DOCSLIB.ORG

Phylogeography of Smallmouth Bass (Micropterus Dolomieu) and Comparative Myology of the Black Bass (Micropterus, Centrarchidae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phylogeography of Smallmouth Bass (Micropterus Dolomieu) and Comparative Myology of the Black Bass (Micropterus, Centrarchidae) Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU ETD Archive 2008 Phylogeography of Smallmouth Bass (Micropterus Dolomieu) and Comparative Myology of the Black Bass (Micropterus, Centrarchidae) William Calvin Borden Cleveland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/etdarchive Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Recommended Citation Borden, William Calvin, "Phylogeography of Smallmouth Bass (Micropterus Dolomieu) and Comparative Myology of the Black Bass (Micropterus, Centrarchidae)" (2008). ETD Archive. 36. https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/etdarchive/36 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in ETD Archive by an authorized administrator of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF SMALLMOUTH BASS (MICROPTERUS DOLOMIEU) AND COMPARATIVE MYOLOGY OF THE BLACK BASS (MICROPTERUS, CENTRARCHIDAE) WILLIAM CALVIN BORDEN Bachelor of Science in Zoology University of Toronto Toronto, Ontario 1991 Master of Science in Zoology University of Toronto Toronto, Ontario 1996 Submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN REGULATORY BIOLOGY at the CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY May, 2008 This dissertation has been approved for the Department of Biological, Geological, and Environmental Sciences and for the College of Graduate Studies by Date: Dr. Miles M. Coburn, Department of Biology, John Carroll University Co-advisor Date: Dr. Robert A. Krebs, BGES/CSU Co-advisor Date: Dr. Clemencia Colmenares, The Cleveland Clinic Advisory Committee Member Date: Dr. F. Paul Doerder, BGES/CSU Advisory Committee Member Date: Dr. Harry van Keulen, BGES/CSU Internal Examiner Date: Dr. Mason Posner, Department of Biology, Ashland University External Examiner One fish two fish red fish blue fish. Black fish blue fish old fish new fish. This one has a little star. This one has a little car. Say! what a lot of fish there are. — Dr. Seuss, One fish two fish red fish blue fish ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many people were involved in the completion of this work. Firstly, numerous groups and individuals provided tissue samples of smallmouth bass and other fishes. They include J. McClain, A. Bowen, and A. Kowalski (USFWS – Alpena, MI); L. Witzel, A. Cook, E. Arnold, and E. Wright (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources – Lake Erie Management Unit); J. Hoyle (OMNR – Lake Ontario Management Unit); M. Nadeau and D. Gonder (OMNR – Upper Great Lakes Management Unit); K. Schmidt, B. Stefanoky, N. Proulx, and J. Lehner (MnDNR); T. Burzynski (WDNR); J. Johnson, S. DeWitt, J. Diemond, M. Werda, K. Glomski, and D. Fielder (MiDNR – Alpena Fishery Research Station); E. Braun, A. Grier, M. Burlingame, and S. Sheldon (InDNR); K. Kayle, J. Deller, C. Knight, T. Bader, A. Ford (Ohio Division of Wildlife – Fairport Harbor Unit); R. Knight, J. Tyson, and G. Emond (ODW – Sandusky Unit); M. Greenlee (ODW); D. Einhouse, W. Pearsall, J. Evans, and S. Cornett (NYDSEC); B. Crump and R. Standage (Ouachita NF); B Zawiski and S. Taylor (Ohio EPA); M. Austin (Ohio Department of Transportation); R. Stein (Ohio State U); R. Butryn and R. Gonser (Indiana State U); G. Steinhart (Lake Superior State U); A. Echelle (Oklahoma State U); M. Coburn and L. Kousa (John Carroll U); R. Draper (The Ohio Smallmouth Alliance); B. Whiting (Trust Lands Office); A. Thomas, M. Lyons, J. Holt, A. Ford, B. Dunagan, T. Bowens, M. Jedlicka, O. Lockhart, J. Giboney, T. Marth, and D. Kiss (Cleveland State U); C. Landreville; J. Graham; M. Smith; P. and C. Hughes. In particular, the Fairport Harbor staff (ODW) provided samples that formed the bulk of chapters 2 and 3 and offered assistance at every step of the project. I sincerely appreciate their contributions and wish them to understand that this project was doomed without their support. I hope that this work in some way benefited their needs. Several additional groups invited me to join them in the field (MiDNR, USFWS, InDNR, NYSDEC). I enjoyed the opportunity and challenge of integrating academic and fisheries interests and needs and look forward to maintaining this connection in the future. Financial support to conduct field and lab work was provided by the Department of Biological, Geological, and Environmental Sciences and the College of Science (CSU), an Ohio Sea Grant (R/RL-5 to C. Stepien, U of Toledo), a Doctoral Research Expense Award (CSU), research funds of Miles Coburn and Bob Krebs, and personal funds. In addition, BGES provided a salary through a teaching assistantship for four years, although at times I wish they had not!! The morphological work was largely self-funded. Chris Sheil (John Carroll U) provided space, equipment, and critiques of my illustration skills, or lack thereof. His Scientific Illustration course provided much of the incentive to finish this part of the dissertation. Specimens for dissection and clearing and staining were graciously provided by R. Robins, T. Vigliotti, L. Page, and J. Albert (FLMNH), R. Winterbottom (ROM), B. Kuhajda (UAIC), J. Williams, S. Smith, and S. Jewett (USNM), N. Rios and H. Bart, Jr. (TU), D. Catania (CAS), T. Cavender and M. Kibbey (OSUM), D. Nelson (UMMZ), G. Steinhart and R. Stein (OSU), B. Shaner, P. Landford, and J. Biagi (GADNR), G. Garrett (TXDP&W), and J. Williams (USGS-FL). As much as I evolved throughout this process, so did my committee and advisors. I used an assortment of advisors at various times; each voice contributed something to the final product. They include John Holcomb (Mathematics Department at CSU), Ralph Gibson (BGES), Joe Keiper (CMNH), Kevin Kayle and John Deller (ODW – Fairport Harbor), and Michael Tevesz (Center for Sacred Landmarks at CSU). Clemencia Colmenares (Cleveland Clinic Foundation) and Harry van Keulen (CSU) were always enthusiastic and provided sound advice from science to politics to straw-house building. Mason Posner (Ashland U) was kind enough to join the committee as an external reviewer. However, several people carried the bulk of the responsibility with respect to my intellectual and academic development. Rick Winterbottom (ROM) understood my need to return to school and provided encouragement during the early years in particular when I was in doubt. Michael Gates (CSU) also provided an ear and sage advice when I contemplated leaving the program. During this time, Miles Coburn stepped forward to be an advisor. He was soon joined by Bob Krebs, and collectively they were a voice of logical reason and continual support while giving me plenty of freedom to make my own trail, and perhaps more importantly, make my own mistakes. Through it all, they encouraged my scholarship, protected my opportunity to carve out a niche in icththyology, and defended me when necessary while often taking the brunt of sharp criticism for their efforts. Finally, Paul Doerder was first a fellow hiker and later a committee member, but always an ardent supporter and defender. In many ways, the fact that he was not a committee member allowed us to discuss topics that exclude traditional advisors and students. As a consequence, I received an education in the politics of academia. One trait they share is a quiet and reserved demeanor that comes in part with a self-confidence of person and an expertise of field. This quality amongst others, made it enjoyable to work with each of them. Suffice it to say, I am indebted to them. A number of graduate students provided plenty of distractions from the work that should have been done. Alex, Toriano, Jenny, and Melissa were former labmates and all have moved on to bigger and better things. Congratulations. Finally, my parents financially supported me during semesters when I chose not to TA and were always confident that I would make the right decisions for me. Of course, they shared much of my anxiety and stress. Former graduate students from U of Toronto reminded me of the light on the other side. The Toronto gang kept me grounded and offered assistance in disposing of bodies. Amongst my biggest Canadian supporters is Cathy who saw me through the rough times and just wanted me to finish. In Cleveland, Annmarie and Francis (the legacy of CESTP is alive and well) did their best to break the last straw while simultaneously providing a welcome relief from the grind of school. To all I say “Thank you” and hope that I can repay your efforts and time. PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF SMALLMOUTH BASS (MICROPTERUS DOLOMIEU) AND COMPARATIVE MYOLOGY OF THE BLACK BASS (MICROPTERUS, CENTRARCHIDAE) WILLIAM CALVIN BORDEN ABSTRACT Biogeographic patterns were investigated within a single species and among its congenerics. Smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu) were characterized by portions of the cytochrome b gene and the control region although bass in Lake Erie were also evaluated using eight nDNA microsatellites. Overall, little population structure was observed among sites in Lake Erie which was surprising given that most male smallmouth bass exhibit nest site fidelity. But, these lake bass were divergent from bass residing in nearby tributaries indicating that lacustrine bass are reproductively isolated from riverine bass even though both groups may spawn in the same rivers. Adjacent riverine populations have also diverged from each other. Smallmouth bass from 71 sampling sites spanning their native distribution were analyzed to examine post-glaciation colonizing routes from glacial refugia into the Great Lakes. Phylogenetic analyses indicated that ancestral haplotypes exist in today’s Interior and Eastern Highlands, and the tree structure supported sequential colonization events northward with a loss of diversity in more distant populations. Western rivers and the upper Great Lakes were characterized by one phylogroup that viii was distinct from bass occupying the Ouachita Highlands. Bass from Lake Ontario, Georgian Bay, and the St. Lawrence River were characterized largely by just a single, derived haplotype of unknown geographical origin.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fisheries Across the Eastern Continental Divide
    Fisheries Across the Eastern Continental Divide Abstracts for oral presentations and posters, 2010 Spring Meeting of the Southern Division of the American Fisheries Society Asheville, NC 1 Contributed Paper Oral Presentation Potential for trophic competition between introduced spotted bass and native shoal bass in the Flint River Sammons, S.M.*, Auburn University. Largemouth bass, shoal bass, and spotted bass were collected from six sites over four seasons on the Flint River, Georgia to assess food habits. Diets of all three species was very broad; 10 categories of invertebrates and 15 species of fish were identified from diets. Since few large spotted bass were collected, all comparisons among species were conducted only for juvenile fish (< 200 mm) and subadult fish (200-300 mm). Juvenile largemouth bass diets were dominated by fish in all seasons, mainly sunfish. Juvenile largemouth bass rarely ate insects except in spring, when all three species consumed large numbers of insects. In contrast, juvenile shoal bass diets were dominated by insects in all seasons but winter. Juvenile spotted bass diets were more varied- highly piscivorous in the fall and winter and highly insectivorous in spring and summer. Diets of subadult largemouth bass were similar to that of juvenile fish, and heavily dominated by fish, particularly sunfish. Similar to juveniles, diets of subadult shoal bass were much less piscivorous than largemouth bass. Crayfish were important components of subadult shoal bass diets in all seasons but summer. Insects were important components of shoal bass diets in fall and summer. Diets of subadult spotted bass were generally more piscivorous than shoal bass, but less than largemouth bass.
    [Show full text]
  • Physiological Impacts of Catch-And-Release Angling Practices on Largemouth Bass and Smallmouth Bass
    Physiological Impacts of Catch-and-Release Angling Practices on Largemouth Bass and Smallmouth Bass STEVEN J. COOKE1 Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois and Center for Aquatic Ecology, Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 East Peabody Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820, USA JASON F. S CHREER Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada DAVID H. WAHL Kaskaskia Biological Station, Center for Aquatic Ecology, Illinois Natural History Survey, RR #1, Post Office Box 157, Sullivan, Illinois 61951, USA DAVID P. P HILIPP Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois and Center for Aquatic Ecology, Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 East Peabody Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820, USA Abstract.—We conducted a series of experiments to assess the real-time physiological and behavioral responses of largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides and smallmouth bass M. dolomieu to different angling related stressors and then monitored their recovery using both cardiac output devices and locomotory activity telemetry. We also review our current understanding of the effects of catch-and-release angling on black bass and provide direction for future research. Collectively our data suggest that all angling elicits a stress response, however, the magnitude of this response is determined by the degree of exhaustion and varies with water temperature. Our results also suggest that air exposure, especially following exhaustive exercise, places an additional stress on fish that increases the time needed for recovery and likely the probability of death. Simulated tournament conditions revealed that metabolic rates of captured fish increase with live-well densities greater than one individual, placing a greater demand on live-well oxygen conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Fish\Eastern Sand Darter Sa.Wpd
    EASTERN SAND DARTER STATUS ASSESSMENT Prepared by: David Grandmaison and Joseph Mayasich Natural Resources Research Institute University of Minnesota 5013 Miller Trunk Highway Duluth, MN 55811-1442 and David Etnier Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee 569 Dabney Hall Knoxville, TN 37996-1610 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3 1 Federal Drive Fort Snelling, MN 55111 January 2004 NRRI Technical Report No. NRRI/TR-2003/40 DISCLAIMER This document is a compilation of biological data and a description of past, present, and likely future threats to the eastern sand darter, Ammocrypta pellucida (Agassiz). It does not represent a decision by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on whether this taxon should be designated as a candidate species for listing as threatened or endangered under the Federal Endangered Species Act. That decision will be made by the Service after reviewing this document; other relevant biological and threat data not included herein; and all relevant laws, regulations, and policies. The result of the decision will be posted on the Service's Region 3 Web site (refer to: http://midwest.fws.gov/eco_serv/endangrd/lists/concern.html). If designated as a candidate species, the taxon will subsequently be added to the Service's candidate species list that is periodically published in the Federal Register and posted on the World Wide Web (refer to: http://endangered.fws.gov/wildlife.html). Even if the taxon does not warrant candidate status it should benefit from the conservation recommendations that are contained in this document. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS DISCLAIMER...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Red Clay Is Amazingly Sticky. Mix Three Inches of Rain with a Georgia Dirt Road Made out of the Stuff, and You Can Lose a Car in It
    Red clay is amazingly sticky. Mix three inches of rain with a Georgia dirt road made out of the stuff, and you can lose a car in it. On the upside, I’ve found that most red-dirt roads in the South lead to out-of-the- way rivers, many with good fishing. Maybe that inaccessibility is why one of the region’s best game fishes remained unrecognized by science until 1999. That’s when Dr. James Williams and Dr. George Burgess, both researchers with the Florida Museum of Natural History, formally described the shoal bass for the first time. Though similar in appearance to their black bass cousins, shoal bass are in fact unique. They resemble an oversized cross between the red- eye bass (a smallish cousin of the largemouth bass) and a smallmouth. Their similarity to the red-eye led scientists to consider them part of the same species, until the advent of gene testing showed them to be different. Those scientists might have done well to talk to some southwest Background: Middle Georgia is famous for its red-dirt roads and, increasingly, its shoal bass fishery. Right: Catch a shoalie this size, and you’ll probably end up in a magazine spread. The average fish is about a pound. ZACH MATTHEWS 32 I AMERICAN ANGLER WWW.AMERICANANGLER.COM ROB ROGERS Backroad BULLIES Once an overlooked and unrecognized species, Georgia’s hard-fighting shoal bass are quickly becoming a destination warmwater target. by Zach Matthews WWW.AMERICANANGLER.COM MAY/JUNE 2010 I 33 Georgia old-timers, who as far back as the 1940s knew that only the Florida panhandle.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Fish Species
    The Angler’s Guide To TennesseeIncluding Aquatic Nuisance SpeciesFish Published by the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Cover photograph Paul Shaw Graphics Designer Raleigh Holtam Thanks to the TWRA Fisheries Staff for their review and contributions to this publication. Special thanks to those that provided pictures for use in this publication. Partial funding of this publication was provided by a grant from the United States Fish & Wildlife Service through the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force. Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Authorization No. 328898, 58,500 copies, January, 2012. This public document was promulgated at a cost of $.42 per copy. Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency is available to all persons without regard to their race, color, national origin, sex, age, dis- ability, or military service. TWRA is also an equal opportunity/equal access employer. Questions should be directed to TWRA, Human Resources Office, P.O. Box 40747, Nashville, TN 37204, (615) 781-6594 (TDD 781-6691), or to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office for Human Resources, 4401 N. Fairfax Dr., Arlington, VA 22203. Contents Introduction ...............................................................................1 About Fish ..................................................................................2 Black Bass ...................................................................................3 Crappie ........................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • New York Freshwater Fishing Regulations Guide: 2015-16
    NEW YORK Freshwater FISHING2015–16 OFFICIAL REGULATIONS GUIDE VOLUME 7, ISSUE NO. 1, APRIL 2015 Fishing for Muskie www.dec.ny.gov Most regulations are in effect April 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016 MESSAGE FROM THE GOVERNOR New York: A State of Angling Opportunity When it comes to freshwater fishing, no state in the nation can compare to New York. Our Great Lakes consistently deliver outstanding fishing for salmon and steelhead and it doesn’t stop there. In fact, New York is home to four of the Bassmaster’s top 50 bass lakes, drawing anglers from around the globe to come and experience great smallmouth and largemouth bass fishing. The crystal clear lakes and streams of the Adirondack and Catskill parks make New York home to the very best fly fishing east of the Rockies. Add abundant walleye, panfish, trout and trophy muskellunge and northern pike to the mix, and New York is clearly a state of angling opportunity. Fishing is a wonderful way to reconnect with the outdoors. Here in New York, we are working hard to make the sport more accessible and affordable to all. Over the past five years, we have invested more than $6 million, renovating existing boat launches and developing new ones across the state. This is in addition to the 50 new projects begun in 2014 that will make it easier for all outdoors enthusiasts to access the woods and waters of New York. Our 12 DEC fish hatcheries produce 900,000 pounds of fish each year to increase fish populations and expand and improve angling opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Suwannee
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Lower Suwannee National Wildlife Refuge Introduction Located along the Lower Suwannee Refuge was established on April 10, 1979, for the southern edge of the purpose of protecting, maintaining, This blue goose, and enhancing a beautiful and rare designed by "Ding" natural ecosystem. Purchase of the Darling, has become lands was made possible through the a symbol of the cooperative efforts of the U.S. Fish Rtfuge System. and Wildlife Service, The Nature Conservancy, and Florida's Suwannee River Water Management District. Along the river and its tributary creeks, the habitat consists of majestic cypress trees and floodplain hardwood forests; scrub oak communities and pine plantations are found on the upland sites. From the mouth of the Suwannee River, the refuge fronts 26 miles of the Gulf of Mexico where the habitat changes to scenic tidal famous by Stephen marshes dotted with coastal islands. Each of Foster, bisects the refuge. these diverse vegetative 3 communities contributes to making Lower Suwannee Refuge one of the largest undeveloped river delta-estuarine systems in the United States. The overall goal of Lower Suwannee National Wildlife Refuge is to provide conditions desirable to wildlife through scientific management. Specific objectives developed for the area include providing habitat and protection for endangered and threatened species as well as migrating birds cover photo: and resident wildlife. The refuge l.\Y liiclmitistm also provides opportunities for environmental education and wildlife photo (it lift: oriented recreation. Jerry Gamble Wildlife - types present on A constant influx of nutrients from Lower Suwannee £ the river system coupled with Refuge.
    [Show full text]
  • Ambloplites Constellatus, a New Species of Rock Bass from the Ozark Upland of Arkansas and Missouri with a Review of Western Rock Bass Populations
    Ambloplites constellatus, a New Species of Rock Bass from the Ozark Upland of Arkansas and Missouri with a Review of Western Rock Bass Populations ROBERT C. CASHNER and ROYAL D. SUTTKUS V Reprinted from THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST Vol. 98, No. 1, July, 1977, pp. 147-161 University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, Indiana Ambloplites constellatus, a New Species of Rock Bass from the Ozark Upland of Arkansas and Missouri with a Review of Western Rock Bass Populations' ROBERT C. CASHNER Department of Biological Sciences, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana 70122 and ROYAL D. SUTTKUS Tulane University, Museum of Natural History, Belle Chasse, Louisiana 70037 ABSTRACT: A new species of rock bass, Ambloplites constellatus, is described from the upland section of the White River in Arkansas and Missouri. It is compared with the closely related northern rock bass (A. rupestris) from Missouri and Meramec river populations, the southern rock bass (A. ariommus) from the Ouachita and Little river drainages, and with other western rock bass populations of undetermined status. Ambloplites constellatus is distinguished from its congeners by its freckled color pattern and slender body form. Ambloplites constellatus occurs throughout the upper White River. There are two records of the species from the Osage River drainage in Missouri. INTRODUCTION In his study of Missouri fishes, Pflieger (1971) noted that rock bass from the upper White River system differed strikingly in color pattern from other Missouri populations. Based on our examination of mate- rial from throughout the Ozark Upland province, as well as other western rock bass populations, we describe the upper White River population as a new species, Ambloplites constellatus, the Ozark rock bass.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing the Red River of the North
    FISHING THE RED RIVER OF THE NORTH The Red River boasts more than 70 species of fish. Channel catfish in the Red River can attain weights of more than 30 pounds, walleye as big as 13 pounds, and northern pike can grow as long as 45 inches. Includes access maps, fishing tips, local tourism contacts and more. TABLE OF CONTENTS YOUR GUIDE TO FISHING THE RED RIVER OF THE NORTH 3 FISHERIES MANAGEMENT 4 RIVER STEWARDSHIP 4 FISH OF THE RED RIVER 5 PUBLIC ACCESS MAP 6 PUBLIC ACCESS CHART 7 AREA MAPS 8 FISHING THE RED 9 TIP AND RAP 9 EATING FISH FROM THE RED RIVER 11 CATCH-AND-RELEASE 11 FISH RECIPES 11 LOCAL TOURISM CONTACTS 12 BE AWARE OF THE DANGERS OF DAMS 12 ©2017, State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources FAW-471-17 The Minnesota DNR prohibits discrimination in its programs and services based on race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, public assistance status, age, sexual orientation or disability. Persons with disabilities may request reasonable modifications to access or participate in DNR programs and services by contacting the DNR ADA Title II Coordinator at [email protected] or 651-259-5488. Discrimination inquiries should be sent to Minnesota DNR, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4049; or Office of Civil Rights, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C. Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20240. This brochure was produced by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of Fish and Wildlife with technical assistance provided by the North Dakota Department of Game and Fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Fish Report
    Aquatic Fish Report Acipenser fulvescens Lake St urgeon Class: Actinopterygii Order: Acipenseriformes Family: Acipenseridae Priority Score: 27 out of 100 Population Trend: Unknown Gobal Rank: G3G4 — Vulnerable (uncertain rank) State Rank: S2 — Imperiled in Arkansas Distribution Occurrence Records Ecoregions where the species occurs: Ozark Highlands Boston Mountains Ouachita Mountains Arkansas Valley South Central Plains Mississippi Alluvial Plain Mississippi Valley Loess Plains Acipenser fulvescens Lake Sturgeon 362 Aquatic Fish Report Ecobasins Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - Arkansas River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - St. Francis River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - White River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain (Lake Chicot) - Mississippi River Habitats Weight Natural Littoral: - Large Suitable Natural Pool: - Medium - Large Optimal Natural Shoal: - Medium - Large Obligate Problems Faced Threat: Biological alteration Source: Commercial harvest Threat: Biological alteration Source: Exotic species Threat: Biological alteration Source: Incidental take Threat: Habitat destruction Source: Channel alteration Threat: Hydrological alteration Source: Dam Data Gaps/Research Needs Continue to track incidental catches. Conservation Actions Importance Category Restore fish passage in dammed rivers. High Habitat Restoration/Improvement Restrict commercial harvest (Mississippi River High Population Management closed to harvest). Monitoring Strategies Monitor population distribution and abundance in large river faunal surveys in cooperation
    [Show full text]
  • Middle James River Report 2019 Hunter Hatcher Fisheries Biologist Farmville Field Office
    Middle James River Report 2019 Hunter Hatcher Fisheries Biologist Farmville Field Office The James River is the largest river in the state of Virginia, stretching over 550 miles. The middle section of the river refers to the approximately 130 mile stretch between Lynchburg and Bosher’s Dam just above Richmond. Generally fisheries biologist sample the James River every fall, however sampling could not be conducted in 2018 due to high water levels. Sampling resumed in 2019 with a total of 13 sampling locations between Lynchburg and Bosher’s Dam sampled using boat electrofishing (Figure 1). The information that follows outlines the results of those sampling efforts. For more information of the middle James River or to plan your next float trip visit our website by clicking here. Figure 1. Fish Sampling Locations along the middle James River. Smallmouth Bass Smallmouth Bass are a major sportfish in the middle James River though not as prevalent as in the upper James above Lynchburg. A total of 357 Smallmouth Bass were collected from the middle James in the fall of 2019 ranging in size from 2 to 19 inches (Figure 2). Smallmouth represented approximately 20% of the total fish catch from electrofishing samples. Nearly 70% of Smallmouth collected were juveniles (less than 7 inches). While catch rates for adult smallmouth bass were lower relative to historic samples high catch rates for juvenile fish hold promise for the future of the Smallmouth Bass fishery in the middle James River. Smallmouth Bass Size and Number Collected from the Middle 120 James in 2019 100 80 60 40 Number Collected Number 20 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Length (Inches) Figure 2.
    [Show full text]