DOCSLIB.ORG

Vta's Bart Silicon Valley— Phase Ii Extension Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

VTA’S BART SILICON VALLEY— PHASE II EXTENSION PROJECT SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES LISTS P REPARED FOR : Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration P R E P A R E D B Y : ICF 75 E Santa Clara Street, Suite 300 San Jose, CA 95113 November 2016 ICF 2016. VTA’s BART Silicon Valley—Phase II Extension Project Special- Status Species Lists. November. San Jose, CA. Prepared for the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, San Jose, CA, and the Federal Transit Administration, Washington, D.C. Special-Status Plants with Potential to Occur in the Project Footprint Page 1 of 2 Status: Federal/ Scientific and Common State/ Blooming Potential to Occur in BART Name CNPS Geographic Distribution Habitat Requirements Period Extension Footprint Balsamorhiza macrolepis –/–/1B.2 Scattered occurrences in the Chaparral, cismontane woodland, Mar–June None; BART Extension footprint is Big-scale balsamroot Coast Ranges and Sierra valley and foothill grassland, 295 below species elevation range. Nevada foothills. to 5,100 feet above mean sea level (MSL) California macrophylla –/–/1B.1 Alameda, Butte, Contra Costa, Cismontane woodland, valley and Mar–May None; no suitable habitat within the Round-leaved filaree Colusa, Fresno, Glenn, Kings , foothill grassland, 50 to 3,940 BART Extension footprint. There are Kern, Lake, Lassen, Los feet above MSL no CNDDB documented occurrences Angeles, Merced, Monterey, within 2 miles of the BART Napa, Riverside, Santa Extension footprint. Barbara, San Benito, Santa Clara, San Diego, San Joaquin, San Luis Obispo, San Mateo, Solano, Sonoma, Stanislaus , Tehama, Tulare, Ventura, and Yolo counties and Santa Cruz Island. Centromadia parryi ssp. –/–/1B.1 East San Francisco Bay Area, Annual grassland, on lower Jun–Nov None; no suitable habitat within the congdonii Salinas Valley, Los Osos Valley slopes, flats, and swales, BART Extension footprint. There is Congdon's tarplant sometimes on alkaline or saline one CNDDB documented soils, below 700 feet above MSL occurrences within 2 miles of the BART Extension footprint. Presence of this occurrence is extirpated. Chorizanthe robusta var. E/–/1B.1 Alameda, Monterey, Marin, Chaparral, cismontane woodland, Apr–Sep None; no suitable habitat within the robusta Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, San coastal dunes, coastal scrub, 10 BART Extension footprint and Robust spineflower Francisco, and San Mateo to 980 feet above MSL considered extirpated in Santa Clara counties County. There is one CNDDB occurrence documented less than a mile from the area of potential effects, however the species was last seen in 1882 at this location and the area has been highly developed and urbanized. Cirsium fontinale var. –/–/1B.2 Alameda, Santa Clara, and Chaparral, cismontane woodland, Apr–Oct None; BART Extension footprint is campylon Stanislaus counties. valley and foothill grassland, 330 below species elevation range. Mt. Hamilton fountain to ,2920 feet above MSL thistle Special-Status Plants with Potential to Occur in the Project Footprint Page 2 of 4 Status: Federal/ Scientific and Common State/ Blooming Potential to Occur in BART Name CNPS Geographic Distribution Habitat Requirements Period Extension Footprint Collinsia multicolor –/–/1B.2 Monterey, Santa Cruz, San Northern coastal scrub and March–May None; no suitable habitat within the San Francisco collinsia Francisco, and San Mateo closed-cone pine forest, 100 to BART Extension footprint. There are Counties. 820 feet above MSL no CNDDB documented occurrences within 2 miles of the BART Extension footprint. Dudleya abramsii ssp. E/–/1B.1 Santa Clara County Cismontane woodland, valley and Apr–Oct None; BART Extension footprint is setchellii foothill grassland, serpentinite, below species elevation range. Santa Clara Valley dudleya rocky, 195 to 1,490 feet above MSL Fritillaria liliacea –/–/1B.2 Alameda, Contra Costa, Coastal prairie, valley grassland, Feb–Apr None; no suitable habitat within the Fragrant fritillary Monterey, Marin, Santa Clara, northern coastal scrub, and BART Extension footprint. There are San Mateo, San Francisco, San wetland-riparian, 10 to 1,345 feet no CNDDB documented occurrences Benito, Solano, and Sonoma. above MSL within 2 miles of the BART Extension footprint. Hoita strobilina –/–/1B Alameda, Contra Costa, Santa Chaparral, cismontane woodland, May–July None; no suitable habitat within the BART Extension footprint. There are Loma Prieta hoita Clara, and Santa Cruz counties. riparian woodland, usually serpentinite, mesic, from 100 to no CNDDB documented occurrences 2,800 feet above MSL within 2 miles of the BART Extension footprint. Lasthenia conjugens E/–/1B.1 Alameda, Contra Costa, Cismontane woodland, playas, Mar–June None; no suitable habitat within the BART Extension footprint. There are Contra Costa goldfields Mendocino, Monterey, Marin, valley and foothill grassland, vernal Napa Santa Barbara, Santa pools/mesic, from 0 to 1,540 feet no CNDDB documented occurrences Clara, Solano, and Sonoma above MSL within 2 miles of the BART Extension footprint. counties Malacothamnus arcuatus –/–/1B.2 Santa Cruz, San Mateo, and Chaparral, cismontane woodland, April–Sep None; no suitable habitat within the Arcuate bush mallow Santa Clara. from 50 to 1,165 above MSL BART Extension footprint. There is one CNDDB documented occurrence ~0.5-mile west of the BART Extension footprint that was last observed in1961 and is considered possibly extirpated. Special-Status Plants with Potential to Occur in the Project Footprint Page 3 of 4 Status: Federal/ Scientific and Common State/ Blooming Potential to Occur in BART Name CNPS Geographic Distribution Habitat Requirements Period Extension Footprint Malacothamnus hallii –/–/1B.2 Contra Costa, Lake, Mendocino, Chaparral, coast scrub, from 30 to May–Sep None; there is no suitable habitat within the BART Extension Hall’s bush mallow Merced, Santa Clara, San Mateo, 2,500 feet above MSL and Stanislaus counties footprint. There is one CNDDB occurrence less than a mile from the BART Extension footprint in between the airport and Guadalupe River that was last observed in 1973. The area was surveyed in 1993 with negative results. Plagiobothrys glaber –/–/1A Coastal valleys from Marin to Alkaline meadows, coastal salt Mar–May None; there is no suitable habitat Hairless popcorn-flower San Benito Counties marsh and swamps at 50-590 within the BART Extension feet above MSL footprint. There are two CNDDB occurrences less than two miles from the BART Extension footprint, south of the intersection of Highways 280 and 101 that was last seen in 1955 and is listed as a possible misidentification, and ~0.5- mile west of the BART Extension footprint in Santa Clara that was last seen in 1892. Senecio aphanactis –/–/2B.2 Scattered locations in central Chaparral, cismontane woodland, Jan–Apr None; no suitable habitat within the Chaparral ragwort western and southwestern coastal scrub, sometimes BART Extension footprint. There are California, from Alameda alkaline, 50 to 2,620 feet above no CNDDB documented occurrences County to San Diego County MSL within 2 miles of the BART Extension footprint. Streptanthus albidus ssp. E/–/1B.1 Santa Clara County Valley and foothill grasslands, Apr–June None; BART Extension footprint is albidus serpentinite, from 150 to 2,620 below species elevation range. Metcalf Canyon jewelflower feet above MSL Trifolium hydrophilum (T. –/–/1B.2 Sacramento Valley, central Salt marsh, mesic alkaline areas Apr–Jun None; there is no suitable habitat depauperatum var. western California in grasslands, vernal pools, 0 to within the BART Extension hydrophilum) 980 feet above MSL footprint. There is one CNDDB Saline clover occurrence less than a mile from the BART Extension footprint from 1903 located in a currently developed area in downtown San Jose. Special-Status Plants with Potential to Occur in the Project Footprint Page 4 of 4 Status Explanations Federal E = listed as endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act T = listed as threatened under the federal Endangered Species Act – = no listing State E = listed as endangered under the California Endangered Species Act T = listed as threatened under the California Endangered Species Act R = listed as rare under the California Native Plant Protection Act. This category is no longer used for newly listed plants, but some plants previously listed as rare retain this designation – = no listing. California Native Plant Society 1A = List 1A species: plants presumed extinct in California and elsewhere 1B = List 1B species: rare, threatened, or endangered in California and elsewhere 2 = List 2 species: rare, threatened, or endangered in California but more common elsewhere 3 = List 3 species: plants about which more information is needed to determine their status 4 = List 4 species: plants of limited distribution 0.1 = seriously endangered in California 0.2 = fairly endangered in California 0.3 = not very endangered in California b Likelihood of Occurrence High: Known occurrence of plant within 2 miles of the project vicinity from CNDDB or other documents, or presence of suitable habitat conditions and suitable microhabitat conditions Moderate: Known occurrence of plant within 2 miles of the project vicinity from CNDDB or other documents; suitable habitat is present but suitable microhabitat conditions are not Low: Plant not known to occur within 2 miles of the project vicinity from CNDDB or other documents, or habitat conditions are of poor quality, or species presumed extirpated from
Recommended publications
  • Haseltonia Articles and Authors.Xlsx

    Haseltonia Articles and Authors.Xlsx

    ABCDEFG 1 CSSA "HASELTONIA" ARTICLE TITLES #1 1993–#26 2019 AUTHOR(S) R ISSUE(S) PAGES KEY WORD 1 KEY WORD 2 2 A Cactus Database for the State of Baja California, Mexico Resendiz Ruiz, María Elena 2000 7 97-99 BajaCalifornia Database A First Record of Yucca aloifolia L. (Agavaceae/Asparagaceae) Naturalized Smith, Gideon F, Figueiredo, 3 in South Africa with Notes on its uses and Reproductive Biology Estrela & Crouch, Neil R 2012 17 87-93 Yucca Fotinos, Tonya D, Clase, Teodoro, Veloz, Alberto, Jimenez, Francisco, Griffith, M A Minimally Invasive, Automated Procedure for DNA Extraction from Patrick & Wettberg, Eric JB 4 Epidermal Peels of Succulent Cacti (Cactaceae) von 2016 22 46-47 Cacti DNA 5 A Morphological Phylogeny of the Genus Conophytum N.E.Br. (Aizoaceae) Opel, Matthew R 2005 11 53-77 Conophytum 6 A New Account of Echidnopsis Hook. F. (Asclepiadaceae: Stapeliae) Plowes, Darrel CH 1993 1 65-85 Echidnopsis 7 A New Cholla (Cactaceae) from Baja California, Mexico Rebman, Jon P 1998 6 17-21 Cylindropuntia 8 A New Combination in the genus Agave Etter, Julia & Kristen, Martin 2006 12 70 Agave A New Series of the Genus Opuntia Mill. (Opuntieae, Opuntioideae, Oakley, Luis & Kiesling, 9 Cactaceae) from Austral South America Roberto 2016 22 22-30 Opuntia McCoy, Tom & Newton, 10 A New Shrubby Species of Aloe in the Imatong Mountains, Southern Sudan Leonard E 2014 19 64-65 Aloe 11 A New Species of Aloe on the Ethiopia-Sudan Border Newton, Leonard E 2002 9 14-16 Aloe A new species of Ceropegia sect.
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."

    "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."

    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
  • A Master Plan Report OVERFELT GARDENS a Botanical Garden

    A Master Plan Report OVERFELT GARDENS a Botanical Garden

    A Master Plan Report for OVERFELT GARDENS a botanical garden SAN JOSE CITY COUNCIL Thomas McEnery Mayor Blanca Alvarado Vice-Mayor/District 5 Lu Ryden District 1 Judy Stabile District 2 Susan Hammer District 3 Shirley Lewis District 4 Nancy Ianni District 6 Iola Williams District 7 Patricia Sausedo District 8 James Beall, Jr. District 9 Joe Head District 10 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Stanley E. Anderson Chairperson Joseph Guerra III Vice-Chairperson Virginia Holtz Commissioner Dr. Paul Brown Commissioner Ron Wood Commissioner Julie Sabadin Commissioner Jerry Strangis Commissioner Dr. Rodger Cryer Commissioner Charles Walton Commissioner CITY ADMINISTRATION Leslie R. White City Manager Robert G. Overstreet Director of Recreation, Parks and Community Services D. Kent Dewell Director of Public Works MASTER PLAN ELEMENTS.................................................................... 29 The Gardens................ 29 Percolation Ponds..................................................;..........................29 Chinese Cultural Garden................................................ •..................30 Botanical Center................................................................................30 Demonstration Garden.......................................................................30 Conservatory..................................................................................... 31 Orientation / Observation Deck........................................................31 Water Garden...................................................................................
  • Evergreen • East Hills Vision Strategy Project San José, California

    Evergreen • East Hills Vision Strategy Project San José, California

    DRAFT EIR for the EVERGREEN • EAST HILLS VISION STRATEGY PROJECT SAN JOSÉ, CALIFORNIA State Clearinghouse Number: 2005102007 City of San José File Numbers: GP05-08-01A and PDC05-050 GP05-08-01B and PDC05-051 GP05-08-01C and PDC05-048 GP05-08-01D and PDC05-049 GP05-08-01E and PDC05-052 GP05-08-01F and PDC05-053 CITY OF SAN JOSÉ FEBRUARY 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND, & PROJECT OBJECTIVES .........1 1.1 Introduction .........................................................1 1.2 Project Location .....................................................1 1.3 Background .........................................................1 1.4 Project Objectives ...................................................10 1.5 Uses of the EIR .....................................................12 1.5.1 Lead and Responsible CEQA Agencies ............................12 1.5.2 Level of Environmental Review Provided by this EIR ................12 SECTION 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ......................28 2.1 Land Use Development Scenarios ......................................28 2.1.1 Introduction and Overview ......................................28 2.1.2 Development Scenarios for the Arcadia Property ....................33 2.1.3 Development Scenarios for the Pleasant Hills Golf Course Property .....38 2.1.4 Development Scenarios for the Berg/IDS Property ...................42 2.1.5 Development Scenarios for the Legacy Partners Property ..............48 2.1.6 Development Scenarios for the Evergreen Valley College Property ......51 2.1.7 Other General Plan Amendments .................................55 2.2 Transportation and Community Amenity Projects ..........................56 2.2.1 Operational Improvements on U.S. 101 ............................61 2.2.2 Reconfigure White Road between Ocala Avenue and Aborn Road ......63 2.2.3 Reconfigure Ocala Avenue between Capitol Expwy and White Road ....63 2.2.4 Improvements along Capitol Expwy between Quimby Rd.
  • JUNTOS Initiative

    JUNTOS Initiative

    7/9/2020 Print/Preview Powered by ZoomGrants™ Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority 2020 Urban Grant Program Deadline: 7/1/2020 Santa Clara County Public Health Department JUNTOS Initiative Jump to: Project Description Documents Upload $ 199,955.00 Requested Santa Clara County Public Health Department Submitted: 6/30/2020 11:43:58 AM Telephone408-817-6881 (Pacific) 1775 Story Road, Suite 120 Fax 408-251-4014 San Jose, CA 95122 Web www.sccphd.org Project Contact EIN 94-6000533 Michelle Wexler Senior Health Care Program [email protected] Manager Tel: 408-817-6881 Bonnie Broderick [email protected] Additional Contacts none entered Project Description top Applicant Type 1. What type of organization is this? ✔ Public Agency School or School District 501(c)3 Nonprofit Eligible organization acting as Fiscal Sponsor for another organization 2. Does the application include a fiscal sponsor? If the project includes a fiscal sponsor, the fiscal sponsor must be the applicant. YES ✔ NO Overview https://www.zoomgrants.com/printprop.asp?rfpidu=EAFEEA1775E740ADA668DE61AB8BC94A&propidu=1827D0E2B10C428BBA75DF3417C12D24 1/13 7/9/2020 Print/Preview 3. Which type of grant are you requesting? Small ($10,000 - $39,999) ✔ Large ($40,000 - $250,000) 4. Grant category (check all that apply) Environmental Stewardship and Restoration Parks, Trails, and Public Access ✔ Environmental Education ✔ Urban Agriculture / Food Systems 5. Type of project (check all that apply) Capital improvement (Large projects only) Planning ✔ Program 6. Project Location: Address / Neighborhood What is the physical location of the project? If there is no physical location, please enter "N/A." If the project will be in multiple locations, please list all.
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny

    Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny

    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
  • Chumash Ritual and Sacred Geography on Santa Cruz Island, California

    Chumash Ritual and Sacred Geography on Santa Cruz Island, California

    UC Merced Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology Title Chumash Ritual and Sacred Geography on Santa Cruz Island, California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0z15r2hj Journal Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 27(2) ISSN 0191-3557 Author Perry, Jennifer E Publication Date 2007 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology | Vol, 27, No, 2 (2007) | pp. 103-124 Chumash Ritual and Sacred Geography on Santa Cruz Island, California JENNIFER E. PERRY Department of Anthropology, Pomona College, Claremont, CA 91711 In contrast to the archaeological visibility of Chumash rock art on the mainland, its virtual absence on the northern Channel Islands is reflective of what little is understood about ritual behavior in island prehistory. By relying on relevant ethnohistoric and ethnographic references from the mainland, it is possible to evaluate how related activities may be manifested archaeologically on the islands. On Santa Cruz Island, portable ritual items and rock features have been identified on El Montahon and the North Ridge, the most prominent ridgelines on the northern islands Citing material correlates of ritual behavior, intentionally-made rock features are interpreted as possible shrines, which were an important aspect of winter solstice ceremonies among the mainland Chumash. Portable ritual items and possible shrines are considered in the context of sacred geography, revealing aspects of how the Chumash may have interacted with the supernatural landscape of Santa Cruz Island. andscapes are imbued with different attributes and Conception and Mount Pinos (as examples of the former) Llvalues; whether economic, aesthetic, recrea­ to sweatlodges and rock sites (as examples of the latter) tional, spiritual, or otherwise, these values intersect, (Grant 1965; Haley and Wilcoxon 1997,1999).
  • Classification of the House Finch of the Channel Islands, Southern California Philip Unitt, San Diego Natural History Museum, P

    Classification of the House Finch of the Channel Islands, Southern California Philip Unitt, San Diego Natural History Museum, P

    NOTES CLASSIFICATION OF THE HOUSE FINCH OF THE CHANNEL ISLANDS, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PHILIP UNITT, San Diego Natural History Museum, P. O. Box 121390, San Diego, California 92112-1390; [email protected] The Channel Islands of southern California are renowned for their many endemic plants and animals. Among land birds, 22 endemic species or subspecies have been described. Not all of these are valid, however, and their distinctiveness spans a wide spectrum. Johnson (1972) categorized the islands’ land birds in five strata ranging from the Island Scrub-Jay (Aphelocoma insularis) of Santa Cruz Island to those not known to differ from mainland populations. The last includes both species of which no subspecies endemic to the islands have been proposed, such as the Bushtit (Psaltriparus minimus), and described subspecies whose supposed differences have been discredited or found to be insufficient to meet the criteria for recognition. These synonymized names include Colaptes cafer sedentarius van Rossem, 1944 (with C. auratus collaris; AOU 1952), Vireo mailliardorum Grinnell, 1903 (with V. h. huttoni; AOU 1908), Salpinctes obsoletus pulverius Grinnell, 1898 (with S. o. obsoletus; Grinnell 1929), Amphispiza belli clementeae Ridgway, 1898 (with A. b. belli; Patten and Unitt 2002), and Melospiza melodia micronyx and M. m. clementae (the last two with M. m. graminea; Patten and Pruett 2009). The status of the supposed subspecies of the House Finch (Carpodacus mexicanus clementis) has also been questioned. In the original description, Mearns (1898:259) reported the House Finches of the Channel Islands to differ from those of the mainland (C. m. frontalis) in their larger legs and feet, broader streaking on the underparts, shorter wings, and “bill much larger and more convex above.” He designated a type specimen from San Clemente Island, U.S.
  • Lake Cunningham Park Regional Park 8 4 183.25 Alum Rock Park 15350 Penitencia Creek Rd

    Lake Cunningham Park Regional Park 8 4 183.25 Alum Rock Park 15350 Penitencia Creek Rd

    Developed Council Park Area (in Name Address Park Type District District acres) Lake Cunningham Park Regional Park 8 4 183.25 Alum Rock Park 15350 Penitencia Creek Rd. Regional Park 4 6 77.5 Kelley Park Regional Park 7 7 47.44 Kelley Park - Happy Hollow Park and Zoo Regional Park 7 7 41.57 Penitencia Creek Park Neighborhood Park 4 8 36.65 Emma Prusch Farm Park Regional Park 5 6 36.41 Cataldi Park Neighborhood Park 4 8 33.97 Overfelt Gardens Regional Park 5 6 32.04 Almaden Lake Park 6099 Winfield Blvd Regional Park 10 1 30.4 Guadalupe Gardens Regional Park 3 5 27.23 Watson Park Neighborhood Park 3 5 22.32 Municipal Baseball Stadium Sports Facility 7 7 19.22 Edenvale Garden Park Regional Park 2 2 18.76 Jeffery Fontana Park Neighborhood Park 10 1 18.05 T.J. Martin Park Neighborhood Park 10 1 15.75 Calabazas Park Neighborhood Park 1 3 15.12 Arcadia Ballpark Regional Park 8 4 15.08 P.A.L. Stadium Park Sports Facility 5 6 14.28 Hillview Park Neighborhood Park 5 6 14.04 Willow Street Frank Bramhall Park Neighborhood Park 6 3 13.63 Roosevelt Park Neighborhood Park 3 5 13.62 Flickinger Park Neighborhood Park 4 8 13.53 La Colina Park Neighborhood Park 2 1 12.58 Houge Park Neighborhood Park 9 3 12.22 Evergreen Park Neighborhood Park 8 4 12.1 Capitol Park Neighborhood Park 5 6 11.91 Los Paseos Park Neighborhood Park 2 1 11.8 Fowler Creek Park Neighborhood Park 8 4 11.68 Great Oaks Park Neighborhood Park 2 2 11.54 Groesbeck Hill Park Neighborhood Park 8 4 11.46 John Mise Park Neighborhood Park 1 3 11.45 Backesto Park 13th Street and Empire Street
  • Biological Resources Assessment

    Biological Resources Assessment

    Town of Los Gatos 15215 Shannon Road Planned Development Application PD-15-001 Initial Study | Appendices Attachment 2 Biological Resources Assessment 2/4/16 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT FOR 10 RESERVOIR ROAD LOS GATOS, SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA April 18, 2015 Prepared for: Geier & Geier Consulting, Inc. P.O. Box 5054 Berkeley, CA 94705‐5054 Prepared by: Wood Biological Consulting, Inc. 65 Alta Hill Way Walnut Creek, CA 94595 (925) 899‐1282 mike@wood‐biological.com The information provided in this document is intended solely for the use and benefit of Geier & Geier Consulting, Inc. and the Town of Los Gatos. No other person or entity shall be entitled to rely on the services, opinions, recommendations, plans or specifications provided herein, without the express written consent of Wood Biological Consulting, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION ........................................................................... 1 2.0 METHODS AND LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................. 1 3.0 SETTING ...................................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 PLANT COMMUNITIES
  • Tidal Marsh Recovery Plan Habitat Creation Or Enhancement Project Within 5 Miles of OAK

    Tidal Marsh Recovery Plan Habitat Creation Or Enhancement Project Within 5 Miles of OAK

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California California clapper rail Suaeda californica Cirsium hydrophilum Chloropyron molle Salt marsh harvest mouse (Rallus longirostris (California sea-blite) var. hydrophilum ssp. molle (Reithrodontomys obsoletus) (Suisun thistle) (soft bird’s-beak) raviventris) Volume II Appendices Tidal marsh at China Camp State Park. VII. APPENDICES Appendix A Species referred to in this recovery plan……………....…………………….3 Appendix B Recovery Priority Ranking System for Endangered and Threatened Species..........................................................................................................11 Appendix C Species of Concern or Regional Conservation Significance in Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California….......................................13 Appendix D Agencies, organizations, and websites involved with tidal marsh Recovery.................................................................................................... 189 Appendix E Environmental contaminants in San Francisco Bay...................................193 Appendix F Population Persistence Modeling for Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California with Intial Application to California clapper rail …............................................................................209 Appendix G Glossary……………......................................................................………229 Appendix H Summary of Major Public Comments and Service
  • Peace, Trees, and Good Governance

    Peace, Trees, and Good Governance

    The Newsletter of the Santa Clara Audubon Society January - February 2005 Peace, trees, and good governance Young Audubon Nobel Prize winner also started have to acknowledge over time, Green Belt Movement in Kenya but which greatly complicates whale-watching our mission of conservation . by Craig Breon Must we get rid of the despotic trips Jan. 22 The Associated Press headlined its article "First African government of Myanmar (for­ -Page4 Woman Awarded Nobel Prize" but quickly went on to note that merly Burma) to preserve the Kenyan Wangari Maathai , 64, is also the first environmentalist great forests of the earth? Must to receive the honor. we transfer huge amounts of Maathai founded the Green Belt Movement , ostensibly to wealth from the United States and Europe to countries such as teach the women of Kenya that planting trees was essential to India and Brazil in order to mount a serious effort against global their long-term livelihood and the health of the land around climate change? Will fighting for the right to unionize in China them (of course, those two are one and the same). In this goal or at Wal-Mart bring us closer to the sustainable use of natural she has no doubt been a huge success, with more than 30 million resources? Will the war in Iraq mean fewer birds along the trees planted and her ideas spread to surrounding countries. Pacific Flyway? I believe I could make a credible argument that However, perhaps more important has been her integrated the answer to each of the questions above is "Yes ." approach to the strands of social progress .