Driving Central Indiana's Logistics Industry

CENTRAL REGIONAL LOGISTICS COUNCIL STRENGTHENING THE CROSSROADS: DRIVING CENTRAL INDIANA’S LOGISTICS INDUSTRY

OCTOBER 2015 Conexus Indiana is the state’s advanced manufacturing and logistics initiative, dedicated to making Indiana a global leader in these high-growth, high-tech industries.

The mission of CILC is to work with a sense of urgency to strengthen the logistics sector in Indiana by identifying and acting on concrete opportunities for enhancement, which better positions the State to grow existing business, attract new business, and thereby create new jobs. CONEXUS INDIANA CENTRAL REGIONAL LOGISTICS COUNCIL

CHAIR Mark Brown Phillip Gerrian *Mark DeFabis General Manager Senior VP President & CEO Central Indiana & Western Railroad Fraley & Schilling, Inc. Integrated Distribution Services, Inc. Lapel Rushville Plainfield Keith Bucklew Nate Ghaim *Kevin Adams Principal & Freight Discipline Leader President & CEO VP, Operations CDM Smith Hanzo Logistics, Inc. OHL Contract Logistics Indianapolis Plainfield Plainfield (Workforce Development Chair) Jeff Castell Brian Gildea Senior Managing Director, Principal Executive Director Stephen Alexander DTZ Develop Indy CEO/Chief Architect Indianapolis Indianapolis Rees Alexander Indianapolis *Greg Chaney Rodney Graham Executive Director, Global Supply Chain CFO *Timothy Almack Allison Transmission CNG Source, Inc. Partner Indianapolis Indianapolis Katz, Sapper & Miller, LLP Indianapolis Dan Corcoran Bob Grzegorek VP, Midwest Region Plant Manager - Indianapolis Bob Babcock Container Port Group Coregistics SVP, Operations and Business Development Indianapolis Whitestown Indiana Rail Road Company Indianapolis Beth Crider Brad Hastings Division Mgr., Logistics Senior VP Alex Bluestein Firestone Building Products, Co. Tippmann Group/ Interstate Warehousing Chief Global Rep., Business Development Indianapolis Franklin Oscar Winski Lafayette Andrew Elsener Greg Henneke President Executive VP John Brand Spot Freight American Structurepoint, Inc. President Indianapolis Indianapolis Butler Fairman & Seufert Civil Engineers Indianapolis *Dennis Faulkenberg *Nick Hoagland President & CEO COO *Mike Broughton Appian Backhaul Direct Advisor, Global Logistics Indianapolis Indianapolis Eli Lilly and Company Indianapolis

I John Hong Patrick Lindley Tim Miller Leader- North American Logistics & Executive Managing Partner Project Manager International Trade Operations DTZ Lochmueller Group Dow AgroSciences Indianapolis Indianapolis Indianapolis Jim Longest Andi Montgomery Andrea Hopper President Owner & Vice President Senior Dir., Industrial Advisory Services Beam, Longest and Neff Montgomery Aviation Summit Realty Group Indianapolis Zionsville Indianapolis Jennifer Marcum Craig Moore *Mark Hosfeld CEO Director, Corporate Development VP, Leasing & Development Sentry Logistics Citizens Energy Group Duke Realty Corp. Indianapolis Indianapolis Indianapolis *Sean Maroney Dean Munn Michael Huber VP, Market Unit Field Operations Technical VP, Systems Planning Division President & CEO Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. Corradino, LLC Indy Chamber Indianapolis Indianapolis Indianapolis David Martin *Kevin Murray Jim Humphrey VP, Global Sourcing VP, Supply Chain VP/COO, Commercial Services Oerlikon Fairfield Red Gold Goodwill Industries of Central Indiana, Inc. Lafayette Elwood Indianapolis John McCane Mark Nicastro Paul Hunckler Executive Director Director- Indianapolis Distribution Center Regional Account Manager Rush County ECDC CVS Pharmacy Dematic Corporation Rushville Indianapolis Westfield Betsy McCaw Brad Ortman Maeghan Hurley COO Operations Manager President CICP Kokomo Grain Co, Inc. MKM Distribution Services Indianapolis Kokomo Indianapolis David McDougall Chet Parsons Layth Hussain Vice President Principal Dir., Operations Americas HNTB Corporation PCS Engineers Belkin Indianapolis Avon Plainfield John McDowell John Paugh Jennifer Coulter-Lissman President CEO General Manager Multi Modal Transportation Logistics Carter Logistics TOC Logistics International, LLC Whitestown Anderson Indianapolis (Infrastructure, Co-Chair) Steve McGill *Cathy Langham Director of Business Development Dan Peterson President Tonn and Blank Construction VP, Industry & Government Affairs Langham Logistics Indianapolis Cook Group, Inc. Indianapolis Bloomington

II *Dawn Replogle Tim Siddiq *Jim Wade VP, Area Interface Mgr. – Transportation, President & CEO Vice President DCS Americas Merchandise Warehouse Co., Inc. CHA Companies URS Corporation Indianapolis Indianapolis Indianapolis (Public Policy, Co-Chair) Amy Waggoner Ed Rounsaville Steve Smith Client Services Manager General Manager MJ Insurance, Inc. Lochmueller Group GENCO/BD Indianapolis Indianapolis Plainfield (Infrastructure, Co-Chair) Spence Wendelin *John Rowe Roger Stephens President Managing Director Client Service Manager Wabash Central Railway, Big Four Cargo Services, Inc. RQAW Terminal Railroad and C&NC Indianapolis Indianapolis Corydon Bruno Sanzi Jake Sturman Paul Will VP, Business Dev., Contract Services Senior VP Vice Chairman, President & CEO Norbert Dentressangle Group JLL America, Inc. Celadon Group, Inc. Plainfield Indianapolis Indianapolis Thomas J. Scimeca Shelby Swango *Doug Williams Manager, Global Logistics & Customs Area Manager/VP President Administration Parsons Brinckerhoff Venture Logistics, Inc. Allison Transmission Indianapolis Indianapolis Indianapolis Mark Writt *Mark Sell Michael Taylor President Senior VP, Industrial Services President & CEO Integrated Services, Inc. CB Richard Ellis, Inc. MD Logistics Kokomo Indianapolis Plainfield Bob Wu *Mark Shublack *Phil Terry CEO VP, Production Control, Materials Attorney at Law Logistics and Information Systems Monarch Beverage Company, Inc. Ice Miller Subaru of Indiana Automotive, Inc. Indianapolis Indianapolis Lafayette Jim Tilton Director, Materials Draper, Inc. *Conexus Indiana Logistics Council Member Spiceland

III IV LETTER FROM CONEXUS CENTRAL REGIONAL LOGISTICS COUNCIL CHAIR

Strengthening the Crossroads: Driving Central Indiana’s Logistics Industry was created by leading members of the logistics users community throughout Central Indiana.

The logistics community, composed of service providers from the four modes of transportation (air, rail, truck and water) as well as other logistics stakeholders including users of logistics services such as advanced manufacturing, warehouse/ distribution companies, and infrastructure design and construction companies, gathered and agreed unanimously on the key deliverables and priorities for Central Indiana. The Conexus Indiana Logistics Council, partnering with Central Indiana Corporate Partnership, regional economic development organizations and chambers of commerce in Central Indiana created the Central Regional Logistics Council (CRLC) and was the catalyst in creating the forum of logistics executives to discuss issues affecting their industry and to build a common agenda across all logistics sectors, including both private and public. We believe that by aligning priorities in the areas of infrastructure, public policy and workforce development, Central Indiana will be able to maximize short-term and long-term success for the logistics industry in this region.

Strengthening the Crossroads: Driving Central Indiana’s Logistics Industry was prepared from the input of a broad cross section of logistics providers and users, ensuring that the priorities identified for the Central Region will enhance the environment for growth of existing companies, create a more attractive business climate to attract companies to Indiana, and create high paying jobs for the citizens in this region.

Implementation by both the public and private sectors of the strategies, goals and tactics contained in this plan will continue to grow our region’s reputation as a logistics hub and ensure the region’s leadership in logistics well into the future.

The countless hours and dedication of the volunteer executives from CRLC provide the Conexus Indiana Logistics Council (CILC), the Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT), the Ports of Indiana, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation, and the regional and local economic groups and chambers of commerce with a strong foundation to make the goals outlined in this plan a reality. The talented and dedicated staff of Conexus Indiana together with the regional and local economic development groups and chambers of commerce will carry out these initiatives and drive the implementation of the tactics necessary to ensure the plan’s success.

We look forward to continuing conversations on future opportunities that will continue to enhance the logistics sector in the Central Region, and we will continue our work by updating the plan on a regular basis to ensure that it is as dynamic as the logistics industry itself.

Respectfully,

Mark DeFabis President & CEO, Integrated Distribution Services, Inc. Chair, Central Regional Logistics Council

V TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...... 1 PROBLEM STATEMENT...... 1

MISSION STATEMENT ...... 1

OBJECTIVES...... 2

LOGISTICS STRATEGIES...... 3 INFRASTRUCTURE GOALS...... 3

PUBLIC POLICY GOALS...... 4

PUBLIC AWARENESS GOALS...... 4

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT GOALS...... 4

IMPLEMENTATION TACTICS...... 5 INFRASTRUCTURE...... 5 Regional Tactics...... 5 Local Tactics...... 10

PUBLIC POLICY...... 68

PUBLIC AWARENESS...... 69

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT...... 69

LOGISTICS MARKET ANALYSIS...... 70 TRANSPORTATION MODE SWOT ANALYSIS...... 70

PUBLIC POLICY SWOT ANALYSIS...... 74

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT SWOT ANALYSIS...... 77

PUBLIC AWARENESS SWOT ANALYSIS...... 78

CENTRAL REGION INFRASTRUCTURE DATA...... 79

VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: CENTRAL REGIONAL LOGISTICS COUNCIL

The Conexus Indiana Central Regional Logistics Council (CRLC) is a forum of 76 logistics executives and thought leaders from throughout Central Indiana representing the following logistics sectors: air, infrastructure, rail, trucking, warehousing/distribution, waterborne, advanced manufacturing and services firms. Logistics users are manufacturers, distributors/warehousing, and third-party providers.

CRLC is working to:

◆◆ Enhance the environment for companies in advanced manufacturing and logistics to grow their business, taking advantage of Indiana’s position at the heart of the global supply chain;

◆◆ Create a more attractive environment for manufacturing and logistics companies to relocate to or expand in the Central Region, thereby creating jobs and increasing State and local revenue; and

◆◆ Create high paying jobs for Hoosiers – the average wage of Indiana manufacturing and logistics jobs is more than 33% higher than the State’s median income.

PROBLEM STATEMENT The Central Region’s transportation network has opportunities for improvement due to transportation “bottlenecks,” lack of direct rail service, underutilized air facilities with little international freight movement, lack of efficient mode-to-mode connectivity (e.g. road to rail, road to water, road to air, rail to water), a decaying lock and dam infrastructure, and lack of dredging that prohibits barges/ships to maximize capacity. This disconnect has created higher costs, potential environmental impacts, inefficient freight movement, loss of productivity for Central Region business, and safety impacts.

MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Central Regional Logistics Council is to work to provide logistics excellence in Central Indiana through the development of infrastructure, public policy, public awareness, and workforce development to promote logistics competitiveness for the hub of the “Crossroads of America” by driving economic development and business growth.

1 OBJECTIVES

1. Executive Forum: Provide a forum for Central Region logistics executives to discuss issues affecting the industry;

2. Infrastructure: Develop a comprehensive plan to strengthen the Central Region’s public and private logistics infrastructure;

3. Public Awareness: Develop paid and earned media to promote the sector;

4. Public Policy: Identify State and Federal public policy areas that impact the logistics industry and work with State and Federal thought leaders from government, academia and associations to enhance the sector;

5. Workforce Development: Develop and implement strategies to build the human capital needed to support the growing demand for logistics services through innovative workforce programs in the Central Region.

2 LOGISTICS STRATEGIES

◆◆ Increase the flow of goods originating, terminating, and adding value within the Central Region over the next five years, thereby creating an increase of net new jobs and growing the logistics sector.

◆◆ Provide a broad-based forum, consisting of Central Region business executives throughout the logistics industry, for collectively vetting critical relevant logistics public policy issues of commonality, therefore optimizing the business climate.

◆◆ Strengthen and grow the logistics qualified workforce in the Central Region by creating portable skills curricula leading to academic degrees/certifications that will increase the pipeline of qualified workers over the next five years.

◆◆ Increase the public’s awareness of the importance of the logistics industry on the Central Region’s economy.

INFRASTRUCTURE GOALS

1. Reduce bottlenecks in the Central Region to improve the reliability and efficiency of freight movement leading to less congestion, reduced infrastructure repairs, and lower emissions.

2. Ensure global access by connecting Central Region cities based on impact and potential to Interstate-like access.

3. Create better connectivity of Indiana’s water ports via roads and rail modes and improve the reliability and efficiency of water freight movement to and from the Central Region.

4. Develop a fast and efficient process for unplanned economic development infrastructure needs.

5. Develop and implement transportation networks that provide direct rail, truck access and air cargo expansion leading to the improvement and establishment of multimodal and intermodal service and air cargo facilities.

3 PUBLIC POLICY GOALS

1. Ensure State and Federal Government do not legislate or regulate barriers to the safe, efficient and innovative movements of goods and resources that are necessary to support the growth of the logistics sector.

2. Ensure State and Federal Government provide the necessary funding for the public infrastructure needed to support the efficient and cost effective operation of Indiana’s logistics sector.

3. Ensure CRLC is recognized by governmental entities as a resource of first resort and the voice for the logistics industry.

PUBLIC AWARENESS GOALS

1. Develop brand awareness of CRLC.

2. Create general public understanding of logistics by ensuring that the population has a basic understanding of logistics.

3. Increase the perception of the need to improve/expand Indiana’s infrastructure.

4. Highlight Indiana’s logistics companies by bringing awareness to their products and services.

5. Increase the public’s understanding of the positive impact of global trade on Indiana’s economy and jobs.

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT GOALS

1. Increase the skill levels of the Central Region’s logistics workers through workforce education programs. 2. Increase the upward mobility and job prospects of current and future Central Region logistics workers.

4 IMPLEMENTATION TACTICS

REGIONAL TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING CRLC INFRASTRUCTURE GOALS

◆ REGIONAL TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING AVIATION GOALS ◆◆ Air Cargo Volume Study: Conduct a private sector study on air cargo volume for integrated and non-integrated freight and air passenger travel, with the long-term objective of maximizing the use of air capacity

◆◆ Jet Fuel Refinery Feasibility Study – Conduct a private sector study on the need for a jet fuel refinery in Central Indiana

◆ REGIONAL PRIORITY PROJECTS

PROJECT # COUNTY CENTRAL REGIONAL PROJECTS TIER 1 TIER 2 TIER 3 TIER 4 0601 Boone, Clinton, Hamilton, Marion US 421 Additional Lanes 0602 Boone, Hamilton, Madison I-65/I-69 Connector 1008 Boone, Clinton, Hendricks, Johnson, Marion, Shelby, Tippecanoe I-65 Additional Lanes 1801 Delaware, Hamilton, Madison, Marion I-69 Additional Lanes 2501 Hamilton, Howard, Tipton US 31 Indianapolis to Benton Harbor, MI 3201 Boone, Hendricks Ronald Reagan Parkway Extension 3202 Hendricks, Marion US 36 Corridor 3205 Hendricks I-70/I-74 Connector 4517 Out of state Soo Locks 4803 Hancock, Hendricks, Johnson, Madison, Morgan, Shelby Indiana Commerce Connector 4910 Marion Senate Avenue Intermodal 5401 Montgomery, Tippecanoe US 231 Additional Lanes 3802 Randolph, Wayne US 27 Improvements 4101 Johnson, Marion, Morgan I-69 Completion 4909 Boone, Marion I-465 Additional Lanes 6506 Out of state Olmstead Lock Reconstruction 8403 Hancock, Hendricks, Henry, Marion, Morgan, Putnam, Wayne I-70 Third Lane/Dedicated Truck Lanes 2101 Fayette, Wayne Connersville Connector 5408 Boone, Montgomery US 32 Additional Lanes 7001 Decatur, Henry, Rush SR 3 Improvements

5 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region «¬18 B E N T O N W H I T E M I A M I «¬19 W E L L S ADAMS «¬18 «¬218 «¬29 «¬15 «¬116 «¬71 ¤£231 «¬43 «¬25 CASS ¤£35 «¬5 «¬18 «¬67 «¬18 J A Y CARROLL 3401 «¬352 «¬352 «¬225 «¬15 BLACKFORD «¬22 ¤£35 «¬22 «¬26 «¬55 «¬75 «¬!931 3403 «¬3 «¬26 «¬26 7 ! «¬26 9 ¤£52 0 0 167 8 3402 «¬26 G R A N T «¬ 3 0 29 7902 3 «¬ WARREN «¬55 T I P T O N «¬67 «¬38 «¬37 «¬9 D E L A W A R E TIPPECANO E 1202 !

2 1201 2 ¬213 0 « 30 1 Date: 8/12/2015 ¤£ £35 67 «¬28 2 ¤ ¬ «¬28 «¬28 «¬25 «¬28 ¤£421 «¬28 0 «¬28 « 1802 1 1 8 ¬ «¬28 «¬19 « Identified Enhancement 1 13 RA N DO L P H

263 0 «¬ «¬ 332

5 ¬ Categories for Local and 1 «¬38 «¬128 «

41 2 ¤£ 0 C L I N T O N 32 State Facilities «¬341 4 06 «¬ «¬32 «¬55 5 0 1 2 0 0602 0 69 Central 0 6 ¦¨§ ¤£136 MONTGOMERY «¬47 8 0 «¬38 HAM ILTO N «¬67 1 Mobility Improvements «¬232 FOUNTAIN 2 5408 4¬37 ¤£27 (Added travel lanes, «¬341 540 0 « 236 «¬ 3 9 1 «¬3 «¬25 5407 BOONE 8 ¬32 ! 32 2 0 freeway upgrade) « ! «¬ 8 0 ¬38 1 « «¬9 2 0603 ¤£36 State Facility «¬341 5404 ! ¤£35 ¤£136 «¬39 ! MADISON «¬103 «¬234 9 New Terrain, State 4 0 4802 W A Y N E 9 9 Facility 0 4906 «¬38 ¬63 267 ¦¨§8645 465 «¬431 « «¬ ¦¨§7 H E N R Y P A R K E «¬234 2 Local Facility 47 3 ! HANCOCK 8403 0 «¬227 2 109 83 «¬ «¬ «¬103 89 75 4 01 «¬ 0 ¹º»¼ 8 1 New Terrain, Local 1 3002 8403 0 1 236 0 ¬236 «¬ 0 « 236 5 «¬ 0 3 8901 Facility 1 0 §65 7 ¨ 4 ¦ 2 2 3 ¤£40 134 8

3 ¬ 1 New Rail Capacity 2 « ¬71 3202 0 140 « 0 0 ¬ 4 «

3 (new rail line or added ¤£36 6 0 9 227 VERMILLION 2 !4 «¬ capacity) P U T N A M 3 3 «¬1 2 «¬267 0 «¬3 Operational Improvements 6 H E N D R I C K S 1 UNION 7 1 0 0 S H E L B Y (Intersection improvements, 1 0 163 6705 1 2102 ! «¬ ! 5501 «¬267 9 R U S H ¬44 «¬44 new interchange, 0 « 240 6 ¬44 ¬ 1 « « 7 interchange modification, 6 0 ! 4 MARION FAYETTE 7 4 «¬9 and spot improvements) 0 «¬42 V I G O ¤£40 2 8403 «¬39 «¬144 4102 7 «¬44 C L AY 3 ¤£52 «¬121 4803 0 150 1 ¤£ ! 6703 «¬67 1 «¬243 ¦¨§70 0 7302 ! 142 0 State Facility ¬340 «¬ « «¬144 8 «¬244 «¬101 ¤£231 «¬44 ! Local Facility «¬59 «¬342 «¬42 M O R G A N «¬135 4104 «¬1 «¬252 ¹º»¼ Rail Crossing «¬252 ¦¨§74 Improvement «¬252 «¬641 «¬46 O W E N «¬67 F R A N K L I N JOHNSON Multi-Modal 37 ¬46 ¤£41 «¬ « Enhancements 53 «¬246 02 ¤£31 «¬46 DEARBORN «¬159 «¬3 «¬229 Airport Improvements «¬246 B R O W N o «¬246 «¬46 ¤£421 S U L L I VA N «¬46 «¬45 D E C A T U R «¬1 5303 BARTHO L O M EW Port Improvements «¬157 «¬46 101 !Î «¬48 ! «¬129 «¬«¬48 «¬63 «¬48 530 G R E E N E !1 «¬350 ¦¨§275 «¬154 «¬43 «¬148 State Facilities are US, State 5304 ¬135 «¬7 JENNINGS R I P L E Y «¬157 « «¬11 ¤£50 Route, or US Highway funded «¬54 M O N R O E with state and federal funds. «¬54 «¬445 «¬446 «¬750 «¬129 Local Facilities are non-state «¬159 «¬58 ¤£421 jursidiction facilities that can «¬58 «¬59 «¬67 J A C K «¬258S O N «¬3 «¬62 «¬57 «¬45 «¬262 «¬56 use state or local funds. «¬54 L A W R E N C E O H I O «¬135 «¬11 «¬7 JEFFERSON Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16N Other Facilities Projection: Transverse Mercator Datum: North American 1983 Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regional transportation Existing Rail False Easting: 500,000.0000 infrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholders False Northing: 0.0000 Non-Interstate Central Meridian: -87.0000 for graphic representation. Use of this map should be limited to preliminary planning purposes Ü Scale Factor: 0.9996 only. Additional planning, environmental study, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identify Interstate Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000 Units: Meter optimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decision Navigable Streams 0 5 10 Data: Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder Input making. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at the Corp. Limits Miles INDOT Engineering & Asset Management time and is subject to change. ◆ REGIONAL TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING INTERSTATE/HIGHWAY GOALS

◆◆ Project 0601: US 421 Additional Lanes – Widen existing 3-lane segment to 4-lane segment of US 421 from I-465 at North Michigan Road to West 126th Street in Zionsville. Also, widen 2-lane segment to 3-lane segment of US 421 from West 126th Street in Zionsville to SR 28 in Frankfort. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion on US 421 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $83.8 million

◆◆ Project 0602: I-65/I-69 Connector – Connect I-65 and I-69 near SR 47 with Interstate grade road. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion on I-65, I-465 and I-69 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $1.02 billion

◆◆ Project 1008: I-65 Additional Lanes – Widen existing 4-lane rural segments of the Interstate to a minimum of 6 lanes. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion on I-65 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $2.086 billion

◆◆ Project 1801: I-69 Additional Lanes – Widen existing 4-lane rural segments of I-69 to a minimum of 6 lanes. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion along I-69 creating better truck flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $310 million

◆◆ Project 2101: Connersville Connector – Reconstruct and widen SR 1 as a 4-lane divided expressway from Connersville at West 30th Street to I-70. Reason: Ensure global access by connecting cities based on impact and potential to Interstate-like access. Estimated Cost: $145.4 million

◆◆ Project 2501: US 31 Indianapolis to Benton Harbor, MI – Complete the existing 4-lane highway to a 4-lane full access-controlled freeway with interchanges at major intersections on US 31 from I-465 in Indianapolis to I-94 and I-196 at Benton Harbor, Michigan. Reason: Relieve the combined bottleneck truck and passenger car congestion on US 31 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $730 million

◆◆ Project 3201: Ronald Reagan Parkway Extension – Complete Ronald Reagan Parkway from SR 136 to I-65 at Exit 133. Reason: Relieve the combined bottleneck truck and passenger car congestion on I-65; I-465; I-70; I-74 and US 36 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $820 million

7 ◆◆ Project 3202: US 36 Corridor – Convert US 36 to freeway-like access from I-465 to Danville, Indiana. Reason: Relieve the combined bottleneck truck and passenger car congestion on US 36 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $676.3 million

◆◆ Project 3205: I-70/I-74 Connector – Connect I-70 and I-74 near SR 39 with Interstate grade road. Reason: Relieve the combined bottleneck truck and passenger car congestion on I-65; I-465; I-70 and I-74 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $80.4 million

◆◆ Project 3802: US 27 Improvements – Improve and widen US 27 to a “Super-2” from Monroe, Indiana, to I-70 in Richmond, Indiana. Reason: Safety of trucks moving cargo ensuring better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo and creating economic development by allowing for easier truck access to and from communities from Fort Wayne, Indiana, to Richmond, Indiana. Estimated Cost: $249 million

◆◆ Project 4101: I-69 Completion – Complete the build and design of a 4-lane Interstate from SR 45/58 and US 231 at Scotland to I-465 in Indianapolis (Segments 5 and 6). Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion along US 70/SR 41 creating better traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $775 million

◆◆ Project 4803: Indiana Commerce Connector – Construct an outer loop outside I-465 connecting Madison, Hamilton, Hancock, Shelby, Johnson, Morgan, Hendricks and Boone counties from I-69 to I-65. Reason: Relieve the combined bottleneck truck and passenger car congestion on I-65; I-69; I-465; I-70 and I-74 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $1.8 billion

◆◆ Project 4909: I-465 Additional Lanes – Widen existing 2-lane segments of I-465 to a minimum of 3 lanes from West 86th Street to Michigan Road. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion along I-465 creating better truck flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $72.3 million

◆◆ Project 5401: US 231 Additional Lanes – Widen existing 2-lane segment to 4-lane segment of US 231 from Lafayette to I-74 in Crawfordsville. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion along US 231 creating better truck flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $140.4 million

8 ◆◆ Project 5408: US 32 Additional Lanes – Widen existing 2-lane segment to 4-lane segment of US 32 from I-65 at Lebanon to East Crawfordsville Truck Route in Crawfordsville. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $149.1 million

◆◆ Project 7001: SR 3 Improvements – Improve and widen SR 3 from I-70 at Exit 123 to I-74 at Exit 134. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger congestion on SR 3 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $178.7 million

◆◆ Project 8403: I-70 Third Lane/Dedicated Truck Lanes – Widen existing 4-lane rural segments of I-70 to a minimum of 6 lanes from state line to state line. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion along I-70 creating better truck flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $1.43 billion

◆ REGIONAL TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING RAIL GOALS

EXPAND THE SENATE AVENUE RAIL YARD IN INDIANAPOLIS ◆◆ Project 4910: Senate Avenue Intermodal – Expand the Senate Avenue Rail Yard in Indianapolis that provides direct West Coast intermodal rail service from Prince Rupert and Vancouver, Canada, via the CN and Indiana Rail Road Company. Reason: Provide direct rail access leading to the improvement and establishment of intermodal service facilities. Estimated Cost: Not Applicable

◆ REGIONAL TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING WATERBORNE GOALS

SUPPORT RECONSTRUCTION OF SOO AND OLMSTED LOCKS ◆◆ Project 4517: Soo Locks – Construct a new lock to ease the passage of large vessels between Lake Superior ports and steel mills and power plants that support the businesses of the Central Region. Reason: Create better connectivity of Indiana’s water ports. Estimated Cost: $550 million

◆◆ Project 6506: Olmsted Lock Reconstruction – Replace Locks and Dams 52 and 53, known as the Olmsted Locks and Dam, which are under construction between Illinois and Kentucky upstream from the confluence of the Ohio and Mississippi rivers. Olmsted will replace Locks and Dams 52 and 53 and greatly reduce tow and barge delays through the busiest stretch of river in America’s inland waterways. Reason: Create better connectivity of Indiana’s water ports. Estimated Cost: $1.38 billion

9 ◆ LOCAL PRIORITY PROJECTS

PROJECT # COUNTY CENTRAL LOCAL PROJECTS TIER 1 TIER 2 TIER 3 TIER 4 2904 Hamilton SR 37 Limited Access

0603 Boone Anson Interchange Expansion

3001 Hancock North CR 600 West Improvements

3203 Hendricks CR 100 South Improvements

3204 Hendricks CSX Avon Yard Entrance

3206 Hendricks West Danville Truck Corridor

3207 Hendricks CR 200 South Improvements

3405 Howard SR 26 Additional Lanes

3407 Howard Northwest Kokomo Truck Corridor

4104 Johnson SR 252 Extension

4802 Madison SR 13 Interchange Improvement

4901 Marion I-70/I-65 Two Splits

4902 Marion South West Street Industrial Corridor

4903 Marion South Harding Street Rail Grade Separation

4906 Marion Northeast Corridor Interchange Improvements

4907 Marion North Michigan Road Additional Lanes

4908 Marion North Michigan Road Intersection Improvements

5301 Monroe South Bloomington Truck Corridor

7903 Tippecanoe US 52 Additional Lanes

1202 Clinton Northern Frankfort Truck Corridor

1802 Delaware SR 28/SR 67/SR 167 Intersection Improvements

2102 Fayette North Central Avenue Rail Grade Separation

3002 Hancock West CR 300 North Improvements

3403 Howard East Boulevard/SR 931 Intersection Improvements

4102 Johnson Whiteland Road Improvements

5302 Monroe, Owen SR 46 Improvements

5402 Montgomery Memorial Drive Extension

10 PROJECT # COUNTY CENTRAL LOCAL PROJECTS TIER 1 TIER 2 TIER 3 TIER 4 5403 Montgomery East Crawfordsville Truck Route

5404 Montgomery East Market Street Rail Grade Separation

5406 Montgomery CSX Transfer Rail Station

5407 Montgomery Nucor Road Overpass

5501 Hendricks, Morgan I-70/SR 39 Interchange Improvements

6701 Putnam East Greencastle Truck Corridor

6702 Putnam US 231 Additional Lanes

6703 Putnam US 231 Intersection Improvements

6705 Putnam CSX Rail Bridge Replacement

7301 Shelby West Shelbyville Truck Corridor

7302 Johnson, Shelby SR 44 Improvements

7902 Tippecanoe South Tippecanoe Truck Corridor

8902 Wayne Midwest Industrial Park Rail Extension

0803 Clinton Western Southern Railroad Rail Line Extension

1201 Clinton West CR 0 North Improvements

3401 Howard West Morgan Street Extension

3402 Howard East Lincoln Road/SR 931 Intersection Improvements

3404 Howard Touby Pike Additional Lanes

3406 Howard West Defenbaugh Street Improvements

Arlington Road/West 17th Street/North Monroe Street 5303 Monroe Intersection Improvements

5405 Montgomery CSX Railroad Track Removal

6704 Putnam, Morgan SR 75 Extension

6706 Putnam Stardust Road Improvements

7904 Tippecanoe Steel Site Industrial Park Improvements

8002 Tipton Tipton Agriculture Corridor

8301 Vermillion Vermillion Rise Mega Park Improvements

8901 Wayne Norfolk Southern Transloading Facility

South Rockport Road/West Tapp Road/West Country Club 5304 Monroe Drive Intersection Improvements

11 Estimated Cost: $34.8 million * Project 0601: US 421 Additional Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. *Project 0602: I-65/I-69 Connector – This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. Project 0603: Anson Interchange Expansion – Re-engineer, reconfigure and redesign SR 267 Interchange at Exit 133. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. *Project 1008: I-65 Additional Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. *Project 3201: Ronald Reagan Parkway Extension – This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. *Project 4803: Indiana Commerce Connector – This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. *Project 4909: I-465 Additional Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. *Project 5408: US 32 Additional Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. These projects are reflected in other sections of this report. ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ BOONE COUNTY PROJECTS *

12 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region ; Boone County

«¬38

Date: 8/12/2015 «¬47 ¤£52 602 0602 0 «¬47 Identified Enhancement Thorntown «¬47 ¤£421 1 0 Categories for Local and 0 6 0 0 State Facilities 8 «¬39 1 Multi-Modal Enhancements

o Airport Improvements

!Î Port Improvements

Operational Improvements «¬75 (Intersection improvements, new interchange, Ulen interchange modification, 5408 5408 and spot improvements) Lebanon «¬32 ¤£31 ! State Facility «¬32 «¬32 ! Local Facility ¦¨§65 ¹º»¼ Rail Crossing Improvement Mobility Improvements 0 6 (Added travel lanes, 0 freeway upgrade) 1 State Facility New Terrain, State Advance ¤£421 Facility 0603 Local Facility ! 3 New Terrain, Local 0 «¬39 8 Facility 4 New Rail Capacity Whitestown (new rail line or added Zionsville ¨§74 «¬75 3 capacity) ¦ 2 0 1 State Facilities are US, State Route, or US Highway funded «¬267 with state and federal funds. ¤£136 Local Facilities are non-state 09 ¦¨§865 49 49 jursidiction facilities that can Jamestown 09 use state or local funds. ¦¨§465 Other Facilities «¬234 Non-Interstate Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16N Projection: Transverse Mercator Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regional transportation Interstate Datum: North American 1983 False Easting: 500,000.0000 infrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholders Existing Rail False Northing: 0.0000 Central Meridian: -87.0000 for graphic representation. Use of this map should be limited to preliminary planning purposes Navigable Streams Ü Scale Factor: 0.9996 only. Additional planning, environmental study, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identify Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000 Corp. Limits Units: Meter optimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decision 0 1.25 2.5 Data: Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder Input making. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at the Miles INDOT Engineering & Asset Management time and is subject to change. BROWN COUNTY PROJECTS

Nothing local that affects the movement of cargo.

14 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region ; Brown County

Princes Lakes

«¬135

Date: 6/22/2015 Identified Enhancement Categories for Local and State Facilities Mobility Improvements (Added travel lanes, freeway upgrade) State Facility New Terrain, State «¬45 Facility Local Facility New Terrain, Local «¬135 Facility New Rail Capacity (new rail line or added capacity) Operational Improvements (Intersection improvements, new interchange, interchange modification, and spot Nashville improvements) ! State Facility «¬46 ! Local Facility ¹º»¼ Rail Crossing Improvement Multi-Modal Enhancements «¬46 o Airport Improvements

!Î Port Improvements «¬135 State Facilities are US, State Route, or US Highway funded with state and federal funds. Local Facilities are non-state jursidiction facilities that can use state or local funds. Other Facilities Non-Interstate Interstate Existing Rail Navigable Streams «¬135 Corp. Limits Ü «¬58 0 1.25 2.5 Miles Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16N Projection: Transverse Mercator Datum: North American 1983 Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regional transportation False Easting: 500,000.0000 False Northing: 0.0000 infrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholders Central Meridian: -87.0000 for graphic representation. Use of this map should be limited to preliminary planning purposes Scale Factor: 0.9996 Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000 only. Additional planning, environmental study, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identify Units: Meter optimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decision Data: Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder Input making. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at the INDOT Engineering & Asset Management time and is subject to change. Estimated Cost: $18.7 million Estimated Cost: $23.8 million Estimated Cost: $40.7 million *Project 0601: US 421 Additional Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6, Southern Railroad Rail Line Project 0803: Western Extension – Install new rail road ties between Bringhurst to the CSX rail line in Frankfort. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of rail congestion through Carroll and Clinton counties creating better rail traffic flow for the movement of cargo. *Project 1008: I-65 Additional Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. CR 0 North Improvements – Improve Project 1201: West CR 0 North from North CR 200 West and widen West Reason: Relieve the bottleneck to North CR 700 West. of combined truck and passenger congestion on SR 28 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Corridor – Design Project 1202: Northern Frankfort Truck SR 28 at North CR 200 and build a new road from West to East SR 28 at North CR 250 East. Reason: Relieve West the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger congestion on SR 28/US 421/SR 39 through Frankfort creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. These projects are reflected in other sections of this report. ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ CLINTON COUNTY PROJECTS *

16 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region ; Clinton County

«¬26 «¬26 Rossville «¬26

0 Date: 8/12/2015 3

Identified Enhancement Categories for Local and State Facilities Multi-Modal «¬75 «¬29 Enhancements ¤£421 o Airport Improvements Mulberry «¬38 !Î Port Improvements

Operational Improvements Michigantown

(Intersection improvements, 3

new interchange, 8 1202 interchange modification, 0 and spot improvements) ¤£31

! State Facility 0

1 ! Local Facility 1201 ¹º»¼ Rail Crossing Frankfort 0601 Improvement 28 «¬ «¬28 Mobility Improvements 1 0 (Added travel lanes, 0 8 freeway upgrade) ¤£421 «¬28 State Facility New Terrain, State Facility ¦¨§65 Local Facility New Terrain, Local «¬38 0 6 Facility 0 1 New Rail Capacity ¤£52 (new rail line or added 1 capacity) 0 0 8 State Facilities are US, State Route, or US Highway funded «¬38 with state and federal funds. «¬39 Colfax Kirklin Local Facilities are non-state jursidiction facilities that can use state or local funds. «¬38 Other Facilities Non-Interstate Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16N Projection: Transverse Mercator Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regional transportation Interstate Datum: North American 1983 False Easting: 500,000.0000 infrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholders Existing Rail False Northing: 0.0000 Central Meridian: -87.0000 for graphic representation. Use of this map should be limited to preliminary planning purposes Navigable Streams Ü Scale Factor: 0.9996 only. Additional planning, environmental study, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identify Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000 Corp. Limits Units: Meter optimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decision 0 1.25 2.5 Data: Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder Input making. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at the Miles INDOT Engineering & Asset Management time and is subject to change. DELAWARE COUNTY PROJECTS

◆◆ *Project 1801: I-69 Additional Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6. ◆◆ Project 1802: SR 28/SR 67/SR 167 Intersection Improvements – Re-engineer, reconfigure and redesign SR 28/SR 67/SR 167 intersection. Reason: Ensure the safety of trucks moving cargo ensuring better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $1.5 million

* These projects are reflected in other sections of this report. 18 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region ; Delaware County

«¬26

«¬167

Date: 6/22/2015 «¬3 Identified Enhancement Categories for Local and State Facilities Eaton Mobility Improvements (Added travel lanes, freeway upgrade) «¬67 State Facility Gaston 1802 New Terrain, State Alb!any Facility Local Facility «¬28 New Terrain, Local Facility 28 ¤£35 New Rail Capacity (new «¬ rail line or added capacity) «¬67 Operational Improvements (Intersection improvements, new interchange, interchange ¦¨§69 modification, and spot improvements) ! State Facility ¬332 ! Local Facility « ¹º»¼ Rail Crossing Improvement Muncie Selma ¤£35 «¬32 Multi-Modal Yorktown Enhancements

o Airport Improvements

!Î Port Improvements «¬32

1 0

State Facilities are US, State 8 Route, or US Highway funded 1 with state and federal funds. Local Facilities are non-state jursidiction facilities that can use state or local funds.

«¬67 Other Facilities Daleville Non-Interstate Chesterfield Interstate

Existing Rail «¬3 Navigable Streams Corp. Limits ¤£35 Ü «¬236

◆◆ *Project 2101: Connersville Connector Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6. ◆◆ Project 2102: North Central Avenue Rail Grade Separation – Re-engineer, reconfigure and redesign the rail grade separation on North Central Avenue near East 10th Street. Reason: Ensure the safety of trucks moving cargo ensuring better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $5 million

* These projects are reflected in other sections of this report. 20 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region ; Fayette County ¤£40

«¬1 Date: 6/22/2015 Identified Enhancement Categories for Local and State Facilities Mobility Improvements (Added travel lanes, freeway upgrade) State Facility New Terrain, State Facility

Local Facility 1 0 1 New Terrain, Local 2 Facility New Rail Capacity (new rail line or added capacity) Operational Improvements (Intersection improvements, new interchange, interchange modification, and spot improvements) ! State Facility «¬1 ! Local Facility 2102 ! «¬44 ¹º»¼ Rail Crossing Connersville Improvement Multi-Modal «¬44 Enhancements Glenwood

o Airport Improvements

!Î Port Improvements «¬121 State Facilities are US, State Route, or US Highway funded with state and federal funds. Local Facilities are non-state jursidiction facilities that can use state or local funds. Other Facilities Non-Interstate Interstate Existing Rail «¬1 Navigable Streams Corp. Limits Ü «¬121

0 1 2 ¤£52 Miles Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16N Projection: Transverse Mercator Datum: North American 1983 Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regional transportation False Easting: 500,000.0000 False Northing: 0.0000 infrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholders Central Meridian: -87.0000 for graphic representation. Use of this map should be limited to preliminary planning purposes Scale Factor: 0.9996 Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000 only. Additional planning, environmental study, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identify Units: Meter optimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decision Data: Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder Input making. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at the INDOT Engineering & Asset Management time and is subject to change. FOUNTAIN COUNTY PROJECTS

Nothing local that affects the movement of cargo.

22 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region ; Fountain County

«¬55

¤£41 Date: 6/22/2015

Identified Enhancement «¬63 Categories for Local and Attica «¬28 State Facilities «¬25 «¬28 «¬28 Mobility Improvements (Added travel lanes, freeway upgrade) State Facility New Terrain, State Facility Local Facility «¬263 New Terrain, Local Facility «¬55

New Rail Capacity (new Newtown rail line or added capacity) «¬341 Operational Improvements ¤£41 (Intersection improvements, new interchange, interchange modification, and spot improvements) Mellott

! State Facility «¬63 «¬25 ! Local Facility Rail Crossing Covington ¹º»¼ £136 Improvement ¤ Multi-Modal ¦¨§74 Enhancements Veedersburg Hillsboro o Airport Improvements ¤£136

!Î Port Improvements

State Facilities are US, State Route, or US Highway funded «¬341 with state and federal funds. Local Facilities are non-state jursidiction facilities that can use «¬25 state or local funds. «¬32

Other Facilities «¬32 Non-Interstate Interstate ¤£41 Existing Rail Navigable Streams «¬63 «¬341 Corp. Limits Wallace

Kingman «¬234 Ü «¬234

0 1.5 3 Miles Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16N Projection: Transverse Mercator Datum: North American 1983 Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regional transportation False Easting: 500,000.0000 False Northing: 0.0000 infrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholders Central Meridian: -87.0000 for graphic representation. Use of this map should be limited to preliminary planning purposes Scale Factor: 0.9996 Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000 only. Additional planning, environmental study, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identify Units: Meter optimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decision Data: Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder Input making. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at the INDOT Engineering & Asset Management time and is subject to change. – Freeway- Estimated Cost: $265.4 million *Project 0602: I-65/I-69 Connector – This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. *Project 1801: I-69 Additional Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. MI – *Project 2501: US 31 Indianapolis to Benton Harbor, This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. Project 2904: SR 37 Limited Access Reason: like access from I-69 to the I-65/I-69 Connector. Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger congestion on SR 37 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. ◆ These projects are reflected in other sections of this report. ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ HAMILTON COUNTY HAMILTON PROJECTS *

24 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region ; Hamilton County

«¬13 «¬128 Atlanta

«¬213 «¬38

Arcadia

1 0

Date: 6/22/2015 5 0602 «¬38 0602 2 Identified Enhancement Categories for Local and ¤£31 State Facilities «¬19 Multi-Modal Enhancements «¬37 «¬47 Sheridan o Airport Improvements Cicero

!Î Port Improvements

Operational Improvements

(Intersection improvements, 0

9 new interchange, 2 interchange modification, «¬38 and spot improvements) «¬32

! State Facility

! Local Facility ¤£421 ¹º»¼ Rail Crossing Improvement «¬32 «¬32 Mobility Improvements Westfield (Added travel lanes, «¬38 freeway upgrade) «¬37 State Facility «¬13

New Terrain, State 4 0

Facility 9 Noblesville 2 1801 Local Facility ¤£31 ¦¨§69 New Terrain, Local Facility New Rail Capacity (new rail line or added Fishers capacity) Carmel

State Facilities are US, State Route, or US Highway funded 0 ¤£36 «¬9 with state and federal funds. 6 0 1 Local Facilities are non-state jursidiction facilities that can use state or local funds. ¦¨§65 ¦¨§865 ¦¨§465 Other Facilities Non-Interstate Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16N Projection: Transverse Mercator Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regional transportation Interstate Datum: North American 1983 False Easting: 500,000.0000 infrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholders Existing Rail False Northing: 0.0000 Central Meridian: -87.0000 for graphic representation. Use of this map should be limited to preliminary planning purposes Navigable Streams Ü Scale Factor: 0.9996 only. Additional planning, environmental study, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identify Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000 Corp. Limits Units: Meter optimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decision 0 1.5 3 Data: Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder Input making. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at the Miles INDOT Engineering & Asset Management time and is subject to change. Estimated Cost: $32 million Estimated Cost: $1.26 million Project 3001: North CR 600 West Improvements – Widen Project 3001: North CR 600 West from East 96th Street in and improve North CR 600 West Fishers to I-70. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined by truck and passenger congestion on North CR 600 West the Indianapolis Regional Airport at Mount Comfort creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. CR 300 North Improvements – Widen Project 3002: West CR 300 North from North CR 700 West and improve West Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of to North CR 400 West. CR 300 combined truck and passenger congestion on West North by the Indianapolis Regional Airport at Mount Comfort creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. *Project 4803: Indiana Commerce Connector – This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. Lanes – This *Project 8403: I-70 Third Lane/Dedicated Truck is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. These projects are reflected in other sections of this report. ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ HANCOCK COUNTY PROJECTS *

26 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region ; Hancock County

«¬37 ¦¨§69 «¬13

Fortville

McCordsville «¬109 Date: 6/22/2015 «¬234 ¤£36 «¬234 Identified Enhancement

Categories for Local and 3 «¬9 Shirley 0 Wilkinson State Facilities 8

0 Multi-Modal 0 Enhancements 3

o Airport Improvements INDIANAPOLIS !Î Port Improvements REGIONAL AIRPORT Operational Improvements (Intersection improvements, «¬109 new interchange, interchange modification, 3002 8403 and spot improvements) 3002 8403 ¦¨§70 ! State Facility

! Local Facility POPE ¹º»¼ Rail Crossing Improvement Greenfield FIELD ¤£40 Mobility Improvements Cumberland (Added travel lanes, «¬140 freeway upgrade) ¤£40 Spring State Facility Lake

New Terrain, State 4 8 Facility 0

3 Local Facility «¬9 New Terrain, Local Facility New Rail Capacity (new rail line or added capacity) New State Facilities are US, State Palestine Route, or US Highway funded ¤£52 with state and federal funds. Local Facilities are non-state 74 jursidiction facilities that can ¦¨§ use state or local funds.

Other Facilities Non-Interstate Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16N Projection: Transverse Mercator Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regional transportation Interstate Datum: North American 1983 False Easting: 500,000.0000 infrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholders Existing Rail False Northing: 0.0000 Central Meridian: -87.0000 for graphic representation. Use of this map should be limited to preliminary planning purposes Navigable Streams Ü Scale Factor: 0.9996 only. Additional planning, environmental study, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identify Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000 Corp. Limits Units: Meter optimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decision 0 1.25 2.5 Data: Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder Input making. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at the Miles INDOT Engineering & Asset Management time and is subject to change. Estimated Cost: $3.5 million Estimated Cost: $25.2 million Estimated Cost: $12.1 million. Project 3206: West Danville Truck Corridor – Design and Danville Truck Project 3206: West build a new road from North SR 39 at North CR 200 West CR 200 South. Reason: Relieve the to South SR 39 at West bottleneck of combined truck and passenger congestion on SR 39 through Danville creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Project 3207: CR 200 South Improvements – Widen and improve CR 200 South from Dan Jones Road to Ronald Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of Reagan Parkway. combined truck and passenger congestion on CR 200 South by the industries in Plainfield creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. *Project 4803: Indiana Commerce Connector – This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. Project 5501: I-70/SR 39 Interchange Improvements – reconfigure and redesign the I-70 interchange at Re-engineer, SR 39. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Lanes – This *Project 8403: I-70 Third Lane/Dedicated Truck is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ – Design and build a Estimated Cost: $3.5 million Estimated Cost: $8.5 million *Project 1008: I-65 Additional Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. *Project 3201: Ronald Reagan Parkway Extension – This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. *Project 3202: US 36 Corridor – This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. Project 3203: CR 100 South Improvements – Widen and improve CR 100 South from Dan Jones Road to Ronald Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of Reagan Parkway. combined truck and passenger congestion on CR 100 South by the industries in Plainfield creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Entrance Yard Project 3204: CSX Avon from CR 100 South near Allpoints Yard new entrance to Avon Reason: Relieve the Yard. Court to Main Road in Avon bottleneck of combined truck and passenger congestion on US 36 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. *Project 3205: I-70/I-74 Connector – This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. These projects are reflected in other sections of this report. ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ HENDRICKS COUNTY PROJECTS *

28 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region ; Hendricks County

¦¨§865 ¤£421

«¬234

«¬267

Lizton

1 0

¦¨§74 2 Pittsboro 3 Date: 6/22/2015 «¬75 ¤£136 ¦¨§65 Identified Enhancement North Categories for Local and Salem «¬39 236 State Facilities «¬ 4 8

0 Multi-Modal 3 Brownsburg Enhancements «¬236

Airport Improvements 5

o 0 ¦¨§465

2 3 !Î Port Improvements «¬134

Operational Improvements 3

(Intersection improvements, 0 new interchange, 1 interchange modification, and spot improvements) 3202 Danville ¤£36 £36 ¤ 3 4

2 ! State Facility 0 0 3203 2 6 3 ! Local Facility 3207 Rail Crossing 3 ¹º»¼ 2 Improvement 0 Avon 1 Mobility Improvements (Added travel lanes, «¬267 freeway upgrade) «¬75 ¤£40 State Facility Plainfield New Terrain, State Clayton Coatesville Amo Facility 3 «¬39 2 Local Facility 0 4 5 8 New Terrain, Local 0 ¦¨§70 Facility 3 New Rail Capacity (new rail line or added «¬267 capacity) 3 «¬67 «¬37 Stilesville 40 State Facilities are US, State «¬240 8 Route, or US Highway funded with state and federal funds. ¤£40 5501 Local Facilities are non-state 03 ! jursidiction facilities that can 84 use state or local funds. ¤£231 144 «¬42 «¬ Other Facilities Non-Interstate Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16N Projection: Transverse Mercator Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regional transportation Interstate Datum: North American 1983 False Easting: 500,000.0000 infrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholders Existing Rail False Northing: 0.0000 Central Meridian: -87.0000 for graphic representation. Use of this map should be limited to preliminary planning purposes Navigable Streams Ü Scale Factor: 0.9996 only. Additional planning, environmental study, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identify Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000 Corp. Limits Units: Meter optimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decision 0 1.5 3 Data: Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder Input making. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at the Miles INDOT Engineering & Asset Management time and is subject to change. *Project 7001: SR 3 Improvements – This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. Lanes – This *Project 8403: I-70 Third Lane/Dedicated Truck is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. These projects are reflected in other sections of this report. ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ HENRY COUNTY HENRY PROJECTS *

30 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region ; Henry County «¬32 «¬232

«¬9 «¬1 Blountsville «¬236 Middletown ¦¨§69 Springport

¤£35 Date: 6/22/2015

Identified Enhancement «¬3 Categories for Local and State Facilities Sulphur Mount ¤£36 ¤£36 Springs Multi-Modal Summit Mooreland Enhancements

o Airport Improvements «¬109 «¬1 «¬38 !Î Port Improvements «¬103

Operational Improvements (Intersection improvements, new interchange, Cadiz interchange modification, and spot improvements) «¬38 ! State Facility «¬234 New «¬38 ! Local Facility Castle ¹º»¼ Rail Crossing Improvement Kennard «¬234 Mobility Improvements (Added travel lanes, freeway upgrade) Greensboro State Facility «¬103 New Terrain, State «¬3 Facility 8403 Local Facility «¬109 ¨§70 403 ¦ New Terrain, Local 8 Facility New Rail Capacity Spiceland «¬1 (new rail line or added

capacity)

1 0

State Facilities are US, State 0 7 40 Route, or US Highway funded Straughn ¤£ with state and federal funds. Lewisville Dunreith Local Facilities are non-state Knightstown jursidiction facilities that can ¤£40 use state or local funds.

«¬140 «¬3 Other Facilities Non-Interstate Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16N Projection: Transverse Mercator Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regional transportation Interstate Datum: North American 1983 False Easting: 500,000.0000 infrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholders Existing Rail False Northing: 0.0000 Central Meridian: -87.0000 for graphic representation. Use of this map should be limited to preliminary planning purposes Navigable Streams Ü Scale Factor: 0.9996 only. Additional planning, environmental study, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identify Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000 Corp. Limits Units: Meter optimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decision 0 1.5 3 Data: Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder Input making. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at the Miles INDOT Engineering & Asset Management time and is subject to change. Estimated Cost: $3 million Estimated Cost: $9.5 million Estimated Cost: $11.9 million Estimated Cost: $28.1 million Project 3404: Touby Pike Additional Lanes – Widen existing Project 3404: Touby Pike from US 31 2-lane segment to 4-lane of Touby at Exit I-65 to SR 931 via East Morgan Street. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Project 3405: SR 26 Additional Lanes – Widen existing 3-lane segment to 4-lane of SR 26 from South Dixon Street to US 31 at Exit 156. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Defenbaugh Street Improvements – Project 3406: West Defenbaugh Street from South Widen and improve West Reason: Relieve the Park Avenue. Dixon Street to West bottleneck of combined truck and passenger congestion on Defenbaugh Street by the industries in Kokomo creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Corridor – Design Project 3407: Northwest Kokomo Truck and build a new road from US 35 at SR 931 to CR 200 Dixon Road at CR 300 North. Reason: Relieve West/North the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ Estimated Cost: $2 million Estimated Cost: $2 million Estimated Cost: $7.5 million *Project 2501: US 31 Indianapolis to Benton Harbor, MI – *Project 2501: US 31 Indianapolis to Benton Harbor, This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. Morgan Street Extension – Design Project 3401: West Morgan Street from North and build an extension of West CR 200 North at Phillips Street to Judson Road/West Dixon Road. Reason: Relieve North CR 100 West/North the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Project 3402: East Lincoln Road/SR 931 Intersection reconfigure and redesign the Improvements – Re-engineer, East Lincoln Road/SR 931 intersection. Reason: Ensure the safety of trucks moving cargo ensuring better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Project 3403: East Boulevard/SR 931 Intersection reconfigure and redesign the Improvements – Re-engineer, East Boulevard/SR 931 intersection. Reason: Ensure the safety of trucks moving cargo ensuring better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. These projects are reflected in other sections of this report. ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ * ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ HOWARD COUNTY HOWARD PROJECTS

32 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region ; Howard County

«¬19

«¬29

«¬18 «¬18

«¬18 ¤£35

Date: 6/22/2015 1

0 5 Identified Enhancement 2 Categories for Local and ¤£31 State Facilities 07 34 Multi-Modal Enhancements

o Airport Improvements 4 0 4 3401 3 !Î Port Improvements

Operational Improvements (Intersection improvements, «¬29 «¬22 new interchange, «¬22 Greentown interchange modification, ¤£35 and spot improvements) 3406 ¤£31 «¬931 ! State Facility 3403 ! Kokomo ! Local Facility ! 3402 ¹º»¼ Rail Crossing Improvement Mobility Improvements (Added travel lanes, freeway upgrade) 3405 «¬26 «¬26 State Facility «¬26 Russiaville New Terrain, State Facility Local Facility ¤£31 «¬19 «¬213 New Terrain, Local Facility New Rail Capacity (new rail line or added «¬29 capacity) «¬13 State Facilities are US, State Route, or US Highway funded with state and federal funds. Local Facilities are non-state jursidiction facilities that can use state or local funds.

◆◆ *Project 4101: I-69 Completion – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6. ◆◆ Project 4102: Whiteland Road Improvements – Improve and widen Whiteland Road from I-65 to Graham Road. In addition, re-engineer, reconfigure and redesign the intersection at Whiteland Road and Graham Road. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $3.9 million

◆◆ Project 4104: SR 252 Extension – Extend SR 252 from US 31 to I-65. In addition, design and build an interchange at SR 252 and I-65. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $28.1 million

◆◆ *Project 4803: Indiana Commerce Connector – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6. ◆◆ *Project 7302: SR 44 Improvements – This is a local project reflected in the Shelby County map on page 57.

* These projects are reflected in other sections of this report. 34 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region ; Johnson County

¤£31 «¬37 Greenwood Date: 6/22/2015 1 0 1 Identified Enhancement 4 «¬135 Categories for Local and State Facilities Mobility Improvements (Added travel lanes, 1 0 freeway upgrade) «¬144 0 New 9 State Facility Whiteland 2 1 New Terrain, State 410 0 0 Facility 8 Whiteland Local Facility 3 480 New Terrain, Local Facility 4803 New Rail Capacity (new rail line or added Bargersville capacity) Operational Improvements (Intersection improvements, new interchange, interchange modification, and spot «¬144 improvements) 02 Franklin 73 ! State Facility ¦¨§65 ¤£31 «¬44 ! Local Facility ¹º»¼ Rail Crossing Improvement Multi-Modal «¬135 1 Enhancements 0 0 8 o Airport Improvements «¬44

!Î Port Improvements

State Facilities are US, State 1 0 Route, or US Highway funded 0 9 with state and federal funds. Local Facilities are non-state 4104 jursidiction facilities that can use Trafalgar «¬252 state or local funds. Other Facilities Non-Interstate Interstate Existing Rail ¤£31 «¬135 Navigable Streams «¬252 Corp. Limits «¬252

Princes Edinburgh Ü Lakes

0 1 2 Miles Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16N Projection: Transverse Mercator Datum: North American 1983 Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regional transportation False Easting: 500,000.0000 False Northing: 0.0000 infrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholders Central Meridian: -87.0000 for graphic representation. Use of this map should be limited to preliminary planning purposes Scale Factor: 0.9996 Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000 only. Additional planning, environmental study, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identify Units: Meter optimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decision Data: Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder Input making. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at the INDOT Engineering & Asset Management time and is subject to change. MADISON COUNTY PROJECTS

◆◆ *Project 0602: I-65/I-69 Connector – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6. ◆◆ *Project 1801: I-69 Additional Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6. ◆◆ Project 4802: SR 13 Interchange Improvements – Re-engineer, reconfigure and redesign SR 13 Interchange at Exit 214. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $20 million.

◆◆ *Project 4803: Indiana Commerce Connector – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.

* These projects are reflected in other sections of this report. 36 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region ; Madison County

Summitville

Date: 6/22/2015 «¬13 «¬37 «¬9 Identified Enhancement Categories for Local and State Facilities Mobility Improvements «¬28 ¤£35 (Added travel lanes, 28 «¬ Elwood Orestes freeway upgrade) Alexandria State Facility New Terrain, State Facility Local Facility New Terrain, Local «¬332 Facility Frankton «¬128 New Rail Capacity (new rail line or added capacity) Operational Improvements (Intersection improvements, new interchange, interchange «¬213 modification, and spot improvements) ! State Facility

! Local Facility «¬9 Rail Crossing ¹º»¼ Country Club Improvement «¬37 32 Heights «¬ Multi-Modal Woodlawn Chesterfield 67 Enhancements River Heights «¬ Forest o Airport Improvements Edgewood «¬32

0 6 «¬232 !Î Port Improvements 0 2 Anderson

State Facilities are US, State Route, or US Highway funded with state and federal funds. Lapel «¬236 «¬32 1801 Local Facilities are non-state ¦¨§69 jursidiction facilities that can use state or local funds. Other Facilities Non-Interstate «¬38 «¬9 Interstate «¬13 Existing Rail ¤£36 1 Pendleton 4802 0 Navigable Streams 8 ! 1 Corp. Limits «¬38 «¬109 Markleville

3 36 0 ¤£

4 Ü Ingalls «¬9

0 1.75 3.5 «¬234 Miles Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16N Projection: Transverse Mercator Datum: North American 1983 Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regional transportation False Easting: 500,000.0000 False Northing: 0.0000 infrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholders Central Meridian: -87.0000 for graphic representation. Use of this map should be limited to preliminary planning purposes Scale Factor: 0.9996 Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000 only. Additional planning, environmental study, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identify Units: Meter optimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decision Data: Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder Input making. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at the INDOT Engineering & Asset Management time and is subject to change. Estimated Cost: $4 million Estimated Cost: $20 million Estimated Cost: $100 million Project 4906: Northeast Corridor Interchange Improvements – reconfigure and redesign the East 82nd Street Re-engineer, Interchange at I-69 and I-465. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Project 4907: North Michigan Road Additional Lanes – Widen existing 3-lane segment to 4-lane of North Michigan 86th Street to I-465 in Indianapolis. Reason: Road from West Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Project 4908: North Michigan Road Intersection Improvements – reconfigure and redesign the North Michigan Road Re-engineer, 86th Street. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck intersection at West of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. *Project 4909: I-465 Additional Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. Lanes – This is a *Project 8403: I-70 Third Lane/Dedicated Truck regional project reflected on the map page 6. ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ – Widen Estimated Cost: $5 million Estimated Cost: $4 million Estimated Cost: $863 million *Project 1008: I-65 Additional Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. *Project 1801: I-69 Additional Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. *Project 3202: US 36 Corridor – This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. *Project 4101: I-69 Completion – This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. reconfigure and Splits – Re-engineer, Project 4901: I-70/I-65 Two redesign North I-65/I-70 split and South split. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Street Industrial Corridor Project 4902: South West Raymond Street Street from I-70 to West and improve South West West Street/ reconfigure and redesign the South and re-engineer, Raymond Street intersection. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of West combined truck and passenger congestion by industries on South West Street creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Project 4903: South Harding Street Rail Grade Separation – Build and design a rail grade separation on South Harding Street near the IPL Harding Street Station. Reason: Relieve bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. These projects are reflected in other sections of this report. ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ MARION COUNTY PROJECTS *

38 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region ; Marion County

¤£31 ¤£421 ¦¨§865 0601

4 9

9 0 69 0 ¦¨§ 7 9 4908 4 ! Williams «¬267 ¦¨§465 Creek 4906 «¬234 ! Meridian Hills ¤£36 Date: 8/26/2015 North Crows Identified Enhancement Lawrence Categories for Local and Nest State Facilities Crows Nest Multi-Modal Rocky Enhancements Ripple o Airport Improvements Wynnedale ¤£136 Clermont !Î Port Improvements

Operational Improvements (Intersection improvements, «¬134 new interchange, Speedway ¦¨§65 interchange modification, and spot improvements) Indianapolis Warren ¤£31 ¤£40 Park ! State Facility 1 Cumberland

3202 9 ! Local Facility ¤£36 4 ¹º»¼ Rail Crossing 4903 Improvement Senate Ave. Terminal ! 2 Mobility Improvements 0

9 (Added travel lanes, 4 freeway upgrade) ¤£52 State Facility ¤£40 Beech New Terrain, State «¬267 Grove Facility ¦¨§70 1 Local Facility 0 0 New Terrain, Local 9 Facility New Rail Capacity 3201 ¦¨§74

(new rail line or added 1

capacity) 0 Homecroft

1 4 State Facilities are US, State 67 «¬ 135 Southport Route, or US Highway funded «¬267 «¬37 «¬ ¤£31 with state and federal funds. Local Facilities are non-state jursidiction facilities that can use state or local funds.

◆◆ Project 5301: South Bloomington Truck Corridor – Extend West Fullerton Pike from South Rockport Road to West Gordon Pike near Clear Creek Trail. Also, re-engineer, reconfigure and redesign the intersection at West Gordon Pike and South Walnut Street and the intersection at East Rhorer Road and South Walnut Street Pike. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger congestion on SR 46 through Bloomington creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $5.5 million

◆◆ Project 5302: SR 46 Improvements – Improve and widen SR 46 from North Indiana Avenue in Ellettsville to US 231 in Spencer. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $36.5 million

◆◆ Project 5303: Arlington Road/West 17th Street/North Monroe Street Intersection Improvements – Re-engineer, reconfigure and redesign the Arlington Road/West 17th Street/ North Monroe Street intersection. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $2 million

◆◆ Project 5304: South Rockport Road/West Tapp Road/West Country Club Drive Intersection Improvements – Re-engineer, reconfigure and redesign the South Rockport Road/West Tapp Road/West Country Club Drive intersection. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $2 million

40 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region ; Monroe County

«¬252

«¬67

«¬37 Date: 8/12/2015

Identified Enhancement Stinesville Categories for Local and State Facilities Mobility Improvements

(Added travel lanes, 5 3 0 freeway upgrade) 2 State Facility New Terrain, State Facility

Local Facility «¬46 «¬45 New Terrain, Local Ellettsville Facility New Rail Capacity (new rail line or added capacity) Operational Improvements (Intersection improvements, new interchange, interchange 5303 modification, and spot ! «¬45 improvements) «¬37 ! State Facility «¬43 «¬48 Bloomington ! Local Facility «¬46 ¹º»¼ Rail Crossing Improvement 5304 Multi-Modal ! Enhancements 5301 o Airport Improvements «¬446

!Î Port Improvements «¬45 State Facilities are US, State Route, or US Highway funded with state and federal funds. Local Facilities are non-state jursidiction facilities that can use state or local funds. Other Facilities Non-Interstate Interstate Existing Rail «¬37 Navigable Streams Corp. Limits Ü «¬446

0 1.5 3 «¬54 Miles Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16N Projection: Transverse Mercator Datum: North American 1983 Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regional transportation False Easting: 500,000.0000 False Northing: 0.0000 infrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholders Central Meridian: -87.0000 for graphic representation. Use of this map should be limited to preliminary planning purposes Scale Factor: 0.9996 Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000 only. Additional planning, environmental study, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identify Units: Meter optimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decision Data: Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder Input making. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at the INDOT Engineering & Asset Management time and is subject to change. MONTGOMERY COUNTY PROJECTS

◆◆ *Project 5401: US 231 Additional Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6. ◆◆ Project 5402: Memorial Drive Extension – Design and build an extension of Memorial Drive from Whitlock Avenue West to US 231. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion through Crawfordsville creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $10.9 million

◆◆ Project 5403: East Crawfordsville Truck Route – Design and build a new road from Memorial Drive at SR 47 to South US 231 near East CR 300 South. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger congestion on US 231/SR 47 through Crawfordsville creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $67 million

◆◆ Project 5404: East Market Street Rail Grade Separation – Build and design a rail grade separation on East Market Street at the CSX rail tracks. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $30 million

◆◆ Project 5405: CSX Railroad Track Removal – Remove the CSX rail line at Schenck Road to US 231. Reason: Ensure the safety of trucks moving cargo ensuring better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Also relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic in Crawfordsville creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $5 million

◆◆ Project 5406: CSX Transfer Rail Station – Design and build a new rail transfer station at East CR 200 South. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of rail traffic creating better rail traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $20 million

◆◆ Project 5407: Nucor Road Overpass – Design and build an overpass at US 136 and Nucor Road. Reason: Safety of trucks moving cargo ensuring better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $5 million

◆◆ *Project 5408: US 32 Additional Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.

* These projects are reflected in other sections of this report. 42 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region ; Montgomery County «¬28 «¬28 «¬28

¤£52

New Richmond Date: 6/22/2015 «¬55 Linden «¬25 ¤£231 Identified Enhancement Categories for Local and Wingate State Facilities

Mobility Improvements 1 (Added travel lanes, freeway upgrade) State Facility New Terrain, State Facility Local Facility Darlington New Terrain, Local Facility «¬47 New Rail Capacity (new Waynetown rail line or added capacity) ¦¨§74 Operational Improvements ¤£136 (Intersection improvements, 5402 new interchange, interchange «¬25 5407 modification, and spot 5404 5408 ! «¬32 improvements) ! 5405 ! State Facility Crawfordsville 3 0 ! Local Facility 4 «¬32 5 Rail Crossing 54 ¹º»¼ 06 Improvement

Multi-Modal ¤£136 Enhancements

o Airport Improvements Alamo

!Î Port Improvements «¬47 New Ross State Facilities are US, State New Route, or US Highway funded with state and federal funds. Market Local Facilities are non-state jursidiction facilities that can use state or local funds. Other Facilities «¬234 Ladoga ¬234 Non-Interstate « Interstate Existing Rail «¬47 Navigable Streams ¤£231 Corp. Limits Waveland

«¬236 «¬236 «¬59 Ü «¬236

0 1.5 3 Miles Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16N Projection: Transverse Mercator Datum: North American 1983 Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regional transportation False Easting: 500,000.0000 False Northing: 0.0000 infrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholders Central Meridian: -87.0000 for graphic representation. Use of this map should be limited to preliminary planning purposes Scale Factor: 0.9996 Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000 only. Additional planning, environmental study, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identify Units: Meter optimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decision Data: Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder Input making. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at the INDOT Engineering & Asset Management time and is subject to change. *Project 4101: I-69 Completion – This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. *Project 4803: Indiana Commerce Connector – This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. *Project 6704: SR 75 Extension – This is a local project reflected in the Putman County map on page 51. Lanes – This *Project 8403: I-70 Third Lane/Dedicated Truck is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. These projects are reflected in other sections of this report. ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ MORGAN COUNTY PROJECTS *

44 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region ; Morgan County

«¬75

«¬240 03 84 ¤£40 «¬267

! Mooresville 4 8 0 3 «¬42 Monrovia Date: 6/22/2015 6704 ¦¨§70 «¬39 «¬37 «¬144 03 «¬42 Identified Enhancement 84 Categories for Local and ¬67 State Facilities « Multi-Modal Enhancements Brooklyn

o Airport Improvements 4 8 Bethany 0 3 Port Improvements !Î 1 «¬142 410 Operational Improvements (Intersection improvements, new interchange, interchange modification, «¬42 and spot improvements) «¬37 ! State Facility

! Local Facility ¹º»¼ Rail Crossing «¬39 Improvement Mobility Improvements «¬44

(Added travel lanes, 1 0 1 freeway upgrade) 4 State Facility New Terrain, State Martinsville Facility Local Facility «¬67 New Terrain, Local Facility Paragon «¬252 New Rail Capacity (new rail line or added ¤£231 135 capacity) «¬37 «¬ Morgantown State Facilities are US, State Route, or US Highway funded with state and federal funds. «¬67 Local Facilities are non-state jursidiction facilities that can use state or local funds.

46 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region ; Owen County

«¬243

¦¨§70

«¬42 «¬42

Date: 6/22/2015

Identified Enhancement Categories for Local and «¬59 State Facilities Multi-Modal «¬46 Enhancements ¤£231

Airport Improvements o «¬67

!Î Port Improvements Gosport Operational Improvements (Intersection improvements, new interchange, interchange modification, and spot improvements)

! State Facility «¬46

! Local Facility ¬246 ¹º»¼ Rail Crossing « Improvement Spencer 5302 Mobility Improvements (Added travel lanes, freeway upgrade) «¬246 State Facility New Terrain, State «¬46 Facility Local Facility «¬59 New Terrain, Local «¬157 Facility ¤£231 New Rail Capacity (new rail line or added capacity)

State Facilities are US, State «¬43 «¬37 Route, or US Highway funded with state and federal funds. «¬45 Local Facilities are non-state jursidiction facilities that can use state or local funds. «¬48 Other Facilities «¬48 Non-Interstate Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16N Projection: Transverse Mercator Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regional transportation Interstate Datum: North American 1983 False Easting: 500,000.0000 infrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholders Existing Rail False Northing: 0.0000 Central Meridian: -87.0000 for graphic representation. Use of this map should be limited to preliminary planning purposes Navigable Streams Ü Scale Factor: 0.9996 only. Additional planning, environmental study, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identify Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000 Corp. Limits Units: Meter optimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decision 0 1.5 3 Data: Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder Input making. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at the Miles INDOT Engineering & Asset Management time and is subject to change. PARKE COUNTY PROJECTS

Nothing local that affects the movement of cargo.

48 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region ; Parke County

«¬341

«¬234 «¬234

Date: 6/22/2015 «¬63 £41 Identified Enhancement ¤ Categories for Local and State Facilities

Mobility Improvements «¬71 (Added travel lanes, freeway upgrade)

State Facility «¬47 New Terrain, State Facility Local Facility Marshall «¬236 New Terrain, Local «¬236 Facility Bloomingdale New Rail Capacity (new «¬59 rail line or added capacity) Operational Improvements (Intersection improvements, Montezuma new interchange, interchange modification, and spot improvements) ¤£36 «¬63 ! State Facility Rockville ! Local Facility ¤£36 Rail Crossing ¹º»¼ ¤£41 Improvement Multi-Modal Enhancements Mecca o Airport Improvements

!Î Port Improvements

State Facilities are US, State Route, or US Highway funded with state and federal funds. Local Facilities are non-state jursidiction facilities that can use state or local funds. «¬163 Other Facilities Non-Interstate

Interstate «¬59 Existing Rail Rosedale «¬63 Navigable Streams ¤£41 Corp. Limits Ü ¤£150 0 1.5 3 ¤£40 Miles Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16N Projection: Transverse Mercator Datum: North American 1983 Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regional transportation False Easting: 500,000.0000 False Northing: 0.0000 infrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholders Central Meridian: -87.0000 for graphic representation. Use of this map should be limited to preliminary planning purposes Scale Factor: 0.9996 Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000 only. Additional planning, environmental study, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identify Units: Meter optimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decision Data: Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder Input making. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at the INDOT Engineering & Asset Management time and is subject to change. PUTNAM COUNTY PROJECTS

◆◆ Project 6701: East Greencastle Truck Corridor – Design and build a new road from US 231 North of Greencastle at West CR 75 North to South US 231 near East CR 350 South. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger congestion on US 231 through Greencastle creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $42 million

◆◆ Project 6702: US 231 Additional Lanes – Widen existing 2-lane segment to 4-lane segment of US 231 from I-70 to Veterans Memorial Highway/SR 240 in Greencastle. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $33.9 million

◆◆ Project 6703: US 231 Intersection Improvements – Re-engineer, reconfigure and redesign US 231 providing turn lanes and acceleration lanes at intersection of East CR 800 South. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $1 million

◆◆ Project 6704: SR 75 Extension – Design and build an extension of SR 75 from US 40 to I-70 Exit 51. Reason: Create economic development by giving increased access to the industrial areas of Eastern Greencastle. Estimated Cost: $25.2 million

◆◆ Project 6705: CSX Rail Bridge Replacement – Design and build a new replacement rail bridge over US 231 south of West CR 25 South. Reason: Safety of trucks moving cargo ensuring better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $12 million

◆◆ Project 6706: Stardust Road Improvements – Widen existing road from US 231 to South CR 125 East. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $4.2 million

◆◆ *Project 8403: I-70 Third Lane/Dedicated Truck Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.

* These projects are reflected in other sections of this report. 50 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region ; Putnam County

Russellville Roachdale «¬236 «¬236 «¬236

«¬75

¤£231 Date: 6/22/2015 Identified Enhancement Categories for Local and State Facilities Mobility Improvements (Added travel lanes, freeway upgrade) ¤£36 Bainbridge ¤£36 State Facility New Terrain, State Facility Local Facility New Terrain, Local Facility New Rail Capacity (new rail line or added capacity) «¬75 Operational Improvements (Intersection improvements, new interchange, interchange modification, and spot improvements) Fillmore ! State Facility ¤£231 6 ! Local Facility ! 7 6705 0 1 ¹º»¼ Rail Crossing Improvement Greencastle «¬240 Multi-Modal Enhancements

o Airport Improvements ¤£40

!Î Port Improvements

0 7

State Facilities are US, State 6 Route, or US Highway funded with state and federal funds. Local Facilities are non-state

jursidiction facilities that can use 6 state or local funds. 7 0

2 Other Facilities ¤£40 6703 403 Non-Interstate ! 8 Interstate ¦¨§70 Existing Rail 6706 Cloverdale Navigable Streams «¬142 3 «¬243 40 ¤£231 «¬42 Corp. Limits 8 Ü «¬42

52 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region ; Randolph County

«¬167 «¬67

! Albany «¬28 «¬28 Ridgeville

«¬67 Date: 6/22/2015 «¬1 Identified Enhancement 28 Categories for Local and ¤£27 «¬

State Facilities Saratoga

2 0

Multi-Modal 8 Enhancements 3

o Airport Improvements Union City !Î Port Improvements «¬32 Parker Farmland Operational Improvements City (Intersection improvements, «¬32 new interchange, Winchester interchange modification, «¬32 and spot improvements)

! State Facility

! Local Facility ¹º»¼ Rail Crossing Improvement ¤£35 «¬1 Mobility Improvements (Added travel lanes, freeway upgrade)

State Facility

2 0

New Terrain, State 8 Facility 3 «¬227 Local Facility ¤£27 New Terrain, Local Facility New Rail Capacity ¤£35 ¤£36 (new rail line or added Lynn capacity) Modoc State Facilities are US, State Route, or US Highway funded with state and federal funds. Losantville Local Facilities are non-state «¬1 jursidiction facilities that can ¤£36 use state or local funds.

◆◆ *Project 7001: SR 3 Improvements – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.

* These projects are reflected in other sections of this report. 54 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region ; Rush County «¬103 «¬3 ¤£40 «¬109

¤£40

«¬140

«¬3 Date: 6/22/2015 Identified Enhancement

Carthage 1

Categories for Local and 0 0

State Facilities 7 Mobility Improvements (Added travel lanes, freeway upgrade) State Facility New Terrain, State Facility Local Facility New Terrain, Local Facility New Rail Capacity (new rail line or added «¬3 capacity) Operational Improvements (Intersection improvements, new interchange, interchange ¤£52 modification, and spot improvements) Glenwood

0 «¬44

! State Facility Rushville 0

7 ! Local Facility ¹º»¼ Rail Crossing Improvement Multi-Modal Enhancements «¬44

o Airport Improvements

!Î Port Improvements «¬3

State Facilities are US, State ¤£52 Route, or US Highway funded with state and federal funds. Local Facilities are non-state jursidiction facilities that can use state or local funds. Other Facilities 1

0 Non-Interstate 7 Interstate «¬244 Existing Rail «¬244 Navigable Streams Corp. Limits Ü «¬3 ¦¨§74 0 1.25 2.5 Miles Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16N Projection: Transverse Mercator Datum: North American 1983 Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regional transportation False Easting: 500,000.0000 False Northing: 0.0000 infrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholders Central Meridian: -87.0000 for graphic representation. Use of this map should be limited to preliminary planning purposes Scale Factor: 0.9996 Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000 only. Additional planning, environmental study, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identify Units: Meter optimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decision Data: Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder Input making. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at the INDOT Engineering & Asset Management time and is subject to change. SHELBY COUNTY PROJECTS

◆◆ *Project 4803: Indiana Commerce Connector – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6. ◆◆ Project 7301: West Shelbyville Truck Corridor – Design and build a new road from West CR 400 North near I-74 exit 109 to SR 44. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger congestion on SR 9/SR 44 through Shelbyville creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Project: $50.4 million

◆◆ Project 7302: SR 44 Improvements – Improve and widen SR 44 from I-65 to Miller Avenue in Shelbyville. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $49.2 million

* These projects are reflected in other sections of this report. 56 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region ; Shelby County

¤£52

Morristown ¤£52

0 «¬9

Date: 6/22/2015 8

4 Identified Enhancement Categories for Local and State Facilities Mobility Improvements (Added travel lanes, freeway upgrade) State Facility New Terrain, State Facility Fairland Local Facility New Terrain, Local 3 Facility 480 §74 New Rail Capacity (new ¦¨ rail line or added capacity)

3 Operational Improvements 0 «¬44 (Intersection improvements, 1 new interchange, interchange Shelbyville modification, and spot improvements) ! State Facility «¬9

! Local Facility ¹º»¼ Rail Crossing Improvement 7302 «¬244 «¬44 Multi-Modal Enhancements

o Airport Improvements

!Î Port Improvements

Navigable Streams «¬9 ¨§65 Corp. Limits ¦

«¬252 Ü Edinburgh

0 1.25 2.5 ¤£31 Miles Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16N Projection: Transverse Mercator Datum: North American 1983 Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regional transportation False Easting: 500,000.0000 False Northing: 0.0000 infrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholders Central Meridian: -87.0000 for graphic representation. Use of this map should be limited to preliminary planning purposes Scale Factor: 0.9996 Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000 only. Additional planning, environmental study, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identify Units: Meter optimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decision Data: Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder Input making. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at the INDOT Engineering & Asset Management time and is subject to change. TIPPECANOE COUNTY PROJECTS

◆◆ *Project 1008: I-65 Additional Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6. ◆◆ *Project 5401: US 231 Additional Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6. ◆◆ Project 7902: South Tippecanoe Truck Corridor – Improve and widen Veterans Memorial Boulevard from US 231 to 9th Street. Reason: : Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $19.6 million

◆◆ Project 7903: US 52 Additional Lanes – Convert the existing 4 lanes to 6 lanes along US 52 from East County Road 450 South to SR 25/Schuyler Avenue. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Estimated Cost: $57 million

◆◆ Project 7904: Steel Site Industrial Park Improvements – Design and build a new entrance North of the Steel Site Industrial Park at SR 38. Reason: Create economic development by allowing for expansion of Steel Site Industrial Park. Estimated Cost: $4 million

* These projects are reflected in other sections of this report. 58 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs CentralCentra l RegionRegion ; ;Tippecanoe Tipecanoe CountyCounty «¬43 «¬18 «¬18 ¤£421

«¬43 ¤£231 Date: 8/12/2015

Identified Enhancement Categories for Local and «¬225 State Facilities Battle Ground Mobility Improvements 1 ¬25 (Added travel lanes, 0 « Otterbein 0 freeway upgrade) 8 State Facility New Terrain, State ¤£52 Facility Local Facility

New Terrain, Local West Facility «¬26 Lafayette ¦¨§65 New Rail Capacity (new rail line or added capacity) «¬26 Operational Improvements (Intersection improvements, Lafayette new interchange, interchange 7 modification, and spot 9 0 improvements) ¤£52 3 ! State Facility

! 4 Dayton «¬38 Local Facility 0

7902 9 ¹º»¼ Rail Crossing 7 Improvement «¬25 1 0 Multi-Modal Shadeland 0 8 Enhancements

o Airport Improvements ¤£231

!Î Port Improvements

State Facilities are US, State Route, or US Highway funded with state and federal funds. ¤£52 Local Facilities are non-state jursidiction facilities that can use

state or local funds. 28 1 «¬ 0

4 Other Facilities 5 Non-Interstate «¬28 «¬28 «¬28 Interstate Clarks Existing Rail Hill «¬25 Navigable Streams Corp. Limits Ü ¤£231 «¬55 0 1.5 3 Miles Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16N Projection: Transverse Mercator Datum: North American 1983 Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regional transportation False Easting: 500,000.0000 False Northing: 0.0000 infrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholders Central Meridian: -87.0000 for graphic representation. Use of this map should be limited to preliminary planning purposes Scale Factor: 0.9996 Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000 only. Additional planning, environmental study, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identify Units: Meter optimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decision Data: Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder Input making. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at the INDOT Engineering & Asset Management time and is subject to change. Estimated Cost: $14 million *Project 2501: US 31 Indianapolis to Benton Harbor, MI – *Project 2501: US 31 Indianapolis to Benton Harbor, This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. Agriculture Corridor – Design and Project 8002: Tipton build a new road from Division Road East of US 31 to SR 28. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. These projects are reflected in other sections of this report. ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ TIPTON COUNTY PROJECTS *

60 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region ; Tipton County

«¬26 «¬26

«¬931

Date: 6/22/2015 ¤£31 Sharpsville «¬13 Identified Enhancement Windfall Categories for Local and State Facilities «¬19 «¬213 Multi-Modal

Enhancements 1

o Airport Improvements 0

5 2 !Î Port Improvements

Operational Improvements (Intersection improvements, new interchange, interchange modification, and spot improvements)

! State Facility

! Local Facility Rail Crossing

¹º»¼ 2

Improvement 0

Kempton 0

8 Tipton Mobility Improvements «¬28 (Added travel lanes, «¬28 freeway upgrade) «¬28 28 State Facility «¬ New Terrain, State Facility Local Facility ¤£31

New Terrain, Local 1 «¬19 0

Facility 5 2 New Rail Capacity «¬213 «¬13 (new rail line or added capacity)

State Facilities are US, State Route, or US Highway funded with state and federal funds. «¬128 Local Facilities are non-state jursidiction facilities that can use state or local funds.

62 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region ; Union County

«¬227

Date: 6/22/2015

Identified Enhancement ¤£27 Categories for Local and State Facilities Multi-Modal Enhancements

o Airport Improvements «¬1 !Î Port Improvements

Operational Improvements (Intersection improvements, «¬44 new interchange, «¬44 Liberty interchange modification, «¬44 and spot improvements)

! State Facility

! Local Facility ¹º»¼ Rail Crossing Improvement ¤£27 Mobility Improvements (Added travel lanes, freeway upgrade) State Facility New Terrain, State 1 West Facility «¬ «¬101 College Local Facility Corner New Terrain, Local Facility New Rail Capacity (new rail line or added capacity)

State Facilities are US, State Route, or US Highway funded with state and federal funds. Local Facilities are non-state jursidiction facilities that can use state or local funds.

◆◆ Project 8301: Vermillion Rise Mega Park Improvements – Design and build a new entrance North of the Vermillion Rise Mega Park West of SR 63 and East of CR 200 East and widen the 4 existing roads surrounding the Mega Park. Reason: Create economic development by allowing for expansion of Vermillion Rise Mega. Estimated Cost: $14.7 million

64 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region ; Vermillion County

«¬263

¤£136

¦¨§74

¤£136

Date: 6/22/2015 «¬63 ¤£41 Identified Enhancement Perrysville Categories for Local and «¬32 State Facilities «¬32 Mobility Improvements (Added travel lanes, freeway upgrade) State Facility New Terrain, State Facility

Local Facility «¬234 New Terrain, Local Facility Cayuga «¬234 New Rail Capacity (new rail line or added capacity) Operational Improvements (Intersection improvements, new interchange, interchange modification, and spot improvements) Newport «¬47 ! State Facility «¬71 ! Local Facility 8 30 1 ¤£41 ¹º»¼ Rail Crossing «¬236 Improvement Multi-Modal Enhancements

o Airport Improvements Dana ¤£36 !Î Port Improvements

State Facilities are US, State Route, or US Highway funded ¤£36 with state and federal funds. Local Facilities are non-state jursidiction facilities that can use state or local funds. «¬71 Other Facilities Non-Interstate Interstate Existing Rail Fairview Navigable Streams Park ¤£41 Corp. Limits «¬63 Clinton «¬163

Ü Universal

¤£150 0 2 4 Miles Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16N Projection: Transverse Mercator Datum: North American 1983 Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regional transportation False Easting: 500,000.0000 False Northing: 0.0000 infrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholders Central Meridian: -87.0000 for graphic representation. Use of this map should be limited to preliminary planning purposes Scale Factor: 0.9996 Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000 only. Additional planning, environmental study, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identify Units: Meter optimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decision Data: Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder Input making. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at the INDOT Engineering & Asset Management time and is subject to change. – – Extend Estimated Cost: $6 million Estimated Cost: $2.4 million *Project 2101: Connersville Connector Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. *Project 3802: US 27 Improvements – This is a regional project reflected on the map page 6. Lanes – This *Project 8403: I-70 Third Lane/Dedicated Truck is a regional project reflected on the map page 6?. Facility Project 8901: Norfolk Southern Transloading Design and build a new transloading facility at the former Dana Corporation site at Williamsburg Pike. Reason: Create economic development giving further rail access to industrial products. Project 8902: Midwest Industrial Park Rail Extension the Norfolk Southern rail tracks throughout the Midwest Industrial Park. Reason: Create economic development giving County industries. further rail access to Wayne ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ WAYNE COUNTY WAYNE PROJECTS

66 Private Sector Identified Regional Needs Central Region ; Wayne County

¤£36

Economy ¤£35 Date: 6/22/2015 Fountain City Identified Enhancement Whitewater Categories for Local and «¬1 ¤£27 State Facilities 3

Multi-Modal 2 «¬227 Enhancements «¬38 o Airport Improvements Hagerstown

!Î Port Improvements Gree«¬3n8s Operational Improvements Fork (Intersection improvements, new interchange, 84 interchange modification, 03 and spot improvements) 8901 8403 02 89 ¹º»¼ 8403 70 ! State Facility ¦¨§ Spring «¬121 Grove ! Local Facility ¹º»¼ Rail Crossing Richmond Improvement ¤£40 Mobility Improvements Centerville (Added travel lanes, East Dublin Mt. Cambridge freeway upgrade) ¤£40 Germantown Auburn City

State Facility 1

New Terrain, State 0 1

Facility 2 Local Facility Milton «¬1 ¤£27 New Terrain, Local Facility New Rail Capacity (new rail line or added capacity) «¬227

State Facilities are US, State Boston Route, or US Highway funded with state and federal funds. Local Facilities are non-state jursidiction facilities that can use state or local funds.

◆◆ Air Pilot Duty Time (Federal) ◆◆ Reduce the “First Officer Qualification” (FOQ) Rule or 1,500 Hour Rule without compromising flight safety through Federal legislation or regulation

◆◆ Boat Captain Regulations (Federal) ◆◆ Reduce the U.S. Coast Guard boat pilot time requirements without compromising maritime safety from the current 5 years though Federal legislation or regulation

◆◆ Truck Driver Hours of Service (Federal) ◆◆ Increase the driver hours of service with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administrations regulation without compromising highway safety through Federal legislation or regulation

◆◆ Incident Management Coordination (State) ◆◆ Pass State legislation that ensures State and county incident management ownership by an agency ensuring smooth traffic flow

◆◆ Intermodal Heavy Truck Corridors (State) ◆◆ Pass State legislation or revise State regulation to allow for 25 mile radius special intermodal zones

◆◆ Setback Policies and Stoplight Policies (State) ◆◆ Pass State legislation to create a setback and traffic light policy on high trafficked Federal Interstate and State highways in Indiana

◆◆ Truck Parking Study (State) ◆◆ Pass State legislation to study parking locations for trucks at certain locations along major Interstates/highways – I-80/94; I-80/90; I-69; I-65; I-70; I-74; US 31; I-64

◆◆ Truck Weight Limits (State) ◆◆ Pass State legislation to equalize State and county truck weight limits

68 TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING PUBLIC AWARENESS GOALS

◆◆ “Did You Know Stories” in the Central Region to educate the public on the importance of logistics industry to the Central Region and therefore the need for world-class logistics infrastructure

◆◆ Newspaper/Magazine online opinion pieces in the Central Region to educate the public on the importance of the logistics industry

◆◆ Editorial boards in the Central Region to educate the public on the importance of the logistics industry

◆◆ CRLC Strategic Plan launch press conferences; editorial boards; newspaper/online opinion pieces to educate the public on the importance of the logistics industry to the Central Region

◆◆ TV/Radio interviews to educate the public on the importance of the logistics industry to the Central Region

TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT GOALS

◆◆ Develop a plan to address the logistics shortages for air cargo pilots; truck drivers; and warehouse/logistics maintenance technicians in the Central Region

◆◆ Support the concept of implementing a statewide CDL+ Program

◆◆ Support and expand the Conexus Indiana A+ Partners Program

◆◆ Support and expand the Conexus Indiana HIRE Technology curriculum into high schools to develop job skills in logistics and operations for the Central Region

◆◆ Develop a plan to address the lack of logistics certifications, 2-year and 4-year degree programs in the Central Region

◆◆ Act as a facilitator for logistics companies to work more closely with universities offering logistics programs

69 LOGISTICS MARKET ANALYSIS

TRANSPORTATION MODE SWOT ANALYSIS Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) for Indiana’s Central Regional Logistics Sector

INFRASTRUCTURE SWOT

STRENGTHS:

◆◆ Air: ◆◆ Strong network of air facilities ◆◆ Existing excess air capacity ◆◆ 1 of top 125 U.S. cargo airports: Indianapolis International Airport #5 ◆◆ #2 FedEx hub at Indianapolis International Airport ◆◆ 1 airport with 11,900 feet or more of runway: Indianapolis International Airport ◆◆ Total of 23 Central Regional Airports: Anderson Municipal-Darlington Field Airport; Clinton Airport; Crawfordsville Municipal Airport; Delaware County-Johnson Field Airport; Eagle Creek Airport; Frankfort Municipal Airport; Glendale Airport; Greenwood Municipal Airport; Indianapolis Executive Airport; Indianapolis Metropolitan Airport; Indianapolis Regional Airport; Kokomo Municipal Airport; Mettel Field Airport; Reese Airport; New Castle-Henry County Municipal Airport; Noblesville Airport; Pope Field Airport; Purdue University Airport; Putnam County Airport; Randolph County Airport; Richmond Municipal Airport; Shelbyville Municipal Airport; and Sheridan Airport ◆◆ Midwest location ◆◆ Strategic geographic coverage of aviation facilities located around the Central Region

70 ◆◆ Rail: ◆◆ Heavy presence of Class I railroads: CSX and Norfolk Southern ◆◆ 12 Class II & Class III freight railroads: C&NC Railroad; Central Indiana and Western Railroad; Central Railroad of Indianapolis; Honey Creek Railroad; Indian Creek Railroad; Indiana Eastern Railroad; Indiana Rail Road; Indiana Southern Railroad; Kankekee, Beaverville, and Southern Railroad; Louisville and Indiana Railroad; Winamac Southern Railroad; and Vermillion Valley Railroad ◆◆ Direct intermodal access from West Coast bypassing Chicago via The Indiana Rail Road Company and CN into the Senate Avenue terminal in Indianapolis

◆◆ Trucking (Roads): ◆◆ 6 major Interstates and 10 major highways: I-65, I-69; I-70, I-74, I-465, I-865, US 27, US 31, US 35, US 36, US 40, US 41, US 52, US 136, US 231, US 421 ◆◆ Reputation as “Crossroads of America” ◆◆ 80 percent of the U.S. population within a day’s drive of Indiana ◆◆ Strong Midwest location: borders Illinois & Ohio

◆◆ Waterborne: ◆◆ Proximity to three public ports: Ports of Indiana – Burns Harbor, Jeffersonville and Mount Vernon ◆◆ Access to major U.S. inland waterways – Great Lakes, Ohio and Mississippi rivers

◆◆ General: ◆◆ Leader in exports/imports of important commodities (coal, iron/steel products, grain, food products, scrap metal, etc.) ◆◆ Warehouse availability

WEAKNESSES:

◆◆ Air: ◆◆ Central Region airports have minimal international business; other than the domestic cargo shipping at Indianapolis International Airport

◆◆ Rail: ◆◆ Primarily pass through region for intermodal rail ◆◆ Lack of high volume intermodal facilities ◆◆ Bottlenecks due to rail congestion in Chicago

71 ◆◆ Trucking (Roads): ◆◆ Bottlenecks or traffic congestion at major points of interchange ◆◆ Lack of adequate capacity on Central Region’s Interstate highways ◆◆ Lack of designated heavy haul routes ◆◆ Lack of truck parking

◆◆ Waterborne: ◆◆ Not applicable

◆◆ General: ◆◆ Warehouse availability volatility

OPPORTUNITIES:

◆◆ Air: ◆◆ Position the Central Region as a reliever airport for domestic/international air cargo by utilizing excess capacity ◆◆ Create a strategy to better utilize the Central Region’s airports ◆◆ Utilize runways and facilities at several airports to accommodate air shipping opportunities

◆◆ Rail: ◆◆ Freight tonnage will nearly double by 2035, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) ◆◆ Seek opportunity to position Indiana as an East/West Corridor for Class I railroads to bypass Chicago bottleneck

◆◆ Trucking (Roads): ◆◆ Freight tonnage will nearly double by 2035, according to USDOT ◆◆ Relieve bottlenecks around Central Region ◆◆ Upgrade Central Region strategic bridges ◆◆ Build dedicated truck lanes on selected corridors that separate trucks from passenger cars on major Interstates ◆◆ Align truck weight limits comparable with surrounding states ◆◆ Create designated heavy haul routes and align with surrounding states

72 ◆◆ Waterborne: ◆◆ Not applicable

◆◆ General: ◆◆ The value of U.S. imports and exports is expected to be equivalent to 60 percent of GDP by 2030 ◆◆ Work for diversification of exports/imports

THREATS:

◆◆ Air: ◆◆ Continued underutilization of Central Region airports ◆◆ Lack of Federal, State, and local funding to meet infrastructure needs

◆◆ Rail: ◆◆ Continuation of the Central Region as a pass through area for rail ◆◆ Lack of investment in infrastructure by Class I railroads ◆◆ Adjacent states direct investment in rail ◆◆ Lack of private rail investment by private sector in Class II & III railroads

◆◆ Trucking (Roads): ◆◆ Lack of funding to build roads to relieve bottle necks or traffic congestion ◆◆ Lack of funding to upgrade Central Region strategic bridges that are structurally deficient or functionally obsolete

◆◆ Waterborne: ◆◆ Not applicable

◆◆ General: ◆◆ Lack of diversification of exports/imports ◆◆ Lack of funding for all infrastructure modes ◆◆ Impact of Federal Government energy policy on all modes of transportation ◆◆ Loss of competitive advantage in energy costs due to Federal regulations

73 PUBLIC POLICY SWOT

STRENGTHS:

◆◆ Air: ◆◆ Federal government reimburses up to 90% of costs for qualified airport projects ◆◆ Local funding of all Central Region airports

◆◆ Rail: ◆◆ Local rail investment ◆◆ Industrial Service Fund

◆◆ Trucking (Roads): ◆◆ P3 funding for Indiana highways and roads ◆◆ State of Indiana focus on road construction

◆◆ Waterborne: ◆◆ Not applicable

◆◆ General: ◆◆ Indiana’s use of public/private partnerships to facilitate the funding of key projects in the Central Region ◆◆ Transportation and Logistics Tax Credit ◆◆ Tax abatement for vacant buildings

WEAKNESSES:

◆◆ Air: ◆◆ Lack of awareness by public entities on air freight movement ◆◆ Lack of Federal/State funding for the Central Region ◆◆ Pilot shortages ◆◆ Airline pilot duty and entry level requirements for flight time

◆◆ Rail: ◆◆ Lack of private rail investment compared to surrounding states ◆◆ Lack of awareness by public entities on rail freight movement ◆◆ Lack of Federal/State funding ◆◆ Railroad employee hours of service requirements

74 ◆◆ Trucking (Roads): ◆◆ Federal/State use of gas taxes for other general Federal/State revenue needs ◆◆ Lower truck weight limits compared to Illinois and Ohio ◆◆ Inefficiencies in collection of fuel taxes ◆◆ Changes to Hours of Service regulations ◆◆ Truck driver shortages

◆◆ Waterborne: ◆◆ Not applicable

◆◆ General: ◆◆ Increase in unemployment insurance (UI) tax on State level

OPPORTUNITIES:

◆◆ Air: ◆◆ Dedicated state aviation fund creating more Federal funding opportunity for aviation projects

◆◆ Rail: ◆◆ Federal and State investment tax credit incentivizing private rail investment ◆◆ Funding for inter/multimodal rail development

◆◆ Trucking (Roads): ◆◆ Federal and State firewall on gas taxes for highway use only ◆◆ Dedicated truck lanes on major Interstates ◆◆ Allow increase of truck weight limits at Illinois and Ohio borders ◆◆ Use of State sales tax on surface transportation fuels ◆◆ New innovative funding mechanisms for roads

◆◆ Waterborne: ◆◆ Not applicable

◆◆ General: ◆◆ Lower UI tax on State level ◆◆ Lower capital gains tax on Federal level ◆◆ Reduction of personal property tax

75 THREATS:

◆◆ Air: ◆◆ Loss of matching dollars from Federal Government because of lack of State investment

◆◆ Rail: ◆◆ Surrounding states of Illinois and Ohio offer grants/loans/tax credits for rail economic development/private investment

◆◆ Trucking (Roads): ◆◆ Surrounding states of Illinois and Ohio offer grants/loans/tax credits for trucking economic development/private investment ◆◆ Lack of Federal/State highway dollars for new/existing roads ◆◆ Continued use of gas taxes for other general Federal/State revenue needs ◆◆ Competitiveness issues due to higher truck weight limits in Illinois ◆◆ Continued inefficient collection of fuel taxes

◆◆ Waterborne: ◆◆ Not applicable

◆◆ Warehousing/Distribution: ◆◆ Surrounding state of Ohio offers grants/loans/tax credits for warehousing/real estate economic development/private investment ◆◆ Further State tax increases for UI ◆◆ Current use of vacant warehouse/distribution facilities

◆◆ General: ◆◆ Lack of policy action leading to loss of private investment ◆◆ Lack of a State fund for unexpected economic development infrastructure needs ◆◆ Continued lack of growth in national economy

76 WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT SWOT

STRENGTHS: ◆◆ Public/private postsecondary institutions with ability to reach mass of workers

◆◆ Entrepreneurs creating online curriculum programs

◆◆ State government officials who understand importance of up-skilling Hoosier workers

◆◆ Growth of logistics firms in the Central Region

WEAKNESSES: ◆◆ Lack of skilled workers

◆◆ Public misconception of logistics and warehouse careers

◆◆ Assorted logistics education curriculum not meeting industry needs

◆◆ Air cargo pilot, truck driver, and boat captain shortages

◆◆ Warehouse/Logistics maintenance technician shortages

◆◆ 4-year logistics degree supervisor shortages

◆◆ Lack of fork lift certifications

OPPORTUNITIES: ◆◆ Identify logistics job skills gap areas

◆◆ Curriculum development with postsecondary education to meet job skills gap areas

◆◆ Create online program to up-skill Indiana logistics worker from places of employment

◆◆ Continued growth of logistics jobs in the Central Region

THREATS: ◆◆ Loss of logistics economic development due to workforce gaps

◆◆ Continued perception of logistics industry as undesirable work

◆◆ Lower skill workers remaining in lower level positions

◆◆ Lack of 4-year degree student interest in logistics careers

◆◆ Lack of air cargo pilots, truck drivers, and boat captains

◆◆ Lack of warehouse logistics maintenance technicians

◆◆ Lack of 4-year logistics supervisors

77 PUBLIC AWARENESS SWOT

STRENGTHS:

◆◆ Positive visibility of trucking

◆◆ Viewed as a center for surrounding major cities

WEAKNESSES:

◆◆ Lack of public understanding of logistics

◆◆ Lack of public understanding of need for infrastructure expansion/improvement

◆◆ Public misperception of logistics jobs

◆◆ Public misperception of global trade & positive impact on the Central Region

◆◆ Lack of awareness of importance for air, rail & water transportation modes

OPPORTUNITIES:

◆◆ Educate public on positive impacts of logistics industry

◆◆ Explain the facts on how the logistics industry impacts everyday life

◆◆ Educate public on need for infrastructure expansion/improvement

◆◆ Educate public on high-skill, high-wage jobs in logistics

◆◆ Educate public on positive impacts of global trade

◆◆ Increase understanding of importance for air, rail & water transportation modes

◆◆ Educate public on the effects and importance of waterborne transportation on Central Indiana

THREATS:

◆◆ Continued public misperception of the importance of the logistics industry

◆◆ Lack of awareness of need for infrastructure expansion/improvement

◆◆ Continued public misperception of logistics jobs

◆◆ Continued public belief of negative impacts of global trade

78 CENTRAL REGION INFRASTRUCTURE DATA

◆◆ Air ◆◆ 23 Central Region Airports ◆◆ #2 FedEx Hub in the World at Indianapolis International Airport ◆◆ Indianapolis International Airport #23 Busiest Airport by Cargo Traffic

◆◆ Rail ◆◆ 2 Class I Railroads ◆◆ 12 Class II & III Railroads

◆◆ Trucking: ◆◆ 6 Major Interstates and 10 Major Highways

◆◆ Waterborne ◆◆ Proximity to 3 Public Ports

79 FOR MORE INFORMATION

CONTACT: DAVID W. HOLT Vice President Operations & Business Development Conexus Indiana 111 Monument Circle Suite 1800 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Phone: (317)638-2108 email: [email protected] www.conexusindiana.com

Brought to you in part by

www.conexusindiana.com

111 Monument Circle, Suite 1800 Indianapolis, IN 46204 317-638-2108