Part 3 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW for FY 18 Page 49

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Part 3 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW for FY 18 Page 49 Application for Approval of Annual Performance Review for FY-18 and Approval for ARR & ERC under MYT period FY-20-22 and ERC and Tariff Filing for FY-20. ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW FOR FY-18 In accordance with clause 2.8 of MYT regulations, the distribution licensee is subject to an Annual Performance Review (APR). HESCOM is submitting its application to the Hon’ble Commission for approval of Annual Performance Review for FY-18 along with relevant formats as specified under regulations & audited accounts for FY-18. The Hon’ble Commission had issued the tariff order Dtd: 30.03.2016 under MYT frame work duly approving the MYT for the period from FY-17 to FY-19 and retail supply tariff for FY-18 and approval for Annual Performance Review for FY-17. The Hon’ble Commission had also issued a tariff order Dtd: 14.05.2018 duly approving the Annual Performance Review for FY-17 and approval of ARR for FY-19 and retail supply tariff for FY-19. The HESCOM submits to the Hon’ble Commission to carry out the Annual Performance Review for FY-18 in accordance with the principles laid down in KERC (Tariff) Regulations 2000 as amended from time to time and KERC (Tariff) regulations 2006, duly considering the actual expenditure as per the audited accounts for FY-18 and the approved expenditure as per the Commission’s order Dtd: 11.04.2017. Part 3 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW FOR FY 18 Page 49 Application for Approval of Annual Performance Review for FY-18 and Approval for ARR & ERC under MYT period FY-20-22 and ERC and Tariff Filing for FY-20. HESCOM’s Financial Performance in FY-18 As per the audited accounts of HESCOM for FY-18, HESCOM submits to the Hon’ble Commission, an over view of the Financial Performance of HESCOM for FY-18 as under. Rs. In Crs Financial Performance of HESCOM for FY-18: FY18 Sl. Particulars As per filing Approved Vide Order As per the No dated Dtd : 11.04.2018 Audited Acts 30.11.2016 Revenue at existing tariff in Rs. Crores 1 Revenue from tariff and 2717.81 2843.85 3592.05 Miscellaneous Charges 2 Tariff Subsidy to BJ/KJ 53.30 117.87 119.95 3 Tariff Subsidy to IP 3321.76 3321.76 3175.54 4 Total Existing Revenue 6092.87 6283.47 6887.54 Expenditure in Rs. Crores 5 Power Purchase Cost 4780.41 4966.95 5803.83 6 Transmission charges of KPTCL 589.72 535.48 535.48 7 SLDC Charges 4.80 5.39 5.54 8 Power Purchase Cost including cost of 5374.93 5507.82 6344.85 transmission 9 Employee Cost 637.68 687.72 10 Repairs & Maintenance 67.37 58.49 11 Admin & General Expenses 92.36 127.88 12 Total O&M Expenses 797.41 744.36 874.09 13 Depreciation 152.91 130.04 149.03 Interest & Finance charges 14 Interest on Capital Loans 306.31 180.23 291.27 15 Interest on Working capital loans 134.73 126.71 38.57 16 Interest on belated payment on PP Cost 0.00 0.00 115.42 17 Interest on consumer security deposits 55.91 49.01 43.30 18 Other Interest & Finance charges 0.00 0.00 19 Less interest & other expenses capitalized 0.00 0.00 20 Total Interest & Finance charges 496.95 355.95 488.56 21 Other Debits 13.09 0.00 25.48 22 Extraordinary item (Adjustment of excess 102.90 0.00 102.90 subsidy amount as per KERC Order) 23 Return on Equity 0.00 0.00 24 Funds towards Consumer 0.50 0.50 0.01 25 OtherRelations/Consumer Income Education 154.37 170.73 120.07 26 ARR 6784.32 6567.94 7864.85 27 Deficit for FY16 carried forward -372.73 -223.23 28 Distribution loss reduction incentive 24.31 29 Contribution to P&G Trust (as per 448.27 GoK directions) 30 Net ARR 7629.63 6791.16 7864.85 31 Deficit for FY-19 as per audited accounts 977.31 Part 3 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW FOR FY 18 Page 50 Application for Approval of Annual Performance Review for FY-18 and Approval for ARR & ERC under MYT period FY-20-22 and ERC and Tariff Filing for FY-20. Note : Expenses towards DSM activities of Rs.0.01 Crs was booked under account head 76-193 and included in A & G expenses which is bifurcated from O & M expenses and shown separately vide Sl No : 25 of the above table. As per the audited accounts of the HESCOM there is deficit of Rs. 977.31 Crs for FY-19 as indicated above. The item wise explanation of the actual performance as per the audited accounts vis-à-vis the expenses approved as per the tariff order Dtd: 30.03.2016 is indicated as noted below. Sales for FY-18 : The Hon’ble Commission had approved 10569.56 Mu as sales for FY-18, excluding the energy sold to HRECS and SEZ vide Tariff Order Dtd: 11.04.2017. As per the audited accounts and DCB of HESCOM the sales for FY-18 is as indicated below. Sales & No of Installation for FY-18 : No of installations Sales in MUs Tariff Differe Approve Differenc Filed Approved Actual Filed Actual nce d e a b c d c-d e f g f-g LT 2(a) 2520585 2519639 2537347 -17708 1531.53 1531.53 1,412.32 119.21 LT 2(b) 6683 6785 6653 132 21.84 20.96 18.5 2.46 LT 3 351339 351966 355003 -3037 463.51 470.9 447.73 23.17 LT 4 (b) 848 848 856 -8 15.59 16.79 17.43 -0.64 LT 4 (c) 373 373 356 17 0.98 0.98 0.84 0.14 LT 5 113341 113341 113582 -241 327.57 322.3 320.43 1.87 LT 6 40383 40383 42618 -2235 299.64 280.24 277.19 3.05 LT 6 21934 22039 22823 -784 149.86 141.4 149.38 -7.98 LT 7 51236 51236 66658 -15422 26.37 26.37 28.25 -1.88 HT 1 292 296 318 -22 213.84 224.66 234.01 -9.35 HT 2(a) 1484 1516 1586 -70 764.17 913.15 1,005.39 -92.24 HT 2(b) 525 526 578 -52 130.59 130.59 121.8 8.79 HT 2 (c) 331 331 299 32 88.59 88.59 74.14 14.45 HT 3 (a) (b) 267 268 259 9 101.74 181.27 255.87 -74.6 HT 4 31 28 32 -4 14.64 13.55 14.59 -1.04 HT 5 80 80 49 31 34.8 34.8 21.81 12.99 Sub Total 3109732 3109655 3149017 -39362 4185.26 4398.07 4,399.68 -1.6 LT-1 777402 777402 759934 17468 189.48 197.11 245.48 -48.37 LT 4 (a) 734778 734778 696647 38131 5974.38 5974.38 6,054.12 -79.74 Sub Total 1512180 1512180 1456581 55599 6163.86 6171.49 6,299.60 -128.11 Total 4621912 4621835 4605598 16237 10349.12 10569.56 10,699.28 -129.72 HESCOM has registered total sales of 10,699.28 MU as against the KERC approved sales of 10569.56 MU for FY-18, thus showing an increase in the sales of 129.72 MU in FY-18. A major variation in the energy sales, compared to the energy sales approved in the Tariff Order 2017, Dtd : 11.04.2017 is observed as below. No. of installations: There is an increase in the No. of installations in respect of the following categories when compared to the approved figures of FY-17. Part 3 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW FOR FY 18 Page 51 Application for Approval of Annual Performance Review for FY-18 and Approval for ARR & ERC under MYT period FY-20-22 and ERC and Tariff Filing for FY-20. LT-2 (a) :- There is increase in number of installations by 17,708 Nos as compared to the approved figures. However, there is an increase by 1,11,056 Nos over the figures of FY-17 (FY-18 – 25,37,347 Nos, FY-17 – 24,26,291 Nos). The approval of 25,19,639 installations seems to be on the lower side. LT-3 :- There is increase in number of installations by 3037 Nos as compared to the approved figures. However, there is an increase by 18153 Nos over the figures of FY-17 (FY-18 – 355003 Nos, FY-17 – 336850 Nos). LT-4(b) :- There is increase in number of installations by 8 Nos as compared to the approved figures. However, there is a decrease by 420 Nos over the figures of FY-17 (FY-18 – 856 Nos, FY-17 – 1276 Nos). LT-5 :- There is increase in number of installations by 241 Nos as compared to the approved figures. However, there is an increase by 5781 Nos over the figures of FY-17 (FY-18 – 113582 Nos, FY-17 – 107801Nos). LT-6(a) :- There is increase in number of installations by 2235 Nos as compared to the approved figures. However, there is an increase by 4389 Nos over the figures of FY-17 (FY-18 – 42618 Nos, FY-17 – 38229 Nos). LT-6(b) :- There is increase in number of installations by 784 Nos as compared to the approved figures. However, there is an increase by 1278 Nos over the figures of FY-17 (FY-18 – 22823 Nos, FY-17 – 21545 Nos).
Recommended publications
  • Live Storage Capacities of Reservoirs As Per Data of : Large Dams/ Reservoirs/ Projects (Abstract)
    LIVE STORAGE CAPACITIES OF RESERVOIRS AS PER DATA OF : LARGE DAMS/ RESERVOIRS/ PROJECTS (ABSTRACT) Completed Under Construction Total No. of No. of No. of Live No. of Live No. of Live No. of State/ U.T. Resv (Live Resv (Live Resv (Live Storage Resv (Live Total No. of Storage Resv (Live Total No. of Storage Resv (Live Total No. of cap data cap data cap data capacity cap data Reservoirs capacity cap data Reservoirs capacity cap data Reservoirs not not not (BCM) available) (BCM) available) (BCM) available) available) available) available) Andaman & Nicobar 0.019 20 2 0.000 00 0 0.019 20 2 Arunachal Pradesh 0.000 10 1 0.241 32 5 0.241 42 6 Andhra Pradesh 28.716 251 62 313 7.061 29 16 45 35.777 280 78 358 Assam 0.012 14 5 0.547 20 2 0.559 34 7 Bihar 2.613 28 2 30 0.436 50 5 3.049 33 2 35 Chhattisgarh 6.736 245 3 248 0.877 17 0 17 7.613 262 3 265 Goa 0.290 50 5 0.000 00 0 0.290 50 5 Gujarat 18.355 616 1 617 8.179 82 1 83 26.534 698 2 700 Himachal 13.792 11 2 13 0.100 62 8 13.891 17 4 21 J&K 0.028 63 9 0.001 21 3 0.029 84 12 Jharkhand 2.436 47 3 50 6.039 31 2 33 8.475 78 5 83 Karnatka 31.896 234 0 234 0.736 14 0 14 32.632 248 0 248 Kerala 9.768 48 8 56 1.264 50 5 11.032 53 8 61 Maharashtra 37.358 1584 111 1695 10.736 169 19 188 48.094 1753 130 1883 Madhya Pradesh 33.075 851 53 904 1.695 40 1 41 34.770 891 54 945 Manipur 0.407 30 3 8.509 31 4 8.916 61 7 Meghalaya 0.479 51 6 0.007 11 2 0.486 62 8 Mizoram 0.000 00 0 0.663 10 1 0.663 10 1 Nagaland 1.220 10 1 0.000 00 0 1.220 10 1 Orissa 23.934 167 2 169 0.896 70 7 24.830 174 2 176 Punjab 2.402 14
    [Show full text]
  • Shivasamudram, Malavalli Taluk, Mandya Distract Date of Closing Transfer of Nature of Sl
    ANNEXURE -B KARNATAKA POWER CORPORATION LIMITED List of Files - Name of the Office : SEE-OFFICE Address : Superintending Engineer(Ele), Shivasamudram, Malavalli Taluk, Mandya Distract Date of Closing transfer of Nature of Sl. Opening date of file/ file & file File No. Subject Remarks No. date of file Running authority Permanent/ file whom Temporary transferred SEE/F-01 Administration correspondence Volume – 8 1 Running - Permanent 05.05.2014 SEE/F -02 Administration correspondence Volume – 4 2 Running - Permanent KPTCL 26.04.2014 SEE/F-03 Electrical section /Shiva Volume – 4 3 Running - Permanent 04.11.2013 SEE/F -04 Hydraulics section/Shiva Volume – 2 4 Running - Permanent 04.11.2013 SEE/F-05 ODY section (SFC) Shiva/Power Volume – 2 5 Running - Permanent Supply 30.08.2012 SEE/F -06 Electrical section/Shimsha/ Power Volume – 2 6 Running - Permanent Supply 01.03.2012 SEE/F -07 Hydraulics section/Shimsha Volume – 2 7 Running - Permanent 01.07.2010 SEE/F-08 Civil section / Shimsha Volume –3 8 Running - Permanent 15.06.2013 SEE/F -09 Civil section / Shiva Volume – 5 9 Running - Permanent 27.03.2014 SEE/F-10 Enquiry /Quotation Volume – 1 10 Running - Permanent 27.04.2014 SEE/F -11 Purchase order Volume – 3 11 Running - Permanent 16.07.2013 Page 1 of 25 SEE/F-12 Administrative Approval/Technical Volume – 2 12 Running - Permanent Sanction 22.05.2012 SEE/F-13 Work order Volume –3 13 Running - Permanent 12.02.2013 SEE/F-14 Training / Journey approvals Volume – 2 14 Running - Permanent 06.08.2012 SEE/F-15 Daily energy Details of Shimsha & Volume – 6 15 Running - Permanent Shivasamudram 08.03.2014 SEE/F-16 Computers/Telephones Volume – 2 16 Running - Permanent 10.01.2014 SEE/F -17 Statistics (peak load & interruption ) Volume – 1 17 Running - Permanent 03.04.2010 SEE/F-18 Joint Meter Readings of Shiva & Volume – 4 18 Running - Permanent Shimsha 01.1.2013 SEE/F -19 Budget Volume – 2 19 Running - Permanent 17.07.2012 SEE/F-20 General Volume – 1 20 Running - Permanent 21.04.2012 SEE/F-21 H.O.
    [Show full text]
  • KPCL POWER PROJECTS in KARNATAKA Installed Capacity Sl.No Power Stations Units X MW
    KPCL POWER PROJECTS IN KARNATAKA Installed capacity Sl.No Power Stations Units x MW A. HYDRO PROJECTS Cauvery River Basin Sir Sheshadri Iyer Hydro Electric Station 4x6 1 42.00 ( Shivanasamudram) 6x3 2 Shimsha Hydro Electric Station 2x8.6 17.20 Total 59.20 Sharavathy valley Project 3 Linganamakki Dam Power House 2 x 27.5 55.00 4 4x21.6 Mahathma Gandhi Hydro Electric Station 139.20 4x13.2 5 Sharavathi Generating Station 10 x 103.5 1035.00 Total 1229.20 Gerusoppa Hydro Electric Project 6 Gerusoppa Dam Powerhouse 4 x 60 240.00 Kali Hydro Electric Project 7 Supa Dam Powerhouse 2x50 100.00 8 Nagjari Powerhouse 5x150+1x135 885.00 9 Kadra Dam Powerhouse : 3 x 50 =150 3 x 50 150.00 10 Kodasalli Dam Powerhouse : 3 x 40=120 3 x 40 120.00 Total 1255.00 Varahi Hydro Electric Project 11 Mani Dam Powerhouse 2x4.5 9.00 12 Varahi UGPH :4 x 115 =460 4 x 115 460.00 Total 469.00 Krishna Basin Project 13 1X15 Almatti Dam Power House 290.00 5x55 Mini Hydro Electric Project Bhadra Project 14 1x7.2 Bhadra Right Bank Canal Powerhouse 13.20 1x6 15 2 x12 Bhadra Left Bank Canal Powerhouse 26.00 1x2 16 2x9 Munirabad Power House(Thunga Bhadra Basin) 28.00 1x10 17 Ghataprabha Dam Powerhouse 2 x 16 32.00 18 Mallapur Mini Hydel Scheme 2x4.5 9.00 19 Sirwar Mini Hydel Scheme 1x1 1.00 20 Kalmala Mini Hydel Scheme 1 x 0.40 0.40 21 Ganekal Mini Hydel Scheme 1 x 0.35 0.35 Total 109.95 Total Hydro 3652.35 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Dossier of Overall Karnataka and 17 PRS in Compliance to the NGT Orders in the Matter of OA
    Dossier of overall Karnataka and 17 PRS in compliance to the NGT orders in the matter of OA. 673/2018 State: Karnataka Estimated urban population: 22941508 1 Status of Sewage management: Overall Karnataka 17 PRS Estimated sewage generation 3356.5 MLD 884.25 MLD Existing no. of STPs and 141 STPs + 2 FSSM 40 STPs, Treatment Capacity Capacity = 2289.56 MLD Capacity = 635.54 MLD Capacity Utilization of 1592.4 MLD, 410 MLD, existing STPs percent utilization = 69.4% Percent utilization = 64.1% Sewage being treated through 4.53 MLD through FSSM (2.26 Insitu bioremediation: proposed for the Alternate technology (MLD) MLD in Devanahalli and 2.27 construction of artificial island in Dorekere MLD in Nelamangala) (global village Techpark) and Kempambudhi (Sonnenahalli bridge) amounting to ₹62.41 lakh Gap in Treatment Capacity in 1066.47 MLD, 248.71 MLD Percentage gap = 31.7% Percentage gap = 28.1% No. of Operational STPs 128 STPs + 2 FSSM No. of Operational STPs 37 No. of non-operational STPs 13 STPs No. of non-operational STPs 3 No. of Complying STPs 95 STPs complying 29 STPs complying 39 STP compliance data yet to 7 STPs compliance data yet to be procured be procured No. of Non-complying STPs 7 STPs non-complying 4 STPs non-complying 1.1 Details of each existing STP in the State: Karnataka (Annexure1a) 17 PRS (Annexure1b) Bengalur Other than Total Bengalur Other than Total u Bengaluru u Bengaluru No. of STPs 33 108 STP + 2 141STP 11 29 40 FSSM + 2 FSSM Existing treatment 1182.5 1107.06 2289.56 426 209.43 635.43 capacity (MLD) Capacity 920.6 671.78 1592.4 273.8 136.18 410 utilization (MLD) 1.2 Details of ongoing (under construction, commissioned and trial run) STPs of State: Karnataka (Annexure 2a) 17 PRS (Annexure 2b) Bengalur Other than Total Bengaluru Other than Total u Bengaluru Bengaluru Commissio No.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Action Plan for Rejuvenation of River Shimsha Karnataka State
    ACTION PLAN FOR REJUVENATION OF RIVER SHIMSHA --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Proposed action plan for Rejuvenation of River Shimsha Karnataka State Pollution Control Board “Parisara Bhavana”, # 49, Church Street, Bengaluru - 560 001 January 2019 1 ACTION PLAN FOR REJUVENATION OF RIVER SHIMSHA --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 INDEX Topic Page No. Sl. No. 3 1 Introduction to Shimsha River 2 Sources of Pollution - Municipal Sewage 4-5 generation and Treatment 3 Characteristics of River water quality 5 6 4 Action taken by the Board 5 Action to be taken for Rejuvenation of River 6-7 Water Quality 6 Cost component involved in the Restoration of 7 Polluted stretch 7 Status of Environmental Flow (E-Flow) 7 8 Short Term and Long Term Action and the 8-12 Identified Authorities for initiating actions and the time limits for ensuring compliance 2 ACTION PLAN FOR REJUVENATION OF RIVER SHIMSHA --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Proposed action plan for Rejuvenation of River Shimsha 11.State : Karnataka River Name: Shimsha River Stretch: Yediyur to Halagur Priority : IV (BOD 6-10 mg/L) BOD Range: 4.0-10 mg/L __________________________________________________________________________ 1.Shimsha River originates in the southern part of the Devarayanadurga
    [Show full text]
  • Cauvery Basin
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! CAUVERY! BASIN ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 75° E 76° E 77° E 78° E 79° E 80° E ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! KARNATAKA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Index Map ! ! ± ! ! Chikmagalur Tumkur ! ! ! ! ! ! H! H! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ANDHRA PRADESH ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! N ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ° ! ! ! ! ! ! 3 ! Hassan ! 1 ! # H! # ! ! Sakleshpur # #! ! N ! #! ! ° ! ! ! 3 ! ! Thimmanahalli ! # 1 ! ! ! % ! ! Bangalore ! ! ! ! A ! ! ! ! ! ! ! # ## M.H.Halli r ! #! k ! ! S ! ! a ! h ! v ! i Hemavathi a ! ! ! m ! t ! i ! s h ! ! ava a m t # Akkihebbal h ! He i ! #! ! Kudige # ! # Harangi Chunch# unkatte Mandya ###! #! #! ! T. Bekuppe H! ! H a rangi Krishnaraj ! # ! # T.K.H# alli Sagar #! ## ! ! Cau #! # Mysore Arkavathy ! ! very K.M.Vadi H! ! ! ! T.Narasipur #! # ! ! # Biligundulu #! # ! ! Kollegal #! State Wise Basin Area (Sq.km.) # N ! ! #! ° Kabini Hogenakkal ! 2 Bendrahall# i ! S ! 1 #! u ! l ! ! ## v a N a ! ! d ! Kabini r PUDUCHERRY ° n Thoppur n 2 u # ! ! a 1 G ! #! Muthankera v a # t ! ! #! # i #! ! ! Kudlur ## ! ! Mettur
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Water Year Book of Karnataka State 2015-2016
    FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY No. YB-02/2016-17 GROUND WATER YEAR BOOK OF KARNATAKA STATE 2015-2016 CENTRAL GROUND WATER BOARD SOUTH WESTERN REGION BANGALORE NOVEMBER 2016 GROUND WATER YEAR BOOK 2015-16 KARNATAKA C O N T E N T S SL.NO. ITEM PAGE NO. FOREWORD ABSTRACT 1 GENERAL FEATURES 1-10 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Physiography 1.3. Drainage 1.4. Geology RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION IN KARNATAKA STATE-2015 2.1 Pre-Monsoon Season -2015 2 2.2 South-west Monsoon Season - 2015 11-19 2.3 North-east Monsoon Season - 2015 2.4 Annual rainfall 3 GROUND WATER LEVELS IN GOA DURING WATER YEAR 20-31 2015-16 3.1 Depth to Ground Water Levels 3.2 Fluctuations in the ground water levels 4 HYDROCHEMISTRY 32-34 5 CONCLUSIONS 35-36 LIST OF FIGURES Fig. 1.1 Administrative set-up of Karnataka State Fig. 1.2 Agro-climatic Zones of Karnataka State Fig. 1.3 Major River Basins of Karnataka State Fig. 1.4 Geological Map of Karnataka Fig. 2.1 Pre-monsoon (2015) rainfall distribution in Karnataka State Fig. 2.2 South -West monsoon (2015) rainfall distribution in Karnataka State Fig. 2.3 North-East monsoon (2015) rainfall distribution in Karnataka State Fig. 2.4 Annual rainfall (2015) distribution in Karnataka State Fig. 3.1 Depth to Water Table Map of Karnataka, May 2015 Fig. 3.2 Depth to Water Table Map of Karnataka, August 2015 Fig. 3.3 Depth to Water Table Map of Karnataka, November 2015 Fig. 3.4 Depth to Water Table Map of Karnataka, January 2016 Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • KARNATAKA.Pdf
    LIST OF DEFAULTING COMPANIES IN KARNATAKA S.No Reg.No Company Name 1 23 HAMRAJNAGAR SRI CHAMARAJESHWARA CO. LTD 2 38 HAMARAJAGAR SRI RANGANATHA BANK LIMITED 3 12 GUNDLUPET SIR HIMAVAT GOPALA KRISHNA SWAMI BANK LIMITED 4 14 GUNDLUPET SRINIVASA SWAMI BANK LIMITED 5 18 HUNSUR BANK LIMITED 6 19 SRI SHREEKANTESWARA SAMASTHE LTD 7 20 MANCHENAHALLI SRI LAKSHMI VENKATESWARA SWAMI BANK LIMITED 8 21 MANDYA LAKSHMI VILAS BANK LIMITED 9 31 SIDLAGHATTA LAKSHMI SAHAYA BANK LIMITED 10 32 SIDLAGHATTA RAJADHANI BANK LIMITED 11 35 SRINGERI SRI SARADA BANK LIMITED 12 36 SRI RAMACHANDRA BANK LIMITED 13 39 MYSORE MOTOR TRANSPORT COMPANY LIMITED 14 40 3INDU PROVISION STORES, LIMITED 15 41 MYSORE MAHARATTA TRADING BANK LIMITED 16 42 SRINIVASA NIDHI COMPANY LIMITED 17 48 LAKSHMIPATI RICE MILL LIMITED 18 49 KRAFTS INVESTMENTS PVT.LTD. 19 62 GUBBI TILE WORKS LIMITED 20 64 LAKSANDRA PORICK AND TILE COMPANY LIMITED 21 84 SRI RAMA SAHAYA BANK LIMITED 22 86 KOPPA COMMERCIAL CORPN. LTD 23 92 OAKLEY DUNCAN & CO. LIMITED 24 98 HE JAVALI FAMILY BANK LIMITED 25 102 THE MYSORE PREMIER METAL FACTORY LIMITED 26 103 MYSORE CLAY WORKS LIMITED 27 120 KARNATAKA NEWS LIMITED 28 127 MUSASONS (MYSORE) PVT LTD VOL.41-PG215 29 132 MYSORE SUGAR WORKS AND ESTTES LIMITED 30 140 ALL INDIA MUTUAL AID AND POOR HOUSES ASSOCIATION LIMITED 31 142 MYSORE SUGAR CO LTD 32 160 MODERN MOTOR SERVICE OF MYSORE LIMITED 33 163 VYSYA BANK LIMITED 34 185 BANGALORE COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED 35 187 SREENIDHY (BANKING) COMPANY LIMITED 36 192 EPIC PICTURES LIMITED 37 193 EXHIBITIONS FILM CORPORATION LIMITED 38 196 NARAYANA TYPEWRITERS LIMITED 39 200 RANGAPPA & CO., LIMITED 40 203 KRISHNA & CO., PRIVATE LIMITED 41 207 SUBODHA & CO., LIMITED 42 212 SREE INDIRA THEATRES LIMITED 43 217 MYSORE COFFEE & SPICES LIMITED VOL.48 PG595 44 218 STANDARD AGENCIES LIMITED 45 220 MYSORE CHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS LTD VOL.48 PG64 46 228 VACUUN COMPONENTS & INSTRUMENTS PVT.LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • As Per IMD HM Bulletin, Hemavathi Dam- 131.1 Mm, Tungabhadra
    Monitoring (South) Organisation Central Water Commission Bengaluru Special Advisory No.6 (10.08.2019) 1.0 IMD information 1.0.1 Meteorological Situation As per IMD H.M. Bulletin, heavy rainfall is recorded in the basin of Harangi Dam– 133.6 mm, Hemavathi Dam- 131.1 mm, Kabini Dam - 192.7 mm, Upper Cauvery- 109.1 mm and Upper Tungabhadra - 146.5 mm during the last 24 hours. QPF Rainfall of Basin/Sub-Basin as per IMD dated: 08.08.2019: QPF issued QPF issued QPF issued Name of Date Name of Sub-Basin valid for valid for valid for Basin Day-1 Day-2 Day-2 HARANGI >100 >100 51-100 HEMAVATHI >100 >100 51-100 KABINI >100 >100 51-100 10.08.2019 CAUVERY MIDDLE CAUVERY 11-25 11-25 11-25 UPPER CAUVERY >100 >100 51-100 UPPER TUNGABHADRA >100 >100 51-100 2.0 CWC Information 2.0.1 Flood Situation & Advisories as per Actual/ Forecasted Rainfall Due to the continuous heavy rainfall in the basins of Upper Cauvery, Tunga & Bhadra in Krishna Basin and West flowing rivers in Karnataka, water level of the rivers in Cauvery, Krishna (Tunga & Bhadra), West flowing rivers in Karnataka, flowing through the districts of Kodagu, Chikmagaluru, Hassana, Shivamogga, Mandya, Chamarajanagar, Dakshina Kannada, Udupi and Uttara Kannada, Belgavi, Vijayapura, Bagalkote, Kalburgi, Yadigiri, Dharwad and Raichur has raised significantly from past two days and maintained constant Inflow. IMD rainfall forecast, the situation is likely to improve in the next two - three days. In the catchment area of Kabini river, IMD has forecasted a moderate rainfall and there is likely fall in water level in the Kabini river and inflow to Kabini Dam.
    [Show full text]
  • MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS of UPPER SHIMSHA-1 WATERSHED, TUMKUR DISTRICT, KARNATAKA USING GIS and REMOTE SENSING TECHNIQUES by D S Asmita
    PAGE 1 of 52 MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF UPPER SHIMSHA 1 WATERSHED USING GIS AND RS TECHNIQUES B-35 MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF UPPER SHIMSHA-1 WATERSHED, TUMKUR DISTRICT, KARNATAKA USING GIS AND REMOTE SENSING TECHNIQUES by D S Asmita Submission date: 05-Aug-2020 04:41PM (UTC+0530) Submission ID: 1366175289 File name: 1NH16CV030.main.3rd.attempt.pdf (1.38M) Word count: 9031 Character count: 48223 DEPT. OF CIVIL ENGINEERING NHCE, BENGALURU PAGE 2 of 52 MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF UPPER SHIMSHA 1 WATERSHED USING GIS AND RS TECHNIQUES B-35 VISVESVARAYA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, BELAGAVI-590018 2019-2020 “FINAL YEAR PROJECT” MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF UPPER SHIMSHA-1 WATERSHED, TUMKUR DISTRICT, KARNATAKA USING GIS AND REMOTE SENSING TECHNIQUES A PROJECT REPORT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR 8TH SEMESTER FOR THE AWARD OF DEGREE BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING IN CIVIL, USN NAME 1NH16CV030 D S ASMITA 1NH16CV037 DIVYA S KAMBALI 1NH16CV045 JENNIFER ROSE BIJU 1NH16CV062 MANIKYA H M UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF Dr. MAHESHA N ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPT. OF CIVIL ENGINEERING NHCE, BENGALURU PAGE 3 of 52 MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF UPPER SHIMSHA 1 WATERSHED USING GIS AND RS TECHNIQUES B-35 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT We express our sincere thanks to Dr. MOHAN MANGHNANI, Chairman of New Horizon College of Engineering for providing necessary infrastructure and creating good environment. We would like to express our great thanks to Dr. MANJUNATHA, Principal of New Horizon College of Engineering, for granting us permission to undertake the VTU prescribed project. We express our deep sense of gratitude and thanks to the Head of Civil Engineering Department Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture and Irrigation*
    230 Mandya District Gazetteer CHAPTER IV AGRICULTURE AND IRRIGATION* In Mandya District, before the irrigation water was made available to farmers, they used to grow crops only under rainfed condition. During those days, the major crops being grown were Ragi, Paddy and Horse gram. The district started glowing with greenery only after the Krishnaraja Sagar water was made available to farmers for irrigation purpose. The major Ragi varieties being grown during those days were Hullubile, Madaiahanagiri, Giddaragi, Karigidda, Jenumudda, Majjige, Gedesanga, Rudrajade, Hasarukambi, Dodda goubile etc. Afterwards, farmers started growing high yielding varieties such as H-22, K-1 and K-2, which occupied five per cent of the total area under Ragi. During the same time, when the farmers started growing another high yielding variety ‘Aruna’, spreading of awareness regarding high yielding varieties began. This development led to the release of high yielding varieties such as Udaya and Poorna. Farmers used to take up Paddy under irrigated conditions. Before the high yielding varieties became popular, farmers used to cultivate local varieties such as Doddabatta, Karikaalu, Hottekembhatti and Puttabatta. * This Chapter also includes sections on Horticulture, Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Services and Fisheries. Agriculture and Irrigation 231 These were long duration varieties and their average yield was only 8 quintals per acre. After the advent of modern farming systems and due to the influence of Green Revolution, the district is on the progressive path. Those areas of the district that were previously barren, have now evolved into green fields. Along with sugarcane and coconut, Sericulturists started growing Mulberry, which transformed the district into a golden land.
    [Show full text]
  • Karnataka State of Environment Report and Action Plan Biodiversity Sector
    301.31 P04 (CES) Karnataka State of Environment Report and Action Plan Biodiversity Sector Madhav Gadgil In collaboration with Achar K. P., Ameen Ahmed, Amit Agarwal, Arun Venkataraman, Ashok V, Balakrishna H, Bangari A, Bhadregowda L V, Chakravarthy A. K., Chandrashekariah H. N, Chengappa, Chennesh, Geetha Gadagkar, Girija Shankar, Gundappa B. V., Guru Prasad T. V., Harish Bhat, Hegde Anantha Ashisara, Hema H N, Hiremath B. S., Hussain S. A., Jayaram, Krishnaiah K R, Kubendra Naik, Kushalappa C. G., Lakshminarayana K. C., Laxminarayana, Madhyastha N. A., Manjappa S, Mohini Poojari, Murthy C. K., Murthy T. V. N., Nagaraj G, Nagaraju P, Nagendra R, Narasimha Murthy B, Narasimhan V., Narendra Ajay, Nyla Coehlo, Pandurangaiah D, Piran P. A., Prema Iyer, Rahaman M. F., Rajendran, Rajgopal Shetty, Ramanna, Ramesh Kumar B S, Ranganath M S, Ranganathan N., Reddy S. C. V., S.G. Neginhal, Sathyanarayan Bhat, Shanmugam M, Shanmukappa, Shetty Y. N., Shiva Murthy M S, Shivaprakash, Siddananjappa S, Sivan V. V., Sridhar.S, Srikantaiah G. N., Srinidhi S., Srinivas R, Srinivasa S., Subash Chandran M. D., Subramanian K. A.,Sudhira, Swaminath M. H., Talavar H T, Udayshankar H M, T.V. Ramachandra, Utthappa, Yatiraju C., Yogesh Gokhale ENVIS Technical Report No. 16 Environmental Information System (ENVIS) Centre for Ecological Sciences Indian Institute of Science Bangalore 560 012, India Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Web: http://www.ces.iisc.ernet.in/hpg/envis December 2004 Table of contents 1. Current status of the sector.......................................................................................................... 1 BOX 1: BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY ACT............................................................................................................................. 2 BOX 2: PEOPLE’S BIODIVERSITY REGISTER ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]