Angular Momentum

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Angular Momentum Angular Momentum Angular Momentum the cosmic pollutant by Stirling A. Colgate and Albert G. Petschek There seems to be too much angular momentum in the universe to allow the formation of stars or the accretion of matter onto variable x-ray sources. This fundamental problem begs for solution. hen we have too much of Yet our universe is populated by planets, the tension in the string is the attractive something and cannot find stars, and black holes. How does nature get gravitational force, which is proportional a way of getting rid of it, we rid of the cosmic pollutant? to R–2. Since the required inward force often think of it as a pollu- Models proposed for variable x-ray goes as R-3, while the available gravita- tant.w In the game of concentration and sources give a strong clue to this long- tional force goes as R-2, there is bound to collapse of matter in the universe from standing puzzle (see “X-Ray Variability in be a point beyond which gravity is unable clouds of gas to clusters of galaxies, galax- Astrophysics”). But before we restrict our- to cause further collapse. This is the basis ies, stars, planets, and black holes, angular selves to x-ray variables, let’s look at the of a stable Keplerian orbit, like that of the momentum is the “pollutant” that pre- problem more generally. earth around the sun or that of accreting vents the game from being played to the matter around a compact star in an x-ray absolute limit, namely, collapse into one Angular Momentum, Weights, binary. Once in a stable orbit, the only way awesome black hole for each cluster-sized and Noncosmological Strings for matter to move farther inward is to cloud condensed from the early universe. lose angular momentum, but the puzzle is Only at the scale of the whole universe The angular momentum of a weight of how? We also would like to estimate how does the energy in the Hubble expansion mass m whirled at velocity vat the end of a much angular momentum has to be lost by of the universe prevent collapse, inde- string of length R is mvR. Under ideal whatever mechanism we devise. pendent of angular momentum con- circumstances, that is, a rigid support for straints. On smaller scales there seems to the string, no air friction, and no other Angular Momentum be too much angular momentum to allow external torques, the weight will continue and the Universe the collapse of clouds into dense objects. to circle at the same velocity forever. In other words, its angular momentum J = The universe as a whole does not seem mvR is conserved. If the string is short- to be rotating, as evidenced by the fact that objects whose disk-like shapes indicate they ened, by pulling it through the support, the blackbody radiation believed to be a have a net angular momentum. The central then since the angular momentum must relic of the early universe is isotropic to figure is Stephan’s Quintet, a group of five remain constant, the weight will speed up better than one part in 104. Moreover, interacting galaxies. Along the top from left to a higher angular frequency w = v/R. Tyson has found the orientations of a very to right are an edge-on view of the spiral The inward force necessary to keep the large number of galaxies to be random. galaxy NGC 4594, the star Beta Pictoris weight moving in a circular path, FR = Since the net angular momentum appears surrounded by a disk of dust, and the mv2/R = mw2R, is supplied by the tension to be zero over very large scales, the pollu- 2 3 barred spiral galaxy NGC 1300. Along the in the string. Since FR = J /mR in terms tion is not as bad as it could be. Our bottom from left to right are the galaxy of the angular momentum, we see that the problem is restricted to local patches of the M81, an artist’s conception of an x-ray tension in the string increases very rapidly, universe where matter collapses to form binary, and the rings of Saturn. (Photo as R –3, as the string is shortened. In the relatively dense rotating objects such as credits are given at the end of the article.) cosmic game of collapse, the analogue of those shown in the opening figure. LOS ALAMOS SCIENCE Spring 1986 61 Angular Momentum –24 Galaxies Are Not a Problem. Let us about 10 gram per cubic centimeter. To Magnetic Fields consider the specific angular momentum form a star, this dilute matter must have J s = vR (angular momentum per unit collapsed to a density of about 1 gram per Only external torques can alter the mass) of a typical, modestly sized, spiral cubic centimeter, an increase by a factor of angular momentum of a system. An ob- galaxy. The rotational velocity of matter at 1024. The radius would have decreased by vious way to apply a global external torque its outer edge, determined from the Dopp- a factor of 108, the cube root of the density to dilute ionized matter is through mag- ler shifts of spectroscopic lines, is about ratio. The Keplerian velocity at the stellar netic fields. Indeed this is an often-in- 150 kilometers per second, and its radius radius is about 106 to 107 centimeters per voked panacea for the problem. The dif- is about 10 kiloparsecs (-3 X 1022 cen- second, so the initial velocity needed to ficulty is that magnetic fields with the 29 timeters),* so Js = 5 X 10 centimeters conserve angular momentum must have necessary strength and dimension are not squared per second. Suppose that, before been 108 times smaller, or 10-2 to 10-1 observed in the universe. Furthermore, condensing, the galactic matter occupied a centimeter per second. This velocity is even if our estimates of magnetic field space with a radius equal to one-half the unreasonably small for the gas in a strengths (obtained from observations of average distance between galaxies, roughly turbulent rotating galaxy. A more reason- the Faraday rotation of the polarization 3 megaparsecs, or 300 times the galactic able velocity for gas clouds, or even for angle of radio waves caused by their pass- radius. If angular momentum was con- galactic rotation, over the radius of the age through a magnetic field) are er- served in the collapse to the 10-kiloparsec space from which the stellar matter ought roneous, we are faced with the following galactic radius, the initial velocity of the to have been drawn, would be 105 to 106 dilemma. If matter is to be strongly af- matter must have been less by a factor of centimeters per second. With this value fected by magnetic fields, as is reasonable 300, or about 5 X 104 centimeters per for the velocity, coordinated motion of for partially or fully ionized matter, it is second. This velocity, which is roughly the even a small fraction of the matter will also reasonable that the matter is strongly speed of sound in hydrogen at 150 kelvins, introduce too much angular momentum, tied to the field lines. Hence, as a not so seems to be a reasonable value for the by a factor of 1O6 to 108, to allow collapse. extraneous conclusion, magnetic confine- velocity of the turbulent eddies that must This immense amount of excess angular ment fusion should be simple. The fact have existed when galaxies began to form. momentum must somehow have been that it is not means that ionized matter In fact, theoretical calculations suggest dumped before collapse. escapes magnetic fields deceptively easily. that density fluctuations in the early uni- For collapse to a neutron star, 1014 Suppose, to the contrary, that matter and verse may produce velocities of this order. times more dense than a normal star, the field are strongly coupled. Then purely Theoreticians thus regard angular mo- problem would be worse by a factor equal two-dimensional radial collapse by our mentum in spiral galaxies not as a pollu- to the sixth root of 1014. (Since the factor of 108 would mean that a region of tant but as a much sought-after relic of an Keplerian velocity is proportional to uniform galactic field of 3 X 10–6 gauss -1/2 1/2 16 earlier history. This reasonable state of R , Js = vR is proportional to R , or would be compressed by a factor of 10 in affairs is in sharp contrast to the problem p -1/6.) Thus we have another factor of the newly formed star, and the field would angular momentum poses in the making about 100, or a total of 1010 times too increase to 3 X 10]0 gauss. This is too of a star. Angular momentum may also be much angular momentum. much field by many orders of magnitude. a problem in the formation of nearly We have discussed only the initial and spherical “elliptical” galaxies, which seem final states involved in star formation, 1019 dynes per square centimeter, is larger to have very little total angular momen- both of which are spherical. It must not be than the pressure inside the newly formed tum. imagined, however, that the collapse is star by a factor of 104 to 1O6. Hence, mag- spherical throughout. Angular momentum netic field must escape easily from the Collapse to Stars. The density of matter conservation prevents collapse only in the collapsing matter even though it cannot in our own galaxy before any of the matter directions perpendicular to the rotation escape too easily if it is to remove the extra collapsed into stars was roughly 0.1 to 1 axis; collapse parallel to the rotation axis is angular momentum.
Recommended publications
  • Glossary Physics (I-Introduction)
    1 Glossary Physics (I-introduction) - Efficiency: The percent of the work put into a machine that is converted into useful work output; = work done / energy used [-]. = eta In machines: The work output of any machine cannot exceed the work input (<=100%); in an ideal machine, where no energy is transformed into heat: work(input) = work(output), =100%. Energy: The property of a system that enables it to do work. Conservation o. E.: Energy cannot be created or destroyed; it may be transformed from one form into another, but the total amount of energy never changes. Equilibrium: The state of an object when not acted upon by a net force or net torque; an object in equilibrium may be at rest or moving at uniform velocity - not accelerating. Mechanical E.: The state of an object or system of objects for which any impressed forces cancels to zero and no acceleration occurs. Dynamic E.: Object is moving without experiencing acceleration. Static E.: Object is at rest.F Force: The influence that can cause an object to be accelerated or retarded; is always in the direction of the net force, hence a vector quantity; the four elementary forces are: Electromagnetic F.: Is an attraction or repulsion G, gravit. const.6.672E-11[Nm2/kg2] between electric charges: d, distance [m] 2 2 2 2 F = 1/(40) (q1q2/d ) [(CC/m )(Nm /C )] = [N] m,M, mass [kg] Gravitational F.: Is a mutual attraction between all masses: q, charge [As] [C] 2 2 2 2 F = GmM/d [Nm /kg kg 1/m ] = [N] 0, dielectric constant Strong F.: (nuclear force) Acts within the nuclei of atoms: 8.854E-12 [C2/Nm2] [F/m] 2 2 2 2 2 F = 1/(40) (e /d ) [(CC/m )(Nm /C )] = [N] , 3.14 [-] Weak F.: Manifests itself in special reactions among elementary e, 1.60210 E-19 [As] [C] particles, such as the reaction that occur in radioactive decay.
    [Show full text]
  • Rotational Motion (The Dynamics of a Rigid Body)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Robert Katz Publications Research Papers in Physics and Astronomy 1-1958 Physics, Chapter 11: Rotational Motion (The Dynamics of a Rigid Body) Henry Semat City College of New York Robert Katz University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/physicskatz Part of the Physics Commons Semat, Henry and Katz, Robert, "Physics, Chapter 11: Rotational Motion (The Dynamics of a Rigid Body)" (1958). Robert Katz Publications. 141. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/physicskatz/141 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Research Papers in Physics and Astronomy at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Robert Katz Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 11 Rotational Motion (The Dynamics of a Rigid Body) 11-1 Motion about a Fixed Axis The motion of the flywheel of an engine and of a pulley on its axle are examples of an important type of motion of a rigid body, that of the motion of rotation about a fixed axis. Consider the motion of a uniform disk rotat­ ing about a fixed axis passing through its center of gravity C perpendicular to the face of the disk, as shown in Figure 11-1. The motion of this disk may be de­ scribed in terms of the motions of each of its individual particles, but a better way to describe the motion is in terms of the angle through which the disk rotates.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathématiques Et Espace
    Atelier disciplinaire AD 5 Mathématiques et Espace Anne-Cécile DHERS, Education Nationale (mathématiques) Peggy THILLET, Education Nationale (mathématiques) Yann BARSAMIAN, Education Nationale (mathématiques) Olivier BONNETON, Sciences - U (mathématiques) Cahier d'activités Activité 1 : L'HORIZON TERRESTRE ET SPATIAL Activité 2 : DENOMBREMENT D'ETOILES DANS LE CIEL ET L'UNIVERS Activité 3 : D'HIPPARCOS A BENFORD Activité 4 : OBSERVATION STATISTIQUE DES CRATERES LUNAIRES Activité 5 : DIAMETRE DES CRATERES D'IMPACT Activité 6 : LOI DE TITIUS-BODE Activité 7 : MODELISER UNE CONSTELLATION EN 3D Crédits photo : NASA / CNES L'HORIZON TERRESTRE ET SPATIAL (3 ème / 2 nde ) __________________________________________________ OBJECTIF : Détermination de la ligne d'horizon à une altitude donnée. COMPETENCES : ● Utilisation du théorème de Pythagore ● Utilisation de Google Earth pour évaluer des distances à vol d'oiseau ● Recherche personnelle de données REALISATION : Il s'agit ici de mettre en application le théorème de Pythagore mais avec une vision terrestre dans un premier temps suite à un questionnement de l'élève puis dans un second temps de réutiliser la même démarche dans le cadre spatial de la visibilité d'un satellite. Fiche élève ____________________________________________________________________________ 1. Victor Hugo a écrit dans Les Châtiments : "Les horizons aux horizons succèdent […] : on avance toujours, on n’arrive jamais ". Face à la mer, vous voyez l'horizon à perte de vue. Mais "est-ce loin, l'horizon ?". D'après toi, jusqu'à quelle distance peux-tu voir si le temps est clair ? Réponse 1 : " Sans instrument, je peux voir jusqu'à .................. km " Réponse 2 : " Avec une paire de jumelles, je peux voir jusqu'à ............... km " 2. Nous allons maintenant calculer à l'aide du théorème de Pythagore la ligne d'horizon pour une hauteur H donnée.
    [Show full text]
  • Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants As Tracers of Planet Formation
    Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants as Tracers of Planet Formation Thesis by Marta Levesque Bryan In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 2018 Defended May 1, 2018 ii © 2018 Marta Levesque Bryan ORCID: [0000-0002-6076-5967] All rights reserved iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank Heather Knutson, who I had the great privilege of working with as my thesis advisor. Her encouragement, guidance, and perspective helped me navigate many a challenging problem, and my conversations with her were a consistent source of positivity and learning throughout my time at Caltech. I leave graduate school a better scientist and person for having her as a role model. Heather fostered a wonderfully positive and supportive environment for her students, giving us the space to explore and grow - I could not have asked for a better advisor or research experience. I would also like to thank Konstantin Batygin for enthusiastic and illuminating discussions that always left me more excited to explore the result at hand. Thank you as well to Dimitri Mawet for providing both expertise and contagious optimism for some of my latest direct imaging endeavors. Thank you to the rest of my thesis committee, namely Geoff Blake, Evan Kirby, and Chuck Steidel for their support, helpful conversations, and insightful questions. I am grateful to have had the opportunity to collaborate with Brendan Bowler. His talk at Caltech my second year of graduate school introduced me to an unexpected population of massive wide-separation planetary-mass companions, and lead to a long-running collaboration from which several of my thesis projects were born.
    [Show full text]
  • Forces Different Types of Forces
    Forces and motion are a part of your everyday life for example pushing a trolley, a horse pulling a rope, speed and acceleration. Force and motion causes objects to move but also to stay still. Motion is simply a movement but needs a force to move. There are 2 types of forces, contact forces and act at a distance force. Forces Every day you are using forces. Force is basically push and pull. When you push and pull you are applying a force to an object. If you are Appling force to an object you are changing the objects motion. For an example when a ball is coming your way and then you push it away. The motion of the ball is changed because you applied a force. Different Types of Forces There are more forces than push or pull. Scientists group all these forces into two groups. The first group is contact forces, contact forces are forces when 2 objects are physically interacting with each other by touching. The second group is act at a distance force, act at a distance force is when 2 objects that are interacting with each other but not physically touching. Contact Forces There are different types of contact forces like normal Force, spring force, applied force and tension force. Normal force is when nothing is happening like a book lying on a table because gravity is pulling it down. Another contact force is spring force, spring force is created by a compressed or stretched spring that could push or pull. Applied force is when someone is applying a force to an object, for example a horse pulling a rope or a boy throwing a snow ball.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion Projectile Motion,And Straight Linemotion, Differences Between the Similaritiesand 2 CHAPTER 2 Acceleration Make Thefollowing As Youreadthe ●
    026_039_Ch02_RE_896315.qxd 3/23/10 5:08 PM Page 36 User-040 113:GO00492:GPS_Reading_Essentials_SE%0:XXXXXXXXXXXXX_SE:Application_File chapter 2 Motion section ●3 Acceleration What You’ll Learn Before You Read ■ how acceleration, time, and velocity are related Describe what happens to the speed of a bicycle as it goes ■ the different ways an uphill and downhill. object can accelerate ■ how to calculate acceleration ■ the similarities and differences between straight line motion, projectile motion, and circular motion Read to Learn Study Coach Outlining As you read the Velocity and Acceleration section, make an outline of the important information in A car sitting at a stoplight is not moving. When the light each paragraph. turns green, the driver presses the gas pedal and the car starts moving. The car moves faster and faster. Speed is the rate of change of position. Acceleration is the rate of change of velocity. When the velocity of an object changes, the object is accelerating. Remember that velocity is a measure that includes both speed and direction. Because of this, a change in velocity can be either a change in how fast something is moving or a change in the direction it is moving. Acceleration means that an object changes it speed, its direction, or both. How are speeding up and slowing down described? ●D Construct a Venn When you think of something accelerating, you probably Diagram Make the following trifold Foldable to compare and think of it as speeding up. But an object that is slowing down contrast the characteristics of is also accelerating. Remember that acceleration is a change in acceleration, speed, and velocity.
    [Show full text]
  • Frames of Reference
    Galilean Relativity 1 m/s 3 m/s Q. What is the women velocity? A. With respect to whom? Frames of Reference: A frame of reference is a set of coordinates (for example x, y & z axes) with respect to whom any physical quantity can be determined. Inertial Frames of Reference: - The inertia of a body is the resistance of changing its state of motion. - Uniformly moving reference frames (e.g. those considered at 'rest' or moving with constant velocity in a straight line) are called inertial reference frames. - Special relativity deals only with physics viewed from inertial reference frames. - If we can neglect the effect of the earth’s rotations, a frame of reference fixed in the earth is an inertial reference frame. Galilean Coordinate Transformations: For simplicity: - Let coordinates in both references equal at (t = 0 ). - Use Cartesian coordinate systems. t1 = t2 = 0 t1 = t2 At ( t1 = t2 ) Galilean Coordinate Transformations are: x2= x 1 − vt 1 x1= x 2+ vt 2 or y2= y 1 y1= y 2 z2= z 1 z1= z 2 Recall v is constant, differentiation of above equations gives Galilean velocity Transformations: dx dx dx dx 2 =1 − v 1 =2 − v dt 2 dt 1 dt 1 dt 2 dy dy dy dy 2 = 1 1 = 2 dt dt dt dt 2 1 1 2 dz dz dz dz 2 = 1 1 = 2 and dt2 dt 1 dt 1 dt 2 or v x1= v x 2 + v v x2 =v x1 − v and Similarly, Galilean acceleration Transformations: a2= a 1 Physics before Relativity Classical physics was developed between about 1650 and 1900 based on: * Idealized mechanical models that can be subjected to mathematical analysis and tested against observation.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Mechanics
    Classical Mechanics Hyoungsoon Choi Spring, 2014 Contents 1 Introduction4 1.1 Kinematics and Kinetics . .5 1.2 Kinematics: Watching Wallace and Gromit ............6 1.3 Inertia and Inertial Frame . .8 2 Newton's Laws of Motion 10 2.1 The First Law: The Law of Inertia . 10 2.2 The Second Law: The Equation of Motion . 11 2.3 The Third Law: The Law of Action and Reaction . 12 3 Laws of Conservation 14 3.1 Conservation of Momentum . 14 3.2 Conservation of Angular Momentum . 15 3.3 Conservation of Energy . 17 3.3.1 Kinetic energy . 17 3.3.2 Potential energy . 18 3.3.3 Mechanical energy conservation . 19 4 Solving Equation of Motions 20 4.1 Force-Free Motion . 21 4.2 Constant Force Motion . 22 4.2.1 Constant force motion in one dimension . 22 4.2.2 Constant force motion in two dimensions . 23 4.3 Varying Force Motion . 25 4.3.1 Drag force . 25 4.3.2 Harmonic oscillator . 29 5 Lagrangian Mechanics 30 5.1 Configuration Space . 30 5.2 Lagrangian Equations of Motion . 32 5.3 Generalized Coordinates . 34 5.4 Lagrangian Mechanics . 36 5.5 D'Alembert's Principle . 37 5.6 Conjugate Variables . 39 1 CONTENTS 2 6 Hamiltonian Mechanics 40 6.1 Legendre Transformation: From Lagrangian to Hamiltonian . 40 6.2 Hamilton's Equations . 41 6.3 Configuration Space and Phase Space . 43 6.4 Hamiltonian and Energy . 45 7 Central Force Motion 47 7.1 Conservation Laws in Central Force Field . 47 7.2 The Path Equation .
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Angular Velocity of Pedaling on the Accuracy of The
    Research article 2018-04-10 - Rev08 Influence of Angular Velocity of Pedaling on the Accuracy of the Measurement of Cyclist Power Abstract Almost all cycling power meters currently available on the The miscalculation may be—even significantly—greater than we market are positioned on rotating parts of the bicycle (pedals, found in our study, for the following reasons: crank arms, spider, bottom bracket/hub) and, regardless of • the test was limited to only 5 cyclists: there is no technical and construction differences, all calculate power on doubt other cyclists may have styles of pedaling with the basis of two physical quantities: torque and angular velocity greater variations of angular velocity; (or rotational speed – cadence). Both these measures vary only 2 indoor trainer models were considered: other during the 360 degrees of each revolution. • models may produce greater errors; The torque / force value is usually measured many times during slopes greater than 5% (the only value tested) may each rotation, while the angular velocity variation is commonly • lead to less uniform rotations and consequently neglected, considering only its average value for each greater errors. revolution (cadence). It should be noted that the error observed in this analysis This, however, introduces an unpredictable error into the power occurs because to measure power the power meter considers calculation. To use the average value of angular velocity means the average angular velocity of each rotation. In power meters to consider each pedal revolution as perfectly smooth and that use this type of calculation, this error must therefore be uniform: but this type of pedal revolution does not exist in added to the accuracy stated by the manufacturer.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermodynamics of Spacetime: the Einstein Equation of State
    gr-qc/9504004 UMDGR-95-114 Thermodynamics of Spacetime: The Einstein Equation of State Ted Jacobson Department of Physics, University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742-4111, USA [email protected] Abstract The Einstein equation is derived from the proportionality of entropy and horizon area together with the fundamental relation δQ = T dS connecting heat, entropy, and temperature. The key idea is to demand that this relation hold for all the local Rindler causal horizons through each spacetime point, with δQ and T interpreted as the energy flux and Unruh temperature seen by an accelerated observer just inside the horizon. This requires that gravitational lensing by matter energy distorts the causal structure of spacetime in just such a way that the Einstein equation holds. Viewed in this way, the Einstein equation is an equation of state. This perspective suggests that it may be no more appropriate to canonically quantize the Einstein equation than it would be to quantize the wave equation for sound in air. arXiv:gr-qc/9504004v2 6 Jun 1995 The four laws of black hole mechanics, which are analogous to those of thermodynamics, were originally derived from the classical Einstein equation[1]. With the discovery of the quantum Hawking radiation[2], it became clear that the analogy is in fact an identity. How did classical General Relativity know that horizon area would turn out to be a form of entropy, and that surface gravity is a temperature? In this letter I will answer that question by turning the logic around and deriving the Einstein equation from the propor- tionality of entropy and horizon area together with the fundamental relation δQ = T dS connecting heat Q, entropy S, and temperature T .
    [Show full text]
  • Basement Flood Mitigation
    1 Mitigation refers to measures taken now to reduce losses in the future. How can homeowners and renters protect themselves and their property from a devastating loss? 2 There are a range of possible causes for basement flooding and some potential remedies. Many of these low-cost options can be factored into a family’s budget and accomplished over the several months that precede storm season. 3 There are four ways water gets into your basement: Through the drainage system, known as the sump. Backing up through the sewer lines under the house. Seeping through cracks in the walls and floor. Through windows and doors, called overland flooding. 4 Gutters can play a huge role in keeping basements dry and foundations stable. Water damage caused by clogged gutters can be severe. Install gutters and downspouts. Repair them as the need arises. Keep them free of debris. 5 Channel and disperse water away from the home by lengthening the run of downspouts with rigid or flexible extensions. Prevent interior intrusion through windows and replace weather stripping as needed. 6 Many varieties of sturdy window well covers are available, simple to install and hinged for easy access. Wells should be constructed with gravel bottoms to promote drainage. Remove organic growth to permit sunlight and ventilation. 7 Berms and barriers can help water slope away from the home. The berm’s slope should be about 1 inch per foot and extend for at least 10 feet. It is important to note permits are required any time a homeowner alters the elevation of the property.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 the Relativistic Point Particle
    Chapter 5 The Relativistic Point Particle To formulate the dynamics of a system we can write either the equations of motion, or alternatively, an action. In the case of the relativistic point par- ticle, it is rather easy to write the equations of motion. But the action is so physical and geometrical that it is worth pursuing in its own right. More importantly, while it is difficult to guess the equations of motion for the rela- tivistic string, the action is a natural generalization of the relativistic particle action that we will study in this chapter. We conclude with a discussion of the charged relativistic particle. 5.1 Action for a relativistic point particle How can we find the action S that governs the dynamics of a free relativis- tic particle? To get started we first think about units. The action is the Lagrangian integrated over time, so the units of action are just the units of the Lagrangian multiplied by the units of time. The Lagrangian has units of energy, so the units of action are L2 ML2 [S]=M T = . (5.1.1) T 2 T Recall that the action Snr for a free non-relativistic particle is given by the time integral of the kinetic energy: 1 dx S = mv2(t) dt , v2 ≡ v · v, v = . (5.1.2) nr 2 dt 105 106 CHAPTER 5. THE RELATIVISTIC POINT PARTICLE The equation of motion following by Hamilton’s principle is dv =0. (5.1.3) dt The free particle moves with constant velocity and that is the end of the story.
    [Show full text]