Symmetrically Organized Dorsal Unpaired Median (Dum) Neurones and Flash Control in the Male Firefly, Photuris Versicolor by Thomas A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Symmetrically Organized Dorsal Unpaired Median (Dum) Neurones and Flash Control in the Male Firefly, Photuris Versicolor by Thomas A r exp. Biol. (1981), 93. I33"i47 133 Hbt/i 8 figures Printed in Great Britain SYMMETRICALLY ORGANIZED DORSAL UNPAIRED MEDIAN (DUM) NEURONES AND FLASH CONTROL IN THE MALE FIREFLY, PHOTURIS VERSICOLOR BY THOMAS A. CHRISTENSEN AND ALBERT D. CARLSON Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York 11794 USA (Received 1 October 1980) SUMMARY 1. Male fireflies of the species Photuris versicolor produce a species-typical triple-pulsed flash which is used as a courtship signal. The neural anatomy was examined to determine if this complex behaviour could be attributed to the organization within the central nervous system. 2. The lantern is innervated primarily by the two most posterior abdominal ganglia. Bilateral roots from these ganglia form a symmetrical pattern of innervation to both sides of the lantern tissue. With minor exceptions, this pattern is similar to that described for other firefly species. 3. The neural organization within the lantern ganglia was determined by back-filling the roots with cobalt or Lucifer Yellow CH, and then examining the ganglia in whole mount. Clusters of three or four large dorsal unpaired median (DUM) neurone somata, each sending bilateral processes out of the lantern roots, were found in both lantern ganglia. 4. The DUM neurone axons bifurcate several times and ramify throughout the dorsal surface of the lantern tissue. More than one DUM neurone may innervate a particular region of photogenic tissue. 5. When dye was back-filled into peripheral branches of the lantern roots that do not innervate photogenic tissue, no DUM somata were stained. Instead, the fibres that filled carried the dye anteriorly up the nerve cord through the ipsilateral connective. No fibres were observed to cross the gang- lion midline or exit from the contralateral root, nor were any fibres stained in the contralateral connectives. 6. DUM neurones within the lantern ganglia have resting potentials be- tween 30 and 45 mv and they exhibit multiple, as well as single-peaked spon- taneous action potentials. The presence of multiple spikes might reflect the special bilateral morphology of these neurones. 7. The lantern nervous system is organized in an arrangement capable of synchronizing the excitation of all the lantern photocytes. This neural organi- zation could aid in the control of the complex flash pattern displayed by male Photuris versicolor fireflies. INTRODUCTION The firefly flash is a rapid burst of light used as a courtship signal, and each species firefly produces a unique flash exchange pattern (Lloyd, 1966). Male Photuris I 'eflies, in particular, produce complex flashes by rapid variations of flash intensity 134 T. A. CHRISTENSEN AND A. D. CARLSON B Fig. i (A). Relationship between electrical activity in the lantern tissue and the dynamics of a P. verticolor male spontaneous triple-pulsed flash. Upper trace: photomultiplier output of light emission. Lower trace: spike activity recorded via external electrodes in the anterior lantern segment. Temp: 22 °C. Time marker: 200 ms. (B) Gross innervation of the lantern (dorsal view). The two large lantern organs (shaded) completely cover the sternitea of the 6th and 7th abdominal segments. The lantern tissue is innervated by paired roots from the 5 th, 6th and 7th abdominal ganglia. These roots break up into a network of smaller fibres (not illustrated) that densely innervate all the photogenic tissue. Note also that intersegmental tracts link adjacent roots in the periphery. The four genital roots from A 7 are cut short in this diagram. Scale marker: 1 mm. (Barber, 1951), and these modulated flashes are recognized by prospective mates of the same species during courtship (Nelson, Carlson & Copeland, 1975; Zorn & Carlson, 1978). The P. versicolor male typically emits a triple-pulsed flash which appears as a twinkle to the human observer (Fig. 1 A). The rhythmic flash patterns of many fireflies, including P. versicolor, are believed to be controlled by a neural 'pacemaker* within the animal's brain(Case & Buck, 1963; Bagnoli et al. 1976). Bursts of action potentials travel down the segmental nerve cord and by some means activate the photocytes (light-producing cells) of the lantern. These action potentials can be recorded by external electrodes in the lantern tissue (Case & Buck, 1963; Fig. 1 A). In P. versicolor males, the neural volley activates both lantern segments simultaneously, resulting in three rapid pulses of light from the photogenic tissue. Although Chang (1956), and later Buck & Case (1961) demon- strated that the adult firefly lantern behaves like a typical neuroeffector such as striated muscle, we still do not fully understand how neural activity initiates luminescence in the photocytes (Case & Strause, 1978), which are actually derived from fat cells (Hess, 1922). The gross neural anatomy of the lantern was originally described by Hanson (1962). The lantern, which occupies the sternites of the sixth and seventh abdominal segments, is innervated by nerve roots from the fifth, sixth and seventh abdominal ganglia (A 5, A 6 and A 7, respectively), the latter two ganglia lying dorsal to the anterior lantern segment (Fig. 1B). Hanson (1962) showed that it was possible to deganglionate the posterior lantern segment by severing the connexions with its more anterior ganglion, A 7. The adult lantern ultrastructure was first described for a Photinus species by Beaim & Anderson (1955), and later for Photuris by Kluss (1958) and Smith (1963). DUM neurones and flash control in the firefly 135 Prganized into a ventral photogenic layer and an overlying reflector layer. Trachea and nerves plunge ventrally into the photogenic tissue forming a uniform array of tracheal cylinders. Tracheal processes, enclosed in tracheolar cells, project horizontally away from the tracheal cylinders, through specialized, mitochondria-filled tracheal end cells, and eventually reach the photocytes which are situated in a rosette pattern around the tracheal cylinders. Nerve axons split away from their surrounding sheath cells and terminate in pad-like endings between the tracheal end cells and tracheolar cells. Synaptic specializations can be seen between the vesicle-filled nerve endings and tracheolar cells, and it is believed that these cells transmit the excitation to the photo- cytes (Case & Strause, 1978). Several lines of evidence indicate that the phenylethylamine octopamine could function as a neurotransmitter in the lantern. It has been shown that this amine is extremely effective in eliciting lantern luminescence (Carlson, 19686), and that substantial amounts are found in the lantern segments (Robertson & Carlson, 1976). More recently, octopamine has been found to activate an octopamine-sensitive adenylate cyclase in the lantern which catalyses the production of cyclic AMP (Nathanson, 1979). It is suggested that activation of the photocyte-end-cell complex could occur through the actions of this second messenger, but the details of activation remain unresolved. From this description it is clear that we understand a great deal about the neural and physiological control of firefly flashing, but the anatomical organization within the central nervous system, through which the triggering bursts from the brain pass to the lantern, remains unexplored. In this article we report the discovery of distinct popu- lations of large dorsal unpaired median (DUM) neurones within the lantern ganglia that appear to perform a key function in conducting the neural bursts from the brain to the photocytes of the lantern. Moreover, these neurones are organized to ensure the synchronous activation of the thousands of photocytes in both lantern segments. To further define the functional significance of these neurones, we have monitored their spike activity and identified them anatomically using intracellular recording and dye- marking techniques. The results presented here match the expected results, given the geometry of the neurones and their proposed function. In short, these cells appear to be both physiologocally and anatomically suited to an important role in the production of light by the photocytes. A preliminary report of these results has appeared elsewhere (Christensen, 1980). METHODS Organisms Adult male fireflies (Photuris versicolor) were obtained from a tree-lined grassy field near Stony Brook, Long Island, New York. Males displaying their species-specific triple-pulsed flash were lured out of the trees with a single flash from a flashlight pointed into the grass, which served to mimic the typical female response to the male's flash. After capture, the fireflies were kept in glass or plastic containers at room tem- perature with moist paper-towelling and grass. All were dissected within a few days after capture. 136 T. A. CHRISTENSEN AND A. D. CARLSON Anatomical methods The gross morphology of the lantern nervous system was examined by two methods. To locate the destinations of the lantern ganglia roots, the abdominal dorsal cuticle was removed and the exposed ventral nerve cord and lantern were stained with methylene blue dye (1%, w/w, in saline; Hanson, 1962). The finer peripheral nerve processes were traced by back-filling one lantern ganglion root with cobaltous chloride (6%, w/w, in distilled water, containing o-i% bovine serum albumin), and allowing the cobalt to be carried into the ganglion and out again through the contralateral nerve root to the photogenic tissue. Subsequently, the preparation was rinsed with ammo- nium sulphide which
Recommended publications
  • 1)B 2) F 3) a 4) E 5) D 6) C
    Virtual Firefly Festival Lesson: Flash Patterns In this lesson, participants will learn the secret behind the species-specific flash patterns of fireflies and then match visual representations of the patterns with the correct species. New Jersey is home to about 19 native species of fireflies, and you can probably see quite a few of them mingling together in your neighborhood! Each species of firefly has their own unique flash pattern and color, used to communicate with potential mates and predators. There are roughly 2,000 species of fireflies worldwide! Generally, the males are the ones to fly while flashing, and the females hang out perched on grass or in trees and flash to the males. One of the most numerous fireflies, especially here in the northeast, is the common eastern firefly (Phontinus pyralis); the male can be easily seen flashing a yellow-green light as it flies upward in a J-shape. A female P. pyralis can distinguish a male of her species vs. a male Photo by Spencer Black via Science Friday Photinus consimilis which flies in a straight line and emits 4-9 rapid yellow flashes every ten seconds. That being said, the animal world is full of trickery; the female Photuris versicolor (also known as the femme fatale firefly) is an aggressive predator that mimics the flash patterns of the female Photinus pyralis to lure and eat the male P. pyralis! Along with the flash pattern, the color is important and can be used to identify species: the blue ghost firefly, Phausis reticulata, is found in southern Appalachia and the males are famous for their eerie blue light that they maintain for up to a minute as they meander a foot or two above the leaf litter, where the wingless females wait.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide to Western North American Fireflies
    Field Guide to Western North American Fireflies By Larry Buschman (May 2015 Draft) Fireflies are also known as lightning bugs or glowworms. They are popular insects because they produce their own light (bioluminescence). They are not “flies” or “bugs” but beetles (order Coleoptera) with leathery first wings. Fireflies belong to the family “Lampyridae”. Identify members of this family as follows: a. They have an elongated body. b. The head telescopes in and out under the pronotum (the thoracic shield). c. The pronotum is usually large and shield- like. d. The pronotum often has colorful markings with yellow, tan, red, or orange pigment. Fig. 1. Photinus firefly e. Most species are 5-20 mm long. This Field Guide is intended for those who would like to identify the different fireflies in their environment. This guide covers the most common firefly species, but is not intended to be comprehensive. North America is blessed with several hundred species of Lampyrids—the firefly family. Many of them fly around flashing and are called “Fireflies” or “Lightning Bugs”. This Field Guide will focus on these fireflies. However, there are also some “Glowwarms” (Lampyrids that glow from the ground) and the “Dark Fireflies” (non-glowing Lampyrids). For research I am obliged to take voucher specimens. However, many populations are so small, especially in the west, that loosing even a few specimens can be expected to have negative effects on their populations. I would encourage most firefliers not to take specimens (practice catch and release) unless they will be preserved for science. Fireflies should not be collected by children to decorate their bodies etc—not in the west! How to Identify Fireflies Many fireflies can be identified by their flash patterns, but this is not as easy as it would seem.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Consequences Artificial Night Lighting
    Rich Longcore ECOLOGY Advance praise for Ecological Consequences of Artificial Night Lighting E c Ecological Consequences “As a kid, I spent many a night under streetlamps looking for toads and bugs, or o l simply watching the bats. The two dozen experts who wrote this text still do. This o of isis aa definitive,definitive, readable,readable, comprehensivecomprehensive reviewreview ofof howhow artificialartificial nightnight lightinglighting affectsaffects g animals and plants. The reader learns about possible and definite effects of i animals and plants. The reader learns about possible and definite effects of c Artificial Night Lighting photopollution, illustrated with important examples of how to mitigate these effects a on species ranging from sea turtles to moths. Each section is introduced by a l delightful vignette that sends you rushing back to your own nighttime adventures, C be they chasing fireflies or grabbing frogs.” o n —JOHN M. MARZLUFF,, DenmanDenman ProfessorProfessor ofof SustainableSustainable ResourceResource Sciences,Sciences, s College of Forest Resources, University of Washington e q “This book is that rare phenomenon, one that provides us with a unique, relevant, and u seminal contribution to our knowledge, examining the physiological, behavioral, e n reproductive, community,community, and other ecological effectseffects of light pollution. It will c enhance our ability to mitigate this ominous envirenvironmentalonmental alteration thrthroughough mormoree e conscious and effective design of the built environment.”
    [Show full text]
  • From Plant Exploitation to Mutualism
    From Plant Exploitation to Mutualism. Chapter 3 François Lieutier, Kalina Bermudez-Torres, James Cook, Marion O. Harris, Luc Legal, Aurélien Sallé, Bertrand Schatz, David Giron To cite this version: François Lieutier, Kalina Bermudez-Torres, James Cook, Marion O. Harris, Luc Legal, et al.. From Plant Exploitation to Mutualism. Chapter 3. Nicolas Sauvion, Denis Thiéry, Paul-André Calatayud. Insect-Plant Interactions in a Crop Protection Perspective, 81, 2017, Advances in Botanical Research, 978-0-12-803318-0. hal-02318872 HAL Id: hal-02318872 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02318872 Submitted on 1 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. VOLUME EIGHTY ONE ADVANCES IN BOTANICAL RESEARCH Insect-Plant Interactions in a Crop Protection Perspective Volume Editor NICOLAS SAUVION INRA,UMR BGPI 0385 (INRA-CIRAD-SupAgro), Montpellier, France DENIS THIERY INRA, UMR SAVE 1065, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, Centre INRA de recherches de Bordeaux- Aquitaine, Institut des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin, Villenave d’Ornon, France PAUL-ANDRE CALATAYUD IRD UMR EGCE (Evolution, Génome, Comportement, Ecologie), CNRS-IRD-Univ. Paris-Sud, IDEEV, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France; IRD c/o ICIPE, Nairobi, Kenya Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier 125 London Wall, London EC2Y 5AS, United Kingdom The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, United Kingdom 50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States 525 B Street, Suite 1800, San Diego, CA 92101-4495, United States First edition 2017 Copyright Ó 2017 Elsevier Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Lampyridae) with New Ohio Records and Regional Observations for Several Firefly Species
    Ohio Biological Survey Notes 9: 16–34, 2019. © Ohio Biological Survey, Inc. Life History and Updated Range Extension of Photinus scintillans (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) with New Ohio Records and Regional Observations for Several Firefly Species LYNN F. FAUST¹, LAURA S. HUGHES2, MARK H. ZLOBA3, AND HEATHER L. FARRINGTON4 1Lynn F. Faust, 11828 Couch Mill Rd, Knoxville, TN 37932, [email protected]; 2Laura S. Hughes, 365 Shawnee Loop South, Pataskala, Ohio. [email protected]; 3Mark H. Zloba, Ecological Manager, Cincinnati Museum Center, Edge of Appalachia Preserve System, 4274 Waggoner Riffle Rd., West Union, Ohio 45693, [email protected]; 4Heather L. Farrington, Cincinnati Museum Center, Curator of Zoology, 1301 Western Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45203, [email protected]. Abstract: Photinus scintillans (Say) has long been considered the Photinus species with one of the smallest ranges in North America. In field studies conducted between 2016 and 2019 in Ohio and Indiana, we discovered new, thriving P. scintillans populations, tripling the east-west range from 550 km to 1820 km when combined with more recent collection records by firefly researchers Lloyd, Stanger-Hall, and Lower. We describe in new detail flight behaviors, nocturnal timing of activity, flash pattern, lantern coloration changes, courtship, and mating habits. We present the first evidence of the presence of spermatophore-producing spiral glands and prolonged mating with the brachypterous females; oviposition behaviors; larval eclosion and appearance; and seasonality with habitat variations and commonalities. We provide the first report with photos of possible phoresy by a springtail (Collembola) on a firefly. In addition, we offer new Ohio state (and nearby Indiana and Kentucky) firefly records, including the extremely rare P.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Paper, 2013, All Rights Reserved, No Part Should Be Used Or Quoted Without Authors' Permission Contact at [email protected])
    Published in: Atharva. 8(3); 2013 (Copyrighted paper, 2013, all rights reserved, no part should be used or quoted without authors' permission contact at [email protected]) The Neglected Natural Resources of Goa Dr. Nandkumar M. Kamat ( Asst. Professor, Dept. Of Botany, Goa University; Member, Goa State Planning Board, Goa State Environmental Protection Council; Ex member Western Ghats expert panel; State co-ordinator NBSAP, Goa; Member Expert group on training manual National Biodiversity Authority (NBA); Co-ordinator Planning Commission sponsored project on Plant and fungus biodiversity inventory; former Vice chairperson, WWF, Goa state committee; former member Goa State biodiversity board and state wildlife advisory board; Recipient of Goa State Conservation award, 2000 Forest department, Goa) ( Authors’ note:- From May 8, 2011 to August 28, 2011, I published a series of 16 weekly articles in the local English daily The Navhind Times on various aspects of neglected biodiversity of Goa. Many self styled and fake nature lovers, tiger, snake, turtle, frog and bird lovers and foreign funded NGOs have suddenly proliferated in Goa and have managed to keep themselves in media limelight. Their philosophy is as per old Goan proverb- “kashti suki davrun thighur dharap” . Unfortunately the full environmental discourse has been hijacked by these brigades and government is dancing to their tunes. When it comes to knowledge, research, facts and figures there is no substitute for truth- ecological and biological and in that direction this series was aimed to popularize science of Goa’s natural resources and biodiversity treasure. It was original and the longest in the journalistic history of Goa on this subject.
    [Show full text]
  • BETHANY BEACH FIREFLY (Photuris Bethaniensis) UNDER the ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT and to CONCURRENTLY DESIGNATE CRITICAL HABITAT
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR PETITION FOR EMERGENCY LISTING OF THE BETHANY BEACH FIREFLY (Photuris bethaniensis) UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT AND TO CONCURRENTLY DESIGNATE CRITICAL HABITAT Photo by: Christopher M. Heckscher, Delaware State University NOTICE OF PETITION David Bernhardt, Secretary U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Jim Kurth, Acting Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Gary Frazer, Assistant Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1840 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Wendi Weber, Director Region 5 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 300 Westgate Center Drive Hadley, MA 01035-9589 [email protected] Pursuant to Section 4(b) of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1533(b); Section 553(e) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 553(e); and 50 C.F.R. § 424.14(a), the Center for Biological Diversity and the Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation hereby petition the Secretary of the Interior, through the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS,” “Service”), to protect the Bethany Beach firefly (Photuris bethaniensis) on an emergency basis under the ESA. Petitioners believe that emergency listing is warranted, but should FWS fail to provide emergency protections then we urge that the petition still be considered and that a listing proposal be enacted no later than one year from the date of the petition. Based on imminent destruction of a significant portion of its range and degradation in the remaining portion, the Bethany Beach firefly is at immediate risk of extinction.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects of Western North America
    INSECTS OF WESTERN NORTH AMERICA 11. BIOLUMINESCENT BEHAVIOR OF NORTH AMERICAN FIREFLY LARVAE (COLEOPTERA: LAMPYRIDAE) WITH A DISCUSSION OF FUNCTION AND EVOLUTION Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University INSECTS OF WESTERN NORTH AMERICA 11. BIOLUMINESCENT BEHAVIOR OF NORTH AMERICAN FIREFLY LARVAE (COLEOPTERA: LAMPYRIDAE) WITH A DISCUSSION OF FUNCTION AND EVOLUTION By Lawrent L. Buschman Department of Entomology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas USA 60605. Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado USA 80523. Current Address: 963 Burland Dr., Bailey, Colorado 80421, Phone: 303-838-4968 Email: [email protected] March 10, 2019 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University 2 Cover: Image: A photograph of a Photuris pupa showing the glow coming from two oval light organs and bright body glow from the body. (Photo by David Liittschwaer, extended time exposure, used with permission). ©Copyright Lawrent L. Buschman 2019 All Rights Reserved ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences & Pest management Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1177 3 Table of Contents Abstract 5 General Introduction 6 Chapter 1: Description of Larval
    [Show full text]
  • BIBLIOGRAPHY THOMAS EISNER Schurman Professor of Chemical
    LIST OF PUBLICATIONS NA = NOT AVAILABLE THOMAS EISNER PAGE - 1 Eisner, T. and J. Meinwald (eds). 1995. CHEMICAL ECOLOGY: THE BIBLIOGRAPHY CHEMISTRY OF BIOTIC INTERACTION, National Academy Press 214 pp. Eisner. T 2000. Chromatic Fantasy: Leaves in the Midst of Change. Sinauer THOMAS EISNER Associaes, Inc. Sunderland, MA, Schurman Professor of Chemical Ecology Cornell University Eisner, T. 2003. For Love of Insects. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Ithaca, NY 14853 MA. 607-255-4464 (phone) Eisner, T., M. Eisner, M. Siegler. 2005. Secret Weapons. Harvard University 607-255-6186 (fax) Press, Cambridge, MA. e-mail: [email protected] OTHER PUBLICATIONS LIST OF BOOKS 1. Eisner, T. and E.O. Wilson. 1952. The morphology of the Eisner, T. (ed.). 1960. Proc. Symposium, CHEMICAL DEFENSE proventriculus of a formicine ant. Psyche 59 , 47-60. MECHANISMS IN ARTHROPODS. Verhandl. XI. Internat. Kongress Entomol. vol. III, pp. 247-293 (Inst. Entomol. Agraria dell'Univ. Pavia). 2. Eisner, T. 1953. The histology of a sense organ in the labial palps of Neuroptera. J. Morph. 93 , 109-122. Burnett, A.L. and T. Eisner. 1964. ANIMAL ADAPTATION. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York. vii + 136 pp. 3. Wilson, E.O., T. Eisner, and B.D. Valentine. 1954. The beetle genus Paralimulodes Bruch in North America, with notes on morphology Wilson, E.O., T. Eisner, W.R. Briggs, R.E. Dickerson, R.L. Metzenberg, R.D. and behavior (Coleoptera: Limulodidae). Psyche 61 , 154-161. O'Brien, M. Susman, W.E. Boggs. 1973. LIFE ON EARTH. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Stamford, CT. xi + 1033 pp. Second Edition 1978. 846 pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Allegheny National Forest June 2012 Firefly Survey Forest and Warren Counties, PA
    Allegheny National Forest June 2012 Firefly Survey Forest and Warren Counties, PA In cooperation with the U.S. Forest Service, Department of Agriculture, Allegheny National Forest Under the Secure Rural Schools Act, P.L.110-343 and Forest Service Agreement 12-DG-11091900-011 ©Ted Faust 2012 Conducted by the FIRE Team: (Firefly International Research and Education) Lynn Faust, Raphael De Cock, Kathrin Stanger Hall, Zach Marion, Sarah Sander Team leader and corresponding author: Lynn Faust 11828 Couch Mill Road Knoxville, TN 37932-1217 [email protected] (865) 690-2852 ©Lynn Faust Oct 2012 1 Table of Contents Firefly Survey Summary.................................................................................................................................................... 3 General Firefly Biology ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 Habitat Photos of ANF ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Study Sites of ANF, table .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Study Sites, map ............................................................................................................................................................... 7 Photinus carolinus, the synchronous firefly .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Firefly Digital Photography
    Local Environment Attachment and the Possibility of Using Citizen Science Approaches to Measure Firefly Populations in Time and Place DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Yang Xing Graduate Program in Environmental Science The Ohio State University 2012 Dissertation Committee: Professor Richard Moore, Advisor Professor Jeremy Bruskotter Professor Joe Kovach Copyright by Yang Xing 2011 Abstract While the number of conservation projects has increased domestically and worldwide, many environment education programs have failed to fulfill their goals of encouraging the citizens to actively adopt pro-environment behaviors. To investigate the potential correlation between people’s environment attachment and people’s tendency to perform pro-environment behaviors, a survey was conducted in the rural part of Wayne County, OH in 2009. The result of the survey research shows a significant correlation between people’s attachment to the natural environment and their tendency to participate in certain kinds of pro-environment behaviors. Such finding supplements the previous research on the relationship between place attachment and pro-environment behaviors. The survey results from my 2009 survey show that these local citizens tend to associate fireflies with good environment quality. A literature review yielded little evidence to support or reject such hypothesis. One major reason for the lack of research on the relationship between fireflies and the natural environment was because of the lack of suitable technology to monitor firefly activities in the field. I developed a new timed sequential digital photographic method to monitor firefly flashing activities in their natural habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • IMPACT of LIGHT POLLUTION on DIFFERENT TAXA of MIGRATORY SPECIES (Prepared by Ms
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 5th Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC5) Online, 28 June – 9 July 2021 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC5/Inf.7 IMPACT OF LIGHT POLLUTION ON DIFFERENT TAXA OF MIGRATORY SPECIES (Prepared by Ms. Laetitia Nunny on behalf of the CMS Secretariat) UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC5/Inf.7 IMPACT OF LIGHT POLLUTION ON DIFFERENT TAXA OF MIGRATORY SPECIES 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 1.1.1 What is light pollution? The use of artificial light to illuminate our streets, homes, sports pitches, commercial and industrial properties either permanently or intermittently through the hours of darkness has become the norm in most developed countries. Lighting at night is considered essential for our security and/or convenience. Monuments, churches, bridges and other landmarks may be illuminated at night for aesthetic purposes and light is also emitted by the vehicles we use on land, at sea and in the air. The increasing use of electric lighting has modified the natural light environment dramatically and this can have effects on both humans and wild animals. The last century has seen an unprecedented increase in the use of artificial light at night (also known as ALAN), with a global increase rate of approximately 6% per year (with a range of 0-20% depending on geographical region) according to Hölker et al. (2010b). ALAN is also referred to as light pollution and some distinctions are made between “astronomical light pollution”, which prevents us from seeing the stars and other celestial matter, and “ecological light pollution” which has an impact on the biological functioning of species and disrupts ecosystems (Longcore and Rich, 2004).
    [Show full text]