K O S O V O Kosovo Region

ˆ Josanicka- Zlatari 20°30' Brus 21 30' J Banja ° u z The boundaries and names shown and the ˆ KOSOVO REGION M Pawlica Lepenac designations used on this map do not imply o ˆ r official endorsement or acceptance by the a HUNGARY v Raska United Nations. a CROATIA Duga PoljanaROMANIA SERBIA Belgrade Beloljin Prokuplje Topl BOSNIA AND SERBIA ica HERZEGOVINA AND ˆ Blace MONTENEGRO Ib Lesak ˆ Novi Pazar a B Banja r Dren U Kursumlija L ˆ G A KOSOVO R L Zitni Potok A I e DR A po I sˆ a AT vic´ IC THE FORMER S E YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF Socanica A ALBANIA MACEDONIA Bojnik ITALY 43°00' Tutin GREECE SERBIA 43°00' Banjska I Kosovska Podujevo Lebane Gazivodsko ba ˆ r ˆ Lece Jezero Zubin Mitrovica Zvecan nica Potok G. Lapastica Jabla MONTENEGRO ˆ Glavnik ˆ Batlava Rozaj ˆ Vucitrn Orlane S Rakos Rudnik i Istok t Nevoljane n Belo Polje i Vrela c ˆ Kladernica a ˆ Srbica N. Selo Propastica Ravna Banja -Durakovac Poljanceˆ B ˆ e Lausa li m D ri Dobrusa Cirez Vitomirica Obilic´ Pristina Pec´ ˆ Zlokucane´ Dobrosévac Marevce Sicevo´ Klina Glogovac Kosovo Polje Ogoste Rausic´ V. Belacevac´ Novo Brdo Barane Iglarevo Komorane Streocˆ Janjevo De ˆ ˆ ca a nska Bistric ˆ Kosovska Lapusnik KOSOVOˆ Kamenica Decani ´ Vlaski Lipljan Rznic a ˆ c i e Drenovac Krajiste 42 30' an n ˆ Brasaljce 42 30' ° bl ja Krajmirovce a l ˆ Dobrcane ° J ra Malisevo Junik K Tropojë Stimlje Gnjilane a rav Blace a Mo ˆ k ˆ Ratkovac Orahovac ˆ ac ljane n v i ˆ - o B Rajince Dakovica M Pozaranje Suva Reka Urosevacˆ Zegra Bajram Curri ga Biljaca E Zrze plu ˆ ren oˆ ˆ ik D.ˆ Plesina T -Delekare ˆ Rogovo ˆ Presevo V. Krusa Musutiste Grebno Paci Pirane ˆ Gatnje Vitina Sasare ˆ Miratovac Damjane Korisa Brod m Vrbestica ˆ i r Liqeni i Fierzës ˆ D Strpce Tabanovce i ˆ l ˆ Vaksince Krumë ˆ Prizren Be ˆ Kacanik Musnikovo Zur Hoca- Slupcane ALBANIA Zagradska L Brodosavce e G.-Lubinje p Dukagjin e Kumanovo n ˆ Tearce a ˆ c Kalimash Va Kukës Dragas rd Sipkovica a r Skopje Tetovo 42°00' 42 00' ˆ ˆ ° National capital Brod Golema- Recica Zelino ˆ a j Regional capital ˆ n Dracevo i Restelica ska c Town, village re P T V ˆ ˆ a r Airport d a r International boundary Vrapciste ˆ Republic boundary Cajle THE FORMER Brodec Gostivar Autonomous province YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF boundary MACEDONIA Major road ˆ Titov Veles Secondary road Zirovnica 0 10 20 30 40 50 km Railroad 20°30' 21°00' 0 10 20 30 mi Map No. 4069 Rev. 3 UNITED NATIONS Department of Peacekeeping Operations March 2007 Cartographic Section.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Republic of Serbia Ipard Programme for 2014-2020
EN ANNEX Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Republic of Serbia REPUBLIC OF SERBIA IPARD PROGRAMME FOR 2014-2020 27th June 2019 1 List of Abbreviations AI - Artificial Insemination APSFR - Areas with Potential Significant Flood Risk APV - The Autonomous Province of Vojvodina ASRoS - Agricultural Strategy of the Republic of Serbia AWU - Annual work unit CAO - Competent Accrediting Officer CAP - Common Agricultural Policy CARDS - Community Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and Stabilisation CAS - Country Assistance Strategy CBC - Cross border cooperation CEFTA - Central European Free Trade Agreement CGAP - Code of Good Agricultural Practices CHP - Combined Heat and Power CSF - Classical swine fever CSP - Country Strategy Paper DAP - Directorate for Agrarian Payment DNRL - Directorate for National Reference Laboratories DREPR - Danube River Enterprise Pollution Reduction DTD - Dunav-Tisa-Dunav Channel EAR - European Agency for Reconstruction EC - European Commission EEC - European Economic Community EU - European Union EUROP grid - Method of carcass classification F&V - Fruits and Vegetables FADN - Farm Accountancy Data Network FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization FAVS - Area of forest available for wood supply FOWL - Forest and other wooded land FVO - Food Veterinary Office FWA - Framework Agreement FWC - Framework Contract GAEC - Good agriculture and environmental condition GAP - Gross Agricultural Production GDP - Gross Domestic Product GEF - Global Environment Facility GEF - Global Environment Facility GES
[Show full text]
Opština Prokuplje Profil Zajednice
Opština Prokuplje Profil zajednice Lista tabela .........................................................................................................................................3 1 Uvod ...........................................................................................................................................5 2 Osnovne karakteristike..................................................................................................................5 2.1 Geografski položaj (lokacija)......................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Opšti podaci .................................................................................................................................. 7 2.3 Klima ............................................................................................................................................. 8 2.4 Lokalna samouprava (administracija) ......................................................................................... 10 2.5 Istorija, tradicija i kulturno nasleđe.............................................................................................. 15 3 Prirodni resursi ..........................................................................................................................16 4 Ljudski resursi ...........................................................................................................................20 4.1 Stanovništvo (broj stanovnika i stopa rasta) ..............................................................................
[Show full text]
A Multicriteria Analysis of Possible Tourist Offers in Toplica District
QUAESTUS MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH JOURNAL A MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS OF POSSIBLE TOURIST OFFERS IN TOPLICA DISTRICT Dragan TURANJANIN, Mališa ŢIŢOVIĆ, Marija MARČETIĆ, Miodrag ŢIŢOVIĆ Abstract: Some possibilities of making a new offer of the tourism services of the District of Toplica are indicated in the paper. The obtained order of alternative unexploited possibilities prioritizes the recovery of Kuršumlijska Banja spa in relation to all the other alternatives. Yet, it must be said that the other alternatives are also significant, and that they should also be exploited in the future so that this region might be present in the tourist offer of the Republic of Serbia to a greater extent. Keywords: multicriteria analisys, tourism, Toplica district INTRODUCTION Toplica District is an administrative district in Serbia, whose center is in Prokuplje. It is located eastwards from the Southern Morava River, i.e. it encompasses the basin of the Toplica River, a tributary of the Southern Morava, and a small part of the basin of the Rasina River, a tributary of the Western Morava. It surrounds the city of Prokuplje and the municipalities of Kuršumlija, Blace, and ŢitoraŤa. The Toplica River‘s spring is in the mountain of Kopaonik, and it was named after the numerous warm springs in its valley. This river is characteristic for the epigenia, which is found in as many as two places near the city of Prokuplje (it runs in one direction, then in the same line, but in the opposite direction). Therefore, Toplica District consists of the Toplica River Valley and is surrounded by the mountains of Jastrebac, Kopaonik, Radan, Vidojevnica and Pasjaţa.
[Show full text]
Spatial Functional Transformation and Typology of the Settlement System of Toplica District
UNIVERSITY THOUGHT doi:10.5937/univtho7-15574 Publication in Natural Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2017, pp. 47-51. Original Scientific Paper SPATIAL FUNCTIONAL TRANSFORMATION AND TYPOLOGY OF THE SETTLEMENT SYSTEM OF TOPLICA DISTRICT JOVAN DRAGOJLOVIĆ1, DUŠAN RISTIĆ2, NIKOLA MILENTIJEVIĆ1 1Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Priština, Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia 2Fakulty of Geography, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia ABSTRACT Contemporary processes of industralization, urbanization, deagrarianization, the polarization and globalization contribute socio-economic transformation of the observed space as well as the creation of new carrier of functional relationships in space. Towns with its own influences enrich the network of surrounding settlements, strengthen their mutual relations and create a whole functional settlement system of one area , or the gravity of the urban core. By dividing the functions of the primary, secondary and tertiary, the basis and types of settlements are created by functional criteria according to the type of economic activity and the primary content in them. In this area in the second half of the twentieth and early twenty-first century witnessed substantial changes in almost all components of demographic structure, which resulted in the transformation of functional types of settlement, when the predominantly agrarian settlement characteristic of the area of Toplica road went up mixed and service settlement. The idea behind the study is for the geographically complex area to be displayed in the light of socio- economic development, and as a basis for further economic development of this part of the Republic of Serbia. Keyword: urbanization, rural settlements, urban settlements, functions, typology, sustainable development, District of Toplica municipality with an area of 759 km2 (34.0%), Blace 2 INTRODUCTION municipality has an area of 306 km (13.7%), and lowest per surface is the territory of the municipality of Žitoradja 214 km2 Toplica district is located in the southern part of the (9.6%).
[Show full text]
S/2007/582 Security Council
United Nations S/2007/582 Security Council Distr.: General 28 September 2007 Original: English Report of the Secretary-General on the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo Introduction 1. The present report is submitted pursuant to Security Council resolution 1244 (1999) by which the Council decided to establish the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK) and requested the Secretary-General to report at regular intervals on the implementation of the mandate. It covers the activities of UNMIK and developments in Kosovo (Serbia), from 1 June to 31 August 2007. Kosovo future status process 2. On 1 August, I issued a statement welcoming the Contact Group’s agreement on modalities for further negotiations between Belgrade and Pristina during a new period of engagement. This effort is being led by a “Troika”, comprising representatives of the European Union, the Russian Federation and the United States of America. The United Nations has been providing support to the Troika’s mediation effort. On 30 August, the Troika held proximity talks in Vienna with delegations representing Serbia and Kosovo. Prior to those talks, the Troika held its first meeting with the Serbian Government on 10 August and with the Kosovo Unity Team on 11 and 12 August. I look forward to the Contact Group reporting to me on the results of the period of engagement by 10 December. Political situation 3. During the reporting period, the overriding political focus in Kosovo was on the deliberations on a new resolution in the Security Council. The Kosovo Albanian community and its leadership expressed disappointment when the Council failed to adopt a new resolution.
[Show full text]
Strategija Održivog Razvoja Opštine Kuršumlija 2010 – 2020
Opština Kuršumlija Delegacija Evropske unije STRATEGIJA ODRŽIVOG RAZVOJA OPŠTINE KURŠUMLIJA 2010 – 2020. GODINE SO Kuršumlija u saradnji sa projektom Exchange 2- Zajedniþka podrška lokalnim samoupravama Strategija održivog razvoja opštine Kuršumlija oktobar 2009. Strategija održivog razvoja Opštine Kuršumlija 2010 – 2020. godina Autor: Opština Kuršumlija Izdavač: Stalna konferencija gradova i opština Ova publikacija je izrađena uz pomoć Evropske unije. Sadržaj ove pub- likacije je isključivo odgovornost opštine Kuršumlija, i ni na jedan način ne oslikava stavove Evropske unije. Graﬁ čki dizajn i štampa: Kotur i ostali o.d. Tiraž: 75 primeraka Program EXCHANGE2 Projekat ﬁ nansira Evropska unija 2 Strategija održivog razvoja Opštine Kuršumlija 2010 – 2020. godina 0. LSDS – SAŽETAK O METODOLOGIJI Metodologija za izradu STRATEGIJE ODRŽIVOG RAZVOJA LOKALNE ZAJEDNICE je nastala kao rezultat aktivnosti Projekta Exchange 2 Zajedniþka podrška lokalnim samoupravama u cilju metodološke standardizacije procesa strateškog planiranja za potrebe Stalne konferencije gradova i opština i lokalnih samouprava u Srbiji. STRATEGIJA ODRŽIVOG RAZVOJA LOKALNE ZAJEDNICE naslanja se na okvirni plan „Milenijumskih razvojnih ciljeva“ UN. Na nacionionalnom nivou usklaÿena je sa Nacionalnom Strategijom održivog razvoja Republike Srbije i drugim nacionalnim strategijama koje se tiþu održivog razvoja lokalnih zajednica. Održivost zahteva od ljudi da koriste prirodne resurse u onoj meri koja im dozvoljava da se ti resursi prirodno obnove. STRATEGIJA ODRŽIVOG RAZVOJA LOKALNE
[Show full text]
Semi-Annual Report #2, October 2006 – March 2007
SERBIA CONTINGENCY PLANNING AND ECONOMIC SECURITY PROGRAM (SCOPES) SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT #2 ST ST OCTOBER 1 2006 – MARCH 31 2007 April 20, 2007 This report was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Development Alternatives, Inc. SCOPES Semi-Annual Report #2, October 2006 – March 2007 Serbia Contingency Planning and Economic Security Program (SCOPES) SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT #2 OCTOBER 1ST 2006 – MARCH 31ST 2007 April 20, 2007 DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Development Alternatives Inc. Humska 3 11000 Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro Phone: (381) 11 3690 757 Fax: (381) 11 2647 222 Under Contract: DFD-I-00-05-00250-00 Task Order #1 SCOPES Semi-Annual Report #2, October 2006 – March 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................... 4 SECTION 2: PREPAREDNESS AND PLANNING ACTIVITY ............................................ 8 SECTION 3: ECONOMIC SECURITY COMPONENT ....................................................... 24 SECTION 4: SURGE CAPACITY ........................................................................................... 36 ANNEX A: SUCCESS STORIES........................................................................................... 39 ANNEX B: SUMMARY OF SCOPES MEDIA COVERAGE............................................ 44 ANNEX C: QUALITATIVE
[Show full text]
Registar Izdatih Graðevinskih Dozvola
Spisak izdatih rešenja u postupku ozakonjenja Red. Adresa podnosioca Vlasnik Vrsta objekta Broj i datum izdavanja rešenja br. zahteva Kuršumlija, Kosan čić 1 Velimir Sretenovi ć Ivana 36B stambeni Po+P 01-351-66/2010 od 23.06.2016. 2 Gradimir Milivojevi ć Kuršumlija, selo Ljutova stambeni Su+P 01-351-163/2010 od 29.03.2016. 3 Stanojka Vujovi ć Kuršumlija, Kosovska 69 stambeni Po+P 01-351-317/2003 od 29.03.2016. Kuršumlija, Drinke Milica Nikoli ć i Pavlovi ć 25; Kuršumlija, 4 Dragoljub Nikoli ć Njegoševa 3 stambeni P 01-351-31/2010 od 30.03.2016. Kuršumlija, Cara Lazara 5 Cveta Vasi ć 18 stambeni P+1 01-351-350/2003 od 31.03.2016. Kuršumlija, Desanke 6 Budimirka Vukosavljevi ć Makcimovi ć 10 stambeni P 01-351-34/2010 od 31.03.2016. 7 Dejan Risti ć Kuršumlija, selo Selova stambeni P 01-351-197/2010 od 31.03.2016. Kuršumlija, Dr Voje 8 Goran Risti ć Stojanovi ća 22 stambeni P 01-351-58/2010 od 11.04.2016. Kuršumlija, Bra će 9 Milan Mati ć Vuksanovi ća 7 stambeni P 01-351-136/2010 od 14.04.2016. Kuršumlija, Sretena 10 Nadica Ćirkovi ć Mladenovi ća 5 stambeni P 01-351-89/2010 od 18.04.2016. Kuršumlija, Topli čka 11 Ljubomir Veljovi ć 37/29 stambeni P 01-351-96/2010 od 18.04.2016. Kuršumlija, selo 12 Vladimir Milovanovi ć Dabinovac stambeni P 01-351-25/2010 od 18.04.2016. Kuršumlija, Radomira 13 Laketa Jovi ć Milovanovi ća Samo 141 stambeni P 01-351-95/2010 od 26.04.2016.
[Show full text]
Powerpoint Template for a Scientific Poster
Р Е Д Н О - П Р И В Е Х Р П Р А М О Б Љ Е Н О А П Ш А К К О О С Л И А В INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS Agricultural production in the Toplica District cannot be described The subject of research in this paper is an analysis of the performance as intensive although there are adequate natural conditions in that of agricultural professional services through the engagement of agricultural consultants, as well as the interest of farmers in co- respect. Farmers need to be aware that under the current changeable operating with agricultural consultants. The research was conducted on business conditions they need to take care of the sustainability of the territory of the Toplica District, in three municipalities: Prokuplje, their business. Blace and Kuršumlija. These municipalities belong to a group of By relying exclusively on traditional knowledge and skills they risk underdeveloped areas of the Republic of Serbia. further marginalization of their economic and social status, even The main research goal is to present the role and significance of jeopardize their survival. To develop business and reach stability agricultural consultants for the development of agricultural production decision-makers in agricultural households need to be ready to on the territories of municipalities of Prokuplje, Blace and Kuršumlija continuously educate themselves about modern production in the Toplica District. technologies, financing, marketing, risk assessment, production To collect and analyse research data the authors resorted to a non- experimental method of a survey by means of questionnaires comprising insurance, information technologies, etc.
[Show full text]
Strategic Planning of Regional Sustainable Development Using Factor Analysis Method
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. Vol. 30, No. 2 (2021), 1317-1323 DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/124752 ONLINE PUBLICATION DATE: 2020-09-26 Original Research Strategic Planning of Regional Sustainable Development Using Factor Analysis Method Marija Milenković1, Ashok Vaseashta2, Dejan Vasović3* 1University of Niš, Univerzitetski trg 2, Niš, Serbia 2International Clean Water Institute, Manassas, VA and NJCU – State University of New Jersey, NJ USA 3University of Niš, Faculty of Occupational Safety in Niš, Čarnojevića 10a, Niš, Serbia Received: 24 February 2020 Accepted: 28 June 2020 Abstract Sustainable development of a regional and local community involves setting a strategic balance among economic, social, and environmental criteria (factors) of development. Due to their large number, physical quantity variance, and incompleteness, these factors have a limited, sometimes even conflicting and ineffectual application in producing a unified effect on development. This issue becomes resolvable through a modification of factor analysis by means of combining it with multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). The solutions thus obtained in the form of a ranking, with the top-ranked solution being the most favorable, constitute immense support for decision makers to use the proposed most favorable solution to formulate and implement their plan of development. Keywords: sustainable regional development, development factors, multi-criteria decision analysis, multi-objective planning, factor analysis Introduction the one hand, natural resources are used for the purpose of production, but in order to attain sustainability, it is Regional development is one of the frequent topics necessary to invest in the natural environment, as it of interest not only within economic sciences but also is the only way to achieve harmonious development.
[Show full text]
Emergency Plan of Action (Epoa) Serbia: Floods
P a g e | 1 Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) Serbia: Floods DREF Operation n° MDRRS014 Glide n°: FF2020-00158-SRB Expected timeframe: 4 months Date of issue: 10 July 2020 Expected end date: 30 November 2020 Category allocated to the of the disaster or crisis: Yellow DREF allocated: CHF 313,953 Total number of people affected: 52,745 Number of people to be 20,256 assisted: Provinces affected: 24 Provinces targeted: 20 Host National Societypresence (n° of volunteers, staff, branches): Red Cross of Serbia (RCS) with 222 volunteers and 83 staff in the branches of Arilje, Blace, Cacak, Despotovac, Doljevac, Gornji Milanovac, Ivanjica, Koceljeva, Kosjeric, Krusevac, Kursumlija, Lucani, Majdanpek, Osecina, Pozega, Prokuplje, Zitoradja, Kraljevo, Ljubovija, Trstenik, Krupanj, Obrenovac, Bajina Basta, Vladimirci. Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners actively involved in the operation: N/A Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: Sector for emergency of the Ministry of Interior, members of the Municipal Emergency Response headquarters (municipal emergency services), Serbian Armed Forces, local public companies. A. Situation analysis Description of the disaster For two weeks before the date of the disaster, which occurred on 22-24 June, the Republic of Serbia was affected by heavy rainfalls. The most affected areas are Kolubarski, Moravicki, Raski, Zlatiborski, Rasinski, Toplicki, Jablanicki, and Pomoravski districts. 8 municipalities and cities reported on 22 June that were affected by heavy rain that caused flash floods and floods. It was reported that the municipalities of Osecina, Ljubovija, and Lucani are the most affected by heavy rain (more than 40 litres per square meter in 24 hours) leading to floods in the whole region.
[Show full text]
Court of Auditors
12.6.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 168/1 I (Information) COURT OF AUDITORS SPECIAL REPORT No 2/2001 concerning the management of emergency humanitarian aid for the victims of the Kosovo crisis (ECHO), together with the Commission’s replies (pursuant to Article 248(4), second subparagraph, EC) (2001/C 168/01) CONTENTS Paragraph Page LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................... ........... 2 MAPOFKOSOVO........................................................... ........... 3 SUMMARY................................................................. ........... 4 INTRODUCTION ............................................................ 1-6 5 CONTEXT OF ASSISTANCE .................................................... 7-257 Allocation of funds ........................................................ 7 7 ECHO’srole.............................................................. 8-11 7 Emergency procedures ...................................................... 12-18 8 Framework Partnership Agreements (FPAs) ...................................... 19-20 9 EC-UN Agreement ......................................................... 21-259 Relevance of earmarking funds ............................................ 23-2510 MANAGEMENT OF ACTIVITIES................................................. 26-49 10 Mobilisation of funds ....................................................... 26-30 10 ECHO resources and organisation ............................................. 31-32 12 Appraisal of projects ......................................................
[Show full text]