DOCSLIB.ORG

IUCN Evaluations of Nominations of Natural and Mixed Properties to the World Heritage List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IUCN Evaluations of Nominations of Natural and Mixed Properties to the World Heritage List WHC/17/41.COM/INF.8B2 IUCN World Heritage Evaluations 2017 IUCN Evaluations of nominations of natural and mixed properties to the World Heritage List IUCN REPORT FOR THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE, 41ST SESSION, KRAKÓW, POLAND, 2-12 JULY 2017 Cover page photo: Los Alerces National Park, Argentina © IUCN/T. Jaeger 2016 IUCN Evaluations of Nominations of Natural and Mixed Properties to the World Heritage List Table of Contents Executive summary table Alphabetical index and IUCN field evaluators Introduction A. Natural Properties Page n° A1. New Nominations of Natural Properties Africa Benin/Burkina Faso – W-Arly-Pendjari Complex (extension of W – Niger) 3 Ghana – Mole National Park 17 Asia / Pacific China – Qinghai Hoh Xil 29 India – Bhitarkanika Conservation Area 43 Europe / North America Albania/Austria/Belgium/Bulgaria/Croatia/Italy/Romania/Slovenia/Spain/Ukraine – Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians and Other Regions of Europe 55 Latin America / Caribbean Argentina – Los Alerces National Park 73 A2. Referred Nominations of Natural Properties Asia / Pacific Mongolia/Russian Federation – Landscapes of Dauria See document WHC/17/41.COM/INF.8B2.ADD A3. Minor Boundary Modifications of Natural Properties Asia / Pacific India – Manas Wildlife Sanctuary See document WHC/17/41.COM/INF.8B2.ADD India – Western Ghats See document WHC/17/41.COM/INF.8B2.ADD B. Mixed Properties Page n° B1. New Nominations of Mixed Properties Latin America / Caribbean Mexico – Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley: originary habitat of Mesoamerica 89 B2. Minor Boundary Modifications of Mixed Properties Asia / Pacific China – Mount Wuyi See document WHC/17/41.COM/INF.8B2.ADD C. Cultural Properties Page n° C1. New Nominations of Cultural Landscapes Africa South Africa – ǂKhomani Cultural Landscape 103 Europe / North America Denmark – Kujataa – a subarctic farming landscape in Greenland 107 France – Taputapuātea 111 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland – The English Lake District 115 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TABLE OF IUCN EVALUATIONS TO THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE Meets protection and Meets one or more natural criteria Meets conditions of integrity management Name of the requirements State ) / Note ) ) ) property vii viii ix x Party ( ( ( ( n in (ID number) rotectio Criterion Criterion Criterion Criterion Criterion Integrity Boundaries Threats addressed Justification of serial approach Protection status Management zone Buffer P surrounding arrea Paragraphs of the Operational 78, 108- required ission Guidelines for the 118, 77 77 77 77 78, 87-95 99-102 78, 98 137 78, 132.4 103-107 Implementation of the World 132.4, Heritage Convention 135 m Further IUCN Recommendation W-Arly-Pendjari Benin / Bukina Complex (extension of ̶ ̶ yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no I Faso W – Niger) (749 Bis) Mole National Park Ghana no ̶ no no no no yes ̶ yes part part no N (1514) Qinghai Hoh Xil China yes ̶ ̶ yes yes yes yes ̶ yes yes yes no I (1540) Bhitarkanika India Conservation Area no ̶ no no no no no ̶ no no no no N (1530) Albania / Austria / Belgium / Bulgaria / Primeval Beech Forests Croatia / Italy / of the Carpathians and ̶ ̶ no ̶ no part yes no part part part yes D Romania / Other Regions of Slovenia / Europe (1133 Ter) Spain / Ukraine OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE Meets protection and Meets one or more natural criteria Meets conditions of integrity management Name of the requirements State ) / Note ) ) ) property vii viii ix x Party ( ( ( ( n in (ID number) rotectio Criterion Criterion Criterion Criterion Criterion Integrity Boundaries Threats addressed Justification of serial approach Protection status Management zone Buffer P surrounding arrea Paragraphs of the Operational 78, 108- required ission Guidelines for the 118, 77 77 77 77 78, 87-95 99-102 78, 98 137 78, 132.4 103-107 Implementation of the World 132.4, Heritage Convention 135 m Further IUCN Recommendation Los Alerces National Argentina Park part ̶ ̶ part part part part ̶ part yes part no I (1526) Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Mexico Valley: originary habitat ̶ ̶ ̶ part part no part yes part no part yes D of Mesoamerica (1534) KEYS yes met I inscribe / approve part partially met N non inscribe / approve no not met R refer ̶ not applicable D defer ALPHABETICAL INDEX State Party ID No. Property Page Albania / Austria / Belgium / Bulgaria / Croatia / Italy / 1133 Ter Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians and Other Regions of Europe 55 Romania / Slovenia / Spain / Ukraine Argentina 1526 Los Alerces National Park 73 Benin / Burkina 749 Bis W-Arly-Pendjari Complex (extension of W – Niger) 3 Faso China 1540 Qinghai Hoh Xil 29 Ghana 1514 Mole National Park 17 India 1530 Bhitarkanika Conservation Area 43 Mexico 1534 Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley: orginary habitat of Mesoamerica 89 IUCN FIELD EVALUATORS Site Name Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians and Other Kumiko Yoneda, Josephine Langley, Elena Osipova Regions of Europe Lu Zhi, David Mihalic Los Alerces National Park Paula Bueno and Tilman Jaeger W-Arly-Pendjari Complex (extension of W – Niger) Thierry Lefebvre Qinghai Hoh Xil Carlo Ossola and Chimed Ochir-Bazarsad Mole National Park Wendy Strahm and Oscar Mthimkhulu Bhitarkanika Conservation Area Naomi Doak and Remco van Merm Sila National Park Gerhard Heiss Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley: originary habitat Thora Amend of Mesoamerica It should be noted that the IUCN field evaluators are part of a broader evaluation approach detailed in the introduction of this report. THE WORLD HERITAGE CONVENTION IUCN TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT OF WORLD HERITAGE NOMINATIONS MAY 2017 1. INTRODUCTION other five Commissions (Species Survival, Environmental Law, Education and Communication, This technical evaluation report of natural and mixed Ecosystem Management, and Environmental, properties nominated for inclusion on the World Economic and Social Policy); from international earth Heritage List has been conducted by the World science unions, non-governmental organizations and Heritage Programme of IUCN (International Union for scientific contacts in universities and other Conservation of Nature). The World Heritage international agencies. This highlights the considerable Programme co-ordinates IUCN’s input to the World “added value” from investing in the use of the Heritage Convention in close cooperation with the extensive networks of IUCN and partner institutions. IUCN Global Protected Areas Programme (GPAP) and other units of IUCN both at headquarters and in the These networks allow for the increasing involvement of regions. It also works particularly closely with IUCN’s regional natural heritage experts and broaden the World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA), the capacity of IUCN with regard to its work under the world’s leading expert network of protected area World Heritage Convention. Reports from field managers and specialists, with the IUCN Species missions and comments from a large number of Survival Commission (SSC) and other IUCN external reviewers are comprehensively examined by Commissions, as well as the many members and the IUCN World Heritage Panel, as key inputs to each partners of IUCN. evaluation. The IUCN World Heritage Programme prepares the final technical evaluation reports which IUCN’s evaluations are conducted according to the are presented in this document and represent the Operational Guidelines that the World Heritage corporate position of IUCN on World Heritage Committee has agreed, and which are the essential evaluations. IUCN has also placed emphasis on framework for the application of the evaluation providing input and support to ICOMOS in relation to process. This framework was updated and revised in those cultural landscapes which have important natural 2015, and a revised process documented in Annex 6 values. of the Operational Guidelines, following discussion by the World Heritage Committee. In carrying out its IUCN has continued to extend its cooperation with function under the World Heritage Convention, IUCN ICOMOS, including coordination in relation to the has been guided by four principles: evaluation of mixed sites and cultural landscapes. IUCN and ICOMOS have also enhanced the (i) ensuring the highest standards of quality control, coordination of their panel processes as requested by institutional memory and consistency in relation to the World Heritage Committee. This cooperation was technical evaluation, monitoring and other reported at the 40th Session of the World Heritage associated activities; Committee, and will be discussed under Item 9B this year, where IUCN and ICOMOS exchanged and (ii) increasing the use of specialist networks of IUCN, coordinated their advice to the Committee, as also especially WCPA, but also other relevant IUCN noted in the relevant specific reports. Commissions and specialist partner networks; IUCN has endeavoured wherever possible to work in (iii) working in support of the UNESCO World the spirit of the Upstream Process, as will be debated Heritage Centre and States Parties to examine in the relevant items on the Committee’s agenda how IUCN can creatively and effectively support the World Heritage Convention and individual properties as “flagships” for conservation; and 2. EVALUATION PROCESS (iv) increasing the level of effective partnership In carrying out the technical evaluation of nominations between IUCN and the World Heritage Centre, IUCN is guided by the Operational Guidelines to the ICOMOS and ICCROM. World Heritage Convention, specifically Annex 6 which spells out the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Austrocedrus Forests of South America Are Pivotal Ecosystems at Risk Due to the Emergence of an Exotic Tree Disease
    GSDR 2015 Brief Austrocedrus forests of South America are pivotal ecosystems at risk due to the emergence of an exotic tree disease: can a joint effort of research and policy save them? By Alina Greslebin 1, Maria Laura Vélez 2 and Matteo Garbelotto 3. 1CONICET-Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia SJB, Argentina; 2CONICET-Centro de Investigación y Extensión Forestal Andino Patagónico (CIEFAP), Argentina; 3University of California Berkeley, USA Introduction A. chilensis covers today a total estimated area of Human expansion, global movement, and climate 185,000 ha in South America. As a dominant forest change have led to a number of emerging and re- species, its role in supporting biodiversity, generating emerging diseases. The decline of biodiversity due to shelter for wildlife, as well as preventing soil erosion emerging plants pathogens may cause habitat and and preserving water quality is well understood. Along wildlife loss and declines in ecosystem services. This, in with Araucaria araucana, it is the tree species that turn, often results in lower human well-being. Reports grows furthest into the ecotone zone within the of emerging plant diseases are constantly on the rise, Patagonia steppe, where it plays a key role preventing and often they appear to be linked to the commercial desertification. There are however additional functions trade of plants and plant products. While there are this tree provides, including the production of valuable several examples of decimation or extinction of plant timber and the generation of an environment ideal for hosts affected by invasive forest diseases, there are no cattle grazing, recreational and touristic activities and known cases of invasive forest diseases successfully for human settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • Benin 2019 - 2020
    BENIN 2019 - 2020 West African Savannah Buffalo Western Roan Antelope For more than twenty years, we have been organizing big game safaris in the north of the country on the edge of the Pendjari National Park, in the Porga hunting zone. The hunt is physically demanding and requires hunters to be in good physical condition. It is primary focused on hunting Roan Antelopes, West Savannah African Buffaloes, Western Kobs, Nagor Reedbucks, Western Hartebeests… We shoot one good Lion every year, hunted only by tracking. Baiting is not permitted. Accommodation is provided in a very confortable tented camp offering a spectacular view on the bush.. Hunting season: from the beginning of January to mid-May. - 6 days safari: each hunter can harvest 1 West African Savannah Buffalo, 1 Roan Antelope or 1 Western Hartebeest, 1 Nagor Reedbuck or 1 Western Kob, 1 Western Bush Duiker, 1 Red Flanked Duiker, 1 Oribi, 1 Harnessed Bushbuck, 1 Warthog and 1 Baboon. - 13 and 20 days safari: each hunter can harvest 1 Lion (if available at the quota), 1 West African Savannah Buffalo, 1 Roan Antelope, 1 Sing Sing Waterbuck, 1 Hippopotamus, 1 Western Hartebeest, 1 Nagor Reedbuck, 1 Western Kob, 1 Western Bush Duiker, 1 Red Flanked Duiker, 1 Oribi, 1 Harnessed Bushbuck, 1 Warthog and 1 Baboon. Prices in USD: Price of the safari per person 6 hunting days 13 hunting days 20 hunting days 2 Hunters x 1 Guide 8,000 16,000 25,000 1 Hunter x 1 Guide 11,000 24,000 36,000 Observer 3,000 4,000 5,000 The price of the safari includes: - Meet and greet plus assistance at Cotonou airport (Benin), - Transfer from Cotonou to the hunting area and back by car, - The organizing of your safari with 4x4 vehicles, professional hunters, trackers, porters, skinners, - Full board accommodation and drinks at the hunting camp.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Affairs November 2015
    CCUURRRREENNTT AAFFFFAAIIRRSS NNOOVV 22001155 -- TTEECCHHNNOOLLOOGGYY http://www.tutorialspoint.com/current_affairs_november_2015/technology.htm Copyright © tutorialspoint.com News 1 - GSAT-15 of ISRO launched successfully The GSAT-15, India’s communication satellite, was launched successfully by the European Ariane 5 VA-227 launch Vehicle. This massive 3164 kgs GSAT-15 carries communication transponders in Ku-band as well as a GPS Aided GEO Augmented Navigation (GAGAN) payload operating in L1 and L5 bands. This is the 3rd satellite to carry GAGAN payload after GSAT-8 and GSAT-10. Navigation payload GAGAN would provide orbital backup to ensure safety of life navigation services in the civil aviation sector. News 2 - Agni-IV missile test fired successfully The Nuclear capable surface-to-surface Agni-IV missile was successfully test-fired by the Indian Army’s Strategic Forces Command (SFC). This two-stage solid-propelled, surface-to-surface ballistic missile is designed to carry a one-tonne payload to a distance of 4,000 kms. During the test fire, this missile covered a range of more than 3,500 kms, before splashing down in the waters of Bay of Bengal. News 3 - Chinese Supercomputer Tianhe – 2 declared the most powerful supercomputer for sixth straight time China’s Tianhe-2 supercomputer has emerged as the world’s most powerful supercomputer system for the sixth consecutive time. This supercomputer also called as the Milky Way 2 has been developed by China’s National University of Defense Technology. The supercomputer Titan of the US Department of Energy and supercomputer Sequoia of the Tech giant IBM have been placed at second and third position respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • SIPRI Yearbook 2018: Armaments, Disarmament and International
    world nuclear forces 267 VI. Indian nuclear forces shannon n. kile and hans m. kristensen India is estimated to have a growing arsenal of 130–40 nuclear weapons (see table 6.7). This figure is based on calculations of India’s inventory of weapon-grade plutonium and the number of operational nuclear-capable delivery systems. India is widely believed to be gradually expanding the size of its nuclear weapon stockpile as well as its infrastructure for producing nuclear warheads. Military fissile material production India’s nuclear weapons are believed to be plutonium-based. The plutonium was produced at the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) in Trombay, Mumbai, by the 40-megawatt-thermal (MW(t)) heavy water CIRUS reactor, which was shut down at the end of 2010, and the 100-MW(t) Dhruva heavy water reactor. India operates a plutonium reprocessing plant for military purposes at the BARC.1 India plans to build six fast breeder reactors by the 2030s, which will significantly increase its capacity to produce plutonium that could be used for building weapons.2 An unsafeguarded 500-megawatt-electric (MW(e)) prototype fast breeder reactor (PFBR) is being built at the Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research (IGCAR) complex at Kalpakkam, Tamil Nadu. The PFBR is expected to be commissioned in mid-2018 following a series of technical delays.3 The IGCAR has announced that a fast reactor fuel cycle facility will be built at Kalpakkam to reprocess spent fuel from the PFBR and future fast breeder reactors. The plant is scheduled to be commissioned by 2022.4 India is currently expanding its uranium enrichment capabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Reproductive Features of Chaltenobatrachus Grandisonae
    Revista Chilena de Historia Natural ISSN: 0716-078X [email protected] Sociedad de Biología de Chile Chile CISTERNAS, JAVIERA; CORREA, CLAUDIO; VELÁSQUEZ, NELSON; PENNA, MARIO Reproductive features of Chaltenobatrachus grandisonae (Anura: Batrachylidae) within a protected area in Patagonia, Chile Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, vol. 86, núm. 3, 2013, pp. 365-368 Sociedad de Biología de Chile Santiago, Chile Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=369944186013 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative REPRODUCTION OF CHALTENOBATRACHUS GRANDISONAE 365 REVISTA CHILENA DE HISTORIA NATURAL Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 86: 365-368, 2013 © Sociedad de Biología de Chile NATURAL HISTORY NOTE Reproductive features of Chaltenobatrachus grandisonae (Anura: Batrachylidae) within a protected area in Patagonia, Chile Características reproductivas de Chaltenobatrachus grandisonae (Anura: Batrachylidae) en un área protegida en Patagonia, Chile JAVIERA CISTERNAS1,2,*, CLAUDIO CORREA1,3, NELSON VELÁSQUEZ2 & MARIO PENNA2 1Aumen o el Eco de los montes, Organización No Gubernamental, P. O. Box 393, Coyhaique, Chile 2Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Medicina, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, P. O. Box 70005, Santiago, Chile 3Pontifi cia Universidad Católica de Chile, Departamento de Ecología, Alameda 340, P. O. Box 6513677, Santiago, Chile *Corresponding author: [email protected] Basso et al. (2011) assigned the monotypic Reproductive mode is defined by genus Chaltenobatrachus for the species a combination of characteristics including described originally as Telmatobius grandisonae breeding site, clutch structure, location of Lynch, 1975 (later transferred to the genus egg deposition, larval development site and Atelognathus by Lynch 1978).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1: Maps and Plans Appendix184 Map 1: Conservation Categories for the Nominated Property
    Appendix 1: Maps and Plans Appendix184 Map 1: Conservation Categories for the Nominated Property. Los Alerces National Park, Argentina 185 Map 2: Andean-North Patagonian Biosphere Reserve: Context for the Nominated Proprty. Los Alerces National Park, Argentina 186 Map 3: Vegetation of the Valdivian Ecoregion 187 Map 4: Vegetation Communities in Los Alerces National Park 188 Map 5: Strict Nature and Wildlife Reserve 189 Map 6: Usage Zoning, Los Alerces National Park 190 Map 7: Human Settlements and Infrastructure 191 Appendix 2: Species Lists Ap9n192 Appendix 2.1 List of Plant Species Recorded at PNLA 193 Appendix 2.2: List of Animal Species: Mammals 212 Appendix 2.3: List of Animal Species: Birds 214 Appendix 2.4: List of Animal Species: Reptiles 219 Appendix 2.5: List of Animal Species: Amphibians 220 Appendix 2.6: List of Animal Species: Fish 221 Appendix 2.7: List of Animal Species and Threat Status 222 Appendix 3: Law No. 19,292 Append228 Appendix 4: PNLA Management Plan Approval and Contents Appendi242 Appendix 5: Participative Process for Writing the Nomination Form Appendi252 Synthesis 252 Management Plan UpdateWorkshop 253 Annex A: Interview Guide 256 Annex B: Meetings and Interviews Held 257 Annex C: Self-Administered Survey 261 Annex D: ExternalWorkshop Participants 262 Annex E: Promotional Leaflet 264 Annex F: Interview Results Summary 267 Annex G: Survey Results Summary 272 Annex H: Esquel Declaration of Interest 274 Annex I: Trevelin Declaration of Interest 276 Annex J: Chubut Tourism Secretariat Declaration of Interest 278
    [Show full text]
  • In Situ Management and Domestication of Plants in Mesoamerica
    Annals of Botany 100: 1101–1115, 2007 doi:10.1093/aob/mcm126, available online at www.aob.oxfordjournals.org REVIEW In situ Management and Domestication of Plants in Mesoamerica ALEJANDRO CASAS*, ADRIANA OTERO-ARNAIZ, EDGAR PE´ REZ-NEGRO´ N and ALFONSO VALIENTE-BANUET Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, UNAM. Apartado Postal 27-3 (Santa Marı´a de Guido), Morelia, Michoaca´n 58190, Mexico Received: 29 September 2006 Revision requested: 22 January 2007 Accepted: 22 May 2007 Published electronically: 25 July 2007 † Background and Aims Ethnobotanical studies in Mexico have documented that Mesoamerican peoples practise systems of in situ management of wild and weedy vegetation directed to control availability of useful plants. In situ management includes let standing, encouraging growing and protection of individual plants of useful Downloaded from species during clearance of vegetation, which in some cases may involve artificial selection. The aim of this study was to review, complement and re-analyse information from three case studies which examined patterns of morphological, physiological and genetic effects of artificial selection in plant populations under in situ manage- ment in the region. † Methods Information on wild and in situ managed populations of the herbaceous weedy plants Anoda cristata and Crotalaria pumila, the tree Leucaena esculenta subsp. esculenta and the columnar cacti Escontria chiotilla, Polaskia chichipe and Stenocereus stellatus from Central Mexico was re-analysed. Analyses compared morphology and fre- http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/ quency of morphological variants, germination patterns, and population genetics parameters between wild and managed in situ populations of the species studied. Species of columnar cacti are under different management inten- sities and their populations, including cultivated stands of P.
    [Show full text]
  • Transhumant Pastoralism in Africa's Sudano-Sahel
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Transhumant Pastoralism in Africa’s Sudano-Sahel The interface of conservation, security, and development Mbororo pastoralists illegally grazing cattle in Garamba National Park, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Credit: Naftali Honig/African Parks Africa’s Sudano-Sahel is a distinct bioclimatic and ecological zone made up of savanna and savanna-forest transition Program Priorities habitat that covers approximately 7.7 million square kilometers of the continent. Rich in species diversity, the • Increased data gathering and assessment of core Sudano-Sahel region represents one of the last remaining natural resource assets across the Sudano-Sahel region. intact wilderness areas in the world, and is a high priority • Efficient data-sharing, analysis, and dissemination for wildlife conservation. It is home to an array of antelope between relevant stakeholders spanning conservation, species such as giant eland and greater kudu, in addition to security, and development sectors, and in collaboration African wild dog, Kordofan giraffe, African elephant, African with rural agriculturalists and pastoralists. lion, leopard, and giant pangolin. • Enhancement and promotion of multi-level This region is also home to many rural communities who rely governance approaches to resolve conflict and stabilize on the landscape’s natural resources, including pastoralists, transhumance corridors. whose livelihoods and cultural identity are centered around • Continuation and expansion of strategic investments in strategic mobility to access seasonally available grazing the network of priority protected areas and their buffer resources and water. Instability, climate change, and zones across the Sudano-Sahel, in order to improve increasing pressures from unsustainable land use activities security for both wildlife and surrounding communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Monitoring and Conservation in a West African Protected Area by Andrew Cole Burton a Dissertation Submitted in Partial
    Wildlife Monitoring and Conservation in a West African Protected Area By Andrew Cole Burton A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science, Policy and Management in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Justin S. Brashares, Chair Professor Steven R. Beissinger Professor Claire Kremen Professor William Z. Lidicker Fall 2010 Wildlife Monitoring and Conservation in a West African Protected Area © 2010 by Andrew Cole Burton ABSTRACT Wildlife Monitoring and Conservation in a West African Protected Area by Andrew Cole Burton Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science, Policy and Management University of California, Berkeley Professor Justin S. Brashares, Chair Global declines in biological diversity are increasingly well documented and threaten the welfare and resilience of ecological and human communities. Despite international commitments to better assess and protect biodiversity, current monitoring effort is insufficient and conservation targets are not being met (e.g., Convention on Biological Diversity 2010 Target). Protected areas are a cornerstone of attempts to shield wildlife from anthropogenic impact, yet their effectiveness is uncertain. In this dissertation, I investigated the monitoring and conservation of wildlife (specifically carnivores and other larger mammals) within the context of a poorly studied savanna reserve in a tropical developing region: Mole National Park (MNP) in the West African nation of Ghana. I first evaluated the efficacy of the park’s long-term, patrol-based wildlife monitoring system through comparison with a camera-trap survey and an assessment of sampling error. I found that park patrol observations underrepresented MNP’s mammal community, recording only two-thirds as many species as camera traps over a common sampling period.
    [Show full text]
  • Birding Tour to Ghana Specializing on Upper Guinea Forest 12–26 January 2018
    Birding Tour to Ghana Specializing on Upper Guinea Forest 12–26 January 2018 Chocolate-backed Kingfisher, Ankasa Resource Reserve (Dan Casey photo) Participants: Jim Brown (Missoula, MT) Dan Casey (Billings and Somers, MT) Steve Feiner (Portland, OR) Bob & Carolyn Jones (Billings, MT) Diane Kook (Bend, OR) Judy Meredith (Bend, OR) Leaders: Paul Mensah, Jackson Owusu, & Jeff Marks Prepared by Jeff Marks Executive Director, Montana Bird Advocacy Birding Ghana, Montana Bird Advocacy, January 2018, Page 1 Tour Summary Our trip spanned latitudes from about 5° to 9.5°N and longitudes from about 3°W to the prime meridian. Weather was characterized by high cloud cover and haze, in part from Harmattan winds that blow from the northeast and carry particulates from the Sahara Desert. Temperatures were relatively pleasant as a result, and precipitation was almost nonexistent. Everyone stayed healthy, the AC on the bus functioned perfectly, the tropical fruits (i.e., bananas, mangos, papayas, and pineapples) that Paul and Jackson obtained from roadside sellers were exquisite and perfectly ripe, the meals and lodgings were passable, and the jokes from Jeff tolerable, for the most part. We detected 380 species of birds, including some that were heard but not seen. We did especially well with kingfishers, bee-eaters, greenbuls, and sunbirds. We observed 28 species of diurnal raptors, which is not a large number for this part of the world, but everyone was happy with the wonderful looks we obtained of species such as African Harrier-Hawk, African Cuckoo-Hawk, Hooded Vulture, White-headed Vulture, Bat Hawk (pair at nest!), Long-tailed Hawk, Red-chested Goshawk, Grasshopper Buzzard, African Hobby, and Lanner Falcon.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Assessment for Atlantic Coast Leopard Frog
    Species Status Assessment Class: Amphibia Family: Ranidae Scientific Name: Lithobates [Rana] kauffeldi Common Name: Atlantic Coast leopard frog Species synopsis: More than a century of taxonomic confusion regarding the leopard frogs of the East Coast was resolved in 2012 with the publication of a genetic analysis (Newman et al. 2012) confirming that a third, cryptic species of leopard frog (Rana [= Lithobates] sp. nov.) occurs in southern New York, northern New Jersey, and western Connecticut. The molecular evidence strongly supported the distinction of this new species from the previously known northern (R. pipiens [= L. pipiens]) and southern (R. sphenocephala [=L. sphenocephalus]) leopard frogs. Rana kauffeldi is morphologically similar to R. sphenocephala and R. pipiens, but distinguishable by advertisement call, genetics, habitat, geographic distribution, and a combination of morphological characters (Feinberg et al. 2014). Bioacoustic evidence of the frog’s occurrence in southern New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware, and as far south as the Virginia/North Carolina border is available, thereby raising uncertainty about which species of leopard frog occur(s) presently and historically throughout the region. Some evidence suggests that Long Island might at one time have had two species: the southern leopard frog in the pine barrens and the Atlantic Coast leopard frog in coastal wetlands and the Hudson Valley. For simplicity’s sake, in this assessment we retain the name “Atlantic Coast leopard frog” even though much of the information available may also refer to the southern leopard frog or a combination of species (Feinberg et al. 2014). 1 I. Status a. Current and Legal Protected Status i. Federal ____ Not Listed______________________ Candidate? ___No____ ii.
    [Show full text]
  • Tamil Nadu News National News
    July-28 TAMIL NADU NEWS PM Modi inaugurated Dr APJ Abdul Kalam memorial in Rameshwaram PM Modi inaugurated Dr APJ Abdul Kalam memorial in Rameshwaram. The memorial is situated at Pei Karumbu near Rameswaram, where the mortal remains of Kalam were laid to rest. The task of building the 15 crore worth of memorial was taken up by India’s Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO). A replica of India’s most powerful long-range missile, Agni, has also been installed at the memorial site. Satellite models, more than 700 photographs of Dr.Kalam, and 91 paintings are exhibited at the memorial site. The memorial was inaugurated on the second death anniversary of Dr.A.P.J.Abdul Kalam. NATIONAL NEWS Odisha formally named Wheeler Island after APJ Abdul Kalam Former President of India, A.P.J.Abdul Kalam’s Death Anniversary: July 27 Odisha government has formally named the Wheeler island in Bhadrak district as ‘APJ Abdul Kalam Island’. The revenue and disaster management department issued a gazette notification after obtaining no objection certificate from the Ministry of Home Affairs. Odisha government has named the island as a tribute to the former president on his second death anniversary. Dr.Kalam had an emotional attachment with the interim test range at Chandipur in Balasore district and Wheeler Island in Bhadrak district. He had spent most of his time in these two places as part of his efforts to develop missiles for the protection of the country. INTERNATIONAL NEWS BRICS tax authorities inked landmark Taxation Cooperation Memorandum Tax authorities of the five BRICS countries signed a landmark document to establish a mechanism for taxation cooperation.
    [Show full text]