DOCSLIB.ORG

The Spin Structure of the Nucleon Arxiv:1807.05250V3 [Hep-Ph]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Spin Structure of the Nucleon Arxiv:1807.05250V3 [Hep-Ph] JLAB-PHY-18-2760 SLAC{PUB{17279 The Spin Structure of the Nucleon Alexandre Deur Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA 23606, USA Stanley J. Brodsky SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94309, USA Guy F. de T´eramond Laboratorio de F´ısica Te´orica y Computacional, Universidad de Costa Rica, San Jos´e,Costa Rica April 26, 2019 [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], arXiv:1807.05250v3 [hep-ph] 24 Apr 2019 Abstract We review the present understanding of the spin structure of protons and neutrons, the fundamental building blocks of nuclei collectively known as nucleons. The field of nucleon spin provides a critical window for testing Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD), the gauge theory of the strong interactions, since it involves fundamental aspects of hadron structure which can be probed in detail in experiments, particularly deep inelastic lepton scattering on polarized targets. QCD was initially probed in high energy deep inelastic lepton scattering with unpolarized beams and targets. With time, interest shifted from testing perturbative QCD to illuminating the nucleon structure itself. In fact, the spin degrees of freedom of hadrons provide an essential and detailed verification of both perturbative and nonperturbative QCD dynamics. Nucleon spin was initially thought of coming mostly from the spin of its quark constituents, based on intuition from the parton model. However, the first experiments showed that this expectation was incorrect. It is now clear that nucleon physics is much more complex, involving quark orbital angular momenta as well as gluonic and sea quark contributions. Thus, the nucleon spin structure remains a most active aspect of QCD research, involving important advances such as the developments of generalized parton distributions (GPD) and transverse momentum distributions (TMD). Elastic and inelastic lepton-proton scattering, as well as photoabsorption experiments provide various ways to investigate non-perturbative QCD. Fundamental sum rules { such as the Bjorken sum rule for polarized photoabsorption on polarized nucleons { are also in the non-perturbative domain. This realization triggered a vigorous program to link the low energy effective hadronic description of the strong interactions to fundamental quarks and gluon degrees of freedom of QCD. This has also led to advances in lattice gauge theory simulations of QCD and to the development of holographic QCD ideas based on the AdS/CFT or gauge/gravity correspondence, a novel approach providing a well-founded semiclassical approximation to QCD. Any QCD-based model of the nucleon's spin and dynamics must also successfully account for the observed spectroscopy of hadrons. Analytic calculations of the hadron spectrum, a long sought goal of QCD research, have now being realized using light-front holography and superconformal quantum mechanics, a formalism consistent with the results from nucleon spin studies. We begin this review with a phenomenological description of nucleon structure in general and of its spin structure in particular, aimed to engage non-specialist readers. Next, we discuss the nucleon spin structure at high energy, including topics such as Dirac's front form and light-front quantization which provide a frame-independent, relativistic description of hadron structure and dynamics, the derivation of spin sum rules, and a direct connection to the QCD Lagrangian. We then discuss experimental and theoretical advances in the nonperturbative domain { in particular the development of light-front holographic QCD and superconformal quantum mechanics, their predictions for the spin content of nucleons, the computation of PDFs and of hadron masses. Contents 1 Preamble 4 2 Overview of QCD and the nucleon structure6 2.1 Charged lepton-nucleon scattering . .7 2.1.1 The first Born approximation . .7 2.1.2 Kinematics . .8 2.1.3 General expression of the reaction cross-section . .8 2.1.4 Leptonic and hadronic tensors, and cross-section parameterization . .9 2.1.5 Asymmetries . 10 2 2.2 Nucleon-Nucleon scattering . 10 2.3 e+ e− annihilation . 12 3 Constraints on spin dynamics from scattering processes 12 3.1 Deep inelastic scattering . 12 3.1.1 Mechanism . 12 3.1.2 Bjorken scaling . 13 3.1.3 DIS: QCD on the light-front . 13 3.1.4 Formalism and structure functions . 17 3.1.5 Single-spin asymmetries . 18 3.1.6 Photo-absorption asymmetries . 19 3.1.7 Structure function extraction . 20 3.1.8 The Parton Model . 20 3.1.9 Perturbative QCD at finite Q2 .............................. 22 3.1.10 The nucleon spin sum rule and the \spin crisis" . 24 3.1.11 Definitions of the spin sum rule components . 26 3.2 The resonance region . 27 3.2.1 Constituent quark models . 28 3.2.2 The resonance spectrum of nucleons . 29 3.2.3 A link between DIS and resonances: hadron-parton duality . 30 3.3 Elastic and quasi-elastic scatterings . 30 3.3.1 Elastic cross-section . 31 3.3.2 Quasi-elastic scattering . 33 3.4 Summary . 34 4 Computation methods 34 4.1 The Operator Product Expansion . 35 4.2 Lattice gauge theory . 36 4.2.1 Calculations of structure functions . 37 4.2.2 Direct calculation of hadronic PDFs: Matching LFQCD to LGT . 38 4.3 Chiral perturbation theory . 39 4.3.1 Chiral symmetry in QCD . 39 4.3.2 Connection to conformal symmetry . 39 4.4 The light-front holographic QCD approach . 39 4.5 Summary . 41 5 Sum rules 41 5.1 General formalism . 41 5.2 GDH and forward spin polarizability sum rules . 42 5.3 δLT sum rule . 43 5.4 The Burkhardt-Cottingham sum rule . 43 5.5 Sum rules for deep inelastic scattering . 44 5.6 Color polarizabilities . 47 6 World data and global analyses 47 6.1 Experiments and world data . 47 6.2 Global analyses . 49 6.3 PQCD in the high-xBj domain . 50 3 6.3.1 A1 in the DIS at high-xBj ................................. 51 6.3.2 Quark models and other predictions of A1 for high-xBj DIS . 51 6.3.3 A1 results . 52 0 6.4 Results on the polarized partial cross-sections σTT and σLT .................. 52 6.5 Results on the generalized GDH integral . 53 6.6 Moments of g1 and g2 ....................................... 53 6.6.1 Extractions of the g1 first moments . 53 6.6.2 Data and theory comparisons . 55 6.6.3 Results on Γ2 and on the BC and ELT sum rules . 55 6.7 Generalized spin polarizabilities γ0, δLT ............................. 56 6.7.1 Results on γ0 ........................................ 56 6.7.2 The δLT puzzle . 56 6.8 d2 results . 57 6.8.1 Results on the neutron . 57 6.8.2 Results on the Proton . 57 6.8.3 Discussion . 57 6.9 Higher-twist contributions to Γ1, g1 and g2 ........................... 57 6.9.1 Leading and higher-twist analysis of Γ1 ......................... 58 6.9.2 Color polarizabilities and confinement force . 59 6.9.3 Higher-twist studies for g1, A1, g2 and A2 ........................ 59 6.10 Study of the hadron-parton spin duality . 60 6.11 Nucleon spin structure at high energy . 61 6.11.1 General conclusions . 61 6.11.2 Individual contributions to the nucleon spin . 62 6.11.3 High-energy picture of the nucleon spin structure . 65 6.11.4 Pending Questions . 66 6.11.5 Contributions from lower energy data . 66 7 Perspectives: Unexpected connections 67 8 Outlook 69 1 Preamble The study of the individual contributions to the nucleon spin provides a critical window for testing detailed predictions of QCD for the internal quark and gluon structure of hadrons. Fundamental spin predictions can be tested experimentally to high precision, particularly in measurements of deep inelastic scattering (DIS) of polarized leptons on polarized proton and nuclear targets. The spin of the nucleons was initially thought to originate simply from the spin of the constituent quarks, based on intuition from the parton model. However, experiments have shown that this expectation was incorrect. It is now clear that nucleon spin physics is much more complex, involving quark and gluon orbital angular momenta (OAM) as well as gluon spin and sea-quark contributions. Contributions to the nucleon spin, in fact, originate from the nonperturbative dynamics associated with color confinement as well as from perturbative QCD (pQCD) evolution. Thus, nucleon spin structure has become an active aspect of QCD research, incorporating important theoretical advances such as the development of GPD and TMD. Fundamental sum rules, such as the Bjorken sum rule for polarized DIS or the Drell-Hearn-Gerasimov sum rule for polarized photoabsorption cross-sections, constrain critically the spin structure. In addition, 4 elastic lepton-nucleon scattering and other exclusive processes, e.g. Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering (DVCS), also determine important aspects of nucleon spin dynamics. This has led to a vigorous theoretical and experimental program to obtain an effective hadronic description of the strong force in terms of the basic quark and gluon fields of QCD. Furthermore, the theoretical program for determining the spin structure of hadrons has benefited from advances in lattice gauge theory simulations of QCD and the recent development of light-front holographic QCD ideas based on the AdS/CFT correspondence, an approach to hadron structure based on the holographic embedding of light-front dynamics in a higher dimensional gravity theory, together with the constraints imposed by the underlying superconformal algebraic structure. This novel approach to nonperturbative QCD and color confinement has provided a well-founded semiclassical approximation to QCD. QCD-based models of the nucleon spin and dynamics must also successfully account for the observed spectroscopy of hadrons. Analytic calculations of the hadron spectrum, a long-sought goal, are now being carried out using Lorentz frame-independent light-front holographic methods. We begin this review by discussing why nucleon spin structure has become a central topic of hadron physics (Section2).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Electron-Nucleon Scattering at LDMX for DUNE
    Snowmass Letter of Intent: Snowmass Topical Groups: NF6, RF6, TF11 Electron-Nucleon Scattering at LDMX for DUNE Torsten Akesson1, Artur Ankowski2, Nikita Blinov3, Lene Kristian Bryngemark4, Pierfrancesco Butti2, Caterina Doglioni1, Craig Dukes5, Valentina Dutta6, Bertrand Echenard7, Thomas Eichlersmith8, Ralf Ehrlich5, Andrew Furmanski∗8, Niramay Gogate9, Mathew Graham2, Craig Group5, Alexander Friedland2, David Hitlin7, Vinay Hegde9, Christian Herwig3, Joseph Incandela6, Wesley Ketchumy3, Gordan Krnjaic3, Amina Li6, Shirley Liz2,3, Dexu Lin7, Jeremiah Mans8, Cristina Mantilla Suarez3, Phillip Masterson6, Martin Meier8, Sophie Middleton7, Omar Moreno2, Geoffrey Mullier1, Tim Nelson2, James Oyang7, Gianluca Petrillo2, Ruth Pottgen1, Stefan Prestel1, Luis Sarmiento1, Philip Schuster2, Hirohisa Tanaka2, Lauren Tompkins4, Natalia Toro2, Nhan Tran§3, and Andrew Whitbeck9 1Lund University 2Stanford Linear Accelerator Laboratory 3Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory 4Stanford University 5University of Virginia 6University of California Santa Barbara 7California Institute of Technology 8University of Minnesota 9Texas Tech University ABSTRACT We point out that the LDMX (Light Dark Matter eXperiment) detector design, conceived to search for sub-GeV dark matter, will also have very advantageous characteristics to pursue electron-nucleus scattering measurements of direct relevance to the neutrino program at DUNE and elsewhere. These characteristics include a 4-GeV electron beam, a precision tracker, electromagnetic and hadronic calorimeters with near 2p azimuthal acceptance from the forward beam axis out to 40◦ angle, and low reconstruction energy threshold. LDMX thus could provide (semi)exclusive cross section measurements, with∼ detailed information about final-state electrons, pions, protons, and neutrons. We compare the predictions of two widely used neutrino generators (GENIE, GiBUU) in the LDMX region of acceptance to illustrate the large modeling discrepancies in electron-nucleus interactions at DUNE-like kinematics.
    [Show full text]
  • (E) Slac Measurement of the Neutron Spin Structure
    Sr.AC-PUB-b217 _ _ "" --7 (- 7 _ -_ • / April 1993 (E) DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsi- bility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Refer- ence herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recom- mendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. SLAC MEASUREMENT OF THE NEUTRON SPIN STRUCTURE FUNCTION Emlyn llughes Representing the Efd2 Collaboration Stanford l,inear Accelerator Center Stanford, CA 94309, USA ABSTRACT A measurement of the nucleon spin asymmetries from deep inelastic scattering of polarized electrons by polarize.d alle has been performed. The neutron spin structure flmction gn is extracted and used to test the Bjorken sum rule. The neutron integral assuming a simple Regge theory extrapolation at low x is fo_gr_(x)dx = -0.022 + 0.011. Combined with the EMC proton results, the l_jorken sum rule predicts a neutron integral of ._ .qr_(x)dx = -0.065:t:0.018. Presented at the 2Sth Rencontres de Moriond QCD and Hi@ Energy tJadronic Interactiot's l.es Arcs, France, March 20-28,1993 *Work supported l.y Deparlment of Energy contract I-)ti-ACO3-7(,SI:(It}515 "' ': " "; ...
    [Show full text]
  • From Quark and Nucleon Correlations to Discrete Symmetry and Clustering
    From quark and nucleon correlations to discrete symmetry and clustering in nuclei G. Musulmanbekov JINR, Dubna, RU-141980, Russia E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Starting with a quark model of nucleon structure in which the valence quarks are strongly correlated within a nucleon, the light nu- clei are constructed by assuming similar correlations of the quarks of neighboring nucleons. Applying the model to larger collections of nucleons reveals the emergence of the face-centered cubic (FCC) sym- metry at the nuclear level. Nuclei with closed shells possess octahedral symmetry. Binding of nucleons are provided by quark loops formed by three and four nucleon correlations. Quark loops are responsible for formation of exotic (borromean) nuclei, as well. The model unifies independent particle (shell) model, liquid-drop and cluster models. 1 Introduction arXiv:1708.04437v2 [nucl-th] 19 Sep 2017 Historically there are three well known conventional nuclear models based on different assumption about the phase state of the nucleus: the liquid-drop, shell (independent particle), and cluster models. The liquid-drop model re- quires a dense liquid nuclear interior (short mean-free-path, local nucleon interactions and space-occupying nucleons) in order to predict nuclear bind- ing energies, radii, collective oscillations, etc. In contrast, in the shell model each point nucleon moves in mean-field potential created by other nucleons; the model predicts the existence of nucleon orbitals and shell-like orbital- filling. The cluster models require the assumption of strong local-clustering 1 of particularly the 4-nucleon alpha-particle within a liquid or gaseous nuclear interior in order to make predictions about the ground and excited states of cluster configurations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Large Hadron Collider Lyndon Evans CERN – European Organization for Nuclear Research, Geneva, Switzerland
    34th SLAC Summer Institute On Particle Physics (SSI 2006), July 17-28, 2006 The Large Hadron Collider Lyndon Evans CERN – European Organization for Nuclear Research, Geneva, Switzerland 1. INTRODUCTION The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN is now in its final installation and commissioning phase. It is a two-ring superconducting proton-proton collider housed in the 27 km tunnel previously constructed for the Large Electron Positron collider (LEP). It is designed to provide proton-proton collisions with unprecedented luminosity (1034cm-2.s-1) and a centre-of-mass energy of 14 TeV for the study of rare events such as the production of the Higgs particle if it exists. In order to reach the required energy in the existing tunnel, the dipoles must operate at 1.9 K in superfluid helium. In addition to p-p operation, the LHC will be able to collide heavy nuclei (Pb-Pb) with a centre-of-mass energy of 1150 TeV (2.76 TeV/u and 7 TeV per charge). By modifying the existing obsolete antiproton ring (LEAR) into an ion accumulator (LEIR) in which electron cooling is applied, the luminosity can reach 1027cm-2.s-1. The LHC presents many innovative features and a number of challenges which push the art of safely manipulating intense proton beams to extreme limits. The beams are injected into the LHC from the existing Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) at an energy of 450 GeV. After the two rings are filled, the machine is ramped to its nominal energy of 7 TeV over about 28 minutes. In order to reach this energy, the dipole field must reach the unprecedented level for accelerator magnets of 8.3 T.
    [Show full text]
  • First Results of the Cosmic Ray NUCLEON Experiment
    Prepared for submission to JCAP First results of the cosmic ray NUCLEON experiment E. Atkin,a V. Bulatov,b V. Dorokhov,b N. Gorbunov,c;d S. Filippov,b V. Grebenyuk,c;d D. Karmanov,e I. Kovalev,e I. Kudryashov,e A. Kurganov,e M. Merkin,e A. Panov,e;1 D. Podorozhny,e D. Polkov,b S. Porokhovoy,c V. Shumikhin,a L. Sveshnikova,e A. Tkachenko,c;f L. Tkachev,c;d A. Turundaevskiy,e O. Vasiliev ande A. Voronine aNational Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”, Kashirskoe highway, 31. Moscow, 115409, Russia bSDB Automatika, Mamin-Sibiryak str, 145, Ekaterinburg, 620075, Russia cJoint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Joliot-Curie, 6, Moscow region, 141980, Russia d arXiv:1702.02352v2 [astro-ph.HE] 2 Jul 2018 “DUBNA” University, Universitetskaya str., 19, Dubna, Moscow region, 141980, Russia eSkobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, 1(2), Leninskie gory, GSP-1, Moscow, 119991, Russia f Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics, 14-b Metrolohichna str., Kiev, 03143, Ukraine 1Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], tfl[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract.
    [Show full text]
  • 14. Structure of Nuclei Particle and Nuclear Physics
    14. Structure of Nuclei Particle and Nuclear Physics Dr. Tina Potter Dr. Tina Potter 14. Structure of Nuclei 1 In this section... Magic Numbers The Nuclear Shell Model Excited States Dr. Tina Potter 14. Structure of Nuclei 2 Magic Numbers Magic Numbers = 2; 8; 20; 28; 50; 82; 126... Nuclei with a magic number of Z and/or N are particularly stable, e.g. Binding energy per nucleon is large for magic numbers Doubly magic nuclei are especially stable. Dr. Tina Potter 14. Structure of Nuclei 3 Magic Numbers Other notable behaviour includes Greater abundance of isotopes and isotones for magic numbers e.g. Z = 20 has6 stable isotopes (average=2) Z = 50 has 10 stable isotopes (average=4) Odd A nuclei have small quadrupole moments when magic First excited states for magic nuclei higher than neighbours Large energy release in α, β decay when the daughter nucleus is magic Spontaneous neutron emitters have N = magic + 1 Nuclear radius shows only small change with Z, N at magic numbers. etc... etc... Dr. Tina Potter 14. Structure of Nuclei 4 Magic Numbers Analogy with atomic behaviour as electron shells fill. Atomic case - reminder Electrons move independently in central potential V (r) ∼ 1=r (Coulomb field of nucleus). Shells filled progressively according to Pauli exclusion principle. Chemical properties of an atom defined by valence (unpaired) electrons. Energy levels can be obtained (to first order) by solving Schr¨odinger equation for central potential. 1 E = n = principle quantum number n n2 Shell closure gives noble gas atoms. Are magic nuclei analogous to the noble gas atoms? Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Polarized Target Experiments for Elementary Particle Physics
    SOME POLARIZED TARGET EXPERIMENTS FOR ELEMENTARY PARTICLE PHYSICS R.H. DALITZ Department of Theoretical Physics, Oxford INTRODUCTION At the present stage in elementary particle physics, there are three major areas of phenomena where the use of polarized targets may lead to especially illuminating information. a. High energy scattering, in the energy range where the dominant contributions to the processes observed may arise from Reggion ex­ change. The features of particular interest in these situjtions will be discussed at this meeting by Dr R.J.N. Phillips 1 • b. Tests of time-reversal (T) invariance for electrom~gnetic pro­ cesses, following the suggestion by Bernstein et al 2) that the CF-violation observed in the weak decay of kaons arises from the existence of an electromagnetic interaction which strongly viola­ tes T-invariance. Evidence for this hypothetical T-violating elec­ tromagnetic interaction can be sought most directly in the study of electromagnetic processes from a polarized proton target, for example in the study of the electro-excitation process e + N-+ e + N* , as discussed by Christ and Lee 3J. The experi~ents proposed will be discussed at this meeting by Dr M. Jacob 4J. c. Hadron spectroscopy. Very many resonant states have been obser­ ved for masonic and baryonic states. These hadronic states are be­ lieved to correspond to the patterns appropriate to unitary multi­ plets of states, and these unitary multiplets appear to be grouped in supermultiplet patterns. In our attempt to classify and under­ stand all these hadronic states, our first need is for the deter­ mination of the spin and parity for each state.
    [Show full text]
  • Electron- Vs Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering
    Electron- vs Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering Omar Benhar INFN and Department of Physics Universita` “La Sapienza” I-00185 Roma, Italy NUFACT11 University of Geneva, August 2nd, 2011 Neutrino-nucleus scattering . impact of the flux average . flux-averaged electron scattering x-section: a numerical experiment . contributions of reaction mechanisms other than quasi elastic single nucleon knock out to the MiniBooNE CCQE data sample Summary & Outlook Outline Electron scattering . standard data representation . theoretical description: the impulse approximation Omar Benhar (INFN, Roma) NUFACT11 Geneva 02/08/2011 2 / 24 Summary & Outlook Outline Electron scattering . standard data representation . theoretical description: the impulse approximation Neutrino-nucleus scattering . impact of the flux average . flux-averaged electron scattering x-section: a numerical experiment . contributions of reaction mechanisms other than quasi elastic single nucleon knock out to the MiniBooNE CCQE data sample Omar Benhar (INFN, Roma) NUFACT11 Geneva 02/08/2011 2 / 24 Outline Electron scattering . standard data representation . theoretical description: the impulse approximation Neutrino-nucleus scattering . impact of the flux average . flux-averaged electron scattering x-section: a numerical experiment . contributions of reaction mechanisms other than quasi elastic single nucleon knock out to the MiniBooNE CCQE data sample Summary & Outlook Omar Benhar (INFN, Roma) NUFACT11 Geneva 02/08/2011 2 / 24 The inclusive electron-nucleus x-section The x-section of the process e
    [Show full text]
  • MIT at the Large Hadron Collider—Illuminating the High-Energy Frontier
    Mit at the large hadron collider—Illuminating the high-energy frontier 40 ) roland | klute mit physics annual 2010 gunther roland and Markus Klute ver the last few decades, teams of physicists and engineers O all over the globe have worked on the components for one of the most complex machines ever built: the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at the CERN laboratory in Geneva, Switzerland. Collaborations of thousands of scientists have assembled the giant particle detectors used to examine collisions of protons and nuclei at energies never before achieved in a labo- ratory. After initial tests proved successful in late 2009, the LHC physics program was launched in March 2010. Now the race is on to fulfill the LHC’s paradoxical mission: to complete the Stan- dard Model of particle physics by detecting its last missing piece, the Higgs boson, and to discover the building blocks of a more complete theory of nature to finally replace the Standard Model. The MIT team working on the Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) experiment at the LHC stands at the forefront of this new era of particle and nuclear physics. The High Energy Frontier Our current understanding of the fundamental interactions of nature is encap- sulated in the Standard Model of particle physics. In this theory, the multitude of subatomic particles is explained in terms of just two kinds of basic building blocks: quarks, which form protons and neutrons, and leptons, including the electron and its heavier cousins. From the three basic interactions described by the Standard Model—the strong, electroweak and gravitational forces—arise much of our understanding of the world around us, from the formation of matter in the early universe, to the energy production in the Sun, and the stability of atoms and mit physics annual 2010 roland | klute ( 41 figure 1 A photograph of the interior, central molecules.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spin of the Proton
    The spin of the proton Bo-Qiang Ma (马伯强) Peking Univ (北京大学) ? The 7th Workshop on Hadron Physics in China and Opportunities Worldwide August 3-7, 2015, Duke Kunshan University Collaborators: Enzo Barone, Stan Brodsky, Jacques Soffer, Andreas Schafer, Ivan Schmidt, Jian-Jun Yang, Qi-Ren Zhang and students: Bowen Xiao, Zhun Lu, Bing Zhang, Jun She, Jiacai Zhu, Xinyu Zhang, Tianbo Liu 3 It has been 30 years of the proton “spin crisis” or “spin puzzle” • Spin Structure: experimentally u d s 0.020 u d s 0.3 spin “crisis” or “puzzle”: where is the proton’s missing spin? The Proton “Spin Crisis” In contradiction with the naïve quark model expectation: u d s 0.3 Why there is the proton spin puzzle/crisis? • The quark model is very successful for the classification of baryons and mesons • The quark model is good to explain the magnetic moments of octet baryons • The quark model gave the birth of QCD as a theory for strong interaction So why there is serious problem with spin of the proton in the quark model? The parton model (Feynman 1969) Infinite • photon scatters incoherently off Momentum massless, pointlike, spin-1/2 quarks Frame • probability that a quark carries fraction of parent proton’s momentum is q(), (0< < 1) 1 2 2 F2 (x) d eq q( ) (x ) eq x q(x) 0 q,q q,q 4 1 1 xu(x) x d(x) x s(x) ... 9 9 9 •the functions u(x), d(x), s(x), … are called parton distribution functions (pdfs) - they encode information about the proton’s deep structure •Parton model is established under the collinear approxiamtion: The transversal motion of partons is neglected or integrated over.
    [Show full text]
  • A Peek Into Spin Physics
    A Peek into Spin Physics Dustin Keller University of Virginia Colloquium at Kent State Physics Outline ● What is Spin Physics ● How Do we Use It ● An Example Physics ● Instrumentation What is Spin Physics The Physics of exploiting spin - Spin in nuclear reactions - Nucleon helicity structure - 3D Structure of nucleons - Fundamental symmetries - Spin probes in beyond SM - Polarized Beams and Targets,... What is Spin Physics What is Spin Physics ● The Physics of exploiting spin : By using Polarized Observables Spin: The intrinsic form of angular momentum carried by elementary particles, composite particles, and atomic nuclei. The Spin quantum number is one of two types of angular momentum in quantum mechanics, the other being orbital angular momentum. What is Spin Physics What Quantum Numbers? What is Spin Physics What Quantum Numbers? Internal or intrinsic quantum properties of particles, which can be used to uniquely characterize What is Spin Physics What Quantum Numbers? Internal or intrinsic quantum properties of particles, which can be used to uniquely characterize These numbers describe values of conserved quantities in the dynamics of a quantum system What is Spin Physics But a particle is not a sphere and spin is solely a quantum-mechanical phenomena What is Spin Physics Stern-Gerlach: If spin had continuous values like the classical picture we would see it What is Spin Physics Stern-Gerlach: Instead we see spin has only two values in the field with opposite directions: or spin-up and spin-down What is Spin Physics W. Pauli (1925)
    [Show full text]
  • Polarized Target for the Measurement of the Gluon Contribution to the Nucleon Spin in the COMPASS Experiment
    Polarized target for the measurement of the gluon contribution to the nucleon spin in the COMPASS experiment Nagoya University Thesis for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Physics by Naoki TAKABAYASHI 1 2002 1 Supported by Research Fellowships of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists. CONTENTS 1. Introduction : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1 2. Spin structure of the nucleon : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 5 2.1 Deep inelastic scattering . 5 2.2 Cross section and structure functions in unpolarized DIS . 7 2.3 Cross section and structure functions in polarized DIS . 9 2.4 Structure functions and spin puzzle in Parton Model picture . 13 2.4.1 Parton distribution . 14 2.4.2 Spin puzzle in Parton Model picture . 16 2.5 Structure functions and spin puzzle in QCD evolved Parton Model . 18 2.5.1 Unpolarized structure functions . 18 2.5.2 Factorization schemes . 20 2.5.3 DGLAP equation and Scaling violation . 22 2.5.4 Spin-dependent structure functions and polarized DGLAP equation . 23 2.6 Interpretation of small ∆Σ. Is gluon contribution large? . 24 2.6.1 Sum rules . 25 2.6.2 Axial anomaly . 26 3. COMPASS experiment : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 30 3.1 Open charm lepto-production via photon-gluon fusion . 30 3.2 Expectations . 35 3.2.1 Luminosity . 35 3.2.2 Reconstruction of the open charm events . 35 3.2.3 Statistical accuracy . 37 3.3 Comparison with the other experiments on ∆g . 40 3.3.1 High pT hadron pairs . 40 3.3.2 pp¯ collision . 41 3.3.3 Comparison of the expected precisions and the kine- matic ranges .
    [Show full text]