The Road to Damascus June

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Road to Damascus June ttt T. E Lawrence in June 1918 The road to By June, the German ‘Spring Off ensive’ on the Western 1918: the road Front was faltering, but not before Allenby’s forces Damascus had been stripped of two complete battle-hardened Marking the extraordinary divisions: nine yeomanry regiments and 23 infantry trials, triumphs and to Damascus battalions, to reinforce that Front. But with the US tribulations of T. E. Lawrence Army now at last arriving in France in signifi cant in the last year of the First numbers, the Allies began to dream of a victorious World War, month by month, June: diplomatic clarifi cation spring/summer campaign in 1919, yes 1919! in the British army alongside the Arabs fi ghting in the Allenby and the main British forces on the coastal front deserts of the Middle East; or confusion? between Jaff a and Jericho remained stalled, training when the legend of Lawrence up troops newly-arrived from Mesopotamia and India of Arabia was born. to replace those sent to France. The Arab forces had The British Empire, with support As temperatures in Arabia soar, moved northwards at the end of May along the line of from many Arabs, was fi ghting Allenby trains up a new (mostly the Hejaz railway capturing Hesa and Faraifra. They against the Turkish Ottoman were managing to keep hold, but only just, under Empire, allies of the Germans Indian) Army, while Lawrence keeps constant pressure from the opposing Turkish Ottoman and the Austro-Hungarians. the Ottomans busy. But wider forces. Lawrence moved forward to Hesa, and then This series of leafl ets covers on to Sultani, to see for himself the Arab successes, the months leading up to the political issues start to intrude. travelling in a loop round to Themed and then back to capture of Damascus from the Feisal’s H.Q. at Abu al-Lissan. Turkish army at the beginning of October 1918, which 1 June – Sultani; 2 June – Um el Rusas [Umm ar- eff ectively signalled the end Rasas]; 5 June – Themed; 6 June – Wadi Mojeb of the war in the Middle East: [Wadi Mujib]; 7 June – Jurf [Jurf Al Darawish]; the formal Armistice with the A Jiddah street scene 8 June – Aba el Lissan [Abu al-Lissan] Ottoman Turks was signed at ‘I explained to Feisal that Nasir’s cutting of the the end of October. [Hejaz railway] line would endure another month; Some dramatic reversals of and, after the Turks had got rid of him, it would be fortune in the fi nal year of the yet a third month before they attacked us at Aba el campaign took their toll on Lissan. By then our new camels should be fi t for use Lawrence’s already strained in an off ensive of our own. I sugg ested that we ask nerves. This, and his feelings his father, King Hussein, to transfer to Akaba the of guilt around what he saw regular units at present with [Feisal’s brothers] Ali and as the betrayal of his dreams Abdulla. Their reinforcement would raise us to ten of a pan-Arab empire during thousand strong, in uniformed men.’ the complex post-war peace ‘We would divide them into three parts. The immobile negotiations, eventually caused the breakdown that brought would constitute a retaining force to hold Maan quiet. him in due course to seek A thousand, on our new camels, would attack the Entering Damascus solitude at Clouds Hill. Deraa-Damascus sector. The balance would form a second expedition, of two or three thousand infantry, to move into the Beni Sakhr country and connect with Copyright © 2018 National Trust Allenby at Jericho. The long-distance mounted raid, Map, quotes and photos: Seven Pillars of Wisdom, published in 1926; by taking Deraa or Damascus, would compel the Turks Lawrence’s personal account of his role in the Great Arab Revolt to withdraw from Palestine one division, or even two, against the Ottoman Empire. Bust photo © John Hammond. to restore their communications. By so weakening the The National Trust is a registered charity no. 205846. Design by Pure Glow Media enemy, we would give Allenby the power to advance of politeness, which would be lost on the hard and his line ... to Nablus.’ suspicious old man in Mecca. Yet the eff ort promised so ‘Feisal fell in with the proposal, and gave me letters much for us that we went up to Allenby, to beg his help to his father advising it. Unhappily, the old man [i.e. with the King.’ Hussein] was, nowadays, little inclined to take his 15 June – Alexandria; 17 June – Cairo; 18 June – Sinai; advice, out of green-eyed hatred for this son who 19 June – At G.H.Q. [Bir Salem, near Ramlah, Palestine] was doing too well and was being disproportionately 19 June ‘At G.H.Q., we felt a remarkable diff erence in the air. helped by the British. For dealing with the King I The place was, as always, throbbing with energy and relied on joint-action by Wingate and Allenby, his hope, but now logic and co-ordination were manifest paymasters. I decided to go up to Egy pt personally, 15-16 June in an uncommon degree.’ Lawrence had hoped to go to to press them to write him letters of the necessary 1-7 June see Allenby directly, but instead found himself having stiff ness.’ to work through Staff Brigadier-General Bartholomew. Although unmentioned in Seven Pillars, while Lawrence 13-14, 17, 20 ‘We unrolled before him our scheme to start the ball was away raiding with Nasir, a brief (45 minutes) but June rolling in the autumn, hoping by our pushes to make historic meeting took place on 4 June at Waheida 8-9 June it possible for him to come in later vigorously to our [Awheeda] between Emir Feisal and Chaim Weizmann, 12 June support. He listened smiling, and said that we were leading Zionist proponent of the ‘Balfour Declaration’ three days too late. Their new army was arriving to time of 2 November 1917 in which the British Government from Mesopotamia and India; prodigious advances had expressed support for the idea of a ‘national home in grouping and training were being made. On June for the Jewish people’ in Palestine, subject to it not 25-30 June the fi fteenth it had been the considered opinion of a harming the interests of ‘existing non-Jewish [90% private conference that the army would be capable of a Arab] communities’. Lawrence had been intended ... sustained off ensive in September.’ to be interpreter, but in his (accidental or intended) Finally, ‘we went in to Allenby, who said outright that absence, Col. Joyce substituted. Weizmann and late in September he would make a grand attack ... Feisal were wary in this fi rst meeting but professed even to Damascus and Aleppo. Our role [i.e. the Arabs’] an informal understanding (formalised in January would be as laid down in the spring; we must make the 1919): Feisal supporting limited Jewish settlement in Deraa raid on the two thousand new camels. Times Palestine; the Zionists assisting in the development and details would be fi xed as the weeks went on, and as of the vast Arab empire that Feisal’s father, Hussein, Bartholomew’s calculations took shape.’ hoped to establish. British military Ottoman military occupation occupation Main desert areas ‘I got Allenby’s blessing upon the transfer of Ali’s and Lawrence and Feisal must have spoken of this key Markers show Arabs allied to Pro-Ottoman British front-line Abdulla’s khakhi-clad contingents; and set off , fortifi ed, issue between 8-10 June, but Lawrence was soon off Lawrence’s Sharif Hussein Arab Sheiks locations overnight Arab Sheiks not allied to Jidda, where I had no more success than I expected.’ on what proved to be his longest absence from the to Hussein but in Hussein’s claim Arab front line of the War; he was away for over six treaties with Britain 20 June – Cairo; 21 June – In Mansurah [SS weeks until 28 July. Mansourah, an Egy ptian government mail steamer, for passage from Suez to Jiddah]; 25 June – Jidda [Jiddah] 10 June – In Arethusa [HMS Arethusa II, fl eet ‘The King had got wind of my purpose and took refuge, messenger vessel, for passage from Aqaba to Suez]; on the pretext of Ramadhan, in Mecca, his inaccessible 12 June – Suez; 13 June – Cairo Map and quotations are taken from Seven Pillars of capital. We talked over the telephone, King Hussein ‘In Cairo, Dawnay agreed both to the transfer of the Wisdom, chapters 96 and 97. sheltering himself behind the incompetence of the southern regulars, and to the independent off ensive. The dates and places in bold [with modern operators in the Mecca exchange, whenever the subject We went to Wingate, argued it, and convinced him transliterations where it helps] are taken from Appendix turned dangerous. My thronged mind was not in the that the ideas were good. He wrote letters to King 2 of Seven Pillars, in which Lawrence records from his mood for farce, so I rang off , put Feisal’s, Wingate’s Hussein, strongly advising the reinforcement of diary where he was overnight. and Allenby’s letters back unopened into my bag Feisal. I pressed him to make clear to the King that Not all places mentioned remain visible today. and returned to Cairo in the next ship.’ Lawrence left the continuance of a war-subsidy would depend Jiddah, again in the Mansourah, on 1 July, calling in at on his giving eff ect to our advice: but he refused Wejh on his way back to Suez and then Cairo.
Recommended publications
  • Re-Visiting the Arab Revolt of 1936-1939 in Palestine
    Oberlin Digital Commons at Oberlin Honors Papers Student Work 2016 Contested Land, Contested Representations: Re-visiting the Arab Revolt of 1936-1939 in Palestine Gabriel Healey Brown Oberlin College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.oberlin.edu/honors Part of the History Commons Repository Citation Brown, Gabriel Healey, "Contested Land, Contested Representations: Re-visiting the Arab Revolt of 1936-1939 in Palestine" (2016). Honors Papers. 226. https://digitalcommons.oberlin.edu/honors/226 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Digital Commons at Oberlin. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons at Oberlin. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Contested Land, Contested Representations: Re-visiting the Arab Revolt of 1936-1939 in Palestine Gabriel Brown Candidate for Senior Honors in History Oberlin College Thesis Advisor: Zeinab Abul-Magd Spring/2016 Table of Contents Acknowledgments………………………………………………………………………………...1 Map of Palestine, 1936……………………………………………………………………………2 Glossary…………………………………………………………………………………………...3 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………….4 Chapter One……………………………………………………………………………………...15 Chapter Two……………………………………………………………………………………...25 Chapter Three…………………………………………………………………………………….37 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………….50 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………………. 59 Brown 1 Acknowledgements Large research endeavors like this one are never undertaken alone, and I would be remiss if I didn’t thank the many people who have helped me along the way. I owe a huge debt to Shelley Lee, Jesse Gamoran, Gavin Ratcliffe, Meghan Mette, and Daniel Hautzinger, whose kind feedback throughout the year sharpened my ideas and improved the coherence of my work more times than I can count. A special thank you to Sam Coates-Finke and Leo Harrington, who were always ready to listen as I worked through the writing process.
    [Show full text]
  • The Purpose of the First World War War Aims and Military Strategies Schriften Des Historischen Kollegs
    The Purpose of the First World War War Aims and Military Strategies Schriften des Historischen Kollegs Herausgegeben von Andreas Wirsching Kolloquien 91 The Purpose of the First World War War Aims and Military Strategies Herausgegeben von Holger Afflerbach An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org Schriften des Historischen Kollegs herausgegeben von Andreas Wirsching in Verbindung mit Georg Brun, Peter Funke, Karl-Heinz Hoffmann, Martin Jehne, Susanne Lepsius, Helmut Neuhaus, Frank Rexroth, Martin Schulze Wessel, Willibald Steinmetz und Gerrit Walther Das Historische Kolleg fördert im Bereich der historisch orientierten Wissenschaften Gelehrte, die sich durch herausragende Leistungen in Forschung und Lehre ausgewiesen haben. Es vergibt zu diesem Zweck jährlich bis zu drei Forschungsstipendien und zwei Förderstipendien sowie alle drei Jahre den „Preis des Historischen Kollegs“. Die Forschungsstipendien, deren Verleihung zugleich eine Auszeichnung für die bisherigen Leis- tungen darstellt, sollen den berufenen Wissenschaftlern während eines Kollegjahres die Möglich- keit bieten, frei von anderen Verpflichtungen eine größere Arbeit abzuschließen. Professor Dr. Hol- ger Afflerbach (Leeds/UK) war – zusammen mit Professor Dr. Paul Nolte (Berlin), Dr. Martina Steber (London/UK) und Juniorprofessor Simon Wendt (Frankfurt am Main) – Stipendiat des Historischen Kollegs im Kollegjahr 2012/2013. Den Obliegenheiten der Stipendiaten gemäß hat Holger Afflerbach aus seinem Arbeitsbereich ein Kolloquium zum Thema „Der Sinn des Krieges. Politische Ziele und militärische Instrumente der kriegführenden Parteien von 1914–1918“ vom 21.
    [Show full text]
  • 1918: the Road to Damascus July
    T. E Lawrence in July 1918 The road to During June, Lawrence had spent a frustrating three 1918: the road weeks shuttling between Feisal’s H.Q. in Abu al-Lissan, Damascus General Allenby’s G.H.Q. in Palestine, the British base Marking the extraordinary at Cairo, and Jiddah on the Red Sea Coast – all in a trials, triumphs and to Damascus fruitless attempt to persuade King Hussein to transfer tribulations of T. E. Lawrence more Arab forces northwards to support his son Feisal. in the last year of the First World War, month by month, 1 July – In SS Mansurah [SS Mansourah, an Egy ptian in the British army alongside July: recovery and planning government mail steamer, for passage from Jiddah to the Arabs fi ghting in the Suez via Wejh]; 3 July – Wejh; 4 July – In SS Mansurah deserts of the Middle East; for a September off ensive [continuing on to Suez]; 6 July – Cairo when the legend of Lawrence of Arabia was born. On 16 June 1918 (while Lawrence was in Egy pt, so if he didn’t pick up on it then, he must have during this The British Empire, with support As victory in Europe becomes a next stay) the British government ‘clarifi ed’ its policy from many Arabs, was fi ghting in response to questions from seven surviving Arab against the Turkish Ottoman possibility, Britain wrestles with its Nationalist leaders, whom Lawrence dismissed as ‘an Empire, allies of the Germans war aims. In Palestine, Allenby and unauthorized committee of seven Gothamites.’ Britain and the Austro-Hungarians.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain's Broken Promises: the Roots of the Israeli and Palestinian
    Britain’s Broken Promises: The Roots of the Israeli and Palestinian Conflict Overview Students will learn about British control over Palestine after World War I and how it influenced the Israel‐Palestine situation in the modern Middle East. The material will be introduced through a timeline activity and followed by a PowerPoint that covers many of the post‐WWI British policies. The lesson culminates in a letter‐writing project where students have to support a position based upon information learned. Grade 9 NC Essential Standards for World History • WH.1.1: Interpret data presented in time lines and create time lines • WH.1.3: Consider multiple perspectives of various peoples in the past • WH.5.3: Analyze colonization in terms of the desire for access to resources and markets as well as the consequences on indigenous cultures, population, and environment • WH.7.3: Analyze economic and political rivalries, ethnic and regional conflicts, and nationalism and imperialism as underlying causes of war Materials • “Steps Toward Peace in Israel and Palestine” Timeline (excerpt attached) • History of Israel/Palestine Timeline Questions and Answer Key, attached • Drawing paper or chart paper • Colored pencils or crayons (optional) • “Britain’s Broken Promises” PowerPoint, available in the Database of K‐12 Resources (in PDF format) o To view this PDF as a projectable presentation, save the file, click “View” in the top menu bar of the file, and select “Full Screen Mode” o To request an editable PPT version of this presentation, send a request to
    [Show full text]
  • Pan-Arabism and Identity Politics: a Between Case Study
    Pan-Arabism and Identity Politics: A between case study design of Iraq 1952-1977 Alex Iliopoulos Master Thesis: International Relations, specialization Global Order in Historical Perspective Faculty of Humanities Based Sciences – Leiden University Date: January 2021 Student number: S1655485 First examiner of the university: Dr. Diana Natermann Second examiner of the university:1 Dr. Anne-Isabelle Richard TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page Abstract -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3 Introduction of research question -------------------------------------------------------------4 CH 1: Pan-Arabism before 1940 (The ‘Awakening’ of Pan-Arabism)-------------------6 CH 2: The (Ethnic) Identity of Pan-Arabism-------------------------------------------------9 CH 3: The between case study research design ---------------------------------------------12 CH 4: Pan-Arabism in Iraq 1940-1952 -------------------------------------------------------15 4.1: Group Identification is fluid -----------------------------------------------------15 4.2: The driving forces behind Pan-Arabism ---------------------------------------17 4.3: ‘Othering’, the ‘out-group’ and ‘scapegoats’ ---------------------------------19 CH 5: Pan-Arabism from 1952-1970 (the in-between period of the two case studies)-21 CH 6: Pan-Arabism 1970-1977, What changed?--------------------------------------------24 Conclusion / Discussion-------------------------------------------------------------------------27 Bibliography--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------32
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Arabism in Syria Author(S): C
    The Rise of Arabism in Syria Author(s): C. Ernest Dawn Source: Middle East Journal, Vol. 16, No. 2 (Spring, 1962), pp. 145-168 Published by: Middle East Institute Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4323468 Accessed: 27/08/2009 15:10 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=mei. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Middle East Institute is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Middle East Journal. http://www.jstor.org THE RISE OF ARABISMIN SYRIA C. Ernest Dawn JN the earlyyears of the twentiethcentury, two ideologiescompeted for the loyalties of the Arab inhabitantsof the Ottomanterritories which lay to the east of Suez.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    British Journal for Military History Volume 7, Issue 1, March 2021 What’s in a name? Identifying military engagements in Egypt and the Levant, 1915-1918 Roslyn Shepherd King Pike ISSN: 2057-0422 Date of Publication: 19 March 2021 Citation: Roslyn Shepherd King Pike, ‘What’s in a name? Identifying military engagements in Egypt and the Levant, 1915-1918’, British Journal for Military History, 7.1 (2021), pp. 87-112. www.bjmh.org.uk This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. The BJMH is produced with the support of IDENTIFYING MILITARY ENGAGEMENTS IN EGYPT & THE LEVANT 1915-1918 What’s in a name? Identifying military engagements in Egypt and the Levant, 1915- 1918 Roslyn Shepherd King Pike* Independent Scholar Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT This article examines the official names listed in the 'Egypt and Palestine' section of the 1922 report by the British Army’s Battles Nomenclature Committee and compares them with descriptions of military engagements in the Official History to establish if they clearly identify the events. The Committee’s application of their own definitions and guidelines during the process of naming these conflicts is evaluated together with examples of more recent usages in selected secondary sources. The articles concludes that the Committee’s failure to accurately identify the events of this campaign have had a negative impacted on subsequent historiography. Introduction While the perennial rose would still smell the same if called a lily, any discussion of military engagements relies on accurate and generally agreed on enduring names, so historians, veterans, and the wider community, can talk with some degree of confidence about particular events, and they can be meaningfully written into history.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestine and the Arab-Israeli Conflict: 1948– 1970
    PALESTINE AND THE ARAB-ISRAELI CONFLICT: 1948– 1970 by Dr Charles D. Smith, University of Arizona With the declaration of Israeli independence on May 14, 1948, the nature of the Arab-Israeli conflict and Britain’s role in it entered a new phase. Before Israel’s creation, the conflict was one between Zionism and the Palestinian Arabs that originated prior to World War I as a result of Jewish immigration into Palestine with the goal of ultimately creating a Jewish state. This objective had gained official recognition with the issuance of the Balfour Declaration by Great Britain on November 2, 1917. It promised British support to create “in Palestine a national home for the Jewish people,” understood by British and Zionist officials to mean a Jewish state in all of Palestine. Once the Balfour Declaration was incorporated into the 1922 British mandate for Palestine, Britain was obligated to prepare an incoming Jewish population for self-government, not the existing Arab population; mandates had been instituted with the idea of preparing local inhabitants for future independence. As the mandatory power responsible for Palestine, Britain had faced an Arab revolt in the 1930s which it had crushed, and then a Jewish revolt from 1945 onward demanding a Jewish state. Faced with world knowledge of the Holocaust and American pressure favouring Zionism, Britain decided to abdicate its responsibility and in February 1947 handed the Palestine question over to the newly formed United Nations, though British forces remained in Palestine to May 1948. The U.N. General Assembly approved recommendations for partition of Palestine into a Jewish and an Arab state in November 1947, leading to intense civil strife between Jews and mostly Palestinian Arabs that resulted in the creation of Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Legacies of the Anglo-Hashemite Relationship in Jordan
    Legacies of the Anglo-Hashemite Relationship in Jordan: How this symbiotic alliance established the legitimacy and political longevity of the regime in the process of state-formation, 1914-1946 An Honors Thesis for the Department of Middle Eastern Studies Julie Murray Tufts University, 2018 Acknowledgements The writing of this thesis was not a unilateral effort, and I would be remiss not to acknowledge those who have helped me along the way. First of all, I would like to thank my advisor, Professor Thomas Abowd, for his encouragement of my academic curiosity this past year, and for all his help in first, making this project a reality, and second, shaping it into (what I hope is) a coherent and meaningful project. His class provided me with a new lens through which to examine political history, and gave me with the impetus to start this paper. I must also acknowledge the role my abroad experience played in shaping this thesis. It was a research project conducted with CET that sparked my interest in political stability in Jordan, so thank you to Ines and Dr. Saif, and of course, my classmates, Lensa, Matthew, and Jackie, for first empowering me to explore this topic. I would also like to thank my parents and my brother, Jonathan, for their continuous support. I feel so lucky to have such a caring family that has given me the opportunity to pursue my passions. Finally, a shout-out to the gals that have been my emotional bedrock and inspiration through this process: Annie, Maya, Miranda, Rachel – I love y’all; thanks for listening to me rant about this all year.
    [Show full text]
  • Occupation and Resistance in Southern Iraq: a Study of Great Britain's Civil Administration in the Middle Euphrates and the Gr
    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences 3-2018 Occupation and resistance in southern Iraq: a study of Great Britain’s civil administration in the Middle Euphrates and the Great Rebellion, 1917-1920 Scott Jones DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd Recommended Citation Jones, Scott, "Occupation and resistance in southern Iraq: a study of Great Britain’s civil administration in the Middle Euphrates and the Great Rebellion, 1917-1920" (2018). College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 241. https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/241 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Occupation and Resistance in Southern Iraq: A Study of Great Britain’s Civil Administration in the Middle Euphrates and the Great Rebellion, 1917-1920 A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts March, 2018 BY Scott Jones Department of International Studies College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences DePaul University Chicago, Illinois Jones 1 Occupation and Resistance in Southern Iraq: A Study of Great Britain’s Civil Administration in the Middle Euphrates and the Great Rebellion, 1917-1920 Scott Jones International Studies Master’s Thesis Thesis Committee Advisor – Kaveh Ehsani, Ph.D., DePaul University Reader – Rajit Mazumder, Ph.D., DePaul University Reader – Eugene Beiriger, Ph.D., DePaul University Introduction – Occupation and Resistance in Southern Iraq 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Arab Revolt
    Keys to the Kingdom National Anthem The Office History The Great Arab Revolt Much of the trauma and dislocation suffered by the peoples of the Middle East during the 20th century can be traced to the events surrounding World War I. During the conflict, the Ottoman Empire sided with the Central Powers against the Allies. Seeing an opportunity to liberate Arab lands from Turkish oppression, and trusting the honor of British officials who promised their support for a unified kingdom for the Arab lands, Sharif Hussein bin Ali, Emir of Mecca and King of the Arabs (and great grandfather of King Hussein), launched the Great Arab Revolt. After the conclusion of the war, however, the victors reneged on their promises to the Arabs, carving from the dismembered Ottoman lands a patchwork system of mandates and protectorates. While the colonial powers denied the Arabs their promised single unified Arab state, it is nevertheless testimony to the effectiveness of the Great Arab Sharif Hussein bin Ali, King of the Arabs and King of the Hijaz. Revolt that the Hashemite family was able to secure Arab rule over © Royal Hashemite Court Transjordan, Iraq and Arabia. Archives In order to discern the motives of the Hashemites in undertaking the revolt, one must understand the policies undertaken by the Ottoman Empire in the years leading up to World War I. Following the Young Turk coup of 1908, the Ottomans abandoned their pluralistic and pan­ Islamic policies, instead pursuing a policy of secular Turkish nationalism. The formerly cosmopolitan and tolerant Ottoman Empire began overtly discriminating against its non­Turkish inhabitants.
    [Show full text]
  • Arab Nationalism from a Historical Perspective: a Gradual Demise?
    | 11 Yalova Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Arab Nationalism from a Historical Perspective: A Gradual Demise? İsmail KURUN1 Abstract Arab nationalism emerged as a secular ideology in the early 20th century in the Ottoman Empire. During the First World War, it proved influential enough to motivate an Arab rebellion against the Ottomans and, following the war, several Arab states were founded. Its popularity rose in the interwar period, and many Arab mandates became independent after the Second World War. Its popularity peaked at the hands of Gamal Abdel Nasser in 1958 when Syria and Egypt united to form the United Arab Republic. After the 1967 Arab-Israeli War, Arab nationalism began losing its appeal and declined dramatically during the 1970s and 1980s. At the turn of the 21st century, Arab nationalism became an almost irrelevant ideology in the Middle East. This study examines the birth, the dramatic rise, and the sudden decline of Arab nationalism from a historical perspective and concludes that Arab nationalism today, as an ideology, is on the brink of demise. Keywords: political history;Arab nationalism; pan-Arabism; Islam Tarihsel Perspektiften Arap Milliyetçiliği: Tedrici Bir Ölüm Mü? Özet Arap milliyetçiliği 20. yüzyılın başlarında Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nda seküler bir ideoloji olarak ortaya çıktı. Birinci Dünya Savaşı sırasında Osmanlılara karşı bir Arap ayaklanmasını motive edecek kadar etkili oldu ve savaştan sonra birkaç Arap devleti kuruldu. Arap milliyetçiliğinin popülaritesi iki savaş arası dönemde yükseldi ve birçok Arap devleti İkinci Dünya Savaşı’ndan sonra bağımsız hale geldiler. 1958’de Suriye ve Mısır, Birleşik Arap Cumhuriyeti’ni kurmak için birleştiklerinde Arap milliyetçiliğinin popülaritesi zirve yaptı.
    [Show full text]