Phthiraptera: Pediculidae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Phthiraptera: Pediculidae) J. Mountain Res. ISSN: 0974-3030 Vol. 12, (2017) 39-46 Lousicidal and repellency properties of two plant extracts against human head louse, Pediculus humanus capitis Charles De Geer. (P hthiraptera: Anoplura) 1 2 Surman Arya * • Suneel Kumar Singh 1Department of Zoology, Dr. PDBH, Govt. P.G. Co llege, Kotdawar (Garhwal)- 246149, Uttarakhand, India 2Department of Biotechnology & Microbiology, Modern Institute of Techno logy, Dhalwala, Rishikesh - 249201, Uttarakhand, India. *Corresponding Author Email: [email protected] Received: 14.07.2017; Revised: 21.08.2017; Accepted: 15.10.2017 ©Society for Himalayan Action Research and Development Abstract: Leaf extracts of Himalayan shrubs Timru ( Zanthoxylum alatum ) and Raimunia or L antana (Lantana camara) and flower extracts of L. camara have been tested for their lousicidal and repellency properties against human head louse, Pediculus humanus captis (Pht hiraptera: Anoplura). The crude extract of these plants were noted very effective in other insects. The mortality rate and repellency were noted 80% and 86.36% in case of Z. alatum while 66.67% and 76.19%, respectively in L. camara . Flower extract of L. camara caused 56.67% mortality and 66.18 % repellency. Preliminary results of these plants extracts clearly exhibited lousicidal effects . Keywords: Human head louse • Lousicidal • plant extracts • repellency Introduction Head louse infestation is a global problem and affected with immune suppressi on, environmental varies greatly from place to place. Children are the pollution and development of resistant of strain. most affected group (Gratz, 1997). Considerable Several authors have already mentioned that work has already been done on prevalence rate o f intensive and continuous application of head louse in different parts of the world. Many biodegradable pesticides may be an asset from other workers get success to eradicate head louse environmental as well as economic point of view. through different synthetic pesticides (Maunder, Biodegrad able pesticides are not only safer but eco - 1971; Pollack et al., 1999; Yoon et al., 2003 ; Kerryn friendly also. Several plant extracts have also been and Tanya, 2012; Dadas et al., 2016). These efficiently tested against pest of dogs, buffaloes, pesticid es increases pest resistance, harms non - cattle and birds (Tripathey et al., 1995, Banerjee, target beneficial organism, contaminate feed, create 1997; Kumar et al., 2002a, b and 2011; Lakshmanan environment hazard apart from economic et al., 2016). Furthermore pesticidal properties of consideration. Moreover, by using these synthetic several other plants have been tested against pesticides many other birds and mammals are different pests (Murray et al., 1995; Maske et al., ©SHARAD 39 1999; Khater et al., 2014). Lousicidal and repellency grinder. Extracts of these plants material were properties of some selected plant (viz. Azadirachta prepared by using acetone and kept in 12 hrs, at indica, Adhatoda vassica, Argimone mexicana, room temperature (28+2ºC). Later on, extracts were Acorus calamus, Cassio fistula ) have already been filtered through Whatman filter paper (No.1) and tested by Kumar et al. (2002a, b and 2003); Khan et solution left on Petridish, kept for one to two days al. (2008); Kosalge and Fursule (2009); Nalamwar for evaporation. The residue of the extracts stored in et al. (2009) against tropical hen louse. Some other deep freezer. The extracts were then tested for workers like Heukelbach et al. (2006a and b); mortality and repellency on lice at various Semmler et al. (2010); Shrivastava et al. (2010); concentrations (Kumar et al., 2002a, b and 2003; Toloza et al. (2010a and b); Bagavan et al. (2011) Khan et al., 2008). For conducting the mortality test, and Combescot et al. (2015) tested A. indica, saturating concentration of stock solution was Eucalyptus, Citurs, Syzygium and Vitex agnus placed on filter paper (Whatman filter paper No. 1, castus , respectively, against human head louse to diameter 9.0cm) and allows dry in shade, at room note mortality and repellency. Isman (2000); Abdel- temperature (28+2ºC) in Petridishes. Healthy adult Ghaffar and Semmler (2007); Shaaya and Rafaeli lice ( P. humanus capitis ) of both sexes in nearly (2007); Rossini et al. (2008); Purval et al. (2010); equal proportion sorted out from infested children Toloza et al. (2010); Rassimi and Soonwera (2011); and adult in randomly selected locality of Kotdwar Watcharawit and Soonwera (2013); Soonwera and its adjoining areas. Live head lice were (2014) also reported some plants essential oils and collected by using a fine-toothed anti louse comb plants extract against human head louse as eco- (Picollo et al., 1998 and 2000; Vassena et al., 2003) friendly, biodegradable, possess low or no toxicity and kept in an environmental chamber and with the against mammal and very effective against insect help of camel hair brush were transferred on the pests. Eucalyptus has also been tested against treated filter paper in Petridishes. Male and female insects (Papachristos and Stamopoulos, 2002; Lucia head lice can be easily distinguishable due to their et al., 2007 and Batish et al., 2008) and head lice size, but attempt have not been made to record sex (Yang et al., 2004; Toloza et al., 2006, 2010a and b; wise mortality. Mortality test were performed in Choi et al., 2010). Plant extract of monk pepper three sets along with control unit (using exhibits repellency activity against head lice, ticks acetone).Ten-ten active fresh healthy adult lice of and insects (Semmler et al., 2010) but Mehlhorn et both the sexes were released on each of the three al. (2005) suggests monk pepper extract as replicate the lice were then reared in vitro repellency activity against lice only for short period. environmental chamber at 29±2ºC and 60-80% R.H. In vitro bionomics of human head louse has already The aim of the present study was to investigate been done (Takano-Lee et al., 2003). Mortality was and evaluate the lousicidal and repellency properties recorded after every 2 hrs interval and the of different parts (e.g., leaf, flower, etc.) of percentage mortality was calculated for each of sets Zanthoxylum alatum and Lantana camara against up to 24 hrs then average percentage mortality was human head louse. Least work has been done on noted by using the formula. lousicidal and repellency properties of some plant extracts in Uttarakhand region, so keeping in view Mortality = ND/NT X100…………Equation No. 01 the lacunae in the fields, the present study was Where, ND= Number of dead lice, NT= Number of carried out. total lice Materials and Methods For checking the repellency of said plants Leaves ( Z. altum and L. camara ) and flower ( L. extracts against human head louse, one half portion camara ) collected from Kotdwar (Garhwal) and its of Whatman filter paper was immersed in test adjoining area, were thoroughly washed, dried solvent and then allowed to dry. The other half was (under shade) and powdered in a domestic hand dipped in pure solvent (acetone) and dried. Such a ©SHARAD 40 filter paper was placed in Petridish, which were (Table 1). Similarly flower extract of the L. camara covered with glass funnel of same diameter was exhibited mortality 0%, 3.33%, 10%, 16.67%, 20%, inverted over the Petridish and its joints were sealed 26.67% and 56.67%, respectively. In control unit, (to avoid the escape of lice). Repellency tests were there was no any mortality up to 6 hrs, but it was also performed in triplicate sets. In each Petridish noted 3.33% in 8 hrs, 6.67% in 10 hrs and 12 hrs ten healthy adult (both sexes) lice were released on duration, while in 24 hrs it reached 10% mortality. the test area. Then Petridish were placed inside the Overall mortality of leaf extract of Z. alatum and L. environmental chamber maintain at 29±2ºC and 60- camara exhibited 80% and 66.67%, while flower 80% R.H. The numbers of lice on treated and extracts of L. camara showed 56.67% overall untreated side were recorded after every one hr mortality (Table 1). There was only 30% overall interval. The repellency was calculated for each mortality recorded in control unit. Present results Petridish up to 12 hrs and average percentage clearly indicated that these plants extracts possesses repellency was noted by using the formula effective mortality against human head louse, P. suggested by Kumar et al. (2002a and b). humanus capitis . Repellency% = UT × 100/UT + T...Equation No. 02 Attempts were made to note the repellency efficacy leaf extract of Z. alatum against said lice. Where UT= Number of lice trapped in untreated Repellency after 1 hrs, 2 hrs, 3 hrs and 4 hrs have side, T= Number of lice trapped in treated side been noted as 80%, but in 5 hrs duration it increases An attempt was also made to examined the lice up to 100%, while notable fall was noted in 6 hrs on the filter paper under a dissecting microscope by duration (up to 88.89%)(Table 2). After 12 hrs a single observer in all cases to prevent inter duration it again reaches up to 100% repellency. observer variation. The criteria used for survival of Overall repellency of leaf extract of Z. alatum noted lice were extremely strict, if any even minor signs of as 86.36%. Similarly repellency efficacy of leaf life, such as internal movements or movement of extract of L. camara were remained 50%, 60%, antennae or minimal leg movements were observed 80%, 77.78%, 88.89% and 87.5% at the duration of (with or without stimulation by a forceps), the lice 1 hr, 2 hrs, 3 hrs, 4 hrs, 5 hrs and 6 hrs respectively, were categorized as alive. The lice were judged as while it was found 100% repellency at the 12 hrs dead if there were no vital signs at all (complete duration.
Recommended publications
  • David L.Reed
    Curriculum Vitae David L. Reed DAVID L. REED (February 2021) Associate Provost University of Florida EDUCATION AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: Management Development Program, Graduate School of Education, Harvard Univ. 2016 Advanced Leadership for Academic Professionals, University of Florida 2016 Ph.D. Louisiana State University (Biological Sciences) 2000 M.S. Louisiana State University (Zoology) 1994 B.S. University of North Carolina, Wilmington (Biological Sciences) 1991 PROFESSIONAL EXERIENCE: Administrative (University of Florida) Associate Provost, Office of the Provost 2018 –present Associate Director for Research and Collections, Florida Museum 2015 – 2020 Provost Fellow, Office of the Provost 2017 – 2018 Assistant Director for Research and Collections, Florida Museum 2012 – 2015 Academic Curator of Mammals, Florida Museum, University of Florida 2014 – present Associate Curator of Mammals, Florida Museum, University of Florida 2009 – 2014 Assistant Curator of Mammals, Florida Museum, University of Florida 2004 – 2009 Research Assistant Professor, Department of Biology, University of Utah 2003 – 2004 NSF Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Biology, University of Utah 2001 – 2003 Courtesy/Adjunct Graduate Faculty, Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, UF 2009 – present Graduate Faculty, School of Natural Resources and the Environment, UF 2005 – present Graduate Faculty, Genetics and Genomics Graduate Program, UF 2005 – present Graduate Faculty, Department of Biology, UF 2004 – present ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD: Associate Provost, Office of the Provost, University of Florida July 2018-present Artificial Intelligence • Serve on and organize the AI Executive Workgroup dedicated to highest priority aspects of the AI Initiative. • Organize and host (Emcee) the all-day AI Retreat in April 2020. Had over 600 participants. • Establish AI Workgroups on nearly a dozen topics • Establish and Chair the AI Academic Workgroup focused on the AI Certificate, new and existing AI courses, the development of new certificates, minors, tracks and majors.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Survey of the Head Louse Pediculus Humanus Capitis in Thailand and Its Potential Role for Transmitting Acinetobacter Spp
    Sunantaraporn et al. Parasites & Vectors (2015) 8:127 DOI 10.1186/s13071-015-0742-4 RESEARCH Open Access Molecular survey of the head louse Pediculus humanus capitis in Thailand and its potential role for transmitting Acinetobacter spp. Sakone Sunantaraporn1, Vivornpun Sanprasert2, Theerakamol Pengsakul3, Atchara Phumee2, Rungfar Boonserm2, Apiwat Tawatsin4, Usavadee Thavara4 and Padet Siriyasatien2,5* Abstract Background: Head louse infestation, which is caused by Pediculus humanus capitis, occurs throughout the world. With the advent of molecular techniques, head lice have been classified into three clades. Recent reports have demonstrated that pathogenic organisms could be found in head lice. Head lice and their pathogenic bacteria in Thailand have never been investigated. In this study, we determined the genetic diversity of head lice collected from various areas of Thailand and demonstrated the presence of Acinetobacter spp. in head lice. Methods: Total DNA was extracted from 275 head louse samples that were collected from several geographic regions of Thailand. PCR was used to amplify the head louse COI gene and for detection of Bartonella spp. and Acinetobacter spp. The amplified PCR amplicons were cloned and sequenced. The DNA sequences were analyzed via the neighbor-joining method using Kimura’s 2-parameter model. Results: The phylogenetic tree based on the COI gene revealed that head lice in Thailand are clearly classified into two clades (A and C). Bartonella spp. was not detected in all the samples, whereas Acinetobacter spp. was detected in 10 samples (3.62%), which consisted of A. baumannii (1.45%), A. radioresistens (1.45%), and A. schindleri (0.72%). The relationship of Acinetobacter spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Report: Head Lice
    CLINICAL REPORT Guidance for the Clinician in Rendering Pediatric Care Head Lice Cynthia D. Devore, MD, FAAP, Gordon E. Schutze, MD, FAAP, THE COUNCIL ON SCHOOL HEALTH AND COMMITTEE ON INFECTIOUS DISEASES Head lice infestation is associated with limited morbidity but causes a high abstract level of anxiety among parents of school-aged children. Since the 2010 clinical report on head lice was published by the American Academy of Pediatrics, newer medications have been approved for the treatment of head lice. This revised clinical report clarifies current diagnosis and treatment protocols and provides guidance for the management of children with head lice in the school setting. Head lice (Pediculus humanus capitis) have been companions of the human species since antiquity. Anecdotal reports from the 1990s estimated annual direct and indirect costs totaling $367 million, including remedies and other consumer costs, lost wages, and school system expenses. More recently, treatment costs have been estimated at $1 billion.1 It is important to note that head lice are not a health hazard or a sign of poor hygiene and This document is copyrighted and is property of the American Academy of Pediatrics and its Board of Directors. All authors have filed are not responsible for the spread of any disease. Despite this knowledge, conflict of interest statements with the American Academy of there is significant stigma resulting from head lice infestations in many Pediatrics. Any conflicts have been resolved through a process approved by the Board of Directors. The American Academy of developed countries, resulting in children being ostracized from their Pediatrics has neither solicited nor accepted any commercial schools, friends, and other social events.2,3 involvement in the development of the content of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Pediculus As Vector
    Pediculus as Vector Geetanjali Mishra Associate Professor Department of Zoology University of Lucknow Lucknow HUMAN LOUSE: (Pediculus humanus captis carporis) Class: Insecta Division: Exopterygota Order: Anoplura Family: Pediculidae They occur all over the world. They have been associated with man since ancient times. External feature: It is a small (3-3.5mm long), with elongate and dorsoventrally flattened body. Mouth part are sucking type. Head are small and eyes are reduced. Claws on the legs are meant for clinging to hairs on host’s body. Antennae are small, 5-6 jointed. Wings are lacking and wing pads are present. Abdomen of male are narrower and pointed than the female and terminates into a curved hook like clasper, which works as a sheath, aedeagus. Abdomen of female is relatively broad, nearly rounded apically with a prominent niche or genital pouch. Head louse is smaller than the body louse. Life Cycle: The lice breed throughout the year. The female lays eggs or nits, singly, glued to the hair. Average 100 eggs are laid by the head louse and 300 eggs by the body louse. The eggs are oval and elongated with a perforated covering of the eggs, the operculum. The egg hatch within 8 days and the nymphs eclose by pushing the operculum of the eggs. Nymphs start feeding soon after then eclosion and there are three nymphal stages. Nymphal period lasts for 16 days (15-16). The adults survive for 30-40 days. The life cycle is completed at about a month and their arev10-12 generations in a year. Economic Importance: Both the nymphs and adults bite and suck the blood of the host.
    [Show full text]
  • Body Lice (Pediculus Humanus Var Corporis)
    CLOSE ENCOUNTERS WITH THE ENVIRONMENT What’s Eating You? Body Lice (Pediculus humanus var corporis) Maryann Mikhail, MD; Jeffrey M. Weinberg, MD; Barry L. Smith, MD 45-year-old man residing in a group home facil- dermatitis, contact dermatitis, a drug reaction, or a ity presented with an intensely pruritic rash on viral exanthema. The diagnosis is made by finding A his trunk and extremities. The lesions had been body lice or nits in the seams of clothing, commonly in present for 2 weeks and other residents exhibited simi- areas of higher body temperature, such as waistbands.1 lar symptoms. On physical examination, the patient Other lice that infest humans are the head louse was noted to have diffuse erythematous maculae, pap- (Pediculus humanus var capitis) and the pubic louse ules, hemorrhagic linear erosions, and honey-colored crusted plaques (Figure 1). Numerous nits, nymphs, and adult insects were observed in the seams of his clothing (Figures 2–4). Pediculosis corporis (presence of body lice liv- ing in the seams of clothing, Pediculus vestimenti, Pediculus humanus var corporis, vagabond’s disease) is caused by the arthropod Pediculus humanus humanus (Figure 4). In developed countries, infestation occurs most commonly among homeless individuals in urban areas and has been linked to Bartonella quintana– mediated endocarditis.1 Worldwide, the body louse Figure 1. Hemorrhagic linear erosions and honey- is a vector for diseases such as relapsing fever due to colored crusted plaques on the extremity. Borrelia recurrentis, trench fever due to B quintana, and epidemic typhus caused by Rickettsia prowazekii.2 The body louse ranges from 2 to 4 mm in length; is wingless, dorsoventrally flattened, and elongated; and has narrow, sucking mouthparts concealed within the structure of the head, short antennae, and 3 pairs of clawed legs.1 Female body lice lay 270 to 300 ova in their lifetime, each packaged in a translucent chitin- ous case called a nit.
    [Show full text]
  • Host Switching of Human Lice to New World Monkeys in South America
    Infection, Genetics and Evolution 39 (2016) 225–231 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Infection, Genetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/meegid Research paper Host switching of human lice to new world monkeys in South America Rezak Drali a, Laurent Abi-Rached a, Amina Boutellis a, Félix Djossou b, Stephen C. Barker c, Didier Raoult a,⁎ a Aix Marseille Université, URMITE, UM63, CNRS 7278, IRD 198, Inserm 1095, 13005 Marseille, France b Service de maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Centre Hospitalier de Cayenne, 97306 Cayenne Cedex, Guyane Française, France c Department of Parasitology, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia article info abstract Article history: The coevolution between a host and its obligate parasite is exemplified in the sucking lice that infest primates. In Received 29 September 2015 the context of close lice–host partnerships and cospeciation, Pediculus mjobergi, the louse of New World primates, Received in revised form 5 February 2016 has long been puzzling because its morphology resembles that of human lice. To investigate the possibility that Accepted 6 February 2016 P. mjobergi was transmitted to monkeys from the first humans who set foot on the American continent thousands Available online 8 February 2016 of years ago, we obtained and compared P. mjobergi lice collected from howler monkeys from Argentina to Keywords: human lice gathered from a remote and isolated village in Amazonia that has escaped globalization. Pediculus mjobergi Morphological examinations were first conducted and verified the similarity between the monkey and human lice. Amazonian head louse The molecular characterization of several nuclear and mitochondrial genetic markers in the two types of lice Host-switching revealed that one of the P.
    [Show full text]
  • What Are Head Lice? the Head Louse, Or Pediculus Humanus Capitis, Is a Parasitic Insect That Can Be Found on the Head, Eyebrows, and Eyelashes of People
    TIP SHEET – Head LICE What are head lice? The head louse, or Pediculus humanus capitis, is a parasitic insect that can be found on the head, eyebrows, and eyelashes of people. Head lice feed on human blood several times a day and live close to the human scalp. Head lice are not known to spread disease. Head lice move by crawling - they cannot hop or fly. • Head lice are spread by DIRECT Contact with the hair of an infested person. • Anyone who comes into DIRECT head-to-head contact with someone who already has Head Lice is at greatest risk. • The Head Lice do not fly or jump to another person. DIRECT contact is necessary for transmission. • Lice is spread by DIRECT contact with clothing (such as hats, scarves, coats) and personal items (such as combs, brushes, or towels) used by an infested person. • Head lice and nits are found on the scalp, typically around the ears and neckline Head lice survive less than 1–2 days if they fall off a person and cannot feed; nits cannot hatch and usually die within a week if they are not kept at the same temperature as that found close to the human scalp How do we treat head lice in the hospital? Treatment requires a physician order. Follow these treatment steps: 1. Treat/ Retreat according to instructions 2. Have the infested person put on a clean gown and change linen after treatment. 3. The nits (head lice eggs) must be combed out. 4. Nit (head lice egg) combs should be used to comb nits and lice from the hair shaft.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Population Genetics of Human Head and Clothing Lice to Elucidate Human Evolution
    USING POPULATION GENETICS OF HUMAN HEAD AND CLOTHING LICE TO ELUCIDATE HUMAN EVOLUTION By MELISSA ANNE TOUPS A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2008 1 © 2008 Melissa Toups 2 To my family. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. David Reed, and my committee members Dr. Pamela Soltis and Dr. Mike Miyamoto. I would also like to thank the Zoology department faculty for all their support, particularly Dr. Marta Wayne, Dr. Charlie Baer, and Dr. Colette St. Mary. I would like to acknowledge my coauthors Dr. Andrew Kitchen and Dr. Jessica Light, as well as my labmates Angelo Soto and Julie Allen. Finally, I would like to thank my friends Ondi Crino and Matt Salomon. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...............................................................................................................4 LIST OF TABLES...........................................................................................................................6 LIST OF FIGURES .........................................................................................................................7 ABSTRACT.....................................................................................................................................8 CHAPTER 1 THE NATURAL HISTORY OF THE HUMAN HEAD AND CLOTHING LOUSE, Pediculus humanus .................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Impact of Epidemic Typhus
    THE HISTORICAL IMPACT OF EPIDEMIC TYPHUS by JOSEPH M. CONLON LCDR, MSC, USN [email protected] INTRODUCTION Louse-borne Typhus Fever is undoubtedly one of the oldest pestilential diseases of mankind. Called by many names and confused with other fevers, it is not until the late fifteenth century that it can be recognized with certainty as causing devastating epidemics. With Plague, Typhoid, and Dysentery, it was the scourge of armies and civilian populations throughout the Middle Ages and frequently played a decisive role in wars conducted in Europe from the 15th through the 20th centuries. The manner in which the course of European history has been affected by Typhus epidemics has been graphically portrayed by a number of authors. This paper will attempt a further analysis of the historical impact of Louse-borne Typhus and how its epidemic propagation has led many to regard Pediculus humanus corporis as having a more profound effect on human history than any other animal. EPIDEMIC TYPHUS FEVER (TABARILLO, CLASSIC OR EUROPEAN TYPHUS, JAIL FEVER, WAR FEVER) Causative Agent. Typhus fever is an acute specific infection caused by Rickettsia prowazeki as isolated and identified by DaRocha-Lima in 1916. Named in honor of H. T. Ricketts and L. von Prowazek, both of whom contracted typhus in the course of their investigations and died, R. prowazeki was originally believed to be a virus because of its minute size and difficulty of cultivation. R. prowazeki is now recognized as being morphologically and biochemically a type of bacterium. A rod-shaped microorganism, R. prowazeki is an obligate intracellular parasite whose cell wall contains muramic acid, diaminopimelic acid, and other components similar to those of the gram-negative bacteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Lice: Body Louse, Pediculus Humanus Humanus Linnaeus and Head Louse, Pediculus Humanus Capitis De Geer (Insecta: Phthiraptera (=Anoplura): Pediculidae)1 H
    EENY-104 Human Lice: Body Louse, Pediculus humanus humanus Linnaeus and Head Louse, Pediculus humanus capitis De Geer (Insecta: Phthiraptera (=Anoplura): Pediculidae)1 H. V. Weems and T. R. Fasulo2 Introduction Human louse infestation, called pediculosis, can spread rapidly and may reach epidemic proportions if left un- Throughout time, lice, particularly head lice (Pediculus checked. In a group of people, such factors as age, race (for humanus capitis De Geer), have been a common reoccur- example, African-Americans are rarelyinfested with head ring problem, especially in schools. Millions of American lice (Slonka et al. 1975)), sex, crowding at home, family size, school children may encounter head lice during the school and method of closeting clothes influence the course and year. Head louse infestations throughout the United States distribution of the disease. The length of the hair does not affect people on all social and economic levels. appear to be a significant factor. Before World War II, head lice were fairly common in the It is generallyassumed that body lice evolved from head lice United States, body and crab lice much less so. After World after mankind began wearing clothes. War II and the emergence of DDT as a louse control agent, outbreaks of lice were much less common. Now lice again are intruding into the environment of the average Ameri- Identification can. Lice or their eggs are easily transmitted from person Three types of lice infest humans: the body louse, Pediculus to person on shared hats, coats, scarves, combs, brushes, humanus humanus Linnaeus, also known as Pediculus towels, bedding, upholstered seats in public places, and by humanus corporis; the head louse Pediculus humanus capitis personal contact.
    [Show full text]
  • Crab Louse, Pthirus Pubis (Linnaeus) (Insecta: Phthiraptera (Anoplura): Pediculidae)1 H
    EENY-103 Crab Louse, Pthirus pubis (Linnaeus) (Insecta: Phthiraptera (Anoplura): Pediculidae)1 H. V. Weems and T. R. Fasulo2 Introduction caused by Borrellia recurrentis (Lebert) Bergy et al. (PAHO 1973). Sucking lice are small wingless external parasites that feed on blood. Three types of sucking lice infest humans: the Crab lice most commonly inhabit adults and are not found body louse, Pediculus humanus humanus Linnaeus, also on children prior to puberty. Infestation with crab lice is known as Pediculus humanus corporis; the head louse, said to result most often from contact during coitus. As Pediculus humanus capitis De Geer; and the crab louse or with body lice and head lice, but less so with crab lice, pubic louse, Pthirus pubis (Linnaeus). transmission may occur from crowding of infested clothing with uninfested clothing in locker rooms and gymnasiums, The head louse and the body louse are morphologically by sleeping in infested beds, or from contact with badly indistinguishable, but are easily distinguished from the infested persons in a crowd. Pubic lice tend to remain on crab louse. The crab louse usually infests the hairs of the their hosts throughout their lives unless dislodged, taken off pubic and perineal regions, but may move to the armpits, with clothing, or controlled. beard, or mustache. It occurs rarely on the eyelids and in a few instances has been found in all stages on the scalp of Little is known about the incidence of infestation with unusually hairy individuals. It is relatively immobile when Pthirus in a human community, but generally it seems on the host, remaining attached and feeding for hours or to be much lower than with Pediculus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mitochondrial Genome of the Chimpanzee Louse, Pediculus Schaeffi
    Herd et al. BMC Genomics (2015) 16:661 DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-1843-3 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access The mitochondrial genome of the chimpanzee louse, Pediculus schaeffi: insights into the process of mitochondrial genome fragmentation in the blood-sucking lice of great apes Kate E. Herd1, Stephen C. Barker1 and Renfu Shao2* Abstract Background: Blood-sucking lice in the genera Pediculus and Pthirus are obligate ectoparasites of great apes. Unlike most bilateral animals, which have 37 mitochondrial (mt) genes on a single circular chromosome, the sucking lice of humans have extensively fragmented mt genomes. The head louse, Pediculus capitis, and the body louse, Pe. humanus, have their 37 mt genes on 20 minichromosomes. The pubic louse, Pthirus pubis, has its 34 mt genes known on 14 minichromosomes. To understand the process of mt genome fragmentation in the sucking lice of great apes, we sequenced the mt genome of the chimpanzee louse, Pe. schaeffi, and compared it with the three human lice. Results: We identified all of the 37 mt genes typical of bilateral animals in the chimpanzee louse; these genes are on 18 types of minichromosomes. Seventeen of the 18 minichromosomes of the chimpanzee louse have the same gene content and gene arrangement as their counterparts in the human head louse and the human body louse. However, five genes, cob, trnS1, trnN, trnE and trnM, which are on three minichromosomes in the human head louse and the human body louse, are together on one minichromosome in the chimpanzee louse. Conclusions: Using the human pubic louse, Pt. pubis, as an outgroup for comparison, we infer that a single minichromosome has fragmented into three in the lineage leading to the human head louse and the human body louse since this lineage diverged from the chimpanzee louse ~6 million years ago.
    [Show full text]