DOCSLIB.ORG

Amendment 10 to the Fishery Management Plan for Spiny Lobster

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Amendment 10 to the Fishery Management Plan for Spiny Lobster 8/1/2011 FINAL AMENDMENT 10 TO THE FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SPINY LOBSTER IN THE GULF OF MEXICO AND SOUTH ATLANTIC Including Final Environmental Impact Statement, Regulatory Impact Review, and Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis August 2011 Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council South Atlantic Fishery Management Council 2203 North Lois Avenue 4055 Faber Place Drive Suite 1100 Suite 201 Tampa, FL 33607 North Charleston, SC 29405 813-348-1630 Phone 843-571-4366 Phone 813-348-1711 Fax 843-769-4520 Fax www.gulfcouncil.org www.safmc.net National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Regional Office 263 13th Avenue South St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 727-824-5305 Phone 727-824-5308 Fax http://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov This is a publication of the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council Pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA10NMF4410011 and the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council Pursuant to NOAA Award No. FNA05NMF4410004 This page intentionally left blank ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS DOCUMENT ABC acceptable biological catch ACL annual catch limit ACT annual catch target AM accountability measure APA Administrative Procedure Act B Biomass BMSY Biomass at MSY CEA Cumulative Effects Analysis CEQ Council on Environmental Quality CFMC Caribbean Fishery Management Council CFR Code of Federal Regulations Councils Gulf of Mexico Fishery and South Atlantic Management Councils CPUE catch per unit effort CWA Clean Water Act CZMA Coastal Zone Management Act DQA Data Quality Act EEZ Exclusive Economic Zone EFH Essential Fish Habitat EIS Environmental Impact Statement EJ Environmental Justice EO Executive Order EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act F instantaneous fishing mortality rate FAC Florida Administrative Code FAO Food and Agriculture Organization (United Nations) FIS Fishery Impact Statement FKNMS Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary FMP fishery management plan FMSY Fishing Mortality Rate Yielding MSY FMU fishery management unit FWC Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FWRI Fish and Wildlife Research Institute FWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service GC general counsel GMFMC Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council Gulf Gulf of Mexico IRFA initial regulatory flexibility analysis M instantaneous natural mortality rate Magnuson-Stevens Act Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act MFMT Maximum Fishing Mortality Threshold MMPA Marine Mammal Protection Act mp million pounds MPA Marine Protected Area MRFSS Marine Recreational Fishery Statistics Survey SPINY LOBSTER AMENDMENT 10 i ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS MRIP Marine Recreational Information Program MSST Minimum Stock Size Threshold MSY maximum sustainable yield NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Same as NMFS OFL overfishing limit OMB Office of Management and Budget OY optimum yield PRA Paperwork Reduction Act RA Regional Administrator of NMFS RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act RIR regulatory impact review RSE restricted species endorsement SAFMC South Atlantic Fishery Management Council SBA Small Business Administration Secretary Secretary of Commerce SEDAR Southeast Data Assessment Review (stock assessment SEFSC Southeast Fisheries Science Center of NMFS SFA Sustainable Fisheries Act SoVI Social Vulnerability Index SPL saltwater products license (FL) SPR spawning potential ratio SRCL Special Recreational Crawfish License SSB spawning stock biomass SSBR spawning stock biomass per recruit SSC Scientific and Statistical Committee TED turtle excluder device TCP trap certification program USCG United States Coast Guard VEC valued environmental component ww whole weight SPINY LOBSTER AMENDMENT 10 ii ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS AMENDMENT 10 TO THE FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SPINY LOBSTER IN THE GULF OF MEXICO AND SOUTH ATLANTIC REGIONS INCLUDING A FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (FEIS), REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW (RIR), REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ACT ANALYSIS (RFA) Proposed actions: Establish annual catch limits and accountability measures for Caribbean spiny lobster; remove several other species of lobster from the FMP; redefine biological reference points; update the framework process; and establish or modify other management measures. Lead agency: FMP Amendment – Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic Fishery Management Councils EIS - NOAA Fisheries Service For Further Information Contact: Stephen A. Bortone, Ph.D. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council 2203 N. Lois Avenue, Suite 1100 Tampa, FL 33607 (813) 348-1630 (Phone) (888) 833-1844 (Toll Free) [email protected] Website: www.gulfcouncil.org Robert K. Mahood South Atlantic Fishery Management Council 4055 Faber Place, Suite 201 North Charleston, SC 29405 (866) SAFMC-10 [email protected] Website: www.safmc.net Roy E. Crabtree, Ph.D. NOAA Fisheries, Southeast Region 263 13th Avenue South St. Petersburg, FL 33701 (727) 824-5301 [email protected] Website: www.nmfs.noaa.gov NOI for Amendment 10: 1/28/09 (74 FR 4943) – SAFMC 9/1/09 (74 FR 45182) – GMFMC SPINY LOBSTER AMENDMENT 10 iii EIS COVER SHEET Scoping meetings held: SAFMC as part of Comp. ACL Amendment (1/26/09 in Charleston, SC; 1/27/09 in New Bern, NC; 2/3/09 in Key Largo, FL; 2/4/09 in Cape Canaveral, FL and 2/5/09 in Pooler, GA) GMFMC (9/21/09 in Key West, FL and 9/22/09 in Marathon, FL) NOI for EIS: 3/12/10 (75 FR 11843) Public Hearings held: 4/11-20/11 (76 FR 16730) Public Hearings held: 5/9/2011 (76 FR 20957) DEIS filed: 4/8/11 DEIS notice published: 4/15/11_(76 FR 21345) DEIS Comments received by: 6/1/11 Abstract Revisions to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Management and Conservation Act in 2006 require that fishery management plans contain annual catch limits and accountability measures for all managed species to prevent overfishing. Annual catch limits must be set at levels that prevent overfishing and do not exceed the recommendations of the respective Councils’ Scientific and Statistical Committees for acceptable biological catch. Species in a fishery management plan not subject to overfishing should have annual catch limits and accountability measures effective in 2011. No species in the spiny lobster fishery management unit are known to be undergoing overfishing. Amendment 10 to the Fishery Management Plan for Spiny Lobster in the Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic contains the following actions by the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council and the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council: Removing species from the fishery management plan (i.e., smoothtail spiny lobster, spotted spiny lobster, Spanish slipper lobster, and ridged slipper lobster); defining or modifying biological reference points (i.e., maximum sustainable yield, overfishing, and overfished thresholds); considering sector allocations; specifying an acceptable biological catch control rule; setting annual catch limits and annual catch targets; establishing accountability measures; updating the framework procedure and protocol for enhanced cooperative management; modifying or removing the allowance of undersized lobsters as bait in commercial traps; modifying or removing tailing permit regulations; and determining authority to remove derelict or abandoned spiny lobster traps from federal waters off Florida. This amendment also explored two additional actions pertaining to protected resources: one was limiting fishing areas to protect threatened staghorn and elkhorn corals (Acropora spp.) and the other was trap line marking requirements for the commercial sector. The Councils decided to take no action in this amendment, and will address them in a separate amendment to allow more time for stakeholder input. SPINY LOBSTER AMENDMENT 10 iv EIS COVER SHEET TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Abstract ........................................................................................................................ iv Summary .................................................................................................................... S-1 Purpose and need ...........................................................................................................5 Alternatives ..................................................................................................................10 Affected environment ..................................................................................................63 Environmental consequences .....................................................................................119 List of preparers .........................................................................................................212 List of agencies, organizations, and persons to whom copies of the statement are sent ...............................................................213 Index ..........................................................................................................................227 SPINY LOBSTER AMENDMENT 10 v EIS COVER SHEET TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS DOCUMENT ....................................................................... i TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ...................v LIST OF TABLES ...........................................................................................................................x LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Hampshire Fish and Game Department NEW HAMPSHIRE SALTWATER FISHING 2021 DIGEST
    New Hampshire Fish and Game Department NEW HAMPSHIRE SALTWATER FISHING 2021 DIGEST Fish the Coast! The Official New Hampshire Digest of Regulations fishnh.com A Legacy of High Performance NEW! SARAGOSA SW REEL Infinity Drive Technology increases this reel’s winding torque under load compared to its TERAMAR XX SW RODS predecessor to give anglers a distinct advantage Shimano’s Spiral X and Hi-Power X technologies enhance power over hard fighting game fish. Combined with transmission through the rod blank for increased casting distance a battle-tested rigid HAGANE Body that won’t and lifting power as well as reduced blank twist during tough flex under immense loads and the battles. Whether fishing for stripers in the Northeast, reds in the HAGANE Gear to create eternally smooth reeling. Southeast or Southwest, or salmon on the West Coast, there is a Cross Carbon drag and X-Protect offer high-level Teramar XX rod to fit your fishing needs. water resistance to create long-lasting durability. No matter whether anglers are fishing inshore or offshore, jigging for bottom fish or casting baits at tailing fish, they can count on — just like they always have — the Saragosa SW to stay smooth no matter the conditions and perform when TREVALA PX RODS needed most. The bar is raised for saltwater spinning reels. Incorporates a redesigned rod blank with Shimano’s Hi-Power X reinforcing technology to increase overall strength and control while also enhancing rod twist resistance when jigging or fighting a fish. Save the date! FISHINGFEST® 2021 ~ April 1-4 Quality components for enhanced performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Lobster Review
    Seafood Watch Seafood Report American lobster Homarus americanus (Image © Monterey Bay Aquarium) Northeast Region Final Report February 2, 2006 Matthew Elliott Independent Consultant Monterey Bay Aquarium American Lobster About Seafood Watch® and the Seafood Reports Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch® program evaluates the ecological sustainability of wild-caught and farmed seafood commonly found in the United States marketplace. Seafood Watch® defines sustainable seafood as originating from sources, whether wild-caught or farmed, which can maintain or increase production in the long-term without jeopardizing the structure or function of affected ecosystems. Seafood Watch® makes its science-based recommendations available to the public in the form of regional pocket guides that can be downloaded from the Internet (seafoodwatch.org) or obtained from the Seafood Watch® program by emailing [email protected]. The program’s goals are to raise awareness of important ocean conservation issues and empower seafood consumers and businesses to make choices for healthy oceans. Each sustainability recommendation on the regional pocket guides is supported by a Seafood Report. Each report synthesizes and analyzes the most current ecological, fisheries and ecosystem science on a species, then evaluates this information against the program’s conservation ethic to arrive at a recommendation of “Best Choices,” “Good Alternatives,” or “Avoid.” The detailed evaluation methodology is available upon request. In producing the Seafood Reports, Seafood Watch® seeks out research published in academic, peer-reviewed journals whenever possible. Other sources of information include government technical publications, fishery management plans and supporting documents, and other scientific reviews of ecological sustainability. Seafood Watch® Fisheries Research Analysts also communicate regularly with ecologists, fisheries and aquaculture scientists, and members of industry and conservation organizations when evaluating fisheries and aquaculture practices.
    [Show full text]
  • 1779 Soldiers, Sailors and Marines Kyllonen
    1779 Soldiers, Sailors and Marines Kyllonen pation, farmer; inducted at Hillsboro on April 29, 1918; sent to Camp Dodge, Iowa; served in Company K, 350th Infantry, to May 16, 1918; Com- pany K, 358th Infantry, to discharge; overseas from June 20, 1918, to June 7, 1919. Engagements: Offensives: St. Mihiel; Meuse-Argonne. De- fensive Sectors: Puvenelle and Villers-en-Haye (Lorraine). Discharged at Camp Dodge, Idwa, on June 14, 1919, as a Private. KYLLONEN, CHARLEY. Army number 4,414,704; registrant, Nelson county; born, Brocket, N. Dak., July 5, 1894, of Finnish parents; occu- pation, farmer; inducted at La,kota on Sept. 3, 1918; sent to Camp Grant, Ill.; served in Machine Gun Training Center, Camp Hancock, Ga., to dis- charge. Discharged at Camp Hancock, Ga., on March 26, 1919, as a Private. KYLMALA, AUGUST. Army number 2,110,746; registrant, Dickey county; born, Oula, Finland, Aug. 9, 1887; naturalized citizen; occupation, laborer; inducted at Ellendale on Sept. 21, 1917; sent. to Camp Dodge, Iowa; served in Company I, 352nd Infantry, to Nov. 28, 1917; Company L, 348th Infantry, to May 18, 1918; 162nd Depot Brigade, to June 17, 1918; 21st Battalion, M. S. Gas Company, to Aug. 2, 1918; 165th Depot Brigade, to discharge. Discharged at Camp Travis, Texas, on Dec. 4, 1918, as a Private. KYNCL, JOHN. Army number 298,290; registrant, Cavalier county; born, Langdon, N. Dak., March 27, 1896, of Bohemian parents; occupation, farmer; inducted at Langdon on Dec. 30, 1917; sent to Fort Stevens, Ore.; served in Battery D, 65th Artillery, Coast Artillery Corps, to discharge; overseas from March 25, 1918, to Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 MARINE FISHERIES INFORMATION CIRCULAR Connecticut Commercial and Recreational Fishing
    Connecticut Department of ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 2021 MARINE FISHERIES INFORMATION CIRCULAR Connecticut Commercial and Recreational Fishing INTRODUCTION IMPORTANT NOTE: CHANGES MAY BE MADE DURING THE YEAR THAT WON’T BE REFLECTED IN THIS CIRCULAR. Commercial fishery licensing statutes were amended in 2015 (Public Act 15-52) creating some new license types and mandating annual renewal of moratorium licenses commercial fishing vessel permits and quota managed species endorsements. PLEASE SEE Page 1 General Provisions for important details. This circular is provided to inform commercial and recreational fishermen about Connecticut statutes and regulations that govern the taking of lobsters, marine and anadromous finfish, squid, whelk (conch) and crabs using commercial fishing gear or for commercial purposes. For information pertaining to oysters, clams and bay scallops, contact local town clerks or the Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Aquaculture (203-874-0696). The circular is intended to be a layman's summary. No attempt is made to employ the exact wording of statutes or regulations or to provide a complete listing of them. Interpretation or explanation of the material contained herein may be obtained from a Connecticut Environmental Conservation Police Officer, or from the following sources: DEEP Marine Fisheries Program (860-434-6043) DEEP Marine Environmental Conservation Police (860-434-9840) For legal purposes, please consult the most recent: • Commissioner Declarations at www.ct.gov/deep/FisheriesDeclarations, • Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies at https://eregulations.ct.gov/eRegsPortal/ and • Connecticut General Statutes at http://www.cga.ct.gov/current/pub/titles.htm. License applications and licenses are obtained by writing the DEEP Licensing and Revenue Unit, 79 Elm Street, First Floor, Hartford, Connecticut 06106, or by calling 860-424-3105.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Fish, Big Impact: Managing a Crucial Link in Ocean Food Webs
    little fish BIG IMPACT Managing a crucial link in ocean food webs A report from the Lenfest Forage Fish Task Force The Lenfest Ocean Program invests in scientific research on the environmental, economic, and social impacts of fishing, fisheries management, and aquaculture. Supported research projects result in peer-reviewed publications in leading scientific journals. The Program works with the scientists to ensure that research results are delivered effectively to decision makers and the public, who can take action based on the findings. The program was established in 2004 by the Lenfest Foundation and is managed by the Pew Charitable Trusts (www.lenfestocean.org, Twitter handle: @LenfestOcean). The Institute for Ocean Conservation Science (IOCS) is part of the Stony Brook University School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences. It is dedicated to advancing ocean conservation through science. IOCS conducts world-class scientific research that increases knowledge about critical threats to oceans and their inhabitants, provides the foundation for smarter ocean policy, and establishes new frameworks for improved ocean conservation. Suggested citation: Pikitch, E., Boersma, P.D., Boyd, I.L., Conover, D.O., Cury, P., Essington, T., Heppell, S.S., Houde, E.D., Mangel, M., Pauly, D., Plagányi, É., Sainsbury, K., and Steneck, R.S. 2012. Little Fish, Big Impact: Managing a Crucial Link in Ocean Food Webs. Lenfest Ocean Program. Washington, DC. 108 pp. Cover photo illustration: shoal of forage fish (center), surrounded by (clockwise from top), humpback whale, Cape gannet, Steller sea lions, Atlantic puffins, sardines and black-legged kittiwake. Credits Cover (center) and title page: © Jason Pickering/SeaPics.com Banner, pages ii–1: © Brandon Cole Design: Janin/Cliff Design Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5: Commercial and Recreational Fisheries
    Ocean Special Area Management Plan Chapter 5: Commercial and Recreational Fisheries Table of Contents 500 Introduction.............................................................................................................................9 510 Marine Fisheries Resources in the Ocean SAMP Area.....................................................12 510.1 Species Included in this Chapter ..........................................................................12 510.1.1 Species important to commercial and recreational fisheries.....................12 510.1.2 Forage fish ................................................................................................15 510.1.3 Threatened and endangered species and species of concern ....................15 510.2 Life History, Habitat, and Fishery of Commercially and Recreationally Important Species............................................................................................................17 510.2.1 American lobster.......................................................................................17 510.2.2 Atlantic bonito ..........................................................................................19 510.2.3 Atlantic cod...............................................................................................20 510.2.4 Atlantic herring .........................................................................................21 510.2.5 Atlantic mackerel......................................................................................23 510.2.6 Atlantic
    [Show full text]
  • Spiny Lobster Amendment 4
    AMENDMENT 4 TO THE FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SPINY LOBSTER IN THE GULF OF MEXICO AND SOUTH ATLANTIC INCLUDING THE REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT prepared by the South Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Councils SEPTEMBER 1994 Financial assistance for producing this Amendment was provided by grant funds from the National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, under Public Law 94-265, the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE LIST OF ACTIONS IN SPINY LOBSTER AMENDMENT 4 ........................................... i REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW FOR SPINY LOBSTER AMENDMENT 4 ..................... ii 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED.................................................................................. 1 2.0 ALTERNATIVESINCLUDINGTHEPROPOSEDACTION .....................................5 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT.......................................................................... 7 A. Optimum Yield.....................................................................................7 B. Definition of Overfishing......................................................................... 7 C. Commercial Fishery...........................................:.................,................. 8 D. Recreational Fishery .............................................................................. 9 E. Status of the Stocks ............................................................................... 16 ~~-· 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ...............................:;:-.:
    [Show full text]
  • OCEANA Bycatch Summary V4.Indd
    COLLATERAL DAMAGE: HOW TO REDUCE BYCATCH IN CANADA'S COMMERCIAL FISHERIES oceana.ca 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 01 executi ve summary 04 glossary and acronyms WHAT IS 05 bycatch is a global issue 06 Harmful gear 08 assessing canada’s bycatch problem bycatch? 10 key fi nding: hundreds of species end up as bycatch 13 key fi nding: there are big holes in the data 16 key fi nding: canada’s regulatory approach to reducing bycatch is collateral damage created by fi shing: the non- bycatch is inadequate target fi sh and ocean wildlife that are captured in nets, 17 methods for monitoring bycatch lines and other gear set for other targeted species. it may 18 msc-certi fi ed fi sheries with the most discards be discarded at sea or brought to port. 24 what’s the soluti on? 25 recommendati ons for fisheries and oceans canada globally, this includes the dolphins that are ensnared to 27 conclusions bring you canned tuna, the sea turtles caught to bring you 28 oceana canada: saving the oceans shrimp and the fl ounder thrown overboard to put seared to feed the world scallops on the menu. it also includes targeted fi sh that are too small to harvest and non-target fi sh with litt le commercial value. Quite simply, poorly managed bycatch is one of the biggest threats to the world’s oceans, contributi ng to the dramati c decline of some fi sh populati ons. Collateral Damage: 2 How to reduce bycatch in Canada’s commercial fi sheries EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Bycatch is one of the biggest threats to ocean health.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Hearing Draft Generic Amendment
    TAB E, NO. 8 1/16/2019 Carryover Provisions and Framework Modifications © Shutterstock Draft Public Hearing Generic Amendment to the Fishery Management Plans for Reef Fish, Coastal Migratory Pelagics, Coral and Coral Reefs, and Spiny Lobster in the Gulf of Mexico January 2019 This is a publication of the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council Pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA15NMF4410011. This page intentionally blank ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT COVER SHEET Name of Action Draft Generic Amendment to: Fishery Management Plan for the Reef Fish Resources of the Gulf of Mexico; Fishery Management Plan for Coastal Migratory Pelagic Resources of the Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic; Fishery Management Plan for the Coral Resources of the Gulf of Mexico; and Fishery Management Plan for the Spiny Lobster Resources of the Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic. Responsible Agencies and Contact Persons Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (Council) 813-348-1630 2203 North Lois Avenue, Suite 1100 813-348-1711 (fax) Tampa, Florida 33607 [email protected] Ryan Rindone ([email protected]) http://www.gulfcouncil.orgn South Atlantic Fishery Management Council 866-723-6210 4055 Faber Place, Suite 201 843-769-4520 (fax) North Charleston, South Carolina 29405 http://www.safmc.net John Carmichael ([email protected]) National Marine Fisheries Service (Lead Agency) 727-824-5305 Southeast Regional Office 727-824-5308 (fax) 263 13th Avenue South http://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov St. Petersburg, Florida
    [Show full text]
  • Artisanal Fishing of Spiny Lobsters with Gillnets —
    Global Ecology and Conservation 4 (2015) 572–580 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Global Ecology and Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/gecco Original research article Artisanal fishing of spiny lobsters with gillnets — A significant anthropic impact on tropical reef ecosystem Bruno Welter Giraldes a,c,∗, Angela Zacaron Silva b, Fabio M. Corrêa b, David M. Smyth a a Environment Studies Center (ESC), Qatar University QU, Doha, Qatar b Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade – ICMBio, CEPENE, Tamandaré, PE, Brazil c Museu Oceanografico da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (MOUFPE), Recife, PE, Brazil h i g h l i g h t s • Artisanal fishing using gillnets impact the shore reefs more than it is pictured. • It impacts low-trophic level species such as important herbivores and detritivores. • It impacts rare decapod populations that inhabit mainly coastal reefs. • It impacts juveniles of lobster that use the shore reefs as nursery area. • This activity results in serious ecological imbalance in the reef ecosystem. article info a b s t r a c t Article history: Artisanal fishing activity with gillnets to capture the spiny lobster is a common practice Received 24 April 2015 along the coastal reefs of Brazil. This research aims to understand the impact that this Received in revised form 17 October 2015 artisanal fishing practice is having on the coastal reef systems analysing its associated Accepted 17 October 2015 fauna (bycatch) and the stock of the target species Panulirus echinatus. The study compared Available online 5 November 2015 an area which was subjected to intense gillnet fishing against one were the practice was absent.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNOUNCEMENTS Breaking News – Postponement of ICWL 2020
    VOLUME THIRTY THREE MARCH 2020 NUMBER ONE ANNOUNCEMENTS Breaking News – Postponement of ICWL 2020 12th International Conference and Workshop on Lobster Biology and Management (ICWL) 18-23 October 2020 in Fremantle, Western Australia The Organising Committee of the 12th ICWL workshop met on the 31 March 2020 and decided to postpone the workshop to next year due to the Covid-19 outbreak around the world. Please check the website (https://icwl2020.com.au/) for updates as we determine the timing of the next conference. The World Fisheries Congress which was planned for 11-15 October 2020 in Adelaide, South Australia (wfc2020.com.au) has also been postponed to 2021. The Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD) and the Western Rock Lobster (WRL) council were looking forward to hosting scientists, managers and industry participants in Western Australia in 2020. However we are committed to having the conference in September / October 2021. Don’t hesitate to contact us or the conference organisers, Arinex, if you have any questions. Please stay safe and we look forward to seeing you in 2021. Co-hosts of the workshop Nick Caputi Nic Sofoulis DPIRD ([email protected]) WRL ([email protected]) The Lobster Newsletter Volume 33, Number 1: March 2020 1 VOLUME THIRTY THREE MARCH 2020 NUMBER ONE The Lobster Newsletter Volume 33, Number 1: March 2020 2 VOLUME THIRTY THREE MARCH 2020 NUMBER ONE The Natural History of the Crustacea 9: Fisheries and Aquaculture Edited by Gustavo Lovrich and Martin Thiel This is the ninth volume of the ten-volume series on The Natural History of the Crustacea published by Oxford University Press.
    [Show full text]
  • Photogr?)Phs Reduced Copies of Measured Drawings
    San 1 fon1 ia PHOTOGR?)PHS REDUCED COPIES OF MEASURED DRAWINGS WRITTEN ISTORICAL AND DESCRIPT VE DATA i i c Arne .i can Eng i 11 r n Pe conj Na onal Park Service rtmen of the Int r r P.O. Bm< 37127 Wash ngton, D .. 2001 7 27 IllSTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD SHIP BALCLUTHA (Ship Star of Alaska) (Ship Pacific Queen) HAER No. CA-54 Rig/Type of craft: Ship Trade: Cargo Official Number: 3882 Principal Length: 256.3 1 Gross tonnage: 1862 Dimensions: Beam: 38.5' Net tonnage: 1590 Depth: 17.5 Location: Hyde Street Pier San Francisco, California Date of Construction: 1886 Designer: Unknown Builder: Charles Connell & Co. Scotstoun, Scotland Present Owner: National Park Service San Francisco, California Present Use: Historic ship exhibit Significance: One of the. last surviving steel-hulled full­ rigged ships. Vessel involved in the 19th century Pacific Coast grain trade and the 20th century Pacific Coast salmon packing trade. Researcher: Norman J. Brouwer South Street Seaport Museum, New York, 1990 Ship BALCLUTHA ( HAER No. CA-54 Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Background: The Sailing Ship and the Industrial Revolution 3 Robert McMillan, Owner of the BALCLUTHA 8 SIRENIA, the Brief Career of the Only Near-sistership 13 Charles Connell & Co., Builders of the BALCLUTHA 18 The Building of the BALCLUTHA 21 BALCLUTHA's Career Under the British Merchant Ensign 35 BALCLUTHA's Years in the Pacific Lumbar Trade 52 BALCLUTHA's Years In the Alaska Salmon Packing Trade 57 PACIFIC QUEEN, "Ark of Nautical curiosities" 66 BALCLUTHA and the San Francisco Maritime Museum 76 The Design of BALCLUTHA 88 Endnotes 97 Appendix 1.
    [Show full text]