Graptolite Taxonomy and Classification

MU EN-ZHI

Mu En-zhi: Graptolite Taxonomy and Classification. Bull. geol. Soc. Denmark, vol. 35, pp. 203--207, Co­ penhagen, July 1st, 1987. https://doi.org/10.37570/bgsd-1986-35-21

Graptolithina comprises chiefly six orders. Among them Graptoloidea and a part of Dendroidea known as Graptodendroids are planktonic in mode of life. Graptoloidea consists of three suborders namely Axono­ lipa, Axonocrypta and Axonophora. The families Dendrograptidae-Anisograptidae-Tetragraptidae and Didymograptidae-Isograptidae-Cardiograptidae-Diplograptidae-Monograptidae represent anagenetic grades. Some important evolutionary trends took place once again, representing cladogenetic divergen­ ces. All other families or subfamilies are offshoots of various grades. The suborder Axonocrypta is dis­ cussed in detail.

Mu En-zhi, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Academia Sinica, Chimingssu, Nanjing, China, August20th, 1986.

General Consideration tinae, tri-radiate Anisograptinae and biradiate Adelograptinae) is derived from the floating Dic­ , a class of Hemichordata, com­ tyonema due to the loss of dissepiments (Mu, prises chiefly six orders known as Dendroidea, 1974), while the reclined Psigraptidae Lin (1981) Graptoloidea, Tuboidea, Camaroidea, Stolonoi­ with isolated autothecae is an offshoot. Recently dea and Crustoidea (Kozlowski, 1949, 1966; Bul­ Zhao & Zhang (1985) proposed a new family man, 1970). The thecae in Dendroidea and Grap­ Muenzhigraptidae with biform autothecae rep­ toloidea are regularly arranged in stipes, al­ resenting the direct ancestor of Psigraptidae. though Dendroidea has three kinds of thecae Graptoloidea first appeared in the late Xin­

(autotheca, bitheca and stolotheca), while Grap­ changian (X3) due to the loss of bithecae from toloidea has only one. In the graptoloid thecae, Adelograptinae and flourished in early Ning­ the proximal portion (protheca) and the distal kuoan (N1), marking another new stage in grap­ portion (metatheca) are homologous with the tolite history. Since then, Graptoloidea became stolotheca and autotheca respectively. the master of the quiet sea area in Among these orders, Dendroidea is the ear­ and and even in Early . liest in appearance (M. Cam.?, Late Cam.) and the latest in disappearance (Late Carb.); Grapto­ loidea ranged from Early Ordovician to Early Subdivision of the Order Graptoloidea Devonian; the other orders are rare in materials and known to occur from Ordovician to Silurian. The subdivision of Graptoloidea has been treated All the Tuboidea, Camaroidea, Stolonoidea, by many graptolite workers. Two suborders, Crustoidea and most of Dendroidea are ben­ Axonolipa and Axonophora, proposed by Frech thonic in the mode of life, whereas Graptoloidea (1897) and emended by Ruedemann (1904, 1908) and a part of Dendroidea are planktonic. The have been used for a long time (Mu, 1950; Obut, floating dendroids with free sicula appeared in 1957; Mu, 1974; Yu & Fang, 1979). In fact, Axo­ the latest (Fengshanian) and flour­ nolipa consists of Didymograpta and Dicello­ ished in Early Xinchangian (Tremadocian), in­ grapta of Lapworth (1880) and Axonophora con­ dicating a new stage in graptolite history. The sists of Diplograpta and Monograpta of Lap­ graptodendroid family Anisograptidae compris­ worth (1880). In the sixties, J,aanusson (1960) ing three subfamilies ( quadriradiate Staurograp- divided Graptoloidea into foursuborders namely

Note: While the present volume was in press the editor received information on the death of Prof. Mu En-zhi. 204 Mu En-zhi: Graptolite Taxonomy and Classification

Didymograptina, Glossograptina, Diplograptina from Isograptidae, a descendant of Didymograp­ and Corynoidina. Bulmann (1963) grouped Co- tidae (and Tetragraptidae?). rynoidina into the suborder Didymograptina and The suborder Axonophora comprises those divided the Diplograptina into two suborders, with virgula embedded in the median septum in Diplograptina and Monograptina. Mu & Zhan biserial form (Diplograpta) or in the dorsal wall (1966) established the suborder Axonocrypta in of the periderm in uniserial form (Monograpta). addition to Axonolipa and Axonophora based on In Diplograpta, the initial bud originates from the structure of the rhabdosome. Mu (1974) ten­ the porus on the distal part of metasicula and tatively used Didymograpta and Dicellograpta as even near the sicular aperture. The proximal the­ subdivisions of Axonolipa and Diplograpta and cae in early forms are curved upwards with three Monograpta as subdivisions of Axonophora re­ or more crossing canals; in some later ones, the spectively. crossing canals increase throughout the rhabdo­ Axonolipa comprises the forms with nema free some without dicalycal theca (aseptate). The vir­ and the stipes pendent to reclined just like float­ gella is well developed, beginning at the proximal ing dendroids. Those in Didymograpta are devel­ part of the metasicula even near the prosicula. oped in a primitive type. The initial bud orig­ The most primitive genus Glyptograptus of Di- inates from the poms on the ventral or dorsal plograptidae is most probably derived from Car­ side of the prosicula or the proximal part of meta- diograptidae of Axonocrypta due to the fusion of sicula. The proximal thecae grow downwards to the dorsal walls of two stipes, forming a median nearly horizontally with one or two crossing ca­ septum. Exigraptus seems to be a transitional nals, that is to say, the first or the second theca is form between Cardiograptidae and Diplograpti- dicalycal. The virgella is usually absent, or pres­ dae. In China, the earliest species of Glyptograp­ ent in advanced forms, it begins at the proximal tus, G. sinodentatus, direct ancestor of G. aus- or middle part of the metasicula. The most primi­ trodentatus, is more closely related to Exigraptus tive forms such as Didymograptus of Didymo- (Mu et al., 1979; Chen, 1982). It is questionable graptidae, Tetragraptus of Tetragraptidae and that G. austrodentatus is derived from Maeandro- bitheca-lacking Clonograptus of Dichograptidae graptus (Jenkins, 1980) and G. dentatus is related are the direct descendants of Adelograptinae of to Phyllograptus elongatus (Cooper & Fortey, Anisograptidae. In Dicellograpta, the initial bud 1983). arises from the porus on the middle or distal part In Monograpta the initial bud originates from of metasicula. The proximal thecae grow hori­ the sinus on the distal part of the metasicula near zontally to upwards with two or three crossing ca­ the sicular aperture. The proximal thecae grow nals, that is to say, the second or third theca is di­ directly upwards without crossing canal, i.e., no calycal. The virgella is well developed, beginning dicalycal theca. The earliest representatives of usually at the proximal part of the metasicula. Monograpta are Atavograptus (Rickards, 1974), Dicellograptus of Dicranograptidae is the earliest Monoclimacisl (Bjerreskov, 1975) and Pristio- derived from Didymograptidae. graptus (Li, in press) of Monograptidae, appea­ In Axonocrypta the nema (virgula) is enclosed ring abruptly in the beginning of Silurian (per- between the four to two scandent stipes. The sic- sculptus Zone) and representing another new ula is relatively long. The initial bud originates stage of graptolite history. It is believed that from the porus on the prosicula or the proximal Monograptidae is derived from Diplograptidae part of metasicula. It arises from the ventral, lat­ with discontinuity. Peiragraptidae and Dimor- eral or dorsal side of the sicula. The proximal phograptidae are offshoots. thecae grow downwards or curved distally, with one or two crossing canals. The virgella is usually present in advanced form. Those with four or On the Suborder Axonocrypta three stipes back to back (Phyllograptidae) are derived from Tetragraptidae, and those with two Axonocrypta linking with Axonolipa and Axo­ scandent stipes back to back (Cardiograptidae) nophora bears the fundamental characters be­ or side to side (Glossograptidae) are derived tween them in the structure of rhabdosome and Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, vol. 35 1987 205 in the mode of development. There are three are different from Pseudotrigonograptus ensifor- families in Axonocrypta, known as Phyllograpti- mis as described by Rickards (1973, p. 600, figs. dae, Cardiograptidae and Glossograptidae (= 1-3). They are not conspecific. Cooper has Cryptograptidae). rightly distinguished these two species based on Phyllograptidae is directly derived from Tetra- the materials of New Zealand (Cooper, 1979, p. graptidae of Axonolipa with Tetragraptus phy- 91, figs. 83b-c). llograptoides and Phyllograptus cor as the tran­ The pore of the common canal in Pseudotrigo­ sitional forms (Cooper & Fortey, 1982; Cooper & nograptus uniformis corresponding to the "fore- Lindholm 1985). The Family Phyllograptidae was nic foramina" in Phyllograptus typus illustrated revised by Hsu (1934) and Mu & Zhan (1966) to by Cooper & Fortey (1982, figs. 71k, 74) is an ad­ be composed of Phyllograptus and Trigonograp- vanced feature. The Spitzberg materials de­ tus (= Pseudotrigonograptus) based on the struc­ scribed by Fortey (1971) and Cooper & Fortey ture of the rhabdosome. Recently, Cooper & (1982) as Pseudotrigonograptus ensiformis (4-sti- Fortey (1982) revised this family to comprise ped) and P. minor Mu et Lee (3-stiped) are pos­ Phyllograptus (s.s.) and a new genus Xiphograp- sible new forms representing a genus intermedi­ tus with two horizontal stipes, based on the origin ate between Pseudophyllograptus and Pseudotri- of first theca from the dorsal side of the sicula nogograptus, because the stipes are not entirely and the presence of a virgella. In the writer's overlapped laterally as in Pseudotrigonograptus opinion, the orientation of the initial bud on the and the serrated ventral margins of the stipes are sicula is less taxonomic significance than the pres­ clearly exposed. They are quite different from ence of virgella. Dorsal origin of initial bud on Pseudotrigonograptus ensiformis and P. minor the sicula is also known in Didymograptus roz- Mu et Lee. This genus seems to be identical with kowskae and Parazygograptus erraticus (Kozlow- Cooper's Gen. 1 from New Zealand (Cooper, ski, 1954), but with no virgella. Since the pres­ 1979, p. 93, figs. 84a-e). This genus is more prim­ ence of virgella is an advanced feature, the vir- itive than Pseudotrigonograptus, it occurs in a gella-bearing Phyllograptus (s.s.) is more lower horizon. The other two families of Axo­ advanced than Pseudophyllograptus without a nocrypta, Cardiograptidae and Glossograptidae virgella, and the virgella-bearing Xiphograptus is with two scandent stipes back to back and side to an advanced member in Didymograptidae. It is side respectively are derived from isograptidae. noteworthy that the virgella-bearing Pseudazy- Cardiograptidae with two stipes back to back (di- gograptus incurvus (Ekstrom), the type species of pleural) developed in platycalycal type and Glos­ Pseudazygograptus (Mu et al., 1960), with elab­ sograptidae with two stipes side to side (mono- orated thecae is an advanced member in Azy- pleural) developed in pericalycal type. Morpho­ gograptidae (Finney, 1980, p. 1199, Textfigs. 9, logically, Oncograptus is an intermediate form 10). True Azygograptus with simple thecae and between Isograptus and Cardigraptus. Two dis­ without virgella occurs in Arenigian of Europe tinct series in Oncograptus and Cardiograptus are and Ningkuoan (N4) of the Yangtze Region and recognized, namely, the upsilon-morsus series the Jiangnan subregion of the S. China region in with wedge-shaped rhabdosome and the magnus- China, but is unknown in and amplus series with parallel-sided rhabdosome. Australasia. The former occurs in North America, Australasia In Phyllograptidae another advanced form is and the NW Region of China, whereas the latter Pseudotrigonograptus uniformis Mu et Lee, the is only known in the S. China Region. The rela­ type of species of Pseudotrigonograptus (Mu and tion between Oncograptus magnus and Cardio­ Lee, 1958, p. 417, PL. Ill, figs. 7-10). The de­ graptus amplus are possibly transitional, whereas tailed structure of the rhabdosome was described the relation between Oncograptus upsilon and by Mu & Lee (1958) and illustrated by Hsu & Cardiograptus morsus is uncertain, because an Chen (1964, figs. 1, 4) based on the analysis of additional theca is present in Oncograptus up­ the pyritized thecae. The peculiar thecal charac­ silon (Bulman, 1936) and a distinct virgella is ters and common canal and the parallel-sided present in an allied species Oncograptus zhong- rhabdosome in Pseudotrigonograptus uniformis guoensis Xu & Huang (1979). Therefore, Onco- 206 Mu En-zhi: Graptolite Taxonomy and Classification graptus is here placed in Isograptidae of Axono­ Cyrtograptinae and Linograptinae in Axono­ lipa. Skevington (1968) considered Oncograptus phora. upsilon and Cardigraptus morsus to be conspe- Overlapping of stipes: Kalpinograptidae in cific derived from "Isograptus" manubriatus Axonolipa, Glossograptidae (= Cryptograpti­ based on the so-called "curved" proximal thecae. dae) in Axonocrypta. Cooper (1979) demonstrated the proximal thecae Elaboration of thecae: Muenzhingraptidae-Psi- in Oncograptus and Cardiograptus which grow graptidae in Dendroidea, Sinograptidae, Kinne- downwards without curvature. graptidae, Atopograptidae and Dicranograptidae The characteristic feature of Glossograptidae is in Axonolipa, various lineages in diplogratids the overlapping of the two scandent stipes and monograptids in Axonophora. (monopleural). In Apiograptus Cooper & Reduction of periderm: Abrograptidae in McLaurin (1974) the two stipes begin to be over­ Axonolipa, Reteograptidae and Archiretioli- lapped laterally (Cooper, 1979). It was conside­ tidae-Retiolitidae-Plectograptidae in Axono­ red to be a primitive member of Glossograptidae phora. (= Cryptograptidae) by Mu et al., 1979. In the Studies on internal structure of graptolites af­ advanced form, Cryptograptus tricornis, the two ford important features of taxonomic signifi­ stipes are entirely overlapped. For the sake of cance: clarity, the writer used formerly Hadding's Cryp­ 1) The initial bud growing from the porus on tograptidae instead of Lapworth's Glossograpti­ the prosicula or on the proximal part of meta- dae, because Lapworth's Glossograptidae is sicula changes downwards to grow from the distal fused with his Lasiograptidae. For the same rea­ part of metasicula and the porus changes to a son, the writer proposed Hallograptidae instead sinus. of Lapworth's Lasiograptidae (Mu, 1950; Urba- 2) The formation of a virgella beginning at the nek, 1959). It is unnecessary to divide the family distal part of metasicula changes upwards to be at Glossograptidae (= Cryptograptidae) into two the proximal part of the metasicula. families (Strachan, 1985). 3) The growth direction of the proximal thecae especially the first two pairs changes from down­ wards to upwards. 4) The formation of the median septum in Anagenetic Grades and Cladogenetic scandent rhabdosome changes from a compound Divergences septum (median septa in Axonocrypta) to a sim­ ple septum (in Axonophora). As stated above, Axonocrypta links with Axono­ Ultrastructural studies of graptolites have pro­ lipa and Axonophora. Dendrograptidae and Ani- vided some important information for graptolite sograptidae of Dendroidea, Tetragraptidae-Didy- taxonomy as reviewed by Rickards, Crowther & mograptidae and Isograptidae of Axonolipa, Chapman (1982). Further studies on the micro- Cardiograptidae of Axonocrypta and Diplograp- structure and ultrastructure of the etched mate­ tidae and Monograptidae of Axonophora repre­ rials will settle well the problem of the graptolite sent anagenetic grades. Some important evolu­ taxonomy. tionary trends such as simplification and com­ plication of rhabdosome, overlapping of stipes, elaboration of thecae and reduction of periderm, took place once again in the graptolite history Dansk sammendrag representing cladogenetic divergences. The fol­ Graptolithina er sammensat af seks. ordener. Blandt dem er lowing taxa are all offshoots of various grades. Graptoloidea og en del af Dendroidea kendt for deres plankto- Simplification of rhabdosome: Azygograptidae niske levevis. Graptoloidea er sammensat af tre underordener and Corynoididae in Axonolipa, Peiragraptidae nemlig Axonolipa, Axonocrypta og Axonophora. Familierne Dendrograptidae-Anisograptidae-Tetragraptidae og Didymo- and Dimorphograptidae in Axonophora. graptidae-Isograptidae-Cardiograptidae-Diplograptidae-Mo- Complication of rhabdosome: Pterograptinae, nograptidae representerer anagenetiske grader. Nogle vigtige evolutionære tendenser viste sig igen i form af cladogenetiske Nemagraptinae (= Pleurograptinae) and Tan- afspaltninger. Alle andre familier eller subfamilier er sideskud gyangraptinae in Axonolipa, Diversograptinae, af forskellig grad. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, vol. 35 1987 207

Underordenen Axonocrypta bliver diskuteret i nogen detalje Kozlowski, R., 1954: Sur la structure de certains Dichograp- i det nærværende arbejde. tids. Acta Geol. Polonica, 4, 423-444. Kozlowski, R., 1966: On the structure and relationships of graptolites, Jour. Palaeont. 40, 3, 489-501. References Lapworth, C, 1980: On the geological distribution of the Rhabdophora. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. V, 5,45-62,273-285, Bjerreskov, M., 1975: Llandoverian and Wenlockian grapto­ 359-369; vol. 6, pp. 16-29,185-207. lites from Bornholm, Fossils & Strata, 8., 94 pp. Lin Yao-kun, 1981: New Materials of Graptodendroids with Bulman, O. M. B., 1936: The structure of Oncograptus T. S. special reference to the Graptodendroidea. Bull. Nanjing Hall, Geol. Mag., 73, 864, 271-278. Inst. Geol. Paleont. Acad. Sinica, 3, 241-262. Bullman, O. M. B., 1963: The evolution and classification of Mu, A. T., 1950: On the evolution and classification of Grapto­ the graptoloidea, Quart. Jl. geol. Soc. London, 119, 401- loids. Ti-chih-lun-ping, 15, 4-6, 171-183. (in Chinese). 418. Mu, A. T., 1974: Evolution, Classification and Distribution of Bulman, O. M. B., 1970: Graptolithina with section on En- Graptoloidea and Graptodendroids, Scientia Sinica, 17, 2, teropneusta and Pterobranchia, Treatise on Invertebrate 227-238. Paleontology, part V, Geol. Soc. Amer. and Univ. Kan­ Mu, A. T. & Lee, C. K., 1958: Scandent graptolites from the sas, 163 pp. Nangkuo Shale of Kiangshan-Changshan area, western Chen Xu, 1982, Early Ordovician Exigraptus and Glyptograp- Chekiang, Acta Palaeont. Sin., 6,4, 391-428. tus from Xingan, N. Guangxi and the origin of Biseries Ax- Mu, A. T., Lee, C. K. & Geh, M. Y., 1960: Orodviciangrapto­ onophorous graptoloids, Acta Pal. Sinica, 21, 5, 513-535. lites from Xinjiang, Acta Palaeont. Sinica, 8,1, 27-39. Cooper, R. A., 1979: Ordovician geology and graptolite faunas Mu, A. T. & Zhan, S. G., 1966: On the probable development of the Aorangi Mine area, Northwest Nelson, New Zea­ and systematic position of Glossograptus. Scientia Sinica, land, Pal. Bull, 47, New Zealand Geological Survey, 1- 15, 92-98. 127. Mu En-zhi, Ge Mei-yu, Chen Xu, Ni Yu-nan & Lin Yao-kun, Cooper, R. A. & Fortey,, R. A., 1982: The Ordovician Grap- 1979, Lower Ordovician graptolites of wouthwest China. tolites of Spitsbergen, Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Geol.) 36, Palaeont. Sinica, 156B (13), 1-1921. 3, 157-302. Obut, A. M., 1957: Classification and ordering of the genera of Cooper, R. A. & Fortey, R. A., 1983: Development of the graptolites. Vsesoyuz. Paleont. Obshch. Ezhegodnik 16, graptoloid rhabdosome, Alcheringa, 7, 201-221. 11—47. (in Russian). Cooper, R. A. and Lindholm, K., 1985: The phylogenetic rela­ Rickards, R. B., 1973: The Arenig graptolite genus Pseudotri- tionships of the graptolites Tetragraptus phyllograptoides gonograptus Mu et Lee, 1958, Acta geol. Polonica, 23, 4, and Pseudophyllograptus cor. Geol. Foren. Stockholm 597-604. Forh. 106, 3, 279-291. Rickards, R. B., 1974: A new monograptid genus and the ori­ Cooper, R. A. and McLaurin, A. N., 1974: Apiograptus gen. gins of the main monograptid genera. Special Paper in Pal­ nov. and the origin of the biserial graptoloid rhabdosome, aeontology 13, 141-147. Special papers in Palaeontology, 13, 75-85. Rickards, R. B., Crowther, P. R. and Chapman, A. J., 1982, Finney, S. C, 1978: The affinities of Isograptus, Glossograptus, Ultrastructural studies of graptolites - a review, Geol. Cryptograptus, Corynoides, and allied graptolites. Acta Mag., 119, 4, 355-370. Palaeontologica Polonica, 23, 4, 481-495. Ruedemann, R., 1904: Graptolites of New York, Part I: Grap­ Finney, S. C 1980: Thamnograptid, Dichograptid and Abro- tolites of the lower beds. N. Y. State Mus., Mem., 7, 457- graptid graptolites from the Middle Ordovician Athens 803. Shale of Alabama, Jour. Palaeont., 54, 6, 1184-1209. Ruedemann, R., 1908: Graptolites of New York, part II: Grap­ Fortey, R. A., 1971: Tristichograptus, A Triserial Graptolite tolites of higher beds. N. Y. State Mus., Mern. 11, 1-583. from the Lower Ordovician of Spitsbergen, Palaeontology, Skevington, D., 1968: The affinities of Oncograptus, Cardi­ 14, 1, 188-199. ography and allied graptolites from the Lower Ordovician, Freeh, F, 1897: Lethaea geognostica I, Lethaea palaeozoica, 1, Lethaia, 1, 4, 311-324. Leipzig, 690 pp. Strachan, L, 1985: The significance of the proximal end of Hsu, S. C, 1934: Graptolites of the Lower Yangtze Valley, Cryptograptus tricornis (Carruthers) (Graptolithina), Monograph Nat. Res. Inst. Geol., A 4, 106 pp. Geol. Mag. 122, 2, 151-155. Hsu, S. C & Chen, P. L., 1964: On the genus Trigonograptus, Urbanek, A., 1959: Studies on graptolites II, on the devel­ Scientia Sinica, 13, 4, 639-653. opment and structure of graptolite genus Gymnograptus Jaanusson, V., 1960: Graptoloids from the Ontikan and Viruan Bulman, Acta Palaeont. Polonica, IV, 3, 279-338. (Ordov.) Limestones of Estonia and Sweden, Bull. geol. Xu Jie & Huang Zhi-gao, 1979: Lower Ordovician graptolite Inst. Univ. Uppsala, 38, 289-366. faunas of Guozigou Area, Hocheng, Xinjiang. Acta geol. Jenkins, C, 1980: Maeandrograptus schmalenseei and its bear­ Sinica, 1979, 1, 1-19. ing on the origin of the diplograptids. Lethaia, 13, 289- Yu Jian-hua & Fang Yi-ting, 1979: On the classification of grap­ 302. toloids. Acta Palaeont. Sinica. 18, 5, 435-443. Kozlowski, R., 1949: Les Graptolithes et Quelques Nouveaux Zhao Xiang-lin & Shang Zhun-xin, 1985: Reclined graptolites Groupes d'Animaux du Tremadoc de la Pologne. Paleon- of the Xinchangian. Journal of Changchun College of tologia Polonica, iii, 1948, 235 pp. Geology, 1985 (2), 13-26.