DOCSLIB.ORG

The Great Battles of Epaminondas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Introduction these battles solitaire since competi- This module covers the key battles of the famous Theban tive play is not very interesting. general Epaminondas: Leuctra and Mantinea, the swan Important Note songs for both Sparta and Thebes. At the conclusion of the In order to play this module you need to havea copyof theDeluxe Edition of Battle of Mantinea Sparta and Thebes would never again the Great Battles of Alexander and play dominant roles in Greek politics. More importantly, the Diadochoi module. you will get to use the giant Hoplite unit that came with General Notes your copy of Diadochoi. Counters come from either Deluxe Alexander or the Diadochoi module. Several things will become evident ill afford to drag the situation out. The Counters From column in the set after playing these scenarios. Because Hence, once the forces actually came ups indicates the origin of the of the small number of leaders, to blows, the battles were over in counter; either A for Deluxe usually one, there is little ability for about an hour. In the two scenarios Alexander or D for Diadochoi. in this module the game will usually either side to conduct subtle maneu Mod ule Sp ec ia l Ru le be over within two game turns. vers. This was a characteristic of Theban Deep Echelon Unit Hoplite warfare whereby, after a You will have noticed a very large good harangue from the General in Lastly, the scenarios are not very counter that came with Diadochoi. It charge, the Paeu (battle song) was balanced. Epaminondashad just is treated like a Hoplite unit in every sung and the charge was sounded. invented the beginnings of an way, with the following additional This led to a swift outcome, which is evolution in Hoplite warfare that movement rules. The unit is oriented the other critical feature of Hoplite would lead to the Macedonian on the hexfield based on Diagram A warfare. This aspect of Hoplite battles Phalanx. The Spartans,although a (see page 8 .for diagram). is reinforcedby using the set-ups as a professional army, were ill suited to means of limiting the player's deal with this new style of warfare The Theban Deep Echelon unit may maneuver options. Most of the and lost badly in both of these battles. only move into its front hexes as per Hoplites had day jobs, and they could Players may learn more from playing the diagram. It cannot turn while moving forward. It can turn if it is not The Great Battles of Alexander: Official Designer Module in an enemy ZOC, expends 4 move- the Peloponnesian War. Using phalanx at the battle of Delium ment points, and the physical shifting treacherythe Spartans gained control during the Peloponnesian war to of the unit in the hexfield is uninter- of the Cadmeia, the citadel of Thebes, defeat the Athenians. However, the rupted by any other units (friendly or causing a violent Theban reaction.In major tactic in hoplite warfare enemy). In other words, the unit 379 BC the garrison was ejectedand remained putting the main effort cannot move through another unit's Sparta declared war on Thebes. The against the enemy's left flank. The hex in any manner. Although, Theban general Epaminondas drilled key was to win on the right before physically, the flankhexes at the the populace into a first class military losing on the left. waist of the unit are partially occu- force and prepared to meet a Spartan pied by the Deep Echelon counter, invasion.In 371 BC the Spartans and Epaminondas created three innova- these spaces are considered empty their allies, under King Cleombrotus, tions which broke this tradition. and friendly/enemy units may invaded Bocotia and camped at Epaminondas saw the Spartan occupy thosehexesas per the normal Leuctra near Thebes. Epaminondas right flank as their center of gravity movement rules. In all other ways - broughtup his smaller army and and shifted his main attack to his I'm sure I'll regret saying this - the engaged the Spartans in battle. left flank to directly oppose the Deep Echelon unit acts like a normal Spartan hoplites. hoplite counter. The battle is noteworthy for several key innovations that Epaminondas His second major innovation was to Leuctra (371 B.C.) used againstthe Spartans. The deploy his main attack force into a 50 In 382 BC the Spartans continued to Thebans for some time had experi- deep phalanx. It has been suggested assert their leadership of the Greek mented with deeper hoplite forma- that this force may even have used world, established by their victory in tions.Theyhadused a 25 depth pikesa lei the Macedonian phalanx, The Grea t Batt les of Epam inon das becauseof the unusualshape of executed a flank attack into the other can be moved with one line Theban shields,but there is nodirect Spartan right flank. The results were command as per the Alexander rules. evidence that this wasthecase. the destruction of the Spartan Lastly, the remainderof the Theban hoplites, including the king, and the Echelon Line Commands - One of hoplite line was deployed en echelon, Spartan allies quit the field without the big maneuvers in this battle so as to delay the Spartan allies from actually coming into direct contact besides the deep echelon unit was the engaging them before the Theban left with the Thebans. The fallof Sparta movement of the entire Hoplite line had won the battle. had begun. 'en echelon'. Only Epaminondas can issue an 'en echelon' line command. Xenophon, who is the main chroni- Map A unitis 'en echelon'if it has a front cler of this battle, wrote in a treatise Use the Lyginiusmap from the hex which is also the flank hex of on cavalry tactics, that horses could Deluxe Edition of the Great Battles of another hoplite unit which is faced in be used to screen infantryforces Alexander. The long map edge where the same direction.The intent here is because of the height of the horse. the terrain key is located is North. that the entire Theban line including Caesar used this tactic at the battle of Note the following terrain modifica- the Deep Echelon unit can move with Pharsalus. The deployment of the tions.Flexes4614to4618and all one line command. Theban cavalrysuggests that this hexes north of them are level 2 hexes. tactic may have prevented the The Spartan camp is in hex3813 and The Theban Sacred Band - This, the Spartans from seeing the deep all adjacent hexes. Use the Baggage most famous individual combat unit Theban phalanx before the dust of the train marker from Alexander to mark in Greek city-state history - andthe cavalry engagement had settled. this location. The baggage train touchstone of Theban supremacy- cannot move in this scenario. was actually quite a small unit in The battle itself went according to numbers. Although composed of plan. The Theban cavalry drove off Historical Scenario only 150 men, its importance to the Spartancavalryand then the Setup allof theunits in the indicated the Greek army in terms of morale Theban leftsmashedinto the Spartan setup hexes. was immeasurable. (However, hoplites. The Sacred Band probably Philistines that we are, we have served the dual purpose of protecting Special Rules measured it.)That is whytheir loss the large open flank of the deep Lines - Hoplite units that are in line (worth 9 TQ points) is so much Theban phalanx and probably (flank to flank) and adjacent to each greater in proportion to its Size. The Great Battles of Alexander: Official Designer Module Epaminondas: Epaminondasis the Theban: The Spartan/Allied army timeswhen killed. The Deep only elite commander in the scenario. nn-1st he rotted. Echelonunitcounts 3 times its TQ rating for army rout purposes. Skirmish Orders: Peltasts, the LP Retreat Edge Mantinea (362 B.C.) units, and cavalry can be given orders Spartan: Northern edge of the map by the Overall commanders Theban: Southern edge of the map With the Spartans driven into (Epaminondas or Cleobrotus) the Peloponnesus,the Thebans regardless of there range from the Army Rout grew in strength and confidence. commander. Spartan: Army Routs when units Epaminondas launchednumerous with TQ totaling 28 have been routed. expeditions into the Peloponnesus Spartan Camp: The Spartan camp is Leaders as always are worth their and probably would have captured hex3813 plus alladjacenthexes.Its activation rating when wounded and Sparta itself if it weren't for the location is designated by the baggage their activation rating times five inspired defense put up by train unitwhich cannot move in this when killed. Spartan Hoplite units King Agesilaus. scenario. If at any time any of these count twice their TQ rating for army hexes areentered by a Thebanunit rout purposes. In 363 BC, an allegation over Olym- the Theban player gains 10 TQ points pian temple funds found Mantinea toward Spartan army rout. Thebans: Army routs when units (pro-Spartan) and Tegea (pro- with a TQ totaling 22 have been Theban) at the head of rival coali- Victory Conditions routed. Leaders as always are worth tions. Epaminondasfirstattempted to Spartan: The Theban Army must be their activation rating when intercept the Athenian contingent routed. wounded and their activation rating before it could join their Spartan The Great Battles of Epamino ndas allies, but failed when these troops was mortally wounded during the Special Rules were moved by sea. He then moved battle. The similarities between Lines - Hoplite units that are in line the Theban army to Tegea, which Epaminondas and Gustavus (flank to flank) and adjacent to each placed his forces between Sparta and Adolphus are interesting. Both other can be moved with one line Mantinea.
Recommended publications
  • Ancient History Sourcebook: 11Th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA an Ancient City in Greece, the Capital of Laconia and the Most Powerful State of the Peloponnese

    Ancient History Sourcebook: 11Th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA an Ancient City in Greece, the Capital of Laconia and the Most Powerful State of the Peloponnese

    Ancient History Sourcebook: 11th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA AN ancient city in Greece, the capital of Laconia and the most powerful state of the Peloponnese. The city lay at the northern end of the central Laconian plain, on the right bank of the river Eurotas, a little south of the point where it is joined by its largest tributary, the Oenus (mount Kelefina). The site is admirably fitted by nature to guard the only routes by which an army can penetrate Laconia from the land side, the Oenus and Eurotas valleys leading from Arcadia, its northern neighbour, and the Langada Pass over Mt Taygetus connecting Laconia and Messenia. At the same time its distance from the sea-Sparta is 27 m. from its seaport, Gythium, made it invulnerable to a maritime attack. I.-HISTORY Prehistoric Period.-Tradition relates that Sparta was founded by Lacedaemon, son of Zeus and Taygete, who called the city after the name of his wife, the daughter of Eurotas. But Amyclae and Therapne (Therapnae) seem to have been in early times of greater importance than Sparta, the former a Minyan foundation a few miles to the south of Sparta, the latter probably the Achaean capital of Laconia and the seat of Menelaus, Agamemnon's younger brother. Eighty years after the Trojan War, according to the traditional chronology, the Dorian migration took place. A band of Dorians united with a body of Aetolians to cross the Corinthian Gulf and invade the Peloponnese from the northwest. The Aetolians settled in Elis, the Dorians pushed up to the headwaters of the Alpheus, where they divided into two forces, one of which under Cresphontes invaded and later subdued Messenia, while the other, led by Aristodemus or, according to another version, by his twin sons Eurysthenes and Procles, made its way down the Eurotas were new settlements were formed and gained Sparta, which became the Dorian capital of Laconia.
  • Xenophon and Epaminondas Westlake, H D Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Spring 1975; 16, 1; Proquest Pg

    Xenophon and Epaminondas Westlake, H D Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Spring 1975; 16, 1; Proquest Pg

    Xenophon and Epaminondas Westlake, H D Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Spring 1975; 16, 1; ProQuest pg. 23 Xenophon and Epaminondas H. D. Westlake HE PRESENTATION ofEpaminondas by Xenophon is very remark­ Table, even in a work so unmethodically and capriciously written as the Hellenica. Epaminondas is mentioned for the first time as leader of a Theban expedition to Achaea in 366 B.c. (7.1.41)1 when his achievements already included his celebrated defiance of Agesilaus at the Peace Congress of 371, his defeat of the Spartans at Leuctra, and his first two invasions of the Peloponnese, which resulted in the devastation of Laconia, the liberation of Mes­ senia and the foundation of Messene and Megalopolis. 2 The suppres­ sion of his name up to that point has rightly been attributed to the notorious antipathy of Xenophon towards the The bans, which causes him to deny to their principal leader the credit due for all these achievements.3 It is, therefore, astonishing to find that when Xenophon deals with the fourth The ban invasion of the Peloponnese culminating in the battle of Mantinea (7.5.4-27), Epaminondas dominates the narrative: the course of events is recorded almost exclusively from his point of view; his plans and motives are carefully analysed; he is credited with having shown foresight and boldness throughout the campaign; some of his actions are explicitly praised. It is tempting to interpret the presentation of Epaminondas in the last pages of the Hellenica as a palinode; to conclude that Xenophon, conscious of having done him less than justice hitherto, now wishes to 1 All references are to the Hellenica unless otherwise stated.
  • A. the Peloponnesian War (431-404 BC)

    A. the Peloponnesian War (431-404 BC)

    www.HistoryAtOurHouse.Com Junior High Class Notes III. The Decline and Fall of Greece (431-146 BC) A. The Peloponnesian War (431-404 BC) 1. The main reasons Sparta and Athens went to war were that they had opposite forms of government and that they were rivals for the leadership of Greece. 2. Even though they had agreed to the “Thirty Years Peace,” the war began in 431 BC when Athens agreed to help its ally Corcyra defend itself against Corinth, an ally of Sparta. Corinth claimed this broke the terms of the peace, and Sparta's allies clamored for war. 3. This war was made especially famous by the writing of one of the first great historians, named Thucydides. His History of the Peloponnesian War became a celebrated example of how to write history and had been studied by historians ever since. 4. In our time, however, the details of the war discussed by Thucydides cannot concern us if we are not professional historians. What matters is its impact on Greece. 5. The first key impact of the war was the defeat of Athens by Sparta, and its effect on Athenian democracy. As Athens started to lose, the aristocrats of Athens temporarily took charge. Worse, at the end, the Spartans chose thirty of them to be the “Thirty Tyrants” to force the city to follow Sparta’s lead. 6. When the democrats of Athens took over again, they sought to punish anyone connected to the tyrants. The philosopher Socrates was among those critical of democracy, and he was persecuted.
  • Fish Lists in the Wilderness

    Fish Lists in the Wilderness

    FISH LISTS IN THE WILDERNESS: The Social and Economic History of a Boiotian Price Decree Author(s): Ephraim Lytle Source: Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens, Vol. 79, No. 2 (April-June 2010), pp. 253-303 Published by: The American School of Classical Studies at Athens Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40835487 . Accessed: 18/03/2014 10:14 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The American School of Classical Studies at Athens is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 71.168.218.10 on Tue, 18 Mar 2014 10:14:19 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions HESPERIA 79 (2OIO) FISH LISTS IN THE Pages 253~3°3 WILDERNESS The Social and Economic History of a Boiotian Price Decree ABSTRACT This articlepresents a newtext and detailedexamination of an inscribedHel- lenisticdecree from the Boiotian town of Akraiphia (SEG XXXII 450) that consistschiefly of lists of fresh- and saltwaterfish accompanied by prices. The textincorporates improved readings and restoresthe final eight lines of the document,omitted in previouseditions.
  • Thucydides, Sicily, and the Defeat of Athens Tim Rood

    Thucydides, Sicily, and the Defeat of Athens Tim Rood

    Thucydides, Sicily, and the Defeat of Athens Tim Rood To cite this version: Tim Rood. Thucydides, Sicily, and the Defeat of Athens. KTÈMA Civilisations de l’Orient, de la Grèce et de Rome antiques, Université de Strasbourg, 2017, 42, pp.19-39. halshs-01670082 HAL Id: halshs-01670082 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01670082 Submitted on 21 Dec 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Les interprétations de la défaite de 404 Edith Foster Interpretations of Athen’s defeat in the Peloponnesian war ............................................................. 7 Edmond LÉVY Thucydide, le premier interprète d’une défaite anormale ................................................................. 9 Tim Rood Thucydides, Sicily, and the Defeat of Athens ...................................................................................... 19 Cinzia Bearzot La συμφορά de la cité La défaite d’Athènes (405-404 av. J.-C.) chez les orateurs attiques .................................................. 41 Michel Humm Rome, une « cité grecque
  • Synoikism, Urbanization, and Empire in the Early Hellenistic Period Ryan

    Synoikism, Urbanization, and Empire in the Early Hellenistic Period Ryan

    Synoikism, Urbanization, and Empire in the Early Hellenistic Period by Ryan Anthony Boehm A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Emily Mackil, Chair Professor Erich Gruen Professor Mark Griffith Spring 2011 Copyright © Ryan Anthony Boehm, 2011 ABSTRACT SYNOIKISM, URBANIZATION, AND EMPIRE IN THE EARLY HELLENISTIC PERIOD by Ryan Anthony Boehm Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology University of California, Berkeley Professor Emily Mackil, Chair This dissertation, entitled “Synoikism, Urbanization, and Empire in the Early Hellenistic Period,” seeks to present a new approach to understanding the dynamic interaction between imperial powers and cities following the Macedonian conquest of Greece and Asia Minor. Rather than constructing a political narrative of the period, I focus on the role of reshaping urban centers and regional landscapes in the creation of empire in Greece and western Asia Minor. This period was marked by the rapid creation of new cities, major settlement and demographic shifts, and the reorganization, consolidation, or destruction of existing settlements and the urbanization of previously under- exploited regions. I analyze the complexities of this phenomenon across four frameworks: shifting settlement patterns, the regional and royal economy, civic religion, and the articulation of a new order in architectural and urban space. The introduction poses the central problem of the interrelationship between urbanization and imperial control and sets out the methodology of my dissertation. After briefly reviewing and critiquing previous approaches to this topic, which have focused mainly on creating catalogues, I point to the gains that can be made by shifting the focus to social and economic structures and asking more specific interpretive questions.
  • Interstate Alliances of the Fourth-Century BCE Greek World: a Socio-Cultural Perspective

    Interstate Alliances of the Fourth-Century BCE Greek World: a Socio-Cultural Perspective

    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 9-2016 Interstate Alliances of the Fourth-Century BCE Greek World: A Socio-Cultural Perspective Nicholas D. Cross The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1479 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] INTERSTATE ALLIANCES IN THE FOURTH-CENTURY BCE GREEK WORLD: A SOCIO-CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE by Nicholas D. Cross A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2016 © 2016 Nicholas D. Cross All Rights Reserved ii Interstate Alliances in the Fourth-Century BCE Greek World: A Socio-Cultural Perspective by Nicholas D. Cross This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in History in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ______________ __________________________________________ Date Jennifer Roberts Chair of Examining Committee ______________ __________________________________________ Date Helena Rosenblatt Executive Officer Supervisory Committee Joel Allen Liv Yarrow THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT Interstate Alliances of the Fourth-Century BCE Greek World: A Socio-Cultural Perspective by Nicholas D. Cross Adviser: Professor Jennifer Roberts This dissertation offers a reassessment of interstate alliances (συµµαχία) in the fourth-century BCE Greek world from a socio-cultural perspective.
  • What May Philip Have Learnt As a Hostage in Thebes? Hammond, N G L Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Winter 1997; 38, 4; Proquest Pg

    What May Philip Have Learnt As a Hostage in Thebes? Hammond, N G L Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Winter 1997; 38, 4; Proquest Pg

    What may Philip have learnt as a hostage in Thebes? Hammond, N G L Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Winter 1997; 38, 4; ProQuest pg. 355 What May Philip Have Learnt as a Hostage in Thebes? N. c. L. Hammond HE BELIEF that Philip did learn some lessons in Thebes was clearly stated in three passages.1 After denouncing the slug­ Tgishness of the Athenians, Justin (6.9.7) wrote that Philip "having been held hostage in Thebes for three years and having been instructed in the fine qualities of Epaminondas and Pelo­ pidas" was enabled by the inactivity of the Greeks to impose on them the yoke of servitude. The source of this passage was clearly Theopompus. 2 Justin wrote further as follows: "This thing [peace with Thebes] gave very great promotion to the outstanding natural ability of Philip" (7.5.2: quae res Philippo maxima incrementa egregiae indolis dedit), "seeing that Philip laid the first foundations of boyhood as a hostage for three 1 The following abbreviations are used: Anderson=J. K. Anderson, Military Theory and Practice in the Age of Xenophon (Berkeley 1970); Aymard=A. Aymard, "Philippe de Macedoine, otage a Thebes, REA 56 (1954) 15-26; Buckler=J. Buckler, "Plutarch on Leuktra," SymbOslo 55 (1980) 75-93; Ellis=J. R. Ellis, Philip II and Macedonian Imperialism (London 1976); Ferrill=A. Ferrill, The Origins of War from the Stone Age to Alexander the Great (London 1985); Geyer=F. Geyer, Makedonien bis zur Thronbesteigung Philippe II (Munich 1939); Hammond, Coll. St.-N. G. L. Hammond, Col­ lected Studies I-IV (Amsterdam 1993-97); Hammond, Philip=id., Philip of Macedon (London 1994); Hammond, "Training"=id., "Training in the Use of the Sarissa and its Effect in Battle, n Antichthon 14 (1980) 53-63; Hat­ zopoulos,=M.
  • Interventions and Citations in Xenophon, Hellenica and Anabasis Author(S): Vivienne Gray Source: the Classical Quarterly, New Series, Vol

    Interventions and Citations in Xenophon, Hellenica and Anabasis Author(S): Vivienne Gray Source: the Classical Quarterly, New Series, Vol

    Interventions and Citations in Xenophon, Hellenica and Anabasis Author(s): Vivienne Gray Source: The Classical Quarterly, New Series, Vol. 53, No. 1 (May, 2003), pp. 111-123 Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Classical Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3556483 . Accessed: 20/06/2014 22:57 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Cambridge University Press and The Classical Association are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Classical Quarterly. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 188.72.96.102 on Fri, 20 Jun 2014 22:57:54 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Classical Quarterly53.1 111-123 (2003) Printed in Great Britain 111 INTERVENTIONS AND CITATIONS IN XENOPHON, HELLENICA AND ANABASIS Herodotus and Thucydides have benefited from the impetus that narratology has given to the analysis of historical narrative,1 and Xenophon deserves this too, not least because his first-person interventions into his narratives and his citations of 'what people say' are, in the absence of prefaces for
  • The Dancing Floor of Ares Local Conflict and Regional Violence in Central Greece

    The Dancing Floor of Ares Local Conflict and Regional Violence in Central Greece

    The Dancing Floor of Ares Local Conflict and Regional Violence in Central Greece Edited by Fabienne Marchand and Hans Beck ANCIENT HISTORY BULLETIN Supplemental Volume 1 (2020) ISSN 0835-3638 Edited by: Edward Anson, Catalina Balmaceda, Monica D’Agostini, Andrea Gatzke, Alex McAuley, Sabine Müller, Nadini Pandey, John Vanderspoel, Connor Whately, Pat Wheatley Senior Editor: Timothy Howe Assistant Editor: Charlotte Dunn Contents 1 Hans Beck and Fabienne Marchand, Preface 2 Chandra Giroux, Mythologizing Conflict: Memory and the Minyae 21 Laetitia Phialon, The End of a World: Local Conflict and Regional Violence in Mycenaean Boeotia? 46 Hans Beck, From Regional Rivalry to Federalism: Revisiting the Battle of Koroneia (447 BCE) 63 Salvatore Tufano, The Liberation of Thebes (379 BC) as a Theban Revolution. Three Case Studies in Theban Prosopography 86 Alex McAuley, Kai polemou kai eirenes: Military Magistrates at War and at Peace in Hellenistic Boiotia 109 Roy van Wijk, The centrality of Boiotia to Athenian defensive strategy 138 Elena Franchi, Genealogies and Violence. Central Greece in the Making 168 Fabienne Marchand, The Making of a Fetter of Greece: Chalcis in the Hellenistic Period 189 Marcel Piérart, La guerre ou la paix? Deux notes sur les relations entre les Confédérations achaienne et béotienne (224-180 a.C.) Preface The present collection of papers stems from two one-day workshops, the first at McGill University on November 9, 2017, followed by another at the Université de Fribourg on May 24, 2018. Both meetings were part of a wider international collaboration between two projects, the Parochial Polis directed by Hans Beck in Montreal and now at Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, and Fabienne Marchand’s Swiss National Science Foundation Old and New Powers: Boiotian International Relations from Philip II to Augustus.
  • Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Common Sense

    Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Common Sense

    M A X-P LANC K - INST I T U T FÜR W I SSENSCH AFTSGESC H I C H T E Max Planck Institute for the History of Science 2012 PREPRINT 426 Klaus Geus, Martin Thiering (eds.) Common Sense Geography and Mental Modelling COMMON SENSE GEOGRAPHY AND MENTAL MODELLING CHAPTER 1: COMMON SENSE GEOGRAPHY AND MENTAL MODELLING: OPENING 2 THE STAGE. Klaus Geus & Martin Thiering CHAPTER 2: SPATIAL MENTAL MODELS IN COMMON SENSE GEOGRAPHY. 11 Martin Thiering CHAPTER 3: THINKING SPACE: INSULARITY AS MENTAL MODEL. Gian Franco 45 Chiai CHAPTER 4: XENOPHON’S ANABASIS AND THE COMMON GREEK MENTAL 57 MODELLING OF SPACES. Anca Dan CHAPTER 5: GEOGRAPHY OF HEAVENS IN THE BYZANTINE COMMONWEALTH: 74 THE “ENOCHIC CHRONOTOPE”. Florentina Badalanova Geller CHAPTER 6: BEROSSOS ON KOS FROM THE VIEW OF COMMON SENSE GEOGRAPHY. 101 Mark J. Geller CHAPTER 7: A ‘DAY’S JOURNEY IN HERODOTUS’ HISTORIES. 110 Klaus Geus CHAPTER 8: WHAT DISTINGUISHES SCIENTIFIC GEOGRAPHY FROM COMMON 119 SENSE GEOGRAPHY? Kurt Guckelsberger CHAPTER 9: SPATIAL ORIENTATION IN THE DIDACTIC POEM OF DIONYSIUS 131 PERIEGETES. Ekaterina Ilyushechkina CHAPTER 10: THE CREATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF AN ANCIENT SCIENTIFIC 139 »FACT«: PARADOXORAPHY IN THE PERIPATOS. Colin Guthrie King CHAPTER 11: LOOKING FOR BIRD’S EYE VIEW IN ANCIENT GREEK SOURCE. 145 Thomas Poiss ABOUT THE AUTHORS 156 CHAPTER 1 COMMON SENSE GEOGRAPHY AND MENTAL MODELLING: 1 OPENING THE STAGE Klaus Geus & Martin Thiering Freie Universität Berlin / Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin & Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Schon der Augenschein überzeugt uns offenbar, dass die Erde eine Kugel ist. Dennoch darf man den Augen- schein nicht als Beweismittel verwenden, denn nicht alles erscheint uns so, wie es in Wahrheit ist.
  • An Ancient Fort on Mount Oneion

    An Ancient Fort on Mount Oneion

    AN ANCIENT FORT ON MOUNT ONEION (PLATES 23-27) N additionto the mighty citadel of Acrocorinthand the Long Walls linking the city to its western port of Lechaion, ancient Corinth possessed another effective barrier to movement through the Isthmos in the long finger of Mount Oneion. Rising to a maximum height of 584 m. above sea-level, the rocky spine of this mountain extends for about seven kilometers on an east-west line which forms the southern boundary of the Corinthian Isthmos.' At its western end it is separated from Acro- corinth by a narrow but level pass which carries the Leukon river, the Peloponnesian railway, and the modern highway to Argos. At its eastern extremity Oneion drops steeply down to the sea and ends in a stubby promontory, the ancient Chersonesos, which marks the northern limit of the bay of Galataki and has at its base the Baths of Helen.2 The ancient port of Kenchreai on the Saronic Gulf lies a little more than a kilometer to the north. At the base of Chersonesos, below the steeply rising rocks of Mount Oneion, passed an important ancient road leading south from the Isthmos into the plain of Galataki, ancient Solygeia, and then to the hinterland of southeastern Corinthia, where the modern villages of Vlasseika, Katakali, and Sophiko are located. In wartime the road became a strategic artery; by following it around Mount Oneion and then turning westward past Solygeia, an invading army could easily make its way into the southern Corinthia, and thence to Argos, unhindered by either the defenses at the western end of Oneion or those of Acrocorinth and the Long Walls to Lechaion.