Croatia Period of Democratic Transition: 1999–2000 Pro-Democracy Civic Movement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Croatia Period of democratic transition: 1999–2000 Pro-democracy civic movement: not present After independence was proclaimed in 1991, Croatia drifted gradually toward authoritarian rule under President Franjo Tudjman and his ruling Croatian Democratic Union Party (HDZ). At the same time, Tudjman manipulated the presidency, the state, economic patronage, state media, political intimidation, and ethnic nationalism to mobilize his base and consolidate his hold on power. Nonetheless, some independent media and a number of civic groups and political parties continued to function throughout the 1990s. When the Serb-Croat civil war ended in 1995, small pockets of opposition began gaining strength, while the HDZ found that its capacity to use ethnic nationalism and scare tactics was weakening. The death in December 1999 of President Tudjman enabled him to be perceived as the hero of Croatia’s march to independence. As a result, the authoritarian system was shaken, and the ruling authorities agreed to ensure a civic and political environment conducive to a free and fair electoral process. In the subsequent presidential elections in January 2000, Stjepan Mesic, running as a joint candidate of the Croatian Peasant Party, the Croatian People’s Party, the Liberal Party, and the Istrian Democratic Assembly, was elected president. In legislative elections that also took place in January 2000, a center-left coalition wrested control of Parliament from the HDZ. Ivica Racan, leader of the Social Democratic Party of Croatia (SDPC)—formerly the League of Communists of Croatia—was named prime minister. The parliamentary majority in the government formed by liberals and the SDPC advocated Croatia's rapid integration into the European mainstream. Presidential and legislative elections have been held regularly in Croatia since 2000, and transitions are generally peaceful. Concerns continue to exist over minority rights and war crimes, but Croatia has striven to apply itself to democratic procedures in line with European Union membership rules. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

INTERIM REPORT 31 October – 14 November 2007 I. EXECUTIVE
OSCE/ODIHR Limited Election Observation Mission Parliamentary Elections Croatia 2007 Hotel Westin, 2st floor 1 Krsnjavoga 10000 Zagreb, Croatia Tel: (+385) (1) 6666 800 Fax: (+385) (1) 6666 828 [email protected] INTERIM REPORT 31 October – 14 November 2007 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • On 15 October 2007 President Stjepan Mesi called elections to the Sabor (Croatian Parliament) for 25 November 2007, following the expiration of the 4- year mandates of the representatives elected in November 2003. • The elections are being conducted for the first time by a permanent State Election Commission (SEC) constituted under the 2006 Law on the SEC (amended in 2007). The SEC is not yet operating with a full-time Secretariat, and is depending on staff and premises loaned to it by the Parliament. • Under the new Law on Voter Lists (2007) the system of voter registration has been computerised, which allows for cross-checking and correction of lists. A system is in place to facilitate voters that will not be in their place of permanent residence on polling day. • The campaign to date has been bipolarised and taking place in a generally calm environment, focusing occasionally on personalities rather than the programmes of the two main political parties (the ruling Croatian Democratic Union [HDZ] and the main opposition Social Democratic Party [SDP]). • Efforts to increase access to polling stations for Croatian citizens in Bosnia and Herzegovina have become politicised during the campaign due to the influence that the number of mandates elected in the diaspora constituency may impact on the formation of the next Government. • The electronic and print media are generally covering the election campaign in line with the legal framework and procedures for media coverage of the elections.
[Show full text]
Croatia: Three Elections and a Funeral
Conflict Studies Research Centre G83 REPUBLIC OF CROATIA Three Elections and a Funeral The Dawn of Democracy at the Millennial Turn? Dr Trevor Waters Introduction 2 President Tudjman Laid To Rest 2 Parliamentary Elections 2/3 January 2000 5 • Background & Legislative Framework • Political Parties & the Political Climate • Media, Campaign, Public Opinion Polls and NGOs • Parliamentary Election Results & International Reaction Presidential Elections - 24 January & 7 February 2000 12 Post Tudjman Croatia - A New Course 15 Annex A: House of Representatives Election Results October 1995 Annex B: House of Counties Election Results April 1997 Annex C: Presidential Election Results June 1997 Annex D: House of Representatives Election Results January 2000 Annex E: Presidential Election Results January/February 2000 1 G83 REPUBLIC OF CROATIA Three Elections and a Funeral The Dawn of Democracy at the Millennial Turn? Dr Trevor Waters Introduction Croatia's passage into the new millennium was marked by the death, on 10 December 1999, of the self-proclaimed "Father of the Nation", President Dr Franjo Tudjman; by make or break Parliamentary Elections, held on 3 January 2000, which secured the crushing defeat of the former president's ruling Croatian Democratic Union, yielded victory for an alliance of the six mainstream opposition parties, and ushered in a new coalition government strong enough to implement far-reaching reform; and by two rounds, on 24 January and 7 February, of Presidential Elections which resulted in a surprising and spectacular victory for the charismatic Stipe Mesić, Yugoslavia's last president, nonetheless considered by many Croats at the start of the campaign as an outsider, a man from the past.
[Show full text]
From Understanding to Cooperation Promoting Interfaith Encounters to Meet Global Challenges
20TH ANNUAL EPP GROUP INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE WITH CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS FROM UNDERSTANDING TO COOPERATION PROMOTING INTERFAITH ENCOUNTERS TO MEET GLOBAL CHALLENGES Zagreb, 7 - 8 December 2017 20TH ANNUAL EPP GROUP INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE WITH CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS / 3 PROGRAMME 10:00-12:30 hrs / Sessions I and II The role of religion in European integration process: expectations, potentials, limits Wednesday, 6 December 10:00-11:15 hrs Session I 20.30 hrs. / Welcome Reception hosted by the Croatian Delegation / Memories and lessons learned during 20 years of Dialogue Thursday, 7 December Co-Chairs: György Hölvényi MEP and Jan Olbrycht MEP, Co-Chairmen of 09:00 hrs / Opening the Working Group on Intercultural Activities and Religious Dialogue György Hölvényi MEP and Jan Olbrycht MEP, Co-Chairmen of the Working Opening message: Group on Intercultural Activities and Religious Dialogue Dubravka Šuica MEP, Head of Croatian Delegation of the EPP Group Alojz Peterle MEP, former Responsible of the Interreligious Dialogue Welcome messages Interventions - Mairead McGuinness, First Vice-President of the European Parliament, - Gordan Jandroković, Speaker of the Croatian Parliament responsible for dialogue with religions (video message) - Joseph Daul, President of the European People’ s Party - Joseph Daul, President of the European People’ s Party - Vito Bonsignore, former Vice-Chairman of the EPP Group responsible for - Andrej Plenković, Prime Minister of Croatia Dialogue with Islam - Mons. Prof. Tadeusz Pieronek, Chairman of the International Krakow Church Conference Organizing Committee - Stephen Biller, former EPP Group Adviser responsible for Interreligious Dialogue Discussion 20TH ANNUAL EPP GROUP INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE WITH CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS / 5 4 /20TH ANNUAL EPP GROUP INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE WITH CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS 11:15-12:30 hrs.
[Show full text]
Internalizing European Politics in Croatia Senada Šelo Šabić
ISSN: 2560-1601 Vol. 11, No. 1 (HR) October 2018 Croatia Political briefing: Internalizing European politics in Croatia Senada Šelo Šabić 1052 Budapest Petőfi Sándor utca 11. +36 1 5858 690 Kiadó: Kína-KKE Intézet Nonprofit Kft. [email protected] Szerkesztésért felelős személy: Chen Xin Kiadásért felelős személy: Huang Ping china-cee.eu Internalizing European politics in Croatia On 12 September 2018 the European Parliament voted on a resolution on a proposal to the European Council to consider possible measures against Hungary which is believed to be undermining the rule of law and fundamental rights. The resolution is based on a report submitted by Judith Sargentini, MEP (Member of the European Parliament) from the Greens. Croatian MEPs voted differently – some supported the resolution, some voted against it. This brief explains what were reasons for difference in voting. By doing so it also indicates how European politics is, step by step, internalized in Croatia which has marked its fifth year membership in the European Union. A motion against Hungary On 12 September 2018 the European Parliament voted for the first time in its history on a resolution against its member state. The resolution is “calling on the Council to determine, pursuant to Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union, the existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded.”1 The resolution is an expression of concern that Hungary is underperforming in the following areas: the functioning of the constitutional and
[Show full text]
ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
[Show full text]
Croatia's Parliamentary Elections
106th CONGRESS Printed for the use of the 2nd Session Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe CROATIAS PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS JANUARY 3, 2000 A Report Prepared by the Staff of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe WASHINGTON:2000 Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe 234 Ford House Office Building Washington, DC 20515-6460 (202) 225-1901 [email protected] http://www.house.gov/csce/ LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS HOUSE SENATE CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey, Chairman BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado, Co-Chairman FRANK R. WOLF, Virginia KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas MATT SALMON, Arizona SPENCER ABRAHAM, Michigan JAMES C. GREENWOOD, Pennsylvania SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas JOSEPH R. PITTS, Pennsylvania TIM HUTCHINSON, Arkansas STENY H. HOYER, Maryland FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland BOB GRAHAM, Florida LOUISE MCINTOSH SLAUGHTER, New York RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin MICHAEL P. FORBES, New York CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut EXECUTIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS HAROLD HONGJU KOH, Department of State EDWARD L. WARNER III, Department of Defense PATRICK A. MULLOY, Department of Commerce COMMISSION STAFF DOROTHY DOUGLAS TAFT, Chief of Staff RONALD J. MCNAMARA, Deputy Chief of Staff BEN ANDERSON, Communications Director ELIZABETH CAMPBELL, Office Administrator OREST DEYCHAKIWSKY, Staff Advisor JOHN F. FINERTY, Staff Advisor CHADWICK R. GORE, Staff Advisor ROBERT HAND, Staff Advisor JANICE HELWIG, Staff Advisor MARLENE KAUFMANN, Counsel KAREN S. LORD, Counsel for Freedom of Religion MICHELE MADASZ, Staff Assistant/Systems Administrator MICHAEL OCHS, Staff Advisor ERIKA B. SCHLAGER, Counsel for International Law MAUREEN WALSH, General Counsel ii ABOUT THE ORGANIZATION (OSCE) The Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, also known as the Helsinki process, traces its origin to the signing of the Helsinki Final Act in Finland on August 1, 1975, by the leaders of 33 European countries, the United States and Canada.
[Show full text]
Participants in the Interparliamentary Conference, 14-15 June 2018
Interparliamentary Conference UPHOLDING THE FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, INCLUDING MEDIA FREEDOM, IN THE EU AND BEYOND with Members of the European Parliament and the Pre-Accession Countries' Parliaments Organised by the European Parliament (Democracy Support and Election Co-ordination Group in cooperation with the Committees on Culture and Education and on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and on Foreign Affairs) and the Chamber of Deputies of the Parliament of the Czech Republic Prague, 14-15 June 2018 Venue : Chamber of Deputies of the Parliament of the Czech Republic Prague (Czech Republic) LIST OF PARTICIPANTS Contact: Mr Thierry Jacob [email protected] +32 2 28 42277 European Parliament, Directorate for Democracy Support, Pre-Accession Actions Unit EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Ms Barbara SPINELLI Vice-Chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs Substitute Member of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green Left) Ms Michaela ŠOJDROVÁ Member of the Committee on Culture and Education and of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality, Substitute Member of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and of the Subcommittee on Human Rights (Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats)) Mr Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ Member of the Committees on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and on Budgetary Control (Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats)) Ms Eleni THEOCHAROUS Member of the Committee on Development and
[Show full text]
Outgoing Head of State Ivo Josipovic Running Favourite in the Croatian Presidential Election
PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN CROATIA 28th December 2014 European Elections monitor Outgoing head of State Ivo Josipovic running favourite in the Croatian Presidential election Corinne Deloy Abstract : The President of the Republic of Croatia Ivo Josipovic (Social Democratic Party, SDP) announced on 19th October last that he wanted to run for another term as head of State. He will be facing 3 other candidates on 28th December. His most serious rival is undoubtedly Kolinda Grabar- Analysis Kitarovic, member of the main opposition party, the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) led by Tomislav Karamarko. The presidential election will be test for all of the country’s political parties in view of the general elections planned for the end of 2015. Ivo Josipovic is a popular character amongst his fellow HDZ), is the former European Integration Minister (2003- countrymen but his image may suffer due to the poor 2005), she was then Foreign Affairs and European Inte- economic results of the government led by Zoran Milano- gration (2005-2008), and Ambassador for Croatia in the vic (Social Democratic Party, SPD) and of the weakening US. In 2011 she became the first woman to be appointed of the Social Democrats. Deputy Secretary General of NATO responsible for public The date of the presidential election, which is unusual, can information. She has the support of the Croatian Farmers’ be explained in that in 2009 the Prime Minister Jadranska Party (HSS), the Social Liberal Party (HSLS) and Ruza Kosor (HDZ) decided to organise the presidential election Tomasic, former leader of the Party of Rights-Dr Ante just after Christmas to increase her own party’s chances Starcevic (HSP-AS); of winning, since a great number of expats return home – Milan Kujundzic (Croatian Dawn-People’s Party, HZ), for the holiday period.
[Show full text]
Competition Between Minority Ethnic Parties in Post-Conflict Countries
Competition Between Minority Ethnic Parties in Post-conflict Countries: Performance of Minority Parties in Croatia and Macedonia by Dane Taleski Submitted to Central European University Department of Political Science In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Supervisor: András Bozóki Budapest, September 2014 1 ABSTRACT Academic and policy studies argue that an inclusive approach is needed for sustainable peacebuilding. This justifies the inclusion of former combatants into political parties, but some argue that it can have negative consequences for democratization. Institutional engineering is proposed to forge cross-cutting parties; however it is puzzling to find that parties from rebels often dominate in the post-conflict period. To address this puzzle I look at minority ethnic parties in post-conflict Croatia and Macedonia. SDSS dominates the competition between Serb parties in Croatia and DUI dominates between Albanian parties in Macedonia. To answer why this is so, I first look at the process of their formation and functioning and second I compared them to other minority parties. Despite the common history in Yugoslavia, the inter-ethnic conflicts, the post-conflict conditions and institutional environments for minority politics were very different in Croatia and Macedonia. My level of analysis is the competition between minority parties in each country. Because of the similar outcomes, under varying conditions, I consider that the finding in one country control for the other. Using process tracing I analyzed data from 78 interviews, party content, media and archival sources. The findings were corroborated with quantitative analysis of electoral data from national and sub- national elections in the entire post-conflict period.
[Show full text]
Party Politics in the Western Balkans
Party Politics in the Western Balkans Edited by Věra Stojarová and Peter Emerson 2 Legacy of communist and socialist parties in the Western Balkans Věra Stojarová As Ishiyama and Bozóki note, the development of communist successor parties1 in post- communist politics has had an important effect upon the development of democracy (Bozóki and Ishiyama 2002: 393). In some countries the communist party was outlawed; in many cases it was transformed into a party of a socialist or social democratic character; elsewhere, the communist party began to take part in the democratic process, which led to varying results; in some cases, the party transformed itself into a classic socialist or social democratic party; while in other cases it retained a communist ideology. As the literature reveals, the type of the regime, the modus of transition, the manner of financing political parties, the organisation of the parties, as well as the whole political context, all matter. Ishiyama suggests that the patrimonial communist regime (as in Serbia) produced communist successor parties which had to distinguish themselves from the previous communist system and hence turned towards nationalism, while in a national- consensus regime (Slovenia, Croatia), the successor parties developed policies that divorced the party from the past, and led to the emergence of a social democratic identity (Ishiyama 1998: 81–2). Nevertheless, the application of the above- mentioned theory reveals the exceptionality of the Western Balkan countries. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, the ethnic structure and the different goals of the three ethnicities had a great impact on the formation of political parties, which were mainly based on ethnic grounds, and left little space to the parties with a social democratic orientation.
[Show full text]
Croatia Country Report BTI 2006
Croatia Status Index Management Index (Democracy: 9.10 / Market economy: 8.32) 8.71 6.88 HDI 0.841 Population 4.5 mn GDP per capita ($, PPP) 11.080 Population growth1 0.2 % Unemployment rate2 19.5 Women in Parliament 21.7 % UN Education Index 0.90 Poverty3 4% Gini Index 29.0 (2001) Source: UNDP: Human Development Report 2005. Figures for 2003 unless otherwise indicated. 1Annual Growth between 1975 and 2003. 2International Labour Office, average registered unemployment in 2003. 3Population living below $ 1 (1990- 2003). A. Executive summary Having suffered a serious transformation crisis, war and political isolation in the 1990s, Croatia has rapidly advanced political and economic transformation since January 2000 with success. This dynamic was brought about by political change marked by the end of Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) rule. The HDZ had ruled since independence. The commitment to democracy and market economy then underlined has begun again since the re-election of the reformed HDZ in 2003. The realization of these parliamentary elections and the manner in which successive government change was conducted indicate further development in Croatia’s democratic structures. Improvements in state capacity, political participation and the rule of law underscore this development. While the judiciary operates relatively independently, it is partially limited in carrying out its functions. Improvements are needed, particularly with regard to procedural rationalization and the administration of justice. Because the judicial system’s budget has been increasing since 2003 in the course of adopting EU-standards, the number of untreated cases is likely to decline and the fight against corruption reinforced.
[Show full text]
Download Briefing Here
THE KEY PRIORITIES OF THE CROATIAN PRESIDENCY OF THE EU A Strong Europe in a World of Challenges: The Key Priorities of the Croatian Presidency of the EU By Clare Gray n 1 January 2020, Croatia assumed its first rotating The beginning of the Croatian Presidency was also marked by OPresidency of the Council of the European Union, a national political change, following the election of opposition position it will hold for six months until 30 June 2020. To candidate, Zoran Milanović, as President of Croatia. Mr mark the occasion, the President of the European Council, Milanović, a member of the Social Democratic party, secured Charles Michel, and the College of Commissioners, travelled to victory over the incumbent Kolinda Grabar-Kitarović, a member the Croatian capital of Zagreb from 8-10 January 2020. As the of the governing Croatian Democratic Union. most recent EU Member State and one of the smallest, holding the Presidency gives Croatia the opportunity to coordinate the The motto of the Croatian Presidency, “A Strong Europe in a legislative activities of the Council. World of Challenges”, encapsulates the complex backdrop against which Croatia accedes to the Presidency, while also expressing Croatia takes up the Presidency against a complex political and confidence in the EU’s strengths and capacity for unity in institutional backdrop. The new EU institutions and leaders are overcoming these challenges and responding to the needs of EU now all in office and Croatia will have to work quickly to forge citizens. productive working relationships between the key institutions. In addition, new policy priorities have emerged such as the The Presidency of the Council of the EU European Green Deal and the digital transformation, while old challenges persist such as migration, security and uneven The Presidency of the Council of the European Union rotates economic development.
[Show full text]