DOCSLIB.ORG

Information Collection and Impact Assessment of Possible Requirements for Environmental Inspections in the Area of EU Legislat

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Information Collection and Impact Assessment of Possible Requirements for Environmental Inspections in the Area of EU Legislat Technical Report - 2013 - 074 Information collection and impact assessment of possible requirements for environmental inspections in the area of EU legislation on water, nature protection and trade in certain environmentally sensitive goods Final Report, July 2013 Environment Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union New freephone number: 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://ec.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2013 ISBN 978-92-79-34173-1 doi: 10.2779/64011 © European Union, 2013 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Information collection and impact assessment of possible requirements for environmental inspections in the area of EU legislation on water, nature protection and trade in certain environmentally sensitive goods Final Report July 2013 Consortium coordinator: Project coordinator: Project Partners: 1 Citation and disclaimer: Recommended citation IEEP, Bio Intelligence Service and Ecologic Institute (2013). Information collection and impact assessment of possible requirements for environmental inspections in the area of EU legislation on water, nature protection and trade in certain environmentally sensitive goods. Final report for the European Commission, DG Environment. Institute for European Environmental Policy, Brussels and London, July 2013. Authors: Andrew Farmer, Peter Hjerp, Axel Volkery (IEEP), Mary Ann Kong, Shailendra Mudgal (Bio Intelligence Service), Lucas Porsch, Johanna von Toggenburg and McKenna Davis (Ecologic Institute). Disclaimer: The contents and views contained in this report are those of the authors, and do not necessarily represent those of the European Commission. 2 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 7 ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................. 12 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 16 1.1 Purpose of the report ...................................................................................... 16 1.2 Environmental inspections and implementation of the EU environmental acquis 16 1.3 Concepts and definitions ................................................................................. 19 2 BASELINE ANALYSIS OF THE MEMBER STATES ......................................................... 22 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 22 2.2 The public consultation .................................................................................... 23 2.3 Baseline: lessons from the literature ................................................................ 25 2.4 Baseline analysis: water ................................................................................... 36 2.4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 36 2.4.2 Institutional framework ................................................................................... 37 2.4.3 Strategic approach to inspection ...................................................................... 38 2.4.4 Undertaking inspections .................................................................................. 39 2.4.5 Follow-up, including use of sanctions ............................................................... 41 2.4.6 Capacity .......................................................................................................... 42 2.4.7 Costs of inspection ........................................................................................... 43 2.4.8 Review and effectiveness of inspection ............................................................ 44 2.4.9 Conclusions: recommendations regarding the options ...................................... 48 2.5 Baseline: Nature Directives .............................................................................. 54 2.5.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 54 2.5.2 Legislative and policy framework ..................................................................... 54 2.5.3 Inspection requirements .................................................................................. 56 2.5.4 Inspection planning ......................................................................................... 57 2.5.5 Administrative Arrangements .......................................................................... 57 2.5.6 Inspection and follow-up activities ................................................................... 58 2.5.7 Awareness raising ........................................................................................... 60 2.5.8 Inspection capacity, review and reporting ........................................................ 60 2.5.9 Effectiveness of the inspection system.............................................................. 62 2.5.10 Costs of inspection ........................................................................................... 63 2.5.11 Recommendations regarding the options ......................................................... 64 2.6 Baseline analysis of Trade in endangered species (CITES) ................................. 69 2.6.1 Legislative framework ..................................................................................... 69 3 2.6.2 Inspection planning and process ...................................................................... 70 2.6.3 Inspection capacity .......................................................................................... 71 2.6.4 Inter-institutional arrangements ...................................................................... 72 2.6.5 Inspection review and reporting....................................................................... 74 2.6.6 Effectiveness of the inspection system.............................................................. 75 2.6.7 Costs of inspections ......................................................................................... 77 2.6.8 Conclusions and recommendations for the options ........................................... 78 2.7 Conclusions on the baseline for the three study subject areas .......................... 82 3 IDENTIFICATION OF OPTIONS .................................................................................. 86 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 86 3.2 The range of action in the control chain ........................................................... 86 3.2.1 Inspection of stationary sites to check compliance with operational conditions. 87 3.2.2 Incident response inspection of a stationary activity ........................................ 87 3.2.3 Inspection to ensure certain activities are not undertaken ................................ 88 3.2.4 Control of transported objects ......................................................................... 88 3.2.5 Product standards ........................................................................................... 89 3.2.6 Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 89 3.3 Why joined up inspection should be encouraged ............................................. 89 3.4 What should an inspection address? ................................................................ 90 3.5 Risk-based inspection ...................................................................................... 91 3.6 Who inspects? ................................................................................................. 92 3.7 Delivering environmental outcomes through inspection under other regimes .. 93 3.8 Follow-up ........................................................................................................ 93 3.9 Awareness raising ............................................................................................ 95 3.10 Co-ordination between institutions ................................................................. 95 3.11 Capacity of enforcement institutions ............................................................... 96 3.12 Public access to information and transparency ................................................. 96 3.13 Evaluation of performance .............................................................................. 96 4 THE OPTIONS .......................................................................................................... 97 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 97 4.2 Option 1 - Baseline .......................................................................................... 97 4.3 Option 2 – Non-legislative measures ................................................................ 97 4.4 Option 3 – Upgraded Recommendation ........................................................... 98 4.5 Option 4 – General binding instrument on criteria on control mechanisms in Member States ............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Policing in Federal States
    NEPAL STEPSTONES PROJECTS Policing in Federal States Philipp Fluri and Marlene Urscheler (Eds.) Policing in Federal States Edited by Philipp Fluri and Marlene Urscheler Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) www.dcaf.ch The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces is one of the world’s leading institutions in the areas of security sector reform (SSR) and security sector governance (SSG). DCAF provides in-country advisory support and practical assis- tance programmes, develops and promotes appropriate democratic norms at the international and national levels, advocates good practices and makes policy recommendations to ensure effective democratic governance of the security sector. DCAF’s partners include governments, parliaments, civil society, international organisations and the range of security sector actors such as police, judiciary, intelligence agencies, border security ser- vices and the military. 2011 Policing in Federal States Edited by Philipp Fluri and Marlene Urscheler Geneva, 2011 Philipp Fluri and Marlene Urscheler, eds., Policing in Federal States, Nepal Stepstones Projects Series # 2 (Geneva: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, 2011). Nepal Stepstones Projects Series no. 2 © Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, 2011 Executive publisher: Procon Ltd., <www.procon.bg> Cover design: Angel Nedelchev ISBN 978-92-9222-149-2 PREFACE In this book we will be looking at specimens of federative police or- ganisations. As can be expected, the federative organisation of such states as Germany, Switzerland, the USA, India and Russia will be reflected in their police organisation, though the extremely decentralised approach of Switzerland with hardly any central man- agement structures can hardly serve as a paradigm of ‘the’ federal police organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada Page 1 of 4
    Responses to Information Requests - Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada Page 1 of 4 Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada Home > Research Program > Responses to Information Requests Responses to Information Requests Responses to Information Requests (RIR) respond to focused Requests for Information that are submitted to the Research Directorate in the course of the refugee protection determination process. The database contains a seven- year archive of English and French RIRs. Earlier RIRs may be found on the UNHCR's Refworld website. Please note that some RIRs have attachments which are not electronically accessible. To obtain a PDF copy of an RIR attachment, please email the Knowledge and Information Management Unit. 14 January 2016 UKR105399.E Ukraine: The new law on police and its effectiveness; recourse and state protection available to private citizens who have been the victims of criminal actions of police officers in Kiev (2014-January 2015) Research Directorate, Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Ottawa 1. Police Reform In correspondence with the Research Directorate, a professor emeritus, affiliated with the Centre for Russian and East European Studies at the University of Toronto, who has written extensively on criminal justice systems within the post-Soviet world, stated that a new law on police patrol was adopted and went into effect in the Fall of 2015 (Professor Emeritus 7 Jan. 2016). The same source further stated that "a number of police reform projects" were underway, including "anti-corruption measures more generally" (ibid.). Other sources state that the law "'On National Police'" was passed on 2 July 2015 (Lawyer 8 Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • An Garda Síochána: Culture, Challenges, and Change
    An Garda Síochána: Culture, challenges, and change This thesis was submitted to the School of Social Work and Social Policy, Trinity College Dublin for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2020 Courtney Marsh This thesis was supervised by Professor Eoin O’Sullivan Declaration I declare that this thesis has not been submitted as an exercise for a degree at this or any other university and it is entirely my own work. I agree to deposit this thesis in the University’s open access institutional repository or allow the Library to do so on my behalf, subject to Irish Copyright Legislation and Trinity College Library conditions of use and acknowledgement. I consent to the examiner retaining a copy of the thesis beyond the examining period, should they so wish (EU GDPR May 2018). Signed: Courtney Marsh i Summary An Garda Síochána: Culture, challenges, and change is an exploration and understanding of the organisational culture of An Garda Síochána – Ireland’s National Policing Organisation. While the Gardaí – or officers – are often in the news media, there has been very little academic research on who and what this organisation is. On an abstract level, organisational culture provides the framework of the basic rules necessary to function, or survive, in an organisation. Police organisational culture provides an identity to officers that performs this same function. On a more specific scale, internationally, police culture has been understood to consist of masculinity, discrimination, exclusion, suspicion, isolation, solidarity/loyalty, moral and political conservatism, pragmatism, cynicism, aggression, negative views of supervision, selective enforcement of the law, and a prioritisation of the crime fighter role over service oriented role.
    [Show full text]
  • LAW No. 218 from 23
    LAW no. 218 from 23rd of April, 2002 regarding the organizing and functioning of Romanian Police ISSUER: The Parliament PUBLISHED IN: Official Journal no.305 from 9thof May, 2002 The Romanian Parliament adopts the present law. Chapter 1 - General disposals Art.1 The Romanian Police is part of the Ministry of Interior and is the state specialized institution, which carries on attributions regarding the fundamental rights and freedoms of person, the private and public property, crimes prevention and discovering, public order and safety observance, according to the law. Art.2 The activity of the Romanian Police represents public specialized service and serves the interest of the person, of the community, as well as public institutions’ assistance, exclusively on the law’s base and application. Art.3 For fulfilling its missions, The Romanian Police cooperates with other state’s institutions and collaborates with non-governmental associations and organizations and, also, with natural and legal persons, in keeping with the law’s limits. Art.4 (1) The Romanian Police is organized according to territorial-administrative division of the country. (2) The Romanian Police can be also organized according to the specific of same national economy sectors – railway, aerial and naval transports – or of same economic and social objectives, depending on their importance and number. (3) The police units are established by order of the Ministry of Interior. Chapter 2 - Organizing and functioning Section 1 – Organizational structure Art.5 The Romanian Police has the following organizational structure: a) The General Inspectorate of the Romanian Police; b) Territorial units under the authority of the General Inspectorate of the Romanian Police, The General Police Directorate of Bucharest and the counties’ police inspectorates; c) Educational institutions which provide a continue training for the personnel; d) Other units indispensable for the achievement of police specific attributions, established by law.
    [Show full text]
  • Police of Japan
    P OLICE OF JAPAN CONTENTS ……………………………………………………………………………………………………....... ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE & RESOURCES 1. Responsibilities 1 2. History 2 3. Organizational Structure 2 4. Human Resources 8 5. Budget 11 6. Equipment 12 COMMUNITY SAFETY 1. Community Policing 13 2. Crime Prevention 15 3. Countermeasures against Personal Safety-Threatening Cases 16 4. Sound Growth of Amusement Businesses 16 5. Preventing Deterioration of Public Morals 16 6. Countermeasures against Economic Crimes 17 7. Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency and Sound Development of Youth 18 8. Countermeasures against Cybercrime 21 SUPPORT FOR CRIME VICTIMS 1. Police Support for Victims 24 2. Cooperation with Private Organizations for Victim Support 25 CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION 1. Overview 26 2. Fight against Organized Crimes 28 3. Firearms Control 30 4. Drug Control 31 5. Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing 34 6. Fight against Crime Infrastructures 35 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………....... TRAFFIC POLICE 1. Overview 36 2. Enforcement 36 3. ITS Developed by the Japanese Police 38 4. Driver’s License 39 5. Promotion of Traffic Safety Education and Campaigns 39 SECURITY POLICE 1. Overview 40 2. Various Activities 43 3. Crisis Management System after the Great East Japan Earthquake 45 CYBER SECURITY Strategy and Structure to Counter Cyber Threats 46 POLICE SCIENCE & INFO-COMMUNICATIONS 1. Police Info-Communications 48 2. Criminal Identification 51 3. National Research Institute of Police Science 52 INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION 1. Technical Assistance 55 2. International Cooperation in Fighting Transnational Crimes 57 Appendices 1. Number of Juveniles Arrested for Penal Code Offenses (2019) 59 2. Number of Penal Code Offenses Known and Cleared (2015-2019) 60 3. Numbers of Traffic Violations 61 1 ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE & RESOURCES 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of National Police Oversight Models
    Review of National Police Oversight Models For The Eugene Police Commission Police Assessment Resource Center 520 South Grand Ave., Suite 1070 Los Angeles, CA 90071 (213) 623-5757 www.parc.info February 2005 Police Assessment Resource Center Staff Senior Advisors Merrick J. Bobb Ronald L. Davis Brian R. Buchner Inspector General, Allyson Collins Oakland Police Department Sandra Cuneo Scott Dash William K. Finney Walter McKay Chief, Oren Root St. Paul Police Department (Ret.) Timothy Shugrue Norma Zamudio Thomas C. Frazier Commissioner, Baltimore Police Department (Ret.) Bernard K. Melekian Chief, Pasadena Police Department i Table of Contents Page No. I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 1 II. THE GROWTH OF POLICE OVERSIGHT................................................................. 3 A. THE FOUNDATION OF MODERN POLICING.............................................................. 3 B. THE DEVELOPMENT OF POLICE OVERSIGHT .......................................................... 4 III. POLICE OVERSIGHT MODELS ............................................................................... 7 A. REVIEW AND APPELLATE MODELS ........................................................................ 7 B. INVESTIGATIVE AND QUALITY ASSURANCE MODELS............................................. 8 C. EVALUATIVE AND PERFORMANCE-BASED MODELS ............................................. 12 IV. MAKING THE DECISION ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Police Reform in Ukraine Since the Euromaidan: Police Reform in Transition and Institutional Crisis
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2-2019 Police Reform in Ukraine Since the Euromaidan: Police Reform in Transition and Institutional Crisis Nicholas Pehlman The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/3073 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Police Reform in Ukraine Since the Euromaidan: Police Reform in Transition and Institutional Crisis by Nicholas Pehlman A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2019 © Copyright by Nick Pehlman, 2018 All rights reserved ii Police Reform in Ukraine Since the Euromaidan: Police Reform in Transition and Institutional Crisis by Nicholas Pehlman This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date Mark Ungar Chair of Examining Committee Date Alyson Cole Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: Julie George Jillian Schwedler THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT Police Reform in Ukraine Since the Euromaidan: Police Reform in Transition and Institutional
    [Show full text]
  • FRANCE: National Police, Gendarmerie and First Responders FRANCE: National Police, Gendarmerie and First Responders
    FRANCE: National Police, Gendarmerie and First Responders FRANCE: National Police, Gendarmerie and First Responders Cara Boulesteix January 2014 Overview La Police Nationale (PN, or National Police), La Gendarmerie Nationale (often simply referred to as the Gendarmerie, or military police), Les Sapeurs-pompiers (SP, or firefighters), La Brigade des sapeurs-pompiers de Paris (BSPP, or Parisian firefighting brigade), le Bataillon des marins-pompiers de Marseille (BMPM or Marseille Marine Firefighting Division) and La Sécurité Civile (SC, or Civil Security), guarantee the safety of the French population and of the country’s national interests at home and at times abroad. They also prevent and deter crime, and help those in need when there is a crisis. The PN and SC are part of the Ministry of Interior (MoI). The Gendarmerie, or military police, hold military rank but were attached to the MoI in 2008 for budgetary reasons and their roles overlap in places with the PN. BSPP and BMPM are specialized units of the French Army and French Navy, respectively. Budget The 2013 budget reflected a renewed focus on security. Although many other sectors (including defense) were cut in the latest budget cycle, security was one of the few sectors that was actually augmented (defense cut almost 8,000 jobs). After a flare-up of violence in the summer of 2012, President Hollande promised additional resources for the PN, particularly in troubled suburban areas surrounding large French cities. This pledge was evident in the 2013 budget, which cancelled a previous plan to eliminate 3,200 positions, and instead planned to create 5,000 additional jobs by 2017.1 Many of these new positions will be focused in priority areas for safety, particularly in areas with a high risk for trafficking, underground activities, and violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest for All Forever
    FSC National Risk Assessment For Germany DEVELOPED ACCORDING TO PROCEDURE FSC-PRO-60-002 V3-0 Version V1-1 Code FSC-NRA-DE V1-1 National approval National decision Body: FSC Germany – Verein für verantwortungsvolle Waldwirtschaft Date: 29.11.2017 International approval FSC International Center: Performance and Standards Unit Date: 03 April 2018 (updated 31 July 2020) International contact Name: Ulrich Malessa Email address: [email protected] Period of validity Date of approval: 03 April 2018 Valid until: (date of approval + 5 years) Body responsible for NRA FSC Germany – Verein für verantwortungsvolle maintenance Waldwirtschaft FSC-NRA-DE V1-1 NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR GERMANY 2020 – 1 of 248 – Contents Risk designations in finalized risk assessments for Germany ..................................................... 4 Background information .............................................................................................................. 5 Background to the risk assessment .................................................................................... 5 What do we mean by FSC Controlled Wood? ..................................................................... 5 Why is the risk assessment necessary? .............................................................................. 5 Is all that is happening in German forests identified as ‘low risk’ correct? ........................... 6 Proceeding in a participatory process ................................................................................. 6 Timeline
    [Show full text]
  • FRANCE France Officially the French Republic (French: République Française) Is a Member of the European Union Since 1 January 1958
    FRANCE France officially the French Republic (French: République française) is a member of the European Union since 1 January 1958. It is in Western Europe bordered by Belgium and Luxembourg in the north east, Germany and Switzerland in the east, Italy and Monaco in the south-east, Spain and Andorra in the south west. CAPITAL Paris POPULATION 64 million AREA 675,417 km² (551,500 km² France Metro) LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES Directorate-General of Customs and Indirect Taxes (Direction générale des douanes et droits indirects) French Customs falls under the Directorate- CONTACT DETAILS General of Customs and Indirect Taxes, part of WEBSITE: the Ministry of Budget, Public Accounts and Civil Directorate-General of Service. The Directorate-General is in charge of Customs and Indirect Taxes detecting and tackling fraud, illegal trafficking drugs, counterfeits products and swindling with TELEPHONE cigarettes and tobacco. With a workforce of 0811204444 18,800 agents, French Customs has the legal +33172407850 powers to fight against organised crime, EMAIL alongside the Police and Gendarmerie. Last year, [email protected] French customs detected more than 100,000 customs offences, seized 50 tonnes of drugs, 202 tonnes of cigarettes and tobacco products, and 4.6 million tonnes of counterfeit goods. Within the framework of international organised crime, French Customs continues to intensify its fruitful collaboration with Europol. Between 2004 1 and 2008 the number of requests sent to Europol AWF in which the Customs participates doubled. French National Police (La Police Nationale Française) The French National Police is a civil institution CONTACT DETAILS falling under the Ministry of Interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Marina Caparini and Otwin Marenin
    Introduction Marina Caparini and Otwin Marenin The chapters in this volume originated as papers delivered at the conference ‘Managing International and Inter-Agency Cooperation at the Border’, held in Geneva on 13-15 March 2003. The idea behind organising the conference, and its objective, was to conduct an assessment of recent developments in the governance of border security systems, both within the European region, and comparatively across other regions. Transnational movements of people, goods, and capital have become important security policy items on national and global agendas, and the control of such movements is focused largely on efforts at borders. The powers and reach of border control systems have been enhanced by changes in law, increased political attention, an influx of resources, the utilisation of technological detection and control devices and systems, and a security discourse which stresses border management as crucial element in ensuring the stability of states and the well-being of citizens. In short, as border guards and other state authorities have been given more authority and as their capacity to coercively control people has been magnified, the perennial question of how to control and hold accountable agencies and agents who exercise that power, often within wide margins of discretion, has risen to greater salience. At the same time, the means and mechanisms of accountability must respond to the realities of evolving forms of border management if they are to be effective and legitimate. There are widely acknowledged reasons why borders and the accountability of evolving border control systems now matter. In an era of globally structured change and the increasing interconnections of international and local affairs, advancing integration of even remote societies into a global system of commerce, migration and production is apparent, supported by technologies of communication and transportation far more efficient and more difficult to know about and control than traditional means.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 in National Language English Translation M in Istry D Ep Artmen T C
    Name Organization type* ** Country In national language English translation Europol tobacco Attachés functions Uniforms Weapons In-house chemical and sirens Tax police products products ** Competent laboratories authority at Canine units bets/lotteries service Agency Border Vehicles with Direct taxation flashing lights Ministry authority energy/alcohol Revenue Public gaming/ Customs protection Excise duties on Excise duties on Customs Liaison department Officer at Europol Non-EU Customs AT Austria Bundesministerium Finanzen - Zoll Federal Ministry of Finance - Customs X X X X X X X X Administration générale des Federal Public Service Finance - BE Belgium Douanes et Accises Customs and Excise X X X X X X X X X X X BG Bulgaria Агенция "Митници" National Customs Agency (NCA) X X X X X X X X X CY Cyprus Τμήμα Τελωνείων Customs and Excise Department X X X X X X CZ Czech Republic Celní správa Customs Administration X X X X X X X X X X X X DE Germany Bundeszollverwaltung Federal Customs Administration X X X X X X X X X X X X DK Denmark Told Styrelsen Danish Customs Agency X X X X EE Estonia Maksu Ja Tolliamet Tax and Customs Board X X X X X X X X X X X Agencia Estatal de Administración ES Spain Tax agency Tributaria X X X X X X X X X X X FI Finland Tulli Customs X X X X X X X X X X Direction générale des douanes et General Directorate of Customs and FR France droits indirects Indirect taxation X X X X X X X X X X X GR Greece Ελληνικά τελωνεία Customs X X X X X X X X X Ministry of Finance - Customs HR Croatia Ministarstvo financija Administration
    [Show full text]