DOCSLIB.ORG

Report of the Working Group on North Atlantic Salmon (WGNAS)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report of the Working Group on North Atlantic Salmon (WGNAS) ICES WGNAS REPORT 2018 ICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE ICES CM 2018/ACOM:21 Report of the Working Group on North Atlantic Salmon (WGNAS) 4–13 April 2018 Woods Hole, MA, USA International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H. C. Andersens Boulevard 44–46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: ICES. 2018. Report of the Working Group on North Atlantic Salmon (WGNAS), 4–13 April 2018, Woods Hole, MA, USA. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:21. 386 pp. For permission to reproduce material from this publication, please apply to the Gen- eral Secretary. The document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. © 2018 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea ICES WGNAS REPORT 2018 | i Contents Executive summary ................................................................................................................ 1 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Main tasks .............................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Participants ............................................................................................................ 6 1.3 Management framework for salmon in the North Atlantic ............................ 7 1.4 Management objectives ........................................................................................ 7 1.5 Reference points and application of precaution ............................................... 8 2 Atlantic salmon in the North Atlantic area ............................................................. 10 2.1 Catches of North Atlantic salmon .................................................................... 10 2.1.1 Nominal catches of salmon ................................................................... 10 2.1.2 Catch and release ................................................................................... 11 2.1.3 Unreported catches ................................................................................ 12 2.2 Farming and sea ranching of Atlantic salmon ................................................ 13 2.2.1 Production of farmed Atlantic salmon ............................................... 13 2.2.2 Harvest of ranched Atlantic salmon .................................................... 13 2.3 NASCO has asked ICES to report on significant, new or emerging threats to, or opportunities for, salmon conservation and management ........................................................................................................ 14 2.3.1 Diseases and parasites ........................................................................... 14 2.3.2 Pink salmon captures in 2017 in the North Atlantic area ................. 17 2.3.3 Interactions between striped bass and Atlantic salmon in eastern Canada ....................................................................................... 20 2.3.4 Tracking and acoustic tagging studies in Canada ............................. 23 2.3.5 Progress with implementing the Quality Norm for Norwegian salmon populations .......................................................... 24 2.3.6 The impact of capture and tagging on estimates of Atlantic salmon adult return rates ...................................................................... 25 2.3.7 New opportunities for sampling salmon at sea ................................. 26 2.3.8 Update on poor juvenile recruitment in UK (England & Wales) ...................................................................................................... 28 2.3.9 Progress in stock assessment models; embedding Atlantic salmon stock assessment within an integrated Bayesian life cycle modelling framework .................................................................. 28 2.3.10 A conceptual framework for evaluating marine mortality in Atlantic salmon ...................................................................................... 29 2.3.11 Update on the Workshop on Current Status of Knowledge, Data, and Research Efforts on Atlantic Salmon at Greenland ............................................................................................................... 31 2.3.12 Progress with establishing scale archive/ biochronology repositories ............................................................................................. 33 ii | ICES WGNAS REPORT 2018 2.4 NASCO has asked ICES to provide a review of examples of successes and failures in wild salmon restoration and rehabilitation and develop a classification of activities which could be recommended under various conditions or threats to the persistence of populations ................................................................................. 34 2.4.1 Report of WGERAAS ............................................................................ 34 2.4.2 Establishment of a captive breeding Programme in Scotia- Fundy region of Canada ....................................................................... 36 2.5 Reports from ICES expert group relevant to North Atlantic salmon .......... 36 2.5.1 WGRECORDS ........................................................................................ 36 2.6 ICES and the International Year of the Salmon .............................................. 37 2.7 NASCO has asked ICES to provide a compilation of tag releases by country in 2017 .................................................................................................... 38 2.8 NASCO has asked ICES to identify relevant data deficiencies, monitoring needs and research requirements ................................................ 38 3 Northeast Atlantic Commission area ....................................................................... 71 3.1 NASCO has requested ICES to describe the key events of the 2017 fisheries ................................................................................................................ 71 3.1.1 Fishing at Faroes .................................................................................... 71 3.1.2 Key events in NEAC homewater fisheries ......................................... 71 3.1.3 Gear and effort ....................................................................................... 71 3.1.4 Catches .................................................................................................... 72 3.1.5 Catch per unit of effort .......................................................................... 72 3.1.6 Age composition of catches .................................................................. 73 3.1.7 Farmed and ranched salmon in catches .............................................. 74 3.1.8 National origin of catches ..................................................................... 74 3.1.9 Exploitation indices for NEAC stocks ................................................. 75 3.2 Management objectives and reference points ................................................. 75 3.2.1 NEAC conservation limits .................................................................... 75 3.2.2 Progress with setting river-specific conservation limits ................... 76 3.3 Status of stocks .................................................................................................... 76 3.3.1 The NEAC PFA run-reconstruction model ........................................ 76 3.3.2 Changes to national input data for the NEAC PFA run- reconstruction model ............................................................................. 77 3.3.3 Changes to the NEAC PFA run-reconstruction model ..................... 77 3.3.4 Description of national stocks and NEAC stock complexes as derived from the NEAC PFA run-reconstruction model ............ 78 3.3.5 Compliance with river-specific conservation limits .......................... 80 3.3.6 Marine survival (return rates) for NEAC stocks ............................... 81 3.4 PFA Forecasts ...................................................................................................... 83 3.4.1 Description of the forecast model ........................................................ 83 3.4.2 Results of the NEAC stock complex Bayesian forecast models ..................................................................................................... 84 3.4.3 Results of the NEAC country level Bayesian forecast models and probabilities of PFAs attaining SERs ........................................... 84 ICES WGNAS REPORT 2018 | iii 3.5 Catch options or alternative management advice .......................................... 86 3.5.1 Catch advice for Faroes ......................................................................... 86 3.5.2 Relevant factors to be considered in management ............................ 88 3.6 Framework of Indicators ................................................................................... 89 3.6.1 Background ............................................................................................. 89 3.6.2 Progress in 2018...................................................................................... 89 3.6.3 Next steps ...............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The European Union and the Barents Region
    The European Union and the Barents Region lt) (W) ........... v - . ww f () I '"../'::!")/-) -) U 'Ll7 n../c- V t./i ::I -, t../d' ~, <-?•'' )/ '1 What is the European Union? Growing from six Members States in 1952 to 15 by The European Commission, headed by 20 Commis­ 1995, the European Union today embraces more than sioners, is the motor of European integration. It 370 million people, from the Arctic Circle to Portugal , suggests the policies to be developed and also from Ireland to Crete. Though rich in diversity, the implements them. The Commission is the executive Member States share certain common values. By instrument of the European Union. It sees to it that the entering into partnership together, their aim is to Member States adequately apply the decisions taken promote democracy, peace, prosperity and a fairer and situates itself in the middle of the decision-making distribution of wealth. process of the European Union . The Members of the Commission operate with a clear distribution of tasks. After establishing a true frontier-free Europe by For example, Mr Hans van den Broek has overall eliminating the remaining barriers to trade among responsibility for external relations with European themselves, the Member States of t he European Countries and the New Independent States. Union have resolved to respond to the major economic and social challenges of the day - to The European Parliament represents the people of establish a common currency, boost employment and Europe. It examines law proposals and has the final strengthen Europe's role in world affairs. In so doing, word on the budget.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Human and Ecosystem Dynamics in the Kola
    ARCTIC VOL. 57, N0. 4 (DECEMBER 2004) P. 375–388 Understanding Human and Ecosystem Dynamics in the Kola Arctic: A Participatory Integrated Study ALEXEY VOINOV,1,2 LARS BROMLEY,3 ELIZABETH KIRK,3 ANATOLIY KORCHAK,4 JOSHUA FARLEY,1 TATIANA MOISEENKO,5 TATIANA KRASOVSKAYA,6 ZOYA MAKAROVA,7 VLADIMIR MEGORSKI,7 VLADIMIR SELIN,4 GALINA KHARITONOVA4 and ROBERT EDSON8 (Received 18 June 2003; accepted in revised form 26 July 2004) ABSTRACT. The Lake Imandra watershed is located in one of the most developed regions in the Arctic—the Kola Peninsula of Russia. Approximately 300 000 people live on the roughly 27000 km2 watershed, making it one of the most densely populated areas of the Arctic. Most of the people are involved in large-scale mineral extraction and processing and the infrastructure needed to support this industry. This paper reports the results of a pilot project staged for the Lake Imandra watershed that has put human dynamics within the framework of ecosystem change to integrate available information and formulate conceptual models of likely future scenarios. The observation period is one of both rapid economic growth and human expansion, with an overall economic decline in the past decade. We are applying the Participatory Integrated Assessment (PIA) approach to integrate information, identify information gaps, generate likely future scenarios, and link scientific findings to the decision-making process. We found an increasingly vulnerable human population in varying states of awareness about their local environment and fully cognizant of their economic troubles, with many determined to attempt maintenance of relatively high population densities in the near future even as many residents of northern Russia migrate south.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Potential Risk for Kola's Population from Radiological
    Assessment of Potential Risk for Kola’s Population from Radiological Impact of Accident on Spent Nuclear Fuel Facilities Andrey Naumov Sergey Morozov Pavel Amossov Alexander Mahura Mining Institute, Vsevolod Koshkin Kola Science Centre Yuri Federenko Alexander Baklanov Institute of Northern Ecology (Scientific Advisor) Problems, Kola Science Centre Danish Metrological Institute Northern Studies Working Paper cerum, Centre for Regional Science No. 21:2001 se-90187 Umeå Sweden Umeå University cerum, Centre for Regional Science Assessment of Potential Risk for Kola’s Population from Radiological Impact of Accident on Spent Nuclear Fuel Facilities Andrey Naumov Sergey Morozov Pavel Amossov Alexander Mahura Mining Institute, Vsevolod Koshkin Kola Science Centre Yuri Federenko Institute of Northern Ecology Alexander Baklanov Problems, Kola Science Centre (Scientific Advisor), Danish Meterological Institute cerum Northern Studies Working Paper no. 21 isbn 91-7305-105-5 issn 1400-1969 Address: Cerum, Umeå University, se-901 87 Umeå, Sweden Telephone: +46-90-786.6079, Fax: +46-90-786.5121 www.umu.se/cerum [email protected] 4 Modelling and Visualizing a Nuclear Accident’s Short Term Impact on Transportation Flows Table of Contents Table of Contents, 5 List of Abbreviations, 7 List of Figures, 9 List of Tables, 11 The Project “Nuclear Problems, Risk Perceptions of, and Societal Responses to, Nuclear Waste in the Barents Region” - an Acknowledgement, 13 Executive Summary, 14 Introduction, 17 1Modern Approaches to the Risk Analysis, 21 1.1. Base of risk analysis, 21 1.2. Methods of realization of the risk analysis, 24 1.3. Main parameters of risk, 25 1.4. The methods of quantitative analysis of risk, 26 1.5.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Contribution to the Barents Encyclopedia Kola Is a Town in The
    Contribution to the Barents Encyclopedia “Medium length” article on the “Kola” by Pavel V. Fedorov Kola is a town in the northern part of the Murmansk Oblast, located near the mouths of the Kola and Tuloma Rivers flowing into the Kola Bay. It is adjacent to the southern part of Murmansk city. Kola has been known as a settlement since 1556. It developed into a base of Murmansk fishery. In 1565, there were only three households, in 1574, growing into 44, and, in 1608, 83 households. Until the second half of the 19th century it was the only settlement in the Barents Sea coastal region with a permanent population. It was, until the beginning of the 20th century, regularly visited by fishermen who annually travelled from the Pomor villages to the Murmansk coast and back. Kola was a Russian settlement, both in terms of the ethnic origin of its population and in terms of local traditions. The Finnish scholar Elias Lönnrot, who visited Russian Lapland in 1837, was surprised at the number of different ethnic groups in this area. People spoke many different languages creating a a serious “linguistic obstacle” for an unacquainted traveller. It was only in Kola, as Lönnrot later recalled, that he “started to speak Russian”. Kola became a stronghold of Russian statehood in the north of Europe. From the 1560s until the foundation of Arkhangelsk (in 1584) it was an important centre for international trade in the Russian North. In the years 1582–1858 and 1883–1899 it was the administrative centre of the Kola district (uyezd).
    [Show full text]
  • The Kola Peninsula: Geography, History and Resources GENNADY P
    ARCTIC VOL. 47, NO. 1 (MARCH 1994) P. 1-15 The Kola Peninsula: Geography, History and Resources GENNADY P. LUZIN, MICHAEL PRETES* and VLADIMIR V. VASILIEV’ (Received 27August 1992; accepted in revised form 25 May 1993) ABSTRACT. The Kola Peninsula in northwest Russia is one ofthe most important economic regions in thecircumpolar North. The region contains valuable natural resources, including a wide variety of mineral and fish resources, and is proximate to the large gas fields of the Barents Sea. A large population, industrial complexes, and military infrastructure are also characteristic of the region. The Kola Peninsula developed rapidly during the Soviet period (1917-92) under the principles of socialist development policy. This policy favoured extensive resource extraction and industrialization and resulted in increased northern settlement, much of it involuntary. Soviet development policy prompted the opening of new mines and the construction of smelters and refining facilities, while Soviet military policy necessitated the establishment of large military basing operations. Resource development and processing have led to severe environmental damage in the region and beyond. This paper describes the geographical features of the Kola Peninsula and the region’s development history andcontains data on natural and labour resources. Key words: Kola Peninsula, Murmansk Region, Murmansk, Russian Arctic, Soviet Arctic, natural resources, economic development, militarization &SUMÉ. La presqu’île de Kola dansle nord-ouestde la Russie est l’unedes plus importantes zones économiques du Grand Nord circumpolaire. La région contient de précieuses ressources naturelles, y compris une grande variété de ressources minières et de poisson, et elle est proche des champs gaziers de la mer de Barents.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Cultural Characteristics of the Russian Indigenous Communities in the Barents Region: Political and Legal Perspectives
    Kudryashova, EV, et al. 2020. Socio-cultural characteristics of the Russian Indigenous communities in the Barents region: Political and legal perspectives. Elem Sci Anth, 8: 48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.445 RESEARCH ARTICLE Socio-cultural characteristics of the Russian Indigenous communities in the Barents region: Political and legal perspectives Elena V. Kudryashova*, Maksim Y. Zadorin* and Elena Gladun† Legal regulation of socio-cultural processes taking place in the Barents Euro-Arctic Region (BEAR) is not Downloaded from http://online.ucpress.edu/elementa/article-pdf/8/1/445/474504/elementa.445.pdf by guest on 24 September 2021 effective without involving indigenous communities, which is a specific population group representing the traditional ethno-cultural landscape of the region, unchanged for centuries and affected by globalization. Owing to the cross-border nature of the BEAR, socio-cultural characteristics acquire special synergetic properties determining the vectors of intergovernmental cooperation. With areas of its land making up the largest part of the BEAR, Russia seems to be the key actor in its socio-cultural development. It is dif- ficult to estimate the progress of the unity without understanding the legal and political background of Russia in the field of indigenous issues. This paper sheds light on the policy and regulations on indigenous- related issues in Russia by examining five cases of regions which are part of the Russian Arctic Zone and the BEAR members. The authors compare the essential actions and measures the Russian Arctic regions have taken for complying with the international indigenous agenda. The paper also makes an effort to examine the potential for cooperation in the BEAR through establishing institutional, political and legal mechanisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Stakeholder Engagement Plan
    CONSTUCTION OF LAVNA COAL TRANSSHIPMENT TERMINAL (MURMANSK REGION, RUSSIAN FEDERATION) STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN Ecoline Environmental Assessment Centre Moscow 2018 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ CONSTUCTION OF LAVNA COAL TRANSSHIPMENT TERMINAL (MURMANSK REGION, RUSSIAN FEDERATION) STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN Prepared by: Ecoline Environmental Assessment Centre (Moscow, Russia) Director: Dr. Marina V. Khotuleva ___________________________ Tel./Fax: +7 495 951 65 85 Address: 21, Build.8, Bolshaya Tatarskaya, 115184, Moscow, Russian Federation Mobile: +7 903 5792099 e-mail: [email protected] Prepared for: Black Sea Trade and Development Bank (BSTDB) Moscow 2018 2 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ LIST OF ABBREVIATION BSTDB Black Sea Trade and Development Bank CTT coal transshipment terminal EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EHS environmental, health and safety ESAP Environmental and Social Acton Plan ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment IFC International Financial Corporation IFC International Finance Corporation IFIs International finance institutions LLC Limited Liability Company MTH Murmansk Transport Hub NGO non-governmental organization NTS non-technical summary OVOS National Environmental Impact Assessment (Russian abbreviation); abbreviated name RAS Russian Academy of Sciences KAE Kola Archaeological Expedition RF Russian Federation SEP Stakeholder Engagement Plan SMEs small and medium
    [Show full text]
  • Occurrence of Fish Species in the Inland Water of Murmansk Region (Russia): Research in 1972-2021
    Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e68131 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.9.e68131 Data Paper Occurrence of fish species in the inland water of Murmansk Region (Russia): research in 1972-2021 Elena Zubova‡, Nikolay Kashulin‡‡, Petr Terentyev , Alexey Melekhin§, Roman Konstantinovich Fedorov|, Sergei Shalygin¶ ‡ INEP KSC RAS, Apatity, Russia § PABGI KSC RAS, Apatity, Russia | ISDCT SB RAS, Irkutsk, Russia ¶ New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, United States of America Corresponding author: Elena Zubova ([email protected]), Nikolay Kashulin ([email protected]), Petr Terentyev ([email protected]), Alexey Melekhin ([email protected]), Roman Konstantinovich Fedorov ([email protected]), Sergei Shalygin ([email protected]) Academic editor: Yahui Zhao Received: 01 May 2021 | Accepted: 20 May 2021 | Published: 28 May 2021 Citation: Zubova E, Kashulin N, Terentyev P, Melekhin A, Fedorov RK, Shalygin S (2021) Occurrence of fish species in the inland water of Murmansk Region (Russia): research in 1972-2021. Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e68131. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e68131 Abstract Background Knowledge about the distribution of organisms on Earth is important backbone of biological sciences and especially for deeper understanding of biogeography. However, much of the existing distributional data are scattered throughout a multitude of sources (including in different languages), such as taxonomic publications, checklists and natural history collections and often, bringing them together is difficult. Development of the digital storage facilities may prevent loss of important data (Ruchin et al. 2020). Project GBIF is a good example of a successful data storage facility, which allows investigators to publish biodiversity data in one safe place in one uniform format.
    [Show full text]
  • 55 Presentation of the ICES Advice to the Council
    Council CNL(17)55 Presentation of the ICES Advice to the Council sal.oth.nasco North Atlantic Salmon Stocks Terms of Reference With respect to Atlantic salmon in the North Atlantic area 1.1 provide an overview of salmon catches and landings by country, including unreported catches and catch and release, and production of farmed and ranched Atlantic salmon in 2016; 1.2 report on significant new or emerging threats to, or opportunities for, salmon conservation and management; 1.3 provide a review of examples of successes and failures in wild salmon restoration and rehabilitation and develop a classification of activities which could be recommended under various conditions or threats to the persistence of populations; 1.4 provide a summary of the available diet data for marine life stages of Atlantic salmon and identify key prey species at different life stages; 1.5 provide a description of the potential future impacts of climate change on salmon stock dynamics; 1.6 provide a compilation of tag releases by country in 2016; and 1.7 identify relevant data deficiencies, monitoring needs and research requirements. Background • Management framework for salmon in the North Atlantic • Reference points and application of precaution 1.1 overview of salmon catches and landings, unreported catches, catch and release, and production of farmed and ranched Atlantic salmon in 2016 • nominal catch : round, fresh weight of fish caught and retained • total nominal catch for 2016: 1209 t • second lowest in the time‐series, after 2014 Area Catch (t) 2014 2015 2016 NEAC 954 1081 1043 (86%) NAC 122 144 140 (12%) WGC 58 57 27 (2%) Total 1134 1282 1209 1.1 overview of salmon catches and landings, Location of catches (Figure 3): • NEAC : 62% in‐river , 4% estuarine, 35% coastal.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Military Posture in the Arctic
    Research Paper Mathieu Boulègue Russia and Eurasia Programme | June 2019 Russia’s Military Posture in the Arctic Managing Hard Power in a ‘Low Tension’ Environment Russia’s Military Posture in the Arctic: Managing Hard Power in a ‘Low Tension’ Environment Contents Summary 2 1. Introduction 4 2. Perimeter Control Around the ‘Bastion’ 6 3. Military Infrastructure and Logistics in the Russian Arctic 11 4. Arctic Force Structure 16 5. Russia’s Arctic Military Intentions 24 6. Military Implications for Other Arctic States, NATO and its Partners 28 7. Conclusion 35 Appendix 36 Acronyms and Abbreviations 43 About the Author 44 Acknowledgments 44 1 | Chatham House Russia’s Military Posture in the Arctic: Managing Hard Power in a ‘Low Tension’ Environment Summary • Russia’s military posture in the Arctic is informed by the changing geopolitical environment, and can no longer be considered in isolation from the country’s growing tensions with the West. In this sense, the period of ‘Arctic exceptionalism’ – in which, by convention, the region has been treated as a zone of depoliticized cooperation – is coming to an end. • Certainly, the Russian Arctic is not exceptional for Moscow in military-operational terms. Russia’s leadership has accorded the same threat perception to the Arctic as it has to other theatres of operation. It seeks consistent control over foreign military activity in the Russian Arctic, and ensured access for Russian armed forces, particularly the Northern Fleet. Russia’s military build-up in the Russian Arctic and the Kremlin’s intentions are, at least for now, defensive in nature. • Russia’s military build-up in the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation (AZRF) primarily aims to ensure perimeter defence of the Kola Peninsula for the survivability of second-strike nuclear assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Where Russia Begins
    Land Where Russia Begins Murmansk region is by right considered to be the Land, where Russia begins, and the Northern gates of our country. Important geopolitical position, available all-the-year-round navigation with direct access to international shipping commercial routes combined with source of mineral and raw materials unique in its composition and reserves has made it possible to form large industrial complex within the territory of the region. The region provides 100% of the need of Russia in apatite concentrate, to a considerable extent – in nickel, copper, iron-ore concentrate and other minerals. The region applies to the number of the most power-possessed territories of the country and it gives to the country every sixth ton of food fish products produced in Russia. The region has stable volume of industrial production. Large investments are allocated for the development of ore fields – OAO (Public joint stock company) “Apatity”, OAO “Kolskaya GMK (Mining & Smelting company), ОАО “Olkon”, expansion of capacities in the production of aluminium in Kandalaksha aluminium works of the company ОАО “SUAL”, for the development of Murmansk marine commercial port and Murmansk marine fishing port. The consumer’s market of goods and services is in dynamic progress. The banking system in the region functions quite stable ensuring high rate of crediting for corporations and the population. The wages increase, the increase in cash income of the population, in pensions are visible. Large investment projects of the Federal importance are implemented in Murmansk region. Among them – the complex development of Murmansk transport junction, of oil and gas branch in the Arctic, development of new mineral deposits (“Fedorova tundra”, “Oleny ruchey”), building of new terminals in Murmansk marine commercial port, replenishment of the fleet with vessels including ice-class vessels for the Northern shipping route.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Ethnic Cleansing on the Kola Peninsula
    3. The Nordic Threat: Soviet Ethnic Cleansing on the Kola Peninsula Andrej Kotljarchuk It’s the hidden enemy, whom we don’t know, who is dangerous. We know all the people [in this report] and have files on them. The day will come when we’ll settle accounts with them. Stalin (cited in Bazhanov 1990: 93) Access to previously unavailable sources from Soviet archives has brought to light a little-known history, namely ‘national operations’ of the Soviet secret police (NKVD) and the deportation of minorities, one of the central features of Stalinist repression (Samuelson and Sorokin 2007: 739–56). Local studies have already provided a deeper understanding of the nature and mechanism of this repression (Vatlin 2004; Kotljarchuk 2012a). How- ever, most previous studies have been concerned with large minority groups (Iwanow 1991; Mann 2005; Dönninghaus 2009) or with the deportation of minorities during the Second World War (Nekrich 1978; Sword 1994; Poljan 2004). This chapter focuses on the inter-related phases and dimen- sions of state-run violence in a short-term and long-term perspective and on a case uncharted by previous research. Investigating local material in the broader context, it examines Soviet large-scale violence towards Nordic minorities of the Polar area as a gradual process of ethnic cleansing. It also reconsiders the ways in which the Soviet state dramatically changed the population structure of the Kola Peninsula and fully integrated this region into the ‘pure’ Russian context. Historians have put forward many explanations for the mass repression of various ethnic groups committed by the Soviet Union; two approaches are particularly relevant.
    [Show full text]