The New England Retail Grocery Industry

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The New England Retail Grocery Industry Working Paper #1120-80 never published WORKING PAPER ALFRED P. SLOAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT THE NEW ENGLAND RETAIL GROCERY INDUSTRY Paul E. Cournoyer WP 1121-80 March 1980 MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 50 MEMORIAL DRIVE CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS 02139 THE NEW ENGLAND RETAIL GROCERY INDUSTRY Paul E. Cournoyer WP 1121-80 March 1980 This report was prepared for the Economic Research Division, Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, under grant number OER-620- G78-14 (99-7-13440) . The work was co-sponsored by the Office of Research and Development, Employment amd Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor; and the Center for the Study of Metropolitan Problems, National Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Contractors and grantees conducting research under government sponsorship are encouraged to express their own judgments freely. Therefore, the statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations in this report are solely those of the author (s) , and do not necessarily reflect the views of amy of the sponsor- ing agencies. .-n -> /'-\ .^- ^ t? BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA SHEET . On the research project of which this report is one product, "Private Investment, Public Policy, and the Transformation of Older Regions: An Analysis of the New England Economy" A research team of economists, planners, and industrial relations and management specialists has completed a twenty-two month study of the New England economy. Case studies, historical research and statistical analysis of several new microdata sets were used in combination to learn about the development since the 1950s of twelve specific (3-digit) industries in the region, representing both the old (e.g. apparel) and the new (e.g. computers), both mcmufacturing (e.g. aircraft engines) cuid services (e.g. hospitals). Additional working papers were written on plant closings and the impact on workers, on differences in labor meurket structure between "old" and "new" American cities, and on the various methodologies employed in the case studies themselves. A synthesis of the case studies is also available. Like the latter, this synthesis/overview is organized around five themes: the historical development of the industry, nationally and in New England; the record (since the late 195-Q5) of private investment and disinvestment in the industry in New England; major changes in technology which have affected or facilitated industry expansions, contract- ions or relocations of private capital; the impacts of these transformations on the region's labor force (and especially on workers in these particular industries) ; and the ways in which government (especially at the national level) has promoted or retarded these developments . The synthesis is accompamied by a statistical overview of macroeconomic changes in the New England region— chcuiges in the growth and mix of all of the area's industries —since the end of World War II. This provides a context within which the case studies may be given some perspective The principal investigator was Prof. Bennett Harrison of the M.I.T. Department of Urban Studies and Planning. His faculty colleagues included Prof. Barry A. Bluestone, Director of the Social Welfare Research Institute of Boston College; and Prof. Thomas A. Barocci, Industrial Relations Section, Sloan School of Management, M.I.T. They and a team of twenty under- graduate and graduate MIT and BC students conducted the research over the period March, 1978 - Jan., 1980, based at the Harvard- MIT Joint Center for Urban Studies. The project was co-sponsored by the U.S. Economic Development Administration, the Employment and Training Administration of the U.S. Department of Labor, and the Center for the Study of Metropolitan Problems in the National Institute of Mental Health. to be added later: list of project reports and from whom they cam be ordered (either NTIS, the Joint Center, or the Sloan School l-forking Paper Series) • Acknowledgements I would first like to thank Professor Thomas Barocci for his direc- ' tion and support throughout this project. He was responsible for my ini- tial involvement in this study and has given me considerable help in all aspects of this report. Professor Bennett Harrison has been an invalu- able resource and as such has provided numerous comments on the struc- ture and content of this report. I would like to thank Ms. Christine LeCain for editing this report in its entirety as well as keeping me company in the library for what turned out to be memy hours Lastly, I would like to thank Milton Segel, executive director, Massachusetts Food Association, for introducing me to many grocery execu- tives in the New England states and for providing me with an overview of this industry in the initial stages of my research. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I, INTRODUCTION 1 Description of the Grocery Industry 2 Methodology of This Study 8 CHAPTER II, HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT, ANALYSIS OF NEW ENGLAND VS. U.S. TRENDS 11 Historical Development of the Grocery Industry 11 CHAPTER III, MARKET STRUCTURE 21 Vertical Integration, Investment and Mergers 26 Location 31 Pricing 34 Price Discrimination 38 Advertising/Marketing 45 CHAPTER IV, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION 51 Innovation and Technology 51 CHAPTER V, EMPLOYMENT AND TRADE UNIONISM 59 Longitudinal Analysis of the Grocery Industry's Labor Force 59 Employment 60 Short-Run Worker Mobility by Industry: Workers Leaving the Grocery Industry 69 New Entrants to the Grocery Industry 71 Origin and Destination Studies: Long-Run Mobility 73 Earnings 82 Dun and Brads treet Data 91 CHAPTER VI, GOVERNMENT LEGISLATION AND REGULATION 104 Government 104 CHAPTER VII, GROCERY INDUSTRY OUTLOOK AND SUMMARY 112 The Grocery Industry Outlook 112 Summary 116 APPENDIX 118 BIBLIOGRAPHY 121 TABLE OF TABLES TABLE 1 Market Share of Convenience Stores ' 4 TABLE 2 Sales and Nxomber of Stores 6 TABLE 3 Employment in the "Food Industry" 18 TABLE 4 Concentration Ratios and Number of Stores 22 TABLE 5 Grocery Closings and Reopenings ^~°^ 25 TABLE 6 1975 Operating Profiles - Independent Stores 27 TABLE 7 Average Relationships Between Industry Concentra- tion, Firm Market Shares, and Average Profits: 1976 28 TABLE 8 Consumer Price Index 37 TABLE 9 Average Costs of Doing Business 39 TABLE 10 Distribution of Employment of Yovmg and Old 62 TABLE 10a Age" Distribution of Workers 64 TABLE 11 Distribution of Employment by Sex and Age 66 TABLE 12 Distribution of Employment by Race 68 TABLE 13 Number of Workers Leaving Grocery Industry by Age 70 TABLE 14 Number of Workers Leaving Grocery Industry by Industry into Which They Move 72 TABLE 15 Distribution of Entrants by Age and Sex 74 TABLE 16 Distribution of New Entrants to N.E. Grocery 1973 76 TABLE 17 Destination Study 1973 78 TABLE 18 Origin Study of Workers in 1969 80 TABLE 19 Origin Study of Workers Under 25 81 TABLE 20 Comparison 6f Real Annual Earning 83 TABLE 21 Grocery Worker's Real Earnings Distribution by Age 86 TABLE OF TABLES (continued) TABLE 22 Average Yearly Earnings by Age 87 TABLE 23 Ratio of Grocery Earning to All New England Average by Sex 89 TABLE 24 Ratio of Female to Male Earnings 90 TABLE 25 Comparison of Sexes Working All Four Quarters 92 TABLE 26 1969-1972 Components of Employment Change 94 TABLE 27 1972-1974 Components of Employment Change 95 TABLE 28 Components of Employment Change 1974-1976 97 TABLE 29 Distribution of Regional Unionization 99 . CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION This case study of the New England grocery industry is one of twelve industry studies conducted by the New England Economy Project under the auspices of the Harvard/M.I .T. Joint Center for Urban Studies. The major areas of inquiry in the project as a whole include the historical development of each industry, market structure, technology and innova- tions, government regulations and legislation, employment, and finally an industry forecast. -This grocery industry study places particular em- phasis on market structure and employment Topics included in the market structure section of this paper are concentration, competition, integration, merger, investment, diversifi- cation, location, pricing, and price discrimination. The information is based on interviews I conducted with a number of New England grocery chain executives, industry spokesmen and academic experts on the grocery retail industry (see Appendix for the interview guide used for this purpose) . Utilizing longitudinal data on the work histories of a large number of Social Security-covered people working in New England at some time between 1957 and 1975, the employment section analyzes labor force behavior in the New England grocery industry. Description of the grocery industry Grocery stores (SIC541) , as defined by the Standard Industrial Classification, are primarily engaged in the retail sale of all sorts of canned food and dry goods, either packaged or in bulk, such as tea, coffee, spices, sugar, and flour, fresh fruits, and vegetables and fre- quently smoked and prepared meats, fish and poultry. They are commonly known as supermarkets, food stores and delicatessens. The grocery or retail food business is the largest retail industry in the United States, with over $180 billion in annual sales. It is characterized by large variations in store size as measured by sales vol- ume. The three categories of grocery stores as defined by sales volume include supermarkets, superettes, and a variety of convenience or small stores. Supermarkets are defined as those grocery stores with annual sales exceeding one million dollars. These stores are typified by large 30,000 to 40,000 square foot markets such as Stop and Shop, Purity Su- preme, and Star Markets. Superettes, the second category of grocery stores, have annual sales between $500,000 and $1,000,000 and tend to be owned by small independents. Convenience stores or small stores are characterized by annual sales of less than $500,000, typically averaging around $300,000.
Recommended publications
  • The Retail Sector on Long Island Overlooked… Undervalued… Essential!
    The Retail Sector on Long Island Overlooked… Undervalued… Essential! A Preliminary Report from the Long Island Business Council May 2021 Long Island “ L I ” The Sign of Success 2 | The Retail Sector on Long Island: Overlooked, Undervalued, Essential! Long Island Business Council Mission Statement The Long Island Business Council (LIBC) is a collaborative organization working to advocate for and assist the business community and related stakeholders. LIBC will create an open dialogue with key stakeholder groups and individuals to foster solutions to regional and local economic challenges. LIBC will serve as a community-focused enterprise that will work with strategic partners in government, business, education, nonprofit and civic sectors to foster a vibrant business climate, sustainable economic growth and an inclusive and shared prosperity that advances business attraction, creation, retention and expansion; and enhances: • Access to relevant markets (local, regional, national, global); • Access to a qualified workforce (credentialed workforce; responsive education & training); • Access to business/economic resources; • Access to and expansion of the regional supply chain; • A culture of innovation; • Commitment to best practices and ethical operations; • Adaptability, resiliency and diversity of regional markets to respond to emerging trends; • Navigability of the regulatory environment; • Availability of supportive infrastructure; • An attractive regional quality of life © 2021 LONG ISLAND BUSINESS COUNCIL (516) 794-2510 [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: Socioeconomic Conditions
    Chapter 3: Socioeconomic Conditions A. INTRODUCTION This chapter analyzes whether the proposed actions would result in changes in residential and economic activity that would constitute significant adverse socioeconomic impacts as defined by the City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR) Technical Manual.1 The proposed actions would result in the redevelopment of an underutilized site with an approximately 214,000- square-foot (sf), 60-foot-tall commercial building currently anticipated to be a BJ’s Wholesale Club along with up to three other retail stores on the second level, 690 parking spaces, and approximately 2.4 acres of publicly accessible waterfront open space. The Brooklyn Bay Center site (“project site”) is located at 1752 Shore Parkway between Shore Parkway South to the east, Gravesend Bay (Lower New York Bay) to the west, and between the prolongation of 24th Avenue to the north and the prolongation of Bay 37th Street to the south. The objective of the socioeconomic conditions analysis is to determine if the introduction of the retail uses planned under the proposed actions would directly or indirectly impact population, housing stock, or economic activities in the local study area or in the larger retail trade area. Pursuant to the CEQR Technical Manual, significant impacts could occur if an action meets one or more of the following tests: (1) if the action would lead to the direct displacement of residents such that the socioeconomic profile of the neighborhood would be substantially altered; (2) if the action would lead to the displacement of substantial numbers of businesses or employees, or would displace a business that plays a critical role in the community; (3) if the action would result in substantial new development that is markedly different from existing uses in a neighborhood; (4) if the action would affect real estate market conditions not only on the site anticipated to be developed, but in a larger study area; or (5) if the action would have a significant adverse effect on economic conditions in a specific industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Proposed Second Administrative Settlement and Request for Public Comment
    http://frwebgate3.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin.. .cID=7723205640+0+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve Superfund Records Confer [Federal Register: September 10, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 175)] ol 11: faff <&&*>! [Notices] BREAK: [Page 57426-57429] OTHER: From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:frlOse02-81] ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [FRL-7373-4] Proposed Second Administrative Cashout Settlement Under Section 122(g) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act; In Re: Beede Waste Oil Superfund Site, Plaistow, NH AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Notice of proposed second administrative settlement and request for public comment. [[Page 57427]] SUMMARY: In accordance with section 122(i) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given of a proposed second administrative settlement for recovery of past and projected future response costs concerning the Beeda Waste Oil Superfund Site in Plaistow, New Hampshire with the settling parties listed in the Supplementary Information portion of this notice. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency--Region I (EPA) is proposing to enter into a second de minimis settlement agreement to address claims under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (^CERCLA11), 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq. Notice is being published to inform the public of the proposed second settlement and of the opportunity to comment. This second settlement, embodied in a CERCLA section 122(g) Administrative Order on Consent C'AOC'1), is designed to resolve each settling party's liability at the Site for past work, past response costs and specified future work and response costs through covenants under sections 106 and 107 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics in a Mature Industry: Entry, Exit, and Growth of Big-Box Grocery Retailers
    WORKING PAPERS Dynamics in a Mature Industry: Entry, Exit, and Growth of Big-Box Retailers Daniel Hanner Daniel Hosken Luke M. Olson Loren K. Smith WORKING PAPER NO. 308 September 2011 FTC Bureau of Economics working papers are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment. The analyses and conclusions set forth are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of other members of the Bureau of Economics, other Commission staff, or the Commission itself. Upon request, single copies of the paper will be provided. References in publications to FTC Bureau of Economics working papers by FTC economists (other than acknowledgment by a writer that he has access to such unpublished materials) should be cleared with the author to protect the tentative character of these papers. BUREAU OF ECONOMICS FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20580 Dynamics in a Mature Industry: Entry, Exit, and Growth of Big-Box Grocery Retailers Daniel Hanner Daniel Hosken Luke M. Olson Loren K. Smith1 U.S. Federal Trade Commission September 15, 2011 Abstract This paper measures market dynamics within the U.S. grocery industry (defined as supermarket, supercenter and club retailers). We find that the composition of outlets changes substantially, roughly 7%, each year, and that store sizes have increased as the result of growth by supercenter and club retailers. We find significant changes in the relative position of brands in markets over time. These changes are largely the result of expansion (or contraction) by incumbents rather than entry or exit. There is little entry or exit, except by small firms.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic News & Trends
    ECONOMIC NEWS & TRENDS March 3, 2017 ECONOMIC NEWS & TRENDS This nonconfidential edition includes excerpts from articles, studies, and economic research. The content focuses on trends and news during the third and fourth quarters of 2016. This report may be forwarded to others in your agency, the local chamber, and in your community. CONTENTS FIGURES HIGHLIGHTS. PAGE 2 FIGURE 1. GDP CHANGES OVER QUARTERS (2013–2016), PAGE 3 Section 1. U.S. ECONOMY, PAGE 3 FIGURE 2. UNEMPLOYMENT FOR 4Q2016, PAGE 5 Section 2. U.S. AUTO REPORT, PAGE 7 TABLES Section 3. TEXAS ECONOMY, PAGE 7 TABLE 1. PERCENT CHANGES IN CPI FOR ALL URBAN CONSUMERS 2016, PAGE 4 Section 4. RETAIL AND E-COMMERCE SALES AND TRENDS, PAGE 9 TABLE 2. U.S. HOUSING MARKET INDICATORS FOR 4Q2016, PAGE 5 Section 5. RESTAURANT NEWS AND SUPERMARKET TRENDS, PAGE 10 TABLE 3. ESTIMATED QUARTERLY REVENUE FOR SELECTED SERVICES FOR EMPLOYER FIRMS, NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED FROM 3Q2016 TO Section 6. SELECTED REGIONAL REPORT, PAGE 12 4Q2016, PAGE 6 CLIENT TEAM, PAGE 12 TABLE 4. TEXAS HOUSING MARKET INDICATORS FOR 4Q2016, PAGE 8 TABLE 5. U.S RESTAURANT EXPANSION 2016, PAGE 11 For more information about MuniServices, visit: www.MuniServices.com or contact us at [email protected]. ECONOMIC NEWS & TRENDS March 3, 2017 HIGHLIGHTS U.S. GDP: Real gross domestic product (GDP) increased at U.S. median home sales price: In 4Q2016, the median asking an annual rate of 1.9 percent in 4Q2016, according to the sales price for vacant-for-sale units was $167,700. New “advance” estimate released by the Bureau of Economic vehicles: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Freson Bros. Stony Plain AB Bobs' IGA Wrangell AK City Market, Inc
    NGA Retail Membership List by State – Summer 2018 Company City State Freson Bros. Stony Plain AB Bobs' IGA Wrangell AK City Market, Inc. Wrangell AK Copper Valley IGA Glennallen AK Country Foods IGA Kenai AK Cubby's Marketplace IGA Talkeetna AK Fairway Market, IGA Skagway AK Hames Corporation dba Sea Mart Quality Foods Sitka AK Howsers Supermarket IGA Haines AK IGA Food Cache Delta Junction AK Tatsuda's IGA Ketchikan AK Trading Union IGA Petersburg AK A & R Supermarkets, Inc. dba Sav Mor Calera AL Autry Greer & Sons, Inc. Mobile AL Baker Foods, Inc. dba Piggly Wiggly Pell City AL Big Bear of Luverne, Inc. dba Super Foods Supermarkets Luverne AL Farmers IGA Foodliner Opp AL Forster & Howell, Inc. dba Grocery Outlets Dothan AL Fourth Avenue Supermarket Inc. dba Four Winds Fine Foods Bessemer AL Freeman Foods Inc. dba Freeman's Shur-Valu Foods Dothan AL Gregerson's Foods, Inc. dba Gregerson's Foods Gadsden AL Hackleburg Market Hackleburg AL Holley Oil Company Wetumpka AL Hopper Family Market Cullman AL Johnson's Giant Food, Inc. Altalla AL Langley Inc. Hayneville AL M&B Enterprises dba Fuller's Supermarket Greensboro AL Piggly Wiggly - Warrior, AL Russell Supermarket, Inc. Warrior AL Pinnacle Foods Mobile AL Ragland Bros. Retail Co. Inc. Huntsville AL Shan Bruce Enterprises, Inc. dba Foodland Fort Payne AL Tallassee Super Foods Tallassee AL Western Supermarkets, Inc. Birmingham AL Williams-McGue Inc. dba WM Grocery Wedowee AL Wrights Markets Opelika AL Bill's Fresh Market Jonesboro AR Cash Saver Russellville AR Cranford's Fresh World White Hall White Hall AR Dale Newman Management Co.
    [Show full text]
  • New Economic Approaches to Consumer Welfare and Nutrition
    New Economic Approaches to Consumer Welfare and Nutrition Conference Proceedings Food and Agricultural Marketing Consortium Alexandria, Virginia January 14-15, 1999 EXPANSION OF NON-TRADITIONAL FOOD RETAIL OUTLETS: EFFECT ON CONSUMER WELFARE ERS Commissioned Paper for the January 1999 Meeting of the Food and Agricultural Marketing Consortium *Michelle A. Morganosky Associate Professor of Consumer and Retail Marketing Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics University of Illinois 326 Mumford Hall 1301 West Gregory Drive Urbana, IL 61801-3681 Tel: 217-333-0737 -or- 217-333-3217 Fax: 217-333-5538 Email: [email protected] Brenda J. Cude Professor and Head Department of Housing and Consumer Economics The University of Georgia 215 Dawson Hall Athens, GA 30602-3622 Tel: 706-542-4856 -or- 706-542-4857 Fax: 706-542-4397 Email: [email protected] *Send correspondence to Michelle A. Morganosky EXPANSION OF NON-TRADITIONAL FOOD RETAIL Version: March 3, 1999 BC OUTLETS: EFFECT ON CONSUMER WELFARE ABSTRACT In this study three different methods of data collection (telephone interviews/focus groups/on-line consumer surveys) were used to assess the impact of non-traditional retail outlets on consumer welfare. We analyzed consumer cross patronage between supermarkets and non- traditional food retail channels, examined reasons for cross patronage, and made a preliminary assessment of consumer response to one of the newest retail channels: on-line food shopping. Telephone interviews were conducted in a medium-size market with 300 individuals and focus groups were conducted in two major metropolitan markets and one medium-size market. The on-line survey consisted of responses from 243 on-line food shoppers in six different markets.
    [Show full text]
  • James Fishkin
    James A. Fishkin Partner Washington, D.C. | 1900 K Street, NW, Washington, DC, United States of America 20006-1110 T +1 202 261 3421 | F +1 202 261 3333 [email protected] Services Antitrust/Competition > Merger Clearance > Merger Litigation: U.S. > James A. Fishkin combines both government and private sector experience within his practice, which focuses on mergers and acquisitions covering a wide range of industries, including supermarket chains and other retailers, consumer and food product manufacturers, internet- based firms, chemical and industrial gas firms, and healthcare firms. He has been a key participant in several of the most significant litigated antitrust cases in the last two decades that have set important precedents, including representing Whole Foods Market, Inc. in FTC v. Whole Foods Market, Inc. and the Federal Trade Commission in FTC v. Staples, Inc. and FTC v. H.J. Heinz Co. Mr. Fishkin has also played key roles in securing unconditional clearances for many high-profile mergers, including the merger of OfficeMax/Office Depot and Monster/HotJobs, and approval for other high-profile mergers after obtaining successful settlements, including the merger of Albertsons/Safeway. He also served as the court-appointed Divestiture Trustee on behalf of the Department of Justice in the Grupo Bimbo/Sara Lee bread merger. Mr. Fishkin has been recognized by Chambers USA, The Best Lawyers in America, The Legal 500 , and Benchmark Litigation for his antitrust work. Chambers USA notes that Mr. Fishkin “impresses sources with his ‘very practical perspective,’ with commentators also describing him as ‘very analytical.’” The Legal 500 states that Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Changes in Food Retailing: Six Country Case Studies
    FSRG Publication Structural Changes in Food Retailing: Six Country Case Studies edited by Kyle W. Stiegert and Dong Hwan Kim FSRG Publication, November 2009 FSRG Publication Structural Changes in Food Retailing: Six Country Case Studies edited by Kyle W. Stiegert Dong Hwan Kim November 2009 Kyle Stiegert [email protected] The authors thank Kate Hook for her editorial assistance. Any mistakes are those of the authors. Comments are encouraged. Food System Research Group Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Wisconsin-Madison http://www.aae.wisc.edu/fsrg/ All views, interpretations, recommendations, and conclusions expressed in this document are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the supporting or cooperating organizations. Copyright © by the authors. All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for noncommercial purposes by any means, provided that this copyright notice appears on all such copies. ii Chapter 7: Food Retailing in the United States: History, Trends, Perspectives Kyle W. Stiegert and Vardges Hovhannisyan 1. INTRODUCTION: FOOD RETAILING: 1850-1990 Before the introduction of supermarkets, fast food outlets, supercenters, and hypermarts, various other food retailing formats operated successfully in the US. During the latter half of the 19th century, the chain store began its rise to dominance as grocery retailing format. The chain grocery store began in 1859 when George Huntington Hartford and George Gilman founded The Great American Tea Company, which later came to be named The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company (Adelman, 1959). The typical chain store was 45 to 55 square meters, containing a relatively limited assortment of goods.
    [Show full text]
  • NGA Retail Membership List by State – Winter 2019
    NGA Retail Membership List by State – Winter 2019 Company City State A & R Super Markets, Inc. Calera Alabama Autry Greer & Sons Inc Mobile Alabama Baker Foods, Inc. Pell City Alabama Bruce Management, Inc. Fort Payne Alabama Farmers IGA Foodliner Opp Alabama Food Giant, Inc. Bessemer Alabama Forster & Howell Inc Dothan Alabama Fourth Avenue Supermarket Bessemer Alabama Freeman's Shur-Valu Foods Dothan Alabama Fuller's Supermarket Greensboro Alabama Gateway Foodland Inc Double Spgs Alabama Gregerson's Foods, Inc. HQ Gadsden Alabama Holley Oil Company Wetumpka Alabama Johnson's Giant Food, Inc. Attalla Alabama Piggly Wiggly Warrior Alabama Pinnacle Foods dba Save A Lot Mobile Alabama Ragland Bros Retail Co's, Inc. Huntsville Alabama Renfroe, Inc. Montgomery Alabama Star Super Market, Inc. Huntsville Alabama Tallassee Super Foods Tallassee Alabama Western Supermarkets, Inc Birmingham Alabama Wright's Markets, Inc. Opelika Alabama Benjamin's IGA Wrangell Alaska City Market, Inc. Wrangell Alaska Copper Valley IGA Glennallen Alaska Country Foods IGA Kenai Alaska Cubbys Marketplace IGA Talkeetna Alaska Fairway Market IGA Skagway Alaska Hames Corporation Sitka Alaska Howsers IGA Supermarket Haines Alaska IGA Food Cache Delta Junction Alaska Tatsudas IGA Ketchikan Alaska Trading Union IGA Market Petersburg Alaska Freson Bros. Stony Plain Alberta Rodney's Supermarket Arima Arima Del Sol IGA #6 San Luis Arizona Ed's IGA Market Snowflake Arizona El Rancho Market IGA Chandler Arizona Food Town IGA Eloy Arizona Garrett's IGA Supermarket Rio Rico Arizona Norms IGA Kearny Arizona Olsens IGA Market Yuma Arizona RCCM Foodtown IGA Market Eloy Arizona Shopes Market IGA Coolidge Arizona The Butcher & The Farmer Marketplace IGA Buckeye Arizona Tonto Basin Market Place IGA Tonto Basin Arizona Wilburs IGA Market Saint Johns Arizona Cranford's Fresh World Little Rock Arkansas Cranford's Fresh World dba FoodWise Hot Springs Village White Hall Arkansas Cranford's Fresh World dba ShopWise Redfield Redfield Arkansas Cranford's Fresh World, Rison Rison Arkansas Dale Newman Management Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Powerline Plans
    Powerline Plans Plan Name Bin Number PCN Phone Number 16th Street Clinic 600471 5122 800-248-1062 170 Group Insurance Benefits 610494 9999 800-788-7871 1st Rx 004261 CRX 800-964-2531 4D Clinic Plan 006037 810-540-2425 4D Pharmacy Management 600428 01990000 248-540-2425 A-Med Authority 600471 3905 800-248-1062 A & S Financial 600471 1018 800-248-1062 AAA of Michigan and Wisconsin 400004 AMW 800-233-8065 AAA of Michigan and Wisconsin 003858 A4 800-235-4357 AARP/Member Choice 610415 800-345-5413 ABAG Golden Gate Brg WC 600471 W001 800-248-1062 Abbey Pharmacy Network 600471 1451 800-248-1062 ABC Liquors, Inc. 600428 00674000 800-522-7487 ABC Warehouse,Detroit MI 600428 01140456 800-522-7487 ABCRC 600428 00677003 800-522-7487 ABI - Humphrey Products 003585 23070 800-788-2949 ABI 10 Motor Components 003585 33820 800-788-2949 ABI 600428 00700032 800-522-7487 Abrams Industries, Inc. 600428 01061096 800-522-7487 Absolute CompCare Rx WC 008977 ADP Absolute CompCare Rx WC 007192 01140456 800-522-7487 Acceleration Ntnl Svc Inc. 600428 01120086 800-522-7487 Access MedPlus/Tenncare 900014 CLAIMRX 401-782-0700 Access MedPlus 880005 4044 800-884-3238 Access/Vital Interests 610014 800-922-1557 https://www.qs1.com/PLPlans.nsf/Web%20By%20Plan%20Name!OpenView&Start=2 (1 of 2)8/8/2006 6:50:44 PM Powerline Plans Accident Fund of Michigan 600428 00700054 800-522-7487 Accubank Mortgage Inc 600428 00672018 800-522-7487 Aclaim 005848 800-422-5246 ACMG Employers Health Plan 400004 ACM 800-233-8065 Acordia Sr Benefits Horizons 600428 00790015 800-522-7487 https://www.qs1.com/PLPlans.nsf/Web%20By%20Plan%20Name!OpenView&Start=2 (2 of 2)8/8/2006 6:50:44 PM Powerline Plans Plan Name Bin Number PCN Phone Number Acordia Sr Benefits Horizons 600428 00790015 800-522-7487 ACT Industries, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The U.S. Food Marketing System, 2002--AER-811
    Electronic Report from the Economic Research Service United States Department www.ers.usda.gov of Agriculture The U.S. Food Marketing System, Agricultural Economic 2002 Report No. 811 Competition, Coordination, and Technological Innovations Into June 2002 the 21st Century J. Michael Harris, Phil R. Kaufman, Steve W. Martinez (coordinator), and Charlene Price Abstract This report focuses on recent trends in the food supply chain. Chapters on food manu- facturing, wholesaling, grocery retailing, and food service provide a detailed overview of structure, performance, information systems, new technology, and foreign direct invest- ments. The report also contains a comprehensive set of appendix tables containing sales, concentration, trade, productivity, and other indicators. At the time of publication, most of the data sets used in this report included data through the year 2000. Keywords: Consolidation, concentration, trade, sales, technology, profits, foreign direct investment. Acknowledgments We are indebted to several reviewers for helping us to get this publication off the ground. Special thanks are due to Jean Kinsey, University of Minnesota; Jim MacDonald, Economic Research Service; and Brian Todd, The Food Institute; for detailed comments and suggestions on the entire draft. We also thank Joe Uhl, Purdue University; John Connor, Purdue University; and Gerald Grinnell, Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA); for detailed comments on specific chapters. Finally, we gratefully acknowledge Alden Manchester and Mark Denbaly, Economic Research Service, for their valuable comments on the manuscript; Veronica Jones for invaluable assistance with the extensive set of appendix tables; Dale Simms for excellent editorial assistance; and Wynnice Pointer-Napper for exquisite design. Note: Use of brand or firm names in this publication does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]