Gendering Political Leadership: a Case Study of the UK, Examining Media and Voter Perceptions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gendering Political Leadership: a Case Study of the UK, Examining Media and Voter Perceptions ORBIT-OnlineRepository ofBirkbeckInstitutionalTheses Enabling Open Access to Birkbeck’s Research Degree output Gendering political leadership: a case study of the UK, examining media and voter perceptions https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/40435/ Version: Full Version Citation: Smith, Jessica (2019) Gendering political leadership: a case study of the UK, examining media and voter perceptions. [Thesis] (Un- published) c 2020 The Author(s) All material available through ORBIT is protected by intellectual property law, including copy- right law. Any use made of the contents should comply with the relevant law. Deposit Guide Contact: email Gendering Political Leadership: A Case Study of the UK, Examining Media and Voter Perceptions Thesis submitted for completion of PhD Politics, Birkbeck College, University of London Jessica C. Smith I declare that the work submitted for the completion of this thesis is solely that of the candidate, Jessica C. Smith. Signed: Date: 1 Abstract The central research question of this thesis is: Are perceptions of political leadership gendered, and if so, how? The thesis examines both the different ways, and extent to which, the concept of political leadership is gendered and how this gendering is context specific via an examination of the UK case. Gendered norms are dynamic and vary over time and place, yet, much of the extant literature on gender stereotypes and leader evaluations takes a somewhat static approach to theorising how gender mediates political leadership and pays too little attention to cultural and political context. This runs counter to recent work within the ‘interactionalist’ paradigm in the wider study of political leadership, which privileges context in determining the effectiveness of leaders. This thesis takes a twin-track method to examine in-depth, firstly, the media’s representations of men and women political leaders, both in the contemporary context and over time, and, secondly, voter perceptions of British political leadership using innovative experimental methods. It offers the first comprehensive and methodologically nuanced account of gender’s role in political leadership in the UK context. The two methods work in synergy to reveal nuances and complexities in the gendering of political leadership in the British case. The analysis supports the thesis’ original claim: that gendering is complex; that context is important; and that a primarily US-based body of literature does not necessarily, or easily, travel to the UK context. Moreover, gendering was found to vary between media and voters, over time, and potentially between demographic groups of voters. A systematic analysis of the British case offers an opportunity to contribute to, and critically engage with, current gendered and non-gendered debates on political leadership and increases our understanding of the complex gendered environment in which leaders operate. 2 Contents List of Tables 4 List of Figures 5 Acknowledgments 6 Introduction 8 Chapter 1: Literature Review 13 Chapter 2: Methodology and Research Design 43 Chapter 3: Decent Blokes and First Women: Gender in the 69 2015 UK Labour Party Leadership Election Chapter 4: Politics and Parenthood: An Examination of UK 112 Party Leadership Elections Chapter 5: Voter Perceptions and Candidate Sex: An 132 Experimental Analysis Chapter 6: Voting for Mother and Father: An Experimental 172 Analysis Chapter 7: Conclusion 207 Bibliography 232 Appendixes 250 3 List of Tables Table 1: Trait Stereotypes ........................................................................................... 17 Table 2. Conservative and Labour Party Leadership Elections since 1945 ....... 47 Table 3: Content Analysis Sources ........................................................................... 50 Table 4: Seymour-Ure’s Characteristics ................................................................... 53 Table 5: Trait Framework ............................................................................................ 54 Table 6. Visibility by Candidate .................................................................................. 73 Table 7. Newspaper and Broadcast Mean Visibility Index by Reporter Sex* ...... 77 Table 8. General News Framing by Type of Media and Sex of Candidate .......... 84 Table 9. Top Five Traits for Candidates .................................................................... 90 Table 10. Trait Groupings by Candidate ................................................................... 90 Table 11. Tone of Traits in Framework by Sex ........................................................ 91 Table 12. Tone of Positive Traits in Context by Trait Grouping and Sex ............ 93 Table 13. Tone of Positive Traits in Context by Trait Grouping and Candidate . 94 Table 14. Number of Articles Mentioning Candidate’s Family by Politician and Election ........................................................................................................................ 118 Table 15. N of Articles Mentioning Childlessness ................................................ 124 Table 16. Candidate Biographies ............................................................................. 143 Table 17. Total and Valid Sample Demographics Experiment 1 and 2 .............. 148 Table 18. Pre-Election Vote Choice by Sex of Participant ................................... 151 Table 19. Total Articles Viewed by Participants .................................................... 152 Table 20. Mean Total Articles Viewed by Participant Demographics ................ 153 Table 21. Total N of Articles Viewed ....................................................................... 153 Table 22. Post-Election Vote Choice by Participant Sex ..................................... 159 Table 23. OLS Regression on Post-Election Trait Scores ................................... 160 Table 24. Participants Who Changed Vote Choice from a Female to a Male Candidate .................................................................................................................... 161 Table 25. Crosstab Vote Choice and Party Leadership Election ........................ 162 Table 26. Crosstab Vote Choice and Party Leaning ............................................. 163 Table 27. Crosstab Vote Choice and Age Grouping ............................................. 163 Table 28. Total Articles Viewed by Participants .................................................... 184 Table 29. Mean Total Articles Viewed by Participant Demographics ................ 184 Table 30. Mean Total Information Viewed by Type of Candidate ....................... 185 Table 31. OLS Regression on Post-Election Trait Scores ................................... 190 Table 32. Sex of Participant and Vote Choice ....................................................... 192 Table 33. Age and Vote Choice Crosstab ............................................................... 193 Table 34. Party Leadership Election and Vote Choice Crosstab ........................ 194 Table 35. Party Leaning and Vote Choice Crosstab ............................................. 195 Table 36. Parenthood of Participant and Vote Choice Crosstab ........................ 196 Table 37. Summary of Thesis Hypotheses ............................................................. 208 4 List of Figures Figure 1: Dimensions of Personalisation in the News ........................................... 40 Figure 2. Example DPTE Scrolling Home-screen .................................................... 61 Figure 3. Example DPTE Article ................................................................................. 61 Figure 4. Experimental Design ................................................................................... 62 Figure 5. Example Opening Screen for Experiment 1 Conservative Leadership Election .......................................................................................................................... 64 Figure 6. Total Mean Candidate Visibility by Month ............................................... 75 Figure 7. Average Tweets per Day by Month ........................................................... 76 Figure 8. Overall Tone of News Items by Sex .......................................................... 78 Figure 9. Overall Tone of Coverage by Media Type ................................................ 78 Figure 10. Tone of News Items by Candidate and Media Type ............................. 79 Figure 11. Newspaper Article Tone for Female vs Male Journalists .................... 80 Figure 12. General News Frames by Sex for all News Items ................................. 82 Figure 13. News Item Framing by Sex of Journalist ............................................... 85 Figure 14. “Guido’s Fashion Tips: Labour Leadership Edition” .......................... 99 Figure 15. Tone of Statements for Candidates With Children ............................ 119 Figure 16. Tone of Statements for Candidates Without Children ....................... 120 Figure 17. Example DPTE Scrolling Home Screen ............................................... 140 Figure 18. Example DPTE Article ............................................................................. 140 Figure 19. Example Opening Screen for Conservative Leadership Election ... 142 Figure 20. Example Criticism of Issue Position .................................................... 145 Figure 21. Example Endorsement Article ..............................................................
Recommended publications
  • The Effect of Observable Party Cohesion on Voter Choice in Liberal Democracies
    PhD in Political Science The effect of observable party cohesion on voter choice in liberal democracies. Candidate David Jack Barrett Supervisor Michael Gallagher September 2017 2 Declaration I declare that this thesis has not been submitted as an exercise for a degree at this or any other university and it is entirely my own work. I agree to deposit this thesis in the University’s open access institutional repository or allow the library to do so on my behalf, subject to Irish Copyright Legislation and Trinity College Library conditions of use and acknowledgement. Date Signature 3 Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been possible without the help of a large number of people, and I would like to take the opportunity to express my thanks and gratitude to them. First, my supervisor Michael Gallagher has truly been extraordinarily helpful, providing comments and feedback at every point in the last four years, often at quite short notice. His encouragement and advice both on this thesis, but also in teaching and to attending conferences has always been wonderful. Certainly no one could have asked for a more patient and forgiving supervisor. This thesis would have been impossible without the financial support provided by the Irish Research Council (IRC) and by the Department of Political Science at Trinity College Dublin. My work is deeply in the debt of many scholars. James Davidson in the University of Exeter though, especially, provided me with much of the data used in Chapter Five in this thesis that he had gathered for his own research, and answered my endless questions regarding it, without which this research would have been impossible.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Opposition-Craft': an Evaluative Framework for Official Opposition Parties in the United Kingdom Edward Henry Lack Submitte
    ‘Opposition-Craft’: An Evaluative Framework for Official Opposition Parties in the United Kingdom Edward Henry Lack Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of PhD The University of Leeds, School of Politics and International Studies May, 2020 1 Intellectual Property and Publications Statements The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. ©2020 The University of Leeds and Edward Henry Lack The right of Edward Henry Lack to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 2 Acknowledgements Page I would like to thank Dr Victoria Honeyman and Dr Timothy Heppell of the School of Politics and International Studies, The University of Leeds, for their support and guidance in the production of this work. I would also like to thank my partner, Dr Ben Ramm and my parents, David and Linden Lack, for their encouragement and belief in my efforts to undertake this project. Finally, I would like to acknowledge those who took part in the research for this PhD thesis: Lord David Steel, Lord David Owen, Lord Chris Smith, Lord Andrew Adonis, Lord David Blunkett and Dame Caroline Spelman. 3 Abstract This thesis offers a distinctive and innovative framework for the study of effective official opposition politics in the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservative Party's Credibility Deficit Updated Tax and Spending
    The Conservative Party’s credibility deficit Updated tax and spending commitments April 2010 2 Contents Page Introduction 5 Summary 7 Methodology 8 Tables 10 Broken promises 13 45,000 new single rooms in the NHS 15 5,000 new prison places 19 Reducing taxes on savings 22 More places for science courses, training and apprenticeships 24 Maternity nurses for all 25 Reinstate the Defence Export Services Organisation (DESO) 28 National Loan Guarantee Scheme 30 Tax cuts 33 Corporation tax and investment allowance changes 35 Freeze council tax for two years 38 Reduce employers’ NICs for some small companies 41 Tax cuts for married couples 43 Inheritance tax cuts 50 Reverse impact of abolition of dividend tax credit 53 Tax reversals 57 Raise National Insurance Contributions thresholds 59 Oppose Broadband levy 61 Oppose cider duty increase 63 Tax increases 65 Non-domicile levy 67 Spending reductions 73 Cut Government “waste” 75 Savings on employment and skills programmes 78 Reduce spending on Building Schools for the Future 83 Reduce eligibility for tax credits 85 Reduce eligibility for Child Trust Funds 88 Reduce government spending on consultants and advertising 90 Reduce “bureaucracy” spending by a third 92 Welfare savings 95 Scrap ContactPoint 98 NHS IT Programme 100 Freeze pay and cap pensions for public sector workers 103 Reduce spending on Sure Start outreach workers 105 3 Scrap some Regional Development Agencies 107 Scrap regional assemblies 109 Scrap identity cards 110 “Cutting the cost of politics” 112 Scrap the Trade Union Modernisation
    [Show full text]
  • How Do British Political Parties Mobilise and Contact Voters To
    How do British political parties mobilise and contact voters to increase turnout? Submitted by William Stephen King to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of MA by Research in Politics In August 2018 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature: ………………………………………………………….. 1 Abstract This thesis will explore how British political parties over the period 2010-2017 have developed their mobilisation and contacting methods. Looking at social media, demographics, and other salient issues, I will construct a coherent and clear narrative of how British political parties have reacted to new technology, and what the advantages and disadvantages of doing so are. I shall be looking in particular at youth political mobilisation and contact, as this demographic has a poor election turnout record, so I shall explain why this is and how British political parties are attempting to contact and mobilise them (and how they have done so successfully). Looking at the 2010, 2015, and 2017 General Elections as well as the 2014 EU and 2016 referendums, this will enable me to take a look at Britain in different political times and differing levels of technology, from the first TV debates in 2010 to the first social media election in 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Left's Views on Israel: from the Establishment of the Jewish State To
    ‘The Left’s Views on Israel: From the establishment of the Jewish state to the intifada’ Thesis submitted by June Edmunds for PhD examination at the London School of Economics and Political Science 1 UMI Number: U615796 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615796 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 F 7377 POLITI 58^S8i ABSTRACT The British left has confronted a dilemma in forming its attitude towards Israel in the postwar period. The establishment of the Jewish state seemed to force people on the left to choose between competing nationalisms - Israeli, Arab and later, Palestinian. Over time, a number of key developments sharpened the dilemma. My central focus is the evolution of thinking about Israel and the Middle East in the British Labour Party. I examine four critical periods: the creation of Israel in 1948; the Suez war in 1956; the Arab-Israeli war of 1967 and the 1980s, covering mainly the Israeli invasion of Lebanon but also the intifada. In each case, entrenched attitudes were called into question and longer-term shifts were triggered in the aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • FDN-274688 Disclosure
    FDN-274688 Disclosure MP Total Adam Afriyie 5 Adam Holloway 4 Adrian Bailey 7 Alan Campbell 3 Alan Duncan 2 Alan Haselhurst 5 Alan Johnson 5 Alan Meale 2 Alan Whitehead 1 Alasdair McDonnell 1 Albert Owen 5 Alberto Costa 7 Alec Shelbrooke 3 Alex Chalk 6 Alex Cunningham 1 Alex Salmond 2 Alison McGovern 2 Alison Thewliss 1 Alistair Burt 6 Alistair Carmichael 1 Alok Sharma 4 Alun Cairns 3 Amanda Solloway 1 Amber Rudd 10 Andrea Jenkyns 9 Andrea Leadsom 3 Andrew Bingham 6 Andrew Bridgen 1 Andrew Griffiths 4 Andrew Gwynne 2 Andrew Jones 1 Andrew Mitchell 9 Andrew Murrison 4 Andrew Percy 4 Andrew Rosindell 4 Andrew Selous 10 Andrew Smith 5 Andrew Stephenson 4 Andrew Turner 3 Andrew Tyrie 8 Andy Burnham 1 Andy McDonald 2 Andy Slaughter 8 FDN-274688 Disclosure Angela Crawley 3 Angela Eagle 3 Angela Rayner 7 Angela Smith 3 Angela Watkinson 1 Angus MacNeil 1 Ann Clwyd 3 Ann Coffey 5 Anna Soubry 1 Anna Turley 6 Anne Main 4 Anne McLaughlin 3 Anne Milton 4 Anne-Marie Morris 1 Anne-Marie Trevelyan 3 Antoinette Sandbach 1 Barry Gardiner 9 Barry Sheerman 3 Ben Bradshaw 6 Ben Gummer 3 Ben Howlett 2 Ben Wallace 8 Bernard Jenkin 45 Bill Wiggin 4 Bob Blackman 3 Bob Stewart 4 Boris Johnson 5 Brandon Lewis 1 Brendan O'Hara 5 Bridget Phillipson 2 Byron Davies 1 Callum McCaig 6 Calum Kerr 3 Carol Monaghan 6 Caroline Ansell 4 Caroline Dinenage 4 Caroline Flint 2 Caroline Johnson 4 Caroline Lucas 7 Caroline Nokes 2 Caroline Spelman 3 Carolyn Harris 3 Cat Smith 4 Catherine McKinnell 1 FDN-274688 Disclosure Catherine West 7 Charles Walker 8 Charlie Elphicke 7 Charlotte
    [Show full text]
  • UK-US Trade Relations
    House of Commons International Trade Committee UK-US Trade Relations Second Report of Session 2017–19 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 25 April 2018 HC 481 Published on 1 May 2018 by authority of the House of Commons International Trade Committee The International Trade Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Department for International Trade and its associated public bodies. Current membership Angus Brendan MacNeil MP (Scottish National Party, Na h-Eileanan an Iar) (Chair) Mr Nigel Evans MP (Conservative, Ribble Valley) Mr Marcus Fysh MP (Conservative, Yeovil) Mr Ranil Jayawardena MP (Conservative, North East Hampshire) Mr Chris Leslie MP (Labour (Co-op), Nottingham East) Emma Little Pengelly MP (Democratic Unionist Party, Belfast South) Julia Lopez MP (Conservative, Hornchurch and Upminster) Stephanie Peacock MP (Labour, Barnsley East) Faisal Rashid MP (Labour, Warrington South) Catherine West MP (Labour, Hornsey and Wood Green) Matt Western MP (Labour, Warwick and Leamington) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website and in print by Order of the House. Evidence relating to this Report is published on the inquiry publications page of the Committee’s website. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Mariam Keating (Committee Assistant), Lydia Menzies (Clerk), George Perry (Media Officer), Dr Gabriel Siles-Brügge (ESRC IAA/POST Parliamentary Academic Fellow), David Turner (Committee Specialist), Luke Villiers (Committee Specialist), Andrew Wallace (Senior Committee Assistant), and Joanna Welham (Second Clerk).
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Party Leaders and Officials Since 1975
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 07154, 6 February 2020 Conservative Party and Compiled by officials since 1975 Sarah Dobson This List notes Conservative Party leaders and officials since 1975. Further reading Conservative Party website Conservative Party structure and organisation [pdf] Constitution of the Conservative Party: includes leadership election rules and procedures for selecting candidates. Oliver Letwin, Hearts and Minds: The Battle for the Conservative Party from Thatcher to the Present, Biteback, 2017 Tim Bale, The Conservative Party: From Thatcher to Cameron, Polity Press, 2016 Robert Blake, The Conservative Party from Peel to Major, Faber & Faber, 2011 Leadership elections The Commons Library briefing Leadership Elections: Conservative Party, 11 July 2016, looks at the current and previous rules for the election of the leader of the Conservative Party. Current state of the parties The current composition of the House of Commons and links to the websites of all the parties represented in the Commons can be found on the Parliament website: current state of the parties. www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Conservative Party leaders and officials since 1975 Leader start end Margaret Thatcher Feb 1975 Nov 1990 John Major Nov 1990 Jun 1997 William Hague Jun 1997 Sep 2001 Iain Duncan Smith Sep 2001 Nov 2003 Michael Howard Nov 2003 Dec 2005 David Cameron Dec 2005 Jul 2016 Theresa May Jul 2016 Jun 2019 Boris Johnson Jul 2019 present Deputy Leader # start end William Whitelaw Feb 1975 Aug 1991 Peter Lilley Jun 1998 Jun 1999 Michael Ancram Sep 2001 Dec 2005 George Osborne * Dec 2005 July 2016 William Hague * Dec 2009 May 2015 # There has not always been a deputy leader and it is often an official title of a senior Conservative politician.
    [Show full text]
  • Carina Trimingham -V
    Neutral Citation Number: [2012] EWHC 1296 (QB) Case No: HQ10D03060 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 24/05/2012 Before: THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between: Carina Trimingham Claimant - and - Associated Newspapers Limited Defendant - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Matthew Ryder QC & William Bennett (instructed by Mishcon de Reya) for the Claimant Antony White QC & Alexandra Marzec (instructed by Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP) for the Defendant Hearing dates: 23,24,25,26,27 April 2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Approved Judgment I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic. ............................. THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT Trimingham v. ANL Approved Judgment Mr Justice Tugendhat : 1. By claim form issued on 11 August 2010 the Claimant (“Ms Trimingham”) complained that the Defendant had wrongfully published private information concerning herself in eight articles. 2. Mr Christopher Huhne MP had been re-elected as the Member of Parliament for Eastleigh in Hampshire at the General Election held in May 2010, just over a month before the first of the articles complained of. He became Secretary of State for Energy in the Coalition Government. He was one of the leading figures in the Government and in the Liberal Democrat Party. In 2008 Ms Trimingham and Mr Huhne started an affair, unknown to both Mr Huhne’s wife, Ms Pryce, and Ms Trimingham’s civil partner. By 2008 Mr Huhne had become the Home Affairs spokesman for the Liberal Democrats.
    [Show full text]
  • New Ministerial Team at the Department of Health
    New Ministerial Team at the Department of Health The Rt Hon Alan Johnson MP Secretary of State for Health Alan Johnson was first elected to Parliament in 1997 as the Member for Kingston upon Hull. A former postman, Alan Johnson served as a former General Secretary of the Communication Workers Union (CWU) and is one of the largest trade union names to have entered Parliament in recent decades. Often credited with the much coveted tag of being an "ordinary bloke", he is highly articulate and effective and is credited with the successful campaign that deterred the previous Conservative government from privatising the Post Office. Popular among his peers, Alan Johnson is generally regarded to be on the centre right of the Labour Party and is well regarded by the Labour leadership. As a union member of Labour's ruling NEC (up to 1996) he was seen as supportive of Tony Blair's attempts to modernise the Labour Party. He was the only senior union leader to back the abolition of Labour's clause IV. He becomes the first former union leader to become a cabinet minister in nearly 40 years when he is appointed to the Work and Pensions brief in 2004. After moving to Trade and Industry, he becomes Education and Skills Secretary in May 2006. After being tipped by many as the front-runner in the Labour deputy leadership contest of 2007, Alan Johnson was narrowly beaten by Harriet Harman. Commons Career PPS to Dawn Primarolo: as Financial Secretary, HM Treasury 1997-99, as Paymaster General, HM Treasury 1999; Department of Trade and Industry 1999-2003:
    [Show full text]
  • Where Mps Get Their News Summer 2018
    WHERE MPS GET THEIR NEWS: NEWSPAPERS, BLOGS AND FAVOURITE JOURNALISTS JULY 2018 BBC NEWS IS THE MOST POPULAR NEWS PROGRAMME FOR MPS Daily At least twice a week Weekly Monthly Less than monthly Never No Response BBC News Channel 36% 35% 8% 6% 8% 4% 2% BBC Radio 4 47% 21% 10% 6% 7% 8% 1% BBC 6 O'Clock News/BBC News at Ten 22% 41% 20% 4% 5% 7% 1% Sky News 30% 28% 18% 10% 6% 5% 2% ITV News 15% 33% 24% 12% 9% 6% 1% Channel 4 News 16% 25% 19% 18% 12% 8% 1% BBC Radio 5 Live 11% 18% 13% 12% 19% 22% 3% LBC 4% 9% 10% 15% 25% 34% 3% CNN 2% 8% 9% 11% 28% 40% 2% Bloomberg 1%2% 5% 8% 28% 54% 3% Al-Jazeera English 1%1%2%6% 22% 66% 2% Other 4% 4% 1%1% 8% 81% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% The most popular daily news programme for Labour MPs is BBC News (45%) The most popular daily news programme for Conservative MPs is Sky News (33%) Q. How frequently, if at all, do you watch or listen to the following news programmes? Base: April 2018 all MPs (n=151). 2 THE TIMES IS READ ONLINE ‘AT LEAST TWICE A WEEK’ BY 46% OF MPS Daily Newspapers 2018 2016 2018 2016 Online Paper copy 31% The Daily Telegraph 27% 32% 21% 19% 14% 12% Financial Times 10% 38% The Guardian 21% 32% 18% 46% The Times 36% 31% 35% 5% 9% 5% Daily Express 3% 32% 22% 28% Daily Mail 21% 13% 8% 13% Daily Mirror 5% 12% The Evening Standard 45% 7% 25% 10% 14% 7% The Sun 10% 3% 3% 1% Daily Star 0% 2% 0% 3% The Morning Star 1% 4% 16% n/a The Metro n/a 18% 7% n/a The Independent n/a 10% i 4% 5% 3% 7% 7% 7% Other 7% The Times is most regularly read by MPs online, with nearly half reading it at least twice a week The Evening Standard is the most popular paper (46%).
    [Show full text]
  • Titania Mcgrath: Mxnifesto
    Edinburgh Festival Fringe 2019: Comedy Titania McGrath: Mxnifesto Pleasance Above 31st July - 25th August (not 12th) ‘Titania McGrath is a genius.’ Charles Moore, Spectator Titania McGrath, the world-renowned millennial icon and radical intersectionalist poet committed to feminism, social justice and armed peaceful protest, is coming to the Edinburgh Festival Fringe to show you – yes, YOU – why you are wrong about everything! MXINFESTO takes the form of a confrontational lecture in which Titania guides her audience through the, often bewildering, array of terminology and concepts that constitute 21stcentury “wokeness”. New words such as “manterrupting”, “microaggressions” and “heteronormativity” often leave the general public bemused, particularly if they don’t read the Guardian. Having conquered the world of social media, Titania is now generously bestowing her wisdom onto a live audience. Her step-by-step guide will enable her audience to become the woke people they need to be in an increasingly progressive world. In a non-patronising manner, Titania will explain where exactly they are going wrong and how to be more like her. ‘Hilarious… perfectly captures the chiding, self-righteous, intolerant, joyless tone of the “woke” Stasi.’ Janice Turner, The Times Titania McGrath is the satirical alter-ego of writer and comedian Andrew Doyle. She has been active on Twitter for only a year, but in that time has amassed over 275,000 followers. Her first book, WOKE: A GUIDE TO SOCIAL JUSTICE, was published in March of this year to great acclaim. Up until January 2019, Andrew Doyle was the co-writer of spoof news reporter Jonathan Pie. During a three year collaboration, Andrew co-wrote a Jonathan Pie book, two live tours, a BBC mockumentary, and numerous viral videos including a response to Donald Trump’s election which was viewed online more than 150 million times, and a more recent video which was described by Ricky Gervais as “one of the most perfect (and important) pieces of comedy I’ve ever seen”.
    [Show full text]