Prohibited Stimulants in Dietary Supplements After

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Letters Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported. 1. Williams SV, Eisenberg JM. A controlled trial to decrease the unnecessary use 1. Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, Gottlieb DJ, Lucas FL, Pinder EL. of diagnostic tests. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;1(1):8-13. doi:10.1007/BF02596318 The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending, part 1: the content, 2. Geleris JD, Shih G, Logio L. Analysis of diagnostic test ordering habits among quality, and accessibility of care. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(4):273-287. doi:10 internal medicine residents [published online October 8, 2018]. JAMA Intern Med. .7326/0003-4819-138-4-200302180-00006 doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3519 2. Weinberger SE. Providing high-value, cost-conscious care: a critical seventh general competency for physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(6):386-388. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-6-201109200-00007 Prohibited Stimulants in Dietary Supplements 3. Asch DA, Nicholson S, Srinivas S, Herrin J, Epstein AJ. Evaluating obstetrical After Enforcement Action by the US Food and Drug residency programs using patient outcomes. JAMA. 2009;302(12):1277-1283. Administration doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1356 The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responsible for 4. Kahneman D, Rosenfield AM, Gandhi L, Blaser T. Noise: how to overcome the eliminating adulterated and potentially hazardous dietary supple- high, hidden cost of inconsistent decision making. https://hbr.org/2016/10 /noise. Published October 2016. Accessed January 30, 2018. ments from the marketplace. The FDA uses a variety of enforce- 5. O’Brien DK, Flood J, Wesley R. Resident test ordering patterns. Fam Pract Res ment actions, including public notices, to remove potentially J. 1987;7(1):42-50. hazardous ingredients. How- 6. Dine CJ, Bellini LM, Diemer G, et al. Assessing correlations of physicians’ ever, it is not known whether Editor's Note page 1723 practice intensity and certainty during residency training. J Grad Med Educ. public notices are effective. We 2015;7(4):603-609. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-15-00092.1 explored the effectiveness of the FDA’s public notices issued be- tween 2013 and 2016 targeting prohibited sympathomimetic Editor's Note stimulants in supplements. We analyzed supplements purchased The Persistent Problem of Overuse of Diagnostic in 2014 and the same brands purchased again in 2017 to deter- Testing Among House Staff—Time to Move Forward mine the presence of prohibited stimulants before and after the I was a second-year medical student at the University of Penn- FDA issued public notices. sylvania, Philadelphia, in 1978, and I had the immense good for- tune to work with Sankey Williams, MD, and John Eisenberg, MD. Methods | From January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2016, the They were performing a trial to evaluate the influence of educa- FDA issued notices regarding 4 prohibited sympathomimetic tion on reducing house staff use of unnecessary inpatient labo- stimulants: 1,3-dimethylamylamine (1,3-DMAA), 1,3- ratory testing.1 The educational intervention had no benefit on dimethylbutylamine (DMBA), β-methylphenylethylamine house staff ordering behavior, but it had resounding effects on (BMPEA), and methylsynephrine (oxilofrine).1-4 The FDA how I came to view routine use of many different types of test- notices regarding ingredients in supplements not catego- ing and treatments that I had previously assumed were evidence rized as sympathomimetic stimulants, such as picamilon, based. That early research experience led me to carefully ques- were excluded from the current analysis. We previously ana- tion the evidence base for many commonly used tests and pro- lyzed all supplements on sale in 2014 listing Acacia rigidula cedures: How will the information from this test help me to take as an ingredient for the presence of 1 stimulant, BMPEA.1 For better care of my patient? Will it lead to better outcomes? Could the current study, we purchased the same brands of supple- I have gotten there without the use of this test? ments in 2017. Supplements purchased in 2014 were reana- The Research Letter by Geleris et al2 in this issue of JAMA lyzed for 1,3-DMAA, DMBA, and oxilofrine, and supplements Internal Medicine brought back my 40-year-old memories of purchased in 2017 were analyzed for all 4 prohibited stimu- research on the overuse of diagnostic testing by house staff. lants subject to FDA enforcement action. As previously Clearly, the problem has not gone away. In their study, Geleris described,1 liquid chromatography–quadrupole time-of- et al2 found that there is tremendous variation in inpatient labo- flight mass spectrometry was used to analyze the supple- ratory test and radiology test ordering among the house staff, ments, and the presence of each stimulant was confirmed by an indicator (particularly when outcomes do not differ) of ques- accurate mass, retention time, isotope pattern, and at least 1 tionable or unnecessary care, and we publish studies like this fragment ion in the mass spectra. one to keep the conversation moving forward. Medicine re- mains largely an apprenticeship. The practice patterns that resi- Results | Of the 21 brands of supplements analyzed in 2014, a dents develop are likely to persist throughout their careers. total of 12 brands (57%) were still available for purchase in 2017. Residency is the perfect time to think clearly and deeply what The 12 brands that were available in both 2014 and 2017 were can be learned from each potential test and to order only those included in the current analysis (Table). In 2013, the FDA is- tests that will affect the care of the patient. sued a public notice about the use of 1,3-DMAA. Of the 12 supplements purchased in 2014, 1,3-DMAA was present in 6 Rita F. Redberg, MD, MSc (50%). The FDA issued notices about the use of DMBA and BMPEA in 2015 and oxilofrine in 2016. Of the 12 supplements Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, University of California, purchased in 2017, a total of 9 (75%) contained at least 1 of the San Francisco; Editor, JAMA Internal Medicine. 4 stimulants subject to FDA notices, and 6 (50%) contained 2 Published Online: October 8, 2018. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3503 or more. One stimulant, DMBA, was not detected in any supple- Corresponding Author: Rita F. Redberg, MD, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus, Room M1180, ment purchased in 2014. After the FDA issued a public notice San Francisco, CA 94143 ([email protected]). about DMBA in 2015, DMBA was detected in 4 of the 12 supple- Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported. ments (33%) purchased in 2017. jamainternalmedicine.com (Reprinted) JAMA Internal Medicine December 2018 Volume 178, Number 12 1721 © 2018 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/27/2021 Letters Abbreviations: BMPEA, indicates Table. Quantities of 4 Experimental Stimulants Subject to FDA Public Notices in Supplements β-methylphenylethylamine; Purchased in 2014 and 2017 DMBA, 1,3-dimethylbutylamine; BMPEA,b Mean 1,3-DMAA,c Mean DMBA,d Mean (SD), 1,3-DMAA, 1,3-dimethylamylamine; Claim on Label (SD), mg per Pill (SD), mg per Pill mg per Pill Oxilofrine,e Mean (SD), FDA, US Food and Drug Producta or Website or Capsule or Capsule or Capsule mg per Pill or Capsule Administration; ND, not detectable. Supplements Purchased in 2014 a Coded indicator of the product. A Cognitive function ND ND ND 0.07 (0.04) b β-Methylphenylethylamine is not B Weight loss ND ND ND 54.31 (0.82) approved for use in humans. Quantities of BMPEA in products C Weight loss 18.71 (2.16) 36.70 (11.91)f ND 34.07 (10.06) purchased in 2014 were previously D Weight loss 5.74 (1.15) ND ND 26.48 (2.56) reported.1 E Weight loss 27.35 (5.87) 34.68 (0.89)f ND 34.31 (2.06) c 1,3-Dimethylamylamine is a 1940s F Weight loss ND ND ND 0.31 (0.04) to 1960s nasal decongestant (Eli Lilly & Co) that was withdrawn G Sports supplement 3.22 (0.67) ND ND 7.78 (0.49) from the market in the 1970s. It was H Sports supplement 31.23 (5.72) ND ND 31.07 (1.94) never approved for oral use. I Weight loss 9.89 (1.26) 12.17 (1.23)f ND 25.62 (1.53) d 1,3-Dimethylbutylamine is not J Weight loss 3.35 (0.74) 12.03 (1.31)f ND 37.45 (1.21) approved for use in humans. e K Weight loss 0.97 (0.31) 11.39 (1.74)f ND 40.75 (5.31) Oxilofrine was previously available in several European countries. It f L Weight loss 23.05 (2.79) 26.89 (6.05) ND 37.44 (7.43) increased blood pressure and Supplements Purchased in 2017 cardiac output and was available in A Cognitive function ND ND ND 0.05 (0.01)f 16- to 40-mg capsules. It was never approved for use in the United f B Weight loss ND ND ND 40.84 (6.48) States. f f C Weight loss ND ND 30.43 (3.26) 7.09 (0.91) f Quantities represent stimulants in D Weight loss ND ND ND 28.38 (0.82)f supplements after the FDA issued a public notice about the stimulant. Eg Weight loss 17.23 (1.47)f 36.12 (5.45)f ND 27.43 (1.06)f The date of the FDA warning for F Weight loss ND ND ND ND 1,3-DMAA was July 2013; DMBA, G Sports supplement ND ND ND ND April 2015; BMPEA, April 2015; and oxilofrine (referred to as H Sports supplement ND ND ND ND methylsynephrine), April 2016.
Recommended publications
  • (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub

    (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub

    US 20130289061A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/0289061 A1 Bhide et al. (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 31, 2013 (54) METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS TO Publication Classi?cation PREVENT ADDICTION (51) Int. Cl. (71) Applicant: The General Hospital Corporation, A61K 31/485 (2006-01) Boston’ MA (Us) A61K 31/4458 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. (72) Inventors: Pradeep G. Bhide; Peabody, MA (US); CPC """"" " A61K31/485 (201301); ‘4161223011? Jmm‘“ Zhu’ Ansm’ MA. (Us); USPC ......... .. 514/282; 514/317; 514/654; 514/618; Thomas J. Spencer; Carhsle; MA (US); 514/279 Joseph Biederman; Brookline; MA (Us) (57) ABSTRACT Disclosed herein is a method of reducing or preventing the development of aversion to a CNS stimulant in a subject (21) App1_ NO_; 13/924,815 comprising; administering a therapeutic amount of the neu rological stimulant and administering an antagonist of the kappa opioid receptor; to thereby reduce or prevent the devel - . opment of aversion to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Also (22) Flled' Jun‘ 24’ 2013 disclosed is a method of reducing or preventing the develop ment of addiction to a CNS stimulant in a subj ect; comprising; _ _ administering the CNS stimulant and administering a mu Related U‘s‘ Apphcatlon Data opioid receptor antagonist to thereby reduce or prevent the (63) Continuation of application NO 13/389,959, ?led on development of addiction to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Apt 27’ 2012’ ?led as application NO_ PCT/US2010/ Also disclosed are pharmaceutical compositions comprising 045486 on Aug' 13 2010' a central nervous system stimulant and an opioid receptor ’ antagonist.
  • CAS Number Index

    CAS Number Index

    2334 CAS Number Index CAS # Page Name CAS # Page Name CAS # Page Name 50-00-0 905 Formaldehyde 56-81-5 967 Glycerol 61-90-5 1135 Leucine 50-02-2 596 Dexamethasone 56-85-9 963 Glutamine 62-44-2 1640 Phenacetin 50-06-6 1654 Phenobarbital 57-00-1 514 Creatine 62-46-4 1166 α-Lipoic acid 50-11-3 1288 Metharbital 57-22-7 2229 Vincristine 62-53-3 131 Aniline 50-12-4 1245 Mephenytoin 57-24-9 1950 Strychnine 62-73-7 626 Dichlorvos 50-23-7 1017 Hydrocortisone 57-27-2 1428 Morphine 63-05-8 127 Androstenedione 50-24-8 1739 Prednisolone 57-41-0 1672 Phenytoin 63-25-2 335 Carbaryl 50-29-3 569 DDT 57-42-1 1239 Meperidine 63-75-2 142 Arecoline 50-33-9 1666 Phenylbutazone 57-43-2 108 Amobarbital 64-04-0 1648 Phenethylamine 50-34-0 1770 Propantheline bromide 57-44-3 191 Barbital 64-13-1 1308 p-Methoxyamphetamine 50-35-1 2054 Thalidomide 57-47-6 1683 Physostigmine 64-17-5 784 Ethanol 50-36-2 497 Cocaine 57-53-4 1249 Meprobamate 64-18-6 909 Formic acid 50-37-3 1197 Lysergic acid diethylamide 57-55-6 1782 Propylene glycol 64-77-7 2104 Tolbutamide 50-44-2 1253 6-Mercaptopurine 57-66-9 1751 Probenecid 64-86-8 506 Colchicine 50-47-5 589 Desipramine 57-74-9 398 Chlordane 65-23-6 1802 Pyridoxine 50-48-6 103 Amitriptyline 57-92-1 1947 Streptomycin 65-29-2 931 Gallamine 50-49-7 1053 Imipramine 57-94-3 2179 Tubocurarine chloride 65-45-2 1888 Salicylamide 50-52-2 2071 Thioridazine 57-96-5 1966 Sulfinpyrazone 65-49-6 98 p-Aminosalicylic acid 50-53-3 426 Chlorpromazine 58-00-4 138 Apomorphine 66-76-2 632 Dicumarol 50-55-5 1841 Reserpine 58-05-9 1136 Leucovorin 66-79-5
  • West Virginia Secretary of State Administrative Law Division

    West Virginia Secretary of State Administrative Law Division

    WEST VIRGINIA Do Not Mark In This Box SECRETARY OF STATE NATA LIE E. TENNANT ADMINISTRATIVE LAW DIVISION Form #2 ·---------------------------'-------~----- NOTICE OF A COMMENT PERIOD ON A PROPOSED RULE AGENCY: West Virginia Racing Commission TITLE NUMBER: 178 RULE TYPE: _Le_g_isl_at_iv_e--------- CITE AUTHORITY: WV Code 19-23-2(al. 19-23-3071. 19-23-6. 19-23-8, 19-23-9. 19-23-13, 19-23-13b. 19-23-15 AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING RULE: YES- NO- IF YES, SERIES NUMBER OF RULE BEING AMENDED: ----- TITLE OF RULE BEING AMENDED:Th_or_ou...:g_hb_re_d_Ra_c_in.::.g ________________ IF NO, SERIES NUMBER OF RULE BEING PROPOSED:----- TITLE OF RULE BEING PROPOSED:-------------------- IN LIEU OF A PUBLIC HEARING, A COMMENT PERIOD HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED DURING WHICH ANY INTERESTED PERSON MAY SEND COMMENTS CONCERNING THESE PROPOSED RULES. THIS COMMENT PERIOD WILL END ON July 19 • 2013 AT 5:00p.m. ONLY WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BE ACCEPTED AND ARE TO BE MAILED TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: West Virginia Racing Commission 900 Pennsylvania A venue, Suite 533 THE ISSUES TO BE HEARD SHALL BE LIMITED TO THIS PROPOSED RULE. Charleston, West Virginia 25302 tegislathte Rule Making JUN 1 9 2013 Secretary Review Committee BRIEF SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL THOROUGHBRED RACING 178 CSR I The proposed amendments to the rule are intended to update, clarify and address problems with the rule so that the West Virginia Racing Commission can effectively regulate thoroughbred racing in this State. In 2011, the Commission completely re-wrote, repealed and replaced the existing Thoroughbred Racing Rule that was effective April6, 2007. In going through the re-write process in 20 II, the Commission recognized that a more frequent examination of its rule is necessary to keep abreast of industry standards and to address issues with the rule that arise from time to time.
  • Nine Prohibited Stimulants Found in Sports and Weight Loss

    Nine Prohibited Stimulants Found in Sports and Weight Loss

    Clinical Toxicology ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ictx20 Nine prohibited stimulants found in sports and weight loss supplements: deterenol, phenpromethamine (Vonedrine), oxilofrine, octodrine, beta-methylphenylethylamine (BMPEA), 1,3-dimethylamylamine (1,3-DMAA), 1,4-dimethylamylamine (1,4-DMAA), 1,3- dimethylbutylamine (1,3-DMBA) and higenamine Pieter A. Cohen, John C. Travis, Céline Vanhee, Dana Ohana & Bastiaan J. Venhuis To cite this article: Pieter A. Cohen, John C. Travis, Céline Vanhee, Dana Ohana & Bastiaan J. Venhuis (2021): Nine prohibited stimulants found in sports and weight loss supplements: deterenol, phenpromethamine (Vonedrine), oxilofrine, octodrine, beta-methylphenylethylamine (BMPEA), 1,3- dimethylamylamine (1,3-DMAA), 1,4-dimethylamylamine (1,4-DMAA), 1,3-dimethylbutylamine (1,3- DMBA) and higenamine, Clinical Toxicology, DOI: 10.1080/15563650.2021.1894333 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2021.1894333 View supplementary material Published online: 23 Mar 2021. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 22748 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ictx20 CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2021.1894333 BASIC RESEARCH Nine prohibited stimulants found in sports and weight loss supplements: deterenol, phenpromethamine (Vonedrine), oxilofrine, octodrine, beta- methylphenylethylamine (BMPEA), 1,3-dimethylamylamine
  • Appendix-2Final.Pdf 663.7 KB

    Appendix-2Final.Pdf 663.7 KB

    North West ‘Through the Gate Substance Misuse Services’ Drug Testing Project Appendix 2 – Analytical methodologies Overview Urine samples were analysed using three methodologies. The first methodology (General Screen) was designed to cover a wide range of analytes (drugs) and was used for all analytes other than the synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs). The analyte coverage included a broad range of commonly prescribed drugs including over the counter medications, commonly misused drugs and metabolites of many of the compounds too. This approach provided a very powerful drug screening tool to investigate drug use/misuse before and whilst in prison. The second methodology (SCRA Screen) was specifically designed for SCRAs and targets only those compounds. This was a very sensitive methodology with a method capability of sub 100pg/ml for over 600 SCRAs and their metabolites. Both methodologies utilised full scan high resolution accurate mass LCMS technologies that allowed a non-targeted approach to data acquisition and the ability to retrospectively review data. The non-targeted approach to data acquisition effectively means that the analyte coverage of the data acquisition was unlimited. The only limiting factors were related to the chemical nature of the analyte being looked for. The analyte must extract in the sample preparation process; it must chromatograph and it must ionise under the conditions used by the mass spectrometer interface. The final limiting factor was presence in the data processing database. The subsequent study of negative MDT samples across the North West and London and the South East used a GCMS methodology for anabolic steroids in addition to the General and SCRA screens.
  • Drug and Medication Classification Schedule

    Drug and Medication Classification Schedule

    KENTUCKY HORSE RACING COMMISSION UNIFORM DRUG, MEDICATION, AND SUBSTANCE CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE KHRC 8-020-1 (11/2018) Class A drugs, medications, and substances are those (1) that have the highest potential to influence performance in the equine athlete, regardless of their approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration, or (2) that lack approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration but have pharmacologic effects similar to certain Class B drugs, medications, or substances that are approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Acecarbromal Bolasterone Cimaterol Divalproex Fluanisone Acetophenazine Boldione Citalopram Dixyrazine Fludiazepam Adinazolam Brimondine Cllibucaine Donepezil Flunitrazepam Alcuronium Bromazepam Clobazam Dopamine Fluopromazine Alfentanil Bromfenac Clocapramine Doxacurium Fluoresone Almotriptan Bromisovalum Clomethiazole Doxapram Fluoxetine Alphaprodine Bromocriptine Clomipramine Doxazosin Flupenthixol Alpidem Bromperidol Clonazepam Doxefazepam Flupirtine Alprazolam Brotizolam Clorazepate Doxepin Flurazepam Alprenolol Bufexamac Clormecaine Droperidol Fluspirilene Althesin Bupivacaine Clostebol Duloxetine Flutoprazepam Aminorex Buprenorphine Clothiapine Eletriptan Fluvoxamine Amisulpride Buspirone Clotiazepam Enalapril Formebolone Amitriptyline Bupropion Cloxazolam Enciprazine Fosinopril Amobarbital Butabartital Clozapine Endorphins Furzabol Amoxapine Butacaine Cobratoxin Enkephalins Galantamine Amperozide Butalbital Cocaine Ephedrine Gallamine Amphetamine Butanilicaine Codeine
  • Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

    Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

    No. 31874 Multilateral Marrakesh Agreement establishing the World Trade Organ ization (with final act, annexes and protocol). Concluded at Marrakesh on 15 April 1994 Authentic texts: English, French and Spanish. Registered by the Director-General of the World Trade Organization, acting on behalf of the Parties, on 1 June 1995. Multilat ral Accord de Marrakech instituant l©Organisation mondiale du commerce (avec acte final, annexes et protocole). Conclu Marrakech le 15 avril 1994 Textes authentiques : anglais, français et espagnol. Enregistré par le Directeur général de l'Organisation mondiale du com merce, agissant au nom des Parties, le 1er juin 1995. Vol. 1867, 1-31874 4_________United Nations — Treaty Series • Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 1995 Table of contents Table des matières Indice [Volume 1867] FINAL ACT EMBODYING THE RESULTS OF THE URUGUAY ROUND OF MULTILATERAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS ACTE FINAL REPRENANT LES RESULTATS DES NEGOCIATIONS COMMERCIALES MULTILATERALES DU CYCLE D©URUGUAY ACTA FINAL EN QUE SE INCORPOR N LOS RESULTADOS DE LA RONDA URUGUAY DE NEGOCIACIONES COMERCIALES MULTILATERALES SIGNATURES - SIGNATURES - FIRMAS MINISTERIAL DECISIONS, DECLARATIONS AND UNDERSTANDING DECISIONS, DECLARATIONS ET MEMORANDUM D©ACCORD MINISTERIELS DECISIONES, DECLARACIONES Y ENTEND MIENTO MINISTERIALES MARRAKESH AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION ACCORD DE MARRAKECH INSTITUANT L©ORGANISATION MONDIALE DU COMMERCE ACUERDO DE MARRAKECH POR EL QUE SE ESTABLECE LA ORGANIZACI N MUND1AL DEL COMERCIO ANNEX 1 ANNEXE 1 ANEXO 1 ANNEX
  • History Full Circle: 'Novel' Sympathomimetics in Supplements

    History Full Circle: 'Novel' Sympathomimetics in Supplements

    Drug Testing Perspective and Analysis Received: 8 July 2015 Revised: 13 July 2015 Accepted: 15 July 2015 Published online in Wiley Online Library: 2 November 2015 (www.drugtestinganalysis.com) DOI 10.1002/dta.1852 History full circle: ‘Novel’ sympathomimetics in supplements Nicolas Rasmussena* and Peter H. J. Keizersb Since the banning of ephedrine in over-the-counter nutritional supplements a decade ago, a plethora of untested and/or unsafe sympathomimetic stimulants have taken its place. This paper argues that these ‘novel’ stimulants in supplements recapitulate the work of synthetic chemists at commercial pharmaceutical firms during the 1930s and 1940s, all seeking substitutes for recently successful products based on ephedrine and amphetamine. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Keywords: nutritional supplements; amphetamines; ephedrine; pharmaceutical regulation; drug safety; substance abuse In the 1920s ephedrine (compound (7) in Table 1 and Figure 1) methamphetamine (6), which was unpatentable (because of the brought a new era in commercial pharmacology. Extracted from publication of its 1919 synthesis and pharmacological characteriza- the Chinese herb Ephedra spp. and characterized to great acclaim tion, in the course of structural studies on ephedrine, by Japanese by elite pharmacologists Ko Kuei Chen and Carl Schmidt, the drug chemist Akira Ogata).[3,7] These methamphetamine products in- exhibited a range of adrenaline-like actions – but in a more useful cluded Pervitin tablets from the German firm Temmler and Methe- form than adrenaline, the hormone blockbuster of 1901.[1–3] drine tablets from Burroughs-Wellcome, and the Drinalfa Inhaler Adrenaline (as the substance was then known, but now as a from Squibb.
  • Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DIX to the HTSUS—Continued

    Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DIX to the HTSUS—Continued

    20558 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DEPARMENT OF THE TREASURY Services, U.S. Customs Service, 1301 TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL APPEN- Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DIX TO THE HTSUSÐContinued Customs Service D.C. 20229 at (202) 927±1060. CAS No. Pharmaceutical [T.D. 95±33] Dated: April 14, 1995. 52±78±8 ..................... NORETHANDROLONE. A. W. Tennant, 52±86±8 ..................... HALOPERIDOL. Pharmaceutical Tables 1 and 3 of the Director, Office of Laboratories and Scientific 52±88±0 ..................... ATROPINE METHONITRATE. HTSUS 52±90±4 ..................... CYSTEINE. Services. 53±03±2 ..................... PREDNISONE. 53±06±5 ..................... CORTISONE. AGENCY: Customs Service, Department TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL 53±10±1 ..................... HYDROXYDIONE SODIUM SUCCI- of the Treasury. NATE. APPENDIX TO THE HTSUS 53±16±7 ..................... ESTRONE. ACTION: Listing of the products found in 53±18±9 ..................... BIETASERPINE. Table 1 and Table 3 of the CAS No. Pharmaceutical 53±19±0 ..................... MITOTANE. 53±31±6 ..................... MEDIBAZINE. Pharmaceutical Appendix to the N/A ............................. ACTAGARDIN. 53±33±8 ..................... PARAMETHASONE. Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the N/A ............................. ARDACIN. 53±34±9 ..................... FLUPREDNISOLONE. N/A ............................. BICIROMAB. 53±39±4 ..................... OXANDROLONE. United States of America in Chemical N/A ............................. CELUCLORAL. 53±43±0
  • Para-Methoxymethylamphetamine (PMMA) Critical Review Report Agenda Item 5.6

    Para-Methoxymethylamphetamine (PMMA) Critical Review Report Agenda Item 5.6

    para-Methoxymethylamphetamine (PMMA) Critical Review Report Agenda item 5.6 Expert Committee on Drug Dependence Thirty-seventh Meeting Geneva, 16-20 November 2015 37th ECDD (2015) Agenda item 5.6 PMMA Page 2 of 27 37th ECDD (2015) Agenda item 5.6 PMMA Contents Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................... 5 Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 6 1. Substance identification ................................................................................................................ 7 A. International Nonproprietary Name (INN) .................................................................................... 7 B. Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) Registry Number ...................................................................... 7 C. Other Names .................................................................................................................................. 7 D. Trade Names .................................................................................................................................. 7 E. Street Names .................................................................................................................................. 7 F. Physical properties ........................................................................................................................ 7 G. WHO Review History
  • Pharmacology of Stimulants Prohibited by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)

    Pharmacology of Stimulants Prohibited by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)

    British Journal of Pharmacology (2008) 154, 606–622 & 2008 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0007– 1188/08 $30.00 www.brjpharmacol.org REVIEW Pharmacology of stimulants prohibited by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) JR Docherty Department of Physiology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland This review examines the pharmacology of stimulants prohibited by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). Stimulants that increase alertness/reduce fatigue or activate the cardiovascular system can include drugs like ephedrine available in many over- the-counter medicines. Others such as amphetamines, cocaine and hallucinogenic drugs, available on prescription or illegally, can modify mood. A total of 62 stimulants (61 chemical entities) are listed in the WADA List, prohibited in competition. Athletes may have stimulants in their body for one of three main reasons: inadvertent consumption in a propriety medicine; deliberate consumption for misuse as a recreational drug and deliberate consumption to enhance performance. The majority of stimulants on the list act on the monoaminergic systems: adrenergic (sympathetic, transmitter noradrenaline), dopaminergic (transmitter dopamine) and serotonergic (transmitter serotonin, 5-HT). Sympathomimetic describes agents, which mimic sympathetic responses, and dopaminomimetic and serotoninomimetic can be used to describe actions on the dopamine and serotonin systems. However, many agents act to mimic more than one of these monoamines, so that a collective term of monoaminomimetic may be useful. Monoaminomimietic actions of stimulants can include blockade of re-uptake of neurotransmitter, indirect release of neurotransmitter, direct activation of monoaminergic receptors. Many of the stimulants are amphetamines or amphetamine derivatives, including agents with abuse potential as recreational drugs.
  • 2019 Prohibited List

    2019 Prohibited List

    THE WORLD ANTI-DOPING CODE INTERNATIONAL STANDARD PROHIBITED LIST JANUARY 2019 The official text of the Prohibited List shall be maintained by WADA and shall be published in English and French. In the event of any conflict between the English and French versions, the English version shall prevail. This List shall come into effect on 1 January 2019 SUBSTANCES & METHODS PROHIBITED AT ALL TIMES (IN- AND OUT-OF-COMPETITION) IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 4.2.2 OF THE WORLD ANTI-DOPING CODE, ALL PROHIBITED SUBSTANCES SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS “SPECIFIED SUBSTANCES” EXCEPT SUBSTANCES IN CLASSES S1, S2, S4.4, S4.5, S6.A, AND PROHIBITED METHODS M1, M2 AND M3. PROHIBITED SUBSTANCES NON-APPROVED SUBSTANCES Mestanolone; S0 Mesterolone; Any pharmacological substance which is not Metandienone (17β-hydroxy-17α-methylandrosta-1,4-dien- addressed by any of the subsequent sections of the 3-one); List and with no current approval by any governmental Metenolone; regulatory health authority for human therapeutic use Methandriol; (e.g. drugs under pre-clinical or clinical development Methasterone (17β-hydroxy-2α,17α-dimethyl-5α- or discontinued, designer drugs, substances approved androstan-3-one); only for veterinary use) is prohibited at all times. Methyldienolone (17β-hydroxy-17α-methylestra-4,9-dien- 3-one); ANABOLIC AGENTS Methyl-1-testosterone (17β-hydroxy-17α-methyl-5α- S1 androst-1-en-3-one); Anabolic agents are prohibited. Methylnortestosterone (17β-hydroxy-17α-methylestr-4-en- 3-one); 1. ANABOLIC ANDROGENIC STEROIDS (AAS) Methyltestosterone; a. Exogenous*