DOCSLIB.ORG

List of Contributors

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
List of Contributors 435 List of contributors Alexander Anderson, Department of Mathematics, University of Dundee, DD1 4HN, Scotland, UK; e-mail: [email protected] Mats Akesson, Center for Process Biotechnology, BioCentrum-DTU, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark Wolfgang Alt, Theoretical Biology, University of Bonn, Kirschallee 1,53115 Bonn, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Markus Bar, Max-Planck-Institut fUr Physik komplexer Systeme, Nothnitzer Str. 38, 01187 Dresden, Germany Ulrich Behn, Institut fUr Theoretische Physik, Universitat Leipzig, Postfach 100920, 04009 Leipzig, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Uwe Borner, Max-Planck-Institut fUr Physik komplexer Systeme, Nothnitzer Str. 38,01187 Dresden, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Stefan Bornholdt, Interdisziplinares Zentrum fUr Bioinformatik, Universitat Leip­ zig, Kreuzstr. 7b, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Debasish Bose, University of Delhi South Campus, Department of Biophysics, New Delhi 110021, India Markus Brede, Institut fUr Theoretische Physik, Universitat Leipzig, Postfach 100920,04009 Leipzig, Germany Till Bretschneider, Max-Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Am Klopferspitz I8A, 82152 Martinsried,Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Markus A. Dahlem, Leibniz Institut fUr Neurobiologie, Brennecke-Str. 6, 39118 Magdeburg, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Sune Danp, University of Copenhagen, Department of Chemistry, H.C. 0rsted Institute, Universitetparken 5,2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; e-mail: [email protected] 436 List of contributors Peter Dieterich, Technische Universitaet Dresden, Institut fUr Physiologie, Medizi­ nische Fakultat Carl-Gustav-Carus, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Sabine Dormann, University of Osnabruck, Dept. of Mathematics/ Computer Scien­ ce, Applied Systems Science Dirk Drasdo, Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences, Inselstr. 22-26, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Frido Erler, Dresden University of Technology, Institute for Theoretical Physics, 01062 Dresden, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Katharina Flade, Technische UniversiHit Dresden, Institut fUr Werkstoffwissen­ schaft, Helmholtzstr. 7, 01062 Dresden, Germany Gabor Forgacs, University of Missouri, Department of Physics and Biology, 223 Physics Building UMC, Columbia, MO 65211, USA; e-mail: [email protected] Jochen Forster, Center for Process Biotechnology, BioCentrum-DTU, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark Ramsey A. Foty, Department of Surgery, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA; e-mail: [email protected] Erwin Frey, Abt. Theoretische Physik, Hahn-Meitner-Institut, Glienicker Str. 100, 14109 Berlin, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Michael Gelinsky, Technische UniversiHit Dresden, Institut fUr Werkstoffwissen­ schaft, Helmholtzstr. 7, 01062 Dresden, Germany; e-mail: [email protected]­ dresden.de Paramita Ghosh, University of Delhi South Campus, Department of Biophysics, New Delhi 110021, India; e-mail: [email protected] Subhendu Ghosh, University of Delhi South Campus, Department of Biophysics, New Delhi 110021, India; e-mail: [email protected] Ernst Dieter Gilles, Max-Planck-Institute for Dynamcis of Complex Technical Systems, Sandtorstrasse 1,39106 Magdeburg, Germany List of contributors 437 Martin Ginkel, Max-Planck-Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, Sandtorstrasse 1,39106 Magdeburg, Germany Hans Gruler, Ulm University, Department of Biophysics, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm Reinhart Heinrich, Institut fUr Biologie, Humboldt-UniversiUit Berlin, Invalidenstr. 42,10115 Berlin, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Andreas Herrmann, Institut fUr Biologie/Biophysik, Humboldt-Universitat zu Ber­ lin, Invalidenstr. 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany; e-mail: [email protected]­ lin.de Benno Hesst, Max-Planck-Institut fUr Molekulare Physiologie, Otto-Hahn-Str . 11, 44227 Dortmund, Germany; and Max-Planck-Institut fur Medizinische Forschung, Jahnstr. 29, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany Thomas HOfer, Institut fUr Biologie, Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin, Invaliden­ str. 42, 10115 Berlin, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Stefan Hbhme, University of Leipzig, Interdisciplinary Center for Bioinformatics, Kreuzstr. 7b, 04103 Leipzig, Germany Bert Hobmayer, Molekulare Zellbiologie, Technische Universitat Darmstadt, Schnittspahnstr. 10, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany Thomas W. Holstein, Molekulare Zellbiologie, Technische Universitat Darmstadt, Schnittspahnstr. 10, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany; e-mail: [email protected]­ stadt.de Hermann-Georg Holzhutter, Charite, Institut fUr Biochemie, Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin, Monbijoustrasse 2, 10117 Berlin, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Finn Hynne, Department of Chemistry, H.C. 0rsted Institute, Universitetsparken 5, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; e-mail: [email protected] Mads Ipsen, Fritz-Haber-Institut der Max-Planck Gesellschaft, Dept. of Physical Chemistry, Faradayweg 4-6, 14195 Berlin, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] 438 List of contributors Jeroen A.L. Jeneson, Department of Physiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 1, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands; e-mail: j.jene­ [email protected] Kunihiko Kaneko, Department of Basic Science, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, University of Tokyo, Komaba, Meguro, Tokyo 153s-8902, Japan; e-mail: [email protected] Dieter Kaufmann, Ulm University, Department of Human Genetics, Albert-Ein­ stein-Allee 11,89081 Ulm Ralf Kemkemer, Heidelberg University, Biophysical Chemistry, Institute for Physi­ cal Chemistry, 1m Neuenheimerfeld 253,69120 Heidelberg, Germany Jan T. Kim, Institut fUr Neuro- und Bioinformatik, Universitat zu Lubeck, Seeland­ str. la, 23569 Lubeck, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Markus Kirkilionis, Mathematics Department & Centre for Scientific Computing, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK; e-mail: [email protected] Birgit Knepper-Nicolai, Max-Planck-Institut fUr molekulare Zellbiologie und Genetik, Pfotenhauer Strasse 108,01307 Dresden, Germany; e-mail: knepper@mpi­ cbg.de Martin 1. Kushmerick, Departments of Bioengineering, Physiology and Biophysics, and Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle WA, USA LOic Le Goff, Physico-Chimie Curie UMR168, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75248 Paris cede x 05, France Hans-Philipp Lerch, Complex Systems Group, Fritz-Haber-Institut der Max­ Planck-Ges., Department of Physical Chemistry, Faradayweg 4-6,14195 Berlin, Ger­ many; e-mail: [email protected] Markus Loeffler, Universitat Leipzig, IMISE, Liebigstr. 27, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Kai Ludwig, Forschungszentrum fUr Elektronenmikroskopie, Freie Universitat Ber­ lin, Fabeckstrasse 36a, 14195 Berlin, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] List of contributors 439 Thomas Mair, Otto-von-Guericke-Universitat, Institut fUr Experimentelle Physik, Universitatsplatz 2, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany; e-mail: [email protected]­ magdeburg.de Rengaswamy Maithreye, Centre for Cellular & Molecular Biology, Uppal Road, Hyderabad 500007, India; e-mail: [email protected] Thomas Martinetz, Institut fUr Neuro- und Bioinformatik, Universitat zu Lubeck, Seelandstr. la, 23569 Lubeck, Germany; e-mail: [email protected]­ beck.de Hans Meinhardt, Max-Planck-Institut fUr Entwicklungsbiologie, Spemannstr. 35, 72076 Tubingen, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Michael Meyer-Hermann, Institut fUr Theoretische Physik, TU Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Alexander S. Mikhailov, Abteilung Physikalische Chemie, Fritz-Haber-Institut der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Faradayweg 4-6,14195 Berlin, Germany, e-mail: mikhai­ [email protected] Gertrud Muller, Institute for Cell Biology and Immunology, University of Stuttgart, Allmandring 31, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany Stefan C. Muller, Otto-von-Guericke-Universitat, Institut fUr Experimentelle Phy­ sik, Universitatsplatz 2,39106 Magdeburg, Germany; e-mail: stefan.mueller@phy­ sik.uni-magdeburg.de lens Nielsen, Technical University of Denmark, Center for Process Biotechnology, BioCentrum-DTU, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark; e-mail: [email protected] Lennart Olsson, Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat, Institut fUr spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, Erbertstr. 1,07743 lena, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Michal Or-Guil, Institut fur Theoretische Biologie, Humboldt-Universitat Berlin, Invalidenstr. 43,10115 Berlin, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Leiv 0yehaug, Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI), P.o. Box 25, 2027 Kjeller, Norway 440 List of contributors Andrea Parmeggiani, Hahn-Meitner-Institut, Theoretische Physik, Glienicker Str. 100, 14109 Berlin, Germany Erik Plahte, Department of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Agricultu­ ral University of Norway, 1432 As, Norway; e-mail: [email protected] Daniel Polani, Institut fur Neuro-und Bioinformatik, Seelandstr. la, 23569 Lubeck, Germany; current address: Department of Computer Science, University of Hert­ fordshire, Hatfield,ALlO 9AB, UK; e-mail: [email protected] Antonio Politi, Humboldt-UniversitiH zu Berlin, Institute of Biology, Theoretical Biophysics, Invalidenstr. 42, 10115 Berlin, Germany; e-mail: [email protected]­ berlin.de Wolfgang Pompe, Technische Universitat Dresden, Institut fUr Werkstoffwissen­ schaft, Helmholtzstr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reinhart Heinrich (1946–2006) Pioneer in Systems Biology
    NEWS & VIEWS NATURE|Vol 444|7 December 2006 OBITUARY Reinhart Heinrich (1946–2006) Pioneer in systems biology. In biology, mathematical systems analysis where he showed that the flux of was until recently nearly invisible in the reaction was shared by several the dazzling light of twentieth-century enzymes. Much later, he extended discoveries. But it has emerged from the his ideas to signal-transduction shadows in the field of systems biology, pathways, introducing control a subject buoyed by immense data sets, coefficients to dynamic processes. conveyed by heavy computing power, and Sticking to real examples, such as addressing seemingly incomprehensible the Wnt signalling and MAP kinase forms of complexity. If systems biology has pathways, he again demonstrated heroes, one of them is Reinhart Heinrich, a that new properties and constraints former professor at the Humboldt University emerge when the individual steps in Berlin, who died on 23 October, aged are combined into a complete 60. His most famous accomplishment was pathway. metabolic control theory, published in Heinrich also pointed the way to 1974 with Tom Rapoport and formulated considerations of optimality theory independently by Henrik Kacser and James and evolution that will confront A. Burns in Edinburgh, UK. systems biology for the next From the 1930s to the 1960s, biochemists century. The question of evolution were busy describing metabolic pathways, lies just beneath any effort to just as molecular biologists today are understand biology. Yet in most feverishly trying to inventory the cell’s cases, physiological function and gene-transcription and signalling circuits. evolutionary change are considered The basic kinetic features of the enzymes in distinct and are investigated by the major pathways were studied in great different people.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications for Optimal Distributions of Enzyme Concentrations and for the Distribution of flux Control
    BioSystems 54 (1999) 1–14 www.elsevier.com/locate/biosystems Competition for enzymes in metabolic pathways: Implications for optimal distributions of enzyme concentrations and for the distribution of flux control Edda Klipp *, Reinhart Heinrich Humboldt Uni6ersity Berlin, Institute of Biology, Theoretical Biophysics, In6alidenstr. 42, D-10115, Berlin, Germany Received 1 February 1999; accepted 25 April 1999 Abstract The structures of biochemical pathways are assumed to be determined by evolutionary optimization processes. In the framework of mathematical models, these structures should be explained by the formulation of optimization principles. In the present work, the principle of minimal total enzyme concentration at fixed steady state fluxes is applied to metabolic networks. According to this principle there exists a competition of the reactions for the available amount of enzymes such that all biological functions are maintained. In states which fulfil these optimization criteria the enzyme concentrations are distributed in a non-uniform manner among the reactions. This result has conse- quences for the distribution of flux control. It is shown that the flux control matrix c, the elasticity matrix o, and the vector e of enzyme concentrations fulfil in optimal states the relations cTe=e and o Te=0. Starting from a well-balanced distribution of enzymes the minimization of total enzyme concentration leads to a lowering of the SD of the flux control coefficients. © 1999 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Metabolic control theory; Evolutionary optimization; Competition; Enzyme concentrations; Flux control coefficient; Metabolic pathway; Mathematical modeling 1. Introduction optimal manner. On this basis one can draw conclusions about the actual states of metabolic The structural properties of metabolic systems systems using optimization criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Henrik Kacser 1918-1995: Metabolism of control. Westerhoff, H.V. DOI 10.1016/S0167-7799(00)88956-8 Publication date 1995 Published in Trends in Biotechnology Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Westerhoff, H. V. (1995). Henrik Kacser 1918-1995: Metabolism of control. Trends in Biotechnology, 13, 245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7799(00)88956-8 General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:25 Sep 2021 245 f orum Henrik Kacser (19184995): metabolism of control Obituary Henrik Kacser has been referred missed the rate-limiting step. He funding agency had allowed much to as the ‘pope’ of Metabolic much appreciated
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Modeling of Genetic and Biochemical Networks. Edited by James M. Bower and Hamid Bolouri Computational Molecular Biology, a Bradford Book, the MIT Press, Cambridge
    BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS. VOL 7. NO 2. 204 ^206 doi:10.1093/bib/bbl001 Advance Access publication March 9, 2006 Book Review Computational Modeling of Genetic stochastic modelling are inevitable due to the small and Biochemical Networks number of molecules in a cell [1]. These intrinsic Edited by James M. Bower and noise effects have been measured in gene expression Hamid Bolouri using fluorescent probes [2, 3]. Chapter 3, ‘A Logical Model of cis-Regulatory Control in Eukaryotic Computational Molecular Biology, Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/bib/article/7/2/204/304421 by guest on 23 September 2021 A Bradford Book, The MIT Press, Systems’ by Chiou-Hwa Yuh and others, builds Cambridge, Massachusetts; 2004; up on the theoretical framework introduced in ISBN: 0 262 52423 6; Paperback; 390pp.; Chapter 1 and presents a detailed characterization of £22.95/$35.00. a developmental biology gene network with a large number of regulatory factors. Chapters 1–3 deal with individual gene regulations. Eric Mjolsness intro- ‘Computational Modeling of Genetic and duces and reviews computational techniques, such as Biochemical Networks’ arose from a graduate neural network approaches, to study gene networks course taught by the editors in the California in Chapter 4 ‘Trainable Gene Regulation Networks Institute of Technology in 1998. The aim of the with Application to Drosophila Pattern Formation’. book is to provide instruction in the application of Special emphasis is made in the activity patterns modelling techniques in molecular and cell biology during the fruit-fly development. High-throughput to graduate students and postdoctoral researchers. experimental assays play a major role in the current It is also intended as a primer in the subject for shift from reductionist to systems biology approa- both theoretical and experimental biologists.
    [Show full text]
  • Memories of Reinhart Heinrich
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Journal of Theoretical Biology 252 (2008) 544–545 www.elsevier.com/locate/yjtbi In Memoriam Memories of Reinhart Heinrich I first met Reinhart at the symposium that Athel In April 2000, Reinhart secured lodging for me in the Cornish-Bowden organised at Il Ciocco in April 1989 that lovely house for at Humboldt University, where Marı ´ a brought together numerous researchers interested in the Rosa, my wife, came to spend a few delightful days with control and design of metabolism. We connected immedi- me, and spent time talking with Nana, Reinhart’s wife. We ately, because we had many things in common and were so spent a couple of days in Dresden at Reinhart’s mother’s like-minded. home and heard the concert in Dresden Cathedral for After much discussion of the evolution and optimisation Bach’s St. Matthew’s Passion, which Reinhart loved and of metabolism, our first work was on the optimisation of liked to play on his violin. This was a sensational glycolysis. Paco Montero had the first important idea that performance, but there was no applause at the end, the aim of evolution was to maximize the flux of ATP because, as he explained to us, there is never applause in production, and this has been instrumental for all a church in Germany. There are some things about subsequent work in the field. Germans that are hard for Spanish people to understand! I saw that Reinhart’s theory of the optimization of Reinhart was always worried about world peace. He was enzyme kinetic parameters was very important, but hard very sensitive to human suffering, was especially troubled for students.
    [Show full text]
  • Reasoning About Systems Biology Models in the Semantic Web Era
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Journal of Theoretical Biology 252 (2008) 538–543 www.elsevier.com/locate/yjtbi The markup is the model: Reasoning about systems biology models in the Semantic Web era Douglas B. Kella,c,Ã, Pedro Mendesb,c,d aSchool of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, UK bSchool of Computer Science, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, UK cThe Manchester Centre for Integrative Systems Biology, Manchester Interdisciplinary Biocentre, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, UK dVirginia Bioinformatics Institute, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Washington Street 0477, VA 24061, USA Available online 3 December 2007 Dedicated to the memory of Reinhart Heinrich (1946–2006). Abstract Metabolic control analysis, co-invented by Reinhart Heinrich, is a formalism for the analysis of biochemical networks, and is a highly important intellectual forerunner of modern systems biology. Exchanging ideas and exchanging models are part of the international activities of science and scientists, and the Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) allows one to perform the latter with great facility. Encoding such models in SBML allows their distributed analysis using loosely coupled workflows, and with the advent of the Internet the various software modules that one might use to analyze biochemical models can reside on entirely different computers and even on different continents. Optimization is at the core of many scientific and biotechnological activities, and Reinhart made many major contributions in this area, stimulating our own activities in the use of the methods of evolutionary computing for optimization. r 2007 Elsevier Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Isotopomer Subspaces As Indicators of Metabolic-Pathway Structure
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Journal of Theoretical Biology 252 (2008) 391–401 www.elsevier.com/locate/yjtbi Isotopomer subspaces as indicators of metabolic-pathway structure Philip W. Kuchela,b,Ã, David J. Philpc aSchool of Molecular and Microbial Biosciences, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia bCentre for Mathematical Biology, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia cNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia Received 18 April 2007; received in revised form 11 May 2007; accepted 15 May 2007 Available online 5 July 2007 This paper is dedicated to the memory of Professor Reinhart Heinrich of Berlin Abstract The relative abundances and rates of formation of particular isotopic isomers (isotopomers) of metabolic intermediates from 13C-labelled substrates in living cells provide information on the routes taken by the initial 13C-atoms. When a primary substrate such as 13 [U, C] D-glucose is added to human erythrocytes, the pattern of labels in terminal metabolites is determined by a set of carbon-group exchange reactions in both glycolysis and the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP). Of a given terminal metabolite, not all possible isotopomers will be produced from each possible primary substrate isotopomer. There are only 8 different 13C-isotopomers of lactate but not all of these are produced when one of the 64 possible 13C-isotopomers of glucose is used as the input substrate; thus a subset of all 63 glucose isotopomers  8 lactate isotopomers+1 unlabelled glucose  1 unlabelled lactate ¼ 505 pattern associations, would be produced if a complete experimental analysis were performed with all the glucose variants.
    [Show full text]
  • EMBC Annual Report 2005
    EMBO | EMBC annual report 2005 EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY ORGANIZATION | EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY CONFERENCE EMBO | EMBC table of contents introduction preface by Frank Gannon, EMBO 4 preface by Susan Gasser, EMBO Council 6 preface by Marja Makarow, EMBC 8 past & present timeline 12 brief history 13 EMBO | EMBC | EMBL 14 EMBO actions 2005 17 EMBC actions 2005 19 EMBO & EMBC programmes and activities fellowship programme 23 courses & workshops programme 24 world activities 25 young investigator programme 26 women in the life sciences 27 science & society programme 28 electronic information programme 29 EMBO activities The EMBO Journal 32 EMBO reports 33 Molecular Systems Biology 34 journal subject categories 35 national science reviews 36 gold medal 37 award for communication in the life sciences 38 sectoral meetings 39 plenary lectures 40 communications offi ce 41 European Life Sciences Forum (ELSF) 42 ➔ 2 table of contents appendix EMBC delegates and advisers 46 EMBC scale of contributions 53 EMBO council members 2005 54 EMBO committee members & auditors 2005 55 EMBO council members 2006 56 EMBO committee members & auditors 2006 57 EMBO members elected in 2005 58 advisory editorial boards & senior editors 2005 66 long-term fellowship awards 2005 70 long-term fellowships: statistics 84 long-term fellowships 2005: geographical distribution 86 short-term fellowship awards 2005 88 short-term fellowships: statistics 102 short-term fellowships 2005: geographical distribution 104 young investigators 2005 106 young investigators 2000 – 2004 107 young investigators: statistics 108 young investigator lectures 2005 110 courses | workshops | conferences | symposia 2005 112 plenary lectures 2005 118 participation of women in EMBO activities: statistics 120 EMBO staff 124 events in 2006 courses | workshops | conferences | conference series | symposia 2006 128 plenary lectures 2006 134 other EMBO events 2006 136 organisations and acronyms 138 ➔ 3 preface EMBO & EMBC 2005 An awkward time warp surrounds annual 1200 applications for long-term fellowships and reports.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Mechanics Behind Academic Progress
    On the Mechanics Behind Academic Progress Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Wirtschaftswissenschaften (Dr. rer. pol.) von der KIT-Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften des Karlsruher Instituts für Technologie (KIT) genehmigte DISSERTATION von B.Sc. Wi.-Ing. Lars Herberholz Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 16.12.2020 Referent: Professor Dr. Berthold U. Wigger Korreferentin: Professor Dr. Nora Szech Karlsruhe, Dezember 2020 Contents List of Tables ........................................................................................................................v List of Figures ..................................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. ix 1 Introduction................................................................................................................. 1 2 Collapsing Stars and the Diffusion of Scientific Knowledge ............................................ 3 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Data and Research Design............................................................................................ 5 2.2.1 Data Compilation ............................................................................................. 5 2.2.2 The Scientific Elite ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop 2: Understanding the Control of Metabolism
    Understanding the Control of Metabolism C1net Workshop 2; Day 2 David Fell [email protected] http://mudshark.brookes.ac.uk C1netW2 2015 L3: - p. 1 Outline Introduction ● Outline ● The context: manipulating ■ Elements of Metabolic Control Analysis (MCA) metabolism ● The rate–limiting step concept ◆ The flux control coefficient ● Quotes ● Critique of ‘rate–limiting’ steps Control Coefficients ◆ Control coefficients and enzyme kinetics Control coefficients and enzyme kinetics ◆ Flux control coefficients in context Elasticities Connectivity theorem Relevance of flux control coefficients Problems C1netW2 2015 L3: - p. 2 The context: manipulating metabolism Introduction Two different problems: ● Outline ● The context: manipulating ■ Easy: stopping flux to a product through a pathway. (Pick an metabolism ● The rate–limiting step concept essential enzyme; knock out by mutation or inhibition.) ● Quotes ● Critique of ‘rate–limiting’ steps Control Coefficients ■ Hard: increasing flux to a product through a pathway. Control coefficients and enzyme kinetics Elasticities Connectivity theorem Why isn’t the solution to the hard problem: Relevance of flux control 1. find the rate–limiting enzyme, and coefficients Problems 2. increase the amount of this enzyme? C1netW2 2015 L3: - p. 3 The rate–limiting step concept Introduction ● Outline ● The context: manipulating metabolism ● The rate–limiting step concept When a process is conditioned as to its rapidity by a number of ● Quotes ● Critique of ‘rate–limiting’ steps separate factors, the rate of the process is limited by the pace Control Coefficients of the slowest factor. Blackman (1905). Control coefficients and enzyme kinetics Elasticities Connectivity theorem Relevance of flux control coefficients Problems C1netW2 2015 L3: - p. 4 Quotes Introduction ● Outline ■ The first committed step being irreversible .
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Book
    International Symposium Optical Analysis of Biomolecular Machines July 13th – 16th, 2006 Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany Symposium Outline The aim of this international symposium to be held in the context of the DFG Priority Programme “Optical Analysis of Supramolecular Biological complexes” (DFG SPP1128; coordinator C.Cremer/Heidelberg) is to discuss the novel developments and applications of optical analyses of biological nanostructures, their components and their underlying dynamics. The emphasis will be in joining together the methodological developments with the biological applications within each and every session; wherever possible, computer simulations and kinetic modeling will be included. Organizers: M. Cristina Cardoso (Berlin) www.mdc-berlin.de/cardosolab Christoph Cremer (Heidelberg) www.kip.uni-heidelberg.de/AG_Cremer/english/index.html The Symposium is sponsored by: We gratefully acknowledge sponsorship from: Bfi Optilas GmbH* Chromaphor Analysen-Technik GmbH* German Society for Cell Biology Hamamatsu Photonics Deutschland GmbH* ibidi GmbH* Invitrogen GmbH* JPK Instruments AG* KEYENCE DEUTSCHLAND GmbH* LaVision BioTec GmbH* Leica Microsystems Vertrieb GmbH* Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology Okolab* Olympus PicoQuant GmbH* Spectra-Physics GmbH* Visitron Systems GmbH* Carl Zeiss MicroImaging GmbH* *Industrial Exhibition To conference rooms To conference rooms Reception PicoQuant Spectra- Visitron Physics JPK Zeiss Invitrogen BFi Okolab Keyence Ibidi Chromaphor Leica LaVision Hamamatsu OPTiLAS To posters AZ Optical Tools A5.indd 1 16.05.2006 9:33:25 Uhr General Information General Information Conference Office (MDC.C) Phone: +49 - (0) 30 9406 4824 Fax: +49 - (0) 30 9406 2206 Opening hours: Thursday, June 13 08:00 - 21:30 Friday, June 14 08:00 - 19:00 Saturday, June 15 08:00 - 19:00 Sunday, June 16 08:00 - 19:00 Email: Margund Bach [email protected] Michaela M.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Two-Component Biochemical Systems in Interacting Cells; Synchronization and Desynchronization of Oscillations and Multiple Steady States
    BioSystems 43 (1997) 1–24 Dynamics of two-component biochemical systems in interacting cells; Synchronization and desynchronization of oscillations and multiple steady states Jana Wolf, Reinhart Heinrich * Humboldt-Uni6ersity, Institute of Biology, Theoretical Biophysics, In6alidenstrasse 42, D-10115 Berlin, Germany Received 9 October 1996 Abstract Systems of interacting cells containing a metabolic pathway with an autocatalytic reaction are investigated. The individual cells are considered to be identical and are described by differential equations proposed for the description of glycolytic oscillations. The coupling is realized by exchange of metabolites across the cell membranes. No constraints are introduced concerning the number of interacting systems, that is, the analysis applies also to populations with a high number of cells. Two versions of the model are considered where either the product or the substrate of the autocatalytic reaction represents the coupling metabolite (Model I and II, respectively). Model I exhibits a unique steady state while model II shows multistationary behaviour where the number of steady states increases strongly with the number of cells. The characteristic polynomials used for a local stability analysis are factorized into polynomials of lower degrees. From the various factors different Hopf bifurcations may result in leading for model I, either to asynchronous oscillations with regular phase shifts or to synchronous oscillations of the cells depending on the strength of the coupling and on the cell density. The multitude of steady states obtained for model II may be grouped into one class of states which are always unstable and another class of states which may undergo bifurcations leading to synchronous oscillations within subgroups of cells.
    [Show full text]