DOCSLIB.ORG

Not Even Past." William Faulkner NOT EVEN PAST

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Not Even Past. "The past is never dead. It's not even past." William Faulkner NOT EVEN PAST Search the site ... Age of Anger: A History of Like 0 the Present, by Pankaj Tweet Mishra (2017) By Ben Weiss In Age of Anger: A History of the Present, acclaimed author and journalist Pankaj Mishra explores what he describes as the tremors of global change. For the past several decades, liberal cosmopolitanism provided a false sense of security after the fall of the Soviet Union. Now, Mishra claims, world schisms have begun to manifest in increasingly overt displays of violence by state and non-state actors alike, leaving dubious possibilities for the coming years. In this accessible work of public history, Mishra traces a long arc of the rise of the Age of Anger from the Enlightenment to what he perceives as the precarious present. The book was written and published as we watched the explosion of chaos in Syria and Iraq, the collapse of established and relatively balanced political and economic relationships, increases in terrorist activity in places such as Turkey, Kenya, and Nigeria, and increasing violence stemming from racial prejudices in France, Great Britain, and the United States. The rise of rancorous populism cracking its way through the foundations of traditional model democracies in the West, evidenced by the success of Donald Trump, Marine Le Pen, and Brexit, leads Mishra to fear that the globe is on the precipice of world wide disaster. “After a long, uneasy equipoise since 1945, the old west-dominated world order is giving way to an apparent global disorder.” This new disorderly Age of Anger ranges both from the destabilizing fury of history’s marginalized populations as well as the counterrevolutionary response that has mobilized hatred within mainstream political discourses. Unfortunately, Mishra offers little perspective on how the world may emerge from this predicament. For him, the tumultuous year that was 2016 is only the beginning. The real value of this fairly pessimistic yet stimulating work is in Mishra’s analysis of how we arrived in the Age of Anger. Scholars in subaltern and imperial histories have argued for decades that the sheer arrogance of narratives of Western liberal progress have concealed the crumbling foundations of modernized globalization. Mishra offers an accessible and nuanced narrative of the emergence of popular rage from the European Enlightenment, through the advent of industrialization and imperialism, and the various alignments of the non-Western world within a Eurocentric global order during the twentieth century. From the upheavals of the Reign of Terror in revolutionary France to the rise of fascism in the twentieth century, he shows that the neatly packaged concept of liberal modernization mostly consists of a process of “carnage and bedlam.” Mishra argues that elites, unable to cope with the reality of modernization, take refuge in precipitating alienation: destruction of civil liberties, states of emergency, anti-Islamic movements, rhetoric purporting the global clash of civilizations, and the like. Though perhaps framed within too much of a polarized dichotomy, Mishra’s analysis reveals a massive schism between political and economic elites and the larger masses who have been directed into “cultural supremacism, populism and rancorous brutality” as a result of being denied the promised advantages of modernity. The consequential tension leaves us on the threshold of a “global civil war.” Privacy - Terms A Tea Party protest in 2009 (via Wikimedia Commons). Mishra predicts that continuing economic stagnation will exacerbate the bitterness of these existing divisions. Many will react to literal displacement from their societies or social and political displacement as we have seen with the recent and rapid expansion of activities in United States immigration. The subsequent fear and rage will divide those who may resort to radical violence because they have nothing left to lose from those who will empower more radical elites who promise to tear down the existing system. However, for Mishra, this chaos is fully representative of the process of liberal modernization. Once you strip the implications of liberal modernization of its positive rhetoric, what remains is a cacophony of violence. Slavery, imperialism, and warfare have always been the dark underbelly of the liberal project. While modernization has generated the context for this violence to take on truly global proportions for the rst time, Mishra’s detailed history describes the development of these themes through earlier centuries. For example, Voltaire routinely emphasized the exemplary capacity of humanity to exercise free will, however, he actively encouraged Catherine the Great to coerce Poles and Turks into Enlightenment education under threat of violence. All the while, Catherine’s actions allowed him to make a fortune in the commercial investments of new markets that arose as a result of this coerced ideological diffusion. Mishra also alerts readers to the various thinkers such as Rousseau and Nietzsche who pregured the growth of dissident populations and their inevitable role as destabilizers during the emergence of modernization, drawing interesting parallels to the role of Islam in the twentieth century. The Ottoman capitulation in 1877 ended the Russo-Turkish War (via Wikimedia Commons). By demonstrating the connection of ideas in Europe with the rest of the world, Mishra is able to draw heavily from Nietzsche’s concept of ressentiment, which encapsulates the innate hatred and envy fostered by groups who are positioned as inferior. For example, ressentiment could describe the attitude of the colonized under imperial regimes. Mishra claims that Muhammad Iqbal, an Islamic poet and religious reformist, and Lu Xun, an activist in China all pulled from Nietzsche’s ideas, while “Hitler revered Atatürk” and “Lenin and Gramsci were keen on Taylorism.” This mix of Enlightenment thought with global adaptations speaks to the paradoxical fusion of self-contempt instilled by liberal otherization with the rage that facilitates resistance to the same system. Indeed, as Mishra contends, leaders from all over the global south and east met imperialism by synchronizing with Western ideology in order to secure their independence from the West. This aspiration failed locking much of Africa, Asia, Latin America, and various Marxist movements into liberal modernity. “The key to man’s behaviour lies not in any clash of opposed civilizations, but, on the contrary, in irresistible mimetic desire: the logic of fascination, emulation and righteous self-assertion that binds the rivals inseparably. It lies in ressentiment, the tormented mirror games in which the West as well as its ostensible enemies and indeed all inhabitants of the modern world are trapped.” The Paris Commune stormed the Tuileries Palace in 1792 during the French Revolution (via Wikimedia Commons). The ambitious project of Age of Anger is not without its faults, namely some oversights and generalizations. For one, Mishra does not consider social democracy or Marxism as the alternatives to neoliberal world systems that they perceive themselves to be. In other ways, his attempts to paint a larger history in broad strokes risks overgeneralizing some phenomena and exaggerating historical causality. Due to some of these aws, proponents of liberalism may nd his arguments unconvincing, but for those sympathetic to analysis of the darker sides of modernity, Mishra’s work should prove thought provoking while drawing attention to potential linkages in historical developments across multiple centuries in a way that brings arguments previously sequestered to academia into the public sphere. Pankaj Mishra, Age of Anger: A History of the Present (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2017). Also by Ben Weiss on Not Even Past: My Alternative PhD in History. The British Industrial Revolution in Global Perspective, by Robert C. Allen (2009). Violence: Six Sideways Perspectives, by Slavoj Žižek (2008). Posted April 10, 2017 More Books THE PUBLIC HISTORIAN Making History: Houston’s “Spirit of the Confederacy” May 06, 2020 More from The Public Historian BOOKS America for Americans: A History of Xenophobia in the United States by Erika Lee (2019) April 20, 2020 More Books DIGITAL HISTORY Ticha: Digital Archive Review May 27, 2020 More from Digital History FILMS & MEDIA Jojo Rabbit (Dir: Taika Waititi, 2019) June 08, 2020 More from Films & Media TEXAS Spanish Flu in the Texas Oil Fields May 26, 2020 More from Texas 19th century 20th Century African American History american history Asia Asia & Middle East book review Brazil British Empire China Civil War Cold War Colonialism communism cultural history digital history Early Modern Europe Europe lm gender history History of Science immigration India Islam Latin America Latin American History Mexico Not Even Past Public History race religion Russia slavery Texas Texas History Texas History Day Transnational Twentieth Century History United States US History USSR Womens History world history World War II NOT EVEN PAST is produced by The Department of History THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN We are supported by the College of Liberal Arts And our READERS DONATE CONTACT All content © 2010-present NOT EVEN PAST and the authors, unless otherwise noted Sign up to receive bi-weekly email updates Your email address SUBSCRIBE BOOKS FILMS & MEDIA THE PUBLIC BLOG TEXAS HISTORIAN.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 2: Understanding the Context of Globalization
    CHAPTER 2 Understanding the Context of Globalization PHOTO 1.02.0 WhatHow do creates you imagine positivelife in Mumbai intercultural interactions?(Bombay), India, as different from or similar to your life? © iStockphoto.com/ISnap LEARNING OBJECTIVES 1. Describe the complex and contradictory influences of globalization on intercultural communication. 2. Explain the important role history plays in shaping intercultural communication today. 3. Explain how relationships of power impact intercultural communication in our everyday lives. 4. DoIdentify the not intercultural copy, dimensions of economic, post, political, and culturalor globalization.distribute Scenario One: In the hallway of a university in Southern California, three students—Hamza, an international student from Morocco; Cathy, who came to the United States four years ago from France; and Immaculee from Rwanda, who immigrated 17 years ago—spend the 15-minute break during their intercultural Copyright ©2022 by SAGE Publications, Inc. This work may not be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means without express written permission of the publisher. 29 30 Intercultural Communication communication class speaking with each other in French, relishing in the comfort that speaking a language of “home” offers and forming an intercultural relation- ship, however temporary and transitory. Why would they all speak French? Scenario Two: In the fall of 2018, the United States–Mexico–Canada Agree- ment (USMCA) was signed by all three countries. USMCA, promoted by President Trump, is a revised and rebranded version of the 25-year-old North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). In the 2019 State of the Union address, President Trump urged Congress to approve the USMCA, which he argued must replace “the catastrophe known as NAFTA” and “deliver for American workers like they have not had delivered to for a long time” (Kirby, 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Roundtable XX-44 on Age of Anger: a History of the Present
    H-Diplo Roundtable XX-44 on Age of Anger: A History of the Present Discussion published by George Fujii on Tuesday, July 2, 2019 H-Diplo Roundtable Review Volume XX, No. 44 2 July 2019 Roundtable Editors: Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins and Diane Labrosse Roundtable and Web Production Editor: George Fujii Pankaj Mishra. Age of Anger: A History of the Present. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2017. ISBN: 9780374274788 (hardcover, $27.00). https://hdiplo.org/to/RT20-44 Contents Introduction by Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins, Yale University. 2 Review by Faisal Devji, St Antony's College, University of Oxford.. 4 Review by Shruti Kapila, University of Cambridge. 8 Review by Thomas Meaney, Institut für die Wissenschaften vom Menschen,Vienna. 12 Author’s Response by Pankaj Mishra. 16 © 2019 The Authors. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License. Introduction by Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins, Yale University Democracy is dying. The liberal word order has reached its end. Identity politics are to blame, or perhaps Russia is. Fascism has returned. Tyranny now reigns. All of these claims, made today by politicians or scholars turned watchmen, invoke the horrors of the past to sound the tocsin of clear and present dangers. A history of the present is by its nature a speculative exercise, not only because using historical analogies to compare the present to the past is rarely convincing, but also because the political assumptions of such histories themselves have an unacknowledged agency. Histories of the present that promote the politics of fear—that Islam is a scourge of the West, or that the Kremlin determines U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Roundtable XX-44
    2019 Roundtable Editors: Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins and Diane H-Diplo Labrosse @HDiplo Roundtable and Web Production Editor: George Fujii Roundtable Review Volume XX, No. 44 2 July 2019 Pankaj Mishra. Age of Anger: A History of the Present. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2017. ISBN: 9780374274788 (hardcover, $27.00). https://hdiplo.org/to/RT20-44 Contents Introduction by Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins, Yale University................................................................................ 2 Review by Faisal Devji, St Antony's College, University of Oxford ................................................................... 4 Review by Shruti Kapila, University of Cambridge................................................................................................. 8 Review by Thomas Meaney, Institut für die Wissenschaften vom Menschen,Vienna ........................... 12 Author’s Response by Pankaj Mishra ....................................................................................................................... 16 © 2019 The Authors. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License. 1 | Page H-Diplo Roundtable XX-44 Introduction by Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins, Yale University emocracy is dying. e liberal word order has reached its end. Identity politics are to blame, or perhaps Russia is. Fascism has returned. Tyranny now reigns. All of these claims, made today by politicians or scholars turned watchmen, invoke the horrors of the past to sound the tocsin of clear andD present dangers. A history of the present is by its nature a speculative exercise, not only because using historical analogies to compare the present to the past is rarely convincing, but also because the political assumptions of such histories themselves have an unacknowledged agency. Histories of the present that promote the politics of fear—that Islam is a scourge of the West, or that the Kremlin determines U.S. elections—engender anxiety and, in turn, create the conditions for exceptional political actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Pankaj Mishra, Foreign Affairs, 00157120, Nov/Dec2016, Vol. 95, Issue 6
    Pankaj Mishra, Foreign Affairs, 00157120, Nov/Dec2016, Vol. 95, Issue 6 The Globalization of Rage Why Today’s Extremism Looks Familiar In September 1919, the Italian poet Gabriele D’Annunzio gathered a Iforce of 2,000 mutinous troops from the Royal Italian Army, along with hundreds of other volunteers, and stormed the city of Fiume, on the Adriatic coast, which had been contested territory since the end of World War I. D’Annunzio had served as a fighter pilot in the war, and his daring feats had turned him into one of the most famous people in Europe. An ultranationalist, he had long wanted “Mother Italy” to seize all the territories that he believed rightly belonged to her. In 1911, he had zealously supported Italy’s invasion of Libya, an imperialist adventure whose savagery stoked outrage across the Muslim world. In Fiume, he saw a chance to realize his dream of rejuvenating Italy through war. D’Annunzio’s forces were met with no resistance; British, French, and U.S. forces withdrew to avoid a confrontation. After installing himself as il duce of the “Italian Regency of Carnaro,” D’Annunzio established a fiefdom shaped by outrageous political rhetoric and gestures. He introduced the stiff-armed salute that Adolf Hitler would later adopt. D’Annunzio and his cadres dressed in black uniforms adorned with a skulland-crossbones insignia. They spoke obsessively of martyrdom, sacrifice, and death. Hitler and Benito Mussolini, obscure figures at the time, were keen students of the pseudo-religious speeches that D’Annunzio delivered daily from his balcony before retiring to the company of a large, rotating group of sexual partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Ignatieff
    Michael Ignatieff Born in Canada, educated at the University of Toronto and Harvard, Michael Ignatieff is a university professor, writer and former politician. His major publications are The Needs of Strangers (1984), Scar Tissue (1992), Isaiah Berlin (1998), The Rights Revolution (2000), Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry (2001), The Lesser Evil: Political Ethics in an Age of Terror (2004), Fire and Ashes: Success and Failure in Politics (2013) and The Ordinary Virtues: Moral Order in a Divided World (2017). Between 2006 and 2011, he served as an MP in the Parliament of Canada and then as Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada and Leader of the Official Opposition. He is a member of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada and holds thirteen honorary degrees. Between 2012 and 2015 he served as Centennial Chair at the Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs in New York. Between 2014 and 2016 he was Edward R. Murrow Chair of Press, Politics and Public Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School. He is currently the Rector and President of Central European University in Budapest. Michael Ignatieff Education 1978: MA, Cambridge University 1976: PhD, History, Harvard University 1969: BA Honors, History, University of Toronto Career 2016 - present: President and Rector, Central European University, Budapest 2018: Honorary Professor, Dickson Poon School of Law, King’s College London 2017: Honorary Fellow, St. Antony’s College, Oxford 2016: Distinguished Fellow, Munk School of Global Affairs, University of Toronto 2014-2016: Edward R. Murrow
    [Show full text]
  • Anger Management: the Politics of Frustration in the Arab World and Its Implications for the West Acknowledgements
    FUTURE OF DIPLOMACY PROJECT Anger Management The Politics of Frustration in the Arab World and its Implications for the West José Antonio Sabadell PAPER JUNE 2018 The Future of Diplomacy Project Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School 79 JFK Street Cambridge, MA 02138 www.belfercenter.org/futureofdiplomacy Statements and views expressed in this report are solely those of the authors and do not imply endorsement by Harvard University, the Harvard Kennedy School, the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, or the Future of Diplomacy Project. Layout and Design by Andrew Facini Cover photo: A portion of an oil painting by Mauritanian artist Saleh Lô (https://salehlo.weebly.com/). Copyright 2018, President and Fellows of Harvard College Printed in the United States of America FUTURE OF DIPLOMACY PROJECT Anger Management The Politics of Frustration in the Arab World and its Implications for the West José Antonio Sabadell PAPER JUNE 2018 About the Author José Antonio Sabadell is the Rafael del Pino - MAEC Fellow at the Future of Diplomacy Project of the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs (Harvard Kennedy School) for the Academic year 2017-2018. He is a Spanish diplomat since 1993. He has served as Ambassador and Head of the European Union Delegation to the Islamic Republic of Mau- ritania until 2017. Prior to this post, he was Head of Division for North Africa, Deputy Chief of Staff at the Cabinet of the Minister of Foreign Affairs and Technical Counsellor in the area of Arms Control. He has also served in a number of other capacities including in Afghani- stan, OSCE (in charge of politico-military affairs), Guatemala, Ecuador and Riyadh.
    [Show full text]
  • {TEXTBOOK} Age of Anger: a History of the Present Ebook, Epub
    AGE OF ANGER: A HISTORY OF THE PRESENT PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Pankaj Mishra | 416 pages | 26 Jan 2017 | Penguin Books Ltd | 9780241299395 | English | London, United Kingdom Age of Anger - Wikipedia He traces our current mood back to the French Enlightenment of the 18th century. It is the kind of vision the world needs right now. Lucid, incisive and provocative, the book may be the most ambitious effort yet to diagnose our social condition. With erudition and insight, it explains why movements from below are entrusting their future to paternalistic demagogues in the expectation of rewards from above. Get in touch Email: orders elliottbaybook. Cafe Information Little Oddfellows www. My Account. By Pankaj Mishra. Description One of our most important public intellectuals reveals the hidden history of our current global crisis. Slate 's Laura Miller stated, "The middle of the book could be heavy sledding for anyone lacking a passing familiarity with figures such as Fichte, Bakunin, and Kropotkin, but the chapters on how these European writers affected subsequent generations of leaders in India, Turkey, and China make it worth the effort. Critiques of the book focused on Mishra's evidence, relying more on "novelists and poets than historians and sociologists," [3] and on his attempt to use a single, wide-ranging cause to explain "differing phenomena that in the end require differing explanations. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Age of Anger First edition UK. Retrieved Retrieved from LiteraryReview. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux. There are many problems with his argument, not least its almost total neglect of Marxism and social democracy as alternatives to and critics of the liberal and neoliberal economic and political order.
    [Show full text]