INFORMATION ISSUED by the Assooanm of Xmsh RERKEES UI GREAT BRITAIN

Volume XXVIII No. 7 July, 1973 INFORMATION ISSUED BY THE ASSooAnm OF xmsH RERKEES UI GREAT BRITAIN '^' Bresli was on the whole about 51% and in the last auer half year 39%, the percentage of acknow ledged claims from abroad was 62^% and in the past half year still 58%. In the view of this writer the reasons for this phenomenon TOWARDS THE END OF INDEMNmCATION are the following ones: On the one hand, generally claimants resident in Germany seem to have been more inclined to put forward AND RESTITUTION PROCEEDINGS questionable claims. On the other hand, the officials of the indemnification offices, includ . This article is based on the half-yearly stat- several claims under different headings. Of ing those who are still comparatively young 'stics which the Lander of the Federal Repub- these claims about 74,500 have not yet been and cannot judge the Nazi era from first •p submit to the Federal authorities. Copies settled. hand experience, seem to be quite conversant °i these reports are also sent to the Confer According to latest statistics the number of with the fact that all Jews were persecuted ence on Material Claims Against Germany claims still pending when the Entschadigungs- in every possible way. They appear to be less which in tum brings them to the notice of schlussgesetz was promulgated on September inclined to accept that there were also quite a l^s affiliates, including the Council of Jews 18, 1965, and lodged after 1965 amounted to number of others, political opponents of the ''°ni Gennany. The reports are analysed and 1,140,000, of which 885,000 were submitted by Nazi regime or people who simply could not commented on by the Director of the Claims persons living abroad. As already stated, stomach its excesses, who were persecuted Conference, Dr. Emst Katzenstein, and serve 74,500 cases were still unsettled at the end of and are now liable to claim for the damage ^ the basis of his indefatigable work directed 1972; of these 63,000 referred to claims from they have suffered. Jot only to legislative developments, but also abroad. In all Lander, with the exception of It is also interesting to note from the statis •? the proper administrative handling of the Rheinland-Pfalz, on the average only 2% of tics to what extent the various groups of yaims. Throughout the years, the Council of the foreign claims were still pending. In indemnification claims from abroad were ews from Germany has rendered its assist- Rheinland-Pfalz, however, the percentage of acknowledged and rejected. The final figures ''ce in this work by applications and corres imsettled foreign cases amounts to 19%. This of claims settled after 1965, for instance, re pondence, in former years also by its repre- fact has its very good reasons. A great num veal that of claims made for damage to pro ^ntatiyes' journeys to Bonn and to the ber of the claimants were persecutees who fessional income about 139,000 were acknow uthorities of the various Lander, as set out had formerly not lived in the present terri ledged and 42,000 rejected. In cases covering '".detail for the period until 1967 in the tory of the Federal Republic (including West damage to property, including special levies printed report on "Die Arbeit des Council of Berlin) but in the present German Demo such as Judenabgabe and Reichsfluchtsteuer, ews from Germany auf dem Gebiet der Wie- cratic Republic, or in those parts of former the relationship of acknowledged to rejected êrgutmachung" rendered by the late Dr. F. Germany now in the hands of other countries, claims is 45,000 to 44,000. This may, to some oldschmidt and the present writer. The work or in foreign countries which were occupied extent, be due to the fact that quite a few ^s also been carried out in constant co- by the Nazis. It was necessary to determine claims of this kind were settled under the jP^T^tion with the United Restitution Organ- which Lander should deal with these claims. Federal Restitution Law. In the case of claims anri '^ which handles the individual claims It was arranged that claims of persons for for deprivation of liberty the figures are nd which was established at the initiative of merly resident in the present territory of the 38,000 to 27,000, and in the case of damage to ^''e CouncU. GDR were to be handled by the indemnifica life and health 89,000 to 77,000. tion office at Hildesheim, situated in the Land , ^s now 25 years have passed since the Niedersachsen, and the claims of former resi The relationship between the various groups jj^^^lation in the field of restitution and com- dents of the lost or occupied territories by of claims is, however, very different when jjâtion started, it seems approprate to re- the Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, if the claim the actual payments made are compared. At th ""^ ^^^ present position as revealed in ants now live in Europe, and by the Land the time of the promulgation of the first in J, ^ statistics. The first laws which regulated Rheinland-Pfalz, if they now live outside demnification laws it was estimated that the ^ restitution of identifiable property were Europe. This regulation was not damaging in whole amount needed to settle these claims womulgated by the Allied Governments, and the first two instances, Niedersachsen and would be between six and eight thousand "a '^^^ were directed against individual Nordrhein-Westfalen, as the big apparatus of million D. Marks. The figures of the statistics tj^'^nisers" of property of the persecutees. the indemnification offices in these Lander now show that the indemnification cases alone Qj^y .need not be considered in the context could take the work in its stride. Yet the (from claimants within Gennany and abroad) j^g'his article. A few years later the German Land Rheinland-Pfalz, where the number of already amounted to 33,500 million D. Marks; rg^'jer and the Federal Republic began to indigenous persecutees was not large and where to these have to be ad(ied another 3,500 mil jj^Sulate indemnification claims on accoimt of resources were limited, has increasingly been lion D. Marks for payments under the ^^ various measures of Nazi persecution, unable to cope with its work, to the great Federal Restitution Law and 8,000 million D. y^^^ding to the latest statistics covering the detriment of this group of claimants which Marks paid under other headings, such as 98^^ "ntil December 31, 1972, approximately includes residents especially in the United claims under special arrangements with the by °^ those claims which were submitted States, South America and Israel. Some years State of Israel and indemnification claims gj^P^rsecutees outside Germany have been under the special law for the indemnification ago, a branch office of the indemnification of persecuted officials of the Reich, the jâaiised in all Lander with the exception of authority Rheinland-Pfalz was established in Lander and communities, including Jewish j^îneland-Pfalz, to which reference will be Berlin where the authorities could spare the communities. It is estimated that a further the later. There is even one Land, albeit necessary number of case workers. Neverthe 8,000 million D. Marks will have to be paid ej. ^'nallest one, i.e. Bremen, where at the less, the backlog of claims to be finished by under the various laws imtil 1975. The sums clai °^ ^^ ^^^ °°* ^ single application by the Rheinland-Pfalz authorities has remained still to be paid after 1975 (mainly annuities nants resident outside the Federal Re- the most conspicuous weak spot of the whole and pensions) are estimated at 25,000 million thr *^^ ^*^1 pending (there were still organisation. D. Marks. ,S^ claims of people resi(lent in Bremen). be .^ number of claims submitted from the The statistics reveal that the percentage of The statistics also include details about the ginning of the indemnification legislation rejected cases was considerably higher among capital payments and annuities to claimants liilr *^ ^^^ °* ^^'^2 amounted to about 4J claims by residents of the Federal Republic abroad under the Federal Indemnification ig Y!.^^' °f course, the number of claimants than among claims from abroad. Whilst the Law. The capital payments for damage to *er because frequently one claimant had percentage of acknowledged inland claims Continued on page 2, colnnui 1 Page 2 AJR INFORMATION July, 1973 TOWARDS THE END OF FROM THE GERMAN SCENE INDEMNIFICATION BRANDT'S VISIT TO ISRAEL WAR CRIMINALS Continued from page 1 Himmler Aide Chancellor Brandt's visit to Israel received professional earnings amount to approximately wide coverage in Germany, Israel and other Inquiries into the wartime role of Horst 2,700 million D. Marks, and capital payments counitries. Apart from a few, unimpressive Bender, a Stuttgart lawyer who was the legal protests, there were no signs of resentment adviser to Heinrich Himmler, the S.S. cbiei. for damage to life or health altogether have been opened by the Central Agency p^ approximately also to this amount. Payments in Israel, and the welcome accorded him by Mrs. Meir and other Israeli leaders was par the Investigation of Nazi Crimes at Ludwigs for damage to liberty amount to approximately ticularly cordial. The Chancellor reiterated burg. 2,500 million D. Marks, and for damage to the attatude of the Federal German Republic Bender recently admitted advising Himini^r property to about 900 million D. Marks. As to Israel: Bonn seeks normal diplomatic rela in 1942 that the murder of Jews " for political far as current annuities paid to claimants tions with any country which wants them reasons" should not be punished; only theu abroad are concemed, they have so far but these ties "cannot come at the expense of murder " on sadistic or sexual grounds amounted to 10,700 million D.

Load more