Summary Details of Sites of International Importance in SEA Area 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Summary Details of Sites of International Importance in SEA Area 1 Appendix E E1 Summary Details of Sites of International Importance in SEA Area 1 Figure E.1 International Designations in SEA Area 1 © AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited December 2013 Appendix E E2 Table E.1 Summary Details of Relevant Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) in SEA Area 1 Name, Code and Area (ha) Annex I Habitat Annex II Species Vulnerability Management Location1 Garron Point 15.58 Primary: N/A Primary: Narrow- Use by the public; Signage informing users of UK0030356 Qualifying: N/A mouthed whorl snail geologists, and people snail colonies. The 02 10 08 W Vertigo angustior conducting information introduction of livestock may Qualifying: N/A recreation. Changing be advantageous provided 56 59 00 N pattern of grazing by erosion does not take place, rabbits and roe deer which should be ensured may be problematic. through a management Parts of the site may be agreement. vulnerable to certain forms of marine oil pollution and rising sea- levels. Craigengar 37.31 Primary: N/A Primary: Marsh Drainage operations. Continuation of low-intensity UK0012577 Qualifying: European dry saxifrage Saxifraga grazing. 03 28 30 W heaths, Species-rich hirculus 55 46 20 N Nardus grassland, on Qualifying: N/A siliceous substrates in mountain areas (and submountain areas in continental Europe) Dunkeld– 428.09 Primary: Oligotrophic to Primary: Slender Nutrient inputs. Dependent on maintaining Blairgowrie mesotrophic standing naiad Najas flexilis Quaking bogs and low levels of dissolved Lochs waters with vegetation of Qualifying: Otter transition mire can nutrients. UK0012638 the Littorelletea uniflorae Lutra lutra sustain only low levels 03 33 15 W and/or of the Isoëto- of physical disturbance Nanojuncetea and require high water 56 34 30 N Qualifying: Transition table mires and quaking bogs River Tweed 3,797.41 Primary: Water courses Primary: Atlantic Pollution, acidification Water Framework Directive, UK0012691 of plain to montane levels salmon Salmo salar, and eutrophication, River Tweed Catchment 02 47 30 W with the Ranunculion otter Lutra lutra river-works and Management Plan, SEPA fluitantis and Callitricho- bankside management, and EA management. 55 36 00 N Qualifying: Sea Batrachion vegetation lamprey Petromyzon genetic pollution and Qualifying: N/A marinus, brook disease, abstraction lamprey Lampetra and impoundment planeri, river lamprey management. Lampetra fluviatilis Flanders 1,073.58 Primary: Active raised Primary: N/A Drainage. Part of site is a National Mosses bogs *Priority feature, Qualifying: N/A Nature Reserve (NNR). UK0012902 degraded raised bogs still Management Agreement in 04 12 00 W capable of natural place for programme of regeneration ditch-blocking and scrub 56 09 30 N Qualifying: N/A removal. Barry Links 789.69 Primary: Embryonic Primary: N/A Overgrazing. Joint MoD/SNH Concordat UK0013044 shifting dunes, shifting Qualifying: N/A includes grazing 02 45 00 W dunes along the shoreline management, an SSSI and with Ammophila arenaria scrub management plan. 56 28 45 N (`white dunes`), fixed There is also an active dunes with herbaceous Conservation Group. vegetation (`grey dunes`) *Priority feature, Atlantic decalcified fixed dunes (Calluno-Ulicetea) *Priority feature, humid dune slacks Qualifying: N/A © AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited December 2013 Appendix E E3 Name, Code and Area (ha) Annex I Habitat Annex II Species Vulnerability Management Location1 Clyde Valley 434.66 Primary: Tilio-Acerion Primary: N/A Non-native tree and NNR management plan to Woods forests of slopes, screes Qualifying: N/A shrub species invasion. encourage native broad- leaved woodlands. UK0013089 and ravines *Priority Overgrazing, feature uncontrolled dumping 03 47 50 W Qualifying: N/A of refuse. 55 43 00 N Loch Lomond 1,454.33 Primary: Old sessile oak Primary: N/A Non-native tree and Woodland Grant Schemes, Woods woods with Ilex and shrub species invasion. NNR management plan. Qualifying: Otter Overgrazing. UK0013573 Blechnum in the British Lutra lutra Isles 04 40 45 W Qualifying: N/A 56 12 00 N Lendalfoot 1,309.71 Primary: Species-rich Primary: N/A Changes in agricultural Dependent on differing Hills Complex Nardus grassland, on Qualifying: N/A practices (e.g. artificial grazing and management fertilisers). UK0013592 siliceous substrates in regimes. Approximately mountain areas (and 50% of site covered by 04 53 15 W submountain areas in management agreements. 55 11 29 N continental Europe) *Priority feature, alkaline fens Qualifying: Northern Atlantic wet heaths with Erica tetralix, European dry heaths, calaminarian grasslands of the Violetalia calaminariae, transition mires and quaking bogs Whitlaw and 40.71 Primary: Transition mires Primary: Slender Agricultural activity Whitlaw is a NNR and Branxholme and quaking bogs green feather-moss accelerating rate of Branxholme subject to a Management Agreement. UK0013594 Qualifying: Alkaline fens Drepanocladus change in wetland sites (Hamatocaulis) from open water 02 47 38 W vernicosus through fen to carr woodland. 55 33 00 N Qualifying: N/A Bankhead 32.5 Primary: Active raised Primary: N/A Overgrazing. Owned by MOD and Moss, Beith bogs *Priority feature Qualifying: N/A situated on a Royal Naval UK0019756 Qualifying: N/A Armaments Depot, and is therefore well protected 04 38 00 W from any damage. 55 43 10 N Black Loch 108.42 Primary: Active raised Primary: N/A Drainage, burning, Management agreement to Moss bogs *Priority feature Qualifying: N/A overgrazing. conserve and promote diversity of peatland plant UK0019757 Qualifying: Degraded communities. Restricts 03 50 00 W raised bogs still capable of natural regeneration activities such as drainage 55 54 20 N and burning and controls grazing levels. Blawhorn 109 Primary: Active raised Primary: N/A Drainage, fires. NNR Management Plan Moss bogs *Priority feature Qualifying: N/A addresses potential problems such as fires. UK0019758 Qualifying: Degraded Installation of dams and 03 47 00 W raised bogs still capable of natural regeneration drain-blocks on all the 55 53 40 N manmade drains and erosion gullies. © AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited December 2013 Appendix E E4 Name, Code and Area (ha) Annex I Habitat Annex II Species Vulnerability Management Location1 Braehead 122.6 Primary: Active raised Primary: N/A Overgrazing. NNR Management Plan. Moss bogs *Priority feature Qualifying: N/A UK0019759 Qualifying: Degraded 03 39 30 W raised bogs still capable of natural regeneration 55 44 40 N Coalburn Moss 224.32 Primary: Active raised Primary: N/A Drainage, non-native Several Management bogs *Priority feature UK0019760 Qualifying: N/A tree species and scrub Agreements are either in encroachment. Qualifying: Degraded place or being negotiated 03 51 50 W which include the removal of raised bogs still capable of 55 36 15 N natural regeneration coniferous woodland and invading scrub, and the blockage of drains. Cockinhead 48.4 Primary: Active raised Primary: N/A Drainage, invasive tree Part of this raised bog Moss bogs *Priority feature Qualifying: N/A scrub, fires, peat covered by a Management extraction. UK0019761 Qualifying: Degraded Agreement to conserve and promote the development of 04 36 30 W raised bogs still capable of natural regeneration the range of peatland 55 42 10 N habitats. Cranley Moss 101.27 Primary: Active raised Primary: N/A Drainage, invasive tree Management Agreements to bogs *Priority feature UK0019762 Qualifying: N/A scrub, fires, peat conserve and promote the extraction. development of the diversity Qualifying: Degraded 03 40 30 W of peatland habitats. raised bogs still capable of 55 42 30 N natural regeneration Dykeneuk 61.64 Primary: Active raised Primary: N/A Drainage, invasive tree Management Agreement Moss bogs *Priority feature scrub, over-grazing. Qualifying: N/A covers about 40% of site UK0019763 Qualifying: Degraded and makes provision for the maintenance of fences, the 04 37 50 W raised bogs still capable of natural regeneration damming of drains and the 55 41 20 N removal of trees or scrub. Waukenwae 155.49 Primary: Active raised Primary: N/A Drainage, invasive tree Management Agreements to Moss bogs *Priority feature Qualifying: N/A scrub, over-grazing, restrict the use of fertilisers, fires. pesticides and agricultural UK0019765 Qualifying: Degraded activities thought to have a 04 05 54 W raised bogs still capable of natural regeneration damaging impact (e.g. 55 44 00 N drainage, burning, grazing). North Shotts 53.36 Primary: Active raised Primary: N/A Drainage, invasive tree Present management Moss bogs *Priority feature Qualifying: N/A scrub, over-grazing, compatible with the nature fires. conservation interests. UK0019768 Qualifying: Degraded Monitoring is ongoing to 03 47 54 W raised bogs still capable of natural regeneration ensure long-term favourable 55 49 50 N condition of the bog. Kirkcowan 777.57 Primary: Active raised Primary: N/A Drainage, invasive tree Management Agreement to Flow bogs *Priority feature Qualifying: N/A scrub, over-grazing, conserve the active blanket fires. bog. Controls grazing, UK0019813 Qualifying: Degraded drainage and muirburn. 04 44 10 W raised bogs still capable of natural regeneration 55 00 10 N © AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited December 2013 Appendix E E5 Name, Code and Area (ha) Annex I Habitat Annex II Species Vulnerability Management Location1 Endrick Water 239.11 Primary: N/A Primary: Brook Point and diffuse Development of a river UK0019840 Qualifying: N/A lamprey Lampetra sources of pollution not conservation strategy during planeri, river lamprey thought significant. 2001/2002 under the 04 24 00 W Lampetra fluviatilis Gravel extraction. ’Safeguarding Natura Rivers 56 03 20 N Qualifying: Atlantic in the UK’ LIFE Project, salmon Salmo salar which addressed all the management issues on the river including gravel extraction. Merrick Kells 8,698.3 Primary: Northern Atlantic Primary: N/A Overgrazing Small part of site is a NNR UK0019841 wet heaths with Erica Qualifying: Otter but SNH has recommended tetralix, siliceous alpine expansion of this to cover a Lutra lutra 04 26 45 W and boreal grasslands, larger part of the SAC under 55 08 00 N blanket bogs *Priority Forest Enterprise feature ownership.
Recommended publications
  • CHELTENHAM LOCAL PLAN: Regulation 19
    CHELTENHAM LOCAL PLAN: Regulation 19 HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT (HRA) SCREENING REPORT NOVEMBER 2017 Cheltenham Local Plan: Regulation 19 HRA Screening Report Cheltenham Borough Council Cheltenham Local Plan: Regulation 19 Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) Screening Report November 2016 date: October 2016 Draft v01 November 2017 Draft v02 & v03 Final prepared for: Cheltenham Borough Council prepared by: Owen Jeffreys Enfusion Cheryl Beattie Barbara Carroll quality Barbara Carroll Enfusion assurance: Treenwood House Rowden Lane Bradford-on-Avon BA15 2AU T: 01225 867112 www.enfusion.co.uk cbc273_November 2017 2/22 Enfusion Cheltenham Local Plan: Regulation 19 HRA Screening Report CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 4 The Cheltenham Plan & the HRA 4 Context: The GCT JCS & the Cheltenham Plan 5 Consultation 6 Purpose & Structure 7 2 HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT & THE DRAFT PLAN 8 Requirements for Habitat Regulations Assessment 8 Guidance & Good Practice 8 Method 11 The Draft Cheltenham Plan 11 3 SCREENING 15 The JCS HRA (2013) 15 Screening the Draft Cheltenham Plan (2016) 15 Other Plans & Programmes 16 The Effects of The Plan (Updated 2017) 16 In-Combination Effects (Updated 2017) 18 4 HRA SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS & NEXT STEPS 21 Summary 21 Conclusion 21 Next Steps TABLES & FIGURES 2.1 HRA Key Stages 11 2.2 The Cheltenham Plan Vision & Objectives 11 3.1 European Sites Characterisation 16 3.3 Housing, Employment and Infrastructure Development - 17 Possible Effects & Impacts on European Sites APPENDICES I European Site Characterisations II Plans, Programmes and Projects Review III HRA Screening of Policies & Site Allocations cbc273_November 2017 3/22 Enfusion Cheltenham Local Plan: Regulation 19 HRA Screening Report 1.0 Introduction The Cheltenham Plan & The HRA 1.1 Cheltenham Borough Council is preparing a new Local Plan in consideration of National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF, 2012), changed local circumstances, and the progress of the new Gloucester, Cheltenham & Tewkesbury Joint Core Strategy (GCT JCS).
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrate Assemblages on English Sssis English Nature Research Reports
    Report Number 618 Invertebrate assemblages on English SSSIs English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 618 Invertebrate assemblages on English SSSIs Keith N. A. Alexander, C. Martin Drake, Derek A. Lott and Jonathan R. Webb 2004 You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2005 Acknowledgements Mike Edwards contributed to early discussion. Summary 1. Data from English Nature’s Invertebrate Site Register, SSSI citations and the English Nature Site Information System (ENSIS) were used to identify assemblages of invertebrates on SSSI for which invertebrate interest had been recognised in the citations or ENSIS. 2. Assemblages were defined using predominantly well recognised habitat terms. These terms were organised into a hierarchy of three levels. A total of 133 terms were used at the second and third levels, and the number of assemblages recognised exceeds this when the terms were used in combinations. The importance of assemblages was assessed as national / international, regional or county / local. 3. Of the 1028 sites investigated, 885 had sufficient data to allow at least one assemblage to be identified. The average number of assemblages per site was 3.1, ranging from 1 to 10. 4. Assemblages with a high representation in the results were those associated with grasslands, mature woodland, fen and marsh (the latter two mainly represented in features such as ponds and ditches). A few assemblages appeared to be particularly poorly represented, notably shingle and dune assemblages.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for the Protection of European Sites: Habitat Regulations Assessment/Appraisal (HRA)
    Planning for the Protection of European Sites: Habitat Regulations Assessment/Appraisal (HRA) Evidence Gathering / Baseline Report for the Gloucestershire Minerals Local Plan Update 5 February 2015 HRA Baseline / Evidence Report for Minerals Local Plan Page 1 Contents European Sites in and within 15km of Gloucestershire’s boundary .................................................................. 3 Section 1: Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 4 International / European Sites - An Introduction ........................................................................................ 4 Update 5 for the Minerals Local Plan (MLP) .............................................................................................. 5 Background to Evidence Gathering for HRA .............................................................................................. 5 Updated List of Consultees ........................................................................................................................ 6 Other Plans & Projects ............................................................................................................................... 7 HRA Reporting: Methodology ................................................................................................................... 10 Section 2: European Sites in Gloucestershire & within 15km of its administrative boundary ......................... 11 Rodborough
    [Show full text]
  • Severn River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015-2021
    Severn River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015-2021 PART B - Sub Areas in the Severn River Basin District December 2015 Published by: Environment Agency Natural Resources Wales Horizon house, Deanery Road, Cambria house, 29 Newport Road, Bristol BS1 5AH Cardiff CF24 0TP Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] www.gov.uk/environment-agency http://www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk Further copies of this report are available Further copies of this report are available from our publications catalogue: from our website: www.gov.uk/government/publications http://www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk or our National Customer Contact Centre: or our Customer Contact Centre: T: 03708 506506 T: 0300 065 3000 (Mon-Fri, 8am - 6pm) Email: [email protected]. Email: [email protected] © Environment Agency 2015 © Natural Resources Wales All rights reserved. This document may be All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the reproduced with prior permission of Natural Environment Agency. Resources Wales. ii Contents Contents ............................................................................................................................. iii Glossary and Abbreviations ................................................................................................ iv 1. The layout of this document .......................................................................................... 1 2. Sub-areas in the Severn River
    [Show full text]
  • Cotswold District Local Plan 2011-2031: Submission Draft Regulation 19 - Focussed Changes
    Cotswold District Local Plan 2011-2031: Submission Draft Regulation 19 - Focussed Changes Habitats Regulations Assessment Report Prepared by LUC April 2017 Project Title: Habitats Regulations Assessment of the Cotswold District Local Plan Client: Cotswold District Council Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 1 21/10/15 HRA Report for the Kieran Moroney Jeremy Owen Jeremy Owen Cotswold District Local Kate Nicholls Plan Regulation 18 Consultation: Planning Policies 2 04/05/16 HRA Report for the Kieran Moroney Jeremy Owen Jeremy Owen Cotswold District Local Kate Nicholls Plan: Regulation 19 Submission Draft 3 14/06/16 Final updated HRA Kieran Moroney Jeremy Owen Jeremy Owen Report for the Kate Nicholls Cotswold District Local Plan: Regulation 19 Submission Draft 4 05/01/17 Updated HRA Report Katherine Jeremy Owen Jeremy Owen for the Cotswold Sydney District Local Plan: David Green Submission Draft Regulation 19 - Focussed Changes 5 24/04/17 Updated to reflect Katherine Jeremy Owen Jeremy Owen comments from Sydney Natural England and Gloucestershire County Council Cotswold District Local Plan 2011-2031: Submission Draft Regulation 19 - Focussed Changes Habitats Regulations Assessment Report Prepared by LUC April 2017 Planning & EIA LUC BRISTOL Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Registered in England Design 14 Great George Street London Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning Bristol BS1 5RH Glasgow Registered Office: Landscape Management Tel:0117 929 1997 Edinburgh 43 Chalton Street Ecology Fax:0117
    [Show full text]
  • HRA) Screening Report for WCS Site Options October 2009
    Planning for the Protection of European Sites Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA) Screening Report for WCS Site Options October 2009 Map 1. European sites in and within 15 km of Gloucestershire’s boundary 1 Contents Page PART ONE – BACKGROUND 3 1. Introduction / the purpose of HRA / AA for land use plans 3 2. HRA guidance and best practice 4 3. HRA key stages 6 4. Evidence gathering for HRA and links to Sustainability Appraisal (SA) 7 5. HRA screening of the Waste Core Strategy (WCS) to date 7 6. Screening methodology 7 PART TWO – THE HRA SCREENING ASSESSMENT 9 7. European sites in an close to Gloucestershire and existing waste management sites / 9 development 8. General characteristics of waste management development and potential impacts 9 9. Screening task A 13 10. Screening task B 30 11. Screening task C 80 12. Screening task D 106 13. Conclusion / Contacts 107 Appendices 108 Appendix A: Detailed maps of 13 proposed waste sites 108 Appendix B: All European sites in and close to Gloucestershire and those within a 10 km 115 radius of proposed „Zone C‟ waste sites Appendix C: All European sites in and close to Gloucestershire and those within a 10 km 125 radius of proposed „Outside Zone C‟ waste sites 2 PART ONE – BACKGROUND 1. Introduction – the purpose of HRA / AA for land use plans This report is the Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA) on Gloucestershire County Council‟s Waste Core Strategy Site Options Paper (October 2009). Its primary aim is to ensure that the plan and plan options that have been put forward (including sites) are appropriately screened in terms of their potential impacts on protected European sites in and close to Gloucestershire.
    [Show full text]
  • COTSWOLD DISTRICT LOCAL PLAN 2011-2031 (Adopted 3 August 2018)
    COTSWOLD DISTRICT LOCAL PLAN 2011-2031 (Adopted 3 August 2018) In memory of Tiina Emsley Principal Planning Policy Officer from 2007 to 2012 COTSWOLD DISTRICT LOCAL PLAN 2011-2031 Contents 1 Introduction 6 2 Portrait 11 3 Issues 17 4 Vision 20 5 Objectives 21 6 Local Plan Strategy 23 6.1 Development Strategy (POLICY DS1) 23 6.2 Development Within Development Boundaries (POLICY DS2) 29 6.3 Small-Scale Residential Development in Non-Principal Settlements (POLICY DS3) 30 6.4 Open Market Housing Outside Principal and Non-Principal Settlements (POLICY DS4) 32 7 Delivering the Strategy 34 7.1 South Cotswold - Principal Settlements (POLICY SA1) 37 7.2 Cirencester Town (POLICY S1) 38 7.3 Strategic Site, south of Chesterton, Cirencester (POLICY S2) 44 7.4 Cirencester Central Area (POLICY S3) 47 7.5 Down Ampney (POLICY S4) 54 7.6 Fairford (POLICY S5) 57 7.7 Kemble (POLICY S6) 60 7.8 Lechlade (POLICY S7) 63 7.9 South Cerney (POLICY S8) 66 7.10 Tetbury (POLICY S9) 68 7.11 Mid Cotswold - Principal Settlements (POLICY SA2) 71 7.12 Andoversford (POLICY S10) 71 7.13 Bourton-on-the-Water (POLICY S11) 74 7.14 Northleach (POLICY S12) 77 7.15 Stow-on-the-Wold (POLICY S13) 80 7.16 Upper Rissington (POLICY S14) 82 Planning applications will be determined in accordance with relevant policies in this Local Plan, which should be considered together, unless material considerations indicate otherwise. COTSWOLD DISTRICT LOCAL PLAN 2011-2031 Contents 7.17 North Cotswold - Principal Settlements (POLICY SA3) 84 7.18 Blockley (POLICY S15) 85 7.19 Chipping Campden (POLICY
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal Decision
    Appeal Decision Inquiry held on 30 November – 4 December 2020 Site visit made on 9 December 2020 by Katie McDonald MSc MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 12th January 2021 Appeal Ref: APP/G1630/W/20/3256319 Land off Ashmead Drive, Gotherington The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant outline planning permission. The appeal is made by J J Gallagher Limited and Mr Richard Cook against the decision of Tewkesbury Borough Council. The application Ref 19/01071/OUT, dated 25 October 2019, was refused by notice dated 16 June 2020. The development proposed is an outline planning application with means of access from Ashmead Drive (all other matters reserved for subsequent approval), for the erection of up to 50 dwellings (Class C3); earthworks; drainage works; structural landscaping; formal and informal open space; car parking; site remediation; and all other ancillary and enabling works. Decision 1. The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for an outline planning application with means of access from Ashmead Drive (all other matters reserved for subsequent approval), for the erection of up to 50 dwellings (Class C3); earthworks; drainage works; structural landscaping; formal and informal open space; car parking; site remediation; and all other ancillary and enabling works at Land off Ashmead Drive, Gotherington in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 19/01071/OUT, dated 25 October 2019, subject to the conditions set out in the attached Schedule. Preliminary Matters 2. This appeal is an outline planning application for up to 50 dwellings with all matters except for access reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Cotswold Ash Pollards, Gloucestershire Naturalist 21, 2010
    The Gloucestershire Naturalist No. 21, 2010 THE COTSWOLD ASH POLLARDS – A UNIQUE HERITAGE IN NEED OF ACTIVE CONSERVATION Keith Alexander Introduction The Cotswolds are well known for their limestone grasslands and drystone walls, but ask people about tree heritage and they will undoubtedly talk about ancient woodlands and fail to mention the old ash pollards. And yet the Cotswolds are virtually unique in Britain for their special heritage of ash pollarding. These old ash pollards are living history, a characteristic feature of the sustainable land management systems of past centuries. They also support biodiversity of European significance. Pollarding for fodder and fuel Pollarding is the practice of cutting trees above the reach of browsing animals in order to generate a sustainable resource from the branches. The length of cutting cycle varies according to the type of product desired, as does the proportion of the crown that is removed on any one occasion. If cut sympathetically the tree is able to re-grow its crown time and time again, without any loss of structural integrity. Cut badly and the tree may decline in health, become structurally unsound, and even die. But what were the products of pollarding? Old ash pollards are very widespread across the Cotswolds, especially in the north and through the river valleys. It follows that pollarding was once a common activity and clearly the products were in great demand. Unfortunately, as with so many everyday essentials, little or nothing has been written down about how the trees were managed and why. Good clues are, however, available from other parts of Britain and Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal Decision
    Appeal Decision Inquiry held on 30 November – 4 December 2020 Site visit made on 9 December 2020 by Katie McDonald MSc MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 12th January 2021 Appeal Ref: APP/G1630/W/20/3256319 Land off Ashmead Drive, Gotherington • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant outline planning permission. • The appeal is made by J J Gallagher Limited and Mr Richard Cook against the decision of Tewkesbury Borough Council. • The application Ref 19/01071/OUT, dated 25 October 2019, was refused by notice dated 16 June 2020. • The development proposed is an outline planning application with means of access from Ashmead Drive (all other matters reserved for subsequent approval), for the erection of up to 50 dwellings (Class C3); earthworks; drainage works; structural landscaping; formal and informal open space; car parking; site remediation; and all other ancillary and enabling works. Decision 1. The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for an outline planning application with means of access from Ashmead Drive (all other matters reserved for subsequent approval), for the erection of up to 50 dwellings (Class C3); earthworks; drainage works; structural landscaping; formal and informal open space; car parking; site remediation; and all other ancillary and enabling works at Land off Ashmead Drive, Gotherington in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 19/01071/OUT, dated 25 October 2019, subject to the conditions set out in the attached Schedule. Preliminary Matters 2. This appeal is an outline planning application for up to 50 dwellings with all matters except for access reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment ARNDP
    Habitats Regulations Assessment: Ashchurch Rural NDP Screening Report Ashchurch Rural Parish Council December 2020 Habitats Regulations Assessment: Ashchurch Rural NDP Quality Information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by George Wilkinson Dr James Riley Max Wade Dr James Riley Graduate Ecologist Technical Director Technical Director Technical Director Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position 0 18/12/20 Draft for group JR James Riley Technical Director review 1 13/04/21 Final for JR James Riley Technical Director consultation reviewed by the group (Andrea Pellegram) Distribution List # Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name Prepared for: Ashchurch Rural Parish Council AECOM 2 Habitats Regulations Assessment: Ashchurch Rural NDP Prepared for: Ashchurch Rural Parish Council Prepared by: AECOM Limited Midpoint, Alençon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP United Kingdom T: +44(0)1256 310200 aecom.com © 2020 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for:
    [Show full text]
  • Update 6 – 6Th November 2017
    Planning for the Protection of European (International) Sites: Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA) Evidence Gathering / Baseline Report for the Gloucestershire Minerals Local Plan Update 6 – 6th November 2017 HRA Baseline / Evidence Report for Minerals Local Plan Update Version 6 Page 1 Contents European (International) Sites in and within 15km of Gloucestershire’s boundary ........................................... 3 Section 1: Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 4 International / European Sites - An Introduction ........................................................................................ 4 Update 6 for the Minerals Local Plan (MLP) .............................................................................................. 5 Background to Evidence Gathering for HRA .............................................................................................. 5 List of Consultees ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Other Plans & Projects ............................................................................................................................... 7 HRA Reporting: Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 9 Section 2: European Sites in Gloucestershire & within 15km of its administrative boundary (as at June
    [Show full text]