1 Glutaraldehyde: A review of its fixative effects on nucleic acids, proteins, 2 lipids, and carbohydrates 3 4 Andrew T. McKenzie1 (https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7462-4340) 5 6 1 Medical Scientist Training Program, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 7 NY, NY, USA 8 9 Correspondence to: 10 Andrew McKenzie 11 Email address:
[email protected] 12 13 Abstract 14 15 Tissue banking methods such as brain banking often face a trade-off 16 between morphological and molecular preservation. For example, 17 cryopreservation is preferred for subsequent molecular assays, while fixation by 18 aldehyde crosslinking is commonly used for microscopy. Among aldehyde 19 fixatives, formaldehyde is often considered better for immunohistochemistry, 20 while glutaraldehyde is often considered better for electron microscopy. 21 However, it is unclear whether morphological versus molecular preservation 22 trade-offs reflect fundamental biology or technology limitations. As a window into 23 this discussion, in this narrative review, I evaluate the literature regarding the 24 effects of glutaraldehyde on molecular preservation, with an emphasis on 25 nervous system tissue. Available evidence suggests that crosslinking with 26 glutaraldehyde has minimal direct effects on most molecular features, with a few 27 critical exceptions such as protein conformation. On the other hand, 28 glutaraldehyde fixation frequently fails to retain non-directly crosslinked 29 molecules such as lipid and carbohydrate species during subsequent 30 dehydration steps. Further, as a result of probe diffusion limitations or strong 31 covalent interactions with glutaraldehyde, many molecules can be more difficult 32 to visualize or otherwise measure in tissue fixed with glutaraldehyde.