DOCSLIB.ORG

International Engagement in the Georgian-Abkhaz Conflict Resolution Process May 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
International Engagement in the Georgian-Abkhaz Conflict Resolution Process May 2010 INTERNATIONAL ENGAGEMENT IN THE GEORGIAN-ABKHAZ CONFLICT RESOLUTION PROCESS May 2010 Understanding conflict. Building peace. About International Alert International Alert is an independent peacebuilding organisation that has worked for over 20 years to lay the foundations for lasting peace and security in communities affected by violent conflict. Our multifaceted approach focuses both in and across various regions; aiming to shape policies and practices that affect peacebuilding; and helping build skills and capacity through training. Our field work is based in Africa, South Asia, the South Caucasus, Latin America, Lebanon and the Philippines. Our thematic projects work at local, regional and international levels, focusing on cross- cutting issues critical to building sustainable peace. These include business and economy, gender, governance, aid, security and justice. We are one of the world’s leading peacebuilding NGOs with more than 125 staff based in London and our 13 field offices. To learn more, visit www.international-alert.org. This publication has been made possible with the help of the UK Conflict Prevention Pool and the European Union Instrument for Stability. Its contents are the sole responsibility of International Alert and can in no way be regarded as reflecting the point of view of the European Union or the UK Government. © International Alert 2010 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without full attribution. Layout by D. R. ink Front cover image: © Mattias Nutt INTERNATIONAL ENGAGEMENT IN THE GEORGIAN-ABKHAZ CONFLICT RESOLUTION PROCESS May 2010 2 International Alert Table of Contents Introduction from International Alert 4 Part I – The Abkhaz Papers International Engagement in Abkhazia – Experience and Prospects 7 Introduction 8 Chapter 1 The Role of International Intergovernmental Structures in the Resolution of the Georgian-Abkhaz Conflict and Political Stabilisation in the Region (before August 2008) – Natella AKABA 9 Chapter 2 Abkhazia’s Experience of Cooperation with International Institutions and Organisations – DIANA KERSELYAN 18 Chapter 3 Consequences of the Withdrawal of the UN Mission and Prospects for International Presence in Abkhazia – IRAKLIY KHINTBA 27 Chapter 4 The Significance of the Geneva Process: Concerns, Limitations, Possibilities and Prospects – MANANA GURGULIA 35 Chapter 5 The Role of International NGOs in the Georgian-Abkhaz Conflict Transformation Process – LIANA KVARCHELIA 47 Part II - The Georgian Papers International Engagement in the Georgian-Abkhaz Conflict Resolution Process 61 Introduction 62 Chapter 1 A Retrospective Analysis of Factors Impeding and/or Contributing to Effective International Engagement in the Resolution of the Georgian-Abkhaz conflict – VakHtang KOLBAIA 64 Chapter 2 Expert Assessment of the Closure of the UN and OSCE Peacekeeping Missions in Georgia – N. SARJVELADZE, M. BALIASHVILI, N. JaparidZE, E. MUJIRI 76 Chapter 3 ‘The Geneva Process’: Fears, Opportunities and Prospects – ARCHIL GEGESHIDZE 86 Chapter 4 Prospects for International Participation in the Georgian-Abkhaz Conflict Resolution Process – IVLIAN HAINDRAVA 93 Annex I Expert Assessment of the Effectiveness of International Engagement in the Resolution of the Georgian-Abkhaz Conflict (Results of Qualitative Research) 101 Annex II An Expert Analysis of the Role and Effectiveness of the ‘Geneva Talks’ (Results of Qualitative Research) 105 International Engagement in the Georgian-Abkhaz Conflict Resolution Process 3 Acronyms ADB Asian Development Bank APEC Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation BSEP Black Sea Environmental Programme CBDN Caucasus Business and Development Network CIS Commonwealth of Independent States CR Conciliation Resources CSCE Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe CSTO Collective Security Treaty Organisation ENP European Neighbourhood Policy EU European Union EUMM Monitoring Mission of the European Union GUAM Organization for Democracy and Economic Development (Georgia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, Moldova) IBRD International Bank for Reconstruction and Development IDP Internally Displaced Person IGO International Governmental Organisation IIFFMCG International Independent Fact Finding Mission on the Conflict in Georgia INGO International Non-Governmental Organisation IPRM Incident Prevention and Response Mechanism IWPR Institute for War and Peace Reporting MEP Member of the European Parliament NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization NGO Nongovernmental Organization OHCHR Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights OSCE Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe PACE Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe UN United Nations UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund UNOMIG United Nations Observer Mission in Georgia UNPO Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organisation USAID United States Agency for International Development WWF World Wildlife Fund 4 International Alert Introduction from International Alert This collection of papers is the second in a series of ‘dialogue through research’ produced by Georgian and Abkhaz researchers, in an attempt to shed new light on the conflict and stimulate a different way of thinking about conflict-related issues. The first paper, on which work began prior to the August 2008 conflict and was published in September 2009, was entitled Dialogue on Security Guarantees in the Context of the Georgian-Abkhaz Conflict and considered the separate analyses of both Georgian and Abkhaz civil society experts on the need for security guarantees, the reasons why the sides have been unable to agree on them as well as barriers and opportunities for future agreements. The theme behind this paper on International Engagement in the Georgian-Abkhaz Conflict Resolution Process was chosen by researchers at a meeting in Paris in July 2009, only two weeks after Russia had vetoed the extension of the UN Observer Mission in Georgia (UNOMIG) mandate.1 This prompted a lively discussion on the potential consequences of the departure of UNOMIG, especially in the context of the already on-going debate on the isolation of Abkhazia, and Abkhazia’s increasing economic and political ties with Russia since Russian recognition of Abkhazia’s independence in August 2008. The veto came somewhat as a surprise to many, despite the fact that UNOMIG’s mandate and name had been under review since August 2008. The core of UNOMIG’s mandate had been undermined by Georgia’s withdrawal from the 1994 Moscow agreement on 30th August 2008, and by the withdrawal of CIS peacekeepers and their replacement with Russian border guards. Many analysts had considered that the interest in keeping a UN mission in Abkhazia was strong enough on all sides to make it possible to find a compromise on the wording of a new mandate, and a new name. Speculation as to why Russia finally vetoed the extension was rife. Why had the sides allowed it to happen? Each side was able to blame the other sides’ intransigence, yet other internal factors appeared to be at play also, such as the Abkhaz internal political dynamic in the run-up to presidential elections in December 2009; concerns within certain Georgian quarters that UN presence in some way legitimised the presence of Russian troops and was preventing progress on getting EU monitor2 access; Russian lack of enthusiasm for observation of its troops; and even US lack of enthusiasm to continue six-monthly head- to-head with Russia at the Security Council when renewing the mandate. Suddenly, with this surprise veto, all political interests were served. But two key questions remained: what of the isolation of Abkhazia? And what did UNOMIG’s departure mean for local and regional security? The previous paper on Security Guarantees had explored the question of who would be acceptable guarantors of an agreement on non-use of force, given that there were no completely neutral actors. While Russia and the EU/US were mistrusted by Georgians and Abkhaz respectively, the UN was considered to be the most neutral, and most experienced. One of the recommendations arising from the research was for there to be a balance of guarantors, but the UNOMIG withdrawal forced the question as to what would a balance of guarantors look like? In considering the significance of UN imminent withdrawal, the researchers discussed UNOMIG’s strengths and weaknesses. Would their impending departure have any significant impact? What had they, or other international organisations for that matter, actually achieved? More importantly, what lessons could be drawn from their experience? 1 UNOMIG (UN Observer Mission in Georgia) established in August 1993 to verify compliance with the ceasefire agreement between the Georgian and Abkhaz parties. Its mandate was expanded following the signing by the parties of the 1994 Moscow Agreement on a Ceasefire and Separation of Forces. 2 The EU Monitoring Mission is a civilian mission operational since 1st October 2008 to monitor the implementation of the EU-brokered peace agreements of 12th August and 8th September. EUMM is currently only able to monitor Georgian-controlled territory and continues to try to negotiate access to Abkhaz & South Ossetian-controlled territory. International Engagement in the Georgian-Abkhaz Conflict Resolution Process 5 The main regret appeared to be that there would be
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ARTISTIC AWAKENING in ANKARA (1953)1 Bülent Ecevit
    DOCUMENT ARTISTIC AWAKENING IN ANKARA (1953)1 BÜLent ecevit Until very recently, we Ankara residents were as jealous of Istanbul’s artistic awareness as we were of its sea and its trees. Our trees have yet to reach maturity, and we are as distant from the sea as ever, but an artistic awakening has now begun in Ankara as well. Concert tickets have begun to sell out in the blink of an eye, as soon as they are available. Curiously enough, tickets to the opening night of the opera reportedly sometimes sell out even before they are released.2 I say “reportedly” because this is a story I heard from one of the people interested in opening nights at the opera. Our opera no longer admits people to the concert hall who are ungroomed or who lack a formal dinner jacket. There are frequent balls at the opera. You’d think you’re in 18th-century Vienna. Because, as far as we know, this kind of dandyism no longer exists in any 20th-century city. Even in the most traditional of cities, like London, people in dinner jackets sit side- by-side with those in sports coats. 1 First published in Turkish as “Ankara’da sanat uyanıs¸ı,” Dünya, April 2, 1953, n.p. 2 The Ankara Opera, designed in 1933 by Turkish architect S¸evki Balmumcu as a space for large-scale exhibitions, was converted for use as the Ankara State Opera by German archi- tect Paul Bonatz in 1948. It was a widely recognized symbol of Turkey’s—and especially Ankara’s—cultural sophistication.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologiis Institutis Shromata K
    t.qdyt,f xtvb vfcofdkt,kbc frfltvbrjc gtnht ufv'htkb.bc [cjdyfc . . To the Memory of my Teacher Academician Petre Gamkrelidze (1903 - 1979) C F M F H S D T K J C V T W Y B T H T , F S F F R F L T V B F FK. }FYTKB"BC CF[. U T J K J U B E H B B Y C N B N E N B ihjvt,b, f[fkb cthbf, yfrd. 111 ფ ძ CFMFHSDTKJC GFKTJUTJUHFABF LF UTJKJUBEHB UFYDBSFHT,F GFKTJUTYEH LHJIB . 1999 , , , - . - . - , , . - , , - - . - - - . - . - . - “ ”. . - .. : .-. , .. .-. , .. . .. , . я, . 111 .. . 1 9 9 9 The present book deals with detail reconstruction of paleogeography and history of geological evolution of Georgia in the Paleogene time on the base of new factual material and deep drilling data, the description being accompanied by a series of paleogeographic and lithological-facial maps compiled for different epochs of the Paleogene. In the light of the concept of new global tectonics pre-folding dimen- tions of the Paleogene flysch and epicontinental basins were reconstruct- ed that allowed to evaluate the degree of their contraction as a result of fold-and thrust formation. The work considers the general regularities of manifestation of the Pyrenean tectogenesis in the Caucasus on the whole including timing, duration and character of display of the Late Pyrenean phases on the study area. In the new light there has been presented the structure of the Sadzeguri syncline of the Jhinvali-Gombori subzone. For the first time the presence of the faunistically dated Paleocene and Lower Eocene sediments in the Kvaisa ore-bearing district has been es- tablished.
    [Show full text]
  • An Economic Analysis of the Olympic Games in Ancient Greece
    RACE NOT WAR: AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE OLYMPIC GAMES IN ANCIENT GREECE -AND- WAR WITHOUT SHOOTING: AN ANALYSIS OF AMBUSH MARKETING by Vera Lantinova M.A., Williams College, 2005 EXTENDED ESSAYS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS In the Department ofEconomics © Vera Lantinova 2007 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY 2007 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission ofthe author. APPROVAL Name: Vera Lantinova Degree: Master of Arts (Economics) Title of Essays: Race not War: An Economic Analysis of the Olympic Games in Ancient Greece - and- War Without Shooting: An Analysis of Ambush Marketing Examining Committee: Chair: David Andolfatto Professor, Department of Economics Douglas Allen Senior Supervisor Professor, Department of Economics Clyde Reed Supervisor Professor, Department of Economics Steeve Mongrain Internal Examiner Associate Professor, Department of Economics Date Defended/Approved: July 31,2007 ii SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Declaration of Partial Copyright Licence The author, whose copyright is declared on the title page of this work, has granted to Simon Fraser University the right to lend this thesis, project or extended essay to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. The author has further granted permission to Simon Fraser University to keep or make a digital copy for use in its circulating collection (currently available to the public at the "Institutional Repository" link of the SFU Library website <www.lib.sfu.ca> at: <http://ir.lib.sfu.ca/handle/1892/112>) and, without changing the content, to translate the thesis/project or extended essays, if technically possible, to any medium or format for the purpose of preservation of the digital work.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalism, Politics, and the Practice of Archaeology in the Caucasus
    -.! r. d, J,,f ssaud Artsus^rNn Mlib scoIuswVC ffiLffi pac,^^€C erplJ pue lr{o) '-I dlllqd ,iq pa11pa ,(8oyoe er4lre Jo ecr] JeJd eq] pue 'sct1t1od 'tustleuolleN 6rl Se]tlJlljd 18q1 uueul lOu soop sltll'slstSo[ocPqJJu ul?lsl?JneJ leool '{uetuJO ezrsuqdtue ol qsl'\\ c'tl'laslno aql 1V cqtJo lr?JttrrJ Suteq e:u e,\\ 3llLl,\\'ieqt 'teqlout? ,{g eldoed .uorsso.rciclns euoJo .:etqSnr:1s louJr crleuols,{s eql ul llnseJ {eru leql tsr:d snolJes uoJl uPlseJnPJ lerll JO suoluolstp :o ..sSutpucJsltu,' "(rolsrqerd '..r8u,pn"r.. roJ EtlotlJr qsllqulso ol ]duralltl 3o elqetclecctl Surqsrn8urlstp o.1". 'speecorcl ll sV 'JB ,(rnluec qlxls-pltu eql ut SutuutSeq'et3:oe9 11^ly 'porred uralse,t\ ut uotJl?ztuolol {eer{) o1 saleleJ I se '{1:clncrlled lBJlsselc uP qil'\\ Alluclrol eq] roJ eJueptlc 1r:crSoloaeqcJe uuts11311l?J Jo uollRnlele -ouoJt-loueqlpue-snseon€JuJequoueqlpuE'l?luoulJv'er8rocg'uelteq -JaZVulpJosejotrolsrqerdsqtJoSuouE}erdlelutSutreptsuoc.,{11euor8ar lsrgSurpeeco:cl'lceistqlsulleJlsnlpselduexalere^esButlele;"{qsnsecne3 reded stql cql ur .{SoloeeqJlu Jo olnlpu lecrllod eql elBltsuotuop [lt,\\ .paluroclduslp lou st euo 'scrlr1od ,(:erodueluoJ o1 polelsJUtr '1tns:nd JturcpeJe olpl ue aq or ,{Soloeuqole 3o ecrlcu'rd eq} lcedxa lou plno'{\ 'SIJIUUOC aAISOldxe ouo 3Jor{,t\ PoJe uP sl 1t 'suolllpuoJ aseql IIe UsAtD sluqle pur: ,{poolq ,{11euor1dacxo lulo^es pue salndstp lelrollrrel snor0tunu qlr,n elalder uot,3e; elllBlo^ ,(re,r. e st 1l 'uolun lel^os JeuIJoJ aql io esdelloc eqt ue,tr.3 'snsBsnBJ aql jo seldoed peu'{u oql lle ro3 ln3Sutueau 'l?Iuusllllu
    [Show full text]
  • Ankara University
    Ankara University FOLLOW-UP EVALUATION REPORT July 2011 Team: Fuada Stankovic, chair Alina Gavra Andy Gibbs, coordinator Institutional Evaluation Programme/Ankara University/July 2011 Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Institutional Evaluation Programme and follow-up evaluation process ............................ 3 1.2 Ankara University and the national context ..................................................................... 4 1.3 The Self Evaluation Process ............................................................................................. 4 1.4. Description of the University ............................................................................................ 5 1.5. Changes that have been made since the original evaluation ............................................ 5 2. Internationalisation ......................................................................................................... 7 3. Science and society ....................................................................................................... 10 4. University / Industry Collaboration ................................................................................ 12 5. Quality Monitoring and Administration ......................................................................... 14 6. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 16 2 Institutional
    [Show full text]
  • Turkish President Turgut Özal's Impact on Nursultan
    TURKISH PRESIDENT TURGUT ÖZAL’S IMPACT ON NURSULTAN NAZARBAYEV’S PERCEPTION OF TURKEY* Nursultan Nazarbayev'ın Türkiye Algısına Tugut Özal'ın Etkisi Din Muhammed AMETBEK** Abstract Nursultan Nazarbayev as the founding President of Kazakhstan played a determinant role in the formation of Kazakh foreign policy. In this respect, the article examines Nazarbayev’s perception of Turkey as a decision maker in foreign policy are based on observation rather than realities. Nazarbayev is aware of the fact that the national identity of Kazakhstan is divided between two competing poles; Russian and Kazakh, in a broader sense; Slavic and Turkic. From this perspective, Nazarbayev’s perception of Turkey is significant as it is not only related to foreign policy but at the same time the national identity of Kazakhstan. The study argues that the President of Republic of Turkey of early 1990s Turgut Özal with his active diplomacy towards Kazakhstan contributed to the positive image of Turkey. The research concludes that close and reliable relations between Nazarbayev and Özal became the basis of a strategic part- nership between Kazakhstan and Turkey. Keywords: Turgut Özal, Nursultan Nazarbayev, Kazakhstan, Turkey, Perception, National Identity Özet Kazakistan’ın kurucu Cumhurbaşkanı Nursultan Nazarbayev’in, Kazak dış politi- kasının oluşumunda belirleyici rol üstlendiği kesindir. Bu bağlamda, makale, Nazarba- yev’in Türkiye algısını ele almaktadır. Çünkü inşacı ekolün iddiasına dış politika kararları gerçeklere değil algı üzerine alınmaktadır. Nazarbayev Kazakistan’ın ulusal kimliğinin Rus ve Kazak olarak, daha geniş kapsamda Slav ve Türk olarak yarışan iki kutba ayrıldığının farkındadır. Buradan hareketle, Nazarbayev’in Türkiye algısı, yal- nızca dış politika açısından değil aynı zamanda Kazakistan’ın ulusal kimliği açısından da önemlidir.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Council Distr.: General 18 July 2007
    United Nations S/2007/439 Security Council Distr.: General 18 July 2007 Original: English Report of the Secretary-General on the situation in Abkhazia, Georgia I. Introduction 1. The present report is submitted pursuant to Security Council resolution 1752 (2007) of 13 April 2007, by which the Security Council decided to extend the mandate of the United Nations Observer Mission in Georgia (UNOMIG) until 15 October 2007. It provides an update of the situation in Abkhazia, Georgia since my report of 3 April 2007 (S/2007/182). 2. My Special Representative, Jean Arnault, continued to lead the Mission. He was assisted by the Chief Military Observer, Major General Niaz Muhammad Khan Khattak (Pakistan). The strength of UNOMIG on 1 July 2007 stood at 135 military observers and 16 police officers (see annex). II. Political process 3. During the reporting period, UNOMIG continued efforts to maintain peace and stability in the zone of conflict. It also sought to remove obstacles to the resumption of dialogue between the Georgian and Abkhaz sides in the expectation that cooperation on security, the return of internally displaced persons and refugees, economic rehabilitation and humanitarian issues would facilitate meaningful negotiations on a comprehensive political settlement of the conflict, taking into account the principles contained in the document entitled “Basic Principles for the Distribution of Competences between Tbilisi and Sukhumi”, its transmittal letter (see S/2002/88, para. 3) and additional ideas by the sides. 4. Throughout the reporting period, my Special Representative maintained regular contact with both sides, as well as with the Group of Friends of the Secretary-General both in Tbilisi and in their capitals.
    [Show full text]
  • A Haif-Democratiic Russia Will Always Be a Half-Aliy to the United States
    A Haif-Democratiic Russia Will Always Be a Half-Aliy to the United States MICHAEL MCFAUL AND NIKOLAI ZLOBIN T he improvement in Russian-American relations is one of the few positive fac- tors in the muddled picture of international relations today. Russian president Vladimir Putin's support for the American struggle against international terror- ism has elevated communications between two former enemies to a new level Politicians on either side of the ocean are calling the. United States and Russia "allies ." Noting the decisiveness with which President Putin supports the United States and Washington's extremely positive reaction to this, many Russian politi- cians and public figures have begun speaking openly of Russia's entry into West- ern organizations and unions. Membership in the World Trade Organization is discussed in Moscow as an obvious reward that Russia should receive for sup- porting American military actions; entry into the European Union is brought up as a relatively near goal, and so forth. The hopes are great, but do they reflect reality? Inflated expectations and skewed assessments of the speed and character of Russia's integration into the West are dangerous. It is true that the new situation brings forth many hopes, but it also provides the groundwork for possible future disillusion. Russia's drive toward integration must be welcomed, but without open discussions concerning the entire range of problems hampering the development of relations between Russia and the West, Russian and American officials are simply exaggerating unrealistic expectations, the collapse of which could seriously complicate relations in the future. This is a replay of the situation ten years ago, when an absence of pragmatism led to the appearance of hopes that were never realized.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia/Abkhazia
    HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH ARMS PROJECT HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH/HELSINKI March 1995 Vol. 7, No. 7 GEORGIA/ABKHAZIA: VIOLATIONS OF THE LAWS OF WAR AND RUSSIA'S ROLE IN THE CONFLICT CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................................5 EVOLUTION OF THE WAR.......................................................................................................................................6 The Role of the Russian Federation in the Conflict.........................................................................................7 RECOMMENDATIONS...............................................................................................................................................8 To the Government of the Republic of Georgia ..............................................................................................8 To the Commanders of the Abkhaz Forces .....................................................................................................8 To the Government of the Russian Federation................................................................................................8 To the Confederation of Mountain Peoples of the Caucasus...........................................................................9 To the United Nations .....................................................................................................................................9 To the Organization on Security and Cooperation in Europe..........................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Russia, Georgia and the Eu in Abkhazia and South Ossetia
    PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION: RUSSIA, GEORGIA AND THE EU IN ABKHAZIA AND SOUTH OSSETIA Iskra Kirova August 2012 Figueroa Press Los Angeles The views and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author and cannot be interpreted to reflect the positions of organizations that the author is affiliated with. PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION: RUSSIA, GEORGIA AND THE EU IN ABKHAZIA AND SOUTH OSSETIA Iskra Kirova Published by FIGUEROA PRESS 840 Childs Way, 3rd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90089 Phone: (213) 743-4800 Fax: (213) 743-4804 www.figueroapress.com Figueroa Press is a division of the USC Bookstore Copyright © 2012 all rights reserved Notice of Rights All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmit- ted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission from the author, care of Figueroa Press. Notice of Liability The information in this book is distributed on an “As is” basis, without warranty. While every precaution has been taken in the preparation of this book, neither the author nor Figueroa nor the USC Bookstore shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by any text contained in this book. Figueroa Press and the USC Bookstore are trademarks of the University of Southern California ISBN 13: 978-0-18-214016-9 ISBN 10: 0-18-214016-4 For general inquiries or to request additional copies of this paper please contact: USC Center on Public Diplomacy at the Annenberg School University of Southern California 3502 Watt Way, G4 Los Angeles, CA 90089-0281 Tel: (213) 821-2078; Fax: (213) 821-0774 [email protected] www.uscpublicdiplomacy.org CPD Perspectives on Public Diplomacy CPD Perspectives is a periodic publication by the USC Center on Public Diplomacy, and highlights scholarship intended to stimulate critical thinking about the study and practice of public diplomacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul's Speech Before the Areopagus and the Evangel for Today
    MINISTRY EVANGEL Autumn 1992 69 THE GOSPEL FROM ATHENS: PAUL'S SPEECH BEFORE THE AREOPAGUS AND THE EVANGEL FOR TODAY John Proctor This article illustrates the way the apostles contextualised their messages. Paul's address to the Areopagus court in Athens the perceptions and preconceptions of contemporary (Acts 17:22-34) represents a carefully targetted and Britain. thoughtful presentation of the Christian message to a particular audience in a unique setting. In a centre 1. Religion of the Greek Gods outstanding for the visible expression-in art and architecture--of Greek religion, Paul engages with 'The city was full of idols' (16). 'Men of Athens. the folk-belief, the popular religious perceptions, of you are very religious. For as I passed along, and the day and the place. Among an audience versed in observed the objects of your worship, I found also an philosophical thought and learning, he interacts with altar with this inscription, "To an unknown god." , their intellectual perspectives and their outlook on (22f) Athens was splendidly endowed with buildings the ultimate issues of life. He takes on their world­ and statues to the pagan deities of Greece, which view, and meets it with the Christian proclamation­ from an aesthetic perspective were (and are) rated as or, more particularly, with selected elements of the objects of merit and magnificence, 'among the artistic Christian message, chosen because they address the masterpieces of the world'. 2 Although the religion of need of the situation. He speaks in a way that both the ancient deities had declined somewhat under the latches onto and challenges the way his hearers have influence of philosophy, and had been replaced by been accustomed to look at life.
    [Show full text]
  • The View from Abkhazia of South Ossetia Ablaze
    Central Asian Survey Vol. 28, No. 2, June 2009, 235–246 The view from Abkhazia of South Ossetia ablaze Paula Garbà Department of Anthropology, University of California, Irvine, USA The Abkhazian and South Ossetian perspectives on the fighting between Georgians and South Ossetians in August 2008 could not be heard above the noise generated around the geopolitical implications of the larger Russian–Georgian clash. The population of Abkhazia experienced the violence in South Ossetia as though it was occurring on their own territory. This confirmed their complete lack of trust in the Georgian government’s commitment to peaceful resolution of the conflicts. In addition, they were disappointed with what they regarded as the international community’s absence of criticism of Georgia’s actions and lack of concern for the safety and well-being of the South Ossetians. Russia’s recognition of South Ossetia’s and Abkhazia’s independence has taken the question of Georgia’s territorial integrity off the negotiation table indefinitely. It also has set back the formal peace process with both South Ossetia and Abkhazia. An essential way forward, toward establishing trust as a necessary foundation for progress in the political negotiations, would be for the US and other interested countries to engage with the people of Abkhazia and South Ossetia at all levels, demonstrating credible and consistent concern for the safety and well being of all the people affected by the conflict. Keywords: conflict; culture; Abkhazia; South Ossetia Introduction Georgian–Abkhazian official relations since the end of the 1992–1993 war have offered little common ground for a mutually acceptable resolution.
    [Show full text]