello,

I am sure you have heard quite often from our neighborhood. You are splitting up a great thing starting at PRES. The kids nowwill only havea 15%feed from Clarksville to AHS. Halfwaythrough the dayyesterday we were slated to goto RHHS as expected. We are now being pushed back again to AHS. What is going on here?

We have no voice here? The polygon 128 seems to get favoritism for some reason. They were moved into the PRES district years backwhich overcrowded the school. They are nowgetting treated far better than polygons 117/1117. It seems someone is taking care of them here. It was stated that Polygon 128 is a big part of PRES and must be kept with the students base there. Well Ashleigh Knolls in Clarksville is and has always been a large part of PRES and deserves a fairshake when it keepsthe kidstogether with their peers. Please explainto me whythis is happening.We need answers or a better resolution.

Alan

Alan Strott Operations Director/ Sales Director Novo Trading LLC. 6822 Oak Hall Lane Suite B Columbia, MD 21045 410. 381. 5500 office 301. 807. 5683 mobile www. novobeads. com

From: Alans Sent: Friday, November 15, 2019 11:18 AM To: '[email protected]' Cc: mavis_ellis@hcpss. org' ; 'kirsten_coombs@)hcpss. org' ; vicky_cutroneo@hcpss. org'; 'christina_delmont-small@hcpss. org';'jennifer_mallo(Bhcpss. org'hcpss. org>; 'sabina_taj(a)hcpss. org' ; 'chao_wu@)hcpss. org' Subject: RE: Ashleigh Knolls Redistricting

Hello,

Our polygons (117/1117) need your help in keeping with the RHHS redistricting. We cannot be the lone soldiers ofthe Pointers Run students to be kept at AHS. Our children deserve to join their friends and student base in the move. I find it interesting that this is all changedat the last minute and favoritism given to larger neighborhoods. Eithersomething shady is going on or someone is helping out friends. We all along were to be moved with the other PRESstudents and now blindsided at the very last minute.

Alan Strott Operations Director/ Sales Director Novo Trading LLC. 6822 Oak Hall Lane Suite B Columbia, MD 21045 410. 381. 5500 office 301. 807. 5683 mobile www.novobeads.com

From: Alans novobeads. com> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 12:00 PM To: 'redistricting@)hcpss. org' Cc: 'mavis_ellis(a>hcpss. org' hcpss. ore>; 'kirsten_coombs@)hcpss. org' ; 'vicky_cutroneo@>hcpss. org' ; 'christina_delmont-small@lhcpss. org' ; 'jennifer_mallo(ahcpss. org' ; 'sabina_taj(a>hcpss. org' ; 'chao wuOhcpss. org' Subject: Ashleigh Knolls Redistricting

Hello,

It has come to my attention yesterday that the student population ofAshleigh Knolls in Clarksville will be not be moved to River Hill asoriginally expected. Thisdecision is notgood for our children who have been with their classmates now for 6 years, plus 3 more in middle school. Please please take this into consideration. Thankyou in advance.

Alan

Alan Strott Operations Director/ Sales Director Novo Trading LLC. 6822 Oak Hall Lane Suite B Columbia, MD 21045 410. 381. 5500 office 301. 807. 5683 mobile www. novobeads. com Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Xiang Yu Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:55 PM To: BoE Email; Hcpss Redistricting;Christina Delmont-Small;Vicky Cutroneo; SabinaTaj; Chao Wu; Kirsten Coombs; Jennifer Mallo; Mavis Ellis Subject: [External] Polyon 296/1296: Keep a FAIR feed from CMS to AHS or Move to RHHS

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear BOE members,

I live in Polygon 296 and 1296, District 4. Some of our neighbors attended your meeting yesterday.

Your work in the last few days has created anextremely unfair situation for people like us who have not beenmoved but beenisolated by the flurry of changes.

Ourcommunity is small. Only 10 kidsin eachgrade in high school. How could the 10 kids fit into a high school, where eachgrade hasan average of365 stodents? My soncomplained that everybody he knows from PRES andCMS will move awayby this redistricting when he reaches high school in 2 years.

Sincethis plan constructed by BoE only in the last fewdays is differentfrom the earlier proposed feasibUity study, superintendent's plan md even earlierMs. Mallo's plan. All the adults we talked to thinkthe latest one is the worst for us. But still manypeople in our community maynot have hada chance to be aware of such change. Wenever havea chanceto speakup. It is UNFAIR.

Thecurrent has a balancedfeed from 4 differentmiddle schools, including Clarksville MS, Hammond MS, MurrayHill MS, andWilde Lake MS. The feed from ClarksviUeMS to AtholtonHS has never been below 27% sinceearly 2000 (maybe 2003). The sufficient feed from CMS andbalanced feed from the other 3 middle schools have made Atholton a great school. In this redistricting, we urge you to be FAIR, and keep a minimum of 25% ofCMS feed to AHS.

Ifthat is notpossible, please consider move ourpolygons to MfflS so that the 10high school kids from ourpolygons in eachgrade can keep their fiiendship.

Ourpolygons are surroundedby high way 32 to thenorth. Middle Patuxent River to theeast, JohnsHopkin's Applied Research Lab to the south. Our only connection is to the west through Guilford Road, after a short very distance on Samier road, which used to be Guilford road before road realigmnent).

While you have not reassigned our community, the outcome for us is worse than any existing plan circulated because reduction of CMSto AHS feedto 15%.Due to proximity,we car pool withfnends on Guilford Road. Now we are pretty much isolated as all (he polygons on our drive to PRES/CMS are reassigned to RHHS except us.

In 2 years, my son will complete his middle school in CMS, then he will lose almost all his fiiends as most of them moves to REIHS rather thanhis AHS. He is a naturally shyboy, who is not easyto make newfnends. It would be even harderin high school. But compare to my neighbor Mei Han's daughter, he might be actually the luckier one.

My neighbor Mei Han's daughter is a 9th grader in Atholton HS. In your work session, you moved aU her fiiends out other cmrent school. Shehas been redistricted at elementary school level and at middle school level. Although herparents never moved ourhouse, she has suffered and lost her friends twice in her 10 years of schooling in HCPSS.

This time, you moved all her friends out and leave her as a small feed fiom CMS to AHS.....

Nowtfae ClarksviUe Middle School (CMS) feedto AtholtonHigh School (AHS) has decreased to exactly 15%,according to your document. 6%just moved into the PRES-CMS-AHS feed last year. The actual feed for kids making CMS AHS transition could only be 9% when considering fi-iendship.

Pleaserealize the impact of your last minute decisions to peoplethat is notpart ofmoved polygons.

1 I urge you to vote NO to the current proposal of work session 9 until our concern is addressed.

Sincerely,

Xiang Yu Dear Board of Education,

The final plan sends the Pointers Run community polygons (64, 1064, 129, 1129) to Swansfield Elementary School. However, this creates an island. The polygons in question may appear close to polygons 13p5 and 1135 on a map (see below), but in fact the Middle Patuxent Environmental Area separates these neighborhoods with over 1000 acres of wooded, undeveloped land. In reality, the neighborhoods are not at all connected.

Polntere Run area (64, 1064, 129, 1129) Is a discontlguous island with respect to the Swansfield Elementary School attendance area.

CES

1. Middle Patuxant Environmental Area: No roads, no houses; Not really contiguous In temns of bansportation

4. Only ingress/egress to West Summer Sunrise & Great Star (leads to PRES attendance area)

CCES

PRES 3. Cunf fln1 residences In this area only

2. Only ingress/egress to East: Grace Or & Cedar Lane fleads to CCESattendance area)

The only way in or out of our neighborhood to get to Swansfield is at Grace Dr and Cedar Lane, which actually leads into the Clemens Crossing attendance area. To get to Swansfiled from our house, we would pass through at least 10 other polygons (counting only those polygons on the West side of Cedar Lane). We pass 2 polygons to get to Pointers Run.

This attendance area is inconsistent with Policy 6010 Section IV.B. 2. b regarding community stability and contiguous neighborhoods. I sincerely hope you wilt consider re-examining the decision to move these polygons. The final few work sessions appeared very rushed, and it appears many similar issues have been raised with the final plan. I believe more time is needed to ensure the board members have accurate data and canfully discuss some of the severe ramifications of these decisions.

Thank you for the continuing effort. We know this process has been long and difficult, but it's critical to get it right. Thousands of children's lives are being affected.

Sincerely, Michelle McGeogh Polygon 1064 J^arilynjGrosskopf

From: Wang Jie Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:54 PM To: Vicky Cutroneo; Sabina Taj; Hcpss Redistricting; Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Jennifer Mallo; Christina Delmont-Small; Chao Wu Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do aotcUck links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thankful to BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

BOE's original decisionto move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LK.S was due to bad and inaccurate dataprovided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unforhinately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kih) to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are less than 20 students proposed to so into Lime Kiln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019-20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189at the CIarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids soine to Clarksville middle school. Our existins elementary population is also dispersed evenly K- S andwill not cause disruption to CMS capacitv.

2. Keeping Communities together -- Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for ChUdren and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1 . 3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereas the proposed LimeKiln middle school is 6.8 miles awayfrom Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10minute round trip commute daily for_ow children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School. 4. Clarksville Middle SchoolPTA position statement supportins our request is attachedfor reference and consideration.

5. By keepins Polvson 189 at CMS. there are no impacts to FAMRnumbers, aswe can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers fattached). Thank you for your consideration.

Yours Sincerely, Joyce Marilyn Grosskopf

From: irenevane Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:54 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] 117/1117 AHS small feed

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. Howard County Board of Education Members,

Please consider moving 128 back to AHS from RHHS and 117/1117 back to RHHS from AHS as it was originally planned. When you made this swap, you created a smaller feed from CMSto AHS and created an island. All three polygonsare part of the PRESand CMS community and are made up of similar demographics. The differences is polygon 128 is much larger than 117/1117. Removing 128 from AHS had a larger impact on feed than moving 117/1117 back into AHS.

Thank you for your consideration, Irene Vane 1117 JVIarilyn Grosskopf

From: ShivakumarPeddi Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:54 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. Dear BoE Members,

We greatly appreciate you all for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES. Unfortunately, the BoE forgot to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from LKMS to CMS. Request: Pleaseconsider keepingPolygon 189kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS- Keeping Polygon 189at the CMSwill have no negative or adverse impact on anyof the FARM or Utilization.

2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - CMS is less than 1. 3 miles away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a longer commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polyflon-189 kids will go pass CMS to go to the LKMS.

4. Also, Dr. Wu stated in hisjustification that a newcommunity is coming online on Great Star Dr. in the coming years, and BoE needs to make room for them. We know our's is new community but our kids have been going to this school for 2 yearsand we haveto moveto makea wayfor housesthat aren't even builtyet. If BOEhas to make a room, whynot move a polygon's from the zoned areas that is by LKMS and also consider assigning the new community to be built to LKMS instead of breaking the relation with the school which kids already established.

Sincerely, Polygon 189 Resident, Dear Board of Education,

I would like to bring an important geographical factor that has been continuously overlooked in the redistricting process thus far. The final plan sends the Pointers Run community polygons (64, 1064, 129, 1129) to Swansfield Elementary School. However, this creates a discontiguous attendance area for Swansfield. The polygons in question may appear close to polygons 135 and 1135 on a map (see below), but in fact the Middle Patuxent Environmental Area separates these neighborhoods with over 1000 acres of wooded, undeveloped land.

Pointers Run area (64, 1064, 129, 1129) is a discontiguous island with respect to the Swansfleld Elementary School attendance area.

CES

1. Middle Patuxent EnvironmentalArea: No roads, no houses; Not really contiguous In terms of transportation

4. Only ingress/egress to West: Summer Sunrise & Great Star (leads to PRES attendance area)

CCES

PRES 3. Current readences in this area only

2. Only ingress/egress to East: Grace Dr & Cedar Lane (leads to CCES attendance area))

While the colored polygons on the map abut each other, it is not really a contiguous area as far as driving is concerned. The only way in or out of our neighborhood to get to Swansfield is at Grace Dr and Cedar Lane, which actually leads into the Clemens Crossing attendance area. If you were to drive from the center of our polygons to the East, you would see that you quickly leave the developed area and then drive several minutes along Grace Drto Cedar Lane. At that point, you'd pass through many polygons assigned to Clemens Crossing, through many busy 4-way intersections, before reaching Swansfield. In contrast, leaving the Pointers Run neighborhood to the West would pass through one 4- way intersection and require just 2 turns before arriving at PRES. Along the way, you d pass our community pool, multiple tot lots, and the route of the community July 4th parade.

This appears to be a clear violation of Policy 6010 Section IV. B. 2. b regarding community stability and contiguous neighborhoods. I sincerely hope you will consider re-examining the decision to move these polygons. The final few work sessions appeared very rushed, and it appears many similar issues have been raised with the final plan. I believe more time is needed to ensure the board members have accurate data and can fully discuss some of the severe ramifications of these decisions.

Thank you for the continuing effort. We know this process has been long and difficult, but it's critical to get it right. Thousands of children's lives are being affected.

Sincerely,

Amy Becker Polygon 64 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: mahendra marathe Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 3:43 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting; Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs;Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont- Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu Subject: [External] MotionNeeded: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle Attachments: FARM Numbers. jpg

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Board of Education Members, We greatly appreciated all seven BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 backto PRES. BOE'soriginal decision to move Polygon 189 from PRESand CMSto DOASand LKSwas dueto bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 backfrom Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are a micro feed less than 20 students prooosed to oo mto Lime Klln Middle. Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight. 1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on anyof the FARM or Capacitynumbers, as we are less than 20 kidsgoing to Clarksville middle school. Our existingelementary Dooulatlon is alsodispersed evenly K- 5 andwill notcause disruption to CMScapacff^,

2. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS not only help to reduce the cost. time and resources o/County's Transportation Division, but also greatly reduce travel time, reduce traffic blocks and enhancethe safetyof kids. 3. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMScommunity and should remain with CMS community.

4. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

5. Clarksvllle Middle School PTA position statement suoport/noour request is attachedfor reference andconsideration. 6. BY keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS. there are no impactsto FAMRnumbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached).

Thank you for your consideration. Polygon 189 Reside nt-Citizen FABM FARM FARM Middle School Capactty Aug ZZ Nov 19 Change Bonnie Branch MS 701 27% 13.41' Burieltfi ManorMS 779 ux O.Z7 ClafksvtlleMS 643 12% 11.46) Dunloggln MS SB5 i:. y, ElkrldgeLanding MS 779 26X ilOli BlteottMIUsMS 701 10» FollyQuarter MS 662 GlenwoodMS 545 0.68 Hammond MS 604 26K . 3.W; HarpnisCholMMS 506 31» I-If Lake Bkhom MS 643 . 3.11! Unna Krin MS 721 <5« MayfleldWoods MS 73S (2,7; Mount View MS Tsa <5S6 Murray Hill MS GSZ 33K iS. 36' Oakland MllltMS 506 . ». PatapscoMS 64S 18» 3.3^'

PatuxentValley MS 760 33» 1.3..S} Thomas Vladuct MS 701 M.OS) Wilde lake MS 721 38% 16.54, J\flarilyn Grosskopf

From: Marcella Wilson Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:51 PM To: Superintendent; Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu; Hcpss Redistricting; cbball@howardcountymd. gov Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thankful to BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES. BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are tess than 20 studentssroposed to ao into Lime Kiln Middle. Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as theyare attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary Dopulatlon is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacity.. 2. Keeping Communities together - Polvaon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding Increasedtransportation costs and lead limes - Clarksville Middle School is toss than 1. 3 miles away from Polvaon 189. whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 milesawa^ from Polvaon 189. This createsa 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute dailyfor our children. Moreover, based on the orocosed move to LKMS.our Polvaon 189kids will go pass Clarksville Middle Schoolto go to the Lime Klln Middle School.

4. Clarksvllle Middle School PTA position statement suDportlna our request Is attached for referenceand^ consideration.

5. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS. there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached). Thank you for your consideration.

Dr. Marcella Wilson JVIarilyn Grosskopf

From: Tara Mahanti Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:51 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Please ReconsiderSmall Feed of Polygon 1018/18

! CAUTION: TUs emafl originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. As of last night's work session, Polygon 1018/18 are changed from Hammond Elementary/Hammond Middle to Guilford Elementary/Patuxent Valley. I am askingif you can please re-look atthis area. Thiscreates a very small feed ofstudents that will attend Guilford and move onto Patuxent. It is breaking up the Huntington neighborhood. Ifyou could at least consider moving 1018/18 to Bollman Bridge which makes a larger feed to Patuxent Valley middle. Or re-look at the large amount of Fulton that was put into Hammond to overcrowd it, essentially pushingout our tiny polygon. This also decreases FARMSsignificantly for HESfrom 25%to 13%and raises Guilford which will put more demands on an already needy school. PLEASE look at the numbers and do not make the children in 1018/18 suffer. Thank you, Tara Mahanti Dear Board of Education,

I would like to bring an important geographical factor that has been continuously overlooked in the redistricting process thus far. The final plan sends the Pointers Run community polygons (64, 1064, 129, 1129) to Swansfield Elementary School. However, this creates a discontiguous attendance area for Swansfield. The polygons in question may appear close to polygons 135 and 1135 on a map (see below), but in fact the Middle Patuxent Environmental Area separates these neighborhoods with over 1000 acres of wooded, undeveloped land.

Pointers Run area (64, 1064, 129, 1129) is a discontjguous island with respect to the Swansfield Elementary School attendance area.

CES

j!

1. Middle Patuxent EnvironmentalArea: No roads, no houses; Not feally contiguous In terms of transportation

4. Only ingress/egress to West: Summer Sunrise & Great Star (leads to PRESattendance area)

CCES

PRES 3. Current residences in this area only \ 2. Only ingress/egress to East: Grace Dr & Cedar Lane (leads to CCES attendance area)

While the colored polygons on the map abut each other, it is not really a contiguous area as far as driving is concerned. The only way in or out of our neighborhoodto getto Swansfieldis at Grace Drand CedarLane, which actually leads into the Clemens Crossing attendance area. If you were to drive from the center of our polygons to the East, you would see that you quickly leave the developed area and then drive several minutes along Grace Dr to Cedar Lane. At that point, you'd passthrough manypolygons assignedto Clemens Crossing, through manybusy 4-way intersections, before reachingSwansfield. Incontrast, leaving the Pointers Run neighborhood to the West would pass through one 4-way intersection and require just 2 turns before arriving at PRES. Along the way, you'd passour community pool, multiple tot lots, andthe route ofthe community July 4th parade.

Thisappears to be a clearviolation of Policy6010 Section IV. B. 2. b regarding community stability and contiguous neighborhoods. I sincerely hope you will consider re-examining the decision to move these polygons. The final few work sessions appeared very rushed, and it appears many similar issues have been raised with the final plan. I believe more time is needed to ensure the board members have accurate data and can fully discuss some of the severe ramifications of these decisions.

Thank you for the continuing effort. We know this process has been long and difficult, but it's critical to get it right.Thousands of children's lives are being affected.

Sincerely, Jennifer Diamond Polygon 129 Marilyn

From: Krishna Chennamaneni Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:47 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: Mavis Eilis; Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu; Savitha Krishnamaneni Subject: [External] Polygon 189 - Enclave Rill Hill - Redistricting Attachments: CMS PTA Letter.jpg; FARM Numbers.jpg

CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Board of Education Members, We greatly appreciated all seven BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 backto PRES. BOE'soriginal decision to move Polygon 189from CMSto LKSwas basedon moving PERSto DOES. Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending forthe school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight. 1. No adverse impact to CMS_- Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impacton any ofthe FARM or Capacitynumbers, aswe are less than 20 kids goingto Clarksvllle middle school Our existingelementary population Isalso dispersed evenly K-S andwill notcause disruption to CMScapaci^

MS not £', -^,Aeef?'"? po/l/fi'°"?89 afC °nlv helD to reduce the cost. time and resources of County's Transportation Djwsion, butalso greatly reducetravel time, reducetraffic blocks andenhance the safety of kids. ^Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189is heavilyinvolved withCMS community andshould remain with CMS community. 4. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is i^lt!^a? I'3 mjl?f awayfrom Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute roundtrip commute daily for our chjldran. Moreover. based on the proposed move to LKMS,our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville MiddleSchool to go to the Lime KiTn Middle" School.

5. Clarksville Middle School PTAposition statement suDoortina our request is attachedforraference andconsideration. 6. By keeping Polyqon 189 at CMS. there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached}

Thank you for your consideration! roynoN STAWMEW

OcwbwXX. MlS

Clartevllte Middle School Parent Teacher Assodatton Poritfon Statement Atttndanw Ann *<^u«Unent Plan (dated AitN* 20. MM<)

*«Mn^toUteitodfiBilEE&. th«"^«lw<*fourns*te. to**

The Ohrio^lte PTA hoSdt th» Wtoifrfng (Xitltiam;

1. Vfeayec with ^.ort of NfdwN^lNuwof twqutty to HowardCo»a«y. (t fe net cteur. howewr, that tvtdWKesupcartt mo»bi»ttudwtt theircommunlUwuxidAwdrfs and. sbctoecanNnicdbparttyshotAtbe addrused byetewung tducaUonaTreiBuroet (WacherMrtn|, .ftw .cf nwntorlrv. atfw pnwam*) bMml on need nrtwr dianby dteupttng rtudaWs' Uwes. 2. AwmttoteUrtthauldaffwtthBftwmamimbBrctf ornate*nwanwy. in-atW^/&u^thwtlauw«feradwabiidetrtaei?iUlWUietTmB»lhert llntrodudn ttrwTtoiwtng ailudwtt' nrtimrkof aW°rt-Wm^_otf>SP"««. nm a ^5'ttnetolm^tewto^m^ Ho^Cou^ hu .«;wttytoa'-ri iittu^mimdmwmiw onmwitri hwlth. Fo»dnB^c*Mnnto mow to a .diBdoutrfdirtn^bortwad wUdeflrttety^U«»- andB»y

4. a. iiM^thtcominunlty. npecWlyfamily affa^^w^ricUng tnTlwhunW, nwe aiou^UW pracaaor decWon. B^dng.^ tewmttolNitw uS^in?^"<«»ricttai^hw^but^a^_^^ p» to. n^|BNtrf'^ lid^AriB». ri^tetf

I would like to bring an important geographical factor that has been continuously overlooked in the redistricting process thus far. The final plan sends the Pointers Run community polygons (64, 1064, 129, 1129) to Swansfield Elementary School. However, this creates a discontiguous attendance area for Swansfield. The polygons in question may appear close to polygons 135 and 1135 on a map (see below), but in fact the Middle Patuxent Environmental Area separates these neighborhoods with over 1000 acres of wooded, undeveloped land.

Pointers Run area (64, 1064, 129, 1129) is a dlscontlguous island with respect to the Swansfleld Elementary School attendance area.

CES

1. Middle Patuxent EnvironmentalArea: No roads, no houses; Not really contiguous in terms of transportation

4. Only ingress/egress to West: Summer Sunrise & Great Star (leads to PRES attendance area)

CCES

PRES 3. Cunwit residences in this area only

2. Only ingress/egress to East: Grace Dr & Cedar Lane (leads to GOES attendance area)

While the colored polygons on the map abut each other, it is not really a contiguous area as far as driving is concerned. The only way in or out of our neighborhood to get to Swansfield is at Grace Dr and Cedar Lane, which actually leads into the Clemens Crossing attendance area. If you were to drive from the center of our polygons to the East, you would see that you quickly leave the developed area and then drive several minutes along Grace Dr to Cedar Lane. At that point, you'd pass through many polygons assigned to Clemens Crossing, through many busy 4-way intersections, before reaching Swansfield. In contrast, leaving the Pointers Run neighborhood to the West would pass through one 4- way intersection and require just 2 turns before arriving at PRES. Along the way, you d pass our community pool, multiple tot lots, and the route of the community July 4th parade.

This appears to be a clear violation of Policy 6010 Section IV. B. 2. b regarding community stability and contiguous neighborhoods. I sincerely hope you will consider re-examining the decision to move these polygons. The final few work sessions appeared very rushed, and it appears many similar issues have been raised with the final plan. I believe more time is needed to ensure the board members have accurate data and can fully discuss some of the severe ramifications of these decisions.

Thank you for the continuing effort. We know this process has been long and difficult, but it's critical to get it right. Thousands of children's lives are being affected.

Sincerely,

Debbie Goldberg Polygon 1129 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Mythrai Sangem Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:48 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Please KEEP Polygon 189 at Clarksville Middle School Attachments: FARM Numbers.jpg; CMS PTA Letter.jpg

! CAUTION:TMs email originatedfrom outside ofHCPSS.Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Board of Education Members,

We greatly appreciated all seven BOEmembers for unanimouslypassing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are a micro feedless than 20 students proposedto go into Lime Kiln Middle.

Request: Pleaseconsider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019-20 andpropose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keq>mg Polygon 1 sy at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverseimpact on any of the FARM or Capacitynumbers, as we are less than 20 kids goingto Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementarypopulation is also dispersedevenly K- 5 andwill not cause disruptionto CMS capacity.

2. By keeping Polygon 189 at CMS not only help to reduce the cost, time and resources of County s TransportationDivision, but also greatly reduce travel time, reducetraffic blocks and enhancethe safety of kids. 3. KeepingCommunities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and shouldremain with CMS community.

4. Continuity for Children and avoidingincreased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1.3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereasthe proposed Lime Kiki middle school is 6.8 miles awayfrom Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, basedon the proposedmove to LKMS,our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

5. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement supporting our request is attached for reference and consideration.

6. By keq)ing Polygon 1 89 at CMS, there are no impacts to FAMRnumbers, as we can see from the attached BOB FARMnumbers (attached).

Thank you for your consideration. FARM FARM FARM Middle School Capacity Aug 22 Nov U Change Bonnle Branch MS 701 27% i3.41' Burieigh Manor MS 779 tt» O.Z7 ClaritsvilleMS 643 12% tl. 46, Dunlo^tn MS 565 iax ElkrldgeLanding MS 779 2696 Bltcott Mills MS 701 10% Folly Quarter MS G62 <5% Gtenwooii MS 545 8% 0.6B Hanimond MS 26% 13.73; HaipT S Cholca MS 306 SIX sl. ?:- laka Elkhorn MS 643 ii. Ut UmeKllnMS 721

Mayfteld Woods MS 79S 4IS , 7S. Mount View MS T9&

Ot»b«rW,, 20t»

Clarksv

1. Wea»»ew«h(«wi>riadA»Btfife»ort. Socto»iBmmicdtepu1^*h»«te adAwaedby dewtlngeduutid»o( dialh ow 5 mltot mw »«m pwtteul

3. fixrinastudents to trai»ft»*dxK>l»i*det»1mN

4. GBnaatCBitimatoabeatthepnceBorntBtttictlni: a. imotw theaifnRNrtty, «*pecf»yfemfttes, ^^tlym^rtctfn> to7tefriiuirW* iBOW'ttw^ P"Kaa

From: Tejal Gambhir Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:47 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle School

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thankful to BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS respectively was due to inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189. As noted above, the elementary level change was then corrected.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are fess than 20 students proposed to transition from Clarksville Middle to Lime Klln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school ysar 2018- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary Dopulatlon is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacitv.

2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles awayfrom Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. As recent as last year, BOE members moved a larger number of students from polygons previously zoned for LMKS to CMS to allow better utilization at the latter. These polygons were closer to LKMS.

5. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement supporting our request is attached for reference and consideration.

6. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS. there are no Impacts to FARM numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached). Thank you for your consideration.

Tejal Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Jimmy Furr Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:45 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Please Help with # 38, 1038 and 2038

! CAUTION:This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello. I would like to askyou to revisit the issue of redistricting polygons 1038 and 2038. Redistricting these two single polygonsat thistime separates and divides neighborhoodsof kidsthat havegrown up togetherand gone to school together for many years. We are not a secluded area and there is no natural or man-made division between these polygon lines.

I live on Summer Haven Lane and my son is currently a seventh grader at Elkridge Landing Middle School. He has many friendsthat live in the neighboringpolygons that he has met in school. When I first heard that ourarea, the streets off of Hanover Road, were planned to be redistricted I was not happy. That was because my oldest son is at Howard now and we are happywith him there andwe love the school andthe teachers. But since development hasgotten out of hand, we are well aware of how crowded Howard is and know that something needs to be done.

Even though I did not look forward to the change, I wasOK with it since some of my sons best friends would be moving with him and they would all still be together. But now all of that has changed. His two best friends that live one street over are not beingredistricted but we are. My son is devastated and I am concerned for him havingto start alone at a new high school.

I knowyou are very busy, and I am sure that any area that gets redistricted will not be happywith it. But could you please take the time to review the neighborhoods and howthey are divided. Ifyou could drive through the neighborhood you would see what I mean. We are the last few streets off Hanover Rd, right at the end ofthe county and it is hard for me to understand whywe are beingdivided off. I believe the whole area of Hanover Rd should be. consideredtogether to keep kidstogether with their neighborhoodfriends.

Please reachout ifyou have questionsor need other information action from me. And please reviewour boundaries and neighboring polygons and revisit the issue of redistricting for polygons 1038 and 2038. Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Wang Jie Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:45 PM To: VickyCutroneo; SabinaTaj; Hcpss Redistricting; Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs;Jennifer Mallo; Christina Delmont-Small; Chao Wu Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle

' CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless \ou recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We arethankful to BOB members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

BOE's original decisionto move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKSwas dueto bad and inaccurate dataprovided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are less than 20 students proposed to so into Lime Kiln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019-20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1.No adverse impact to CMS - KeepingPolygon 189atthe Clarksville Middle School will haveno negative or adverse impact on any ofthe FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids spins to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary population is also dispersedevenly K- 5 andwill not causedjsruption to CMS capacity.

2. Keeping Communities together Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for ChUdren and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6.8 miles awayfrom Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, basedon the proposed move to LKMS,our Polygon 189kids will gopass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School. fQ',, 111iBw ».1/«; i irytM n

wi.oei.'r fM. w"r.

Ctarksvitte Middle Scboot P'afent Teacher' Association Position Statement AttendBifia" ^r«» Adlustnwnt PI»>B (dated t&vyst M, 20t9i

Accordtngto the taaivtaiidPTA. the nttsslon ut'our PTSAWW suppon. andspeati on behalf of chOdmilnouFschaoL, In the cwnmuntty, and before goveniment bodtes and othw orB»ntatlan$ Urt make deristons affecting chtldrefl,

The ClanavtUle PTA holds the foll

i. We agree vrith th®BOB! of atfdresslng iswe-ioi fneqwty in Howard County. (t Is not clear, however, that evtdence supports movlnaaudenU out of thrircommunfUes to address thte goal. SBCtoeconomtc disparity should be addressed by'dewttng educattonal resources (teacher Wrii^, after; mentoring, other progmmsf based un nesd rather tlian bt»dferuottne students' lives. 2. Any redistrictlng shoulfi affect e (awest number oif tamllfes «1lsc«»ary- Movfng-207students from a school that Isnot overcrowded is,notj!^yf

3. Forcidfi students Edtrans? r schools te< . -Uotheicmental_h»l 'fsmoving theirsafety tandlntre ring unnewsary ^ streM.'~Removit^astude ts'network suWort-Menfe, otherparwu, teachers, counselors, i strata i leaves them wtnerabte during a critfeat time in their di I H( ard County has receRtly increased attention and resouru »tha h. Foreinachildren to mowe to a schsol out of 'iritety add stress and may increase sadne dat fd* !Bti8in.

IstfliCTir 4. ra( copimei itltes, i "sirirttng essol

"its j for s. Imiuim of to»&

c, FARM FARM FARM MIddla School Capacity Aug22 Nov IS Change Bonnle Branch MS 701 279S 0.41) Burlelgh Manor MS 773 use O. Z7 Clartevllle MS &B UK (l.dfi) DunlogglnMS 565 16% 12-57) Elkridge LandingMS 779 26W il.Olj EIIIcott Mills MS 701 10% (0.86} Folly Quarter MS 662 <5S6 filenwoad MS 545 0. 68 Hammond MS 604 26% (3. 79» Harpers Choice IHS 506 31% 12.55) take Elkhom MS 643 13.13} UFDE Klln MS 721 <5% Mayfleld Woods MS 798 41% 12. 73; Mount View MS 79S <5% Murray Hill MS 662 33% (5. ( Oaklanii Mills MS SOB 44% JL25} Patapsco MS 643 1S9S J0.31» PatuxEntValleyMS 760 33% j4/(2) 'homasVlaductMS 701 (4.03) Wilde Lake MS 721 J^arilyn Grosskopf

From: vadlamoodi aditya Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:42 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle

! CAUTION: This emaUoriginated from outsideof HCP8S. Do not cUcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thankful to BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 backfrom Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are less than 20 students proposed to go into Lime Kiln Middle. Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019-20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids soing to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary population is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacity. 2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement supporting our request is attached for reference and consideration.

5. By keeping Polygon 189 at CMS, there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached).

Thank you for your consideration.

Thanks, Polygon 189 resident rn

From: Savitha Krishnamaneni Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:44 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu; Krishna Chennamaneni Subject: [External] Polygon 189 - Enclave Rill Hill - Redistricting Attachments: CMS PTA Letter.jpg; FARM Numbers.jpg

CAUTION: This emau originated from outside ofHCPSS. Donot click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Board of Education Members, Wegreatly appreciated all seven BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 backto PRES. BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from CMS to LKS was based on moving PERS to DOES. Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

please c°"sider 189 kids at the S??l?TS-t. keeping Polygon same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight. 1. No adverse impact to CMS_- Keeping Polygon 189at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. 'Our existingelementary population is alsodispersed evenly K- 5 andwill notcause disruption to CMScapacity.

£",.^, -eep/"? F',°lvaon 189at, CMSnot °nlv heto to reduce the cost time and resources of County's Transportation Division, butalso greatly reduce travel time, reducetraffic blocks andenhance the safety of kids. 3. KeepingCommunities together - Polygon 189is heavilyinvolved withCMS community and should remainwith CMS community. 4. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is r?flt^?-. 1.'3.m.'l?^ awayfrom Polygon 189,whereas the proposed LimeKiln middleschool is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily forour children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the LimeKiln M-iddle School.

5. Clarksville Middle School PTAposition statementsupDortlna ourrequest is attachedfor reference andconsideration. & By keeping Polyqon 189at CMS. there are no impactsto FAMRnumbers, aswe can_see_6vm the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached}

Thank you for your consideration. WtmONSTATCTittNT

Ovu*m . W\9

Ctaritsvtlte Middle Sdiool Parent TetMrfwr Assoctatton Posftkm Statmnent AIUmAnce Ana *

*«wi^ to the MindafllLeK. th< "»»*>n of ow PTSAkto «in»rt «rf»e«li oft MvMul dttriwilnowichool. In tiw axwnunlty, md t»ron iBWmmnnt bodto andottN^ oiiprtaattow Uttt nnlui d«Atom irf^ctlnt tWldnm. Th®OarkwtUe PTA hold* the fottoiring potltton*:

1. Wkagrw with tf»» .Bat<^po»t«mo¥«n(ttuitenta ox^ thelrcammurtUwtuaddnMtMttBri. Soctoea)mmlcdfa{)Wlty»hoddl» addrened by (tewttng educattinafreiBupoei (twcher W»1n|t, . diw tdwot mentnrbiBi «hw'proffwa) . >Nttl7 stoK tHA from . aftool ttt ft not werawwded teny 1"^ .natiwon, liuring «*>»ettudentt, whowe abte to wiUt to CtatwtUe fiBddteSdio<»l, to«*dwo(yutteow5mn»»inv»wm*pwtaa

4. 6enBalCtWiment»d»ulthe , of wdhtrictinB:

.. jiw^^<»mwi^, «pK^yf»^te'?^^^nd!?rk:t1^ teafBfhiKrirt, nmBttiourfiffii proceaordecjitaiwiwktai.^ »»^»wm. Wte pNwttwnttBl»(n«*W~1n how bouwtoria we imdwtoiddait mdlttricttei WU»»PINnbuttt»cw»»*piwnU» wy^^irtft^prwtouipropon&vAtttwe bwnX.d6j

Dunli^ln MS 5fi5 i2-S"''*UAi1 : ElkrldgeLanding MS 779 (l. Olj HRcottMilbMS 701 10% Folly Quarter MS 6SZ <5S6 Btenwaod MS 545 o.es Hammond MS 604 ,2.ay. rkeSkhomMS 643 38% . 3,li Ume Win MS 721

MayfleldWoods MS 798 F Marilyn Grosskopf

From: j hu Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:42 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Support to exempt rising 5th and 8th graders

! CAUTION; This emaUoriginated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not clicklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. Dear BOB members

Thank you for bringing up the concern for rising 5th and 8th graders. You aremaking huge efforts to make it better. It will be theirlast yearfor rising5th and8th graders. Pleasedo not separatethem from their friends and their schools that have been in their daily life for years. Taking bus from the closest bus stop or self- fa-ansportation can be the choice provided to reduce the cost if cost is an issue. But at least, kids benefit from it, which is our ultimate goal.

I humbly request HC BOB members to agree to exempt rising 5th and 8th graders. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely, Liuzhu Zhang Polygon 189 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Rajitha Mandepudi Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:42 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: Kirsten Coombs; Chao Wu; Sabina Taj; Jennifer Mallo; Christina Delmont-Small; Vicky Cutroneo; Mavis Ellis Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle Attachments: FARM Numbers.jpg; CMS PTA Letter.jpg

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, imless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thankful to BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 backto PRESon 11/18/2019.

BOE'soriginal decision to move Polygon 189from PRESand CMSto DOESand LKMSwas due to incomplete dataat that time on November 13, where DrWU proposed to move Polygon 189from PRESandCMStoDOASand LKS. Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are tess than 20 students proposed to go into Lime Kiln Middle from CMS. Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending forthe school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight. 1. No adverse impact to CMS- Keeping Polygon 189at the Clarksville MiddleSchool will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are fess than 20 Wds oo/no to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary Dopulation is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS caoacjt^ 2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMScommunity andshould remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1^3 mjjes awayfrom Polygon 189, whereasthe proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6.8 miles awayfrom Polygon 189. Thiscreates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute dailyfor our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle SchooHo go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement suoportina our requestis attachedfor reference and consideration.

5. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS. there are no impacts to FARM numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers iatfached).

6. will be able to eliminate disruption to attend after school activities.

7. To avoid parents losing their valuable time in travel to pickup their multiple kids from different schools

Thank you for your consideration.

Thanks Parent of students from Polygon 189 FABM FARM FARM Middle School Capaetty Aug 22 Nov 19 Change Bonnle Branch MS 701 27% (S.4'.; Manor MS 779 UK 0.27 ClaritsvjlteMS 643 U9S 11.46',

OunloeglnMS 565 . 5" Bkrldge LandingMS 773 2696 Eldcott Mills MS 701 FollyQuarter MS 662 <596 Gtenwood MS 545 0.68 Hammond MS aw 0. Harpers Choice MS sos 3196 !.? lake Bkhom MS 643 38% li. U; UmeKUnMS 7Z1 <5%

Mayfleld Woods MS 7SS 41% <2, 71. Mount VlewKS 798 Mun-ayHIUMS 662 33» (S.36) OaMand MlllsMS SOG fl. »-

Patapsco MS 643 10.33.J PatuxentValleyMS 760 33% >-.^7 Thomas Wad uct MS 701 !d.Di; Wilde take MS TH i6. &t» WWnONSTATtNtOT

Octutiw f». t9^9

Clartavflte Mltklle ScSmA Parent Ttadw Aaodatton Poritton Statement *tUntlMK» Am» Aiyurtm'nt Plan (dMat *u»a» 20. MH»t

Accan^ to the ISsaian^JCTA t^'^<^ ^ <^ FTU tett ***lort . nd*pollt on behalfof eWlAwlnowidiool. tn theconNnunlQr, md t>eroi»_«Bimwnmt bodha and othw orwmtatlmi tiiu mda d«<*ton*«ni»aii» cWttm. nw Ctartw^te PTAhold* tte ftrttowtat pttttlBm;

1. »tea|iieewNhtfi6a<»t<^»tniq»my«nHwmntCcu»y. It I* mat chw. hcwaw. that avWBnM suwwtt mc^ ttudentt < o? their t»mmurtt*» to addn«y»ls»Bri. StoctoeuinairtcdNarttydiouWbe tdttiwied ty (tewUng educatl8naTre*ou»iQBt (te^*Br Nrin|, rfter ictioo; mmtoring. ottw pro»mna» buad OBnwd nithcr ttan by tfwupUni ttudents'Uw*. 2. AiymdttWaingdiaildaffactthefewBttmimhirofftniKtuiNCNBNy. ^ng^^iAitt froma tdtool^ tonot emmowded fenrt^^^ inaaWlfen, turii^ d>BMrtudente, wlw are aMe to wUt to OutevtUa Nt^te Sdud, to'a »dwot tint toow 5 mtte w^r wenu pwtteulwty

3. FordnBStu(tentttotmBfer*cho(*tttdeUrtmentaltotf>*inetttA^ SumWGMBuyshBnse: ib^ ftnni^ a ttudu^ networitcf lupport-Wend^ (..ctenTCTunai^mdidmlnWnata^te^ Swcrt' ne1nttefr'n*»^diad»wto «»». to » tdiodoutarthdr nrtKitwrtuod wU

4. GenaalcwBBiBittdMBttlNt ofndbtric! a. htw^^caiiiwin^, «pec(rtyftw^w. _ _ *vm«»k^^ , niws'ttoutfrt) udB^nd'^ t«»»trtctlnt ^ hwm ^ ttecu^gi^^ ^Wfe^^~pnt^P^>^»Wdth"w txw^sWfer ^M^ «idommunRy tiyut <»»«.tite p^; twoyeN?. b. n^»tfnK«ttrirt^i

c.' S±a^ud££i'£SS««-»-«-»wt.^ JVIarilyn Grosskopf

From: mahendra marathe Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 3:33 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting; Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont- Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu Subject: [External] MotionNeeded: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle Attachments: FARM Numbers.jpg

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Board of Education Members, Wegreatly appreciated all seven BOEmembers for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 backto PRES. BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are a micro feed less than 20 students proposed to no Into Lime Kiln Middle. Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight. 1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on anyof the FARM or Capacitynumbers, as we are fessthan 20 kidsgoing to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary oooulation is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause dlsrwfion to CMS capacity^

2. By keeping Polvaon 189at CMSnot only helpto reducethe cost. time andresources of County'sTransportation Division, but also greatly reduce travel time, reduce traffic blocks and enhance the safety of kids. 3. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

4. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

5. Clarksville Middle School PTA oosition statement suDOOrtinaour request is attachedfor reference and consideration.

6. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS. there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached).

Thank you for your consideration. Polygon 189 Resident-Citizen FARM FARM FARM Mlitdte School Capacity Aug 22 NOV19 Change Bonnle Branch MS 701 27% >3. 4:. Buriei^i ManorMS 779 u% 0.27 ClarksvillcMS 643 t2SS ' 1,4&} DunlojglnMS 565 (2.57; 779 2696 (1.0; Elllcott Mills MS 701 FollyQuarter MS 662 <5% Glenwood MS S45 Hammond MS 604 (i. 79i HarpeK Choice MS sos 1196 UricBkhomMS 643 3BS Unr Kiln Ms 721

MayfleldWoods MS 798 41% ! 2.7^ Mount View MS 798 <5%

MuiTayMIBMS 3396 SS.36; Oakland Mills MS sos 44%

Pataptco MS 643 last >:C,3:; PatuxentValley MS 760 B3X , 1^ Thomas Vladuct MS TVO. M.C: Wilde take MS 721 3B96 i6. Wi Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Aditya Vadlamoodi Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:42 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle

! CAUTION:This emaUoriginated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not cUcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thankful to BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 backfrom Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are less than 20 students proposed to go into Lime Kiln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019-20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary population is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacity.

2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles awayfrom Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement supporting our request is attached for reference and consideration.

5. By keeping Polygon 189 at CMS, there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached).

Thank you for your consideration.

Thanks, Polygon 189 resident. Marilyn Grosskopf

From: G P Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:41 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon solution for CCES and impact on busing; Polygon move Request

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click Unks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. Dear BOB members,

Westrongly opposethe redistricting ofPolygon 1132.This being said, we would like to helpyour process by suggesting that you move 2134, 1134, and 134 from CCES to Swansfield ES as they are in close proximity (can likely walk) to Swansfield; and move 1132, 2132, and 132 back to Clemens Crossing, which is close in proximity to CCES. Thismove is a similar swapof FARMS, etc. It will alsoreduce the impact onbus transportation for all individuals involved. Thank you for your consideration.

POLYGON 1132, 2132 and 132 JVIarilyn Grosskopf

From: Chandra Anagani Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:41 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Please keep Polygon 189 at Clarksville Middle School Attachments: FARM Numbers.jpg; CMS PTA Letter.jpg

'CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Board of Education Members,

Wegreatly appreciated all sevenBOE members forunanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189back to PRES.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction ofmoving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kihi to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, weare a micro feedless than20 students proposed to go into LimeKiln Middle.

?f??e-s!: please consider keeping Polygon 189kids atthe same schools asthey are attending for the school year 2019-20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverseimpact to CMS - KeepingPolygon 189at the Clarksville Middle School will haveno negativeor adverse impact on any ofthe FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary population is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not causedismption to CMS capacity.

2. Bykeeping Polygon 189at CMSnot only helpto reducethe cost, time andresources ofCounty's Transportation Division,but also greatlyreduce travel time, reducetraffic blocks andenhance the safetyof kids.

3. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community. 4. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1 . 3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiinmiddle school is 6.8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

5. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement supporting our request is attached for reference and consideration.

6. By keeping Polygon 1 89 at CMS, there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached).

Thank you for your consideration. FABM FARM FARM Middle School Capacity Aug 22 Nov 19 Change

Bonnte Branch MS 701 27% 15.41J Burief^i ManorMS 779 u% 0.27 ClaiksvilleMS 643 129S >'1.46, DunloffilnMS Sfi5 ;^,. )i?' akrlttge landing MS 779 . I. Oli MS Btlcott Mills 7U1 10% >u.!"R FollyQMBrter MS G6Z <5% Glenwood MS 545 0.6S Hammond MS 604 )S.79i Haiyen Choice MS 506 3M6 lake Blthom MS 643 38% n. Mi UmeKllnMS 721 <5%

MayfleldWoods MS 798 n E.7ii Mount View MS 798 <5% MurrayMill MS 662 33% «5.3fi! Oakland Mills MS 506 4t% . X2ii Pataptco MS 643 USt PatuxentValley MS 760 3396 !-S^?i Thomas Viaduct MS 701 3856 i4:(B; Wilde take MS 721 38% i6.5A} J\Aarilyn Grosskopf

From: Srilakshmi Gogineni Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:41 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Keep Polygon 1171 at MRHS and MVMS

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board members,

The decision you havetaken Yesterday Nov 18thsession for Polygon 1171 caused lot of distress among our kidsand the families in the community. You just moved our polygon as a chess piece. Our kids hadjust started this year to go to new school and the proposed movement for upcoming year is going to have bad impact on kids as they keep moving schools.

With the proposed plan our kidsare attending 3 different schools in 3 years. 2018, 2019, 2020. Please imagine how much the little brainscan take asthey are approachingto biggergrades and the effect of learning curve on them.

Wewonder When our Polygonwas rezoned in 2017for Elementary level and whythere wasno proposal/motion for Middle and High ? Whythe decision came up suddenlyto move us from current schools?

Our Polygon has very small feed to Middle and highschools the impactof moving will not help the schools but it impacts the kids a lot.

This move in last minute gave us no time to testify or protest our concernsto the board members. Please reconsider your decision and put us back to MRHS and MVMS.

Thank You Resident of Polygon 1171.

SRILAKSHMIGOGINENI SENIOR QUALITl' ASSURANCE SPECIALIST TEL:+1.410.290.5114 VECTORWORKS, INC. 7150 Riverwood Dr., Columbia MD 21046 ;\0 VECTORWORKS' AtBdaciBtcounufv Marilyn Grosskopf

From: David Rose Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:41 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Redistricting Polygon 132

! CAUTION: This emaUoriginated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not cMeklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Boardmembers, I havea sonattending kindergarten at Clemens Crossing. Wejust moved to theSebring community inMay. My community is less than a half-mile from the school. Our community is very supportive ofeach other andwe take careof our children, whichhas been a welcome discovery. Ifa parent is lateto thebus stop, there are always otherparents who will watchwhatever child hadno oneto meet him/her. The same applies to after- school activities, which aremore accessible and convenient. We are afraid that this forced redistricting will nullify the these new valuable relationships and add an increased burden on the parents in polygon 132. Formy son, being closer to the school hasanother advantage: my sonis very shy and It takes himtime to adjust to new situations. He is intelligent andhe is doingfairly well at this school andhe has made fiiends, but he benefits from anenvironment thatis consistent. Formany years my sonattended the samepreschool buton occasions weneeded to find other daycares to provide carewhen our regular onewas closed. He consistently hasshown progress in familiar settings but when he has spent time at other centers he was withdrawn and did not participate well Withmy tight schedule I feel theneed to haveeasy access to the schoolto addressany issues thatmay arise. I choseto move to polygon 132because ofthis abilityto bein close proximity to his school and to be able to support my son closely if necessary. I am hoping that you will allow polygon 132 to stay at Clemens. Thank you for your time.

Concernedparent David Rosen Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Andrew B Goldberg Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:40 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: Kirsten Coombs;Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; SabinaTaj; Mavis Ellis; Chao Wu; Jennifer Mallo; Superintendent Subject: [External] Overlooked geographicalinformation: New island being created Attachments: BOE_island. pdf

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not eUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education,

Here is a final letter regardingredistricting. I hope you'll take the time to read.

Thank you so much for all the time and effort!

Sincerely, Andrew Goldberg Polygon 64 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Vee Cee <99godspeed99@gmail. com> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:39 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Request to move Polygon 189 back to CMS Attachments: CMS PTA Letter. jpg

! CAUTION: This emaUoriginated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not cUcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members, yy^-g^e?. y. al^prec!a^e a.l! seven BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES- u."f°rt."nately the BOE "eglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 backfrom Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOES and LKMS was due inaccurate data. Pleaseconsider keeping Polygon 189kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019-20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight. 1. Noadverse impact to CMS_-Keeping Polygon 189at theClarksville MiddleSchool will haveno negative oradverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary Dopulation is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacjty. 2. By keeping Polvaon 189at CMSnot only helpsto reducethe cost lime and resourcesof County's Transportation Division, but also greatly reduce travel time, reduce traffic blocks and enhance the safetyof kids. ^Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

4. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is tessthan 1.3 milesaway from Polygon 189,whereas the proposed LimeKiln middleschool is6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. This createsa 1 hour 10minute roundtrip commute dailyfor ourchUdrerLMoreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime'Kiln Middle School.

5. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement supDortina our request is attached for reference and consideration. 6. By keeping Polvoon 189 at CMS. there are no Impactsto FARMnumbers.

Vishal Chhikara

S Wt8 ST*TtMBCT

eiEXiterXk. Mt*

Cla»tev(llc Middle S«Aool Parent Teacher Asseci) tton Posltfon StateflWtt AttwidneeA B Aitt'aUnmt Plan (ttattd Augiat20. »t»l

Accorthigto thejiu^aniUIft. tfw mtodnn ufour PTSA *» to wnwn"nd »«k an bArtf of chttdneninoi^tdNxrt. tn tff commurtty, wd tNrfure tBWfnnumt bodte* and ottrnr orwAattom uw mdw d^riom tffccttr cWdron.

Tlw CtartwNle PTA hotd» de fottowtnt potKton*;

1. Wte^w with the tort oT aiWmuKvteues of htB<(utty»iHmmnt County. ltt*notdwr. ho»mw, th«twf8nm»» t»M«don need nther tlan byle towrik to OuiawtUe Mddte Schod, to . Khool that b owr 5 (rito awnv WWM tssmm srty unreuomNe. 3. ftiretogitudentttotrwaer»choobl»deu*nwlaltoU»frnua*^tat: tynsinwii^ ttefrnrfety netand NitroAidni umweaay d»l

tt. flN^MOfnrttf tod ttudate riKxAI bej^en . (n**num ol tws idian^ngKhoob. c. fwMvr asWds»thrt cwnnwt^to and i we MarN^

From: ravishankarmallampally Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:39 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 1171: Please Do Not Punish the Families who took many Painsand Sacrificesto give our Kidsthe best Opportunity for choosing this area

CAUTION: Thu em"l originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not dlek links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. Dear BOE members and redistricting officials,

I am resident of Polygon 1171, and would like all the members to reconsider and review our polygon (# 1171)High School Redirection. Today'sdecision left our kids and communityshocking. As you arewell aware, the success of a kid notjust depends upon the school but also on the support system they have (including parents, friends and community). It is impossible for anyfamily to'raise kids on theirown without the help ofstrong community. It is natural forthe younger kids to emulate the older kids not just for studies but also for sports and other activities at school. With this move all of a sudden, we became a Small Feed Island, depriving of normal school kid life, which could affect both their physical and emotional health. Wefeel thatwe belong "Nowhere". Weare neither Ug enough to have our own group of kids and nor "close" enough to play/participate/engage in any" neighborhood and school activities with the "" kids. Asyou clearly know, Thefeed from polygon 1171 remains negligibleand does not havemuch impact on the current schools (HS: 0.37% now and 1. 3% by 2025, MS)' While every family in this neighborhood has a unique story, we are not outsiders but are proud residents of Howard county for years who chose to move into this community because of diversity, great culture and wonderful neighborhoods. We love being here and we are very proud of. Please do not break the years old camaraderie.

T'lease Do Not Punish the Families who took many Pains and Sacrifices to give our Kids the best Opportunity for choosing this area". From the bottom ofour hearts we are requesting you to keep us (Polygon 1171) at MRHS. Please make every effort to keep our communities together

We really appreciate your Time & Help.

Thanks & Regards,

Usha Mallampally Westmount community Marilyn Grosskopf

From: VeeCee <99godspeed99@gmail. com> Sent Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:38 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: BoE Email; Chao Wu; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Kirsten Coombs; Mavis Ellis; Sabina Taj; Vicky Cutroneo Subject: [External] Request to move Polygon 189 back to CMS Attachments: CMS PTA Letter.jpg

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not cBck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We greatly appreciate all seven BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES. Unfortunately the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOES and LKMS was due inaccurate data.

Please consider keeping Polygon 1 89 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 201 9-20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are fess than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary pooulation is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacity.

2. By keeping Polvaon 139 at CMS not only helps to reduce the cost, time and resources of County's Transportation Division, but also greatly reduce travel time, reduce traffic blocks and enhance the safety of kids.

3. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

4. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trio commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

5. Clarksyille Middle School PTA position statement suooortina our request Is attached for reference and consideration.

6. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS. there are no impacts to FARM numbers.

Vishal Chhikara 8a«ft£'ri%.. 20t»

Clartevdte MleMle Sdmri Parent Teacher Posttfon Statwnent ^and-tw ATM Atdutbnwt PlN«

Accorttne to the (ftBiftnfiLEI*. tf* mtottw a* our PTS*ttto wpport andwMk an behatfoltftttdnm In aw .chnul. (n ttc camfliunliy, .nd b^w^tamnnwnl IXNflwmd otfw orgwtlatton* ttM nwte

1. Wl»affw»^^|Batofa*lTBrtntoiuMofln»»uttytoHw»MdQ>tmty. Itt* iwt clw, howww, that BvM»w «W»»tt mc^ *"**!» a* o», UNXrcBmmmlttKtoadtbwtUttsaoal. Sactoea»o»nlcdtopaB akfcw^ bydwottni .duutlenrt'ntwircB (ttKher Nrtng. aftwtdttrt mmttrNig, ot»w prwam*» biaad on need rether than by AtnipUna rtudaWtNet. 2. Any fwl^rtoUnt »houtd affort Uw fmwtt numbw rf »«n^J» -cwwx- Mi>^i» »ff *tud^ from a sch(^ tl^ t»twt warerow^ ^natjuwied, tnaddl^m, buAr tfiewttudurts, whoareitote tewUtto a^awttte INddteSdiool. toasctwotduttoowStrtl-wnywmai

3. ftin^«tudent»t<>t»anifer»chi»b(tBiteWiBar 6itoth"lrm"^totf rtna 'Rwwini .itudanU' networituf am» ^»^Mm. ywS. inchmi, taumdws, Nid .dnilnteb'^ro-tawu Uiem wlNfflU-^W CT^( ttiielTttelr'dwetopment. HmmnlCoun^hunaa^y! » a

4. GwwlCBmmenttlNwltheproaiMtrfmdlttrtt^ .. lowtwtte aanniunlty, apedaUy funata. '>"i^_tlyrad»^»» toato^^^iSIS*te^e2SS!2!>¥te ui5m^^ mftWctlngwU h^^ to ^cxm^^^^^

(». R mdttifct«titiKlKilsihouhll»tlwn»fl**»N ofttu yM C< /M ws Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Kavitha Bala Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:38 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 189 - Request to move back to CMS

! CAUTION:This emaUoriginated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not clicklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize thesender and know the content is safe. DearBoard of EducationMembers,

We are thankful to BOB members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 1 89 back to PRES.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are less than 20 students proposed to go into Lime Kiln Middle.

Request: Pleaseconsider keeping Polygon 189kids at the same schools as they are attendingfor the school year 2019-20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverseimpact to CMS - KeepingPolygon 189 atthe Clarksville Middle School will haveno negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Ourexisting elementary population is also dispersed evenly K- 5 andwill not causedisruption to CMS capacity.

2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS coimiiunity and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increasedtransportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1 . 3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6.8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement supporting our request is attached for reference and consideration.

5. By keeping Polygon 1 89 at CMS, there areno impacts to FAMRnumbers, as we can see from the BOB FARM numbers.

Thank you for your consideration. Kavitha

Thanks, Kavitha Bala 240-755-2430 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: rajitha_challapalli@yahoo. com Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:35 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: Kirsten Coombs; Chao Wu; Sabina Taj; Jennifer Mallo; Christina Delmont-Small; Vicky Cutroneo; Mavis Ellis Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle Attachments: CMS PTA Letter.jpg; FARM Numbers.jpg

! CAUTION: This emafl originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognise the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

Weare thankful to BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 backto PRESon 11/18/2019.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOES and LKMS was due to incomplete data at that time on November 1 3, where DrWU proposed to move Polygon 189from PRESand CMSto DOASand LKS. Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are tess (/lan 20 students proposed to go into Lime Kiln Middle from CMS. Request: Please consider keeping Potygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight. 1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189at the Clarksville MiddleSchool will have no negative or adverse impacton anyof the FARM or Capacitynumbers, aswe are less than 20 kidsgoing to Clarksville middle school. Our existingelementary Dopulation is alsodispersed evenly K- 5 andwill notcause disruptionto CMScapacity 2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMScommunity andshould remain with CMS community.

3. Continuityfor Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville MiddleSchool is less than 1_3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. Thiscreates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute dailyfor our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle SchooFto go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksvllle Middle SchoolPTA oosition statementsuDportina our request Is attachedfor reference and consideration. 5. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS. there are no impactsto FARMnumbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers faftached).

6. will be able to eliminate disruption to attend after school activities.

7. To avoid parents losing their valuable time In travel to pickup their multiple kids from different schools

Thank you for your consideration.

Thanks Rajitha WWmm STATEMENT

etft&tfXX, S9t9

Ctartatvltte MtAlte Sdwot Parent Twct ,r ^sseLtton Porithm Statement MMHKtonce Anc At(|iabn«it PUn (ifated Auautt 20. M1<|

Aixorttog to the |iKga'iagi(£%. the mhtton

1. WkaywwfthtfiegwriofiNtdreBtogtBUBtofflWtliNtyml Itttnotctew, how8wr, thWvldenc»tu(i(>orta(m(»»fntiituihnttoutof yietrcBflimunftteitoadUnBttteaori. SedoeONwntfcdbpartty Anitd t» ad*e»ed by dewung tduatlonal rwaupcw (tmdwr Nrtn|, after tdioc* mentnrint, athwpniBruiaj bt sad OR nwd nithn" thantiydtou rtuda^'Uwes.

2. Ay md^1<^nj»houM affect tftetowwinunAT of (MriUwiNUBttwy. Miwrtng W rtvdents fnim . tchool Uaft fe not omrcrowded b nut tutUfhsd* to addKton, bustni ttiwe ttudtattt, who are aWeto watttto ChwtowttlB NlddteSdioot. toBKhootUtKhowSmttetwmirNwmp 3>1y wires

3. fforclnBatuctentttotnmsfertchowabdtetrtmuittlloytelrii by »«na»

tf^ . KhBOifc Aeldimr wn^E* FABM FARM FARM Middle School Capaefty Aug 22 Nov 13 Change Bonme Branch MS 701 i 2.4!! aurielgh Manor MS 779 0.27 ClartisvllleMS 643 12K 11.46; Dunloggln MS 565 16« i'' 57' HkrldgeLanding MS 779 26X EIUcott Mills MS 701 {CWj Folly Quarter Ms 662 <5S Glenwooii MS 545 0.68 Hammond MS ii. 79) Harpars Choice MS S06 31S6 1^-BSj lake Elkhom MS 643 (i. lji Uciw Klln MS 721 0% Mayfldd Woods MS 798 41% 12.7;; Mount View MS 798 <5% MumyMHIMS 662 ; 3.36. Oakland Mills MS 506 11.251 P«tapsB3 MS 643 18% SG.ii! Pttuxent Valley MS 760 33% (.8^2: Thomas Vladuct MS 701 38% U. O?; Wilde take MS 7U (5.541 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: VidhyaPriya GopalaKrishnan Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:37 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle Attachments: CMS PTA Letter. jpg; FARM Numbers. jpg

'CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

Wegreatly appreciated all seven BOE membersfor unanimously passinga motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 moved to LKS since the elementary was moved from PRES to DOAS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are tess Ihan 20 students proposed to oo into Lime Kiln Middlefrom our community. Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight. 1. No adverse impact to CMS- Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville MiddleSchool will have no negative or adverse Impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are tess than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existingelementary oooulation is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMScapacity.

2. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS not only help to reduce the cost. time and resources of County's Transportation Division, but also greatly reducetravel time, reduce traffic blocks and enhancethe safetyof kids. 3. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS communityand should remainwith CMS community.

4. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

5, Clarksyllle Middle School PTA position statement supportmg our request is attached for reference and consideration.

6. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS. there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers /attached]

Thanks, Vidhya Gopalakrishnan. Oct»bwr^. ?019

Clartevtlle Middle Sdwx* Parent Tewah rAssoctotton Position Statennent W«nrt«ue Aw Aiquttment Pteft ^toted Au.i *st 20. 2

<<*wrtng to B»e jSKrianstEn, Ac flwtnmwit bodlw and ortw oricnlatton* th» mdw (tocWan* . ffacUngcbttdnn. ITf Oariwllte n-A botdi tte fWtowtnt (WWanK

1. WBatnwwWhtlwodofaddnnrinBteBiwoflneqimyinHomrfCminiy. It h not ctew, howww, th»t Wdenc* aippoitt nwytnt ttudwto out al UNrfrcommunttfes ta adifrastWs aiat. Sodnecaioirtc«lh(NrtlyABUldl» adA'eaed by dcwthn whicatfenri .oour'M* (ttNher hWn(, tftw tchod mentoring, othwpropamst based on need nthwttan by dhnipUng studntts* tfws.

2. Any(«tiitricUn|thouyiaff«ctthefmwBtmiirt»rcrfenlUtanncinB«uden&totru8tef»choobbdetri(neeitritothrtrRNmUAbN»h toynnNi^lng thaw-»^ty iw*and tatrocludni uwwceBurydiNifft and »t»»k ItNmwlniattedmlt'netwwkofwpport-trientb. othurpNwte,

crtt(criUmeiityN*rdewtopinent. HoimnitoiB^hanKank^htGpnMd .ttenttonwdlFUounsMonniuiWhB^ti, PioittiictoKdnmtonnwtoa idinel out of thefr mliihbortood w^ (tefWtely add rtn« wd iwv tncmue Mdnn^ hopdwnea, and sutctdri ideattm. 4. G«N»alcu»»n«»»abeuttteproaHaotmdl*trtctln»

a. taw(wthe6ominur*v, »pBCtoUyftuirttR. affeisbe

Bonnle Branch MS 701 . 3.41; BurieighManor MS 779 u% 0.27 ClarkswilleMS 6'B 1296

Murray Mill MS 662 15.36; Oakland Mills MS sos ^. »s PBtapscoMS 643 18K i'S. Alt PatuxentValley MS 760 »% M^?; Thomas Wad vrt MS 701 i't. Oif WIIdetateMS 7ZI asst ' ;. 's.- Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Colleen Clary Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:36 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 76

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not cUek links or open attachments, unless you recogmare the sender and know the content is safe. I am writing to respectfully request that polygon 76 not be redistricted. You are moving an entire neighborhood from Waterloo Elementary to Illchester Elementary, which is further away. Moreover, polygon 76 will then not go to Bonnie Branch Middle (which is in Illchester's parking lot) but rather to Mayfield Middle School. So you are willing to move children that are comfortable with their teachers and friends, to a brand new school to be forced to become comfortable with a new building, new teachers and new friends, to then move the children away from the new friends they made for middle school. This is causing my son to have 2 major moves in 2 years. It makes absolutely no logical sense to move polygon 76 to a further away school for elementary but not middle school.

Furthermore, I have been following the redistricting plan for a while now. There have been numerous opportunities for the families with children in high school to testify, but not for the elementary school children. It's blatantly unfair to make decisions impacting our children with out the knowledge and input from those you are impacting.

I request that you reconsider moving polygon 76 and instead leaving it districted for Waterloo Elementary so these children can be with their friends in middle school, making that transition easier.

I appreciate your attention to this matter.

Colleen Clary Mother of 3rd grade son at Waterloo Elementary Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Aditya Vadlamoodi Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:36 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not clicklinks or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. DearBoard ofEducation Members,

Weare thankful to BOBmembers forunanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189back to PRES.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccuratedata provided byDr. Wuon November 13, wherehe proposed to move Polygon 189from PRESand CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoEneglected to addressthe correction ofmoving Polygon 189back from Lime Kihito Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are less than20 students proposed to go into Lime Kiln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019-20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any ofthe FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary population is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacity.

2. KeepingCommunities together - Polygon 189is heavilyinvolved with CMS commimity andshould remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kihl middle school is 6.8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kihi Middle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTAposition statement supporting ourrequest is attachedfor reference and consideration.

5. By keeping Polygon 1 89 at CMS, there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the attached BOB FARM numbers (attached).

Thank you for your consideration.

Thanks, Polygon 189 resident. Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Vishal Chhikara Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:36 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion required - Move Polygon 189 from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle Attachments: CMS PTA Letter.jpg; FARM Numbers.jpg

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thankful to BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES. BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are tess than 20 students proposed to so into Lime Kiln Middle. Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight. 1. No adverse impact to CMS- Keeping Polygon 189at the Clarksville MiddleSchool will have no negative or adverse impacton anyof the FARM or Capacitynumbers, as we are fessthan 20 kidsgoing to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary oooulation Is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruofion to CMS capacjty^ 2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuityfor Children and avoiding increasedtransportation costs and lead times - Clarksville MiddleSchool is less than 1. 3 mBes awayfrom Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles awayfrom Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trio commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement supDortina our request is attached for reference and consideration.

5. By keeping Polvaon 139 at CMS. there are no impacts to FARM numbers, as wecansee from the attached BOE FARM numbers /attached).

Thank you for your consideration.

Vishal Chhikara $TATEt N1t

^. 281»

Clarksvdte Middle SchocA Parent Teadier itton Posttkwi Statement ^UndmcB Ana *it(i»bnNit Ptan (dMxrf **i»at». ax<»

*ccon >Btoy»iSMXteA£tt. d*"<»ton

The OiriavNte PTA hoUt Uie toltiwlnB pMlttans;

1. Wpa|^»w(thUN*Bi>atoftddro»

3. Rxclng ttudents to tnisfer tdiBote ^ detrimwital touiefr ffimtetj** OTiductngwmBaaniydwie »*d .bw; tenmtKartudmtt' iwh«>*

4. GenerriewnmuUflMrtUrpP s of ruWricBng: a. |muhw(hecemmui^, upecta(ByfanAf«, ^fiha<[b»rtcoRmNriU»NNtnd^bBrt>BOdt FARM FARM FARM Mlddte School Capactty Aug 22 Nov 19 Change

Bonnle Branch MS 701 27% t?. .4.1; Buriel^l Manor MS T» u% O.Z7 ClarksvilleMS 643 u% (L46, Dunloggln MS 5fl5 2.57 Elkrldge LandingMS 779 26% i 1.01) Blicott Mills MS 701 . 0.86; Folly Quarter MS 662 <5% Slenwnod MS 545 0.68 HammondMS a» 25» HarpBB Choice MS 506 31% Lake BIAom MS 643 38S IS. li? Ume Kiin MS 721 <5% Mayfleld Woods MS T5S 41% 12.7ii MountVlew MS <5% Murray Hill MS ;S.36i Oakland Mill* MS 506 4496 fatapsro MS 643 18% . o-ilj Patuxent Valley MS 760 33% JJ4;. Thomas Vfaduct MS 701 3S» lASli Wilde lake MS 7Z1 1i6.Wi Marilyn Grosskopf

From: rmallampally. Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:35 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Please, Do not let our kids to be "Island-prisoners" and "school friends ophans"

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear BOEmembers and redistrictingofBcials,

I am resident of Polygon 1171, and would like all the members to reconsiderand review our polygon (# 1171) High School Redirection. Today's decisionleft our kids and community shocking. As you are well aware, the success of a kid notjust dependsupon the school but also on the support system they have (including parents, Iriends and community). It is impossible for any family to raise kids on their own without the help of strong community. It is natural for fhe younger kids to emulate the older kids notjust for studiesbut also for sports and other activities at school. Withthis move, all of a sudden, we became a Small FeedIsland, depriving of normal school kid life, which could affectboth their physical and emotional health. We feel that we belong "No where". We are neither big enough to have our own group of kids and nor "close" enough to play/participate/engagein anyneighborhood and school activities with the "Glenelg High School" kids.

As you clearly know. The feed from polygon 1171 remains negligible and does not have much impact on the current schools (HS: 0.37% now and 1.3% by 2025, MS)

While every family in this neighborhood has a unique story, we are not outsiders but are proud residents of Howard county for years who chose to move into this community because of diversity, great culture and wonderful neighborhoods.We love beinghere andwe are very proud of. Pleasedo not breakthe years old camaraderie.

"Please Do Not Punish the Families who took many Pains and Sacrifices to give our Kids the best Opportunity for choosing this area".

From the bottom of our hearts we are requesting you to keep us (Polygon 1171) at MRHS. Please make every effort to keep our communities together.

Wereally appreciate your Time & Help.

Thanks & Regards, Ravi Mallampally Westmount community Opposition to Redistricting - One

Greetings' My name is L. Tucker and I'm a resident at Uorsey Hall lownhomes (Polygon #148). I reside at: 4950 Dorsey Hall Dr., Unit #1, Ellicott City, MD, 21042. Dorsey Hall is a unified neighborhood that was not included in previous proposals until the 10/28 work session. We seek better due process and oppose the changes made to NES and DMS that impact the Dorsey Hall neighborhood (polygons 148, 1148, 2148, 276, 302. ). Splitting the Dorsey Hall neighborhood impacts our community as many of our neighborhood CA resources exist in and around the polygons being relocated. We are walkers and walk/bike ride to everything. Our polygons walk/ride to the pool, the playground, NES, DMS, etc. We have existing CA pathways throughout our neighborhood. Most of the children in the impacted polygons live within walking distance of at least one of our schools. With the newly completed traffic circle and crosswalks installed at Columbia Rd and Kingscup Ct, the Director of Transit and Howard County have commenced a review of our requests for walker status for additional individuals in our community that may now qualify. We seek to maintain a walkable school and community for residents. Increased bus costs are not an acceptable alternative to a crossing guard. We love all of our schools, especially WLHS. We are concerned deeply that the proposal greatly reduces the DMS to WLHS feed to a single digit microfeed level that is not in compliance with BoE policy. For us, this is about keeping our very tight community together. Others might question how we organized so quickly.. .to us this is not surprising because we really are one big neighborhood with neighbors that are very close and heavily involved our community. We don't want to see dismption to that. Please keep our Community together! Thank you! Follow us on twitter @onedorseyhall https://twitter. com/onedorseyhall Watch our community focus video at https://www.voutube.com/watch?v=LLVUJtbAv_k Questions/Inquiry: Please email us at: onedorseyhall(%gmail. com

Best,

L. Tucker Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Potu, Sreenivasa R(CGI Federal) Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:34 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle Attachments: CMS PTA Letter. jpg; FARM Numbers. jpg

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thankful to BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES. BOE'soriginal decision to move Polygon 189 from PRESand CMSto DOASand LKSwas due to bad and inaccuratedata provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRESand CMSto DOASand LKS. Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to addressthe correction of moving Polygon 189 backfrom Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are less than 20 students proposed to go into Lime Kiln Middle. Request: Pleaseconsider keeping Polygon 189 kidsat the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019-20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight. 1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksvllle middle school. Our existing elementary population is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacity. 2. Keeping Communitiestogether - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMScommunity and should remain with CMS community. 3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs ana lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1.3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereasthe proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6.8 miles awayfrom Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School. 4. Clarksville Middle School FTA position statement supporting our request is attached for reference and consideration. 5. By keeping Polygon 189 at CMS, there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached).

Thank you for your consideration.

Proprietary/confidential infomiation belonging to CGI Federal Inc. or its affiliates may be contained in this message. If you arenot a recipient indicated or intended in this message (or responsible for the delivery ofthis messageto suchperson), or if youthink for anyreason that this messagemay have been addressed to youin error, you may not use or copy or deliver this message to anyone else. In such case, you should destroy this message and are asked to notify the sender by reply email. wxmoN wwtwsm

Ocubw«. 2a*»

Claricwtlte Middle Sdhoot Parent TwwAer AaBoctotlon Pttritfon Statwnent

Aecantog tn the BKatoalJ'Ii. dw "*tton "'our PTCA ltto UIWrt *n<

1. ¥tei»r w»h«»d>oot(hrtteow5mil«w»w»m»P«tta ^ unreMomtote. 3. R»itlnBrtu(tefrtttotnmriier«choctet»detrtm»i^toUwfc^»i hrt rtimi; 'Rcnml»» t ttidentt' iwttwxkof «WO»t-frimd^ othnrpw^. ^ ^hera, ccumetwii, .ntfadnrtilrtmtera-towB ttiBavulnwwe dunng . a»ariUiHelntf>^rdewliq>mu<. Hcmrt Countylutmumt^ .ttei^andinoumonmmudhrtta. Rx^tMdmntBm tea 'nrt tooww ndnwi. lN»xtowN», wda*AN Idcstton.

4. Genwrtcomnu^abeut a. »wi^^caisMa^, v!Wi^^^^ste'tMwaaAt»ndl^wl* toa'i»liu(rtBd, inoretttit-t..l;; MS Thomas Vmduct 701 t-1.03; WUdetake MS 721 38% ffi. ws Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Brendan Mahoney Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:34 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting; Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont- Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj Subject: [External] 117/1117 to River Hill from Atholton

! CAUTION: This email originated fromoutside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. Board Members, Please reconsider your decision and move polygons 117/1117 (Ashleigh Knolls) from Atholton to River Hill.

Our neighborhood was changed 4 times in the process including twice yesterday - each time with different conflictingreasons for the changes.

. 117/1117 are 40% further away from AHS than the other CMS-AHS polygons that were moved from AHS to RHHS. This will needlessly increase transportation cost. This is a clear example of a mistake being made simply because one board member (Dr. Wu) got his request in first. . 117/1117 were moved from LKMS to CMS as part of the last redistricting because we were left as a micro-feed from LKMS to AHS. While we appreciate the boards desire to avoid a "double-move", most of the families impacted want this move. In that case, as in this case, we do not have a preference for what school we attend, wejust want to be in a strong feed. We have asked those families who would be moved twice to indicatethat in their request as most are in favor ofthis move. . The continued heavy development in the Maple Lawn area will eventually require 117/1117 to be moved west to RHHS. Doing so now minimizes impact and disruption later.

Overall I'm extremely disappointed by the haphazard nature by which this process has taken place. Kudos to Dehnont-Small and Cutroneo for honestly admitting this. This redistricting has made the small feed problem worse. The number of small feeds has not improved - even by the arbitrary 15% threshold. If you compute the Average Feed Size you'll see that it has decreased from 31.6% to 28.6% at the High School Level.

Under your plan, far more kids will transition to the next school level with fewer of their classmates.

The complete disregard for this issue by Chairwoman Ellis was contemptible. The boo's you received at the completion of the meeting were well deserved and echo'd by thousands in the community who watched in disbelief as one arbifa-ary decision after another was made. The straw-man argument of "someone will be unhappy no matter what" is dismissive and insulting to the community. We all expected more and will vote accordingly.

Brendan Mahoney Polygons 117/1117 AsMeigh Knolls Greetings! My name is Laveme Tucker and I'm a resident at Dorsey Hall Townhomes (Polygon #148 which at the moment remains NES/DMSAVLHS. ). I reside at: 4950 Dorsey Hall Dr., Unit #1, Ellicott City, MD, 21042. 1 am writing regarding the vote pertaining to the Dorsey Hall community. I believe it is a mistake to alter the Dorsey Hall polygons. To adjust the polygons is an unexpected and drastic measure. Dorsey Hall is an established community from the 1980's, and there is no logical reason to alter our polygons. At the least you could send the entire polygon together to the same school.

Second, our community has asked to be kept intact, #OneDorseyHall, and instead we were spit beyond even the polygon level. Other areas that have asked to be left intact have had their voices heard (e. g.. Pointers Run, Valley Meade). Why not us? Because we didn't have the chance to testify for hours in front of the board?

Third, the boardhas yet to address our remaining small feed. DMSAVLHSwas already a small feed andunder this plan it will get even smaller. How is this fairto our community? We embraceWLHS, but it's a steep price for our kids to pay, to leave the vast majority of your middle school peers. You are looking at small feeds in otherparts ofthe county, so please give ours the same consideration.

Fourth, Northfield is NOT currently over capacity, nor is it projected to be, given the CURRENT attendance area. There is no capacity issue until VES polygons are added to our attendance area. Wouldn't the better choice be to find another way to alleviate that overcrowding? Then there would be no need to move anyone at NES from a capacity perspective.

Lastly, I understand the drive to balance FARM rates. However, in this case, I think that this particular move has 3 negatives (breaking coiinnunities, creating a smaller feed, moving a "walkable" community) and only one positive (balancing FARM rate). There must be a better solution. Perhaps look back at the feasibility studies or the Superintendent's recommendation (as you did for CCES). Also, safety is of concern as our children will be bussed across a busy congested intersection, causing more congestion in the area and higher to-affic concerns.

In closing, I just want to plead that Dorsey Hall is a close knit community. Most ofus share common values which allow us to embrace our trajectory to WLHS. Please keep Dorsey Hall intact.

Best,

Laveme Tucker Opposition to Redistricting - One Dorsey Hall

Greetings! My name is L. Tucker and I'm a resident at Dorsey Hall Townhomes (Polygon #148). I reside at: 4950 Dorsey Hall Dr., Unit #1, Ellicott City, MD, 21042. Dorsey Hall is a unified neighborhood that was not included in previous proposals until the 10/28 work session. To address the Dorsey Hall concerns with BOB proposal for Northfield, I propose the BOEunravel a series of unnecessary moves of a few polygons that artificially created an over capacity issue at Northfield. This plan the allows the BOE to retain the 174 children from Northfield polygons1148, 148, 302 and 276 at Northfield, and thus these children would not need to be pushed into Running Brook for artificially high capacity reasons. This steady state at NES will allow more children from RBES to stay at their school, while still alleviating the potential 3-year over capacity problem. Additionally, more Bryant Woods children would be able to remain at their school as well. Below are the three steps needed for implementation.

1) Return the Waterloo to Veterans polygons to Waterloo. This move caused an unnecessary ripple effect: moving kids out of Veterans to Northfield which in turn moving kids from Northfield to Running Brook Elementary. We suggest retaining these children at Waterloo. This would stop unneeded moves of 110 children. 2) Return the Veterans to Northfield polygons to Veterans. This would keep an additional 161 children from changing schools but leave VES at approximately 115% of capacity. 3) If desired, in order to reduce Veterans 115% overcapacity, the BOB could move VES Polygon 101 from Veterans to Worthington which would take VES to approximately 109% of capacity and Worthington to 99%. This would move 48 children to a new school, which has been proposed by the Superintendent's plan as well as Dr. Wu. 4) Thus, the elimination of the Waterloo to VES and VES to NES moves would allow NES to remain at its current utilization. This utilization rate was acceptable in both feasibility studies as well as Dr. Martirano's plan. And therefore our proposal would allow the NES polygons148, 276, 302, and 1148 to remain at Northfield. Thus, this plan would move only 48 students as compared to at least 450 in the current BOB plan. Why cause a ripple effect when it is not needed? This will tremendously reduce the number of kids moving to different schools when it is not necessary for capacity reasons. Additionally, the current BOB proposal would temporarily lower the FARMS rate at Running Brook just to the point RBES would no longer be eligible for Title 1 funds in current HCPSS policy. The current BOB plan also increases the RBES utilization rate to 108% in the first year, rising to 114% by the third. Thus, this plan likely saves additional students at RBES that would otherwise be moved in three years.

Best,

L. Tucker Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Wang Jie Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:34 PM To: Vicky Cutroneo; Sabina Taj; Hcpss Redistricting; Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Jennifer Mallo; Christina Delmont-Snnall; Chao Wu Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not cliekUnks or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members.

Weare thankful to BOEmembers forunanimously passinga motion to move Polygon 189back to PRES.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are less than 20 students proposed to eo into Lime Kiln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the saine schools as they are attending for the school year 2019-20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - KeepingPolygon 189atthe Clarksville Middle Schoolwill haveno negative or adverse impact on any ofthe FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids soine to Clarksville middle school. Our existine elementary population is also dispersed evenly K- 5 andwill not cause disruption to CMS capacitv.

2. Keeping Communities together -- Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for ChUdren and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6.8 miles awayfrom Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School. 4. Clarksyille Middle School PTAposition statement supportins our request is attached for reference and consideration.

5. By keeping Polveon 189 at CMS. there are no impacts to FAMRnumbers, as -we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached}. Thank you for your consideration.

Yours Sincerely, Joyce ;Eiac>P llOra ^l'A~rt yFtu I

t'ifto^c* te_

Clarksville Middle School Perent Tfeachw Associat'ton Position Statement Attentfancf' Area Adlustmmr Plt?B fdated MFfiat , 20Ki

AecortNng to the ^pfyiMiSFTk, UIB" BttWon uf our PTSAte to tuppan. andspeak on behalf of chltdren In ourschool, in the communtty, and before govwnmfnt bodies and other

The Ciarkarilte WA holds tte Wlitteinji pBuiMons: i. We agree with the goal of addres»ing issues oif fneqwty iln ttowanil tounty. ft )s not cfear, however, that evtdeoce supports moving students out o( their communities to address thte goal. Sodoeconwntc dlspari^ should be addressed bydewttng educaUonal resources (teacher Wring, after school imentortng, other programs) based on need rather than by dlsruptfng students' lives.

2. my redistrictlng should affect me fewest numbBr of families nsseaary. Mwing 207 studepts from a school that

Forcfng students transif'er schools Is iWintentat to ihefr msntot hwtth by ^moving their safety i t and intn «Aas unnecessary etwnge and stress. Renwrtns B siydft i" netwc support-friends, other parente, teachers, counselors, ar criticat tinw In their d» ' CounQ> has recently increased i., Foreina children to move to a sdwot out of mitely atf" stress and IT y (dat t( in.

ii. «W in f essol

ayrrwt pros te been offer years.. FARM FARM FARM Middle School Capaoty Aug 22 Nov U Change Bonnle Braiich MS 7D1 27% 13.41J Burtelgti Manor MS 779 '!». MSi 0. 27 ClarksyIlleMS 643 iSK 12% JL<61 Bunloggln MS 5S5 :fflS !2.S7l Skrldge Landing MS 773 2» 2fiW !i. oi) BllBitt Mills MS -mi ^u» Folly Quarter MS 662 <5% Slenwood MS 54S lh 0.68 Hammond MS 604 aftt 26% 13.79] Harpers Chaice MS sos 31% fz-ssj Lake ElkhomMS 643 13. 13) Ume Ktln Ms 721 fS% Mavfleld Woods MS 798 '3.73) MouirtViBWMS 796 <5% Murray Hill Ms 662 33% J5.3S) Oakland Mill? MS 566 s . il.2S} Patapsso MS 643 JU8( uSfi lO. ili Patuxent Valley MS TW »m 33% i4.-t2! ;Thomas Vfaduct MS 701 3B% j4. 0ij Wilde take MS 721 (S.Sil) JVIarilyn Grosskopf

From: Cara Mahoney Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:33 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting; Vicky Cutroneo; Kirsten Coombs; Christina Delmont-Small; Chao Wu; Sabina Taj; Mavis Ellis Subject: [External] small feeds that could be avoided

' CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good afternoon.

1 knowthis is thelast time m whichyou will behearing testimony. I amwriting againin regards to the CMS/AHS feed. At the onset ofthis redistricting, the feed was a strong 35%. Since this has started, the feed has shamefally been reduced to 15%. A little backstory - yes, our polygons (all ofthe remaining polys which you have kept at AHS and not moved to RHHS) were moved 2 years ago at the middle school level from LKMS to CMS. The reasoning for the moves at that time were to free up space at LKMS and to eliminate the small feed from LK to AHS, which at the tune was around a 13% feed. So, we moved - great, we were with our community. Well, nowwe are placed right back in the sameprediciment, just now from a differentmiddle school. A "slightly" bigger feed, but not really under Mallo's definition ofa 2% difference, hasbeen created from a much stronger feedfor no reason. There is zero reason whythis feedneeds to exist! Looking atthe new proposed map ofAHS isjust nonsensical andcould be very easily avoidor rectified. Ifwe can fix tfiis small feed by eliminating it, would it be possible to have current freshman, who so desire, sign a waiver to stay at AHS with their own transportation? It is a very small number ofchildren that this woirid affect. I am asking, once again, to eitherput backto status quo the 35% CMS/AHS feedor eliminate it completely so that our children can stay in schools with their community. Ifneither ofthese scenarios arepossible, please vote NO onthis plan andtake fhe time to really dothe research neededto make informed decisions regarding the future schooling of our children.

Thankyou

Cara Mahoney Polygonlll? Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Julie Vilnit Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:32 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Don't make Long Reach higher FARMs

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Board members, I live in polygon 2087 and my area is going to be redistricted out of Howard into Long Reach HS. I was happy that part of this move including trying to decrease the FARMS percentage at Long Reach. However the proposed changes still leave LRHSas one of the schools with the highest concentration of poverty and a stark contrast to its neighboring Howard. Please do not continue to move low FARMS polygons back out of Long Reach and back into Howard and increase the FARMS percentage back up. I was dismayed to see so many polygons in Elkridge being proposed to move backto Howard making Howard more overcrowded and LR FARMS higher. Wasn't the whole crux of this redistricting to relieve overcrowding at Howard? I appreciateyour eye to future development but that hasn't been consideredthroughout the county such as at the Milk Plant going into Hammond ES. Also you aim to fix a feed from EESthat was already an existing small feed to Long Reach. Your initial changes made that feed bigger as well as a stronger feed from ELMS to LRHS overall. Please don't undo those changes by moving so many of those polygons back to Howard and making the Rockburn students (who now have a split feed) have less peers to go to LRHSwith. Elkridge ES has had s split to Howard and Long Reach for some time. Thank you. -Julie Vilnit

Sent from my IPhone FASM FARM FARM Middle School Capacity Aug Z2 Nov 13 Change Bonnie Branch MS 701 »3-.; Suriel^i Manor MS 779 u% 0.27

CtarksnlleMS 643 <1. 46,

DunlogginMS 565 , -i r, ~, Elkrldge landing MS 779 _{. aiteottMIBsMS 701 low

Murray Mill MS 662 3396 '5.36.1 Oatdand Mills MS u. 2i. PatapscoMS 643 . J.. i-; 760 33% W42) Thomas Vladuct MS 701 38X weii WUdelakeMS 721 i&w.i pesinoM STATi. wiNi

8CTnb»rXX. 3>at9

Clartevftle Mfcldte School Parent Teactwr Assoctatton Poritfon Statement Atttndutce Anae Adjuttnmi Ptan tttated Augutt 29,

*«w<^tothe(teySand^3TA. tbemWanur»irrrSAtote»ainionamlipM l( on betatfof ehttdiwTlniwidwnl, In th» community, widt^oi»_tummnm»t bodtet midottwr o»»nte»ttom thrt matedNhtam aftocttat «*<«*»«>. The OartBvUte PTA (wtds tte fottowlna paitttom:

Wte^(w w»h (^ »^ of NklFBNrtna toiuei or tacqrity to ttowwd County. It I* net clmr, how^. that wfdenn awoitt ma^ ttulwte cut rf ttwtrcommurtttesufdAaBtbfetBal. Soctoeaxmrtc g eduiattanarraoureu (tMdwr Wrtnfc aftwtdwol mcntt>rii», othw pro»mn»> bMNl on nwd nrthar than by daupttig ttudw^s'llw*. 2, JWP«ti*U<<^»*hl*^afl!K:tth»ftswlwlmlmlNrolrft"rtl?"'NCW £.. Mo^^^idwtefnmaadiootttrtfenotomawnM fted. inadrttion, bu*« aicse ttudentt, who an Ate to iwBt tn an*»1

<. Giiualcammentt about Uieprecaa o» rettetrt hwatwd* uNumuf^ w&wrai^ ft«wK(^affatfted by i^tUdirtcttai (.(."tafrhuirt^i^'dwfl^ proaaoKtocWoft^NiMnB.^ parontewwt tote tawhedtehw b<»»*rt«w wdr?wn>we, FpropoM&^sfiftMihme bwm offend far r^^Biti MBNnunftyt^utowthBiNrtttwyeiui. rtudate dwdld be^wn . trti*num af t f artor to diwgint s' iufcttig^rt^ »thrt a»wnurty»and i »nirtrtdn«t. Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Srini Potu Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:31 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion'Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle Attachments: FARM Numbers. jpg; CMS PTA Letter. jpg

! CAL7TION:This emaU originatedfrom outside ofHCPSS.Do not cMcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. DearBoard of EducationMembers,

We are thankful to BOB members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 1 89 back to PRES.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate dataprovided by Dr. Wu onNovember 13, wherehe proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to addressthe correction ofmoving Polygon 189back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are less than 20 students proposed to go into Lime Kiln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019-20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - KeqiingPolygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any ofthe FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary population is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacity.

2. KeepingCommunities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and shouldremain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1.3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kihimiddle school is 6.8 miles awayfrom Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, basedon the proposed move to LKMS,our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement supporting our request is attached for reference and consideration.

5. By keeping Polygon 1 89 at CMS, there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the attached BOB FARM numbers (attached).

Thank you for your consideration. Potu FARM FARM FARM Middle School Capacity Aug Z2 Nov 19 Change Branch MS Bonnle 701 27% 13.41. Burieftfi ManorMS 779 u» 0.27 ClarksvilleMS 643 1W . l. te; DunlogglnMS 565 16K i. ^' Elkri^e LandingMS 779 26X >1.C;< Elllcott Mills MS 701 10% FollyQuarter MS G62 <5% Glenwood MS 545 0.68 Hammond MS i3. 73i HarpBR Choice MS SOB 3M6 iz. a'.i ttke Slthom MS &B 38% n. i!; UmeKtinMS 721 MayfleldWoods MS 798 41W 12.7; Mount View MS 798 <5% MS Murray Hill 33% . 3.36] OaMand Mills MS 506 ii. ZS' Patapsco MS 643 1B»6 . ^.2..- Ptuxant ValleyMS 760 33% f-i-ASi

Thomas Viaduct MS 701 38% f-S. C; Wilde lake MS 721 ; AM- »OWT(8N' STATWCNT

OctBbwxx. iOt?

Clartovllte Middle Sdwol Parent Twcher Assoctatton Posttfon Statement *tum»tenns Aw *

AcconNngto thBBK^ffAEB. thetNtsto o»our f(SAfcto awort Nrit^alt on brt^f

The OartowiUePTA hold* tfr feltowtnt pwttlcnt;

1. ^. ye®wNiitte|(»loradd atnai»»uworinc<|uitytnHw »dC<)unty. It to notclmr. howmer, that wWanoBtupports moivlnt ttidwte i yiefra>mmwrittwtBaddn»tl«b»>at. SoctoecBiwiwfcApwltythouUtr .ddreaed by dmttW aduntlonat i»wuro» we sbiderte, »»ho_tnattoowr5mfte«wyN W p»

3. y!&tc^ttudentstot»iaiBte*cte»(tdrtrtm«iU»ltottieh'nN»i^hM( ! introducing uniNWWd-»e Ntrf ^mt~9HM^i a tudanti' Mtomk o? *W», hopriwinss, andnricktri id^ton. 4. GawalconNneBttabout UNipmcen or mdlttricUnr. a. inwtwthe communl^. upectoUyfaroate, affkdri by rBdrtrictti. in7l«riiui»W/nion' ">^. <'d

;iSiHi!;> u5^ 5totmdttrirtnt^hw«*bat^ _JW»*j> ^ew n«t(lcBm«nu(*yiiv«owttef«&t»s iww^ t>. ni Bfn

From: JieWang Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:31 PM To: Vicky Cutroneo; Sabina Taj; Hcpss Redistricting; Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Jennifer Mallo; Christina Delmont-Small; Chao Wu Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck Itaks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thankful to BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

BOE's original decisionto move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kihi to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are less than 20 students proposed to so into Lime Kiln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019-20 andpropose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon isyat the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any ofthe FARM or Capacitynumbers, as we are less than 20 kids soine to Clarksville middle school. Our existine elementary vopulation is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacity.

2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increasedtransportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1 . 3 miles away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6.8 miles awayfrom Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School. JVIarilyn Grosskopf

From: Lubna Arora Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:31 PM To: Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; SabinaTaj; ChaoWu; BoE Email; KathleenV. Hanks;Trudy M. Grantham; David L. dark; Superintendent; Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 1129 kids are WALKERS TO PRES! DO NOT MOVE WALKERS!

! CAUTION: TMs emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe senderand know the content is safe. Good afternoon,

When Dr. Wu brought this up in yesterday's session, it was said that the transportation study would need to be done to claim walker eligibility.

CAN WE PLEASEATTEMPT TO PURSUETHAT STUDYAND NOT MAKETHIS POLYGONWAIT SEVERAL MORE YEARS TO BE MOVED BACK TO THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOL AGAIN?

I urge you to please considerthis prior to your final vote. I understand that it's nearly impossible to consider this so late in the game, but this should've been addressed in Dr. Martirano's original plan. The onus was on the board and plan makers to determine walker eligibility based on proximity (< 1 mile) to current school rather than moving these kids to a school that is 5 miles away. If this got missed in the process, it deserves a second look.

This will also provide some relief to the shortage of bus drivers. PLEASE RE-EVALUATE THIS DECISION! thank you! Eshween Kohli Polygonll29 Marityn Grosskopf

From: itsrajitha@yahoo. co. in Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:28 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: Kirsten Coombs; Chao Wu; Sabina Taj; Jennifer Mallo; Christina Delmont-Small; Vicky Cutroneo; Mavis Ellis Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle Attachments: CMS PTA Letter.jpg; FARM Numbers.jpg

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thankful to BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES on 11/18/2019.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOESand LKMSwas due to incomplete data at that time on November 1 3, where Dr WU proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS. Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are tess than 20 students proposed to go into Lime Kiln Middle from CMS. Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight. 1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impacton anyof the FARM or Capacitynumbers, as we are lessthan 20 kidsgoing to Clarksvillenijddie school. Our existing elementary Dopulation is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacjt^ 2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuityfor Children and avoiding increasedtransportation costs and lead times - Clarksville MiddleSchool is less than 1_3 miles away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles awayfrom Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement suooortinaour request Isattached for reference and consideration.

5. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS. there are no impacts to FARM numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached).

6. will be able to eliminate disruption to attend after school activities.

7. To avoid parents tos/no their valuable time in travel to pickup their multiple kids from different schools

Thank you for your consideration.

Thanks

Rajitha Mandepudi, CPA OauberWMO

Clartowltle MfAlle Sdwol Parent Teadw Assoctatton Poritfon Stoterre?nt AttmdincBAm Ad»u*tment Ptan (drtNd Aigurt M,

Ac n^« to th* (Sl*aSaal£B. the nation of our WSAhto aippan andKNA on tMhatfirfAtldmi^itiwchBot, (n Uwconmun^, andlieftm . awmnumt badlw and other ownaattoiw th« n»l» dachtom tffacttot chMmn. "Ow Ctortiwttte PTA hold* the fattewli^ pwfttow:

1. WiTwwfUh the |ortgiwm( ba*ad on nwd iitkw than by dsrui studatts'Uvw.

2. Avmdtttrictts*hou{

3. fiorcti» rtudento to&ans?ar«dwo(» kdttrtromlri tothdr a®BMhurtth by mmwlni tft^ afa^ IN*1^ bttredudni umwcBnwy <*NNit« Ntd ttnu. ftnnwlng a Audmitt' mttwk of wpport-ftfaiA, oUter ;,<..>...»-., tBKhera, awmetois, and adndntrtralUB-lamB tt»n wdnenhte -iynm . CTftkrttlroeinttefrttewlcpmeK. Mowwd County hB»

y» , fw » priorto dBN^IniKAoote. c. 1» }WHi^uU^d ^»lS^wcimj^^»^»^l*w^mA Wf BlriBBAlBtl. FAKM FARM FARM Middle School Capadty Aug 22 Nov 19 Change

Bonnle Branch MS 701 27% ^:i^\ BurielghManor MS 779 u% O.Z7 ClaiksvllleMS 12K Dunlogpn MS SS5 16% -;.ST 779 ElltTldgeLanding MS 26% I ^ I'.. Hticott Mills MS 701 FollyQuarter MS 662 Gtenwood MS 545 0.68 HammondMS 604 26W ll:, Harpers Choice MS 506 Sl% <2.6i.' lake Elkhom MS 643 iS. U; UmeKrinNIS 721

MayfleldWoodsMS 798 41% <2,73j Mount View MS 798 <5%

MunayHltlMS 662 3396 s~s.3e; Oakland Mill* MS 506 Patapsco MS 643 ?0.32i Patuxent Valley MS 33% i^M; FThomasVladurt MS 7D1 3856 . 4.0ij Wilde lake MS 721 3896 '6,54} Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Joyce WANG Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:30 PM To: Vicky Cutroneo; Sabina Taj; Hcpss Redistricting; Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Jennifer Mallo; Christina Delmont-Small; Chao Wu Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thaiikful to BOB members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES said CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad aiid inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on Noveinber 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS aiid LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to CIarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are less than 20 students vrovosedto so into Lime Kiln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the saine schools as they are attending for the school year 2019-20 aiid propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189atthe Clai-ksville Middle School will haveno negative or adverse impact on any ofthe FARM or Capacity nui-nbers, as we are less than 20 kids spins to Clarksvjlle middle_school. Our existins elementai-v population is also dispersed evenly K- 5 andwill not cause disruption to CMS_capacitv.

2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS commuiiity and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clm-ksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6.8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, ou- Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement supportins our reauest is attached for reference and consideration.

5. By keepins Polvson 189 at CMS. there are no impacts to FAMRnumbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached). Thaiik you for your consideration.

Yours Sincerely, Joyce S'il A'f-EMEN't

^aotec" ^^,,

Clarksvltle Wddle School Pprent "reache'ir' Assoctatton Position Statemeirt Attentfancf Afea Adiustmiint Pl»n (datwl AlflE-ust 310, i£019t

Accordtng to the (terviand PTA, (. ht.' niiiwan cii' our PTSA te to sup^oa anil speak on behalfof chtklreii In our school, in the com»m»ntty, and before gowniiinent bodies and other orB»nftattons thai nwttc deds.tens affectingcb

The Clartavtllle hold* tfle (oilto'm'ne pusi'uona:

1. We agree with the- gwl utr adtfresslng ils&Mes of fnequiiy in Hawani County. It Is not clear, however, that evidence supports movfnj stucteflts out o< their CBmmunfUes to addres thts goal. Sadoeconomfc disparity shouto be addressed by dewttng educational resources (teacher Mring, after sdwol mentoring, other pn^r». m»> based cin n&'sd rathar than by dlsnupttng. students' lives. 2. Any redistrictlns snould affec. t tfw fewest number olT tamllies necessary. Mwtng 207 studtents from ? school that Is not OTercrowied te not jusWed. Inaddition, busing these studenu, whoare able to v-®lkto Ctartevtllc AUddleSchool, to a school that is over 5 miles awayseems particularly unreasonable. 3. Forcing students transfer schools is timenlal to their mental heatth by wmoving their safety i ' and intn rfng umeceaary etiange and stress- Itemcwtr^ » stude " iuroort Mer" r parents, teachers, counselon, ar leaves tftem » iMe during B crittcal tiffre in their dd rt County has ; :-3ei tly inc'reased attentfon and resources i. Fwcing children' cimwe to s school out of' iritriy add stress ar del fda an.

.life offered for

himum csf

c. FARM FARM FARM Middle SchoDl Capacity Aug 22 Nov 19 Change Bonnle Branch MS 701 ZTSi 13.41)! BUrieigh Manor MS 773 i;-^ 1194 O. Z7 ClarlcsyilleMS 643 1256 11.4B) DunlegglnMs 565 aa '-sn Etferidge Landing MS Tf3 il-Oli Elllcatt Mills MS 701 T%, loss} Folly Quarter MS 662 a Glenwaod MS 545 o.ea Hammond ^as 604 O. TSj Harpers Choice MS 506 31% (Z.S5) latiE Elkhom MS 643 3856 tu.y, Ume Kiln Ms 721 <5W Mayfleld Woods MS 798 41% 12. 73) Mount View MS res <5% Murray Hill MS 662 33% 15. S6) Oakland Mills MS 50S Jl^S) PatapS Eo MS 643 (0. 31) Patuxent Valley MS 760 iThsmas VIaductMS 701 ..a 3BX (4.03) Wilde Lake MS 721 'aSs 38% j6 541 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: mahendra marath Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 3:21 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting; Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; VickyCutroneo; Christina Delmont- Small;Jennifer Mallo; SabinaTaj; ChaoWu Subject: [External] Motion Needed:Polygon 189 backto Clarksville Middle Attachments: FARM Numbers.jpg

ION: emafl ""ginated from outside of HCPSS. Do CAyT Tl^s not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members, Wegreatly appreciated all seven BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES. BOE'!°''iginalde°si°. n to move poly90n 189from PRESand CMSto DOASand LKSwas dueto badand inaccurate 1 provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189fromPRESandCMS ^"DOAS'and u."f°rt"n.ate',y'. t.he BOEne9lected to addressthe correction ofmoving Polygon 189back from LimeKiin to

As it stands, we are a m/cro feedtess than 20 students proposed to oo into L/me K;/n Mdd/e. Request:-please c°nsider keeping poly?°n 1 89 kids atthe same schools as they are attending forthe school year 2019- and propose a motion to fix the oversight. 1»N°adverse-impact. t°CMS:Keepin9 poly9°" 189at the Clarksville MiddleSchool will haveno negative or adverse l.pa.ct-°rl, any°fthe FAR.M..OF'Capacity numbers, aswe are fess than 20kids going toClarksvillemidd^e"school~Our' Is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS caoacih

£", BI/,teep'"? po'vaon 189 at CMS n°t °"lv help to reduce the cost. time and resources of County's TransDortatit DMsion, butalso greatly reduce travel time, reducetraffic blocks andenhance the safetyof kids. 3. Keepl"g.c°mmllnitles to9ether- Polygon 189is heavilyinvolved with CMS community and should remainwith community. 4:-co"tin!,"ty-forch"dre" and av°'ding_i"creased transportation costs and leadtimes - Clarksville MiddleSchool is less than 1. 3 miles away from Polygon 1-89, whereas the proposed Lime" Kiln'middre'schooi is'6"8 mile's;

. -189',Th. is»creates ? 1 h°ur 10 minute round trio commute dailyfor our childrenMoreover. 'tsasecl on the oposed move to our pr LKMS, Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle-SchooTto-go totheTime KiTnM'id'dle'

5. Clarksville MiddleSchool PTAposition statement supoortinaour request is attachedfor reference and Marntlr 6'.B/ teeP"7ff Polyqon 189at CMS. there are no impacts to FAMRnumbers, as we can see from the atfacheii BOF FARM numbers lattached).

Thank you for your consideration. FARM FARM FARM MiddteSchool Capacity Aug 22 Nov 19 Change

Bonnie Branch MS 701 27S6 Burieigh Manor MS 779 ue< 0.27 ClarksvilleMS 643 ua

Dunloggln MS S6S 16% . \i?) Elkridge Landing WS 779 11. ElltCOMMills MS 701 l0% FotlyQuarter MS G62 <5% Glenwood MS 545 0.68 Hammand MS 604 26S 'i. 'TSl Harpers Choice MS 31814 !? 8'..

Lake Elkhorn MS 643 (?S,.'}A> UmaKitnMS 721 <5% Mayfleld Woods MS 798 /^.i Mount View MS ^raaT <5% Murray Hill MS 662 33% !5.36. Oahland Mills MS 506 4

Patuxtnt Valley MS 760 (w.. <*Jf 'Thomas VIaduct MS 701 3S% . n;' Wilde lake MS 721 38% if. S.lj ^anl^

From: Denise Esquivel Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:29 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Fw: Redistricting for Polygon 1120 (Ashleigh Greene) to be included with 120 (Ashleigh Greene), and 117, 1117, 118 (Ashleigh Knolls) and for ALLOF THESE POLYGONS TO GO WITH OUR PRES & CMS COMMUNITY

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Donot cBcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

-- ForwardedMessage -- From; Denise Esqiiivel To: BoE Email ; chao_wu@hcpss. org ;jemufer_mallo@hcpss. org ;kirsten_coombs@hcpss. org;-MavisEIlis; viclsy^cutroneo@hcpss^org ; christiaadehnont-small@hcpss. org; sabina_taj@hcpss. org Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019, 12:10:29 PM EST Subject^ Re: Redistrictmg forPolygon 1 120 (Ashleigh Greene) to be included with 120 (AsUeigh Greene), and 117, 1117, 118 (AsUeighKnolls) andfor ALL OF THESE POLYGONS TO GOWITH OUR PRES & CMS COMMUNITY I amvery saddenedmd confused as to whyPolygons 117, 1117, 118, 120, 1120are not being redistricted with the Clarksville Middle Schoolfeed. My8th grade daughter and our family have been a partof (he Pointers Run community for over 15 years. The redistrictingplan sends all of her Mends from Clarksville Middle to lUver Hill. Friendsthat she has had since kmdergarten. Shewill goto Atholton isolated andalone without the support offamiUarfamilies toher. I havebeen watching the work sessions. It seems as thoughthis decision was based on sophomores at AHS being affected. Thosestudents should be given a waiverto stayat Atholton andthepolygom shouldbe redistricted to River Hill for(he greater good. Orthe current plan should not be implemented untUnew highschools are built. Thiswould give fair preparation to studentsand families and allow the board membera to makedecisioiB without being mshed. Please keep our neighborhoods together, eliminate the smaU feed from CMS to AHS. Alleviate this stress from our chUdren. Denise Esquivel

Sent from my iPhone

OnNov 18, 2019, at 3:45 PM, DeniseEsquivel wrote:

Please Please.... Mycul-de-sac is part ofAshleigh Greene butwe are in a differentpolygon with a verylow population!! I havean 8th grader at Clarksville Middle mdmypolygon is redistricted to a differentHS than my neighborhood!!? Help! Please send 1120 with 120/117/1117/118. Denise Esquivel

Sent from my iPhone

OnNov 13, 2019,at 11:20PM, Denise Esquivel wrote: Redistricting Testimony Re: Appeal for Polygon 1120 to redistrict with the Clarksville Middle School feed

To whom in may concern,

I currently have an eighth-grade student at Clarksville Middle School who is subject to redistricting in the 2020 school year. The most recent redistricting scenario has Polygon 1120 in which I reside assigned to a different high school than 85% + ofCMS students. I respectfully request reconsideration of this current plan.

I was very disappointed and saddened to see that Polygons 1128 & 128 were swapped with 117 118 1117 120for reasons that include: they involve moving less polygons and the residents there want to be kept as part of the Pointers Run community. Our surrounding polygons, while totaling more in number of polygons, actually total less in number of people being moved. We too very much want to remain part of the Pointers Run community and Clarksville Middle School feed. My daughter has grown up attending both of these schools. It is challenging to stay connected and supported and share advocacy in the geographically remote and divided area where we live. We identify and cling to the connections provided by our school community. We now stand to be more isolated by our exclusion in the redistricting feed. My daughter is part of only a handful of children in our polygon. Their experience would be greatly enhanced by remaining with the other students from Clarksville Middle School rather than 12% outcast to a different school. I do not think that this is asking too much, especially in light of these students already having endured the stress of being redistricted after 1 year of middle school. Following completion at Pointers Run Elementary they were part of a small group separated to attend Lime Kiln Middle School rather than remain with the majority feed to Clarksville Middle. While adjusting to 6thgrade and transitioning to middle school, these students were told they would be moved again, and in 7thgrade were sent to Clarksville Middle. What is the point of redistricting my child to Clarksville Middle only to have her excluded from high school with these peers? Give our kids consideration and do not overlook them. It is becoming hard not to feel dismissed. I am asking that this small group of students remain in the Clarksville Middle School feed to which they have traditionally been grouped and to which they have established a community. The feed to a different high school is incredibly small and isolating. They deserve this just as much at Polygons 1128 & 128.

The prospect of being isolated from friends that they have made since elementary school at PRES and the friendships they have worked hard to promote at Clarksville is daunting as they enter high school. In a time when emotional stability is more important than ever, please do not separate our children again from their friendships and the community network that supports our challenging lives. I respectfully request that students in Polygon 1120 remain with the approximately 85% being redistricted in the Clarksville Middle School feed.

Sincerely, Denise Esquivel and the Esquivel Family Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Richa Mann Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:29 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; BoE Email; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu Subject: [External] Request to move Polygon 189 back to CMS Attachments: CMS PTA Letter. jpg

CAUTION: This emau originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. Dear Board of Education Members, we^g[ea,tLyapprec. iate ?."seven BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to ^R . u."fort""ately the BOE ne9'ected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 backfrom Lime Kiln to Middle. BOE'soriginal decision to move Polygon 189from PRESand CMSto DOESand LKMS was due inaccuratedata. Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending forthe school year2019-20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

189 at the 1_No. adye rse_'m, pact.tocMS-~ KeePin9 Polygon Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, aswe are lessthan 20 kidsgoing to Clarksville middle school. 'Ow existing elementary population is also dispersed evenly K- 5 andwill notcause disruption to CMScaoacj^

MS nlv helDS to the cost t""e and resources of County's Transportatii n:.^L'^ep/"?^l/?-°n. !89afC not. °. rec?'ce Djyision, but also greatly reduce travel time, reduce traffic blocks and enhance the safetyof kids. ^Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with community. 4. Continuityfor Children andavoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville MiddleSchool is

. t^', '. 1-'?_mj1^ awayfrom Polygon 189 whereasthe proposed LimeKiln middleschool is6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. Thisj:reatesa 1 hour 10minute round trip commute dailyfor our children. Moreover, basedon the proposed move to LKMS, our 189 will Polygon kids go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to theYime'Kirn M'iddle School.

5. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement suDDOrtina our request is attached for reference and consideratia 6. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS. there are no Impacts to FARM numbers. POSniOX STATEM NT

OctOBe'XX. 20t9

C(artav(t(e Middle &:hcwt Parent Teacher Asoctatton Position Stat«ment AttendanceArea Ad^istnxmt nui tdated *u»st 20, Z0t»»

According to the Maaiffi&ETA. the

1. Weagree wtth the pal of addre»tog l»uw aq{ students' ttvet,

2. /wy retUurfcting riwutd affect the f«wa number of famaies wccssaty. Mowing 207 students from . school Uwtfe notowrerowdedfe not lusWfed. In addlitton, busing these studenu, who are

3. Forcii^ students to transferschssb ft dewuwrtal io tl-- . Itn by nmNnrfng their safety n« and tntroAKAngunneceiswyc |eand stress. ltetn, __ rparenB, tiMchers, counselore, md admtntstratora-tewes them vtdneraMie durtaa » crtycaltftnelnttetrdewtopment. HowaKt Coun^ has recmtly (ncreaaed attertton and reswrcei w mental healtti. Forring chWtfren Ui mfff ' to a school out of thdr ne(^rfx>rtio(ri wtU deflrttety add S»»B and may tocrwwsadne®,hopeteii»iess. and .Butdtld, tdeatton.

4. Genefal csinwmnts ti»f of redtttncUng; a. j»n^waieCTnmunity, e^»edaUyfamfttes, affettedbyred strtettn8 in a te»-tturricd, ffwrethoy^itftA proass of decfeton-maMng. Parents w tmolved in how boundaries are piMlrawn. Wte understa ttt^usslon and commimtty (nput owr the past two y»rs. . FuntU«of»w»ttrictedstudcnttsiiasAibegtv«ia»nWn»an

Awfcinnnfptf f-gdto*±isothatc w^netgN Ws Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Sai Bala Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:28 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thankful to BOB members for unanimouslypassing a motion to move Polygon 189back to PRES.

BOE'soriginal decisionto move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccuratedata to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglectedto addressIhe correction ofmovmg Polygon 189back from LimeKiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are less than 20 students proposed to go into Lime Kiln Middle.

Request: Pleaseconsider keeping Polygon 189 kids at fhe same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019-20 andpropose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverseimpact to CMS - KeepingPolygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle Schoolwill haveno negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementarypopulation is also dispersedevenly K- 5 and will not cause disruptionto CMS capacity.

2. Keeping Connnunities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoidingincreased transportation costs andlead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1 .3 miles away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6.8 miles awayfrom Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 mmute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, basedon the proposedmove to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement supporting our request is attachedfor reference and consideration.

5. By keeping Polygon 1 89 at CMS, there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the BOB FARM numbers.

Thankyou for your consideration.

Best Regards SaiBala Thanks Sai 678-478-1944 (Mobile) Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Sahana Potu Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:27 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle Attachments: FARM Numbers.jpg; CMS PTA Letter.jpg

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thankful to BOB members for unanimouslypassing a motion to move Polygon 1 89 backto PRES.

BOE's original decisionto move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 fromPRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglectedto addressthe correction ofmoving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are less than 20 students proposed to go into LimeKiln Middle.

Request: Please considerkeeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019-20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverseimpact to CMS - KeepingPolygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will haveno negative or adverse impact on any ofthe FARM or Capacitynumbers, as we are less than 20 kids goingto Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementarypopulation is also dispersedevenly K- 5 and will not cause dismption to CMS capacity.

2. KeepingCommunities together - Polygon 189 is heavilyinvolved with CMS commumty and shouldremain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoidingincreased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1.3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereasthe proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6.8 miles awayfrom Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kihi Middle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement supporting our request is attachedfor reference and consideration.

5. By keeping Polygon 1 89 at CMS, there are no impacts to FAMRnumbers, as we can see from the attached BOB FARM numbers (attached).

Thank you for your consideration. Sahana 6th Grade Clarksville Middle school STATfKEW

C8ftob»rtOC, 2019

Clartevllte Mtcktle School Parent Teacher Assodatton Position Statement Aneixtence Area Adjustment Plan (datasd *uai« 20, Z01»»

According to tte t!teSd^fs Oft behatfof dtfldrentn our tchoot.

The Oaritsvtlte PTA bold* the foltowlng potdiom:

We agree with the goal of tddn'Hrfngissue* at Ine^ty m HowwdCourty. It tt not clear, however, that evhlenut suppon* nwvtnB students out <»f thrtr communities to address thte goal. Sadoeccinonitedfspwlty ihOtAl be addfvawdtby devoting educationalniourow (tmcher Wrtnt, aftwschool menioring, other proyanw) bis«'d on need rather than by disrupUng stuteus' Itws. Any redfstrtetlng riwutdaffcet the fewwt numtw of famtttet ne

4. General carono a< y. Inw-iwthe ammunity, fi Uyfwnlltes, affected ty re< i»fctSn| (n»le*$-hi -fed, flnorethoujh tutproceMosalswhfdi havebeen offered fer ^' landcummwtt ii^ut owr the pasttwo yeara. ^ p, rfn itsriiotMdbegtvwamtntretmofwa ce i !^ schcsls. so that camniunlttK and n From: Cynthia Bell Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:25 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] High School Redistricting

CAUTION:This emau originated from outsideofHCPSS. Do not cUcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. November 19, 2019

Thank you so much for all your hard work in developing a plan that will benefit the children ofHoward County. The task set before you is not easy and impacts so many people. There are difficult decisions that will need to bemade. Weurge you to please consider the moves you aremaking atthe high school level. The superintendent's plan waspresented andthose affected were given time to respond. Time proved beneficial for them because theyhave been ableto raisemoney to hirelobbyists, create t shirts, display yardsigns, write letters, make posters, create hashtags, have their children testify before the board, protest and sit m board meetings with signs, andbecause of their tune andpersistent efforts, theirvoices have been heard. Theloudest voices heardwere those fromparents from River Hill High School. They effectively lobbied to guarantee their students would notbe sentto Wilde LakeHigh School. Weurge you'to consider thatby not sendingany studmts to WildeLake High School that you are sending the wrong message to the students of HowardCounty Tiemajor point of this entire process was to alleviate overcrowding and to address equity. RiverHill HighSchool's FARM numbers remain the same at less than five percent why isn't the "county average"considered in this case? Wefully support diversifying all schools andappreciate the factthat socioeconomic status was considered for all schools in the original plan proposed by the superintendent. It is unfairand appears that some high schools so close to eachother, appear unchanged as others will experience greatchange. AAolton HighSchool will havea largenumber of students moved out anda largenumber of students moved in, their FARM numbers will double, and the number offeeder middle schools will increase under the board's plan. Ashomeowners of a homelnPolygon 1123, we urge you consider ATHOLTON UNITED just as you consideredRIVER HILL UNITED as you vote. Perhaps high school changes should be revisited in two years when the newhigh school opens.

Sincerely,

Dr. & Mrs.Henry H. Bell, Jr. Dr. & Mrs. Henry H. Bell, Jr. Marilyn Grosskopf

From: sirisha busam Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:23 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear BoE Members,

We greatly appreciate you all for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

Unfortunately, the BoE forgot to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from LKMS to CMS. Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the CMS will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Utilization.

2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - CMS is less than 1. 3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles awayfrom Polygon 189. This creates a longer commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our PolygonT89 kids will go pass CMS to go to the LKMS.

4. Also, Dr. Wu stated in his justification that a new community is coming online on Great Star Dr. in the coming years, and BoE needs to make room for them. We know our's is new community but our kids have been going to this school for 2 years and we have to move to make a way for houses that aren't even built yet. If BOE has to make a room, why not move a polygon's from the zoned areas that is by LKMSand also consider assigning the new community to be built to LKMS instead of breaking the relation with the school which kids already established.

Sincerely, Shiva Peddi, Polygon 189 Resident, Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Tom Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:24 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting; Chao Wu; Vicky Cutroneo; Jennifer Mallo; Christina Delmont-Small; Superintendent; Sabina Taj; Kirsten Coombs; Mavis Ellis Cc: 'Sebring Civic Association'; sebringdvicassociation@yahoogroups. com Subject: [External] Redistricting, Polygon 132

! CAUTION:This email originated from outside of HCPSS.Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I've been watching the redistricting plan and the myriad of meetings play out over the past few weeks and I am appalled at the overall process I've witnessed. The board appears confused most of the time and it is all being done hastily and without regard for the damage to the community.

The board has moved on too many occasions to keep Polygon 132 at CCES which was never part of the Superintendent's plan. There seems little logic behind why Polygon 132 is continually lumped into the larger X32 discussion (132, 1132 and 1232). We are a separate neighborhood and community and we would like to have our voice heard independent of the others. As it stands right now, the motion to keep our quiet secluded community in CCES would have been approved last night had the other two not been thrown back in the mix in mid-vote. And for what purpose? To placate capacity and FARM numbers which don't move leaving Polygon 132 in CCES. The BOE has shown no regard for the Sebring Community that has attended CCES since the school was built.

As a Cub Scout leader of Pack 618, 1 maintained an established tradition with CCES youth recruiting and developing many young men into Boy Scouts, Eagle Scouts and leaders in our community. The values we instilled in the families and communities were built and maintained long ago and continue today. Our kids and community are also heavily involved in the Clemens Crossing swim team and nobody in our neighborhood is in favor of the move to BWES.

Please reconsider the move of Polygon 132as it has little impact on the numbers you seek to change while having a dramatic and negative effect on our community!

Thank you, Thomas Erwin J^rN^

From; Jie Wang Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:23 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle

CAUTION: This ema11originated from outside ofHCPSS. Donot cUcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members.

Weare thankful to BOEmeinbers for unanimously passinga motion to move Polygon 189back to PRES.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKSwas due to bad and inaccurate dataprovided by Dr. Wu on November 13, wherehe proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are less than 20 students proposed to so into Lime Kiln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189kids atthe same schools asthey are attending for the school year 2019-20 and propose a motion to fix the oversiglit.

1.No adverseimpact to CMS -^KeepingPolygon isyatthe Clarksville Middle Schoolwill haveno negative or adverse impact on any ofthe FARM or Capacity nambers. _asj^ear^es^haii^kids_ggijzg_f. g_Qarhville nMddle_scliooi_Qu,_exisiin^elenwn_tc!iyjiopulation is also dispersedevenly K. -5andwillnotcause~disruvtion to CMS capacih:,

2. Keeping Communities together -- Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Claiksville Middle School is less than 1 . 3 miles away fi-om Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6.8 miles awayfrom Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10minute round trin_commute daily for our duld'^ Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School. 4. Clarlisville Middle School PTAposition statement supportins our request is attached for reference and consideration.

5. By keesins Polvson 189 at CMS. there are no impacts to FAMRnumbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached)^ Thaiik you for your consideration.

Yours Sincerely, Joyce TOS'.i'f iiOr,. .*''T&'"ff,.'itK]ii

^^. sotec* ^^

Clarksville Middle School Parent teacher Assoc'iattoni Position Statement Atiencence Are» A

Accordtng to the Atarvtend CTA. (.lit- n»

Ttie Clarisvllle PTA hoUs the foUttiwina ptiaittons:

>. Weagree with th®goBt u( au'dnesslngfesiues uf Inequity in HwwaraiCouniy. tt Is not clear, however. that evtdence suw»rts movinj audents out o(^ their aimmunlUes to address this goal. SBdoeconcmiK: dl^arity should te addressed bydewttng educaUonalresources (teacher Mrtng, after sdwol mentoring, either progremsi has " 1 rather than by dlsniptin® students' lives. 2. toy redtstricttrig snsuld affect me fe< K number of famllieis neswaary. Moving 207studepts from s school thiit Isnst wercrowded te not jiaWled. In addition, busing these students, w' o areable to walkto Claritsv(Lt» Wddte School, to B sctool that» owv 5 mttes awayseems part.iculartv unreaso»wble.

Forciiit stiKients to i ram r schools fe < ' ;l to their meni it heaith by nsmo^ng their safety A ST ' intnx ring vnneccssary ctani' and ether Stress. Removing a studii ts" r suwlolt Wer>(!s, parenu, teachers, coudselors, BBI leaves them vulnerable during s critiial time In their i «rd Counly has recently Increased

,h. Fordng children to rnoro to a school out of V Inltely i de' stcess r^ imf increase si

Gw

itite, i "teErirtlr :esso1 1». i. We

^ a I

-... r;i1 a. mtotmun of twc'

irtBE

. niunttt'es FARM FARM FARM Middle School Capacity Aug 22 Nov 19 Change Bonnie Braneh MS 701 sa 27% .41) Burlelgh Manor MS 773 1SS', 11% 0. 27 ClarksvIlleMS 643 aa 13% !L46) GunlggginMS 565 16% fZ.ST'l. Bkridge tflndlng MS 775 VHi 26% (i.m) aiteatt Mills has 701 M* 10% (o. sel Folly Quarter MS 662

Mayfield Woods MS .K'S (2. 73J Mount View MS 7SB »£? 0% VlurrayHIIIMS 662 aw 3396 (S. 36! Oakland Mills MS 50G as* 44% jl. 2.^ 'atapsco MS 643 SSSt 18» iC. 31) atuxentValleyMS 760 »x 33% f4.42i homasViaductMS 701 .vS^w 3S< l4, 0i) A/ilde lake MS 721 sx 38% ifi.5-Si From: ZeenatZeya Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:23 PM To: Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; VickyCutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Malta; SabinaTaj; ChaoWu; BoE Email;Kathleen V. Hanks;Trudy M. Grantham; David L. dark; Superintendent; Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 1129 kids are WALKERS TO PRES! DO NOT MOVE WALKERS!

CAIJTION: This emau originated from outside ofHCPSS. Donot cUcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good morning!

When Dr. Wu brought this up in yesterday's session, it wassaid that the transportation study would need to be done to claim walker eligibility.

CAN WE PLEASEATTEMPT TO PURSUETHAT STUDYAND NOT MAKE THIS POLYGON WAITSEVERAL MORE YEARS TO BE MOVED BACK TO THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOL AGAIN?

I urge you to please consider this prior to your final vote. I understand that it's nearly impossible to consider thisso late inthe game, butthis should've beenaddressed in Dr. Martirano's original plan.The onus was on the board and plan makers to determine walker eligibility based on proximity (< 1 mile) to current school rather than moving these kids to a school that is 5 miles away. Ifthis got missed in the process, it deserves a second look.

This will alsoprovide somerelief to the shortage ofbus drivers. PLEASERE-EVALUATE THIS DECISION! Thank you! ZeenatZeya Polygon#1129 From: Gopal Reddy Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:23 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Fwd: Motion Needed:Polygon 189 backto Clarksville Middle Attachments: CMS PTA Letter.jpg; FARM Numbers.jpg

' CAUTION: This emau originated from outside ofHCPSS. Donot cUcklinks or open attachments, unless }ou recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Board of Education Members, Weare thankful to BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 backto PRES. BOE'soriginal decision to move Polygon 189from PRESand CMSto DOAS and LKSwas due to bad and inaccurate by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRESandCMS to'DOASand

Unfortunately, the BoEneglected to addressthe correction ofmoving Polygon 189back from LimeKiln to Middle.

As it stands, we are tess than 20 students proposed to go into Lime Kiln Middle. RequestRease consider keepjng Polygon 189kids at the same schools asthey are attending for the school year2019- propose a motion to fix the oversight. 1_N°. adveree-.impacttocMS: KeePin9 Polygo" 189at the Clarksville MiddleSchool will have nonegative oradverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, aswe are less than 20 kidsgoing to Cfaricsi/tffe m/ddte"scAoo/. ~6ur" existing elementary population is also dispersed evenly K-5 and will not cause disruption to'CMS 'capacjti, 2.'. Keepmgc°mmu"ities to9ether- Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with community. 3_ ontinl"ty for children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is J,>3. m^esawayfrom. p°lyg°" 189'whereas the proposed LimeKiln middleschool is 6^8miles away from' ion 189. This creates a 1_hour 10 minute round trio commute dailyfor our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS,our Polygon 189kids will go passClarksville MiddleSchool to go toThe'Ume~Kiln"M'iddle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTAposition statement suooortina our request Isattached forreference andconsideratic 5:BY.keepina polyaon. 189at CMS-there are no impactsto FAMRnumbers, aswe cansee from the attachedBOE FARM numbers (attached).

Thank you for your consideration. »<»mON STAtIIKrNT

Octdtwr !8t. t0<9

Ctarksvide Mfddte School Parent Teacher /teoctatfoo Position Statement AnenttoncoAm Adjustment Phm (dated Aueua 20, 201»(

Accorttng to the ffii5to!d..ro. th* mferion

l. We agree wfth (he joat of addressing (»u« of tneqtrity In Howfd Couaty. tl ft not ctear, howver, that evtdence supports movtng studtente out vl th^r communittes to addrw* ttts aoat. Suctocconomtc dteiartty Aoatd be addreaed by dewtina educattenal resourcts (teacher htrtng, after sdwoi mefltorii^, wher prx^rams) basi-d

2. Any nsdfstrictilna should affect (he fewwt number of fOTitlfcs necaaiy. Mmfnf 207 students from a school that b not owrcrowdedts not justlftel, In addltton, txah^i these stucfento, wto are d>le to walk to Ctartawtlte MKktte Schooi, to a idwot that ts emt- 5 mites away t

3. Rxtfnt students to transfer sclicslstedesrtmeiual to thmrmentU health by rermwtng their safety net and (ntroducing wswaessarf chaiw and ttress. tononrfngastiKfentt'netwwkorsiwoit-frtewts. otherpwwiSs, teachers, cawwtore, aid adminfet ton-le«v« ttM^m vidnerabte (hirtng B crittcatttactatfwirdeyetopmenl. Hovant County has recentty incnasetf attenUon and resources on mental health. Fordit cWtdren to mow to » school out of their nef^Aortioiri wttt deflftttely add stwss and nay (mrease sadness, hopetetsiess. md sutcktol tdeaUon.

4. Geflenitcon»»M»rtsti»ot

a.

HammondMS 604 265t ^. ^-,. Harpers Choice MS sos uka Btehorn MS 643 ^. Jl^' Ume Kiln MS 721 <5W Mayfleid Woods MS 738 41% !.73 Mount View MS 7SS <5% Murray HIII MS 662 OaManc; Mills MS Patapsca MS 643 PatuxentValtevMS 760 3i?S

Thomas Viaduit MS 701 . -,c.:

Witde Lake MS 721 3SE'S S.54. From: sreenivasa potu Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:23 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed:Polygon 189 backto Clarksville Middle Attachments: CMS PTA Letter.jpg; FARM Numbers.jpg

CAUTION: Thls email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Donot cUcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members, we^arethankful to BOEmembers for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 backto

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he prooosed-to~move' 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS. Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are less than 20 students proposed to go into Lime Kiln Middle. Request please. consider keePin9 Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending forthe school year 2019-20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight. 1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negativepr adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20'kids goingto Clarksville middle school. Ourexisting elementary population is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacity. 2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community. ?:. continuityfor children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle sch001ls. 6.8.miles_awayfrom po.iy90n 189-This creates a 1 hour10 minute roundtrip commutedaily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids wiil Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School. 4. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement supporting our request is attached for reference and consideration.

5^By keeping Polygon 189 at CMS, there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached). Thank you for your consideration. Sri Potu

SniON STATtMtNT

Octci!Bfl»XX, 20>9

Claritsvflte Mtddte School Parent Teacher Assoctatton Position Statement Attandanw *.<. Adjuttnwnt Plan (dated *u»ist 20. a>19t

teconnng to the .(BOteAET** th< iwlsslon »» on behalf of chitdrw~fn~owichool,

1. We agrw wtth the eoal o( addreatftg <*SUKof Inequity U>Ho»wd Qaunty. tt h not ctear. hmwwr,that evtdence wipportt movliqittudents out flt thdrcBromunftiestaaddfewthtegort. Suctoeconomlc dtepwl^ ah0t

4. General comments i (rf ndbtricUng;

a. Invutwthe amni nlty,y espwny daUyyr«KrtrtCtlng toal hurried, i<»e thou|htfiA proc^oifoecBaon. tr Puw (nvolwdlln how boundariet ut rMlnwn. We undi tot n it~from~prevtous'p«H>o8atewMdihwebeCTB?fwedto iwidcomnNOTttySnputcwrdwip ttwoyeare. ^tt' ' students risou'd be tefaemtntmmioT1 fe» . xAw^i^sdioals. districts ss ttatca- are mstotahN'd. FARM FARM Middle School Capacity Aug 22 Nov 13 Change Bonnle Branch MS 701 ZTS Burlel^hManor MS 779 us O.Z7 ClarksvllleMS 643 12% Duflloggin MS S65 16%

779 . - f EllfcotlMlilsMS 701 10% FollyQuarter MS 662 Glenwood MS 545 0.68 Haminond MS 604 26% Harpers Choice MS S06 '. K-,- Ufce Elkhorn MS 643 i. la: Umff Ktln MS 721

Mayfleld Woods MS 4156 I Z.73) Mount View MS 79S

Murray Hilt MS 662 33% .. 3fi Oakland Mftlt MS S06 14% 7".' Patapsco MS 643 Patuxent Valley MS 760 33% Thomas Vtadud MS 701 3854 Wilde Lake MS 721 . S. 54; Mant^

From: Christy Erwin Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:22 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Re: Board confusion ended with overlook

'CAUTION:This email originated from outsideof HCPSS. Do notclick [inks or open attachments, unlessyou recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Polygon 132, not 138. In my second sentence, I wrote polygon 138 when I meant 132. On Nov 19, 2019, at 1:18 PM, Christy Erwin wrote:

> Dear Board Member, > I am writing to let you know of an overlook you had during a vote yesterday. You were talking about moving polygon 138 backto Clemens Crossing from Bryant Woods. The vote began with 3 board members voting yes, and then there wasconfusion that polygon 132 shouldstay with polygons1132. Polygon132 is the neighborhoodofSebring. Moving polygon 132by itself would helpwith the overcrowding of an already crowded BryantWoods, and Sebring is a diverse community already attending Clemens Crossing Elementary. It would affect 32 children. The other polygons you were trying to keep uswith aren't part ofour neighborhood. Infact Martin Road and west all would go to Bryant Woods. It would not beas if those children would bethe only children to goto BryantWoods. Polygon 132shouldn't belumped together with those polygons. > > Pleaselook at polygon 132as a separateentity because it would help both BryantWoods and Clemens Crossing. It would also eliminate the children of Sebring from leaving their current elementary school, ride a bus to a much farther location, change their swim team, and place them in a school out oftheir community. speak from experience asthis happened to me in the 70's.

> > Please take another look at this.

> > Thank you, Christy Erwin Marilyn Grosskopf

From: ShivaKumar Peddi Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:21 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle

! CAUTION: This emaU originatedfrom outside ofHCPSS.Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear BoE Members,

We greatly appreciate you all for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

Unfortunately, the BoE forgot to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from LKMSto CMS. Request: Pleaseconsider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attendingfor the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the CMS will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Utilization.

2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - CMS is less than 1. 3 miles away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a longer commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass CMS to go to the LKMS.

4. Also, Dr. Wu stated in hisjustification that a new community is comingonline on GreatStar Dr. in the comingyears, and BoE needs to make room for them. We know our's is new community but our kids have been going to this school for 2 years and we have to move to make a way for houses that aren't even built yet. If BOE has to make a room, why not move a polygon's from the zoned areas that is by LKMS and also consider assigning the new community to be built to LKMS instead of breaking the relation with the school which kids already established.

Sincerely,

Shivakumar Peddi, P. E. Polygon 189 Resident, 6107 Flutie Ln, Clarksville, MD 21029. 775-291-8777

Connect with me LinkedEi. Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Ross Laidig Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:21 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting; Kirsten Coombs; Jennifer Mallo; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont- Small; Superintendent; Mavis Ellis; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu Subject: [External] Negative Affect on Bryant Woods

! CAUTION:This email originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. Moving Polygon 132 to Bryant Woods from Clemens Crossing does not reduce FARMs. The FARM rate looks less only because there are more students by adding Polygon 132. Bryant Woods will have the same number of FARMsjust more kids to OVERCROWDclassrooms and adversely affect teacheraffectiveness.

If you are trying to improve Bryant Woods then this plan will do the OPPOSITE. This would be a terrible mistake.

Pleasekeep Polygon 132 in Clemens Crossing for everyone's sake!! !

Ross Laidig JVIarilyn Grosskopf

From: MiZhou Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:20 PM To: Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Hcpss Redistricting; BoE Email; Chao Wu; Sabina Taj Subject: [External] Uncertainty > Significance? Unfair last minute change

! CALTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear BOE members,

My family live in Clarksville Hunt community (polygons 296 and 1296) in district 4. I attended yesterday's BOE work session, thank you for the hard work! However, it is extremely sad to find that the uncertainty in the data can be as large as 5% »the mathematically significance that Ms. Mallo suggested for evaluating the moves. Thousandsof children's life will be significantlyimpacted based on very inaccurate information! Specificallyfor our community, we were in 34%feed from CMSto AHS down to 15%feed (NOTE,this 15% could be a 10% small feed due to the uncertainty in the data). Our kids are isolated from their friends based on a last minute change. This move is different from the earlier proposed feasibility study, superintendent's plan and even earlier Ms. Mallo's plan. Most people in our community couldn't have had an chanceto be awareof such change.

I urge you to think twice about the children in HCPSS behind the numbers and vote NO the the current proposal base on very inaccurate information.

Thank you for your consideration!

Mi Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Sanghee Lee Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:18 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting; Jennifer Mallo; Kirsten Coombs; Chao Wu; Mavis Ellis; vicki_cutroneo@hcpss. org; Sabina Taj; Christina Delmont-Small Subject: [External] Polygonl 129_walker. pdf Attachments: Polygonl 129_walker. pdf

! CAUTION:TMs email originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Good morning!

When Dr. Wu brought this up in yesterday s session, it was said that the transportation study would need to be done to claim walker eligibility.

CAN WE PLEASE ATTEMPT TO PURSUE THAT STUDY AND NOT MAKE THIS POLYGON WAIT SEVERAL MORE YEARS TO BE MOVED BACK TO THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOLAGAIN?

I urge you to please consider this prior to your final vote. I understand that it's nearly impossible to consider this so late in the game, but this should've been addressed in Dr. Martirano's original plan. The onus was on the board and plan makers to determine walker eligibility based on proximity (< 1 mile) to current school rather than moving these kids to a school that is 5 miles away. If th is got missed in the process, it deserves a second look.

This will also provide some reliefto the shortage ofbus drivers. PLEASERE-EVALUATE THIS DECISION! thank you! Sanghee Lee Polygon 1129

Sent from my iPhone Polygon 1129 Petition

The undersigned residents of Polygon 1129 formally request BOE to e Extend walkine zone of Pointers Run ESto include Polveon 1129. 1. We are eligible walkers to PRES.The distance between polygon 1129 and PRESis only 0.8 mile. 2. The walking route is safe. The traffic light to walk across the great star drive has a timer and push button, so that we do not need a guard to help us across the street. 3. We will share the same walking route as polygon 295 whose residents are in the current walking zone of PRES. We request to extend PRES walking zone to include Polygon 1129 area.

o Keep Polveon 1129 in Pointers Run Elementary School. The board redistricted polygon 1129 to Swansfield Elementary School. We request the board to revisit the move because we are walkers to PRESISince BOE kept Polygon 295 at PRES, polygon 1129 should also be kept at PRES.

Walking ZONE of PRES

^-.J

PoiygonZSS

First and Last Name Street Address *( 1^1\-\ Si^Le<.4 &'-i33~TlM:n^, n^(, i.^li ~tl~ftZ^_ u-;ff« -< G>?, 33-'\\y, i{cit:>f,10 IT./\c-eu. }^./ ff'oc. fcl/-!' 62(7 OE-'^I /s-<-o uL/ ?i(//-"y ''T^/i/i'^ '/^{/{/^.e^/nff ^^^'<£%/. %^'^ t^, ^ W/y'9I 'f^. - '. ~ y:v, 'ic? . 3>'-u^t- ^» ^i^t'. l ^^^«. f- E'^< -t»11 2-i LOen-j-e. e. [-it.^r. +T 6 'St S -A oSrSK^ Pr.Vca |A'1Af"i^<} Pt^'^e. L<'n^ tf i (z.4 L-i i5iS A.r»*"3 ff^iu Mjb^ *f(^ 5^\f( 1-^ 6?tf? Sfl ^ l^.t t^^ ffttii<\ Polygon 1129 Petition

The undersigned residents of Polygon 1129 formally request BOE to . Extent walkine zone of Pointers Run ES to include Polygon 1129, 1. We are eligible walkers to PRES. The distance between polygon 1129 and PRES is only 0.8 mile. 2. The walking route is safe. The traffic light to walk across the great star drive has a timer and push button, so that we do not need a guard to help us across the street. 3. We will share the same walking route as polygon 295 whose residents are in the current walking zone of PRES. We request to extend PRESwalking zone to include Polygon 1129 area.

o Keep Polveon 1129 iiLPointea Run Elementary School. The board redistricted polygon 1129 to Swansfield Elementary School. We request the board to revisit the move because we are walkers to PRES!Since BOE kept Polygon 295 at PRES, polygon 1129 should also be kept at PRES.

Walking ZONE ot PRES

Poiy^yniuy O. femiit ^0 PRi;?

Polygon 295

First and Last Name Street Address ^f'y (^ -Us- (y'SC^ ^^ff^ir^t ^-tr^.ft^^ v^ i.. 31 .i \<^£^ P^-fh .^.=\\a^-:)

^v.~\Clf1 Pfigc-e V-^.l 'A(t>-T ^'D/^^. COWA^ b's, z^ iJwi^Le'tk^ie-r Pfll W<2' yoth^jc% CO^A/ "^2«_ 'Os^L-y^ie i^l^ 4Hii.' ^.. A ^f^n^id ( (c5a''1. TW.!*< p;. (L^ et-^-fl'-?^'-tt-i ^ ^^j^u'^ X-^L. / ?6^ ^3? '^'C. C:?- ^. i I12^ Polygon 1129 Petition The undersigned residents of Polygon 1129formally request BOEto . Extend walking zone of Pointers Run ESto include Polveon 1129. 1.We are eligible walkers to PRES.The distance between polygon 1129and PRES is only 0. 8 mile. 2.The walking route issafe. The traffic lightto walk across the great star drive hasa timerand push button, sothat we do not need a guardto help usacross the street. 3 Wewll^share the same walking route as polygon 295whose residents arein the current walking zone of PRES. We request to extend PRESwalking zone to include Polygon 1129 area. . Keep PolvBon 1129 in Pointers Run Elementary School. The board redistricted polygon 1129to Swansfleld Elementary School. Werequest the board to revisit the move because weare walkers to PRESSSince BOEkept Polygon 295 at PRES,polygon 1129 should also be kept at PRES.

Walking ZONE of PRES

// M.Srv.h Potygpii 11^

Share ttif saiTir

Poison 295

First and Last Name Street Address . 4?o -ft 13tlLJ^SS3£s&. ^63 '?/2, ^s^lif litU f^-f.. '/^(wi-K \, uft 7ir--^t-t /-! Y/^(? )'^l\/6- £-?/^i ir. c4ie , _, ^}>i- /./,A/>. r. /L...!y< 1-/A'/p 2/& C6k^i/^ 2/& y^-- ^\l 7T;-W(?f r'l'/f-W y ( ^I^M cy1-- ! <^'.-7^t~> t--, -'^, ^^ ^ i«;4; I/ ^o. Yc^c tu .r2^^ Ll. Jk( ^.) ^ C~ t'^.-ci,-f' /Lt> ^'i« ^ ./ ^. l, ~7 ^/- Uf^ ^^,. Polygon 1129 Petition Theundersigned residents of Polygon 1129formally request BOEto . Extendwalkine zone of Pointers Run ESto include Polveon 1129. 1.We are eligible walkers to PRES.The distance between polygon 1129 and PRES is only 0. 8 mile. 2.The walking route issafe. The traffic light to walkacross the great star drive hasa timerand push button, sothat we do notneed a guardto help us acrossthe street. 3 Wewnlshare lhe same walking route as polygon 295whose residents arein the current walking zone of PRES. We request to extend PRESwalking zone to include Polygon 1129 area. . Keep Polveon 1129 in Pointers Run Elementary School. The board redistrirted polygon 1129to Swansfield Elementary School. Werequest the board to because tt ^- .t .moye are <»iilliers to PRESI Since BOE kept Polygon 295 at PRES, polygon 1129 should also be kept at PRES.

Walking ZONEolPRLS

Polygon Z9S

First and Last Name ft?? Street Address ^Kpl/l. ', fl/t;'^ P(... it1 ) !<->.? (. -^i?-,, ^i^/-^

The undersigned residents of Polygon 1129 formally request BOE to o Extend walkine zone of Pointers RynfSto include Polveon 1129. 1. We are eligible walkers to PRES. The distance between polygon 1129 and PRES is only 0.8 mile. 2. The walking route is safe. The traffic tight to walk across the great star drive has a timer and push button, so that we do not need a guard to help us across the street. 3. We will share the same walking route as polygon 295 whose residents are in the current walking zone of PRES.We request to extend PRESwalking zone to include Polygon 1129 area.

o KeepPolveon 1129 in Pointers Run Elementan^SchgoL The board redistricted polygon 1129 to Swansfield Elementary School. We request the board to revisit the move because we are walkers to PRES!Since BOE kept Polygon 295 at PRES, polygon 1129 should also be kept at PRES.

\.~\. Walking ZONE of PRES ^1 ' .^ ' r J

..,, /:, 0.7mite/f /r ^ /" /? OAmile -<. PQ^WU^ \ O. SifliietoPKgS \ Share fhupamc! t /

I Polygon 295

First and Last Name itreet Address P-if.^n« ft ^ ^EMftL T^i-^^J sfcl ''-V. If! Uu^-u-. M-»+f /^-CT-^ ., ^_. ~'7S '/'^tUfj-^-w _Z^.^ 4 ^tp-"rr^(/- 6-'^^<^ ^^-"i1 1 1 m/?Id of -/-l-jfc»Yi^_/y^ f/J'3 7 J>^ A /L\ ^'f, /\ ti

From: susankdefibaugh Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:17 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 52 - Hopewell Redistricting

^CAUTION: This emaUoriginated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognue the sender andknow the content is safe. Dear School Board, lamnot swewhy you want to move Hopewell to Atholton High School. I willtell youthat it was districted for 1 webought our house 21 years ago andthen was changed to OaklandMills HSbefore our' gotto U^ schoolwhere our oldest son graduated in 2017 and ouryoungest will graduate-in2022.' Hammond andOakland Mills areabout the same'distance from ourneighborhood, butAttofton~isreaUv~far in comparison and requires getting on Rt. 32 and Rt. 29 from our house. I recommend &e feedfor Hopewell beTSES, OMMS, andOMHS. Thisplan solves the feedissue where a ^ofkids^lO inmy youngest son's case) are separated from most oftheir friends'forthemiddles'chool yeare. Ts feedalso helPSFARMS_at TSES, OMMSand OMHS. Whywould you create a bizmefeed'ofTSES to LEMSto AHS and pull usout of a highschool where we were helping the FARM stats^ Thismakes no sense.

Also,people from Hopewell have traditionally been officers of the PTAs and parent leaders of other school groups at the feeds we are currently in and I fearmoving us out from where wehave been helpfaTwili'bea' disservice to these schools.

Note that myson^s a risingjunior and will stay at OMHS so the changes no longer personally affect mv famil ; welove OMHS and hate to see the value our neighborhood brought to that sdool'takenawayfrom'it^'" Thank you for your consideration.

Susan Defibaugh Polygon 52

Sent frorji my Verizpn. S.-. insung Gilaxy sinarlplione Marilyn Grosskoi

From: susankdefibaugh Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:17 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 52 - Hopewel! Redistricting

-5'A?TION: Tl!is email origmated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not cUcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender andknow the content is safe. Dear School Board, lamnot swewhy you want to move Hopewell to Atholton High School. I willtell you that it was districted for I when we bought our house 21 years ago andthen was changed to Oakland Mills HS'before'our' gotto U^ schoolwhere our oldest son graduated in 2017 and our youngest will graduate-in2622.' Hammond andOakland Mills areabout the same distance from ourneighborhood, butAthofton isreallv farin comparison andrequires getting on Rt. 32 and Rt. 29 from our house. I recommend Ae feed forHopewell beTSES, OMMS, andOMHS. Thisplan solves the feedissue where a ^ofkids^lO inmy youngest son'scase) are separated from most of their friends for the middle school yea". Ts feedalsohelPS FARMSat TSES, OMMS'and OMHS. Whywould you create a bizairefeed'ofTSES to LEMS to AHS andpull us out ofa high school where we were helping the FARM stats? This makes no sense.

Also,people from Hopewell have traditionally been officers of the PTAs and parent leaders of other school groups atthe feeds we are currently in and I fear moving us out from where wehavebeenhdDfiiTwmbea disservice to these schools.

a rismgJunior and wiu at OMHS so the Note.thatmy.s,onls stay changes no longer personally affect my famil : welove OMHS andhate to seethe value our neighborhood broughtto that school taken away from'it Thank you for your consideration.

Susan Defibaugh Polygon 52

Sen[ fi'nininy Verizoii. SainsungGalaiiy smarlphone Marilyn Grosskonf

From: Rajitha Mandepudi Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:16 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: KirstenCoombs; Chao Wu; Sabina Taj; Jennifer Mallo; Christina Delmont-Small; Vicky Cutroneo; Mavis Ellis Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle Attachments: CMS PTA Letter.jpg; FARM Numbers.jpg

^CAUTION: ThisemaU originated from outsideofHCPSS. Do not cUck links oropen attachments, unless you recognizethe sender andknow the content is safe. DearBoard of Education Members, we.are ankful to BOEmembers forunanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189back to PRESon

.BOE'SJirigiraLclec's'°'1-to movep°'_ygo"189 from PRES and CMS to DOES and LK"S was due to incomplete data at t time on November 13, where DrWU proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRESandCMS'toDOAS'ati'd'LKS"

BOE "eg'ected *° address the correction ^af°k^i1llt ^lYd^I. of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to

As it stands, weare tess than 20students proposed to go Into LimeKilnMiddlefrom CMS. Req"ost;-p'easec°ns'd_erkeep. ingPOIV?°" 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019. and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

189 at the Clarksvilte °.advers^mpacttocMS»Keeping p°lygorl Middle School will have no negative or adverse ,'LN Lmpa.ct-°rl, anyonhe FARM°r Capacity numbers, aswe are less than 20 kldsaoinofociarksvllle'middS'school. ''0'w' lion is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS caoacih 2, >Keep'"9.c:omm"nities to9ether - Polygon 189 is heavily involved withCMS community andshould remain with community. 3-c°nt'n"ityJf°rch"dren and avo'dingjncreased transportation costs and leadtimes - Clarksville MiddleSchool is i an 1^3mjes awayfrom Polygon 189,whereas the proposed LimeKilnmiddFe school is~6~8miles, 3°", 189'This.c''eates a 1-.ho"r 10minute roundfriD commute dailyfor our children. Moreover, ' ba'sed'on'the' oposed move to LKMS, our pr Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go'to'the'L'ime'Kiln"M'iddle

4. Clarksville Middle School PTAposition statement suoDortina ourrequest is attached for reference anrir. nnsiriaraiir &.B/?eep'"fl po/w°n ?s? afCMS' there areno impactsto FARMnumbers, aswe can see from the attachedBOE FARM numbers (attached}.

6. will be able to eliminate disruption to attend after school activities

Thank you for your consideration.

Thanks

Rajitha Mmdepudi, CPA TOii HION ST*TtMIN»

Oacbor W. ?019

Ctarksvltte Middle School Parent Teacher Association Position Statenwnt Attendana" A'w Ad)u*tnwrt Plan (dated August 20, 201

According to tt»<*ttoajffistfjPTA. the nriBton ot our PTSA(t W tupport and^iMk on behaWof diildrenlnouFtchool.

1. we agree with the ywl of addrewingissues of inequity (n HowardCounty. tt ft not ctear. howewr, that wWencesupportt movtnettudents Wtvt^ Uirir communities to addwss thts goat. Soctoeccfwmte iHipart^f shodd te addressed by dewing educationafniources (trachBr htrtng, tfwr sdw^ meniortng, other pfograms) bued on nnBd ntfw than by (StsniptlnB stvdents' Ifws. 2. Any (Wlirtricting should effect the fewea number of famtlfes nece*s»»y. Wovod will

Seneral conwn«rts d»oul t( of redtstrtct'snB: !ltyfamtltes, affeo dby in'ai»:hwri®d,moretlwi

Mayfietd Woods MS 79S 41% \i^ Mount View MS 798 (Murray Hill MS 662 335i l^i.l Oaklanc'Mills MS 506 44% Patapsco MS 643 18% 'atuxeflt Valley MS 760 3i% IThomas Viaduct MS 701 ..Xi WIfde Lake MS 721 3S% Marilyn Grosskopf

From: sonal sahu Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:12 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to CMS Attachments: CMS PTA Letter. jpg

CAUTION: Thls emau originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Members,

We greatly appreciated all seven BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES. Big thanks for that.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data on November 13, where it was proposed to move Polygon 189from PRES and CMS to DOASandLKS. Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address thecorrection of moving Polygon 189back from LimeKiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are tess than 20 students proposed to go into LimeKiln Middle. 5??l??-tLplease consider keeP'n9 Polygon 189kids at the same schools as theyare attending for the school year2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight. 1_N°-advorse "'".pact.t°CMS-~ KeePinS Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impacton anyof the FARM or Capacitynumbers, aswe are lessthan 20 kids goingto Clarksville middle school.'Our existing elementary Dopulation is alsodispersed evenly K-5 and will not cause disruption to CMScapacitv. ^.. L^V PolYqon 189at CMS notonly help to reduce the cost. time and resources of County's Transportation Diyjsjon, butalso greatly reducetravel time, reducetraffic blocks and enhance the safetyof kids. ^Keeping Communities together- Polygon 189 is heavilyinvolved withCMS community and should remainwith CMS community. 4. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is l?fit^?-1_?_mJ1^? awayfrom Polygon 189 whereasthe proposed LimeKlln middleschool is6. 8 milesaway from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trio commute daily for our children. Moreover. based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middie School.

5. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement suDportina our request is attached for reference and consideration. 6. By keeping Polvaon 189at CMS. there are no Impactsto FARM numbers, aswe can see from the BOEFARM numbers.

Thanks and warm regards. Sonal Polygon 189 resident POsmoH sTATtMtm

October XX. 3?019

Clartevilte Middle School Parent Teacher Association Position Statement Attendance*w Adlintment Pton (dateditugist 2fi, 2019»

AcconWng to the ffa.t^^&fSA, the mtBlon

t. Weagrw with the goal of adifraKringttsue* oT fneqirtty in Howrd County. It (t not clear, hewever, that evtdenct nwortt mooring ttudentt out of Vwlr communities to addrea te aoal. Soaoecanomlc Brtty dmnB) l>»»asdon nwd rathw than by dtsnipUnd students' Ifws.

2. Any redfstrtetlng thoutd affect the fe^st mimbw of famttfes necesssiy. Moving 207 students from a school that ts not overcrowdedfa not juftlffed. In addition, busingthea studwiB, whoare Ate to waftto Oartcwllte M transterschoob is (teutnerttal to thetr»'"il by remiwfng their safe^ net wd tntroAKtng winecwary chww wd Sttvs. ftenwtngastudenti'network of support-friends, other pweMs. teachers, counsctors, iu»d admtnfetratois-teaves them vutnenbte dwlng a critical ne in ttetrctewilopment ttowart Cfltmty hai recently tna»Med attwrtton and retouree* on mefltal health. Forelna cWldren to nww to a sdwol out of ttelr naWdiortwod wlU deflrftely MM strw and may .nd sutdtial tdeatton.

4. GenCTitconOTientsatooulOie prooss of mdtstrtcuing: a. ln«rfvetheoNmwmity, ttpe£i8UyfiBm

From: Cammie Timmerman Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:11 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting; Chao Wu; Christina Delmont-Small; Vicky Cutroneo; Jennifer Mallo; Kirsten Coombs; Sabina Taj; Mavis Ellis Subject: [External] Re: Redistricting for Polygon 120 (Ashleigh Greene) to be included with 1120 (Ashleigh Greene), and 117, 1117, 118 (Ashleigh Knolls) and for ALLOF THESE POLYGONS TO GO WITH OUR PRES & CMS COMMUNITl'

! CAUTION:This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless 5 ou recognize the sender and know the content is safe. NAME: Camille Timmerman POLYGON: 120

I am very saddened and confused as to why Polygons 117, 1117, 118, 120, 1120 are not being redistricted with fhe Clarksville Middle School feedto River Hill HS. My 8th grade daughter and our family havebeen a part of the Pointers Run community since she was in Kindergarten. The redistricting plan sends all ofher classmates from Pointers Run ES and Clarksville Middle to River Hill HS. These are relationships she has been building since kinderearten and she is being separated from the community that she always believed shewould eo to high school with. These are old fiiends from PRES andnew friends that she now goes to CMS with for 7th and 8th grade. Instead, as the plan currently stands, she will eo to Atholton isolated and alone without the support of familiar families. I have been watching the work sessions. It seems as though this decision was based on rising sophomores at AHS being affected, but no thought has been put into how this decision is negativelyimpacting therising 9fh graders andthe many students that come afterthem. All ofthose students will beripped awayfi-om the community theywent to elementary andmiddle school with,just becausethe board does not wish to redistrict one grade (the rising lOfh graders) twice. If it is so important to that board that those students stay at Atholton HS they should be given a waiver to stay at Atholton due to their specific situation, but Polygons 117, 1117, 118, 120, 1120 should be redistricted to River Hill HS for the greater good of this community. Or, the current plan should not be implemented until new high schools are built. This would give fair preparation to students and families and allow the board members to make decisions without being rushed.

Pleasekeep ourneighborhoods together, eliminate the small feed from CMS to AHS. Alleviate this stress from our children. Thank you for your consideration.

Camille Timmerman Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Gina Fisher Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:11 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] New Redistricting polygon 1038, 2038

! CAUTION: TMs email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I am respectfully asking that you reconsider po;ygons 1038 and 2038 buina moved to LRHS

I strongly disagree with this choice. My daughter has a 504 plan tliat we rely on very heavily to have h>'r bo successful in her education. We have made many decisions, and plans to help her transition to a school that her siblings have also gonu. She has participatrid in many an events to get her comfortable in her surroundingii, tc'achers, and peers.

To make us redo ail of our hard work, and therapy is so extremely hurtful to myself and my child's social and emotional well being.

Please please reconsider this plan.

Gina Fisher J\fflarilyn Grosskopf

From: Srinivas Potu Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:10 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle Attachments: CMS PTA Letterjpg; FARM Numbers.jpg

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed

! CAUTION:This emaUoriginated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

DearBoard of EducationMembers,

Weare thankful to BOBmembers forunanimously passinga motion to move Polygon 1 89back to PRES.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccuratedata provided byDr. Wuon November 13, wherehe proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRESand CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, theBoE neglected to addressthe correction ofmoving Polygon 189back from LimeKihi to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are less than20 students proposed to go into Lime Kiln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019-20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any ofthe FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary population is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacity.

2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increasedtransportation costs and leadtimes - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6.8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement supporting our request is attached for reference and consideration.

5. By keepingPolygon 1 89 at CMS, there areno impacts to FAMRnumbers, as we can see from the attached BOB FARM numbers (attached). Thank you for your consideration. Sreeni JVIarilyr^Grosskopf

From: Urjita Rami Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:10 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle Attachments: CMS PTA Letter.jpg; FARM Numbers.jpg

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of EducationMembers,

We are thankful to BOB members for uimnimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES. BOE'soriginal decisionto move Polygon 189 from PRESand CMS to DOAS and LKSwas due to inaccurate dataprovided on November 13, where it was proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to Dayton oaks and Limeklin middle.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 backfrom Lime Kiln to Clarksvme Middle.

As it stands, we are less than 20 students prooosed to so into Lime Kiln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year2019-20 andpropose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at (he Clarksville Middle Schoolwill have no negative or adverse impact on anyof the FARM or Capacitynumbers, as we are lessthan 20 kidseoim to Clarksvillemiddle school. Ourexistine elementary aoaulation is also dispersedevenly K- 5 and-will not cause disruption to CMS capacity.

2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS commumty.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereas the proposed LimeKiln middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10minute roundtrip commute daily for our children. Moreover, basedon the proposed move to LKMS,our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. darksyille Middle School PTAposition statement suaportim our request is attached for reference andconsideratmrL

5. By keepine Polvson 189 at CMS. there are no impacts to FARM numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached).

Thank you for your consideration. fWmON STATEMtN^

OoobeOOt. ZOK

Ctarksvilte Middle School Parent Teacher Asseelatton Pcsition Statement Attendance Area Adjurtmcnt Pton (dated Augua 2fl, itM<)>

AccoriNi^ to tte ijar^jjlCT^, the mteton of our PTSA tt to stwort wd apedk wi behalf of ch

1. WeaBre«>wtthUiegoalofaddn'atnt('Buetoy<»iw|u(ty(nHo*»aRiGou»ay. It ft not ctear, howwer, that evdtence supports mcnring students out at their communfttes to address thtsaoal. Sactocconomie dtepwtty ritOiAt he addressed by dewttng educattonat retourett (teachw Wrtng, tfter schooi nientorir^, other pn^rams) based on need rather tfanby dtenipting stydents' lives.

2. Any redlttricting should affect tiw twmst number ritcfaipport-?riends, otherpa*wts, taachen, counsetars, and admlnfetnton-taves tfean vulnerabte durtoB a critical tkne in their ctewtopment. Howard Coimty ta* raantty Increaari attortton and retoimes on mental haaltfi. Fofdng cMUtrwi to mow to . idiootoutofthe(rne(tf o»ftood*riUdefWtety«kfstn»sand .y ami sufct'M (deaUon.

4. Genentcomr its diovl te process of mMstrtatng: a. wnutn-tt ca?amyrtty, fsp«.»ay change schools. FARM FARM FARM Middle School Capacity Aug 22 Nov 19 Change Bonnie Branch MS 701 27e. Burieigh Wianor Ms 779 u% 0.27 Clarksville MS 643 12e< !l.. t6; Dunloggfn MS 565 ElkridgeLanding MS 779 26«« -Cl Elticaft Mills MS 701 w% Folly Quarter MS 662 <5% Glenwaod MS 545 0.68 Hammond MS 604 26% Harpers Choice MS 506 316S Late Etkhorn MS 643 li. l: ;£'/ Lima Ktln MS 721 W9 MayfleldWoods MS 738 41% :. 7: Mount View MS 79S <5" Murray Milt MS 662 33% OaManri IWrtl* MS 506 Patapsco MS 643 Patuxent Vallev MS 760 . »

From: Niraj Kumar Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:09 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to CMS Attachments: CMS PTA Letter. jpg

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Members,

We greatly appreciated all seven BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES. Big thanks for that.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data on November 13, where it was proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are tess than 20 students proposed to go Into Lime Klln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary oooulation is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacity.

2. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS not only help to reduce the cost, time and resources of County's TransDortation Division, but also greatly reduce travel time, reduce traffic blocks and enhance the safety of kids.

3. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

4. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trio commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

5. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement suDportina our reauesf is attached for reference and consideration.

6. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS. there are no impacts to FARM numbers, as we can see from the BOE FARM numbers.

Best regards, Niraj POSmON STATEMtW

Ortot»r»». 201l*»

Ctarksville Middle School Parent Teacher Assoctatton Pwition Statemmt Anendanee Area Ait)u!it»nent Pton (dated August 20, 2(n9»

Accorttng to the M^QdangjPTA, the ffriwton uf our PTSA tt to uwort andipwk on behalfof chlhtrentlFouFtchoet, In Vtutcommunity, and beforaBcmninNmt bodte* and otfw ownteattons that make decfetom affecMng cftUdwn.

The Oartavaie P7A holds the foltowfng pwfttont:

1. We B|W with the p»l of «(dre»(ng Ktiaa. of inequity Sn Hotinnl Courty. (t fc not clear, bowewr, that wfktenu «wort» movtna audents out vf their oommunltws to addnss this aoat. Sodoecanwnlc dlspnrity shixMtt be addreswdby dewtingeducattonal mources (te«:hwhiring, afur school roemortnB. other prx^rum) basad on need ladiw than by (Hsiupttng students' lives. 2. Any redlttrictlng should affect the fewest number or famtlfet n.ecessaiy. Mwtng 207 stuttentt f run a sdioot that (s not werowwded te not ju^tftetf. In addition, tauslng these students, who are d>te to waUtto CUntevllte NJddle Sdwol, to a school that feover 5 mite* away *een» (Mrtlculnrty unreuonabte. 3. FordngsttKtentsto traBsfcrsdwalsteitesrtnentat t8thefr mental hurith bynsfflwllng thdr safety net md (ntrodudngunneussary cteW md Mrvss. Removinga stu*tte' nettmk ofsupport-friends, othw P"mtt* tMchers, counselors, and admlnbtratora-leaves em wAnwAte ctwlnB » oftiat tene In tfwtr dewtopment. Howard County h» recently tnawad atUmUon and resources on mental health. FordnBcMMren to mow to a sdw^ otrt of thdr m^Aortwod wtUdeflrftely addsto-ess and may

4. General conwmitsitout the |»wiss of redfsblcUnt; a. (nw)(wtheinturtty, Wicialtyfam1Ues, a aed^redistrhatng (nitea-hurrfed, fnorettoahtfulpniasscrfdedston-mddng. Piuwtevmtt to'betnwhmd (n howboundaries^TC rMlraNm. Vte under" 1 tf»a£ redbtrteVng wWhappen but the curnrt propwal te t from prevtous'prqxsalstthich tew beenoffered for dtofl d affiiimmlty inputover the put twoyeara. ::~"~~ trfetedrtudentsriwtAdbegtwnamtatnwKBrftwo Ice] orto duafli^ sdtools. c. nipt rtngdistrictewtNitcoimnunltfesw ndghbortiooite are Howard County Board of Education Public Hearing September 2019

Testimony of Robert Nelson Luke 881OSandrope Court Columbia, MD 21046 Polygon 16 (Based on the Current Re-Districting Map) robertluke@comcast. net Personal Background

My name is Robert Luke and I am a resident of Columbia, Maryland. I have lived in Howard County for 18 years, and specifically in the King's Contrivance community for 16 of those years. I am an active member of the King's Contrivance Board and have served the County as a volunteer in several programs offered through the Department of Parks and Recreations. I have devoted my professional career in business and finance, with a focus on compliance and the application of tax policies in corporate environments. I hold a Master's Degree in Finance from the University of Baltimore. attended the University of Pittsburgh and hold a Bachelor's of Science degree in Political Science, with a minor in Accounting.

have reviewed the Board's June 2019 and the recently-revised redistricting proposals. I currently reside in Polygon 16 and I appreciate the opportunity to provide my perspectives in this important matter, drawing on my educational and professional experiences, my roles within this community, and my most important responsibility as a fatherwhose son is currently enrolled in the public school system. I chose to make my home in Columbia because of the diversity and progressive educational programs offered and I understand and support the need to ensure availability of educational opportunities for all students.

An Historical Perspective

Redistricting, when historically performed, was done to create financial efficiencies and maximize the dollars available and used for students' needs to ensure academic success. Redistricting directly affects individual students and their families who feel a sense of security in their school environment that becomes a second home, or in some cases serves as, a child's primary home (e. g., those in home-transition, homeless, foster or custody situations, etc. ). Life-long relationships are formed with friends, teachers, and other families as these learning years make up the foundations on which our children will build their academic and professional endeavors in future years.

Redistricting plans should primarily address situations of capacity and overcrowding as the main priority. In August 2019, CBS News/Baltimore reported Howard County as the best school system in Maryland. 1 The U. S. Census Bureau ranked Howard County as the eighth highest district for enrollment, when compared nationally, and third highest in the nation in per-pupil spending.2 That being said, financial resources are limited and fiscal responsibility and financial stewardship must be keystones of any plans to serve the Howard County student population.

' Refer to: httos://baltimore. cbslocal. com/2019/08/06/school-rankinas-in-marvland/. Refer to: htt[>s://www. census. aov/librarv/visualizations/2018/comm/school-finances. html. html. The Current Redistricting Proposal is Based on Unreliable and Flawed Data

I am here today to raise a serious concern with the methodology on which the Board's current approach and proposal is based. The current redistricting proposal is no longer focused on ensuring seating capacity, available resources, and individual needs for student success within our schools. Instead, the Board's proposal relies heavily on Free and Reduced Meals ("FARM") data to redistribute and reassign students throughout our hometowns as a way to balance school populations, racial compositions, and school - rather than student - performance. This is a highly concerning approach and I offer Perhaps even negligent as our fiduciaries of taxpayer dollars. It has been widely publicized that the FARM program is fraught with fraud. It is important to note that:

. In 2015, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) set out a series of policy proposals to explore options for the escalating federal spending in child nutrition programs. 3 These proposals are helpful in understanding the complex, various ways the federal government subsidizes children's nutrition programs that funnels to the lunch tables in Howard County schools.

. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report in May 2019 entitled, "SCHOOL MEALS PROGRAMS: USDA Has Reported Taking Some Steps to Reduce Improper Payments but Should Comprehensively Assess Fraud Risks. " The report explains that in 2018, almost 30 million children participated in the National School Lunch Program and over 14 million participated in the School Breakfast Program, with cash payments totaling almost $17 billion. Historically, the school meals programs have reported high estimated improper payment error rates, which suggest that these programs are vulnerable to fraud. The GAO report illustrates the importance of the U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), to establish better processes to plan and conduct regular fraud risk assessments for the school meals programs that align with the leading practices in the Fraud Risk framework. In fact, the report notes that the agency generally agreed with the GAO's recommendation.

. In November 2018, the Urban Institute released a report* explaining that for decades free and reduced meal status were used as measures for student poverty, but these data measurements are outdated and are less useful in today's contexts'as a "proxy measure" of poverty In addition, many reports and scholarly articles point out a variety of current and reliable methods to measure poverty rates that are more reliable and more representative of affected populations.

Likewise, in June 2019, the Foundation for Economic Education published, "The Government's 'Free' Lunch Program Is Horribly Dysfunctional, " which cited the U. S. Office of Management and Budget (0MB) statistics showing that the National School Lunch Program lost nearly $800 million owing to improper

3htto://www. cbo. aov/sites/defaulVfiles/114th-conaress-2015-2016/reDorts/50737-childnutntion. odf. 4https://www. urban. ore/sites/default/files/oublication/99325/new measures of student povertyJ_edf payments in fiscal year 2018, while the School Breakfast Program lost $300 million.

These concepts are not new, and in fact, while I cite several recent reports and studies, these issues have been known for decades. Many reports and studies have been performed through the years and quick searches on the Internet reveal many credible sources. Thus, I remain perplexed whythe Board's redistricting proposal relies so heavily on data that is widely known to be inaccurate and unreliable.

It is also true that the majority of FARM applications go unverified (i. e., not subject to documentation or audit). In fact, my research on this topic and speaking with school administration officials indicated that less than 3% of the FARM applications received are ever reviewed. I was shocked to uncover this data point, particularly when other federal and state programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) and other federally-funded programs require proof of eligibility to receive benefits.

Many Maryland residents are having to appear in person with paper documents across the state at the Department of Motor Vehicles in order to have the privilege to drive and have a valid, "REALID" state-issued driver's license. Yet, the majority of FARM applications are received, processed and approved with no validation'processes in place. In other states, press articles reported that some schools were even reported as giving out monetary gift cards to retail stores as incentives to increase the number of applications and subsequent funding for the school system.5

Eligibility for FARM is more that ensuring children have a well-balanced breakfast and lunch. FARM eligibility opens access for many other benefits listed on the HCPSS website, 6 including the following 23 resources:

. Access to HCPSS Pre-K program. . Free recjistratiQnfees_for^AT_and SATJ subject tests » Free registration for ACT tests . Reduced AP exam registration fees. . Up to four free college applications . Reduced tuition for_H_CPSS_Su_mmer Projgrams (High School, G/T Summer Institute, CTE, Summer Institute) . Re.duced. tujtion for HCPS_S Innovative. Pathways Prparam which offers an evening and summer program

6 httos://www. hcoss. ora/food-services/farms/ . Reduced tuition for HCPSS Digital Education Program which promotes anywhere, anytime learning . Free or reduced JurnfiStartJyjtjon offered through our dual enrollment partnership with . Free access to participate in the Outdoor Education Program for 6th graders. . Free registration for the NCAA Clearinghouse for Dl or Dll athletics . Discounted internet through Comcast Internet Essentials program

Students may also be eligible for:

. Reduced health insurancecoverage through Maryland Children's Health Programs . Reduced Columbia Association (CA) membershjfi fees and access to the CA Youth and Teen Center . Tuition-based scholarship at Columbia Center for Theatrical Arts . Reduced Howard County Rec and Park Program fees (applies to before- and after-care; after-school clubs; sports leagues) Reduced YMCA fees (applies to before- and-after- school enrichment; preschool; summer camp) . Free Head Start classes or Pre-K through the Community Action Council (CAC) of Howard County . Access to the Judy Center which serves families with young children (birth through 5) who live in the Cradlerock Elementary School attendance area, have children who attend Head Start or who have 4-year-old children attending HCPSS Pre-K and/or Regional Early Childhood Center program. . Access to Child Care Subsidy program through the Maryland State Department of Education . Access to Bridges to Housing Stability . Access to CAC_Housinci Assistance and CAC Enorov Assistance . Disability resources, food supplement applications, and medical assistance applications through the Maryland Department of Human_Resourcos

I, too, want to ensure that children in need receive proper nutritional support. However, the FARM program is now operating as an open-access program for anyone who submits the application and benefits far exceed nutritional support for those in need. Conclusions and Recommendations

The FARM data are in no way reliable metrics, and are not representative of, nor should be used as, a poverty indicator within Howard County. The Board needs to do its homework to revisit a better way to measure the poverty rate in Howard County, and specific students in need, before proceeding any further with the redistricting plan.

I would also encourage the Board to use the electoral process and ballot initiatives to seek approval of and consensus among taxpayers before conducting school redistricting processes based on efforts to promote equality policies until more work through better research and real-life assessments can be performed. Taxpayers should have the ability to vote on new Board policy proposals such as the idea of spreading equity across the school system based on racial composition data and income criteria derived from FARM. In addition, existing State programs and the Governor's goals and proposals for the educational system across the State must be considered as part of a cohesive and comprehensive approach.

I appreciate the opportunity to offer my perspectives, research, and opinions and I stand ready to assist the Board in the future as we work together to make our community and our schools safe, productive, and sustainable places for our families to live, work, and enjoy our communities. Marilyn Grosskopf

From: kalyani prayaga Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:08 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu Subject: [External] Keep Polygon 189 with CMS

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. The Proposed solution to move Polygon 189 from CMS to Lime Kiln will create more problems than it is fixing. County Loose Money in transport. Kids and Parents Loose valuable time in Travel.

Please DO NOT MOVEPolygon 189 from CMS to Lime KUn.

Kalyani Home Owner Polygon 189 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Kalyani Satish Kodukula Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:08 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu Subject: [External] Keep Polygon 189 with CMS

! CAUTION:This email originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not click Unks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and knon the content Is safe. The Proposed solution to move Polygon 189 from CMS to Lime Kihi will create more problems than it is fixing. County LooseMoney in transport. Kids and Parents Loosevaluable time in Travel.

Please DO NOT MOVE Polygon 189 from CMS to Lime Kiln.

Satish. Home Owner Polygon 189 rn

From: hong Un Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:07 PM To: BoE Email; Hcpss Redistricting; Kirsten Coombs;Jennifer Mallo; ChaoWu; Mavis Ellis; Sabina Taj; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small Subject: [External] Let 296/1296 stay AHS with a fair feed or move us to RHHS

'CAUTION: Thisemail originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear BOE members,

I live in community of Polygon 296 and 1296, District 4.

I attendedyour working session last night.With a signsaid move 286/1296to RHHS.Because my polygonwas not on the tablefor discussion. Sounds like no changein the beginning, butgradually, we became a small feed,down to 12% from Clarksville middle school to Althoton High.

According the numbers, assuming they are somewhat accurate, the feed from the Clarksville Middle School (CMS) to Atholton HighSchool (AHS) is changed to exactly 15%. But please consider that 6%among these 15%was just moved in AHS last year. The actual feed is only 9%.

Can you imagine what could happen when a teenager starts high school knowing nobody expect for his next door neighbor? Ourcommunity issmall. About10 kids in eachgrade. Howcould the 10kids fit into a highschool, where each grade has an average of 365 students?

Thecurrent Atholton HighSchool hasa balancedfeed from 4 differentmiddle schools, includingClarksville MS, Hammond MS, Murray Hill MS, and Wilde Lake MS. The feed from Clarksville MS to Atholton HS has never been below 27% since early 2000 (maybe 2003). The sufficient feed from CMS and balanced feed from the other 3 middle schools have made Atholton a great school. In this redistricting, we urge you to be FAIR, and keep a minimum of 25%of CMS feed to AHS.

Another wayto make it work is to move 296/1296 to RHHS. Because my community is surrounded by highway 32 to the north. MiddlePatuxent River to the east,Johns Hopkin's Applied ResearchLab to the south. Ouronly connection isto the west through Guilford Road.

My son is a raising 9th grader, it seems that all his friends from CMS will go to RHHS, and he will be left as a small feed from CMS to AHS.

Please listen to people who voted for you and knew their community.

Sincerely, Hong Un M^u^

From: Satish Kodukula Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:07 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Malta; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu Subject: [External] Keep Polygon 189 with CMS

CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. The Proposed solution to move Polygon 189from CMS to LuneKiln will create more problems than it is fixing. County LooseMoney in transport. Kids and Parents Loosevaluable time in Travel.

PleaseDO NOT MOVEPolygon 189 from CMS to Lime Kiln.

Satish. Home Owner Polygon 189 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Fred Xie Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:06 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc Chao Wu; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Kirsten Coombs; Mavis Ellis; Sabina Taj; Vicky Cutroneo Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle

! CAUTION: This emaU originatedfrom outside ofHCPSS.Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We greatly appreciated all seven BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are a micro feed less than 20 students proposed to cro into Lime Klln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight. 1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville MiddleSchool will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary Dopiilatlon is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacity.

2. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMSnot only help to reducethe cost time and resources of County'sTransportation Division, but also greatly reduce travel time, reduce traffic blocks and enhance the safety of kids.

3. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

4. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1.3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6.8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

5. Clarksville Middle School PTA oosition statement suoBortina our request is attached for reference and consideration.

6. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS. there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers_iattached}.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely yours

Dr. Xie FARM FARM FARM Middle School Capacity Aug22 Nov 19 Change Bonnle Branch MS 701 MK 27% 13.41) Burielgh Manor MS 779 ux u% 0. 27 Clarksville MS 643 u% (L46J DunlogglnMS 565 isst. 16% 12.57) Stcrldge tandtngMS 773 w& 26% aiteatt Mills MS 701 3& 10% (o.aej Folly Ouarter MS 6SZ <-(

Mount View MS 7SB . «?. .aw Murray Hill MS IE>yL?.i 662 ai^irns: 3396 is. aej Oakland Mills MS 506 SSi 1.1.2 Patapsca MS 643 VSi f0. 31) wuxEntVsllEv MS 7fi0 Wt 33% homasViaductMS 701 -^$i 38% (4. 33) Wilde take MS 721 i6. 51)

"B&ilitffiJ

(X'tlt^On ?f^,. ^. f-v-

Clarksvllle AAtddte School Parent leacher Association Positicn Statement Atfntfsnec Area Adlustnwnr PUin (dated wcRUEt Id,

According to the tesnfteoij PTA. <.hc> inii»ton ot our PtSA tt to supsifttt . Kd speak on behalfof chftdrw in ourichoot, In the community, and before ffwemmwt bodies and other orgtntaattons that malw (fecfsfons affectfne cMtriren. The Ctaneivllle PTA holds tte ?oltomnp pt&ittons:

i, We agree with th®goal o( addretstng Issues of Inequi'ty iin Howard County. It fe not clear, however, that evidence supports moving students out of their communfttes to address this goal. 'Sodoeconofntc disparity should be addressed by dewungeducational resources (teacher Mrtng, after sdtoot mentortns, other pn^rams} based oi> neeS rathar than by dlsruotfn® studente' IIVBS.

Any redtstrictlng shauld .ffec.t B»e fewest num&er of temiliw iscessary. Atow'rg 207 ttudente from s school that

3. Forcing studenu ro transfer trtmentflt to their men1: ithealtt'i by removing thetr safety n clr^ unnecesary diarig and stress. Remwi'ng a sturfen support-friends, os.ter parents, teachers, counselors, and i leaves them vulnerable during B critfcat time In thefr dewl ard County has recently increased attention end resources o» h. Forcing children to mo^e to a school out of r' flnitiely 'd stress; ri

ng;

itn < sdsft

we a

( tWB

untoes ar Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Satish Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:06 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu Subject: [External] Keep Polygon 189 with CMS

! CAUTION:This email originated from outside of HCPSS.Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. The Proposed solution to move Polygon 189 from CMS to Lime Kiln will create more problems than it is fixing. County Loose Money in transport. Kids andParents Loose valuable time in Travel.

Please DO NOT MOVEPolygon 189 from CMS to Lime Kiln.

Satish. Home Owner Polygon 189 MMtt^nGi

From: Rachel Thompson Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:06 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Please keep us One Dorsey Hall

CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education members,

I am a resident ofpolygon 1148, andI havea first graderwho is currently attendingNorthfield ES. WhileI am very grateful that the Board voted for polygons 1148 and 2148 to remain atNorthfield ES and Dimloggin MS, I am writing to advocate for the Board to vote on polygons 148, 302, and 276 remaining at these schools, as well. From the beginning, the mantra ofour opposition to the proposals submitted by Ms. Mallo and Dr. Wu was 'OneDorsey Hall " Weare a community, andwe have become evenmore cohesive andsupportive ofone anotfierin li^it ofthis threatened disruptionto ourneighborhood. To redistrict polygons 148, 302, and276 would beto fundamentally break apart our coimnunity. Though wehave forged strongbonds with oneanother, thesebonds will inevitablyweaken if our children are sent to different schools. Furthermore, I remainvery concerned about the potential safetyand traffic issues involved withthese polygons being redistricted to Ruiming Brook ES and Wilde Lake MS. Busing children to these schools would necessitate drivingthrough the ah-eadycrowded anddangerous intersections at OldAnnapolis Rdand Columbia Rd andRoute 108 andColumbia Rd. Currently, buses haveto travel alonga relatively low-traffic route to take thesechildren to school. However, crossingRoute 108each morning will greatlyincrease the chanceof an accident, andwill alsocause significant traffic delays atrush hour times. Asit standsnow, it typicallytakes several traffic cycles for carsto beable to navigate theseintersections atmsh hour. I am extremely concerned about what the congestion would look like for our community ofpolygons 148, 302, and 276 are moved to Running Brook ES and Wilde Lake MS.

?..^di^io.n' ??Tremoval ofthese polygons fromDimloggin MS will reducethe feed from Dunloggin MS to WildeLake HS to lessthan 10%. Thisis unfair to theremaining Dorsey Hall stodents atDunlogpn. Moreover, there appears to bea very realistic concern thatthe redistricting plans affecting polygons 148, 302, 276, and others will result in RBES being overcapacity within the next two to three years. To move children in thesepolygons to RBES and then potentially redistrict them once more in a fewmore years would be incredibly disruptive, andfrankly, anirresponsible act on thepart ofthe Board.

Finally, I would like to say a word about the new development in Dorsey Hall that has been mentioned a few times in BOB meetings. This new development is a 50+ community, containing virtually no children that attend local schools. This is not a development that is in any way contributing to school overcrowding. In fact, DorseyHall haskept development limited inrecent years, duein partto a desireto keep ourschools from exceeding their capacity.

??r ?e r^asolls listed above> J strongly urge the board to vote to retain all five Dorsey Hall polygons - 1148, 2148, 148, 302, and 276 - at Norfhfield ES and Dunloggin MS when the Board renders its final vote this Thursday. Respectfully, Rachel Thompson Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Jigita Patel Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:55 PM To: Vicky Cutroneo; Kireten Coombs; Chao Wu; Mavis Ellis; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Hcpss Redistricting; BoE Email Subject: [External] MOTION NEEDED - POLYGON 189 - TO MOVE IT BACK TO CLARKSVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

FIRST, thanks to all BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are tess than 20 sfudente proposed to^o into LJme Kiln Middle-

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary DOpuletion is_also_disBersed^evenlv K-_5 and wi!Lnotc3use_dlsruBtion_to CMScasasjtv.

2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. 77)/s creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Kids can Bike/Walk if needed from Clarksville Middle School - after-school activities- Presently it takes on 10-15 minutes to Clarksville Middle school, kids can bike from after-school actwities or even walk if needed. Clarksville kids will stay within Clarksville community.

Thanks Jigita From: Russell Pentz Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:02 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting; Superintendent Subject: [External] Keep Polygon 132 at CCES!!!!!

5AFTION:Tl?is emailorigmated fromoutside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links oropen attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Justnumbers on a map...

r a house in a ^c. ^!y-se^chfd. fo y^s to. f?d community that would have our kids going to the high perfomnngschools that Howard County is so proud of. Wespent our life savings to mSe mire that we pro_ - .themthebest we could offer and withm a matterofdays. with almost no time to create opposition, we arl"ow.told-thatthe p. lmhas changod";-I-watehed the Process and can say without bias that we'were7ust~ numbers ona map,no&ingmore^ WhileI understand thedirective toprevent overcrowdmg andre^stribute !?^o!lco??nllcmequities' tl?ese BOEmembma-e notin a position to manage our communities, housing markets^localeconom. yordemographies. Welove the diversity our communities offerTthat'swhy'we are i!!'^Putting our children in &e best schools we can find has nothing to do with diversity. R hasto'do with ^PCTfolmance offllesch001' unfortunately' ourfamily is rethinking our decision givaiflieuistability the school system in Columbia inparticular. Sweepingmoves like this without sufficient research will A-ivemore andmore out ofthe equation completely. Ourcommunity is a bigpart ofthe success ofour schools, weare not just numbers on a map.

Russell Pentz Polygon 132 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Elliott Pearl Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:01 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 132

! CAUTION: This emaUoriginated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not cUcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content h safe. My children are41 and33 yrs old andthe latter wasa student at Clemens Crossing. Theproposed move ofthe Sebring neighborhood student population from CCES to BWES makes no sense. The numbers do not bear out thepurported benefits when critically examined. Theadverse social andpsychological effects onthese youngsters would be pronounced.

I strongly urge reconsiderationof this issue.

Elliott R Pearl, MD 6125SebringDr Marilyn Grosskopf

From: durgam Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:01 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Opposing Proposed move of Polygon 1171 - Westmount

ION: This em"l from CAyT originated outside of HCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Board Members:

We are the parents of kids from Howard county school polygon 1171 residing at 3343 Burton Dr. Ellicott Cit MD 21042.

With thevery last minute changes yesterday, you havemoved our Polygon 1171 from MRHS to GHS. Wedid not get a chanceto voice our opinion from to the Board.

In ourJ>olygon, _we live close to Kiwanis Park which is at the far east end ofthe Polygon and it's about 9 miles awayfrom GHS. You havemade our Polygon an ISLANDwhich causes significantissues to our kids whether it's travel time, stress, no nearby friends and lack ofsleep. As such, wesincerely request you all to re-considerkeeping 1171@MRHS.

Thanks,

Santhosh Durgam

3343 Burton Dr

EllicottCityMD21042 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Jeremy Dommu Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:01 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: Vicky Cutroneo; Jennifer Malta; Kirsten Coombs; Christina Delmont-Small; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu; Mavis Ellis Subject: [External] Procedural Error in Motions has Significant Consequences

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. There was a proceduralmistake that occurred duringthe first motion at the 11/14working sessionmeeting. At the onset of this meeting, Ms. Mallo explained that after attending the 11/13 Clemens Crossing Elementary PTA meeting, she was revising her plan. As Ms. Mallo explained, she proposed reverting back to the original boundaries for CCES, whichwas more in line with the Superintendent's suggestion. Ms. Taj thenmotioned to start with this idea, andthe motion passed. Ms. Mallo then clearly stated that the Clemens boundarieswere reverted and then she went about the process of making subsequent motions with the existing Clemens' boundaries as the base case. One of which was to move 132, 1132, and2132 from CCES to BWES, butthat motion failed. The intent of Ms. Taj's motion is at the 1:20:00mark ofthe stream (www.hcpsstv.new.swagit.coin/videos/38024). The assumptionthat motion #1 was to start withthe Mallo plan as presented at the 1 1/12 board meeting is incorrect. The motion was to start with Malllo's revised idea to revert the Clemens bordersback to their current assignment. At a minimum, the motion (hat passedwas not clearly articulated or described. Yet, this incorrect assumption had significantimpacts on decisionsmade later that night and at the 11/18 working session.

The below summarizes the timeline as it relates to 132, 1132, and 2132. It clearly showsthat thesepolygons were not given an equal opportunity to testify, and last minute changes and confusionhave resulted in an area beingremoved from their neighborhoodschool without proper data, infonnation, or opportunity for public feedback.

January2019: HoCo Board ofEd directed HCPSSto initiate a system-wideschool boundaryreview process. HCPSS commissions independentconsultants Cooperative Strategies, LCC at the cost of $400,000 to conduct feasibility studies, whichwould inform a recommendedplan from the Supeiintendent.

June 2019: Feasibility Studies and data detailing several different redistricting options is released. None ofthe options identifiedin this study suggestedmoving polygons 132 (Sebring), 1132, or 2132.

July 2019: Several community input sessions wereheld to allow members offhe public to provide input to the Superintendent and testify regarding the plan. As polygons 132, 1132, or 2132 were not impacted, there was little reason for neighbors to testify.

August 22: Superintendentrecommends his plan based on the feasibilitystudy. This does not move 132, 1132, or 2132.

August 22 to November 19: Board accepts written testimony via email sent to redistrictingfSihcoss.ore.

September 2019: Public hearings scheduledto allow families to testify on the Superintendent'splan. Again, as 132, 1132, or 2132 were not impacted, there was no reason for us to testify. October 17: Board ofEducation begins public work sessions to review andalter the Superintendent's plan. Duringthese time severalboard members begin making alternative suggestions thatwould impact polygons that hadnever been considered for a move.

MondayOctober 28 Work Session: BothMallo andWu begin posting alternative redistrictingplans on Facebookand personal websites. Both Mallo andWu post at leastone plan that moves 132(Sebring) and 132 alone from CCES to BWES.

Weekend ofNovember 2 and 3: Sebring mobilizes. Flyers, letters, and information on how to provide written testimony is distributed throughout the Sebring neighborhood by a group ofparents. Parents in the community begin to submit written testimony.

^Ion^a?^![ove?lbe-5_4: _Both Mall°and wu Post on Facebook revised plans that do not include moving 132 from CCESto BWES. Mallo refera to herinclusion ofthe move of 132 from CCES to BWESas a "typological error. " Wuresponds to emails statingthat heagrees and does not plan to move 132 from CCESto BWES. Polygon 132 parents think they are in the clear. November 5 andNovember 7: Additionalwork sessions held. 132is not discussed. Boardmembers agreeto no longer post revised plans on social media.

Tuesday November 12: At the very end ofan evening working session meeting, Mallo reads offa new elementary planthat would significantly alter CCESby moving out 11 out ofthe 16polygons currently assignedand reassigning nearly 70%of the studentpopulation. Theseinclude moving 132, 1132, and2132 from CCES to BWES moving the Clary's Forest neighborhood from CCES to SwES, movmg the Hawthrone/Sunny Springs neighborhood from BWES to CCES. WednesdayNovember 13:A work-sessionoccurs in afternoon in which there was some discussion regarding CCES boundaries but no motions or decisions were made. That night, Ms. Mallo attends the CCES PTA meeting.

Thursday November 14 Work Session: Ms Mallo began the meeting on 1 1/14 with a revised proposal. She statedthat afterattending the CCES PTA meeting theprior night, that shehad a newproposal thatwould not impact Clemens Crossingnearly as much, andit wouldbring CCES back closer to the Superintendent's plan. Ms Taj then made a motion, seconded by Coombs, to start with this plan. The motion passes 4-3 (Coombs, Ellis, Mallis andTaj voted forit; Cutroneo, CDS,and Wu voting against). This firstmotion on 11/14 becomes a keymoment asit becomeunclear later on whether this motion was referring to Mallo'splan first presentedon 11/12or the revised Mallo plan that adjusted Clemen's boundaries. Themotion and vote happened quickly without much discussion. As soon asthe motion passed, Mallo explained thather plan was to revert Clemens back to its original boundaries with some adjustments, and that Mallo would make individual motions for those adjustments. Accordingly, Ms. Mallo andthe board went through a series ofproposals from this starting point ofCCES current boundaries. This included moving polygons 64, 129, 1129, and 1064 from PRES to SwES (which passes 4-3 along the same vote), and splitting polygons 130 so that the Simpsons Mills townhouse conmiunity was to bemoved from CCES to SwES (also passes 4-3 along the same vote). Next, Mallo motioned and Taj seconds a proposal to move polygons 132, 1132, and 2132 from CCES to BWES. This motion failed(Coombs, Cutronemo, CDSand Wu voting against), so atthe end of the 1 1/14session, these polygons were still assigned to CCES.

Theboard then moved onto other areasof the county. However, a fewinteresting motions occuiredlater that night. Ofnote is that a motion later this evening to move polygon 100 and 1100 from Waterloo ES to Veterans ESfailed, but it is statedthat because motion #1 thatnight was to startwith the Mallo plan, that this motion was not needed since under the Mallo plan, 100 and 1100 were already moved from Waterloo to Veterans. There were several ofha-moves thatdid not comeup duringthis sessionthat were presumed to haveoccurred (such as moving 2174, 135, and 53 from SwES to CCES; andmoving 5133, 1133, 133, and 2204 from BWES to SwES [this one is particularly interesting because these polygons were to be moved from BWES to CCES under the 11/12Mallo plan but no motion was ever made regarding them, whichhad they been working from the 1 1/12 Mallo plan as later presumed, this motion would have needed to be made since the 1 1/12 Mallo clan hadthem at CCES]). November18 Board Work Session: Towards the beginning ofthe 11/18board meeting, Ms. Mallo explained that the failing motion to move 132, 1132, and 2132 from CCES to BWES was made in'error because the firs't' motionof the 11/14meeting was to use the Mallo plan first presented on 11/12as the starting point, and accordinglysuch a motionto move 132 1132,and 2132 was not necessary since under the U/'12Malloplan, these polygons were already reassigned from CCES to BWES. But, that is not tme. Motion #1 from 1 l7l4-was to keep CCESas is andpresumably otherwise adoptthe 11/12Mallo plan. Shortly thereafter, Ms. Coombs made a new motion to move 132, 1132, and 2132 back from BWES to CCES. This motion failed 4-3 (Wu, Ellis, Taj, and Mallo voting no). After the dinner break at -7:45 PM. Wu motioned, and CDS seconded, a vote to move 132 back from BWES to CCES. Voting started on this motion andCutraneo abstained, whileMallo and Combs both voted in favor ofthe move, andthus, it wason track to fi that Wu and pass giyf CDS had made the motion and would have voted for it. However, before the voting ?^» finish> Bllis thenasked forclarification onwhether the motion wasto move all 3 polygons orjust 132. After some discussion, it was agreed that the motion was to move all three polygons 132, 1132, and 2132, themotion was revised, andagain this motion failed. Thevote to keep polygon 132,by itself, atCCES was never taken even though it had support. Themeeting ends at 11PM with the board voting 5-2 in a strawpoll tomove forapproval ofthe elementary school plan as it currently stands. This would include moving 132, 1132, and 213i from CCES to BWES. Thursday November 22: Theboard is slated to vote, presumably polygon bypolygon, to adoptthe changes presented.

Best, JeremyDommu (Polygon 132) Marilyn Grosskopf

From: SheelaChellappan Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:00 PM To: Mavis Ellis; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu; Kirsten Coombs; Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle School Attachments: FARM Numbers.jpg; CMS PTA Letter.jpg

CAUTION:This email originated from outsideofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Board of Education Members, Wegreatly appreciated all seven BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES. BOE'soriginal decisionto move Polygon 189from PRESand CMS to DOASand LKSwas due to inaccuratedata on 13, wherehe proposed to move Polygon 189from PRESand CMSto DOASand LKS. Unfortunately, the BoEneglected to addressthe correction of moving Polygon 189back from LimeKiln to Clarksville Middle. As it stands, weare a micro feed less than20 students proposedto go into LimeKlln Middle. Request:_l:'lease c°nsider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending forthe school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight. 1_No. adverse. impact. °n CMS~ KeePinS Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any ofthe FARM or Capacity numbers, aswe are lessthan 20 kidsgoing to Clarksville middJe'schooi. 'Our' existing elementary population is also dispersed evenly K-5 and will not cause disruption to CMScaoa^

MS nlv hela fo redul:e the cost. time and resources of County's Transportatii n:.^L;lT.ep^''?^l/??. ".?89afC not. °. Diyision, but also greatly reduce travel time, reduce traffic blocks and enhance the safety of kids. ^Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with the CMS community. 4. Continuityfor Children andavoiding increased transportation costs and leadtimes - Clarksville MiddleSchool is

. t^l, '..1_'?-mJl^awayfrom Polygon 189 whereasthe proposed LimeKiln middleschool is 6^8miles away from Polygon 189. Thisj:reates a 1 hour 10minute round trip commute dailyfor our children. Moreomr, basedon the proposed move to LKMS, our 189 kids Polygon will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go tothe'Lim'e'Kirn M'iddie" School.

5. Clarksville Middle School PTA poslfion statement supDortina our request Is attached for reference and consideration. 6".B/ keep'nf polyciorl. 189 at CMS- there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached).

Thank you for your attention to this matter and consideration. Sincerely,

Dr. Sheela K Chellappan House owner in Polygon 1 89.

6162 Flutie Lane, Clarksville. MD 21029 FARM FARM FARM Middle School Capacity Aug 22 Nov 19 Change Bonnle Branch MS 701 27% Burielgh Manor MS 779 u% 0.27 ClarksuilleMS 643 UK f 1.46. Dunlo^inMS 565 16% ^ . ElkridgeLanding MS 779 Ellicott Mills KS TO1 Folly Quarter MS 662 <5% Glenwood MS 545 D.6S Hammond MS 604 26% <3. 73; Harpers Choice MS sos 31% l;. '?i.i Lake Etlchorn MS 643 3S'i Ume Krtn MS 721 Msyfield Woods MS 79S 41% Jf'f.iF'3 Mount View KS 798 <5% Murray Hill MS 662 335a is. s:-

Oakland Mills MS S06 44C-4 Patapsco MS S43 Patuxent Valley MS 760 33% '4 V 'Thomas Vtadud 701 38% M.Ci^ Wide lake MS 721 38% iP. 541 roSniOXi iTATEMEN'S

Cktotnr

Clarksvitte Mtddt®School Parent Teacher Association Posttton Statement Atumdanw Aw Adjustment Plan tttoted Autxst 20, ZOIOt

According to the jUaate'&EA. th* "»l»lo"

The Uartsvtlte PTAhrtds the foltowfn( porittom:

agree with the goal of .Afreaing inuw of inequity in howMd Courty. It tt not ctear. howwer, that cwtdmce suppons moivfnt ttudentt out of their cofnmunfties to address thts soat. Sodoecunomtc dfepartty dtoirid te adAwsed bydevoting educationnl naoure« (twchw Wrtnt, aftw setw*^ roenww^, other pregnna) bwed on need rather than by dssnytfng students' lives. 2. Any ndfttrfctlnt shcwtd affect the fewest number oT tamtl<« ncwsswy. Moviiv 207stustents from a school that b not owraw»dedfa not lurtlfled. In addttton, txistng these rtudents, whoare Ale tnwaUtto OariwtUe AUddte Sdwot, toi adwot Uut te owr 5 mths away temro (»rticutarty uiweasonabte. 3. Fordi^stiKtentsto transfersehwistsdetnmental to unetrmeirtalhwltt by»wnovrs, aid admlntstrators-leaves ttwn wAnenAte durtng . crittalttawtntfietrdefdl^menL Howard County hu recurtly tnawwd attenyonandrwourcwonnwntalhMttt. ForefnBcMldnn to nxwe to B iritod wt ^ their neWAorhocdwttl deflnttriy wkl stress andma» fticrwae saehws, hq»eteane«, .nd sutctrial tdeatta*. 4. GenwatcsnNnartsabc fheproti . of redtetrfcttng: e. |nwitvetf»cwffiWfnlty, CT,w !Uyfamftte, afl^eOedbyred»rfet(ng tnatea-hurrfed, »noretfioi

From: Sirisha Busam Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:58 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting; BoE Email Subject: [External] POLYGON-189 :: move back to CMS

! CAUTION:This email origmatedfrom outsideofHCPSS. Do not click links or openattachments, unlessyou recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Respected Board members,

We appreciateyour tireless efforts. BringingPolygon 189middle schoolkids to your attention. Therewas an oversight, as you we're making a considerate decision regarding elementary school kids. They will be driving 6miles to go to LMKS as per your proposal. We request you to consider the following points.

1. PRESand CMS arenext to eachother and are onthe sameroad. Ourhousing is around 1.2 miles away.Easier to manage for families with kids in both schools.

Elementary School Current MS MS OPT PLAN ID Pointers Run ES Clarksville MS Lime Kiln MS 189 Why mi l. Zmiles, next door to PRES 6 miles via MD-108

2. LKMS is 6 miles away and means long commute and added transportation cost.

3. There are no capacity issues to address at CMS with this move.

SoPLEASE CONSmER OUR PRIORTTIES. Appreciate your vigilance regarding this issue.

Sincerely, Sirisha Busam Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Arlette Garcia Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:57 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] TSES redistricting

! CAUTIO^: TMs emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I ask HCPSS and member of the board to keep 1059/2059 @ TSES & move Polygon 55 to SFES instead.

Keep 59/3059 w/1059/2059 @ OMMS. Polygons 67/311 should stay at EMMS since they remain at HOHS & would be a tiny feed at OMMS not continuing to OMHS.

Arlette Garcia Gill Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Hinish, Sheri Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:57 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting; Chao Wu Subject: [External] Motion->Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle Attachments: CMS PTA Letterjpg; FARM Numbers. jpg

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and knom the content is safe. Dear Dr. Chao and BoE,

We greatly appreciate all seven BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 backfrom Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are a community with less fhan 20 students proposed to go Into Lime Klln Middle. Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existingelementary Dopulafionis also dispersed evenly K- 5 andwill not cause disruptionto CMScapacity.

2. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS not only help to reduce the cost, time and resources of County's Transportation Division, but also greatly reduce travel time, reducetraffic blocks and enhance the safetyofkids7 3. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

4. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trio commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

5. Clarksvllle Middle School PTA position statement suooorf/no our request Is attached for reference and consideratjon.

6. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS. there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached). Thank you for your consideration.

Sheri Hinish, MAc, MsSCM, PMP, LSSGB SupplyChainQueen®] Executive Advisor and Change Leader] IBM Futurist 410-456-3126 | srhinish@amail. com SyeplyChainQyeen^com | Skype: sheri. hinish Pi!@ PRSmON STATWtW

onot»f xx, ;o»»

ClaNavltte Middle School Parent Teacher Asoctattw PcKttion Statement Attendance Am Adjustnumt Plan (dated August W. 201t»

Accordingto the (terytamil'TA. the missionat aw PT5Afc to support andNtaaS* on behalf of chlteinmiiour achool. tn the axtimunlty, and briore^aowmment bodtw andother orB»iwnUontthat make decfetonsaffectfng chUdren. The Oiirtevtlte PTAhold* UN?foltow«»tg potltfom:

t. Weagn* wtth the goal of addrwalng lisuw of fneqMlty Hwmnl Courty. ft tt rwtclear, howewr, that wKtenceMWortt movingttudwto o«rtrf ttet»i< students' tfws. 2. Any redistrictfng thoutd affect tte fewea rwmber o?tamtUtt '*«»"X- Mwtng-2ad7 stuAmts fnm a school ttwit isnot wercre»«tewtPdCotm^hasrec»ai» attenUton and mwuree*an mental heatth. Fordna^cMldrw to mow to a Khwiaitrtf'ttdr neWAortwodwtU deflritely add stress and may fcicnmesadnes*. ho ~- . andsutcktol tdeatton.

4. Ge» ?al tiaous. the yvceas of nsdtetncttng: f»woh tfwcommmtty, espeefally famUtes, affated by redtrtrtcttng tn'ates:hwrfed, moretfiourfhtfiA pFacffiStrfdedston-mddnt. hren^wwit tobefnwlwdlln howboutKtorteaw re^amm. Vte und^uritftat redbtrictin wit happen but ti» airrert ^x»«lfe uston andcomimmlty tnput wer tf» paAtwo y»n. 'iuofm strictedstedsntsthouAttbegtvenamWimmKrftwo »ml >p ortodwu^fa^sdtoote. Ay ' ttngdtrtrictesott aremaint ncd. FARM FARM FARM Middle School Capacity Aug 22 Nov 19 Change Bonnie Branch MS 7m Z7ct Burlejgh Manor MS 779 11% 0.27 Clarksville MS 643 1256 Ounloggln MS S6S 16% ElkridgeLanding MS 779 zs% EtlieotlMtfl'sMS 701 10% Folly Quarter MS 662 <5y

filenwood MS 545 sa Q.6S Hammond MS 604 26% >3.TO:

Harpers Choice MS 506 31% ..:! 8E. Lake Etkhorn MS 64i a. ir Um» Kiln MS 721

MayfleldWoods MS 798 12.73, Mount View MS 738 <-5% MS Murray Hilt 662 . . 3. ^; Oaklanri Mills MS S06 . t^. Patapsco MS 643 Patuxent Valley MS 760 33et Thomas Vladuct W5 701 Wilde take MS 721 :. 5-i! JVIarilyn Grosskopf

From: Nicole Davis Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:56 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting; School Planning Subject: [External] Howard County Redistricting

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

! CAUTION:This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

> To: Howard County Board of Education > > In June of 2017, my family moved from Baltimore County to Howard County. Our desire was to relocate to a diverse and inclusivecommunity that offered the besteducation for our young son. Weselected a home inthe HickoryRidge community in Columbia (Golden Hook). Much to our surprise, we learned that the elementary school that we were zoned for was Bryant Woods - a school that is approximately 12 minutes awayby car. Clemens Crossing Elementary School is literally within walking distance of our home. We were hopeful that the 2017 redistricting would re-zone to what logically made the most sense, but that didn't happen. > > Ourson hasattended BryantWoods Elementary for the pasttwo years. It isa goodschool and we've tried to getas much out of the experience as possible. We attend almost every school event, we regularly meet with his teachers, and I am on the PTA board. With that said, we continue to be frustrated by the fact that we are beingforced to send our son to a school that isfarther awayand not rated asfavorably. > > Our hope was renewed once again with the possibility of the re-zoning efforts taking place this year. The original proposal finally made sense and directed our polygon to Clemens Crossing. I believe this amounted to 20 students makingthe move. Unfortunately, dueto circumstances andarguments unknownto us,Swansfield Elementarywas introduced as another possible option. This was done late last week without any notification to potentially impacted families.

> > This makes no sense when we are a stone's throw away from Clemens Crossing. We grocery shop alongside Clemens families.... we bump into each other when walking our dogs.... we engage at community events.... yet we cannot attend the same school as our neighbors? Why? > > I implorethe HowardCounty Boardof Educationto dowhat makes sense logicallyand fundamentally. Sendpolygon 5133 to Clemens Crossing. > > Sincerely, > Nicole Davis

> > Sent from my iPhone Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Hua Wang Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:56 PM To: BoE Email; Hcpss Redistricting; Christina Delmont-Small; Vicky Cutroneo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu; Kirsten Coombs; Jennifer Mallo; Mavis Ellis Subject: [External] Keep a FAIR feed from Clarksville MS to Atholton HS

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear BOE members,

I live in Polygon 296 and 1296, District 4.

I attended your meetingyesterday. Yourwork hascreated an extremely unfairsituation for people who have been moved or isolated at the last minute.

Our polygon is surrounded by high way32 to the north. Middle Patuxent Riverto the east, Johns Hopkin's Applied Research Labto the south. Our only connection is to the west through Guilford Road.

My friend's daughter is a 9th grader in Atholton HS. In your work session, you moved all her friends out of her current school. My friend's daughter has been redistricted at elementary school level and at middle school level. Although we never moved our house, she hassuffered and lost herfriends twice in her 10years ofschooling in HCPSS.

This time, you moved all her friends out and leave her as a small feed from CMS to AHS.....

Nowthe Clarksville Middle School (CMS) feed to Atholton High School (AHS) has decreased to exactly 15%, according to your document. 6%just moved into the PRES-CMS-AHSfeed last year. Theactual feed is only 9%.

Ourcommunity is small. Only 10 kids in eachgrade in high school. Howcould the 10 kidsfit into a highschool, where each grade has an average of 365 students? My friend's daughter has complained that everybody she knows, not just herfriends, moves awayby redistricting. But you don't give hera chanceto speak up for herself. It is UNFAIR.

The current Atholton HighSchool hasa balancedfeed from 4 different middle schools, includingClarksville MS, Hammond MS, Murray Hill MS, and Wilde Lake MS. The feed from Clarksville MS to Atholton HS has never been below 27% since early 2000 (maybe 2003). The sufficient feed from CMS and balanced feed from the other 3 middle schools have made Atholton a great school. In this redistricting, we urgeyou to be FAIR,and keep a minimum of 25%ofCMS feed to AHS.

As I heard in the meeting, the data you use for FARM calculation has an error of 3% and 5% in two separate elementary schools, notsure the accuracyof other schools. However,you evaluate that a decreaseof 2% FARM rate asa statistically significant improvement. Based on the data with this degree of error, your plan moves 5320 students, and many ofthem without beinggiven a chance to speak. Howcould BOEcreate this unprofessional and disruptive data-driven procedure?

I urge you to vote NO to the current proposal of work session 9.

Sincerely, Hua Wang Sent from my iphone Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Rachael Bis Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:55 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Clemens Crossing Polygons 1132Walker Survey

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Please, please don't rip 132, 2132, 1132 awayfrom Clemens Crossing. Polygons 2132 and 1132 are within 0.9 miles ofClemens Crossing and in the process ofcompleting a walker survey. Moving us to a school that is much farther away and already overcapacity does not serve anyone's best interest!

Please address school utilization with as few dismptions as possible by leaving current Swansfield students at underutilized Swansfield, instead ofmoving Swansfield children to Clemens Crossing andpushing out Clemens Crossing childrento overcapacity Bryant Woods. Keepingthe children at their current schools decreases commute time (and bus cost) for all children involved and avoid disrupting all of these children. Pleaseextend to usthe same compassion that you showedto the rest ofthe Clemens CrossingCommunity and let us stay remain with our community.

Approximate Commute Distance Polygons Current School SwansfleldES Clemens Crostlng BryantWoods 53, 2174, 2135 SwansftoUES 0.7 miles 2. 7 miles 2. 5 miles 132. 1132, 2132 Clemem CrosshsES 2. 2 miles 0.9 miles 2.4 miles

Ifyou must move ourpolygons, pleaseconsider moving us to Swansfieldinstead, at least wewould not be causing an already overcapacity school to become even more crowded.

I know you are probably exhausted and fiustrated with this process, but I beg you to please reconsider our situation one more time. Our children are not commodities to be bartered with. Please considerthe harm that moving these children away from their community will do to them as individuals, notjust asnumbers to be balanced.

Thank you for your time and consideration, Rachael Ramirez Bis Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Fred X Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:52 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: Chao Wu; Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Mavis Ellis; Sabina Taj Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We greatly appreciated all seven BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES. BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189from PRESand CMSto DOASand LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 backfrom Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are a micro feed less than 20 students proposecfto oo into Lime Klln Middle. Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are fess than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existingelementary poou/at/on is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruptionto CMScapacity.

2. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS not only help to reduce the cost. time and resources of County'sTransportation Division, but also greatly reduce travel time, reduce traffic blocks and enhance the safety of kids. 3. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

4. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trio commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

5. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement suDOOrtina our request is attached for reference and_eonsjderation.

6. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS. there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached).

Thank you for your consideration.

Fred FARM FARM FARM Middle School Capacity Aug 22 NavlS Change Bonnle Braneh MS 701 27K 0.41) Burlelgh Manor Ms 773 tSSS O. Z7 clarksvllle MS 643 12% Dunloggln MS 565 1S6t 12.57) Elkndgelanding MS 77S s% (1-111) Bllcott Mills MS 701 UK !0,86! Folly Quarter MS BBZ aS

Hammond MS 604 ^s 26% 0.73) Harpers Choice MS SOB 31» (2.85) Lake Elkham MS 643 38% J3. 13) UmBKilnluis 721 ,']lA'.''"r['»<.tN1i

t'tEtOt!;"" '»..

Clartevllle Wtddle SKIN081 pRi-ent ie@ctwy- Assoctotton1 Position St,at.emt?n1, Attendtanec Area Adiluctnnig'nt flfin (dated AUEUSI 2G, ZCI^t

According :to the Kisryianfl PTA. thr nwsslon uf our PTSA to to supgtan, and spert on behalfof chftdren in ouFschooL, in the conwnunlty, and beforegovet'fflment bodfes and other orBtnfeatlwis VUM make dedstom affectfne cbitUlren.

The cianwlllle PTA holds tne foiitewiing pmiiittom:

1. Weagree with e goai ot adoressmg issues ut~ fneqwty In Haward County. It Is not clear, however, that evtdence supports nwvfns studeots out o< their communfUes to address this goal. tedoeconcwntc dispari^ should be addnesed by devoting educatfonafrewurces (teacher hfring, after school rnentortng, other programs! based or r PB i rather than by disniptine students' lives. 2. Any redtstricttng should »ffec, t the fewest numbsr of families. nigsessairy. Mwtr^ 207 students from f school that Is niat overcrowded fa»wt justifled. Inaddition, busing these students, are able to walkto Claitevtlte Middle School, to a school that is over 5 mtles awayseems partfculartv onrcasonable,

Forcing studena to transfer schools Is imentel tfl tndr mental heeltt by removing their safety net and intrr .^ unneceaary diangp and stress. Itemovlr^ B tludents" net teachers, cou- 'ton, and a ws critical tin >t heir i rd Counly has reMntly increased attentfoni id s . Forcing children to move to a SdKMlOUt f init^y Id rtfess 'iid increase ss tion.

.9. Ga

^.

?e nt life nie (fOir

cnf tea- Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Julekha Dash Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:54 PM To: Julekha Dash Subject: [External] Moving Polgygon 2161 won't achieve equity

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click Unks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To the Board of Education,

I am an Ellicott City resident andmy daughter attends Waverly Elementary School.

I appreciate the long hours all ofyou have put in to achieve equity in the Howard County School District.

I respectfully askthat the board please reconsider moving Polygon 2116and keep it atWaverly Elementary School. It has been moved several times in the last decade from St. Johns Elementary to Hollified Station back to St. Johns Lane and Waverly and now... back to St. John's. I urge you to not keep volleying kids back and forth from these three elementary schools. It does nothing to achieve eqiiity or level out FARMS recipients. This Polygon was addedwithout any discussionon the impact it would have on students.

Sincerely,

Julekha Dash 443-257-9299

Twitter: @Julekha Instagram: @foodtravelart httDS://iulekhadash. contentlv. com/ Manl^

From: Hinish, Sheri Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:53 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting;chao. [email protected] Subject: [External] ~> Motion to Move Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle Attachments: CMS PTA Letter.jpg; FARM Numbers.jpg

CAUTION: This emaa originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members, We greatly appreciate all seven BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 backto PRES. BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOASand LKSwas due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRESandCMS to'DOASand LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to addressthe correction of moving Polygon 189back from LimeKiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are a community with less than 20 students orooosed to oo into Lime Klln Middle. Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight. 1_N°. adverse impact. t°CMS'-~ KeePin9 Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impacton anyof the FARM or Capacitynumbers, aswe are less than 20 kidsgoing to Clarksville middle school. 'Our existingelementary pooulation is alsodispersed evenly K-5 andwill notcause disruption to CMScapacity. s". -^,keep/"? p,°IY<^°n 139 at CMS not onlv helD to reduce the cost. time and resources of County's Transportation Dmsion, but also greatly reduce travel time, reduce traffic blocks and enhance the safety of kids. ^Keeping Communities together- Polygon 189is heavilyinvolved withCMS community andshould remainwith CMS community. 4. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is iTflt^'.'l'?. mJl^ awayfrom Polygon 189 whereasthe proposed LimeKiln middleschool is 6. 8 milesaway from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10minute round trio commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime KiinM'iddie' School.

5. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement supDortinaour request is attachedfor reference and consideration. 6:BY.keePina Polvaon 189at CMS. there are no impactsto FAMRnumbers, aswe can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached). Thank you for your consideration.

Sheri Hinish, MAc, MsSCM, PMP, LSSGB SupplyChainQueen®]Executive Advisor and Change Leader] IBM Futurist | 410-456-3126 | srhinish^amaiLcpm SypplyChainQueeacom I Skvoe: sheri. hinish T" fe"^ W&mON STATEMENl

RaoBprXX. ?019

ClariesviUe Mlckfte School Parent Teacher Position Statement Attendanct?Area iM^utnient Pt«<(dated *ugutt 20. 2M9}

Aaord^ to Uw MiKigign^gTA,the mteton ut our PTSA(t to tupport ant i(»w5i on behalf of difldn'ntnourtchool. In tN>camnitmtty, andliefore aowmiwnt bodfw and other organaatton* that n»ke dedria»B affecUi^ ctilldwi. Tb< CUittevtlte PTA hotdt the foltowlng pattttons:

l. t»'»ag(ww»tt the (oal of »

2. Any redtstrictfng dwutd aflect the fewett rwmber ot famtltes necetsaiy. Mflwtt<| 207 lUidents fnxn a sdwot that to not owrcrowdedla not }ustifitri. (n addttjon, bustng these students, wtw are able to walk to Ctoriuvtlte Mddte Sdwot, to « school that fe cw 5 mtte* wmy wwm particytert^ UnflHBWMblC.

3. Forch^aMdentstotninrferKhosBtettetTimentoltcyieirmurtirfhealttt ly ramwlng their *afe^ nrt md tntrududng imnecauary ehu»|e aid stnss. temov(fltastudarerparena>, teactNsra, coumdors, smd admbifstrators-teaves them vulnerabte dwtag » crttkattftnetn their dei imait. Howai 1 Csunty has nwntly , »ndsyfclt iltdCTUwi.

4. GefieratcomnmrttdwuttfieprocesofredbtrtcUna:

a. Uwolwti 6om(»wnny, epedaltyfamiltes, affected by redfetrtaing (natett- Nnried, Bic ' itful process of decldos-tnatent. Puwts . howbeundarteawr@-drawm. Mte imdertti (rill happen btA the Girwrttpropotalfe ydff --- ;- iswtrfdi have been offeml for n ON iftyfai ut over tlw (Mstt tw ywrs. n ttfti irtud ntsriiotAdbeBlvefflatnfcitaanoftwa - s idttols. c. Idiwrnl tt

From: Gopi Krishna S Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:52 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Fwd: Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle Attachments: CMS PTA Letter.jpg; FARM Numbers.jpg

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thankful to BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are tess than 20 students orooosed to go Into Lime Klln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1, No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are tess than 20 kkls going to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary Dopulation is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacity.

2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - uiawsville Miaaie School is less than 1. 3 miles away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement sudsortjna our request is attached for reference and consideration.

5. By keeping Polygon_189 at CMS. there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached).

Thank you for your consideration. FARM FARM FARM Middle School Capacity Aug 22 Nov IS Change

Bonnle Branch MS 701 276t . 3.4:; Burielgh Ntanor MS 779 u% 0.27 ClsrksvilleMS 643 tZC U. 4&! Dunloggin MS 565 16% Elktidge Landing MS 779 28% BltCOtt Mills MS 701 ". r' Folly Quarter MS 662 <5% Glenwooit MS 545 8% 0.6S Hammonrf MS 604 Z6S Harpers Choice MS 506 M56 t. ;*} lake Etthorn MS 64i Lime Kiln MS 721 Mgyfield WoodsMS 798 41% f 2.7; Mount View MS 798

Murray Mill MS 662 33% ^ ^,2

OaMand Mills MS 506 44% . ^!

Pstapsco MS 643 ia% . '. ^; Patuxent Valley MS 760 'Thomas Vtadun MS 7Q1 38% . -C: WtldetakeMS 721 38% 3.5.' Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Rajesh Kumar Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:52 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle School Attachments: FARM Numbers. jpg; CMS PTA Letter. jpg

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Board of Education Members,

We greatly appreciated all seven BOE membersfor unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 backfrom Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are a micro feed less than 20 sfydente proposed to oo into Lime Klln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact on CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existingelementary Dopulation is also dispersedevenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMScapacity.

2. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS not only help to reduce the cost. time and resources of County's Transoortation Division, but also greatly reduce travel time, reducetraffic blocks and enhancethe safetyof kids7 3. Keeping Communities together- Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with the CMS community.

4. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

5. Clarksville Middle School PTA oosition statement suoDorting our request is attached for reference and consideration.

6. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS. there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers /attached).

Thank you for your attention to this matter and consideration. Sincerely, Dr. Raj'esh Kumar NV

House owner in Polygon 189. 6162 Flutie Lane, Clarksville, MD 21029 FARM FARM FARM Middle School Capacity Aug 22 Nov 19 Change Bonnle Branch MS 701 27% Burieigh Manor MS 779 u» 0.27 Clarksville MS 643 ua Dunloggln MS 565 16% ElkridgeLanding MS 779 26t'i Hticott Mills MS 701 Wt FollyQuarter MS 66Z <5S Glenwood MS 545 Bci 0.6S Hammond MS 604 26X li. K; Harpers Choice MS 506 31% Lake Etkhorn MS 643 Ume Kiln MS 721 Mayfield Woods MS 798 '37;; Mount View B>*S <5% Murray Hill MS 662 335i . S.I; Oakland Mills MS S06 11-» Patapsco MS 643 760 l-i. -t!'-

Thomas Vladuct MS 701 asy» ;d.O;S; Wide Lake MS 721 3SW iS. Si!

Pt&mON SMTEMEN1

Qaab*'W, S6f.9

Clarksvltte Mtddte School Parent Teacher Asswiatton Position Statement Anmttance Aw Adjustnient Pton (dated August 3M, 20^1

AcconMng to the tt>rxte

The Clartawttte PTA hottte the foltowtng pwtttom:

1. W®airec with the goal of addn-sttoB l»u<» of <»*<(u^y tn howanl County. ft B not ctear. howewr, that evtdenc®suppexts m

3. Fon^studentttotraa^schootetsdwuntmtaltottetrmwrtriJ fr lafety net md introdudng wmwxsswyam y^y'temK^ »ttude*to'net»mi* of«mxirt-frten

4. Guierat comnwts Aotfl the pn ss of redtsUlcUna:

a. inmtwOwcoBW riltyi «P<'c<»tlyfamtltei>'?ffectelbym!i?rictlnt fiiatet-tHNTted, wretiiaightfiA process oy deciston-inddnB. parentt\mittoi fnvo^edtnhowbotmdaritsOTre^iwn. ^e "tt^ m '.xWna nibttt thecurreiA yopc^ ^ fe w differe^~from evi ~ whichh» bewOflfwed for dh arionand corn nlt e parttwo yws._ b. Fi teofn -.- jbe8iv®"lal"lfelton(MI

Oao«»»»XX. ?Ot9

Clarksvllte Middle School Parent Teactmr Assoctatton Position Statement ^Uwndanw Area Adjiutinent Pfaut (dated August 2fi, 201<»1

*

1. We a|»w with Ut» goal of addreutei (»uw of tnequtty In Hownl County. It It not ciear. howcwr, that evtdenc®suppont moving students out ct thrtr communlttes to addnss thte goat. Soctoecnnomtc diapartty shwM be addressed by devoting educaUonal rwourees (teacher hiring, tfttr tdwol mentorw^, other programs) baaed on need rather than by dfsniptti^ students' ttws. 2. Asy redlttrtetfi^ shouldaffect the fewesinumber of famtKei nwaaaiy. Movtng 207 students frtNn a sdwot that is not overcnwded fe not iusttfied. In addition, busingttwse students, vAs are d»le to watttto Cankwtlte Wddte Schoot, to a schoot that is over 5 mttes away sem» partlculartv unreuond»te. 3. Forcing students to iraftsterschootetedesrunental to ttffiTfl " i h' byrenwvtng theirsafety net wd tntroitudng unneoeaaiy dwitp »<< »tro». Rmiovlngt students'network of tupport-friends, other pifents, teachers, counsetora, aid .dmlnlrtnwrs-teaves ISwmvutnenAte durtna a critical ttme to their Awtopment. Howanl County has recert, ty inatwed attefltton and resources an mental healtii. Fordi^ cMldrm to me" to » iwhool out of their inelgMxirtio^ wtU deflrftely add ttn» and iw/ fncreiBe sadnea. hopri^ «. wid sufcktol tdeation.

4. a. invihwtfteconmwnfty. esped lyfiuriltes. affetS by ^tftsing Inatearft rtsd, nwret*WM|h tAproce»ofdedston-mdrfng. Parents w jtobebwolve^tn ww bowidaries am re-drawun. We underatui t>atmttAricUn|t Uhiwenbut the current propanlfe been gffered fir "y~d( i it from pfevtotttpK ^ouris^whtehlwe aatton i ri ONnmtOTtty biput owr the past twioy»rs. nUteiof sdistrictedi" ' " ' yAdbe^venamWnumoftwo ceprtortochai i^sdwols. g. Awe mSpirttftngdfet' >sotlat « _ = S Marilyn Grosskopf

From: ellie012 Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:52 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 189. -20 Students Back to Clarksville Middle School

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education members,

Please consider correction to move our ~20 middle schoolers in Polygon 189 from LKMS back to ClarksnUe Middle School. The board canceledthe proposal ofmoving P189 from PRESto DOES,but did not changedthe related middle school movement yet. tess than 20 students proposed to go into Lime Kiln Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019-20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers. Polygon 189 has only -20 middle school students, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary Dopulation is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS caoscjty.

Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community. CMS PTA also supports Polygon 189's request.

Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is about 1 mile away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is about 7 miles away from Polygon 189. Clarksville Middle School is on the way from Polygon 1 89 to Lime Kiln. Why should the kids pass by their near middle school on the way to further school every morning?

This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. We strongly ask the Members to consider the change back.

Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement suooort/no our request is attached for reference and consideration.

Sincerely,

Kenneth Kim and Youngji Jeon Marilyn Grosskopf

From: dariodario Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:50 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Howard high school redistricting moves; final decisions

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Ms. Mallo, Dr. Wu, Ms. Ellis, Ms. Coombs, Ms. Cutroneo, Ms. Delmont-Small, and Ms. Taj,

I am sending this email to you to include polygon 296 and 1296 to be added to the rest of moving 271 students out ofAtholton High School (AHS) to River Hill High School (RHHS).

We reside in the Clarksville Hunt community, a major portion of polygons 296 and 1296. Our two polygons only have 48 high schoolers in the school year 2020-2021. There are only 12 students on average for each grade. Many of the 9th graders already experienced anxiety and stress of separation from their peers when the previous redistricting happened and again last year when the majority of the CMS 8th grade students separated to attend RHH. These kids have been connected to, and only connected to, the Pointers Run/River Hill villages through community and school activities. Your decision on Nov 13 isolates these kids from their peers and friends whom they have shared their lives and experiences during the past 10 years. I would like to request to keep these polygons with the rest of the major polygons to keep the kids connected and united.

We value your hard work to solve the overcapacity issue in several schools in HCPSS. However, it should not be at the expense of isolating an individual community and should not create an actual small feed of students. Communities are not defined as villages under the Columbia Association.

As HCPSS pursue improvements, achievements, and healthy learning environments for all students, I would like to remind and request all BOE members: please keep in mind to keep Polygons 296 and 1296 with a strong feed of CMS students. This will benefit the students, the school community, and the surrounding schools.

Warm Regards,

Donna Abbasian 6932 Sandy Creek Ct Clarksville, MD21029 JVIanl^

From: gopi krishna Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:50 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle Attachments: CMS PTA Letterjpg; FARM Numbers.jpg

CAUTION: Tlus email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Board of Education Members, Weare thankful to BOEmembers for unanimouslypassing a motion to move Polygon 189 backto PRES. BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189from PRESand CMS to DOAS and LKSwas due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to'DOASand

Unfortunately, the BoEneglected to addressthe correction of moving Polygon 189back from LimeKiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are tess than 20 students proposed to go Into Lime Klln Middle. Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight. 1_NO-adverse "T',pact.tocMS-~ KeePin9 Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on anyof the FARM or Capacitynumbers, aswe are less than 20kids going to Clarksville middle school. 'Our existingelementary Dooulatlon is alsodispersed evenly K-5 andwill notcause disruption to CMScapacity. ^Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMScommunity and should remain with CMS community. 3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less.thanJ»3. mlles awayfrom, p°ly9°" 189,whereas the proposed LimeKiln middleschool is 6^8miles awayfrom' Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10minute round trip commute daily forour children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime'Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement suODortina our request is attached for reference and consideration. 5. By keeping Polyqon 189 at CMS. there are no impactsto FAMRnumbers, aswe can see from the attachedBOE FARM numbers {attached!. Thank you for your consideration. I^SniON STATEMtN-t

eootlwXX. 2019

Clarksville Middle School Parent Teacher Association Position Statement Anendancf Area Ad^utmCTt Ptoi (ttoted AM|ist 20, 201»ii

Accordtn( to the UB.I^KASI*. th®mteton

l. We agnse wtth the goal of addresttng tnuet

2. Any (.erfistricttf< should affect the fewest raim!»sr of twniltw necestary. Moving 20i7 students from a school that ts not overcrowded fa not )ustifIe towaUtto Clartwrilte Mddle School, to a school tlat is cwer 5 mito awy ieen» parttcrferty u»we«aHuble.

'ItoUwtrmen^hCf tn by rcmwfna thdr safety net Mid (ntreductnt imn e :e4»ry dwtge wid stress. Itemovtngattudenti'netowrttOfsupport-frtemte. otherpwBte, teKhers, cowweiore, aid adminlstrators-leavies than wilnenM* durtoB » crtelcalttawinttetrdmriopment. Howard Coun^ hu recently tnCTew«» atteittton and mouren an mental hurith. Forcft^ dittAw to flw*fi to a school out n.

4. a. tnw w ttecomrmintty, «peddly familfes, affeaed by n«tte(tetln| hi ieB-hifried, flU»®thoi' Lake Elkhorn MS 643 38% Ume Ktln MS 721

From: ankita ahuja Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:50 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed:Polygon 189 backto Clarksville MiddleSchool

CAUTION:This ema11 orig"iated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board ofEducation Members, Weare thankful to BOE members for unanimously passing a motionto move Polygon 189 back to PRES. BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRESand CMS to DOAS and CMS to LKMSwas proposed byDr. Wuon November 13. OnNovember 1 8th, BOEmembers graciously passed-the-motion to move Polygon 189back to PRES.Unfortunately, theBoE neglected to addressthe coiTectionofmovu Polygon 189back from LimeKiln to Clarksville Middle. Request: Pleaseconsider keeping Polygon 189kids atthe same schools asthey areattending forthe schoolyear 2019-20and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

impact to 189at the clarksville hNO_adverse. C.MS:Keepmg_polygon Middle School will have no negative or adviseimpact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, aswe are less than 20 kids going~to Clarks\?lie' middle school. Ourexisting elementary population is alsodispersed evenly K- 5 andmil not causedisruDtion to CMS capacity. 2. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1.3 miles away from Polygon 1 89, whereas theproposed Lime Kiln middle schooi is 6.8 miles awayfrom Polygon 1 89.This creates a-l hour 10minute round trip commute-daily~forour'chi1dren. 'The stress ofmoving andlonger commute canlead to manyproblems for our children. Moreover, based onthe ?roposed m°Ye. to LKMS'wr Polygon 189kids mU gopass ClarksvUe Middle Schoolto goto theLime KUn Middle School.

Thank you for your consideration.

Yours Sincerely,

Ankita Chandupatla Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Danielle Estrada Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:49 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Fwd: Motion Needed: Move Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle Attachments: CMS PTA Letter.jpg; FARM Numbers.jpg

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Board of Education Members,

We greatly appreciated all seven BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data provided on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are a micro feed tess than 20 students proposed to go into Lime Klln M'lddle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary Dopulation Is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacity.

2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1.3 miles away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trio commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS not only help to reduce the cost, time and resources of County's Transportation Division, but also greatly reduce travel time, reduce traffic blocks and enhance the safety of kids.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement suDportina our request is attached for reference and consideration.

5. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS. there are no impacts to FARM numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached).

Thank you for your consideration

Danielle Estrada FARM FARM FARM Middle School Capactty Aug 22 Nov 19 Change Bonnie Branch MS 701 Z7°< '3.4:.i Burlelgh Manor MS 779 u% 0.27 Clarksville MS 643 12% Acs. Dunloggln MS ses Elkndge LandingMS 779 ElltCOtt Mills MS 701 Fotly Quarter MS 662 <5% Glenwood MS 545 0.68

Hammond MS 604 26% ; 3.79! Harpers Choice MS sos 319i Lake Elkhorn MS 64i 38% Lima "{iln MS 721 Mayfield Woods MS 73B 2-7: Mount View MS 798 <5W MurravHiltMS 662 33% Oakland Nflls MS 506 4t66 Patapsco MS 18% Patyxent Valley MS 760 Thomas Vladurt MS 701 38% '. f.; Wilde take MS 721 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Joyce Wang Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:49 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle Attachments: imagel. jpeg; image2. jpeg

! CAUTION:This email originatedfrom outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or openattachments, unlessyou recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thankful to BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

BOE'soriginal decisionto move Polygon 189 from PRESand CMSto DOASand LKSwas due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to addressthe correction of moving Polygon 189 backfrom Lime Kilnto Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are less than 20 students proposed to go into Lime Kiln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools asthey are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. Noadverse impact to CMS- Keeping Polygon 189atthe Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary population is also dispersed evenly K-5 and will not cause disruption to CMScapacity.

2. KeepingCommunities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMScommunity and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuityfor Childrenand avoiding increasedtransportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1.3 milesaway from Polygon189, whereas the proposed LimeKiln middleschool is6. 8 milesaway from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement supporting our request is attached for reference and consideration.

5. By keeping Polygon 189 at CMS, there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached). Thank you for your consideration.

Yours Sincerely, Joyce

[imagel. jpeg][image2. jpeg] SSSi Wl iPhone PCUITtON STATttMtNI

October XX, ?019

Clarksvttte Mtddle School Parent Teactwr Assoeiatton Position Statement AnendaneaArea Adjuttmeft Plan (datedAugtrt 20, 2(M»i

tecoRflng to e MBaSMAPTA. th®"rt»lon o( our PTSA to ta support-xl ifNN* on behalf of chlldnm tn our tchool, in the community. u»d befon* townNnent bwHviand other oiianiattons tlwt nwki!dectetoos affecting dtfldren. The CtartsvtUe PTA hotds the foltowtf^t |x»(tto»u:

1. WeagnewiththegoalofBedon need rather than by d(sru(tUng styctents' lives.

2. Any ndfttrtetJng riwutd affect the fewest mimbw of famtlttt »Nscest»iy. Moving 207students fnwi a schoolttwt is not wercrowdedIs not justtffed. In addttion, bustng these students, who are dtle to walk to ClwtaartUe Wdrte Sdwot, to a schoot that Is over 5 mttet . wy teen» partteutorty unreiacBuble. 3. RxKng students to tra'Bfcrsdwstetedeerthnattal to thefrment-. ilheeto ty mnwtng their safety net md introductn ynn«3Mswy chMSP and strws. RwmMng a studef^'net»w)»k of aipport-frtends, other parents, teachers, counirtirs, wid admfciittratore-teaws them vidn«abte dwtne . crttfcalttnebithefrdwriopment. Huwai'i County hu recently tncreaaed attention and resowccton mental health Forel^i cWldmn to mow to a school ovt of thefrnetBWwrtwodwtUdefli tdy add ttrea atid may increase sactoen, hof ^easness, and 'wtch I (deatton.

4. General the pmuRB of redfetrtctfng: a. Inwtwthec mamlty, «p«S Uy?amrethoudh ut process of decteton-aiBMng. ibetnwlwdft w» botmdaries t redrawn. Vte I mdtertcttnsi U happen b(A the current propwalfe »pnwtous'propoialtwWch haw be« cffiwed for NnmiOTtty Input ow the p^ bwuyears. b. tricted ttudents shodd be gtven . mWRiun o( two fct c. A dB^fcti so tfat corfiCT Intataed. FARM FARM FARM Middle School Capacity Aug 22 Nov 19 Change Bonnle Branch MS 701 ZTfi Burlelgh Manor MS 779 us 0.27 Clarksville MS 64i

Dunloggln MS 565 . fw, ElkridgeLanding MS 779 Ellteott Mills MS 701 vm Folly Quarter MS 662 <56S Glenwaod MS 545 0.6S

Hammond MS 604 26% t-l-. ^--;

Harpers Choice MS 506 31?a ^ t . '- Uke Etkhorn MS 643 38% Um»»(ilnMS 721

Mayfleld Woods MS 798 . 27: Mount View MS 79S <5% Murray Hill MS 662 i'J^-J1 Oakland Vills MS 506 Pataptco MS 643 18% PatuxentValleyMS 760 33% U AS} Thomas Viaduct NiS 701 3S% Wflde lake MS 721 3S96 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Allison Fishbein Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:49 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 1 89 back to Clarksville Middle Attachments: CMS PTA Letter. jpg; FARM Numbers. jpg

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content Is safe.

Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thankful to the BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

BOE's original decision to move Potygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Wliddle.

As it stands, we are tess than 20 students orooosed to no into Lime Kiln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary oooulation is also dispersed_evenly K-_5 andwilLnotcause disrupSon to_CMS_caBSdty,

2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trio commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTA sosition statement suDportina our request is attached for reference and consideration.

5. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS, there are no Impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached).

Thank you for your consideration.

Allison Fishbein Polygon189 STATEMfm

anobff XX, 3!OW

Clarksvllte Mtddle School Parent Teacher tesoctation Position Statement AttendanceAm Mjustnw* Ptan (datedAuguat 2C, 2(»<»t

AixonUne to the f^aUgidPTA. tlw i»f»lon of our PTSA to to wwer on behalfof chiidnmiTourtchool, (n the conwnuntty, and berom tomwnent bodlw andother o»ii»nfa«tfont at nahededstom affcctlnj! chftdren. The Oariavtlte PTAhold* the foltowlng positMns:

t. We agne wth the goal! of addre»

3. bymnwiw thdr »fety netand Introdudni imnecemiy d rtrws. ttenwtng a students' nelwmk of «Kiport-frtends, a-j

a. Invutwti Veffamilte, affecb i by _ _ >trW ing (nateB* (htfut proffiss of decteton-tnaldn |. Parents' (d hew bowxtoriw are re'dnwr . Vte jfcttng will happen but tfw cummA l v^ojspr ips»atswhtchhBWbe»ioff«etS riiot^d be gtron a mWnitfn of twe sMctt »that ammiunlttet ind n

Mayfleld Woods MS n% ] 2 7: Mount View MS 79B <5%

Murray Hitl MS 662 33% J. u. ^ Oaklafd Mills MS S06 14% Pstapsco MS 643 18»o PatuxentVallevMS 760 33% iTbomas Vladuct MS 701 33%

WtldeLakeMS 721 3S"i ..5, 5. Marilyn Grosskopf

From: CHANDRA ANAGANI Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:46 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle Attachments: CMS PTA Letter. jpg; FARM Numbers. jpg

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We greatly appreciated all seven BOE membersfor unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 backto PRES.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 backfrom Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are tess than 20 students proposed to go Into Lime Klln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville MiddleSchool will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existingelementary Dopulation Is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will notcause disruptionto CMScapacity.

2. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS not only help to reduce the cost. time and resources of County's Transoortation Division, but also greatly reducetravel time, reducetraffic blocks and enhancethe safetyof kids7 3. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS communityand should remain with CMS community.

4. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

5. Clarksville Middle School PTA oosifion statement supDortina our request is attached for reference and consideration.

6. By keeping Polvaon 139 at CMS. there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers /attached).

Thank you for your consideration. KWrriON STATtMtNI

Oiaob»r«x. ?oi»

ClarltsviKe Mtddte School Parent Teacher AKOdation P(»itton Statement Anendance Area Ad}urtimi« Man (dated Auaun M, 201»»

tecwxttng to the Mar^witH^, then»telon ot our PT5A to to support and spwk on behalf of chlktren In our Khool, In the cnmtwinlty, and before »Bwmmwt bodtes .nd other orB«n

t. We agn-e with the goal of ad*w»tng laues (rf fnequ

4. G nd comswrts about of redtstricttni:

a. (nwtvethecanmiimlti Ityfamtltes, affected fay red< .ricting tnates-hwrit' irt gRKsas «rfdec('*xn-nu*tng. Pafwtswa KW boundaries are nMirawn. Vfe uu~"-": rietli^-Ulappen but the curru* proposal ts wrydffl rentfromprevkxis^i^spaatewAttchtwe beenoffwed for dtoaric andcumnumtty input owrtts-past towy«wi. b. fani^ trfnxWftrfcbed students dwtMdbe pi-en amWmim offtwo ywnnotfce prior to dutfVna sdioote. c. ' mldnnmfpitte (itstrictssothatwm nutetafned. FARM FARM FARM Middle School Capacity Aug 22 Nov 19 Change Bonnle Branch MS 701 27% li4:' Burleigh Manor MS 779 u» 0.27 Clarksvlle MS 643 t2SS Dunloggin MS S6S 16% <-.* Elkridge Landing MS 779 26% Ellicott Mills MS 701 lo°i Foily Quarter MS 662 <5CS Glenwood MS 545 8% 0.6S Hammond MS 604 26% Harpers Choice MS 31% Lake Etlthorn MS 643 3&% Um< Kiln MS 721 <5%

MS . "5 7'i Mayfleld Wtiods 793 41% » i. '; Mount View MS 79S <5% Murray Hitl MS 662 33% 3n^; Oakland Mill", MS 44% Patapsco MS 643 1B% Patuxent Valley MS

Thomas Viaduct MS 701 3S% . cs Wtlde take MS 721 3SW >e.5~'. Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Danielle Patterson Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:45 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle Attachments: CMS PTA Letter.jpg; FARM Numbere.jpg

CAUTION: Thls email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members, We are thankful to BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES. BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189from PRESand CMS to DOASand LKSwas due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to-DOASand LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are tess than 20 students proposed to go into Lime Klln Middle. Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending forthe school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight. 1_No. adveree impact. tocMS-~ KeePin9 Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Cjarksyille middle school. 'Our existingelementary pooulation is alsodispersed evenly K-S andwill not cause disruption to CMScapacity. ^Keeping Communities together- Polygon 189 is heavilyinvolved withCMS community and should remainwith CMS community. 3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is s whereas the ^!^.tJ1^ J.^. mll,e, awayfrompoly9on 189, proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6.8 miles away from Polygon 189. Thiscreates a 1 hour 10minute round trip commute daily forour chjldrerLMoreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville MiddleSchool to go to the Lime'Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement supporting ourrequest is attached for reference and consideration. i By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS. there are no Impactsto FAMRnumbers, aswe can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached).

Thank you for your consideration.

Danielle Patterson IWmOtl STATEMIW

OttcbcrXX. ^OtS

Clarksvflte Middle School Parent Teacher ^swiatkm Position Statement Atwndanw*ne« AdKustiwntPttm (dated Augiat 2fl. 20<9i

According to the MRQtwAET^, the nmteKm

t. Weagne with the goal oTaddrwmngJMuesof fncqutty in HwwdCounty. tt ft not cieer. however, that whtence supporu moving students out of thtrfr oommunttfes to address this goat. Saetoecenomte dt^artty thoutd b& addressed by dewtlng educattonat resowcw (teacher htrtni, after xhool fnentorirqi, other pnggrarre) bated on nesd rather than by disntpttng students' ttvw.

2. AW rerfiMrfcUng should affect the fvweii number of famtltes iȣ

3. Fondly students to tran'sferschostefedewlineftel to their nwntat health iyrenNwtegtlirir safetynet wxt tntroductn|tmneceaarychaiBe »1d »tm». Itetnovbit . ttudents' neiworit of tupport-friends, effsr pi»wts, teachen, caunselore, mS adminfetraton-tenws thmi vutefabte during a crttfcat tftne tn thefr dewtopment. HowardCounty haarece«ly tncreued atteottet and rwources on mental health. Foftlng cWtdren to mow to B school ovlt of irir ne^Aortwi wlUdeflrttdy add ttress and ma^ (nanease sadnea, h(^ lewtess MX) ajtcte'al ((teaUon.

4. Ger wat cuimnaitt

a. liw Uy famtltes, affected by rBis-.rictlni tn a Us .hunr re' rent » wctwdtoho boundaries are re^nwm. We rtriclh^t^ appenbutthecurmrtprop»<, lte y<

Fi tetofn Wbegtv t»mtnlm< tf't li yi notfcei wtochmL^

Elkfidge LandingMS 779 26?i I. ElttCOttMKIsMS 701 Folly Quarter MS 66Z <5S filenwoott MS 545 8% 0.68 Hammond MS 604 26%

Harpera Choice MS ''. !i.- Lake Etkhorii MS 643 Urns Kiln MS 721 <5% Mayfleld Woods MS 798 41% Mount View 798 <5V Murray Hill MS 662 33S

->'^ Pstapsco MS 643 IS?» Patuxent Valley MS 3i% Thomas Vladuct MS 701 38% .d Wilde lake MS 721 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Carios Estrada Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:45 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attacliments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members, Weare thankful to BOEmembers for unanimously passinga motion to move Polygon 189 backto PRES. BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKSwas due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 backfrom Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are tess fhan 20 students proposed to go into Lime Klln Middle. Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight. 1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksvllle middle school. Our existingelementary oooulation is alsodispersed evenly K- 5 andwill notcause disruption to CMScaBacjty^ ^Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1_3mNes awayfrom Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. Thiscreates a 1 hour 10minute round trip commute dailyfor our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS,our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville MiddleSchool to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement suoportina our request is attached for reference and consideration. 5. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS. there are no impacts to FARMnumbers, as wecansee from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached).

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Carlos F. Estrada and all of Polygon 189

Carlos F Estrada - House owner in Polygon 189. 6191 Flutie Lane, Clarksville, MD 21029 Dear BOE members,

Please consider one more time. Show us that you really care about students. It is really easy. Vote NO to move 148, 276, 302 to Runningbrook ES. NO to move 100, 1100 to Veterans ES. NO to move 191, 1191, 3191 to Northfield.

Don't make decisions on non vetted data. Don't split our communities. Don't break the bonds that our kids created with their friends. Don't put kids on buses for 4 mi instead of 2 mi. No to longer bus rides than needed. No to biased and rushed decisions. No to double standards. No to creating islands. Don't tell us that we are privileged. Don't pit neighborhoodsagainst each other. Don't put development and profit before our kids.

If you can face all ofthe above with clear conscience, you made right decisions. Ifyou have doubts vote NO to move 148, 276, 302 to Runnlngbrook ES. NO to move 100, 1100 to Veterans ES. NO to move 191, 1191, 3191 to Northfield.

Best regards, Svetlana Stjepanovic polygon 148 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Manish Nayak Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:43 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Last minute change 1 171

! CAUTION:This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear BoE members

Felt heartbroken for our kidsly) at the last minute change on our Polygon 1171.

On work session V - moved us 1171 to GHS from MRHS On work session VI - moved us 1171 back to MRHS On work session IX - first time motion failed to move 1171 to GHS On work session IX - another motion and this time moved our middle school now On work session IX- yet another motion and this time moved 1171 to GHS and middle school change - at the very end

Polygons are not objects to play with them like this and we have no chance to protest with the very last minute changes

Please stop this whole redistricting until HS13

Thanks Manish - Resident of 1171 and father of elementary and middle school kids JMarilyn Grosskopf

From: j hu Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:42 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Please move Polygon 189 from Lime klin middle to clarksville middle

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi BOE members,

Thisis JieminHu from polygon 189. Thankyou very much to move our elementary schoolback to PRESat yesterday's working session, but youneglected ourmiddle school. Theprevious move ofour elementary and middle schools together wasbased on that two schools should bemoved or staytogether. Since you unanimouslymoved our elementary schoolback, it is logically to move ourmiddle schoolback together. We have only 20 middle school students stated in feasibility plan. Keeping these 20 students in either school does not affect anything. But it is big different if you move our middle school backbecause: 1. less transportation . 1.3 mile vs. 6.5 miles, savetransportation fee. 2. kids have to pass clarksville middle to get to lime klin middle 3. tear our kids from their fnends, teaches at CMS. 4. keep our community together

Jiemin Hu polygon 189 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Fred Xie Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:40 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle

! CAUTION:This emaU originated from outside of HCPSS.Do not cUcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thankful to BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are tess than 20 students proposed to go mto Lime Kiln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are tess than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary oooulation is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMScapacity^

2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - t-larKsville Middle School is less than 1.3 miles away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6.8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksvllle Middle School PTA position statement suooortina our request is attached for reference and consideration.

5. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS. there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can_see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached). Thank you for your consideration.

Dr. Xie

6215 Bridget Way Clarksville, MD. 21029 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Jie Wang Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:40 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle

! CAUTION:This email originatedfrom outside of HCPSS.Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the coffltent Is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thankful to BOB members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

BOE's original decisionto move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inacciu-ate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are less than 20 students proposed to so into Lime Kiln Middle.

Request: Pleaseconsider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019-20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any ofthe FARM or Capacitynmnbers, as we are less than 20 kids spins to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary population is also dispersed evenlv K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacity.

2. Keeping Communities together Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS coimnunity.

3. Continuity for ChUdren and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1 . 3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereasthe proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6.8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement supporting our reciuest is attached for reference and consideration. 5. Bv keepins Polvson 189at CMS. there areno impacts to FAMRnumbers, aswe can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers (attached). Thank you for your consideration.

Yours Sincerely, Joyce Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Aaron C Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:39 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Suggestion in the CCES/PRES/SES area

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 6405 Old Romance Row Columbia, MD 21044 November 19, 2019 Polygon 1064

Dear Board Members, I am writing to suggest a revision for the CCES/PRES/SESarea. In an early (or original) version of the proposal Ms. Mallo advanced, polygons currently at CCESwere shifted to SES. At thattime other polygonscurrently at CCESwere proposedto move to BWESand polygons from BWESwere being moved to CCES. This was met with concern from the CCES community as over 50% of their current students would be moved to other schools. As the Board plan evolved, the moves from BWESto CCES and CCESto SESwere removed which resulted in less impact to the existing CCES composition. The current board plan has CCESovercapacity. To address this issue polygons 66, 134, 1066, 1134,and 2134 can be movedfrom CCESto SESto maintainCCES in the preferred capacity utilization range. This would lessenthe potential impactto CCES(-62% of the existingstudents remain)from the earlierproposal andwould remove the need to move polygons 64, 129, 1064, and 1129from PRESto SES. Below is the seriesof moves that keeps-62% of the current CCESstudents at CCES. It might be possibleto even move less CCES polygons depending on the desired capacity utilization of SES.

Suggested moves are from the Board plan: Move 64, 129, 1064, and 1129 to PRES. This returns them to their current school. Movepolygons 66, 134, 1066,1134, and 2134 from CCESto SES. Thisis similar to the move suggested in the Superintendent's Plan and early versions of the Mallo plan. Move polygon 189from PRESto DOES. Thismove hasbeen included at times withthe various iterations of the Board plan. These moves would undo the virtual islanding of polygons 64, 129, 1064, and 1129 from the SEScatchment as the Middle Patuxent River provides a natural barrier. This suggestion would reduce the overall travel time of students to their assigned schools. These revisions would provide a single shift from CCESto SESof polygons abutting the existing SEScatchment with no manmade or natural barriers standing in the way, providing a continuous community. These are all goals of policy 6010that the current Board plan can be revised to achieve. While PRESwill be overcapacity, it will be similar to the current operating condition where the multiple portable onsite mitigate this concern.

Thank you for your time and consideration on this matter,

Aaron Cheskis h/larilvn Grosskoof

From: Youngji Jeon Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:37 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 189. Don't need to move only -20 students to LKMS! Back to Clarksville Middle.

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thankful to BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189from PRESand CMS to DOAS and LKS. Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are tess than 20 students proposed to oo into Lime Kiln Middle. Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight. 1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any ofthe FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are tess than 20 kids going toClarksville middle school. Our existing elementary oooulation is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacity. 2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community. 3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksvllle Middle School is less than 1. 3'miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute dailyfor our children. Moreover based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kidswill go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School. 4. darksvllle Middle School PTA position statement suDportina our request is attached for reference and consideration.

Sincerely,

Youngji Jeon Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Feng Xie Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:36 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thankful to BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are tess than 20 students proposed to go into Lime Kiln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers. as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary oopulation is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacifv.

2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trio commute daily for our c/l/Wren.Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement suaoortina our request is attached for reference and consideration.

5. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS. there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers tattached). Thank you for your consideration.

Feng Marilyn Grosskopf

From: FAISALSAIFULLAH Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:36 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Fwd: Redistricting & special needs

! CAUTION:This email originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: Nicole Saifallah Date: November 19, 2019 at 12:34:10PM EST To: mavis_ellis@hcpss. org, kirsten_coombes@hcpss. org, vicky cutroneo@hcpss. org, christina_dehnont-small@hcpss. org, jennifer_mallo@hcpss. org, sabina_taj@hcpss. org, [email protected] Subject: Redistricting & special needs

Good afternoon members of the board of education,

Redistaicting and special needs

As a parent oftwo childrenwith special needs, changingschools withinHoward County is nothing new for us. Below are the years and schools attendedby my eight-year-old: 2014-2015 Waverly elementary school 2015-2016 Waveriy Elementary school 2016-2017Veterans Elementary school Kindergarten b-ansition was assigned to Waverly Elementary school which was changed to Bellows Springs Elementary school 2017-2018homeschooled due to staffnot being familiar with his IEP 2018-2019attended halfday at Bellows Springs andhalf day at a private ABA center. 2019-2020 the Shafer Center

I am concerned aboutredistoicting and the negativeimpact it will have on progress beingmade for all childrenwith special needs. I also havemany safety concerns.

Making students with individualized education plans (and 504 plans) switch schools is not the same as it is with their typically developingpeers.

Special-needsparents have worked with the IEP team to develop individualizededucational plans accordingto their child's needs and that specific school (since not all schools offer the sameprograms or levels of support). The childrenhave established a workingrelationship with the teachers, assistants, speechtherapist, occupational therapist, physical therapist, psychologist, board certifiedbehavior analyst, and guidance counselor (dependingon their needs). Also, the instructional facilitators often observed the childrenin their teachingenvironment, and are familiarwith their specific learning needs.

The childrenwho will have the most difficult time with changingschools are the childrenwho are not able to advocate for themselves. Often times these children also have unique sensory needs that may impact learning. These children will become fmstrated, and there will be a lot more behaviors to manage throughout the school day.

My six-year-old is a student at Northfield Elementary school. He is currently in an excellent learning environment. His teachers understandhis needs, andhe currently does not need any additional supports in school. Next year, he will probablybe assignedto RunningBrook Elementary school (polygon 148 ), I hope that he will continueto make progress in school without the need for additional support. He does have some difficultymaking friends, and Northfield has programs in place to support the entire student body. I hope that RunningBrook elementary offers the same level of support. Having fiiends who are not in walking distancewill have a negative impact on his social circle.

While planningto redistaibutestudents, I ask that you considerthe negative impact redistricting will have on the special needs students and their families. I also ask for an increase in trained staffmembers for the special educationdqiartment. Addingmore Board certifiedbehavior analysts and trained staffwill support the teachers and students in making an easiertransition. Having additional supports will also decreasethe turnover rate of special education staff.

Thank you for listening to my concerns.

Nicole Saifallah

Sent from my iPhone Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Scott Mason Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:34 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting; cbball@howardcountymd. gov; dyungmann@howardcountymd. gov; djung@howardcountymd. gov; crigby@howardcountymd. gov; ojones@howardcountymd. gov; ewalsh@howardcountymd. gov Cc: scott@scotteblog. com Subject: [External] HCPSS Redistricting

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi,

This is just one more voice objecting to your redistricting effort.

The thoughts that come to mind in observing your efforts is that it has been bizarre and lacking common sense. That the effort has been so difficult, that you are being rushed to make a decision, and that there have been so many voices opposing this redistricting should have led you to stop and reconsider. All of these children have voting parents. Moving so many of them with so much opposition flies in the face of electoral sense.

One of the views I have heard a lot is that people - your constituents - would rather deal with the overcrowding than have their communities broken up. Another is why are we not increasing the capacities of existing schools. And why are we continuing to build more homes without increasing the infrastructure, e. g., schools, road. I've also heard views about the negative social and financial impacts on the schools resulting from redistricting.

Then there is the budget. As a taxpayer I object to going through this process without even a rough sense of the budgetary impacts. With all of the busing, transportation costs will definitely soar. As a taxpayer in a county known for its quality educational system, spending money on transportation rather than education rubs me wrong. The additional funds should come from your pockets, not mine. And borrowing more money through bonds for a here today, gone today consumable like transportation is unwise. While these are issues that involve the county council (aka the zoning board) and executive, the BOE has a role in this.

I've lived in Valley Meade for the most part of the last 40+ years. We are in your polygon #1159. We chose to live in this school district. The entire community is in the SJLES/PMS/MTH district and has been for all of my time here. Sending children from Valley Meade to Manor Woods or any other school is flat out bankers. The same applies to the middle and high schools.

Going forward, I urge you to stop and reconsider your redistricting effort. The goals of what you hope to achieve are not clear to me. Presuming that you will continue, please keep the Valley Meade community intact and in our current school districts. The school district we choose to live in is our choice, not yours.

Regards, W. Scott Mason 3126 Elmmede Rd, 21042 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Veera V Satya N Kanithi Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:33 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] ISLAND Polygon with 9 miles travel

! CAUTION:This emaUoriginated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and knon the content Is safe. Dear Board Members,

With the very last minute changes yesterday, you have moved our Polygon 1171 from MRHS to GHS. We did not get the chance to voice our opinion from the community.

In our Polygon we live close to Kiwanis Park, whichis at the far east end ofthe Polygon and it's 9 miles away from GHS.

You havemade our Polygon an ISLAND,which causes significantissues to our kids.

I sincerely request you all to re-consider 1171@MRHS Elementary feed can be fixed by moving us to closer elementary schools.

Also please note, board has changedour Polygon 1171 ESin 2017 from Manor Woodsto TRES, why didn'tthe board changethe Middle Schooland High Schoolat that time? Whyis this happeningnow? Had the change to MS & HS happened in 2017, we wouldn't have bought our comes andtake up this hard relocation to 1171 knowing the fact that my kids have to go HS 9 miles away.

Thank You J^arilyn Grosskopf

From: Rekha and Puneet Tiwari-Mehrotra Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:29 PM To: Mehrotra, Puneet Cc: Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu; Hcpss Redistricting; BoE Email Subject: [External] 1132 allowed to stay in Clemens

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. Hello and thank you for being a member of the BOE.

After reviewing the meeting notes from the 11/18/19, working session, I am concerned that polygon 1132 was listed as part of BryantWoods, whenoriginally it was part of Clemens Crossing. I believethe voting outcome is incorrect and should be invalidated.

Move polygons 132, 1132, and 2132 from BryantWoods ESback to Clemens Crossing ES.

Motion by Kirsten A Coombs, second by Christina Delmont-Small. Final Resolution: Motion Fails Yea: Kirsten A Coombs, Vicky Cutroneo, Christina Delmont-Small Nay: Mavis Ellis, Jennifer Mallo, Sabina Taj, Chao Wu

The movement of polygon 1132to Bryant Woods hasa profound impact on community and children. The Clemens Crossing community is a close knit community where we work, play and grow together. We have built roots with our neighbors and teachers and our children are able to bike and walk to Clemens Crossing and enjoy the community and school.

I urge you to keep 1132 with Clemens Crossing since this has a profound impact on community and the children.

Thank you,

Puneet and Rekha Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Kalyani Satish Kodukula Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:28 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Po!ygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle Attachments: CMS PTA Letter. jpg; FARM Numbers. jpg

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not cBck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and knon the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We arethankful to BOEmembers for unanimously passinga motion to move Polygon 1 89 backto PRES.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate dataprovided by Dr. Wu on November 13, wherehe proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BOE neglected to address the correction ofmoving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kihi to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are less than 20 students proposed to go into Lime Kiln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019-20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any ofthe FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to CIarksville middle school. Our existing elementary population is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacity.

2. KeepingCommunities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and shouldremain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1.3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereasthe proposed LimeKiln middle school is 6.8 miles awayfrom Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 mmute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, basedon the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kihi Middle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement supporting our request is attached for reference and consideration.

5. By keeping Polygon 1 89 at CMS, there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the attached BOB FARM numbers (attached). Sincerely, Satish Kodukula Home Owner Ploygon 189 W^W* STATltUKT

«tol»bwXX.

Clartavltte M(

IM:Bor<^to tte jtefflBSlffl*. u*» mtetan ot our PTSAt» tn tunwrt and i(»oali on behatfof cftthfrwilnowidwrt. Intiw community, .nd befen .»mnn*»nt bodfc*art otfw oivwrfaaUowthat imatod^ston* rffctlng cWUIwn. The ClarinwWe PT* hot* tte Whwti^ potfttam:

t. WeayeewtthtticBOd<»f«<<*wrinB<»«»*oftoeq^tyhiHwwriCounty. It (t IN* ctew, hwcewr, that wWimoB aoporta ma»tn(( ttoideflte out of thefrouflNmmfttBUiaddrwsthfeaotf. Sodoeconatntc dtt(wtty ifaauld be ad*w*ed by dewttig educntfenat rwouroes (tiwchar htrtn(, after tdwol nwntorhifc otfwr prcgwnt) biscd en nwd rathw than ty rttrupttig studatts* Uws.

2. Avfwtetri<*(i7 itodeirts from a tdwot ttwt fe not owrerowded fe twt ItBUfled. (n addttton, baring ttiese ttudents, whowe aUa to walkto ChwlewWiB (WddteSdwol, to . *d»o( ttut ft wm-5 mttet mwy Mwnt pNttetterty wivwanatite. 3. Forcing ^identt^transrwichoobbi ^tothrirtnertalhBtfttt ty naniwdn thefr ntety net and tatrodudnt ynmoeaaay clNngB and ttnw. Ren»ylnf*tudmls'n«!wo»k at tunwrt-fttend^ other puwte. tiiKhm, auweton, md admhfatraton-temw dwm wtawdste Artii . CTWcrtUmetnttNArdewtapmeiA. HowanlCotmtyhMreeert^flncnMaBd iittBntfonuNtmiuwcetoninmttfhtnttii. RorcbiBrtNAwtomowt . rtwt i (ncnua MdnKs, hopriawxw. aBd afcMri ftlertton.

4. Genaalcunmentt about tfwpnaaa of redhtrittfnr a. fc«w(wt)iea>mpw^ f«pectalty fefflftles, .yfiKtBltynKfelricUng to a tafrhurried, nwe thouifrtftil |>roce»

b. oTnNfttotetod rtudcnts ritodd be^wa ii n**nuiB d town y Baprior to dwqftog schoab. C. A» Bdptiw*< tifcts» Uu*commu^tet andiN^hbwhoodi MW FABM FARM FARM Middle School Capacity Aug 22 NOV 19 Change Bonnle Branch MS 701 ! Ml; BurielghManor Ms 779 u% 0.27 ClarksvilleMS 643 OunlogglnMS S65 Bkrldgelanding MS 779 2696 'I. Htlcott Mills MS 701 's. fWj FollyQuarter MS 662 Slenwaod MS 545 o.sa

HammondMS 604 . 3.791 Harpen Choice MS 506 31% t!.i lake Bfchom MS M3 3B* UraeKUnMS 721 MayfleldWoods MS 79S '3. 7:. Mount view MS 798 s.: Oakland MIUs MS 506 i 1.25'

Patapsco MS 643 18% t. -....^ PatuxentValley MS 760 33% '.i-^S: ^ThomasVlsduct MS 701 r4.G3i MS Wilde lake 721 38% (S.&.; Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Puneet Mehrotra Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:27 PM To: Mehrotra, Puneet Cc: Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu; Hcpss Redistricting; BoE Email Subject: [External] Re: 1132 Originally part of Clemens Crossing,

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello,

After reviewing the meeting notes from the 11/18/19, working session, I am concerned that polygon 1132 was listed as part of Bryant Woods, when originally it was part of Clemens Crossing. I believe the voting outcome is incorrect and should be invalidated.

Move polygons 132, 1132, and 2132 from Bryant Woods ES back to Clemens Crossing ES.

Motion by Kirsten A Coombs, second by Christina Delmont-Small. Final Resolution: Motion Fails Yea: Kirsten A Coombs, Vicky Cutroneo, Christina Delmont-Small Nay: Mavis Ellis, Jennifer Mallo, Sabina Taj, Chao Wu

The movement of polygon 1132 to Bryant Woods has a profound impact on community and children. The Clemens Crossing community is a close knit community where we work, play and grow together. We have built roots with our neighbors and teachers and our children are able to bike and walk to Clemens Crossing and enjoy the community and school.

I urge you to keep 1132 with Clemens Crossing since this has a profound impact on community and the children.

Thank you,

PM jyiarilyn^rosskopf

From: Susan Coghlan Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:27 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] PLEASE vote for no changes

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education -

PLEASE, I implore you NOT to make any changes to our schools right now. PLEASE. You have a new school that will be built and opened in three years and you'll NEEDto do it again, causingrift andheartache to so many families and children. Now is NOTthe time to implement a massiveresfaTieturing.

PLEASE don't move children within walking distance to a school to another where they'll need to take a bus. We alreadydon't have enoughmoney in our school system and the idea ofincreasing transportation costs to haphazardly meet a goal you don't seem to be guessing to achieve is ridiculous.

If you insist on changingright now, PLEASEallow for younger siblings attending the same school as the seniors who are allowed to stayto STAY (without asking for permission). Havingto be a part oftwo different high schools is cmel.

PLEASEunderstand that families in lower income areas who haven'tbeen vocal DO care - we're not being heard.

Im in polygon 3139 and DO NOTwant to see us or the surroundingpolygons (most ofthem low income) to another school simply to balance out equity.

PLEASE understand that despite our best efforts to welcome, embrace, treat people from other socioeconomic backgrounds with warmth and respect - the more affluent communities DON'T WANT US. I know we won't ruin their school. I also believe at my core that this massive redistricting will causemore harm than good to so many families.

PLEASEdon't do it right now... the grater impact will be like a category 5 hurricaneblazing through our community andthe results will likely be catastrophic. To take somethinglike this on without REALLYgiving yourselves time to work through the plan - ESPECIALLY when you'll need to do it again for the new school isnt smart. It's walking into a nightmare with open eyes and expecting it to go well.

Thank you Susan Coghlan parent ofa high schooljunior and freshman. Stq)mofher to a freshman, sophomore, and sixth grader - ALLof whom will be impacted by this change.

You are beautiful. You are strong. You are enough. PoshMamaSaidSo.com Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Sheela Chellappan Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:23 PM To: Superintendent; Mavis Ellis; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu; cbball@howardcountymd. go; Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle Attachments: CMS PTA Letter.jpg; FARM Numbers.jpg

! CAUTION: This emaUoriginated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not cUck Unks or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thankful to BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are tess than 20 students proposed to go into Lime Klln Middle.

Request: Pleaseconsider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attendingfor the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are tess than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary oomlation is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacity.

2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1.3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6.8 miles awayfrom Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksyllle Middle School PTA position statement supoorfmg our request is attached for reference and consideration.

5. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS. there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers /attached). Thank you for your consideration. Polygon 189 resident; SheelaK Chellappan, Ph.D rosniON sTAnEtam

oaot><»)0t, 2»»»

CtarhsvlUe Middle Sdwol Parent TtKAer Asssctotfon Posttfcm Statemsnt *tto»>diim»*w At(ju»bnent Pto* (dUiri Augurt 20. KM9)

Aoconltog to the *tsc^MSE£». tl*e mtekm ^

». Vite^pwwitht»ie»9al»wdCoun^. Itttnotctur, howevw, th«twld»iGeaipporttmorti(ttudenttotftoif ttetr communities to addressUibaiMt. Stoctoeainonifedispultytftouldbe «tifre»ed by dewtmg eduatfonri re*Bu»t« : rtudwtts'Ihw.

2. AnyfadteMctinBNiou(<(aff8CttbeteK inn;mw>b

3. ft»rc6nBttudeMstotfamfertd»obttde

a. bwilwtlNiCwwyj«y, upBctelity(ainWBs, Bflieciadbym

so FARM FARM FARM Middle School Capacity Aug 22 Nov U Change Bonnle BranGh MS 7DI i5.4i! BurieighManor MS 779 0.27 ClartevilIeMS 643 : 1.46; DunlogglnMS 565 w% 'S.M Elto-idgeLanding MS 779 EIBcott Mills MS 701 Folly Quarter MS G6Z GlenwoodMS 545 0.68 Hammond MS 604 i3.7S?

Harpers Choir MS Tl &'< . sos 3196 s-^.. E. ^i Lake Bkhorn MS 643 UmcKifnMS 721 <5« MayfleldWoods MS 738 (2.7i. Mount View >ffi 796 . s% Murray Mill MS 662 3S% 15.36) Oakland Mill* MS 506 44% ' i-St Patapsco MS 643 18% 1&.31 WuxwitValleyMS 760 3396 iiS.Sts

Thomas Vladuct MS 701 '.\Ci;

Wilde take MS 721 16.,54'i Marilyn Grosskopf

From: kalyani prayaga Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:23 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle Attachments: FARM Numbers. jpg; CMS PTA Letter.jpg

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thankful to BOB members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

BOE's original decisionto move Polygon 189 from PRES andCMS to DOAS andLKS was dueto badand inaccurate dataprovided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BOE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are less than 20 students proposed to go into Lime Kiln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for (he school year2019-20 andpropose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - KeepingPolygon 189 at fhe CIarksville Middle Schoolwill haveno negative or adverse impact on any ofthe FARM or Capacitynumbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our eristlng elementary population is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and win not cause disruption to CMS capacity.

2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community andshould remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kihi middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute roundtrip commute daily for our children. Moreover, basedon the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. CIarksville M.iddle School PTA position statement supporting our request is attached for reference and consideration.

5. By keeping Polygon 189 at CMS, there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the attached BOB FARM numbers (attached).

Smcerely, Kalyani Prayaga Home Owner PIoygon 189 FARM FARM FARM Middle School Capacity Aug 22 Nov 19 Change Bonnle Branch MS 701 27% 'i. ll^j Burielgh Manor MS 779 U56 0.27 ClarksvllleMS 643 il. W. Dunlo@;lnMS 565 k? ^7-S Elkrid^ LandingMS 779 i 1.01] EBicott Mills MS 701 Folly Quarter MS Slenwaod MS 545 0.68 Hammond MS 604 i^. /3

Harpers Choice MS 305 31% . -^ I-' -", Lake Hfthorn MS 643 ii. l. :: UmeKilnMS 721 <5%

Mayfleld Woods MS 798 '.2.7:. Mount View MS 798 Murray HIMMS 662 Oakland Mills MS 506

Pataptco MS 64i >^. a.: PatuxentValleyMS 760 liX .f^.^ Thomas Viaduct MS 701 38% i4,03, Wilde take MS 721 38% i6.5A; K»fflON STATENttfr

October ia. 20t 9

ClarksvlUe Middle School Parent Teacher Posltfon Stat«nent Attondww Aw Ad)uan»nt Ptan <

Accordfttg to the WferffHBlSA. the mtehin u» ow PTSA kto nipputwid^pMk an behatfof chtKJKBB'tauuFidtOol, In Uw conimuntty, . nd b^BW^tomnmwft bodte md otfwr orrntotton* Ui» mdw dmAton* afftUng <*«Am. The Ctarimttte PTA hotdt UNSfultowKni podtton*;

1. Wteapw with the .oal ofaddfWttottnuw of ln»<»ftty to Muw'dCounty. It h not ciwr. howww.that wldena *u ttetrcommirtttestoaitoeaUtfeai^. SBdoecfliwwlcdfepw^thB»p« rtudaus' tfvet. 2. AnymttetrteU»»slKwM affectthe fwwttnumhirtrffWBMesnBoutwy^ wererowaec Bdoi ^mnwi. in'«d5ton, bu*>8U»aeriBKte"t*.w^o_"B. «btetowlultoa*riwrftte MSeWmot. w* »choo(that tewr 5 mttet »wy*»» ptttteuton?

3. FonA«itirientttotnmferachool»1> bywm*» theiraifety mt and»'"**d"l *"»C5"'; ttimTtoiwtnt atfudmli' nrtimkrf *"PI»rt^rf"n*i^l£paK. tMdien. aumdo".and .di»Wrtniton-towsthwn wlnenibte &»».. crWcrt ttne to their devdtopmHrt. atteirtmandrwweu on inentri toaWi. _ ForetntdindFBnto to . ^JwToutoftfietr n^BhbwhwdwM d" 1 ri»Bdd rtn Biwa, and tdddrt tetUdi. 4. Genwalcommentt aboutthe proun of ndlatrictlnff «. inwhfthcwi "^«pecte^f«nilttes,. We^dbyn^ricynB more tB» We pw totwiiMAwd'lnlww boimtota we nMtoawm. S .ntftomfln^pSo^Stweb

From: Mehrotra, Puneet Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:22 PM To: Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu; Hcpss Redistricting; BoE Email Subject: [External] 1132 Originally part of Clemens Crossing,

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello and thank you for being a member of the BOE.

After reviewing the meeting notes from the 11/18/19, working session, I am concerned that polygon 1132 was listed as part of Bryant Woods, when originally it was part of Clemens Crossing. I believe the voting outcome is incorrect and should be invalidated.

Move polygons132, 1132, and 2132 from Bryant Woods ES back to Clemens Crossing ES.

Motion by Kirsten A Coombs, second by Christina Dehnont-Small. Final Resolution: Motion Fails Yea: Kirsten A Coombs, Vicky Cutroneo, Christina Delmont-Small Nay: Mavis EUis, Jennifer Mallo, Sabina Taj, Chao Wu

The movement of polygon 1132 to Bryant Woods has a profound impact on community and children. The Clemens Crossing community is a close knit community where we work, play and grow together. We have built roots with our neighbors and teachers and our children are able to bike and walk to Clemens Crossing and enjoy the community and school.

I urge you to keep 1132 with Clemens Crossing since this has a profound impact on community and the children.

Thank you,

Puneet Mehrotra Regulatory and Compliance Oversight Consultant Health Services [Embedded Compliance w 443-547-3127 | c 412-610-4094 [email protected]

Unauthorized interception of this communication could be a violation of Federal and State Law. This communication and any files transmitted with it are confidential and may contain protected health information. This communication is solely for the use of the person or entity to whom it was addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, distribution, printing or actmg in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and destroy any and all copies. Thank you. ATENCION: Si habla espanol, tiene a su disposicion servicios gratuitos de asistencia Imgiiistica. Llame al 855-258-6518 tM, : $Da

From: odilians10@aol. com Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:18 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] MOTION NEEDED: POLYGON 189 BACK TO CLARKSVILLE MIDDLE

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe.

Dear Board Members, Weare thankful to BOE members for unanimously passinga motion to move Polygon 189 backto PRES. BOE'soriginal decision to move Polygon 189from PRESand CMSto DOASand LKSwas dueto bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 backfrom Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are tess than 20 students proposed to oo into Lime Klln Middle. Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight. 1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary population is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not causedlsruotion to CMS caciacjty^ 2. Keeping Communities together- Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTA oosition statement suDportina our request is attached for reference and consideration. 5. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS. there are no impacts to FAMRnumbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers fatfached). Thank you for your consideration. Marilyn Grosskopf

From: CHANDRA ANAGANI Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:16 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Motion Needed: Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle Attachments: CMS PTA Letter. jpg; FARM Numbers. jpg

! CAUTION:This email originated from outside of HCPSS.Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thankful to BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime Kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are tess than 20 students proposed to oo into Lime Klln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are tess than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary ciooulation is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS caB§sJty_

2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - (JlarKsville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles awayfrom Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round tria commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksyille Middle School PTA oosition statement supBorfina our request is attached for reference and consideratton.

5. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS. there are no impacts to FAMR numbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARMnumbers (attached}.

Thank you for your consideration. fOWWMSTAT(NCN1i

Clariavilte Mktdte Schori Parent Teacher Assoeiatfon Positkm aatement Atumdance *m» AiyiBtment Ptui (drt^l Au»itt M, »M»j

*

t. Weaensew(ththe»>dofaddre»lngta»«»orin»tu(ty(nH»>»winiCounW. tt I* not elwr, howeww, that wtdpo»ttmoivtn(ttudenls outof tbe

2. Any mdtetrirtlngriioutd affect the fwwat number of fanAI»»waBBa»y. Ahwtng 207 «u*mte from » tdwot thtt te not

3. R»retosstu(!<:-atsto transfertcf&aBBdetrinwntalta UN*mental hedth by rwwwfi^ thefr arfe^ net end tntrodudni tiRneceBwydtBnge and »t»»u. »temwlngartriBilB'jietw>»kirfRwpwt-frtendt, other(»NBBKt, towhen, couwBto^ and adialnbtratorfr-tawu Item wAierabte durtng a criUcatUme in their . Howanl Cotwty hu Fecen^ fnaiw»d .ttentfonandlrwource&onmBntrihNtth. PopctagdiUdreotonuwtaa .chool out of ftefr nedhbwtwod wM defWtoty MM «n» ud m^f toawe ndnm, haprtMuiea, and ariddrt Id^ton.

4. a. hnw(»ttt«CBminuo»y, <<)«*iUyfamUt«, affected by F ng to a Iwt^hurrieil, nwe thou|h < procCT;ttf (teclttofrwdttoie. Pwwts wnt to be tnwtwd to how boundwtet we ns^nwn. We undent (hatrecttftffctlnawUhKipBnbtaidiecunmttHopoidlt wy

From: Eric Davis Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:16 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting; School Planning Cc: Eric Davis Subject: [External] Please reconsider this and shift 5133 from Bryant Woods to demons Crossing!!!. docx Attachments: Please reconsider this and shift 5133 from Bryant Woods to demons Crossing!!!.docx

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Good Afternoon,

Please see the attached regarding polygon 5133. Please contact me with any questions or comments.

Regards,

Eric 11/19/2019 Hello, My wife and I are, the parents of a 3rf grader currently attending Bryant Woods Elementary. We live in polygon 5133 which is between 1-2 minutes away from Clemmons Crossing Elementary. We've lived in Columbia for a little over 2 years. At first, we wondered why our son has to attend a school that is 15 minutes away, on the other side of Columbia Mail??? We were provided the reasoning (which was unsubstantiated) but still endured the inconvenience ofour son attending a school so far away. We were deeply saddened and upset to discover that there is a faction which includes part ofthe staff and some of the parents at demons Crossing that opposed the absorption of 5133 to their school. We were advised that it was confirmed that this faction does exist. This actions and influence of this faction need to be in the media for all to see! Asa result ofthe protest activity and influence ofthe faction, it was now proposed that out son and other children in 5133 be shuffled once againto Swansfield Elementary. THIS ISABSOLUTELY REDICIOLOUSN! The data and the rationale of the planning committee does not substantiate this move! Other polygon shifts that make more sense can be implemented to accommodate potential overcrowding. Each time my wife and I drop our son off and nick him up from either Brvant Woods or Swansfield, we will be reminded of the socioeconomic and racial prejudice that is orohibitinE him from Roinfito the school closest to our house, demons Crossine! This is 2019 in Columbia MD and not 1964 in Alabama!!! Also,as mentioned in the mediaand on the news,the subsequent proposed move (after the original from Bryant to demons) which is nowfrom Bryant Woodsto Swansfield, wasnot publicized in the proper fashion to allow for the protest. Pleasereconsider this andshift 5133from Brvant Woodsto demons Crossine!!! This polygon is on the edge and appears to contain only 20 children who as an FYI, are diverse, well behaved, and should not be further inconvenienced. This redistricting should serve asa correction to a blatant flawwith the current situation regarding 5133 and should not make it even worse. Everyone is more than well aware of the activity of the faction and their protest/influential activity. Please give our children a chanceto flourish and prosper in the school in whichthey should attend. Subject: One Dorsey Hall Solution Polygons 148, 276, 302, 1148 and 2148

November 19, 2019

Dear Howard County Board of Education members, Last night's Work Session was a bittersweet, pyrrhic for the Dorsey Hall community and heartbreaking loss for the disruption caused to over 5000 HCPSSstudents and their families. applaud the efforts of members Cutroneo and Delmont-Small for their efforts to provide additional time and rationality to the process. I am appalled at other members whom were myopically focused getting to a straw poll vote without adequate consideration of feeds, data quality or who knowswhat else information. It is inconceivablethat the months ofdedicated work on shifting polygons and students culminates in a rapid generation of the information, all of which board members were required to make a decision upon within minutes. Insufficient time leadsto rushed, inadequatelythought out decisionsthat Board members cannot in good faith reach, let alone communicate to or hear from the impacted communities. The members of Dorsey Hall remain united in the beliefthat there are options in which polygons 148, 276 and 302 remain at Northfield ESand Dunloggin MSand not break apart the Dorsey Hall community. Thank you for your time and consideration in keeping One Dorsey Hall.

Sincerely, Steve Bennett & Laura Stitt Polygon 1148 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Ellen Suh Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:06 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] NEWLYCREATED DOUBLE SMALL FEEDS POLYGON 98, 1098. Please pay attention and fix this.

! CAUTION: This emaH originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. To whom it may concern,

After work session 8, you newly create double small feeds for our polygon. It has not been discussed past few months. It is NEW! And I can't believe no one mentioned our polygon at the last work session. I doubt you even realized what you did to our community.

1. Kids will move from blue ribbon school to title 1 school.

2. You created new small feed from Phelps Luck elementary to Ellicott Mills middle, by not moving 100 and 1100together with us, unlike the superintendent's initial plan.

3. You also made weaker feed from Ellicott Mills to Howard high. It was originally 18. 7% but you made it worseto 11.4%, by moving Polygon 67 and 311 to OaklandMills middle andPolygon 65, 1065, 2065 and 2074 to Bonnie Branch.

You triple punishedour kids. Everything got worse. Pleasemake at least one thingbetter so that we can compromise. This is not acceptable. At least you have to try. Not even mentioning this matter was very shocking to me, because it seemed you ignored our community and you didn't realized what you did. Please please please someone mention and bring out this matter. Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Rachel Farah Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:06 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygons 95/1095/2095/301/1301

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not elick links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content Is safe. Good morning,

I am writing with deep concern over Ms. Mallo's proposal to move the above listed polygons from Ilchester Elementary to Waterloo Elementary. I know you have received numerous emails from my many outraged neighbors over this seemingly pomtless circular move between schools, when Uchester is not overcrowded, and has a perfect feeder system.

I understand the need to relieve overcrowding from schools like Howard (where my daughter is a freshman), but I believe this process has unnecessarily ballooned prematurely. It seems that it would make much more sense to do a fall redistricting process closer to the opening of the new high school, which will naturally create a whole new set of changes county wide. This is simply TOO MUCH CHANGE you are inflicting on our children.

While I am aware that Waterloo is a wonderful school, it is not the natural choice for residents of Montgomery Meadowswho would be bussed in a far less saferoute than they currently experienceattending Ilchester. The busses would have to make a very unsafe left turn onto 108, where there is no safe benefit of a traffic light, and travel much further than they do to get to Uchester. Physical and emotional well being should be the main focus of anyonemaking decisions for our children. It is your responsibility to fully investigate these factors, instead of rushing votes, as we witnessed this week. Several board members expressed concern these polygon shifts were not properly vetted, and due to a technicality where 2 members abstained from a vote at a previous work session, they were unable to addressthe vote last night.

I truly hope that you choose to vote NO at the final plan vote Thursday. I can tell you that as a county, thousands of residents are taking notice at those who choose to rush votes, and WE will be paying close attention at the next BOB elections.

Should this terrible plan be approved, I would hope that as you have allowed concessions for rising juniors and seniors to stay at their current schools, you would do the same for a rising 5th and 8th grader. I have an incredibly anxious 4th grader. If he is forced to attend a brand new school with only 1 neighborhood friend for 1 year before going BACK to our original feeder school (BBMS), where virtually no one from Waterloo will be attending, I cannot fathom the undue stress this will cause. Please think of the emotional well being of our students.

Sincerely, Rachel Farah November 19, 2019

Re: Polygon 2053:A Swansfield Island in Clemens Crossing

Honorable Board of Education Members:

Wewrite as parents ofcurrent and future students at Swansfield Elementary to express our concern aboutthe disposition of polygon 2053 under the boundary adjustment proposal asof November 18, 2019 Theproposal makes polygon 2053an islandwhose students attend SwansfieldElementary when all adjacentpolygons inthe same neighborhood attend Clemens CrossingElementary. Polygon 2053 comprises the middle section ofWatch ChainWay (a through street which connects to Cedar Lanevia Harmel Driveto the south and to Hickory Ridge Road in the north) andthe cul-de-sac streets of Triangle Drive, Fence Post Court, and Middlewater Court.

Currently, polygons to the south of 2053 (1066 and 66) attend Clemens Crossing, while polygons to the north (53, 2135, and 2174) attend Swansfield. Under the proposed boundary adjustment plan, polygons 53, 2135, and 2174 would move to Clemens Crossing; polygons to the south would remain at Clemens Crossing.

The result isthat polygon 2053 becomes a tiny island attending Swansfield surrounded by neighborhoods on three sides (north, east, and south) attending Clemens Crossing. The removal of polygons 53, 2135, and 2174 from the Swansfield community physically isolates polygon 2053 from all other polygons attending Swansfield. The adjacent polygon to the west that would still attend Swansfieldunder the proposal isseparated bya largewooded area and not part ofthe same neighborhood.

From a transportation perspective, the proposed moves also do not make sense. A school bus would haveto travel along Watch Chain Way,skipping anystreets in polygon 53, andturn around just to make a fewstops in polygon 2053. The current Swansfield bus(682) makes a u-turn at Triangle Drive, andthe proposed boundarieswould continue this unsafe practiceto pick up even fewerstudents.

We strongly believe that polygon 2053 should remain united with polygons 53, 2135, and 2174 and attend thesame elementary school, whetherit isSwansfield of Clemens Crossing. Leavingpolygon 2053 physically isolated a significant distance awayfrom anyother polygons attending the same elementaryschool hurts our community and separates us from manyfriends we've had the privilege to know over the past few years at Swansfield Elementary.

Very truly yours,

Chris and Jackie Deichmeister 6100 Fence Post Court Columbia, MD 21044 Marilvn Grosskoof

From: Gang Chen Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:01 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] RE: rezone proposal

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. DearBOB members and redistrictingofGcials, Please let our kids (Polygon 1171) go to MRHS and MVMS, this is VITAL for their physical and emotional health.

1. Ourkids are goingto be onthe isolatedisland. All ofthe neighborhoods aroundus go to MRHS.

2. The EVERYDAY commute/distance will increase, doubled for middle school, 53% for high school. Longer commute = Sleep deprivation. This will be damagingto ourkids health.

3. Financial wise, it will cost Howard County school district more money on transportation and it will put our kids in danger.

From the bottom ofour hearts, asparents of students, we are asking you to reconsider Polygon 1171.

Greatly appreciated your consideration!

Gang Chen Marilvn Grosskopf

From: Dong Chen Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:59 AM To: David W. Ramsay; Hcpss Redistricting Subject: Re: [External] Request for walkarea reevaluation for polygon 302 to Dunloggin Middle School Attachments: map_distance_Donloggin_ms_to_Leyday_way_polygon302_148_276. pdf

David and BOE members,

As per our correspondence below, I have enclosed a Google map showing that the distance between a resident home in polygon 302 and Dunloggin Middle School is 1.0 mi.

Thanks a lot.

Sincerely, Dong Chen

From: David W. Ramsay Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:33 AM To: Dong Chen Subject: RE: [External] Request for walk area reevaluation for polygon 302 to Dunloggin Middle School

Good morning, Thankyou for your einail. To ensurethat all Boardmembers areaware of your feedback, please sendyour comments to the Board of Education via the following email address, redistrictinefS. hcpss. org.

Again, thank you for your email. David

David Ramsay Director, Pupil Transportation Office Howard County Public School System 410-313-6726

From: DongChen Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:43 AM To: David W. Ramsay Subject: [External] Request for walk area reevaluation for polygon 302 to Dunloggin Middle School

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUek links or open attachments, unlessfou recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. Dear Mr. Ramsay, We understand you probably have received many requests for walk area status re-evaluation as a result of the BOE redistricting plans. We really appreciate that you make every effort to meet the requests as soon as possible!

As residents from polygon 302 (Leyden Way), we would also like to make a formal request to conduct a reevaluation of our Walk Area status to Dunloggin Middle School. Some of our residents experimented walking from the community to DMS on Sunday morning and we believe the distance is around the 1-mile limit to qualify as a walker. As you may be aware,the last BOEwork session has moved to reassign our middle school from DMS to Wilde Lake Middle School, which is a much father away school (3-4 miles). This will exacerbatethe already poor traffic condition of the areas around Rt 108 and Columbia Rd, and dramatically increase the risk of traffic safety for our kids. Since the final voting date is this Thursday, Nov 21, 1 would really appreciate if you could complete re-evaluation as soon as possible. I know you and your stuff are already doingyour best. I really appreciate your contribution to the public and would appreciate if you could come over to finish the re-evaluation soon. Sorry for the rush and we truly appreciate your understandingof our situation!

Sincerely, Dong Chen === 20191119tuesday === Leydayway polygon302_148_276

OinlaqciiF? Mrddl- Sch.. '3i KB^?-njFiniTy^^

Q 04285Brigh-: Bay Way 's;t.*ne pflii'-fA ^ ;. c°s*

».. . ^ ?2ndd<-E^-t;cslDyoufph-i-w 0°° B ^ viaColumbia Rd 20mtn U^K^'-"" 1; ., ". DETAILS

Pinu.ii^ ^

(*

.* ., '9'Sl

. i;,i['!^)t, * "M'ti- '^^. ^.^ »'':fii-Ew,.V , ^r.. ^ ({. ->-

/ \

ti^RS'-i"0 S t'AR C li fs-'"":

G^> :gla

2 areas likely within 1mi/5280n

For homes, shall also use property line instead of door asthe end point of distance measurement?

May the middle schooler use lawn (unpaved path), the two thick lines shown in the last map? Ifyes to those question, there seems to be about 20 homes on Leyden Way(Polgyon302) and several buildings in Polygon 148 are within 1 miles Marilyn Grosskopf

From: DonaldArant < Donnie.Arant@kiewit. com> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:56 AM To: Anne Arant; Hcpss Redistricting; Jennifer Mallo; Christina Delmont-Small; Vicky Cutroneo; Chao Wu; Superintendent Subject: [External] Polygon 1132 Redistricting

! CAUTION:This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To: Howard County Board of Education

Regarding: Polygon 1132 We recently moved from a neighborhood that was the focus of redistricting two years ago and purchased a home closer to Clemens Crossinglast springto ensure our children would retain stabilitythroughout their elementary and teenage years. The neighborhood located in Polygon 1132 has been assigned to Clemens Crossing for over 40 years, and this was the primary factor for moving into this neighborhood. We are located one mile from the school, and much of our live revolves around the community and friends we have built at Clemens Crossing. At a recent board meeting, our polygon wassuddenly moved to Bryant Woods Elementarywith little basisfor the move. We were even viewed as a mistake!!!!

. We had no chance to review this proposal

. We had no chance to voice our opinion

. There was little justification or research behind this move Many communities have been given months to organize, research, and have their voice heard. They have held meetings, they have hired lawyers, they have attended meetings. Our voices have beensilenced.

If the boa rd did their full research they would quickly learn the following:

. Polveon 1132 is walkable to Clemens CrossinB. it is imoossible to walk to Brvant Woods o This would further increase travel time. less sleep at nieht. and increase the risk of traffic accidents for our family.

o We walk to school on every possible opportunity, to start the day off right, get exercise, spend quality time with our children, spend time with friends.

There are busy roads, traffic lights, hospitals, malls, colleges, and intersections that separate us from Bryant Woods. We are not contiguous with the schools you intend to redistrict us to. . It would greatly increasetravel time, require busor car transportation, and greatly impact our daily routine.

. We are involved in numerous Clemens Crossing activities that tie us to our community

o Swim team

o Baseball

o PTA

o Destination Imagination o Kids Empowerment

o Rec Programs

o We walk to all of these proerams daily, and our Rarticioation in the community would be greatly impacted, as well as the development of our children.

o Driving back and forth to school multiple times a day is not how this great City was setup!! After $400,000 of taxpayer money was spent, the study did not move our polygon. Now on a whim, with a unresearched idea, we are moved like chess pieces. There is little understandingor consideration bythe boardto justify this move. We are not just resources, or FARM%'s. We are people that deserve a voice and the dignityto be part ofour diverse community.

With a special needs child. this will be particularly devastatine. considerine the stability, soecialized care and relationships he has built with the staff at Clemens. Instead of the thrivine environment we have found, we will have to start over.

Ourfamily and specificallyour children have built relationshipswith a highlydiverse network offriends and family, and we will now be separated from people that are a mere 5 minutes away.

Please research our sneciflc oolveon and the routes it takes to get to school and reconsider our redistrictine.

Sincerely,

Donald Arant

Polygon 1132 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Robert Miller Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:55 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] FARMS Distribution at the Middle School Level

! CAUTION:This emaU originated from outside of HCPSS.Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

Though I have not been following all of the details of the redistricting process, I feel compelled to bring a matter to your attention. On the 11/18 Worksession Comparison spreadsheet, the Board's Plan has 5 middle schools with FARMS percentages in the 40's, with the highest at 49. The Superintendent's Plan has 2 middle schools with FARMS percentages in the 40's, with the highest at 44. As a former middle school teacher, my view is that the challenges faced by middle schools as FARMS percentages increase is quite different when percentages arerelatively low than whenthey arerelatively high. To illustrate, the challenges for a school going from 5% to 15% could be likened to being increased linearly, while the challenges for a school going from 35% to 45% could be likened to being increased more exponentially. Though a non-data-based illustration, I hope that it provides a perspective that I feel is lacking. I encourage you to speak with middle school teachers, especiallythose at the six middle schools with FARMS percentages presently in the 40's and 50's, and ask if they agree. I believe that you are all trying to do what's best, but given whatthe worksheet shows, I wonder if you arereceiving sufficient input (relative to parent input) from the educators whose responsibility it is to teach our students. Please consider this before you make your final decisions. Thank you very much for your consideration, andbest wishes as you continueworking through this challenging situation.

Sincerely,

Robert

Robert W. Miller Cell: 410-227-8445 Home: 410-992-1933 robmilfamiaamail. com Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Imran Virk Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:54 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Reconsider Polygon 1171

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear School Board Members,

My name is Imran Virk and I recently moved into the 1171 polygon, Westmount neighborhood. I noticed last night that our polygon was assigned to different schools without consideration for our children. My commimity and I OPPOSE this redistricting plan.

Currently, our children are going to Man-iotts RidgeHS which is not overpopulated. Whydisropt our children's lives andmove them? Theyhave built a foundationin that school, andnow you aretelling thembecause of political gains,it is okayto move them from one unpopulated school to another?

Furthermore, our childrenare gettingon (hebus at 6:40AM to go to Mamotts RidgeHS whichis a fewmiles from us.Now you are telling us, that our children will have to get on the bus when (he rest ofneighborhood is sleeping to go to a school not close to us at all. The time our children will spend on the bus will hinder (heir development and time outside the classroom. WHERE is (he school life balance that all children deserve?

Also, please considermoving our middle schoolers to Mount Viewvs. Folly Quarter as initially proposed. Please don'tjust appeasecertain neighborhoods. This is HowardCounty and WE ALL have the samerights. PleaseDO NOT tell myselfand my communitythat this is a necessarymove because it is not. PLEASEthink about om children as you have thought about yours and leave things as they are. Thank you for your dme.

Imran Marilvn Grosskoof

From: Mike Rapacki Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:53 AM To: Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu; BoE Email; Vicky Cutroneo; Kirsten Coombs; Mavis Ellis; Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygons98/1098 - one last time before Thursday

! CAUTION: TMs emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Members of the board:

After the conclusion of last nightswork session, we strongly request you to look at polygon 1098/98, as it has not been reviewed nor discussed at any point thus far. Here is the distribution for our neighborhood, Brampton Hills: . Currently we attend Waterloo ES. . Under the new consolidated plan we will attend Phelps Luck (PLES). . Items of note that we feel have been overlooked include our NEWLY created small feed, our schools's proximity, and capacities.

Our neighborhood's move to Phelps Luck is creating a small feed - only 9% or less of students from our neighborhood will complete PLESto move into Ellicott Mills (essentially our entire neighborhood). Meanwhile, 40%of Worthington's population will advanceto Ellicott Mills. Ellicott Mills Middle islocated acrossthe streetfrom our neighborhood (we could walk there) and therefore feel it is important to stay close to our community.

Worthington ES- the closest school geographically to our neighborhood, is at 85%capacity, and forecasted to remain at this threshold for the future. Meanwhile Phelps LuckES is at 100%,trending to increase. Finally, from a proximity standpoint. Elementary Schools ranked in order ofshortest to longest distance from our neighborhood:

Worthington Veterans Rockburn Waterloo

Moving 1098/98to Worthingtonwill help keeptransportation costs in line, strengthen our feed and maintain our connection to our community, and assist in addressing capacity issues in the future.

While you have all put hours of work and tireless efforts into getting this right, I understand that there is no template to immediately fixingthe vast challenges facing HoCo. We request that you slow down and apply reason to the process.

Weexpect that you will exerciseyour best and most carefuljudgment to addressthe redistricting and not experiment with the future of our children with "on the fly" redistricting plans.

Thanks for your time with regard to this matter. Mike Rapacki Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Kristin Kopasz Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:52 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Redistricting OM polygons

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello again - I wanted to write again in another last ditch effort to request you to reconsidering moving polygon 2059 out of TSES. You mentioned last night I think to keep 2059 at SFES. BUT WE AREN'T THERE! We are at TSES and want to stay there!

What if you....

Keep polygons 1059/2059 @ TSES & move Polygon 55 to SFES instead?

And I request that you keep polygons 59/3059 w/1059/2059 @) OMMS. Polygons 67/311 should stay at EMMS since they remain at HOHS & would be a tiny feed at OMMS not continuing to OMHS.

Could you please revisit your plans for the OM communities? We are so happy at TSES, even though the new building plans are on hold, even though there is mold.... if we aren't important enough to even have a chance for funding for a new building, just let us be. We're happy where we are. Let us be.

Thank you, Kristin Kopasz Marilyn Grosskopf

From: zhangyu Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:49 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 189-Move backto CMS-Correct move based on wrong data

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear BOE members

OnNov 18, Polygon 189 was moved back to PRES to correct the move on 11/13 due to incorrect data. However, it was forgotten to move middle school back to CMS. Please consider to propose a motion to fix the oversight. 1.No adverse impact to CMS capacityand FARM: There are less tfaan 20 studentsonly going to CMS.They are new in this area and please do not move them from fheir network just set up.

2. Reduce cost by keeping in CMS: CMS is over 6 miles away. At least additional 1 hour commute time per day is added to the transportation cost. Kids will pass CMS in order to go to LKMS. Considering (he tight budget ofHCPSS, it is not a wise move. Besides, kids sacrifice their valuable time on the buses.

Please consider to propose the motion to move Polygon 189 back to CMS.

Thank you for your attention.

Sincerely, YuZhang Polygon 189 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Bill Hauf Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:47 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Valley Mede - Polygons 159 & 1159

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender »ndknow the content Is safe. Thursdaythis Board could set a very sad precedent for the Valley Mede community. My fearis that fracturing this community by moving polygons 159& 1159on the elementary & middle levels will have irreparable damageon the senseof "community" in Valley Mede.

I believe 2 out of the 7 members get it. Thank you to Mrs. Delmont-Small and Mrs. Cutroneo. I feel others understand, but don't really appreciate the history the impact this move would have on the community. I'm hoping this email will open more discussion Thursday and change some minds. Oneof the main pillarsof policy 6010 is community stability. Keeping communities together. I spoke aboutthis during my oral testimony. My parents moved to Howard County when I was 2 years old. I have just recently hit the big "50"! For 48 years I've seen the changes in this county. I am a product ofthe Howard County school system having gone to SJLES,PMS, & MTH graduatingin 1987. Sincethe 80'swhen public sewer lines were installed in the eastern part ofthe county growth alongwith redistricting has been out of control. Simply put, the school system has never been able to keep up with the demand due to development. ValleyMede has been able to weatherthe storms dueto community stability. Thecommunity hasbeen in existence for over 50 years!! ! It truly is a "jewel" of the county asfar ascommunity involvement. Most ofthis community s involvement stems for the very strong feeds we have had forever between SJLES, PMS, & MTH. SJLESis built withinthe confinesof the community itself. These schools are part ofthe glue that keeps so many other community activities relevant. SJLESis the 1stbuilding blockof stability for the Valley Mede community. It isthere wherethe relationships between kids & the kids parents are born. These relationships, developed through school functions literally spill over into all aspects of life. These arethe building blocks that provide the kids a true sense of "community". Myfear isthat fracturing this community bymoving polygons 159& 1159on the elementary & middle levels will haveirreparable damageon the sense of "community" in Valley Mede.

Make no mistake, this will be on the Board of Education.

Precedent has been set in regard to Valley Mede. Many times the B. O. E. has tried to move the line from Bethany Lane into Valley Mede. It has never happened due to policy 6010 community stability. As a long standing resident of Howard County, and particularly the Valley Mede community, I am respectfully asking the Board to keep Valley Mede together and remain an extremely strong feed from SJLES- PMS- MTH. I honestly feel our community depends on it!

Bill Hauf Polygons 159 & 1159 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Russell Pentz Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:46 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Walkers Survey Request

! CAUTION:TMs email originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To whom it may concern,

Wejust witnessedour polygon 132 redistoicted from CCES to Bryant Woods ES. Our polygon is 1 mile away from CCES whereas Bryant Woods is 4 miles away. Our community will appeal the redistricting and would like to request a walkers survey and explore the possibility ofpolygon 132 to become "walkers" to CCES.

Pleaselet me know an appropriate timeline for such a request to help our community manage expectations during the appeal process.

Russell Pentz Service and Parts Director Mercedes-Benz of Catonsville IIIIIAMG Performance Center 2015, 2016, 2017 & 2018 Best of the Best Award Winning Dealership office: 443-860-3229 fax: 410-788-1426 text: 240-216-4320 russell. pentz@koons. com With regard to the West Columbia redistricting, I would like to provide the following input:

1) While I think the superintendent's plan and Mallo's original plan with respect to Columbia West elementary schools (Swansfield, Bryant Woods, Clemens Crossing, etc. ) were more logical in terms of feed, neighborhood continuity, and utilization, I do understand the attempt to tackle FARMs more aggressively in the current plan and I don't anticipate it being changed at this late juncture. 2) Given that the ES plan now creates two new small feeds at Swansfield, I propose combining them and sending all former PRESand BWES polygons together to CMS as a strong feed. This also improves the CMS to AHS small feed and FARMs at CMS. Note: all of these kids used to have complete feeds ES-MS. Doing this shouldn't require undoing any moves you've agreed upon already. I do realize this will create a small island; however strong feeds should take precedence over avoiding islands (as you decided with the OMHS to AHS moves). The primary reason to avoid islands is because they generally create poor feeds, but this would be the opposite because creating a single island improves several feeds. 3) I believe OSP missed the reverted moves between AHS and RHHS. Please make sure that is rectified in the final plan. The inaccessibilityof accurate and timely information to the BOE and public has been a real issue in this process! This includes the FARMs data issues as well. 4) I understand polygons proposed to move from CCES to BWES are requesting a walkabilitysurvey. I request that the same be done for 5133 and 1133. These polygons are also walkers to Atholton and are located at the juncture of the crosswalk at Sunny Spring and Owen Brown. Once this crosswalk over the small two lane road is traversed, Hawthorn residents are immediately within the existing CCES walk zone. For this reason, along with the existence of complete sidewalks and pathways throughout the route, Hawthorn is clearly more walkable to CCES than the other polygons north of Owen Brown Rd. However it has traditionally been underrepresented in BOE deliberations (likely due to its relatively low affluence and resulting low advocacy). IF the CCES attendance area is going to be revisited again by this BOE, Hawthorn should be the highest priority to be assigned to CCES, due to its walkability and the FARMs benefit to CCES, as well as for the sake of its feeds. Note this move has been suggested for at least five years of feasibility studies (including he most recent) and yet never acted upon.

Thank you.

Tim and Michelte Wood Marilvn Grosskoof

From: mei han Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:40 AM To: BoE Email; Hcpss Redistricting; Christina Delmont-Small; Vicky Cutroneo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu; Kirsten Coombs; Jennifer Mallo; Mavis Ellis Subject: [External] Keep a FAIR feed from Clarksville MS to Atholton HS

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear BOE members,

I live in Polygo. n 296 and 1296, District 4. I attended the BOE redistricting work session 9 last night. Your work has created an extremely unfair situation for people who have been moved or isolated at the last minute. Our polygon is surrounded by hieh wav 32 to the north. Middle Patuxent River to the east, Johns Hookin's Applied Research Lab to the south. Our only connection is to the west through Guilford Road. My daughter is a 9thgrader in Atholton HS. In your work session, you moved all her friendsout of her current school. My daughterhas been redistricted at elementary school level and at middle school level. Although we never moved our house, she has suffered and lost her friends twice in her 10 years of schooling in HCPSS.

This time, you moved all her friends out and leave her as a small feed from CMS to AHS. I know this time is different. She is a high school freshman. As a teenager, she is not as resilient as BOE members may hope.

Nowthe Clarksville Middle School (CMS) feed to Atholton High School (AHS) has decreased to exactly 15%, accordingto your document. 6%just moved intothe PRES-CMS-AHSfeed last year. Theactual feed is only 9%.

Our community is small. Only 10 kids in each grade in high school. How could the 10 kids fit into a high school, where each grade has an average of 365 students? My daughter has complained that everybody she knows, not just her friends, moves away by redistricting. But you don't eive her a chance to speak up for herself. It is UNFAIR.

The current Atholton High School has a balanced feed from 4 different middle schools, including Clarksville MS, Hammond MS, Murray Hill MS, and Wilde Lake MS. The feed from Clarksville MS to Atholton HS has never been below 27% since early 2000 (maybe 2003). The sufficient feed from CMS and balanced feed from the other 3 middle schools have made Atholton a great school. In this redistrictine, we uree you to be FAIR^and keep a minimum of 25% of CMSfeed to AHS. As I heard in the meeting, the data you use for FARM calculation has an error of 3% and 5% in two separate elementary schools, not sure the accuracy of other schools. However, you evaluate that a decrease of 2% FARM rate as a statistically significant improvement. Based on the data with this degree of error, your plan moves 5320 students, and many of them without beine eiven a chance to speak. How could BOE create this unprofessional and disruptive data-driven procedure?

I uree you to vote NO to the current prooosal of work session 9. Sincerely,

Mei Man

(6808 Creekside Rd., Clarksville) Marilyn Grosskopf

From: David W. Ramsay Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:38 AM To: Aryeh Englander; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Chao Wu; Superintendent; Hcpss Redistricting; Kathleen V. Hanks Subject: RE: [External] Redistricting plan - polygons 132, 1132, and 2132

Good morning, Thank you for your email. To ensure that all Board members are aware of your feedback, please send your comments to the Board of Education via the following email address, redistrictine(%hq>ss. org.

Again, thank you for your email. David

David Ramsay Director, Pupil Transportation Office Howard County Public School System 410-313-6726

From: Aryeh Englander Sent: Monday, November 18, 2019 11:43 PM To; Vicky Cutroneo hcpss.org>; Christina Delmont-Small ; Jennifer Mallo ; Chao Wu ; Superintendent ; Hcpss Redistricting ; David W. Ramsay hcpss.org>; Kathleen V. Hanks Subject: [External] Redistricting plan - polygons 132, 1132, and 2132

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. We havebeen watchingthe deliberations at the school boardredistricting meetings with increasingconcern and alarm. Plans keep being thrown back and forth without the due consideration and careful analysis that this requires. For example, it appearedto us from watchingthe proceedingsthat Dr. Wu's original motion for our polygons wasn't even readin fall, so that the board only got to hearpart of it beforerejecting it. This isn't a bunch of statistics we are dealingwith here - these are actual children whoselives will be hugely affectedby these decisions! How can such decisions be mshed to the point of not even taking the time to carefully consider all the available options, and without giving the parents enough time to fully absorb what's going on, let alone be a part of the process?

This is especially teue for polygons 132, 1132, and 2132. We were only told this past Thursday that our group ofpolygons was going to be moved, which gave us almost no time to protest or research our options. Every plan until Thursday did not have us moving from Clemens Crossing, and we were even told explicitly by board members that we wouldn'tbe moved. And then suddenlywe are told at the very last minute that actually we are goingto be switchedout ofClemens Crossing. How is this even remotely fair whendeciding on the future educations of hundreds of children?

We have seen several alternative plans put forward - the superintendent's very well-researched plan, Dr. Wu's original plan, and several alternative plans that families in our area cameup with on their own. But of course there wasno time to actually submit or considerthose plans, becauseof the last-minute nature ofthis whole process.

The lack of due consideration of available options, the haphazard nature of the entire process, and the extreme lack of time afforded to us are completely unacceptable, and we are planning to seek legal action as a group.

We are a contiguous geographic community that is naturally connected to the Clemens Crossing area but not to other areas. All of our roads connect only to the Clemens Crossing neighborhood and not to anywhere else - they arenot through streets, andthere aren't even walkingpaths to other neighborhoods. Most ofthese polygons are also within one mile from the school, and we are already actively pursuing the possibility of being considered within the walk area for the school.

For our own children, this changewill be very detrimental. They already come home from school exhausted and worn out. The bus ride, filled with other children who are also similarly frazzled, only adds to that. And now they're looking at an additional 20+ minute bus ride in each direction. They will come home even more worn out, andthen on top ofthat theywill have less time to wind down and do fheirhomework. Wehave also had somebullying problems on thebus, andthese are likely to only get worseif the children are all trapped together in the bus for an extra 40 minutes a daywithout good supervision. And that'sjust for our children. This change would have similar impacts for hundreds other children, both those from the Clemens Crossing area and those beingbused in the opposite direction.

It is critical that fhe board give this process the careful consideration it deserves, instead of deciding on thousands of children's futures in a haphazard and last minute process without giving the parents and coinmunities enough time to participate.

Sincerely, Aryeh and DeenaEnglander Yaakov Englander (grade 4) Yocheved Englander (grade 2) YehoshuaEnglander (kindergarten) Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Kim F Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:35 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting; Kirsten Coombs; Sabina Taj; Jennifer Mallo; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Superintendent; Chao Wu; Mavis Ellis Subject: [External] Error Made on Nov. 14

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. Howard County Board of Education,

I'm writing to bring attention a huge error that was made by the board andthat has had huge implications for the families in polygons 1132, 2132, and 132. The timeline below shows that (he board did not know which ofMallo's plan for CCES they voted on 11/14/19 - Mallo's original plan for CCES from 11/12 or her revised plan for CCES presented on 11/14.

Tuesday November 12: At the very end of an evening working session meeting, Mallo reads off a new elementary plan that would significantly alter CCES by moving out 11 out of the 16 polygons currently assigned and reassigning nearly 70% of the student population. These include moving 132, 1132, and 2132 from CCESto BWES,movmg the Clary's Forest neighborhood from CCES to SwES, moving the Hawthrone/Sunny Springs neighborhood from BWES to CCES.

WednesdayNovember 13: A work-sessionoccurs in afternoon in whichthere was some discussionregarding CCES boundaries but no motions or decisions weremade. That night, Ms. Mallo attends the CCES PTA meeting.

Thursday November 14 Work Session: Ms Mallo beganthe meeting on 11/14 with a revised proposal. She stated that after attending the CCES PTA meeting the prior night, that she had a new proposal that would not impact Clemens Crossing nearly as much. Ms. Taj then made a motion, seconded by Coombs, to start with the Mallo plan. The motion passes 4-3 (Coombs, Ellis, Mallis andTaj voted for it; Cutroneo, CDS, and Wu voting against). This first motion on 11/14becomes a key moment as it becomes unclear at the time ofthe vote whetherthis motion was referring to Mallo's plaii first presented on 11/12 or the revised Mallo plan that adjusted Clemen's boundaries. The motion and vote happened quickly without much discussion. As soon as the motion passed, Mallo explainedthat herplan was to revert Clemens back to its original boundaries with some adjustinents, and that Mallo would make individualmotions for tliose adjushnents. Accordingly, Ms. Mallo and the board went through a series of proposals from this starting point ofCCES current boundaries. This included moving polygons 64, 129, 1129, and 1064 from PRESto SwES(which passes 4-3 along the same vote), and splitting polygons 130 so that the Simpsons Mills townhousecommunity was to be moved from CCES to SwES(also passes 4-3 along the same vote). Next, Mallo motioned and Taj seconds a proposal to move polygons 132, 1132, and 2132 from CCES to BWES. This motion failed (Coombs, Cutronemo, CDS and Wu voting against), so at the end ofthe 11/14 session, these polygons were still assigned to CCES.

Theboard then moved on to other areasof the county. However, a few interestingmotions occurred later that night. Ofnote is that a motion later this eveningto move polygon 100 and 1100 from Waterloo ES to Veterans ES failed, but it is stated that because motion #1 that night was to start with the Mallo plan, that this motion was not needed sinceunder the Mallo plan, 100 and 1100were ah-eadymoved from Waterloo to Veterans. There were several othermoves that did not come up duringthis sessionthat werepresumed to have occurred (such as moving 2174, 135, and 53 from SwES to CCES; and moving 5133, 1133, 133, and 2204 from BWES to SwES [this one is particularlyinteresting because these polygons were to be moved from BWESto CCES under the 11/12 Mallo plan but no motion was ever maderegarding them, whichhad they been working from the 1 1/12 Mallo plan as later presumed, this motion shouldhave since the 11/12 Mallo plan hadthem at CCES.

November 18 Board Work Session: Towards the beginningof the 11/18 board meeting, Ms. Mallo explainedthat the failingmotion to move 132, 1132, and2132 from CCES to BWESwas made in error because the first motion of the 11/14 meeting was to use the Mallo plan first presented on 11/12 as the startingpoint, and accordingly such a motion to move 132, 1132, and 2132 was not necessary sinceunder the 11/12 Mallo plan, thesepolygons were already reassigned from CCES to BWES. But, that is not true. Motion #1 from 11/14 was to keep CCES as is and presumably otherwise adopt the 11/12 Mallo plan.

hope you are able to address this error in a timely manner.

The Fern Family Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Amy Overholt Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:35 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygons 98/1098

! CAUTION: This emafl originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe.

To the Howard County Board of Education:

After the conclusion of last night's work session, we strongly request you to look at polygon 1098/98, as it has not been reviewed nor discussed at any point thus far. Here is the distribution for our neighborhood, Brampton Hills:

Currently we attend Waterloo ES.

Under the new consolidated plan we will attend Phelps Luck.

Items of note that we feel have been overlooked include our NEWLYcreated small feed, our school's proximity, and capacities.

First, our neighborhood's move has created a small feed - only 9% or less of students from our neighborhood will complete PLES to move into Ellicott Mills. Meanwhile, 40% of Worthington's population will advance to Ellicott Mills.

Worthington ES - the closest school is, at 85% capacity, and forecasted to remain at this threshold for the future. Meanwhile PLES is at 100%, trending to increase. Finally, from a proximity standpoint, Elementary Schools ranked in order from shortest to longest distance from our neighborhood:

Worthington

Veterans

Rockburn

Waterloo

Moving 1098/98 to Worthington will help keep transportation costs in line, strengthen our feed and maintain our connection to our community, and assist in addressing capacity issues in the future.

Another option would be to relook at the movement to and from Phelps Luck ES. By including Polygons 100/1 100 in our move, you would be creating a stronger feed. The movement out of Phelps could be to Worthington ES where they are currently under capacity and have a low FARM rate. It would have a transportation cost to consider, but it would be creating equity for more students in Howard County.

Coming from Waterloo Elementary School, a school which will be completely changed by this proposal, had a strong feed to Elllcott Mills MS. The lack of consideration as to where our neighborhood stands after we are moved and a small feed is created is very concerning to the community as a whole.

We request that you slow down and please apply reason when looking at our polygons 98/1098 one last time.

While we have boiled attendance areas down to numbers, shapes, and color coded regions, they are actually comprised of our children. We request that you give us the time and review of our neighborhoods as each child's education and future is equally important.

Thanks for your time with regard to this matter. Sincerely,

Amy Koscielniak (Polygon 1098) Marilyn Grosskopf

From: okeeffecarolann@aol. com Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:34 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 148

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

! CAUTION: This emzU originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content Is safe. Dear Board of Education;

I am writing as a 31-year resident and the President of the Dorsey's Choice TownhouseAssociation, a communityof 130 homes in the Villageof Dorsey's Search. You, the decision makers, are acting in a manner that favors families of single family homes to the detriment of families in townhomes and wreaking socio-economic inequity in your purported pursuit of equity

Dorseys Choice and the original townhouse communities in Dorsey Search comprise some of the decreasing number of units of affordable housing in Columbia. Dorsey'schoice is an extremelydiverse communitywith a numberof families with young children whose families have chosen to live here because of the attractive and affordable "starter houses" located in a school district with excellent schools. Your redistricting plan will destroy that.

Your decision to divide the community and send the children to schools farther from their homes is outrageous and lacks due process. It has been done without appropriate consideration for the views of this community, coming as it has, after the close of the abilityto provide testimony in a public hearing. Your decisionwill negativelyaffect the education of the children here and property values of people with fewer resources than the owners of the detached housing units and should not be made.

Please reconsider.

Carol O'Keeffe President Dorsey's Choice Townhouse Association 4647 Hallowed Stream Ellicott City Michael and Emily Calderone on behalf of Ellie Calderone Polygon 191 3525 Rogers Ave Ellicott City, MD 21043

November 19, 2019

Howard County School Board 10910 Clarksville Pike Ellicott City, MD 21042

To the Howard County School Board: It is with great respect for your decision-making abilities that we submit this letter on behalfof our daughter, EllieCalderone, a third gradestudent atVeteran's Elementary Schoolin Ellicott City. The beginning of Ellie's elementary school experience wasvery difficult, given herextreme social anxiety. Thefirst years in elementaryschool were extremely bumpy, andfilled witha lot ofemotion in andout ofschool. It hasonly beenin the lastthree months, afterthree plusyears at Veteran's that she has begunto comeout of her shell and blossom. It hasbeen largely due to thefact that she has all ofher friends in the schooland hasdeveloped strong social networks. Thiswill all be disrupted ifpolygon 191 is redistricted to a different school, asit currently proposed. This will resultin such severe disruption to mydaughter's current social networks that she relies on to keep her emotions in control andto handle the dailystress of life asa developing child. Weask that with respectto individualstudent development andthe severedisruption of the current educational communities that arefirmly established at each school, to consider a different approach than the one that iscurrent proposed. This needsfurther study and a phased in approach to do what is best for all students, not just low-income students. Your decisions impact the arc of all students' lives. An educational interruption can havefar rangingimplications that will last long beyond yourtenure, to the detriment of all involved.

Sincerely,

Michael Calderone EmilV^alderone rn

From: Maddy Anthony Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:33 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] east side of rt 1

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. ^?^'?.^e., 10ticed the th.e p.°iy90ns ieft out on the East side of rt 1. You moved 38 but not the other 38's (2038 and W38)With this move youjust increasedHowards Capacity along with the moves you madeto keep 124 1124 1300and 300 and created small feeds and islands. All ofthe East (1300, 300, 1124, 124, 38, 2038 and 10~38together. Whether you send em to Howard Or Long Reach. Plug the numbers back in and send them to Long Reach nivina Howard the relief that's needed. Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Raj Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:33 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting; Mavis Ellis; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Vicky Cutroneo; Kirsten Coombs; Chao Wu; Christina Delmont-Small Subject: [External] Please stop Flip flopping on Polygon 1171

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. Hello Respected board members,

We, the residences at polygon 1171 arein shock at how the decision for redistricting wasmade for us. During last couple ofwork sessions, the board unanimously decidedto keep us at our current assigned schools only to revert it last minute in yesterday's work session. Insteadof changing our very far elementary school to somewhere near by, the board decided to make our Middle and High schools even farther for our poor kids!

We are now this island in middle ofall thesepolygons who will all be going to Marriottsridge high. Wehave a tiny feed of less than 10 high schoolers and we are still getting moved!!!

We won't have anyone around our connnunity going to Glenelg with our kids! Our kids will have to travel long distances to go to all of their schools and miss out on all the before and after school opportunities! Our kids have to sacrifice their sleep and well beingjust so they can travel to their far off schools!! !

Why? Whyare we beingmoved instead ofpolygons that arejust next to those schools?

We are completely perplexed with the board'sthough process and wantto urge the boardto please reconsider their decision and let us stay with our current high and middle school.

Thanks for your attention! Regards, -Sunaina Fotedar Dear Board of Education members,

We are writing to ask you to reconsider moving polygon 132 from Clemens Crossing Elementary to Bryant Woods Elementary for the following reasons:

. Undercurrent plans on the table, BryantWoods will still be over capacityafter redistrictingand the FARM rate will only have dropped by three percentage points to 47%. It seems that schools with the highest FARM rates should be the last ones to receive additional students because additional students reduce the resources available per student. . OurSebring neighborhood (which makes up the majority of polygon 132) has been districted to Clemens Crossing ever since Clemens Crossing was built in 1979. There is a long, historical relationshipbetween Sebring and ClemensCrossing. Why cause our children to lose the school community our neighborhood has been embedded in for 40 years, when doingso will not meet the main objectives of the redistricting process? . Our children lost friends when other polygons were redistricted out of Clemens Crossing two years ago. Now they will be separated from most of the rest ofthe friends that they have made during their time at Clemens Crossing.

Wewould also urgethe board not to rush decisionsthat affect so many people. If you are not prepared by the end ofthis weekto vote on a solid plan that is well-thought-out and meets your main objectives, please push back the deadline for redistricting.

Sincerely, Timothy and Jennifer McNeel Residents of Loventree Road in polygon 132 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Jie Fu Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:26 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 1171, much longer commute EVERYDAY

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear BOE members and redistricting officials, Please let our kids (Polygon 1171) go to MRHS and MVMS, this is VITALfor their physical and emotional health.

1. Our kids are going to be on the isolated island. All of the neighborhoods around us go to MRHS. 2. The EVERYDAY commute/distance will increase, doubled for middle school, 53% for high school. This will be damaging to our kids health. 3. Also, it will cost Howard County school district more money on transportation and it will put our kids in danger.

From the bottom of our hearts, as parents of students, we are asking you to reconsider Polygon 1171.

Jie & Gang Marilyn Grosskopf

From: archana chilpuri Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:20 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting; BoE Email Subject: [External] Polygon 1171 - Ms. Cutroneo / Dr. Wu / Ms. Mallo please read

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board members, Yesterday night (November 18th) session made me think if I was watching a school board meeting or a gambling show to watch out kids kicked from one school to another to see where our luck finally lands. Yes, I am talking about polygon 1171. You voted to move 1171 to MRHS; then brought in the move votd for from BMMStoMVMS; and then kicked us back to FQMS and GHS. My son is in a BMMS school basketball team and in know how many times we run back and forth from the school to pick and drop him. Now moving to this distant school which is FQMS, it is not possible to do the same anymore. It is not going to be the same anymore for our community kids to take advantage of after school activities anymore. Our kids are disappointing in the choices that are bring made not have a good reason to support.

Ms. Cutroneo-You mentioned you drove from polygon 1171 community to GHS and MRHSand pointed out that it is the same distance and time. That is absolutely not true. I am happy to drive with you and show you the time difference. Driving. A bus driving a route of 9 miles is not same as a route that is 5 miles on those narrow roads of Route 32 (whatever the bus route is determined as) and now you need a bus to come all teh way to this island. DOES NOT MAKE SENSE at all.

Dr. Wu / Ms. Mallo - You have been talking about keeping the communities together and make on islands. But your choice to move us to GHS has ruined us both ways. PLEASE RECONSIDER1171. Putting 171 (a FARMLAND) next to 1171 will still make us an island.

WE respect your commitment to help the community but this is WRONG, COMPLETELY WRONG. Please think about this one more time - what are you gaining from moving less than 10 HS students from MRHS to GHS. The development you are talking about is spread across 10 years and by then new schools will come, things will anyway change. There are many new communities raising closer to GHS. Please focus on those when they are built and you have better predictions but not now.

We had a hope and we still have a hope because we put our trust in YOU and we want to believe that we have a made a right choice by electing you as our board members. We request you to leave polygon 1171 at TRES > MVMS or BMMS > MRHS

Thank you, Archana Pasham (resident of Polygon 171 still in the hope that we will be heard) Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Eileen Brewer Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:24 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 141

! CAITTION: This emaU originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I know the plan is done and the preliminary vote is complete, but I had to write one more time. If we are moved to Clarksville, I haveno ideawhat I will do aboutpreschool formy son. Currently hegoes to preschool at LongfellowNursery School. It is literally rightnext to LongfellowElementary whereiny daughter attends. This means thatI canpick them up at the sametime in theafternoon. Otherwisemy daughterwill get offthe bus to anempty house. Sheis not readyto bealone in a house. I'm not readyto give her a phone, she's fartoo young, andwe do not have a housephone. It'sunsafe to leave a person alonewithout a phonethough. I havebeen unable to locatepreschool for 4 yearolds in Clarksville thatis 5 daysa weekand only costs $270 a month. I can't afford more.

In addition to that very real andpractical challenge, I don't want my daughter or my son in the future to attend a less diverse school. I love that they arepart ofsuch an amazing community at Longfellow and I know that they will miss that in Clarksville.

Furthennore, we've timed her bus ride, and my daughter, who gets car sick onbuses easily, will be on the bus for 10-15 minutes longer, meaning herbus ride will benearly anhour. I hope the bus driver enjoys cleaning up vomit. We'll sendher with extra clothes I guess.

Lastly, this move means that our kids will be taken out oftheir community and then put back in it with less relationships for middle andhigh school. It doesn't make sense. Wetry to keep feedstogether, right? I guess you mean for everyone who is rich, but not us.

I'dreally like it if youheld offon the process all together and gavemore people adequate time to respond. I'd like it if you came up with a plan that actually addressed the challenges we are facing and the criteria ofPolicy 6010 I actuallyheard someone sayduring the meeting theother night that they didn't want to delaybecause theyhave plans next week. Weelected youto do a job andnobody thinks you aredoing it well. I haven't encountered a singlehappy person withthe plan andit doesn't appearto anyonethat desegregation, population confa-ol. or diversitywere among your priorities. Pleaseslow down, taketime, andsort this outproperly. If you can't do that because ofyour plans next week, at least consider my polygon andhow much we do not want to leave our community for practical and ideological reasons. If you don'treconsider, pleasesend me information on affordablepreschool.

Thanks,

Eileen Brewer

11106 Cricket Hollow Court Columbia, MD 21044 443-538-8334 aleenbunny@gmail. com rn Grosskool

From: Matt English Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:23 AM To: Kjrsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Chao Wu; SabinaTaj; Mavis Ellis;Superintendent; Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 2051, 51, 1051, 279, 52 Hopewell

CAUTION: This eIn"Uoriginated from outside ofHCPSS. Donot cUcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Pleasereconsider the assignment ofpolygons 51, 1051, 2051, 279, 52 (Hopewell). V^^ ^e ,ei.ngP^. ^TSE.S butwere h°Peful thatour small feedwould be eliminated atLEMS. Bymaking a 100%feed from TSESto OMMSto OMHSyou could relive both small feeds andFARMs rates in the OM system. You have proposed moving Hopewell from our longtime assignment at OMHS to AHS. I listened to your concern withbuses having to beon Rt 108 at other schools in your discussions onMonday, so shouldn't therebe more concern withbuses onthe actual highways ofRt. 32 andRt. 29 to get to Atholton from the eastern edgeof Columbia? The assignment ofHopewell to AHS raises FARMs percent at OMHS, creates a tiny total feed from TSES-LEMS-AHS, doubles the distance to HS, puts kids in buses on highways, buses travel will travel throu^i oneof two other neighborhoods assigned to closerschools to getto AHS, putparents in msh hour downtown Columbia traffic to attend evening school events, and removes an established and involved neighborhoodfrom the OM cluster. OMis hOMe and Hopewell wantsto continueto helpstrengthen this diverse andamazing community. Letus do ourpart. Addpolys 51, 1051, 2051, 279, 52 to the current TSES feed to OMMS and OMHS to create a stable diverse 100%-feed at all levels. It checks most ofthe boxes in policy 6010 and it is the right thing to do for our community. Most ofall AHS is not a close and we fear that becausewe are within the redistricting footprint ofHS 13 you will sendus somewhere elsein a fewyears. Respectfully yours, -Matt English Polygon2051 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Hinish, Sheri Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:22 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting; chao. wu@hcpss. org Subject: [External] Motion needed - Polygon 189 back to Clarksville Middle Attachments: FARM Numbers.jpg; CMS PTA Letter.jpg

CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

Weare thankful to BOEmembers for unanimously passinga motion to move Polygon 189back to PRES.

BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189from PRES and CMS to DOASand LKSwas due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRESand CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are tess than 20 students proposed to go into Lime Kiln Middle.

Request: Pleaseconsider keeping Polygon 189kids at the same schools asthey are attending forthe school year201 9- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, aswe are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existingelementary Dopulationis also dispersed evenly K-5 andwill not cause disruption to CMScapacity.

2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavilyinvolved withCMS community and should remainwith CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles awayfrom Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles awayfrom Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement suoDorfina our request is attached for reference and consideration.

5. By keeping Polvaon 189 at CMS. there are no impactsto FAMRnumbers, as we can see from the attached BOE FARM numbers /attached). Sheri Hinish, MAc, MsSCM, PMP, LSSGB SupplyChainQueen®! Executive Advisor and Change Leader] IBM Futurist 410-456-3126 | [email protected] SupplyChainQueen^com I Skvoe: sheri. hinish FARM FARM FARM Middle School Capacity Aug 22 Nov 19 Change Bonnle Branch MS 701 17% I;-I: BurleighManor MS 77S u% 0.27 ClarksvilleMS 643 12% Dunloggllt MS 565 16% Elkndgelanding MS 779 Bltcotl Mills MS 701 w% Folly Quarter MS <5% Glenwood MS 545 HammondMS 604 26% "5. 79, Harpers Choice MS sos lal<« Elkhofil MS 643 38% . 11' Ume Ktln MS 721 Mayflefd Woods MS 798 41% Mount View MS 798 <5% Murray Hi!t MS 662 33% Oakland Mills MS 506 44SS

PaUpsco MS 1B?6 MS Patuxent Valley 33% ! < , '.

Thomas Vladuct MS 701 38% .. c: Wide Lake Ms 721 3S°t :?.5-: POSITION S.TATEMEKT

CKtcb*r)0(. ?Ot9

CiarksvlUe Middle School Parent Teacher Association Position Statement Attendanca Aw Adjustment PUm (dated AuB»st M, 20l»ii

According to (he ttaagBnaJETA, the mfBlon of our PTSA h to nwtWt M

1. We agree with the goal of .dd»»Kle to waVito Ctortwrtlte Wddte School, lt>a sdka^ that it cww 5 mtta awaywws p«rtteulart» umfwnable. 3. Forctng stu^nts usstTMttfer schools,te dcWnentat to tiKir mental healttf fr safety net md (ntnxhictni unneusmy dunge and Stnas. Itemovlng a studattt' netwrit of «wort-triends, efcar pwe^, ^chera, ~counsetore, md admtntetratean-teaves than wAnenAte Airina » crfitealthnetattetrdewtopment. Hiwanl County hu recently tnCTMsed attentton and rwourctt on mental heBlth. ForctngcMldrm to mow te » sdiool art of tfwlr nel^Aortwcd wtUdeflnitely addWvss and may (ncrease sadoe», hopete >ess. andaitcklri idcayon.

4. Genwat commente d) process of retiiilrtctfng; iwWe commmlty, espesi illyfamftte, affectedt f redtetricttns ip a t "^ trted. nwe though Fut process of dedston- naWns.

parente~ ntto W (fmitved

From: Margaret McGillivray Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:20 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Redistricting

! CAUTION:This email originatedfrom outside of HCPSS.Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board Members,

I wantto take the time to thank you for your service to the Board ot Education. It's often a thankless task and I can appreciate the work that goes into being an active member ofthe board.

However, I wanted to let you know how disappointed I am in how the redistricting process is taking place. I'm not upset the kids are being moved and I appreciate how the board is at least trying to make an attempt to balance FARMs rates and capacities. However, as it stands, the process has be delegitimizedby the slapdash, last-minute nature of the plans currently being voted on and amended. The board spent good money on feasibility studies and discarded those ideas outright. The superintendent spent an enomious amount of time thinkmg through various scenarios in order to come up with his proposal which was voted down by the board. Even Dr. RichardKohn, OM parent andprofessor at UMD, developed computer models using actual datathat dealt more fairly with those numbers and people and our differing situations than is currently happening at the work sessions. Instead, the board is using a plan developed on someone's kitchen table that is failing the parents, students and staffof the school m the easternpart of the county, whilebowing to the well-fimded organizations in the western part.

This is not money or time well-spent.

This particular pertains to the crisis in the schools ofthe OaklandMills cluster. I, with children at both Thunder Hill and Oakland Mills Middle, have an admitted bias here. But as an expat Canadian who has lived and experienced educational systems all over the US and the world, the board needs to know that there are more ways forward than they are currently imagining. And shuffling kids around the cluster without making meaningful changes to facilities, staffing and resources will be a stain on their legacy. If you accept FARMs rates asmeasures ofpoverty andthat the No. 1 indicatorof standardizedtest scores is socioeconomic, than any FARMs rate of over 25% at any school when others are less than 5% is an embarrassment.

I urge the boardto rethink the OaklandMills cluster at minimum andto press pause on the process whilethey take a consideredlook at RichardKohn's balanced plan.

Thank you for your time and consideration,

Dr. Margaret McGillivray, DMA, M.M., B. Mus, ARCT ThunderHill Neighbourhood,polygon 35 520-266-9249 www.marearetmceillivrav. com Marilyn Grosskopf

From: long. c. chen@gmail. com Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:18 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting; BoE Email Cc: Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Chao Wu; Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs: Sabina Taj; Vicky Cutroneo; BoE Email; Kathleen V. Hanks Subject: [External] ERRORS FROM REDISTRICTING WORK SESSIONS 11/14/19 & 11/18/19

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click Unks or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. Dear HCPSS BOE,

I am writingto notifyyou that a significanterror wasmade duringthe redistricting work sessionon November 14that resulted in moving polygons 1132-132-2132 from Clemens Crossing Elementary School (CCES) to Bryant Woods Elementary School (BWES). The timeline below shows that the board did not know which of Mallo's plan for CCESthey voted on 11/14/19 - Mallo's original plan for CCESfrom 11/12 or her revised plan for CCES presented on 11/14. It also shows that the details of Ms. Mallo's revised plan for CCES dated 11/14 was not revealed to the board until after the motion to use Ms. Malta's plan for CCES was passed. Again however, the motion was not specific as to whether the board voted on the Ms. Mallo's plan for CCESdated 11/14 (the detail of which was never fully provided to the board before the motion) or Ms. Mallo's original plan for CCES dated 11/12.

I hope you are able to address this error in a timely manner. Thanks!

TIMELINE:

Tuesday November 12: Atthe very end of an evening working session meeting, Mallo reads off a new elementaryplan that would significantly alter CCESby moving out 11 out ofthe 16polygons currently assigned and reassigning nearly 70% of the stodent population. These include moving 132, 1132, and 2132 from CCESto BWES,moving the Clary's Forestneighborhood from CCESto SwES,moving the Hawthrone/Sunny Springs neighborhood from BWES to CCES.

WednesdayNovember 13: A work-sessionoccurs in afternoon in whichthere was some discussionregarding CCES boundariesbut no motions or decisionswere made. That night, Ms. Mallo attends the CCES PTA meeting.

Thursday November 14 Work Session: Ms Mallo began the meeting on 11/14 with a revised proposal. She stated that after attending the CCES PTA meeting the prior night, that shehad a new proposal that would not impact Clemens Crossing nearly as much. Ms. Taj then made a motion, seconded by Coombs, to start with the Mallo plan. The motion passes 4-3 (Coombs, Ellis, Mallis and Taj voted for it; Cufa-oneo, CDS, andWu voting against). This first motion on 11/14 becomes a key moment as it becomes unclear at the time of the vote whetherthis motion wasreferring to Mallo's plan firstpresented on 11/12or therevised Mallo planthat adjusted Clemen's boundaries. The motion andvote happenedquickly without much discussion. As soon as the motion passed, Mallo explainedthat her plan was to revert Clemens backto its original boundarieswith some adjustments, and that Mallo would make individual motions for those adjustments. Accordingly, Ms. Mallo and the board went through a series ofproposals from this starting point of CCES current boundaries. This included moving polygons 64, 129, 1 129, and 1064 from PRES to SwES (which passes 4-3 along the same vote), and splitting polygons 130 so that the Simpsons Mills townhouse community wasto be moved from CCES to SwES (also passes4-3 alongthe samevote). Next, Mallo motioned andTaj seconds a proposal to move polygons 132, 1132, and 2132 from CCES to BWES. This motion failed (Coombs, Cutronemo, CDS and Wu voting against), so at the end of the 11/14 session, these polygons were still assigned to CCES.

The board then moved on to other areas of the county. However, a few interesting motions occurred later that night. Ofnote is that a motion later this evening to move polygon 100 and 1100 from Waterloo ES to Veterans ES failed, but it is stated that because motion #1 that night was to start with the Mallo plan, that this motion was not needed since under the Mallo plan, 100 and 1100 were ah-eadymoved from Waterloo to Veterans. There were several other moves that did not come up during this session that were presumed to have occurred (such as moving 2174, 135, and 53 from SwESto CCES; andmoving 5133, 1133, 133, and2204 from BWESto SwES [this one is particularly interestingbecause these polygons were to be moved from BWESto CCESunder the 11/12 Mallo plan but no motion was ever made regarding them, which had they been working from the 11/12 Mallo plan as later presumed, this motion should have smce the 11/12 Mallo plan had them at CCES.

November 18 Board Work Session: Towards the beginningofthe 11/18 boardmeeting, Ms. Mallo explained that the failing motion to move 132, 1132, and 2132 from CCES to BWES was made in error because the first motion of the 11/14 meeting was to use the Mallo plan first presented on 1 1/12 as the starting point, and accordingly such a motion to move 132, 1132, and 2132 was not necessary since under the 11/12 Mallo plan, these polygons were alreadyreassigned from CCES to BWES. But, that is not true. Motion #1 from 11/14was to keep CCES as is and presumably otherwise adopt the 11/12 Mallo plan.

Shortly thereafter, Ms. Coombs made a new motion to move 132, 1132, and 2132 back from BWES to CCES. This motion failed 4-3 (Wu, Ellis, Taj, and Mallo voting no). After the dinner break at -7:45 PM, Wu motioned, and CDS seconded, a vote to move 132 back from BWES to CCES. Voting started on this motion and Cutraneo abstained, while Mallo and Combs both voted in favor of the move, and thus, it was on track to pass given that Wu and CDS had made the motion and would have voted for it. However, before the voting could finish, Ellis then asked for clarification on whether the motion was to move all 3 polygons or just 132. After some discussion, it was agreedthat the motion was to move all three polygons132, 1132, and 2132, the motion was revised, and againthis motion failed.

The meeting ends at 11 PM with the board voting 5-2 in a straw poll to move for approval ofthe elementary school plan as it currently stands. This would includemoving 132, 1132, and2132 from CCES to BWES.

-Long Chen 10210DottysWay Columbia MD 21044 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: kristen piggott Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:12 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Small Feeds - One more Plea

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. Dear BOE members,

As you know polygons 159 and 1159 will be a 5% feed from BurleighManor to Mt HebronHigh School. Last night you discussed40 students per year for the feed. That number is incorrect. The total student per year is less than 20. Twenty students per year entering a high school with a population of 1, 500 is a very small number.

According to the HCPSS projections spreadsheet for 2020-2021, polygons 159/1159 have 120 elementary, 46 middle and 69 high school students. Dividingthose total numbers by grade levels hat gives 20, 15 and 1 7 per grade for each ofthe levels. The ofGcialprojected feed calculation is 5.2%. The final BOEPlan tables have Mt Hebron at a capacity of 1400 with a utilization of 113%... that should a total student body of 1, 582. 5. 2% of 1582 is 82 students. Divide by 4 and that's 20.

The feed report that was produced last night showsthat prior to redistrictingthere were two middle to high school feeds under 10%. One was <5% and one was 9%. There are now three 5% feeds and one 9% feed.

You havemade it clear that no more time will be spent to develop a good solution for the SJLES,Waverly, and Manor Woods area schools. I would ask you to look at the possibility of leaving our students at SJLES and Pataspco, or at least Pataspco. The two polygon feed to Patapsco would be better than the two polygon feed to Mt Hebron.

SJLESis projected to be 119%. You have left Talbot Springs, a Title 1 school, at 119%.

Finally, I do not have children in middle school, but I would encourageyou to at least exempt rising 8th graders entering all very small feeds. The rising 8th graders in our polygons would move to Burleigh Manor for one year just to be returned to their cohort at Mt Hebron the next year. If there is not funding to provide transportation please consider allowingthose parents to provide transportation. I understandthat some parents will not be able to provide transportation while others will. I acknowledgethat is not fair, but havingto be a part of a 5% feed isn't "fair" either. This is an imperfect system is there is no way to make it fair to everyone.

Thank you for your consideration, KristenPiggottll59 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Jason Jones Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:11 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Lake Elkhorn Middle School Capacity

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, I am the PTSA president of the Lake Elkhom Middle School and a resident of the Hopewell Neighborhood. I am writing to you today to ask that you please refrain from increasing the population of Lake Elkhom Middle School in future redistricting.

Although it might seem on paper that the school is under capacity, the unsafely crowded hallways between class periods would mdicate otherwise. The architecture of the building forces students into narrow hallways with poor trafGc circulation. This leads to frequent collisions of students as they try to get fonn class to class without being tardy.

Please consider reducing the population of students in Lake Elkhom. Not increasing it.

Thank you, Jason Jones Lake Elkhom PTSA President Marilyn Grosskoi

From: YuZhang Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:10 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Support to exempt rising 5th and 8th graders

CAUTION:This emau ""ginated from outside of HCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear BOE members

Thankyou for bnnging up the concern for rising 5th and 8th graders. You are making huge efforts to makeit better. It will betheir last yearfor rising 5thand 8th graders. Pleasedo not separate them from their fiTends and theirschools that havebem intheir daily life for years. Takingbus from the closest bus stop or self- transportation canbe the choiceprovided to reducethe costif cost is anissue. But at least, kids benefit from it. whichis ourultunate goal. ---- -~- -, I humblyrequest HC BOE members to agree to exempt rising 5th and 8th graders. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely, Yu Zhang Polygon 189 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: MYTHRAI ANAGANI Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:05 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 189 @ Clarksville Middle School Attachments: FARM Numbers. jpg; CMS PTA Letter. jpg

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thankful to BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

However BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are tess than 20 students to Lime Kiln Middle.

Request: Pleaseconsider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attendingfor the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary ooou/aft'on fe a/so dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS capacity.

2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trio commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarkwille Middle School PTA position statement supporting our request is attached for reference and consideration.

Regards, Mythrai Sangem Polygon 189 FARM FARft/1 FARM Middle School Capacity Aug 22 Nov 19 Change

Bonnte Branch MS 701 3.4: Burlelgh Manor MS 779 u% 0.27

ClarksvilleftflS 643 . 1.46 < Dunloggin MS S8S r. ^ Elkridgs LandingMS 779 26s; ElltCOtTMills MS 701 10% Folly Quarter MS 662 <5% Glenwood MS 545 S'st 0.68 Hammond MS 26% . ;. 79^ Harpers Choice MS '^ - Uke Efthwn MS 64i UmeKilnMS 72.1 Mayfleld Woods MS 798 41% Mount View MS 7SS Murray Hllt MS 662 33B Oakland Mdls MS S06 4456 Patapsco MS 643 PatuXCTt Valley MS 760 3i%

Thomas Viaduct MS 701 3S% '. (, ;.

Wilde Lake MS 721 38% . ?.5. Marilyn Grosskopf

From: MYTHRAI ANAGANI Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:05 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 189 © Clarksville Middle School Attachments: FARM Numbers.jpg; CMS PTA Letter.jpg

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside of HCPSS.Do not cUck liiiks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

We are thankful to BOE members for unanimously passing a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES.

However BOE's original decision to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS was due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, we are tess than 20 students to Lime Klln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are tess than 20 kids going to Clarksville middle school. Our existing elementary oopulation is also dispersed evenly K- 5 and will not cause disruption to CMS caBacity_^

2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1. 3 miles away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6.8 miles away from Polygon 189, This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTA oosition statement supDOrtina our request is attached for reference and consideration.

Regards, Mythrai Sangem Polygon 189 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Sandi Jean Berger Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:02 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Redistricting please stop

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. AU,

I have been reading and watching the redistricting process this yesa- and have been shocked at what has transpired across the county. While I don't envy the position you are in, I question whether you all should be making these decisions. There doesn't seem to be clarity in information, what you are trying to achieve and the methodology to complete this task.

I urge you to halt the process, regroup and get clear on the outcome you are sta-iving for and proceed with accurate information.

Thanks.

Sandi Berger Howard County Resident since 2009 4436830709 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Cara Stockham Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 10:59 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] POLYGON 2053

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board Members,

I am writing to you concerningpolygon 2053. We are a very small polygon consistingof three cul-de-sacs off WatchChain Way in the Clarys Forest neighborhoodof Columbia. Along WatchChain Way, directly to the north ofus, is polygon 53. Still along Watch Chain Way, but directly to the south, is polygon 1066. Although we all live offWatch Chain Way, currently 2053 and 53 go to Swansfield while 1066 and 66 further south go to Clemens Crossing.

Ifpolygon 53 moves to Clemens Crossing without us, we will become an island in the middle of Watch Chain Way since 1066 and 66 ah-eady attend Clemens Crossing and are no longer slated to move to Swansfield. We will not be connectedto any other Swansfieldpolygons as we are separated from polygon 1135by woods. The only way to drive in and out ofour polygon is via Watch Chain Way, through polygons currently proposed to go to Clemens Crossing.

I am concerned that our polygon is being overlooked in this process. Our current bus route, 682, goes through polygons 53 and 2053. Our 3 bus stops with a total of4 children are the only ones in our bus route being left out of this move.

This move as it currently stands will further divide our neighborhood and complicate the bus routes. Pleasejoin us with polygon 53 and either move us to Clemens Crossing as well or keep all of us together at Swansfield.

Thank you,

Cara Stockham Polygon 2053 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Ross Laidig Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 10:58 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: Chao Wu; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Superintendent; Sabina Taj; Kirsten Coombs; Mavis Ellis Subject: [External] Time = Life for Polygon 132

! CAUTION: This emafl originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck Unks or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe.

Hello,

Please do not take time from our children's lives.

All our kids need is to eat, sleq>, learn and play. The bus from Polygon 132 takes the kids between 4 and 5 minutes to reach Clemens Crossing Elementary School about . 5 miles away. We can currently walk to Clemens Crossing in ten minutes, or drive in two minutes.

By sendingus across town and across at least six major roadways and obstacles, it took me ahnost 15 minutes to drive to BryantWoods at 8:45amthis weekend, andthat waswithout weekdaytraffic or anystops to pickup children. So it would be reasonable to assume that sending us to Bryant Woods would take at least 20-25 minutes for a bus each way, i.e., 15-20 minutes more each wav (30-40 more minutes total!).

The one thing we cannot replace is time. And losing time takes away from our children eating a good meal, getting enough sleep, having time to study and developing their socialization skills with friends and family.

Please do not steal time from our children.

Thankyou for your consideration.

Ross Laidig Marilyn Grosskopf

From: CHANDRA ANAGANI Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 10:57 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 189 Kids @ Clarksville Middle School Attachments: CMS PTA Letter. jpg; FARM Numbers. jpg

! CAUTION:This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

On November 18th, the BoE unanimously passed a motion to move Polygon 189 back to PRES due to bad and inaccurate data provided by Dr. Wu on November 13, where he proposed to move Polygon 189 from PRES and CMS to DOAS and LKS.

Unfortunately, the BoE neglected to address the correction of moving Polygon 189 back from Lime kiln to Clarksville Middle.

As it stands, a small feed has been created of tess than 20 students to Lime Kiln Middle.

Request: Please consider keeping Polygon 189 kids at the same schools as they are attending for the school year 2019- 20 and propose a motion to fix the oversight.

1. No adverse impact to CMS - Keeping Polygon 189 at the Clarksville Middle School will have no negative or adverse impact on any of the FARM or Capacity numbers, as we are less than 20 kids going to Clarkswille middle school. Our existing elementary cooulation is_also_disBersed_even!v K^5 and wi!Lnot&ause_disrui:itioRlo CMScapacjty.

2. Keeping Communities together - Polygon 189 is heavily involved with CMS community and should remain with CMS community.

3. Continuity for Children and avoiding increased transportation costs and lead times - Clarksville Middle School is less than 1.3 miles away from Polygon 189, whereas the proposed Lime Kiln middle school is 6. 8 miles away from Polygon 189. This creates a 1 hour 10 minute round trip commute daily for our children. Moreover, based on the proposed move to LKMS, our Polygon 189 kids will go pass Clarksville Middle School to go to the Lime Kiln Middle School.

4. Clarksville Middle School PTA position statement suDportina our request is attached for reference and consideration^

Regards, Chandra Anagani Polygon 189 TOSniON STAIItMtNT

tta[o(»rXX. ?019

Ctarisvitle Middle School Parent Teacher Assodatton P(»

Accordjng to tiw MaryUgngiTA the mhtton at our PTSAh to «mwt andspcrt. on behalf of chtldrw'tn ouTtchool. in the conwmmlty. and be(on> aowmmett bodtes and other orwnfaattom that mBte dectetom affectlnB chtKtnm.

The Clartwrflte PTA itoUte the foltowlng potttlons:

1. We agree wth the aoaloTatWrwrinBitaunoiftnequi ltytnHonwdCauitty, It» m»t ctear. fwmwr, that entfence supports movingttudents out o» their commimtttes to addres thts goal. Soctoecmonite dlspart^f ftwM bft addresied by devoting edueatlonsfmouFa* (te«her htrtng, after idwot menaoring, other proarams} bwed on need rather than by dtsnipttnB students' Ifws. 2. Any fidittricting Aould affect the VWWK number of famttfes f Wtsa*y, ftmfv VS7stwfents from . sdwot that b not owrerowded tenot jusUfted. In additton, bustmi these ftudaitt, who are itote to walk to Oarttwite Wddte School, tea aditwl tlat Is owr 5 miles away nwnw parUeularty

3. Forrii^i students to trastrfer schrote tsdetrtmemnl to ttetr mattet_hMlth bynsmwfin tlwawtt' teachere, counselors, wri .dmlntaratora-toaws thwnvutnerabte durtna » cr^^tftwinttefr'dewtopment Howart Coimty to recwtly ina-wsed attention and reiource* on mental health. ForcingcMcbw to mcwe to a sdiod out of thetrmsWibwtwodwlUdeftrrttiely add stress air "may . %. BKt aitekisl tdeayon.

4. GeneotconNnenlSi proaas of rsdfetrttttng: a. kwtwthecor wmlKy, ' - Uyfamntes. affee ^ ;li»fc i tnatets-hwfe , more t iAprocasofdecteton-fneWi^. F" ~ invot wwbow wrfrdrwn-Wr " .. but the current pre^xxalls nntfrom (ffopnalswWdihsw been(rffend for landcom )utowrthepB ttowy«iR. ste ihoiAi be ate n a mWmimn of twe i (Siwticepstor m(d rmnfutatt so ttet OBR. an?naft*Ate

Bonnie Branch MS 701 ZTSi. <3. 41 Burlelgh Manor MS 779 u% 0.27 Clarksvllle MS 643 u% S6S Elkridge landing MS 779 26W l, fti Ellicon Mills MS 701 w% '". s? Folly Quarter M5 662 <3% SIenwood MS 545

Hammond MS 6(W 26% . ^rs.

Harpers Choice MS S06 3K< . ;. E5-' uke Etkhorn MS 643 i. », Uma Ktln MS 721 Mayfield Woods MS 798 4IW .. ? 7~. Mount View MS 798 <5% Murray Hill MS 662 33?i Oaiiland Mills MS 506 44% Pttapsco MS 64i Patuxent Valley MS 760 33% Id. -;'

Thomas VTadurt MS 701 ,..Ei. Wilde Lafee MS 721 3S% . :..v, Marilvn Grosskoof

From: Dara Glenn Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 10:56 AM To: hlcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] capacity over 120% concerns

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. Dear Members of the Board of Education,

Thankyou for your many hours ofattention to the movement ofthe children in Howard County. 1 am writing with a concern that Hammond Middle School's capacity is now cited as reaching 137%- this is as high as Howard High presently [a problem everyone in the county agrees needs fixing.]

This seems counter-intuitive to the process. Do these numbers NOT include the moved from HMS to PVMS? That may account for the high numbers. If so, the community would appreciate seeing an adjustment in Board Docs. Ifthey are already accounted for, I believe that something else needs to be done before finalizing this plan. HMS shares a building with HES, is an older building, has a non- traditional layout making hallways more crowded, and cannothandle being that high over capacity. Additionally is the only other school that reaches over 120% capacity (at 124% by the 3rd year of your plan.) Thank you for your added attention to these matters as well as others brought to your attention by the community.

With appreciation, Dara Glenn - polygon 1007

Dara Glenn

Howard County Regional Director - Let Me Run httDS://howardcountv. letmerun. ore/ 443-896-3241

"Too many people undervalue what they are, and overvalue what they're not." Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Rebecca Detig Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 10:55 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] TSES - LEMS - AHS

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello,

Please reconsider the districting plan for Hopewell. We are a small feed and the only feed that goes from TSES to LEMS to AHS. Please consider leaving us districted to Oakland Mills.

Thank you,

John & Rebecca Detig Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Sean Fern Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 10:54 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting; Kirsten Coombs; Sabina Taj; Jennifer Mallo; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Superintendent; Chao Wu; Mavis Ellis Subject: [External] Fwd:

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Howard County Board of Education,

I am writingto express my disappointmentwith the haphazardway that polygons 1132, 2132, and 132 (and others) have been mismanaged throughout the recent redistricting process. At last Thursday's meeting, there was a verbal agreement amongstthe board to maintainthe Clemens Crossing community in its original state (keqiing polygons 1132, 2132, 132 at CCES). This was aligned with the original study endorsed by the superintendent (and backed by research/data). At the meeting, Ms. Mallo adjusted her revisions in order to keep 1132, 2132, and 132 at CCESbased on her attendanceat a recent PTA meeting and the failure to provide our polygons time to form/convey our opinion and desires on the matter. Furfhennore, the board voted on the againstthe move ofthe threepolygons (keeping them at CCES) that evening.

However, during last nights (Mon 11/18)meeting, Ms. Mallo claimed that the motion/vote on Thursdaywas in "error" (without adequateexplanation) and that we were againsubject to be displacedfrom CCES. This was obviously a surprise to the other board members as evident by their reactions. In fact, the board members had trouble figuring out where our polygons were originally districted and where the proposed moves would place us. Subsequentmotions to move our polygons backto CCES were dismisseddue to overcapacity, whichwas counteredwith a proposed solution that would move polygons 34, 2134, and 1134 to Swansfielddue to their close proximity. Students from those polygons are walkers to Swansfield, the move would even out capacity and didn't have a significant impact to farm rates (and was part of the superintendents original/researched back plan). As a result of 1132, 2132, and 1 32 moving from CCES, Bryant Woods will be a title 1 school at 112% capacity. This is in direct conflict with the premies of capacity utilization claimed by the county.

As far as I cantell, this entire process hasbeen political driven (I b-uly don't wantto believe this is the case) and over $400,000 in taxpayermoney has been wastedon researchthat was discounted by boardmembers more concerned about electability and their political/personal agendas. Ourpolygons (1132, 2132, and 132) were not provided an opportunity to voice our concerns, we are walking distance from CCES (in fhe process of submitting for walker status as well) and fully embeddedinto the community. All logic appearsto havebeen thrown out the windowwhile the county continues to seeminglypush their political agendasinstead of actually addressing the real sources of inequality and providing better resources for all Howard County school and educators. By moving children around, are we admitting that certain schools and their educators are unskilled and/orincapable of teaching young childrenof all backgrounds? I don't believe that to be the case, but if it is/was, wouldn't dedicatingtime/resources to improving schools andpresenting more opportunities to communities have a greater effect thanjust shufflingpeople around and spendingmoney on transportation (vs. education) resources.

Playing a shell gamewith children, families, and communities to pad numbers and statistics is unacceptableand won't solve the problem in the long nm. My concern is that it will have the opposite effect as parents either struggle to become involved in their children's education due to proximity (and limited resources), or choose to limit their involvement with community members that they will have sparse interaction with due to proximity from school/home.

Sincerely, Scan Fern Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Boyd&becky Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 10:51 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Livingston- An Appeal/Opinion on School Redistricting and Polygon 78

! CAU1ION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. School board, Accordingto the Baltimore Sun-the following was reported onthe current redistricting plan in Howard County: "The school board's plan looks to move several thousand fewer students than Martirano's, asit puts 51 schools into the system's target of90% to 110% utilization ofcapacity. Currently, 42 schools are within the capacityparameters. As of now, the plan would place the system's 74 comprehensive schools between 82% and 129% capacity, with eight schools under capacity and 15 over."

I wouldfirst askhow anyone could consider 15 schools over capacityas an acceptable goal. All students at a school suffer when overcapacity is present. And second, whileyou maybe making these shifts under the banner of diversity, have you verified that your plan does that? How do you define diversity? By skin color? Parent's financial income? Proximity to the school? Student tests scores? Would you plan look different if you were to try andraise the averagetests scoresAND minimize the distancea studentis requiredto ti-avel? Whatever your plan, it should be fair and follow a defined criteria so your decisions are transparent andunderstandable. If you are trying to correct a few issues, then address them. But if your goal is to promote diversity, then certainly more than 50004- students should be impacted based on suggested criteria above.

I have a residence in polygon 78 andam greatly concerned about the current plan. Deep Run Elementary is within walking distance and so busing our children to Jeffers Hill does NOT appear to follow the HCPSS policy of NOTbusing walkers. Also, the ride to Jeffers Hill is much further and so from a costing perspective must cost more. As for the middle and high schools, I feel strongly that HCPSS should minimize the distance a child must travel to school. Currently we are zoned to Mayfield Woods and Long Reach. So if there is another closer school for zone polygon 78 that is fine. With respect to DRES, it is the closest school for our zone. Thank you for listening.

Rebecca Livingston 8308 Stairtop Ct Columbia MD 21045

Sent from my iPhone Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Jennifer Rapacki Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 10:51 AM To: Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu; BoE Email; Vicky Cutroneo; Kirsten Coombs; Mavis Ellis Cc: Michael Rapacki; Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] One last plea to considerPolygons 98/1098 - one last time beforeThursday

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Members of the board:

After the conclusion of last nights work session, we strongly (desperately) request you to look at polygon 1098/98, as it has not been reviewed nor discussed at any point thus far. Here is the distribution for our neighborhood, Brampton Hills: . Currently we attend Waterloo ES. . Under the new consolidated plan we will attend Phelps Luck(PLES). . Items of note that we feel have been overlooked include our NEWLY created small feed, our schools's proximity, and capacities.

Our neighborhood's move to Phelps Luck is creating a small feed - only 9% or less of students from our neighborhood will complete PLESto move into Ellicott Mills (essentially our entire neighborhood). Meanwhile, 40% of Worthington's population will advanceto Ellicott Mills. Ellicott Mills Middle is located acrossthe street from our neighborhood (we could walk there) and therefore feel it is important to stay close to our community.

Worthington ES- the closest school geographically to our neighborhood, is at 85% capacity, and forecasted to remain at this threshold for the future. Meanwhile Phelps Luck ES is at 100%, trending to increase. Finally, from a proximity standpoint, Elementary Schools ranked in order of shortest to longest distance from our neighborhood:

Worthington Veterans Rockburn Waterloo

Moving 1098/98 to Worthington will help keep transportation costs in line, strengthen our feed and maintain our connection to our community, and assist in addressing capacity issues in the future.

As one memberof the board stated last night, this all suddenly hasa "speed dating"feel. Whileyou have all put hours of work and tireless efforts into getting this right, I understand that there is no template, or holy grail to immediately fixing these challenges. We request that you slow down the speed date round and please apply reason when looking at our polygons 98/1098 one last time.

It's dishearteningto knowthat our children will leave theirfriends that they currently go to school nextto, play sports with, go to the Y with, and see at church so we can help the board manipulate statistics on paper. While we have boiled attendance areas down to numbers, shapes, and color coded regions, they are actually comprised of our children. We request that you give us the time and review of our neighborhoods as each child's education and future is equally important.

Thanks for your time with regard to this matter. Marilvn Grosskoof

From: Azad, Alvi Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 10:47 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Opposition to HCPSS'sRedistricting Proposal

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside of HCPSS.Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Honorable Board Members: I am writing to bring to your attention my strongest opposition to Superintendent Michael Martirano's Howard County Public Schoolredistricting proposal. I andmy familyrecentiy moved to HowardCounty. Theprincipal reason for moving to Howardwas because ofour desire to bepart of a knit community whereour childrenwould be ableto growand go to schoolwith the neighborhoodkids. We value and believe a stableand predictable community iskey to theemotional health and education of our children. WhileI fully understand andsupport for theneed to addressdisparity in performances amongstthe schoolsin HowardCounty, theproposed plan is thewrong strategyto addressthe issue. Wedo not haveto breakup communities to help addressvery complicated issuesof equity and socioeconomic needs,that clearly require a moreholistic policy approach at local, state andnational level. As a concerned citizen, I'll behappy to takeup evenmore responsibility to help addressthe socio economic issuesaffecting some segments ofour community. I'm ofthe opinion that it's in the interest ofall ofus to make sure that we sufBciently take care ofeach ofour school children and fheir educational needs. This should not however require that my children be separated from their fiiends at school andbe expected to ridebuses to schools located farther from their neighborhood. This proposedplan, whileit mayhave the best intentions atits core,would neither meaningfully addressthe stated equity needs nor necessarily enrich the experiences ofmy children at school. As a Child andAdolescent Psychiatrist, I can seemany negative outcome if this plan is implemented, to include but not limited to dismpting ffiendships, longer bus rides, less time to sleep and participate in extracurricular activities. All ofwhich will negatively affectour children'smental health. As a taxpayerthis will lead to increased transportation costs. I therefore askyou to discard this ill-designed redistricting planin favor ofkeeping communities together while at the same time searching for a more global policy alternative to address the socio economic needs ofour school children across the entire County. Let's be more deliberative and not msh thingsjust to meet some artificial timelines. By doing so, we shall keep our County remain the envy ofmany counties across the nation, for its warm community and great education while we continue to meet the challenge ofraising the hope of each child in HoCo. Thank you in advance for yourfhoughtfalness and forbeing open to listen to us all, theparents ofHoward County.

Very Respectfully Dr. Alvi Azad

6305 Golden Star Pl.

Columbia, MD 21044

Planning Polygon # 1186

Alvi A. Azad, DO, MBA Lt Col, USAF, MC, FS Assistant Professor of Psychiatry and Pediatrics AssociateProgram Director, NCC PsychiatryResidency F. Edward Hebert School of Medicine -"America's Medical School" Uniformed Services University Bethesda, Maryland phone: 516-567-0374 email: Alvi. azad(S).usuhs. edu Marilvn Grosskoof

From: Lindsey Thattassery Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 10:44 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Please stop the redistricting

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Asa mother and a physician, I believe that movingchildren out oftheir comfort zone and awayfrom theirfriends can impact their social and emotional well-being. It is understandable that families haveto relocate due to jobs or being close to family. Kids excel when they are in their familiar environment, with their friends and teachers they adore and respect. Making new friends and learning the rhythm of a new school does take time and can interfere with academics. Please reconsider moving children out oftheir schools, whichis their second home. Instead, provide more helpfor teachers or after school supplemental teaching for those who need it. Reach out to parents who need to be more involved in their children'seducation and guidethem to resourcesand waysto improve studying at home.

Sincerely, LindseyThattassery Sent from my iPhone Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Tina Weiseman Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 10:37 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Reconsider polygon #2059

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

BOE, Dr. Martirano, and others involved in the redistricting process,

Please reconsider polygon #2059 and 1059 at the elementary school level. Moving us rrom I SbSto bhtb raises the current FARMS level at TSES with negligible capacity benefit. The redistricting is supposed to help the schools, not hurt them. I can see no rationale in moving us. Please move us back to our home of TSES so we can continue to support our school.

2059 and 1059 belong atTSES!

Tina

Sent from my iPhone Marilvn Grosskoof

From: Priti Wankhade Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 10:32 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Last Appeal

! CAUTION: This emaU origmated from outside of HCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Respected Board Members, This is my last and final appeal to you. Please do not go ahead with this proposal. You need to spend more time evaluating it. Over crowding issue has to solved by building new schools or expanding current ones. Every kid should have access to high quality education in their neighborhood. Mixing high achieving kids with under performers will only result in school within a school. I do not believe busing kids to solve FARM numbers is the answer.

Here is an argument I have heard again and again and makes whole lot of sense in today's world: "We have todesegregate our neighborhoods, and our schools will take care of themselves. Classes and schools should be determined by performance, not political correctness. Eliminating gifted andtalented programs is a race to drive everyone to equal mediocrity in a world that is becoming more competitive by the day.

Thank you for your time. Mant^

From: Jennifer Moynihan Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 10:30 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Redistricting of polygons 141, 142

! CAUTION: This emaUoriginated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not click Unks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. am writing again in opposition of the redistricting of polygons 141 and 142 from Longfellow to Clarksville Elementary School. To move two low FARM polygons to a school that is already < 5% FARM does not fulfill the goal of balancing our schools. Much ofthe current GT program at Longfellow would be gutted with this move, a significant lossto thisTitle 1 school. The proposed changes increasethe FARM rates at Longfellowand disrupt a wonderful neighborhood school which is an excellent example ofthe Columbia ideals at work.

The speed with whichthis current proposal hasbeen made and adopted is unacceptable. Other polygons had months to make their voices heard. This proposal was announced last week, during which time we have had no opportunities to speak to members of the BOE.

Please do the responsible thing and leave polygons 141 and 142 at Longfellow Elementary.

Sincerely, Jennifer Moynihan, MD Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Jason Weesner Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 10:27 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] regarding the 11/18/19work session

! CAUTION:This email originatedfrom outsideof HCPSS.Do not click links or open attachments, unlessyou recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

BOE,

Last night'sworking session wasan unmitigated train wreck. Whatthe public sawwas a frazzled group of people, making last minute changes, reversals, & adjustments on the fly. We saw rushed decisions based on suspect data. We saw short-term fixes, with no long-term strategy. We saw favoritism on display, while the concerns of others fell on deaf ears. We saw debate curtailed in order to meet an artificial deadline. Wesaw the county transportation officerissue an llth-hour caveat,saying we don't knowhow much it will cost, & we don't have enough buses, nor drivers. Wesaw BOE taking a strawvote on relocating>5k students without propercost estimates, riskanalysis, or feasibility studies. Wesaw dismissive remarksflying backand forth between BOEmembers and, from the BOEto the audience. We saw hugely impactful decisions being made without community support. We saw one BOE member describe last night's session as being akin to "speed dating". The Howard County Schoolsystem isthe crownjewel ofthis jurisdiction, but if lastnight's display isthe new-normal we will see that prestige erode quickly.

I'm not aware of any public polling on the matter. Butto gauge public sentiment, youshould pay more attention to the publictestimony submitted tothe BOE,as well as thevarious social media groups who have been allowing commentary. Youhave virtually no public buy-ln. Based on the overwhelmingly negative publicfeedback, I'll venture to say, there will befallout at the ballot box. I'd urgeeach of you to recognizethat you areabout to implement a planthat will haveprofoundly negative impactson the citizens of Howard County. BOE must take more measured and strategic approach to solve the issues at hand. What we have witnessed thus far is completely unacceptable.

Jason Weesner Polygon 159 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Ethan Andreas Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 10:26 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] PF 189 - Take the Drive

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Board Members,

Our PG appreciates the discussion yesterday and the return ofour community to PRES. Unfortunately, the coorespoing move of our PG from CMS to LKMS was not reversed as well. Again, there was no discussion surroundmg why our PG was being moved to LKMS, and presumably it was because there is no feeds from DOES to CMS. This move truely boggle the mind when looking at the map, but really hits home when you have to map the drive our community would have to take to get to LKMS. Our community only has exits onto GuilfordRoad, whichwould sendour kids directlypast CMS (only 1 mile away)on the 6. 1 milejourney to LKMS. Both schools are about the same capacity, have sunilar FARMS, and our feed from PRES to LKMS would be less than 15%. When you take into consideration the moves that were made during the 2017 redistricting process when 11 PGs were moved from LKMS to CMS, it seems counterproductive to now have to send a PG from the furthest area ofCMS to LKMS. Just as the Board admitted that moving PG127 to PRES last nightovertaxed PRES,this move wouldbe ahnost the carbon copy asLKMS will undoubtedly encounter capacity issues in the next few years with the continues expansion ofMaple Lawn. Please don't unecessarily move our community for the sakeof moving them, whichwill not beable to beundone during the next round of redistricting becauseof existingpolicy.

I implore the Board to look at this in the aggregate. The distance, historical moves, small feed from PRES to LKMS and increased fa-ansportation costs makes this move an unecessary burden the Board does not have to place on the community.

Thanks,

EthanA To: Howard County Board of Education

From: Mariejeng

Hello, my name is Marie Jeng and my family lives in Polygon 2148 in Dorsey Hall. I appreciate the opportunity to provide feedback related to the current BOB redistricting plan, which shifts Polygons 148, 302, and 276 in Dorsey Hall away from Northfield Elementary and Dunloggin Middle. Dorsey Hall is a very close-knit community. I'm asking you to please keep these polygons together with the rest of the families in Dorsey Hall!

Here are some additional reasons why I feel that Polygons 148, 302, and 276 should remain at Northfield and Dunloggin:

1. Northfield and Dunloggin are within easy walking distance of much of Dorsey Hall. Middle school students in Polygons 148, 302, and 276 are able to participate in after-school and other extracurricular activities because they have the ability to walk home. They can also walk to their classmates' homes and to shared community amenities such as the pool and the village center. This ability to walk to school and to see their friends, and the community cohesiveness that it provides, would not be possible if these children in our community are sent to schools that are farther away;

2. The feed from Dunloggin MS to Wilde Lake HS is already small, and removing Polygons 148, 302, and 276 from Dunloggin would shrink the Dunloggin to Wilde Lake feed to under 10%. On the other hand, keeping the Dorsey Hall community together at Northfield and Dunloggin would bolster the feed to Wilde Lake HS;

3. Putting Dorsey Hall elementary and middle school students on buses heading south on Columbia Rd through the intersection at Route 108 during morning rush hour will increase traffic congestion at an intersection that already is graded an F for traffic flow. In addition, the frequency of accidents at or near that intersection would inevitably disrupt the students' school day from time to time and could even put their safety in jeopardy; and

4. The plan to shift Dorsey Hall students to Running Brook and WLMSdoes not look to the future, because according to the projected impact of development that is already in the works. Running Brook will be significantly over capacity in just 3 years. It does not make sense to move Dorsey Hall children now, only to have to shift them back to Northfield or elsewhere in just 3 years. Such shifts would create much instability in our community.

Thank you for your consideration ofthese important matters. November 19, 2019

To Whom It May Concern

The current effort at the Board of Education to adjust school districts or attendance areas

effective FY 2020-21, building on the Superintendent's August proposal, tackles an issue of

great importance and consequence for families with school-going kids in Howard County. It is

fair to acknowledge that anyplan from the Board would be an imperfect solution at best. The

plan would attempt to reduce school overcrowding and FARM rates, which in turn arise from policies in areas ofhousing and economic development over at least a decade. Still, at a minimum, the plan should not leave any child worse offin terms ofprospects for academic achievement. Suchan outcome wouldrequire assistancefrom otherpolicy makers at county and state level. For instance, the plan should provide resources, such as, a preparatory program for those students moving to high performing schools (as evidenced by performance on standardized tests) in order for them to efiectively compete with their peers. Additionally, it should incentivize students moving to low performing schools through academic enrichment programs that would help these students to maintain their high academic perfonnaace. Moreover, property tax credits shouldbe offered to homeownerswith a future decreasein increaserate oftheir house values, resulting from assignment to a low perfonning school. Last but not least, it should offer any worse-off student, as detennined on a case-by-case basis, county-wide voucher for use in any public school that is under capacity.

Sincerely,

Saad A. Waqas Polygon 172 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Shelley English Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 10:18 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting; Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Chao Wu; Sabina Taj; Mavis Ellis; Jennifer Mallo; Superintendent Subject: [External] Redistricting - Hopewell

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed

! CAUTION: TMs email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good morning,

Pleasereconsider the moves slated for Hopewell polygons 51, 1051, 2051, 279, 52.

Currently for this school year, these polygons go to Talbott Springs ES, Lake Elkhom MS (less than 8% feed from TSES) and Oakland Mills HS.

Basedon the current moves throughlast night's sessions, thesepolygons will go to Talbott Springs ES, Lake EUchom MS and Atholton HS.

Afholton HS is not close and is more than 5 miles from our neighborhoodand would require traveling on major highway,either 32 or 29 or both, to get thereby bus in heavy traffic. Oakland Mills HS is 3 miles from our neighborhood, and no major highways are needed to get there from Hopewell.

Wehave been advocatingfor years to go from TSES to OaklandMills MS andthen on to OaklandMills HS. Please consider this move or at least move us back to Oakland Mills HS instead ofAtholton. We need this consistent feed for our students and children.

Thankyou. ShelleyEnglish Polygon 1051 JVIarilyn Grosskopf

From: Violeta Staneva Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 10:16 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting;Sabina Taj; ChaoWu; Christina Delmont-Small;Jennifer Mallo; Kirsten Coombs; Mavis Ellis; Vicky Cutroneo; Superintendent Subject: [External] ONE DORSEY HALL

! CAUTION: This emaUoriginated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not cUcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. To BOB ofHoward County,

My name is Violeta Staneva and I live in polygon 276. Please reconsider moving polygons 276, 148 and 302 from NES/DMS to RBESAVLMS. Here are my reasons:

1. SAFETY concern: if you move those kids they will have a longer bus ride to school which will include crossmg a major intersection. Thatincreases the chancesof accidents andfor thekids to beinjured in those accidemts Especially for the elementary school, fhechildren's commute will bein mshhour in bothways!!! You didn'tmove other polygons withthe same argument howis that fair for ourpolygons andwhy should our kids be exposed to bigger safetyrisks!

2. SMALLFEED: by moving thosepolygons you arecreating an island and the feed from DMSto WLHSwill be so insignificant, less than 10%! And we are talking about only 50 to 60 kids!!!! _'_^I.YER5:APACITY Problem: Ifyou move thosepolygons youwill becreating anovercapacity problem at RBES in 2 years! This will result in bouncingbach and forth kids. THE DEVELOPMENTIN 276 IS +55 COMMUNITY and will not bring more kids to the school, unlike the developments near RBES!!! 4. Ourcoimnunity wasn'tgiven the same chance as other communities. Thereasons that you used to move or not to move other polygons weren't used with the same weight for our community. Isn't that DISCRIMmATmG?

Norttifield elementary school didn't have a capacity problem before Ms. Mallo's plan created it! The solutions that her plan created are creating more problems for other schools, including NES and RBES. Are those solutions real solutions when they create more problems than they solve! PLEASEreconsider splitting our community and keep Dorsey hall together!

Violeta Staneva Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Ross Laidig Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 10:15 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: Chao Wu; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Superintendent; Sabina Taj; Kirsten Coombs; Mavis Ellis Subject: [External] Capacity is Real. FARM rate is perceived

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed

! CAUTION: This emaUoriginated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not clicklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello,

Please do not get confused by real capacity and adjusted percentages for FARMs.

In watching and attending the Board Meetings, it seems the Board is especially concerned with FARMs. Of particular interest to me is the alarming move ofPolygon 132 from Clemens Crossing Elementary School to Bryant WoodsElementary School.

The current proposed plan hasPolygon 132 (whichhas alwaysbeen at Clemens since it opened 40 years ago) moving to Bryant Woods. This move significantiy increases the overcrowding problem at Bryant Woods. Capacityproblems arereal andthe higher the number the more resources must be divided amongthe students and the less attention teachers can provide to students. This comes from a family ofteachers. This move gives the perception ofless FARMs. But this is NOT TRUE. The FARM rate reduction is perceived. It is a percentage that only decreasesbecause you areincreasing the overcrowding at Bryant Woods. The actual numberof students in FARMdoes not chanee. Thismove only addsto overcapacity andstretches theresources at a school that is already Title One and does not need more students.

Pleasekeep Polygon 132 at Clemens CrossingElementary School forthe sake of all the students at Bryant Woods and Polygon 132.

Thank you,

Ross Laidig

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019, 10:37PM Ross Laidig wrote: Theredoes not appearto bereliable data,many Howard County residents werenot provided theopportunity at a public speakingforum, the monetary andpersonal costs arenot known and there havebeen numerous flaws in the process. YOU CAN DO BETTER WITHMORE TBIE AND MORE INFORMATION.Please do not rush this at the detriment of our children. The Director of Pupil Transportation Officejust stated that there may not be funding or available drivers to accommodate the moves. This needs to be known. Please don't rule that I need to send my child across town withoutbus transportation. Budget and Redistricting are not completely separate.

Thank you,

Ross Laidig Marilvn Grosskopf

From: Robyn Winder Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 10:13 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Redistricting in Hanover part of HoCo

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click Unksi or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. The decisionto sendPolygon 1038 (whichincludes HanoverWoods where I live) to LongReach HS and Polygon 38 (which includes the Patapsco Ridge neighborhood) andmost ofthe rest ofthe Elkridge community to Howard HS is a terrible idea and needs to be rescinded. Hanover Woods, Hanover Crossing, and Patuxent Quarterhave always viewed ourselves asone neighborhood as well aspart ofthe larger Elkridge/Hanover community. We do not want to be divided and separated, andthis plan violates a fundamental principle of community and neighborhood schools. EUcridge and Hanover arethe oldest parts ofHoward County andhave a long tradition ofneighborliness and cohesion that this plan is undermining. I no longer have children in the school system (they aregrown now), butI do not wantto seeour neighborhood broken apartlike this becauseit is so harmful to our community as a whole and most especially to the children and families affected by it.

I respectfully askthat youreconsider this decisionand not vote to makethis plan final.

RobynWinder 6428 Skipton Drive Hanover J\flarilyn Grosskopf

From: MARILYN ZIGMUND LUKE Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 10:09 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting; councilmail@howardcountymd. gov Subject: [External] Public Schools

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. Dear Members:

I have been a resident of Howard County for over 17 years and my son attends Howard County schools. We are in Polygon 16 in the redistricting proposals.

Recent developments and discussions have revealed that overcapacity that exists and will expand in many schools. I am writing to reinforce my earlier testimony to encourage the Board and the Council to devote time for re-examining ways to promote capital investments in our schools. In addition, each building should be placed on an infrastructure review/update schedule to keep place with making updates to important systems and school grounds (e. g., similar to the Columbia Associate pools and gyms infrastructure updating processes). This process should be County-wide and should also build- in a component that assesses moving trends and available areas for potential developers, which can be easily tracked with the help of a realtor and a good researcher, to help plan for potential over- crowding in future years.

There must also be an immediate way to remedy the ongoing problem that many parents and teachers already know is occurring, which is children attending Howard County schools but who reside outside the County boundaries. I have heard many anecdotal stories including: (1) about 10 children being driven to one bus stop by people who do not live in a neighborhood and boarding buses to attend a Howard County school; (2) children who attend Atholton Elementary and other schools by listing a County address where they do not reside; and (3) discussions at PTA meetings where it was identified by PTA officials - with the principal in attendance - that the school has students who live in other Counties but are still allowed to attend the local Howard County school. "Looking the other way" must stop, and the County needs to disseminate a number where individuals can call to report these situations for further investigation. If not, County and taxpayer funds will continue to be expended on non-County residents and related services.

It is clear to me from the many hearings and meetings related to the re-districting proposal that fiscally responsibility must be a priority to stop the burden on taxpayer funds so that an overall and comprehensive plan can be developed to improve our infrastructure in the short and long terms.

Please publicly announce how the School Board and the County Council plans to address this issue.

Thank you.

Marilyn Zigmund Luke 8810SandropeCt. Columbia, MD 21046 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Razan Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 10:09 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] One Dorsey Hall United- polygon 1148

! CAUTION:This email originatedfrom outside of HCPSS.Do not click linksor open attachments, unlessyou recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello

My son is getting ready to start in Northfield Elementary in the next year. Many of our friends and neighbors attend it and he has been so excited to join.

Please reconsider redistricting elementary school since this change will be challenging for me and my husband. We both work full time

Important note: My daughter, 3 and half years old, is already attending daycare/school "Children's Manor Montessori School - Ellicott City". Northfield and Children's Manor are close and in the same path to our house in Hallowed Stream. This is very important for emergencies situations such as snow days, and also, for drop off and pick up during normal days.

Sent from my iPhone November 19, 2019

To Whom It May Concern

The current effort at the Board of Education to adjust school districts or attendance areas

effective FY 2020-21, building on the Superintendent's August proposal, tackles an issue of

great importance and consequence for families with school-goingkids m HowardCounty. It is

fair to acknowledge that any plan from the Board would be an imperfect solution at best. The

plan would attempt to reduce school overcrowding and FARM rates, whichin turn arise from

policies in areas of housing and economic development over at least a decade. Still, at a

minimum, the plan should not leave any child worse off in terms ofprospects for academic

achievement. Such an outcome would require assistance from other policy makers at county and

state level. For instance, the plan should provide resources, such as, a preparatory program for

those students moving to high performing schools (as evidenced by performance on standardized

tests) in order for them to effectively compete with their peers. Additionally, it should

incentivize students moving to low performing schools through academic enrichment programs

that would help these students to maintain their high academic performance. Moreover, property

tax credits should be offered to homeowners with a future decrease in increase rate of their house

values, resultmg from assignment to a low performing school. Last but not least, it should offer

any worse-offstudent, as detennined on a case-by-casebasis, county-widevoucher for use in

any public school that is under capacity.

Sincerely,

Sundus Z. Baig Polygon 172 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Kathryn Wisniewski Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 10:07 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Stevens Forest Residents of ALLAges Have Been Doing

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless ^ou recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To all Board Members,

Most of the demonstrations regarding redistricting have focused on the reactions of parents whose children currently attend Howard County schools. All the news coverage captures the anger and resentment of parents whose children may be moved. What no one mentions is the extraordinary efforts by the older generation of residents whose children formerly attended what were once economically and ethnically diverse schools like Stevens Forest Elementary.

We watched in dismay after the redistricting 6 years ago assigned ALL Verona residents, including those who live right next to Talbott Springs Elementary, to Stevens Forest School-presumably because Sewells Orchards and Hopewell parents (whose children have to be bussed in any case) protested loudly about being shifted to Stevens Forest. As a result of that decision, the FARMS rate at Talbott Springs fell while Stevens Forest shot up-making us the most economically disadvantaged school in the county; it also resulted in de facto segregation. For 5 years we have watched young children, whose families can't afford cold-weather gear from REI, walk almost a mile to get from the Verona to Stevens Forest.

Nevertheless, our family and many of our neighbors have pitched in over the last 5 years with countless hours of volunteering in the schools, supporting every fundraiser, donating to clothing drives, and reaching out in every way we can to help the dedicated staff at our local schools. We don't have the stamina for protest marches and late-night meetings because we're worn out from community activities that aren't covered in the national press or even the Columbia FLIER.

But we always show up at the polls,

Is this plan-reducing the FARMS rate at Stevens Forest by a paltry 5 percent-really the best you can do to rectify a problem created by a previous Board decision?

Sincerely,

Kay and Paul Wisniewski Marilyn Grosskopf

From: j hu Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 10:07 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Please Keep rising 8th graders at current schools

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi BOB members, Itis absolutely good idea to keep rising 8th and 5th graders at their current^school. Thelast year in middle ^ schooland elementary schoolis'very critical to oursensitive young kids. If you grant exemption to move, i MdswiUbuild tight relationship witti their Mends, teachffs and schools. And the parents will . suwortthe'PTA'^r boosterprograms in current school. If 8thgraders aremoved to a newschool,^ b^een"betweennewschooTand newparents is weak. It is the huge loss _among kids, parents and schools. In Ae'future. ifkids are askedwhich middle or elementary schools they graduated, they will proudly tell their ^WTmt~schools-msteadof2 ormore schools. Please consider to passthis motion asyou all saidin the meeting that the less move, the better. Thank you.

JieminHu

Polygon 189 Marilyn

From: Mark Pennsy (mapennsy) Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 10:05 AM To: hlcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Keep Polygon 132 at Clemens Crossing Elementary

! CAUTION: This emailoriginated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not clicklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Howard County Board of Education,

I am writing in support of keeping Polygon 132 at Clemens Crossing Elementary School. This last-minute move has blindsided our neighborhood and will tear it apart.

We live 0. 6 miles from Clemens Crossing E. S. in the Clemens Crossing neighborhood of Hickory Ridge Village. I served as a volunteer on the CCES PTAfor a number of years while my children attended CCES. Additionally, we live 0. 5 miles from Clemens Crossing outdoor pool. My children have been members of the Clemens Crossing Neighborhood Swim Team for over 12 years. My sons still biketo the pool to meet classmates they built friendships with at Clemens Crossing Elementary.

We alsojoined Cub Scout Pack618, which is based out of Clemens Crossing Elementary School. Mysons learnedtheir love ofscouting at and around the school. Wewould leada springstream cleanupcollecting quite a bit oftrash alongthe stream nextto CCES.We also walked our neighborhood supporting Scouting for Food, which we then delivered to the food pantry at Harper House on Cedar Lane. My boys remain in scouting with one having achieved the Eagle Scout rank. I'm not sure they would still be in scouts without the foundation built in Pack 618 at CCES.

I alsowonder what impact all the additional bussingwill have on our precious environment. Pleasedon't add more damage to the environment by bussing our children through Town Center to another elementary school in another Village nearly two miles farther away. I also wonder how the additional bussing costs will burden the taxpayers of HoCo.

Clemens Crossing Elementary Schoolis the hub ofour neighborhood and community. Ourchildren are disconnected more than ever in today'stechnology driven world and need a sense of neighborhood and community. CCESprovides that anchorfor our neighborhood. I strongly believe children should goto the schools intheir neighborhood. Pleasekeep the Clemens Crossingneighborhood together at Clemens Crossing Elementary and look to addressthe Superintendent's concerns in a better and more constructive waythan bussing.

Bussing doesn't work - we should learn from the mistakes of other Maryland counties - not repeat them!

Very respectfully,

Mark Pennsy 6256 Martin Road Columbia, MD 21044 From: Tim Kelley Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 20199:59 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon2161

! CAUTION:This emaUoriginated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not cUcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Goodmomuig, my nameis Tim Kelley andI live inpolygon 2161 andhave 2 children ages6 and9. lam added to the at the last e. lnns has writing to express our concerns over how our polygon was plan very minyt timed°our familyupside downand has damaged our faithin the HCPSS. I've been a life long Howard County resident andHCPSS grad, whenthe original plan cameout my 4th gradedaughter who attends Waveriy ES askedTfwe'dbe impacted. I foolishlytold her no because I just didn'tthink that our_BOE would pull a stunt^ liketiiis. Soat the bus stop a fewweeks ago my daughter and wife heard about this from a neighborschild^ To sayflris had taken its toll onour family is an understatement. Youhave not only pulled my children away from fheir'fiiends youhave made the feed from Waverly to Patapsco even smaller. I haveheld many board positions iiithe county over the years and although I respectyour position and understand the gigantic task you had, the waythe board has handled themselves isshameful. Makesme sad to seewhat has happened to ourwonderfiri county. Tell notallow us to voice our opinions at any public hearing is awful. I sincerelyhope you consider leavingpolygon 2161 atWaverly.

Thank you Tim

Tim KeUey HoCo Girls Lacrosse Club Youth Director (410)925-2283 www.hocogirlslacrosse. com

Sent from my iPhone Marilyn Grosskopf

From: miao liu Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:58 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 189 move out of CMS - against capacity policy

! CAUTION: This emafl originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board members, Thank you for your hard work and efforts to balance school capacity and children's benefits. However, removing Polygon 189 from CMS to LKM does NOT satisfyboth basic policies. 1. CMS does not reach it's capacity yet. Polygon 189 is the only one to be moved out. As we are small group( less than 30 students), I did not see the necessaryto move us out. 2. The side effect for moving out children to a far awayschool (4 mins vs. 15 mins) is very oblivious. Time consuming, increasing transportation cost and social isolation. As our ffiends will attend CMS and wewill be the only group to a new school. As you saidbefore, do not sweep small feeds and leave any community as an "island". Unfortunately, I feel like our kids are on an island now. One more thing I would like to reminder - as our community is pretty new, most of our kids move from other schools within these two years. Changing school frequently won't benefit children at all. I sincerely wish every remember could reconsider your decision. Please let us stay with CMS.

Best regards,

Miao Liu

On Sunday, November 17, 2019, 08:14:15AM EST, miao liu wrote:

Dear Board members,

As a resident from newPolygon 189, 1 strongly against Dr. Wu's proposal on 11/13/2019.

It is based on inaccurate data - our community is almost completed and only 30 more families might join in the next two years. Moving our Polygon out won't effect the total number for the PRE and CMS in the near future. Please reconsider the last minute proposal as it won't benefit the whole Howard County School system and our community.

Best regards,

Miao Liu Marilyn Grosskoof

From: Lam, Clarence Senator Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:58 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] FW: Howard County redistricting Attachments: Polygon assignments as of Wed., Nov. 13 a. m. .pdf; Long Term Impactpdf

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. Hello Sen. Lam, Asked that I pass along this constituent concern that regarding socioeconomic segregation.

Thank you, Scott

Scott Tiffin Chief of Staff Senator Clarence Lam, MD, MPH Maryland State Senate District 12 | Baltimore & Howard Counties Office: 410-841-3653 Register to Vote Here

From: Trade Schmidt [mailto:tr_schmidt@icloud. com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 7:00 AM To: Lam, Clarence Senator ; Hill, Terri Delegate Cc: Tracie Schmidt icloud. com> Subject: Howard County redistricting

Semtor Lam and Representative Hill, I havebeen closely following the the Howard County redistricting proposals. While overcrowding may be lessened, I believethat socioeconomic segregation is being maintained and that there is no effort to correct this issue of equity.

There is no movement of students from affluent schools to less affluent schools. A few students from less affluent schools are being moved to more affluent schools when affluent students would have to otherwise move.

Are eitherof you concernedabout this? Ifso, now would be the time to questionthe Board of Education and review their effort to reduceovercrowding and, in particular, to reducesocioeconomic segregadon. Two BOE documents are attached below. Oneshows the polygon moves as ofyesterday morning. The other gives projected school capacity andFARM rate at each school. Nothing more was done to improve FARM rates during the Wed. Attendance Adjustment meeting. Keep in mind thatthe beginningredistricting map usedby the BOEis the current school boundary map. The BOB didnot start with Dr. Martirano's suggested redisfricting plan or either of the plans suggested in the 2019 Feasibility Study.

Affluent students are being left as walkers and in their neighborhoods. Less affluent students are being bused out of their neighborhoods andtheir neighborhoods arebeing divided. The most vocal families in opposition to redistrictmg arebeing given favor. I feel segregated students inthis county seedmother advocate. The HowardCounty BOE is not advocating for all children.

Thank you for your time. Sincerely,

Trade Schmidt 11118 Proud Foot Pl. Columbia 21044 Summary of Board Polygon Reassignment Discussions ReflectsWork Sessions 1!1-VI (through November12, 2019} ((eachWS section only includesareas discussed that night- eachsection isnot cummulative)) ChangesIn school boundaries areonly final withBoard approval ofentire plan {scheduledfor November Zlj

Work Session III Board 1 Plan Comments (adjustments made in WS IV} Sending Receiving Plan ID 38 44, 86, 87, 299, 300, 1038, 1086, 1087, 300, 1300 reverted via consensus in WS IV 1 Howard HS Long Reach HS 1299, 1300, 2038, 2087, 3087, 4087 33. 1 reverted via consensus dus to wa;ker status Howard HS OaklandMills HS 311 . 78. 79 reverted due to walker status 35. 78. 79. 80, 81, 1035, 1080, 1082, 2035, SO. 1080, 3071 reverted to keep with 78, 79 ; Long Reach HS Oakland Mills HS 2081, 3035, 3071, 4035 1035. 1082 sent to OMHS in WS IV 49 sent to HaHS in WS IV to keep with 105G 52. 54. 58, 1054, 1058, 2054 removed during WSIV; [Oakland Mills HS Atholton HS 49. 52. 54, 58, 1054, 1058, 2054 consensus to test atAHS and OMHS Reverted dunngOMHS conversation WS IV [Wilde Lake HS Oakland Mills HS 111, 2111, 1111 33. 266. 1033, 1256 reassigned WS !V to OMHS :h Hammond HS 33. 266. 1033. 1266

Work Session IV Board 2 Plan

Receiving Plan ID . Sending 38. 44, 86, 87, 124, 299, 1038, 1086, 1087, ;Howard HS Long Reach HS 1124, 1299, 2038, 2087, 3087, 4087 33, 35. 81, 266, 1033, 1035, 1082, 1266, 2035, Oakland Mills HS ! Long Reach HS 2081, 3035, 4035 [Oakland Mills HS Hammond HS 49 iHammond HS Atholton HS 270 MOTIONSFOR CONSIDERATION Hammond HS Atholton HS or Hammond HS 57, 1057, 2057 OaklandMills HS Atholton HSor Oakland Mills HS 52. 54, 58, 1054, 1058, 2054 dWS d WS IV

Work Session V Board 2 Plan Comments from WS V Sending Receiving Plan ID 51. 52. 54, 58, 279, 1051, 1054, 1058, 2051, Atholton HS by consensus Oakland Mills HS 2054, 3139 by consensus Mt Hebron HS Centenial HS 308. 1308, 2308 by vote Centennial H5 Marriotts Ridge HS 97, 154, 214, 1154, 2154 Mamotts Ridge HS Glenelg HS 171, 1171 by vote MOTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION Wilde Lake HS 133. 2133. 3133, 4133

Page 1 of 2 Work Session V Board 6 Plan Sending Receiving Plan ID Comments from WS V 64. 117, 118, 120, 129, 190, 1064, 1117, 1129, by consensus Uholton HS R'ver Hill HS 1190 by concensus. Cancels reassignment. Area remains at 171, 1171 Glenelg HS Mamotts Ridge HS current SY 2018/19 boundary.

Hammond HS Reservoir HS 47. 2047, 3047, 4047 by consensus Reservoir HS River Hill HS 114, 122, 1114, 1115, 2114, 3115 by consensus 180. 181, 182. 183, 1180, 1181, 1182, 1183, River Hill HS Glenelg HS by consensus 2182, 2183, 3182, River Hill HS Glenelg HS 200, 1200 by vote 4-3 Wilde Lake HS Rive 141, 1142"' *contains Harper's Choice MS Burleigh Manor MS Foily Quarter MS 1171 *maybe; dependent on reassignr;ent at HS leve; *2148dependent on wa;kzone study Dunlogging MS Wilde Lake MS 148, 276, 302, 1148 E'kridge Landing MS Thomas ViaductMS 36 EIEicott Mills MS Bonnie Branch MS 2074 *1067 was briefly discussed note, 67 is accessed through 65, 67, 311, 1065, 2065 Ellicatt Mills MS Oakland Mills MS 1067.

Hammond MS Patuxent Valley MS 17, 18, 1018 Harper's Choice MS Wilde Lake MS 143, 144, 1144 Harper's Choice MS Clarksville MS 141, 1142* *1142 is Harper'sChoice MS polygon Mayfield Woods MS Bonnie Branch MS 277 Murray Hill MS Hammond MS 297, 1297 'atapsco MS Burleigh Manor MS 159, 1159 Patapsco MS Dunloggin MS 72 rhomasViaductMS Patuxent Valley MS 27, 1027 26, 1026 under discussion (consider feeds)_ BeHows Springs ES Waterloo ES 269, 1076, 1269 Bollman Bridge ES Forest Ridge ES 260, 1260 Bryant Woods ES Clemens Crossing ES 133, 1133, 2204, 4133, 5133 Bryant Woods ES Longfellow ES 268, 1268 Likely walkers to walkers Clemens Crossing ES Swansfield ES 61, 66, 130, 134, 1066, 1130, 1134, 2134 Clemens Crossing ES Bryant Woods ES 132, 1132, 2132 Cradlerock ES Stevens Forest ES 55 Elkridge ES Ducketts Lane ES 36 Fulton ES Hammond ES 7, 221, 1007, 1221, 2221 Guilford ES Hammond ES 2048 Hammond ES Bollman Bridge ES 17, 18, 1018 Hollifield Station ES Veterans ES 105, 1105, 1308 llchesterES Waterloo ES 95, 301, 1095, 1301, 2095 Ueffers Hills ES PhelpsLuckES 261, 1261 *Harper's Choice MS polygon ! Longfellow ES Clarksville ES 141, 1142" * dependenton walk zone designation;request to test 148. 276, 302, 1148, 2148* iNorthfield ES Running Brook ES scenario with and without 1148 & 2148 IPhelpsLuckES Waterloo ES 69, 1069, 4069, 5069

i Running Brook E5 Bryant Woods ES 136, 204, 1136, 1204, 2133, 2136, 3133, 4136

|St Johns Lane ES Manor Woods ES 159, 1159 IStevens Forest ES Thunder Hill ES 113, 2062 IStevens Forest ES TaI bott Springs ES 96" "onlya portion of96, the arethat egressesto WhiteAcre [Swansfield ES Clemens Crossing ES 53, 2135, 2174 ISwansfield ES Longfellow E5 3138 [Taibott Springs ES Thunder Hill ES 1059. 2059 |TaI bott Springs ES Stevens Forest ES 59, 3059 IThunder Hill ES PhelpsLuckES 65, 1065, 2065 Likely walkers to walkers IVeterans ES Northfield ES 191, 11913191 IWaterloo ES Phelps Luck ES 74, 98, 1074, 1098, 2074 I Waterloo ES llchester ES 76 I Waterloo ES Veterans ES 100, 1100 [Waverly ES St. John's Lane ES 2161 [West Friendship ES Triadelphia Ridge ES^ 171

Page 2 of 2 46% 49% -i- 25% 33% 174% | 121% 24% <5% ~]~- 36% 61% ^_ 12% 51% 8% 11% 63% 137% <5% 105% 6% 97% 52% 9% 111% 68% 61%

. 35; 50% 95% 21% 91% <5% 1% 100% 21% '% 24% 2* <5% ?% 112% 6% 5%

py^'tf. Superintendent Plan

0-21 2021-22 2022-23 FARM 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 FARM 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 FARM

32% lllX 106% 106% 27% 98% 98% 28% 11% 102% 103% 103% 11% 109% 110% 11.1% 11% 105% <5% 95% 94% 91% 12% 115% 6% t\6% ll<>% 19% Ill* 11S% 16% 107% 109% 112% 17% 105% 21% 101% 105% 110% 26% 92% 19% 130% 126% 11% 121% 10% 110% U)W 107% 10% 102% 100% <5% 102% 102% 100% <5% 102% 102% 100% <5% 97% 92% 8% 106% 106% 102% 8% 98% 97% 8% 6"it 19% 108%, 108% 110% 26% 11.?% iim tt^a 13% 96% 90% 52% M8% 106% 100% 31% 47% 53% 103% 98% loms, 38% 94% 100% <5% 94% 94% 100% <5% 94% 94% 100% <5% 105% 104% 44% 104% 103% 1CE% 41% 105% 104% 104% 41% lij% <5% 107% 116% <5% 106% <5% :1% 117% 38% 12134 117% 33% 109% 106% 105% 33% 101% 48% 108% 107% 109» 44% 38% 13W- 135% 17% UJ% 17W. 18% 109% 116% 18% 91% 38% 91% ~1% 33% ni% 108% 109% 35% 109% 45% 96% .% 38% 110% 40% 96% 47% 93% 38% 106% 108% 3. 12% 38% Middle Schooi Elementary School SiSiSS ]Eftia< BOE Feed Status

Bonnie Branch MS I fchester ES 47. 7% 285 Bonnie Branch MS IJeffersHill ES <5% *N/A KN/A Removed Small Feed Bonnie Branch MS Phelps Luck ES 45. 9% 38. 6% 299 Bonn!e Branch MS Rockburn ES <5% <5% 32 Same Bonnie Branch MS Waterloo ES KN/A 20. 4% 158 Burleigh Manor MS Centennial Lane ES 56. 2% 52. 2% 454 Burleigh Manor MS Manor Woods ES 27. 2% 32. 4% 282 Burleigh Manor M5 Northfleld ES 15. 5% 144% 125 Same Burleigh Manor Triadelphia Ridge ES <5% <5% <10 Same Clarksville MS Clarksville ES 46. 1% 49. 346 Clarksville Pointers Run ES 53. 9% 50. 9% 359 Dunloggin MS Hollifield Station ES 67% »N/A <10 Removed Small Feed Dunloggin MS Northfleld ES 44. 8% 47. 7% 302 Dunloggin M; St Johns Lane ES 11. 6X 18. 2% 115 Removed Small Feed Dunioggin MS ThunderHill ES 51% 5.4% 34 Dunloggin M; Veterans ES 31. 8% 28. 8% 182 Elkridge Landing MS Elkridge ES 65. 8% 63. 3% 439 EIkridge Landing M5 Rockburn ES 34. 2% 36.7% 255 Ellicott Mills MS Phelps Luck ES »N/A 95% 71 New Small Feed Elllcott Mills MS Thunder Hill ES 20. 8% 93X 73 New Small Feed Ellicott Mills MS Veterans ES 26. 8% 40. 4% 301 Ellicott Mills Waterloo ES 17. 8% »N/A »N/A Elllcott Mills MS Worthington ES 34. 5% 40.3% 300 Folly Quarter MS Bushy Park ES 18. 8% 18.8% 124 Folly Quarter MS Clarksville ES <5% <5% <10 Folly Q,uarter MS Dayton Oaks ES 30. 9% 30. 9% 204 Folly Quarter MS Triadelphia Ridge ES 50. 2% 50. 2% 331 Glenwood MS Bushy Park ES 48. 2% 48. 2% 237 Glenwood Lisbon ES 51. 8% 51. 255 Hammond Atholton ES 25. 9% 27. 1% 148 Hammond MS Fulton ES 15. 9% »N/A »N/A Hammond MS German Crossing ES #N/A U5% 63 Jew Small Feed Hammond Hammond ES 58.2% 61. 4% 335 Harpers Choice MS Clemens Crossing ES IfN/A 15.5% 64 Harpers Choice MS LongfellowES 41.2% 34. 1% 141 Harpers Choice MS Swansfield ES 58.8% 50. 5% 209 Lake Elkhorn MS Cradlerock ES 41. 0% 38. 4% 223 Lake Elkhorn M< Guilford ES 26. 6% 26. 6% 154 Lake Elkhorn Jeffers Hill ES 24. 0% 24. 0% 139 Lake Elkhorn MS Stevens Forest ES «N/A

Atho'ton HS Clarksville MS 34. 0% lb.d?b 251 AthoFton HS Hammond MS 130% 13. 2% 204 Same Atholton HS Lake Elkhorn MS #WA 18.5% 286 New Strong Feed Atholton HS Murray Hill MS 21. 1% 20. 7% 319 Atholton HS Wilde Lake MS 32.0% 31. 3% 483 Centenniai HS Burleigh Manor MS 51. 2% 40. 4% 585 Centenniai HS Dunloggin MS 23. 4% 31. 6% 458 Centennial HS Ellicott Mills MS 25. 4% 28. 0% 405 ilenelg HS Folly Quarter MS 38. 4% 48.9% 706 ilenelg HS ilenwood MS 61. 6% 51. 1% 738 ^ammond HS Hammond MS 26. 7% 21.8% 269 Hammond HS Lake Elkhorn MS 118% 16. 2% 200 Removed Small Feed ^ammond HS >atuxentValley MS 44. 9% 47. 3% 583 lammond HS FhomasViaductMS 16. 6% 14. 6% 180 Howard HS Bonnie Branch MS 35. 1% 47. 7% 715 loward HS Elkridge LandingMS 45.8% 31. 4% 470 Howard HS Ellicott Mills MS 18. 7% 1221t 183 Weaker -toward HS Mayfield Woods MS <5% «N/A »N/A Removed Small Feed Iowa rd HS OaklandMills MS »N/A 87% 131 New Small Feed Long Reach HS Bonnie Branch MS 112% 108% 176 Same Long Reach HS Elkridge LandingMS 90% 29. 5% 481 Stronger Long Reach HS Vlayfield Woods MS 49. 7% 43. 7% 713 ong Reach HS homas Viaduct MS 30. 0% 16. 1% 262 Warriotts Ridge HS urleigh Manor MS 18. 1% 29. 6% 489 Ularriotts Ridge HS VIountViewMS 81. 9% 70. 4% 1164 UIt Hebron HS urleigh Manor MS *N/A 5. 3% 82 Jew Small Feed W Hebron HS 3unloggin MS 17. 1% 16. 2% 250 Ult Hebron HS lliron Mills MS 21. 6% 22.8% 351 Ult Hebron HS 'atapsco MS 61. 3% 55. 7% 859 lakland Mills HS Lake Elkhorn MS 46. 6% 20. 2% 250 )akland Mills HS layfleld Woods MS (»N/A S.3% 66 Mew Small Feed lakland Mills HS akland Mills MS 53. 4% 53. 0% 657 akland Mills HS homas Viaduct MS ffN/A 21. 5% 267 eservoir HS ammond MS 115% 15. 0% 253 itronger

. eservoir HS me Kiln MS 33. 0% 26. 6% 448

. eservoir HS lurray Hill MS 41. 8% 35. 2% 594 eservoir HS atuxent Valley MS 137% 23. 2% 391 itronger iver Hill HS larksvllte MS 46. 1% 62. 5% 966 Iver Hill HS ally Quarter MS 32. 9% 137% 211 A/eaker iver Hill HS me Kiln MS 21. 1% 23. 8% 368 1/llde Lake HS unloggin MS 111% 73% 91 Veaker Vilde Lake HS arpers Choice MS 51. 0% 43. 7% 547 Vilde Lake HS tide Lake MS 37. 9% 49. 0% 614 rn

From: Caruso, Jennifer Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:57 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: BoE Email Subject: [External] Movement of polygons 17, 18, 1018from Hammond MSto Patuxent Valley MS

! CAUTION: This emaH originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not cUcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Goodmorning, At thevery end of lastnight's work session, the boardvoted to includea move ofpolygons 17, 18,and 1018from Hammond MSto Patuxent Valley MS. This move wason the base plan, but was not discussed during any work session, and, therefore, the board did not look at the effects on capacity or FARMSor other factors related to this move in combination with any other moves madeto those schools. I don't believe that the comparison chart (1118 2019 Comparison Worksession IX FARMS) shared for last night's work session took this move into account because it reflectsthat PVMSwould beat 94%capacity both inthe Basecolumn andin the BoardWorksession IVcolumn. I urge the board to look atthe relevant numbers before the final vote on Thursday to determine whether moving these polygons makes sense in light of other proposed moves to these schools that may or may not have been included in the final plan for decision.

Thank you for your consideration, Jennifer Caruso Future PVMS Parent Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Carl Marchese Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:55 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Environmental impacts beyond school head count as it relates it redistricting Howard County

! CAUTION:This emaUoriginated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear BOE;

It concerns and saddens me that the discussion aroundthe moves specificto the Valley Meade neighborhood in Ellicott City (AKA Polygons 159 and 1159) do not appear to have the same level of discussion and attention as other moves across Howard County.

I understand that time is precious and short. I believe you are trying to find the best solution for the stress on our children's education. However, your decisions todaywill create ripples and repercussions of even greater strains impacting our school system and the safety of our children. Over-development is a key cause ofthe strain, and bytemporarily lightening the load in the Valley Meadearea, you open the doorfor a developerwho, for the last three-plus years, has attempted to dump in high-density housing in this area. High-density housing, which in time will severely impact the stress on our school system, increasecar traffic, and eliminate precious undeveloped grasslands needed to absorb rainwater. These proposed high-density buildings will undoubtedly increase the population and fill the margins the Board is so desperately trying to create, while the environmental impact could threaten the safety of children and adults alike. A few more points and considerations for today:

Please do not rush any decisions that impact Polygons 159 and 1159 based on a play to assign Bethany Glen to SJLES/Patapsco/MHHS. Please assign Bethany Glen its Polygon number. It cannot be absorbed into Polygon 159. Please, resist the developers attempt to slip their project into a fragile environment. I know you want to save and cultivate our schools in a timely manner, but please invest your time in this matter. Be our champions, be our voice. If you cannot find a way to keep our two polygons at our current neighborhood schools; you, can break the cycle of strain and redistrict and deter these developers. These developers are in it for the money; they do not live here and do not care about our well being or the collateral damagethey will leave in theirwake, and the subsequent and undoubtedly substantial work the Board will need to do to find another solution to the ever- increasing strain.

If you must move Polygons 159 and 1159 please consider howyou can keep us at schools north of the route 40 corridor (ideally Waverly), and keep Valley Meade intact (159 and 1159 with the rest of Polygons 1034, 2034. 34. 158and3034). - . - , ^-^--^-^ . -., "-..-. --., -., -.,

Please consider revisiting the options previously proposed options, I understand that this will take more time. However, I knowyou can find a better solution that will leave us the legacyof a sustainable, successful solution that will endure. Please look beyond the scope of the moment and envision the more significant impact these developers will have on the schools and eco-system and then project the subsequentwork and investments needed by both the County and School Board to resolve that stain. If delay the decision the developers' window would be allowed to build homes with less impact to our already stressed infrastructure. Please take the extra time and consider this.

With Best Regards

Carl & Heather Marchese Ellicott City J^arilyn Grosskopf

From: Junghwa Kwon Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:52 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Don't move polygon 1098 to Phelps Luck ES

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Good morning. I am the residence of polygon 1098. Veterans ES is across the the street. Why do we need to move to Phelps Luck ES that is lOmin away? If The board ask me give my child the ride for Veterans, definitely will. Move to PhelpsluckES???Noway!!! Sent from myiPhone Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Melrose Benkacoker Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:51 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: [email protected]; Jonathan Edelson; Megan Williams Subject: [External] Fwd: Redistriciting forTSES Polygons 1059 & 2059

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless ^ou recognizethe sender and know the content is safe.

Good MorningBoard,

I am writing on behalf of Talbott Springs Elementary School family. We know you as a board have been on this redistricting issues and are trying to do what will be best for our community and our kids especially. This is one last plea from us please keep TSES as it is until we get our new building. Not having the new building start as planned is already having animpact on our kids and our community please keep them together so that we asparents do not have to deal with a 2nd issue ofseparating family and fi-iends. Polygon 1059 and 2059 do not have many children and they are a part ofTSES please have some compassion and please keep these 2 polygons at TSES.

Thank you all so much for all the work you've been doing and continue to do we do appreciate you all.

Sincerely, Melrose Benka-Coker Parent TSES Michele Hagen, 7821 FlagstoneCt, Polygon 86

am writing one final plea before the board vote on 11/21, as the published boundary review process allows. Whatthe boundaryreview processdoes not allow is newscenarios for redistrictingto be thought up by board members individuallyafter the time frame for publictestimony at the scheduled hearings has passed. I feel this is a lack of transparency on the part of publicly elected officials. I ask that any high school redistricting be tabled until HS 13 is constructed. Any HS movement before that time is a short-term band-aid instead of a long-term fix. If HS 13 istruly underway, whywould you disrupt so many children's attendance areasfor something that isjust goingto change in the very near future anyway? Boardof Ed members have beenvocal aboutthe raceagainst the clockto get somethingdone. No motions have passed with any kind of unanimous support. Parents have been vocal about their discontent with the redistricting process. Students themselves have advocated against the redistricting process.

Howard High School is overcrowded. This is a fact and is undisputable. It has been for as long as I personally (a parentof a senior at Howard, and a resident of the Howard attendance area for the 11 years I have owned my home) can remember. The board's plan from 11/18 brings the capacity percentage to 126%. This is a band-aid. My polygon will go to Long Reach HS which will be at 110%. In a school of 1420students, this puts the numberto 1789 (HoHS). In a school of 1488,this puts the number to 1636 (LRHS). And this is in 2020-21 only. By 2023 LongReach HSis back up to 121%capacity vs. Howard's 120% projected capacity, so how is any move from Howard to Long Reach anything but a band-aid? It does not solve the long-term problem. Why is any discussion of HS 13 absent from work session 9, and what that will do to the affected polygons in the years leading up to it's opening in 20237 Do the capacity percentages take into account the students who are absent from Howard HSon a daily basisfor the HCCdual enrollment/jump start program? Mysenior currently participates in this program, asdoes almost every memberof her peer group. This is a program that wasintroduced to help combat overcrowding on a voluntary basis. I believe this program is worthwhile and should be allowed time to evaluate its benefiton our overcrowded highschools. This program wasonly put into place in the very recent past and I don't believe has had the time or attention dedicated to it to see if it is working in the manner intended.

These are children's lives being played with by the Board of Education. Anything less than a perfect plan is not acceptablewhen it comesto our children. It would garnermore respect to admit the Board cannotfix the problem at this time, table anymovement at the HSlevel until HS13 is readyto open and fix the county-wide problem with capacity at the high school level in one sweeping movement. Thank you for your attention as a taxpayer who votes and pays your salaries. Marilyn Grosskoi

From: C P Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:40 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Opposing move of Polygon 1171 - Who is representing us?

CAUTION:This emauoriginated from outside ofHCPSS. Oonot cUcklinks or open attachments, uilless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear BOE members,

I am Chandrakant Patel, resident ofHCPSS Polygon 1171.

Yesterday BOEboard members voted to move polygon 1171to Glenelg HighSchool because BOEmembers repeatedly brought upthe pointthat we will havefuture development. Theydid not, however, askabout the projections. In2024- 25, our P°lygon^s projected to have23 highschool students. Howis this worth moving usto a school 55%farther away? Polygon232, 232 and 1231were suggested to move from MRHSto GHSin HighSchool Option 1 and HighSchool Option 2 in the FeasibilityStudy Report and in the Superintendent recommendation for HighSchool move. Theygot their chance to testify andconvince boardmember to notchange their school. We are asking for our chance to testify in front of the board.

Below is screen image from BOE's own projection file. A»t- u ~ t. i- ^ n' f. '. u f y (t SV 2018. 19 ..EnrflilinBflitPniiecthms Ertrtttlftftnt 5dK»lY«ir20(20>2(Kl Sciw(riYesr2(ai-2Ct22 School Year 2022-2023 School Year 2023. 2024 Schofl) Year 2Q24-202S

Pdyr.T , B MS . H5 cs *ns ;H5 £S :MS HS ES MS HS ES MS H5 '£5 MS HS 171 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 231 ID u M M tl i5 11 tS I" tl U |t0 12 16 131 37 3< 2? 2S » 36 w |S? 3D 41 63 31 42 lan * 10 31 Id IS It It 169 21 IS 80 25 21 1231 11 10 II 10 12 |U 10 12 121 ID 13 Geography a. Westmount is located in the northeast part of polygon 1171. Polygon 1171 isa very large polygon and even after development more than 80% of this polygon will remain farmland. b. Westmount issurrounded by FrederickRoad to the north, Kiwanis-WallasPark to the east, andfarmland to the west and south. c. The only ingress and egress option for Westmount residents is onto Frederick Rd. (Rt. 144). You maysee other road onto this polygon (like Manor Lane), but they are private roads for farms and not accessible to Westmount residents, only accessible for farmland traffic. Please checkthe map; this community issurrounded by other communities that are still assigned to MRHS on three sides and Polygon 171, which is only farmland. Polygon 171 is adjacent to 1171. 171 isfarmland and is a biggeographical buffer between us and the rest of Howard County to the south with 0 students in HCPSS until at [east 2025. Polveon 1171 resident area. mmnlrtrlu ISOLATED from all nearby neighborhood communities.

'^Sirtf'iti; teirigt »-tA M^l 1.^

^ , ^'£ty^EW. JL7t) TSt. uow. iffi

P'lAf^evt. l^ys MMIS e t».a. sistia ?%' ^ PitriF s

C4i\fe^AiStt HA

ne: Private road

/--

'-' 'ws-fa.._ Polygon 171 and polygon 1171 were not included in any earlier reports for High School change since moving them will create Isolated island polygon. All the BOE members knew that they will be creating an isolated island, so they combined polygon 171 to show it's not as bad as it seems. In reality, it is one of the worst examples of redistricting in HCPSS. Polygon 171 is totally farmland (with 0 students until at least 2025); Polygon 1171 is also 80% non-residential. BOE members also mentioned that they do not want to bring GHS above 95% because it is an older school, so they took polygons from Glenelg and put them in River Hill. Then members did exactly what they said they didn't want to do by moving us to GHS.As I said earlier, our polygon makes no difference in either school. But it will make catastrophic impact on resident / student at this polygon.

Manytimes, we heard BOEmembers talk about keepingcommunities and neighborhoodstogether for manyother polygons -1 have not heard this point mentioned for our polygon a single time. That is the textbook definition of bias BOEmembers are favoringone community overthe other. Not applying BOE Policy6010 consistently acrossall polygons. BOE should be making an objective decision.

I feel that there is NO representation for me or my community in this matter that will affect us severely.

Chandrakant Patel Resident of Polygon 1171 Marilyn Grosskoof

From: julie. hotopp@gmail. com Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:36 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: khotopp@gmail. com Subject: [External] Secondvideo testimony on the boundary review in HowardCounty that has moved polygons 32, 1132, and 2132 to BWES

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unlessyou recognize the sender and know the coutent is safe. Pleaseaccept the followingadditional video astestimony on the boundaryreview in Howard County that has moved polygons 32, 1132, and 2132 to BWES.

Usinggoogle maps I highlightthe many problems with the movement ofthese polygonsfrom what is clearlytheir walkable neighborhood, asenvisioned in the original Columbia design,to a completely different neighborhood, leading to geographic isolation (and arguably significant probability of marginalization) of these students. https://www. voutube. com/watch?v=_sgCL[l_w_CFkA

Sorryfor the poorquality, there is so little time and my skills are so very limited.

Julie Marilyn Grosskopf

From: JayPeterson Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:36 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Christina Delmont-Small; Chao Wu; Vicky Cutroneo; Sabina Taj Subject: [External] Livewithin 1 mile: Request minor polygon adjustments to become a "walker" to stay at Clemens Crossing ES (Polygons 1132, 132, 2132)

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless >ou recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear BOE Members:

In relation to Pupil Transportation Policy5200 related to walkers, I would like to request that forthe 1132, 132, and 2132 students who live within 1 mile of Clemens Crossing ESbe allowed to remain at Clemens and walk to school, to at least provide some relief for a small portion of these polygon students who were impacted by the proposed moves to Byrant Woods and are able to walk and remain at Clemens.

Can the polygons be adjusted or proposed accordinglyto at least reflect the 1 mile adjustment? At times, Howard County Polygons have been adjusted in a similar manner at other locations. This would also provide some relief to the bus transportation services and costs.

Our children will not be able to take the bus to Bryant Woods, as proposed, because of our AM and PM caretaker locations and fixed work schedules, as this will likely create a financial hardship and may impact employment.

Our polygon 1132 is being proposed to be redistricted from Clemens Crossing ESto Bryant Woods ES. Our house is actually 0. 8 miles from Clemens Crossing ES, and ~ 75 feet from to a polygon border (Owen Brown Road) that remains at Clemens Crossing ES.

believe this is a very reasonable request - thank you for your consideration.

Jay & Mina Peterson 6195 Llanfair Drive Columbia, MD 21044 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: I Alh Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:30 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: Razan Yasin Subject: [External] One Dorsey Hall United - Polygon 1148

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not click links or open attachments, unlessyou recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good morning,

My name is Ismail Alhasan and I live on Hallowed Stream. My son is getting readyto start in Norfhfield Elementary in the next year. Many ofour friends and neighbors attend it and he has been so excited to join.

Please reconsider redistricting elementary school since this change will be challenging for me andmy wife. We both work fall time, andmy job is located in VA.

Important note: My daughter, 3 and half years old, is already attending daycare/school "Children's Manor Montessori School - Ellicott City". Northfield and Children's Manor are close and in the same path to our house in Hallowed Stream. This is very important for emergencies situations such as snow days, and also, for drop off and pick up during normal days.

Thank you,

Ismail Al Hasan Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Mike Heber Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:29 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Please add Polygons 1038 and 2038 polygons backto Howard High School Our neighborhoods have been split!

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck Unks or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe.

Board Memebers,

I am respectfully askingthat you please reconsider your vote to re-visit Polygons 1038 and 2038 and move these areas backto Howard High School. As it stands nowthe 38s have been split in halfwith children goingto Howard High School and . My family is located in polygon 2038. My daughter is a rising sophomore and will be deeply affected by this move. In addition to her having anxiety issues and having to go through the whole agonizing ordeal of becoming familiar with yet another new high school and being moved out of her high school from other family members, she will more than likely be redistricted again with the opening of HS#13. Our polygon (the 38s) have traditionally always been assigned to Howard High school. Howard High already has many portables to accommodate our children, along with the large staffand the lower FARMS numbers to deal with over capacity as compared to Long Reach High School. Long Reach High School is expect to boom in population soon. Please reconsider leaving polygons 1038 and 2038 to stay with their home school of Howard High school and their sister polygon 38 at Howard High.

I understand that the Board has a very difficult job, but this small feed will only disrupt communities and families. These two polygons 1038 and 2038 need to stay at Howard High school. I implore you to please help our area. Other communities have had months to assemble, get t-shirts and rally. We learned in one night that they split our neighborhoods and very few had noticed or said a word because it is the llth hour. Please please help polygons 1038 and 2038 and move us backto our home school of Howard High school.

I have watched the meetings and appreciate how you have helped many small feeds return to their home schools and would appreciate the same thought and time and effort given to mine of 2038. Please keep the 38s (38, 1038 and 2038) together at Howard High school.

I am asking please dont rush this and negatively affect so many families. I invite you to drive down Hanover road to see that our polygons 1038 and 2038 feed into the 38 and 1124 and 124 neighborhoods all the way down Hanover Road. We belong with Howard High school, am askingthat you please try to move us backto the Howard High school feed before the vote this Thursday.

Thank you for all of your time and efforts.

Mike Heber Polygon 2038 - Please keep us at Howard High School Marilyn

From: Peter Palmieri Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:28 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting; ChaoWu; Christina Delmont-Small; VickyCutroneo; Kirsten Coombs;Jennifer Mallo; Mavis Ellis; SabinaTaj Subject: [External] Polygon 1301

CAUTION: This emau originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. DearBoard Members, WhileI highlydoubt anyof you arereading anyfurther comments onthis matter, I'mnot goingto giveup just yet.

Ivery much disagree with your decision to move Polygon 1301 from Ilchester Elementary to Waterloo Elementary. Additionally, I amappalled atthe manner in whichthe motion to keep 1301 andsurrounding polygons at IES washandled. Ms. Cutroneo andMs. Delmont-Small askedquestions to get clarifying information anddata in orderto make m informeddecision - anadmirable request that the Board should have been happy to oblige. You SHOULDbe making informed decisions. Instead, bothboard members werequickly shutdown byMs. Ellis thechair person ofthe board. I couldnot believe whatI wasseeing as I watched. Theywere not even given the opportunity to vote with enough infonnation to make an infonned decision. Whatkind of behavior is this? I thoughtthis Board was all about everybody's voices being heard. I thought thisBoard was all aboutputting our children and communities first. I thoughtthis county was about civility. Clearly I thought wrong.

This entireprocess hasbeen fmstrating anddisorganized. Whetheryou agreed with the Superintendent's plan or not (which you clearly didn't), he presented facts, figures anddata from professionals hiredto do suchwork. Youspent $40, 000of taxpayer money, just to throwall of that information away.

Instead, you throw out Polygon numbers andFARM figures, asif those arethe only things thatmatter. There is more to this, andthe Superintendent's dataprovided a muchbigger picture onthe impact to our communities. You aremoving our commumty out ofIES, a school wehave been districted to since our neighborhood was built in 1993. Ourneighborhood sendsless than 25 kidsto elementary school, andwill sendeven less in 2021 after several move to middle school. Our community has a single entrance and exit. We are NOT connected to any other communities.

Whatyou've done, andwhat you are doing is WRONG. Theprocess is wrong, the plan is wrong and the decisions are wrong.

SinceI knowthat I cannot changethe minds ofall ofyou, I will speakdirecfly to Dr. Wu,Ms. Coombs, Ms. Cutroneo and Ms. Dehnont-Small - Vote this plan down! The decisions have been mshed. You've been forced to make decisions without ample information. This isnot theright thing to do,nor the right way to go about doing it. I imploreimolore youvou to vote thisthi< plan down.

Thank you.

I'cli.'r I'. iliiiit. 'ri 51151 itllL'Cavk Dr. I llif. i); ('|1\. MI) lit; Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Christine McCauley Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:27 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] llchester to Waterloo feed

! CAUTION:This emaUoriginated from outside ofHCPSS. Donot eficklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. I am writing requesting permission for the 5th grade llchester students to stay at llchester and not be redistricted to Waterloo. Our Montgomery Meadows neighborhood represents a very small feed that may now go from Waterloo to Bonnie Branch.

It is cruel to send 10 rising 5th graders to a school where they will no virtually no one, only to send them to backto Bonnie Branch with their llchester community in 6th grade. They would know only 9 other 5th graders at Waterloo as compared to 100 students at llchester.

5th grade is a very important year. My daughter has alreadyformed her Battle of the Books team. She is looking forward to the famous 5th grade play, the class field trip to DCand Mt Vernon. She has always done well;in the class spelling B andthe class poetry contest. She can't waitto compete forthe 5th gradetitle. She wants to participate in graduation with the friends that she has had since pre-school.

My daughter has been a part of llchester since she was 1 week old and went to llchester to see hertwo sisters. This is the only school she has ever known.

My daughter loves school and is flourishing. She is the happiest kid you have ever met. She has been inconsolable for the past four days. She cried so hard today that she threw up this morning. I put her on the bus kicking and screaming. She was so upset she could not breathe.

I had to call the school this morning and have the Guidance Counselor / School Psychologist talk to hertoday as I am extremely concerned about her mental health.

10 students will not change the demographics at Waterloo. In fact, you picked the most diverse neighborhood at llchesterto send to Waterloo so you just significantly decreased the African American and Hispanic populations at llchester. My children represented the AA community and no other llchester neighborhood had more black and brown students than Montgomery Meadows. Our PTA was very diverse as well with our llchester President, VP and treasurer all from Montgomery Meadows.

This decision is a huge blowfor our llchester community. Pleaseconsider allowing the 10 children to stay. We are 1 mile from llchester and it would be cheaper to bus us to llchester than Waterloo where it is 4 times longer to bus us there.

Thank you

Christine McCauley Jenny Toth

Polygon 1150

Please don't divide up our Dunloggin neighborhood by sending our children to different high schools, please allow our children to continue to attend our neighborhood high school, CHS, and allow our children to feel connected to our community. We have 5 children and worked very hard to purchase a single-family home in Dunloggin neighborhood in 2015. We chose Dunloggin neighborhoodbecause we wantedthe feel of community and have proximity to school and activities. Asa large family ofvarying ages, proximityto schoolsand activities isvery important to us. Proximityto our high school allows our children to be involved in high school after school activities and allows us as parents to be involved. Increasing commute times - due to distance and/or traffic patterns - will have a negative impact on so many and in so many ways.

Proximity is important because less time commuting means:

. More time with family . More time for dinner . More time for homework . Allowing our children to be involved in after school activities More time to spend with school friends outside of school, especially because currently our kids can safely walk or bike to see friends . More time for youngersiblings to not be in the carwhile transporting older siblings Allowing younger siblings to be involved in their own activities, rather than be in the car transporting older siblings . Lessmoney spent on gas-yes, this is important, an extra tank ofgas a week hasan impacton family financial budgets Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Jessica Fener Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:25 AM To: Kirsten Coombs; Jennifer Mallo; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Mavis Ellis; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu; Superintendent; Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygons 1098/98 small feed concerns

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUek links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. Members oftlie board: After the conclusion oflast nightswork session, we strongly request you to look at polygon 1098/98,as it has notbeen reviewednor discussedat anypoint thus far. Here is the distributionfor our neighborhood,Brampton Hills: Currentlywe attend Waterloo ES. Under the newconsolidated plan we will attend Phelps Luck. Items of note that we fee] have been overlookedinclude our NEWLYcreated small feed, our schools'sproximity, andcapacities. First, our neighborhood's move has created a small feed - only 9% of students from PLES will move into EllicoU Mills (essentially our entire neighborhood).Meanwhile, 40% ofWorthington's population wUl advance to EUicottMills. WorthingtonES - the closest school is, at 85% capacity, and forecasted to remain at this threshold for the future. They have not beenlooked at during this process and given their low capacity utilization I am forced to wonder why. Meanwhile PLES is at 100%, Title l and trendingto increase.Finally, from a proximitystandpoint, ElementarySchools ranked in order ofshortest to longest distancefrom our neighborhood:Worthington Veterans Rockbum Waterloo Moving 1098/98to Worthingtonwill help keeptransportation costs in line, strengthenour feedand maintain our connectionto our community, andassist in addressingcapacity issues in thefuture. A couple ofyou have shared that this processfeels very rushed.I agreewith this sentiment as the board has made many drastic changes with no notice to the communities it will effect and therefore not givingfamilies any time to processthese changes and/or respond to them. Whileyou haveall put hoursof work and tireless efforts into gettingthis right, I understandthat there is no perfect planto makethe changesyou all areseeking to make. We requestthat you slowdown the process andplease apply reason not just yourconscious when looking at our polygons 98/1098 one last time. It's disheartening to knowthat our children will leave their friends that they currently go to schoolnext to, playsports with, goto theY with, andsee at churchso we can help the boardmanipulate statistics on paper.While we have boiled attendance areas down to numbers, shapes,and color codedregions, they are actually comprised of our children. We request that you polygons 1098/98 the time and review it deserves as each child's education and future is equally important. Thank you for your time and patience during this very critical time in our county,

Jessica Fener Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Stephanie P Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:20 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Redistricting

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board Members,

Please do not create the smallest feed in Howard Countyby moving our kids out of SJLSand PMS. Keep Polygons 159/1159 aspart ofthe community they have alwaysbeen part of. Please use this last bit oftime to review the long bus times for young children, and creating a tiny feedwhere kids will not know any oftheir classmates with each school move.

Keep the community together and delay the redistrictinguntil it canbe done correctly.

Thank you,

Stephanie K. Freeburger, MSPH SDarsons9(S).email.com Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Rajesh Kumar Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:17 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 189 - Reverse Decision to move CMS to Lime Kiln MS

! CAUTION: This emaUoriginated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. Respected HC Education Board Members,

I am a resident ofPolygonl89. I amwriting to oppose HC EducationBoard's recent discussionto redistrict students from CMS to Lime Kiln MS. The brief discussion that took place for this decision was based largely on inaccurate information. Board member Dr. ChaoWu saidthat 'Huge development at palygon 189may overload PRESandCMS.

. At present, there is no huge developments or any plan for huge developments in polygon 189. Over 82% fl24/lS01 of newly built houses in polygon 189 were sold and move-in completed prior to the beginning ofthe 2019-2020 school calendar year.

. Given the fact that CMS has not reached its full capacity of occupancy and students currently enrolled in CMS from polygon 189 constitute approximately 5% ofthe enrolled students in CMS, It is highly unlikely that students from polygon 189 could contribute to the full capacity of CMSin the near future. In fact, approx 100 students from polygons 117 and 1117 located in between CMS and LKMSwere redistricted last year by the board from LKMSinto CMS.These polygons andothers like 126 and 127,which are geographically much closer to LKMS than 189 is being sent to CMS, apparently because LKMS is more crowded.

CMS is within 1 mile ofPolygon 189.

I humbly request HC Education Board Members to reverse your last-minute proposal to redistrict students from CMS to Lime Kiln MS.

Thank you for your attention to this matter and consideration.

Sincerely,

Rajesh Kumar NV

6162 Flutie Lane, Clarksville, MD 21029 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Rajesh KumarNV Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:14 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 189 - Enclave Rill Hill - School Redistricting

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do notcUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear HC Education Board Members,

I am a resident of Polygonl89. 1 amwriting to oppose HL UducationBoard's recent discussionto redistrict students from CMS to Lime Kiln MS. The brief discussion that took place for this decision was based largely on inaccurate information. Board member Dr. Chao Wu said that 'Huge development at polvaon 189 may overload PRES andCMf. . At present, there is no huge developments or any plan for huge developments in polygon 189. Over 82% f 124/1501 of newly built houses in polygon 189 were sold and move-in completed prior to the beginningof the 2019-2020school calendaryear.

. Given the fact that CMS has not reached its full capacity of occupancy and students currently enrolled in CMS from polygon 189 constitute approximately 5% of the enrolled students in CMS, it is highly unlikely that students from polygon 189 could contribute to the full capacity ofCMS in the near future. In fact, approx 100 students from polygons 117 and 1117 located in between CMS and LKMS were redistricted last year by the board from LKMS into CMS. These polygons and others like 126 and 127, which are geographically much closer to LKMSthan 189 is being sent to CMS, apparently because LKMS is more crowded.

CMS is within 1 mile ofPolygon 189.

I humbly request HC Education Board Members to reverse your last-minute proposal to redistrict students from CMS to Lime Klln MS. Thank you for your attention to this matter and consideration.

Sincerely,

Rajesh Kumar NV 6162 Flutie Lane, Clarksville, MD 21029 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: dana garrett Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:13 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: Tim Garrett Subject: [External] Redistricting Issue

! CAUTION:TMs email originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not cUcklinks or open attachments, unlessyou recognizethe sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Board of Education Members,

I would like to thank you for your consciousness and dedication to the redistricting process.

I am writing to you today because I would like to bring your attention an issue that should be considered for modification during the next redistricting process. I am a parent oftwo elementary school aged children with special needs. During the 2017 redistricting process, I sent a written testimony pleading for my boys not to be redistricted from MWES. I included some personal information that was specific to theircases (both had lEP's), unaware that all testimony/emails would be released for public record. Luckily, Ms. Hick's automatic response included a blurb that caught my attention and I wasable to withdrawmy initial email. While I was ableto resubmit it without the personal information, it certainly lost most of its significance. Fastforward to the current 2019red istricting process, our neighborhood is once again markedfor redistricting. We are a part of the 63 children that are being moved a second time in their elementary school career, this time from WFES to TRES (polygon 1179). That would mean my boys would be in their third elementary school, while living in the same house. While, I wrote a written testimony and a portion of the oral testimony that our neighborhood delivered, neither were able to capture the specific examples or details that affected my boys.'

am askin9thatyou considerallowing non-publictestimony for the parents (care givers/fosterfamilies) of special need children. I would plead for the protection of these children's special needs, be balanced with the public's right's to see ALLtestimony. Weshould be afforded the same rights to advocate for our children, while also protecting their right to privacy. We shouldn't have to choose between pleadingfor theircase or causingthem harm due to public knowledge. Please feel free to contact to me if you would like to speak offthe record about the specific affects that my children faced from the 2017 redistricting.

Thankyou for your time! I realizethat manyof you have put in whatcould beconsidered a full time equivalentjob in developing your own redistricting plans. Yourcommitment to the students of Howard County is not going unnoticed!

Regards,

Dana Garrett Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Michelle Trotter <7palms4me@gmail. com> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:12 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External]

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content Is safe. To the BOE,

I am writing to voice my concerns regarding the Board's lack of transparency in the process of making a decision, which will impact a generation of children, their families and communities. The Board plans to vote, to adopt a plan, without first providing a final version to Howard County citizens. The public should be permitted to publicly testify on its merits or faults. I am asking that you schedule a session for public testimony prior to voting on November 21. 1 am asking that you perform a detailed and objective analysis of the public's testimony, even if this means postponing the vote. This will be necessary if the Board plans to make a decision that is truly in the best interest of all.

Michelle Trotter Concerned Howard County Citizen Dear BOE Members,

I am writing regarding the last minute changes in redistricting and to bring to your attention the current overcrowding at Hammond Middle School. The current administration is having trouble managing at 116%.

Students in 7th grade lunch are not allowed to sit with friends because of the overcrowding. Their one 30 minute slot to be social they are forced to sit with their homerooms, not their friends. The administration blames this on the overcrowding. My daughter tested into the higher band class at the end of last school year. The administration was not able to move her into the class due to the overcrowding in her other classes that needed to be switched. These are just two examples of many inequities at HMS.

I bring this to your attention because you have recently moved polygons into the already overcrowded HMS. Please revert Polygons 297 and 1297 back to Murray Hill MS. You are sending them from Murray Hill @121% capacity to Hammond MS putting it at 129%. This is not a good move for the students in Polygon 97 and 1297. The current administration will not be able to handle this increase in students.

You have also moved polygons from Fulton Elementary to Hammond Elementary. You are not taking into consideration the new Milk Producers development that will come online in 2021. A more logical way to fix the small feed would be to keep the children at FES and move them to Lime Kiln Middle School. This allows the children to continue to RHSwith students they have been in school with for their careers. As it stands now, students will move from middle school to high school with a very small feed. Currently those same students rekindle relationships from FES. With these moves those students will find themselves in the same small feed for high school never having met the students at FES.

These polygons 221, 1221, 2221 were recently moved to FES from HES because of overcrowding. Once the Milk Producers development comes online you will need to move them back and this juggling is not healthy for our children.

2020 utilization: HES95% FES 122% HMS 116% LKM 96%

2024 utilization (Not including 400 homes from new development) HES:107% FES:130% H MS: 126% LKM 106% Current feed from Hammond Middle to Reservoir High is relatively small-only 7 polygons.

Keep these polygons, 221, 1221, 2221, at Fulton Elementary and move them to Lime Kiln Middle to relieve the capacity at Hammond Middle. This creates an even stronger feed from Fulton to Lime Kiln to Reservoir which are all on the same campus.

Keepcommunities south of216 and east of 29 together from elementarythrough high school! Stop unnecessarily creating islands and isolating kids.

Respectfully,

Lisa Marr HMS parent Polygon 14 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Qitao Xie Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:08 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] strongly oppose to moving polygons64, 1064, 1129, 129awayfrom PRESto SES

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not cUck Unks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear BOE members,

We noticed that only our polygons (64, 1064, 1129, 1129) have been moved at both Elementary level and high school level. A few questions need to be answered from BOE. Why moved us from Blue ribbon school to a title one school? Think about it, title one...Why penalized our polygons but not other polygons? Whywere lots of polygons NOTtouched at all? Is there some conflict of interest for some BOE members? Should you investigate it? We bought the decent houses here for the purpose of better education and for the better community. We live here not for being penalized. Ifthe county needs to improve those title 1 schools, you should move more polygons there. Not just small feed to let us struggle there only. If you live in the good community with the school-aged kids, would you like to let your kids attend a title 1 school? I really doubt it. This is very frustrating for the whole communities in ourpolygons. Did you pay attention to the testimonies from our communities at all? Or you just wanted to take care of some special communities, or just some special interest groups.The school redistricting is not our problem, butyours. Nowthe ball is kicked backto us for solution. One thing I heard very nastily is what Ms. Jen Mallo said last night: "We don't want to double penalize those polygons". Why penalized us.... why...... You need to give us an answer.

Thanks, Jack (Polygon 64) Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Puneet Mehrotra Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:07 AM To: Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu; Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] BOE 1132 to Bryant Woods

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello Board of Education Member,

hope this email finds you well.

After reviewing and viewing the most recent BOEre-districting proposalsfmoving 1132 to Bryant Woods from Clemens Crossing) from 11/18, 1 have come to the conclusion that the proposal will have multiple adverse impacts on the children and community in Polygon 1132. The logistics of the proposal to move 1132 to Bryant Woods will negatively impact the children and community involved by a numberthings, 1. Significantly increasing the time they spend on a bus. Currently, polygon 1132 is lessthan one mile from demons Crossingfa 3 min drive). Our children frequently walk or bike to school for exercise and enjoyment and, given the close proximity, families are easily able to be very active with the Clemens Crossing community. Bryant Woods is up to 4 milesfdepending on the route) away from 1132 and would require children to walk or bike along Broken Land Parkwayand cross Little Patuxent Parkway. 2. Lack of safety and community participation ofthe children given the traffic near the town center, attending events at Bryant Wood for families in our polygon would be a half hour round trip commute, which would greatly reduce community participation. I believe the families in 1132 would be open to becoming walkers to Clemens Crossing. We have taken the proactive steps to take part in a walkers survey. In addition, the potential routes for reaching Bryant Woodsfrom polygon 1132 include Martin Rd to Broken Land Pkwy or Cedar Rd. Given Ms. Mallo s proposal, both these routes would require children from 2132, 1132 and 132 to be bused through multiple polygons that would be attending Clemens Crossingfpotentially 4133, 5133, 2204 and 1133) in order to reach Bryant Woods.This would significantlyincrease the bustime for children involved. It would make much more sense, logistically, for the school population between BryantWoods ESand SwansfieldES to be redistricted. These schools are closer to one another and currently projected to be under the utilization in the coming years. a. A number of families and ours, go to Clemens Crossing multiple times a week to play, to have fun and be a part ofa largercommunity, this hasgreatly enriched ourfamilies'life and especiallyour children's lives. b. Manyof my 1132 neighbors bike or walkto school. This hasprovide vital exercise but also a sense of community and belonging that is so very much needed.

Another keytake awayor concern that I have is, the lack of process and the lack ofability to testify and provide oral feedback to the proposed changes. The swiftness of the change, between Friday and Monday, has not allowed families to properly participate fully.

I implore you andthe boardof education to NOTmove polygon 1132to BryantWoods, this will havea negative impact on community, safety and the overall well being of our children.

Thank you for your time,

Punit and Rekha Marilyn Grosskopf

From: DMV FoodGroup Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:06 AM To: Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu; Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] 1132 Clemens crossing to Bryant woods

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. Hello Board of Education Member,

I hope this email finds you well.

After reviewing and viewing the most recent BOE re-districting proposalsfmoving 1132 to Bryant Woods from Clemens Crossing) from 11/18, 1 have come to the conclusion that the proposal will have multiple adverse impacts on the children and community in Polygon 1132. The logistics of the proposal to move 1132 to Bryant Woods will negatively impact the children and community involved by a number things, 1. Significantly increasing the time they spend on a bus. Currently, polygon 1132 is lessthan one mile from demons Crossing(a 3 min drive). Our children frequently walk or bike to school for exercise and enjoyment and, given the close proximity, families are easilyable to bevery active with the ClemensCrossing community. BryantWoods is up to 4 milesfdeoendinEon the route) awayfrom 1132 and would require children to walkor bike along Broken Land Parkway and cross Little Patuxent Parkway. 2. Lackof safety and community participation of the children given the traffic nearthe town center, attending events at Bryant Wood for families in our polygon would be a half hour round trip commute, which would greatly reduce community participation. I believethe families in 1132would be open to becomingwalkers to Clemens Crossing. We havetaken the proactive steps to take part in a walkers survey. In addition,the potential routes for reaching BryantWoods from polygon 1132 include Martin Rd to Broken Land Pkwyor CedarRd. Given Ms. Mallo's proposal, both these routes would require children from 2132, 1132and 132 to be bused through multiple polygonsthat would be attendingClemens Crossingfpotentially 4133, 5133, 2204 and 1133) in orderto reach Bryant Woods. This would significantly increase the bus time for children involved. It would make much more sense, logistically, for the school population between Bryant Woods ES and Swansfield ESto be redistricted. These schools are closer to one another and currently projected to be under the utilization in the coming years. a. A number of families and ours, go to Clemens Crossing multiple times a week to play, to have fun and be a part of a larger community, this has greatly enriched our families' life and especially our children's lives. b. Many of my 1132 neighbors bike or walk to school. This has provide vital exercise but also a sense of community and belonging that is so very much needed.

Another key take awayor concern that I have is, the lack of processand the lackof abilityto testify and provide oral feedbackto the proposed changes.The swiftnessof the change, between Fridayand Monday, hasnot allowed families to properly participate fully.

I implore you and the board of education to NOT move polygon 1132 to Bryant Woods, this will have a negative impact on community, safety and the overall well being of our children.

Thank you for your time,

Rekha Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Andrew Zanghi Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:05 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 1038

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside of HCPSS.Do not eUcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. DearMembers ofthe Board of Education,

First, I realize that this email comes very late in the redistricting process, but that is largely the problem and I ask that you take a minute to read what I have to say.

I live m Polygon 1038 with my wife and two daughters, both ofwhom attend Elkridge Elementary school. My wife and I understand the need for redistricting, the fact that redistricting is an imperfect puzzle that balances competing priorities, and that some families are not going to be happy with the end result. We have been following the redistricting process, realizing that our neighborhood would likely end up at either Howard High School or Long Reach High School. And, throughout the process, different proposals had our neighborhood at one of those schools or the other, and we were generally okay with that.

We did not expect whathappened yesterday, however. Polygons 1038 and 38 encompass a single neighborhood. The houses werebuilt in three phases and eachphase was given a different name, but for all practical puqioses it is one, still relatively small, neighborhood. Last night, for what I believe was the first time, those two polygons were separated. All of a sudden, without any warning, without any chance for debate, discussion or chance for input from the community, you split our neighborhood down the middle. We're talking about less than 10 high school students from two small neighborhoodstreets being separated from their neighbors.

Had this been the plan from the beginning, or had the plan been proposed with time for debate and discussion, fine. To do this to our neighborhood and our kids without warning is unconscionable.

I understandthat a line has to be drawn somewhere and that there arethere are goingto be kids that are on either side ofthe line that go to different schools. This is not the casehere. At the last minute you are separating a small polygon, with less than 10 high school students, from most ofthe Elkridge community, including their direct neighbors.

Our children deserve a chanceto speak out. Doingthis at this last second, without warning, without time, without, I believe, a fall understanding of what you were doing is wrong.

I appreciate your time and dedication. I ask for your help in this matter.

Sincerely,

AndrewZanghi Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Erica Buhl Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:05 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting; Erica Buhl Subject: [External] "pin" that was not revisited: tiny island (125/1125) of handful of kids bordered by Applied Physics Lab/MapleLawn/former classmates redistricted (backwest) Attachments: School Redistricting. pdf

! CAITTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Did anyone get time to read this? You put a pin in 125/1125. To my knowledge, it was never revisited. PLEASE RESPOND! We live in 125. To my knowledge, 125/1125, which together contain a very small number of students, were the only polygons (sent from PRESto Lime Kiln) that the board did not "restore" back west.

That is, these kids are now separated from their ("Hopkins Meade") community of older homes that stretches for a short distance offof either side ofJohns Hopkins road. A few years ago, thesekids (on either side of Hopkins Road)rode a bus togetherto attend PRES. I'dbe at least ashappy for this whole(Hopkins Meade) community to attend Reservoir. I just don't wantto be a tiny island, cut offfrom therest. At this point, all of the other kids in this community of older houses are disfaicted for RHHS. As noted, my son used to ride a bus to PRES with the other Hopkins Meade kids that live across the (Johns Hopkins) road.

- Three years ago,my guy (socially awkwardand dealing with significantbullying) wasseparated from ffiends when entering (Lime Kihi) middle school in a small feed.

-The following year, while my son continued to sti-uggle, an additional separation occurred when a large number of children from that small feed were sent back west to Clarksville Middle.

- Now, to my knowledge, this plan sends all of what remains ofthat small feed back west to RHHS, leaving 125/1125 as a tiny island of older homes.

The superintendent's planhad all offhe kids in the olderhomes moving from Reservoir to River Hill. Ms. Mallo's and Dr. Wu's original plans had all ofthese kids together at either Reservoir or RHHS. I just want this small community to stay together, be it at Reservoir or River Hill. Again, as far as I know, 125/1125 are now on their own, bordered by 1) the Applied Physics Lab 2) Maple Lawn and 3) fomier classmates who are now redistricted "back west."

Sony for the second email, but I don't know if anyone got the chance to read my husband's email (below). Again, PLEASERESPOND! I have no ideaif anyone had a chance to read my husband's email, or if anyone is aware ofthis tiny island that was pinned and not revisited.

Forwarded message From: Harry Eaton Date: Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 11:09 PM Subject: Fwd: Polygons 125 and 1125 are being separated from their community; River Hill vs Reservoir To: Erica Buhl Forwardedmessage From: Harry Eaton Date: Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 11:04 PM Subject: Polygons 125 and 1 125 arebeing separated from their community; River Hill vs Reservoir To:

Seeattached testimony regarding the board's unwarranted dqiarture from the superintendent's plan in these polygons with a very tiny number of students. Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Rekha and Puneet Tiwari-Mehrotra Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:05 AM To: Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu; Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [Externa!] Moving 1132 to Bryant woods, please NO

! CAUTION:This email originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. Hello Board of Education Member,

I hope this email finds you well.

After reviewingand viewingthe most recent BOE re-districting proposalsfmoving 1132to BryantWoods from Clemens Crossing) from 11/18, 1 have come to the conclusion that the proposal will have multiple adverse impactson the children and community in Polygon 1132.The logistics ofthe proposalto move 1132to BryantWoods will negativelyimpact the children and community involved by a number things, 1. Significantly increasing the time they spend on a bus. Currently, polygon 1132 is tessthan one mile from demons Crossingfa 3 min drive). Our children frequently walk or bike to school for exercise and enjoyment and, given the close proximity, families are easilyable to be very active with the Clemens Crossing community. BryantWoods is up to 4 milesfdeoendine on the route) away from 1132 and would require children to walk or bike along Broken Land Parkway and cross Little Patuxent Parkway. 2. Lack of safety and community participation of the children given the traffic near the town center, attending events at Bryant Wood for families in our polygon would be a half hour round trip commute, which would greatly reduce community participation. I believe the families in 1132 would be open to becoming walkers to Clemens Crossing. We have taken the proactive steps to take part in a walkers survey. In addition, the potential routes for reaching Bryant Woods from polygon 1132 include Martin Rd to Broken Land Pkwy or Cedar Rd. Given Ms. Mallo's proposal, both these routes would require children from 2132, 1132 and 132 to be bused through multiple polygons that would be attending Clemens Crossingjpotentially 4133, 5133, 2204 and 1133) in order to reach Bryant Woods. This would significantly increase the bus time for children involved. It would make much more sense, logistically, for the school population between Bryant Woods ES and Swansfield ES to be redistricted. These schools are closer to one another and currently projected to be under the utilization in the coming years. a. A number of families and ours, go to Clemens Crossing multiple times a week to play, to have fun and be a part of a larger community, this has greatly enriched our families' life and especially our children's lives. b. Many of my 1132 neighbors bike or walk to school. This has provide vital exercise but also a sense of community and belonging that is so very much needed.

Another key take away or concern that I have is, the lack of process and the lack of ability to testify and provide oral feedback to the proposed changes. The swiftness of the change, between Friday and Monday, has not allowed families to properly participate fully.

I Implore you and the board of education to NOT move polygon 1132 to Bryant Woods, this will have a negative impact on community, safety and the overall well being of our children.

Thank you for your time,

Thank you, Puneet Mehrotra From: Puneet M Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:03 AM To: Mehrotra, Puneet Cc: Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs;Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small;Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu; Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] 1132 changes

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cKck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello Board of Education Member,

I hope this email finds you well.

After reviewing andviewing the most recent BOE re-districting proposals(moving 1132to BryantWoods from Clemens Crossing) from 11/18, 1 havecome to the conclusion that the proposal will havemultiple adverse impacts onthe children andcommunity m Polygon 1132. Thelogistics ofthe proposal to move 1132to BryantWoods will negatively impact the children and community involved by a number things, 1. Significantlyincreasing the time they spend on a bus.Currently, polygon 1132is less thanone mile from demons Crossing(a 3 min drive). Our children frequently walkor bike to school for exercise and enjoyment and, given the close proximity, families are easily able to bevery active with the Clemens Crossing community. Brymt Woods is up to 4nules(depending on the route) awayfrom 1132 and would require children to walk or bike along Broken LandParkway and cross Little Patuxent Parkway. 2. Lackof safety and community participation ofthe children given the traffic nearthe town center, attending events at Bryant Wood for families in our polygon would be a halfhour round trip commute, which would greatly reduce community participation. I believe the families in 1132 would be open to becoming walkers to Clemens Crossing. Wehave takenthe proactive steps to takepart in a walkers survey. In addition, thepotential routes forreaching Bryant Woods from polygon 1132 include Martin Rdto Broken LandPkwy or Cedar Rd. Given Ms. Mallo's proposal, boththese routes would require children from 2132. 1132 and 132 to be bused through multiple polygons that would be attending Clemens Crossing(potentially 4133, 5133, 2204 and 1133) in order to reach Bryant Woods. Thiswoiiid significantly increase the bus time for childreninvolved. It would make much more sense, logistically, for the school population between Bryant Woods ES andSwansfield ES to be redistricted. These schools are closerto one anotherand currently projected to be under the utilization in the coming years. a. A number offamilies andours, goto Clemens Crossingmultiple times a weekto play, tohave fun and be a partof a largercommunity, thishas greatly enriched our families' life and especially our children's lives. b. Manyof my 1132neighbors bike or walkto school. Thishas providevital exercise but also a sense of community and belonging that is so very much needed.

Anoflier key take away or concern that I have is, the lack ofprocess and the lack of ability to testify and provide oral feedback to the proposed changes. The swiftness ofthe change, between Fridayand Monday, hasnot allowedfamilies to properlyparticipate fally.

I implore you andthe board of education to NOTmove polygon 1132to Bryant Woods,this will have a negative impact on community, safety and the overall well being of our children

Thankyou,

Puneet https://outlook. of5ce.com/mail/redistoictmg@hcpss. org/deeplink';

[External] Re: PLEASE READ!!!! PLEASE DISCUSS 159/1159!!- ST. JOHN'S ES to MANOR WOODS Jason Weesner Tue 11/19/2019 9:03 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting ; Chao Wu ;VickyCutroneo ; Mavis Ellis ;Jennifer Mallo ; Superintendent ; Christina Delmont-Small ; SabinaTaj ; Kirsten Coombs ! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. BOE,

First - a thank you to Ms. Delmont-Small & Ms. Cutroneo for attempting advocate for 159/1159. To the rest of you - I'm deeply disappointed.

The board make several changes on the fly last night, affecting numerous polygons (159/1 59 being exceptions). The basis for many of these changes involve the same issues 159/1159 will be facing as a result of the proposed move & resulting feeds (see below).

I'm baffled as to why some polygons were given in-depth consideration, while others were ignored(e.g. 159/1159). If "equity" is a driving force in these deliberations, I'd say that equitable consideration needs to be given to all polygons in order to reach well-informed decisions.

Ms. Cutroneo & Ms. Delmont-Small did try to discuss 1 59/1159, but were immediately shut down. I'm appalled that the other board members refused to allow them to express their opinions. Frankly, the Board is being negligent by refusing to consider this matter fully.

I'd appreciate a more in-depth conversation of 159/1159 and the impact this move will have on our children and the community.

There are viable alternatives that can & should be explored, if only more time were allowed.

Concerns:

. The move runs counter to Policy 6010 in that it divides the long-time contiguous Valleymede community. . The proposed move of 2161 from Waverly to SJLES, while moving 159/1159 to Manor Woods will have a NEGLIGIBLE impact on SJLES' population. . My children will be subjected to a commute that is triple the distance, across some of the busiest roadways in the area.

1 of 5 12/26/2019, 10:43 https://outlook.of5ce.com/mail/[email protected]/deeplinl<

The lengthy commute poses a public safety risk and will result in increased transportation costs. The obstacles created by this move (logistical & social) will create impediments to student success. The move creates an unacceptable micro-feed at the MS & HS levels. The move has little to no impact on FARMS. The negative impacts of this proposed move far outweighs any objective benefit. The future Bethany Glen project needs to be removed from this discussion, with consideration of putting that potential feed into a separate polygon/s.

Jason Weesner 159

On Nov 18, 2019, at 9:22 PM,Jason Weesner wrote:

BOE-Give Ms. Delmont-Small the opportunity to debate her concerns on 159/1159.

Not doing so would'be shameful.

Regards, Jason Weesner 159

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 18, 2019, at 8:33 PM, Jason Weesner wrote:

Thank you, Ms. Delmont-Small for ATTEMPTING to discuss 159/1159 tonight.

However, I'm disgusted by the fact that her attempt to discuss these polygons was immediately shut down.

Let her speak, please.

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 18, 2019, at 5:54 PM, Jason Weesner wrote:

Can we please have some discussion on the proposed move of 159/1159 from SJLES to Manor Woods, per below?

2 of 5 12/26/2019, 10:43 { https://outlook. oflGce. com/maiVredistrictmg@hcpss. org/deep!inli

Thank you, Jason Weesner 159

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 18, 2019, at 8:09AM, Jason Weesner jasonweesner(a)gmail. com> wrote:

BOE,

Ip advance of your session today, I wantto express my support for Ms. Cutroneo's request to add more work sessions and/or extend the timeline.

It's the right thing to do.

Regards,

Jason Weesner Poly159

On Nov 16, 2019, at 3:51 PM, Jason Weesner wrote:

BOE,

To supplement my remarks below, attached are photos of the FIVEportables in use at Manor Woods.

Please help me understand how moving kids from SJLESto Manor Woods will have a significantly positive impact on EITHERschool.

Regards, Jason Weesner 159

Sent from my [Phone

On Nov 16, 2019, at 9:29 AM, Jason Weesner wrote:

3 of 5 12/26/2019, 10:43 A. https://outlook. ofGce. com/maiVredistrictmg@hcpss. org/deeplink

BOE,

As an addendum to my comments below, I'll add that I recently learned that Manor Woods currently has FIVE portables on campus.

This fact further diminishes the rationale to move students from SJLES to Manor Woods.

PLEASE RECONSIDER. DO NOT MOVE 159/1159 from SJLES to MANOR WOODS!!

Regards, Jason Weesner 159

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 15, 2019, at 12:27 PM, Jason Weesner wrote:

BOE,

PLEASE RECONSIDER THE PROPOSED MOVE OF 159/1159 FROM ST. JOHNS LANE ES TO MANOR WOODS!

We request that these polygons be subject of further conversation & review. This area has NOT been given adequate consideration.

The move runs counter to Policy 6010 in that it divides the long- time contiguous Valleymede community. . The proposed move of 2161 from Waverly to SJLES, while moving 159/1159 to Manor Woods will have a NEGLIGIBLEimpact on SJLES' population. . My children will be subjected to a commute that is triple the distance, across some of the busiest roadways in the area. . The lengthy commute poses a public safety risk and will result in increased transportation costs. . The obstacles created by this move (logistical & social) will

4 of 5 12/26/2019, 10:43, https://outIook. ofEce. com/maiVredistrictmg@hcpss. org/deeplink

create impediments to student success. The move creates an unacceptable micro-feed at the MS & HS levels. The move has little to no impact on FARhflS. The negative impacts of this proposed move far outweighs any objective benefit. The future Bethany Glen project needs to be removed from this discussion, with consideration of putting that potential feed into a separate polygon/s.

I understand that the SJLES PTA and others have extended invitations for BOE members to visit the neighborhood, &/or to drive the proposed route from Valleymede to Manor Woods - I'd ask for BOE members to respond to this open invitation in order to make a better informed decision on this proposal. PLEASE VISIT - PLEASE MAKE THE DRIVE!"

There are more practical solutions that would facilitate community continuity, avoid micro feeds, and minimize the logistical obstacles noted above. Please take time to explore the options, and RECONSIDER.

Regards,

Jason Weesner Gingerwood Dr. Polygon 159

5 of 5 12/26/2019, 10:43 i Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Aani Bhargava Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:01 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External; Keep Polygon 1171 at MRHS

! CAUTION:This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. Dear BOE members and redistricting officials,

Please let our kids (Polygon 1171) go to MRHS and MVMS, this is vital for their physical and emotional health.

1. Our kids are going to be on the isolated island. All of the neighborhoods around us go to MRHS. We were assigned to MRHS from the beginning and even the superintendent wanted to keep us and switch our middle school to MVMS like it was approved today, but then taken away. 2. The commute/distance will increase by 54% to Glenelg versus if we stay with our school, MRHS. This will be damaging to our kids health. 3. Also, it will cost Howard County school district more money on transportation and it will put our kids in danger. 4. There are only 7-8 kids in high school, and it's not likely to change in next 3-4 years. The nearst Glenlg bus-stop is 5 miles from our polygon, so adding a new bus route for 7-8 kids will be waste of community's money. All this while we share a bus stop for MRHS with our neighboring polygon.

From the bottom of our hearts we are asking you to keep us (Polygon 1171) at MRHS.

Regards, Aarti Bhargava (Homeowner at Polygon 171) Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Mehrotra, Puneet Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 8:59 AM To: Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu; Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 1132 changes

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello Board of Education Member,

hope this email finds you well.

After reviewingand viewingthe most recent BOEre-districting proposalsfmoving 1132to Bryant Woodsfrom Clemens Crossing) from 11/18, 1 have come to the conclusion that the proposal will have multiple adverse impacts on the children and community in Polygon 1132. The logistics of the proposal to move 1132 to Bryant Woods will negatively impact the children and community involved by a number things, 1. Significantlyincreasing the time they spend on a bus. Currently, polygon 1132 is lessthan one mile from demons Crossingfa3 min drive). Ourchildren frequently walkor biketo schoolfor exerciseand enjoyment and, given the close proximity, families are easily able to be very active with the Clemens Crossing community. Bryant Woods is up to 4_mi!es(dependingon the route) awayfrom 1132 and would require childrento walkor bike along Broken Land Parkway and cross Little Patuxent Parkway. 2. Lackof safetyand community participationof the children giventhe traffic nearthe town center, attending events at Bryant Wood for families in our polygon would be a half hour round trip commute, which would greatly reduce community participation. I believe the families in 1132would be open to becomingwalkers to Clemens Crossing.We havetaken the proactive steps to take part in a walkers survey. In addition,the potential routes for reaching BryantWoods from polygon 1132include Martin Rd to Broken Land Pkwyor CedarRd. Given Ms. Mallo's proposal, both these routes would require children from 2132, 1132 and 132 to be bused through multiple polygonsthat would be attendingClemens Crossing(potentially 4133, 5133, 2204 and 1133) in orderto reach BryantWoods. This would significantlyincrease the bustime for children involved. It would make much more sense, logistically, for the school population between Bryant Woods ES and Swansfield ES to be redistricted. These schools are closer to one another and currently projected to be under the utilization in the coming years. a. A number of families and ours, go to Clemens Crossing multiple times a week to play, to have fun and be a part of a larger community, this hasgreatly enriched our families' life and especiallyour children's lives. b. Manyof my 1132 neighborsbike or walkto school. This has providevital exercise but also a sense of community and belonging that is so very much needed.

Another key take away or concern that I have is, the lack of process and the lack of ability to testify and provide oral feedback to the proposed changes. The swiftness of the change, between Friday and Monday, has not allowed families to properly participate fully.

I implore you and the board of education to NOT move polygon 1132 to Bryant Woods, this will have a negative impact on community, safety and the overall well being of our children.

Thank you for your time, Puneet Mehrotra | Certified SAFe" 4 Agilist Health Services | Embedded Compliance Canton 5"' Floor | Mailstop CT09-01 1501 S. Clinton Street, Baltimore, MD 21224 w 443-547-3127 | c 412-610-4094 Puneet. MehrotrafScarefirst. com

****.l;************************************************************************** Unauthorizedinterception ofthis communication couldbe a violation ofFederal and State Law.This communication and any files transmitted with it are confidential and may contain protected health information. This communication is solely for theuse of the person or entity to whomit wasaddressed. Ifyou arenot fhe intended recipient, anyuse, distribution, printing or acting in reliance on the contents ofthis message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and destroy any and all copies. Thank you. ATENCION: Si habla espanol, tiene a su disposicion servicios gratuitos de asistencialinguistica. Llameal 855-258-6518 ^a: inS

From: Sharad Bhargava Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 8:58 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Keep Polygon 1171 at MRHS

! CAUTION:This email originated from outside of HCPSS.Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. DearBOE members andredistricting ofBcials,

Pleaselet our kids (Polygon 1171) go to MRHS and MVMS, this is vital for theirphysical and emotional health.

1. Our kids are goingto be on the isolatedisland. All ofthe neighborhoods around us go to MRHS. Wewere assigned to MRHS from the beginning and even the superintendent wanted to keep us and switch our middle school to MVMS like it was approved today, but then taken away. 2. The commute/distance will increase by 54% to Glenelg versus if we stay with our school, MRHS. This will be damagingto our kids health. 3. Also, it will cost Howard County school district more money on transportation and it will put our kids in danger. 4. There are only 7-8 kids in high school, and it's not likely to change in next 3-4 years. The nearst Glenlg bus- stop is 5 miles from our polygon, so addinga newbus route for 7-8 kids will be waste ofcommunity's money. All this while we share a bus stop for MRHS with our neighboring polygon.

From the bottom of our hearts we are asking you to keep us (Polygon 1171) at MRHS.

Regards, Sharad Bhargava (Homeowner at Polygon 1171) Mant^nGt

From: Jamie and Mike HEBER Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 8:54 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Please add Polygons 1038 and 2038 polygons backto Howard High School Our neighborhoods have been split!

CAUTION: Tlus emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. Board Members,

! am respectfully asking that you please reconsider your vote to re-visit Polygons 1038 and 2038 and move these areas backto Howard HighSchool. Asit stands nowthe 38shave been split in halfwith children goingto Howard HighSchool and LongReach High school. Myfamily is located in polygon 2038. Mydaughter is a rising sophomore andwill bedeeply affected bythis move. Inaddition to herhaving anxiety issues and having to go throughthe wholeagonizing ordeal ofbecoming familiar with yet another newhigh school and beingmoved out of her high school from other family members, she will more than likely be redistricted againwith the opening of HS#13. Our polygon (the 38s) havetraditionally always been assigned to Howard'High school. Howard High already has many portables to accommodate our children, alongwith the large staffand the lower FARMSnumbers to deal with over capacity ascompared to LongReach High School. LongReach High Schoolis expect to boom in population soon. Pleasereconsider leavingpolygons 1038and 2038 to staywith their home school of Howard Highschool andtheir sister polygon 38 at Howard High. I understand thatthe Board hasa very difficultjob, butthis small feed will onlydisrupt communities and families.These two polygons 1038 and 2038 need to stayat HowardHigh school. I imploreyou to pleasehelp our area. Other communities have had months to assemble, get t-shirts and rally. We learned in one night that they split our neighborhoods and very few had noticed or said a word because it is the llth hour. please please help polygons 1038 and 2038 and move us backto our home school of Howard High school.

I have watched the meetings and appreciate how you all have helped many small feeds return to their home schoolsand would appreciatethe samethought and time andeffort given to mineof 2038. Pleasekeep the 38s (38, 1038 and 2038) together at Howard High school.

I am asking please dont rush this and negatively affect so many families. I invite you to drive down Hanover roadto seethat our polygons 1038and 2038 feed into the 38and 1124and 124neighborhoods allthe way down Hanover Road. We belong with Howard High school, am askingthat you please try to move us backto the Howard High school feed beforethe vote this Thursday.

Thank you for all of your time and efforts.

Jamie Heber Polygon 2038 - Please keep us at Howard High School Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Sharon Singer-Barnard Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 8:44 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Redistricting HCPSS Testimonial

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To the Board of Education,

Please do not move polygon 78 from Deep Run ES, Mayfield Woods MS and Long Reach HS. Under the Superintendent's plan, the few children in our neighborhood would be moved to Jeffers Hill ES, Lake Elkhorn MS, and Oakland Mills HS.

1. There are very few students in our neighborhood (7 in ES, 3 in MS, and 5 in HS). Having these few students stay in their current schools will not have a significant impact on school crowding. There are no homes currently for sale and there are no plans for any new development within polygon 78 - there is no room for additional housing development. Our current 15 students make up insignificant percentage of the student population at HCPSS and will not impact capacity at HCPSS schools.

2. Polygon 78 is just across Route 108 from DRES. The children are bused to school because of traffic on Route 108. Polygon 78 is so close to the current schools that children could be walkers. Mayfield Woods MS and Long Reach HS are also within short distance to our neighborhood. There are three closer schools to our polygon than JH - DRES is 0.6 miles, Bellows Springs is 1. 2 miles, and Waterloo is 1 . 4 miles.

By moving us to a schools so much further away you are isolating us from the rest of community. We will become one of those islands that I thought everyone was trying to avoid.

3. The cost of gas for moving these 15 children would increase greatly because right now they take a very short bus ride (at most 1 0 minutes), but if they were moved to Jeffers Hill ES, Lake Elkhorn MS, and Oakland Mills HS, their bus ride would at least double (does not include other neighborhoods that might be on their bus, and does not account for traffic on Route 175).

4. The objective of the plan was to maintain diversity and not make poor schools poorer. However, by moving our 69 single family homes and our 15 children the plan actually makes DRES less diverse and more poor.

5. Switching these few students would definitely effect their educational welfare, and in turn the welfare of the children already at Deep Run ES, Mayfield Woods MS and Long Reach HS. Our children would have no friends/neighbors at Jeffers Hill ES, Lake Elkhorn MS, and Oakland Mills HS other than each other and no one nearby to see about missed homework and/or assignments. In addition, the test scores at JH are already lower^han DRES'test scores and'now under the Plan JH would also be over capacity than DRES. I am not sure how over populating JH would help any student's educational welfare (our children or the children already at JH). 6. Safety of our children must be considered in this case. Under the Plan our 15 children would be traveling on Route 175 where there is considerably more traffic than Lark Brown and Waterloo Roads. In addition, on the way home from Route 175 the bus would have to make a left hand turn onto Lark Brown Road. This turn is very dangerous, there is a traffic accident at this intersection every couple of weeks (I can see it from my house). Please do not move polygon 78 to Jeffers Hill ES, Lake Elkhorn MS, and Oakland Mills HS.

Thank you for your consideration,

Sharon Singer-Barnard 8303 Painted Rock Road, Columbia, MD 21045 (resident of polygon 78) Marilvn Grosskoof

From: Lisa Park Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 8:42 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] One Dorsey Hall United- Polygons 148, 276, 302, 1148 and 2148

! CAUTION: This emaU originatedfrom outside ofHCPSS.Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender andknow the contentIs safe. Hi Howard County Board of Education Members, My name is Lisa Park and I live in polygon 4, 150. Thank you so much for moving to put polygon 1148 and 2148 back to Northfield Elementary andbunloggin Middle Schools. That's where they belong. But three polygons, 148, 276, and 302 are still proposed to be moved to Running Brook Elementary and Wilde Lake Middle Schools. I kindly ask that you reconsider this decision. These three polygons are an integral part of our community. While not walkers/bikers to school, they use the same paths, we use the same Columbia Association pool and shop at the same Dorsey HallVillage Center Giant. Ifthese three polygons move to Running Brook Elementary_and Wilde Lake Middle School, their boundarieswill prevent them from walking/bikingto their schoolmates' homes. Because it would require them to cross Route 108. Essentially, they will become an island, a pocket of sort, trapped because crossing Route 108 isjust not safe atany age. At last night's meeting, Board Members discussed notwanting kids on the bus any longer than they needed to be. This holds true for polygons 148, 276 and 302 as well. I know that the Board of Education is trying to balance school capacity, FARM rates and other factors. But please, I ask that you also consider safety, in a proactive way. Our community's safety. Our kids' safety. There is no spreadsheet thatcaptures thisand noformula to measure this. Justimagine a young student crossing Route 108at Columbia Road. A major exitfor Route 29. Where age 50+ townhouse are slated to be built in the coming years. Imagine this young student trying to cross, just to go to a friend's house. How many accidents or deaths need to occur before there is an outrage? I hope that this answer is none, because this Board of Education will move polygons 148, 276 and 302 back to schools that would not require them to cross a major highway to visit friends.

Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Lisa Park R/Iarilyn Grosskopf

From: Tracie Schmidt Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 8:42 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Thank you

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Good morning, I would like to thank Dr. Martirano and Board Member SabinaTaj for consistently addressing school equity and for always considering the needs of all students in Howard County. Special thanks to Dr. Martirano's staffand the consultant stafffor the many long hoursthey have spent supporting the redistricting effort.

Tracie Schmidt parent of a thriving Wildecat Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Kathryn Patterson Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 8:41 AM To: Hcpss Redistrict1ng Subject: [External] Polygon 132

! CAUTIOX: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender andknow the content is safe.

Board,

I am asking you to please reconsidermoving polygon 132 fromClemens crossing to Bryant Woods. We are a small neighborhood, within walkingdistance to Clemens, notgeographically connected to 1132 and 2132.

My daughter is in Girl Scouts and otheractivities. We want to stay in this community. Below is a picture of my daughter and herfriends at bingo night at the community center. Please keep them together!

Thank you,

Kathryn Patterson

1 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Vanessa Beltran Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 8:40 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] FARM in 2132

! CAUTION:This email originatedfrom outside of HCPSS.Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To Whom it May Concern:

I somberly write to you to discuss your redistricting proposal. First, let me beginby sharing that my children are the children who you are, supposedly, trying to help. I am a divorced mom of three and have been able to stay in Howard County because I live with my parents. My children are FARM recipients. Over the years, I have contemplated moving out ofstate, or even looking into housinghelp since I am living in poverty, but I have always decided that my children arebetter off staying here because they were pretty much walking distanceto their school. I have a 7th grader, 5fh grader, and a Kindergartener. I am on my second Principal and 3rd Assistant Principal at Clemens Crossing. I have 2 nephews currently at Clemens as well. Even thoughwe fall under "disadvantaged, " because my children have family around we've had a small support system to fall on when times have gotten difficult. I cannotbelieve that after all my family's effort and sacrificeto stay at Clemens (it is not easy sharinga house with 3 generations, thejudgment alone from others ofwhy I live with my parents is terrible), my son now will be bussed away for the sake of other children to take his place at his school. Somehow,my disadvantagedson is not disadvantagedenough for members ofthe board to thinkhe deserves to stay at the school he's been visiting with his siblings since his birth and looking forward to attending. There are other children who the board feels are more important, or more disadvantaged, than him, that should take his place at his school, thus sending him away from his entire support system and actual family members. He now has to go farther awayso the Board ofEducation can conduct their social experiment on all ofour FARM babies. You shouldbe ashamedof yourselves looking at us andtreating us in such a way! We arenot a statistic for you to trifle with in order for you to go home at night and feel good about yourselves becauseyou shuffledus all across the county and think you did something noble.

Furthermore, the board discusses diversity, I am a fcst-generationLatina from Puerto Klco who came to HowardCounty aftermy father lived his whole childhoodin poverty, joined the military, and aftermany many years of sleepless nights and hard work, eventually got his masters. I am one ofthe few Latinas I know at Clemens who was actually born in theirhome country, andmy children's fatherhas a similar story from Panama.Your wanting diversity is taking diversity awayfrom Clemens, but I guessbeing only considered as polygon 2132 wouldn't let you understand that.

My son shouldn't have to pay for your social experiment. Everyone I've heard discuss the overcrowding at schools andhigh FARM rates agrees that this is serious and shouldbe addressed. I have not heard anyone say otherwise or speakin an ill manner. Everyone wants to keq? HowardCounty Schools as a leaderin education and diversity, however, using our children as an experiment is completely inappropriate.

I heard you all last night, vote my son awayfrom his family school as Ms. Coombs, even though she is not our representative, proposed bringing him back. My hope in Ms. Delmont-Small, who's been discussing keeping communities toghther, was shattered, and Ms. Mallo is unconscionable.

She attended our PTA meeting at Clemens and out ofdesperation I publicly exposed myselfin front ofall my fellow parents as a mother with children in FARM, again, the people the board is supposedly trying to help, but it did not matter. It went in one ear and out the other. I've watched her propose sending my children away last Thursday and then be disappointed when it failed and againvote against them staying yesterday. She obviously knows best andhas a more noble agendain mind thankeq>ing my family in theirhome school andwith our support system.

I would say thank you, but there is nothing to thank here.

Vanessa Beltran, Divorced single mom, and mother of 3 beautiful Latino children, butjust another polygon number to the board. Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Kathleen Seitz Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 8:39 AM To: Christina Delmont-Small; Superintendent; Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Redistricting

! CAUTION: This emafl originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unlessyou recognizethe sender and know the content Is safe.

BOE members,

Per the Superintendent and member Coombs request for notification of any plan mistakes or gaps, we are asking the BOE for another look at polygons 159, 1159 since no final decision was made. We would like polygons 159, 1159 to remain with the rest of Valley Mede polygons 1034, 2034 and 34.

The current plan seems to have 159, 1159 moving to Manor Woods Elementary and Burleigh Manor Middle which creates a feed of UNDER 5%. This is an extremely low feed.

Please review these two points for our community. Thank you for your consideration. The Seitz Family Marilvn Grosskoof

From: Ross Laidig Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 8:36 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Redistricting Concerns - Polygon 132

! CAUTION: This email origuated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. Dear Members of the Board of Education, With only hours left to provide written testimony and never an opportunity to address any moves of our neighborhood like other communities were given, I need to re-enforce our concerns with the detrimental redistricting of polygon 132 from Clemens Crossing Elementary School to Bryant Woods Elementary School. The kids of Polygon 132 have always attended Clemens Crossing Elementary. They are socially embedded in the community. These families participate in their neighborhood swim team, local sports teams part ofthe CA after school programs. Many parents are the scout leaders and soccer coaches. Through these neighborhood-based activities we have built a mutual support network and removing this small group of kids from that would only serve to separate relationships and community ties. By moving polygon 132 from Clemens Crossing to Bryant Woods it would add overcrowding to an already Trtle One school, taking resources away from the kids who needs to resources and overburdening teachers - hurting the level of education for all children in Bryant Woods and Polygon 132. All Board Members discussed that it would be better for Clemens to have more students than Bryant Woods. Please take action to ensure this! The children involved in any move from Clemens Crossing Elementary (Vz mile away) to Bryant Woods Elementary (2. 5 miles away) would not allow them to ever to be independently socially involved in the Bryant Woods community and friends due to the high traffic on major roads (Hickory Ridge Road, Broken Land Parkway, Little Patuxent Parkway and Governor Warfield Road) with no safe access via Columbia paths to their new school or children attending the school. Especially with the increase in traffic expected with all the new construction surrounding Merriweather Post Pavillion where hundreds of addition residents will soon arrive and be more suited for attendance at Bryant Woods. The children are left to rely on their working parents to get to school events when they would be able to walk and bike to their current community on their own because of the current safe side- walks, cross-walks and no lights or major roads.

To take these children out of their upcoming school year and send them to a new school, causes such significant trauma for them being moved from a school where they would make little to no impact on facility utilization at Bryant Woods Elementary. This is especially true when you are only moving three polygons out of Clemens Crossing to move three in. Why disrupt the lives of all of these children for little to no impact on FARMs? Keeping our diverse community together in our local neighborhood school directly upholds the standards in Policy 6010 with regards to community stability, maintaining strong feeds, minimizing transportation costs, fiscal responsibility, diversity, and minimizing the number of students moved. Respectfully, piease reconsider including Polygon 132 in the current redistricting plans to Clemens Crossing and keep our community together. We were surprised to hear that all of this was proposed by MS. Mallo at the work sessions. She wrote in multiple formats that this polygon would not move and we trusted those statements. Ifwe can't trust what we're told directly from our elected officials now, how will we be able to trust them in the future? What is that teaching our children?

Thank you,

Ross Laidig Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Jennifer Weissmueller Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 8:34 AM To: Mavis Ellis; Chao Wu; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Mallo; Kirsten Coombs; Hcpss Redistricting; Vicky Cutroneo; Sabina Taj Subject: [External] Polgyons 1098/98 NEEDADDITIONAL REVIEW!

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content Is safe. Dear Members of the Board:

After the conclusion oflast night's meeting (which I watched in it's entirety, and I thank you for your tiresome efforts and long late nights), we, the neighbors ofBrampton Hills (Polygons 1098/98) strongly request that you re-look at our situation. Our specificneighborhood/polygons havenot beenreviewed or thoroughly discussed at any point thus far. Here is the distribution for our neighborhood: Currently we attend Waterloo Elementary School. Under the new consolidatedplan we will attend Phelps Luck. Items of note that we feel have been overlooked include our NEWLY created small feed, our school's proximity and capacities.

First, our neighborhood's move has created a small feed - only 9% of less of students from our neighborhood will complete PLESto move into Ellicott Mills (essentially our entire neighborhood). Meanwhile, 40% of Worthington's population will advanceto Ellicott Mills. WorthingtonES - the closest school is, at 85% capacity and forecasted to remain at this threshold for the future. Meanwhile, PLES is at 100%trending to increase. Finally, from a proximity standpoint. Elementary School ranked in order of shortest to longest distance from our neighborhood: Worthmgton Veterans Rockbum Waterloo Moving ] 098/98 to Worthington will help keep transportation costs in line, strengthen our feed and maintain our connection to our community, and assist in addressing capacity issues in the future.

As one member ofthe board stated last night, this all suddenlyhas a "speeddating" feel. While you have all put hours ofwork and tireless efforts into getting this right, I understand that there is no template, or holy grail to immediately fixing these challenges. We request that you slow down the speed date round and please apply reason when looking at our Polygons 1098/98 one last time.

It's dishearteningto know that our children will leave their fi-iendsthat they currently go to school with, play sprts with, go to theY with and see at church so we canhelp the boardmanipulate statistics on paper. Whilewe haveboiled attendance down to numbers, shapes and color codedregions, they are actually comprised of OUR CHILDREN. We request that you give us the time and review of our neighborhoods as each child's education and future is equally important.

Thank you for your time!

Sincerely, Jennifer Weissmueller Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Kristin Yakas Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 8:28 AM To: Superintendent; BoE Email; Hcpss Redistricting;Jennifer Mallo; Christina Delmont-Small; Chao Wu; Mavis Ellis Subject: [External] I need you to read this

! CAUTION: This emafl originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. It's unacceptable to saythat this plan can't be perfect. To you this is a big picture plan, but to us this is our everydaylives. We arethe oneswho will haveto carryout this imperfectplan. It'sunfair to askthe children of 1159 and 159 to have to go to school 15-20 minutes away (when there's one two minutes away). But mostly it's unfair to accept a 5% micro feed of40 kids from MS to HS. Not only will they now have to make all new fiiends, but once they do, those kids will go to a different HS. You want our kids to make all new friends in HS? Ellis and Mallo seem curiously disinterested in solving this problem. I want to know what is behind that? This is not in the best interest of any child. No parent would stand for this. We are tax payers to this county, and you're going to make us accept that you can't fix this for us? You all keep saying the schools are overcrowded. So build more. That's the solution. The solution is not to move our kids like this doesn'thave repercussions. The solution is not to make our kids suck it up for the greater good. I am so dissatisfied with this county right now. Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Melissa Charny Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 8:17 AM To: Superintendent; Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Monday'schanges, alternative plan and transparency

'CAUTION: This emafl originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attaGhments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear superintendent and Boardmembers,

MASSWE CHANGE AND DISRUPTION ONE WEEK BEFORE A VOTE Our elementary School polygon came up in talks last Monday. After attempting to move 75% of the student bodyand 95% ofbus riders, themotion wasstopped anda Clemens CrossingElementary was reverted backto its original polygons.

CONFUSION, LACK OF TRANSPARENCY, NO DUE PROCESS Thursday November 14 there was a vote proposed by Ms Mallo to move our kids from 1132 as well as 132 and 2132 to Bryant Woods. It failed 3:4. On Monday 11/18, the board was confused, stated that motion was invalid andwe were moved in the numbers anyway to Bryant Woods. The board was given FARM numbers showing minimal (under 2% changes) and over capacity at Bryant Woods which is a smaller, older, Title 1 school less able to deal with a larger student body.

WALK ZONE, EGRESS Currently, 1132 and 132 arein process ofbecoming established asa walkzone to Clemens Crossingas we are 0. 7 miles away. Our egress is INLYto the south towards Clemens. Moving us to Bryant Woods drives us past the ColumbiaMail, Hospital and6 traffic lights. Weabsolutely cannotwalk asour egressis only south, there is too muchtraffic andtoo greata distance. It becomes a safelyissue with small children andis impractical. Cutting out a healthy alternative where kids walk with parents and their fiiends and peers.

GUTTDSTG OUR COMMUNITy CAUSING ISOLATION Friendships,boyscout andgirl scout troops, parent volunteers, team sports are all beingbroken by this move. WITHTHE LATESTCHANGE WE ARENOW THE ONLYISOLATED POCKET NOT GOINGTO CLEMENS Our community is effectively cut off from our community. It makes it harder to pick up our kids after work when they are 15 vs 2 minutes away from home. Especially after driving through trafGc from DC and Baltimore.

AS A NURSE WHO ADVOCATES PHYSICALAND MENTAL HEALTH FOE HER PATIENTS, THIS HAPHAZARD,RUSHED, UNNECESSARY CHANGE HAS CAUSEDANGUISH AMONGST OUR COMMUNHY AND CHILDREN

AFTER6 MONTHS IN SYRIA, ALANAAND GABRIELSFATHER CAME HOME ON FRIDAY. CHAOS ANS DISRUPTION ON OUR HOME FRONT AS WELL. UNFOUNDED. Unnecessary.

Why not move 1134, 2134 and 134 to Swansfield where they can walk? Why make those in 1132 and 132 Drive to an overcrowded school when they can walk to Clemens? Where are we getting all ofthis $$$$ ? If this decision is not delayed or deferred so that our coinmunity has a chance to defend itself against those we voted to help us (and at the very least DO NO HARM), we will be seeking legal action. This is a gross offense. Overcrowding is one issue we all want to solve. And we *had* solved it. This is purely demographics now with FARMS and that can not be the only justification for uprooting children from their community and fiiends and stripping the schools of its troops leaders, PTA members and volunteers. As an active PTA member, frequent volunteer androom parent I am telling you this will cause great hami.

Sincerely,

Melissa Chamy Polygonll32

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Corey Freeburger Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 8:17 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Keep Valley Mede Together (Polygons 159/1159)

! CAUTION: This emafl originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board Members,

Pleasedo not create the smallest feedin HowardCounty by moving our kids out of SJLSand PMS. Keep Polygons 159/1159 as part of the community they have always been part of. Please use this last bit of time to review the long bus times for young children, and creating a tiny feed where kids will not know any of their classmates with each school move.

K-eep the community together and delay the redistricting until it can be done correctly.

Thank you, Corey Freeburger Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Arielle Miller Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 8:11 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Harper's Choice

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attacfaments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. Goodmorning,

I'll bebrief- I'm writing this email before my first class.

HCMS is, frankly, in crisis right now. Having taught now at HCMS and SFES, I'm finding this year extremely difficult due to constant behavior challenges. Our students' parents are trying their best, but they have all the difficulties I'm sure you've heard before from Title I community members. We are trying to be everything for our students, and we are overwhehned.

In addition, the financialpressure on ourprograms increased greatlyjust two years ago whenwe faced the last redistrictingprocess. I haveseveral students that areunable to paythe $14 for a concert unifonn, not to mention instruments, supplies, andtravel. Our Boosters are struggling to cover costs for those students nowthat our population is out of proportion.

Increasing the FARMS rate at Harper's would be contrary to the inteat ofthe redistricting plan, and I hope you will reconsider before the final vote.

Many thanks, Arielle Miller Director of Bands Harper's Choice Middle School Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Jake Smith Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 8:01 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygons 159/1159

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not eUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. I am asking once again to reconsider these polygons. The tiny feed this will create is going to ruin some of these kids childhoods. Being torn apart from childhood fnends multiple times is hard, ask anyone that has had to move multiple times as a kid. This, not to mention all of the other items that will be detrimental to their health and funds for the school system. I see you working hard, and I ask you revisit the SMALLEST feed in the county and fix it.

Short of fixing this, I ask you delay this decision to not rush to any bad decisions.

Thank You, Jacob Smith

Jake Smith President Core Logic Integrations 443-257-9967 J\flarilyn Grosskopf

From: Vanessa Beltran Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 7:48 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] From my 5th grader in 2132 Attachments: IMG_8464.JPG

.'CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. To Whom it May Concern:

This is what my fifth grader wrote in tears on her own when she heard my mother and I discussingthat parents and students were being encouraged to speak up. Attached is her actual letter, I have obviously corrected spelling errors:

If you think that separating my friends, my little brother, and I is right? then you are being mean and inconsistent! LOOKmy little brother is 5! and he is loving kindergarten and if you want to take that awayfrom him and all his friends then you are very wrong 'cause my friends and I have a very very very strong relationship and if you break our relationship you will tear me apart! I believe 100% you have never gone through what I'm goingthrough right now. Please please PLEASEdont' let them do this to my family. f.^ .i, f U ^^^1(/ ^,^v -TV\\f^ 5-t!. p'?^ . I? ) \ -../ 1'^ ('^d-, M^ ^ £)ro^<-'('. ^r*v0' . f^h^ -Hien U6^ ^

I -'-3C?i' ^N f I / ' C?4^?( a^ h or^ \jer^ -fa^ uor rty^ " ^~F, -;V-1 V6/^ V/ C4 V<^v, ^ ir^..-^ 0^0^ i"Y ^^ JLF r Q^CA Lc->r i ?C^('J- /'") 0. /c u^ tJ *?1<& ^ JVIarilyn Grosskopf

From: siya nayak Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 7:45 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting; BoE Email Subject: [External] Number of kids from Pollygon 1171

.'CAUTION:This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not clicklinks oropen attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Please see the picture below: 2020-2021 - 0. 37%( 11 HS kids in total) 2024-2025 -1.39%(21 HS kids in total)

t.^-, ^ Mil... -. 1-. &37%^IWii^_ L IJd%In M24-20JS

.ONllhir IUMBI aa-ani au»au IBMU* au*.N»

BOGBmrtlHNUThguclwi li If n 21 .adluit ttuipdUd;ibAau (iBaduiUfli! It *uiiim 16nnt«nmif Itiwuiuiwrt ai talMMISnf«ll»(I*li) tin ««nt .Wi lit* IWi

Dear Board Members, Providing the list which has the number ofkids who will go to HS, as you cm see the numbers are very very less.. Please reconsider your thoughts about moving them.. they will not have any friends from neighboring commumties it will effect them mentally and which in turn will effect their academics too.. pleasesee the above picture the number of kids attending HS are very low and is goingto below forcoming few years too..

Thank you, Apama Nayak

Sent from my iPhone

Sent from my iPhone Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Ten Folden Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 7:43 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Our neighborhood is being split

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. bear Board of Education,

I live in Polygon 1038 and I found out today that during your meetings to discuss redistric+ing, you split my nieghborhoodbetween two highschools. This is not a big neighborhood, it is only 3 streets and 2 courts. One reason my husband and I chose to move into this neighborhood 10 years ago, is that we wanted stability for our children when it came to attending school with their friends. We loved the ideathat they would be attending elementary school, middle school and high school w/i+hthe children they can walk outside and play with from the time they were babies.

Additionally, we have a student in Polygon 38 that is hearing impaired. We do appreciate you recongnizing how important the American Sign Langua+e program is at Howard for that student but also for his friends that live in the neighborhood. It is vital that alt the children in his neighborhood have access to this amazing program so that they can continue to communicate with himand make himfeel inclusiveof hisneighborhood. I knowpersonally that mydaughter has been in his class and enjoys "talking" with him and I want to encourage her to build that friendship. You are denying these children a lasting relationship by separating the streets of a small neighborhood.

Please note, my polygon only has 13 high schoolers and could easily stay at Holward with polygon 38. Did anyone check the streets that would be affected when Kirsten Coombs motioned to have us included. I do not believe anyone did check. This decision needs to be reconsidered. PLEASECHECK ON A MAP! If Howard already has 19 portables, a large staff and a lower FARM, would they be better able to handle the overcapaci+y with Long Reach expected to boom? Not only is this not fair to our students by splitting our neighborhood into two highschools, but it is also not fair to our community that wasgiven little noticewas given regarding this decision prior to the vote. Other communities had months to write and talk about their opinions and yet we have just days.

I strongly urge you to reconcider this decision that was made onyesterday Monday November 18+h.

Thank you for your time and consideration, Ten' Folden JVIarilyn Grosskopf

From: Ivo Tatarov Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 7:43 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Poiygon 1171 to MRHS and MVMS

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear BOE members and redistricting officials,

Please let our kids (Polygon 1171) go to MRHS and MVMS, this is vital for their physical and emotional health.

1. Our kidsare goingto be on an isolated island.All ofthe neighborhoodsaround usgo to MRHS.We were assignedto MRHS from the beginning and even the superintendent wanted to keep us and switch our middle school to MVMS like it was approved today, but then taken away. 2. The commute/distance will increase by 54% to Glenelg versus if we stay with our school, MRHS. This will be damaging to our kids health. 3. Also, it will cost Howard County school district more money on transportation and it will put our kids in danger.

From the bottom of our hearts we are asking you to keep us (Polygon 1171) at MRHS.

-Ivo Tatarov Mari\yn Grosskopf

From: Ramesh Kumar Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 7:41 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Keep Polygon 1171 @MRHS

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content Is safe. Dear Members,

We appreciate all the hard work and time given to redistricting process. Since redistricting affect many families, kids and their future, process must follow the strict guidelines. I find it very frustrating that one issue is very important a moment ago and then suddenly has no impact. Process must have strict rationale, parameters and their weightage in decidingany move. Move cannot be basedon person'sstate of mind at given moment.

We oppose Polygon 1171 move for following reasons.

1. Longer Commute: GHS is 8 mile away from MRHS which means time wastage in travel, less time for other activities, increases safety risks, less time for sleep etc. 2. Creating Island: In last redistricting, our kidswere assignedto TREScreating island whichwas fine for temporary solution as new ESis planned in turf valley. At that time MS and HSwould have re-aligned. Instead of fixing TRES issues,you havejust created a biggerissue by moving MSand HSwhich needsto be redistricted againafter new ES is built. 3. GHSover capacity: GHS is one ofthe old school and can't handle more than 95%capacity. This argument was used to assign us at MRHSbut later in heatof rushingdecision, that fact wasignored.

We are in support of Superintendent plan which has covered all these issues. Please re-consider and keep usat MRHS, MVMS and TRES (till new ES is built).

Thanks,

Ramesh Kumar Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Angie Andresen Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 7:37 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Moving 159/1159 violates policy and splits community

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Have you driven Valleymede to seethe division ofcommunity and the 4% feed you're creatingby splitting 159 and 1159 from Polygons 1034, 2034, 34, 158 and 3034? Have you seen the line you're drawingbetween neighbors? 159/1159 is not connectedto the otherpolygons in purple on the map below. Our nextdoor neighbors are the polygons in the light blue. Literally next door neighbors. There is no county road dividing our home.

Do you physically see the distance between 159-1159 to St Johns Lane ES in comparison to Manor Woods? Drive it todaybetween 8am-8:45 and feel the differencefor the kids.

s. ;;.. «1» rs»'

t.-. ? S'i»iM--:il'1- ... 4 ifr "' , -':^ ^'.^^WfaiferiyES V^ t*SS\ . !liR %* est. x»' *.* NBUft^l t aic tenor- . Woods ES

1W : Cuitennurf 155 law es-'-.. ^liiKISfi :. ttS4, ::;"

The only thing moving 159 and 1159 accomplishes is: 1. Moves kids out oftheir neighborhoodschool 1.5 miles whichis from their house

2. Breaksup a community by creating a micro feed of less than 4%

1 3. Refills half of those seats with moving kids in from 2161 Waverly to St. John's Lane

3. Violates policy 6010 by creating a micro deed

4. PushesManor Woods capacity from 95.4% to 109.3%therefore solvingno over capacityissues. 5. Creates earlier start times forthe elementary agedchildren. Theywill go from beingpicked up at 8:30am, 15 minutes before school starts. To bringpicked up at Samor earlier to ride a bus for 45+minutes.

6. Creates a disruptive feedas these kids arepushed to ManorWoods and Burleigh andthen brought back together in high school at Mt Hebron

Please look at alternative options. Keeping Valleymede together was initially proposed in the feasibility study in Western option # 1. Please review that option.

This process seems rushed andit appears we are now making quick decisions for the sake ofbeing done and moving forward. Anyonewho has actually driven this neighborhoodand seen the proximity to school, knows moving 159 and 1159 is a bad, turn a blind eye kind ofplan.

Angie Andresen Polygonll59 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Srinivasa Kukatla Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 7:34 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] 1171 Microfeed @0. 37%

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the conteut is safe.

Good Morning Dear BOE,

Please find the number of students (microfeed) of our Polygon 1171. Please consider revising your decision to keep us at Marriotts Ridge. You should have moved us to a closed elementary instead you are penalizing us. There are lot of communities closer to GlenElg if you are looking for feed to GlenElg High.

Thaiik you. I hope members look into these and consider.

0.37% Today 1.30% in 2024-2025

Seliool Ycs.r 21120-2BZI 2BZ1-20Z2 ZBZZ-ZDZ3

B012 ea'allt-menl PTujcctiun 11 16

Studwits linpactiid sludeitils (Excluding 11 16 from 1171 Risingiiemor/ Risingjuniw)

% ofMRHS capacity (14151 937% 0,68% O.gwy,

Sent from my iPhone Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Brian Brewer Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 7:29 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 132

! CAUTION:This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not clicklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. Lastnight, the BOBvoted for Polygon 132to move from Clemens CrossingES to Bryant WoodsES. I am still searchingfor answersabout how we got to this situation whenwe were told byMs Mallo andDr Wu on multiple occasionswe werenot goingto be moved (we have documentation from Ms. Mallo and Dr Wu if needed). We were NEVER part ofthe Superintendents plan, and 2 weeks ago we were "added in". We were then told we were a mistake and should not be moved, then told we were being moved again. This process has beenextremely fi-ustratingand disappointing, buthas also been extremely sloppy.

The Superintendentreleased a plan after workingwith Professionals for MONTHS, and the BOBhas come in andmade moves thatmake zero sense geographically andwill destroy communities. I urge you to choosethe Superintendents plan (asmany board members have admitted shouldhave been done in the first place) or to actually look at thePolygons walkability andgeographic location to the schools you areplacing them at.

We walk to Clemens, my kids walk to their friends houses, we walk to the pools. There areNO main roads. You arekeeping kids at Clemens who CANNOTwalk because of main roads (and are not FARMS) and choosingto move US becauseof overcrowding? Wewill NEVERbe ableto part ofthe BryantWoods community becauseof the 4 mainroads we would have to cross andthe distance. (1/2 mile vs. 4 miles) Again this is negligible and I urge you to look deeper at what you are doing and stop playing "musical polygons" as yoiir BOB colleagues have called it. This is DEEPLYconcerning.

Thanks you,

Brian Brewer Polygon 132 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Ramesh Kumar Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 7:27 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Keep Polygon 1171 ©MRHS

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Donot cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know thecontentis safe. Dear Members,

Weappreciate all the hardwork and time given to redistricting process. Sinceredistricting affectmany families, kidsand their future, process must follow the strict guidelines. I find it very frustrating that one issue isvery important a moment agoand then suddenly has no impact. Processmust havestrict rationale, parametersand their weightage in deciding any move. Move cannot be based on person's state of mind at given moment.

We oppose Polygon 1171move for following reasons. 1. Longer Commute: GHS is 8 mile awayfrom MRHSwhich means time wastage in travel, less time for other activities, Increases safety risks, less time for sleep etc. 2. Creating Island: In last redistricting, our kidswere assigned to TREScreating island whichwas fine for temporary solution as new ESis planned in turf valley. At thattime MSand HSwould have re-aligned. Instead of fixingTRES issues, you have just created a bigger issue by moving MS and HS which needs to be redistricted again after new ES is built. 3. GHS over capacity:GHS is one of the old school and can't handle more than 95% capacity. This argument was used to assign us at MRHSbut later in heat of rushingdecision, that fact was ignored. Weare in supportof Superintendent plan whichhas covered allthese issues. Pleasere-consider and keep usat MRHS, MVMS and TRES (till new ES is built).

Thanks, Ramesh Kumar Marilyn Grosskopf

From: torn Wing Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 7:14 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Equality for Howard County Schools !!

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Columbia was founded with idea of equality for all.

I support the redistricting plan recommended by the impartial study.

Integrated schools produce better students.

Tom Wing 7457 Swan Point Way Columbia. 21045 tomwing@comcast. net Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Vedant Patel Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 7:12 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 1171

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. BOE members,

Mypolygon, 1171 hasbeen moved backto Glenelg High School because BOEmembers repeatedly broughtup thepoint that we will havefuture development. Theydid not, however, askabout the projections. In 2024-25, our polygon is projected to have 23 high school students. How is this worth moving us to a school 55% farther away?All theBOE members knewthat they will becreating an isolated island, so theycombined polygon 171 to showits not asbad as it seems. Inreality, it is oneof the worst examples ofredistricting in HCPSS. Polygon 171 is totally farmland (with 0 students until at least 2025); Polygon 1171 is also 80% non-residential.

BOB members also mentioned that they do not want to bring GHS above 95% because it is an older school, so theytook polygons from Glenelg andput them in River Hill. Thenmembers did exactly whatthey saidthey didn't want to do by moving us to GHS. As I said earlier, our polygon makes no difference in either school. This move is designed to keep RiverHill polygons wherethey arewhile moving us around like pawns. Many times we heard BOB members talk about keeping communities and neighborhoods together for many other polygons -1 have not heard this point mentioned for ourpolygon a single time. That is the textbook definition ofbias - BOEmembers arefavoring onecommunity overthe other. You shouldbe making an objective decision.

I am taking several high-level classes currently. For example, I am planning on taking the AP Test for Calculus AB this yearso I cantake Calculus C nextyear. I wastold bymy counselorthat this is only anoption at MRHS. If I am moved to Glenelg, I will not be able to do this.

Furthermore, I just moved to this community and have hadto spend time restarting here. I do not want to have to do this againat GHS.

I feel thatthere is NOrepresentation forme ormy community in thismatter thatwill affectus severely. Know that you are impacting an entire community when you make these split-second decisions. Know that you are impacting me when you make these choices without letting me or my community testify. Andmost ofall, knowthat you areimpacting hundreds ofstudents acrossHCPSS with the sameproblem asme.

Vedant Patel 9fh Grader at MRHS from Polygon 1171 Greetings! My name is Laveme Tucker andI'm a resident at Dorsey Hall Townhomes (Polygon #148 whichat the moment remains NES/DMS/WLHS. ). I reside at: 4950 Dorsey Hall Dr.^Unit #1,Ellicott City, MD, 21042. 1 amwriting regarding the vote pertaining to the DorseyHall community. I believeit isa mistaketo alterthe Dorsey Hall polygons. To adjustthe polygons is anunexpected anddrastic measure. DorseyHall is anestablished community from the 1980's, andthere is no logical reasonto alterour polygons. At the least you could sendthe entire polygon together to the same school. Second,our community hasasked to bekept intact, #OneDorseyHall, andinstead we were spit beyond even the polygon level. Other areasthat have askedto be left intact havehad their voices heard (e. g. Pointers Run, Valley Meade). Why not us? Because we didn't have the chance to testify for hours in front of the board? Third theborn-d has yet to address ourremaining small feed. DMSAVLHS wasalready a small feedand under this plan it will geteven smaller. Howis this fairto ourcommunity? Weembrace WLHS, but it's a steepprice for our kids to pay, to leavethe vast majority of yourmiddle school peers. You are looking at small feeds'in other parts of the county, so please give ours the same consideration.

^!?!?L?r.^thfieId isNOT currentlyover capacity, nor is it projected to be, given the CURRENTattendance area. Thereis no capacityissue until VESpolygons areadded to our attendance area. Wouldn't the better choice be to find another way to alleviate that overcrowding? Then there would beno needto move anyone atNES from a capacity perspective.

Lastly, I understand the drive to balance FARM rates. However, in this case, I think that this part cularmove has 3 negatives (breaking communities, creatinga smaller feed,moving a ^'walkable" community) andonly one positive (balancingFARM rate). Theremust be a better solution. Perhapslook backat the feasibility studies orthe Superintendent's recommendation (as you did for CCES). Also, safety is of concern as our children will be d across a busse busy congested intersection, causing more congestion in the area and higher to'affic concerns.

In closing, I just wantto pleadthat Dorsey Hall is a closeknit community. Most ofus share common values which allow us to embrace ourta-ajectory to WLHS. Please keep Dorsey Hall intact.

Best,

Laveme Tucker Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Ann Wing Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 6:54 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] REDISTRICT (per recommendation of Martirano)

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. Keep Columbia Columbia unique

1. Columbia founded with ideaof equality of all in it... race, income, age, 2. Redistricting recommended by impartial study. 3. WEALTHY PEOPLE CAN AFFORD TIME OFF TO PROTEST. PEOPLEWITH LOW INCOME JOBS CANNOT AND ARE THEREFORE UNDERREPRESENTED. 4. Integrated schoolsproduce better students... studies show. 5. Post article Monday on NYC school integration shows students can do well in non neighborhood schools. 6. Students here would NOT travel horrid distances from home. In fact, some would be to closer schools. Districts are Gerrymandered already. 7. My daughter graduated from OAKLANDMILLS, went to an Ivy Leagueschool, did research in Antarctica, got a Seagrant to intern in the US Senate,ALL SCHOOLSIN COLUMBIAPRODUCE WELL EDUCATED STUDENTS.

Thank you Ann Wing 7457 SwanPoint Way Columbia. 21045 JVIarilyn Grosskopf

From: Haitao Dai Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 6:35 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Please keep 1171 at MRHS

! CAUTION:This email originatedfrom outsideof HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unlessyou recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear BOE members and redistricting officials,

Please let our kids(Polygon 1171)go to MRHSand MVMS,this is vital fortheir physicaland emotional health. 1. Our kidsare goingto beon the isolated island. All ofthe neighborhoods around usgo to MRHS.We were assigned to MRHSfrom the beginningand even the superintendent wantedto keep us and switchour middle school to MVMSlike it was approved today, but then taken away. 2.The commute/distance will increaseby 54% to Glenelgversus ifwe stay with our school, MRHS.This will bedamaging to our kids health. 3. Also, it will cost Howard County school district more money on transportation and it will put our kids in danger. From the bottom of our hearts we are askingyou to keep us (Polygon 1171) at MRHS.

Best Dr. Haitao Dai Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Tina Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 6:28 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] IESpolygons (95, 1095, 2095, 301, 1301)transportation safety

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Please drive our bus routes before the final vote to switch us from lllchester to Waterloo ES. It is a safety concern due to busy roads, turns, and a traffic circle. As opposed to a single one mile straight ride to lllchester ESwith no turns.

Polygons 95, 1095, 2095, 301, 1301

Concerned parent from Montgomery Meadows, Tina Bartlinski MD

Sent from my iPhone Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Hilda Forman Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 6:21 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Please keep Polygons 64, 129, 1064, and 1129 at Pointers Run Elementary School

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the eontent is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

Pleasekeep Polygons 64, 129, 1064, and 1129 at Pointers Run Elementary School.

Thank you, Hilda Forman Polygon 129 Marilyn Grosskoof

From: MarkWeaver Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 6:08 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting; Mark Weaver Subject: [External] Re: Redistricting

' CAUTION: This emaaoriginated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello Howard County Board of Education, Pleasekeep the '56 (56, 1056,2056 and 3056) polygons (Allview neighborhood) in OMHS. l. am.s'n9'e. parent- , !, have. tw° children. and nextYear they will be a sophomore anda senior. Ifsophomore's are moved to itwi"create an undue burden an°ther_sch°°''. °n me and my family. I am a single parent, rhavebeenone'since m'wife'died both of children °fcan.cer,.ir'-2°U^Ha'"n9 my a"he same schools (AES -> OM'MS''-~>OMHS), 'whilechaire nging haVbeer?" 3m hasbeen wonderful, butifAllview is split between multiple schools; my challengeswill be increased my support will be as well. /^and system impacted I only have one vehicle, and am not abTetoli uv mv oTd'e'st a" ^.hrclLbefo^, ^lCTroLyear'-s° there, w'!ln°tbe any relieffo '.at-OMHSfr°m. s°ccerto baseba!' to.the an"ual Play and musical, and they attend manyof'thesporting"eTOn'ts'a't"the °°!wateMn9. t!1elrfrrenljs-lf'end uphavins mychildren attwo different schools,-for mysonVlastyear"! w'ilibe'spendi? between two schools and not having much time to enjoy their events when'there'is'overiap. >rhanky°u-for.all-.°f.y°"rhardw°. rk°"the intractabte.issue °f redistricting. Noplan is perfect, andeveryone in Howard l. anopmron. °ne-way-°rthe_°ther °" retlistricting. I understand that. All schools in Howard County aregood. 'and'anoThe'r" another have e_or place, J may a different opinion. However, I need to have my children at-thesame~s^hooi. ~N'otTL son's senior year, but for my daughter's last three years. . ---. --.. --... - -..-.. lt, ^°,u!dalTOomeana totto meand my children if they could 9raduate from their mother's alma mater. Shegraduated from in iyyo.

Las.k, thatthe Board °f Education allow rising sophomores the same exemption ofrising juniors and seniors and that 1 to stay at the school where they began theirfreshman year.

Thank you,

Mark Weaver Polygon 2056

on Fri'. Nov. ^ 2019 at 1 1:45PM Mark Weaver wrote: Hello Howard County Board of Education, i Please keep the '56 (56, 1056, 2056 and 3056) polygons (Allview neighborhood) in OMHS. '. am.s"1g'e. parent; , l,, have. two children. and nextyear they will bea sophomore and a senior. If sophomore's are moved to it will create an undue burden on another_school^ me and my family. I am a singre parent. 'Thavebeen'on'e since m7wfedied both °f chiidren °fca"ce.''..'n2°14;. Ha'""g my at the same scho°ls (AES -> OMMS''-~>OMH'S), 'whiTechaire nging ha's'beer?" LMysupp°rt-systemhas been wonderful. but ifAllview Issplit between multiple schools', mychalienge°s"w'lll"be increased dramatically, and will be my support system impacted as well. I only have one vehrd e. and'am n°ot~abie to' I °-!dest-a veh"?'e-bef°l;eh's seni°1'year' s° there wi" n°t be a"yrenef for me-un"l hegoes t'o'coTiege. ' Mychiidren'ai-e"in7o'lved Ln.manyact""tes at,OMHS.fr°m soccer to baseball to the annual play and musical, and they attend many of''thes-portir atohing the"'friends' lf' end ^entsal, t-he^ch°°lw "P ha'"n9 my children at two different schoolsjor'my son's laSt'yeaar will ! spending my time driving befaveen hwo schools and not having much time to enjoy their'events'when'Ihere rs overiap'.

.rhanky°u-f°r. a"-°f.y°u''hard wo.rk °"the infractable issue ofredistricting. Noplan is perfect, and everyone in Howard l, an °p'-nl°"-°ne-way-°rthe_°the'' °" redistrictins-1 understand that. Ail schools in Howard County are good, and another" another place, have adifferent le^or J may opinion. However, I need to have my children arthesame~sSooi."N'otTL son's senioryear, butfor my daughter'slast threeyears. . ---.. -...--...- -..-.. It would also mean a lot to me and my children if they could graduate from their mother's alma mater. She graduated from OMHS in 1986.

I ask that the Board of Education allow rising sophomores the same exemption of rising juniors and seniors and that they be allowed to stay at the school where they began their freshman year.

Thank you,

Mark Weaver Polygon 2056 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Sunmy Brown Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 6:01 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Dorsey Hall Micro-Feed

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Board Members,

I respectfully ask the Board to look at the micro-feed that was created at Dorsey Search Polygons 148, 276, and 302 that was not revisited for discussion at last night's work session after voting to keep Polygon 1148 at Northfield Elementary and Dunloggin Middle School.

Ms. Cutroneo and Ms. Delmont-Small, I know both of you expressed your concerns about the creation of micro-feeds. Please find out exactly how many students from Polygons 148, 276, and 302 the members of the board will be pulling away from Northfield Elementary and Dunloggin Middle to attend Running Brook and Wilde Lake Middle. Will ripping these polygonsoutofthe DorseySearchCommunity inherently achieve your goals for alleviating school capacity and decreasing FARMS?The development in downtown Columbia will certainly impact capacity in the next few years at Running Brook Elementary. Therefore, wouldn't there be a great possibility that Dorsey's micro-feed will most likely be shuffled back again in the future?

The result of creating an island for these students now and in the future will result in the isolation of these FAMILIES from remaining in the contiguous Dorsey Search Community. How is this fair and equitable?

Please keep Polygons 148, 276, and 302 at Northfield Elementary and Dunloggin Middle as ONE STRONG FEED without breaking up this contiguous community.

Respectfully, Sunmy Brown Polygon 2148

Please excuse any typos sent from my iPhone Marilyn Grosskopf

From: hlilda Forman Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 5:53 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting; Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont- Small; Jennifer Malta; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu Subject: [External] Please keep Polygons 64 129 1064 and 1129 at Pointers Run Elementary School

CAITTION: This email frnm originated outside ofHCPSS. Do not cHck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Education Members,

Pleasekeep Polygons 64, 129, 1064, and 1129 atPointers Run Elementary School. Thank you, Hilda Forman Polygon 129 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Ashish Parajuli Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 5:54 AM To: Kirsten Coombs;Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small;Jennifer Mallo; SabinaTaj; ChaoWu; Mavis Ellis; Hcpss Redistricting;djung@howardcountymd. gov; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [External] Plan overcrowds Swansfield ES and adds 30 FARMs students

! CAUTION:This emaUoriginated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUckUnks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Rushed decision-making this week resultecJ in arbitraiy elementary school moves Planned moves will overcrowd high-FARMs schools

J- 12 root s d* t80 Swansfield Elementery TAT- sna + un 's«» Current Proposei S) 308 FARMS 334 363 JB EMO FMM* HUUh Total 548 z"» % Utitization 79%

Current Proposed

Plan overcrowds Swansfield ES and adds 30 FARMs students

The Board of Education Must: Rescind harmful proposed elementary school moves Complete high school and middle school redistricting

* .. A:- f-- J>.1_ _. -I-AT. .1 - - - JL - Get Outlook for iOS

From: Ashish Parajuli Sent: Friday, November 15, 2019 11:52 AM To: kirsten_coombs(a>hcpss. org; vicky_cutroneo@>hcpss. org; christina_de[mont-small@>hcpss. org; jennifer_mallo@hcpss. org; sabina_taj@hcpss. org; chao_wu@hcpss. org; mavis_ellis@hcpss. org; redistricting@hcpss. org; djung@howardcountymd. gov; ccwilliams@howardcountymd. gov; ggick@howardcountymd. gov Subject: Revert moving polygon 129 from Pointers Run ESto Swansfield ES

Please see the attached letter.

BR, AshishParajuli Polygon 129 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: S. SP. Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 5:45 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting; BoE Email Subject: [External] Polygon 52

'CAUTION:This email originatedfrom outsideof HCPSS.Do not click links or open attachments, unlessyou recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Board of Education Members,

I have followed the redistricting process and understand many factors are considered when moving children to different schools. I askthat polygon 52 be allowed to stayat Oakland Mills HighSchool.

Polygon 52 positively contributes to Oakland Mills High School because many children from my polygon tend to be in GT programs, high achieversand are leaders for those around them. Polygon 52 is a neighborhoodof home ownerswith childrenthat positivelycontribute to schoolsthrough their behaviorand achievements. Beinga neighborhoodof home owners, polygon 52 likely has little contribution to the FARM program, more reason to allow polygon 52 to remain at OaklandMills High School. Considerjust moving high FARM recipient neighborhoodsto balanceattendance number and not everyone in an area.

Another pressing concern with moving polygon 52 from Oakland Mills High School to Atholton HighSchool is the bus route. I'm extremely worried that route 32 will be used to transport my child during rush hour with high traffic speeds to Atholton High School from the Owen Brown area. What will the bus route be for children forced to move from our community highschool and be busedto anothercommunity for highschool? Ifroute 32 will be used, will there be increased police presence on their route and speed cameras on route 32 to slow the rush hour traffic down? Will the school boardensure a reducedspeed limit on route 32 ifchildren h?veto travel duringrush hour?The travel safetyof our children is paramount. If neighborhood roads are used for transportation, how much earlier will the children need to beat the busstop to takea much longer route to gofrom OwenBrown to Atholton HighSchool? Will highschool start times be pushed back to accommodate the extra travel time so high schoolers don't have to get up even earlier? Mychild would liketo remain atOakland Mills HighSchool. I'mvery worried aboutthe negativeemotional impactof moving a freshman after one year of high school to a new high school. High school is one of the most social times in school andto let a child haveone year at our neighborhood highschool and then pull heraway from our neighborsand friendships she's had since elementary school is heartbreaking. My child is worried and I'm concerned about the negative impactemotionally, sociallyand possiblyon academicsas well. Willthe school board be ensuringthat incoming school are prepared to fully assist new students in becoming part of their new school community? Will there be additional efforts to help new students adjust emotionally, socially and academically to their newschool? I hope the school board considers all ofthe aspects of moving large number ofstudents to new schools especially the emotional support, social support and the travel safety. Children are more than numbers.

Thank you for the hard work and I hope the school board's efforts used to move students to different schools continues with ensuring all ofthe children moved are fully supported duringthis bigtransition. I also hope the school board continuesto work hardto ensure safetravel sincethere will be longer bus rides.

Regards,

Sarah Stiit-Plater Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Chris H Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 5:06 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] DO NOT MOVE POLYGON 1018

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To Whom It May Concern;

My name is Chris Hurley, I'm in polygon 1018 and have a son who is a 7th grader at Hammond Middle School and with your straw vote last night of 5-2 you're sending him to Patuxent Valley for his 8th grade year. Is moving 25 students really going to affect the numbers at Hammond or the FARM numbers?? You're pulling him awayto basicallysatisfy a quota!! You're pulling hun awayfrom his fnends andplacing hun m a school with people he doesn't know and why?? He will not graduate from 8th grade with his friends, to satisfy a quota!! Do you realize the emotional, psychological affect this is going to have on kids?? Are your kids meaningthe Board of Educationaffected by all this?? I'm sure they are not

Moving polygon 1018 IS NOT going to make or break Hammond Middle school. Right here, right now you have the chance to do the right thing. LEAVE POLYGON 1018 ALONE!! If this email truly goes into the record thenplease read it. Several board members saidthey don't wantto breakup neighborhoodsand i watcheslast night as you guys restructured things you had donepreviously to keep neighborhoodstogether. LEAVEPOLYGON 1018 ALONE!!I'LL REPEAT IT, LEAVEPOLYGON 1018 at Hammond Middle School!!!

Chris Hurley Manl^

From: Amy Overholt Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 4:48 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygons 1098/98

' CAUTION: This emafl originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good Morning,

I smasking you to reconsidermoving polygons 1098and 98 to PhelpsLuck Elementary. Withthe new plan, wewill^have a 9% feed from Phelps Luck elementary to Ellicott Mills MS and puts our neighborhood on an island. We will be the only polygon in our surrounding community to be sent to this school. After watching flie work sessionlast night, there was a claim that small feeds neededto happen in orderto help overcrowding. However, wewere taken fi-om Waterloo Elementary whereovercrowding was not anissue. Please consider moving us with a surrounding polygon to create a community and a larger feed to Ellicott Mills MS.

Best, Amy Koscielniak(1098) Marilyn Grosskoof

From: Mara Winterhoff Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 4:41 AM To: Superintendent; Mavis Ellis;Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont-Small; Jennifer Malta; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu; Hcpss Redistricting; cbball@howardcountymd. gov; Rigby, Christiana Subject: [External] 18NOV19

' CAUTION:This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear BOB, T-lallkyoufor_stepping on'md. s1uislringow small feed off 18/1018. You are going to cause undue anxiety on an 11 yearold who hasalready been through more thaneveryone onyour board put together. Ourki^ donot wantto be moved to PVMS. It isn't just because of their 6-iea. dsor knowing the building, you havekids'who" havea connectionto the principa[Dr. Dale(He should take all ofyour job^since he actuaUy'cares abouthis students, ^eachers, and families). The guidance counselor Ms. Sheffield cares about her students and'the'kids knowit. Thereare childrmthat NEED this support. Elijah has been to 2 otherschools mflnscoimty and'nrither 1 this level ofkindness andsupport to him. Your decision disgusts me. You seeus asa littlV neighborhoodwith aUttle voice. Somefamilies do not even know what is goingon due to languagebamers, wo.rkschedul_es', etc'1hope you areproud of yourselves for failing us. As a'reminder, you WCTTvotedmtoyour position, we will ensure you are not voted into ANY position agau.

Mara Cortes Hammond Middle Mom Soon-to-be Hammond Elementary Mom (again) Graduate of River Hill High School 2004 Polygon 18

On Sat,Nov 16, 2019, 8:44PM MaraWmterhoff wrote: November 16. 2019 DEAR BOARD OF EDUCATION, LDOJ*JPT..W-ANT. TO. CH_ANGE_SCHOOLS BECAUSE ALLOF MY FRIENDSARE THERE. I HAVETHE BESIPRIN.CipA!:. THAT_CHECKS up ON ME LIKE ONCE A WEEK. HE HELPS-ME W'lfH THE'BULLY R.EPORLA.NDOTHER. STUFF- I LIKEMY TEACHERS ANDTHEY LOVE ITWHEN-[ AS'KQUES'TIONS. IH,ERE.IS-NO.FIGHTING. -J'M_WORRIEDABOUT MY NEWSCHOOL NO~T BEING SUPPORTIVEAS'MY CL!RRENTSCHOOL LWONT BE As CONFIDENTAND ASK AS MANYQuisTToNS AND'I'A'M NERYOUS-. WHOTO. TURN TOIFi AM BULLIED AGAIN. I DON'T WANTYo'MOVE AND NEITHER DOES ANYONE ELSE BECAUSE ASKEDAROUND AND THEY SAY "NO".

PLEASE DON'T MAKE US MOVE!

FROM, ELIJAH B. HAMMOND MIDDLE SCHOOL POLYGON 18

Dear Board of Education of Howard County,

The above letter is from my son (a years long FARM student). At one point in time, he attended St. John's Lane Elementary. SJLES is a highly rated school and sought after district. There, he received many problems to include name-calling and racism from not only students, but two teachers as well. We researched many schools before choosing a house so we could pull him out of the situations he was in at SJLES. Within one week at Hammond ES, he was re-evaluated and the new teacher found his reading level was far higher (10 levels higher) than reported by the previous instructor. Our community is as diverse as they come. White, black, islander, African, Asian, Salvadoran, and so many more! We also come from all different financial backgrounds. We have government employees, lawyers, teachers, nurses, marketing directors, construction workers, retirees, childcare professionals, and those on section 8/disability. Our lovely community (all of Kings Contrivance) is an example of true unity. We love Hammond ES, MS, and High School. To split up our community is to end the diversity in our community. The parents, PTA, teachers have much better suggestions and the community is on board to assist with changes needing to be made to accommodate our schools. We have the solutions, we just need to be heard. To be honest, there is no sense of logic in any of these moves that would actually help these students, much less the community. You have children moving from one school just to turn around and bring students to that school from another school. It is embarrassing how rushed and careless these decisions are being made. We were once so proud to live in Howard County. Nowall we are proud of, is how our communities have all banned together to oppose this redistricting process. For further clarification, we DO NOT oppose redistricting with a true purpose such as true overcrowding. To which, that problem could be solved when politicians grow a spine and stand up to the developers instead of letting them line their pockets. I am proud to see my neighbors wealthy and not stand together for OUR CHILDREN. Maybe it is lost on the Board, but these are CHILDREN. They are being punished for adults being dictators instead of consulting with the community. Our neighbors who do not read or even speak English have no idea what is going on. Put yourself in their shoes. You are shutting out the very families you say you say you intend to protect. When we speak to them in their native tongue, they do not agree with you either. Hold a meeting at each school with the purpose of finding another solution. Give the parents, students, teachers, and PTA enough notice to prepare their statements and who will present. Please do not forget to send notices to YOUR constituents in their native tongue. Enough of us can help you translate if you are incapable.

You have an exorbitant amount of support from the community that you have chosen to simply shut out. You may not be invested in our children, schools, and their teachers, but we are. I hope that the entire county truly begins to put our most vulnerable citizens first, the children. And I pray that they stop being used in your political chess game. Aggressive and careless players never win.

Thank You for Your Time, Mara Cartes Hammond Middle Mom Soon-to-be Hammond Elementary Mom (again) Graduate of River Hill High School 2004 Polygon 18 Dear Board of Education,

My name is John Emig. I live in polygon 180 and my daughter is a junior at River Hill High School and my son is an eighth grader at Folly Quarter Middle School. I feel compelled to submit this testimony in protest of the pending redistricting in Howard County.

Howard County public schools currently rank #7 in the country according to Niche. This is a truly remarkable accomplishment and it haggles the mind why anyone would purposely want to "fix" a system that clearly is not broken. While there are obvious overcrowding issues in some Howard County schools that absolutely need to be addressed, there has been a side effort to include politically motivated changes based on FARM data. The Board of Education needs to focus solely on the problem at hand -overcrowding. Forced bussing of students outside of their neighborhood school systems has been shown to be detrimental to their development and will likely lead to lower test scores and lower future rankings for Howard County public schools.

A large part of the criteria I used when buying my home in Ellicott City was the public schools, specifically River Hill. This redistricting is a classic bait-and-switch that not only affects students and their families, but real estate prices and family economics. My daughter has excelled during her 3 years at River Hill and we fully expected our son to follovy in her footsteps. My son is excited to attend River Hill next year as a freshman with his sister. However, these proposed changes to the polygons on maps would force my son to attend a different high school. My son is not only interested in the world class academics and community pride offered at River Hill, but also the sports programs. Nick plays travel baseball and has attended River Hill baseball camps for the last 3 years. His dream is to play for Coach McCoy at River Hill. That dream is now in jeopardy.

If the Board decides to go forward with redistricting, then they should consider the original two options provided by the Feasibility Study. Why invest so much money for a study to be done and then ignore its recommendations? Option #1 would keep Polygon 180 students at River Hill, so that is the best case scenario for my family and the one we would support if forced to choose. The subsequent option proposed by Superintendent Martirano should be scuttled on the basis that it is the product of one person and lacks verified research. At least the Feasibility Study options were the product of a committee working together to find a universal solution based on data.

My recommendation to the Board would be to scuttle the current redistricting proposals and work on a new concept that only moves students based on school utilization. However, if you decide to redistrict this year, then the Board should grandfather all current middle school and high school students and allow them to remain at their current schools. This doesn't necessarily fix the overcrowding problem in the short term, but it provides time for proper resource planning for the schools that are picking up additional students and gives families with younger children the option to relocate to the school district of their choice. Alternatively, consider situations like mine where families can be granted multi-year waivers to stay with their intended high school.

I hope the Board considers the VAST amount of testimony from unhappy families throughout Howard County. My family is being redistricted in schools that are not overcrowded and that will have no change in FARM percentage - this plan is BROKEN. The proposed redistricting is an unpopular option and does not have community support. As elected members of the Board of Education, your duty is to vote for what the community wants, not what a political minority wants. Please keep this in mind when you vote AGAINST redistricting Howard County Public Schools. Ginger Mair 9601 Jester Court Laurel, MD 201723 202-491 -8303; gmair@iqsolutions. com

November 19, 2019

Howard County Board of Education Howard County Public School System 1091 OCIarksvilte Pike EllicottCity, MD21042 redistricting@hcpss. org

Dear Howard County School Board Members,

I am a 5-year resident of Howard County and reside in Polygon 46 which will be directly impacted under Board of Education Member Chao Wu's proposed school redistricting plan. I am requesting the School Board vote no against the Wu's proposed plan. My husband and I moved to the Kings Wood community in 2014 because of the neighborhood schools, racial and cultural diversity, and the close-knit community of neighbors that we now call friends. The close- knit neighborhood community I refer to includes not only polygon 46, but also the interconnected polygons 2046, 3046, 1046, 12, 116, and 1116 which are now at risk of being broken apart based on the proposed new school boundaries.

Impact on my children's social and mental health. As a mother of two young girls one that is currently a student at Forest Ridge Elementary School (FRES) and the other who will be starting FRES in the 2020-2021 school year, I am very concerned about the unintended consequences on my 2nd grader's emotional health to have to switch schools and be separated from the kids from the neighboring polygons, specifically 1046 and 3046. My daughter currently attends school and rides the bus with kids from these other polygons, participates in Girls Scouts and other after school programs with students from these polygons-they are her close friends. Shifting subsets of kids from one elementary school to another presents the opportunity for the displaced children to suffer loss of relationships, isolation, and subsequently deal with emotional lows. I have neariy two decades of experience in behavioral health and have seen firsthand the impact of changes such as loss of friendships on children's emotional health and in this day and age of increased suicide rates we must be cautious of the societal impacts of our decisions on youth.

Social-economic pressures from wealthier communities west of 1-95. The proposed school redistricting carries the perception that the communities with higher-valued homes are being heard and that the families of the the impacted Kings Wood communities are an afterthought. Kings Wood communities were offered less time than other communities to voice our opinions on the proposed plan. It is also not going unnoticed that the areas west of 95 are primarily white in race and do not want their children to attend what they likely assume to be an inferior school, Laurel Wood Elementary School because it has a higher Black and Hispanic makeup. Again, we moved to Howard County because of its reputation for inclusivity and acceptance, particularly in this racially charged political environment at the national level. I would be extremely disheartened if Howard County schools begins to reflect the circus, we see inthe national news day in and day out. Itwill eventually impact the county's prestigious reputation and not to mention carryover into state and local voting decisions ofelected officials. FRESis a model school, whychange it? FREScurrently meets the HowardCounty goalsfor ethnic and socioeconomic diversity, andFree and Reduced Meal (FARM)targets, and assuch serve as^model for Howard County. MovingPolygons 12, 46, and 2046 will disrupt the diversity atthe FRESand it will undoubtedly push FREScloser to the40 percentthreshold'for Title I eligibility. Inthis push for equity in Howard County, isit sensible to create yet another Title I school? Inaddition, this movewill increase utilization forLaurel Woods Elementary Schoolto 105 percent which would be pushing the school to its limits. High school 13 and other new residential developments. Polygons 12, 46, and 2046 are in the impact area for High School #13. Reassigning these polygons'now ensures that mrrent^graders willchange schools more than once in a five-yearperiod which goes against Policy6010. Since this Boardwill not bevoting on HighSchool #13 boundaries, it benefitsour communities to not be moved in this current round of redistricting. Also, the new Laurel Racetrackdevelopment areas should be considered for the move to Laurel Woods Elementary School and Murray Hill Middle School. The first phase of development is scheduled for 2020~so again, polygons 46, 12, and 2046 should not be moved during this phase of redistricting until these other considerations have truly been evaluated.

Concerned resident,

^. -T^(. . -TV^U^L.

Ginger Mair Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Elena Tatarov Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:02 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 1171, please help

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Donot click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. From: Elena Tatarov, Polygon 1171 (Westmount Community)

To: Members of Board, Board of Education, Howard County, MD

Dear Board Members:

Please let our kids (Polygon 1171) go to MRHS and MVMS, this is vital for their physical and emotional health.

1. Our kids are going to be on the isolated island. All of the neighborhoods around us go to MRHS. We were assigned to MRHS from the beginning and even the superintendent wanted to keep us and switch our middle school to MVMS like it was approved today, but then taken away.

2. The commute/distance will increase by 54% to Glenelg versus if we stay with our school, MRHS. This will be damagingto our kids health.

3. Also, it will cost Howard County school district more money on transportation and it will put our kids in danger.

We feel like we are in a horrible dream. Please, we beg you keep us at MRHS and MVMS. We sacrificed everything for our kids to have a healthy school experience and the move to far away schools will ruin that for our kids. They will be isolated and their health is going to be compromised.

From the bottom of our hearts we are asking you to keep us (Polygon 1171) at MRHS.j Marilyn Grosskoi

From: Nicole Laidig Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:35 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] 132, 1132, 2132 - Reconsider last minute additions and changes

CAUTION:This emauoriginated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not cUeklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize thesender and know the content is safe. Dear Members of the Board,

TTiisaftCTnoon, Polygons 132, 1132and 2132 were all voted to move out of Clemens Crossing to Bryant Woods. Please reconsider this move for many reasons. Theproximity ofthese polygons makes them part of the Clemens Crossingcommunity whichis more than just the school. Children walk to school, the Clemens Crossing Pool, ride bikes to after school and weekend events. anduse the connecting trails to accessfriends houses. Weare a walk-ablecommunity. Weare NOT a walk- ablecommunity to Bryant Woods. Polygon 132is well withinthe walk zone for Clemens Crossing Elementary and would bewalkers if it were not for a small patch ofmissing sidewaUs. Polygons 1132 and 2132 have alreadybegun the process for a walkersurvey. Thisfurther demonstrates why our polygons should be part of Clemens Crossing Elementary School. Additionally, polygon 132has been constantly mislead as to thenature of the redistricting plan. Wehave been assuredmultiple times that we were not being considered for redistricting, that our polygon number being includedin Ms. Mallo andDr. Wu'splan was an error only to findout that we were included again at the next meeting. Polygons 1132and 2132 were pulled in even later. Ourcommunities havehad no time to react, to resemch orto voice our concmis, suggestions orquestions. Manyother areashave had ample opportunity to be heard.We have had nothing. Eventhe redisfaicting email address which I amwriting to now has stopped replyingto say that our testimony has been received. Aftervoting on Thursday, Nov 14, 2019 to keq) 132, 1132 and2132 at Clemens Crossing thatmotion wasoverturned. The inconsistencies, lastminute additions and errors cause me to greatly question the thoroughness ofthis plan as a whole. Thereare many other plans and options which have not been given adequate consideration. Theseplans could reduce overcrowding and create equity in our schools without unnecessarily moving students from their community or creating a budget downfall with the added costof busing the many students who arebeing moved. Takingwalkers from Swansfieldand busing them to Clemens Crossingwhile moving students outof ClemensCrossing to busthem to Bryant Woods is unreasonable. Thereare alternative plans that need to be considered. One such plan was presented by Dr. Wu that would move 34, 2134 and 1134 to Swansfield and keep 132, J 132and 2132 at Clemens Crossing. Thiswould put overall capacitiesat Bryant woods at 89%, ClemensCrossing 113% and Swansfield at 99%. Pleasedo not overcrowd a title 1 school. Thisonly spreads the services out to more kids and lunits the space in which the teachers and other professionals have to work. It shouldbe a priorityto make sure fhat fhe title 1 teachersand staff have the space and best environment possible to workin. A newerschool like Clemens Crossingis better equipped to handle a slightlylarger population. Simply looking at FARMs rate is not the only consideration. Please begin to consider all factors in yourdecisions. Weneed schools where teachers can effectively reachand help the students they have in their school. Thereare many more options for plans and the board needs to take the time to identify tile plan that truly makes the greatest impact and does the least harm. Theprocess should not be emotionally damagingto students who arepulled out oftheir school andtheir neighborhoodwhile the jest of the school remains. Polygon132, 1132and 2132 students will be living'in two different communities ifthey are sent to Bryant Woods; Theywould be bused to a completely differenT neighborhood than where they spend their free time. Pleaserealize that asparents wewant what is best forour children and we want to knowthat our ownBoard of Education is taking our children's future as seriously aswe are. This is not a process that should have been rushed andpieced together the last threeweeks. Polygons, suchas 132, 1132'and 2132 should not'have'been included asthe only polygons to move out oftheir school whilethree polygons move in from anofher. TTie processis broken. Thebest interest of students, teachersand the community isnot being taken into account. Please, stop yourwork. Reviewthe recommendations andcome back to thetable whenyou canwork on a process that will include the community's feedback and is not a haphazard attempt to meet a deadline.

Thank you

Sincerely, Nicole Laidig Marilyn Grosskopf

From: AnneArant Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:35 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting; Jennifer Malta; Christina Delmont-Small; Vicky Cutroneo; Chao Wu; Superintendent; Kirsten Coombs; Mavis Ellis; SabinaTaj Subject: [External] Clemens 32's Polygons

! CAUTION: This emaU originatedfrom outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. To: Board of Education

Polygons 132, 1132, and 2132 have been at Clemens Crossing Elementary School for over 40 years, until last week. We did not get a chance to voice our opinions at public forums. We had less than one week to collect information and send email hopingthat anelectronic messagewas enough. According to the SchoolBoundary Review - FrequentlyAsked Questions:

The Superintendent clearly stated that "... In order to ensure an equitable process, every stakeholder will have multiple opportunities to receive accurate information andprovide input andfeedback, and all voices will be heard and respected." Were we heard electronically this week? We sure didn't have accurate information to respond to last week. As indicated in the meeting on Monday 11/18, we were moved to stay in Clemens in error.

Polygons 132, 1132, and 2132 have been at Clemens Crossing Elementary School for over 40 years, until last week. We have been removed from our community based on a decision that wasmade with mass confusion, no thorough understanding of ourgeographical location and no consideration ofour contiguous streets to Clemens neighborhoods. Thisis not right.The polygons mayappear contiguous to otherpolygons, butwe are surrounded bywoods to the north and have no egress in that direction. Weare divided byso many major building landmarks that I can't even imagine taking my children to any extra-curricular school and PTA events or swim team as often as I am able to do so at our school, Clemens Crossing. These are the landmarks (depending on the route chose to take) that I would have to drive through or around to get to Bryant Woods:

. Howard County General Hospital . Howard County Community College . Downtown Columbia (including major intersections and heavy traffic such as Broken Land Parkway and Hickory Ridge Road, Broken Land Parkway and Little Patuxent Road, Governor Warfield and Twin Rivers Road. CedarLane and HickoryRidge, Little Patuxentand HickoryRidge, and so forth). Walkingand ridingbikes is out of the question. .

Polygons 132, 1132, and 2132 have been at Clemens Crossing Elementary School for over 40 years, until last week. The Superintendent s Plan that cost $400,000 of taxpayer's money did not move us out of our school. There's no confusion if the Superintendent's plan is usedas the baseplan. Stop the confusion. Usethe Superintendent's plan. Polygons 132, 1132, and 2132 have been at Clemens Crossing ElementarySchool for over 40years, until last week. We walk and bike to school. We would like to continue to walk and bike to school. We walk and bike to swim team. We would like to continue to walk and bike to swim team. We walk and bike to school and PTA sponsored events. We would like to continueto walk and biketo school and PTAsponsored events. It is healthyand it waspart ofthe vision for this great city. We walk and bike to school because we have determined that my oldest child is not capable of riding a bus unsupervised in a safe and manner. The bus route will be significantly longer due to redistricting and we will spend significantlymore time in the careach week insteadof runningaround at playgrounds on ourway homefrom school.

Polygons 132, 1132, and2132 have been at Clemens Crossing ElementarySchool for over 40years, until last week. These homes are filled with children, not "resources". These homes are filled with children, not statistics. These homes are filled with friendswith so manydifferences in abilities, diversity, religious beliefs, cultural celebrations;yet we are all celebrated and connected in passion and unity at Clemens Crossing.

Sincerely,

The Arant Family

Polygon 1132 From: Srinivasa Kukatla Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:31 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Polygon 1171 is a microfeed Island

! CAUTION:This email originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unlessyou recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Good Afternoon,

l^amresident of Polygon 1171,and would likeall the members to reconsiderand review our polygon HighSchool Redirection.

decision left our day's kids and because ours is a Small to community shocking Feed Island thrown 2-3 high schools away. Our kids suffer lack of friends from neighboring communities.

Ourcommunity is2-3 milesfrom Centennial High, 5-6 miles from Marriotts Ridge High and more than 8 miles awavfrom GtenElg High School.

Thisputs safety of our kids at riskdue to irregularbus times dueto distance, physical, psychologicaland emotional stress. Ifthey missthe bus it takes about 30-40 minutes to drop the kids in the morning and takes about an hour in the evening for after school activities.

Thiswill be great disadvantagefor our kids and effectstheir future.

I sincerely request you to reconsider the decision you have made regarding our Polygon. NoIsland is good for Children. They are feeling very very down due to this decision, since all thekids are also following the discussions and decisions made.

Thankyou in advanceonce again.

Best Regards Srinivas Kukatla & Ramyashri Katta TarakKukatla - AttendingTriadelphia RidgeElementary NehaKukatla Burleigh ManorMiddle School

Sent from my iPhone Chan Park & Hyo-Jung Kim Polygon #1157 10220 Tuscany Rd Ellicott City, MD 21042

November 14, 2019 redistrictingOhcpss.org

Dear, Howard County Public School System -redistricting committee members

I am writing to you to testify AGAINST school the school redistricting proposal for Polygon 1157. The current redistricting plan proposes to move us from Manor Wood ES to Triadelphia Ridge ES that is more than Smiles away from our home. This will dramatically increase the kids' commute time to more than 40 minutes school bus ride ONE-way. The young kids will be spending 90+ minutes in the school bus. There are AT LEAST FIVE elementary schools that are closer than TRES, including the Centennial Lane ES, which is also walking distance (<1 mile) from where we live.

We have an active 5 year-old boy who would have to sit in a school bus for more than 90 minutes every single day to and from school. I am extremely concerned for the safety of the young children who have to sit in a school bus without seat belts and without anyone overseeing the children to intervene potential bullying. The air-conditioning and the heating system are not great in a school bus. To have children as young as 5 years old, who are just beginning school, to sit in a cold bus without seat belts while the bus is driving on slippery road condition through the winter months is UNSAFE physically and emotionally for the little kids. The children have to wake up much early due to the long commute and walking in the dark to get to the school bus on slippery, cold winter months is also dangerous. A recent crash test by IMMI, the primary supplier of seatbelts for school buses, was administered to determine if school bus passengers wearing seatbelts suffered less injury or death when involved in a bus accident. The test took place at Center for Advanced Product Evaluation utilizing school-aged-sized dummies and included a head on collision and a roll over crash. The simulation revealed that the test dummies that wore seatbelts remained secure in their seats, while the test dummies who did not wear seatbelts were tossed throughout the bus. It was reported by IMMI that children who are on a bus that crashes and who utilize lap shoulder seatbelts can decrease death and injury rates by 50%. " (Edelstein, J.)

The funding of longer bus rides me more gas money, more buses to circulate out to the further area. It would be nice to gather all the money to be used in other areas such as expanding more classrooms or facilities to accommodate the growing population of children. The other concern is that all of our children's friends and classmates will be far away. To have a play date will be not only difficult but would be less frequent. We are set up for the children to have more lonely school years. This distance also presents a problem for parents. It would be difficult for the parent to volunteer or get involved with the school events more frequently due to the long distance commutes.

am urging the Howard County Public School Systems to no sacrifice and overlook our community in order to accommodate to the growing number of students. There are other closer schools that we can attend and some are even walking distance. Please consider options that are more feasible to our lives and our children's lives. This is an unreasonable solution when there are more schools that are close by.

Sincerely,

Hyo-Jung Kim & Chan Soo Park Polygon#1157 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: G kim Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:20 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] STRONGLYOPPOSE move to Glenelg HS - Polygon 1171

! CAUTION: This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not click Unles or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Members: Our high schoolers are going to be on a school bus 1 l/2hr for round trip to school. Your decision creates an island andit also increasesmore thandouble the travel distancethan the distanceto the existingschools thatour children are currently attending. This will affect both emotional andphysical health ofour children due to sleep deprivation and lack of after school activity participation.

We ask each of you to please reconsider and hear our concerns before making the final decision on Thurs., 11/21.

Sincerely, GimanKim 3332 Burton Drive EllicottCity, MD21042 Polygonll71 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Sunaina Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:17 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting; Mavis Ellis; Kirsten Coombs; Vicky Cutroneo; Christina Delmont- Small; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Chao Wu Subject: [External] Don't make us an island! Please keep polygon 1 171 at MRHS.

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe. Respected board members,

Thankyou for all the work that you havebeen doingpast several months to address the overcrowdingand economic disparityin Howard countypublic schools. We do understandthat making decisions andthinking through this process is an extremely dauntingtask.

Lastweek, all boardmembers reached a consensus that our polygon 1171 shouldbe left in MRHS sincemoving us would make us a strange island andbecause Glenelg HS is very far for us. Wewere very pleased about fhe thoughtful decisionby the boardmembers. However, today all ofthat decisionwas againreversed putting us back into very far schools! We are very concerned about this latest decisiondue to the following reasons:

1. The proposed move is goingto have significantunpact on the growth and development of our kids especially the for high schoolers. The commute is going to increase by about 55% which will take toll on their well-being emotionally andphysically. They will haveto wakeup early and spend a great chunk of quality time in commute andtraffic (twice a day at minimum). It's a serious health and security concern whichwill definitelyhave a very adverse affect on their well-being. 2. With proposed move, we are being isolated from surrounding community and turned into an island. This makes it extremely challengingfor kids and even parents to get involved in community and PTA events; this move is goingto breakthe community and dynamics within neighborhood. 3. Though the polygon looks big on map but it comprises of a small group ofmiddle andhigh schoolers. The enrollment projections for next 4 years are not going to overcrowd MRHS in any manner. With current capacity ofboth MRHS and GHS being at about 87% and 84% respectively, the move won't address overcapacityissues but it will adversely affect andbreak the cohesionwithin the community, so pleasereconsider the proposal.

Weunderstand that you are trying to find a balancewithin the county schoolsbut moving us out ofMRHS into GHS does not look like a rational or logical idea at all. Please don't make 1171 an island and make our kids grow throughphysical and emotional hardship in the pursuit of gettingbasic education.

Thank you for your time and immediate attention. Sincerely, -Sunaina Fotedar (Hopeful resident ofPolygon 1171) Marilyn Grosskopf

From: llia Baskakov Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:17 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Redistricting ERRORS - Work Session IX

C:AUTION:This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not cUck links or open attachments, unless you recognizethe sender andknow the contentIs safe. Dear HCPSS BoE, ^amwritin^gto^pointputseveral errors and inconsistencies that have led to your decision to redistrict p°, l.ygons. 1132-132~2132 from ctemens Crossing Elementary (CCES) to Br'yant Woods today. DuringAttendance Area Adjustment Work Session VIII on Thursday, November 14, 2019, the entire te'.arthad. aElreedto revert ctemens Crossing Elementary backto its currentstate/polygons. Thereafter, looted down a motion brought by Jen Malloto redistrict 1132-132-2132 from'ClemensCrossina to BryantWoods Elementary. Then today; Monday, November 18,2019 the-motion'votedwas"inraTidated Lto.a"earl'ermotio" to revert. back to Ms. Mallo's earlier plan. It was shown in'toda/s liveca'stThat'sTx members were utterly confused about the motions and verbal agreement that had'take'n was the rp!ace'-And_it eyi dent. in yKJe°_that not all board members fully understood why'the' previous and motion to redistrict the 1 132-132-2132 to Bryant Wood Elementary was invalid. £ue. to-th, is_errOT-andconI"slon;you have denied the Pare"ts ofthe 1132-132-2132 polygons due process to.app-oal UIldec.isK'n-.spec'fically' as a result ofyour carelessness and neglTgence, -the~fam^ies' affected LOST FOUR DAYS to respond, organize and appeal. This is simply not acceptabie. Also^duringjoday'swork session, rightbefore Ms. KirstenCoombs broughtthe motion to move 1132-132- -132fr°m. B'vantw°°.dsto c:;tem_ens crossin9 Elementary, Dr. ChaoWu and Ms. Coombs agreedto comUne e ion wBh mot movm_g_34-2134-1134 to Swanfidd Elementary (SFES)soThat the uTilFzation rates^orBWES, ^CCES, ^nd_SFES would be 89%, 113% and 99%, respectively; whiieThe'FARM'ratefor ^would be lowere_d by 5%_However, this combination was denied by the Chairwoman, ' MsYMa'vis' LBUnhiswas INCONSISTENT with howthe board v°ted on many other motions'dunng the' redistricting process. The recorded work sessions show on many occasions, the board members comb.i"eddiffere"t. sce"ar'os/m':"/e. d that he'ped to yieid acceptable (what is acceptebie'i's never" i defined) numbers for FARM and utilization rates. Your decision to randomly exclude7he CC'ES"motion'J being combined with other scenarios/moves was inconsistent and demonstrates the in which the redistricting process has been carried out. Redistricting process should be methodical andconsistent, butthe onewe havewitnessed hasbeen ad hocand haphazardat best. Wewill join otherfamilies in HowardCounty to demand a'due" hearing and assert our rights to be heard!

Dr. llia Baskakov 10210DottysWay Columbia, MD 21044 Members of the Board, While I appreciate the Board's dedication to the community and the hard work put into this process, recent events have caused me to conclude that it has become broken and simply un-democratic.

As a taxpayer, like you, I paid for a well investigated study performed by an experienced and independent organization. This study was based in clear metrics and presented by the facts. For months, this study was evaluated, debated, and a formal plan recommended from it by our chiefeducator, Superintendent Martirano. In turn, that plan was discussed and protested. The impacted communities were given the time, and shown the respect, to allowthem to ask questions and share concerns. To putforward new plans after public oral testimony has been closed, impacting new and different areas, but not affording those communities an equal opportunity to ask questions and share their new concerns in an open and public forum is not in the spirit of democratic debate. Additionally, the new plans proposed by individual board members are not obviously available to the community for evaluation. At least, I couldn't find them readily availableonline -which makes this feel like a less than transparent process. I wasable to find some detail in the public record of the new plans promoted by Dr. Wu and Ms. Mallow, but it is notable that the methodology of these new plans have not been independently evaluated and determined to meet the enrollment and academic equalization requirements and standards set forth in the feasibility studies. Nor has there been time allotted for such an evaluation.

As parents of bvo elementary school aged children in Polygon 2161 we have significantconcerns about the new recommendations to move 2161 to St. Johns Lane Elementary, while keeping our sister polygons 1162 and 162 at Waverly Elementary. These 3 polygons were redistricted from SJLES to Waverly a few years ago. This resulted in a condition where less than 25% (approximately 30/135) ofWaverly's graduatingclass would be moving on to Patapsco Middle instead ofwith the larger cohort that would attend MountView Middle. This, in itself, was controversial at the time. The newplans by Dr. Wu and Ms. Mallo will further decreasethis percentage and cause even further disruptionto emotions and friendships- whichare crucial to the development of a child at anyage. Further, it is not clearthat this will result in a long term solution and our small polygon community will remain at risk of being redistricted and uprooted yet again in the future.

In addition to the impactto the children, it is also notable howthese moves havethe potential to affectthe larger family unit - emotionally as well as financially. My wife and I have been told by Howard County Parks and Recthat ifwe are redistricted to a newelementary school we are not "grandfathered"into the before/after care program. With SJLEShaving a smaller program, we have been told it is likely we will be put on the "waitlist". As such, not only will our child be moved from the highest performing elementary school in the county (Waverly) to a school that is not the highest performing school (St. Johns Lane) without any quantifiable reassessed feasibility study analysis to show how school performance is likely to change after the redistricting process, but we may also no longer be able to work a full 8 hour day because we will lose access to child care. This is simply unacceptable.

I implore you to abandon these new plans until they can be fully studied and then publicly debated.

Thank you for your consideration, Russell Stein Polygon 2161 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Veera V Satya N Kanithi Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:12 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] FELT HUMILIATED - Polygon 1171

! CAUTION:This emaU originated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Directors

I'm from Polygon 1171 and hadbeen following BOE sessions ever since there was a proposal to move our Polygonto GHS whichwas a last minute change.

Wholeboard voted to keep the Polygon 1171 at MRHS onNOV12 working session. Todayalso there weretwo times hadvoting done andpassed both times to keep@MRHS. At the end all of a sudden, anothermotion started againand moved us to GHS.

You are all playing with our Polygon like a soccer ball by bringing it many times for voting andwe strongly felt humiliated.

One of the main reason mentioned is the feed from TRES to BMMS. If that is the reason, then why don't you switch us to Manor Woods or Centennial Elementary. GHS is way far (9 miles) from our homes and makes us only ISLANDPolygon.

This is very unfair decisionat the last minute. Please D considerour plead and DO NOT MOVEUS FROMMRHS.

Thank You Marilyn Grosskoof

From: Rick Bis Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:1 1 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] 132, 1132, 1232 Alternate Plan.

CAUTION= Thls emauoriginated from outside ofHCPSS. Donot cUcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize thesender and know the content is safe. Dearboard members, Ourcommmity hasdeveloped theproposal belowto addressthe issues in a waythat keep communities togetherand improves studmts fortunesin anequitable manner. Pleasestrongly reconsider your moving of polygons 132, 1132, and 1232. In additionto keeping communities together, thisplan has other subtle advantages that may not be readily apparent by casual consideration.

s has limited before and after ^ rst'.S.,men, cirossin g care, which, I believe, would be more detrimentally impactftil to the families ofthe polygons currently slated to move from Swansfield to CCES. econd'- SI'lmha8 the advante8e oflowering busing costs. Polygons 132, 1132, and 1232 arewithin a mile ofCCES andare in the process ofpetitioning tobe changed to walker status. Thecommunity iscuiraitly working onthese issues, andis willing to expend significant capital to make anycapital improvements necessaryto allow forthis change. In contrast, movingthese polygons to Bryant Woodswould entail significantbusing as all egressfrom these polygons heads south out of the neighborhoods towards CCESbefore ading towards Bryant Woods and the Mali. The direct le past driving route from my house, e. g., is 2. 4 miles to Bryant woods.

Third, thisplan has the advantage of minimizing public outrage and legal liability. It hewscloser to thewell- ^a^ ,ed^u?erinten?ent? plantha;t wa-s p?id for by taxpayers. It doesnot entail polygon movements only initiallybrought up a fewbusiness days before a finalvote (and thus not in compliance withBemsteinetal. v. Boardof Education of Prince George's County (245 MD. 464, pg. 474)andin questionable wmpTiancewTth' Chapter 2 ofthe Open Meetings Act ofMaryland, whichPolicy 2040(rV)(A)(l) ofyour boardisreqmredto follow.). Finally, inregards to keeping Ae community together, I just wantedto letyou know thatmy 3rd grade daughter (not to mention mywife) hasbeen crying everynight sinceWednesday, whenwe were first notified that om- polygon was suddenly being considered to move. Sheis heartbroken fliat shewill not beable to be in ttie same girl scouttroop with her fnends next year. Shetears up when she thinks about missing her fiiendsmd teachers at school. ^Whether you mean to or not, you areteaching her to hate the government and seeit as a mwe tool of fliepowerful touse people aspawns to furtherthe goals of others. WhileI, asan adult, understand thatyou are balancingrompeting concerns, I wantyou to be sure that you understand the fall costof your decisions and the deeper, subtlereffects your decisions have that cut to the bone. Pleasestrongly reconsider this move. Please makeyour decisions while keeping asan overriding concern, minimal disruption to achievethe goals you want. It is easyto overlook thehidden pain ofchildren andparents whenstming probabilities andstatistics in theface. I'msorry that I caimotquantize my daughters grief or weigh her tears. But knowthat they are real.

enrollment Projections SY 2018-19 Project< Enrollment School Year 2020-1 School Year School Year School Year School Year 2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 Assigi Polygon ES MS HS ES MS HS ES MS I HS ES I MS I HS ES I MS I HS ES I MS I HS Cu 61 17 * 18 19 10 15 20 10 15 21 11 15 25 11 16 30 12 16 ICIemens C 130 66 12 23 73 26 26 79 28 28 79 30 31 80 31 34 79 33 36 ICIemens C 131 45 22 35 51 21 34 54 22 33 55 23 33 56 23 34 56 24 34 ICIemens C 132 30 * 20 33 13 17 36 14 18 36 IS 18 36 16 19 37 16 20 [Clemens C 133 87 42 91 93 42 77 97 43 72 100 46 71 98 46 72 103 47 72 IBryant We 1130 20 10 27 25 11 21 26 12 20 26 13 20 27 13 20 27 14 20 ICIemens C 1131 70 26 34 77 33 40 82 34 42 85 36 44 85 38 46 86 38 48 ICIemens C 1132 20 12 24 22 10 20 24 10 19 23 10 18 24 10 18 25 10 18 ICIemens C 1133 * * 25 11 * 17 11 * 15 11 * 13 11 * 13 11 * 12 IBryantWc 2131 52 22 40 58 25 38 63 27 37 62 28 38 63 29 40 64 30 40 ICIemens C 2132 26 29 12 13 32 12 14 31 13 15 32 13 16 33 14 16 ICIemens C * * 3131 16 * * * * * 17 22 21 * 22 * 23 * ICIemensC 4131 18 * * 12 20 12 22 * 12 21 * 12 21 * 12 22 * 13 ICIemens C 5133 20 10 19 21 10 17 22 11 16 23 11 16 23 11 17 23 12 17 |Bryant Wo total 487 549 590 594 603 619

Very sincerely, Richard Bis Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Kim F Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:10 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Cc: Mavis Ellis; Chao Wu; Christina Delmont-Small; Vicky Cutroneo; Jennifer Mallo; Sabina Taj; Kirsten Coombs; Superintendent Subject: [External] Polygons 1132, 2132, 132 Consideration

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Board of Education,

I am writing with deep concern and frustration over the disorganized handling of polygons 1132, 2132, and 132. The community was shocked today to learn the the motion from last Tuesday which put us at Clemmens (where we are now and belong) was somehow an "error?" If an "error" was made why was it not addressed that same day?

Our community has many concerns with our 3 polygons being sent to a title 1 school that will be at 112% capacity. This can be alleviated by Dr. Wu's original plan to move 3 polygons to Swansfield that are in walking distance to Swansfield. Keeping our 3 polygons that are walking distance to Clemens in walking distance to Clemens. In fact our community is in the process of requesting a walker survey since we are around 1 mile form Clemens and may be converted to a walker zone. Another option to this overcrowding at Bryant Wood's would be as follows: Split polygon 130 alone Cedar Ln. The Swansfield side of the polygon goes to Swansfield, the CCES side goes to CCES. Boundaries would be Cedar Ln, Hickory Ridge RD, Broken Land, 29, AND 32. This would move 107 kids from BWES to CCES (this is 15-20% of the pollution of the "new" CCES). I believe this would bring more SESdiversity to CCES. It also moves kids from CCESto Swansfield, all on the same side of Cedar Ln as Swansfield, keeping them in their village of Clary's Forest so they become a contiguous geographic community.

Another concern for our polygons (1132, 2132, 132) is the extra 2 hours per week our kids will be spending on buses, who are currently only 1 mile from their school and often walk and bike. Not only will this result in reduced family time during the week, but increased stress on families already burdened to find the time to fit in homework, meals, extracurricular activities etc.. Also more bus time can lead to more disciplinary issues. Many kids think they can get away with things on the bus as there is no adult present and these longer bus rides will give them the freedom to do so.

I urge you to take another look at these 3 polygons as our community feels that we have been jerked around and not given the time to have a voice being added last minute and this latest "error" being brought to everyone's attention 3 days before voting.

Kim Fern Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Long Chen Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:04 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] ERRORS and INCONSISTENCY -WORK SESSION IX

! CAUTION:This emaUoriginated from outside ofHCPSS. Do not clicklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content Is safe.

Dear HCPSS BoE,

I am writing to point out several errors and inconsistencies that have led to your decision to redlstrict polygons 1132-132- 2132from Clemens Crossing Elementary(CCES) to BryantWoods Elementary(BWES) today. DuringAttendance Area Adjustment Work Session VIIIon Thursday, November 14, 2019, the entire board had agreed to revert Clemens Crossing Elementary back to its current state/polygons. Thereafter, the board voted down a motion brought byJen Malloto redistrict 1132-132-2132 from Clemens Crossing to Bryant Woods Elementary. Then today, Monday, November 18, 2019 the motion voted was invalidated due to an earlier motion to revert back to Ms. Mallos earlier plan. It was shown in today's livecast that six of the board members were utterly confused about the motions and verbal agreement that had taken place. And it was evident in the video that not all board members fully understood why the previous andfailed motion to redistrictthe 1132-132-2132 to BryantWood Elementarywas invalid^ Dueto this error and confusion, you have denied the parents ofthe 1132-132-2132 polygons due process to appeal your decision. Specifically, as a result of your carelessness and negligence, the families affected LOST FOURDAYS to respond, organize and appeal. This is simply not acceptable.

Also during today's work session, right before Ms. Kirsten Coombs brought the motion to move 1132-132-2132 from Bryant Woods to Clemens Crossing Elementary, Dr. Chao Wu and Ms. Coombs agreed to combine the motion with moving 34-2134-1134to SwanfieldElementary (SFES) so that the utilization rates for BWES,CCES, and SFESwould be 89%, 113% and 99%, respectively; while the FARM rate for SFES would be lowered by 5%. However, this combination was denied bythe Chairwoman, Ms. Mavis Ellis. But this was INCONSISTENTwith howthe boardvoted on manyother motions during the redistricting process. The recorded work sessions show on many occasions, the board members combined different scenarios/moved that helped to yield acceptable (what is acceptable is never clearly defined) numbers for FARM and utilization rates. Yourdecision to randomly excludethe CCES motion from being combinedwith other scenarios/moves was inconsistent and demonstrates the haphazard way in which the redistricting process has been carried out.

Redistricting process should be methodical and consistent, but the one we have witnessed has been ad hoc and haphazard at best. We will join other families in Howard County to demand a due process hearing and assert our rights to be heard!

-Long Chen 10210DottysWay Columbia, MD 21044 Marilyn Grosskopf

From: M N Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:03 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] 1179 Decision

! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear BoE members -

Please revert the decision to move 1171 to farther schools. We have similar or under capacity schools nearby us for all level. Your decision to move them to farther school will have immensely negative effects on kids physical and emotional health. They are being cutoff from nearby communities creating 1179 an island.

Please keep 1179 @> MRHS Middle school as Mount View or Burleigh Manor. Elementary at any nearby Elementary school

Please do not divide communities and do not compromise on our kids health and well-being.

Thanks Manish Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Satya Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:02 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] VERY DISAPPOINTED - POLYGON 1171

! CAUTION:This email originatedfrom outside ofHCPSS. Do not click links or open attachments, imless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Board of Directors,

I m from Polygon 1171 andhad been following BOEsessions ever sincethere was a proposal to move our Polygon to GHS whichwas a last minute change.

Whole board voted to keep the Polygon 1171 at MRHS on NOV12 working session. Today also there were two times had voting done and passed both times to keep@MRHS. At the end all ofa sudden, another motion started again and moved us to GHS.

You are all playing with our Polygon like a soccer ball by bringing it many times for voting.

One ofthe main reason mentioned is the feed from TRES to BMMS. If that is the reason, when don't you switchus to ManorWoods or Centennial Elementary. MRHS is wayfar from ourhomes andmakes us only ISLAND Polygon.

This is very unfair decisionat the last minute. Please please consider our plead and DO NOT MOVE US FROM MRHS.

Thank You Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Platino Family Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:01 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] There is a better solution for Clemens Crossing

! CAUTION:This emaUoriginated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not eUcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. DearMembers of the Board of Education,

I live in polygon 3131, saidI have a 4th grader and a 1 st grader at Clemens Crossmg Elementary. I am writing to the members again because the decision made today to move polygons 132, 1132 and2132 outofClemensto Bryant Woods was the wrong solution for Clemens. Moving these polygons tears our neighborhood apart. There is a better and more logical solution, and I have outlined the reasons below:

The most logical Polygons to move out ofClemens are 134, 1134 and 2134. They have been part ofthe process from the begimung (and in fact were part ofthe last redistricting process too), and have hadthe opportunity to voice concerns to theboard. They areactually closerto Swansfieldthan Clemens, locatedright next to polygons 53 and 2053, which already go to Swansfield. Polygons 1134 and 2134 could be walkers to Swansfieid. They are already slated to go to , like many Swansfield students and arepart ofthe Clary's Forest neighborhood, separated from the Clemens Crossing neighborhood both by Cedar Lane and distance..

In contrast, polygons 132, 1132 and 2132 have never been part ofthe redistricting plans until last week. They have hadno opportunity to voice their concerns about the unpact ofthis to the board. They arevery close to Clemens Crossing (the very furthest home is 1. 1 miles away). Because ofthis, many kids in polygons 132, 1132, 2132 would be walkers to Clemens Crossing if there was a crossing guard on Owen Brown Road - and in fact many ofthese kids walk andbike to school daily!

Each ofthe streets in polygons 132, 1132 and 2132 egress only onto Owen Brown Road - which means they face the Clemens Crossing neighborhood and are clearly part ofthe Clemens Crossing community, mid in fact are directly next to polygons 2131 and 4131, who all walk to Clemens. There is no access from these polygons into any polygon that attends Bryant Woods. Polygon 4133, along with the rest ofthe Bryant Woods Elementary community, empties out onto Hickory Ridge Road.

Polygons 132, 1132 and 2132 attend Afholton High School like the majority ofCCES students, and in fact 1132 and 2132 are walkers to AHS. In addition, they are closest to the Clemens Crossing pool, andbecause they are on an outparcel, their kids would swim on the Wilde Lake swim team if moved to Bryant Woods.

Whenwe look at these two communities, polygons 132, 1132 and 2132 have 84 students, while polygons 134, 1134and 2134 have 80. However, it makes senseto move polygons 134, 1134and 2134 - this feelingis echoed even by many ofthose who live in those polygons. However, 132, 1132 and 2132 are clearly anintegral part of the Clemens Crossmg Coinmunity. Moving these polygons would tear apart our community! Moving the 132 polygons was the wrong decision. Please reconsider and move 132, 1132 and 2132 backto Clemens Crossing before the final vote.

Thank you, Risa Carlson Marilyn Grosskopf

From: Nicole Laidig Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:01 AM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Redistricting Process Concerns - Postpone Voting

! CAUTION: This emaUorigmated from outside ofHCPSS.Do not cUcklinks or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Members of the Board,

As theredistricting process continues, I amboth saddenedand disappointed by the process andthe manner in whichthis has been handled. Manystudents futures havebeen decided with rash decisions where the big picture was not taken into account, only a single statistic. While I understand and support the purpose of redistricting, theway the board ofeducation hashandled this process hasbeen upsetting to saythe least. Redistrictingbegan as a clearand transparent process whereresearch and data driven changeswould be proposedwith feedback provided by the community. Hundredsof thousands of dollars was spent in researching a viable plan. Withonly weeks before the final decisions members ofthe board took it upon themselves to provide alternative plans. While alternatives would havebeen welcomed, they should haveonly come with an opportunity for feedback from the public, clear data driven support and ample opportunity for review. These proposals never provided any ofthese things. Plans were submitted at the last possible minute much to the surprise ofthe polygons thrown into themix at the 1 1thhour. Opportunities forpublic response happened months agoleaving usto write emails to a generic email address. An email address that even stopped generating an automatic response that verified your written testimony hadbeen received a week ago. Residents have no voice in this plan. No opportunity to ask questions, to understand the move, to analyze the data. The process has become haphazard and mshed. As you move toward your scheduled final vote this week. Please take alloftfris into account. Is it really possible that the board has had sufficient time to analyze eachof these moves that hasbeen made over thepast week? Have youtally beenable to giveit the attention andprofessional responsethat a taskthis large andimportant deserves? Giventhe factthat board members were working in marathon 10 hour sessions where the polygon numbers begin to blur andmotions are accidentallyvoted on, I thinkit is clearthat the answer to thosequestions is a resoundingno. Therefore, I ask thatyou take the time to properly review these moves. Thinkthem through as a wholerather than a single polygon with a statistic attached. There aremany missingpieces here. A plan with somany holes and questions should not move forward!

Please postpone your vote. Fix the process. Do not proceed until the public has equal opportunity to voice their opinioD/concems andunderstand thereasoning that should bedriving these decisions. Pleasepostpone your finalvote and adjust the redistricting process soit canbe the clear and fair procedure that it shouldhave always been.

Thank you!

Sincerley, Nicole Laidig Novanber 19, 2019

To the Howari County Board ofEdiaiatioa.

Tile community in HowaidCounty Sdool Polygoa t ISis paitimring tfaeBtwud of Education to amend the Pi'elimmaty Hti(b Scbuoi redistrictaig plan Aat was^iproved last night in Work Session K to aaign Polygon 118 immAthoiton High School to River Hill ffighSiAool basedon thefollowing rationale: . Themonon to move Polygons 1 17. i 117, 118aa:! 120fiwn Atfaoton irB^i Scfaool to River Hill ^ School on fe aftermBMi ufWCTfe Session (Xmade by Victcy Cuticonen was appmved by the wswe Soatd o<'Eiducfd»n (7-Q). This showed tiiai the board favoied moving this blwk offour pvlysptw w Putton, MB un (he last Work Session before the Preliminary Hi(Eh Wsool raiistrictitiig plan straw vote. . Theabove motion was rescinded andreiuinedPoiygwis 117, HI 7. I IS and 120tack lo AAottcaiHigh Schuoian die night of Wor, SessionDC based on a motwn by Jen Mallnthat wantedh» avgid (heae. polyguns ftom a tloubieledistricting mirve. rhe polygons 117, 1117, and 120 wae rsaiiariuted from Ltme (Cito to ClarksvUle Middle School in 2017. For this reason alone, i&is nwnon to iieasind tto iMrticr motiuo was approved bythe Board ofEducarion with aivitte of frfl (with 1 boardmember abstaining).

' This p^ition is tu show ifaatthe cmnmunin' m f'olygwi 11» suppwts the move to River Hill Hi^i School de^riie Ae ewliermiddle scihool move in 2017,based on a shorter distance to Rivn Hill than Athulta*n Higfi school and a stnmysx Ciarlcsville Middle School feedw River Hill than AAolton

ThereareonlyKi, l7and 19 ht^i schooi gmdssnts iTOm Potygon UK projected for the school years begmning in 2020, 2021, and 2022 nsspecrively Moving dus number ofstudent fium Atholtonw River Hill HBj^ sciii»olwould noi si^iifi

1'heiefore, the community ta Poiygon 118 requests dtat ttie Boaniof Education assi^i Polygon 118 fi-om AAolton to River High ffigfaSchool in fl»eFinal High School redistricting plan that will be qyrovtd on 'Ilnirsday, November 21. 2019.

'Ulw -y^ Ifg, ft (^^ {1^_ /- ','^^L//^ "YYlo^ft^- ^3^3_^^A^^ ^/^ (^hn. wOZK.

. ^J^(AIJ/JU^L rasia^ / 23 ^5~ FUas^ ^ ^ew D/- /;. iz^ci ?o^ e, d^ BF^^nf AlO, -(_^/-fy^^ f ^,_/-^ f^lto^ ^Zo~iye\ Lo'^-'^ . . 20'^ ^^4\ Yo\^\- \^AdU^ DJC- '/^AkL ^}}^ \^\^ a(n^^ l'Z-27'75'l i IL?^-> C<«/o f 0^-.

. ^/^ FU^^ , MO -Z. -a7j-<) l-!,7^^ c'-ni (^. 'iMiiC. 0 -^rt. '^0 . Z. -TT? |-t<>^1 piiAi^i \i\i^ I\TJ<. < (-l-. ltto./l, rt^D -Z^'ISq ^, A-A^b^L.^/pM/b/l^ ^-3^7Y?!<-^1^ V'^;,^ ^ ^ C^lol'"^/^A'onv^ /3367f^s^^u(vi^ Dc. -^(/i. n. KD.zo, I . W^QC^^> LlV\ I 3 ll£\

;4- <^^^^Aqi/1 '^ S^IY^ |22)^c? PtG'O.Oc, ^'/V/'^-lA)0^rf(, i/)'c;W Mj>3C. ?- |'> ,PA/V- V

Ito. 56 a..- ^c<(^'\ \U\(yt> \tu^. c-A- ^^_ t7^ i£i. (.4n- n -^J-7 ! 1 Mrs ?n4i^^_-T^L; 1^3^-f Pf^jE^J 1/e^ -^-^ f-lJ^/^ Z^-lT] i if Mr__^

^ ^fl£^_ ^^r_ lllM P^cu^5pf^ ff- ^ t>7r Z^- ~7/v^n_ (^S^^~^. /-^2-^ ^6^'-^^ ^7 ^; i' ZZZ7^ ^ ^<5^ ^/^^. ^^ ^ 1^1^ P)&3^m ^inq ^ ^7^ lt-5^ P^^-) (2j^ ^r. ^^

?^

F-t-orr, : IVonkey Penny mon. '. ^,. ;-;, :, :^'^ ^hcj^ . ;. ;... : ti^',.;!: Re: Our community petition for school redistrfcting beforetinat vote O. 'K November 19, 2019 at 1£:30 PM '-c; Maslan^Main ;?ni?i~;ai. ' . f;.;.T:c"--it-ie-

Hello, Michelle,

I am supportive of the proposal to keep our neighborhood in the schools closest to it, including River Hill HS and Clarksville MS.

I am not available to physically sign your petition today, but please use this email as a proxy to represent my intent / preference.

Thank you, Phil Quade 12325 Point flidge Dr Fulton MD pc? ii-^q o^i 11 y (Urs. ^^°

-kl i- ^

. - « ^ 9^awfift"^ ^.^»4^ (^ '" ^ -h> n5^ or ^^)^' [ -^Tk^ ^ ;e^^ ^)^^, ;CEIVED NOV I 9 2013 0^ L'j

[-^ .s R tart !?"< ^.' ^^J.