BILL HEARD ENTERPRISES, INC., Et Al.,1 ) Chapter 11 ) Debtors

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

BILL HEARD ENTERPRISES, INC., Et Al.,1 ) Chapter 11 ) Debtors Case 08-83029-JAC11 Doc 2014 Filed 07/31/09 Entered 07/31/09 19:24:58 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 155 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION IN RE: ) BILL HEARD ENTERPRISES, INC., et al.,1 ) Chapter 11 ) Debtors. ) Case No. 08-83029-JAC11 ) NOTICE OF FILING OF BLACKLINE OF FIRST AMENDED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT DESCRIBING DEBTORS’ JOINT CONSOLIDATED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF LIQUIDATION PROPOSED BY DEBTORS AND THE OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS, THE EXHIBITS THERETO AND FIRST AMENDED JOINT CONSOLIDATED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF LIQUIDATION COMES NOW, Bill Heard Enterprises, Inc. ("Heard"), and certain of its direct and indirect subsidiaries (the "Subsidiaries"), as debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the "Debtors"), by and through their undersigned counsel, and submits the attached blacklines2 of the First Amended Disclosure Statement Describing Debtors’ Joint Consolidated Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation Proposed by Debtors and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the “Disclosure Statement”), the Exhibits thereto and the First Amended Joint Consolidated Chapter 1 In addition to Bill Heard Enterprises, Inc., the Debtors include the following entities: (i) Bill Heard Chevrolet Company, (ii) Tom Jumper Chevrolet, Inc., (iii) Bill Heard Chevrolet, Inc. - Huntsville, (iv) Landmark Chevrolet, Ltd., (v) Bill Heard Chevrolet, Ltd., (vi) Bill Heard Chevrolet Corporation Nashville, (vii) Bill Heard Chevrolet Corporation - Orlando, (viii) Bill Heard Chevrolet, Inc. - Union City, (ix) Bill Heard Chevrolet at Town Center, LLC, (x) Bill Heard Chevrolet, Inc. - Collierville, (xi) Bill Heard Chevrolet, Inc. - Scottsdale, (xii) Bill Heard Chevrolet, Inc. - Plant City, (xiii) Bill Heard Chevrolet, Inc. - Buford, (xiv) Bill Heard Chevrolet Corporation - Las Vegas, (xv) Bill Heard Chevrolet Corporation - N.W. Las Vegas, (xvi) Twentieth Century Land Corp., (xvii) Enterprise Aviation, Inc., (xviii) Century Land Corporation, (xix) Century Land Company - Tennessee, (xx) Bill Heard Management, LLC, (xxi) Landmark Vehicle Mgt., LLC, (xxii) Georgia Services Group, LLC, (xxiii) Columbus Transportation, LLC, and (xxiv) Airport Chevrolet, Inc. 2 Contemporaneously herewith the Debtor is filing non-blacklined versions of the Plan and Disclosure Statement as well. 1766662 v1 Case 08-83029-JAC11 Doc 2014 Filed 07/31/09 Entered 07/31/09 19:24:58 Desc Main Document Page 2 of 155 11 Plan of Liquidation (the “Plan”)3, which represent the modifications that have been made to the Plan and the Disclosure Statement since their filing with the Court on June 19, 2009. These modifications have been made following discussions with parties-in-interest in advance of the hearing set on the Disclosure Statement for August 4, 2009. For ease of reference, the blacklines are being filed in color. A key to the modifications is included as the last page of the blackline. Modifications in blue represent new text added, modifications in green represent text that has been moved, and modifications in red represent deletions. /s/ Marc P. Solomon Robert B. Rubin Derek F. Meek Marc P. Solomon Attorneys for Debtors OF COUNSEL: BURR & FORMAN LLP 420 North 20th Street, Suite 3400 Birmingham, Alabama 35203 Telephone: (205) 251-3000 Facsimile: (205) 458-5100 3 The Plan is attached as Exhibit A to the Disclosure Statement. 1766662 v1 2 Case 08-83029-JAC11 Doc 2014 Filed 07/31/09 Entered 07/31/09 19:24:58 Desc Main Document Page 3 of 155 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the foregoing has been served on the attached Master Service List and the following parties listed below who had previously requested a copy of the Disclosure Statement and Plan on this the 29th day of July, 2009. /s/ Marc P. Solomon OF COUNSEL 1766662 v1 3 Case 08-83029-JAC11 Doc 2014 Filed 07/31/09 Entered 07/31/09 19:24:58 Desc Main Document Page 4 of 155 MASTER SERVICE LIST MassMutual Asset Finance LLC c/o Robert H. Adams Electronic Service: Kimberly B. Glass Haskell Slaughter Young & Rediker, LLC Robert B. Rubin 1400 Park Place Tower Derek F. Meek 2001 Park Place North Heather A. Lee Birmingham, AL 35203 Marc P. Solomon [email protected] Amanda M. Beckett [email protected] c/o Burr & Forman LLP Counsel for Debtors ADP Commercial Leasing, LLC 420 North 20th Street, Suite 3400 ADP, Inc. Dealer Services Group Birmingham, AL 35203 c/o Henry A. Callaway, III [email protected] Hand Arendall LLC [email protected] Post Office Box 123 [email protected] Mobile, AL 36601 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Alphera Financial Services, A Division of Edward J. Peterson BMC Financial Services NA, LLC Amy Denton Harris c/o Holland & Knight LLP Counsel for Debtor James H. Rollins Stichter Riedel Blain & Prosser P.A. Paul E. Vranicar 110 East Madison Street, Suite 200 Suite 2000, One Atlantic Center Tampa, FL 33602 1201 West Peachtree Street [email protected] Atlanta, GA 30309-3400 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Richard Blythe Bankruptcy Administrator for the MassMutual Asset Finance LLC Northern District of Alabama c/o Jodie E. Buchman 400 Wells Street Shaan S. Chima PO Box 3045 DLA Piper LLP (US) Decatur, AL 35602 The Marbury Building [email protected] 6225 Smith Avenue Baltimore, MD 21209-3600 First Commercial Bank [email protected] c/o Stuart M. Maples [email protected] Maples & Ray, PC 401 Holmes Ave., Suite H Huntsville, AL 35801 [email protected] Case 08-83029-JAC11 Doc 2014 Filed 07/31/09 Entered 07/31/09 19:24:58 Desc Main Document Page 5 of 155 In re: Bill Heard Enterprises, Inc., et al., Chapter 11 Case No. 08-83029-JAC11 United States Bankruptcy Court for the No. Dist. of Alabama, No. Div. updated: 6/12/2009 Astar Finance LLC [email protected] Astar Financing Falcon II, LLC [email protected] Falcon Finacial II, LLC c/o Mike Rupe GMAC LLC Cara S. Mittleman c/o Sara Anne Ford Merritt A. Pardini Lightfoot, Franklin & White LLC Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP The Clark Building 575 Madison Avenue 400 20th Street North New York, NY 10022-2585 Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] General Motors Corporation c/o Robert B. Weiss Astar Finance LLC Joseph R. Sgroi Astar Financing Falcon II, LLC Adam L. Kochenderfer Falcon Finacial II, LLC Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn, LLP c/o Patrick Darby 2290 First National Building Jennifer A. Harris 660 Woodward Avenue Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP Detroit, MI 48226 1819 Fifth Avenue North [email protected] Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] BMW Financial Services CB & T c/o Jim Rollins c/o Jeff Kelley Holland & Knight Troutman Sanders 1201 West Peachtree Street, N.E. 600 Peachtree Street, NE One Atlantic Center, Suite 2000 Suite 5200 Atlanta, GA 30309 Atlanta, GA 30308-2216 [email protected] [email protected] Carrie Ann Rohrscheib GE Hale, Dewey & Knight, PLLC John M. Monahan 88 Union Avenue, Suite 700 [email protected] Memphis, TN 38103 [email protected] GMAC GMAC LLC GE Commercial Finance Business c/o Charles Tatelbaum Property Corporation Joshua B. Alper c/o John B. Hutton Adorno & Yoss Greenberg Traurig, P.A. 350 East Las Olas Boulevard 1221 Brickell Avenue Suite 1700 Miami, FL 33131 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 [email protected] 21} Case 08-83029-JAC11 Doc 2014 Filed 07/31/09 Entered 07/31/09 19:24:58 Desc Main Document Page 6 of 155 In re: Bill Heard Enterprises, Inc., et al., Chapter 11 Case No. 08-83029-JAC11 United States Bankruptcy Court for the No. Dist. of Alabama, No. Div. updated: 6/12/2009 GE Commercial Finance Business Georgia Department of Revenue Property Corporation c/o Oscar B. Fears, III c/o Stephen Katz Senior Assistant Attorney General John Elrod 40 Capitol Square, S.W. The Forum-Suite 400 Atlanta, GA 30334 3290 Northside Parkway, NW [email protected] Atlanta, GA 30327 [email protected] Coventry Healthcare, Inc. [email protected] c/o Cozen O'Connor Neal D. Colton Wells Fargo Equipment Finance, Inc. Eric L. Scherling C. Ellis Brazeal III 1900 Market Street Edward J. Ashton Philadelphia, PA 19103 Walston, Wells & Birchall LLP [email protected] 1819 5th Avenue North, Suite 1100 [email protected] Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected] JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. [email protected] Clark R. Hammond Lindan Hill DeFalco Advertising Johnston Barton Proctor & Rose, LLP c/o Ted Stuckenschneider 569 Brookwood Village 205 North 20th Street, Suite 427 Suite 901 Birmingham, AL 35203 Birmingham, AL 35209 [email protected] [email protected] Wells Fargo Bank NA and affiliates De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc. c/o Lee R. Benton c/o William M. Hancock Brenton K. Morris Wolfe, Jones, Boswell, Wolfes, Hancock & Benton & Centeno, LLP Daniel, LLC 2019 Third Avenue North 905 Bob Wallace Avenue Birmingham, AL 35203 Huntsville, AL 35801 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Lynda Hall, Tax Collector of Madison Comptroller of Public Accounts of the County, Alabama State of Texas c/o Travis S. Jackson c/o Jay W. Hurst Sirote & Permutt, PC Assistant Attorney General 305 Church Street, Suite 800 Bankruptcy & Collections Division Post Office Box 18248 P.O. Box 12548 Huntsville, AL 35804 Austin, TX 78711-2548 [email protected] [email protected] 31} Case 08-83029-JAC11 Doc 2014 Filed 07/31/09 Entered 07/31/09 19:24:58 Desc Main Document Page 7 of 155 In re: Bill Heard Enterprises, Inc., et al., Chapter 11 Case No. 08-83029-JAC11 United States Bankruptcy Court for the No.
Recommended publications
  • Workforce Readjustment & Employee Benefit Plans
    Workforce Readjustment & Employee Benefit Plans Maintaining Excellence in Human Capital While Minimizing Legal Risks During the Economic Downturn Marcia Goodman, Mayer Brown LLP January 27, 2009 Maritoni Kane, Mayer Brown LLP Edward Pionke, Mayer Brown LLP Mayer Brown is a global legal services organization comprising legal practices that are separate entities ("Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP, a limited liability partnership established in the United States; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales; and JSM, a Hong Kong partnership, and its associated entities in Asia. The Mayer Brown Practices are known as Mayer Brown JSM in Asia. Human capital is key for the knowledge economy, but cost control is now! • In the current economic downturn, every day brings more reports of layoffs, shutdowns and other workforce adjustments • Microsoft plans to layoff almost 10% of its workforce in its first mass layoffs ever • The decline in the stock market and shareholder demands challenge employers in maintaining benefits • How will you maintain excellence and minimize legal risks while addressing these challenges? 2 Common Corporate Survival and Cost-Cutting Strategies in the Current Economy • Reductions in Force • Workforce Restructuring – often global • Sales, Mergers, Acquisitions • Pressure on Executive Compensation • Pressure on Traditional Defined Benefit Pension Plans 3 Overview of Today’s Presentation • Key Areas of Legal Risk in RIF’s, Restructuring
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Documents and Settings\Zdap01.ALNBMS\Local
    UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION In the Matter of: } } BILL HEARD ENTERPRISES, INC., et al. } CASE NO. 08-83029-JAC-11 } CHAPTER 11 } (Jointly Administered) Debtor(s). } TWENTIETH CENTURY LAND CORP., } A.P. No. 09-80023-JAC-11 } Plaintiff(s), } v. } } LANDMARK NORTH FREEWAY, LTD. } ISTAR FINANCIAL, INC. d/b/a AUTOSTAR, } SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO FALCON } FINANCIAL, LLC, et al., } } Defendant(s). } HSBC BANK USA, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE } REGISTERED HOLDERS OF FALCON } AUTO DEALERSHIP LOAN TRUST 2003-1 } LOAN-BACKED BONDS, SUCCESSOR-IN- } INTEREST TO FALCON FINANCIAL, LLC } d/b/a FALCON LENDING, LLC, } } Counterclaim Plaintiff } v. } } TWENTIETH CENTURY LAND CORP., } } Counterclaim Defendant. } MEMORANDUM OPINION On September 11, 2009, this Court entered a memorandum opinion and order tentatively granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Twentieth Century Land Corporation (“Twentieth Century”), and against the defendant, HSBC Bank USA (“HSBC”), a copy of which Case 09-80023-JAC Doc 115 Filed 11/16/09 Entered 11/16/09 14:39:18 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 33 is attached hereto and incorporated herein.1 The Court found that Twentieth Century was entitled to avoid its transfer of property to Landmark North Freeway, Ltd. (“Landmark North”) under § 544(a)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code because the warranty deed transferring the property to Landmark North was not recorded and a hypothetical purchaser would not have had notice of documents recorded outside the chain of title. The Court further found that the possession of Landmark Chevrolet, Ltd. (“Landmark Chevrolet”) as a tenant under a written lease agreement with Landmark North was not sufficiently open, visible, exclusive, and unequivocal to impart constructive notice of Landmark North’s interest in the subject property by virtue Landmark Chevrolet’s possession of same.
    [Show full text]
  • CREW Worst Governors Repor
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………1 Methodology……………………………………………………………………………………...2 The Governors I. Haley Barbour (R-MS)………..…………………………………………………..3 II. Donald L. Carcieri (R-RI)…………………………………………………………6 III. Jim Gibbons (R-NV).…………………………..………………………………….9 IV. Bobby Jindal (R-LA).…………..………………………………………………..13 V. David A. Paterson (D-NY).……………………………..……………………….16 VI. Sonny Perdue (R-GA)..……………………..…………………………………...18 VII. Rick Perry (R-TX)……….………………..……………………………………..21 VIII. Bill Richardson (D-NM)…………………………………………………………25 IX. Mike Rounds (R-SD).…………………….……………………….......................28 X. Mark Sanford (R-SC)…………………………………………………………….30 XI. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R-CA)..………………………………………………..33 INTRODUCTION Since 2003, CREW has closely monitored government ethics, bringing egregious conduct to light and holding public officials accountable for their misconduct. With a few exceptions, CREW has focused primarily on the ethics of federal government officials. In 2006, however, CREW launched the state-based Colorado Ethics Watch (CEW), which concentrates on public integrity at the state level. In 2009, CREW turned greater attention to state government ethics by publishing its Directory of State-based Government Watchdogs, which covers all 50 states and the District of Columbia. CREW’s Worst Governors delves further into state ethics. CREW reviewed the job performance of all 50 of our nation’s governors to determine which are the worst. CREW considered whether governors had violated ethics, campaign finance and personal financial disclosure rules as well as whether they had complied with state transparency laws. It is nearly impossible to compare governors’ adherence to the laws because state rules and laws vary so widely. Each state has its own ethical rules and standards. Requirements regarding disclosure of campaign contributions and expenditures and personal finances differ significantly as do state open records laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Situation Summary
    Change and Decay in All Around I See The Decline of Western Capitalism is a Fascinating Spectacle. Make some popcorn and follow along here! Deep Background & Setup: A lot of the basis for the current Crisis was laid long ago, and there were many warning shots across the bow. If you're not a conneiseur of financial failure and treachery, you might not be aware of these things. I'll catch you up on the high points. Monday 3/28/94 Derivative Surprise! With exquisite timing, Matt starts at Hercules International Management in Minneapolis. We're on the 20th floor of the Piper Jaffray Bldg and share space with Piper Capital Management (PCM). In the next ten days, PCM would misprice a major fund which was tanking due to a huge concentration of derivatives, resulting in major losses to investors, a loss of several billion dollars under managament, many lawsuits, fines and SEC actions. I was oblivious, having to deal with my new position, find the bathroom, etc., but it was an uncanny bit of timing! The SEC rulings are all online and make interesting reading, for me anyway. The point? Leverage, one-way bets, pricing problems and not understanding derivative risks can get you in trouble. It's nothing new. Tuesday 12/6/94 Derivative Surprise!: Orange County, California, declares bankruptcy! Treasurer Robert Citron has made great returns. The way you do this is take big risks. Everybody squinted real hard and didn't look too closely, but when interest rates went the wrong way, his big reverse-repo and inverse-floater derivative positions tanked.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 in the United States Bankruptcy Court for The
    IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION IN RE: CASE NO. 08-83029-JAC11 BILL HEARD ENTERPRISES, INC., CHAPTER 11 et al., Debtors. / BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES, NA, LLC, d/b/a ALPHERA FINANCIAL SERVICES, Plaintiff, COLUMBUS BANK & TRUST COMPANY Intervening Plaintiff v. ADVERSARY PROCEEDING BILL HEARD ENTERPRISES, INC., NO. 09-80117 LANDMARK CHEVROLET, LTD., BILL HEARD CHEVROLET, INC. – HUNTSVILLE, BILL HEARD CHEVROLET COMPANY, TOM JUMPER CHEVROLET, INC., BILL HEARD CHEVROLET CORPORATION – ORLANDO, BILL HEARD CHEVROLET AT TOWN CENTER, LLC, BILL HEARD CHEVROLET, INC. – BUFORD, BILL HEARD CHEVROLET CORP. – NW LAS VEGAS, BILL HEARD CHEVROLET CORP. – LAS VEGAS, BILL HEARD CHEVROLET, INC. – COLLIERVILLE, Defendants. / MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter having come before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment filed by William F. Perkins in his capacity as the Liquidating Trustee for the Debtors (the 1 US2008 1085720.1 Case 09-80117-JAC Doc 42 Filed 02/05/10 Entered 02/05/10 11:14:20 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 25 “Liquidating Trustee’s Motion”), BMW Financial Services NA, LLC, d/b/a Alphera Financial Services, Plaintiff in the above styled adversary proceeding (“the Alphera Motion”), and Columbus Bank & Trust Company, Intervenor Plaintiff (the “CB&T Motion,” together with the Liquidating Trustee Motion and the Alphera Motion, the “Motions”) in the above styled adversary proceeding (the “Adversary”); and it appearing that this Court has jurisdiction over the Motions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334 and venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1409; and this is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Superior Court of Muscogee County State of Georgia
    GEORGIA, MUSCOGEE COUNTY SUPERIOR/STATE COURT eFILED 6/1/2018 3:44 PM SHASTA GLOVER, CLERK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MUSCOGEE COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA WILLIAM T. HEARD, and ERIC LANIGAN, ) AS TRUSTEE OF THE WILLIAM T. HEARD ) IRREVOCABLE LIFE INSURANCE TRUST II, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) CIVIL ACTION v. ) ) FILE NO. SU15CV3681-68 J. BARRINGTON VAUGHT, and, HATCHER, ) STUBBS, LAND, HOLLIS & ROTHSCHILD, ) LLP, ) ) Defendants. ) PROPOSED CONSOLIDATED PRE-TRIAL ORDER The following constitutes the Proposed Consolidated Pretrial Order submitted by the parties in the above-styled case: 1. The name, address and phone number of the attorneys who will conduct the trial are as follows: Plaintiffs W. Winston Briggs Georgia Bar No.081653 W. Winston Briggs Law Firm 1005 Howell Mill Road Building C Atlanta, Georgia 30318 Peter V. Hasbrouck Georgia Bar No.335608 Martenson, Hasbrouck & Simon, LLP 3379 Peachtree Road, NE Suite 400 Atlanta, Georgia 30326 Chris J. Perniciaro Georgia Bar No. 618477 Martenson, Hasbrouck & Simon, LLP 3379 Peachtree Road, NE Suite 400 Atlanta, Georgia 30326 Defendant J. Barrington Vaught Eric J. Frisch Georgia Bar No. 261683 Carlock, Copeland & Stair, LLP 191 Peachtree Tower, Suite 3600 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Defendant Hatcher, Stubbs, Land, Hollis & Rothschild, LLP M. Elizabeth O’Neill Georgia Bar No. 058163 Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP 217 17th Street NW, Suite 2400 Atlanta, Georgia 30363 2. The estimated time required for trial is: By the Plaintiffs: 10 days By the Defendants: 10 to 15 days 3. There are no motions or other matters pending for consideration by the Court except as follows: By the Plaintiffs: Plaintiffs have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment and a Motion to Compel that have not yet been ruled on by the Court.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Documents and Settings\Zdap01.ALNBMS\Local
    UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION In the Matter of: } } BILL HEARD ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., } CASE NO. 08-83029-JAC-11 } } CHAPTER 11 Debtor(s). } MEMORANDUM OPINION This case is before the Court on motion filed by GMAC, LLC ("GMAC") to compel General Motors Corporation ("GM") to turnover funds being held in GM's open accounts for each of Bill Heard’s dealerships for which GMAC provided floor plan financing. (DK # 485) On December 4, 2008, GMAC filed a motion for entry of summary judgment in its favor and against GM seeking an order: (1) confirming GMAC’s priority security interest to the GM open account balances as superior to any interest, right of offset or recoupment or claim by GM; (2) barring GM from recouping or offsetting damages against the credit balances in the open accounts; (3) compelling GM to turnover to GMAC the account balances due each of the GMAC floorplan debtors; and (4) requiring GM to provide an accounting of all funds being held in the open accounts. (DK# 938) At a hearing held on February 10, 2009, the Court instructed GM and GMAC to immediately submit an order requiring any funds being held in these accounts, whether prepetition or postpetition funds, to be placed in a separate escrow account subject to this Court’s jurisdiction, either the GMAC escrow accounts or a separate account as agreed to by the parties, pending the outcome of this litigation. By consent of the parties, the issues before the Court have been bifurcated first into a liability phase to determine the threshold legal issue of whether GM is entitled to recoup or setoff Case 08-83029-JAC11 Doc 1305 Filed 02/12/09 Entered 02/12/09 15:43:35 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 17 the damages it asserts against the GMAC floorplan debtors against the funds GM has been holding in the open accounts.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Northeastern Division
    Case 5:09-cv-01324-WMA Document 16 Filed 11/30/09 Page 1 of 35 FILED 2009 Nov-30 PM 02:42 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION J. GORDON BLAU, et al., } } Appellants, } } CIVIL ACTION NO. v. } 09-AR-1324-NE } BILL HEARD CHEVROLET } CORPORATION - ORLANDO, et } al., } } Appellees. } MEMORANDUM OPINION This strange and convoluted case begins in 2001 with a putative class action filed in the Ninth Circuit Court, Orange County, Florida, civil case No. 05CA-6941, against Bill Heard Chevrolet Corporation - Orlando (“Heard-Orlando”), an automobile dealership. It was brought by Gary Riley, Carla Silver, and Stephen Silver, on behalf of themselves and similarly situated retail buyers who, over a decade, had financed purchases of automobiles from Heard-Orlando and paid hidden charges. The complaint alleges various violations of state and federal law. Enforcing a clause in Heard-Orlando’s retail installment sales contracts, the Florida court sent the case to binding arbitration, case No. AAA 01-0124001, with H. David Luff, Esq. (“Luff”) as arbitrator operating under the Federal Arbitration Act. J. Gordon Blau (“Blau”), and J. Gordon Blau, P.A. (“Blau, P.A.”), Blau’s law firm, were plaintiffs’ counsel. They and their three individual clients are the appellants now before this court on appeal from the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Case 5:09-cv-01324-WMA Document 16 Filed 11/30/09 Page 2 of 35 Alabama. Hereinafter, appellants will be referred to as Blau, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Law Developments 2009
    Commercial Law Developments 2009 Prepared by Professor Stephen L. Sepinuck updated 6/18/19 2009 Commercial Law Developments Page 1 SECURED TRANSACTIONS Scope Issues 1. Kennedy v. Healthone Staffing, LLC, 2009 WL 281777 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009) Secured party did not need to file a financing statement because he received an assignment of a single account in satisfaction of a pre-existing debt and thus Article 9 did not apply under § 9-109(d)(7). Even if Article 9 did apply, the security interest would likely have been automatically perfected under § 9-309(2). 2. In re Gateway Ethanol, L.L.C., 415 B.R. 486 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2009) Five-year lease of $5 million boiler with a $600,000 purchase option at the end of the lease term was a true lease. The transaction failed the bright-line test of former § 1-201(37) because the option price was not nominal because the cost of returning the boiler was only $200,000–$250,000 and the predicted value of the boiler was $600,000. The transaction remained a lease after examining all the facts and circumstances because the boiler had a useful life of 15-20 years and the lessor would have been able to market the boiler had the lessee returned it. 3. Gangloff Industries, Inc. v. Generic Financing and Leasing, Corp., 907 N.E.2d 1059 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009) Eight-year lease of truck for $1,100/month with an option to purchase at the end for $3,200 was not a true lease, but a sale with a retained security interest.
    [Show full text]