DOCSLIB.ORG

How Does Globalization Affect COVID-19 Responses? Steve J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
How Does Globalization Affect COVID-19 Responses? Steve J Bickley et al. Globalization and Health (2021) 17:57 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-021-00677-5 RESEARCH Open Access How does globalization affect COVID-19 responses? Steve J. Bickley1,2†, Ho Fai Chan1,2*† , Ahmed Skali3, David Stadelmann2,4,5 and Benno Torgler1,2,5† Abstract Background: The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the vast differences in approaches to the control and containment of coronavirus across the world and has demonstrated the varied success of such approaches in minimizing the transmission of coronavirus. While previous studies have demonstrated high predictive power of incorporating air travel data and governmental policy responses in global disease transmission modelling, factors influencing the decision to implement travel and border restriction policies have attracted relatively less attention. This paper examines the role of globalization on the pace of adoption of international travel-related non- pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) during the coronavirus pandemic. This study aims to offer advice on how to improve the global planning, preparation, and coordination of actions and policy responses during future infectious disease outbreaks with empirical evidence. Methods and data: We analyzed data on international travel restrictions in response to COVID-19 of 185 countries from January to October 2020. We applied time-to-event analysis to examine the relationship between globalization and the timing of travel restrictions implementation. Results: The results of our survival analysis suggest that, in general, more globalized countries, accounting for the country-specific timing of the virus outbreak and other factors, are more likely to adopt international travel restrictions policies. However, countries with high government effectiveness and globalization were more cautious in implementing travel restrictions, particularly if through formal political and trade policy integration. This finding is supported by a placebo analysis of domestic NPIs, where such a relationship is absent. Additionally, we find that globalized countries with high state capacity are more likely to have higher numbers of confirmed cases by the time a first restriction policy measure was taken. (Continued on next page) * Correspondence: [email protected] Steve J. Bickley, Ho Fai Chan and Benno Torgler contributed equally to this work 1School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George St, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia 2Centre for Behavioural Economics, Society and Technology (BEST), 2 George St, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © The Author(s). 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. Bickley et al. Globalization and Health (2021) 17:57 Page 2 of 19 (Continued from previous page) Conclusions: The findings highlight the dynamic relationship between globalization and protectionism when governments respond to significant global events such as a public health crisis. We suggest that the observed caution of policy implementation by countries with high government efficiency and globalization is a by-product of commitment to existing trade agreements, a greater desire to ‘learn from others’ and also perhaps of ‘confidence’ in a government’s ability to deal with a pandemic through its health system and state capacity. Our results suggest further research is warranted to explore whether global infectious disease forecasting could be improved by including the globalization index and in particular, the de jure economic and political, and de facto social dimensions of globalization, while accounting for the mediating role of government effectiveness. By acting as proxies for a countries’ likelihood and speed of implementation for international travel restriction policies, such measures may predict the likely time delays in disease emergence and transmission across national borders. Keywords: Coronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Globalization, Travel restriction, Border closure, Health screening, Survival analysis Background limit potential virus import and spread through more so- The level of complexity around containing emerging and cially connected populations [14, 15]; greater economic re-emerging infectious diseases has increased with the globalization may indicate slower policy adoption due to ease and increased incidence of global travel [1], along legally binding travel and trade agreements/regulations, with greater global social, economic, and political inte- economic losses, and social issues due to family relations gration [2]. In reference to influenza pandemics, but that cross borders [16–21]. Greater political nonetheless applicable to many communicable and globalization may indicate greater willingness to learn vector-borne diseases, the only certainty is in the grow- from others and/or maintain democratic processes of ing unpredictability of pandemic-potential infectious dis- decision making in global coordination efforts, either ease emergence, origins, characteristics, and the way potentially delaying the implementation of travel re- biological pathways through which they propagate [3]. strictions. Travel restrictions may also have minimal im- Globalization in trade, increased population mobility, pact in urban centers with dense populations and travel and international travel are seen as some of the main networks [22]. Moreover, the costs of closing are com- human influences on the emergence, re-emergence, and paratively higher for open countries than for already transmission of infectious diseases in the twenty-first protective nations. For example, more globalized coun- Century [4, 5]. tries are more likely to incur financial or economic pen- Emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases have alties (e.g., see [23, 24]) when implementing health presented major challenges for human health in ancient policies which aim to improve the health of local popu- and modern societies alike [6–10]. The relative rise in lations such as import restrictions or bans on certain infectious disease mortality and shifting patterns of dis- food groups/products and product labelling. ease emergence, re-emergence, and transmission in the Globalization, after all, is known to promote growth and current era has been attributed to increased global con- does so via a combination of three main globalization di- nectedness, among other factors [11]. More globalized mensions: economic integration (i.e., flow of goods, cap- countries – and, in particular, global cities – are at the ital and services, economic information, and market heart of human influence on infectious diseases; these perceptions), social integration (i.e., proliferation of modern, densely populated urban centers are highly in- ideas, information, culture, and people), and political in- terconnected with the world economy in terms of social tegration (i.e., diffusion of governance and participation mobility, trade, and international travel [12, 13]. One in international coordination efforts) [25, 26]. See Table 1 might assume that given their high susceptibility to in- for examples of data used in the estimation of each fectious diseases, globalized countries would be more (sub)dimension of the KOF globalization index we use willing than less globalized countries to adopt screening, in this study. quarantine, travel restriction, and border control mea- Globalization appears to improve population health sures during times of mass disease outbreaks. However, outcomes such as infant mortality rate (IMR) and life ex- given their globalized nature, globalized countries are pectancy (LE) regardless of a country’s level of develop- also likely to favor less protectionist policies in general, ment (i.e., developed, developing, or underdeveloped) thus, contradicting the assumption above, perhaps sug- [27, 28]. Links between the dimensions of globalization gesting that counteracting forces are at play: greater so- (i.e., social, political, and economic) and general popula- cial globalization may require faster policy adoption to tion health are less clear cut [29]. For less developed Bickley et al. Globalization and Health (2021) 17:57 Page 3 of 19 Table 1 Dimensions and sub-components of Globalizationa Dimension Sub-Component Examples of Data Points Economic Trade Trade in goods and services, trade partner diversity, trade regulations, trade taxes, tariff rates, and number of trade agreements. Financial Foreign direct investment, portfolio investment, international debt, reserves
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On Confinement and Quarantine Concerns on an SEIAR Epidemic
    S S symmetry Article On Confinement and Quarantine Concerns on an SEIAR Epidemic Model with Simulated Parameterizations for the COVID-19 Pandemic Manuel De la Sen 1,* , Asier Ibeas 2 and Ravi P. Agarwal 3 1 Campus of Leioa, Institute of Research and Development of Processes IIDP, University of the Basque Country, 48940 Leioa (Bizkaia), Spain 2 Department of Telecommunications and Systems Engineering, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, UAB, 08193 Barcelona, Spain; [email protected] 3 Department of Mathematics, Texas A & M University, 700 Univ Blvd, Kingsville, TX 78363, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 7 September 2020; Accepted: 30 September 2020; Published: 7 October 2020 Abstract: This paper firstly studies an SIR (susceptible-infectious-recovered) epidemic model without demography and with no disease mortality under both total and under partial quarantine of the susceptible subpopulation or of both the susceptible and the infectious ones in order to satisfy the hospital availability requirements on bed disposal and other necessary treatment means for the seriously infectious subpopulations. The seriously infectious individuals are assumed to be a part of the total infectious being described by a time-varying proportional function. A time-varying upper-bound of those seriously infected individuals has to be satisfied as objective by either a total confinement or partial quarantine intervention of the susceptible subpopulation. Afterwards, a new extended SEIR (susceptible-exposed-infectious-recovered) epidemic model, which is referred to as an SEIAR (susceptible-exposed-symptomatic infectious-asymptomatic infectious-recovered) epidemic model with demography and disease mortality is given and focused on so as to extend the above developed ideas on the SIR model.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Vaccines Frequently Asked Questions
    Page 1 of 12 COVID-19 Vaccines 2020a Frequently Asked Questions Michigan.gov/Coronavirus The information in this document will change frequently as we learn more about COVID-19 vaccines. There is a lot we are learning as the pandemic and COVID-19 vaccines evolve. The approach in Michigan will adapt as we learn more. September 29, 2021. Quick Links What’s new | Why COVID-19 vaccination is important | Booster and additional doses | What to expect when you get vaccinated | Safety of the vaccine | Vaccine distribution/prioritization | Additional vaccine information | Protecting your privacy | Where can I get more information? What’s new − Pfizer booster doses recommended for some people to boost waning immunity six months after completing the Pfizer vaccine. Why COVID-19 vaccination is important − If you are fully vaccinated, you don’t have to quarantine after being exposed to COVID-19, as long as you don’t have symptoms. This means missing less work, school, sports and other activities. − COVID-19 vaccination is the safest way to build protection. COVID-19 is still a threat, especially to people who are unvaccinated. Some people who get COVID-19 can become severely ill, which could result in hospitalization, and some people have ongoing health problems several weeks or even longer after getting infected. Even people who did not have symptoms when they were infected can have these ongoing health problems. − After you are fully vaccinated for COVID-19, you can resume many activities that you did before the pandemic. CDC recommends that fully vaccinated people wear a mask in public indoor settings if they are in an area of substantial or high transmission.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Officer Order
    NICK MACCHIONE, FACHE HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY WILMA J. WOOTEN, M.D. AGENCY DIRECTOR PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICER PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES 3851 ROSECRANS STREET, MAIL STOP P-578 SAN DIEGO, CA 92110-3134 (619) 531-5800 • FAX (619) 542-4186 ORDER OF THE HEALTH OFFICER (Quarantine of Persons Exposed to COVID-19) The spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a substantial threat to the public’s health. San Diego County is currently subject to a declared local health emergency and a proclaimed local emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and the Governor of the State of California proclaimed a state of emergency. Everyone is at risk for becoming ill with COVID-19, but some people are more vulnerable to serious illness due to age or underlying health conditions. In order to slow the spread of COVID-19, and prevent the healthcare system in San Diego County from being overwhelmed, it is necessary for the Health Officer of the County of San Diego (Health Officer) to require the quarantine of persons exposed to COVID-19. Household contacts, intimate partners, caregivers, and any other person who have been in close contact with a person either diagnosed with COVID-19, or likely to have COVID-19 (COVID-19 Patient), must quarantine themselves. A “close contact” is a contact with a COVID-19 Patient that occurs anywhere between 48 hours before the COVID-19 Patient’s symptoms began (or, for asymptomatic patients, 2 days prior to test specimen collection), and until the COVID-19 Patient is no longer required to be isolated, and where they: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Distancing, Quarantine and Isolation During an Infectious Disease Outbreak
    TAKING CARE OF YOUR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH TIPS FOR SOCIAL DISTANCING, QUARANTINE AND ISOLATION DURING AN INFECTIOUS DISEASE OUTBREAK In the event of an infectious disease outbreak, local officials may require the public to take measures to limit and control the spread of the disease. This tip sheet provides information about social distancing, quarantine, and isolation. The government has the right to enforce federal and state laws related to public health if people within the country get sick with highly contagious diseases that have the potential to develop into outbreaks or pandemics. This tip sheet describes feelings and thoughts you may have during and after social distancing, quarantine, and isolation. It also suggests ways to care for your behavioral health during these experiences and provides resources for more help. WHAT IS SOCIAL DISTANCING? • Time taken off from work and the potential loss of Social distancing is a way to keep people from interacting income and job security closely or frequently enough to spread an infectious disease. • The challenges of securing things you need, such as Schools and other gathering places such as movie theaters groceries and personal care items may close, and sports events and religious services may be • Concern about being able to effectively care for children canceled. or others in your care WHAT IS QUARANTINE? • Uncertainty or frustration about how long you will need to Quarantine separates and restricts the movement of people remain in this situation, and uncertainty about the future who have been exposed to a contagious disease to see if they • Loneliness associated with feeling cut off from the world become sick.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Health in Florida – Yesteryear
    Public Health in Florida – Yesteryear FLORIDA'S PUBLIC HEALTH CENTENNIAL William J. Bigler Department of Health 1317 Winewood Boulevard, Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Reprinted with permission from Florida Journal of Public Health, Vol. 1, No. 3, May, 1989, p. 7-19. Figure 1. Cover of Florida Journal of Public Health Vol. 1, No.3 May 1989. ____________________________________________________________ In 1989 William J. Bigler, Ph.D, was Deputy State Epidemiologist for the HRS State Health Office, Disease Control and AIDS Prevention Program. He was initially employed by the Florida State Board of Health 34 years ago as a biologist, has since served in HRS Health Programs as Research Coordinator, Epidemiology Program Supervisor and Biological Administrator, and is currently Senior Epidemiologist with the Department of Health, Bureau of Epidemiology. 2 Abstract Florida's State Board of Health (SBH) was created on February 20, 1889. Historical records during the next century, document that public health programs and policies have influenced the state's political, social and economic infrastucture as well as the quality of life of it's populace. Quarantine, fumigation, vaccination, sanitation, and public education were initially used to control yellow fever, malaria, dengue fever, smallpox, and cholera. World War I brought venereal disease (VD) and epidemics of influenza, dengue fever and plague were encountered shortly thereafter. Statewide mosquito control efforts made the state more habitable. Then hurricanes wreaked havoc when the Great Depression caused massive cuts in budgets and programs. Federal "relief" programs provided some funds for health needs, but not enough. VD was again a problem during World War II. Health care for military dependents, the exploding population and industrial development brought new challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • The Covid-19 Pandemic, Geopolitics, and International Law
    journal of international humanitarian legal studies 11 (2020) 237-248 brill.com/ihls The covid-19 Pandemic, Geopolitics, and International Law David P Fidler Adjunct Senior Fellow, Council on Foreign Relations, USA [email protected] Abstract Balance-of-power politics have shaped how countries, especially the United States and China, have responded to the covid-19 pandemic. The manner in which geopolitics have influenced responses to this outbreak is unprecedented, and the impact has also been felt in the field of international law. This article surveys how geopolitical calcula- tions appeared in global health from the mid-nineteenth century through the end of the Cold War and why such calculations did not, during this period, fundamentally change international health cooperation or the international law used to address health issues. The astonishing changes in global health and international law on health that unfolded during the post-Cold War era happened in a context not characterized by geopolitical machinations. However, the covid-19 pandemic emerged after the bal- ance of power had returned to international relations, and rival great powers have turned this pandemic into a battleground in their competition for power and influence. Keywords balance of power – China – coronavirus – covid-19 – geopolitics – global health – International Health Regulations – international law – pandemic – United States – World Health Organization © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2020 | doi:10.1163/18781527-bja10010 <UN> 238 Fidler 1 Introduction A striking feature of the covid-19 pandemic is how balance-of-power politics have influenced responses to this outbreak.1 The rivalry between the United States and China has intensified because of the pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Current New York City COVID-19 Guidance for Quarantine
    Summary of Current New York City COVID-19 Guidance for Isolation, Quarantine and Transmission-Based Precautions NOTE: The latest revisions are based on the following changes to New York State (NYS) guidance: • Revised Discontinuation of Transmission-Based Precautions for Patients with COVID-19 Who Are Hospitalized or in Nursing Homes, Adult Care Facilities, or Other Congregate Settings with Vulnerable Residents (May 3, 2021) • Discontinuation of Interim Guidance for Travelers Arriving in NYS • Executive Order 202, declaring a disaster emergency in NYS in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and all Executive Orders 202 through 202.111, and Executive Orders 205 through 205.3 were rescinded effective June 25, 2021. Some NYS guidance was also rescinded as a result. This guidance applies to people with a positive diagnostic test or an exposure to someone with COVID-19 in the past 14 days. • If a person falls into more than one category, use the more conservative guideline or longest duration. • With rare exceptions described below, people who test positive for COVID-19 and recover should not be retested and do not need to quarantine for the three months following their date of symptom onset (or date of first positive test if they had no symptoms) per NYS Department Of Health (NYSDOH) guidance. This applies even if they have a new exposure to COVID-19.1,2 • Most people, including most health care personnel (HCP), who are fully vaccinated against COVID-19 (see definition below) do not need to quarantine following exposure to someone with COVID-19 per NYS guidance; however, per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), they should get a COVID-19 test three to five days following the exposure and wear a face mask for 14 days following the exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Health Recommendations: After COVID-19 Vaccination
    Public Health Recommendations: August 18, 2021 After COVID-19 Vaccination Thank you for getting vaccinated and helping our communities get one step closer to overcoming this pandemic. Until you are fully vaccinated (2 weeks after final dose), it’s important to protect others. Many people, including children, are not vaccinated yet. These actions will protect our community. 1. Wear a mask. Wear 2 or more layers. Make sure it's a snug fit. 2. Stay at least 6 feet away from others in public. 3. Wash hands often. 4. Avoid crowds. 5. Follow CDC Travel Guidance: bit.ly/Covid-Travel 6. If exposed to COVID-19, check quarantine and testing guidance to know if you should quarantine: kingcounty.gov/covid/quarantine 7. If you test positive, follow isolation guidance: kingcounty.gov/covid/quarantine 8. Follow any relevant workplace or school guidance Fully vaccinated? You can start doing many things again that stopped because of the pandemic! See next page. Reminders about the COVID-19 vaccines: • You may have some side effects, which are normal signs that your body is building protection. Call your healthcare provider if you have any side effects that bother you or do not go away. • If you experience a severe allergic reaction to the vaccine, call 9-1-1 or go to the nearest hospital. • Schedule your second dose. If you are receiving a 2-dose vaccine, make an appointment for the second dose after you receive your first dose. You need both doses to be protected against COVID-19. • Protection from vaccine is not immediate.
    [Show full text]
  • Increased Air Pollution Exposure Among the Chinese Population During the National Quarantine in 2020
    ARTICLES https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01018-z Increased air pollution exposure among the Chinese population during the national quarantine in 2020 Huizhong Shen 1,2, Guofeng Shen 2 ✉ , Yilin Chen1, Armistead G. Russell1, Yongtao Hu1, Xiaoli Duan 3, Wenjun Meng 2, Yang Xu 2, Xiao Yun 2, Baolei Lyu4, Shunliu Zhao5, Amir Hakami5, Jianping Guo 6, Shu Tao 2 and Kirk R. Smith7,8 The COVID-19 quarantine in China is thought to have reduced ambient air pollution. The overall exposure of the population also depends, however, on indoor air quality and human mobility and activities. Here, by integrating real-time mobility data and a questionnaire survey on time-activity patterns during the pandemic, we show that despite a decrease in ambient PM2.5 during the quarantine, the total population-weighted exposure to PM2.5 considering both indoor and outdoor environments increased by 5.7 μg m−3 (95% confidence interval, 1.2–11.0 μg m−3). The increase in population-weighted exposure was mainly driven by a nationwide urban-to-rural population migration before the Spring Festival coupled with the freezing of the migration backward due to the quarantine, which increased household energy consumption and the fraction of people exposed to rural household air pollution indoors. Our analysis reveals an increased inequality of air pollution exposure during the quarantine and highlights the importance of household air pollution for population health in China. ue to the outbreak of COVID-19, China activated the First because of the COVID-19 outbreak, areas where household air pol- Level Public Health Emergency Response (here called a lution (HAP) is more severe due to the prevalent use of solid fuels quarantine), which required local governments to carry (coal and biomass) for cooking13,18.
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions* *Information Is Current As of 9/17/2021 and Is Subject to Change
    2019 Coronavirus (COVID-19) Frequently Asked Questions* *Information is current as of 9/17/2021 and is subject to change Please note: Text in this color denotes information updated in the last version of this document Text in this color denotes information updated since the last version of this document Contents: (click on a question to navigate directly to it) Situation in Maine .................................................................................................................................................................. 4 • What happens when a case of COVID-19 is identified in Maine? (9/17/2021) ......................................................... 4 • What about people from out of state who test positive? Where are their results reported? (3/31/2020) ............ 4 • What is the guidance for indoor gatherings in Maine? (5/25/2021) ......................................................................... 4 • What is the guidance for outdoor gatherings in Maine? (5/25/2021) ...................................................................... 4 • I would like to volunteer to help with the COVID-19 response (including contact tracing and vaccine distribution). How can I do this? (3/4/2021) ................................................................................................................................... 4 • Where can I find information on COVID-19 vaccination in Maine? (9/17/2021) ...................................................... 4 • I am fully vaccinated but lost my vaccine card. How can I get
    [Show full text]
  • Mental Health Outcomes of Quarantine and Isolation for Infection Prevention: a Systematic Umbrella Review of the Global Evidence
    Open Access Volume: 42, Article ID: e2020038, 11 pages https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2020038 SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Mental health outcomes of quarantine and isolation for infection prevention: a systematic umbrella review of the global evidence Md Mahbub Hossain1,2, Abida Sultana2, Neetu Purohit3 1Department of Health Promotion and Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA; 2Nature Study Society of Bangladesh, Khulna, Bangladesh; 3The IIHMR University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India OBJECTIVES: Transmission of infectious diseases is often prevented by quarantine and isolation of the populations at risk. These approaches restrict the mobility, social interactions, and daily activities of the affected individuals. In recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, quarantine and isolation are being adopted in many contexts, which necessitates an evaluation of global evidence on how such measures impact the mental health outcomes among populations. This umbrella review aimed to synthesize the available evidence on mental health outcomes of quarantine and isolation for preventing infectious diseases. METHODS: We searched nine major databases and additional sources and included articles if they were systematically con- ducted reviews, published as peer-reviewed journal articles, and reported mental health outcomes of quarantine or isolation in any population. RESULTS: Among 1,364 citations, only eight reviews met our criteria. Most of the primary studies in those reviews were con- ducted in high-income nations and in hospital settings. These articles reported a high burden of mental health problems among patients, informal caregivers, and healthcare providers who experienced quarantine or isolation. Prevalent mental health prob- lems among the affected individuals include depression, anxiety, mood disorders, psychological distress, posttraumatic stress disorder, insomnia, fear, stigmatization, low self-esteem, lack of self-control, and other adverse mental health outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Globalization Paradox and the Coronavirus Pandemic
    Globalization Paradox and the Coronavirus pandemic Clingendael Report Remco van de Pas Globalization Paradox and the Coronavirus pandemic Remco van de Pas Clingendael Report May 2020 Disclaimer: Production of this report was conducted within the PROGRESS research framework agreement. Responsibility for its contents and for the opinions expressed rests solely with the authors and does not constitute, nor should be construed as, an endorsement by the Netherlands Ministries of Foreign Affairs and Defence. May 2020 © Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’. Cover photo: © Jon Tyson on Unsplash Unauthorized use of any materials violates copyright, trademark and / or other laws. Should a user download material from the website or any other source related to the Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, or the Clingendael Institute, for personal or non-commercial use, the user must retain all copyright, trademark or other similar notices contained in the original material or on any copies of this material. Material on the website of the Clingendael Institute may be reproduced or publicly displayed, distributed or used for any public and non-commercial purposes, but only by mentioning the Clingendael Institute as its source. Permission is required to use the logo of the Clingendael Institute. This can be obtained by contacting the Communication desk of the Clingendael Institute ([email protected]). The following web link activities are prohibited by the Clingendael Institute and may present trademark and copyright infringement issues: links that involve unauthorized use of our logo, framing, inline links, or metatags, as well as hyperlinks or a form of link disguising the URL. About the author Remco van de Pas is a public health doctor and a global health researcher.
    [Show full text]