DOCSLIB.ORG

The "King" Family

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The 11 These are the arms of the family of King of Thame, Oxon, and Worminghall, Bucks, eminent members of which were Robert Kynge, first Bishop of Oxford, 1506-1559; John Kynge, Bishop of London, 1559-162 1, and Henry Kinge, Bishop of Chichester, 1591-1669, all sprung from John Kynge "yeoman" of Thame, Co. Oxon, about 1442. John Kingof Thame had issue, William, Thomas and John, vintner, of Bicester, Oxon. William King (John of Thame) in turn had issue, Robert, first Bishop of Oxford, William,Thomas, and another son ([name as yet unknown, but mentioned inBishop Robert King's willas "another brother.") William King (William, John) of Devon, of Thame, Oxon and Worminghall, Bucks, married Anne, daughter of Sir John Williams of Burfield, Berks, by his wife Isabella Moore, daughter and co-heir of Richard Moore, armiger, and sister of John, Lord Williams and of Lady—Joane Williams, Prioress of Studley, Co. Oxon, and had issue: Robert, Edmond and Philip. His son Philip King (William, William, John) of Worminghall, Bucks, was page to Henry VIII,and later in the service of John, Lord Williams of Thame. He inherited the greater part of his uncle, Bishop Robert King's estate, and married about 1553, Elizabeth Conquest daughter of Edmond Conquest of Houghton Conquest, Bedfordshire, armiger, and Joane, daughter of William Britton of Ampthill, Co. Bedford, and had issue, twelve children, among whom was John, baptised 1559/60, who became Bishop of London and was the father of Henry King, baptised 17 January, 1591/2, who became Bishop of Chichester. A most complete pedigree of this eminent church family exists down to about 1700, when the male line of Bishops John and Henry King became extinct. There is strong reason to believe, however, that the Kingname was continued by collateral branches, but at yet these kindred families have not been traced. Bishop Robert King"claimed descent from the "Antient Saxon Kings of Devonshire and while there appears to be some doubt as to the antiquity of their coat-armor, yet the admission of the claim to these arms by the Heralds in162 1 at the burial of Bishop John King ofLondon establishes the family right from that date. The above arms inthe early Herald's Visitations were generally borne "Quarterly first and fourth King (as given above) and second and third Gules, within a border engrailed three lions passant, or." (See Plate III.)" The latter arms are called "Plan- tagenet or King Anciently but there is not the slightest proof that this King family was in any way related to the royal line of Plantagenet and their claim to such royal descent can- not be substantiated. Almost identical arms, with slight changes incolors and crests are borne by Kingof Bromley, Kent, of which Kingof Bellevue, Kent, is a branch (Crest: "Alion's gamb erased and erect, sable, grasping a cross pattee' fitchee', or;" King of Eltham, Kent; Kingof Hungrill, Yorkshire and Umberslade, Warwick; (Crest: "Ademi-lion rampant issuing out of a ducal coronet, or;") King of Skellands, Yorkshire; Kingof Chedshunt, Yorkshire; Kingof.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Everard Bishop of Norwich L. Landon
    186 EVERARD, BISHOP OF NORWICH. EVERARD BISHOP OF NORWICH. By L. LANDON. Owing to the identity of the name and to the fact that he had been one of the royal chaplains bishop Everard for a long time was affirmed to be Everard the son of Roger de Montgomery, Everard fitz count as he was usually called, till in 1872 a writer in Notes and, Queries adduced arguments which showed this identification to be untenable.' It is not necessary to repeat the arguments here. Since then no attempt has been made to find out who he was. Although there is nothing in the shape of definite proof there are some slight indications which suggest that he may have been Everard de CaIna, who also probably was one of Henry I's chaplains. Bartholomew Cotton' appears to be the only one of the chroniclers to record that bishop Everard at some time in his life had been archdeacon of Salis- bury. It is not easy to find information about arch- deacons at this early,date but it happens that William of Malmesbury3relates a story of a miraculous cure by S. Aldhem performed upon Everard, one of bishop Osmund's archdeacons. To be an archdeacon Everard would be at least 2.5years old and bishop Osmund died in 1099. From these two factors we get the year 1074 for the latest date of his birth, it was probably a year or two earlier. Calne being in the diocese of Salisbury there is nothing improbable in a member of a family taking its name from that place, if destined for the church, being appointed to an archdeaconry of that diocese.
    [Show full text]
  • Lancelot Andrewes' Doctrine of the Incarnation
    Lancelot Andrewes’ Doctrine of the Incarnation Respectfully Submitted to the Faculty of Nashotah House In Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Master of Theological Studies Davidson R. Morse Nashotah House May 2003 1 Acknowledgements I am deeply indebted to the whole faculty of Nashotah House Seminary for the care and encouragement I received while researching and writing this thesis. Greatest thanks, however, goes to the Rev. Dr. Charles Henery, who directed and edited the work. His encyclopedic knowledge of the theology and literature of the Anglican tradition are both formidable and inspirational. I count him not only a mentor, but also a friend. Thanks also goes to the Rev. Dr. Tom Holtzen for his guidance in my research on the Christological controversies and points of Patristic theology. Finally, I could not have written the thesis without the love and support of my wife. Not only did she manage the house and children alone, but also she graciously encouraged me to pursue and complete the thesis. I dedicate it to her. Rev. Davidson R. Morse Easter Term, 2003 2 O Lord and Father, our King and God, by whose grace the Church was enriched by the great learning and eloquent preaching of thy servant Lancelot Andrewes, but even more by his example of biblical and liturgical prayer: Conform our lives, like his, we beseech thee, to the image of Christ, that our hearts may love thee, our minds serve thee, and our lips proclaim the greatness of thy mercy; through the same Jesus Christ our Lord, who liveth and reigneth with thee and the Holy Spirit, one God, now and for ever.
    [Show full text]
  • Diocese of Chichester Opening Statement
    THE DIOCESE OF CHICHESTER OPENING STATEMENT BY COUNSEL TO THE INQUIRY OPENING REMARKS 1. Good Morning, Chair and Panel. I am Ms. Fiona Scolding, lead counsel to the Anglican investigation . Next to me sits Ms. Nikita McNeill and Ms. Lara McCaffrey , junior counsel to the Anglican investigation. Today we begin the first substantive hearing into the institutional response of the Anglican Church to allegations of child sexual abuse. The Anglican investigation is just one of thirteen so far launched by the statutory Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse established by the Home Secretary in March 2015, offering an unprecedented opportunity to examine the extent to which institutions and organisations in England and Wales have been able to respond appropriately to allegations of abuse. 2. This hearing focuses upon the response of the Diocese of Chichester to allegations made to it about various individuals – both clergy and volunteers over the past thirty years. Some of the abuse you will hear about occurred during the 1950’s and 1960’s: some of it is much more recent in origin. A series of allegations came to light from the late 1990’s onwards and then engulfed the Diocese of Chichester in the first decade of the 21 st century. The role of the hearing is to examine what happened and what that shows about the ability of the Anglican Church to protect children in the past. It is also to ask 1 about its ability to learn lessons and implement change as a result of learning from the mistakes which it has acknowledged that it has made.
    [Show full text]
  • Diocesan Records
    Diocesan Records The Diocese is the administrative area ruled over by the Bishop of Oxford. Below him is an Archdeacon for each Archdeaconry within the Diocese, the Rural Dean for each Deanery (a group of parishes within an Archdeaconry), and the vicar, rector or curate for each parish or joint benefice (linked group of parishes). The Diocesan Records are the administrative records of the Bishop, created in the running of the Diocese. Oxford Diocese was formed in 1542, when the Archdeaconry of Oxford was split away from the huge Diocese of Lincoln. This did not please the Archdeacon of Oxford, who had been accustomed to a great deal of autonomy and now had a Bishop giving him orders. However, fate played into his hands; for 44 of the first 47 years of the Diocese there was no Bishop, and successive Archdeacons took on his duties. This led to considerable confusion in the records; Bishops and Archdeacons used the same officials and clerks, these often wrote affairs pertaining to their masters in the wrong books, and sometimes it can be difficult to tell which records belong to the Bishop (the Diocesan records) and which to the Archdeacon (the Archdeaconry records). Demarcation was finally agreed in the Court of Arches after the Civil War and Interregnum. Until 1836, Oxford Diocese consisted of the single Archdeaconry; only then was the Archdeaconry of Berkshire added, transferred from the Diocese of Salisbury. An attempt was immediately made to add the Archdeaconry of Buckingham from Lincoln Diocese, but Bishop Bagot objected and the transfer finally took place under Bishop Wilberforce in 1845.
    [Show full text]
  • Images of Rule by David Howarth
    SKCM News June, 2004 THE MAGAZINE OF THE SOCIETY OF KING CHARLES THE MARTYR , AMERICAN REGION CHARLES I, ENGRAVING BY PETER OLIVER AFTER MYTENS, C. 1630 SKCM News June, 2004 Mark A. Wuonola, Ph.D., Editor ISSN 1540-045X Table of Contents American Representative‘s Column 1 § 31 January 2004 Annual Mass & Meeting at the Church of the Guardian Angels, Lantana, FL § Upcoming Annual Masses & Meetings: 29 January 2005 at the Church of the Resurrection, New York City, 11 a.m. 28 January 2006 at the Church of the Holy Communion, Charleston, SC 27 January 2007 at S. Clement‘s Church, Philadelphia, PA § Celebrations of Saint Charles‘s Day, 2004 § Charleston Celebration of Oak Apple Day § Sunday 30 January 2005 New England Commemoration at S. Stephen‘s, Providence § London and other U.K. Celebration § New York Chapter News § Father Charles-Roux in the News § Articles in this Issue Sermon Preached at the XXI Annual Mass, 31 January 2004 – Church of the Guardian Angels, Lantana, Florida – the Rt. Rev‘d Keith L. Ackerman, SSC 6 A Sermon Preached on the Feast of King Charles the Martyr 2003 – Saint Barnabas‘ Church, Omaha, Nebraska – the Most Rev‘d Louis W. Falk 8 Good Friday wretchedly transcrib’d: Bishop Henry King‘s Groane – by Richard J. Mammana, Jr. 11 Samuel Pepys: The Unequalled Self by Claire Tomalin – reviewed by Lee Hopkins 22 The Papacy: Its Historic Origin and Primitive Relations with the Eastern Churches by Abbé Guetée, D.D. – reviewed by Lee Hopkins 24 Puritan Iconoclasm during the English Civil War by Julie Spraggon – reviewed by Richard J.
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL SYNOD February 2014 QUESTIONS of Which Notice Has Been Given Under Standing Orders 105-109
    GENERAL SYNOD February 2014 QUESTIONS of which notice has been given under Standing Orders 105-109. Questions for written reply are marked with an asterisk. INDEX QUESTIONS 1-8 BATH & WELLS SEE HOUSE Housing for Bishop of Bath & Wells: timing of announcement Q1 Housing for Bishop of Bath & Wells: publication of relevant minutes Q2 Housing for Bishop of Bath & Wells: Commissioners‟ statement Q3 Housing for Bishop of Bath & Wells: suitability of current housing Q4-5 Housing for Bishop of Bath & Wells: Board consideration Q6 Housing for Bishop of Bath & Wells: financial implications Q7 Review of Church Commissioners‟ decisions Q8 QUESTIONS 9-20 HOUSE OF BISHOPS Theos report on mission of cathedrals Q9 Status of ACNA Q10 Pastoral care and support of homosexual people Q11 Sexuality: facilitated conversations Q12-14 Status of same-sex marriages Q15 Guidance re Reparative or Conversion therapies Q16 Common Awards: alternative validation route Q17 Showing of potentially blasphemous cinematic material Q18 Linkage between clergy skills and church growth Q19 Communicating Christian Faith to under 30s Q20 QUESTION 21 SECRETARY GENERAL PCCs & Chancel Repair Liability Q21 QUESTIONS 22-29 BOARD OF EDUCATION Homophobic bullying in schools: availability of materials to combat it Q22 Data on bullying in schools: role for DBEs Q23 Homophobic bullying in schools Q24 C of E Youth Council: 10th anniversary Q25 Review of RE Council Report on religious education Q26 Provision for children, young people and families Q27 Checks on appointments in Church Schools
    [Show full text]
  • The Church of the Incarnation
    THE CHURCH OF THE INCARNATION A hundred years ago, in the early 20th century, it seemed inevitable that William Temple would one day become Archbishop of Canterbury. Everybody said so. He was generally thought to have the finest mind of his generation, and (though it’s no sort of qualification) he was … the son of a previous Archbishop. But to become Archbishop of Canterbury you have, first, to become a priest, and young William Temple found it uncommon hard to find a bishop who would ordain him. When he was 25, already an Oxford don, he applied to the Bishop of Oxford, who turned him down flat – on grounds that Temple had told him (a) that he didn’t believe in the Virgin Birth, and (b) that his belief in the bodily (that is, the physical) Resurrection of Jesus was shaky at best. Now you may well be thinking that the Bishop of Oxford was right. Aren’t those two rather essential doctrines of Christianity? Well, I’m not so sure. You can certainly make a case for saying that Mary did not have to be a virgin when she gave birth to Jesus (indeed, many of my confirmands have argued that case most vigorously, though I don’t personally subscribe to it). And as to the Resurrection, Temple certainly believed in the Resurrection. What he wasn’t so sure about was whether it had been a physical bodily resurrection or just a spiritual resurrection – the sort of thing you and I hope for after our deaths. At all events, William Temple (and we’ll come back to him later, because he did, indeed, become Archbishop of Canterbury) … young William Temple believed these were arguable matters for Christians – interesting and highly debatable, but paling into insignificance beside the supreme doctrine of Christianity, which is the Incarnation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oxford Movement and the Early High Church Spirituality in Sweden
    International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church ISSN: 1474-225X (Print) 1747-0234 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rjsc20 The Oxford Movement and the early High Church spirituality in Sweden Oloph Bexell To cite this article: Oloph Bexell (2018) The Oxford Movement and the early High Church spirituality in Sweden, International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church, 18:2-3, 277-292, DOI: 10.1080/1474225X.2018.1547538 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/1474225X.2018.1547538 © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 22 Jan 2019. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 61 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rjsc20 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR THE STUDY OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH 2018, VOL. 18, NOS. 2–3, 277–292 https://doi.org/10.1080/1474225X.2018.1547538 The Oxford Movement and the early High Church spirituality in Sweden Oloph Bexell Church History, University of Uppsala, Sweden ABSTRACT KEYWORDS In the early twentieth century, Swedish priests went to England The Oxford Movement; for pastoral studies. There they met the influential leaders of the Swedish High Church; Oxford Movement and were inspired by them. They discovered a Catholicity; Charles Gore; Catholic, but not Roman Catholic, worship and High Church E.B. Pusey; John Henry Newman; John Keble; spirituality. They read Charles Gore, E.B. Pusey and others. Their German Neo-Lutheranism; great discovery was the eucharistic worship and its sacramentally Scottish Free Churches; orientated liturgy and the world-wide Catholic Church, a catho- Gunnar Rosendal; licity they recognised in the Church of Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • Bell's Cathedrals: Chichester (1901) by Hubert C
    Bell's Cathedrals: Chichester (1901) by Hubert C. Corlette Bell's Cathedrals: Chichester (1901) by Hubert C. Corlette Produced by Jonathan Ingram, Victoria Woosley and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team. [Illustration: CHICHESTER CATHEDRAL FROM THE SOUTH.] THE CATHEDRAL CHURCH OF CHICHESTER A SHORT HISTORY & DESCRIPTION OF ITS FABRIC WITH AN ACCOUNT OF THE DIOCESE AND SEE HUBERT C. CORLETTE A.R.I.B.A. WITH XLV ILLUSTRATIONS LONDON GEORGE BELL & SONS 1901 page 1 / 148 PREFACE. All the facts of the following history were supplied to me by many authorities. To a number of these, references are given in the text. But I wish to acknowledge how much I owe to the very careful and original research provided by Professor Willis, in his "Architectural History of the Cathedral"; by Precentor Walcott, in his "Early Statutes" of Chichester; and Dean Stephen, in his "Diocesan History." The footnotes, which refer to the latter work, indicate the pages in the smaller edition. But the volume could never have been completed without the great help given to me on many occassions by Prebendary Bennett. His deep and intimate knowledge of the cathedral structure and its history was always at my disposal. It is to him, as well as to Dr. Codrington and Mr. Gordon P.G. Hills, I am still further indebted for much help in correcting the proofs and for many valuable suggestions. H.C.C. C O N T E N T S. CHAP. PAGE I. HISTORY OF THE CATHEDRAL............... 3 page 2 / 148 II. THE EXTERIOR.......................... 51 III. THE INTERIOR.......................... 81 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • 1066-1272 Eastern Sussex Under the Norman and Angevin Kings of England
    1066-1272 Eastern Sussex under the Norman and Angevin kings of England From the Battle of Hastings through the accession of William II until the death of Henry II Introduction In this paper the relationships of the post-Conquest kings of England to Battle and eastern Sussex between 1087 and 1272 are explored. The area ‘eastern Sussex’ corresponds to that described as ‘1066 Country’ in modern tourism parlance and covers the area west to east from Pevensey to Kent and south to north from the English Channel coast to Kent. Clearly the general histories of the monarchs and associated events must be severely truncated in such local studies. Hopefully, to maintain relevance, just enough information is given to link the key points of the local histories to the kings, and events surrounding the kings. Also in studies which have focal local interest there can inevitably be large time gaps between events, and some local events of really momentous concern can only be described from very little information. Other smaller events can be overwhelmed by detail, particularly later in the sequence, when more detailed records become available and ‘editing down’ is required to keep some basic perspective. The work is drawn from wide sources and as much as possible the text has been cross referenced between different works. A list of sources is given at the end of the sequence. Throughout the texts ‘Winchelsea’ refers to ‘Old Winchelsea’ which may have only been a small fishing village in 1066, but by the 1200s had become a sizable and important, if somewhat independently minded and anarchic town, which stood on a large shingle bank east of the present Winchelsea, possibly just south of where Camber castle still stands today.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Translation of the Life of Saint Thomas, the Archbishop of Canterbury by William, a Monk of Canterbury
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1946 An Annotated Translation of the Life of Saint Thomas, the Archbishop of Canterbury By William, a Monk of Canterbury Mary Annette Bocke Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the Classical Literature and Philology Commons Recommended Citation Bocke, Mary Annette, "An Annotated Translation of the Life of Saint Thomas, the Archbishop of Canterbury By William, a Monk of Canterbury" (1946). Master's Theses. 57. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/57 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1946 Mary Annette Bocke AN ANNOTATED TRANSLATIOli OF THE LIFE OF SAINT THOMAS, mE ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY BY WILLIAM, A MONK OF CANTERBURY BY SISTER MARY ANNETTE BOCKE, O. P. A 1HESIS SUBMITTED IN PJ.RTUL FULFILLMEJ.ITT OF mE REQUIREMDTTS FOR mE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS m LOYOLA UNIVERSITY FEBRUARY 194:6 Vita Sister Mary Annette Boeke, o. P., was born in Quincy, Illinois, March 25, 1915. She was graduated from Notre Dame Academy, Quincy, Illinois, June, 1933, and attended Quincy College from 1933 to 1934. The Bachelor of Arts degree with a major in Latin was conferred by Loyola University, June, 1939. From 1940 to 1946 the wri tar has been engaged in teaching Latin and French at Routt College High School, Jacksonville, Illinois.
    [Show full text]
  • The Church of England in the First World War. Durham: Duke University Press, 1974
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 12-2005 The hC urch of England in the First World War. Kevin Christopher Fielden East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Fielden, Kevin Christopher, "The hC urch of England in the First World War." (2005). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1080. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1080 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Church of England in the First World War _______________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History _______________ by Kevin Fielden December 2005 _______________ Stephen Fritz, Chair William Douglas Burgess Colin Baxter Keywords: Church of England, World War, 1914-1918, First World War, Church History, Anglican Church ABSTRACT The Church of England in the First World War by Kevin Fielden The Church of England was at a crossroads in 1914 as the First World War began. The war was seen as an opportunity to revitalize it and return it to its role of prominence in society. In comparison to other areas of study, the role of the Church of England during this time period is inadequately examined.
    [Show full text]