Gigaclear: Scaling up Rural FTTP Delivery

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gigaclear: Scaling up Rural FTTP Delivery Gigaclear: scaling up rural FTTP delivery Prepared by: Annelise Berendt Date: 17 October 2016 Version: 2.0 Point Topic Ltd 73 Farringdon Road London EC1M 3JQ, UK Tel. +44 (0) 20 3301 3305 Email [email protected] Gigaclear: scaling up rural FTTP delivery Table of Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Background 3 3. The business model 5 Building a predictive model on a demand-led base 5 Developing choice in service provision 6 4. The service, support and marketing 7 Approach to marketing 9 Customer care and support 10 5. Deployments to date 10 Network installation 14 6. Looking to the future 17 Page 2 of 17 Gigaclear: scaling up rural FTTP delivery 1. Introduction Gigaclear has become the UK’s leading alternative network operator specialising in fibre-to-the- premises (FTTP) delivery in rural areas. It is expanding its footprint rapidly and is acquiring a relatively sizable customer base. Founded on a solid and well-oiled approach to demand registration and order taking, with a clear set of aims, focused business model and strong financial backing, the company is now having to adapt its processes to make the transition from local broadband player to national broadband provider in the rather large niche market that is rural Britain. The company designs, builds and operates FTTP broadband networks delivering symmetric speeds of 50Mbps to 10Gbps. It owns and operates 66 rural fibre networks and has over 35 under construction across Kent, Oxfordshire, Northamptonshire, Cambridgeshire, Leicestershire, Buckinghamshire, Hertfordshire, Rutland, Gloucestershire, Berkshire and Essex, and more recently Devon and Somerset. Having spent several years deploying commercially in areas Openreach and others were reluctant to enter, Gigaclear has now embarked on a number of Broadband Delivery UK (BDUK) funded contracts under the Superfast Extension Programme to build next-generation networks in Berkshire, Essex and Gloucestershire, in addition to its continued commercial expansion. Gigaclear is targeting a market of 1.5 million rural households and businesses across thousands of rural communities. It had around 5,800 customers in August 2016 having passed over 21,000 homes and businesses. It plans to have close to 40,000 premises passed by the end of 2016 and around 100,000 by the end of 2017. Point Topic recently visited Gigaclear’s headquarters in Abingdon near Oxford where we met Matthew Hare, the company’s founder and Chief Executive. Gigaclear has grown significantly since our last case study published in December 2013, from 15 employees and 35 contractors, to 150 staff. Following a tour of the site, Hare explained to us how the company is adapting to manage its growing coverage, size and customer base, as well as its ambitions and plans for the future. 2. Background Gigaclear was established in December 2010 to build ultrafast broadband connections to rural communities. In February 2011 the company applied to Ofcom for Code Powers under the Electronics Communications Code and the following month the regulator published its consultation. The Direction applying the electronic communications code to Gigaclear was issued on 10 May 2011, giving the company powers to carry out street works in relation to the roll out of fibre-based telecoms networks in the UK. Gigaclear took a majority stake in sub-loop unbundling pioneer Rutland Telecom in May 2011, which is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Gigaclear plc. At that time Rutland Telecom served over 500 residential and business customers in the county of Rutland. Gigaclear needed to demonstrate it was capable of building and running fibre networks and so, according to Hare, buying the capability in Page 3 of 17 Gigaclear: scaling up rural FTTP delivery Rutland Telecom was a quick way to achieve this. Since December 2014, all Rutland Telecom operations and support have been managed from the Gigaclear offices in Abingdon. Gigaclear began construction of its first network in Hambleton, Rutland, in association with Rutland Telecom in September 2011, opening for service a month later. This was followed by another fibre- to-the-home (FTTH) network in the Oxfordshire communities of Appleton and Eaton. The company’s position was boosted in November 2012 when Gigaclear announced it had concluded equity financing from a private group of investors enabling it to substantially accelerate the pace of FTTH rollout. The transaction was arranged by financial advisers Cameron Barney LLP based on a proven level of demand for high-speed broadband in rural and semi-rural areas. Further funding rounds have taken place as shown in Table 1 below. Two of these rounds in Spring 2014 transformed Gigaclear from a firm backed solely by a small number of private individuals into one backed by over 70 private and institutional shareholders. Then on 15 September 2014 Gigaclear announced its intention to float on AIM in London to raise additional funds principally from new institutional investors, existing shareholders and certain qualifying customers, to enable it to accelerate the rollout of more ultrafast fibre broadband communities. Floatation was due to take place on 24 October 2014 but was cancelled and rescheduled for 31 October. However, Gigaclear decided to put the floatation on hold due to difficult financial market conditions. According to Hare, “All the work has been done and is kept up to date including having a non-executive board. So we could float tomorrow if we wanted to”. Floatation is not a current objective, however. “We are unlikely to go back to the capital markets until we are EBITDA positive,” adds Hare. Two further funding rounds have taken place since then, one in February 2015 and the second in May 2015. Then on 14 January 2016 Gigaclear announced it had secured a EUR25 million committed debt facility from the European Investment Bank (EIB). The loan is being used to support Gigaclear’s rural expansion plans during 2016 as it builds to at least 25,000 additional properties. This involves a major investment by the company, one third of which is being financed through the EIB facility. The loan is the maximum available to companies under the ‘InnovFin – EU Finance for Innovators’ MidCap Growth Finance scheme and was the largest amount the EIB had awarded to any UK business under the initiative. As of August 2016 Gigaclear had raised £72.5 million in equity, had £20 million yet to draw from the EBI, and £10 million in funding for BDUK projects. Gigaclear says it is fully funded until the end of Q1 2017 and is planning to do another round of funding, the amount to be raised dependent on requirements at the time. The majority of deployments have been financed entirely by Gigaclear shareholders with no grants involved. The Hambleton network was different, funded by a loan from the community to Gigaclear secured against the assets of the infrastructure. The more recent BDUK-funded contracts are therefore new territory for Gigaclear but the company says it always expected to see a mixture of funding approaches being used. Page 4 of 17 Gigaclear: scaling up rural FTTP delivery Table 1: Gigaclear funding history Date Details November 2012 Private group of investors April 2014 Raised over £2.75 million through an Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS), which resulted in more than double its original minimum target May 2014 Gigaclear agreed to an additional investment of £5 million from the CF Woodford Equity Income Fund 2 July 2014 Confirmed successful completion of a new round of equity financing totalling £7.75 million to enable Gigaclear to commence rollout of several additional new networks, with the target of serving 10,000 homes and businesses by the end of 2014 13 February 2015 Round of equity financing in which £6.5 million in funds were raised from both existing and new institutional and private shareholders. The CF Woodford Equity Income Fund added to its initial investment and Forward Private Equity became the company’s second institutional shareholder. Following this new round of funding, Gigaclear had over 100 private and institutional shareholders 11 May 2015 Secured £30 million in new equity providing resources for the next 24 months. Prudential committed to invest up to £20 million, managed by Infracapital, the infrastructure investment arm of Prudential. Meanwhile existing shareholder Woodford Investment Management committed a further £10 million of investment 14 January 2016 Secured a EUR25 million committed debt facility from the European Investment Bank 3. The business model Gigaclear is both an infrastructure operator and service provider, and says it is able to install FTTP networks to provide broadband internet access to homes and businesses in rural communities delivering a return on investment after 5.5 years. This is up slightly from five years due to the density of properties in coverage areas having decreased slightly. Costs are running at around £1,000 per property. In BDUK areas the cost to Gigaclear is around £1,200 per property. Building a predictive model on a demand-led base Central to Gigaclear’s business model has been its demand-led approach. It developed a strategy of raising interest in individual communities with residents and businesses making expressions of interest followed by orders for service via the Gigaclear website. By pre-marketing and pre-selling broadband orders, the company has been able to reach a penetration level which makes deployment viable, before actually committing to any build. In October 2016, however, Gigaclear move away from pre-selling broadband provision. Using uptake data already gathered, the operator as developed forecasting tools to predict where it should build. Marketing and selling therefore now begins when building begins, with these functions running in parallel throughout the process. Testing this approach during September 2016 the company says that take-up has proved at least as good in predicted areas as it has in pre-sold areas, and that the Page 5 of 17 Gigaclear: scaling up rural FTTP delivery method is resulting in cost savings.
Recommended publications
  • Notice of Election Vale Parishes
    NOTICE OF ELECTION Vale of White Horse District Council Election of Parish Councillors for the parishes listed below Number of Parish Number of Parish Parishes Councillors to be Parishes Councillors to be elected elected Abingdon-on-Thames: Abbey Ward 2 Hinton Waldrist 7 Abingdon-on-Thames: Caldecott Ward 4 Kennington 14 Abingdon-on-Thames: Dunmore Ward 4 Kingston Bagpuize with Southmoor 9 Abingdon-on-Thames: Fitzharris Ock Ward 2 Kingston Lisle 5 Abingdon-on-Thames: Fitzharris Wildmoor Ward 1 Letcombe Regis 7 Abingdon-on-Thames: Northcourt Ward 2 Little Coxwell 5 Abingdon-on-Thames: Peachcroft Ward 4 Lockinge 3 Appleford-on-Thames 5 Longcot 5 Appleton with Eaton 7 Longworth 7 Ardington 3 Marcham 10 Ashbury 6 Milton: Heights Ward 4 Blewbury 9 Milton: Village Ward 3 Bourton 5 North Hinksey 14 Buckland 6 Radley 11 Buscot 5 Shrivenham 11 Charney Bassett 5 South Hinksey: Hinksey Hill Ward 3 Childrey 5 South Hinksey: Village Ward 3 Chilton 8 Sparsholt 5 Coleshill 5 St Helen Without: Dry Sandford Ward 5 Cumnor: Cumnor Hill Ward 4 St Helen Without: Shippon Ward 5 Cumnor: Cumnor Village Ward 3 Stanford-in-the-Vale 10 Cumnor: Dean Court Ward 6 Steventon 9 Cumnor: Farmoor Ward 2 Sunningwell 7 Drayton 11 Sutton Courtenay 11 East Challow 7 Uffington 6 East Hanney 8 Upton 6 East Hendred 9 Wantage: Segsbury Ward 6 Fyfield and Tubney 6 Wantage: Wantage Charlton Ward 10 Great Coxwell 5 Watchfield 8 Great Faringdon 14 West Challow 5 Grove: Grove Brook Ward 5 West Hanney 5 Grove: Grove North Ward 11 West Hendred 5 Harwell: Harwell Oxford Campus Ward 2 Wootton 12 Harwell: Harwell Ward 9 1.
    [Show full text]
  • OCC Legal Statement Changes Post
    Changes to the Definitive Map & Statement of Public Rights of Way since 21st February 2006 Date Parish/Path Description Width Conditions & Remarks Number Limitations Abingdon Footpath 27 From North Avenue at Grid Reference SU 5029 9893 The Order confirmed Added by Modification Order 07/03/2006 100/27 between property numbers 13 and 15, 7.3.2006 provided a width confirmed 7.3.2006. south-south-westwards for approximately 133 metres 2.5 metres (min) along a strip of Common Land (Registration Number CL153), connecting with the western end of Mandeville Close at Grid Reference SU 5028 9882, to South Avenue at Grid Reference SU 5027 9880. Abingdon Footpath 28 From Colwell Drive at SU 4852 9717 leading generally 2m between SU 4852 1) Northern section added 19/02/2015 100/28 ENE for approx. 54m to SU 4857 9719, then NNW for 9717 and SU 4857 9719. by HA1980 S.38 Agreement approx. 51m and ESE to Willow Brook at SU 4856 9724.] 27.09.2001; came into effect 08.11.2004. 2) Western section added by HA1980 S.38 & 278 Agreement 15.08.2008; came into effect 23.12.2013. Abingdon Footpath 29 From the W end of Caldecott Chase at SU 49017 96473, 2 m. Added by HA1980 S.38 19/02/2015 100/29 leading N & W for approximately 22 m to Caldecott Road Agreement 05.06.2009; at SU 49007 96486. came into effect 06.01.2014. Abingdon Footpath 30 From Caldecott Chase at SU 49106 96470, leading N & E 2 m. Added by HA1980 S.38 19/02/2015 100/30 for approximately 26 m to SU 49109 96490.
    [Show full text]
  • Tubney Wood Liaison Committee
    Tubney Wood Liaison Committee Minutes of Meeting on 20th September 2011 at Appleton Village Hall Present: Oxfordshire County Council – John Hamilton (JH) Hills Quarry Products Ltd – Andrew Liddle (AL), Mick Chivers (MC) Appleton with Eaton Parish Council – Claire Salmon (CS), Fyfield and Tubney Parish Council – John Watts (JW) Tubney Wood Preservation Group (TWPG) Graham Rose (in the chair) (GR); Margaret Reading (MR) John Sear (JS) Resident nearby Tubney Sandpit: Adrian Carey (AC) Marcham Resident and landowner: W Cumber (WC) Savills (Land Agents for Magdalen College): Douglas Mackellar (DM) 1. Apologies: Nick Hester (TWPG) 2. Minutes of last meeting (7th September 2010) approved after clarification over the appearance of two separate versions! 3. Matters arising (and not elsewhere on the agenda): The already infilled areas of the site were top-soiled in the spring and are due imminently to be seeded to allow their return to arable use. The whole site is not returned to the care of Magdalen College for five years after restoration by Hills. The footpath from Besselsleigh is not yet restored, pending the infilling and re-seeding of extraction areas 5 & 6. There will be need for a new footpath sign once this is completed (Action: Fyfield and Tubney Parish Council). 4. Quarry Update: AL stated that extraction of sand should be completed by December 2011. Hills will shortly be lodging an application for an extension of five years. The methodology of operating the site is not conducive to easy in-filling. The in-filling of the void (estimated to be 300000-350000 tonnes) will be carried out over about four years (starting January 2012; with restoration complete by 2017 – one year after final infilling).
    [Show full text]
  • Bob Hindhaugh Associates Ltd Transport Route
    BOB HINDHAUGH ASSOCIATES LTD HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING AND TRANSPORT PLANNING. Registered Company No 7149206 TRANSPORT ROUTE CONGESTION ASSESSMENT. ON A419/A420/A415 LINK ON BEHALF OF WESTERN VALE VILLAGES CONSORTIUM OF PARISH COUNCILS LISTED AS A REPRESENTATION TO THE VALE OF WHITE HORSE DISTRICT COUNCIL EMERGING LOCAL PLAN TO 2029 BY REFERENCE TO ITSDETRIMENTAL TRAFFIC AND ROAD SAFETY EFFECTS ON THE LOCAL HIGHWAY NETWORK (A419/A420/A415 LINK) 1 Page Director: Bob Hindhaugh BSc. PGCert (TEP). MCIHT. FIHE. MIoEE. 46 Oldfield Drive, Vicars Cross, Chester, Cheshire. CH35LL. Email:[email protected] Tel No 07794 244609 BOB HINDHAUGH ASSOCIATES LTD HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING AND TRANSPORT PLANNING. Registered Company No 7149206 Embargoed until 1700 hrs on Thursday 16th May 2013. Please do not copy or publish until then. CLIENTS – Western Vale Villages Consortium of Parish Councils (“WVV”) Wanborough PC Bourton PC Bishopstone PC Ashbury PC Compton Beauchamp Parish Meeting Longcot PC Watchfield PC Shrivenham PC And a number of other councils along the A420 associated with WVV, namely, Faringdon Town Council Uffington PC Buckland PC Great Coxwell PC Hinton Waldrist PC Littleworth Parish Meeting Kingston Bagpuize PC Buckland PC Fyfield and Tubney PC Fernham Parish Meeting Frilford Parish Meeting Hatford Parish Meeting Little Coxwell PC Pusey Parish Meeting And with the valued support of CPRE Oxon 14th MAY 2013 2 Page Director: Bob Hindhaugh BSc. PGCert (TEP). MCIHT. FIHE. MIoEE. 46 Oldfield Drive, Vicars Cross, Chester, Cheshire. CH35LL. Email:[email protected] Tel No 07794 244609 BOB HINDHAUGH ASSOCIATES LTD HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING AND TRANSPORT PLANNING.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Fyfield and Tubney Parish Council Meeting Held on Wednesday 12Th September 2018
    2223 Minutes of the Fyfield and Tubney Parish Council Meeting held on Wednesday 12th September 2018. Present: Mr. Julian Mellor – Chair. Mrs. Jean Burley. Mrs. Shirley Collins. Mr. John Watts. Dr .Stephen Fraser – Clerk. Eight members of the general public. Apologies Apologies had been received from Mr. Alan Woodward. Mr. Jonathan Greaves. Mrs. Anda Fitzgerald-O'Connor – OCC Councillor. Minutes of the Last Meeting. These were signed as a true record by the Chair. Matters Arising. The Clerk had not progressed the documentation required to amend the Definitive Map to include the underpass bridleway given the more pressing items affecting the parish. User evidence would be sought once Lioncourt, the Tubney Quarry proposal and the A420 issues had been attended to. Lioncourt. Mr Mellor reported that the Inspector had completed his enquiry meetings and that his deliberations were awaited. The general consensus was that the Parish Council and Flag had submitted a sound case for rejection. The fact that the District Council had submitted late changes meant that further letters of objection could be put to the Inspector. The delay to the start of development of 4 years because of the Frilford Traffic Lights may not be granted. The impact on the site viability if this happens is not obvious. Nothing could now be done until the Inspector issues his judgement. Proposed Tubney Quarry. The Tubney site had been expanded considerably since the first iteration of the Minerals and Waste Plan. This had come as a complete surprise to the council and required urgent action to submit an objection. It was not helped by the Site Assessment Criteria not being available until requested.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Fyfield and Tubney Parish Council Meeting Held on Wednesday 21St September 2016
    2189 Minutes of the Fyfield and Tubney Parish Council Meeting held on Wednesday 21st September 2016. Present: Mr John Watts – Chair. Mrs Jean Burley. Mrs Shirley Collins. Mr Julian Mellor. Dr Stephen Fraser – Clerk. Four members of the general public. Apologies Mr Ben Lay and Mrs Melinda Tilley. Minutes of the Last Meeting. These were signed with one amendment as a true record by the Chair. Matters Arising. The need for a physical refuge to enable bus passengers to safely cross the road at the Fyfield junction was discussed later in the meeting in the light of further development proposals within the area. The Clerk reported that he had purchased wood for the repair to the bus shelter and would carry out the work shortly. The invoice and cheque stub for £65.34 were initialled by the chairman. Casual Vacancy following the Resignation of Mrs. Valerie Maher The Clerk reported that he had displayed a notice on the parish notice boards and on the website informing parishioners that there was a vacancy due to the resignation of Mrs Valerie Maher. Parishioners had 14 working days to inform Democratic Services at the District Council that an election was required. Failing that, the council should co-opt a councillor at the earliest opportunity. The notice period would expire at the end of the month. Mr. Jonathan Greaves had indicated that he would be willing to serve as a councillor. In the event of no election being called and no other candidate coming forward, it was resolved that Mr Greaves would be invited to fill the post.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Election
    NOTICE OF ELECTION Vale of White Horse District Council Election of councillors for the parishes listed below Number of councillors to Number of councillors to Parish Parish be elected be elected Abingdon-on-Thames: Abbey Ward 2 Harwell: Harwell Ward 9 Abingdon-on-Thames: Caldecott 4 Harwell: Harwell Oxford 2 Ward Campus Ward Abingdon-on-Thames: Dunmore 4 Hinton Waldrist 7 Ward Abingdon-on-Thames: Fitzharris Ock 2 Kennington 14 Ward Abingdon-on-Thames: Fitzharris 1 Kingston Bagpuize with 9 Wildmoor Ward Southmoor Abingdon-on-Thames: Northcourt 2 Kingston Lisle 5 Ward Abingdon-on-Thames: Peachcroft 4 Letcombe Regis 7 Ward Appleford-on-Thames 5 Little Coxwell 5 Appleton with Eaton 7 Longcot 5 Ardington and Lockinge 6 Longworth: East Ward 3 Ashbury 6 Longworth: West Ward 4 Blewbury 9 Marcham 10 Bourton 5 Milton: Heights Ward 4 Buckland 6 Milton: Village Ward 3 Buscot 5 North Hinksey 14 Charney Bassett 5 Radley 11 Childrey 5 Shrivenham 11 Chilton 8 South Hinksey 5 Coleshill 5 Sparsholt 5 Cumnor: Cumnor Hill Ward 4 St Helen Without: Dry 5 Sandford Ward Cumnor: Cumnor Village Ward 3 St Helen Without: Shippon 5 Ward Cumnor: Dean Court Ward 6 Stanford-in-the-Vale 10 Cumnor: Farmoor Ward 2 Steventon 9 Drayton 11 Sunningwell 7 East Challow 7 Sutton Courtenay 11 East Hanney 6 Uffington 6 East Hendred 9 Upton 6 Fyfield and Tubney 6 Wantage: Segsbury Ward 6 Great Coxwell 5 Wantage: Wantage Charlton 10 Ward Great Faringdon 14 Watchfield 8 Grove: Crab Hill Ward 1 West Challow 5 Grove: Grove Brook Ward 4 West Hanney 5 Grove: Grove North Ward 11 West Hendred 5 Wootton 12 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Plan 2031 Part 2 Detailed Policies and Additional Sites
    Publication Version October 2017 Local Plan 2031 Part 2 Detailed Policies and Additional Sites APPENDICES Contents Appendix A: Site Development Templates…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….1 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 2. General Requirements for All Housing Site Allocations ................................................................................................................................ 3 3. South-East Vale Sub-Area ........................................................................................................................................................................... 6 4. Abingdon-on-Thames and Oxford Fringe Sub-Area ................................................................................................................................... 13 Appendix B: Land for Safeguarding for Future Transport Schemes - Maps ........................................................................................................ 30 1. Abingdon-on-Thames and Oxford Fringe Sub-Area ................................................................................................................................... 30 2. South-East Vale Sub-Area ......................................................................................................................................................................... 34 Appendix C:
    [Show full text]
  • Vale of White Horse Local Plan Part 2 Examination Hearing Participants
    Vale of White Horse Local Plan Part 2 Examination Hearing Participants 6 September 2018 Week One July 3rd – 6th at Abingdon & Witney College Tuesday July 3rd 10am Matter 1: Duty to Co-operate and other legal requirements Vale of White Horse CPRE Dandara Daniel Scharf Douglas Bond Fyfield & Tubney PC & FLAG Gardner Planning on behalf of Arnold White Estates Igloo Planning on behalf of CEG LRM on behalf of Taylor Wimpey UK McLoughlin Planning on behalf of Rosconn Strategic Land McLoughlin Planning on behalf of Webbpaton Oxford City Council Oxfordshire County Council Terence O’Rourke on behalf of Pye Homes Turley on behalf of David Wilson Homes Vale of White Horse Liberal Democrat Group WYG on behalf of Rockspring Barwood East Hanney Ltd Tuesday July 3rd 2pm & Wednesday July 4th 10am Matter 2: Unmet housing needs from Oxford Vale of White Horse Barton Willmore on behalf of University of Oxford Bloor Homes Carter Jonas on behalf of DIO Catesby Estates Cllr Debby Hallet CPRE Dandara Gardner Planning on behalf of Arnold White Estates Gerald Eve on behalf of Merton College Gladman Igloo planning on behalf of CEG Layla Moran MP LRM on behalf of Taylor Wimpey UK Oxford City Council Oxford Preservation Trust Oxfordshire County Council Strutt & Parker on behalf of David Wilson Homes Vale of White Horse Liberal Democrat Group Wantage & Grove Campaign Group 1 Thursday July 5th 10am Matter 3: Overall housing provision in the plan and its distribution between sub-areas Vale of White Horse Barton Willmore on behalf of Ptarmigan Land Bloor Homes Carter
    [Show full text]
  • REPORTS Excavations at TUBNEY Wood QUARRY
    REPORTS EXCAVATIONS AT TUBNEY WOOD QUARRY, OXFORDSHIRE, 2001–9 Andrew Simmonds, Hugo Anderson-Whymark, and Andrew Norton with contributions by Paul Booth, Angela Boyle, Sharon Clough, John Cotter, Diana Mahoney, Nicholas Márquez-Grant, Alice Mora, Olaf Nehlich, Ruth Pelling, Ian Scott, Ruth Shaffrey, Colin Smith, Wendy Smith, and Lena Strid SUMMARY Between 2001 and 2009 Oxford Archaeology (OA) carried out a programme of archaeological investigations on behalf of Hills Aggregates Ltd in advance of an extension to their existing sand quarry at Tubney Wood Quarry. The investigations uncovered a wide range of archaeological remains and provide particularly significant new information about the Mesolithic period and the centuries following the end of Roman rule in Britain. Flint scatters provided further indications of the presence of early Mesolithic ‘base camps’ on the Corallian Ridge, while a small post-Roman cemetery adds to the evidence for communities in the region that maintained Romano-British burial practices well into the fifth or sixth century. Bronze-Age, Iron-Age and Roman activity was also uncovered, along with a ditch probably belonging to the deserted medieval village of Tubney. INTRODUCTION etween 2001 and 2009 Oxford Archaeology (OA) carried out a programme of archaeological Binvestigations on behalf of Hills Aggregates Ltd in advance of an extension to their existing sand quarry at Tubney Wood Quarry, Tubney, Oxfordshire (SP 4480 9980; Fig. 1). The extension adjoined the north-western side of the existing quarry and comprised
    [Show full text]
  • Oxfordshire Digital Infrastructure Strategy and Delivery Plan
    Oxfordshire Digital Infrastructure Strategy and Delivery Plan JANUARY 2020 – V11 Bower, Craig – COMMUNITIES | [email protected] Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 2 Vision ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Superfast Broadband ............................................................................................................................ 6 Commercial Operators in Oxfordshire ........................................................................................... 6 BT Plc - Openreach ...................................................................................................................... 6 Virgin Media .................................................................................................................................. 6 Gigaclear Plc ................................................................................................................................. 7 Airband .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Hyperoptic ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Open Fibre Networks Ltd (OFNL) ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Census 2011 Summary Vale of White Horse Including Abingdon, Wantage, Faringdon and Grove
    Census 2011 Summary Vale of White Horse Including Abingdon, Wantage, Faringdon and Grove Who we are How we live What we do Page 2 The 2011 Census The national Census was carried out on 27 March 2011 and the results were released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) from mid-2012 onwards. Data from the Census survey gives an in-depth picture of the local population, housing, living arrangements and employment and is used by communities and public sector agencies to help plan local services. Completing the Census form was mandatory and an estimated 97%1 of the households in Vale of White Horse district completed their questionnaire on paper or the internet (across England the return rate was 95%). This leaflet provides a summary of the main findings of the 2011 Census survey for Vale of White Horse district and for the main settlements of Abingdon, Wantage, Grove and Faringdon. Note that the majority of this publication uses ward data and Faringdon ward includes the parishes of Great and Little Coxwell. Further local area Census data is available for parishes, electoral wards and for smaller geographic areas including output areas (covering an average of 150 households) and super output areas (of up to 1,200 households). See Finding out more at the end of this leaflet. Who we are – the population of Vale of White Horse As of March 2011, there were 121,000 people living in Vale of White Horse district. This was up from the total of 115,600 residents at the time of the last Census survey in 2001, an increase of around 5,300 (+5%).
    [Show full text]