AIM Chg 3 Dtd 12-31-20

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AIM Chg 3 Dtd 12-31-20 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION MANUAL Change 3 December 31, 2020 DO NOT DESTROY BASIC DATED AUGUST 15, 2019 12/31/20 AIM Aeronautical Information Manual Explanation of Changes Effective: December 31, 2020 a. 1−1−8. NAVIGATIONAL AID (NAVAID) SERVICE VOLUMES e. 5−4−13. SIMULTANEOUS APPROACHES This paragraph has been completely rewritten. TO PARALLEL RUNWAYS Significant changes include an updated explanation 5−4−16. SIMULTANEOUS CLOSE PAR- of Standard Service Volumes (SSVs) and how they ALLEL PRM APPROACHES AND SIMULTA- are used in a PBN NAS, revised tables that NEOUS OFFSET INSTRUMENT incorporate new classes of VOR and DME, and new APPROACHES (SOIA) graphics depicting the new SSVs have been placed appropriately with corresponding text. The minimum distance between parallel runways that permits simultaneous independent approaches has b. 1−1−9. INSTRUMENT LANDING SYS- been reduced from 3000 feet to 2500 feet, along with TEM (ILS) the need for high update rate surveillance. Figures 4−1−3. FLIGHT SERVICE STATIONS that address this issue have been updated to reflect 7−1−2. FAA WEATHER SERVICES this change. This revision will update FIG 5−4−20 7−1−5. PREFLIGHT BRIEFING and FIG 5−4−23. 7−1−8. TELEPHONE INFORMATION f. 6−1−1. PILOT RESPONSIBILITY AND BRIEFING SERVICES (TIBS) AUTHORITY 7−1−9. TRANSCRIBED WEATHER BROADCAST (TWEB) (ALASKA ONLY) Because these systems are programmed to make 7−5−6. MOUNTAIN FLYING decisions that would normally fall upon the APPENDIX 3. ABBREVIATIONS/ACRONYMS pilot−in−command and deviate as necessary to save lives and property, this change is to make the This change removes references to TIBS and TWEB controller aware that an emergency autoland system as these services are no longer provided by Flight or an emergency descent mode system may be in Service. control of the aircraft. c. 1−1−18. WIDE AREA AUGMENTATION SYSTEM (WAAS) g. 7−1−14. PROCEDURES FOR WEATHER 5−1−9. INTERNATIONAL FLIGHT PLAN DEVIATIONS AND OTHER CONTINGEN- (FAA FORM 7233−4) IFR FLIGHTS (FOR CIES IN OCEANIC CONTROLLED DOMESTIC OR INTERNATIONAL FLIGHTS) AIRSPACE 5−3−1. ARTCC COMMUNICATIONS This change deletes inflight contingency procedures This change removes references to Multi−Function which will be out of date in subparagraph 7−1−14 c. Transport Satellite (MTSAT). The procedures will be updated in the AIP, where they belong. d. 2−1−6. RUNWAY STATUS LIGHT (RWSL) SYSTEM h. Editorial Changes 2−1−7. STAND−ALONE FINAL AP- Editorial changes include the removal of a reference to a PROACH RUNWAY OCCUPANCY SIGNAL canceled Advisory Circular in paragraph 4−1−10. Another editorial change updates U.S. State Department contact This change deletes verbiage to Final Approach information in paragraph 5−6−8. An editorial change Runway Occupancy Signal (FAROS) and Runway removes an unnecessary “is” in paragraph 4−5−7. Finally, Intersection Light (RIL) systems content, including a reference to “56 weeks” in paragraph 9−1−4 was revision of figures representing their removal. corrected to “56 days.” Explanation of Changes E of Chg−1 AIM 12/31/20 i. Entire Publication Additional editorial/format changes were made where necessary. Revision bars were not used because of the insignificant nature of these changes. E of Chg−2 Explanation of Changes 12/31/20 AIM AIM Change 3 Page Control Chart December 31, 2020 REMOVE PAGES DATED INSERT PAGES DATED Checklist of Pages CK−1 through CK−7 .... 7/16/20 Checklist of Pages CK−1 through CK−7 .... 12/31/20 Comments/Corrections ................. 7/16/20 Comments/Corrections ................. 12/31/20 Table of Contents i through xii ........... 7/16/20 Table of Contents i through xii ........... 12/31/20 1−1−5 and 1−1−6 ...................... 7/16/20 1−1−5 and 1−1−6 ...................... 12/31/20 1−1−7 ............................... 8/15/19 1−1−7 ............................... 12/31/20 1−1−8 through 1−1−37 ................. 1/30/20 1−1−8 through 1−1−38.................. 12/31/20 2−1−7 and 2−1−8 ...................... 8/15/19 2−1−7 and 2−1−8 ...................... 12/31/20 2−1−9 ............................... 7/16/20 2−1−9 ............................... 12/31/20 2−1−10 through 2−1−15................ 8/15/19 2−1−10 through 2−1−13................. 12/31/20 4−1−1 and 4−1−2 ...................... 8/15/19 4−1−1 and 4−1−2 ...................... 12/31/20 4−1−5 ............................... 8/15/19 4−1−5 ............................... 8/15/19 4−1−6 ............................... 8/15/19 4−1−6 ............................... 12/31/20 4−3−13.............................. 8/15/19 4−3−13.............................. 12/31/20 4−3−14.............................. 8/15/19 4−3−14.............................. 8/15/19 4−3−25.............................. 8/15/19 4−3−25.............................. 12/31/20 4−3−26.............................. 8/15/19 4−3−26.............................. 8/15/19 4−3−31.............................. 8/15/19 4−3−31.............................. 8/15/19 4−3−32.............................. 8/15/19 4−3−32.............................. 12/31/20 4−5−13.............................. 1/30/20 4−5−13.............................. 1/30/20 4−5−14.............................. 7/16/20 4−5−14.............................. 12/31/20 4−5−19.............................. 7/16/20 4−5−19.............................. 7/16/20 4−5−20.............................. 7/16/20 4−5−20.............................. 12/31/20 5−1−13.............................. 1/30/20 5−1−13.............................. 1/30/20 5−1−14.............................. 1/30/20 5−1−14.............................. 12/31/20 5−1−21.............................. 1/30/20 5−1−21.............................. 1/30/20 5−1−22.............................. 1/30/20 5−1−22.............................. 12/31/20 5−3−13 through 5−3−20................. 8/15/19 5−3−13 through 5−3−20................. 12/31/20 5−4−37 .............................. 1/30/20 5−4−37 .............................. 1/30/20 5−4−38 .............................. 1/30/20 5−4−38 .............................. 12/31/20 5−4−43 .............................. 1/30/20 5−4−43 .............................. 1/30/20 5−4−44 .............................. 1/30/20 5−4−44 .............................. 12/31/20 5−6−5 ............................... 1/30/20 5−6−5 ............................... 1/30/20 5−6−6 and 5−6−7 ...................... 1/30/20 5−6−6 and 5−6−7 ...................... 12/31/20 5−6−8 ............................... 1/30/20 5−6−8 ............................... 1/30/20 6−1−1 ............................... 8/15/19 6−1−1 ............................... 12/31/20 7−1−1 ............................... 8/15/19 7−1−1 ............................... 8/15/19 7−1−2 ............................... 8/15/19 7−1−2 ............................... 12/31/20 7−1−7 ............................... 8/15/19 7−1−7 ............................... 12/31/20 7−1−8 ............................... 7/16/20 7−1−8 ............................... 12/31/20 7−1−17.............................. 1/30/20 7−1−17.............................. 12/31/20 Page Control Chart AIM 12/31/20 7−1−18.............................. 1/30/20 7−1−18.............................. 1/30/20 7−1−19.............................. 7/16/20 7−1−19 .............................. 12/31/20 7−1−20.............................. 7/16/20 7−1−20.............................. 7/16/20 7−1−23.............................. 7/16/20 7−1−23.............................. 12/31/20 7−1−24.............................. 7/16/20 7−1−24.............................. 7/16/20 7−1−27.............................. 7/16/20 7−1−27.............................. 12/31/20 7−1−28.............................. 1/30/20 7−1−28.............................. 1/30/20 7−1−31.............................. 1/30/20 7−1−31.............................. 12/31/20 7−1−32.............................. 1/30/20 7−1−32.............................. 1/30/20 7−1−35 through 7−1−45................. 1/30/20 7−1−35 through 7−1−45................. 12/31/20 7−1−46 .............................. 1/30/20 7−1−46 .............................. 1/30/20 7−1−55 and 7−1−56.................... 1/30/20 7−1−55 and 7−1−56.................... 12/31/20 7−1−57.............................. 7/16/20 7−1−57.............................. 12/31/20 7−1−58.............................. 1/30/20 7−1−58.............................. 1/30/20 7−1−59.............................. 1/30/20 7−1−59.............................. 12/31/20 7−1−60.............................. 1/30/20 7−1−60.............................. 1/30/20 7−1−61.............................. 1/30/20 7−1−61.............................. 12/31/20 7−1−62.............................. 1/30/20 7−1−62.............................. 1/30/20 7−6−3 ............................... 7/16/20 7−6−3 ............................... 7/16/20 7−6−4 ............................... 7/16/20 7−6−4 ............................... 12/31/20 7−6−5 ............................... 7/16/20 7−6−5 ............................... 7/16/20 7−6−6 ............................... 7/16/20 7−6−6 ............................... 12/31/20 7−6−13.............................. 7/16/20 7−6−13.............................. 7/16/20 7−6−14.............................. 7/16/20 7−6−14.............................. 12/31/20 9−1−7 ............................... 8/15/19 9−1−7 ............................... 8/15/19 9−1−8 ............................... 8/15/19 9−1−8 ............................... 8/15/19 9−1−9 ............................... 8/15/19 9−1−9 ..............................
Recommended publications
  • Addison Airport Strategic Plan 2013 Executive Summary Addison Airport | Strategic Plan
    ADDISON AIRPORT STRATEGIC PLAN 2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ADDISON AIRPORT | STRATEGIC PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Addison Airport is the single most valuable asset owned by the At its grand opening ceremonies, Addison Airport was mar- Town of Addison and its citizens. As such, it is essential that keted as “the World’s Largest Exclusively Executive Airport”; the airport be operated and developed with the interests of its the airport has been focused on serving business aviation citizen-owners at the forefront to facilitate economic develop- throughout its 55+ years of operation. While business aviation ment for the region. It is also part of a unique community, and its has been the primary focus at Addison, other aviation uses are future development must reflect the values – including the aes- also welcomed and accommodated. thetic values – as well as the goals and aspirations of citizens of Addison and the City Council representing those citizens. Addison Airport’s Role in the National Airspace System The purpose of this Strategic Plan is to establish broad policy Addison is a General Aviation (GA) airport and an FAA-desig- goals for the development of Addison Airport through the next nated Reliever for the region’s two commercial service airports, 20 years and beyond. The plan is not an airport “road map”; it Dallas–Fort Worth International (DFW) and Dallas Love Field is meant to provide guidelines and context for making decisions (DAL). Addison also resides in the very top tier of GA airports regarding future development. in the country – a position confirmed by the FAA’s recently-re- leased “ASSET” study, in which Addison was recognized as Some Airport History one of only 84 “National” GA airports among more than 3,000 Addison Airport was established in 1957 by a group of private GA airports in the national airport system plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Dallas Fort Worth International Airport And
    CONNECTIVITY | DALLAS FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AND DALLAS LOVE FIELD CONNECTIVITY Dallas Fort Worth International Airport: Dallas Fort Worth International Airport Our Global Center | ■ 4th busiest airport in the world DALLAS WORTH FORT INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AND DALLAS LOVE FIELD and Dallas Love Field Source: Dallas Fort Worth International Airport (operations) Dallas Fort Worth International Airport is an Dallas Fort Worth International Airport ■ 15th busiest airport in the world economic engine for the region, generating (passengers) $37 billion in economic impact annually. by the numbers (2019): Built in 1974 and situated between Dallas ■ Host to 23 passenger airlines and Fort Worth, it is the highest-capacity Daily Passengers: 205,663 and 23 cargo carriers commercial airport in the world and one of Total Passengers: 75,066,956 two international gateway airports in Texas. ■ Service to 193 domestic and 67 As a major hub of Fort Worth–based International Passengers: 9,578,478 international destinations out of American Airlines, Dallas Fort Worth Total Cargo (metric tons): 984,850 International Airport o ers business travelers 5 terminals and 164 gates a high-frequency schedule and access to any major city in the continental United States in DallasFairbanks Fort Worth International Airport domestic destinations ■ Access to every major city in less than four hours. Cargo operations, which Anchorage the continental U.S. within four Seattle amounted to 984,850 metric tons in 2019, 76 flights per week hours serve 38 major markets around the world, Boston Minneapolis 81 flights per week ■ #1 for customer service among including several key markets in Asia. DFW 88 flights Chicago per week New York Airport recently completed upgrades to its 176 flights per week Philadelphia 162 flights per week Detroit 82 flights per week North American airports serving original terminals with a $2.7 billion ‘Terminal 77 flights per week Washington D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • October 15, 2002
    MARCH 7, 2017 ADDENDUM NO. 3 for CHICAGO DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION CHICAGO O’HARE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT RUNWAY 9C/27C – BID PACKAGE #1 Specification No. 333636 For which bids are scheduled to be opened in the City Hall Bid and Bond Room, Room 103, City Hall, 121 North LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60602, at 11:00 a.m., March 10, 2017. The following revisions are incorporated into the above-referenced specification (the "Contract Documents") as noted. All other provisions and requirements as originally set forth, except as amended by previous Addenda, remain in full force and are binding. Any additional work required by this Addendum shall conform to the applicable provisions of the original Contract Documents. In accordance with Section 13 of the “Requirements for Bidding and Instructions for Bidders” in Part One of Three: Interpretation of Contract Documents, the deadline for questions has passed. No additional questions will be answered prior to bid opening except as the Chief Procurement Officer, in her sole discretion, deems to be in the best interest of the City. BIDDER WILL ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THIS ADDENDUM IN THE SPACE PROVIDED ON THE PROPOSAL PAGE BID OPENING DATE HAS BEEN EXTENDED TO MARCH 21, 2017, 11:00 a.m. CENTRAL TIME ADDENDUM NO. 3 – MARCH 7, 2017 1 OF 6 CITY OF CHICAGO SPECIFICATION NO.: 333636 DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT SERVICES RUNWAY 9C-27C BID PACKAGE #1 FEDERALLY FUNDED JAMIE L. RHEE CHIEF PROCUREMENT OFFICER PART ONE OF THREE INSTRUCTIONS AND EXECUTION DOCUMENTS For the convenience of the potential bidders, the revisions to Part One are as follows (New Pay Items are in bold italics with “*”): Section / Sheet Section Title Description of changes Part One of Three Instructions and Execution Documents Part One Cover Coversheet Revised Submittal Title and Date Revised schedule of prices supercedes Addendum #1 to reflect S3-2 through S3-10 Schedule of Prices all changes made to pay items and quantities.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment H Airport Emissions Inventories for Houston-Galveston
    ATTACHMENT H AIRPORT EMISSIONS INVENTORIES FOR HOUSTON-GALVESTON-BRAZORIA AND DALLAS-FORT WORTH AREAS FOR SELECT YEARS 2012, 2014, 2017, 2020, 2023, 2026, AND 2028 AIRPORT EMISSIONS INVENTORIES FOR HOUSTON- GALVESTON-BRAZORIA AND DALLAS-FORT WORTH AREAS FOR SELECT YEARS 2012, 2014, 2017, 2020, 2023, 2026, AND 2028 FINAL Prepared for: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Air Quality Division Prepared by: Eastern Research Group, Inc. April 21, 2015 ERG No. 0345.00.002 AIRPORT EMISSIONS INVENTORIES FOR HOUSTON-GALVESTON- BRAZORIA AND DALLAS-FORT WORTH AREAS FOR SELECT YEARS 2012, 2014, 2017, 2020, 2023, 2026, AND 2028 TCEQ Contract No. 582-15-50416 Work Order No. 582-15-51606-03-FY2015-08 Prepared for: Anusuya Iyer Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Emissions Assessment Section P. O. Box 13087 Bldg. E, Room 341S Austin, TX Prepared by: Roger Chang Eastern Research Group, Inc. 1600 Perimeter Park Drive Suite 200 Morrisville, North Carolina 27560 April 21, 2015 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 1-1 2.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 2-2 2.1 Purpose and Objectives ........................................................................... 2-2 2.2 Report Organization................................................................................ 2-3 2.3 Background ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ACRP Report 148: LED Airfield Lighting System
    AIRPORT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH ACRP PROGRAM REPORT 148 Sponsored by the Federal Aviation LED Airfield Lighting System Administration Operation and Maintenance ACRP OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE* TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2015 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* CHAIR OFFICERS Kitty Freidheim CHAIR: Daniel Sperling, Professor of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science and Policy; Freidheim Consulting Director, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis VICE CHAIR: James M. Crites, Executive Vice President of Operations, Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, TX VICE CHAIR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Neil J. Pedersen, Transportation Research Board Kelly Johnson MEMBERS Northwest Arkansas Regional Airport Authority Victoria A. Arroyo, Executive Director, Georgetown Climate Center; Assistant Dean, Centers and MEMBERS Institutes; and Professor and Director, Environmental Law Program, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC Deborah Ale Flint Scott E. Bennett, Director, Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, Little Rock Oakland International Airport Deborah H. Butler, Executive Vice President, Planning, and CIO (retired), Norfolk Southern Corporation, Thella F. Bowens Norfolk, VA San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Jennifer Cohan, Secretary, Delaware DOT, Dover Benito DeLeon Malcolm Dougherty, Director, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento Federal Aviation Administration A. Stewart Fotheringham, Professor, School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, University of Richard de Neufville Arizona,
    [Show full text]
  • RCC Day 2021 AIRPORTS.Cdr
    PARTICIPATING AIRPORTS Austin-Bergstrom International Bill and Hillary Clinton National Airport Birmingham-Shuttlesworth International Blue Grass Airport Boston Logan International Airport Charleston International Airport Airport Rental Car Charlotte Douglas International Airport Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International City of Colorado Springs Municipal Airport Supplier Diversity Outreach Day Columbia Metropolitan Dallas Love Field Daniel K. Inouye International Airport Denver International Airport Tuesday, April 27, 2021 Detroit Metro Wayne County Airport Authority DFW International Ellison Onizuka Kona International Airport 10:30am - 12:30pm (PST) Eugene/Mahlon Sweet Field Fairbanks International Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International George Bush Intercontinental/Houston Greater Asheville Regional Airport Authority Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Indianapolis International Airport Jackson-Medgar Wiley Evers International John F Kennedy International Kahului Airport La Guardia International Airport Why Attend? The intent of this event is to inform local Lafayette Regional small businesses of contracting opportunities with car Los Angeles World Airports Louis Armstrong New Orleans International rental companies located at Los Angeles International Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport McCarran International Airport (LAX), Sacramento International Airport (SMF), San Memphis International Diego International Airport (SAN), and San Francisco Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority Miami International International
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impacts of Aviation on North Central Texas
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 1274 223 Economic Impacts of Aviation on North Central Texas JULIE K. P. DUNBAR The North Central Texas Council of Governments has evaluated Figure 1 shows the location of all of the airports included economic impacts of the North Central Texas airport system , in the analysis. A wide variety of sizes and capabilities is which includes more than 40 public-use airport . A representative represented. The airports range from Dallas Love Field, which ample of rbe e airport included 23 existing airp01ts and 4 new has a substantial amount of air carrier activity as well as a full or proposed airport'. Direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts were e timated to determine the total economic impact range of general aviation (GA) services, to small, privately of the 23 existing airports. The economic impact · of these airports owned airfields such as Bourland Field or Hicks Airfield. on I' heir surrounding communities were determined , including the Seven of the 27 airports are privately owned, public-use air­ numbers of job auributablc to th e airport . Foreca t were then ports. This variation in size and capability is one of the unique developed of the economic benefits that might be expected from characteristics of the analysis and is indicated by Table 1, existing and proposed airports by the year 2010. which presents the based aircraft and operations associated with each of the airports. The North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) The study took over 1 year to prepare and was monitored is the metropolitan planning organization for the Dallas-Fort by NCTCOG's Air Transportation Technical Advisory Com­ Worth metropolitan area.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021.02.11 Southwest ORD Release Draft V3
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: February 14, 2021 CONTACT: CDA MEDIA RELATIONS (773) 686-3700 [email protected] SOUTHWEST SHOWS CHICAGO SOME LOVE WITH INAUGURAL O’HARE SERVICE Daily nonstop ,lights to ,ive U.S. cities start on Valentine’s Day CHICAGO – Southwest AirliNes gave the City of Chicago aNd the Chicago DepartmeNt of AviatioN (CDA) a ValeNtiNe’s Day gift this morNiNg with the lauNch of the Dallas- based carrier’s Xirst-ever service at O’Hare INterNatioNal Airport. “Southwest’s decision to expand its operations to O’Hare underscores the strength of Chicago’s aviatioN market aNd the key role the City will play iN the recovery of aN airliNe iNdustry severely impacted by the COVID-19 paNdemic,” Mayor Lori E. Lightfoot said. “INvesting in Chicago’s airport infrastructure is central to our region’s ecoNomic recovery aNd creatioN of good-payiNg jobs, makiNg the oNgoiNg implemeNtatioN of O’Hare 21 projects aNd receNt improvemeNts at Midway more importaNt thaN ever.” The New daily NoNstop Xlights begiN this morNiNg, coNNectiNg passeNgers to Baltimore, Dallas, DeNver, Nashville aNd PhoeNix. Southwest will also offer Saturday- oNly service to OrlaNdo from O’Hare startiNg March 13, 2021. “I’m proud to welcome Southwest as the Newest member of the O’Hare airport commuNity,” CDA CommissioNer Jamie L. Rhee said. “These New routes will reiNforce O’Hare’s world-class coNNectivity aNd offer ChicagoaNs aNd visitors a wide array of choices aNd opportuNities wheN NoN-esseNtial travel caN safely resume, all while complemeNtiNg Southwest’s loNg-staNdiNg commitmeNt to serve Chicago at Midway.” Southwest has offered extensive service at Midway since March 1985, bringing travel opportuNities aNd ecoNomic growth to the City’s commuNities.
    [Show full text]
  • Dallas Love Field Gate Leases
    City of Dallas Aviation Love Field Gate Leases Transportation & Trinity River Project Committee 28 April 2014 1 Background • Dallas Love Field – 20 gates (per the five-party agreement and Wright Amendment Reform Act) – 4.2 million enplanements in 2013 – Classified as a “Medium Hub” by Federal Aviation Administration [“FAA”] • Airports can lease gates on following basis – Exclusive use – Airlines have full control, including branding and scheduling, over space – Preferential use – Airlines have control but gives right for airport to allow new entrants to operate at gates that are not being fully utilized – Common use – gate space and time of use is managed by the airport 2 Background • Dallas Love Field [“DAL”] has leased all available gates on a preferential use basis – Southwest Airlines - 16 gates – United Airlines - 2 gates – American Airlines - 2 gates • Typically, ten flights or “turns” per gate is full utilization 3 Background • American filed for bankruptcy in November 2011 • In February 2013, American and US Airways proposed a merger as a way out of bankruptcy for American • In August 2013, the United States Department of Justice [“DOJ”] and attorneys general from six (6) states and the District of Columbia filed an antitrust lawsuit in an attempt to stop the proposed merger 4 Terms of Proposed Settlement • In November 2013, DOJ announced a proposed settlement of the antitrust litigation – DOJ is requiring gates and slots to be divested to low-cost carriers • In December 2013, the bankruptcy court approved the merger; however,
    [Show full text]
  • Where Did Love Field Get It's Name?
    1 DALLAS LOVE FIELD S P E C I A L P O I N T S O F On the Radar INTEREST: VOLUME 1, ISSUE 3 JANUARY 14TH — 2 0 T H The story of Love Field’s Name Love Field Noise Where did Love Field Get it’s Name? Program Survey Operations On September 4, 1913, First ippines in early 1911. There he 1913, he was detailed for aviation Report Graphs Lieutenant Moss Lee Love, 11th received verbal authority to take duty with the Signal Corps and are now located Cavalry was killed in a ordered to Texas City, on page 3 Type C Wright pusher Texas with the 1st Aero bi-plane at North Island, Squadron. He was re- San Diego, California, lieved of this post in June practicing for his Mili- and ordered to San Diego tary Aviator Test. He for duty with the Signal had been under the Corps Aviation School. instruction of Lt. Frank On September 4, 1913, P. Lahm in the Philip- Lt. Love was killed in an pines in the Spring of airplane crash in San Die- 1912. Lt. Love was born go. on September 16, 1879 in Fairfax, Va. He was He was the eighth avia- INSIDE THIS appointed to the Army tion officer to be killed ISSUE: from civil life and re- and the 10th fatality in ceived his commission Army aviation. Love Field Weather Forecast 2 as 2nd Lieutenant on was named by the United December 1, 1910. States Army on October flying instructions from Lt. Lahm. 19, 1917, in honor of Lieutenant Operations Report 2 He was promoted to First Lieu- Lt.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Final Judgment
    Case 1:16-cv-02377 Document 2-1 Filed 12/06/16 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALASKA AIR GROUP, INC. and VIRGIN AMERICA INC., Defendants. PROPOSED FINAL JUDGMENT Whereas, Plaintiff United States of America (“United States”) filed its Complaint on December 6, 2016, the United States and Defendants, Alaska Air Group, Inc. (“Alaska”) and Virgin America Inc. (“Virgin”), by their respective attorneys, have consented to entry of this Final Judgment without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and without this Final Judgment constituting any evidence against or admission by any party regarding any issues of fact or law; AND WHEREAS, Defendants agree to be bound by the provisions of this Final Judgment pending its approval by the Court; AND WHEREAS, this Final Judgment requires Defendants to undertake certain actions and refrain from certain conduct for the purpose of remedying the loss of competition alleged in the Complaint; Case 1:16-cv-02377 Document 2-1 Filed 12/06/16 Page 2 of 12 AND WHEREAS, Defendants have represented to the United States that the actions and conduct restrictions described below can and will be undertaken, and that Defendants will later raise no claim of hardship or difficulty as grounds for asking the Court to modify any provisions contained below; NOW, THEREFORE, before any testimony is taken, without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and upon consent of the parties, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: I. Jurisdiction The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and Defendants.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation
    HIGHWAYS AND ARTERIALS DALLAS REGIONAL CHAMBER REGIONAL DALLAS ACCESS DENTON TRANSPORTATION McKINNEY Dallas-Fort Worth’s vast transportation | infrastructure connects residents and FRISCO ALLEN businesses. The freeway system provides TRANSPORTATION east-west and north-south corridors with easy access to job centers and residential communities. Mass transit LEWISVILLE PLANO options, including the Dallas Area Rapid FLOWER MOUND WYLIE Transit (DART) system, the Fort Worth PHOTO: DFW AIRPORT T, Trinity Railway Express (TRE), and the AIRPORTS GRAPEVINE CARROLTON Denton County Transit Authority’s (DCTA) A RICHARDSON | XXXXXXX Train off er alternatives to cars for getting ROWLETT 8 GARLAND around the region. 5 The region’s robust interstate infrastructure provides easy links along BEDFORD EULESS IRVING the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) corridor, linking Mexico to Canada DALLAS and to East and West Coast destinations, 15 making it an important intermodal center for the distribution of air, rail, and truck 3 FORT WORTH MESQUITE 4 freight. The nation’s two largest railroads, ARLINGTON GRAND Fort Worth–based Burlington Northern 9 PRAIRIE 16 Santa Fe and Union Pacifi c have major 1 operation nodes in the region, off ering business-effi cient access to other key 2 LANCASTER ports and distribution centers across the 7 DESOTO United States and into Mexico. 17 CEDAR 10 14 MANSFIELD Dallas-Fort Worth also is the HILL destination for some of the nation’s most innovative projects. One of them is already 6 substantially on its way to becoming 12 a reality: the Texas bullet train. TEXAS CENTRAL PARTNERS has received federal 18 CARGO PRE-DESIGNATED McKinney National FOREIGN TRADE ZONE approval for a path of travel for a $15 13 Airport 11 “MAGNET SITES” billion high-speed rail project that will Any company may locate on this connect the DFW area with Houston in 90 land and simply activate with minutes.
    [Show full text]