DOCSLIB.ORG

Keyboard Dynamics Synonyms Related Concepts and Keywords Definition Background Theory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Keyboard Dynamics Synonyms Related Concepts and Keywords Definition Background Theory Keyboard Dynamics Mitchell A. Thornton Department of Computer Science and Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering Southern Methodist University Synonyms typing dynamics, keystroke dynamics, typing patterns Related Concepts and Keywords Bioinformatics; Behavioral bioinformatics, keystroke logging, handwriting and signature recognition Definition Keyboard dynamics are the characteristics of typing or rhythmic patterns of sequences of keystrokes on a keyboard. Background Early telegraph operators realized that they could identify other operators through the unique characteristics of their keying patterns. This differentiation was apparent although all operators were using the same Morse code form of communication since each individual operator develops unique keying characteristics. This same phenomena occurs in the patterns of keystroke sequences of the ubiquitous keyboard. Keyboard users develop and deterministically repeat characteristic patterns that exhibit some degree of uniqueness when compared to other users patterns. Studies on the analysis of user rhythms exhibited by users of data entry devices occurred as early as the work of Bryan and Harter in 1895 when such patterns by telegraph operators were analyzed [1]. In terms of modern keyboards, an early analysis was published by Young in 1989 [2]. Past recent research is described in the work [3,4]. Theory The rhythmic typing patterns of different individuals have characteristics that are unique. Because typing requires an interaction of the mind and manual dexterity, many complicated physiological processes are involved in the chain of events beginning with having a thought about which specific key on a keyboard is to be depressed (and released) and the actual event of key entry. This complicated chain of events is characterized by many biometric factors, or unique characteristics, attributed to a particular individual. Hence, these characteristics allow a unique “signature” to be measured based on the particular rhythmic sequence of typing a set of characters on a keyboard. This particular unique rhythmic sequence can be exploited or used in much the same way that a written signature is used for authentication. Two types of information are transmitted to a data processing device for each keypress, the actual character corresponding to the key and the duration of time that the key is depressed. Modern computers use the amount of time the key is pressed to determine if the user desires multiple instances of the character to be received. The interval in which characters are repeated is referred to as the typematic rate and is typically a variable parameter. Keystroke dynamic algorithms make use of the keypress duration at a more fine- grained level, however mechanisms are clearly in place to determine keypress durations. In addition to using the time between a single key down and key up event, a keystroke dynamic algorithm may also utilize the time interval between a key up event and a subsequent key down event of a different keystroke. The combination of these event time intervals then forms a signature. This signature is then compared to a predetermined and stored keystroke signature known as the baseline signature for the purposes of authentication. Although the rhythmic sequence is unique, there are variations among subsequent key sequence entries. These variations can be characterized as short term and long term. Short term variations arise from factors such as an individual’s mood, state of alertness, or temporary physical injuries. An analogy with a written signature is useful in that an individual’s signature, when written twice subsequently, appears to be substantially the same but has slight variations. Such slight variations are also present in the rhythmic intervals between key depressions and, in fact, their variability is also a biometric attribute that varies among individuals. Measures of this variability over many subsequent training samples can result in the calculation of individual characteristic standard deviation values or other statistics. Long term variations differ in that they represent gradually changing permanent characteristics. From a statistical point of view, these variations could be quantified as slowly changing mean values of individual key depression timing intervals. Long term variations typically occur due to a user becoming more adept or proficient in keyboarding skills through training, or through gaining familiarity with a particular keyboard and the nuances of its key depression pressures and spacing between the keys. The analogy of a handwritten signature to illustrate this situation is to compare an individual’s signature over the span of a lifetime. The signature would typically show distinct differences when compared at the time the writer was very young, then middle-aged, although these differences were acquired gradually over time. A third type of variation that must be accounted for is an abrupt, but permanent change in an individual’s keyboarding characteristics. This phenomenon can arise due to circumstances such as a permanent injury to the hand or brain, or through acquiring new keyboarding techniques by taking a class to retrain the physiological chain of events leading to the depression of a key. Many biometric methods are based on physical characteristics of an individual such as the pattern of a fingerprint or iris. This method is actually a combination of characteristics and an interesting aspect of keyboard dynamics is that it actually incorporates the workings of an individual’s mind into the biometric. Other forms of biometric methods that include workings of the mind are facial gestures and walking gait patterns. Because the mind and the acumen of physical dexterity are adaptable characteristics, effective application of the method necessarily involves methods that account for adaptability. Furthermore, variability in the manufacturers of different models of keyboards also adds a degree of uncertainty. As an example, one keyboard may have pushbutton keys with slightly more or less pressure required to completely depress a key. This in turn can affect the resulting rhythmic typing patterns when the same individual uses two different keyboards and these differences must also be accounted for. Applications The primary application of keystroke dynamics is its use in user authentication. The predominant features required in this application are to somehow account for short term, long term, and abrupt changes in a particular users’ characteristic keyboard dynamics. While the application of keyboard dynamics can be used to authenticate a user at the initial stage of gaining access for a data entry session in a static manner, for instance during a password entry phase, an alternative application could be more dynamic in that keyboard dynamic metrics are continuously evaluated during the entire data entry session. Furthermore, the authentication could be accomplished in a background process by attempting to identify a user of a system that does not have a designated authentication stage. An example may be the use of a public data entry keyboard where passwords are not requested. Another interesting application of keyboard dynamics is to utilize the signature to identify and couple a particular user with other known information about that user or group of users. For example, demographic profiles could be stored and accessed based on some category of users. Similar methods are commonly used in commercial webpages such as those employed by vendors of books. Once a particular user is identified, interest preferences that have been previously acquired are accessed and allow the webpage to customize a set of suggested products the user may be particularly interested in. Experimental Results Several different studies and experiments have been performed in the past and are documented in the literature. The work described in [5] analyzed the different keystroke dynamic characteristics obtained when a group of users entered different kinds of text. The first kind was a sample of grammatically correct sentences that form a coherent passage in the English language, the second kind consisted of a collection of correctly spelled English words that were arranged in a random fashion, and the third type was a collection of random character sequences. Another experimental result is presented in [6] where a study was made of grammatically correct English sentences versus users’ names and other words that they type very frequently. The result of this work allowed comparisons and analyses to be performed with respect to well trained or frequently used character string characteristics. Open problems and future directions Because the use of keyboard dynamics has some variation due to the reasons discussed above, authentication errors have a non-zero probability of occurrence. These errors can be classified into two categories: a false positive where a particular user is incorrectly classified as the wrong person and gains access to a data entry system when they should not have, or a false negative, where a particular user should have gained access but was denied. Depending upon the application, one of these types of errors may be deemed more severe than the other. More research is required to allow for keyboard dynamic variability to be coped with while also reducing the probability of these types of errors. Current research is focused on the types and use of particular statistics to be employed. To implement a keyboard dynamic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Using Xgboost to Classify the Beihang Keystroke Dynamics Database
    UPTEC F 18049 Examensarbete 30 hp 15 Augusti 2018 Using XGBoost to classify the Beihang Keystroke Dynamics Database Johanna Blomqvist Abstract Using XGBoost to classify the Beihang Keystroke Dynamics Database Johanna Blomqvist Teknisk- naturvetenskaplig fakultet UTH-enheten Keystroke Dynamics enable biometric security systems by collecting and analyzing computer keyboard usage data. There are different Besöksadress: approaches to classifying keystroke data and a method that has been Ångströmlaboratoriet Lägerhyddsvägen 1 gaining a lot of attention in the machine learning industry lately is Hus 4, Plan 0 the decision tree framework of XGBoost. XGBoost has won several Kaggle competitions in the last couple of years, but its capacity in Postadress: the keystroke dynamics field has not yet been widely explored. Box 536 751 21 Uppsala Therefore, this thesis has attempted to classify the existing Beihang Keystroke Dynamics Database using XGBoost. To do this, keystroke Telefon: features such as dwell time and flight time were extracted from the 018 – 471 30 03 dataset, which contains 47 usernames and passwords. XGBoost was then Telefax: applied to a binary classification problem, where the model attempts 018 – 471 30 00 to distinguish keystroke feature sequences from genuine users from those of `impostors'. In this way, the ratio of inaccurately and Hemsida: accurately labeled password inputs can be analyzed. http://www.teknat.uu.se/student The result showed that, after tuning of the hyperparameters, the XGBoost yielded Equal Error Rates (EER) at best 0.31 percentage points better than the SVM used in the original study of the database at 11.52%, and a highest AUC of 0.9792.
    [Show full text]
  • Keystroke Dynamic Analysis Using Relative Entropy & Timing Sequence
    International Conference and Workshop on Emerging Trends in Technology (ICWET 2011) – TCET, Mumbai, India Keystroke Dynamic Analysis Using Relative Entropy & Timing Sequence Euclidian Distance H B Kekre, V A Bharadi P Shaktia, V Shah A A Ambardekar Computer Science Department IT Department, TCET Computer Science and Engineering, MPSTME, NMIMS University Mumbai University University of Nevada Mumbai, India Mumbai, India RENO, USA +91-9323557897, +91-9819125676 +91-7738343494 +1-7753131894 [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT traits or even more than one biometric traits can be combined to Biometric authentication systems are becoming more and more implement multimodal biometric systems [1], [2], [3]. In this popular because of increased security concerns. Keystroke paper keystroke dynamics based biometric authentication method Dynamics is one of the important behavior based biometric trait. is discussed. The way one user presses different keys on a It has moderate uniqueness level and low user cooperation is keyboard is peculiar and unique. Along with the characters in a required. In this paper keystroke dynamics analysis using relative password this dynamic information can be used for identifying entropy and Euclidian distance between keystroke timing correct person. sequence is discussed. In this approach keystroke timing sequence are calculated and normalized then this information is used for 1.1 Keystroke Dynamics Keystroke dynamics, or typing dynamics, is the detailed timing generating normalized probability distribution of dynamic information that describes exactly when each key was pressed and passwords, two distance measures namely relative entropy & when it was released as a person is typing at a computer keyboard Euclidian distance are used for classification.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of User Behavioural Biometrics for Authentication Using Keystroke Dynamics and Machine Learning
    University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Electronic Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Major Papers 4-20-2018 Identification of User Behavioural Biometrics for Authentication using Keystroke Dynamics and Machine Learning Sowndarya Krishnamoorthy University of Windsor Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd Recommended Citation Krishnamoorthy, Sowndarya, "Identification of User Behavioural Biometrics for Authentication using Keystroke Dynamics and Machine Learning" (2018). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 7440. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/7440 This online database contains the full-text of PhD dissertations and Masters’ theses of University of Windsor students from 1954 forward. These documents are made available for personal study and research purposes only, in accordance with the Canadian Copyright Act and the Creative Commons license—CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivative Works). Under this license, works must always be attributed to the copyright holder (original author), cannot be used for any commercial purposes, and may not be altered. Any other use would require the permission of the copyright holder. Students may inquire about withdrawing their dissertation and/or thesis from this database. For additional inquiries, please contact the repository administrator via email ([email protected]) or by telephone at 519-253-3000ext. 3208. Identification of User Behavioral Biometrics for Authentication using Keystroke Dynamics and Machine Learning By Sowndarya Krishnamoorthy A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies through the School of Computer Science in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science at the University of Windsor Windsor, Ontario, Canada 2018 ©2018 Sowndarya Krishnamoorthy Identification of User Behavioral Biometrics for Authentication using Keystroke Dynamics and Machine Learning by Sowndarya Krishnamoorthy APPROVED BY: G.
    [Show full text]
  • Shared Data Set for Free-Text Keystroke Dynamics Authentica- Tion Algorithms
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 11 May 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202105.0255.v1 Article Shared Data Set for Free-Text Keystroke Dynamics Authentica- tion Algorithms Augustin-Catalin Iapa 1,* and Vladimir-Ioan Cretu 1 1 Timișoara Politehnica University; Department of Computer and Information Technology; [email protected]; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +40769054995 Abstract: Identifying or authenticating a computer user are necessary steps to keep systems secure on the network and to prevent fraudulent users from accessing accounts. Keystroke dynamics au- thentication can be used as an additional authentication method. Keystroke dynamics involves in-depth analysis of how you type on the keyboard, analysis of how long a key is pressed or the time between two consecutive keys. This field has seen a continuous growth in scientific research. In the last five years alone, about 10,000 scientific researches in this field have been published. One of the main problems facing researchers is the small number of public data sets that include how users type on the keyboard. This paper aims to provide researchers with a data set that includes how to type free text on the keyboard by 80 users. The data were collected in a single session via a web platform. The dataset contains 410,633 key-events collected in a total time interval of almost 24 hours. In similar research, most datasets are with texts written by users in English. The language in which the users wrote for this research is Romanian. This paper also provides an extensive analysis of the data set collected and presents relevant information for the analysis of the data set in future research.
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioral Biometric Verification of Student Identity in Online Course Assessment and Authentication of Authors in Literary Works
    IEEE 6th International Conference on Biometrics, BTAS 2013. Behavioral Biometric Verification of Student Identity in Online Course Assessment and Authentication of Authors in Literary Works John V. Monaco, John C. Stewart, Sung-Hyuk Cha, and Charles C. Tappert Seidenberg School of CSIS, Pace University, White Plains, NY 10606 difficult to duplicate [4, 10]. The keystroke biometric is a Abstract behavioral biometric, and most of the systems developed Keystroke and stylometry behavioral biometrics were previously have been experimental in nature. Nevertheless, investigated with the objective of developing a robust system there has been a long history of commercially unsuccessful to authenticate students taking online examinations. This implementations aimed at continuous recognition of a typist. work responds to the 2008 U.S. Higher Education While most previous work dealt with short input (passwords Opportunity Act that requires institutions of higher learning or short name strings) [1, 7, 14, 15, 16], some used long free undertake greater access control efforts, by adopting (arbitrary) text input [2, 8, 11, 13, 19, 20]. Free-text input identification technologies as they become available, to as the user continues typing allows for continuous assure that students of record are those actually accessing authentication [5, 12, 13, 17] which can be important in the systems and taking the exams in online courses. online exam applications [6, 19]. Performance statistics on keystroke, stylometry, and Stylometry is the study of determining authorship from combined keystroke-stylometry systems were obtained on the authors’ linguistic styles. Traditionally, it has been data from 30 students taking examinations in a university used to attribute authorship to anonymous or disputed course.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Online Banking Authentication Using Keystroke Dynamics
    UNIVERSIDAD POLITECNICA´ DE MADRID FACULTAD DE INFORMATICA´ MASTER´ UNIVERSITARIO EN SOFTWARE Y SISTEMAS Enhancing Online Banking Authentication Using Keystroke Dynamics Master Thesis Author: Mar´ıa del Carmen S´anchez Medrano Directors: Manuel Carro Juan Caballero July 2017 Master Thesis MUSS Master thesis from UPM done by: Author’s Surname and name: S´anchez Medrano, Mar´ıa del Carmen Title: Enhancing Online Banking Authentication Using Keystroke Dynamics Date: July 2017 Directors: Manuel Carro Juan Caballero 2 Abstract The most common method for banks to authenticate users is through a user identifier and password. Unfortunately, this is a method of easy impersonation, because although many banks control brute force attacks by blocking the account after a maximum number of failed login attempts, credentials may be stolen. A big challenge for banks is to identify whether the user is or not the one he is supposed to be. The security measures based on biometrics are the ones that have given better results against this type of attacks. But as a drawback, most of these methods are very expensive to implement and their usability is low since they require special hardware. There are other types of biometric methods based on patterns, like keystroke dynamics. Each user has their own typing pattern which is very difficult to replicate. The different speeds between typing keys or the number of uses of a control key can be the difference between one person to the other. In this thesis, we study how to improve bank authentication using keystroke dy- namics. In order to achieve this objective, we had to perform data acquisition, data preprocessing and feature extraction processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded From
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by E-space: Manchester Metropolitan University's Research Repository Teh, PS and Zhang, N and Teoh, ABJ and Chen, K (2016)A survey on touch dynamics authentication in mobile devices. Computers and Security, 59. pp. 210-235. ISSN 0167-4048 Downloaded from: http://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/625411/ Version: Accepted Version Publisher: Elsevier DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2016.03.003 Usage rights: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Deriva- tive Works 4.0 Please cite the published version https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk A Survey on Touch Dynamics Authentication in Mobile Devices Pin Shen Teh1, Ning Zhang1, Andrew Beng Jin Teoh2, Ke Chen1 1 School of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. 2 School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul 120-749, Republic of Korea. E-mail: {pinshen.teh; ning.zhang-2; ke.chen}@manchester.ac.uk; [email protected] ABSTRACT There have been research activities in the area of keystroke dynamics biometrics on physical keyboards (desktop computers or conventional mobile phones) undertaken in the past three decades. However, in terms of touch dynamics biometrics on virtual keyboards (modern touchscreen mobile devices), there has been little published work. Particularly, there is a lack of an extensive survey and evaluation of the methodologies adopted in the area. Owing to the widespread use of touchscreen mobile devices, it is necessary for us to examine the techniques and their effectiveness in the domain of touch dynamics biometrics.
    [Show full text]
  • Biometric Authentication Techniques: a Study on Keystroke Dynamics
    International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Applied Science (IJSEAS) – Volume-2, Issue-1, January 2016 ISSN: 2395-3470 www.ijseas.com Biometric Authentication Techniques: A Study on Keystroke Dynamics Sandhya Avasthi Assistant Professor, Krishna Engineering College Tanushree Sanwal Assistant Professor, Krishna Engineering College Abstract— Biometrics technologies are gaining popularity today since they provide reliable and efficient means of authentication and verification. Our dependency on electronic devices is growing, and so is our need to secure information on them. Keystroke Dynamics is one of the famous biometric technologies, which identifies the authenticity of a user when the user is working via a keyboard. The authentication process is done by observing the variation in the typing pattern of the user. A comprehensive study of the existing keystroke dynamics methods, metrics, and different approaches are presented. This paper also discusses about the various security issues and challenges faced by keystroke dynamics. Keywords- Biometrics, Keystroke Dynamics, computer Security, Information Security, Biometric Authentication. 1. INTRODUCTION Preventing unauthorized access or restricting access to information system is first step towards security, which is possible through user Authentication. User authentication is the process of verifying identity of the user. The authentication is accomplished by matching some short-form indicator of identity, such as a shared secret that has been pre-arranged during enrollment or registration for authorized users. This is done for the purpose of performing trusted communications between parties for computing applications. User authentication is categorized into three categories [17]: 1. Knowledge - based, 2. Object or Token - based, 3. Biometric - based. User Authentication Knowledge Object Based Biometric Based Based Physiological Behavioral Figure 1 215 International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Applied Science (IJSEAS) – Volume-2, Issue-1, January 2016 ISSN: 2395-3470 www.ijseas.com Figure1.
    [Show full text]
  • Keystroke Dynamics for User Authentication and Identification by Using Typing Rhythm
    International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887) Volume 144 – No.9, June 2016 Keystroke Dynamics for User Authentication and Identification by using Typing Rhythm Rohit A. Patil Amar L. Renke Department of Electronics & Tele-Communication Department of Electronics & Tele-Communication Engineering Engineering K.I.T’s College of Engineering, Kolhapur, K.I.T’s College of Engineering, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, 416234, India Maharashtra, 416234, India ABSTRACT practical now a days. Keystroke dynamics is a behavioral In this era computer security is an important issue now a days biometric characteristic based on the assumption that different because these are used everywhere to store & process the people type in a unique manner. Neurophysiologic factors sensitive data. Specially those used in e-banking, e-commerce, make written signatures distinctive as per person. These virtual offices, e-learning, distributed, computing & various factors are also expected to make typing characteristics unique services over the internet. Using Keystroke dynamics as per person. The idea behind keystroke dynamics authentication technology can be secured by password from authentication appeared in the twentieth century when various attacks. This technique is based on human behavior to telegraph operators could authenticate each other based on type their password. Here analysis is done using human their distinctive patterns when keying messages on telegraph behavior with their typing pattern. As keystroke dynamics lines. Keystroke dynamics is also known with as keyboard does not require any hardware, no extra hardware is used. dynamics, keystroke analysis, typing biometrics and typing Only software based technology is required for password rhythms. protection. The result provides emphasis with pleasure Although Physiological biometrics is considered to be more security that growing in demand in web-based application.
    [Show full text]
  • Authentication System Based on Keystroke Dynamics
    * i Authentication System Based on Keystroke Dynamics Project written by: Name: Signature: Sorin ZAHARIA June 7, 2018 Title: Authentication System Based on Keystroke Dynamics Aalborg University Copenhagen Theme: A. C Meyers Vænge 15 Services and Platforms 2450 København SV Secretary: Maiken Keller Project period: Telephone (+45) 9940 2471 February - June 2018 mks@staff.aau.dk Abstract: Author: Sorin Zaharia Information is a very important asset for com- panies and users. With new types of attacks being developed at a quick pace, innovative Supervisors: technologies are required to keep information Per Lynggaard safe. In this project, a keystroke dynamics au- Samant Khajuria thentication system is proposed, which aims to solve the issues of classic one time log in No. of Pages: 81 systems. The problem with these systems is that, no matter how secure they are, once the No. of Appendix Pages: 12 authentication step is performed, there is no way for the system to authenticate the users Total no. of pages: 103 continuously. In this project, the concept of Finished: June 7, 2018 keystroke dynamics is introduced, and a sys- tem that can continuously authenticate users based on freely-typed text is proposed. Differ- ent feature extraction methods are described that should capture the users’ typing behav- ior. When uploading this document to Digital Exam each group member confirms that all have participated equally in the project work and that they collectively are responsible for the content of the project report. Furthermore each group member is liable for that there is no plagiarism in the report. iii Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background.......................................2 1.2 Authentication.....................................3 1.3 Problem Definition...................................6 1.4 Structure of the Project................................7 1.5 Limitations.......................................7 2 Methodology 9 2.1 Project Phases.....................................9 2.2 Research framework.................................
    [Show full text]
  • Soft Biometrics for Keystroke Dynamics Syed Zulkarnain Syed Idrus
    Soft Biometrics for Keystroke Dynamics Syed Zulkarnain Syed Idrus To cite this version: Syed Zulkarnain Syed Idrus. Soft Biometrics for Keystroke Dynamics. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition [cs.CV]. Université de Caen Basse-Normandie, 2014. English. tel-01108638 HAL Id: tel-01108638 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01108638 Submitted on 23 Jan 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Universit´ede Caen Basse-Normandie Ecole´ doctorale SIMEM PhD Thesis presented and defended on : 04/12/2014 by Syed Zulkarnain SYED IDRUS to obtain the PhD from Universit´ede Caen Basse-Normandie Specialised : Computer Science and Applications Soft Biometrics for Keystroke Dynamics Director of thesis : Pr. Dr. Christophe Rosenberger Co-director of thesis : Pr. Dr. Patrick Bours Members of the Jury Amine Na¨ıt-Ali University Professor LISSI, Universit´eParis-Est Creteil, France (Reviewer) Najoua Essoukri Ben Amara University Professor ENI de Sousse, Tunisia (Reviewer) Mohamed Daoudi University Professor LIFL, T´el´ecom Lille1, France (Examiner) Christophe
    [Show full text]
  • Keystroke Dynamics
    Keystroke Dynamics P018 - term project, 2001 Petr Švenda <[email protected]> Masaryk University Technology overview History: The original technology was derived from the idea of identifying a sender of Morse code using a telegraphy key known as the "fist of the sender", whereby operators could identify senders transmitting a message by the rhythm, pace and syncopation of the signal taps. During World War II, the Army Signal Core identified that an individual keying rhythm on a telegraph key was quite unique. In the early-‘80s the National Science Foundation and the National Bureau of Standards in the United States conducted studies establishing that typing patterns contain unique characteristics that can be identified. Technology details: Keystroke dynamics are one of behavioral biometrics and look at the way a person types at a keyboard. Specifically, keyboard dynamics measures two distinct variables: dwell time, which is the amount of time you hold down a particular key and flight time, which is the amount of time it takes a person to move between keys. Keyboard dynamics systems can measure one's keyboard input up to 1000 times per second. Keystroke dynamics requires, as most biometrics technologies, a reference template. This involves several sessions of a person using a keystroke dynamic system so that the system can construct or build the reference template by detecting one's typing rhythms. There are some other characteristics, which can be also used, such as typing error frequency, frequency of using characters etc. Typing characteristics can be extracted from a structured text (login, first and last name, password ...) same as from an unstructured (free) text, but results of verification/recognition are now much better for structured text.
    [Show full text]