A Graptolite Zone Reference Section

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Graptolite Zone Reference Section Ordovician and Silurian 4 Graptolite Succession in the Trail Creek Area, Central Idaho A Graptolite Zone Reference Section GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1020 4 -t Ordovician and Silurian Graptolite Succession in the Trail Creek Area, Central Idaho A Graptolite Zone Reference Section By CLAIRE CARTER and MICHAEL CHURKIN, JR. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1020 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFF ICE, WASHINGTON: 1977 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Carter, Claire. Ordovician and Silurian graptolite succession in the Trail Creek area, central Idaho-a graptolite zone reference section. (Geological Survey Professional Paper 1020) Bibliography: p. 32-33. Supt. of Docs. No.: I 19.16:1020 1. Graptolites. 2. Paleontology--Ordovician. 3. Paleontology-Silurian. 4. Paleontology-Idaho- Custer Co. 5. Paleontology-Idaho-Blaine Co. I. Churkin, Michael, 1932- joint author. III. Title. III. Series: United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 1020. QE840.5.C37 566 76-608341 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-02982-1 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract.................................................................................................... 1 Systematic descriptions Continued Introduction ............................................................................................ 1 Class Graptolithina Continued Geologic setting...................................................................................... 3 Order Graptoloidea Continued Lithology and structure ...................................................................... 3 Family Dicranograptidae .......................................... 17 Graptolite zones and their correlation .......................................... 5 Genus Dicranograptus ........................................ 17 Lower Ordovician Series ............................................................ 5 Genus Dicellograptus .......................................... 18 Middle Ordovician Series .......................................................... 10 Family Glossograptidae.............................................. 21 Upper Ordovician Series ............................................................ 12 Genus Glossograptus .......................................... 21 Silurian System.............................................................................. 13 Family Cryptograptidae ............................................ 21 Systematic descriptions...................................................................... 13 Genus Cryptograptus .......................................... 21 Class Graptolithina...................................................................... 13 Family Diplograptidae............................................... 22 Order Graptoloidea .............................................................. 13 Genus Dip ograptus ............................................ 22 Family Dichograptidae .............................................. 13 Genus Climacograptus ........................................ 22 Genus Loganograptus.......................................... 13 Genus Glyptograptus .......................................... 24 Genus Goniograptus ............................................ 13 Genus Orthograptus ............................................ 25 Genus Tetragraptus .............................................. 14 Genus Petalograptus ............................................ 27 Genus Phyllograptus............................................ 14 Genus Pseudoclimacograptus .......................... 27 Genus Didymograptus ........................................ 15 Family Lasiograptidae................................................ 28 Genus Isograptus .................................................. 15 Genus Neurograptus ............................................ 28 Genus Maeandrograptus .................................... 16 Family Retiolitidae ..................................................... 28 Family Corynoididae .................................................. 16 Genus Orthoretioiites .......................................... 28 Genus Cornyoides ................................................ 16 Family Monograptidae................................................ 28 Family Nemagraptidae .............................................. 16 Genus Monograptus ............................................ 28 Genus Leptograptus ............................................ 16 Family Cyrtograptidae... .......................................... 30 Genus Pleurograptus ............................................ 17 Genus Cyrtograptus ............................................ 30 References cited...................................................................................... 32 Index ...... .............................................................................................. 35 ILLUSTRATIONS [Plates follow index] Page PLATE Loganograptus, Phyllograptus, Didymograptus, Isograptus, and Tetragraptus. Leptograptus, Dicellograptus, Pleurograptus, Dicranograptus, Isograptus, and Corynoides. Dicellograptus, Glossograptus, Cryptograptus, Pseudoclimacograptus, Diplograptus, Neurograptus, and Petalograptus. Climacograptus, Orthograptus, and Orthoretioiites. Glyptograptus, Monograptus, and Cyrtograptus. Cyrtograptus, Dicellograptus, and Gonioeraptus Sketch of Maeandrograptus, Leptograptus, Dicranograptus, Climacograptus, and Cyrtograptus. FIGURE 1. Map showing location of measured sections .......................................................................... .......................................................... 2 2. Stratigraphic column of the upper plate of the Park Creek thrust in the Trail Creek section, showing zonal sequence and location of graptolite collections......................................................................................................... .. 4 Chart showing correlation of graptolite sequences in western North America, Great Britain, Australia and the U.S.S.R. ............................................................................... 6 Stratigraphic column of the Little Fall Creek section, showing zonal sequence and location of graptolite collections..................................... ..... .. .... .. ...... .......... .. ...... ........................... 9 in IV CONTENTS TABLES Page TABLE 1. Distribution and zonal ranges of Ordovician graptolite genera and species in the lower part of the Phi Kappa Formation, Trail Creek section ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 2. Distribution and zonal ranges of Ordovician graptolite genera and species in the Phi Kappa Formation, Little Fall Creek section......................................................................................................................................................................... 9 3. Distribution and zonal ranges of Ordovician graptolite genera and species in the upper part of the Phi Kappa Formation, Trail Creek section ............................................................................................................................................................ 10 4. Distribution and zonal ranges of Silurian graptolite genera and species in the Phi Kappa Formation, Trail Creek section.................................................................................................................................................................................. 13 ORDOVICIAN AND SILURIAN GRAPTOLITE SUCCESSION IN THE TRAIL CREEK AREA, CENTRAL IDAHO A GRAPTOLITE ZONE REFERENCE SECTION By CLAIRE CARTER and MICHAEL CHLRKIX, JR. ABSTRACT faunas described prior to 1963 were not fitted into a The graptolite-bearing sequence in the vicinity of Trail Creek, Idaho, consists of an unusually large number of zones virtually local stratigraphic succession of graptolite faunas. continuously exposed in a homoclinal section of siliceous shale. Ross and Berry (1963) had to use the graptolite Eight Ordovician zones have been distinguished in the Phi Kappa succession of the Marathon region, Texas (Berry, Formation. These include the Early Ordovician Zones of Didymo- 1960), as a standard to compare and correlate the graptus protobifidus and Isograptus, the Middle Ordovician zones isolated graptolite faunas of the Basin and Range of Glossograptus hincksii, Nemagraptus, Climacograptus bi- cornis, and Climacograptus tubuliferus, and the Late Ordovician province "because *** no readily zonable succession Zones of Pleurograptus linearis and Dicellograptus ornatus. The has yet been found in the Great Basin" (Ross and Early and Middle Silurian Zones of Monograptus convolutus and Berry, 1963, p. 68). Cyrtograptus overlie this Ordovician succession. The relative Later, in the vicinity of Trail Creek, Custer and completeness of the graptolite succession from late Early Ordo­ Blaine Counties, central Idaho (fig. 1), an unusually vician through Late Ordovician becomes apparent when it is compared to other known graptolitic sequences of western North continuous stratigraphic section of graptolitic shale America. Thus it is a potentially useful reference section for at was discovered (Churkin, 1963), and a preliminary least the southern part of the North American Cordillera.
Recommended publications
  • From the Ordovician (Darriwillian) of Morocco
    Palaeogeographic implications of a new iocrinid crinoid (Disparida) from the Ordovician (Darriwillian) of Morocco Samuel Zamora1, Imran A. Rahman2 and William I. Ausich3 1 Instituto Geologico´ y Minero de Espana,˜ Zaragoza, Spain 2 School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom 3 School of Earth Sciences, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States ABSTRACT Complete, articulated crinoids from the Ordovician peri-Gondwanan margin are rare. Here, we describe a new species, Iocrinus africanus sp. nov., from the Darriwilian-age Taddrist Formation of Morocco. The anatomy of this species was studied using a combination of traditional palaeontological methods and non-destructive X-ray micro-tomography (micro-CT). This revealed critical features of the column, distal arms, and aboral cup, which were hidden in the surrounding rock and would have been inaccessible without the application of micro-CT. Iocrinus africanus sp. nov. is characterized by the presence of seven to thirteen tertibrachials, three in-line bifurcations per ray, and an anal sac that is predominantly unplated or very lightly plated. Iocrinus is a common genus in North America (Laurentia) and has also been reported from the United Kingdom (Avalonia) and Oman (middle east Gondwana). Together with Merocrinus, it represents one of the few geographically widespread crinoids during the Ordovician and serves to demonstrate that faunal exchanges between Laurentia and Gondwana occurred at this time. This study highlights the advantages of using both conventional
    [Show full text]
  • Conodonts in Ordovician Biostratigraphy
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Archivio istituzionale della ricerca - Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia 1 Conodonts in Ordovician biostratigraphy STIG M. BERGSTRÖM AND ANNALISA FERRETTI Conodonts in Ordovician biostratigraphy The long time interval after Pander’s (1856) original conodont study can in terms of Ordovician conodont biostratigraphic research be subdivided into three periods, namely the Pioneer Period (1856-1955), the Transition Period (1955-1971), and the Modern Period (1971-Recent). During the pre-1920s, the few published conodont investigations were restricted to Europe and North America and were not concerned about the potential use of conodonts as guide fossils. Although primarily of taxonomic nature, the pioneer studies by Branson & Mehl, Stauffer, and Furnish during the 1930s represent the beginning of the use of conodonts in Ordovician biostratigraphy. However, no formal zones were introduced until Lindström (1955) proposed four conodont zones in the Lower Ordovician of Sweden, which marks the end of the Pioneer Period. Because Lindström’s zone classification was not followed by similar work outside Baltoscandia, the time interval up to the late 1960s can be regarded as a Transition Period. A milestone symposium volume, entitled ‘Conodont Biostratigraphy’ and published in 1971, 2 summarized much new information on Ordovician conodont biostratigraphy and is taken as the beginning of the Modern Period of Ordovician conodont biostratigraphy. In this volume, the Baltoscandic Ordovician was subdivided into named conodont zones whereas the North American Ordovician succession was classified into a series of lettered or numbered Faunas. Although most of the latter did not receive zone names until 1984, this classification has been used widely in North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article 4.6MB .Pdf File
    https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mmv.1939.11.02 November 1939 MEM. NAT. Mus. VrcT., XI, 193Q. GRAPTOLITES OF AUSTRALIA: BIBLIOGRAPHY AND HISTORY OF RESEARCH By R. A. Keble, F.G.S. ( Palaeontologist, National 1J1usem·n, JJ:[elboiirne) and Professor TV. N. Benson, B.A., D.Sc. (University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealcind.) The Australian graptolite fauna is probably the most complete in the world, certainly in regard to its Ordovician components, a fact clearly appreciated by McCoy. He had ready for the press descriptions and figures of most of the species afterwards described in J amcs Hall's J\fonograph published iu 1865, which may be regarded as the basis of systematic graptolite research, when he received from Hall a proof of his fignres. McCoy immediately conceded him priority and adopted his specific names. Had Hall delayed sending his proof, McCoy wonld certainly have pnblisl1ed his figures and descriptions and his name would have been just as pl'ominent in the literature of graptoliies as Hall's. Com­ menting on "Graptolitcs (Didymograpsus) frutieosus (Hall sp.)," l\IcCoy snys, "this is the first Victorian gmptolitc I ever smv, and, as it was then a new species, I had named it in my .MSS. after J\fr. J. A. Panton, who found it iu the soft shalcs of Bcn(Ugo, of ·which goldficld he was then "\Varden, nncl in ·whose hospitable camp I was then able to recognize the true g-cological age of the gold-bearing Rlates of the colony for the first time. �rhe same species was subsequently dis­ covered by Professor Hall in Canada; aud ns he kindly sent me an early proof of his illustration before publication, I of course adopted his name as above" (Prod.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics in Palaeontology
    Systematics in palaeontology THOMAS NEVILLE GEORGE PRESIDENT'S ANNIVERSARY ADDRESS 1969 CONTENTS Fossils in neontological categories I98 (A) Purpose and method x98 (B) Linnaean taxa . x99 (e) The biospecies . 202 (D) Morphology and evolution 205 The systematics of the lineage 205 (A) Bioserial change 205 (B) The palaeodeme in phyletic series 209 (e) Palaeodemes as facies-controlled phena 2xi Phyletic series . 2~6 (A) Rates of bioserial change 2~6 (B) Character mosaics 218 (c) Differential characters 222 Phylogenetics and systematics 224 (A) Clade and grade 224 (a) Phylogenes and cladogenes 228 (e) Phylogenetic reconstruction 23 I (D) Species and genus 235 (~) The taxonomic hierarchy 238 5 Adansonian methods 240 6 References 243 SUMMARY A 'natural' taxonomic system, inherent in evolutionary change, pulses of biased selection organisms that themselves demonstrate their pressure in expanded and restricted palaeo- 'affinity', is to be recognized perhaps only in demes, and permutations of character-expres- the biospecies. The concept of the biospecies as sion in the evolutionary plexus impose a need a comprehensive taxon is, however, only for a palaeontologically-orientated systematics notional amongst the vast majority of living under which (in evolutionary descent) could organisms, and it is not directly applicable to be subsumed the taxa of the neontological fossils. 'Natural' systems of Linnaean kind rest moment. on assumptions made a priori and are imposed Environmentally controlled morphs, bio- by the systematist. The graded time-sequence facies variants, migrating variation fields, and of the lineage and the clade introduces factors typological segregants are sources of ambiguity into a systematics that cannot well be accommo- in a distinction between phenetic and genetic dated under pre-Darwinian assumptions or be fossil grades.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Ordovician Radiation of Marine Life: Examples from South China
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Progress in Natural Science 18 (2008) 1–12 Review The great Ordovician radiation of marine life: Examples from South China Renbin Zhan a,*, Jisuo Jin b, Yuandong Zhang a, Wenwei Yuan a a State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China b Department of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London Ont., Canada N6A 5B7 Received 14 March 2007; received in revised form 23 July 2007; accepted 27 July 2007 Abstract The Ordovician radiation is the earliest and most important biodiversification event in the evolution of the Paleozoic Evolutionary Fauna (PEF), when the basic framework of PEF was established. The radiation underwent a gradual, protracted process spanning more than 40 million years and was marked by several diversity maxima of the PEF. Case studies conducted on the Upper Yangtze Platform (South China Palaeoplate) showed that the Ordovician radiation was characterized by drastic increases in a- and b-diversity in various groups of organisms. During the radiation, brachiopods, trilobites, and graptolites of the PEF became more diverse to dominate over the Cambrian Evolutionary Fauna (CEF) in all marine environments. At either global or regional scales, however, the Ordovician radiation was highly heterogeneous in time and space, and the rate and pattern of radiation exhibited by different major fossil groups were also variable. Ó 2007 National Natural Science Foundation of China and Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier Limited and Science in China Press. All rights reserved. Keywords: Ordovician radiation; Paleozoic Evolutionary Fauna; a-diversity; b-diversity; Upper Yangtze Platform 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Graptolitos Del Ordovícico Y Geología De Los Afloramientos Del Río Venado (Norte Del Departamento Del Huila)
    Boletín de Geología Vol. 30, N° 1, enero - junio de 2008 GRAPTOLITOS DEL ORDOVÍCICO Y GEOLOGÍA DE LOS AFLORAMIENTOS DEL RÍO VENADO (NORTE DEL DEPARTAMENTO DEL HUILA) Mario Moreno Sánchez1,2 ; Arley de Jesus Gómez Cruz1,3; Hardany Castillo González1,4 RESUMEN Una fauna fósil de graptolitos compuesta principalmente por Phyllograptus (s.l.) ssp. Fue recolectada de las secuencias del Río Venado. Los restos encontrados en Shales grises sugieren un rango de edad Floiano-Darriwiliano. Como es sugerido por las similitudes faunísticas de las secuencias de Paleozoico Temprano de Colombia, estas fueron acumuladas sobre un margen pasivo que estuvo conectado con las plataformas peruanas, bolivianas y argentinas. Adicionalmente, según los nuevos datos presentados, la nomenclatura estratigráfica usada para el Paleozoico Inferior del río Venado deberá ser enmendada. Palabras clave: Graptolitos, Phyllograptus, Pseudophyllograptus, Ordovícico, Formación Venado. EARLY ORDOVICIAN GRAPTOLITE AND GEOLOGY OF THE OUTCROPS OF VENADO RIVER (HUILA REGION) ABSTRACT A graptolite faunal, composed dominantly by the genus Phyllograptus (s.l.) ssp., was recovered from the Venado River sequences. The remains, found in grey shales, suggest a Floian-Darriwilian age. As it is suggested by faunal similarities, Early Paleozoic sequences of Colombia were deposited on a passive margin that was connected with Peruvian, Bolivian and Argentinean platform. Furthermore, on the basis of these new data, it is found that stratigraphy nomenclature currently used for the Early Paleozoic
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Rickards, Wright, Hamedi.Pdf
    Records of the Western AustralIan Museum Supplement No. 58: 103-122 (2000). Late Ordovician and Early Silurian graptolites from southern Iran R.B. Rickardsl, A.J. Wright2 and M.A. HamedP I Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3 EQ, England 1 School of Geosciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, N.s.W. 2522, Australia "Department of Geology, Tarbiet Modares University, Tehran, Iran Abstract - Graptolites are described for the first time from the Faraghun mountains (Kuh-e-Faraghun) and the Gahkum mountains (Kuh-e-Gahkum) on the northern edge of the southeast part of the Zagros Mountains, Iran. 38 taxa are recorded, including 4 Ordovician and 34 Silurian species; the latter are the first Silurian graptolites described from Iran. Ashgill (Late Ordovician) graptolite assemblages from Kuh-e-Faraghun include: Persclllptograptlls persculptlls and Orthograptlls amplexicalllis, indicating a persculptlls Biozone age; and Orthograptus amplexicalllis abbreviatlls, indicating the latest Ordovician anceps Biozone. Kuh-e-Faraghun Early Silurian faunas include representatives of the L1andovery leptotheca Biozone; another assemblage, including Monograptlls convollltus and Pselldorthograptlls inopinatlls, indicates the slightly younger L1andovery convollltlls Biozone. Graptolites from Kuh-e-Gahkum comprise a rich Stimlllograptlls sedgwickii assemblage, indicating a slightly higher L1andovery level again (sedgwickii Biozone); a convollltlls Biozone fauna is also probably represented in our collections. INTRODUCTION the Kerman district, East-Central Iran; the fauna Late Ordovician and Early Silurian graptolites, they reported is that described in part from the from two areas in the northern part of the Zagros Katkoyeh Formation by Rickards et al. (1994), now belt (Figures 1, 2, 3), are described for the first time being fully described on the basis of collections from Iran.
    [Show full text]
  • The Position of Graptolites Within Lower Palaeozoic Planktic Ecosystems
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Birkbeck Institutional Research Online The position of graptolites within Lower Palaeozoic planktic ecosystems Charlie J. Underwood An integrated approach has been used to assess the palaeoecology of graptolites both as a discrete group and also as a part of the biota present within Ordovician and Silurian planktic realms. Study of the functional morphology of graptolites and comparisons with recent ecological analogues demonstrates that graptolites most probably filled a variety of niches as primary consumers, with modes of life related to the colony morphotype. Graptolite coloniality was extremely ordered, lacking any close morphological analogues in Recent faunas. To obtain maximum functional efficiency, graptolites would have needed varying degrees of coordinated automobility. A change in lifestyle related to ontogenetic changes was prevalent within many graptolite groups. Differing lifestyle was reflected by differing reproductive strategies, with synrhabdosomes most likely being a method for rapid asexual reproduction. Direct evidence in the form of graptolithophage 'coprolitic' bodies, as well as indirect evidence in the form of probable defensive adaptations, indicate that graptolites comprised a food item for a variety of predators. Graptolites were also hosts to a variety of parasitic organisms and provided an important nutrient source for scavenging organisms. KEY WORDS; Feeding, graptolites, hydrodynamics, ontogeny, parasitism, palaeoecology, plankton, predation. Charlie.J. Underwood, Department of Geology,University of Bristol,Wills Memorial Building, Queens Road, Bristol, BS81RJ, England. May 27, 1992. Graptolitic ecogroups. Within Ordovician and Silurian rocks the benthic ecogroups or assemblages which characterize shelf sediments are well documented (e.g. Cocks & McKerrow 1978a, b; Ziegler et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Cortical Fibrils and Secondary Deposits in Periderm of the Hemichordate Rhabdopleura (Graptolithoidea)
    Cortical fibrils and secondary deposits in periderm of the hemichordate Rhabdopleura (Graptolithoidea) PIOTR MIERZEJEWSKI and CYPRIAN KULICKI Mierzejewski, P. and Kulicki, C. 2003. Cortical fibrils and secondary deposits in periderm of the hemichordate Rhabdopleura (Graptolithoidea). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 48 (1): 99–111. Coenecia of extant hemichordates Rhabdopleura compacta and Rh. normani were investigated using SEM techniques. Cortical fibrils were detected in their fusellar tissue for the first time. The densely packed cortical fibrils form a character− istic band−like construction in fusellar collars, similar to some Ordovician rhabdopleurids. No traces of external second− ary deposits are found in coenecia. Two types of internal secondary deposits in tubes are recognized: (1) membranous de− posits, composed of numerous, tightly packed sheets, similar to the crustoid paracortex and pseudocortex; and (2) fibrillar deposits, devoid(?) of sheets and made of cortical fibrils, arranged in parallel and interpreted as equivalent to graptolite endocortex. There is no significant difference in either the shape or the dimensions of cortical fibrils found in Rhabdopleura and graptolites. The cortical fabric of both rhabdopleuran species studied is composed of long, straight and more or less wavy, unbranched fibrils arranged in parallel; their diameters vary from 220 to 570 µm. The study shows that there is no significant difference between extinct and extant Graptolithoidea (= Pterobranchia) in the histological and ultrastructural pattern of their primary and secondary deposits of the periderm. The nonfusellar periderm of the prosicula is pitted by many depressions similar to pits in the cortical tissue of graptolites. Key words: Rhabdopleura, Pterobranchia, Hemichordata, periderm, sicula, ultrastructure, fibrils. Piotr Mierzejewski [[email protected]], Instytut Paleobiologii PAN, ul.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Sequence Stratigraphy of the Ordovician of Baltoscandia …………………………………………… 20 Druzhinina, O
    Baltic Stratigraphical Association Department of Geology, Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of Latvia Natural History Museum of Latvia THE EIGHTH BALTIC STRATIGRAPHICAL CONFERENCE ABSTRACTS Edited by E. Lukševičs, Ģ. Stinkulis and J. Vasiļkova Rīga, 2011 The Eigth Baltic Stratigraphical Conference 28 August – 1 September 2011, Latvia Abstracts Edited by E. Lukševičs, Ģ. Stinkulis and J. Vasiļkova Scientific Committee: Organisers: Prof. Algimantas Grigelis (Vilnius) Baltic Stratigraphical Association Dr. Olle Hints (Tallinn) Department of Geology, University of Latvia Dr. Alexander Ivanov (St. Petersburg) Natural History Museum of Latvia Prof. Leszek Marks (Warsaw) Northern Vidzeme Geopark Prof. Tõnu Meidla (Tartu) Dr. Jonas Satkūnas (Vilnius) Prof. Valdis Segliņš (Riga) Prof. Vitālijs Zelčs (Chairman, Riga) Recommended reference to this publication Ceriņa, A. 2011. Plant macrofossil assemblages from the Eemian-Weichselian deposits of Latvia and problems of their interpretation. In: Lukševičs, E., Stinkulis, Ģ. and Vasiļkova, J. (eds). The Eighth Baltic Stratigraphical Conference. Abstracts. University of Latvia, Riga. P. 18. The Conference has special sessions of IGCP Project No 591 “The Early to Middle Palaeozoic Revolution” and IGCP Project No 596 “Climate change and biodiversity patterns in the Mid-Palaeozoic (Early Devonian to Late Carboniferous)”. See more information at http://igcl591.org. Electronic version can be downloaded at www.geo.lu.lv/8bsc Hard copies can be obtained from: Department of Geology, Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of Latvia Raiņa Boulevard 19, Riga LV-1586, Latvia E-mail: [email protected] ISBN 978-9984-45-383-5 Riga, 2011 2 Preface Baltic co-operation in regional stratigraphy is active since the foundation of the Baltic Regional Stratigraphical Commission (BRSC) in 1969 (Grigelis, this volume).
    [Show full text]
  • Lab 8: Graptolites and Trace Fossils
    Geos 223 Introductory Paleontology Spring 2006 Lab 8: Graptolites and Trace Fossils Name: Section: AIMS: This lab will introduce you to graptolites (Part A), and to a branch of paleontology known as ichnology (the study of trace fossils; Part B). By the end of Part A this lab you should be familiar with the basic anatomy of graptolites, and have an appreciation for how graptolites are used in the biostratigraphic zonation of the Lower Paleozoic. By the end of Part B of this lab you should be familiar with the basic ethological groups of trace fossils, and have an appreciation for how trace fossils can provide important paleoecological and paleoenvironmental information. PART A: GRAPTOLITES. Graptolites (Class Graptolithina) are an extinct group of colonial hemichordate deuterostomes, similar in morphology and life habit to the modern colonial pterobranch hemichordate Rhabdopleura. The graptolite colony consisted of many clonal zooids, each occupying a theca in the communal skeleton (the rhabdosome). The thecae formed in rows along branches of the rhabdosome called stipes. The rhabdosome was made of a non-mineralized, organic, non-chitinous protein called periderm. Graptolite colonies were either erect fan-like structures growing from the seafloor (most dendroid graptolites, ranging from the Middle Cambrian to the Late Carboniferous) or free-floating in the plankton (the commoner graptoloid graptolites, probably descended from dendroid ancestors and ranging from the Early Ordovician to the Early Devonian). Graptoloid graptolites are very important biostratigraphic zone fossils in Lower Paleozoic strata. 1 DENDROID GRAPTOLITES: A1: Dictyonema. Dendroid graptolite colonies formed fan-like structures with thecae-bearing stipes held apart by horizontal struts (dissepiments).
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, Vol. 35/3-4, Pp. 203-207
    Graptolite Taxonomy and Classification MU EN-ZHI Mu En-zhi: Graptolite Taxonomy and Classification. Bull. geol. Soc. Denmark, vol. 35, pp. 203--207, Co­ penhagen, July 1st, 1987. https://doi.org/10.37570/bgsd-1986-35-21 Graptolithina comprises chiefly six orders. Among them Graptoloidea and a part of Dendroidea known as Graptodendroids are planktonic in mode of life. Graptoloidea consists of three suborders namely Axono­ lipa, Axonocrypta and Axonophora. The families Dendrograptidae-Anisograptidae-Tetragraptidae and Didymograptidae-Isograptidae-Cardiograptidae-Diplograptidae-Monograptidae represent anagenetic grades. Some important evolutionary trends took place once again, representing cladogenetic divergen­ ces. All other families or subfamilies are offshoots of various grades. The suborder Axonocrypta is dis­ cussed in detail. Mu En-zhi, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Academia Sinica, Chimingssu, Nanjing, China, August20th, 1986. General Consideration tinae, tri-radiate Anisograptinae and biradiate Adelograptinae) is derived from the floating Dic­ Graptolithina, a class of Hemichordata, com­ tyonema due to the loss of dissepiments (Mu, prises chiefly six orders known as Dendroidea, 1974), while the reclined Psigraptidae Lin (1981) Graptoloidea, Tuboidea, Camaroidea, Stolonoi­ with isolated autothecae is an offshoot. Recently dea and Crustoidea (Kozlowski, 1949, 1966; Bul­ Zhao & Zhang (1985) proposed a new family man, 1970). The thecae in Dendroidea and Grap­ Muenzhigraptidae with biform autothecae rep­ toloidea are regularly arranged in stipes, al­ resenting the direct ancestor of Psigraptidae. though Dendroidea has three kinds of thecae Graptoloidea first appeared in the late Xin­ (autotheca, bitheca and stolotheca), while Grap­ changian (X3) due to the loss of bithecae from toloidea has only one. In the graptoloid thecae, Adelograptinae and flourished in early Ning­ the proximal portion (protheca) and the distal kuoan (N1), marking another new stage in grap­ portion (metatheca) are homologous with the tolite history.
    [Show full text]