DOCSLIB.ORG

Cultivating the Commons an Assessment of the Potential for Urban Agriculture on Oakland’S Public Land

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cultivating the Commons an Assessment of the Potential for Urban Agriculture on Oakland’S Public Land Portland State University PDXScholar Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Publications Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies and and Presentations Planning 12-2010 Cultivating the Commons An Assessment of the Potential for Urban Agriculture on Oakland’s Public Land Nathan McClintock Portland State University, [email protected] Jenny Cooper University of California - Berkeley Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac Part of the Social Policy Commons, Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Citation Details McClintock, N., and Cooper, J. (2010). Cultivating the Commons An Assessment of the Potential for Urban Agriculture on Oakland’s Public Land. Available at www.urbanfood.org. This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cultivating the Commons An Assessment of the Potential for Urban Agriculture on Oakland’s Public Land by Nathan McClintock & Jenny Cooper Department of Geography University of California, Berkeley REVISED EDITION – December 2010 ! i Cultivating the Commons An Assessment of the Potential for Urban Agriculture on Oakland’s Public Land Nathan McClintock & Jenny Cooper Department of Geography, University of California, Berkeley October 2009, revised December 2010 In collaboration with: City Slicker Farms HOPE Collaborative Institute for Food & Development Policy (Food First) This project was funded in part by the HOPE Collaborative. City Slicker Farms was the fiscal sponsor. Food First published print copies of the report. Fellowship funding from the Robert & Patricia Switzer Foundation, UC Berkeley’s Institute for the Study of Social Change, and Community Forestry & Environmental Research Partnerships also made this project possible. The ideas expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the funding organizations. All text and maps © N. McClintock / J. Cooper. All photos © N. McClintock. All aerial imagery © 2009 TerraMetrics/Google Earth and National Agricultural Imagery Program. Please do not reproduce any element of this report without proper citation. For more information about this project, contact: Nathan McClintock University of California, Berkeley Department of Geography 507 McCone Hall, #4740 Berkeley, CA 94720 Email: [email protected] Website: www.urbanfood.org i Cultivating the Commons: An Assessment of the Potential for Urban Agriculture on Oakland’s Public Land ! Acknowledgements We are deeply indebted to everyone who contributed his or her time to this project: Community Advisory Committee: Brahm Ahmadi, People’s Grocery Thanks, also, to members of the HOPE Collaborative’s Food Leon Davis, Saint Vincent de Paul of Alameda Co. Systems Action Team (and the Production Group, in Alisa Dodge, HOPE Collaborative particular) and Built Environment Action Team for sharing Barbara Finnin, City Slicker Farms their visions of a sustainable food system for Oakland and for Alethea Harper, Oakland Food Policy Council their input into the final draft. Thanks to Alisa Dodge for her Jason Harvey, Oakland Food Connection editorial help. The preliminary analysis of private land would Hank Herrera, HOPE Collaborative have been impossible without Snehee Khandeshi’s hard work. Navina Khanna, HOPE Collaborative Grey Kolevzon, Cycles of Change / Urban Youth Harvest In fond memory of Douglas Allen, whose GIS wizardry was Max Kurtz-Cadji, People’s Grocery invaluable at the early stages of this project. He tragically Aaron Lehmer, Bay Localize passed away before seeing this project come to fruition. Kira Pascoe, Alameda County UC Cooperative Extension David Ralston, City of Oakland (Redevelopment) Loren Rodgers, North Oakland resident About the Authors Paula Simon, West Oakland resident Heather Wooten, Public Health Law & Policy Nathan McClintock is a PhD candidate in geography at UC Berkeley. He also serves on the Oakland Food Policy Dissertation Chair: Council and was a member of the HOPE Collaborative’s Food System Action Team. He holds a MS degree in crop Nathan Sayre, UC Berkeley Dept. of Geography science/sustainable agriculture from North Carolina State University and has worked extensively in sustainable Technical Advisors: agriculture research, extension, and education in the US and internationally. Douglas Allen, UC Berkeley Dept. of Geography Darin Jensen, UC Berkeley Dept. of Geography Jenny Cooper received her BA in geography from UC Mike Jones, UC Berkeley Dept. of Geography Berkeley in 2008. She is works for the Environmental Defense Kevin Koy, UC Berkeley Geospatial Innovation Facility Fund in Washington, DC, on international climate change policy. ii Cultivating the Commons: An Assessment of the Potential for Urban Agriculture on Oakland’s Public Land ! Contents 4. Site Profiles..............................................................................................19 Executive Summary .................................................................................... 1 W.D. Wood Park 1. Introduction................................................................................................ 3 “Jungle Hill” King’s Estates Open Space Food Justice in the Flatlands 3rd Street Farming the Food Deserts: Urban Agriculture Takes Root MLK Shoreline Park Box 1: Urban Agriculture’s Multi-Functionality Clinton Square Box 2: Urban Agriculture Programs in Oakland Cesar Chavez Park Map 1: Urban Gardens in Oakland Harbor Bay Pkwy. / “North Field” Why a Land Inventory? Oakport St. Cultivating the Commons Box 3: Urban Farms on Public Land 5. Conclusions & Recommendations .............................................25 2. Methods...................................................................................................... 11 Box 6: Potential Productivity Map 2: Land Owned by Public Agencies Appendices......................................................................................................31 Box 4: Public Land Assessed in this Inventory A. Land Locator ........................................................................................31 3. Results......................................................................................................... 13 Box 5: How to Use the Land Locator with Existing Online Databases Box 5: Sites by City Council District Map A: North Oakland / CCD 1 Map 3: Size and Distribution of Sites Map B: West Oakland / CCD 3 Map 4: Ground Cover Map C: Central East Oakland / CCDs 2 & 5 Map 5: Potential Agroforestry Map D: East Oakland / CCDs 6 & 7 Map 6: Slope Map E: Oakland Hills (South) / CCDs 6 & 7 Map 7: Permitted Agricultural Use Map F: Oakland Hills (Central) / CCDs 4 & 6 Map G: Oakland Hills (North) / CCD 1 B. GIS Methodology ................................................................................51 C. Calculating Oakland’s Fruit & Vegetable Needs ..........................54 D. Permitted Agricultural Use Zoning .................................................55 E. Municipal Code Related to Animal Raising ...................................57 F. Blueprint for Management Plan for Urban Agricultural Use .....59 G. Privately Owned Vacant Land ...........................................................65 References .......................................................................................................66 iii Cultivating the Commons: An Assessment of the Potential for Urban Agriculture on Oakland’s Public Land iv Cultivating the Commons: An Assessment of the Potential for Urban Agriculture on Oakland’s Public Land Executive Summary Using aerial photos, GIS, and site visits, we identified approximately 1,200 acres of undeveloped open space at 495 This is an inventory of open space with potential for agricultural sites (consisting of 756 individual publicly-owned tax parcels). production on land both owned by public agencies and within the About a third of this land is located on slopes less than 10 city limits of Oakland, California. The inventory was conducted percent, a third between 10 and 30 percent, and a third greater between the summer of 2008 and spring of 2009 and is part of an than 30 percent; overall, at least 828 acres could be cultivated. ongoing movement to develop a more resilient, sustainable, and The majority of these parcels are located within ! mile of public just food system in Oakland. This project aims to locate transportation. A third of the parcels are within a quarter mile of Oakland’s “commons”—land that is owned by public agencies a school, and 7.5 percent have an EBMUD meter. In addition to and therefore a public resource—and assess the potential for the parcels in this inventory, we identified 2,706 acres of publicly- urban agriculture (UA) on this land. We hope that this owned land with the potential for agroforestry. assessment can be used 1) to inform policy decisions that concern Oakland’s food, health, and environmental quality, and Based on a conservative estimate, the parcels identified in this 2) by non-profit organizations and city officials as a tool with land inventory could produce up to 5 percent of the City’s vegetable which to identify potential sites for UA programs. needs or 6 percent of its fruit needs. However, the potential impact of the expansion of UA programs in Oakland extends beyond the While Oakland was once a center for fruit
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Divest/Invest Groups and Campaigns
    DIVEST/INVEST: From Criminalization to Thriving Communities - created by - TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 Criminalization Affects… 1​ 0 Civic Engagement 10 Community Development 11 Criminal Justice Reform 12 Youth/Education 14 Environmental & Climate Justice 16 Data & Surveillance 18 Food Justice 20 Gender Justice 21 Human Rights 23 Immigrant Rights 24 Juvenile Justice 25 Rural Communities 27 Labor 29 LGBTQ Rights 31 Public Health 32 Transportation 34 Art, Design & Public Space 34 Housing Justice 36 Recommendations for Grantmakers 39 Visions of Community-Based Safety and Justice 41 Resources 43 Organizations to Consider 48 About Funders for Justice 56 DIVEST/INVEST: CRIMINALIZATION 2 INTRODUCTION Funders for Justice​ created this website for funders because we believe that our collective investments in housing, education, health, transportation, food security, and jobs will fail if we do not also proactively work to divest this nation’s resources from criminalization. Our partners in the field are organizing for divestment from criminalization, and understand that as critical to the work of transforming communities to be truly safe and secure. This website is a toolkit for grantmakers, donors, and funder affinity groups, to help funders in confronting mass criminalization. We ask you to ​listen​, ​learn​, and​ ​take action​. “We keep each other safe. When governments, schools and the healthcare system fail communities — everyday people take action to create safety. It is my deepest desire to live in a world where safety can be realized without punishment. When we get to that world, the possibilities for transformation will become endless.” –Charlene Carruthers | National Director BYP100 | FFJ Advisor DIVEST/INVEST: CRIMINALIZATION 3 Our budget reflects our values...
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnographic Understandings of Ethnically Diverse Neighbourhoods to Inform Urban Design Practice
    Local Environment The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability ISSN: 1354-9839 (Print) 1469-6711 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cloe20 Ethnographic understandings of ethnically diverse neighbourhoods to inform urban design practice Clare Rishbeth, Farnaz Ganji & Goran Vodicka To cite this article: Clare Rishbeth, Farnaz Ganji & Goran Vodicka (2017): Ethnographic understandings of ethnically diverse neighbourhoods to inform urban design practice, Local Environment, DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2017.1385000 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2017.1385000 © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 10 Oct 2017. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 684 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=cloe20 Download by: [University of Sheffield] Date: 31 October 2017, At: 04:13 LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2017.1385000 Ethnographic understandings of ethnically diverse neighbourhoods to inform urban design practice Clare Rishbeth , Farnaz Ganji and Goran Vodicka Department of Landscape, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY The aim of this paper is to inform urban design practice through deeper Received 19 August 2016 understanding and analysis of the social dynamics of public outdoor Accepted 8 September 2017 space in ethnically diverse neighbourhoods. We hypothesise that KEYWORDS findings from ethnographic research can provide a resource that Public open space; literature improves cultural literacy and supports social justice in professional review; ethnicity; diversity; practice. The primary method is a meta-synthesis literature review of 24 urban design; UK ethnographic research papers, all of which explore some dimensions of public open space use and values in UK urban contexts characterised by ethnic and racial diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Practice of Food Justice in the US
    Notes on the practice of food justice in the U.S.: understanding and confronting trauma and inequity Rachel Slocum 1 Kirsten Valentine Cadieux Minneapolis, USA University of Minnesota, USA Abstract The lexicon of the U.S. food movement has expanded to include the term 'food justice.' Emerging after approximately two decades of food advocacy, this term frames structural critiques of agri-food systems and calls for radical change. Over those twenty years, practitioners and scholars have argued that the food movement was in danger of creating an 'alternative' food system for the white middle class. Alternative food networks drew on white imaginaries of an idyllic communal past, promoted consumer-oriented, market-driven change, and left yawning silences in the areas of gendered work, migrant labor, and racial inequality. Justice was often beside the point. Now, among practitioners and scholars we see an enthusiastic surge in the use of the term food justice but a vagueness on the particulars. In scholarship and practice, that vagueness manifests in overly general statements about ending oppression, or morphs into outright conflation of the dominant food movement's work with food justice (see What does it mean to do food justice? Cadieux and Slocum (2015), in this Issue). In this article, we focus on one of the four nodes (trauma/inequity, exchange, land and labor) around which food justice organizing appears to occur: acknowledging and confronting historical, collective trauma and persistent race, gender, and class inequality. We apply what we have learned from our research in U.S. and Canadian agri-food systems to suggest working methods that might guide practitioners as they work toward food justice, and scholars as they seek to study it.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction Development, Displacement, and Dining Alison Hope Alkon, Yuki Kato, and Joshua Sbicca The sign was intended to be ironic, a joke even, but the community was not laughing. On one side, it read “ink! Coffee. Happily gentrifying the neighborhood since 2014.” The other proclaimed “Nothing says gentrifi- cation like being able to order a cortado.” The neighborhood is Denver’s Five Points, long home, not always by choice, to nearly all of the city’s Black residents. In a history common to many Black communities across the United States, residents were pre- vented from living in other parts of the city through segregation, redlin- ing, and racial covenants. The neighborhood became a vibrant cultural center, colloquially known as the “Harlem of the West,” where more than fifty jazz clubs hosted many of the early twentieth century’s most well- known performers (Dowlen n.d.). But Five Points is no longer a pre- dominantly Black neighborhood, as gentrification has brought an influx of younger, whiter, and wealthier residents. Indeed, realtors and devel- opers no longer refer to the area as Five Points at all, but as the River North Arts District or RiNo. These new residents patronize the area’s many new galleries, restaurants, breweries, and cafes like ink! Coffee. The sign became a flash point for political organizing. Community members understood, sometimes viscerally, that gentrification doesn’t just mean cleaning up the neighborhood. It also means, in the words of community organizer Lisa Calderon, “pushing us out of our community.” Although most activists did not engage in property damage, someone spray painted “white coffee” across the building, unsubtly gesturing at the racialized nature of food’s place in urban “revitalization.” The cof- fee shop’s window was broken, and an unnamed skateboarder stole the offensive sign.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultivating the Commons an Assessment of the Potential for Urban Agriculture on Oakland's Public Land
    Portland State University PDXScholar Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies and Publications and Presentations Planning 12-2010 Cultivating the Commons An Assessment of the Potential for Urban Agriculture on Oakland’s Public Land Nathan McClintock Portland State University, [email protected] Jenny Cooper University of California - Berkeley Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac Part of the Social Policy Commons, Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details McClintock, N., and Cooper, J. (2010). Cultivating the Commons An Assessment of the Potential for Urban Agriculture on Oakland’s Public Land. Available at www.urbanfood.org. This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Cultivating the Commons An Assessment of the Potential for Urban Agriculture on Oakland’s Public Land by Nathan McClintock & Jenny Cooper Department of Geography University of California, Berkeley REVISED EDITION – December 2010 ! i Cultivating the Commons An Assessment of the Potential for Urban Agriculture on Oakland’s Public Land Nathan McClintock & Jenny Cooper Department of Geography, University of California, Berkeley October 2009, revised December 2010 In collaboration with: City Slicker Farms HOPE Collaborative Institute for Food & Development Policy (Food First) This project was funded in part by the HOPE Collaborative. City Slicker Farms was the fiscal sponsor.
    [Show full text]
  • What Can I Do with a Major In… URBAN STUDIES by 2025, 75 Percent of the World's Population Will Live in Cities
    What can I do with a major in… URBAN STUDIES By 2025, 75 percent of the world's population will live in cities. The Urban Studies major prepares students to establish, develop, and carry out ministry or other work in an increasingly urban world, both in the local church and through parachurch ministries, local government and secular non-profits, as well as to lay a foundation for graduate study. Includes one year of course work and internship while living in Minneapolis’ inner city. What types of work are related to this degree? Who employs people with this degree? Inner-city missions Cross cultural ministries, domestic or foreign Refugee resettlement Federal, state and local governments Church staff member AmeriCorps programs Community organization director (cross cultural) Social and human services organizations Evangelism and church planting Para church organizations Government work Community development organizations Hospitality ministries Educational programs (non-licensure) Refugee resettlement Parks and recreation programs Program development Family services agencies/programs (financial, family planning, Job development health and wellness, marriage, vocational, food/housing Life skills coaching assistance, military family support) Residential counselor National and international humanitarian aid organizations Human services worker or case manager Advocacy (legal or adoption) More information online at ONETonline.org General Strategies for Success: An understanding of economics, sociology, anthropology and political science/public policy can enhance your employability and effectiveness. Urban studies majors have an understanding of issues facing society in urban areas. This understanding of other cultures and trends is valued by employers in many industries including education, government, and business. Learn at least one additional language and learn about ESL teaching strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook Headings
    School of Environment, Education and Development Planning and Environmental Management MSc Global Urban Development and Planning 2019-2020 Programme Handbook www.seed.manchester.ac.uk/studentintranet ii School of Environment, Education and Development Planning and Environmental Management MSc Global Urban Development and Planning 2019-2020 Programme Handbook www.seed.manchester.ac.uk/studentintranet iii iv Welcome to the School of Environment, Education and Development The School of Environment, Education and Development (SEED) was formed in August 2013 and forges an interdisciplinary partnership combining Geography and Planning and Environmental Management with the Global Development Institute (GDI), the Manchester School of Architecture and the Manchester Institute of Education, thus uniting research into social and environmental dimensions of human activity. Each department has its own character and the School seeks to retain this whilst building on our interdisciplinary strengths. The Global Development Institute (GDI) is a culmination of an impressive history of development studies at The University of Manchester which has spanned more than 60 years and unites the strengths of the Institute for Development and Policy Management (IDPM) and the Brooks World Poverty Institute. IDPM was established in 1958 and became the UK’s largest University-based International Development Studies centre, with over thirty Manchester-based academic and associated staff. Its objective is to promote social and economic development, particularly within lower-income countries and for disadvantaged groups, by enhancing the capabilities of individuals and organisations through education, training, consultancy, research and policy analysis. To build on this tradition, the University created in SEED the Brooks World Poverty Institute, a multidisciplinary centre of excellence researching poverty, poverty reduction, inequality and growth.
    [Show full text]
  • URBAN STUDIES ACADEMIC MAP: DEGREE BS (120 CREDIT HOURS) Offered Evenings, Weekends, and Online
    URBAN STUDIES ACADEMIC MAP: DEGREE BS (120 CREDIT HOURS) Offered Evenings, Weekends, and Online This deg r e e map is a semester-­‐by-­‐semester sample course schedule for students majoring in Urban Studies. The milestones listed to the right of each se m e ste r are designed to keep a st ude nt on track to graduate in four years. The s chedule serves as a general guideline to help st ude nt s build a full schedule each se m es t e r . Milestones ar e courses and specia l requirements ne cessary fo r timely pro gress t o c omplete a major. When one or more milestones are missed, students should consult with an academic advisor to determine if another degree path would be more suitable. The mission of the Urban Studies program is to recruit, retain, and educate a diverse student body in the knowledge, skills and values of professional public service. In order to accomplish this mission, we will strive to do the following: • Meet the professional development needs of students and those employed in the public, nonprofit, health and urban sectors by providing a quality program that builds skills in and knowledge of sociology, social work, urban affairs, public administration & leadership; • Provide students with responsive, timely, and business friendly support services to promote retention and successful program completion; • Conduct research and service activities supportive of these educational purposes; and • Serve the public, nonprofit, health and urban sectors as a source of consultation, applied research, and knowledge of social programs, public policy & public management issues to the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Impact Report
    TABLE OF CONTENTS OAKLAND GENERAL PLAN LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Page SUMMARY S-1 I. INTRODUCTION I-1 II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION II-1 III. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS III-A-1 AND MITIGATION MEASURES A. Land Use III.A-1 B. Transportation and Circulation III.B-1 C. Population, Housing, and Employment III.C-1 D. Public Services III.D-1 E. Air Quality III.E-1 F. Visual and Aesthetic Conditions III.F-1 G. Cultural and Historic Resources III.G-1 H. Vegetation and Wildlife III.H-1 I. Hydrology and Water Quality III.I-1 J. Energy III.J-1 K. Geology and Seismicity III.K-1 L. Noise III.L-1 M. Hazardous Materials III.M-1 N. Wind III.N-1 O. Consistency with Adopted Plans and Policies III.O-1 IV. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS IV-1 V. IMPACT OVERVIEW V-1 VI. REPORT PREPARERS VI-1 APPENDICES 1. Notice of Preparation and Initial Study 1-1 2. Hazardous Materials Supporting Documentation 2-1 Oakland General Plan Land Use and Transportation Element EIR ii Environmental Science Associates TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES S-1 Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures S-2 II-1 Households, Population, and Employment, 1995 and 2015 II-7 II-2 Household and Job Growth in the City’s Twelve Planning Areas, 1995-2015 II-8 II-3 General Plan Goals II-10 II-4 Correlation Between Proposed and Existing Land Use Categories II-16 II-5 Projects Within the Downtown Showcase District II-20 II-6 Projects Within the Coliseum Showcase District II-21 II-7 Major Land Use Diagram Change Areas II-24 II-8 Acreage in Proposed Land
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Megalopolis: Exploring Americaâ•Žs New •Œmegapolitanâ•Š Geography
    Brookings Mountain West Publications Publications (BMW) 2005 Beyond Megalopolis: Exploring America’s New “Megapolitan” Geography Robert E. Lang Brookings Mountain West, [email protected] Dawn Dhavale Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/brookings_pubs Part of the Urban Studies Commons Repository Citation Lang, R. E., Dhavale, D. (2005). Beyond Megalopolis: Exploring America’s New “Megapolitan” Geography. 1-33. Available at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/brookings_pubs/38 This Report is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Report in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Report has been accepted for inclusion in Brookings Mountain West Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. METROPOLITAN INSTITUTE CENSUS REPORT SERIES Census Report 05:01 (May 2005) Beyond Megalopolis: Exploring America’s New “Megapolitan” Geography Robert E. Lang Metropolitan Institute at Virginia Tech Dawn Dhavale Metropolitan Institute at Virginia Tech “... the ten Main Findings and Observations Megapolitans • The Metropolitan Institute at Virginia Tech identifi es ten US “Megapolitan have a Areas”— clustered networks of metropolitan areas that exceed 10 million population total residents (or will pass that mark by 2040). equal to • Six Megapolitan Areas lie in the eastern half of the United States, while four more are found in the West.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Agriculture: Growing Healthy, Sustainable Places
    Urban Agriculture: Growing Healthy, Sustainable Places Kimberley Hodgson, Marcia Caton Campbell, and Martin Bailkey American Planning Association Planning Advisory Service Report Number 563 Urban Agriculture: Growing Healthy, Sustainable Places is the result of a collaborative partnership between the American Planning Association (APA) and MetroAg: Alliance for Urban Agriculture. Funding for this project was provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) Office of Brownfields and Land Revitalization. This report was developed under the auspices of the Planning and Community Health Re- search Center, one of APA’s National Centers for Planning. The Center engages in research, policy, outreach, and education to advance healthy communities through planning. For more information, visit www.planning.org/nationalcenters/health. APA’s National Centers for Planning conduct policy-relevant research and education involving community health, natu- ral and man-made hazards, and green communities. For more detail, visit www.planning .org/nationalcenters. Kimberley Hodgson, aicp, is a registered dietitian and the manager of APA’s Planning and Community Health Research Center. She served as the project manager and primary author. Marcia Caton Campbell is a coauthor and the Milwaukee director for the Center for Resilient Cities and a MetroAg associate. Martin Bailkey is a coauthor and the evaluation and outreach coordinator for Growing Power, as well as a MetroAg associate. The lead author of the history section of Chapter 2 was Domenic Vitiello, assistant profes- sor of city planning and urban studies at the University of Pennsylvania, with contributions from David Morley, aicp, research associate and PAS coordinator at APA. The lead author of the economic development section of Chapter 4 was Ken Meter, president of the Cross- roads Resource Center.
    [Show full text]
  • List Service Groups 1 and 2 Addendum 3
    Request for Proposal for Zero Waste Services Service Groups 1 and 2 City Facilities ‐ List Addendum 3 Facility Name Facility Address ALLENDALE RECREATION CENTER 3711 SUTER ST ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER 1101 29TH AVE ARROYO COMMUNITY GARDEN 79TH AVE CUL‐DE‐SAC AND ARROYO TENNIS COURTS 8006 PLYMOUTH ST ARROYO VIEJO RECREATION CENTER 7701 KRAUSE AVE BROOKDALE RECREATION CENTER 2535 HIGH ST BURKHALTER TENNIS COURT 3923 COLUMBIAN DR BUSHROD RECREATION CENTER 560 59TH ST CALDECOT FIELD 6900 BROADWAY CARMEN FLORES RECREATION CTR 1637 FRUITVALE AVE CARTER GILMORE FIELD 1390 66TH AVE CHABOT FIELD 6850 CHABOT RD CHABOT TENNIS COURT 6884 CHABOT RD CITY HALL 1 FRANK H OGAWA PLAZA CITY STABLES 13560 SKYLINE BLVD CLINTON PARK 655 INTERNATIONAL BLVD COLUMBIA GARDENS PARK (ENTERPRISE) 9854 KOFORD RD COMMUNITY GARDEN 876 47TH ST COMMUNITY GARDEN PROGRAM 1700 MARKET ST CONCORDIA RECREATION CENTER 2901 64TH AVE CURT FLOOD FIELD PARK 3200 BOSTON AVE DALZIEL BUILDING 250 FRANK H OGAWA PLAZA DAVIE TENNIS STADIUM 198 OAK RD, PIEDMONT DEFREMERY POOL 1269 18TH ST DEFREMERY REC CENTER 1651 ADELINE ST DEFREMERY TENNIS COURT 1239 18TH ST DIMOND PARK & REC CENTER 3860 HANLY RD DIMOND TENNIS COURT 3743 FRUITVALE AVE DOWNTOWN OAKLAND SENIOR CENTER 200 GRAND AVE DUNMUIR HOUSE 2960 PERALTA OAKS CT EAST OAKLAND SPORTS CENTER (STORED/SHARED WITH IRA JINKINS REC. C9161 EDES AVE EASTMONT POLICE SUBSTATION 2651 73RD AVE ESTUARY PARK (BOAT LAUNCH) (Park) 107 EMBARCADERO EAST F M SMITH RECREATION CTR 1969 PARK BLVD FAIRYLAND 245 GRAND AVE FAIRYLAND 699 BELLEVUE AVE FIRE ADMINISTRATION
    [Show full text]