DOCSLIB.ORG

Dictyostelium Cell Fixation: Two Simple Tricks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dictyostelium Cell Fixation: Two Simple Tricks Protocol Dictyostelium Cell Fixation: Two Simple Tricks Michael Koonce 1,*, Irina Tikhonenko 1 and Ralph Gräf 2 1 Division of Translational Medicine, Wadsworth Center, NYS Department of Health, Albany, NY 12237, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Cell Biology, University of Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-518-486-1490 Received: 16 June 2020; Accepted: 1 July 2020; Published: 1 July 2020 Abstract: We share two simple modifications to enhance the fixation and imaging of relatively small, motile, and rounded model cells. These include cell centrifugation and the addition of trace amounts of glutaraldehyde to existing fixation methods. Though they need to be carefully considered in each context, they have been useful to our studies of the spatial relationships of the microtubule cytoskeletal system. Keywords: Dictyostelium; cell fixation; microscopy; microtubule; cytoskeleton 1. Introduction The striking mobility of Dictyostelium makes for an interesting and impactful model system to study dynamic cellular events [1]. Directed cell movement, rapid shape changes, and internal reorganization in response to extracellular cues are frequently accentuated here over more sedentary cell types and thus provide novel access to their study and understanding. However, one of the tradeoffs in a dynamic lifestyle is that these cells can be less tightly adherent to their substrate, and thus imaging and downstream structural analyses can present challenges that must be carefully considered. For many years, we have tinkered with fixation and staining conditions in order to image cytoskeletal arrays and GFP-tagged proteins in D. discoideum [2–6]. Likely not alone, we have been challenged with difficulties in getting cells to sufficiently flatten to facilitate imaging and to remain attached to coverslips for downstream structural processing. In this brief report, we would like to share two insights that make a difference in our work, in the hopes that they benefit others as well. 2. Results 2.1. Cell Flattening In the early 19800s, Fukui and colleagues developed an agar overlay procedure for D. discoideum that utilizes thin sheets of agarose to flatten cells and significantly improves some aspects of cellular imaging [7]. This is now a widely used method that gently restricts the experimental depth of field to around 1–3 µm. Cells under agarose can undergo division and remain viable for hours in sealed chambers. This overlay remains our preferred method for live cell imaging, enabling us to follow individual microtubule (MT) motions in a minimal number of focal planes [8,9]. However, the procedure is a bit cumbersome to use for routine cell fixation, especially for multiple coverslips. The agar sheet takes some care to set up, only covers a small portion of the coverslip, and takes slightly longer for the fixative to penetrate to the cells, and cell loss (at least in our hands) can be significant upon sheet removal for downstream cell processing. With any perturbation, there are caveats to consider when flattening cells for long periods, and thus multiple strategies can be useful to distinguish between genuine and imposed phenotypes. Methods Protoc. 2020, 3, 47; doi:10.3390/mps3030047 www.mdpi.com/journal/mps Methods and Protoc. 2020, 3, 47 2 of 6 As such an alternative, we have begun to spin cells directly onto coverslips. Five minutes at 400 g in a standard tabletop centrifuge not only promotes attachment but also cell spreading. A small volume of cell suspension is added to buffer overlying a coverslip in a centrifuge tube (Figure 1) and spun for five minutes. The coverslip is then lifted out and gently slid into a dish containing fixative. This approach eliminates the waiting period for cell settling; agarose is not required, and cells labeled with a tubulin antibody [10] appear very similar to those prepared by agar overlay (Figure 2). Methods Protoc. 2020, 3, 47 2 of 6 The take-home message here is that the organization of the MT array in centrifuged cells appears to be very similar if not identical to what we would select as the “best” cells from either direct fix or agar Asoverlay such procedures. an alternative, However, we have a primary begun to benefit spin cells is that directly they are onto significantly coverslips. more Five plentiful minutes on at 400the centrifuged g in a standard coverslip tabletop than centrifuge in the other not onlytwo pr promoteseparations. attachment For example, but also approximately cell spreading. 10% A of small the volumecells on ofa gravity cell suspension settled coverslip is added are to busufficientlyffer overlying flat enough a coverslip to project in a centrifuge a useful tubecharacterization (Figure1) and of spunMT arrays for five for minutes. the types The questions coverslip that is interest then lifted us. On out a andcentrifuged gently slid coverslip, into a dish this containingincreases to fixative. at least This60% approachof the population. eliminates This the percentage waiting period is similar for cell in settling; the agar agarose overlay is notpreparations, required, andbut cellscentrifuged labeled withcells aextend tubulin across antibody the entire [10] appearcoverslip very and similar do no tot suffer those detachment prepared by due agar to overlay agar sheet (Figure removal.2). Figure 1. CentrifugationCentrifugation devices. devices. Panel Panel (A ()A shows) shows a side a side view, view, panel panel (B) (showsB) shows a top a topdown down view view of a of50 amL 50 Sorvall mL Sorvall centrifugation centrifugation tube fitted tube fittedwith an with EPON an EPON base (yellow base (yellow layer in layer A) and in A a) white and a Delrin white Delrinrod segment rod segment (2.5 cm (2.5 diameter, cm diameter, 3.75 3.75cm cmlength). length). The The notch notch along along the the side side is is helpful helpful to to retrieve coverslips withwith forceps,forceps, allowingallowing accessaccess to to the the underside underside of of the the coverslip coverslip for for lifting. lifting. Panel Panel (C ()C shows) shows a modifieda modified multiwell multiwell holder holder for for processing processing up up to to 12 12 samples samples at at a a time. time. TheThe toptop rowrow containscontains 1212 mm round coverslips;coverslips; thesethese cancan bebe readilyreadily removedremoved withwith curvedcurved forceps.forceps. The take-home message here is that the organization of the MT array in centrifuged cells appears to be very similar if not identical to what we would select as the “best” cells from either direct fix or agar overlay procedures. However, a primary benefit is that they are significantly more plentiful on the centrifuged coverslip than in the other two preparations. For example, approximately 10% of the cells on a gravity settled coverslip are sufficiently flat enough to project a useful characterization of MT arrays for the types questions that interest us. On a centrifuged coverslip, this increases to at least 60% of the population. This percentage is similar in the agar overlay preparations, but centrifuged cells extend across the entire coverslip and do not suffer detachment due to agar sheet removal. Methods Protoc. 2020, 3, 47 3 of 6 Methods and Protoc. 2020, 3, 47 3 of 6 FigureFigure 2. ExamplesExamples of of antibody-labeled antibody-labeled microtube microtube (MT) (MT) patterns patterns in cells in (A cells) directly (A) addeddirectly to added coverslips to coverslipsand fixed afterand afixed 10 min after period; a 10 min (B) cellsperiod; fixed (B after) cells overlay fixed withafter agaroverlay sheets; with and agar (C ,sheets;D) cells and fixed (C after,D) cells5 min fixed centrifugation after 5 min onto centrifugation coverslips. onto Panels coverslips. (A–C) show Panels interphase (A)–(C)arrangements show interphase of mononucleated arrangements ofcells mononucleated (left) and binucleates cells (left) (right). and Panelbinucleates (D) shows (right). mitotic Panel cells (D) in shows late anaphase mitotic (left)cells andin late late anaphase telophase (left)(right). and While late telophase the three (right). different While cell the preparations three differe looknt cell similar, preparations it is important look similar, to note it that is important there are totypically note that far there fewer are flattened typically cells far on fewer the direct flattened fix coverslips cells on the and direct substantially fix coverslips fewer and cells substantially in general on fewerthe agarose cells in overlay general coverslip. on the agarose MTs are overlay shown cove in green,rslip. MTs DNA are in blue,shown Scale in green, bar = 5DNAµm. in blue, Scale bar = 5 μm. 2.2. Cell Attachment 2.2. CellThe Attachment second perhaps underappreciated impact derives from a fixation recipe that includes a smallThe amount second of perhaps glutaraldehyde underappreciated (0.05% final). impact This derives concentration from a fixation is not recipe sufficient that includes to preserve a small cell amountstructure of on glutaraldehyde its own, nor does (0.05% it require final). This autofluorescence concentration quenching is not sufficient by sodium to preserve borohydride, cell structure but it substantially improves cell retention on the coverslip (Figure3). Although formaldehyde alone or 20 on its own, nor does it require autofluorescence quenching by sodium borohydride, but− it◦ substantiallymethanol can improves provide structuralcell retention preservation on the coverslip at the light (Figure microscopy 3). Although (LM) formaldehyde level, cell loss alone from theor −coverslip20° methanol is substantial can provide at each structural wash or preservation incubation step. at the This light is particularlymicroscopy a(LM) problem level, for cell mitotic loss from cells, thesince coverslip they are is more substantial rounded at each and lesswash adherent or incubation than during step. This interphase. is particularly The fixation a problem recipe for provided mitotic cells,below since does they not interfereare more with rounded GFP labels, and less and adherent thus expressed than during tags can interphase.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Guide to Proper Fixation of Tissue Specimens for Eventual Immunostaining (09/2015)
    A Guide to Proper Fixation of Tissue Specimens for Eventual Immunostaining (09/2015) 1. First and most important - the original tissue sample must be of good quality. Factors such as warm ischemic time, the time delay between tissue excision and fixation, etc. are important. Ideally, tissues should be acquired as close to still being viable as possible, and put into fixative as soon as possible following excision. Delays lead to cell death, autolysis, and loss of tissue and cell integrity with concomitant losses of immunostaining (e.g. due to proteolysis of the antigen). If acquiring animal tissues, consider performing perfusion fixation prior to organ/tissue removal if it is an option. 2. Once the tissue sample is obtained, proper fixation technique is the next critical component of generating high quality fixed tissues that have the best chance to succeed in immumostaining. There are a number of important guidelines here: (a) Formalin solution slowly inactivates over time, thus fresh formalin should always be used. Freshly prepared buffered formaldehyde solution is the absolute best, but good results can certainly be obtained with commercial formalin solutions that are not too old. (b) Diffusion of formalin solution into the tissue is relatively slow- a rate of approximately 1 mm per hour. Thicker specimens take longer to fix, and such specimens fix in a gradient fashion - fixing fastest and most completely from the tissue surface towards the interior. The practical impact of this is that if a specimen is too thick, then the interior may not become fully fixed, or that significant autolysis can occur before the fixative diffuses into the area and finally does fix the interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Improved Spatial Resolution by Induced Live Cell and Organelle Swelling in Hypotonic Solutions Received: 9 April 2019 Astha Jaiswal1, Christian H
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Improved spatial resolution by induced live cell and organelle swelling in hypotonic solutions Received: 9 April 2019 Astha Jaiswal1, Christian H. Hoerth1, Ana M. Zúñiga Pereira1,2 & Holger Lorenz1 Accepted: 23 August 2019 Induced morphology changes of cells and organelles are by far the easiest way to determine precise Published: xx xx xxxx protein sub-locations and organelle quantities in light microscopy. By using hypotonic solutions to swell mammalian cell organelles we demonstrate that precise membrane, lumen or matrix protein locations within the endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi and mitochondria can reliably be established. We also show the beneft of this approach for organelle quantifcations, especially for clumped or intertwined organelles like peroxisomes and mitochondria. Since cell and organelle swelling is reversible, it can be applied to live cells for successive high-resolution analyses. Our approach outperforms many existing imaging modalities with respect to resolution, ease-of-use and cost-efectiveness without excluding any co- utilization with existing optical (super)resolution techniques. Scientifc bioimaging aims to reveal scientifcally relevant information. Besides the mere metrics of biomaterial like cells, organelles, or even sub-organelle structures, more informative are data addressing protein sub-locations and interactions. Especially in the spatio-temporal context of cellular dynamics the precise protein sub-location within the membranous organelle system of the cell is crucial. To know that a certain protein is located within a particular organelle is ofen not sufcient. More precise information is needed, for example whether the protein is membrane-bound, or not. Tis puts a technical challenge on bioimaging since many organelles’ membrane assemblies are well below the micrometer range in size and distance.
    [Show full text]
  • PERIODIC ACID SCHIFF (PAS) PROTOCOL PRINCIPLE: This Stain
    PERIODIC ACID SCHIFF (PAS) PROTOCOL PRINCIPLE: This stain is used for the demonstration of glycogen. Tissue sections are first oxidized by periodic acid. The oxidative process results in the formation of aldehyde groupings through carbon-to-carbon bond cleavage. Free hydroxyl groups should be present for oxidation to take place. Oxidation is completed when it reaches the aldehyde stage. The aldehyde groups are detected by the Schiff reagent. A colorless, unstable dialdehyde compound is formed and then transformed to the colored final product by restoration of the quinoid chromophoric grouping. QUALITY ASSURANCE: The PAS stain with diastase or -amylase digestion has histochemical specificity for glycogen. Skeletal muscle normally contains glycogen and is often recommended as a positive control tissue. SPECIMEN REQUIRED: Snap frozen human striated muscle. (Use the isopentane freezing method previously described.) METHOD: Fixation: None, use snap frozen tissue. Technique: Cut 10 - 16 micron (12 µm) sections in cryostat from snap frozen biopsy. Attach one or more sections to a No.1_, 22 mm square coverslip. Equipment: Ceramic staining rack - Thomas Scientific #8542-E40 Columbia staining dish - Thomas Scientific #8542-C12 Columbia staining dish (jar) - Thomas Scientific #8542-E30 Forceps Latex gloves Reagents: • Absolute alcohol (100% ethanol) - Quantum, FLAMMABLE store at room temp. in a flammable cabinet • Glacial Acetic Acid -Fisher A507-500, CORROSIVE store at room temperature • Amylase - Sigma A-6505, store at room temperature • Chloroform - Baxter 049-4, FLAMMABLE CARCINOGEN store at room temperature in a flammable cabinet) • Periodic Acid - Sigma P7875, store at room temperature • Permount - Fisher SP15-100, FLAMMABLE HEALTH HAZARD • Reagent alcohol, ACS - histological Fisher A962-4 or HPLC A995, FLAMMABLE, TOXIC,TERATOGENIC, store at room temperature In flammable cabinet • Schiff Reagent - Harleco 6073/71, store at room temperature • Xylenes - Fisher #HC700-1GAL, FLAMMABLE, store room temperature in flammable cabinet) 1 Solutions: I.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptations at the Cell and Organelle Level for Utilizing Sunlight1-2
    ADAPTATIONS AT THE CELL AND ORGANELLE LEVEL FOR UTILIZING SUNLIGHT1-2 W. H. CAMPBELL, P. ROBERTIE, R. H. BROWN3 AND C. C. BLACK Biochemistry Department, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602 ABSTRACT The discovery of multiple pathways of carbon dioxide assimilation and dissimilation in higher plants has drastically changed the research and thinking in plant biology. The theme is developed that adaptations within photosynthesis are of fundamental importance in plants and that changes in this dominant metabolic process arc apt to result in strong and immediate selection advantages in the course of plant evolution. Data are presented on the variations in photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in the reductive pentose phosphate cycle, the C4-dicarboxylic acid cycle, and in Crassulacean acid metabolism. Photo- synthetic studies with primitive plants such as P silo turn nudum indicate a metabolism similar to Cj-dicarboxylic acid may have arisen in this primitive plant. In order to establish a perspective on the metabolic processes in plants which might be subject to adaptation, we have considered the activities of major meta- bolic processes such as photosynthesis, photorespiration, dark respiration, transpira- tion, nitrogen fixation, ion uptake, and the synthesis of proteins, lipids, cell walls. Many of these metabolic activities are common to all of life forms and probably have been subject to common adaptations; for example, respiration or protein, lipid, and polysaccharide synthesis. Certain metabolic processes however, are unique to plants and to certain bacteria; among these are photosynthesis, photo- respiration, transpiration, nitrogen fixation, and ion uptake from soil. Unfor- tunately, quantitative data on these activities are not available on a comparable basis with a single plant or on a single plant organ, such as a leaf or a fruit.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Preparation for Fluorescence Microscopy: an Introduction Concepts and Tips for Better Fixed Sample Imaging Results
    White Paper Sample Preparation for Fluorescence Microscopy: An Introduction Concepts and Tips for Better Fixed Sample Imaging Results By Paul Held, Laboratory Manager, Applications Dept., BioTek Instruments, Inc. Products: Cytation 3 and Cytation 5 Multiple processing steps are required to prepare tissue culture cells for fluorescence microscopy. Experiments are generally classified as being either live or fixed cell microscopy. Fluorescence microscopy of live cells uses either genetically encoded fluorescent proteins (e.g. GFP, mcherry, YFP, RFP, etc.) or cell membrane-permeable, non-toxic fluorescent stains. Fluorescence microscopy of fixed cells uses a fixative agent that renders the cells dead, but maintains cellular structure, allowing the use of specific antibodies and dyes to investigate cell morphology and structure. Appropriate sample preparation is necessary to ensure high quality images are captured. Here we describe a number of concepts and considerations regarding the sample preparation process that can assist with automated digital fluorescence microscopy of fixed cells. Cell Fixation The goal of fixation is to maintain cellular structure as much as possible to that of the native or unfixed state during the processing steps and subsequent imaging. There are a number of fixation methods suitable for fluorescence microscopy that fall into two basic categories: aldehyde fixatives and alcohol fixatives. Organic solvents such as alcohols and acetone remove lipids and dehydrate the cells, while precipitating the proteins on the cellular architecture. Cross-linking aldehyde reagents form intermolecular bridges, normally through free amino groups, creating a network of linked antigens. Cross-linkers preserve cell structure better than organic solvents, but may reduce the antigenicity of some cell components, and require a permeabilization step to allow the antibody access to the specimen.
    [Show full text]
  • Fixation and Fixatives – Factors Influencing Chemical Fixation, Formaldehyde and Glutaraldehyde
    Fixation and Fixatives – Factors influencing chemical fixation, formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde Author: Geoffrey Rolls edited by Hiram 3-25-18 This Fixation and Fixatives series covers the factors that influence the rate and effectiveness of tissue fixation as well as looking at two common fixatives: formaldehyde (histology) and glutaraldehyde (ultrastructural electron microscopy studies). Factors influencing chemical fixation There are a number of factors that will influence the rate and effectiveness of tissue fixation. Temperature: Increasing the temperature of fixation will increase the rate of diffusion of the fixative into the tissue and speed up the rate of chemical reaction between the fixative and tissue elements. It can also potentially increase the rate of tissue degeneration in unfixed areas of the specimen. For light microscopy initial fixation is usually carried out at room temperature and this may be followed by further fixation at temperatures up to 45°C during tissue processing. This is really a compromise that appears to be widely accepted to produce good quality morphological preservation. Microwave fixation may involve the use of higher temperatures, up to 65°C, but for relatively short periods. See Part 5 for further discussion. Time: The optimal time for fixation will vary between fixatives. For fixation to occur the fixative has to penetrate, by diffusion, to the centre of the specimen and then sufficient time has to be allowed for the reactions of fixation to occur. Both diffusion time and reaction time depend on the particular reagent used and the optimum time will vary from fixative to fixative. In busy diagnostic laboratories there is considerable pressure to reduce turnaround time and this can result in incompletely-fixed tissues being processed.
    [Show full text]
  • Ltnit 8 Fixation and Staining Techniques
    LTNIT 8 FIXATION AND STAINING TECHNIQUES Structure 8.1 Introduction Objectives 8.2 Introduction to Steps Involved in Permanent Mounts of Plants and Animals Tissue Processing Processing Whole Mounts 8.3 Fixatives and Their Action 8.4 Primary Fixative Groups Coagulant Fixative Non-Coagulant Fixative 8.5 Composite Fixatives Plant Fixatives Animal Fixatives Fixatives and Safety 8.6 Alcohol Series Use of Alcohol Series in Slide Preparation Basis for Procedure of Staining of Permanent Mount 8.7 Some Staining Theory and Methods Basic Dyes Acid Dyes Amphoteric Dyes Types of Staining Methods Mordanting 8.8 Formulary of Reagents and Stains Fixatives in Common Use Stains in Common Use Grades of Alcohol Animal Ringer Solution Animal Physiological Saline Solution 8.9 Summary 8.1 0 Terminal Questions 8.1 1 Answers 8.1 INTRODUCTION - - - - --- - - - - -- - - - - In the previous unit you have already studied about basic techniques of slide preparations. You learnt how slides should be cleaned, cared for, labelled and stored. You also learnt the preparation as well as staining of temporary mounts of plant and animal tissues using squash technique (root-tip) and smear techniques (human cheek cells). The present unit deals briefly with the steps involved in preparing permanent slides of tissues and whole mounts of plants and animals. This unit however deals mainly with the various chemicals that are used for fixing and staining of animal and plant tissues for both temporary and permanent mounts. So in this unit you will study the theory, nature, preparation as well as storage of fixatives, alcohol series, mordants and stains that are used in the preparation of whole mounts or tissue mounts of plants and animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantification of Protein Mobility and Associated Reshuffling of 2 Cytoplasm During Chemical Fixation 3 4 5 Authors: 6 Jan Huebinger *, Jessica Spindler, Kristin J
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/410670; this version posted September 8, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Quantification of protein mobility and associated reshuffling of 2 cytoplasm during chemical fixation 3 4 5 Authors: 6 Jan Huebinger *, Jessica Spindler, Kristin J. Holl, Björn Koos 7 8 9 Affiliations 10 Department of Systemic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, 11 Otto-Hahn-Str.11, 44227 Dortmund, Germany 12 13 * Correspondence to: [email protected] 14 15 16 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/410670; this version posted September 8, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 17 Abstract 18 19 To understand cellular functionalities, it is essential to unravel spatio-temporal 20 patterns of molecular distributions and interactions within living cells. The 21 technological progress in fluorescence microscopy now allows in principle to measure 22 these patterns with sufficient spatial resolution. However, high resolution imaging 23 comes along with long acquisition times and high phototoxicity. Physiological live 24 cell imaging is therefore often unfeasible and chemical fixation is employed. 25 However, fixation methods have not been rigorously reviewed to preserve patterns at 26 the resolution at which they can be nowadays imaged.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.1 General Principles of Fixation and Types of Fixatives
    E-content for Programme: M.Sc. Zoology (Semester - II) Core Course (CC- 7): Biochemistry Unit V: Principles of Histology and Histochemistry 5.1 General principles of fixation and types of fixatives Prepared by: Dr. Richa Rani, MTech, PhD Assistant Professor Post Graduate Department of Zoology Patna University, Patna-800005 Contact:+91-6206450541 Email: [email protected] Intrahepatic neutrophils staining in 10% formalin fixed tissue Rani, Richa et al. AJP, 2017, 187, 2008-19 FIXATION A process used to preserve the constituents of cells and tissue so that they can withstand the subsequent treatment with various reagents with minimum loss of architecture. It is the most crucial step in the preparation of cells or tissues for microscopy analysis. It consists of two steps: Termination of ongoing biochemical reactions i.e. killing FIXATION (Cont’d) Stabilization of the cellular structure and composition i.e. preservation The process results in denaturation and coagulation of proteins in the tissues. The speed of fixation depends on the rate of diffusion of fixative into the tissue and the rate of chemical reactions with various components. Critical roles of Fixation To preserve and stabilize the cell morphology and tissue architecture in a “life-like state”. To prevent or arrest the degenerative processes. To prevent autolysis (tissue digestion by intracellular enzymes released when organelle membranes rupture) and bacterial decomposition (or putrefaction). Critical roles of Fixation (Cont’d) To enhance the refractive index of tissue constituents. To harden or strengthen the samples so that they can withstand the downstream staining procedures. To improve the optical differentiation of cells and tissues.
    [Show full text]
  • Glutaraldehyde: a Review of Its Fixative Effects on Nucleic Acids, Proteins, 2 Lipids, and Carbohydrates 3 4 Andrew T
    1 Glutaraldehyde: A review of its fixative effects on nucleic acids, proteins, 2 lipids, and carbohydrates 3 4 Andrew T. McKenzie1 (https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7462-4340) 5 6 1 Medical Scientist Training Program, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 7 NY, NY, USA 8 9 Correspondence to: 10 Andrew McKenzie 11 Email address: [email protected] 12 13 Abstract 14 15 Tissue banking methods such as brain banking often face a trade-off 16 between morphological and molecular preservation. For example, 17 cryopreservation is preferred for subsequent molecular assays, while fixation by 18 aldehyde crosslinking is commonly used for microscopy. Among aldehyde 19 fixatives, formaldehyde is often considered better for immunohistochemistry, 20 while glutaraldehyde is often considered better for electron microscopy. 21 However, it is unclear whether morphological versus molecular preservation 22 trade-offs reflect fundamental biology or technology limitations. As a window into 23 this discussion, in this narrative review, I evaluate the literature regarding the 24 effects of glutaraldehyde on molecular preservation, with an emphasis on 25 nervous system tissue. Available evidence suggests that crosslinking with 26 glutaraldehyde has minimal direct effects on most molecular features, with a few 27 critical exceptions such as protein conformation. On the other hand, 28 glutaraldehyde fixation frequently fails to retain non-directly crosslinked 29 molecules such as lipid and carbohydrate species during subsequent 30 dehydration steps. Further, as a result of probe diffusion limitations or strong 31 covalent interactions with glutaraldehyde, many molecules can be more difficult 32 to visualize or otherwise measure in tissue fixed with glutaraldehyde.
    [Show full text]
  • Modularity of a Carbon-Fixing Protein Organelle
    Modularity of a carbon-fixing protein organelle Walter Bonaccia, Poh K. Tengb, Bruno Afonsoa, Henrike Niederholtmeyera, Patricia Grobc, Pamela A. Silvera,d, and David F. Savageb,e,1 aDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; bDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology and cHoward Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; dWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115; and eDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 Edited* by Robert M. Stroud, University of California, San Francisco, CA, and approved November 17, 2011 (received for review May 31, 2011) Bacterial microcompartments are proteinaceous complexes that appear in roughly 20% of bacteria, suggesting the existence of catalyze metabolic pathways in a manner reminiscent of organelles. a large functional diversity of uncharacterized BMCs (10). Although microcompartment structure is well understood, much The CB was the first BMC to be discovered and remains a less is known about their assembly and function in vivo. We show model system for elucidating how BMCs assemble and function here that carboxysomes, CO2-fixing microcompartments encoded in the cell (11). Its shell is assembled from roughly 800 protein by 10 genes, can be heterologously produced in Escherichia coli. hexamers, which form the facets of the icosahedron, and 12 Expression of carboxysomes in E. coli resulted in the production pentamers, which form the vertices (8, 12). Inside the lumen of icosahedral complexes similar to those from the native host. In are the enzymes ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase vivo, the complexes were capable of both assembling with carbox- (RuBisCO) and carbonic anhydrase (CA), which are directed to fi fi ysomal proteins and xing CO2.
    [Show full text]
  • Living up to Life Special Stain Kit Periodic Acid Schiff (PAS) Stain
    Living up to Life Special Stain Kit Periodic Acid Schiff (PAS) Stain Kit Catalog No: 38016SS4 Intended Use Staining Protocol (Microwave) For In Vitro Diagnostic Use. For Laboratory Use. Exercise caution when using the microwave to heat any solution or reagent. The microwave The reagents in this kit are intended for In Vitro use only. The PAS kit, when used with the must be properly ventilated to prevent the accumulation of fumes in the laboratory. Microwave appropriate histological procedures, may be used for the detection of specific carbohydrate transparent coplin jars and caps should be used during the staining process. The caps should containing molecules found in tissue sections. be loosely applied to prevent spills. Caps with ventilation holes also may be used. All microwaves should be used in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The Probable Mode of Action procedures described here were performed using an Energy Beam Sciences H2250 laboratory Carbohydrates that contain adjacent hydroxyl (1, 2–glycol) groups are found in glycogen, microwave. All microwaved steps were conducted at a power setting of 800 watts unless neutral mucins as well as specific glycoproteins. The 1, 2-glycol groups are oxidized by periodic otherwise noted. Because of differences in microwave power and frequencies among various acid to produce adjacent aldehyde groups. The aldehyde groups react with the Schiff reagent models, it may be necessary to adjust power levels or times to achieve optimal results. which subsequently produces a bright magenta coloration in areas of tissue containing these 1. Deparaffinize with xylene or a xylene substitute and rehydrate through graded alcohols to carbohydrates.
    [Show full text]