DOCSLIB.ORG

(PAC) Report 2001 – 2002

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(PAC) Report 2001 – 2002 Our Voice in the Political Process Learn which candidates Pfizer PAC supported in your community PFIZER PAC BIENNIAL REPORT 2001-2002 Pfizer is poised to do more for healthcare than any other company in history. Every day, state and federal governments make decisions that affect Pfizer and our business operations. Patent restrictions, importation, anti-DTC and marketing regulations, supplemental rebates and preferred drug lists are just a few examples of the challenges we are facing. With political decisions increasingly taking on greater importance, Pfizer needs to ensure that our voice is heard when officials consider crucial pieces of legislation. Your voice is a critical part of the policy debate that affects your company. As we have seen in past elections, each and every one of us plays a vital role in shaping our world, our environment and our communities – by taking the time to vote, whatever our political affiliation. By participating in Pfizer PAC you become a partner with Pfizer’s government affairs team to encourage positive change for the future. Your participation ensures that your voice – and Pfizer’s voice – is heard in the public policy arena. “Your help is sorely needed. While we can all take pride at being the leader in the pharmaceutical industry, we are not the industry leader when it comes to supporting candidates who value our industry. Eli Lilly and GlaxoSmithKline raise far more than Pfizer and have higher employee participation levels in their PACs. Our urgent goal is to increase the PAC from its current $1.3 million to $3 million for the next election cycle, and to raise employee participation rates from 10% to 25%.” Hank McKinnell Chairman & CEO, Pfizer Inc WHY DOES PFIZER NEED A PAC? Simply put, federal law prohibits corporations from making political contribu- tions to federal candidates. However, corporations are allowed to establish political action committees, which are funded solely through voluntary employee contributions. Pfizer’s ability to support candidates, therefore, depends entirely upon Pfizer PAC’s success in raising money from you and your colleagues. WHY IS EVERY ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEE BEING ASKED TO JOIN PFIZER PAC? A voluntary contribution from all eligible employees will create a generous pool of funds with which to support candidates who shape federal and state government policies affecting our industry. Federal and state legislation and regulation directly impact the financial well being of our company. Pfizer needs to be able to fully participate in the electoral process; therefore, we need all eligible employees to make a voluntary contribution to Pfizer PAC. 2 PAC DISBURSEMENTS FOR 2001-2002 ELECTION CYCLE In the 2001-2002 election cycle the Pfizer PAC supported 211 Congressional candidates of whom 72% were Republicans and 28% were Democrats. Pfizer PAC and corporate contributions were made to a total of 1,182 state and local candidates during the 2001-2002 election cycle, consisting of 58% Republicans, PAC BIENNIAL REPORT PAC 40% Democrats and 2% Independents. 2001-2002 PFIZER WHAT IS PFIZER PAC? Pfizer PAC is a nonpartisan organization that provides opportunities for you to participate in the American political process. By partici- pating in the political action committee (PAC), you help elect candidates who share your views. The Pfizer PAC is an employee- STATE CORPORATE POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS In 29 states it is legal for a corporation to contribute to state election campaigns. In these states, contributions to candidates for state offices generally come from corporate funds. WHY JOIN PFIZER PAC? Pfizer PAC is based upon the principle that if you want policy decisions to reflect your concerns, you need to become involved in the election of those people who make the decisions. Contributing to the PAC with fellow employees gives you a stronger voice and say in who gets elected. Every day, elected officials across the nation make decisions that affect Pfizer and its business operations. By becoming a PAC contributor, you reaffirm your commitment to be an active participant in the election process and help protect Pfizer’s business interests. Your participation ensures that your voice will be heard and opinion valued. 3 Joining the PAC is easy, all one needs to do is simply fill out an enrollment card or go to the PAC website at www.epacweb.com/Pfizer. Pfizer PAC is a voluntary program. You may contribute whatever you wish. You may contribute in the form of a payroll deduction or in a lump sum, up to the $5,000 annual maximum permitted by law. Whether or not you decide to PAC BIENNIAL REPORT PAC participate in the PAC, or the amount you may contribute, will not affect your 2001-2002 PFIZER run organization with a steering committee the presence of Pfizer facilities or employees made up of Pfizer employees from around in the candidate’s district or state. The PAC the country. When choosing to make a con- steering committee reviews and approves all tribution to a candidate, the Pfizer PAC recommendations for PAC contributions on a considers candidates’ views on issues that monthly basis. impact Pfizer and our employees as well as employment status. Contributions to the Pfizer PAC are not tax deductible as charitable contributions for Federal income tax purposes. Additionally, if required by law, the amount of your contribution, together with your name, address, occupation and employer will be publicly disclosed. PFIZER PAC LEADERSHIP COUNCIL In 1998, Pfizer PAC established the Pfizer PAC Leadership Council. The Leadership Council is based upon the premise that if you want policy decisions to reflect your concerns, you need to become involved in the election of those people who make important decisions. By contributing $500 or more per year to the Pfizer PAC, you will be a member of the Pfizer PAC Leadership Council. Whether you choose to join the PAC Leadership Council, prefer to join with a smaller amount to the PAC, or not join at all, is up to you and will not affect your employment status. 4 PAC BIENNIAL REPORT PAC "For the past several years, some candidates and elected officials have spent an enormous amount of time and money attacking our industry. Some attack the industry because they want to see government run health care, while others find us 2001-2002 PFIZER an inviting target because they feel we are unable to respond to their attacks. Patent protection, direct-to-consumer advertising restrictions, price controls, preferred drug lists, supplemental rebates and personal injury lawsuits are just a few of the many issues being debated in Congress and our state capitols across the country. By joining the PAC, you can help Pfizer make our voice heard and have a real impact on government decision-making." Chuck Hardwick Senior Vice President, Worldwide Government & Public Affairs WHO PICKS THE CANDIDATES WHO RECEIVE PFIZER PAC MONEY? The Pfizer PAC Steering Committee, made up of employees from different facilities around the country, oversees the evaluation of candidates for the Pfizer PAC to support. When selecting candidates for funding, Pfizer PAC gives priority to the following: Candidates’ views on matters of concern to Pfizer and its employees, The presence of Pfizer employees or facilities in a candidate’s state or district, In the case of incumbents, a candidate’s proven legislative leadership and ability, A candidate’s commitment to improving the pharmaceutical industry climate. CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM In 2002, President Bush signed campaign finance reform legislation into law. Does this mean that corporations no longer have a role in making political contributions? The campaign finance reform legislation that passed went into effect on November 6, 2002 and bans corporations from contributing corporate 5 funds to political parties such as the Democratic National Committee and the Republican National Committee. Typically, these contributions pay for Get- Out-The-Vote drives and/or ads to promote one party’s candidate over another. The ban on activities funded by corporate contributions makes it crucial that we increase participation in the Pfizer PAC. The additional PAC funds raised PAC BIENNIAL REPORT PAC will offset the recently enacted limits on corporate political activity as well as support and enhance Pfizer’s direct and field based lobbying efforts. 2001-2002 PFIZER COMMITTEES POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS PFIZER PAC POLICY COMMITTEE STEERING COMMITTEE Chairman Member Chuck Hardwick Dan Collier Senior Vice President, Worldwide Vice President, Government & Public Affairs Sales Specialty Division New York, NY Treasurer Richard Passov Member Vice President & Treasurer Forest Harper Vice President, Secretary Pfizer for Living Share Card George Evans Program, Pharmaceuticals Senior Assistant General Counsel Headquarters New York, NY Member Rich Bagger Member Senior Vice President, John Keenan Government Relations Public Affairs 6 PGRD Member Ann Arbor, MI Ken Bowler Vice President, Member Government Relations Gary Platt Director/Team Leader Member Information Technology Jeff Kindler Parsippany, NJ Senior Vice President PAC BIENNIAL REPORT PAC & General Counsel Member Philip Rose Member Director of Distribution, Robert Mallett Pfizer Global Manufacturing Senior Vice President, Memphis, TN Corporate Affairs 2001-2002 PFIZER Member Mike Taylor Senior Vice President, PGRD Global Project Management Groton, CT Member Cheryl Wood Order Fulfillment Manager, Pfizer Global Manufacturing Reno, NV PARTY DISTRICT PAC CORP. ALABAMA SENATE W Sen. Jeff Sessions R 3,000 STATE Sen. William C. Armistead Jr. R 750 W Rep. Scott Beason R 51 500 W Sen. Roger H. Bedford D 6 1,000 W Rep. Robert Bentley R 63 500 W Sen. Steve French R 15 500 W Rep. Victor Gaston R 100 500 W Rep. Laura Hall D 19 500 W Rep. Albert Hall D 22 500 W Rep. Seth Hammett D 92 500 W Rep. Allen W. Layson D 61 250 W Rep. Michael J. Millican D 17 1,000 W Attorney General Bill Pryor R 500 W Governor Bob Riley R 500 Rep.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 87Th LEGISLATIVE SESSION and COVID RESTRICTIONS On
    87th LEGISLATIVE SESSION AND COVID RESTRICTIONS On January 12, 2021, lawmakers from across the state will convene the 87th Texas Legislative Session, meeting for the Regular Session over the following 140 days through May 31. This will be the first time that all 181 legislators will come together since the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, and the virus is top-of-mind for everyone involved. While the Governor recently announced the re-opening of the Capitol building on January 4, we have minimal knowledge of the health and safety protocols the members, staff and Capitol visitors will have to follow when they enter the building next week. It will surely be a much different environment than previous sessions. We know the following requirements will be in place as of today, per a memo released by the State Preservation Board last week: • The Capitol building will only be open from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m., Monday through Friday; it will be closed Saturday and Sunday for cleaning. • The public may only enter through the North Capitol entrance. • Covid testing will be encouraged and provided on the North Plaza at no expense. • A mask will be required to be worn inside the building at all times. • All deliveries to the Capitol, including food and beverage, must be left at the loading dock; no delivery personnel will be allowed beyond the loading dock or through the public entrance. • No public tours or groups or sponsored event space will be available. • The House and Senate will manage public access to their offices once convened and rules are adopted, and the public will need to check with the offices directly for specific guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT to the JUDICIAL COUNCIL for Business Meeting On: February 25, 2011
    Judicial Council of California . Administrative Office of the Courts 455 Golden Gate Avenue . San Francisco, California 94102-3688 www.courtinfo.ca.gov REPORT TO THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL For business meeting on: February 25, 2011 Title Agenda Item Type Court Facilities: Naming the New Courthouse Action Required in Long Beach Effective Date Rules, Forms, Standards, or Statutes Affected February 25, 2011 None Date of Report Recommended by January 19, 2011 Executive and Planning Committee Hon. Richard D. Huffman, Chair Contact Kelly Quinn, 818-558-3078 [email protected] Executive Summary The Executive and Planning Committee recommends naming the proposed new trial courthouse to be constructed in the City of Long Beach in honor of former Governor George Deukmejian. Recommendation The Executive and Planning Committee recommends the council name the proposed new courthouse in Long Beach as follows: Governor George Deukmejian Courthouse Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles Previous Council Action On the council’s behalf, the Executive and Planning Committee adopted the attached Courthouse 1 Naming Policy (the naming policy) in May 2009. The council’s naming standards apply to 1 The naming policy was adopted on an interim basis. The Administrative Director of the Courts was asked to report to the council by December 2011 on the implementation of this policy and to make further recommendations on the policy at that time. renovated and newly constructed courthouses that the council has financed, in whole or in part, where the judicial branch is the facility owner or majority tenant. These standards are listed in section III.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Government Fund Contributions to Candidates and Political Committees January 1 ‐ December 31, 2018
    GOOD GOVERNMENT FUND CONTRIBUTIONS TO CANDIDATES AND POLITICAL COMMITTEES JANUARY 1 ‐ DECEMBER 31, 2018 STATE RECIPIENT OF GGF FUNDS AMOUNT DATE ELECTION OFFICE OR COMMITTEE TYPE CA Jeff Denham, Jeff PAC $5,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 Federal Leadership PAC DC Association of American Railroads PAC $5,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 Federal Trade Assn PAC FL Bill Nelson, Moving America Forward PAC $5,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 Federal Leadership PAC GA David Perdue, One Georgia PAC $5,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 Federal Leadership PAC GA Johnny Isakson, 21st Century Majority Fund Fed $5,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 Federal Leadership PAC MO Roy Blunt, ROYB Fund $5,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 Federal Leadership PAC NE Deb Fischer, Nebraska Sandhills PAC $5,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 Federal Leadership PAC OR Peter Defazio, Progressive Americans for Democracy $5,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 Federal Leadership PAC SC Jim Clyburn, BRIDGE PAC $5,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 Federal Leadership PAC SD John Thune, Heartland Values PAC $5,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 Federal Leadership PAC US Dem Cong Camp Cmte (DCCC) ‐ Federal Acct $15,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 National Party Cmte‐Fed Acct US Natl Rep Cong Cmte (NRCC) ‐ Federal Acct $15,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 National Party Cmte‐Fed Acct US Dem Sen Camp Cmte (DSCC) ‐ Federal Acct $15,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 National Party Cmte‐Fed Acct US Natl Rep Sen Cmte (NRSC) ‐ Federal Acct $15,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 National Party Cmte‐Fed Acct VA Mark Warner, Forward Together PAC $5,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 Federal Leadership PAC VA Tim Kaine, Common
    [Show full text]
  • Consent Decree #01-11161 CAS RZ for Reimbursement of Response
    SFUND RECORDS CTR 2092528 1 JOHN C. CRUDEN Acting Assistant Attorney General 2 Environment and Natural Resources Division LLi BRADLEY R. O'BRIEN, State Bar No. 189425 3 Environmental Enforcement Section Environment and Natural Resources Division CIEBK. U.S. DllpRlCT COURT'? 4 United States Department of Justice 301 Howard Street, Suite 1050 5 San Francisco, CA 94105 NOV 26 2002 Telephone (415) 744-6484 6 Facsimile (415) 744-6476 7 JOHN S. GORDON DEPUTY United States Attorney for the 8 Central District of California LEON W. WEIDMAN 9 Chief, Civil Division 300 North Los Angeles Street 10 Los Angeles, CA 90012 11 NANCY J. MARVEL Regional Counsel 12 THOMAS A. BLOOMFIELD Assistant Regional Counsel Scan Only 13 U, S. Environmental Protection Agency 7E Hawthorne Street ENTERFD n Francisco, CA 94105 CLERK. U S DISTRICT COURT lephone (415) 972-3877 csimile (415) 947-3570 fl/27 2002: CD csa.6 / torneys for Plaintiff United States DISTRICT OF CAUFOTNIA S- IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 01- 1116 1 21 Plaintiff, 22 Civil Action No. v. 23 Consent Decree The STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 24 25 Defendant. r MO roMSTlTUTES NOTICE OF ENTRY 26 i • . .?rDBYFRCP.RULE77ld). 27 28 COM 192672 $ 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 I . BACKGROUND . 3 3 II JURISDICTION . 4 4 III PARTIES BOUND ... 5 5 IV DEFINITIONS .... 5 6 v. SITE BACKGROUND ... 8 7 VI . PURPOSE . 11 8 VII . CASH PAYMENT . 12 9 VIII. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS OF CONSENT DECREE . 14 10 IX. COVENANT NOT TO SUE BY THE UNITED STATES .
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Lilly Report of Political Financial Support
    16 2016 Lilly Report of Political Financial Support 1 16 2016 Lilly Report of Political Financial Support Lilly employees are dedicated to innovation and the discovery of medicines to help people live longer, healthier and more active lives, and more importantly, doing their work with integrity. LillyPAC was established to work to ensure that this vision is also shared by lawmakers, who make policy decisions that impact our company and the patients we serve. In a new political environment where policies can change with a “tweet,” we must be even more vigilant about supporting those who believe in our story, and our PAC is an effective way to support those who share our views. We also want to ensure that you know the story of LillyPAC. Transparency is an important element of our integrity promise, and so we are pleased to share this 2016 LillyPAC annual report with you. LillyPAC raised $949,267 through the generous, voluntary contributions of 3,682 Lilly employees in 2016. Those contributions allowed LillyPAC to invest in 187 federal candidates and more than 500 state candidates who understand the importance of what we do. You will find a full financial accounting in the following pages, as well as complete lists of candidates and political committees that received LillyPAC support and the permissible corporate contributions made by the company. In addition, this report is a helpful guide to understanding how our PAC operates and makes its contribution decisions. On behalf of the LillyPAC Governing Board, I want to thank everyone who has made the decision to support this vital program.
    [Show full text]
  • School Choice Programs. What's Happening in the States. INSTITUTION Heritage Foundation, Washington, DC
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 411 330 UD 031 356 AUTHOR Tucker, Allyson M., Comp.; Lauber, William F., Comp. TITLE School Choice Programs. What's Happening in the States. INSTITUTION Heritage Foundation, Washington, DC. PUB DATE 1995-03-00 NOTE 83p. AVAILABLE FROM Heritage Foundation, Publications Department, 214 Massachusetts Avenue, N.E., Washington, DC 20002-4999; fax: 202-544-2260. PUB TYPE Reports Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC04 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Charter Schools; Educational Change; *Educational Vouchers; Elementary Secondary Education; Federal Legislation; *Free Choice Transfer Programs; Grants; *Private Sector; Program Development; *School Choice; State Legislation; *State Programs ABSTRACT School choice advocates made many advances in 1994, and many states seem ready to pass school choice legislation in 1995. This report describes the state of school choice efforts in the individual states. School choice advocates look for action by the Federal Government as Congress discusses ways to help states implement choice, whether by vouchers, block grants, or other approaches. In 1994 there were increased numbers of privately sponsored school choice programs funded by corporations, individuals, and charitable organizations. Analysis of the reports from individual states yields information about school choice. Of the 44 state legislatures that met in 1994, some sort of school choice legislation was introduced or pending in 25 states. Forty state governors have indicated their support for school choice, and at least 41 states have significant policy groups or grassroots coalitions working for school choice. Ten states have implemented charter school legislation, and many other states are deliberating about charter schools. Several thousand students attended the school of their choice under 1 of 16 privately sponsored voucher programs in 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • Party and Non-Party Political Committees Vol. II State and Local Party Detailed Tables
    FEC REPORTS ON FINANCIAL ACTIVITY 1989 - 1990 FINAL REPORT .. PARTY AND NON-PARTY POLITICAL COKMITTEES VOL.II STATE AND LOCAL PARTY DETAILED TABLES FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 999 E Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20463 OCTOBER 1991 I I I I I I I I FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Commissioners John w. McGarry, Chairman Joan D. Aikens, Vice Chairman Lee Ann Elliott, Thomas J. Josefiak Danny L. McDonald Scott E. Thomas Donnald K. Anderson, Ex Officio Clerk of the u.s. House of Representatives Walter J. Stewart Secretary of the Senate John C. Surina, Staff Director Lawrence M. Noble, General Counsel Comments and inquiries about format should be addressed to the Reports Coordinator, Data System Development Division, who coordinated the production of this REPORT. Copies of 1989-1990 FINAL REPORT, PARTY AND NON-PARTY POLITICAL COMMITTEES, may be obtained b writing to the Public Records Office, Federal Election Commission, 999 E Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20463. Prices are: VOL. I - $10.00, VOL. II - $10.00, VOL. III - $10.00, VOL IV - $10.00. Checks should be made payable to the Federal Election Commission. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. DESCRIPTION OF REPORT iv II. SUMMARY OF TABLES vi III. EXPLANATION OF COLUMNS viii IV. TABLES: SELECTED FINANCIAL ACTIVITY AND ASSISTANCE TO CANDIDATES, DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN STATE AND LOCAL POLITICAL COMMITTEES A. SELECTED FINANCIAL ACTIVITY OF DEMOCRATIC STATE AND LOCAL POLITICAL COMMITTEES AND THEIR ASSISTANCE TO CANDIDATES BY OFFICE AND PARTY Alabama 1 Missouri 37 Colorado 7 New York 43 Idaho 13 Ohio 49 Kansas 19
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Legislative Oversight Committee
    You're viewing an archived copy from the New Jersey State Library. Committee Meeting of SENATE LEGISLATIVE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE "Testimony regarding the Race to the Top education funding application process" LOCATION: Committee Room 4 DATE: October 7, 2010 State House Annex 9:00 a.m. Trenton, New Jersey MEMBERS OF COMMITTEE PRESENT: Senator Barbara A. Buono, Chair Senator M. Teresa Ruiz, Vice Chair Senator Sandra B. Cunningham Senator Paul A. Sarlo Senator Thomas H. Kean ALSO PRESENT: Matthew T. Szudajski Timothy Lydon Frank Dominquez Luke E. Wolff Jason Redd Senate Republican Office of Legislative Services Senate Majority Committee Aide Committee Aides Committee Aides Meeting Recorded and Transcribed by The Office of Legislative Services, Public Information Office, Hearing Unit, State House Annex, PO 068, Trenton, New Jersey You're viewing an archived copy from the New Jersey State Library. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Bret D. Schundler Former Commissioner New Jersey Department of Education 13 APPENDIX: Statement submitted by Bret D. Schundler 1x pnf: 1-126 You're viewing an archived copy from the New Jersey State Library. SENATOR BARBARA BUONO (Chair): Good morning. I’m Senator Buono, the Chair of the Senate Legislative Oversight Committee. We are here today to discuss the circumstances surrounding the application for Race to the Top funding. It was described in detail in the subpoena -- the resolution that supports the subpoena which is demanding the production of documents and the appearance of certain witnesses here today. I just wanted to begin -- before we welcome and swear in the first witness -- that the contractor for the State of New Jersey who was hired to help draft, edit, and prepare the Race to the Top application was in court this morning before Judge Feinberg, with the Attorney General’s office, attempting to raise certain privileges -- executive privilege, other privileges as well -- that would have resulted in Wireless not appearing and producing documents before the Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • SC11-2453 Jurisdictional Answer Brief
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA BOB GRAHAM, et al., Petitioners, Case No.: SC11-2453 L.T. Case Nos.: 1D11-384 2007-CA-1818 v. MIKE HARIDOPOLOS, President of the Florida Senate; and DEAN CANNON, Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives on behalf of the Florida Legislature, Respondents. _________________________________________/ _____________________________________________________________ RESPONDENTS’ JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF _____________________________________________________________ On Review from the District Court of Appeal First District, State of Florida _____________________________________________________________ Daniel C. Brown Fla. Bar No. 0191049 Christine Davis Graves Fla. Bar No. 569372 CARLTON FIELDS, P.A. 215 South Monroe Street, Suite 500 Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Telephone: (850) 224-1585 Facsimile: (850) 222-0398 Counsel for Respondents TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CITATIONS ......................................................................................... ii STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS .......................................................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ................................................................................ 2 ARGUMENT ............................................................................................................. 2 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................... 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ................................................................................. 7 CERTIFICATE OF
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION in the Period Immediately Following The
    CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION In the period immediately following the close of the Civil War, philanthropic endeavors were undertaken to reconstruct secessionist states, establish wide-scale peace among still- hostile factions, and develop efforts to enact social, legal, and educational support. This philanthropic era is characterized by the activities of a number of individual, denominational, organizational, including state and federal supporters that were subsequently responsible for engendering a Negro College Movement, which established institutions for providing freed slaves, and later, Negroes with advanced educational degrees. This dissertation studied: the genesis, unfolding, contributions, and demise issues in conjunction with the social, economic, and political forces that shaped one such institution in Harper’s Ferry (Jefferson County), West Virginia: Storer College, which was founded in 1865 as an outgrowth of several mission schools. By an Act of Congress, in 1868, the founders of Storer College initially were granted temporary use of four government buildings from which to create their campus.1 Over the next 90 years, until its closure in 1955, the college underwent four distinct developmental phases: (a) Mission School [Elementary], (b) Secondary Division, (c) a Secondary Expansion, and (d) Collegiate. Even today—as a result of another Act of Congress—it continues to exist, albeit in altered form: in 1960, the National Park Service branch of the United States Department of the Interior was named the legal curator of the 1 United States. Congress. Legislative, Department of War. An Act Providing for the Sale of Lands, Tenements, and Water Privileges Belonging to the United States at or Near Harpers Ferry, in the County of Jefferson, West Virginia (1868).
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 FESC Summit
    22001100 FFEESSCC SSuummmmiitt University of Central Florida Student Union Orlando, Florida September 28-29, 2010 Date/Time Monday, September 27 Tuesday, September 28 Wednesday, September 29 Registration Registration 7:30- 8:00 Poster Set-up 7:30 – 8:30AM Cape Florida Prefunction Registration 8:00 – 9:30 8:00-9:00 Cape Florida Prefunction 8:30 AM Oral Presentations Session II Cape Florida Ballroom Key West Rooms A, B, C, D Welcome See page 11 Tony Waldrop, Provost 9:00-10:00 8:40 AM: Plenary Session I: Future Directions Break 9:30 – 10:00 See page 6 Cape Florida Ballroom Break 10:00 – 10:30 10:00– 11:00 Cape Florida Ballroom Cape Florida Ballroom 10:00- 10:30 – 11:30 Panel Discussion: 11:00 Cape Florida Ballroom Florida’s Needs and Photovoltaics Workshop Keynote Address Opportunities Cape Florida AB John Lushetsky See page 12 Program Manager, Solar 11:00– 11:30 Energy Technology Program Roundtable Reports U.S. Department of Energy 11:00-noon 11:30 – 11:45 11:30– 12:30 FESC Strategies & Programs Buffet Lunch (provided) Tim Anderson, FESC Director Cape Florida Ballroom 11:45 – 12:30 Buffet Lunch (provided) Noon – Lunch on your own Cape Florida Ballroom Registration 1:00 12:30 – 2:15 Key West Prefunction 12:30 – 2:15 Oral Presentations Session III Oral Presentations Session I Key West Rooms A, B, C, D 1:00 – 2:00 Key West Rooms A, B, C, D See page 13 See page 7 Florida AB Break 2:15 – 2:45 Break 2:15 – 2:45 2:00-3:00 Photovoltaics Cape Florida Ballroom Cape Florida Ballroom Cape 2:45 – 3:30 2:45-4:00 Key West AB West Key Roundtable Discussion
    [Show full text]
  • A Tale As Old As Time
    YOUR HOMETOWN PAPER SINCE 1871 | www.longislandadvance.net | FEBRUARY 6, 2020 | $1 VOTE ON WEDNESDAY, MARCH 18 RE-ELECT Mayor Paul Pontieri Trustee John A. (Jack) Krieger Trustee Lori Devlin • Trustee Thomas Ferb EXPERIENCE YOU CAN TRUST FOLLOW @PATCHOGUE2020 ON #PATCHOGUE2020 Paid for by Friends of PAtchogue PATCHOGUE2020.COM Canaan Lake expected to refill by summer’s end Additional work will create new parkland and add public water access BY NICOLE FUENTES The multiphase plan to restore Canaan Lake back to its recreation- al glory days is now, according to Legis. Rob Calarco (D-Patchogue) in its final phase. Once completed later this summer, the lake will be restored back to its natural state to be used once again as a recreational center- piece in North Patchogue. In November, New York Depart- ment of Environmental Conservation permit applications were submitted, allowing the project to move into the last phase. They were ultimate- ly approved this January, and the Suffolk County Department of Pub- lic Works is currently soliciting bids for a contractor. Calarco acquired an additional $1.65 million in county funding late last year for the comple- tion of the project. Construction is expected to begin in the spring, and the lake should refill late this sum- mer or in early fall. The project began in 2017 with the installation of a new culvert and sluice gate under Traction Boule- vard, which allowed the lake to be drained in 2018 and ultimately dry out the lake bed. In 2019 the lake A tale as old as time bed was dry enough to utilize heavy machinery to scrape it and pile sed- are available for $15 and can be pur- Troy Sica as Cogsworth, Emma But- iment along the perimeter to help ‘Beauty and the Beast’ chased online only at ShowTix4U.
    [Show full text]