DOCSLIB.ORG

The Status of Red Grouse in Ireland and the Effects of Land Use, Habitat and Habitat Quality on Their Distribution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Status of Red Grouse in Ireland and the Effects of Land Use, Habitat and Habitat Quality on Their Distribution The status of Red Grouse in Ireland and the effects of land use, habitat and habitat quality on their distribution. Results of the national Red Grouse Survey 2006-2008 Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 50 The status of Red Grouse in Ireland and the effects of land use, habitat and habitat quality on their distribution. Results of the national Red Grouse Survey 2006-2008 Cummins, S. 1, Bleasdale, A. 2, Douglas, C., 2 Newton, S. 1, O’Halloran, J. 3 & Wilson, H. J. 2 1BirdWatch Ireland , 2 National Parks & Wildlife 3 Department of Zoology, Unit 21, Block D, Service , Ecology & Plant Science, Bullford Business Campus, Department of Environment University College Cork , Kilcoole, Heritage and Local Distillery Fields, Co. Wicklow. Government (EHLG), North Mall, Cork City. www.birdwatchireland.ie 7 Ely Place, Dublin 2. www.ucc.ie www.npws.ie Citation : Cummins, S., Bleasdale, A., Douglas, C., Newton, S., O’Halloran, J. & Wilson, H.J. (2010) The status of Red Grouse in Ireland and the effects of land use, habitat and habitat quality on their distribution. Irish Wildlife Manuals , No. 50. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover photo: Adult Male Red Grouse (© Mike Brown) Irish Wildlife Manual Series Editors: F. Marnell & N. Kingston © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2010 ISSN 1393 - 6670 Red grouse survey 2006-08 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................................................................................6 ABBREVIATIONS & COMMON TERMS USED ........................................................................................................................7 PARTNERSHIP .........................................................................................................................................................................9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .........................................................................................................................................................9 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................................10 1.1 Decline in numbers and range..........................................................................................................................10 1.2 EU Judgment ..........................................................................................................................................................10 1.3 Climate change ......................................................................................................................................................11 1.4 Taxonomic status ..................................................................................................................................................11 1.5 Previous studies ....................................................................................................................................................11 1.6 Habitat preferences ..............................................................................................................................................11 1.7 Territory establishment and habitat management ......................................................................................12 1.8 Conservation value...............................................................................................................................................12 AIMS:...................................................................................................................................................................................12 2.0 METHODS .......................................................................................................................................................................13 2.1 Sampling Range ....................................................................................................................................................13 2.2 Preliminary reconnaissance ...............................................................................................................................17 2.3 Regional Classification .......................................................................................................................................18 2.4 Survey Design and Sampling Strategy...........................................................................................................19 2.5 Survey Units...........................................................................................................................................................19 2.6 Survey Equipment................................................................................................................................................19 2.7 Methods Used........................................................................................................................................................20 2.7.1 Counts with tape-playback...............................................................................................................................20 2.7.1.1 Tape-playback transect methodology...............................................................................................21 2.7.1.2 Effectiveness of tape-playback............................................................................................................22 2.7.1.3 Study Sites for the Standardised tape-playback survey................................................................22 2.7.1.4 Survey Period for Tape-playback.......................................................................................................22 2.7.1.5 Survey Methods.....................................................................................................................................22 2.7.2 Counts using dogs............................................................................................................................................22 2.7.3 Tape-playback versus dog counts ....................................................................................................................23 2.7.4 Casual Sightings and supplementary records database.................................................................................23 2.7.5 Estimating species range..................................................................................................................................24 2.7.6 Population estimates.........................................................................................................................................24 2.7.6.1 Methods for estimation ........................................................................................................................24 2.7.6.2 Local population estimates..................................................................................................................24 2.7.7 Effect of elevation on patterns of distribution.................................................................................................25 2.7.8 Landowner permission .....................................................................................................................................25 2.7.9 Unsuitable areas ...............................................................................................................................................25 2.7.10 Health and Safety ...........................................................................................................................................25 2.7.11 Response rate ..................................................................................................................................................25 2.7.11.1 Tape-playback methods.....................................................................................................................25 2.7.11.2 Time of day ...........................................................................................................................................25 2.8 A survey of Red Grouse ( Lagopus lagopus ) habitat in Ireland 2007 – 2008...........................................26 2 Red grouse survey 2006-08 2.9 Data Analyses ....................................................................................................................................................... 26 2.9.1 Statistical Software.......................................................................................................................................... 27 3.0 RESULTS ..................................................................................................................................................................... 27 3.1 Survey outcome .................................................................................................................................................... 27 3.1.1 Overview .......................................................................................................................................................... 27 3.1.2 Survey coverage ............................................................................................................................................... 27 3.1.3 Responses to tape-playback.............................................................................................................................. 27 3.1.4 Comparison
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 4¼N5 E0 4¼N5 4¼N4 4¼N4 4¼N4 4¼N5
    #] Mullaghmore \# Bundoran 0 20 km Classiebawn Castle V# Creevykeel e# 0 10 miles ä# Lough #\ Goort Cairn Melvin Cliffony Inishmurray 0¸N15 FERMANAGH LEITRIM Grange #\ Cashelgarran ATLANTIC Benwee Dun Ballyconnell#\ Benbulben #\ R(525m) Head #\ Portacloy Briste Lough Glencar OCEAN Carney #\ Downpatrick 1 Raghly #\ #\ Drumcliff # Lackan 4¼N16 Manorhamilton Erris Head Bay Lenadoon Broad Belderrig Sligo #\ Rosses Point #\ Head #\ Point Aughris Haven ä# Ballycastle Easkey Airport Magheraghanrush \# #\ Rossport #\ Head Bay Céide #\ Dromore #– Sligo #\ ä# Court Tomb Blacklion #\ 0¸R314 #4 \# Fields West Strandhill Pollatomish e #\ Lough Gill Doonamo Lackan Killala Kilglass #\ Carrowmore ä# #æ Point Belmullet r Bay 4¼N59 Innisfree Island CAVAN #\ o Strand Megalithic m Cemetery n #\ #\ R \# e #\ Enniscrone Ballysadare \# Dowra Carrowmore i Ballintogher w v #\ Lough Killala e O \# r Ballygawley r Slieve Gamph Collooney e 4¼N59 E v a (Ox Mountains) Blacksod i ä# skey 4¼N4 Lough Mullet Bay Bangor Erris #\ R Rosserk Allen 4¼N59 Dahybaun Inishkea Peninsula Abbey SLIGO Ballinacarrow#\ #\ #\ Riverstown Lough Aghleam#\ #\ Drumfin Crossmolina \# y #\ #\ Ballina o Bunnyconnellan M Ballymote #\ Castlebaldwin Blacksod er \# Ballcroy iv Carrowkeel #\ Lough R #5 Ballyfarnon National 4¼N4 #\ Conn 4¼N26 #\ Megalithic Cemetery 4¼N59 Park Castlehill Lough Tubbercurry #\ RNephin Beg Caves of Keash #8 Arrow Dugort #÷ Lahardane #\ (628m) #\ Ballinafad #\ #\ R Ballycroy Bricklieve Lough Mt Nephin 4¼N17 Gurteen #\ Mountains #\ Achill Key Leitrim #\ #3 Nephin Beg (806m)
    [Show full text]
  • Q3central Bank Quarterly Bulletin
    JULY 11 JULY Q3 Central Bank Quarterly Bulletin Central Bank of Ireland Quarterly Bulletin 03 / July 11 © Central Bank of Ireland 2011 Contents Section 1 Forecast Summary Table 6 Comment 7 The Domestic Economy 9 Box A: The Impact of the Car Scrappage Scheme on Retail Sales Box B: Relative Trends in Irish Services Producer Prices An Timpeallacht Gheilleagrach 33 Financing Developments in the Irish Economy 35 Box 1: Developments in Retail Interest Rate Margins Developments in the International and Euro Area Economy 53 Box 1: Recent Developments in Euro Area Housing Markets Box 2: A Study of Irish Trade with China Recent Economic Research Publications 68 Section 2 The Rise and Fall of Sectoral Net Wealth in Ireland 70 Mary Cussen and Gillian Phelan Using the Bank Lending Survey to Understand the Recent Disruption to Financial Markets: An Overview 83 Bernard Kennedy Meeting the Statistical Challenges of Financial Innovation: Introducing New Data on Securitisation 109 Brian Godfrey and Clive Jackson Section 3 Statistical Appendix Notes 1. The permission of the Government has been obtained for the use in this Bulletin of certain material compiled by the Central Statistics Office and Government Departments. The Bulletin also contains material which has been made available by the courtesy of licensed banks and other financial institutions. 2. Unless otherwise stated, statistics refer to the State, i.e., Ireland exclusive of Northern Ireland. 3. In some cases, owing to the rounding of figures, components do not add to the totals shown. 4. The method of seasonal adjustment used in the Bank is that of the US Bureau of the Census X-11 variant.
    [Show full text]
  • RSPBANI Funding 12Th March 2019 To
    RSPBANI Funding 12th March 2019 To: The Leisure and Development Committee For Decision Linkage to Council Strategy (2015-19) Strategic Theme Accelerating Our Economy and Contributing to Prosperity Outcome Lead Officer Director of Leisure and Development Cost: (If applicable) £10,000 The purpose of this report is to allow members to consider the request for additional grant funding from the Royal Scottish Pipe Band Association of Northern Ireland to facilitate the 2019 Pipe Band Championships in Portrush. Introduction The Pipe Band Championships has occurred in Portrush annually since the 1950s. The Portrush Traders view the Championship as one of the more lucrative events in the annual calendar, generating significant footfall throughout the town. Based upon high quality music of Pipe Bands and Drum Majors, the event incorporates a street carnival parade at the conclusion of the competition with crowds throughout the Town to witness the ‘colourful spectacle and sounds’. A Highland Dance competition takes place on the Friday before the Pipe Band Championships, which has historically been at the Recreation Grounds in Portrush. Following the established practice of event evaluation, Council instructed officers in 2018 to undertake an Economic Impact and Public Perception Analysis of the Pipe Band Championships, for which the services of Sheffield Hallam University were procured. Economic Impact and Public Perception Analysis of the Event The Sheffield Hallam report at Annex A concluded that: The event generated a direct economic impact from visitors of £0.32m (specifically £318,271) for the Causeway Coast & Glens area as a result of the spending by non-local event attendees. It is estimated that the spectator admissions were generated by c.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Climate Change Sectoral Adaptation Plan 2019-2024
    Health Climate Change Sectoral Adaptation Plan 2019-2024 Prepared under the National Adaptation Framework Prepared by the Department of Health www.gov.ie/health Health Climate Change Sectoral Adaptation Plan 2019-2024 1 Contents Foreword 5 Executive Summary 7 Development of a Plan for Ireland’s Health Sector, 2019 – 2024 7 Six climate scenarios with profound health implications 8 Predicted climate risks and health impacts for Ireland include: 10 1. Introduction 11 Mandate and vision 12 Health context and the case for adaptation 13 Mainstreaming climate change adaptation 14 Limitations – more research, better data 15 Development of this Plan 16 2. Scene-setting: climate change, health, and Ireland 21 2.1. Health in Ireland, climate in Ireland 22 2.1.1 Health of the population 22 2.1.2 Climate in Ireland 23 2.1.3 Climate change projections for Ireland 23 2.2. Effect of climate change on human health 24 2.3. Health implications of climate change in Ireland 24 2.3.1 Health impacts of temperature changes 24 2.3.2 Health impacts of drought and flooding 29 2.3.3 Health impacts of storms 32 2.3.4 Mental health impacts 32 2.3.5 Risks to health services 32 3. Prioritisation 35 3.1. Climate Impact Screening 36 3.2. Developing Priorities 38 3.3. Climate scenarios – Priority Impacts 41 3.3.1 UV / Sun exposure 41 3.3.2 Air pollution 41 3.3.3 Windstorms 41 3.3.4 Heat / Heatwaves 42 3.3.5 High precipitation / Flooding 43 3.3.6 Extreme cold snaps 43 2 Contents 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Ireland Information for H4060
    European Community Directive on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora (92/43/EEC) Fourth Report by the United Kingdom under Article 17 on the implementation of the Directive from January 2013 to December 2018 Supporting documentation for the conservation status assessment for the habitat: H4060 ‐ Alpine and Boreal heaths NORTHERN IRELAND IMPORTANT NOTE ‐ PLEASE READ • The information in this document is a country‐level contribution to the UK Reporton the conservation status of this habitat, submitted to the European Commission aspart of the 2019 UK Reporting under Article 17 of the EU Habitats Directive. • The 2019 Article 17 UK Approach document provides details on how this supporting information was used to produce the UK Report. • The UK Report on the conservation status of this habitat is provided in a separate doc‐ ument. • The reporting fields and options used are aligned to those set out in the European Com‐ mission guidance. • Explanatory notes (where provided) by the country are included at the end. These pro‐ vide an audit trail of relevant supporting information. • Some of the reporting fields have been left blank because either: (i) there was insuffi‐ cient information to complete the field; (ii) completion of the field was not obligatory; and/or (iii) the field was only relevant at UK‐level (sections 10 Future prospects and11 Conclusions). • For technical reasons, the country‐level future trends for Range, Area covered by habitat and Structure and functions are only available in a separate spreadsheet that contains all the country‐level supporting information. • The country‐level reporting information for all habitats and species is also available in spreadsheet format.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Day Sporting Memorabilia Auction - Day 2 Tuesday 14 May 2013 10:30
    Two Day Sporting Memorabilia Auction - Day 2 Tuesday 14 May 2013 10:30 Graham Budd Auctions Ltd Sotheby's 34-35 New Bond Street London W1A 2AA Graham Budd Auctions Ltd (Two Day Sporting Memorabilia Auction - Day 2) Catalogue - Downloaded from UKAuctioneers.com Lot: 335 restrictions and 144 meetings were held between Easter 1940 Two framed 1929 sets of Dirt Track Racing cigarette cards, and VE Day 1945. 'Thrills of the Dirt Track', a complete photographic set of 16 Estimate: £100.00 - £150.00 given with Champion and Triumph cigarettes, each card individually dated between April and June 1929, mounted, framed and glazed, 38 by 46cm., 15 by 18in., 'Famous Dirt Lot: 338 Tack Riders', an illustrated colour set of 25 given with Ogden's Post-war 1940s-50s speedway journals and programmes, Cigarettes, each card featuring the portrait and signature of a including three 1947 issues of The Broadsider, three 1947-48 successful 1928 rider, mounted, framed and glazed, 33 by Speedway Reporter, nine 1949-50 Speedway Echo, seventy 48cm., 13 by 19in., plus 'Speedway Riders', a similar late- three 1947-1955 Speedway Gazette, eight 8 b&w speedway 1930s illustrated colour set of 50 given with Player's Cigarettes, press photos; plus many F.I.M. World Rider Championship mounted, framed and glazed, 51 by 56cm., 20 by 22in.; sold programmes 1948-82, including overseas events, eight with three small enamelled metal speedway supporters club pin England v. Australia tests 1948-53, over seventy 1947-1956 badges for the New Cross, Wembley and West Ham teams and Wembley
    [Show full text]
  • The Tipperary
    Walk The Tipperary 10 http://alinkto.me/mjk www.discoverireland.ie/thetipperary10 48 hours in Tipperary This is the Ireland you have been looking for – base yourself in any village or town in County Tipperary, relax with friends (and the locals) and take in all of Tipperary’s natural beauty. Make the iconic Rock of Cashel your first stop, then choose between castles and forest trails, moun- tain rambles or a pub lunch alongside lazy rivers. For ideas and Special Offers visit www.discoverireland.ie/thetipperary10 Walk The Tipperary 10 Challenge We challenge you to walk all of The Tipperary 10 (you can take as long as you like)! Guided Walks Every one of The Tipperary 10 will host an event with a guide and an invitation to join us for refreshments afterwards. Visit us on-line to find out these dates for your diary. For details contact John at 087 0556465. Accommodation Choose from B&Bs, Guest Houses, Hotels, Self-Catering, Youth Hostels & Camp Sites. No matter what kind of accommodation you’re after, we have just the place for you to stay while you explore our beautiful county. Visit us on line to choose and book your favourite location. Golden to the Rock of Cashel Rock of Cashel 1 Photo: Rock of Cashel by Brendan Fennssey Walk Information 1 Golden to the Rock of Cashel Distance of walk: 10km Walk Type: Linear walk Time: 2 - 2.5 hours Level of walk: Easy Start: At the Bridge in Golden Trail End (Grid: S 075 409 OS map no. 66) Cashel Finish: At the Rock of Cashel (Grid: S 012 384 OS map no.
    [Show full text]
  • Driven Grouse Shooting
    Driven grouse shooting RSPB Council updated our previous policy on driven grouse shooting in October 2020. Our policy is to support licensing of driven grouse shooting across the UK, following expected progress on this issue in Scotland in 2020. Unless substantial progress (including effective licensing, stopping raptor killing, cessation of burning on peat soils, and banning use of lead ammunition) is made in reforming driven grouse shooting by 2025 in line with RSPB principles for sustainable gamebird shooting, we will consequently call on governments to introduce a specific ban on driven grouse shooting. Background Driven grouse shooting is defined as where shooters sit in lines of grouse butts on open moorland, and red grouse are then driven by beaters and dogs over the guns to shoot. The activity usually involves shooting large grouse “bags” (where large numbers of grouse are shot in a day). It is a unique hunting type to the UK (mainly England and Scotland) and shooters will pay large sums of money for a day’s shooting. Typically, gamekeepers are employed to kill predators that eat grouse; heather is burned to create young heather (the main foodplant of red grouse); and other additional management techniques are employed to produce as many red grouse as possible for shooting. The red grouse shooting season opens on the 12 August (“the Glorious Twelfth”). The alternative walked up grouse shooting involves a small number of shooters accompanied by dogs. They generally take small and sustainable numbers of grouse, as walked up shooting is more about the hunting experience. This is much less of a conservation issue for us.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunting in SWEDEN
    www.face-europe.org Page 1 of 14 Hunting in SWEDEN SURFACE AREA Total surface area 449,964 km² Woodlands 62 % Farming area 9 % Huntable area n.a. average huntable area n.a. HUNTER/POPULATION Population 9,000,000 Number of Hunters 290,000 % Hunters 3.2 % Hunters / Inhabitants 1:31 Population density inhabitants/km² 22 Source: http:www.jagareforbundet.se, 2005 Handbook of Hunting in Europe, FACE, 1995 www.face-europe.org Page 2 of 14 HUNTING SYSTEM Competent authorities The Parliament has overall responsibility for legislation. The Government - the Ministry of Agriculture - is responsible for questions concerning hunting. The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency is responsible for supervision and monitoring developments in hunting and game management. The County Administrations are responsible for hunting and game management questions on the county level, and are advised by County Game Committees - länsviltnämnd - with representatives of forestry, agriculture, hunting, recreational and environmental protection interests. } Ministry of Agriculture (Jordbruksdepartementet) S-10333 Stockholm Phone +46 (0) 8 405 10 00 - Fax +46 (0)8 20 64 96 } Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (Naturvårdsverket) SE-106 48 Stockholm Phone +46 (0)8 698 10 00 - Fax +46 (0)8 20 29 25 Hunters’ associations Hunting is a popular sport in Sweden. There are some 290.000 hunters, of whom almost 195.000 are affiliated to the Swedish Association for Hunting and Wildlife Management (Svenska Jägareförbundet). The association is a voluntary body whose main task is to look after the interests of hunting and hunters. The Parliament has delegated responsibility SAHWM for, among other things, practical game management work.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Carboniferous Rocks Between the Curlew and Ox Mountains, Northwestern Ireland
    Lower Carboniferous rocks between the Curlew and Ox Mountains, Northwestern Ireland OWEN ARNOLD DIXON CONTENTS i Introduction 7 I 2 Stratal succession 73 (A) General sequence 73 (B) Moy-Boyle Sandstones 73 (c) Dargan Limestone 74 (D) Oakport Limestone 75 (F.) Lisgorman Shale Group 76 (F) Bricklieve Limestone 78 (o) Roscunnish Shale 84 (H) Namurian rocks 84 3 Zonal stratigraphy . 85 (a) Fauna . 85 (B) Zonal correlation 88 4 History of sedimentation 9o 5 Regional correlation. 95 6 References 98 SUMMARY Rocks in the Ballymote area, occupying one of sedimentary environments of a shallow shelf several broad downwarps of inherited cale- sea. The main episodes (some repeated) include donoid trend, provide a crucial link between the deposition of locally-derived conglomerates Vis6an successions north of the Highland and sandstones in a partly enclosed basin; the Boundary line (represented locally by the Ox accumulation of various thick, clear-water Mountains) and successions to the south, part limestones, partly in continuation with ad- of the extensive 'shelf' limestone of central jacent basins; and the influx of muddy detrital Ireland. The sequence, exceeding xo7o metres sediments from a more distant source. (35oo it) in thickness, ranges in age from early The rocks contain a succession of rich and to latest Vis~an (C~S1 to/2) and is succeeded, diverse benthonic faunas, predominantly of generally without interruption, by thick upper corals and brachiopods, but near the top these Carboniferous shales. The succession of differ- give way to several distinctive goniatite- ent rock types reflects changing controls in the lamellibranch faunas. i. Introduction THE LOWER CARBONIFEROUS rocks of the Ballymote map area underlie a shallow physiographic trough extending east-northeast from Swinford, Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Northcote Obsession
    OBSESSION BOOKING HOTLINE: 0333 999 7762* OPENS 8am TUESDAY 17th OCTOBER 2017 *Bookings cannot be taken before the hotline opens Nurtured, harvested, exported, roasted by artisans... brewed by you. The difference is Gaggenau. You spend time searching out selectively-picked, organic Arabica, sun-dried in deepest Yirgacheffe. All this you stipulate. Because when it comes to actually brewing the bean, you have the means to turn all that potential into your cup of coffee. The new lighting concept of our fully automatic espresso machine puts the cup in the limelight. The intuitive TFT touch display makes it simple to create your ideal coffee and save your preferences; each cup will now be as perfect as the first. However you take your coffee, take it seriously. For more information, please visit www.gaggenau.com. Northcote_CoffeeCulture_210x297_SP_UK.indd 1 14.09.17 09:17 2001 TERRY LAYBOURNE 21 Queen Street, Newcastle PHILIP HOWARD The Square, London NICK NAIRN Nairn’s, Glasgow NIGEL HAWORTH & CHARLES METCALFE Northcote, Lancashire 2002 GERMAIN SCHWAB Winteringham Fields, Lincolnshire PHILIP HOWARD The Square, London ROBBIE MILLAR Shanks Restaurant, Bangor BRIAN TURNER Turners Restaurant, London DANIEL COUET Fredsgaten 12, Stockholm NIGEL HAWORTH & CHARLES METCALFE Northcote, Lancashire 2003 CHRIS & JEFF GALVIN Orrery & The Picasso Room, London CHRISTIAN OLSSON Vassa Eggen, Stockholm PHILIP HOWARD The Square, London HESTON BLUMENTHAL The Fat Duck, Berkshire JOHN TORODE Smiths of Smithfield, London NIGEL WIGGLESWORTH Twin Farms, USA NIGEL
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Irish Referendum on Lisbon Treaty, June 2008
    Evaluation of the Irish Referendum on Lisbon Treaty, June 2008 Markus Schmidgen democracy international is a network promoting direct democracy. Our basic goal is the establishment of direct democracy (initiative and referendum) as a complement to representative democracy within the European Union and in the nation states. We also work on the general democratisation of the European Union, democratic reform and more direct and participatory democracy worldwide. http://www.democracy-international.org Written by Markus Schmidgen Layout: Ronald Pabst Proof-reading (contents):, Gayle Kinkead, Ronald Pabst, Thomas Rupp Proof-reading (language): Sheena A. Finley, Warren P. Mayr Advice: Dr. Klaus Hofmann, Bruno Kaufmann, Frank Rehmet Please refer all questions to: [email protected] Published by democracy international V 0.9 (4.9.2008) Evaluation of the Irish Referendum on Lisbon Treaty, June 2008 I Introduction This report examines the process of the Irish CONTENT referendum on the Treaty of Lisbon. The referendum was held on June 12, 2008 and was the only referendum on this treaty. The evaluation is I INTRODUCTION .......................................... 3 based on the criteria set by the Initiative and Referendum Institute Europe (IRIE). These criteria are internationally recognized as standards to II SETTING...................................................... 4 measure how free and fair a referendum process is conducted. This enables the reader to compare the II.1 Background ................................................... 4 Irish Lisbon referendum to other referendums and to identify the points that could be improved as well II.2 Actors ............................................................. 4 as those that are an example to other nations. II.3 Evaluation...................................................... 7 We at Democracy International and our European partners have already published a series of reports on the EU constitutional referenda of 2005: Juan III CONCLUSION.........................................
    [Show full text]