DOCSLIB.ORG

Community Spec Cific Desi Ign Guideelines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Community Spec Cific Desi Ign Guideelines Community Specific Design Guidelines APRIL 2013 Community Specific Design Guidelines Lockport Main Street, Inc. April 2013 Acknowledgements Western Erie Canal Alliance Lockport Main Street, Inc. Lockport Design Guidebook BOARD OF DIRECTORS BOARD OF DIRECTORS Committee Joe Eicheldinger, President, Charlene Seekins-Smith, Board Chair Timothy Arlington Erie County Ruth L. Earl, Board Vice-Chair R. Charles Bell, Director, Benjamin J. Woelk, Vice President, Timothy Arlington, Board Treasurer Department of Community Development Monroe County Susan Shaft, Board Secretary Doug Farley, Development Director, Kelly Kiebala, Secretary, Cookie Butcher Niagara County Historical Society/ Jody Chesko Orleans County Erie Canal Discovery Center Linda Masters Robert Hagen, Chairman, Paul Reid, Treasurer, Niagara County Elizabeth Swanson McCulloch Historic Preservation Commission Martin Busch, Orleans County Kevin McDonough Ann Marie Linnabery, Asst. David Kinyon, Niagara County Lynn Oswald Director/Education Coordinator, Kal Wysokowski, Monroe County Christopher Parada Niagara County Historical Society Amy D'Angelo, Wayne County Nora Smith Linda Masters Henry McCartney, Erie County Linda VanBuskirk Elizabeth Swanson McCulloch Kevin McDonough Heather Peck, Program Manager Heather Peck Margaret Truax, City Historian CONSULTANT: Genesee/Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council 50 West Main Street, Suite 8107 Rochester, New York 14614 This project is supported by the New York State Department of State with funds provided under Title 11 of the Environmental Protection Fund and sponsored by the Board of Supervisors of Wayne County. Cover photograph is The Clinton Building merged with Polster Photographs of Lockport, NY. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….1 HISTORIC OVERVIEW OF THE CITY OF LOCKPORT……………………………………………………………………………………….....2 HISTORIC RESOURCES IN THE MAIN STREET TARGET AREA……………………………………………………………………………….3 WESTERN ERIE CANAL VERNACULAR ARCHITECTURE…………………………………………………………………………………….5 Building Types: Commercial……………………………………………………………………………………………………7 Stores………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………7 Brick-front…………………………………………………………………………………………………………8 Italianate…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..9 Business Block………………………………………………………………………………………………………….....9 Building Types: Public…………………………………………………………………………………………………………15 Building Types: Industrial…………………………………………………………………………………………………….17 Building Types: Residential……………………………………………………………………………………………………19 HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES………………………………………………………………………………………...20 Federal (Adam) Style (1780-1820; locally to ca. 1840)..………………………………………………………………………24 Italianate (1840-1885) ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….25 Colonial Revival (1880-1955)..…………………………………………………………………………………………………26 Beaux Arts (1885-1930)………………………………………………………………………………………………………...27 Neoclassical (1895-1950)………………………………………………………………………………………………………..28 Craftsman (1905-1930)…………………………………………………………………………………………………………29 Modernistic (1920-1970)………………………………………………………………………………………………………..30 Art Deco………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….30 Moderne Style……………………………………………………………………………………………………………31 International Style………………………………………………………………………………………………………..32 Twentieth Century Building Materials………………………………………………………………………………………..33 iii NEW CONSTRUCTION……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..39 Site Design Factors.……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..40 Materials and Elements………………………………………………………………………………………………………...42 Signage…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..43 Green Design Elements…………………………………………………………………………………………………………44 LANDSCAPE AND SITE DESIGN……………………………………………………………………………………………………………45 Site and Streetscape Elements…………………………………………………………………………………………………45 Paving and Curbing.……………………………………………………………………………………………………………46 Furniture.…………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………47 Lighting.…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………47 Fencing and Walls………………………………………………………………………………………………………………48 Viewsheds and Sight Lines.…………………………………………………………………………………………………….49 DESIGN GLOSSARY……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….50 BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...52 APPENDIX A: Lockport Main Street, Inc. Target Area.…...……………………………………………………………………………54 APPENDIX B: Proposed Design Review Flowchart.…………………………………………………………………………………….55 Unless otherwise noted, all photographs taken by Senior Planner Jayme Breschard Thomann, Genesee/Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council. iv INTRODUCTION On September 10, 2008, the communities of the Village of Albion in Orleans County, Village of Lyons in Wayne County, and City of Lockport in Niagara County were announced by the Western Erie Canal Alliance (WECA) as the three inaugural designated Main Street communities of the Western Erie Canal Main Street Program—the first certified Main Street® programs in New York State. The Western Erie Canal Main Street Program is an implementation strategy of the Western Erie Canal Heritage Corridor Management Plan, adopted by the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation in August, 2005. In March 2006, WECA was formed as a non-profit corporation to implement the Western Erie Canal Heritage Corridor Management Plan. The Western Erie Canal Main Street Program is a partner with the National Trust Main Street Center®, a program of the National Trust for Historic Preservation®. On December 30, 2009, the New York Secretary of State Lorraine Cortés-Vázquez announced that the Western Erie Canal Main Street Program was one of 90 projects across New York State to receive funding from the State Environmental Protection Fund’s Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (EPF- LWRP). Sponsored by Wayne County, the program proposed the continuation of its general regional coordination duties and to provide technical assistance and training for the downtown revitalization of selected historic canal communities. The Historic Preservation Guidebook is part of the technical assistance and training under the 2009-2010 EPF-LWRP grant award. Phase One of the Historic Preservation Guidebook for the Western Erie Canal Main Street Program was completed in February 2012 and is available for download at the Genesee/Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council (G/FLRPC) website. The Historic Preservation Guidebook has three basic sections: Education Why is historic preservation important? How do we educate our businesses and residents? Organization A “how to” guide for Main Street Program Managers to effectively work with local municipal officials and boards, regional agencies, and state and federal agencies; with a description of their roles as related to historic preservation. Implementation Funding programs and incentives, regulations, and associated review boards. Phase One serves as a basic compendium of online tools, textual resources, definitions, graphs, maps, and interviews for any person who is interested in learning more about preserving the built heritage in the context of business district revitalization. Phase Two is the development of community specific design guidelines for the Village of Albion, Village of Lyons, and City of Lockport. It is anticipated that two more communities will be added to the Western Erie Canal Main Street Program and will also receive community specific design guidelines. The document includes a historic overview of the canal community and an inventory of historic resources within the Main Street Target Area, or the primary commercial center. Architectural design guidelines that enhance overall understanding and interpretation of basic preservation principles are included, along with advisory site and landscape design elements for the Main Street Target Area. This document aims to provide broad historic preservation guidance for historic buildings to local property owners, business owners, and residents. 1 HISTORIC OVERVIEW OF THE CITY OF LOCKPORT The earliest settlement near present-day City of Lockport was about one mile east at Cold Spring, which featured an old Native American trail that provided an early transportation route from Canandaigua to Fort Niagara. Throughout the early nineteenth century, pioneer settlers—mostly Quakers from the Finger Lakes Region—began to arrive in the unnamed community, purchasing land from the Holland Land Company. The construction of the Erie Canal in 1817 not only influenced the prosperity of marketplaces in New York City and along the East Coast with a faster trade route to the western frontier, but afforded the City of Lockport a place in history with a massive engineering effort consisting of a double flight of locks. A decision was made to cut the waterway through the limestone escarpment at a gorge in the area of Lockport. Laborers and merchants flocked to the area when construction began in 1821, bringing tremendous growth to the still unnamed village. By spring of 1821, the settlement was named Lockport and selected as the seat of government for Niagara County in July, 1822. The original locks were completed in 1825, enlarged in 1859, and the southern tier replaced by two lift locks from 1909-1918. Erie Canal trade and use of the canal water to power mills and factories supported the development of Lockport. Significant improvements were made in East Lockport or Lowertown to create a milling and industrial center. Lockport experienced such tremendous growth during the 1820s that the New York State Legislature passed the act for incorporating the Village of Lockport on March
Load more

Recommended publications
  • October 15, 2002
    MARCH 7, 2017 ADDENDUM NO. 3 for CHICAGO DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION CHICAGO O’HARE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT RUNWAY 9C/27C – BID PACKAGE #1 Specification No. 333636 For which bids are scheduled to be opened in the City Hall Bid and Bond Room, Room 103, City Hall, 121 North LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60602, at 11:00 a.m., March 10, 2017. The following revisions are incorporated into the above-referenced specification (the "Contract Documents") as noted. All other provisions and requirements as originally set forth, except as amended by previous Addenda, remain in full force and are binding. Any additional work required by this Addendum shall conform to the applicable provisions of the original Contract Documents. In accordance with Section 13 of the “Requirements for Bidding and Instructions for Bidders” in Part One of Three: Interpretation of Contract Documents, the deadline for questions has passed. No additional questions will be answered prior to bid opening except as the Chief Procurement Officer, in her sole discretion, deems to be in the best interest of the City. BIDDER WILL ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THIS ADDENDUM IN THE SPACE PROVIDED ON THE PROPOSAL PAGE BID OPENING DATE HAS BEEN EXTENDED TO MARCH 21, 2017, 11:00 a.m. CENTRAL TIME ADDENDUM NO. 3 – MARCH 7, 2017 1 OF 6 CITY OF CHICAGO SPECIFICATION NO.: 333636 DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT SERVICES RUNWAY 9C-27C BID PACKAGE #1 FEDERALLY FUNDED JAMIE L. RHEE CHIEF PROCUREMENT OFFICER PART ONE OF THREE INSTRUCTIONS AND EXECUTION DOCUMENTS For the convenience of the potential bidders, the revisions to Part One are as follows (New Pay Items are in bold italics with “*”): Section / Sheet Section Title Description of changes Part One of Three Instructions and Execution Documents Part One Cover Coversheet Revised Submittal Title and Date Revised schedule of prices supercedes Addendum #1 to reflect S3-2 through S3-10 Schedule of Prices all changes made to pay items and quantities.
    [Show full text]
  • ACRP Report 148: LED Airfield Lighting System
    AIRPORT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH ACRP PROGRAM REPORT 148 Sponsored by the Federal Aviation LED Airfield Lighting System Administration Operation and Maintenance ACRP OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE* TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2015 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* CHAIR OFFICERS Kitty Freidheim CHAIR: Daniel Sperling, Professor of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science and Policy; Freidheim Consulting Director, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis VICE CHAIR: James M. Crites, Executive Vice President of Operations, Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, TX VICE CHAIR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Neil J. Pedersen, Transportation Research Board Kelly Johnson MEMBERS Northwest Arkansas Regional Airport Authority Victoria A. Arroyo, Executive Director, Georgetown Climate Center; Assistant Dean, Centers and MEMBERS Institutes; and Professor and Director, Environmental Law Program, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC Deborah Ale Flint Scott E. Bennett, Director, Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, Little Rock Oakland International Airport Deborah H. Butler, Executive Vice President, Planning, and CIO (retired), Norfolk Southern Corporation, Thella F. Bowens Norfolk, VA San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Jennifer Cohan, Secretary, Delaware DOT, Dover Benito DeLeon Malcolm Dougherty, Director, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento Federal Aviation Administration A. Stewart Fotheringham, Professor, School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, University of Richard de Neufville Arizona,
    [Show full text]
  • DEADWOOD HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Wednesday, April 8, 2020 ~ 5:00 P.M
    DEADWOOD HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Wednesday, April 8, 2020 ~ 5:00 p.m. City Hall, 108 Sherman Street, Deadwood, South Dakota 1. Call meeting to Order a. Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes a. March 25, 2020 HPC Regular Meeting 3. Voucher Approvals a. HP Operating Vouchers b. HP Grant Vouchers c. Revolving Loan Vouchers 4. HP Programs and Revolving Loan Program a. Revolving Loan Program Loan Requests – Exhibit A i. Jim Anterim – 168 Charles St. – Siding Loan Request ii. Jim Anterim – 168 Charles St. – Windows Loan Request Formal Adoption of Deferment Request Policies & Procedures as a result of Covid-19 Pandemic – Exhibit B Borrower Deferment Requests – Exhibit C i. Fairmont Hotel Deferment Request ii. Oyster Bay Deferment Request iii. Berg Jewelry Deferment Request iv. Amy Gorzalka Deferment Request v. Misty Morse Deferment Request b. Grant Requests – Exhibit D i. Carla Laun – 16 Spring Street – Elderly Resident Program ii. Rodney Howell – 148 Charles Street – Elderly Resident Program 5. Old or General Business a. Deadwood Alive RFP – Exhibit E b. Mt. Moriah Cemetery Gate Operations – Exhibit F 6. New Matters before the Deadwood Historic District Commission a. COA 200043–Terry Houck-Midnight Star–677 Main–Exterior Repairs–Exhibit G 7. New Matters before the Deadwood Historic Preservation Commission a. PA 200031 – Jeff Snedeker – 2 Fremont – Demolish House – Continued from 3/25/20 Meeting – Exhibit H b. PA 200044 – Jim Antrim – 168 Charles – Replace Siding/Windows & Doors – Exhibit I 8. Items from Citizens not on Agenda (Items considered but no action will be taken at this time.) 9. Staff Report (Items considered but no action will be taken at this time.) 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 105 WRS&HB Cook County Contract No. 60G37
    January 9, 2013 SUBJECT: FAP Route 330 (US 12/45) Project ACNHF-0330(070) Section 105 WRS&HB Cook County Contract No. 60G37 Item No. 104, 1/18/2013 Letting Addendum A NOTICE TO PROSPECTIVE BIDDERS: Attached is an addendum to the plans or proposal. This addendum involves revised and/or added material. 1. Replaced the Schedule of Prices. 2. Revised the Table of Contents to the Special Provisions. 3. Revised pages 2-8, 14-16, 29-32, 41-50, 472-476 & 540-543 of the Special Provisions. 4. Added pages 575- 879 to the Special Provisions. 5. Revised sheets 1, 3, 4, 9-12, 16, 20, 29, 32, 34, 52, 60, 61, 67-69, 89, 92- 101, 103, 107-112, 114, 120, 134, 135, 181-183, 186, 189, 192, 291, 300, 304, 313 & 336 of the Plans. 6. Added sheets 605A-605BN to the Plans. Prime contractors must utilize the enclosed material when preparing their bid and must include any Schedule of Prices changes in their bidding proposal. Bidders using computer-generated bids are cautioned to reflect any and all Schedule of Prices changes, if involved, into their computer programs. Very truly yours, John D. Baranzelli, P. E. Acting Engineer of Design and Environment By: Ted B. Walschleger, P. E. Engineer of Project Management cc: John Fortmann, Region 1, District 1; Dave Lippert, Mike Renner; D.Carl Puzey; Estimates MS/ks ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Page 1 SCHEDULE OF PRICES 1/10/2013 CONTRACT 60G37 NUMBER - State Job # - C-91-399-09 Project Number Route County Name - COOK- - ACNHF-0330/070/ FAP 330 Code - 31 - - District - 1 - - *REVISED: JANUARY 9, 2013 Section
    [Show full text]
  • Light Emitting Diodes: an Efficient Choice for Airfield Lighting
    2008 FAA AIRPORT DESIGN COMPETITION FOR UNIVERSITIES Light Emitting Diodes: An Efficient Choice for Airfield Lighting Lannie Marsh – Team Lead Ryan Cole Michelle Lanning Nicole Sellers Dr. Isaac Richmond Nettey – Faculty Advisor Aeronautics Division, College of Technology Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242 6th April 2008 17th April 2008 Ms Debbie Ross, Program Assistant Virginia Space Grant Consortium 600 Butler Farm Rd, Suite 2200 Hampton, Virginia 23666 Dear Ms. Ross: Enclosed is the final report on “Light Emitting Diodes: An Efficient Choice for Airfield Lighting” prepared by a student team of Lannie Marsh (student team lead), Ryan Cole, Michelle Lanning and Nicole Sellers from the Aeronautics Program in the College of Technology at Kent State University. The report on “Light Emitting Diodes: An Efficient Choice for Airfield Lighting” is submitted under the 2008 FAA Airport Design Competition for Universities’ broad category of Airport Environmental Interactions Challenges. The enclosed report is the culmination of eight month’s work by the second student team from Kent State University. Thanks for your efforts in furtherance of aviation education at the tertiary level. Sincerely, \A e|v{ÅÉÇw axààxç I. Richmond Nettey, Ph.D. Associate Dean, College of Technology and Senior Academic Program Director of Aeronautics i 2008 FAA AIRPORT DESIGN COMPETITION FOR UNIVERSITIES Light Emitting Diodes: An Efficient Choice for Airfield Lighting Lannie Marsh – Team Lead Ryan Cole Michelle Lanning Nicole Sellers Dr. Isaac Richmond Nettey – Faculty Advisor Aeronautics Division, College of Technology Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242 6th April 2008 ii Executive Summary Current airfield lighting, which is typically incandescent, is inefficient in terms of energy consumption and associated costs for illumination.
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle-Prism-Light
    Institute for Public Service Seattle University Spring 2011 Dr. Marie Wong, Professor Project Managers: David Gregoire Emily Platt Editors: Anika Jesi Audrey Mazza Graphic Coordinators: Jack McKool Keiko Okada Research Teams: Historic Context Sara Cubillos, Team Leader Anne Heron David Nielsen Kevin Quezon Anthony Yak City Comparisons Anika Jesi, Team Leader Aram Dagavarian Paelina DeStephano Rosey Selig-Addiss Napal Tesfai Vendors Audrey Mazza, Team Leader David Gregoire Jack McKool Keiko Okada Emily Platt Cover Photo Credits: Jack McKool and Keiko Okada Table of Contents Introduction to the Study iii List of Figures vi Acknowledgements xi Executive Summary xii Methodology xiv Section 1: Research A: History 2 B: Cities with Prism Lights 9 C: Vendors of Prism Lights 20 Section 2: Inventory North Central Business District 4 South Central Business District 11 International District 13 Pioneer Square 19 Section 3: Findings and Recommendations Section 4: Bibliography and Appendices Appendix A: Pioneer Square Areaway Study, Phase II Report, 1974 Appendix B: City of Seattle Ordinance No. 2833 Appendix C: Overview Planning Report: Areaway Study Pioneer Square Historic District, 1974 Appendix D: Pioneer Square Historical District Areaway Inventory, 1973 Appendix E: Phase II Report Pioneer Square Historic District Streetscape Areaway Study, 1977 Appendix F: New York Historic Preservation Grant Program Fact Sheet for Not-for-Profit Applicants Appendix G: Remarks by Mayor Bloomberg at a Public Hearing on Local Law ii Introduction Seattle has many historic features throughout the city. At the turn of the 20th Century and in the central city, building basements often extended under the sidewalk. Seattle’s downtown has changed dramatically since the arrival of the first settlers.
    [Show full text]
  • AIM Chg 3 Dtd 12-31-20
    U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION MANUAL Change 3 December 31, 2020 DO NOT DESTROY BASIC DATED AUGUST 15, 2019 12/31/20 AIM Aeronautical Information Manual Explanation of Changes Effective: December 31, 2020 a. 1−1−8. NAVIGATIONAL AID (NAVAID) SERVICE VOLUMES e. 5−4−13. SIMULTANEOUS APPROACHES This paragraph has been completely rewritten. TO PARALLEL RUNWAYS Significant changes include an updated explanation 5−4−16. SIMULTANEOUS CLOSE PAR- of Standard Service Volumes (SSVs) and how they ALLEL PRM APPROACHES AND SIMULTA- are used in a PBN NAS, revised tables that NEOUS OFFSET INSTRUMENT incorporate new classes of VOR and DME, and new APPROACHES (SOIA) graphics depicting the new SSVs have been placed appropriately with corresponding text. The minimum distance between parallel runways that permits simultaneous independent approaches has b. 1−1−9. INSTRUMENT LANDING SYS- been reduced from 3000 feet to 2500 feet, along with TEM (ILS) the need for high update rate surveillance. Figures 4−1−3. FLIGHT SERVICE STATIONS that address this issue have been updated to reflect 7−1−2. FAA WEATHER SERVICES this change. This revision will update FIG 5−4−20 7−1−5. PREFLIGHT BRIEFING and FIG 5−4−23. 7−1−8. TELEPHONE INFORMATION f. 6−1−1. PILOT RESPONSIBILITY AND BRIEFING SERVICES (TIBS) AUTHORITY 7−1−9. TRANSCRIBED WEATHER BROADCAST (TWEB) (ALASKA ONLY) Because these systems are programmed to make 7−5−6. MOUNTAIN FLYING decisions that would normally fall upon the APPENDIX 3. ABBREVIATIONS/ACRONYMS pilot−in−command and deviate as necessary to save lives and property, this change is to make the This change removes references to TIBS and TWEB controller aware that an emergency autoland system as these services are no longer provided by Flight or an emergency descent mode system may be in Service.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,354,714 B1 Rhodes (45) Date of Patent: Mar
    USOO6354714B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,354,714 B1 Rhodes (45) Date of Patent: Mar. 12, 2002 (54) EMBEDDED LED LIGHTING SYSTEM 5,160,202 A 11/1992 Legare .................... 362/153.1 5,438,495. A 8/1995 Ahlen et al. ............. 362/153.1 (76) Inventor: Michael Rhodes, 604 SE 2nd Ave., 5,450,300 A 9/1995 Rector, Jr. ............... 362/153.1 Grand Rapids, MN (US) 55744 5,669,691 A 9/1997 Barrow .................... 362/153.1 5,927.845 A * 7/1999 Gustafson et al. .......... 362/152 (*)c: Notice:- - - Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 6,158,8826,142,647 A * 12/200011/2000 HayakawaE. Jr. .................. ................ 362/488362/230 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 6,234,647 B1 5/2001 Liu ............................ 362/235 U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. 6,244,728 B1 6/2001 Cote et al. .................. 362/249 6.286,978 B1 * 9/2001 Tait et al. ................... 362/249 (21) Appl. No.: 09/692,464 sk cited- by examiner (22) Filed: Oct. 20, 2000 Primary Examiner Sandra O'Shea Related U.S. Application Data ASSistant Examiner Anabel Ton (60) Provisional application No. 60/194,371, filed on Apr. 4, (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Richard C. Litman 2000. (57) ABSTRACT (51) Int. Cl." ................................................ F21V 23/00 (52) U.S. Cl. .................... 362/153.1; 362/152; 362/249; An embedded LED lighting System for marking flooring, 362/362; 362/145 walkways, roadways, and airport runways employs a Strip of (58) Field of Search ................................. 362/240, 249, light emitting diode mounted on a I-beam shaped framework 362/362,145, 152, 153.1; 313/500, 512 and encapsulated in a clear or reflective potting material.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Document (Pdf 1.04
    Evaluation of the Safety Performance of Continuous Mainline Roadway Lighting on Freeway Segments in Washington State WA-RD 855.1 Ida van Schalkwyk , Ph.D. March 2016 Narayan Venkataraman, Ph.D. Venky Shankar, PhD, P.E. John Milton, Ph.D., P.E. Ted Bailey, P.E. Keith Calais Office of Research & Library Services WSDOT Research Report Research Report State Force Work EVALUATION OF THE SAFETY PERFORMANCE OF CONTINUOUS MAINLINE ROADWAY LIGHTING ON FREEWAY SEGMENTS IN WASHINGTON STATE by Ida van Schalkwyk, Ph.D. Traffic Safety Research Engineer, WSDOT HQ Traffic Operations Washington State Department of Transportation Narayan Venkataraman, Ph.D. Post-Doctoral Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, Penn State University Venky Shankar, PhD, P.E. Professor of Civil Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Penn State University John Milton, Ph.D., P.E. Director: Quality Assurance and Transportation System Safety Washington State Department of Transportation Ted Bailey, P.E. Business Manager, HQ Traffic Operations Washington State Department of Transportation Keith Calais Signal and Illumination Engineer, HQ Traffic Operations Washington State Department of Transportation HQ Traffic Operations Quality Control and Transportation System Safety Washington State Department of Transportation Washington State Department of Transportation 310 Maple Park Ave SE, Olympia, WA 310 Maple Park Ave SE, Olympia, WA Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering Penn State University 226C Sackett Building, University Park, PA 16802 Prepared for The State of Washington Department of Transportation Roger Millar, PE, AICP, Acting Secretary of Transportation March 2016 1. REPORT NO. 2. GOVERNMENT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NO. WA-RD 855.1 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Schai-Airport-Lighting.Pdf
    By Arthur S. Schai F.I.E.S. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number #86-81865 Copyright 1986 by Jaquith Industries, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in whole or in part by anyone without the express permission of Jaquith Industries, Inc. The Design, Installation and Maintenance of In-Pavement Airport Lighting By Arthur S. Schai Library of Congress Catalog Card Number #86-81865 JAQUITH INDUSTRIES Copyright 1986 by Jaquith Industries, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in whole or in part by anyone without the express permission of Jaquith Industries, Inc. - 2 ­ The Design, Installation and Maintenance of In-Pavement Airport Lighting By Arthur S. Schai About The Author The, author, Arthur S. Schai, is president of Schai Associates, Inc., Consultants for Airport Lighting Installation. Mr. Schai was Senior Vice-President of Vega Industries Inc. until 1977. He is known interna tionally as "The Old Man of the Airport Lighting Industry." He was a pioneer in inset lighting and has been involved as a consultant to consultants in airport lighting for over a quarter of a century. He has participated, in some way, in almost every installation worldwide that used inset lighting, including the NASA Space Shuttle runway at Cape Canaveral, Fla. Educated at Carnegie Institute of Technology, he is a Fellow of the Illuminating Engineering Society, of which he is a past chairman of its Aviation Committee. He has presented many technical papers, lectured to industry and college groups and participated in ICAO seminars on airport lighting in many parts of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • “A History of Progress in AFL Technology”
    “A History of Progress in AFL Technology” 1 HISTORY OF THE AVIATION LIGHTING COMMITTEE OF THE ILLUMINATING ENGINEERING SOCIETY OF NORTH AMERICA On October 21, 1929, a letter was written to the Assistant Secretary for Aeronautics by F.C. Hingsburg, Chief Engineer of the Airways Division of the Department of Commerce, in which he announced that at first meeting of the Aviation Lighting Committee of the Illuminating Engineering th Society had been held on October 17 . The committee was made up of selected engineers interested in the development aviation lighting and air navigation facilities. There had evidently been considerable preparation work before the meeting was held, because it was able to organize itself into ten sub-committees as follows: No. 1: Mr. S.C. Eibben headed the committee to try to standardize airplane lighting; so those replacements could be obtained when aircrafts were outside of their home area. He was from the Westinghouse Lamp Company at Bloomfield, New Jersey. No. 2: This sub-committee was to concern itself with Airways, which at that time were lighted pathways across the country. D.C. Young of the National Lamp Works at Nela Park, Cleveland, Ohio, was put in charge of the Group. Mr. D.C. Young became the secretary of the Lighting Committee and held the position for a number of years. No. 3: This group was to study and make recommendations on color standards for airways and airports. Dr. Gage of Corning Glass works headed this project. No. 4: This group was to concern itself with the airways and beacons and also arrange for research on intensities, colors, duration of flashes, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Miscellaneous Items
    MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS ITEM P-602 EMULSIFIED ASPHALT PRIME COAT DESCRIPTION 602-1.1 This item shall consist of an application of liquid asphalt material on the prepared base course according to these Specifications and in reasonably close conformity to the lines shown on the Plans. MATERIALS 602-2.1 LIQUID ASPHALT MATERIAL. The types, grades, controlling specifications, and application temperatures for the prime coat are given in Table 602-1. Provide the specific prime coat material designated in the Plans. TABLE 602-1. MATERIALS Type and Grade Specification Application Temperatures Application Rate \1\ °F gal/yd2 Emulsified Asphalt SS-1, SS-1h AASHTO M 140 70-160 0.27 to 0.53 MS-2, HFMS-1 AASHTO M 140 70-160 0.27 to 0.53 CSS-1, CSS-1h AASHTO M 208 70-160 0.27 to 0.53 CMS-2 AASHTO M 208 70-160 0.27 to 0.53 CMS-2s \2\ 70-160 0.22 to 0.44 Cutback Asphalt RC-30 ASTM D2028 80+ 0.27 to 0.53 RC-70 ASTM D2028 120+ 0.27 to 0.53 RC-250 ASTM D2028 165+ 0.27 to 0.53 MC-30 ASTM D2027 80+ 0.11 to 0.33 \1\ The maximum temperature for cutback asphalt shall be that at which fogging occurs. \2\ CMS-2s shall meet the following specifications: Viscosity, Saybolt Furol, of 50 to 450 at 122 °F when tested under AASHTO T 59. Particle charge test of Positive when tested under AASHTO T 59. Sieve test maximum of 0.10% when tested under AASHTO T 59.
    [Show full text]