DOCSLIB.ORG

Biofertilizers for Sustainable Agriculture: Isolation and Genomic Characterization of Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria from Sugarcane

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BIOFERTILIZERS FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE: ISOLATION AND GENOMIC CHARACTERIZATION OF NITROGEN-FIXING BACTERIA FROM SUGARCANE A Dissertation Presented to The Academic Faculty by Luz Karime Medina Cordoba In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Biology in the School of Biological Sciences Georgia Institute of Technology May 2020 COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY LUZ KARIME MEDINA CORDOBA BIOFERTILIZERS FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE: ISOLATION AND GENOMIC CHARACTERIZATION OF NITROGEN-FIXING BACTERIA FROM SUGARCANE Approved by: Dr. Joel E. Kostka, Advisor Dr. Jung H. Choi School of Biological Sciences School of Biological Sciences Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. I. King Jordan, Co-advisor Dr. Leonard W. Mayer School of Biological Sciences School of Medicine Georgia Institute of Technology Emory University Dr. Frank Stewart School of Biological Sciences Georgia Institute of Technology Date Approved: December 10, 2019 To my family and friends ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to express my gratitude to my advisor, Joel Kostka, for the opportunity to complete my PhD under his guidance. I am extremely grateful for your contributions to my research, and the experiences in your laboratory, where I learned principles that have made me a better microbiologist. To my co-advisor, King Jordan, thank you for believing in me from the start of the PhD program. Your guidance through each part of this five-year journey has contributed to my growth as a scientist. I will always be grateful for your patience and dedicated effort in educating me on bioinformatics. Your love and dedication to science and your students have made a lasting impression on me. I want to thank my committee members, Dr. Frank Stewart, Dr. Leonard Mayer, and Dr. Jung H. Choi; your support, comments, and suggestions have been fundamental for my research and have helped me to become a better scientist. It would have been impossible to complete my research without my colleges and friends from the lab. Aroon Chande and Dr. Lavanya Rishishwar were extraordinary instructors during the last years of my studies. To Shashwat Deepali Nagar and Héctor Espitia, thank you for your friendship and all your help during my time in the laboratory. I would like to thank my country, Colombia, for providing resources to help further my education. I hope to one day make a difference in the lives of every Colombian through microbiology. Finally, thank you to my family, who have been the catalyst for my motivation to grow as a person and as a professional. To my parents, Dr. Miguel Medina iv and Professor Mabel Cordoba, thank you for your unconditional love and for teaching me early on to love science, and more importantly, to respect others. To my brother Miguel David Medina for being my best friend and always giving me good advice. And to Kai Parham for always being there when I needed encouragement and the strength to continue. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv LIST OF TABLES viii LIST OF FIGURES ix LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS xi SUMMARY xii CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION: BIOFERTILIZERS FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE 1 1.1 Sustainable agriculture 1 1.2 Biological fertilizers (biofertilizers) 2 1.3 Plant growth-promoting bacteria (biofertilizers) and their role in sustainable agriculture 2 1.3.1 Mechanisms of bacterial plant growth promotion 3 1.4 Sugarcane as a global crop for the study of plant growth-promoting bacteria 6 1.4.1 Plant growth-promoting (PGP) bacteria isolated from sugarcane 7 1.4.2 Cultivation based studies 8 1.4.3 Microscopy based studies 9 1.4.4 Genomic based studies 9 1.5 The most common strategies for the application of biofertilizers in sugarcane, and the impact of these strategies on plant growth and crop yield 10 1.6 Challenges to the use of biofertilizers 11 1.6.1 Biofertilizers for sustainable sugarcane agriculture in Colombia 12 CHAPTER 2. ISOLATION AND INITIAL CHARACTERIZATION OF NITROGEN-FIXING BACTERIA FROM COLOMBIAN SUGARCANE 13 2.1 Abstract 13 2.2 Introduction 14 2.2.1 Colombian sugarcane company INCAUCA 14 2.3 Materials and Methods 16 2.3.1 Sample site selection, design, and execution 16 2.3.2 Sample acquisition 22 2.3.3 Cultivation of putative nitrogen-fixing bacteria from sugarcane 23 2.3.4 Molecular screening and identification of nitrogen fixers 25 2.3.5 Initial genome characterization of putative nitrogen-fixing bacteria 26 2.4 Results 28 2.4.1 Cultivation of putative nitrogen-fixing bacteria from sugarcane 28 2.4.2 Initial genome characterization of putative nitrogen-fixing bacteria 28 vi CHAPTER 3. GENOMIC CHARACTERIZATION AND COMPUTATIONAL PHENOTYPING OF NITROGEN-FIXING BACTERIA ISOLATED FROM COLOMBIAN SUGARCANE FIELDS 31 3.1 Abstract 31 3.2 Introduction 32 3.3 Materials and methods 34 3.3.1 Genome sequencing, assembly, and annotation 34 3.3.2 Comparative genomic analysis 36 3.3.3 Computational phenotyping 38 3.3.4 Experimental validation 48 3.4 Results 50 3.4.1 Genome characterization of putative nitrogen-fixing bacteria 50 3.4.2 Comparative genomic analysis 52 3.4.3 Computational phenotyping 59 3.4.4 Virulence comparison 64 3.4.5 Experimental validation of prioritized isolates 66 3.5 Discussion 68 3.5.1 Computational phenotyping for the prioritization of potential biofertilizers 69 3.5.2 Virulence profiling for the prioritization of potential biofertilizers 70 3.5.3 Potential for the use of computational phenotyping in other microbiology applications 71 CHAPTER 4. DEVELOPMENT OF A nifH DATABASE TO FACILITATE THE TAXONOMic ASSIGNMENT AND DIVERSITY ANALYSIS OF NITROGEN- FIXING BACTERIA 73 4.1 Nitrogen fixation 73 4.2 Need for a nifH gene database 75 4.3 Problems with previous nifH gene databases 78 4.4 Creation and evaluation of the nifH gene reference sequence database 81 4.4.1 Automated database pipeline: sequence retrieval and validation 82 4.5 A natural genetic classification system for nifH 87 CHAPTER 5. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS 96 APENDIX A. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLES FOR CHAPTER 2 100 APENDIX B. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLES FOR CHAPTER 3 101 APENDIX C. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLES FOR CHAPTER 4 112 PUBLICATIONS 202 REFERENCES 203 vii LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Physicochemical characterization of INCAUCA sugarcane soil fields.............. 19 Table 2. Genome assembly statistics for the isolates characterized here. ........................ 29 Table 3. List of genome sequence analysis software used in this study. .......................... 35 Table 4. Custom gene panel for nitrogen fixation genes. ................................................. 40 Table 5. Custom gene panels for plant growth promotion genes. .................................... 42 Table6. Genome sequences for clinically-associated isolates from closely related Klebsiella species. ............................................................................................................. 47 Table 7. Genome sequencing assembly and functional annotations. ................................ 51 Table 8. Identity of the most closely related species (genus) for the isolates characterized here. ................................................................................................................................... 55 Table 9. Agro ecological zones sampled for this project. ............................................... 100 Table 10. Sugar cane varieties sampled for this project. ................................................ 100 Table 11. Presence/absence calls for nitrogen fixation genes panel. .............................. 102 Table 12. Presence/absence calls for plant growth promotion genes panel. ................... 104 Table 13. Presence/absence calls for virulence factor genes panel. ............................... 106 Table 14. Presence/absence calls for predicted antibiotic resistance profiles genes panel. ......................................................................................................................................... 110 Table 15. Lis of all full length sequences used for the genetic classification for nifH ... 113 viii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. INCAUCA sugarcane fields. ............................................................................. 15 Figure 2. INCAUCA sugarcane growing zones and farms............................................... 16 Figure 3. Triangular field sampling design. ...................................................................... 17 Figure 4. Sugarcane sampling. .......................................................................................... 18 Figure 5. Sample preparation and shipping system. ......................................................... 22 Figure 6. Platform for high-throughput enrichment of nitrogen-fixing bacteria. ............. 24 Figure 7. Cultivation and storage of nitrogen-fixing bacterial isolates. ........................... 25 Figure 8. Molecular screening of putative nitrogen-fixing bacterial isolates. .................. 26 Figure 9. Intial whole genome sequencing and analysis pipeline. .................................... 27 Figure 10. Screenshot of the BioProject PRJNA418312 available in the NCBI. ............. 30 Figure 11. Phylogeny of the bacterial isolates characterized here (SCK numbers) together with their most closely related bacterial type strains. ....................................................... 53 Figure 12. Phylogeny of the 16S rRNA genes for the bacterial isolates characterized here (SCK numbers) together with their most closely related bacterial type strains ................ 54 Figure 13. Comparison
Recommended publications
  • Multilayered Horizontal Operon Transfers from Bacteria Reconstruct a Thiamine Salvage Pathway in Yeasts

    Multilayered Horizontal Operon Transfers from Bacteria Reconstruct a Thiamine Salvage Pathway in Yeasts

    Multilayered horizontal operon transfers from bacteria reconstruct a thiamine salvage pathway in yeasts Carla Gonçalvesa and Paula Gonçalvesa,1 aApplied Molecular Biosciences Unit-UCIBIO, Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal Edited by Edward F. DeLong, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, and approved September 22, 2019 (received for review June 14, 2019) Horizontal acquisition of bacterial genes is presently recognized as nisms presumed to have facilitated a transition from bacterial an important contribution to the adaptation and evolution of operon transcription to eukaryotic-style gene expression were eukaryotic genomes. However, the mechanisms underlying ex- proposed, such as gene fusion giving rise to multifunctional pro- pression and consequent selection and fixation of the prokaryotic teins (6, 23, 24), increase in intergenic distances between genes to genes in the new eukaryotic setting are largely unknown. Here we generate room for eukaryotic promoters, and independent tran- show that genes composing the pathway for the synthesis of the scription producing mRNAs with poly(A) tails have been dem- essential vitamin B1 (thiamine) were lost in an ancestor of a yeast onstrated (22). In the best documented study, which concerns a lineage, the Wickerhamiella/Starmerella (W/S) clade, known to bacterial siderophore biosynthesis operon acquired by yeasts be- harbor an unusually large number of genes of alien origin. The longing to the Wickerhamiella/Starmerella (W/S) clade, the bacte- thiamine pathway was subsequently reassembled, at least twice, rial genes acquired as an operon were shown to be functional (22). by multiple HGT events from different bacterial donors involving Thiamine, commonly known as vitamin B1, is essential for all both single genes and entire operons.
  • Core Sulphate-Reducing Microorganisms in Metal-Removing Semi-Passive Biochemical Reactors and the Co-Occurrence of Methanogens

    Core Sulphate-Reducing Microorganisms in Metal-Removing Semi-Passive Biochemical Reactors and the Co-Occurrence of Methanogens

    microorganisms Article Core Sulphate-Reducing Microorganisms in Metal-Removing Semi-Passive Biochemical Reactors and the Co-Occurrence of Methanogens Maryam Rezadehbashi and Susan A. Baldwin * Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of British Columbia, 2360 East Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-604-822-1973 Received: 2 January 2018; Accepted: 17 February 2018; Published: 23 February 2018 Abstract: Biochemical reactors (BCRs) based on the stimulation of sulphate-reducing microorganisms (SRM) are emerging semi-passive remediation technologies for treatment of mine-influenced water. Their successful removal of metals and sulphate has been proven at the pilot-scale, but little is known about the types of SRM that grow in these systems and whether they are diverse or restricted to particular phylogenetic or taxonomic groups. A phylogenetic study of four established pilot-scale BCRs on three different mine sites compared the diversity of SRM growing in them. The mine sites were geographically distant from each other, nevertheless the BCRs selected for similar SRM types. Clostridia SRM related to Desulfosporosinus spp. known to be tolerant to high concentrations of copper were members of the core microbial community. Members of the SRM family Desulfobacteraceae were dominant, particularly those related to Desulfatirhabdium butyrativorans. Methanogens were dominant archaea and possibly were present at higher relative abundances than SRM in some BCRs. Both hydrogenotrophic and acetoclastic types were present. There were no strong negative or positive co-occurrence correlations of methanogen and SRM taxa. Knowing which SRM inhabit successfully operating BCRs allows practitioners to target these phylogenetic groups when selecting inoculum for future operations.
  • (Batch Learning Self-Organizing Maps), to the Microbiome Analysis of Ticks

    (Batch Learning Self-Organizing Maps), to the Microbiome Analysis of Ticks

    Title A novel approach, based on BLSOMs (Batch Learning Self-Organizing Maps), to the microbiome analysis of ticks Nakao, Ryo; Abe, Takashi; Nijhof, Ard M; Yamamoto, Seigo; Jongejan, Frans; Ikemura, Toshimichi; Sugimoto, Author(s) Chihiro The ISME Journal, 7(5), 1003-1015 Citation https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.171 Issue Date 2013-03 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/53167 Type article (author version) File Information ISME_Nakao.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP A novel approach, based on BLSOMs (Batch Learning Self-Organizing Maps), to the microbiome analysis of ticks Ryo Nakao1,a, Takashi Abe2,3,a, Ard M. Nijhof4, Seigo Yamamoto5, Frans Jongejan6,7, Toshimichi Ikemura2, Chihiro Sugimoto1 1Division of Collaboration and Education, Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Kita-20, Nishi-10, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 001-0020, Japan 2Nagahama Institute of Bio-Science and Technology, Nagahama, Shiga 526-0829, Japan 3Graduate School of Science & Technology, Niigata University, 8050, Igarashi 2-no-cho, Nishi- ku, Niigata 950-2181, Japan 4Institute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Königsweg 67, 14163 Berlin, Germany 5Miyazaki Prefectural Institute for Public Health and Environment, 2-3-2 Gakuen Kibanadai Nishi, Miyazaki 889-2155, Japan 6Utrecht Centre for Tick-borne Diseases (UCTD), Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 1, 3584 CL Utrecht, The Netherlands 7Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X04, 0110 Onderstepoort, South Africa aThese authors contributed equally to this work. Keywords: BLSOMs/emerging diseases/metagenomics/microbiomes/symbionts/ticks Running title: Tick microbiomes revealed by BLSOMs Subject category: Microbe-microbe and microbe-host interactions Abstract Ticks transmit a variety of viral, bacterial and protozoal pathogens, which are often zoonotic.
  • Response of Heterotrophic Stream Biofilm Communities to a Gradient of Resources

    Response of Heterotrophic Stream Biofilm Communities to a Gradient of Resources

    The following supplement accompanies the article Response of heterotrophic stream biofilm communities to a gradient of resources D. J. Van Horn1,*, R. L. Sinsabaugh1, C. D. Takacs-Vesbach1, K. R. Mitchell1,2, C. N. Dahm1 1Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA 2Present address: Department of Microbiology & Immunology, University of British Columbia Life Sciences Centre, Vancouver BC V6T 1Z3, Canada *Email: [email protected] Aquatic Microbial Ecology 64:149–161 (2011) Table S1. Representative sequences for each OTU, associated GenBank accession numbers, and taxonomic classifications with bootstrap values (in parentheses), generated in mothur using 14956 reference sequences from the SILVA data base Treatment Accession Sequence name SILVA taxonomy classification number Control JF695047 BF8FCONT18Fa04.b1 Bacteria(100);Proteobacteria(100);Gammaproteobacteria(100);Pseudomonadales(100);Pseudomonadaceae(100);Cellvibrio(100);unclassified; Control JF695049 BF8FCONT18Fa12.b1 Bacteria(100);Proteobacteria(100);Alphaproteobacteria(100);Rhizobiales(100);Methylocystaceae(100);uncultured(100);unclassified; Control JF695054 BF8FCONT18Fc01.b1 Bacteria(100);Planctomycetes(100);Planctomycetacia(100);Planctomycetales(100);Planctomycetaceae(100);Isosphaera(50);unclassified; Control JF695056 BF8FCONT18Fc04.b1 Bacteria(100);Proteobacteria(100);Gammaproteobacteria(100);Xanthomonadales(100);Xanthomonadaceae(100);uncultured(64);unclassified; Control JF695057 BF8FCONT18Fc06.b1 Bacteria(100);Proteobacteria(100);Betaproteobacteria(100);Burkholderiales(100);Comamonadaceae(100);Ideonella(54);unclassified;
  • Downloaded 13 April 2017); Using Diamond

    Downloaded 13 April 2017); Using Diamond

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/347021; this version posted June 14, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 2 3 4 5 Re-evaluating the salty divide: phylogenetic specificity of 6 transitions between marine and freshwater systems 7 8 9 10 Sara F. Pavera, Daniel J. Muratorea, Ryan J. Newtonb, Maureen L. Colemana# 11 a 12 Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA 13 b School of Freshwater Sciences, University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA 14 15 Running title: Marine-freshwater phylogenetic specificity 16 17 #Address correspondence to Maureen Coleman, [email protected] 18 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/347021; this version posted June 14, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 19 Abstract 20 Marine and freshwater microbial communities are phylogenetically distinct and transitions 21 between habitat types are thought to be infrequent. We compared the phylogenetic diversity of 22 marine and freshwater microorganisms and identified specific lineages exhibiting notably high or 23 low similarity between marine and freshwater ecosystems using a meta-analysis of 16S rRNA 24 gene tag-sequencing datasets. As expected, marine and freshwater microbial communities 25 differed in the relative abundance of major phyla and contained habitat-specific lineages; at the 26 same time, however, many shared taxa were observed in both environments. 27 Betaproteobacteria and Alphaproteobacteria sequences had the highest similarity between 28 marine and freshwater sample pairs.
  • Biological Nitrogen Fixation Dr. Anuj Rani, Department of Botany, T.N.B

    Biological Nitrogen Fixation Dr. Anuj Rani, Department of Botany, T.N.B

    E- learning: B.Sc. Part-II, Botany Hons and Part-I Sub.] Biological Nitrogen Fixation Dr. Anuj Rani, Department of Botany, T.N.B. College, Bhagalpur Email: [email protected] Conversion of molecular nitrogen (N2) of the atmosphere into inorganic nitrogenous compounds such as nitrates or ammonia is called as nitrogen fixation. When this nitrogen fixation occurs through the agency of some living organisms, the process is called as biological nitrogen fixation in which atmospheric nitrogen is converted into ammonia. Not all the organisms have capacity to fix molecular nitrogen (N2) of the atmosphere. Only certain prokaryotic micro-organisms such as some free living bacteria, cyanobacteria (blue- green algae) and some of the prokaryotic micro- organisms in symbiotic association with other plants (mostly legumes) can fix atmospheric nitrogen. They can be grouped as follows: A. Free Living: 1. Autotrophic: (a) Aerobic e.g., some cyanobacteria (blue-green algae). All those blue-green algae which can fix atmospheric nitrogen usually contain heterocyst’s such as Nostoc, Anabaena, Tolypothrix, Aulosira, Calothrix etc. But all the heterocyst’s bearing blue-green algae may not be atm. nitrogen fixers. A few non- heterocystous blue-green algae such as Gloeotheca are also known to fix atm. N2. (b) Anaerobic e.g., certain bacteria such as Chromatium and Rhodospirillum. 2. Heterotrophic: (a) Aerobic e.g., certain bacteria such as Azotobacter, Azospirillum, Derxia and Beijerinckia. (b) Facultative e.g., certain bacteria such as Bacillus and Klebsiella. (c) Anaerobic e.g., certain bacteria such as Clostridium and Methanococcus. 1 B. Symbiotic: (a) Root Nodules of Leguminous Plants: Various types of bacteria called rhizobia associated with root nodules of legumes can fix atm.
  • Table S5. the Information of the Bacteria Annotated in the Soil Community at Species Level

    Table S5. the Information of the Bacteria Annotated in the Soil Community at Species Level

    Table S5. The information of the bacteria annotated in the soil community at species level No. Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species The number of contigs Abundance(%) 1 Firmicutes Bacilli Bacillales Bacillaceae Bacillus Bacillus cereus 1749 5.145782459 2 Bacteroidetes Cytophagia Cytophagales Hymenobacteraceae Hymenobacter Hymenobacter sedentarius 1538 4.52499338 3 Gemmatimonadetes Gemmatimonadetes Gemmatimonadales Gemmatimonadaceae Gemmatirosa Gemmatirosa kalamazoonesis 1020 3.000970902 4 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas indica 797 2.344876284 5 Firmicutes Bacilli Lactobacillales Streptococcaceae Lactococcus Lactococcus piscium 542 1.594633558 6 Actinobacteria Thermoleophilia Solirubrobacterales Conexibacteraceae Conexibacter Conexibacter woesei 471 1.385742446 7 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas taxi 430 1.265115184 8 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas wittichii 388 1.141545794 9 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas sp. FARSPH 298 0.876754244 10 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sorangium cellulosum 260 0.764953367 11 Proteobacteria Deltaproteobacteria Myxococcales Polyangiaceae Sorangium Sphingomonas sp. Cra20 260 0.764953367 12 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas panacis 252 0.741416341
  • DOMAIN Bacteria PHYLUM Cyanobacteria

    DOMAIN Bacteria PHYLUM Cyanobacteria

    DOMAIN Bacteria PHYLUM Cyanobacteria D Bacteria Cyanobacteria P C Chroobacteria Hormogoneae Cyanobacteria O Chroococcales Oscillatoriales Nostocales Stigonematales Sub I Sub III Sub IV F Homoeotrichaceae Chamaesiphonaceae Ammatoideaceae Microchaetaceae Borzinemataceae Family I Family I Family I Chroococcaceae Borziaceae Nostocaceae Capsosiraceae Dermocarpellaceae Gomontiellaceae Rivulariaceae Chlorogloeopsaceae Entophysalidaceae Oscillatoriaceae Scytonemataceae Fischerellaceae Gloeobacteraceae Phormidiaceae Loriellaceae Hydrococcaceae Pseudanabaenaceae Mastigocladaceae Hyellaceae Schizotrichaceae Nostochopsaceae Merismopediaceae Stigonemataceae Microsystaceae Synechococcaceae Xenococcaceae S-F Homoeotrichoideae Note: Families shown in green color above have breakout charts G Cyanocomperia Dactylococcopsis Prochlorothrix Cyanospira Prochlorococcus Prochloron S Amphithrix Cyanocomperia africana Desmonema Ercegovicia Halomicronema Halospirulina Leptobasis Lichen Palaeopleurocapsa Phormidiochaete Physactis Key to Vertical Axis Planktotricoides D=Domain; P=Phylum; C=Class; O=Order; F=Family Polychlamydum S-F=Sub-Family; G=Genus; S=Species; S-S=Sub-Species Pulvinaria Schmidlea Sphaerocavum Taxa are from the Taxonomicon, using Systema Natura 2000 . Triochocoleus http://www.taxonomy.nl/Taxonomicon/TaxonTree.aspx?id=71022 S-S Desmonema wrangelii Palaeopleurocapsa wopfnerii Pulvinaria suecica Key Genera D Bacteria Cyanobacteria P C Chroobacteria Hormogoneae Cyanobacteria O Chroococcales Oscillatoriales Nostocales Stigonematales Sub I Sub III Sub
  • Textile Waste and Microplastic Induce Activity and Development of Unique

    Textile Waste and Microplastic Induce Activity and Development of Unique

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.08.939876; this version posted February 10, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Textile waste and microplastic induce activity and 2 development of unique hydrocarbon-degrading marine 3 bacterial communities 4 5 Elsa B. Girard1, Melanie Kaliwoda2, Wolfgang W. Schmahl1,2,3, Gert Wörheide1,3,4 and 6 William D. Orsi1,3* 7 8 1 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 9 80333 Munich, Germany 10 2 SNSB - Mineralogische Staatssammlung München, 80333 München, Germany 11 3 GeoBio-CenterLMU, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80333 Munich, Germany 12 4 SNSB - Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie, 80333 Munich, Germany 13 *Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]) 14 15 16 17 18 KEYWORDS 19 Microplastic, Fiber, Hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria, Microbial community, Pollution 20 21 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.08.939876; this version posted February 10, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 22 ABSTRACT 23 Biofilm-forming microbial communities on plastics and textile fibers are of growing interest since 24 they have potential to contribute to disease outbreaks and material biodegradability in the 25 environment.
  • Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences

    Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences

    ISSN: 0975-8585 Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences A Novel Approach to Enhancement of Poly-Β-Hydroxybutyrate Accumulation Aulosira Fertilissima by Mixotrophy And Chemohetertrophy. 1S Sirohi*, 2N Mallick, 3SPS Sirohi , 1PK Tyagi, and 1GD Tripathi. 1Department of Biotechnology, MIET Meerut-250005, India. 2Department of Agricultural and Food Engineering, IIT Kharagpur-721302, India. 3Kisan PG Collage Simbhaoli, Gaziabad, India. ABSTRACT Aulisira fertilissima, a unicellular cyanobacterium, produced poly-β-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) up to 5.4% (w/w) dry cells when grown photoautotrophically but 8.9% when grown mixotrophically with 0.2% (w/v) glucose and acetate after 24 days. Gas-exchange limitations under mixotrophy and chemoheterotrophy with 0.2% (w/v) acetate and glucose enhanced the accumulation up to 17–19% (w/w) dry cells, the value almost 4- fold higher with respect to photoautotrophic condition. These results revealed high potential of Aulisira fertilissima in accumulating PHB, an appropriate raw material for biodegradable and biocompatible plastic. PHB could be an important material for plastic and pharmaceutical industries. Keywords: chemoheterotrophy, mixotrophy, Aulosira fertilissima, poly-β-hydroxybutyrate *Corresponding author March – April 2015 RJPBCS 6(2) Page No. 1266 ISSN: 0975-8585 INTRODUCTION Infact, Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) are the polymers of hydroxyalkanoates, which has gained tremendous impetus in the recent years because of its biodegradable and biocompatible nature and can be produced from renewable sources. PHAs are accumulated as a carbon and energy storage material in various microorganisms usually under the condition of limiting nutritional elements such as N, P, S, O, or Mg [1] in the presence of excess carbon [2]. Many of these bacterial species produce the polymer up to 20% of the dry cell weight (dcw) and a few, such as, Ralstonia eutropha, now called as Wautersia eutropha, is capable of accumulating poly-β-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) up to almost 80% of the dcw [3].
  • A Noval Investigation of Microbiome from Vermicomposting Liquid Produced by Thai Earthworm, Perionyx Sp

    A Noval Investigation of Microbiome from Vermicomposting Liquid Produced by Thai Earthworm, Perionyx Sp

    International Journal of Agricultural Technology 2021Vol. 17(4):1363-1372 Available online http://www.ijat-aatsea.com ISSN 2630-0192 (Online) A novel investigation of microbiome from vermicomposting liquid produced by Thai earthworm, Perionyx sp. 1 Kraisittipanit, R.1,2, Tancho, A.2,3, Aumtong, S.3 and Charerntantanakul, W.1* 1Program of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Maejo University, Chiang Mai, Thailand; 2Natural Farming Research and Development Center, Maejo University, Chiang Mai, Thailand; 3Faculty of Agricultural Production, Maejo University, Thailand. Kraisittipanit, R., Tancho, A., Aumtong, S. and Charerntantanakul, W. (2021). A noval investigation of microbiome from vermicomposting liquid produced by Thai earthworm, Perionyx sp. 1. International Journal of Agricultural Technology 17(4):1363-1372. Abstract The whole microbiota structure in vermicomposting liquid derived from Thai earthworm, Perionyx sp. 1 was estimated. It showed high richness microbial species and belongs to 127 species, separated in 3 fungal phyla (Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Mucoromycota), 1 Actinomycetes and 16 bacterial phyla (Acidobacteria, Armatimonadetes, Bacteroidetes, Balneolaeota, Candidatus, Chloroflexi, Deinococcus, Fibrobacteres, Firmicutes, Gemmatimonadates, Ignavibacteriae, Nitrospirae, Planctomycetes, Proteobacteria, Tenericutes and Verrucomicrobia). The OTUs data analysis revealed the highest taxonomic abundant ratio in bacteria and fungi belong to Proteobacteria (70.20 %) and Ascomycota (5.96 %). The result confirmed that Perionyx sp. 1
  • Tree Scale: 1 D Bacteria P Desulfobacterota C Jdfr-97 O Jdfr-97 F Jdfr-97 G Jdfr-97 S Jdfr-97 Sp002010915 WGS ID MTPG01

    Tree Scale: 1 D Bacteria P Desulfobacterota C Jdfr-97 O Jdfr-97 F Jdfr-97 G Jdfr-97 S Jdfr-97 Sp002010915 WGS ID MTPG01

    d Bacteria p Desulfobacterota c Thermodesulfobacteria o Thermodesulfobacteriales f Thermodesulfobacteriaceae g Thermodesulfobacterium s Thermodesulfobacterium commune WGS ID JQLF01 d Bacteria p Desulfobacterota c Thermodesulfobacteria o Thermodesulfobacteriales f Thermodesulfobacteriaceae g Thermosulfurimonas s Thermosulfurimonas dismutans WGS ID LWLG01 d Bacteria p Desulfobacterota c Desulfofervidia o Desulfofervidales f DG-60 g DG-60 s DG-60 sp001304365 WGS ID LJNA01 ID WGS sp001304365 DG-60 s DG-60 g DG-60 f Desulfofervidales o Desulfofervidia c Desulfobacterota p Bacteria d d Bacteria p Desulfobacterota c Desulfofervidia o Desulfofervidales f Desulfofervidaceae g Desulfofervidus s Desulfofervidus auxilii RS GCF 001577525 1 001577525 GCF RS auxilii Desulfofervidus s Desulfofervidus g Desulfofervidaceae f Desulfofervidales o Desulfofervidia c Desulfobacterota p Bacteria d d Bacteria p Desulfobacterota c Thermodesulfobacteria o Thermodesulfobacteriales f Thermodesulfatatoraceae g Thermodesulfatator s Thermodesulfatator atlanticus WGS ID ATXH01 d Bacteria p Desulfobacterota c Desulfobacteria o Desulfatiglandales f NaphS2 g 4484-190-2 s 4484-190-2 sp002050025 WGS ID MVDB01 ID WGS sp002050025 4484-190-2 s 4484-190-2 g NaphS2 f Desulfatiglandales o Desulfobacteria c Desulfobacterota p Bacteria d d Bacteria p Desulfobacterota c Thermodesulfobacteria o Thermodesulfobacteriales f Thermodesulfobacteriaceae g QOAM01 s QOAM01 sp003978075 WGS ID QOAM01 d Bacteria p Desulfobacterota c BSN033 o UBA8473 f UBA8473 g UBA8473 s UBA8473 sp002782605 WGS