DOCSLIB.ORG

Copyrighted Material

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Copyrighted Material BINDEX 03/09/2012 18:54:54 Page 345 Index A SAS 111, 267 SAS 112, 267–268 Accountants, 92, 223–226 SAS 113, 268 Accredited investors, 16, 339 SAS 114, 269 Acquisition, 339 SAS 115, 270 Acquisition Premium, 339 American Jobs and Closing Tax Advisors, selection of, 91–92 Loopholes Act of 2010, 54 Akerlof, George, 48 American Research and American Accounting Association Development Corporation (AAA), 339 (ARD), 31 American Institute of Certified American waterfall model, 10 Public Accountants (AICPA), Angel investing, 20–21 339 Antitakeover provisions, 93 accounting and review standards, Antitrust legislation, federal 270–271 235–238 SSARS 10, 271 Celler-Kefauver Antimerger Act SSARS 12, 271 (1950), 237 auditing standards Clayton Antitrust Act (1914), SAS 1, 243 236 SAS 1 amendments, 257 Federal Trade Commission Act SAS 82, 249 (1914), 236–237 SAS 82 replacements, Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust 257–264 Improvement Act (1976), SAS 85 amendments, 257 140, 237–238 SAS 95, 249 Robinson-Patman Act (1936), SAS 99, 256–257 237 SAS 104,COPYRIGHTED 264 Sherman MATERIAL Antitrust Act (1890), SAS 105, 265 236 SAS 106, 265 Apollo Global Management, 53, 55 SAS 107, 265–266 Assessments, manufacturing, SAS 108, 266 319–333 SAS 109, 266 corporate vision and mission, SAS 110, 267 323–324 345 BINDEX 03/09/2012 18:54:54 Page 346 346 INDEX Assessments, manufacturing Breakup fee, 129–130, 339 (Continued) Bridge financing, 339 customer satisfaction and Broker-dealer, 339 perceived quality, 322–323 Bulge bracket bank, 74 employee satisfaction, 320–322 Business development companies equipment and facility (BDCs), 54 maintenance, 324–326 Business intelligence, 277–292, 339 inventory management and application to private equity, product flow, 327–328 291–292 operational data and cost of sales, exit strategy, 292 328 investment decision, 291 visual management, 326 portfolio companies, strategic Audit, scaling, 206 management of, 291 Auditing Standards. See also Public competitive, 281–282 Company Accounting contemporary, 278–281 Oversight board (PCAOB) employees, 280–281 standards legal proceedings, 279–280 AU §322, 207 news archives, 279 No. 5, 202–204, 214–215, 216 patent awards and applications, 280 B public records searches, 278–279 social networking, 280 Baldwin, Greg, 221 cost of capital and option to Bank Secrecy Act, 219–220 invest, 285–287 Bankruptcy code, 339 developing relationships and Baskets and caps, 131 navigating crises, 290–291 Bendix, 112–113 developing unique intelligence, Bertrand’s two-firm model, 288 287–288 Best effort, 74 normalizing performance, Bidder confidentiality agreement 282–285 (BCA), 117 quality, economic view of, BlackRock Inc., 55 289–290 Blackstone Group, 4, 6, 11, 15, 19, Buyout funds, 13 51–54, 62, 65, 170, 248 returns by fund size, 43–45 Blank check company, 339 Buyouts, 21, 164–166 Blue sky laws, 339 liabilities under, 105 C Bobrow, Richard S., 279–280 Book building, 73 California Public Employees’ Boutique investment bank, 74 Retirement System Breaking issue, 77 (CalPERS), 6 Breakpoints, 13 Campeau, Robert, 32 BINDEX 03/09/2012 18:54:54 Page 347 Index 347 Capital Asset Pricing Model Control Objectives for Information (CAPM), 339 and Related Technology Capital, drawing down, 8 (COBIT), 186–187, 339 Capital calls, 8, 339 Cooling off period, 340 Carried interest, 10, 14–15, 339 Copyrights, 147–148 current tax framework for, Corporate housekeeping matters, 93 63–64 Covenants, 27–28 Celler-Kefauver Antimerger Act Cressey, Donald R., 223 (1950), 237 Crisis management, corporate Chief executive officer (CEO), 15, governance and, 168–171 101, 171–172, 298 Cullman, Lewis, 31 certifications, 244, 247 Chief financial officer (CFO), 15, D 101, 228 Certifications, 244, 247 Dagres v. Commissioner, 63 Chief operating officer (COO), 15 Data room, 118 Chief legal officer (CLO), 15 Definitive merger agreement Chief recruitment officer, 15 (DMA), 119, 340 Christensen’s framework, 300–301 Deming cycle, 314–315 Clawback provision, 10 Denominator effect, 38 Clayton Antitrust Act (1914), 236, Directors and officers questionnaire, 339 99 Cleantech investments, 41 Disclosure of acquisitions, 138 Club deal, 9–10 Discounted cash flow analysis, 126 Committee of Sponsoring Disinvestment period, 340 Organizations of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Treadway Commission and Consumer Protection (COSO), 178–179, 340 Act, 6–7, 16–17, 58, 61–62, Competitive intelligence, 340 71, 105–109, 182, 187, Compound annual growth rate 201–202, 235, 240, 243, 340 (CAGR), 283 Doriot, General Georges, 31 Comparable public companies, Dot-com companies, 35–37 126 Dow Jones’ Private Equity Analyst, Comparable transactions, 126 55, 62 Confidential information Draper Fisher Jurvetson, 41 memorandum (CIM), Due diligence 116–117 assessments, manufacturing, Confidentiality, 100 319–333 Consumer protection legislation, corporate vision and mission, federal, 238–239 323–324 Control acquisitions, 340 customer satisfaction and Control environment, 340 perceived quality, 322–323 BINDEX 03/09/2012 18:54:54 Page 348 348 INDEX Due diligence (Continued) Employees, as source of employee satisfaction, information, 280–281 320–322 Energy Policy Act (EPACT), 241 equipment and facility Enterprise risk management (ERM), maintenance, 324–326 183–184, 341 inventory management and Equity financing, 340 product flow, 327–328 European waterfall model, 10 operational data and cost of Evergreen funds, 7 sales, 328 Exit, 341. See also Harvest visual management, 326 intellectual property, 149–152 F assessing risk of proposed acquisition, 151–152 Fairness opinion, 126 evaluating investment value, Federal Energy Regulatory 149–151 Commission (FERC), 241 reverse, 157–158 Federal Trade Commission (FTC), IPO, 100 235–239, 341 sale transaction, 125 federal antitrust legislation, acquirer, 130 235–238 seller, 131 Celler-Kefauver Antimerger Duncan framework, 299–300 Act (1950), 237 Dunlap, “Chainsaw Al,” 165 Clayton Antitrust Act (1914), 236 E Federal Trade Commission Act (1914), 236–237 Earnouts, 129, 340 Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Earnings before interest and tax Improvement Act (1976), (EBIT), 117, 317 140, 237–238 Earnings before interest, tax, Robinson-Patman Act (1936), depreciation, and 237 amortization (EBITDA), 21, Sherman Antitrust Act (1890), 117, 317 236 Earnings per share (EPS), 73, federal consumer protection 126–127 legislation, 238–239 Electronic Data Gathering and Federal Trade Commission Act Retrieval System (EDGAR), (1914), 236–237 241 Fiduciary-out clause, 119 Employee Retirement Income Financial Executive International Security Act of 1974 (FEI), 341 (ERISA), 17–18, 31, 79, 163, Financial Crimes Enforcement 341 Network (FinCEN), Prudent Man Rule, 18, 31, 342 220–221, 341 BINDEX 03/09/2012 18:54:55 Page 349 Index 349 Financial statement fraud, 219–234 process, 22–25 categories of fraud, 221–222 recent trends in, 25–26, 54–60 definition of fraud, 222–223 and due diligence procedures, G 231–233 background investigation of Gatekeepers, 8, 22 key employees, 231–232 Gates, Bill, 71–72 file metadata, checking, General Motors (GM), 305–306 232–233 General Motors Acceptance journal transactions, testing of, Corporation (GMAC), 232 229–230 financial statement attestation, General partner 225–227 incentives, 12–15 audit, 226–227 investment restrictions, 26–28 compilation, 226 Gladwell, Malcolm, 282 review, 226 “Green Shoe,” 77 tax return preparation, 225–226 Guiltless Gourmet, 281–282 money laundering, 219–221 Gun jumping, 76 recommendations, 227–231 required elements of fraud, H 223–225 Firm commitment, 74 Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Follow-on fund, 10–11 Improvement Act of 1976, Force majeure, 119 140, 237–238 Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Harvard Management Company, (1977), 243–244 46–47 Forensic valuation, 292 Harvest, 341 Form SB-2, 78–79 Hierarchy of needs, 341 Forward merger, 341 Historical trends, overview of, 29–49 Fraud private equity categories of, 221–222 brief history of, 29–33 in connection with offer and sale at the turn of the century, of a security, 104–105 33–39 definition of, 222, 341 secondary funds, 45–48 financial statement, 219–234 venture capital required elements of, 223–225 and buyout returns by fund risk, 206 size, 43–45 Free writing prospectus, 76 investment and returns by fund Frito-Lay, 281–282 stage, 39–43 Fund of funds (FoF), 4, 18 Holt-Winters method of prediction, Fundraising 285 levels, 1980–2010, 3 Horizontal takeovers, 111, 341 BINDEX 03/09/2012 18:54:55 Page 350 350 INDEX I principal parties, 94, 96, 97 registration process, 100–102 Icahn, Carl, 32, 165 selling security holder Images of Organization (Morgan), documents, 98–99 293 Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Industry Little Hawk, 56–57 Dodd-Frank Act, 105–109 Information Systems Audit and filing obligations, 107 Control Association reverse mergers, 107–109 (ISACA), 272–273, 341 Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA), Initial public offerings (IPOs) 178, 192 advance planning opportunities, standards, 272 91–94 Institutional Limited Partners accountants, 92 Association (ILPA), 10 advisors, selection of, 91–92 Institution of Management antitakeover provisions, 93 Accountants (IMA), 341 corporate housekeeping Institutional-quality investments, 19 matters, 93 Intellectual property, 143–159 management, 94 creating value during securities counsel, 92 management, 152–156 underwriters, 93 brand development efforts, advantages, potential, 87–89 boosting, 154–155 disadvantages, potential, 89–91 knowledge-based resources of harvesting investments through, the workforce, preserving, 69–83 155–156 basics, 69–72 patent rights, leveraging and historical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Private Equity Program (PE Program)
    Attachment 3, Page 1 of 28 California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) Private Equity Program (PE Program) Quarterly Report Executive Summary (As of December 31, 2012) Presentation Date: February 19, 2013 This report is solely for the use of CalPERS personnel. No part of it may be circulated, quoted or reproduced for distribution outside CalPERS without prior written approval from Pension Consulting Alliance, Inc. Nothing herein is intended to serve as investment advice, a recommendation of any particular investment or type of investment, a suggestion of the merits of purchasing or selling securities, or an invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity. Pension Consulting Alliance, Inc. Attachment 3, Page 2 of 28 Quarterly Report December 31, 2012 Table of Contents Section Tab Executive Summary 1 CalPERS’ Private Equity Program Performance Review 2 Private Equity Team Organizational Update 3 Private Equity Market Environment Overview 4 Appendices PE Program Relationships by Total Exposure Attachment 3, Page 3 of 28 Quarterly Report December 31, 2012 1.0 Introduction Private equity is a long-term asset class with performance results influenced by various factors. This report concentrates on several key exposures that contribute to performance results, including sector, geography, structure and vintage year. In addition, the broad industry trends highlighted herein may affect future performance results. 1.2 Highlights of Program Activity The PE Program outperformed the Policy Benchmark over the latest three-year period and posted an annual return above long-term return expectations as of December 31, 2012. However over the latest one, five, and ten-year periods, the PE Program underperformed the Policy Benchmark.
    [Show full text]
  • Venture Capital Postively Disrupts
    PRIVATE CLIENT SERIES VENTURE CAPITAL POSITIVELY DISRUPTS INTERGENERATIONAL INVESTING Families of wealth face three key questions about intergenerational wealth planning: how best to invest to sustain future generations; how best to engage the next genera- tion; and how best to ensure family unity endures. Often each question is addressed independently. We find that a conversation across generations about the impact of a meaningful venture capital (VC) allocation can help address all three questions in an integrated manner. Venture capital offers the potential for attractive returns relative to public equity markets, often in a tax-advantaged manner, thus allowing the portfolio to generate more wealth to support current and future generations. Bringing the next generation into the conversation about the changing investing landscape also offers the oppor- tunity for both generations to learn about the unique aspects of VC investing and the critical role it can play in the family’s portfolio. Furthermore, the vast potential that exists for making lasting impact through VC, both in terms of financial returns and contributions to society, may provide unifying experiences across generations. For many families, venture investing may provide a connection to the original roots of entrepreneurship that created the family wealth. As VC spurs continued innovation and industry disruption, families should consider the potential positive disruption the inclusion of VC can bring to their intergenerational investment plans. This paper provides some context for considering such an inclusion by discussing the investment potential and implications for interested investors. Venture, the source of future returns Whether it be cloud computing, machine learning, or artificial intelligence, emerging technologies are transforming many industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item 5B
    Item 5b - Attachment 3, Page 1 of 45 SEMI - ANNUAL PERFORMANCE R EPORT California Public Employees’ Retirement System Private Equity Program Semi-Annual Report – June 30, 2017 MEKETA INVESTMENT GROUP B OSTON C HICAGO M IAMI P ORTLAND S AN D IEGO L ONDON M ASSACHUSETTS I LLINOIS F LORIDA O REGON C ALIFORNIA U N I T E D K INGDOM www.meketagroup.com Item 5b - Attachment 3, Page 2 of 45 California Public Employees’ Retirement System Private Equity Program Table of Contents 1. Introduction and Executive Summary 2. Private Equity Industry Review 3. Portfolio Overview 4. Program Performance 5. Program Activity 6. Appendix Vintage Year Statistics Glossary Prepared by Meketa Investment Group Page 2 of 45 Item 5b - Attachment 3, Page 3 of 45 California Public Employees’ Retirement System Private Equity Program Introduction Overview This report provides a review of CalPERS Private Equity Program as of June 30, 2017, and includes a review and outlook for the Private Equity industry. CalPERS began investing in the private equity asset class in 1990. CalPERS currently has an 8% interim target allocation to the private equity asset class. As of June 30, 2017, CalPERS had 298 investments in the Active Portfolio, and 319 investments in the Exited Portfolio1. The total value of the portfolio was $25.9 billion2, with total exposure (net asset value plus unfunded commitments) of $40.2 billion3. Executive Summary Portfolio The portfolio is diversified by strategy, with Buyouts representing the largest exposure at 66% of total Private Equity. Mega and Large buyout funds represent approximately 57% of CalPERS’ Buyouts exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Equity
    Private Equity: Accomplishments and Challenges by Greg Brown, University of North Carolina; Bob Harris, University of Virginia; Steve Kaplan, University of Chicago; Tim Jenkinson, University of Oxford; and David Robinson, Duke University ince the 1980s, there has been an ongoing discussion about the role of private S equity (PE) in the economy. As investors have flocked to the asset class, voices critical of the negative social impact of PE have grown louder. In this article, we examine what is known from the academic literature about the effects of private equity on corporate productivity, the returns for investors, and possible broader economic and social consequences. We catalogue what we believe to be strong evidence of the overall benefits of PE-backed companies and investors in private equity, as well as spillovers in the form of broader gains in economic productivity. We also describe apparent instances of PE shortcomings in some specific industries where negative social impacts can be measured in some way. In our view, private equity is “capitalism in high gear” and, Back to the 1980s as such, subject to most of the same debates concerning Our account of private equity begins at the end of the 1980s, economic and social conditions in a free enterprise system. when hostile takeovers and other often highly leveraged While some argue that the 2020 version of capitalism transactions, including a relative newcomer called the lever- (as practiced in the U.S. and much of the world) is inef- aged buyout (or LBO), came under fierce attack in both the fective in coping with current social needs, much of the press and conventional business circles.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Equity Holdings Disclosure 06-30-2019
    The Regents of the University of California Private Equity Investments as of June 30, 2019 (1) Capital Paid-in Capital Current Market Capital Distributed Total Value Total Value Description Vintage Year (2) Net IRR (3) Committed (A) Value (B) (C) (B+C) Multiple (B+C)/A) Brentwood Associates Private Equity II 1979 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 4,253,768 4,253,768 1.42 5.5% Interwest Partners I 1979 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 6,681,033 6,681,033 2.23 18.6% Alta Co Partners 1980 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 6,655,008 6,655,008 2.22 13.6% Golder, Thoma, Cressey & Rauner Fund 1980 5,000,000 5,000,000 - 59,348,988 59,348,988 11.87 30.5% KPCB Private Equity (Legacy Funds) (4) Multiple 142,535,631 143,035,469 3,955,643 1,138,738,611 1,142,694,253 7.99 39.4% WCAS Capital Partners II 1980 4,000,000 4,000,000 - 8,669,738 8,669,738 2.17 14.0% Brentwood Associates Private Equity III 1981 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 2,943,142 2,943,142 0.98 -0.2% Mayfield IV 1981 5,000,000 5,000,000 - 13,157,658 13,157,658 2.63 26.0% Sequoia Private Equity (Legacy Funds) (4) Multiple 293,200,000 352,355,566 167,545,013 1,031,217,733 1,198,762,746 3.40 30.8% Alta II 1982 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 5,299,578 5,299,578 1.77 7.0% Interwest Partners II 1982 4,008,769 4,008,769 - 6,972,484 6,972,484 1.74 8.4% T V I Fund II 1982 4,000,000 4,000,000 - 6,744,334 6,744,334 1.69 9.3% Brentwood Associates Private Equity IV 1983 5,000,000 5,000,000 - 10,863,119 10,863,119 2.17 10.9% WCAS Capital Partners III 1983 5,000,000 5,000,000 - 9,066,954 9,066,954 1.81 8.5% Golder, Thoma, Cressey & Rauner Fund II 1984
    [Show full text]
  • Aggregate Portfolio Private Equity Exposure Summary
    AGENDA BOARD OF FIRE AND POLICE PENSION COMMISSIONERS August 3, 2017 8:30 a.m. Sam Diannitto Boardroom Los Angeles Fire and Police Pensions Building 701 East 3rd Street, Suite 400 Los Angeles, CA 90013 Commissioner Diannitto will participate telephonically from 4612 El Reposo Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90065 An opportunity for the public to address the Board or Committee about any item on today’s agenda for which there has been no previous opportunity for public comment will be provided before or during consideration of the item. Members of the public who wish to speak on any item on today’s agenda are requested to complete a speaker card for each item they wish to address, and present the completed card(s) to the commission executive assistant. Speaker cards are available at the commission executive assistant’s desk. In compliance with Government Code Section 54957.5, non-exempt writings that are distributed to a majority or all of the Board or applicable Committee of the Board in advance of their meetings may be viewed at the office of the Los Angeles Fire and Police Pension System (LAFPP), located at 701 East 3rd Street, 2nd Floor, Los Angeles, California 90013, or by clicking on LAFPP’s website at www.lafpp.com, or at the scheduled meeting. Non-exempt writings that are distributed to the Board or Committee at a scheduled meeting may be viewed at that meeting. In addition, if you would like a copy of any record related to an item on the agenda, please contact the commission executive assistant, at (213) 279-3038 or by e-mail at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Ready Coller Institute of Venture, • Sources of IP – We Will Awash with Cash
    ISSUE 1a — 2014 WELCOME ISSUE $45 THE VENTURE ECOSYSTEM FRAMEWORK: MESSY, FAST, AND GLOBAL 企业生态系统框架： 凌 乱 、快 速 、全 球 化 Trends Shaping the Venture Ecosystem in 2014 / 06 IS THE VC MODEL ‘BROKEN’? 风险投资模式“破损”了吗？ VC Success Definition and Understanding Who Wins and Who Loses / 20 MEASURING SCIENCE PARKS' PERFORMANCE 度量科技园区的业绩 TusPark, Imperial West, and 15 other Parks / 28 time to Impact THE PUBLIC VENTURE POLICY MENU A toolbox of PrOVEN 企业公共政策清单 Policies Public Authorities government policies /36 Can Take / 36 EDITORIAL BOARD Jeremy Coller Eli Talmor Contents Moshe Zviran Yesha Sivan (Editor-in-Chief) Robyn Klingler-Vidra (Associate Editor) COLLER INSTITUTE OF VENTURE 36 Yù (Zöe) Zhái Itai Asaf Odeya Pergament 04 Ann Iveson COPYRIGHT © Coller Institute of Venture at Tel Aviv University 2014 www.collerinstituteofventure.org 05 06 20 28 WHAT IS THE COLLER INSTITUTE MEASURING SCIENCE PARKS' OF VENTURE?—04 PERFORMANCE—28 TusPark, Imperial West, RESEARCH IS AT THE CORE and 15 other Parks OF THE CIV’S VISION—05 How they are designed and managed to T HE VENTURE ECOSYSTEM achieve optimal performance FRAMEWORK: MESSY, FAST, AND GLOBAL—06 Six Trends Shaping the THE PUBLIC VENTURE Venture Ecosystem in 2014 POLICY MENU—36 44 Policies Public Authorities This article presents a generative Can Take framework for the venture ecosystem and highlights the current trends Public policymakers’ tools for fostering affecting the ecosystem local venture ecosystems I S THE VC MODEL ‘BROKEN’?—20 NEWS IN BRIEF—44 VC Success Definition and The News section offers a selection
    [Show full text]
  • Private Equityspotlight
    Spotlight Private Equity www.preqin.com May 2010 / Volume 6 - Issue 5 Welcome to the latest edition of Private Equity Spotlight, the monthly newsletter from Preqin providing insights into private equity performance, investors and fundraising. Private Equity Spotlight combines information from our online products Performance Analyst, Investor Intelligence, Fund Manager Profi les, Funds in Market, Secondary Market Monitor and Deals Analyst. Secondaries in 2010 Feature Spotlight Fundraising Spotlight page 3 page 13 Secondaries in 2010 This month’s Fundraising Spotlight looks at buyout, venture and cleantech fundraising. There was expectation across the industry that there would be heightened activity on the secondary market in 2009. This month’s Feature Article examines why this never materialized Secondaries Spotlight page 16 and looks at what 2010 has in store for the secondary market. We look at statistics from Preqin’s industry-leading product, Secondary Market Monitor, and uncover the latest secondaries news. Performance Spotlight page 6 Secondaries Funds of Funds Investor Spotlight page 17 This month’s Performance Spotlight looks at private equity secondaries funds. This month’s Investor Spotlight examines investors’ attitudes towards the secondary market. Fund Manager Spotlight page 8 Conferences Spotlight page 19 This month’s Fund Manager Spotlight reveals which US states This month’s Conferences Spotlight includes details of upcoming have the most private equity fi rms and capital. events in the private equity world. Deals Spotlight Investor News page 10 page 21 This month’s Deals Spotlight looks at the latest buyout deals and Preqin’s latest product - Deals Analyst. All the latest news on private equity investors including • Abu Dhabi Investment Authority What would you like to see in Private Equity Spotlight? Email us at: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The 2010 Preqin Private Equity Fund of Funds Review
    The 2010 Preqin Private Equity Fund of Funds Review The 2010 Preqin Private Equity Fund of Funds Review www.preqin.com/PEFOF Dear Spotlight Reader, This month’s edition of Spotlight includes extensive analysis on the private equity fund of funds market. We have seen funds of funds accounting for a higher percentage of investors in closed funds in comparison with previous years, and are also seeing an increasing number of investors turning to funds of funds in 2009 compared with 2008. All analysis is taken from our newly released publication, The 2010 Preqin Private Equity Fund of Funds Review. Also in this month’s edition, we examine the use of investment consultants by institutional investors, reveal the latest changes in the returns and NAV of private equity funds, and uncover all the latest investor news. We hope you enjoy this month’s edition, and as ever we welcome any feedback, questions and suggestions for any research that you would like to see in Spotlight in the future. Kindest Regards, Tim Friedman Head of Communications Preqin Private Equity Spotlight www.preqin.com December 2009 / Volume 5 - Issue 12 Welcome to the latest edition of Private Equity Spotlight, the monthly newsletter from Preqin providing insights into private equity performance, investors and fundraising. Private Equity Spotlight combines information from our online products Performance Analyst, Investor Intelligence, Fund Manager Profi les & Funds in Market. PE Fund of Funds Special Feature Article Secondaries Spotlight page 3 page 16 The Growing Importance of Funds of Funds We look at statistics from Preqin’s industry-leading product, Secondaries Market Monitor, and uncover the latest secondaries With other institutional backers of private equity funds having news.
    [Show full text]
  • Tenex Capital Partners II, LP
    Agenda Item 7a CHRIS CHRISTIE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Governor DIVISION OF INVESTMENT KIM GUADAGNO P.O. BOX 290 FORD M. SCUDDER Lt. Governor TRENTON, NJ 08625-0290 Acting State Treasurer January 22, 2016 MEMORANDUM TO: The State Investment Council FROM: Christopher McDonough Director SUBJECT: Proposed Investment in Tenex Capital Partners II, L.P. The New Jersey Division of Investment (“Division”) is proposing an investment of up to $100 million in Tenex Capital Partners II, L.P. This memorandum is presented to the State Investment Council (the “Council”) pursuant to N.J.A.C. 17:16-69.9. Tenex Capital Management (“Tenex” or the “Firm”) is establishing Tenex Capital Partners II, L.P. to continue their successful strategy of leveraging the Firm’s unique combination of experience in operational restructurings, capital markets, and investment management to make control investments of industry laggards and return them to market competitive. The Division is recommending this investment based on the following factors: Differentiated Investment Style: Tenex targets companies with operational distress, typically looking to buy “B” and “C” companies from motivated sellers at attractive valuations, often through busted auctions where there are few competing buyers due to the operational distress. Meanwhile, Tenex has shown strong purchase price discipline, with an average entry Enterprise Value/ Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”) multiple of 6.5x. Impressive Long Term Track Record: Prior to five of the Managing Directors forming Tenex in 2010, over a 10-year period, the Tenex team had participated in the investment of over $900 million in nine companies, which generated cash proceeds of $2.6 billion to yield a gross Internal Rate of Return (“IRR”) of 35.8% and a 2.8x Multiple on Invested Capital (“MOIC”).
    [Show full text]
  • US Private Equity Index® and Selected Benchmark Statistics March 31, 2018 Data As of US Private Equity Index and Selected Benchmark Statistics March 31, 2018
    US Private Equity Index® and Selected Benchmark Statistics March 31, 2018 Data as of US Private Equity Index and Selected Benchmark Statistics March 31, 2018 Note on Company Analysis Update Beginning in 2016, we have included company IRRs both by CA industry classifications and Global Industry Classification Standard (“GICS®”). The Global Industry Classification Standard (“GICS®”) was developed by and is the exclusive property and a service mark of MSCI, Inc. (“MSCI”) and S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC (“S&P”) and is licensed for use by Cambridge Associates. Pages with company IRRs by Global Industry Classification Standard (“GICS®”) will be noted as such. Please note that no changes to the gross IRR calculations have been made. | 2 Data as of US Private Equity Index and Selected Benchmark Statistics March 31, 2018 Disclaimer Our goal is to provide you with the most accurate and relevant performance information possible; as a result, Cambridge Associates’ research organization continually monitors the constantly evolving private investments space and its fund managers. When we discern material changes in the structure of an asset class and/or a fund’s investment strategy, it is in the interest of all users of our benchmark statistics that we implement the appropriate classification realignments. In addition, Cambridge Associates is always working to grow our private investments performance database and ensure that our benchmarks are as representative as possible of investors’ institutional-quality opportunity set. As a result we continually add funds to the database (both newly-raised funds and backfill funds) and occasionally we must remove funds that cease reporting.
    [Show full text]
  • Prime Property Fund, LLC Supplemental Disclosure: Oct 2020 J.F
    MWRA EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT BOARD MEETING ................................................................. AGENDA .................................................................. Thursday, November 19, 2020 10:00 a.m. MWRA, 2 Griffin Way Via Remote Participation …………………………………………………………………………………………………………... Item 1 10:00 a.m. Meeting called to order ............................................................ OLD BUSINESS ............................................................ Item 2 Standing Committee Reports i. By-Laws Committee: Member Kevin McKenna ii. Human Resources Committee: Member Thomas J. Durkin, Member Frank Zecha iii. Special Committee, Stipend: Chair James M. Fleming, Member Kevin McKenna iv. Job Review Committee: Member James M. Fleming; Member Thomas J. Durkin Item 3 Approval of one month creditable service for Michael McKenna for the month of December 2019 and one month of creditable for the month of January 2020 pursuant to G.L. c. 32, § 4(1)(c), which allows the Board to grant up to one month creditable service without contribution – VOTE .................................................................. NEW BUSINESS .................................................................. Item 4 Approval of October 29, 2020 Minutes – VOTE Item 5 Approval of Warrants – VOTE a) Warrant 11-2020 b) Warrant 11-2020A – Payroll Item 6 Approval of Monthly Transfers 11-2020 – VOTE Item 7 Acknowledgement of retirement applications under G.L. c 32 §5 – VOTE a) Robert P. Cecchini DOR 10/24/2020 b) Stephen Greenwood DOR 11/1/2020
    [Show full text]