2019 Potomac-Garrett Sustainable Forest Management Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2019 Potomac-Garrett Sustainable Forest Management Plan Sustainable Forest Management Plan FOR Potomac – Garrett State Forest Sustainable Forests for People, the Bay and Appalachia FOREST SERVICE Updated: 2019.02.28 POTOMAC-GARRETT STATE FOREST 18,632 ACRES 1 Table of Contents Preface 6 Index of Tables 7 Index of Figures 8 Abbreviations 9 Chapter 1 - Background and History of the Forest 11 1.1 Introduction 11 1.2 State Forest Planning and Sustainable Forest Management 14 1.3 Planning Process 16 1.4 Purpose and Goals of the Plan 17 1.5 Future Land Acquisition Goals for Potomac-Garrett State Forest 18 Chapter 2 - Resource Assessment 20 2.1 Garrett County 20 2.2 General Geology and Soils 21 2.3 Water Resources 21 2.4 Wildlife Resources 23 2.5 Endangered and Threatened Species of Special Concern 24 2.6 Plant Communities and Habitats of Special Concern 27 2.7 Important Wildlife Species 29 2.8 Migratory Birds of Special Concern 32 2.9 Fish Species of Special Concern 33 2.10 The Forests of Garrett County 33 2.11 Forest Management in Garrett County 35 2.12 The Forest Products Industry 36 2.13 People and Forests in Garrett County 36 2.14 Landscape Considerations 39 2.15 Water Quality Issues 41 Chapter 3 - Resource Characterization 43 3.1 The Forests 43 3.2 Old Growth Forest 45 2 3.3 Forest Production 45 3.4 Water Quality 46 3.5 Watersheds 46 3.6 Soils 49 3.7 Complexes 50 3.8 Compartments 51 Chapter 4 - Land Management Area Guidelines 54 4.1 Land Management Areas 54 4.2 General Forest 55 4.3 Ecologically Significant Areas ESA and Other State Protected Lands 55 4.4 Forested Riparian Buffers 55 4.5 Wildlife Habitat Areas 56 4.6 Visual Quality Areas 56 4.7 Non-Forested Lands 56 Chapter 5 - Forest Management 57 5.1 High Conservation Value Forest HCVF 57 5.2 Potomac-Garrett State Forest Mapping 57 5.3 Forest Types and Silvicultural Practices 58 5.4 Cultural Heritage and Indigenous Peoples 61 5.5 Forest Management Guidelines 62 5.6 General Management Areas 62 5.7 High Conservation Value Forest Areas 63 5.8 Forest Management Activities 66 5.9 Forest Harvesting Equipment 69 5.10 Chemical Use 70 5.11 Financial Returns 71 5.12 Forest Modeling 71 5.13 Inventory and Monitoring 72 5.14 Forest Certification 74 5.15 Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) – Guidelines & Principles 74 5.16 Practice Scheduling Annual Work Plans (AWP) 76 5.17 Non-Silvicultural Forest Management Activities 76 Chapter 6 - Water Quality Areas: Riparian Forest Buffers and Wetlands 78 3 6.1 Introduction 78 6.2 Riparian Forest Buffers High Conservation Value Forest (HCVF) 78 6.3 Non-Operational Wetlands 80 6.4 Riparian Forest Buffer Delineation for High Conservation Value Forest 82 6.5 Management and Function of Expanded Riparian Forest Buffers 82 6.6 Significant Vernal Pools 83 Chapter 7 - Ecologically Significant Areas (ESA) 89 7.1 Ecologically Significant Areas (ESA) Defined 89 7.2 Ecologically Significant Area (ESA) Descriptions 91 7.3 Prescribed Burning within ESAs 109 7.4 Use of Herbicides/Pesticides within ESAs 109 7.5 Annual Work Plans 109 7.6 Wildlands 109 7.7 Historic and Archaeological Areas 110 Chapter 8 - Wildlife Habitat: Protection and Management 112 8.1 Introduction 112 8.2 Invertebrates 112 8.3 Non-Game Small Animals 114 8.4 Reptiles 114 8.5 Amphibians 115 8.6 Forest Game Birds and Mammals 115 8.7 Upland Game Birds and Mammals 120 8.8 Waterfowl 121 8.9 Aquatic Furbearers 122 8.10 Upland Furbearers 123 8.11 Management Objectives and Strategies 125 8.12 Rare Threatened and Endangered Wildlife Species 127 8.13 Fishery Assessment 129 Chapter 9 - Public Use & Education 137 9.1 Background 137 9.2 Current and Future Public Uses 137 9.3 Education and Public Outreach 149 9.4 Implementation 150 4 Chapter 10 - Monitoring Plan 151 10.1 Introduction 151 10.2 Monitoring Plan 151 10.3 Tier I Landscape scale Longterm Monitoring 152 10.4 Tier II Stand Complex-level Medium-term Monitoring 155 10.5 Tier III Management Activity-based Short-term Monitoring 157 10.6 Procedures by Forest Management Actions 158 Chapter 11 - Annual Work Plan Process 161 11.1 Annual Work Plan 161 11.2 Annual Work Plan Time Table 163 11.3 Contents of the Annual Work Plan 164 Chapter 12 - Operational Management 166 12.1 Introduction 166 12.2 Funding Sources 166 12.3 Operational Cost 167 12.4 Summary 172 Appendix 173 Appendix A - Citizens Advisory Committee 173 Appendix B - FSC US Forest Management Standard v1.0 174 Appendix C - Sustainable Forestry Initiative 176 Appendix D - Soils Management Groups 181 Appendix E - Rare, Threatened & Endangered Species 185 Appendix F - SFI Management Review & Continual Improvement 187 Appendix G - Glossary 188 Appendix H - Biological Diversity 190 Appendix I - Maps ?? Appendix J - Conifer Component of the Forests of Garrett County 225 Appendix G - Forest Resource Planning Determination of Annual Incremental Growth 235 Appendix L - Black Bear Bait Station Suvery Results 239 5 Preface The information contained within the Potomac-Garrett State Forest Sustainable Management Plan was derived from a variety of sources. These include the 1993 Potomac-Garrett State Forest - Ten Year Resource Management Plan, and the 2010 Sustainable Forest Management Plan for Pocomoke State Forest. Data presented in tables and charts that are specific to Potomac-Garrett State Forest was generated from field data collected by the Maryland Forest Service and the Maryland Wildlife & Heritage Service from 2002 through 2009. Other information contained within this document is referenced as to its source. The 18,632 acres Potomac-Garrett State Forest is located entirely within Garrett County. 6 Index of Tables Table 1.1 Acquisi(on and Disposi(on History of Potomac-Garre9 State Forest Table 2.1 Land Use in Garre9 County Table 2.10 Area of Timberland by Forest Type and Ownership Group Table 2.13.2 Popula(on Characteris(cs of Maryland and Garre9 County Table 3.1 Forest Diversity Analysis Table 3.3.1 Potomac-Garre9 S.F. & Savage River S.F. as % of Garre9 County Table 3.3.2 Potomac-Garre9 State Forest as a % of Forest by County Table 3.5.1 Strahler Stream Order by Watershed Table 3.5.1.1 Es(mate # of Stream Miles by Category, Fish Index of Bio(c Integrity Table 3.5.1.2 Es(mate # of Stream Miles by Category, Benthic Index of Bio(c Integrity Table 3.6.1 Soil Management Groups for Potomac-Garre9 State Forest Table 3.7.1 Potomac-Garre9 State Forest - Complexes Table 3.7.2 Complex Sta(s(cs by Size Table 3.8.1 Potomac-Garre9 State Forest Compartments Table 3.8.2 Compartment Sta(s(cs by Size Table 5.2 Potomac-Garre9 State Forest Management Layers Table 5.3 Forest Diversity Analysis Table 8.13 List of Common & Scien(fic Names of Fish Within the Potomac-Garre9 S.F. Waterbodies of the Youghiogheny and Potomac River Watersheds Table 10.3.2 Strata for Long-Term Monitoring on Potomac-Garre9 State Forest 7 Index of Figures Figure 2.1 Garre9 County Land Cover Surrounding Potomac-Garre9 State Forest Figure 2.7.1 White-tailed Deer Harvest Trends for Garre9 County, 1980-2009 Figure 2.9.2 Bear Visita(ons at Scent Sta(ons in Garre9 County Figure 2.14.2 Watersheds in Garre9 County Figure 3 Potomac-Garre9 State Forest - Garre9 County, Maryland Figure 4.1 Schema(c of Land Management Area Guidelines Figure 6.6.1 Amphibian Buffer Zone Around a Vernal Pool Figure 6.6.2 Vernal Pool Connec(vity Zone for Amphibian Conserva(on Figure 11.1 Annual Work Plan Development Process 8 Abbreviations AMWI Appalachian Mountain Woodcock Initiative ATV All Terrain Vehicle AWP Annual Work Plan BIBI Benthic Index of Biotic Integrity BMP Best Management Practices CAR Corrective Action Requests CBI Combined Biotic Index CCC Civilian Conservation Corps CF Chesapeake Forest CFI Continuous Forest Inventory DNA Deoxyribonucleic acid DC District of Columbia DNR Department of Natural Resources DDT Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane ESA Ecologically Significant Areas FIBI Fish-based Index of Biotic Integrity FIDS Forest Interior Dwelling Species FSC® Forest Stewardship Council® GCN Greatest Conservation Need GIS Geographic Information System GPS Global Positioning System HCP Habitat Conservation Plan HCVF High Conservation Value Forest ID Interdisciplinary LAC Limits of Acceptable Change MBSS Maryland Biological Stream Survey MD Maryland NBPR North Branch Potomac River NHA Natural Heritage Areas NWR National Wildlife Refuge OGEMA Old Growth Ecosystem Management Area ORV Off Road Vehicle PA Pennsylvania PGSF Potomac-Garrett State Forest PHI Physical Habitat Index RTE Rare, threatened, and Endangered SAFETEA Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act SFI® Sustainable Forest Initiative® SMG Soil Management Groups 9 SMZ Streamside Management Zones SRSF Savage River State Forest US United States USDA United State Department of Agriculture USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service USGS United States Geological Survey WSSC Wetlands of Special State Concern 10 Chapter 1 - Background and History of the Forest 1.1 Introduction The history of the Potomac and Garrett State Forests began with the birth of Maryland's Forestry and Public Lands system. In 1906, John and Robert Garrett were concerned with the future of Maryland's forestlands. They had inherited 1917 acres of land from their grandfather John W. Garrett who had expanded the B&O railroad into Garrett County in the mid 1880's. Garrett County was to later be named after him. Robert Garrett donated this land to the state with the stipulation that the state must make "adequate provision for its care".
Recommended publications
  • Maryland's Wildland Preservation System “The Best of the Best”
    Maryland’s Wildland Preservation System “The“The Best Best ofof thethe Best” Best” What is a Wildland? Natural Resources Article §5‐1201(d): “Wildlands” means limited areas of [State‐owned] land or water which have •Retained their wilderness character, although not necessarily completely natural and undisturbed, or •Have rare or vanishing species of plant or animal life, or • Similar features of interest worthy of preservation for use of present and future residents of the State. •This may include unique ecological, geological, scenic, and contemplative recreational areas on State lands. Why Protect Wildlands? •They are Maryland’s “Last Great Places” •They represent much of the richness & diversity of Maryland’s Natural Heritage •Once lost, they can not be replaced •In using and conserving our State’s natural resources, the one characteristic more essential than any other is foresight What is Permitted? • Activities which are consistent with the protection of the wildland character of the area, such as hiking, canoeing, kayaking, rafting, hunting, fishing, & trapping • Activities necessary to protect the area from fire, animals, insects, disease, & erosion (evaluated on a case‐by case basis) What is Prohibited? Activities which are inconsistent with the protection of the wildland character of the area: permanent roads structures installations commercial enterprises introduction of non‐native wildlife mineral extraction Candidate Wildlands •23 areas •21,890 acres •9 new •13,128 acres •14 expansions Map can be found online at: http://dnr.maryland.gov/land/stewardship/pdfs/wildland_map.pdf
    [Show full text]
  • Forestry· Wildlife Guidelines to Habitat Management
    11111111~113 0318 r~1~1 mmmr1~1~11~1~r11~11111111 00028. 8449 This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp (Funding for document digitization was provided, in part, by a grant from the Minnesota Historical & Cultural Heritage Program.) FORESTRY· WILDLIFE GUIDELINES ·, TO HABITAT MANAGEMENT 1985 Revision FOREST - --·----·- ~ ... / -T-R A N S I T I 0 N PRAIRIE ·MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES GENERAL CON:rENrS SEr.rION PAGES .EOLICY - WILDLIFE/FORESTRY COORDINATION •••••••••••••••• A-G I - I'NI.'RC.>IXJC'I ION • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 - 12 Foreword, Approval, Vegetative Zones and Habitat Evaluation, Vegetative Zone Map II - MANAGEMEN.r IN!'EGRATION BY GENERAL PRACI'ICES •••••••••••• 13 -24 Rationale, Soils Evaluation, Timber Harvest, Reforestation, Tirrber stand Improvement III - MANAGEMENI' IN!'EGRATION BY TIMBER TYPE •••••••••••••••••• 25 - 42 References, Aspen and Paper Birch, Oaks, Northern Hardwoods, Central Hardwoods, Lowland Hardwoods, Conifers, Deforested Areas IV - WILDLIFE PROJECTS FOR HABITAT MANAGEMEN.r IN CONJUN:TION WITH TIMBER MANAGEMENI' •••••••••••••••••• 43 - 54 Wildlife Openings, Roads and Trails, Non­ corrmercial Cover Type Regeneration, Brush Piles, Fruit Trees V - WILDLIFE PROJECTS FOR HABITAT MANAGEMENI' SEPARATE FROM TIMBER MANAGEMENI' ••••••••••••••••••••••• 55 - 60 Browse Regeneration, Agriculture Leases
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-Symposium-Booklet.Pdf
    0 TABLE OF CONTENTS The Abstracts ................................................................................................................................................ 2 COLLEGE OF BUSINESS Department of Management ....................................................................................................................... 3 Department of Marketing and Finance ........................................................................................................ 5 COLLEGE OF EDUCATION Department of Kinesiology and Recreation ................................................................................................. 6 COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS AND SCIENCES Department of Biology ............................................................................................................................... 10 Department of Chemistry ........................................................................................................................... 25 Department of Communication ................................................................................................................. 28 Department of Computer Science and Information Technologies ............................................................ 29 Department of English and Foreign Languages .......................................................................................... 31 Department of Geography ......................................................................................................................... 39 Department
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Land Management Plan
    2009 LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN (Updated Annual Harvest Plan -2014) Itasca County Land Department 1177 LaPrairie Avenue Grand Rapids, MN 55744-3322 218-327-2855 ● Fax: 218-327-4160 LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN Itasca County Land Department Acknowledgements This Land Management Plan was produced by Itasca County Land Department employees Garrett Ous, Dave Marshall, Michael Gibbons, Adam Olson, Bob Scheierl, Roger Clark, Kory Cease, Steve Aysta, Tim Stocker, Perry Leone, Wayne Perreault, Blair Carlson, Loren Eide, Bob Rother, Andrew Brown, Del Inkman, Darlene Brown and Meg Muller. Thank you to all the citizens for their sincere input and review during the public involvement process. And thank you to Itasca County Commissioners Lori Dowling, Karen Burthwick, Rusty Eichorn, Catherine McLynn and Mark Mandich for their vision and final approval of this document. Foreword This land management plan is designed for providing vision and direction to guide strategic and operational programs of the Land Department. That vision and direction reflects a long standing connection with local economic, educational and social programs. The Land Department is committed to ensuring that economic benefits and environmental integrity are available to both present and future generations. That will be accomplished through actively managing county land and forests for a balance of benefits to the citizens and for providing them with a sustained supply of quality products and services. The Department will apply quality forestland stewardship practices, employ modern technology and information, and partner with other forest organizations to provide citizens with those quality products and services. ________________________________ Garrett Ous September, 2009 Itasca County Land Commissioner 1177 LaPrairie Avenue Grand Rapids, MN 55744-3322 218-327-2855 ● Fax: 218-327-4160 ICLD - LMP Section i., page 1 of 3 Itasca County Land Department Land Management Plan Table of Contents i.
    [Show full text]
  • Savage River State Forest Is a Natural Area with Hunting Is Permitted Throughout the Forest
    DIRECTIONS Take Exit 22 off I-68, turn left and go south on Chestnut Ridge WELCOME Please Play Safe! HUNTING Savage River Reservoir Road. At the stop sign, turn left onto New Germany Road. Savage River State Forest is a natural area with Hunting is permitted throughout the forest. The Savage River Reservoir provides fishing and Continue for two miles. Turn right onto Headquarters Lane certain hazards such as overhanging branches, Boundaries are marked with yellow paint. No paddling opportunities. Boat launches are located and continue to the forest office on the right. rocky and slippery trails, and venomous hunting allowed where there are safety zone signs or at Big Run State Park, Dry Run Road and near the snakes. Bottles of water and sturdy shoes are where posted by private landowners. Hunters should breast of the dam. No gasoline motors are permitted. Approximately 3 hours from Washington, D.C./Baltimore, 2 hours from Pittsburgh. recommended while exploring, as well as blaze consult the Maryland Hunting Guide — available at Anglers can catch Catfish, Trout, Bass and Tiger orange clothing during hunting seasons. Some of dnr.maryland.gov/huntersguide — for exact season Muskie. Depending on the season, visitors may More information is available at dnr.maryland.gov/ the forest trails are gravel roads, which are open dates and bag limits. see grouse, great blue herons, king fishers, minks publiclands/western/savageriverforest.asp or by contacting to motor vehicles at various times. Remember, and eagles as well. Swimming in the Reservoir is the forest office. you are responsible for having the necessary Several access roads are available to hunters with prohibited.
    [Show full text]
  • Health and History of the North Branch of the Potomac River
    Health and History of the North Branch of the Potomac River North Fork Watershed Project/Friends of Blackwater MAY 2009 This report was made possible by a generous donation from the MARPAT Foundation. DRAFT 2 DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 TABLE OF Figures ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 THE UPPER NORTH BRANCH POTOMAC RIVER WATERSHED ................................................................................... 7 PART I ‐ General Information about the North Branch Potomac Watershed ........................................................... 8 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Geography and Geology of the Watershed Area ................................................................................................. 9 Demographics .................................................................................................................................................... 10 Land Use ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Age Class Change Simulator (FACCS): a Spreadsheet-Based Model for Estimation of Forest Change and Biomass Availability
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy Forest Age Class Change Simulator (FACCS): A spreadsheet-based model for estimation of forest change and biomass availability by David C. Wilson, Grant M. Domke and Alan R. Ek February 2014 Staff Paper Series No. 228 Department of Forest Resources College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 1 For more information about the Department of Forest Resources and its teaching, research, and outreach programs, contact the department at: Department of Forest Resources University of Minnesota 115 Green Hall 1530 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55108-6112 Ph: 612.624.3400 Fax: 612.625.5212 Email: [email protected] http://www.forestry.umn.edu/publications/staffpapers/index.html and see also http://iic.umn.edu/ The University of Minnesota is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, disability, public assistance status, veteran status, or sexual orientation. 2 Forest Age Class Change Simulator (FACCS): A spreadsheet based model for estimation of forest change and biomass availability by David C. Wilson, Grant M. Domke and Alan R. Ek February 23, 2014 Technical Report Interagency Information Cooperative 3 Acknowledgements This research was funded by the Interagency Information Cooperative, University of Minnesota Department of Forest Resources and the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station under project MIN 42-019. The authors wish to thank Professor Thomas E.
    [Show full text]
  • May 20, 2019 VIA EMAIL & COURIER Ms. Ruby Potter
    May 20, 2019 VIA EMAIL & COURIER Ms. Ruby Potter [email protected] Health Facilities Coordination Officer Maryland Health Care Commission 4160 Patterson Avenue Baltimore, Maryland 21215 Re: Application for Certificate of Need Construction of a Cancer Center at the University of Maryland Medical Center Dear Ms. Potter: On behalf of applicant University of Maryland Medical Center, enclosed are six copies of the “Response to Additional Information Questions 1-21 Dated April 18, 2019” with respect to the CON Application for construction of a cancer center at the University of Maryland Medical Center. I hereby certify that a copy of this submission has also been forwarded to the appropriate local health planning agencies as noted below. Sincerely, Thomas C. Dame Ella R. Aiken TCD/ERA:blr Enclosures #663928 006551-0238 Ms. Ruby Potter May 20, 2019 Page 2 cc: Kevin McDonald, Chief, Certificate of Need Paul Parker, Director, Center for Health Care Facilities Planning & Development Suellen Wideman, Esq., Assistant Attorney General Mary Beth Haller, Interim Baltimore City Health Commissioner Megan M. Arthur, Esq., Senior Vice-President & General Counsel Sandra H. Benzer, Esq., Associate Counsel, UMMS Mohan Suntha, M.D., MBA, President and CEO Dana D. Farrakhan, FACHE, Sr. VP, Strategy, Community and Business Development Joseph E. Hoffman III, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, UMMC Georgia Harrington, Senior Vice President, Operations, UMMC Craig Fleischmann, Senior Vice President, Finance, UMMC Leonard Taylor, Jr., Senior
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Hyporheic Exchange at In-Stream Restoration Structures on Savage River, Garrett County, Maryland
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2013 Assessment of Hyporheic Exchange at In-stream Restoration Structures on Savage River, Garrett County, Maryland Anna L. Berlinghieri West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Berlinghieri, Anna L., "Assessment of Hyporheic Exchange at In-stream Restoration Structures on Savage River, Garrett County, Maryland" (2013). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 206. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/206 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Assessment of Hyporheic Exchange at In-stream Restoration Structures on Savage River, Garrett County, Maryland Anna L. Berlinghieri Thesis submitted to the Eberly College at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology J. Steven Kite, Ph.D., Chair Joe Donovan, Ph.D. Danny Welsch, Ph.D. Nicolas Zegre, Ph.D. Department of Geology and Geography Morgantown, West Virginia 2013 Keywords: Hyporheic exchange, Stream restoration Copyright 2013 Anna L.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 6 Maryland Invasive Species Council USDA National
    Maryland Invasive Species Council USDA National Agricultural Library Beltsville, MD 21401 Thursday May 15, 2014 Call to order Facilitator Dick Bean called the meeting to order at 9:15 am Introductions Barbara Beelar –Friends of DCL Mary Kay Malinoski—Maryland Extension Dick Bean - MDA, PPWM Caroline Puckett—Carroll Cty Forestry Bd Eric Duce – Baltimore Cty Dept of Env Prot. Bud Reaves – Anne Arundel County Mike Ellis—PG Cty Parks Kim Rice – MDA PPWM Anne Goodman—Rockville Native Spp Network Pete Rupp—MDA, PPWM Mike Greenberg -- SHA Matt Salo – Cheverly Green Infrastructure Ruth Hanessian -- MAPI Mark Smith – MDA Weed Control Lane Heimer—MDA PPWM Jil Swearingen—Plant Conservation Alliance, attending as guest Mike Hemming, Eastern Shore Nurseries Bob Tatman – MDA Forest Pest Mangmt Craig Highfield—ACB,Forestry for the Bay John Peter Thompson -- Consultant Alice Imlay, guest Mark Thurmond – USDA APHIS Marc Imlay, PG Cty Parks, Sierra Club Bob Trumbule—MDA Biocontrol Jay Kilian – DNR Resource Assessment Service Mark Smith—MDA PPWM Kerrie Kyde—MDNR—Nat Heritage Program Tyler Wakefield—DNR MFS Deborah Landau--TNC Jim Young – USDA APHIS Additions to the Agenda Meeting will be recorded today. New recording secretary needed. Approval of minutes from January and March 2014 meeting January minutes approved as amended. March minutes amended, Kerrie Kyde requested review and forwarding of corrections. Dick Bean asked for a volunteer for recording secretary? No one volunteered. Memberships • Mike Ellis requested membership. Attended a previous meeting,
    [Show full text]
  • 1 I-68/I-70: a WINDOW to the APPALACHIANS by Dr. John J
    I-68/I-70: A WINDOW TO THE APPALACHIANS by Dr. John J. Renton Dept. of Geology & Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV Introduction The Appalachian Mountains are probably the most studied mountains on Earth. Many of our modern ideas as to the origin of major mountain systems evolved from early investigations of the Appalachian region. The Appalachians offer a unique opportunity to experience the various components of an entire mountain system within a relatively short distance and period of time. Compared to the extensive areas occupied by other mountain systems such as the Rockies and the Alps, the Appalachians are relatively narrow and can be easily crossed within a few hours driving time. Following I-68 and I-70 between Morgantown, WV, and Frederick, Maryland, for example, one can visit all of the major structural components within the Appalachians within a distance of about 160 miles. Before I continue, I would like to clarify references to the Allegheny and Appalachian mountains. The Allegheny Mountains were created about 250 million years ago when continents collided during the Alleghenian Orogeny to form the super-continent of Pangea (Figure 1). As the continents collided, a range of mountains were created in much the same fashion that the Himalaya Mountains are now being formed by the collision of India and Asia. About 50 million years after its Figure 1 1 creation, Pangea began to break up with the break occurring parallel to the axis of the original mountains. As the pieces that were to become our present continents moved away from each other, the Indian, Atlantic, and Arctic oceans were created (Figure 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Outdoors Ec R the Keystone for Healthy Living Or Do Ut O E Iv Ns He 20 Pre 09– Om 2013 Statewide C
    lan n P tio rea Pennsylvania Outdoors ec R The Keystone for Healthy Living or do ut O e iv ns he 20 pre 09– om 2013 Statewide C www.paoutdoorrecplan.com lan into action. his p ut t o p e t ast d h an om isd w The preparation of this plan was financed in part through a Land and Water ith Conservation Fund planning grant and the plan was approved by the National Park k w Service, U.S. Department of the Interior under the provisions for the Federal Land or w and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (Public Law 88-578). uld We sho National Park Service – Joe DiBello, Jack Howard, David Lange and Roy Cortez September 2009 Contents Acknowledgements........................................................................................................2 Governor’s.Letter............................................................................................................3 Executive.Summary........................................................................................................4 Introduction.....................................................................................................................6 Public.Participation.Process.........................................................................................10 Research.and.Findings:.What.Pennsylvanians.Say.About.Outdoor.Recreation.........12 Goals.and.Recommendations.......................................................................................46 Funding.Needs.and.Recommendations....................................................................... 94
    [Show full text]