Long-Read Assembly of a Great Dane Genome Highlights the Contribution of GC-Rich Sequence and Mobile Elements to Canine Genomes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Reference Genome Sequence of the Model Plant Setaria
UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works Title Reference genome sequence of the model plant Setaria Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2rv1r405 Journal Nature Biotechnology, 30(6) ISSN 1087-0156 1546-1696 Authors Bennetzen, Jeffrey L Schmutz, Jeremy Wang, Hao et al. Publication Date 2012-05-13 DOI 10.1038/nbt.2196 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California ARTICLES Reference genome sequence of the model plant Setaria Jeffrey L Bennetzen1,13, Jeremy Schmutz2,3,13, Hao Wang1, Ryan Percifield1,12, Jennifer Hawkins1,12, Ana C Pontaroli1,12, Matt Estep1,4, Liang Feng1, Justin N Vaughn1, Jane Grimwood2,3, Jerry Jenkins2,3, Kerrie Barry3, Erika Lindquist3, Uffe Hellsten3, Shweta Deshpande3, Xuewen Wang5, Xiaomei Wu5,12, Therese Mitros6, Jimmy Triplett4,12, Xiaohan Yang7, Chu-Yu Ye7, Margarita Mauro-Herrera8, Lin Wang9, Pinghua Li9, Manoj Sharma10, Rita Sharma10, Pamela C Ronald10, Olivier Panaud11, Elizabeth A Kellogg4, Thomas P Brutnell9,12, Andrew N Doust8, Gerald A Tuskan7, Daniel Rokhsar3 & Katrien M Devos5 We generated a high-quality reference genome sequence for foxtail millet (Setaria italica). The ~400-Mb assembly covers ~80% of the genome and >95% of the gene space. The assembly was anchored to a 992-locus genetic map and was annotated by comparison with >1.3 million expressed sequence tag reads. We produced more than 580 million RNA-Seq reads to facilitate expression analyses. We also sequenced Setaria viridis, the ancestral wild relative of S. italica, and identified regions of differential single-nucleotide polymorphism density, distribution of transposable elements, small RNA content, chromosomal rearrangement and segregation distortion. -
Transcriptome Analyses of Rhesus Monkey Pre-Implantation Embryos Reveal A
Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on September 23, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Transcriptome analyses of rhesus monkey pre-implantation embryos reveal a reduced capacity for DNA double strand break (DSB) repair in primate oocytes and early embryos Xinyi Wang 1,3,4,5*, Denghui Liu 2,4*, Dajian He 1,3,4,5, Shengbao Suo 2,4, Xian Xia 2,4, Xiechao He1,3,6, Jing-Dong J. Han2#, Ping Zheng1,3,6# Running title: reduced DNA DSB repair in monkey early embryos Affiliations: 1 State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan 650223, China 2 Key Laboratory of Computational Biology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Collaborative Innovation Center for Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences-Max Planck Partner Institute for Computational Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China 3 Yunnan Key Laboratory of Animal Reproduction, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan 650223, China 4 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China 5 Kunming College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan 650204, China 6 Primate Research Center, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China * Xinyi Wang and Denghui Liu contributed equally to this work 1 Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on September 23, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press # Correspondence: Jing-Dong J. Han, Email: [email protected]; Ping Zheng, Email: [email protected] Key words: rhesus monkey, pre-implantation embryo, DNA damage 2 Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on September 23, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press ABSTRACT Pre-implantation embryogenesis encompasses several critical events including genome reprogramming, zygotic genome activation (ZGA) and cell fate commitment. -
Y Chromosome Dynamics in Drosophila
Y chromosome dynamics in Drosophila Amanda Larracuente Department of Biology Sex chromosomes X X X Y J. Graves Sex chromosome evolution Proto-sex Autosomes chromosomes Sex Suppressed determining recombination Differentiation X Y Reviewed in Rice 1996, Charlesworth 1996 Y chromosomes • Male-restricted • Non-recombining • Degenerate • Heterochromatic Image from Willard 2003 Drosophila Y chromosome D. melanogaster Cen Hoskins et al. 2015 ~40 Mb • ~20 genes • Acquired from autosomes • Heterochromatic: Ø 80% is simple satellite DNA Photo: A. Karwath Lohe et al. 1993 Satellite DNA • Tandem repeats • Heterochromatin • Centromeres, telomeres, Y chromosomes Yunis and Yasmineh 1970 http://www.chrombios.com Y chromosome assembly challenges • Repeats are difficult to sequence • Underrepresented • Difficult to assemble Genome Sequence read: Short read lengths cannot span repeats Single molecule real-time sequencing • Pacific Biosciences • Average read length ~15 kb • Long reads span repeats • Better genome assemblies Zero mode waveguide Eid et al. 2009 Comparative Y chromosome evolution in Drosophila I. Y chromosome assemblies II. Evolution of Y-linked genes Drosophila genomes 2 Mya 0.24 Mya Photo: A. Karwath P6C4 ~115X ~120X ~85X ~95X De novo genome assembly • Assemble genome Iterative assembly: Canu, Hybrid, Quickmerge • Polish reference Quiver x 2; Pilon 2L 2R 3L 3R 4 X Y Assembled genome Mahul Chakraborty, Ching-Ho Chang 2L 2R 3L 3R 4 X Y Y X/A heterochromatin De novo genome assembly species Total bp # contigs NG50 D. simulans 154,317,203 161 21,495729 -
Dane Line Reimagined
Dane Line Reimagined Published by the Great Dane Club of New England January 2021 Be Sure to Join Us for Our Up-Coming Shows: Supported Entry at the Chickadee Classic, Maine June 26-27, 2021 2021 Fall Specialties Thanksgiving Classic Springfield November 27-28 The shows will fall on Thanksgiving weekend President—Sue Davis Shaw Vice President—Marcia Roddy Recording Secretary—Kim Thurler Corresponding Secretary—Tiffany Cross Treasurer—Sharon Boldeia Directors—Suzanne Kelley, Normand Vadenais & Dianne Powers President’s Letter January 2021 Happy New Year everyone! I know it will be a better one for all of us. Welcome to the first issue of our ‘bigger and better’ bulletin thanks to the talented Carol Urick. Carol was the editor of Daneline for many years and evolved it into the wonderful publication that it was. We only ended it due to lack of funds in the club and the increasing cost of publication. Since I’ve been doing Throwback Thursday, I’ve heard from several people across the country who told me that they looked forward to getting it each year at the National. I hope everyone will get on board with getting your brags and litters listed. We are planning an every other month publication so the next deadline should be March 1st. I would like to welcome our new Associate Members, Michelle Hojdysz from New Rochelle, NY and Anne Sanders from Gardiner, NY. We hope to actually meet you in person when dog shows open up again. January is the month when we hold our annual meeting and election of officers. -
WO 2014/135655 Al 12 September 2014 (12.09.2014) P O P C T
(12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2014/135655 Al 12 September 2014 (12.09.2014) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every C12Q 1/68 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, (21) International Application Number: BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, PCT/EP2014/054384 DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (22) International Filing Date: HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, 6 March 2014 (06.03.2014) KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, (25) Filing Language: English OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, (26) Publication Language: English SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, (30) Priority Data: ZW. 13305253.0 6 March 2013 (06.03.2013) EP (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (71) Applicants: INSTITUT CURIE [FR/FR]; 26 rue d'Ulm, kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, F-75248 Paris cedex 05 (FR). CENTRE NATIONAL DE GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE [FR/FR]; 3 rue UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ, Michel Ange, F-75016 Paris (FR). -
The Bacteria Genome Pipeline (BAGEP): an Automated, Scalable Workflow for Bacteria Genomes with Snakemake
The Bacteria Genome Pipeline (BAGEP): an automated, scalable workflow for bacteria genomes with Snakemake Idowu B. Olawoye1,2, Simon D.W. Frost3,4 and Christian T. Happi1,2 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Redeemer's University, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria 2 African Centre of Excellence for Genomics of Infectious Diseases (ACEGID), Redeemer's University, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria 3 Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA 4 London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, University of London, London, United Kingdom ABSTRACT Next generation sequencing technologies are becoming more accessible and affordable over the years, with entire genome sequences of several pathogens being deciphered in few hours. However, there is the need to analyze multiple genomes within a short time, in order to provide critical information about a pathogen of interest such as drug resistance, mutations and genetic relationship of isolates in an outbreak setting. Many pipelines that currently do this are stand-alone workflows and require huge computational requirements to analyze multiple genomes. We present an automated and scalable pipeline called BAGEP for monomorphic bacteria that performs quality control on FASTQ paired end files, scan reads for contaminants using a taxonomic classifier, maps reads to a reference genome of choice for variant detection, detects antimicrobial resistant (AMR) genes, constructs a phylogenetic tree from core genome alignments and provide interactive short nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) visualization across -
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Recent Work
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Recent Work Title 1,003 reference genomes of bacterial and archaeal isolates expand coverage of the tree of life. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7cx5710p Journal Nature biotechnology, 35(7) ISSN 1087-0156 Authors Mukherjee, Supratim Seshadri, Rekha Varghese, Neha J et al. Publication Date 2017-07-01 DOI 10.1038/nbt.3886 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California RESOU r CE OPEN 1,003 reference genomes of bacterial and archaeal isolates expand coverage of the tree of life Supratim Mukherjee1,10, Rekha Seshadri1,10, Neha J Varghese1, Emiley A Eloe-Fadrosh1, Jan P Meier-Kolthoff2 , Markus Göker2 , R Cameron Coates1,9, Michalis Hadjithomas1, Georgios A Pavlopoulos1 , David Paez-Espino1 , Yasuo Yoshikuni1, Axel Visel1 , William B Whitman3, George M Garrity4,5, Jonathan A Eisen6, Philip Hugenholtz7 , Amrita Pati1,9, Natalia N Ivanova1, Tanja Woyke1, Hans-Peter Klenk8 & Nikos C Kyrpides1 We present 1,003 reference genomes that were sequenced as part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea (GEBA) initiative, selected to maximize sequence coverage of phylogenetic space. These genomes double the number of existing type strains and expand their overall phylogenetic diversity by 25%. Comparative analyses with previously available finished and draft genomes reveal a 10.5% increase in novel protein families as a function of phylogenetic diversity. The GEBA genomes recruit 25 million previously unassigned metagenomic proteins from 4,650 samples, improving their phylogenetic and functional interpretation. We identify numerous biosynthetic clusters and experimentally validate a divergent phenazine cluster with potential new chemical structure and antimicrobial activity. -
Palmitic Acid Effects on Hypothalamic Neurons
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.03.454666; this version posted August 4, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Running title: Oleic and palmitic acid effects on hypothalamic neurons Concentration-dependent change in hypothalamic neuronal transcriptome by the dietary fatty acids: oleic and palmitic acids Fabiola Pacheco Valencia1^, Amanda F. Marino1^, Christos Noutsos1, Kinning Poon1* 1Department of Biological Sciences, SUNY Old Westbury, Old Westbury NY, United States ^Authors contributed equally to this work *Corresponding Author: Kinning Poon 223 Store Hill Rd Old Westbury, NY 11568, USA 1-516-876-2735 [email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.03.454666; this version posted August 4, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Abstract Prenatal high-fat diet exposure increases hypothalamic neurogenesis events in embryos and programs offspring to be obesity-prone. The molecular mechanism involved in these dietary effects of neurogenesis are unknown. This study investigated the effects of oleic and palmitic acids, which are abundant in a high-fat diet, on the hypothalamic neuronal transcriptome and how these changes impact neurogenesis events. The results show differential effects of low and high concentrations of oleic or palmitic acid treatment on differential gene transcription. -
Cellular Corepressor TLE2 Inhibits Replication-And-Transcription
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, Feb. 2010, p. 2047–2062 Vol. 84, No. 4 0022-538X/10/$12.00 doi:10.1128/JVI.01984-09 Copyright © 2010, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Cellular Corepressor TLE2 Inhibits Replication-and-Transcription- Activator-Mediated Transactivation and Lytic Reactivation of Kaposi’s Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirusᰔ Zhiheng He,1 Yunhua Liu,1 Deguang Liang,1 Zhuo Wang,1 Erle S. Robertson,2 and Ke Lan1* Key Laboratory of Molecular Virology and Immunology, Institute Pasteur of Shanghai, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 225 South Chongqing Road, Shanghai 200025, The People’s Republic of China,1 and Department of Microbiology and The Abramson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania Medical School, 2 3201E Johnson Pavilion, 610 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104 Downloaded from Received 18 September 2009/Accepted 18 November 2009 Replication and transcription activator (RTA) encoded by open reading frame 50 (ORF50) of Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) is essential and sufficient to initiate lytic reactivation. RTA activates its target genes through direct binding with high affinity to its responsive elements or by interaction with cellular factors, such as RBP-J, Ap-1, C/EBP-␣, and Oct-1. In this study, we identified jvi.asm.org transducin-like enhancer of split 2 (TLE2) as a novel RTA binding protein by using yeast two-hybrid screening of a human spleen cDNA library. The interaction between TLE2 and RTA was confirmed by glutathione S-transferase (GST) binding and coimmunoprecipitation assays. Immunofluorescence anal- ysis showed that TLE2 and RTA were colocalized in the same nuclear compartment in KSHV-infected at Shanghai Information Center for Life Sciences, CAS on March 25, 2010 cells. -
Dog Breed DNA and Survey Results: What Kind of Dog Is That? the Dogs () DNA Results Survey Results
Maddie's Shelter Medicine Program College of Veterinary Medicine (https://sheltermedicine.vetmed.ufl.edu) Dog Breed DNA and Survey Results: What Kind of Dog is That? The Dogs () DNA Results Survey Results Dog 01 Top Responses 25% Toy Fox Terrier Golden Retriever 25% Harrier Pomeranian 15.33% Anatolian Shetland Sheepdog Shepherd Cocker Spaniel 14% Chinese Crested Chihuahua Dog 02 Top Responses 50% Catahoula Leopard Labrador Retriever Dog American Staffordshire 25% Siberian Husky Terrier 9.94% Briard No Predominant Breed 5.07 Airedale Terrier Border Collie Pointer (includes English Pointer) Dog 03 Top Responses 25% American Labrador Retriever Staffordshire German Shepherd Dog 25% German Shepherd Rhodesian Ridgeback 25% Lhasa Apso No Predominant Breed 25% Dandie Dinmont Terrier American Staffordshire Terrier Dog 04 Top Responses 25% Border Collie Wheaten Terrier, Soft Coated 25% Tibetan Spaniel Bearded Collie 12.02% Catahoula Leopard Dog Briard 9.28% Shiba Inu Cairn Terrier Tibetan Terrier Dog 05 Top Responses 25% Miniature Pinscher Australian Cattle Dog 25% Great Pyrenees German Shorthaired Pointer 10.79% Afghan Hound Pointer (includes English 10.09% Nova Scotia Duck Pointer) Tolling Retriever Border Collie No Predominant Breed Dog 06 Top Responses 50% American Foxhound Beagle 50% Beagle Foxhound (including American, English, Treeing Walker Coonhound) Harrier Black and Tan Coonhound Pointer (includes English Pointer) Dog 07 Top Responses 25% Irish Water Spaniel Labrador Retriever 25% Siberian Husky American Staffordshire Terrier 25% Boston -
2017 Horrible Hundred Report
The Horrible Hundred 2017 A sampling of problem puppy mills and puppy dealers in the United States May 2017 For the fifth straight year, The Humane Society of the United States is reporting on problem puppy mills, including some dealers (re-sellers) and transporters. The Horrible Hundred 2017 report is a list of known, problematic puppy breeding and/or puppy brokering facilities. It is not a list of all puppy mills, nor is it a list of the worst puppy mills in the country. The HSUS provides this update annually, not as a comprehensive inventory, but as an effort to inform the public about common, recurring problems at puppy mills. The information in this report demonstrates the scope of the puppy mill problem in America today, with specific examples of the types of violations that researchers have found at such facilities, for the purposes of warning consumers about the inhumane conditions that so many puppy buyers inadvertently support. The year 2017 has been a difficult one for puppy mill watchdogs. Efforts to get updated information from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) on federally-inspected puppy mills were severely crippled due to the USDA’s removal on Feb. 3, 2017 of all animal welfare inspection reports and most enforcement records from the USDA website. As of April 20, 2017, the USDA had restored some Puppies at the facility of Alvin Nolt in Thorpe, Wisconsin, were found on unsafe wire flooring, a repeat violation at the facility. Wire flooring animal welfare records on research facilities and is especially dangerous for puppies because their legs can become other types of dealers, but almost no records on entrapped in the gaps, leaving them unable to reach food, water or pet breeding operations were restored. -
2013 Trainee Institution Lab/Research Group Division Of
2014 Trainee Institution Lab/Research Group Division of Basic Sciences Shannon Barbour University of California, Santa Cruz Harmit Malik, PhD Sarah Debs Whitman College Cecilia Moens, PhD Alec Heckert University of Washington Jesse Bloom, PhD Lauren Hillers Hope College Carissa Perez Olsen, PhD Heather Johns Whitman College Robert Bradley, PhD Chris Large University of Puget Sound Harmit Malik, PhD Division of Clinical Research Linda Dao University of Texas at Arlington Edus (Hootie) Warren, MD, PhD Meselle Jeff-Eke University of Chicago Marie Bleakley, MD, PhD, M.Msc Danielle Oliver Hampton University Cameron Turtle, MD, PhD Maya Rosenfield University of Washington James (Jim) Olson, MD, PhD Derek Wong University of Chicago John Pagel, MD, PhD Division of Human Biology Micah Atwood Northwest University Patrick Paddison, PhD Joshua Messer University of Wyoming Denise Galloway, PhD Emma O'Melia Clark University Catherine (Katie) Peichel, PhD Ethan Paddock Northern Arizona University Julie Overbaugh, PhD ± Monica Salazar New Mexico State University Peggy Porter, MD Sophia Stone Mary Baldwin College Stephen Tapscott, MD, PhD Connor Wagner New Mexico State University Nina Salama, PhD Bailey Wooldridge University of Hawaii at Hilo Adam Geballe, MD Division of Public Health Sciences Meghan Gerry New Mexico State University Kerryn Reding, PhD, MPH Riley Hughes Yale University Johanna Lampe, PhD, RD ± Mayra Lovas New Mexico State University Linda Ko, PhD Shirley Beresford, PhD / Lauren Mercer New Mexico State University Beti Thompson, PhD ± Swati